Coro Global Inc. - Annual Report: 2008 (Form 10-K)
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington
D. C. 20549
FORM
10-K
[X]
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For the
year ended December 31, 2008
[ ]
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
For the
transition period from
Commission
file number 33-25126-D
Medefile
International, Inc.
(Exact
name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)
Nevada
|
85-0368333
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
301
Yamato Road, Suite 3155
Boca
Raton, FL 33413
(Address
of principal executive offices)
(973)
993-8001
(Issuer's
telephone number)
Copies
to:
Richard
A. Friedman, Esq.
Sichenzia
Ross Friedman Ference LLP
61
Broadway, 32 nd
Floor
New York,
New York 10006
Phone:
(212) 930-9700
Fax:
(212) 930-9725
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer as defined
in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes £ No
R
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes £ No
R
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes R No
£
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K . £
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”,
“accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting company x
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes £ No
R
As of
April 15, 2009, the aggregate market value of the issued and outstanding common
stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based upon the closing price of
the common stock as quoted on the National Association of Securities Dealers
Inc. OTC Bulletin Board of $0.0006 was approximately
$218,121. For purposes of the above statement only, all
directors, executive officers and 10% shareholders are assumed to be
affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily
a conclusive determination for any other purpose.
Number of
shares of common stock outstanding as of April 15, 2009 was
509,113,989.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
– None
FORM
10-K
FOR
THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008
INDEX
Page
|
||
PART
I
|
||
Item
1
|
Business
|
3
|
Item
1A
|
Risk
Factors
|
6
|
Item
1B
|
Unresolved
Staff
Comments
|
9
|
Item
2
|
Properties
|
9
|
Item
3
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
9
|
Item
4
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
9
|
PART
II
|
||
Item
5
|
Market
for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
|
10
|
Item
6
|
Selected
Financial
Data
|
12
|
Item
7
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
12
|
Item
7A
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
16
|
Item
8
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
16
|
Item
9
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
|
17
|
Item
9A
|
Controls
and
Procedures
|
17
|
Item
9B
|
Other
Information
|
18
|
PART
III
|
|
|
Item
10
|
Directors,
Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance
|
18
|
Item
11
|
Executive
Compensation
|
20
|
Item
12
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
|
24
|
Item
13
|
Certain
Relationships and Related
Transactions
|
25
|
Item
14
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and
Services
|
25
|
PART
IV
|
|
|
Item
15
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement
Schedules
|
26
|
Signatures
|
27
|
2
PART
I
ITEM
1. BUSINESS
Organizational
History
On
November 1, 2005, Bio-Solutions International, Inc. ("Bio-Solutions") entered
into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Agreement") with OmniMed Acquisition
Corp., (the "Acquirer), a Nevada corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of
Bio-Solutions, OmniMed International, Inc., a Nevada corporation ("OmniMed"),
and the shareholders of OmniMed (the "OmniMed Shareholders"). Pursuant to the
Agreement, Bio-Solutions acquired all of the outstanding equity stock of OmniMed
from the OmniMed Shareholders. As consideration for the acquisition of OmniMed,
Bio-Solutions agreed to issue 9,894,900 shares of Bio-Solutions' common stock to
the OmniMed Shareholders. These issuances were deemed to be exempt under rule
506 of Regulation D and Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
since, among other things, the transaction did not involve a public offering,
the investors were accredited investors and/or qualified institutional buyers,
the investors had access to information about the company and their investment,
the investors took the securities for investment and not resale, and the Company
took appropriate measures to restrict the transfer of the
securities.
As a
result of the Agreement, the OmniMed Shareholders assumed control of
Bio-Solutions. Effective November 21, 2005 Bio-Solutions changed its name to
OmniMed International, Inc. Effective January 17, 2006, OmniMed changed its name
to Medefile International, Inc. ("Medefile" or "the Company").
Overview of
Business
Medefile
International, Inc., through its Medefile, Inc. subsidiary, has developed a
system for gathering, digitizing, storing and distributing information for the
healthcare field.
Medefile's
goal is to revolutionize the medical industry by bringing digital technology to
the business of medicine. Medefile intends to accomplish its objective by
providing individuals with a simple and secure way to access their lifetime of
actual medical records in an efficient and cost-effective manner. Medefile's
products and services are designed to provide Healthcare providers with the
ability to reference their patient's actual past medical records, thereby
ensuring the most accurate treatment and services possible while simultaneously
reducing redundant procedures.
Medefile
has created a system for gathering and digitizing medical records so that
individuals can have a comprehensive record of all of their medical visits.
Medefile's primary product is the MedeFile system, a highly secure system for
gathering and maintaining medical records. The MedeFile system is designed to
gather all of its members' medical records and create a single, comprehensive
medical record that is accessible 24 hours a day, seven days a
week.
Industry
Overview
Since the
beginning of modern medicine, information about a patient's history, testing,
treatment and care have been key ingredients in the provision of quality
healthcare. Medical record information takes many forms, such as the patient's
diagnosis, treatments, surgeries, medications, allergies, x-rays, and test
results. The usage of medical record information has dramatically increased over
the past 2 decades due to factors such as the complex reimbursement structure in
the United States healthcare system, an ever more litigious society, and
increased patient awareness.
Every
patient visit generates a medical record. Today this information is typically
contained in a paper-based patient medical record. A patient's medical records
are usually stored in physicians' offices as well as other healthcare facilities
the patient has visited. A record that tracks a patient's medical treatment over
time is called a "longitudinal record".
In
today's healthcare environment, access to hospital-based medical records by
patients and other authorized parties (e.g., insurance companies, attorneys,
etc.) is controlled by Release of Information (ROI) policies and procedures. ROI
processes are based on the premise that patients have a right to access their
medical records and that they must specifically designate any other party to
whom their medical information can be released. ROI policies and procedures are
based on the following laws and policies: the federal Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA), various state laws, and the policies
and professional practice guidelines set forth by the American Health
Information Management Association (AHIMA).
3
Congress
passed the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act (HIPAA) in
1996. The purpose of HIPAA is to prevent fraud in the health care industry and
to protect confidential patient information. HIPPA standardizes and provides
enforcement mechanisms for ROI rules and guidelines to protect personal
healthcare information. HIPAA effects entities involved with electronic health
care information--including health care providers, health plans, employers,
public health authorities, life insurers, clearinghouses, billing agencies,
information systems vendors, service organizations, universities, and even
single-physician offices. The final version of the HIPAA Privacy regulations was
issued in December 2000, and went into effect on April 14, 2001. A two-year
"grace" period was included; enforcement of the HIPAA Privacy Rules began on
April 14, 2003.
Overview of Products and
Services
MedeFile
MedeFile
is a Business to Business and a Business to Consumer subscription service.
MedeFile is designed to create a "cradle to grave" longitudinal record for each
of its members by retrieving and consolidating copies of their medical records.
When the records are received, the MedeFile system consolidates them into a
single medically correct format. The records are then stored in Medefile's
MedeVault, a secure repository that can be accessed by MedeFile members 24 hours
a day, 7 days a week. Because of the unique security procedures incorporated
into the MedeFile system through SecuroMed, the member is the only person to
access or give permission to access their records.
A
complete MedeFile file is comprised of copies of the member's actual medical
records as well as a Digital Health Profile (DHP), which is an overview of the
patient's and his family's medical history. In addition, every MedeFile member
receives a MedeDrive, an external USB drive which stores all of a patient's
Emergency Medical Information as well as a copy of the member's
MedeFile.
MedeFile's
Emergency Medical Information (EMI) Card
Upon
becoming a MedeFile member each individual will receive a Membership / Emergency
Medical Information (EMI) Card which contains instructions on how to contact
MedeFile in order to retrieve the member's medical records.
The
Digital Health Profile (DHP)
A part of
a member's MedeFile is their Digital Health Profile (DHP). This form is
completed by the patient in order to provide a summary of the patient's
healthcare history which assists healthcare providers in understanding the
patient's course of medical treatment. This document, along with Advanced
Directives and medical record copies, complete the documents contained in the
patient's MedeFile.
MedeDrive
The
MedeDrive is an external USB drive which stores all of a patient's Emergency
Medical Information and their MedeFile which can be viewed on a personal
computer. MedeDrive self loads its own viewer, so no special program or
software is required. The MedeDrive easily plugs into any PC USB port on
most Windows-based computers built in the last four years. (Macintosh version is
currently unavailable). The MedeDrive USB key can be updated easily and as
frequently as the member desires at no additional cost.
MedeVault
The
MedeVault is designed to serve as an electronic data and document repository
that incorporates state-of-the-art security features in order to prevent
unauthorized access to a patient's records. Access to the MedeVault is provided
through an encrypted connection to a web service run by Medefile. This
connection is provided by Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) technology.
Medefile
Clinical Information Systems (CIS)
Medefile
CIS is a Business-to-Business professional consulting service that is designed
to generate revenue from two primary sources: consulting engagements and product
commissions.
Medefile
CIS intends to offer a full range of HIPPA assessment and compliance services.
Medefile CIS' goal is to facilitate the transition to HIPAA compliance. In
addition, Medefile CIS intends to offer services that will enable medical
facilities to transition from paper-based medical records to electronic medical
records. Medefile CIS plans to digitize medical facility offices and offer
software to keep the records up-to-date, index the records, and make them
queryable based on each facility's specific needs.
4
Medefile
consulting engagements are generally fixed-price and fixed scope projects that
also generate occasional time-and-materials income from ongoing support and
training activities related to its services. In addition, Medefile CIS intends
to resell technology from various vendors as needed and may incur commission
revenue and revenue from the markup of these products.
Medefile
CIS will offer several services, including the evaluation of the record keeping,
security, and back office practices. After evaluation is complete, Medefile CIS
staff will move forward to implement their own remediation plans for the
client. Other revenue streams may be created based on the licensing
of the OmniViewer for the digitized records as well as the scanning software for
those facilities wishing to implement a "go-forward" scanning system. Finally,
the clients may be charged a contractual support fee for ongoing technical
support and updates, which may be assessed on an annual basis.
MedeMinder
MedeMinder
is MedeFile’s reminder service. The member tells us when and where to
call, and we automatically contact the member day or night with an appropriate
reminder, spoken by real people. The member can even choose the voice they want
to hear. MedeMinder helps insure the member will not miss an
appointment or forget to take their medication.
SecurMed
SecurMed
is designed to serve as an authentication process that protects against any
information being viewed by unauthorized persons.
Members
As of
December 31, 2008, MedeFile had approximately 2600 members. The Company’s
marketing strategy includes issuing trial memberships on several levels.
Approximately 1,800 trial memberships were issued in 2007.
Sales and
Marketing
Medefile
intends to employ the following marketing strategies in order to generate
awareness of Medefile's products and services: direct sales, direct mail, a
public relations campaign, speaking engagements by Medefile's executive
officers, participation in trade shows, and alliances and partnerships with
third parties.
Medefile's
marketing strategy will target the following types of organizations: Health
Maintenance Organizations, Preferred Provider Organizations, managed care
organizations, insurance companies, unions, large groups of individuals such as
AARP, large and medium sized corporations, nursing homes, and internet
users.
In
particular, the MedeFile service is designed to be sold in several distinct
ways:
o MedeFile Website - through
normal e-commerce mechanisms, patients may enroll in the service directly from
the MedeFile website. Membership may be purchased on an annual basis and may be
paid all at once, or over time at the patient's discretion.
o Physician Referrals - Patients
may enroll based on a doctor's referral. In the event that these physicians are
also Medefile CIS customers, they may easily transfer their patients'
information into the MedeFile system.
o Large group offerings (e.g., AARP,
trade unions) - Large, membership-driven organizations may offer the
MedeFile system to their members at a discounted rate, which may be negotiated
with Medefile based on the size of the expected enrollment. An additional
promotional advantage may be derived from the use of MedeFile through the
website of the client organization. Hence, MedeFile functionality may be
accessed using each organization's site.
o Insurance companies - Similar
to large group offerings identified above, insurance companies may offer the
MedeFile service to their insured as a means to decrease the cost of medical
care.
Technology
Medefile
will use and continue to update the most advanced security measures available.
Data transmitted between Web browsers and Web servers over the Internet using
TCP/IP is generally susceptible to unauthorized interception. To protect
sensitive data, the most common method of protection is data encryption.
MedeFile will use the industry standard Secure Sockets Layer (SSL), which is a
mechanism to secure Internet traffic so that it cannot be intercepted. SSL
utilizes digital certificates to verify the identity and integrity of a web site
(such as MedeFile) and to protect the security of transactions by certifying
their source and destination.
5
Competition
There are
other companies working in the medical information technology arena such as GE
Healthcare, Bio-Imaging Technologies, and Cyber Records. Some competing
companies offer a USB key for medical record storage but require the customer to
provide or "self-populate" the information to be stored. The information in a
self-populated record is limited and is only as accurate as the individual's
memory and understanding of their health condition. Other companies expect each
customer to obtain their own medical records from their various healthcare
providers. Some offer a CD-Rom for record storage. Usually, the CD-Rom cannot be
updated with any changes to an individual's medical status or treatment.
Therefore, a new CD-Rom needs to be obtained from that company in order for the
individual to have the most current, accurate information regarding their
health. There are companies that are solely web-based that do not provide
the customer the capability to have a copy of their records. In this case,
an internet connection is required to view stored documents. In addition, there
are companies that do not concentrate on digitizing an individual's medical
records but on converting medical facilities' records from paper to electronic
format.
The
advantage to being a MedeFile member is that MedeFile gathers, consolidates,
organizes and securely stores each member's actual medical records on their
behalf. The MedeFile membership includes a Digital Health Profile (DHP) which
contains the member's general health history, emergency contacts, doctor
contacts, family medical history, allergies, medications, and current
conditions. A MedeFile membership also includes a MedeDrive which easily plugs
into any PC USB port on most Windows-based computers built in the last four
years. (Macintosh version is currently unavailable). The MedeDrive contains the
member's emergency medical information that can be easily accessed by emergency
care personnel, and the client's actual medical records which are stored in a
secure area of the subscriber's MedeFile. The MedeDrive USB key can be updated
easily and as frequently as the member desires at no additional
cost.
Employees
From our
inception through the period ended December 31, 2008, we have relied on the
services of outside consultants. As of December 2008, Medefile had a total 5
full time employees and 3 consultants.
None of
our employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements, and we believe
our relations with our employees are favorable.
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS
YOU
SHOULD READ THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS TOGETHER WITH OUR CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES INCLUDED ELSEWHERE IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT.
SOME OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR SET FORTH
ELSEWHERE IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT, INCLUDING INFORMATION WITH RESPECT TO OUR PLANS
AND STRATEGIES FOR OUR BUSINESS, INCLUDES FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT
INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. YOU SHOULD REVIEW THE "RISK FACTORS" SECTION OF
THIS REPORT FOR A DISCUSSION OF IMPORTANT FACTORS THAT COULD CAUSE ACTUAL
RESULTS TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THE RESULTS DESCRIBED IN OR IMPLIED BY THE
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT. IF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING
RISKS ACTUALLY OCCUR, OUR BUSINESS, FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS COULD SUFFER.
RISKS
RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS:
We have a
history of operating losses, and we may not achieve or maintain profitability in
the future.
We have
experienced a net loss of $1,977,158 or $0.01 per share, for the year ended
December 31, 2008. We expect these losses to continue and it is uncertain when,
if ever, we will become profitable. The audit opinion contained in our financial
statements raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going
concern. Our operating expenses have outpaced and are likely to continue to
outpace revenues. We expect to incur increasing operating losses in the future
as a result of expenses associated with research and product development as well
as general and administrative costs. We may never be able to reduce these
losses, which would require us to seek additional debt or equity financing. If
such financing is obtained our existing shareholders may experience significant
additional dilution.
6
We may
not be able to execute our business plan and may not generate cash from
operations.
In the
event that cash flow from operations is less than anticipated and we are unable
to secure additional funding to cover our expenses, in order to preserve cash,
we would be required to reduce expenditures and effect reductions in our
corporate infrastructure, either of which could have a material adverse effect
on our ability to continue our current level of operations. To the extent that
operating expenses increase or we need additional funds to make acquisitions,
develop new technologies or acquire strategic assets, the need for additional
funding may be accelerated and there can be no assurances that any such
additional funding can be obtained on terms acceptable to us, if at all. If we
were not able to generate sufficient capital, either from operations or through
additional debt or equity financing, to fund our current operations, we would be
forced to significantly reduce or delay our plans for continued research and
development and expansion. This could significantly reduce the value of our
securities.
Our
independent registered public accounting firm has expressed doubt about our
ability to continue as a going concern, which may hinder our ability to obtain
future financing our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2008
have been prepared under the assumption that we will continue as a going
concern. Our independent registered public accounting firm has issued a report
dated April 15, 2009 that included an explanatory paragraph expressing doubt in
our ability to continue as a going concern without additional capital becoming
available. Our ability to continue as a going concern ultimately is dependent on
our ability to attain additional capital, or to find an acquisition to add value
to its present shareholders and ultimately, upon our ability to attain future
profitable operations. The financial statements do not include any adjustments
that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
The
commercial success of our products and services depends on the widespread market
acceptance of digital technology in the healthcare industry.
The
market for digitization of medical records is emerging. Our success will depend
on acceptance of digital technology for use in and maintaining and accessing
medical records by individuals and Healthcare providers, as well as the success
of the commercialization of the Medefile products and services. At present, it
is difficult to assess or predict with any assurance the potential size, timing
and viability of market opportunities for our technology in this market. The
healthcare records market sector is well established with entrenched competitors
with whom we must compete.
We May Be
Unable To Effectively Manage Our Growth or Implement Our Expansion
Strategy.
Our
growth strategy is subject to related risks, including pressure on our
management and on our internal systems and controls. Our planned growth will
require us to invest in new, and improve our existing, operational,
technological and financial systems and to expand, train and retain our employee
base. Our failure to effectively manage our growth could have a material adverse
effect on our future financial condition. In addition, our lack of operating
experience may cause us difficulty in managing our growth.
We have
limited marketing or sales capabilities, and if we are unable to develop sales
and marketing capabilities, we may not be successful in commercializing our
products.
We
currently have limited sales, marketing or distribution capabilities. As a
result, we may be forced to depend on collaborations or agreements with third
parties that have established distribution systems and direct sales forces. To
the extent that we enter into co-promotion or other licensing arrangements, our
revenues will depend upon the efforts of third parties, over which we may have
little or no control.
We may
engage in future acquisitions, which may be expensive and time consuming and
from which we may not realize anticipated benefits.
We may
acquire additional businesses, technologies and products if we determine that
these additional businesses, technologies and products complement our existing
business or otherwise serve our strategic goals. If we do undertake transactions
of this sort, the process of integrating an acquired business, technology or
product may result in operating difficulties and expenditures and may absorb
significant management attention that would otherwise be available for ongoing
development of our business. Moreover, we may never realize the anticipated
benefits of any acquisition. Future acquisitions could result in potentially
dilutive issuances of our securities, the incurrence of debt and contingent
liabilities and amortization expenses related to intangible assets, which could
adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
7
Dependence upon Major
Customer
For the
years ended December 31, 2008, there was no single customer which accounted for
a majority of the revenues and for the year ended December 31, 2007, there was a
single customer accounted for approximately 63% of revenues. We do not have a
written agreement with our customers. Therefore, the provision of services to
these customers is provided by us “at will” and the customers may decide not to
use our services at any time.
RISKS
RELATED TO OUR COMMON STOCK:
Our
Common Stock is Subject to the "Penny Stock" Rules of the SEC and the Trading
Market in Our Securities is Limited, Which Makes Transactions In Our Stock
Cumbersome and May Reduce the Value of an Investment in Our Stock.
The
Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted Rule 15g-9 which establishes the
definition of a "penny stock," for the purposes relevant to us, as any equity
security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an
exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. For
any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules
require:
* that a
broker or dealer approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks;
and
* the
broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the
transaction, setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be
purchased.
In order
to approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or
dealer must:
* obtain
financial information and investment experience objectives of the person;
and
* make a
reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for
that person and the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial
matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny
stocks.
The
broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a
disclosure schedule prescribed by the Commission relating to the penny stock
market, which, in highlight form:
* sets
forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability
determination; and
* that
the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor
prior to the transaction.
Generally,
brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the
"penny stock" rules. This may make it more difficult for investors to dispose of
our common stock and cause a decline in the market value of our
stock.
Disclosure
also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public
offerings and in secondary trading and about the commissions payable to both the
broker-dealer and the registered representative, current
quotations
for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases
of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to be
sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account
and information on the limited market in penny stocks.
We Do Not
Expect to Pay Dividends for Some Time, if At All.
No cash
dividends have been paid on our common stock. We expect that any income received
from operations will be devoted to our future operations and growth. We do not
expect to pay cash dividends in the near future. Payment of dividends would
depend upon our profitability at the time, cash available for those dividends,
and other factors.
Future
Capital Needs Could Result in Dilution to Investors; Additional Financing Could
be Unavailable or Have Unfavorable Terms .
Our
future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including cash flow
from operations, progress in our present operations, competing market
developments, and our ability to market our products successfully. It may be
necessary to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings. Any
equity financings could result in dilution to our then-existing stockholders.
Sources of debt financing may result in higher interest expense. Any financing,
if available, may be on terms unfavorable to us. If adequate funds are not
obtained, we may be required to reduce or curtail operations.
8
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This
annual report on Form 10-KSB includes forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which we refer
to in this annual report as the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which we refer to in this annual
report as the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements are not statements of
historical fact but rather reflect our current expectations, estimates and
predictions about future results and events. These statements may use words such
as "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "predict," "project"
and similar expressions as they relate to us or our management. When we make
forward-looking statements, we are basing them on our management's beliefs and
assumptions, using information currently available to us. These forward-looking
statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including but
not limited to, risks, uncertainties and assumptions discussed in this annual
report. Factors that can cause or contribute to these differences include those
described under the headings "Risk Factors" and "Management Discussion and
Analysis and Plan of Operation."
If one or
more of these or other risks or uncertainties materialize, or if our underlying
assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual results may vary materially from what
we projected. Any forward-looking statement you read in this annual report
reflects our current views with respect to future events and is subject to these
and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions relating to our operations,
results of operations, growth strategy and liquidity. All subsequent written and
oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or individuals acting on our
behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by this paragraph. You should
specifically consider the factors identified in this annual report which would
cause actual results to differ before making an investment decision. We are
under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of
this annual report or to conform these statements to actual results.
ITEM
1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not
applicable.
ITEM
2. PROPERTIES
Medefile
leases its main office, which is located at 301 Yamato Rd, Boca Raton,
FL 33431, commencing March 01, 2009. Medefile’s previous
location was 240 Cedar Knolls Rd, Cedar Knolls, NJ 07927 , commencing September
2007 and expiring in August 2012. By mutual agreement the lease was cancelled
and Medefile chose Florida for its main office location. With new
business development and more favorable conditions and costs with the transition
to operations in Florida. The current lease is for a term of 24
months.
2009
|
2010
|
|||||
12
Months ending 12/31
|
$
|
34,686
|
$
|
30,720
|
We
believe that our current office space and facilities are sufficient to meet our
present needs and do not anticipate any difficulty securing alternative or
additional space, as needed, on terms acceptable to us.
ITEM
3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Other
than as noted below, Medefile is not a party to any pending legal
proceeding, nor is its property the subject of a pending legal proceeding, that
is not in the ordinary course of business or otherwise material to the financial
condition of Medefile's
business.
Consumer
Protection Corporation
On
September 8, 2008, the Company was notified via a process server of a proposed
class action suit brought by Consumer Protection Corporation (“CPC”) in Superior
Court in the State of Arizona. CPC alleges that the Company sent an unsolicited
facsimile advertisement in violation of the TCPA. On October 8, 2008, the matter
was moved to the District Court of Arizona. On October 28, 2008, the Company
filed a motion to dismiss the action based on the plaintiff’s failure to
properly allege a cause of action. CPC filed a response to the Company’s motion
to dismiss on November 4, 2008. CPC is seeking damages of $500 per member of the
class. As the class has yet to be certified by the court, management is unable
to estimate the potential liability related to this claim. The Company denies
any involvement in the alleged facsimile transmission and intends to vigorously
defend itself.
ITEM
4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
9
PART
II
ITEM
5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The
following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the range of high and low
intraday closing bid information per share of our common stock as quoted on the
Over The Counter Bulletin Board. Our stock is traded under the symbol
"MDFI".
High
|
Low
|
|||||||
Quarter
ended 03/31/07
|
$
|
0.80
|
$
|
0.21
|
||||
Quarter
ended 06/30/07
|
$
|
0.32
|
$
|
0.12
|
||||
Quarter
ended 09/30/07
|
$
|
0.19
|
$
|
0.11
|
||||
Quarter
ended 12/31/07
|
$
|
0.63
|
$
|
0.16
|
||||
Quarter
ended 03/31/08
|
$
|
0.27
|
$
|
0.11
|
||||
Quarter
ended 06/30/08
|
$
|
0.44
|
$
|
0.11
|
||||
Quarter
ended 09/30/08
|
$
|
0.19
|
$
|
0.09
|
||||
Quarter
ended 12/31/08
|
$
|
0.10
|
$
|
0.001
|
(The
quarterly prices are adjusted to reflect the May 2005, 1 for 10 reverse
split).
The above
prices are believed to reflect representative inter-dealer quotations, without
retail markup, markdown or other fees or commissions, and may not represent
actual transactions.
As of
April 15, 2009, there were approximately 1,045 holders of record of the
Company's common stock. As of April 15, 2009, the Company had 509,113,989 its
common stock issued and outstanding.
IN-KIND
DIVIDEND
On
January 20, 2006, the Company paid an in-kind dividend of 14 shares of common
stock for each share of common stock held by shareholders of record at the close
of business on January 16, 2006.
DIVIDEND
POLICY
We do not
currently pay any cash dividends on our common stock, and we currently intend to
retain any future earnings for use in our business. Any future determination as
to the payment of cash dividends on our common stock will be at the discretion
of our Board of Directors and will depend on our earnings, operating and
financial condition, capital requirements and other factors deemed relevant by
our Board of Directors. There are no restrictions in the Company's articles of
incorporation or bylaws that prevent the Company from declaring dividends. The
Nevada Revised Statutes, however, do prohibit the Company from declaring
dividends where, after giving effect to the distribution of the
dividend:
1. the
Company would not be able to pay its debts as they become due in the usual
course of business; or
2. the
Company's total assets would be less than the sum of its total liabilities plus
the amount that would be needed to satisfy the rights of shareholders who have
preferential rights superior to those receiving the distribution.
The
declaration of dividends on our common stock also may be restricted by the
provisions of credit agreements that we may enter into from time to
time.
10
EQUITY
COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The
following table shows information with respect to each equity compensation plan
under which Medefile's common stock is authorized for issuance as of the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2008.
Plan
category
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Number
of securities
|
||||||||||
Number
of securities
|
|
remaining
available for
|
||||||||||
to
be issued upon exercise of |
Weighted
average exercise price of |
future
issuance under equity compensation plans |
||||||||||
outstanding
options,
|
outstanding
options,
|
(excluding
securities
|
||||||||||
warrants
and rights
|
warrants
and rights
|
reflected
in column (a)
|
||||||||||
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
||||||||||
Equity
compensation plans approved
|
-0- | -0- | -0- | |||||||||
by
security holders
|
||||||||||||
Equity
compensation plans not
|
5,640,000 | $ | 0.80 | 4,360,000 | ||||||||
approved
by security holders
|
||||||||||||
Total
|
5,640,000 | $ | 0.80 | 4,360,000 |
In
January 2006, the Board of Directors of the Company approved and Incentive Stock
Plan, which plan has not yet been presented to shareholders for their approval,
pursuant to which they have initially reserved 10,000,000 shares of common Stock
for issuance. Under the 2006 Incentive Stock, the Board has granted an aggregate
of 5,640,000 options to employees pursuant to certain employment agreement that
are more fully described below (See "ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION -
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS").
SALES
OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
On
November 15, 2007, the Company and Vantage, the Company’s largest stockholder
and primary source of funding, entered into a debt conversion
agreement. Pursuant to the debt conversion agreement, Vantage agreed to
convert the aggregate principal amount of $2,100,000 of its indebtedness into an
aggregate of 14,000,000 restricted shares of common stock of the
Company. In addition, the Company will issue to Vantage 8,400,000 three
year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 8,400,000 restricted shares of the
Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.60 per share.
On
November 16, 2007, pursuant to the terms of a securities purchase agreement the
Company sold subscriptions to 11,000,000 restricted shares of the Company’s
common stock and three year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 6,600,000
restricted shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.60
per share for aggregate proceeds of $1,650,000.
On
January 22, 2008, pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company
sold subscriptions to 2,000,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock
and three year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,200,000 restricted
shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.60 per share for
aggregate proceeds of $140,000. The Company claims an exemption from the
registration requirements of the Act for the private placement of these
securities pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Act and/or Regulation D promulgated
thereunder since, among other things, these transactions did not involve a
public offering, the investors were accredited investors and/or qualified
institutional buyers, the investors had access to information about us and their
investment, the investors took the securities for investment and not resale, and
the Company took appropriate measures to restrict the transfer of the
securities.
During
the quarter ended March 31, 2008, pursuant to the terms of the Purchase
Agreement, the Company issued and sold 2,000,000 restricted shares of the
Company’s common stock and three year warrants to purchase an aggregate
of 1,200,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise
price of $0.60 per share for aggregate proceeds of $300,000. The
Company claims an exemption from the registration requirements of the Act for
the private placement of these securities pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Act
and/or Regulation D promulgated thereunder since, among other things, these
transactions did not involve a public offering, the investors were accredited
investors and/or qualified institutional buyers, the investors had access to
information about us and their investment, the investors took the securities for
investment and not resale, and the Company took appropriate measures to restrict
the transfer of the securities.
The
Company issued 37,500 shares of common stock to an employee per their employment
agreement during the quarter ended March 31, 2008. The Company recognized
compensation expense of $22,125 based on the closing price of the Company’s
common stock as of the grant date.
On
September 23, 2008, in connection with the Cancellation of Debt Agreement with
Vantage Group (Note 6) 14,000,000 shares of restricted common stock, previously
issued on February 27, 2008 were cancelled and returned to the
Company.
On
September 30, 2008 the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of restricted common
stock in exchange for $300,000
11
ITEM
6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Not
Applicable.
ITEM
7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATION
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
It should
be noted that this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations may contain "forward-looking statements." The terms
"believe," "anticipate," "intend," "goal," "expect," and similar expressions may
identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements represent
the Company's current expectations or beliefs concerning future events. The
matters covered by these statements are subject to certain risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
set forth in the forward-looking statements, including customer acceptance of
new products, the impact of competition and price erosion, as well as other
risks and uncertainties. The foregoing list should not be construed as
exhaustive, and the Company disclaims any obligation subsequently to revise any
forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of
such statements, or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated
events. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the
forward-looking information included herein, the inclusion of such information
should not be regarded as a representation that the strategy, objectives or
other plans of the Company will be achieved. The Company wishes to caution
readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements,
which speak only as of the date made. We undertake no duty to update this
information. More information about potential factors that could affect our
business and financial results is included in the section entitled "Risk
Factors"
Sales and
Marketing
Medefile
intends to employ the following marketing strategies in order to generate
awareness of Medefile's products and services: direct sales, direct mail, a
public relations campaign, including radio and television infomercials, speaking
engagements by Medefile's executive officers, participation in trade shows, and
alliances and partnerships with third parties.
Medefile's
marketing strategy will target the following types of organizations and market
segments: Health Maintenance Organizations, Preferred Provider Organizations,
managed care organizations, insurance companies, unions, large groups of
individuals such as AARP, large and medium sized corporations, home healthcare
agencies, retirement communities, nursing homes, public and private schools,
summer camps and internet users.
In
particular, the MedeFile service is designed to be sold in several distinct
ways:
-
|
MedeFile
Website - through normal e-commerce mechanisms, patients may enroll in the
service directly from the MedeFile website. Membership may be purchased on
an annual basis and may be paid all at once, or over time at the patient's
discretion.
|
|
-
|
Physician
Referrals - Patients may enroll based on a doctor's referral. In the event
that these physicians are also Medefile CIS customers, they may easily
transfer their patients' information into the MedeFile
system.
|
|
-
|
Large
group offerings (e.g., AARP, trade unions) - Large, membership-driven
organizations may offer the MedeFile system to their members at a
discounted rate, which may be negotiated with Medefile based on the size
of the expected enrollment. An additional promotional advantage may be
derived from the use of MedeFile through the website of the client
organization. Hence, MedeFile functionality may be accessed using each
organization's site.
|
|
-
|
Insurance
companies - Similar to large group offerings identified above, insurance
companies will be able to offer the MedeFile service to their insured as a
means to decrease the cost of medical
care.
|
Technology
Medefile
will use and continue to update the most advanced security measures available.
Data transmitted between Web browsers and Web servers over the Internet using
TCP/IP is generally susceptible to unauthorized interception. To protect
sensitive data, the most common method of protection is data encryption.
MedeFile will use the industry standard Secure Sockets Layer (SSL), which is a
mechanism to secure Internet traffic so that it cannot be intercepted. SSL
utilizes digital certificates to verify the identity and integrity of a web site
(such as MedeFile) and to protect the security of transactions by certifying
their source and destination.
12
Competition
There are
other companies working in the medical information technology arena such as GE
Healthcare, Bio-Imaging Technologies, and Cyber Records. Some competing
companies offer a USB key for medical record storage but require the customer to
provide or "self-populate" the information to be stored. The information in a
self-populated record is limited and is only as accurate as the individual's
memory and understanding of their health condition. Other companies expect each
customer to obtain their own medical records from their various healthcare
providers. Some offer a CD-Rom for record storage. Usually, the CD-Rom cannot be
updated with any changes to an individual's medical status or treatment.
Therefore, a new CD-Rom needs to be obtained from that company in order for the
individual to have the most current, accurate information regarding their
health. There are companies that are solely web-based that do not provide the
customer the capability to have a copy of their records. In this case, an
internet connection is required to view stored documents. In
addition,
there are
companies that do not concentrate on digitizing an individual's medical records
but on converting medical facilities' records from paper to electronic
format.
The
advantage to being a MedeFile member is that MedeFile gathers, consolidates,
organizes and securely stores each member's actual medical records on their
behalf. The MedeFile membership includes a Digital Health Profile (DHP) which
contains the member's general health history, emergency contacts, doctor
contacts, family medical history, allergies, medications, and current
conditions. A MedeFile membership also includes a MedeDrive, which easily plugs
into any PC USB port on most Windows-based computers built in the last four
years. (Macintosh version is currently unavailable). The MedeDrive contains the
member's emergency medical information, which can be easily accessed by
emergency care personnel, and the client's actual medical records which are
stored in a secure area of the subscriber's MedeFile. The MedeDrive USB key can
be updated easily and as frequently as the member desires at no additional
cost.
Employees
From our
inception through the period ended December 31, 2008, we have relied on the
services of outside consultants. As of December 31, 2008, MedeFile had a total 5
full time employees and 3 consultants.
None of
our employees are covered by employment or collective bargaining agreements, and
we believe our relations with our employees favorable.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
Revenues
Revenues
for the year ended December 31, 2008 totaled $53,235, compared to revenues of
$44,847 for the year ended December 31, 2007. The increase in revenue is
primarily related to an increase in the amount of members and
medical record reimbursement revenue received from members. Medical record
reimbursement revenue is a dollar for dollar reimbursement for charges from
member’s doctors for sending updated medical records to MedeFile. The offsetting
expense is charged to selling general and administrative expense.
Selling, General and
Administrative Expenses
Selling,
general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008 totaled
$1,869,551 consisting primarily of cash compensation, marketing costs and
professional fees. This was an increase of $135,986 or approximately 7.8%
compared to selling, general and administrative expenses of $1,733,565 for the
year ended December 31, 2007. The overall increase in the total selling, general
and administrative is primarily due to an increase in headcount, sales,
marketing, and business development expenses. We expect expenses to increase in
future periods as we continue to solicit new customers.
Non-cash
Compensation
Non-cash
compensation expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008 totaled $102,678.
This compensation was for stock-based compensation to employees and consultants.
This was a decrease of $2,186,153 or approximately 95.5% compared to non-cash
compensation expense of $2,288,831 for the year ended December 31, 2007. The
decrease is due a decrease in stock-based compensation to outside consultants
for services provided. We expect our non-cash compensation to decline in the
future as all expense associated with the non-cash compensation has been
recognized.
Depreciation
Expense
Depreciation
and amortization expense totaled $20,240 and $22,518 for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
13
Interest
Expense
Interest expense for the year ended
December 31, 2008 was $37,924, a decrease of $122,855 or 76% compared to
interest expense of $160,779 during the year ended December 31, 2007. The reason
for the decrease was due to conversion of related party note payable to common
stock. (Note 6)
Net Loss
For the
reasons stated above, our net loss for year ended December 31, 2008 was
$1,977,158 or $0.01 per share, an decrease of $2,183,688 or
approximately 52.4%, compared to a net loss of $4,160,846 or $0.02 per share
during the year ended December 31, 2007.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
As of
December 31, 2008, we had cash of approximately $7,844. Our current
liabilities as of December 31, 2008 aggregated $254,919. Working capital deficit
at December 31, 2008 was $247,075. We had an accumulated deficit of $11,505,607
and stockholders' equity deficit of $158,937 at December 31, 2008.
The
Company used $1,618,077 of cash for operating activities during the year ended
December 31, 2008. Cash used in investing activities for the year ended December
31, 2008 was $11,402. Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended
December 31, 2008 was $269,908, consisting of net proceeds from loans by related
parties.
During
2008, pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company issued and
sold an aggregate of 2,000,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock
and three year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,200,000 restricted
shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.60 per share for
aggregate proceeds of $300,000.
The
Company claims an exemption from the registration requirements of the Act for
the private placement of these securities pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Act
and/or Regulation D promulgated thereunder since, among other things, these
transactions did not involve a public offering, the investors were accredited
investors and/or qualified institutional buyers, the investors had access to
information about us and their investment, the investors took the securities for
investment and not resale, and the Company took appropriate measures to restrict
the transfer of the securities.
While we
have raised capital in the First Quarter of 2008 to meet our working capital and
financing needs, additional financing is required in order to meet our current
and projected cashflow requirements from operations and development . Additional
investments are being sought, but we cannot guarantee that we will be able to
obtain such investments. Financing transactions may include the issuance of
equity or debt securities, obtaining credit facilities, or other financing
mechanisms. However, the trading price of our common stock and the downturn in
the U.S. stock and debt markets could make it more difficult to obtain financing
through the issuance of equity or debt securities. Even if we are able to raise
the funds required, it is possible that we could incur unexpected costs and
expenses, fail to collect significant amounts owed to us, or experience
unexpected cash requirements that would force us to seek alternative financing.
Further, if we issue additional equity or debt securities, stockholders may
experience additional dilution or the new equity securities may have rights,
preferences or privileges senior to those of existing holders of our common
stock. If additional financing is not available or is not available on
acceptable terms, we will have to curtail our operations.
Off Balance Sheet
Arrangements
We do not
have any off balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2008 or as of the
date of this report.
Critical Accounting
Policies
The
preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to
make estimates and judgments that affect our reported assets, liabilities,
revenues, and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities.
We base
our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other
assumptions we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Future events,
however, may differ markedly from our current expectations and assumptions.
While there are a number of significant accounting policies affecting our
consolidated financial statements; we believe the following critical accounting
policy involves the most complex, difficult and subjective estimates and
judgments:
14
Revenue
Recognition
The
Company generates revenue from licensing the right to utilize its proprietary
software for the storage and distribution of healthcare information to
individuals and affinity groups. For revenue from product sales, the Company
recognizes revenue in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") No. 104,
"Revenue Recognition," which superseded SAB No. 101, "Revenue Recognition in
Financial Statements." SAB No.101 requires that four basic criteria must be met
before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists; (2) delivery has occurred; (3) the selling price is fixed and
determinable; and (4) collectibility is reasonably assured. Determination of
criteria (3) and (4) are based on management's judgments regarding the fixed
nature of the selling prices of the products delivered and the collectibility of
those amounts. Provisions for discounts and rebates to customers, estimated
returns and allowances, and other adjustments are provided for in the same
period the related sales are recorded. The Company defers any revenue for which
the product has not been delivered or is subject to refund until such time that
the Company and the customer jointly determine that the product has been
delivered or no refund will be required. SAB No. 104 incorporates Emerging
Issues Task Force ("EITF") No. 00-21, "Multiple-Deliverable Revenue
Arrangements." EITF No. 00-21 addresses accounting for arrangements that may
involve the delivery or performance of multiple products, services and/or rights
to use assets. The effect of implementing EITF No. 00-21 on the Company's
consolidated financial position and results of operations was not significant.
This issue addresses determination of whether an arrangement involving more than
one deliverable contains more than one unit of accounting and how the
arrangement consideration should be measured and allocated to the separate units
of accounting.
Stock-based
Compensation
On
January 1, 2006 the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123 (revised 2004) "Share-Based Payment" ("SFAS 123 (R) which requires the
measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment
awards made to employees and directors including employee stock options and
employee stock purchases related to a Employee Stock Purchase Plan based on the
estimated fair values. SFAS 123 (R) supersedes the Company's previous accounting
under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No.25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees" ("APB 25") for the periods beginning fiscal 2006.
The
Company adopted SFAS 123 (R) using the modified prospective transition method,
which required the application of the accounting standard as of January 1, 2006.
Stock based compensation expense recognized under SFAS 123 (R) for the years
ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, was $2,288,831 and $2,383,461, respectively.
Stock-based compensation expense recognized during the period is based on the
value of the portion of share-based payment awards that is ultimately expected
to vest during the period.
New Accounting
Pronouncements
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value
Measurements.” SFAS No. 157 establishes a single definition of fair value
and a framework for measuring fair value, sets out a fair value hierarchy to be
used to classify the source of information used in fair value measurements, and
requires new disclosures of assets and liabilities measured at fair value based
on their level in the hierarchy. SFAS No. 157 is effective for all fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007 (January 1, 2008 for 3M) and
is to be applied prospectively. In February 2008, the FASB issued Staff
Positions No. 157-1 and No. 157-2 which partially defer the effective date of
SFAS No. 157 for one year for certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities and
remove certain leasing transactions from its scope. The Company is currently
evaluating the impacts and disclosures of this standard, but would not expect
SFAS No. 157 to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated
results of operations or financial condition.
In
September 2006, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 1N,
Financial Statements - Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when
Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements (SAB 108). SAB
108 provides guidance on how prior year misstatements should be evaluated when
determining the materiality of misstatements in the current year financial
statements. SAB 108 requires materiality to be determined by considering the
effect of prior year misstatements on both the current year balance sheet and
income statement, with consideration of their carryover and reversing effects.
SAB 108 also addresses how to correct material misstatements. The Company
adopted the provisions of this bulletin effective October 1, 2007. The Company
did not incur any material impact to its financial condition or results of
operations due to the adoption of SAB 108.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”. SFAS No. 159 permits an
entity to choose, at specified election dates, to measure eligible financial
instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently
required to be measured at fair value. An entity shall report unrealized gains
and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings
at each subsequent reporting date. Upfront costs and fees related to items for
which the fair value option is elected shall be recognized in earnings as
incurred and not deferred. SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation and
disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that
choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and
liabilities. SFAS No. 159 is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within
those fiscal years. At the effective date, an entity may elect the fair value
option for eligible items that exist at that date. The entity shall report the
effect of the first remeasurement to fair value as a cumulative-effect
adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. The Company has not
elected the fair value option for eligible items that existed as of December 31,
2007.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, "Noncontrolling Interest
in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51" ("SFAS
No. 160"), which will change the accounting and reporting for minority
interests, which will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and
classified as a component of equity within the consolidated balance
sheets. SFAS No. 160 is effective as of the beginning of the first
fiscal year beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier
adoption is prohibited and the Company is currently evaluating the effect, if
any, that the adoption will have on its financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
15
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, “Business Combinations,”
which changes how business acquisitions are accounted. SFAS No. 141R
requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all (and
only) the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction and
establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Certain
provisions of this standard will, among other things, impact the determination
of acquisition-date fair value of consideration paid in a business combination
(including contingent consideration); exclude transaction costs from acquisition
accounting; and change accounting practices for acquired contingencies,
acquisition-related restructuring costs, in-process research and development,
indemnification assets, and tax benefits. For 3M, SFAS No. 141R is
effective for business combinations and adjustments to an acquired entity’s
deferred tax asset and liability balances occurring after December 31,
2008. The Company is currently evaluating the future impacts and
disclosures of this standard.
In
December 2007, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 110 regarding
the use of a simplified method, as discussed in SAB No. 107 (SAB 107), in
developing an estimate of expected term of plain vanilla share options in
accordance with SFAS No. 123 (R), Share-Based Payment. In particular,
the staff indicated in SAB 107 that it will accept a company's election to use
the simplified method, regardless of whether the company has sufficient
information to make more refined estimates of expected term. At the time SAB 107
was issued, the staff believed that more detailed external information about
employee exercise behavior (e.g., employee exercise patterns by industry and/or
other categories of companies) would, over time, become readily available to
companies. Therefore, the staff stated in SAB 107 that it would not expect a
company to use the simplified method for share option grants after December 31,
2007. The staff understands that such detailed information about employee
exercise behavior may not be widely available by December 31, 2007. Accordingly,
the staff will continue to accept, under certain circumstances, the use of the
simplified method beyond December 31, 2007. The Company currently uses the
simplified method for “plain vanilla” share options and warrants, and will
assess the impact of SAB 110 for fiscal year 2009. It is not believed that this
will have an impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations
or cash flows.
In March
2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of
FASB Statement No. 133. This standard requires companies to provide
enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative
instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are
accounted for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how
derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial
position, financial performance, and cash flows. This Statement is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The Company has not yet
adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 161, but does not expect it to have a
material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
In May
2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 162,
“The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”. SFAS No. 162
sets forth the level of authority to a given accounting pronouncement or
document by category. Where there might be conflicting guidance between two
categories, the more authoritative category will prevail. SFAS No. 162 will
become effective 60 days after the SEC approves the PCAOB’s amendments to AU
Section 411 of the AICPA Professional Standards. SFAS No. 162 has no effect on
the Company’s financial position, statements of operations, or cash flows at
this time.
In May
2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 163,
“Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts-and interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 60”. SFAS No. 163 clarifies how Statement 60 applies to
financial guarantee insurance contracts, including the recognition and
measurement of premium revenue and claims liabilities. This statement also
requires expanded disclosures about financial guarantee insurance contracts.
SFAS No. 163 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15,
2008, and interim periods within those years. SFAS No. 163 has no effect on the
Company’s financial position, statements of operations, or cash flows at this
time.
ITEM
7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
We are a
smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and are not required to provide information under this
item.
ITEM
8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Our
financial statements and related notes are set forth
at pages F-1 through F-14
16
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS
WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
Evaluation of Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Disclosure
controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we
file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include,
without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file under the Exchange
Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal
executive and financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
As of the
end of the period covered by this Annual Report, we conducted an evaluation,
under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer), of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) of the
Exchange Act). Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer) concluded that the
Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that we file
or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and which also
are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the
Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is
accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the
Company’s Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting
Officer), to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management's Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management
is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting of the Company. Because of its inherent limitations,
internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and
procedures may deteriorate.
Management,
with the participation of our principal executive officer, financial and
accounting officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 based on criteria
established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation,
because of the Company’s limited resources and limited number of employees,
management concluded that, as of December 31, 2008, our internal control
over financial reporting is not effective in providing reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
This
annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s
independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over
financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the
Company’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary
rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in
this annual report.
Limitations on Effectiveness
of Controls and Procedures
Our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive,
Financial and Accounting Officer), does not expect that our disclosure controls
and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A
control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only
reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system
are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that
there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered
relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control
systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all
control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been
detected. These inherent limitations include, but are not limited to, the
realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns
can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be
circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more
people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of
controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of
future events and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in
achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time,
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the
inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to
error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
17
Changes in internal
controls
There
have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified
in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rule 13a-15 or
15d-15 under the Exchange Act that occurred during the quarter ended December
31, 2008 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM
9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None
ITEM
10. DIRECTORS, OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.
The
following tables set forth certain information with respect to our directors and
officers as of March 31, 2009. The following persons serve as our directors and
executive officers:
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
||
Milton
Hauser
|
65
|
President,
Chief Executive Officer, Acting Chief Financial Officer,
Director
|
||
Eric
Rosenfeld*
|
45
|
Chief
Information Officer, Secretary, Director
|
||
Michael
S. Delin**
|
45
|
Director
|
||
* On
November 11, 2008, Eric Rosenfeld resigned from his position as Chief
Information Officer, Secretary and as a member of the Board Directors of
MedeFile International, Inc.
**
Effective December 12, 2008, Michael S. Delin was appointed to the Board of
Directors of Medefile International, Inc.
Our
executive officers are appointed by and serve at the discretion of our Board of
Directors. There are no family relationships between any director and/or any
executive officer.
Background
of Executive Officers and Directors
Milton
Hauser, President, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer.
Milton. Hauser has been President of Medefile International since 2001. Prior to
his joining Medefile International, his career was in the Marketing and
Advertising field and included creating marketing campaigns and programs for
such companies as Panasonic, Sanyo, Avon, Lederle International, and other
Fortune 500 companies.
Eric
Rosenfeld, Chief Information Officer. Mr. Rosenfeld became the Chief information
Officer in April 2004. Prior to that time, Mr. Rosenfield had been Chief
Technical Officer since 2002. He designs and develops the technology utilized by
all the divisions of the company. On November 13, 2007, Mr. Rosenfeld was
appointed to the Baord of Directors. Before working for Medefile, Mr. Rosenfeld
owned and operated a successful consulting company that was engaged in various
healthcare and pharmaceutical projects for Fortune 500 companies. Prior to that,
he was a senior member of Oracle Corporation and helped establish its NY Metro
consulting practice. He was a contributing author of Oracle's development tools
and consulting methodologies, including its Designer and CDM products.
Throughout his career, Mr. Rosenfeld has played a key role in the development
and architecture of Oracle Corporation's Clinical and Pharmaceutical products
and has authored clinical data management computer systems for Merck,
Parke-Davis, Schering-Plough, and Johnson & Johnson/PRD. Mr. Rosenfeld was
also a senior member of Sybase Inc. On November 11, 2008, Eric Rosenfeld
resigned from his position as Chief Information Officer, Secretary and as a
member of the Board Directors of MedeFile International, Inc.
Michael
Delin, Director. Mr. Delin is the sole proprietor and operator of an accounting
and tax preparation service. He has previously provided consulting
services to the Company. Mr. Delin also currently serves as the Chief
Financial Officer of a construction company based in southwest
Florida. Mr. Delin graduated from the University of South Florida
with a Bachelor of Arts degree in accounting
18
COMMITTEES
Audit
Committee
The
purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the board of directors in fulfilling
its oversight responsibilities for (1) the integrity of the Company's financial
statements, (2) the Company's compliance with legal and regulatory requirements,
(3) the independent auditor's qualifications and independence, and (4) the
performance of the Company's internal audit function and independent auditors.
Currently, the Company does not have an audit committee.
Compensation
and Personnel Committee
The
purpose of the Compensation and Personnel Committee is to provide oversight
review of compensation and benefits of the employees of the Company. The
Committee evaluates and makes regular reports to the Board of Directors on
matters concerning management performance, employee compensation and human
resources policies, programs and plans, including management development and
continuity plans, and approves employee compensation programs and benefit
programs. Currently the Company does not have a compensation and personnel
committee.
Nominating
and Governance Committee
The
purpose of the Nominating and Governance Committee is to ensure that the Board
of Directors is appropriately constituted to meet its fiduciary obligations to
the shareholders and the Company. To accomplish this purpose, the Nominating and
Governance Committee develops and implements policies and processes regarding
corporate governance matters, assesses Board membership needs, makes
recommendations regarding potential director candidates and makes regular
reports to the Board of Directors. Currently the Company does not have a
nominating and governance committee.
CODE
OF ETHICS
We have
adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct that applies to our officers,
directors and employees.
SECTION
16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section
16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our officers, directors,
and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of our common stock to file
reports of securities ownership and changes in such ownership with the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Officers, directors and greater than
10% beneficial owners are also required by rules promulgated by the SEC to
furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based
solely upon a review of Forms 3 and 4 and amendments thereto furnished to us
under Rule 16a-3(e) during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, we believe
that during the year ended December 31, 2008, our executive officers, directors
and all persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our
equity securities complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements.
19
ITEM
11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The
following table sets forth information concerning the compensation for services
in all capacities rendered to us for the three fiscal years ended December 31,
2008, of our Chief Executive Officer and our other executive officers whose
annual compensation exceeded $100,000 in the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008, if any. We refer to the Chief Executive Officer and these other officers
as the named executive officers.
SUMMARY
COMPENSATION TABLE
Name
and
Principal
Position
|
Year
|
Salary
($)
|
Bonus
($)
|
Stock
Awards
($)
|
Option
Awards
($)
|
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
|
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
|
All
Other
Compensation
($)
|
Total
($)
|
|||||||||
Milton
Hauser (1)
President,
CEO, Acting CFO and Director
|
2009
2008
2007
2006
|
170,220
180,000
181,914
120,000
|
--
--
--
--
|
--
--
--
----
|
--
--
--
--
|
--
--
--
--
|
--
--
--
--
|
22,300
--
--
|
202,300
181,914
120,000
|
|||||||||
Kevin
Hauser
Director
of New Business Development
|
2009
2008
2007
2006
|
121,016
86,000
84,000
--
|
--
--
--
--
|
--
--
--
--
|
718,243
(2)
718,240
(2)
|
--
--
--
--
|
--
--
--
--
|
5,600
--
--
|
809,843
802,243
|
|||||||||
Eric
Rosenfeld (3)
Chief
Information Officer and Director
|
2009
2008
2007
2006
|
133,857
110,650
78,300
--
|
--
--
--
--
|
--
--
--
--
|
718,243
(2)
718,240
(2)
|
--
--
--
--
|
--
--
--
--
|
13,858
--
--
|
842,751
796,540
--
|
|||||||||
Peter
LoPrimo
Vice
President, Sales and Marketing
|
2009
2008
2007
2006
|
96,000
90,000
--
|
--
--
--
--
|
--
--
--
--
|
718,243
(2)
718,240
(2)
|
--
--
--
--
|
--
--
--
--
|
--
--
--
|
814,243
808,240
--
|
(1) In
addition, other compensation also includes expense reimbursements of approximately $12,000
paid by the Company related to personal expenses incurred during the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007.
(2) On
January 1, 2006, we issued 1,800,000 options to purchase shares of common stock
at an exercise price of $0.80 per option to the above three named officers.
These options vest ratably over a two-year period beginning January 1, 2006. At
December 31, 2006, options to purchase 900,000 shares have vested and options to
purchase 900,000 shares are unvested. During 2007, the additional 900,000 shares
vested. The fair value of each award at the date of grant was determined to be
$1,436,483 under the Black-Scholes options pricing model. For the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006, we recognized $718,243 and $718,240,
respectively of the fair value of each award as compensation expense in our
statement of operations.
(3) On
November 11, 2008, Eric Rosenfeld resigned from his position as Chief
Information Officer, Secretary and as a member of the Board Directors of
MedeFile International, Inc.
20
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End as of December 31, 2008
Option
Awards
|
Stock
Awards
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name
|
Number
of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options
(#)
Exercisable
|
Number
of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options
(#)
Unexercisable
|
Equity
Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised
Unearned Options
(#)
|
Option
Exercise Price
($)
|
Option
Expiration Date
|
Number
of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
(#)
|
Market
Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
($)
|
Equity
Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights
That Have Not Vested
(#)
|
Equity
Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or
Other Rights That Have Not Vested
($)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mitlon
Hauser
President,
CEO, Acting CFO and Director
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kevin
Hauser
Director
of New Business Development
|
1,800,000 | -- | -- | $ | 0.80 |
12/31/2009
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Eric
Rosenfeld
Chief
Technical Office and Directorr
|
1,800,000 | -- | -- | $ | 0.80 |
12/31/2009
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peter
LoPrimo
Vice
President, Sales and Marketing
|
1,800,000 | -- | -- | $ | 0.80 |
12/31/2009
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
Director
Compensation
Name
|
Fees
Earned
or
Paid in
Cash
($)(1)
|
Stock
Awards
($)
|
Option
Awards
($)
|
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
|
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
|
All
Other
Compensation
($)
|
Total
($)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Milton
Hauser
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | |||||||||||||||||||||
Eric
Rosenfeld
(1)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | |||||||||||||||||||||
Michael
Delin
(2)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | |||||||||||||||||||||
John
Bason (3)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | |||||||||||||||||||||
Eric
Rosenfeld
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
(1) Mr.
Rosenfeld resigned as a Director effective
(2) Mr.
Delin became a Director effective December 12, 2008
21
OPTION
GRANTS IN FISCAL 2008
The
Company issued no option grants during 2008.
EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENTS
On
December 10, 2008, Medefile entered into an employment agreement with Kevin
Hauser pursuant to which Kevin Hauser agreed to continue to serve as the
Company’s Vice President of Sales and New Business Development for a term of
three years. The term of his agreement shall automatically extend for
successive one year periods unless otherwise terminated by the parties in
accordance with the terms of the agreement. Pursuant to his
agreement, Kevin Hauser shall be entitled to receive an annual salary of
$216,000. He shall also be entitled to a discretionary bonus from
time to time during the term of the agreement in an amount determined by the
sole discretion of the Company’s board of directors.
On
December 10, 2008, Medefile entered into an employment agreement with Rachel
Hauser pursuant to which Rachel Hauser agreed to serve as the Company’s Director
of Marketing and Public Relations for a term of three years. The term
of his agreement shall automatically extend for successive one year periods
unless otherwise terminated by the parties in accordance with the terms of the
agreement. Pursuant to his agreement, Kevin Hauser shall be entitled
to receive an annual salary of $216,000. She shall also be entitled
to a discretionary bonus from time to time during the term of the agreement in
an amount determined by the sole discretion of the Company’s board of
directors.
In
January 2007, Medefile entered into an employment agreement with Eric Rosenfeld.
The agreement provides for Mr. Rosenfeld to receive an annual salary of $115,400
for the first year and $137,400, paid monthly, thereafter.
LONG
TERM INCENTIVES
STOCK OPTIONS AND RESTRICTED
STOCK .
Executive
officers, together with our other employees, are eligible to receive grants of
awards under our 2006 Stock Option Plan. These awards may be in the form of
stock options and/or restricted stock grants. The number of shares underlying
options or shares, together with all other terms of the options and shares, are
established by the Board of Directors.
STOCK
INCENTIVE PLANS
2006
Incentive Stock Plan
The 2006
Incentive Stock Plan has initially reserved 10,000,000 shares of common Stock
for issuance. Under the 2006 Incentive Stock Plan, options may be granted which
are intended to qualify as Incentive Stock Options ("ISOs") under Section 422 of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code") or which are not ("Non-ISOs")
intended to qualify as Incentive Stock Options thereunder. In addition, direct
grants of stock or restricted stock may be awarded.
Purpose .
The primary purpose of the 2006 Incentive Stock Plan is to attract and retain
the best available personnel in order to promote the success of our business and
to facilitate the ownership of our stock by employees and others who provide
services to us.
Administration
. The 2006 Incentive Stock Plan is administered by our Board of Directors, as
the Board of Directors may be composed from time to time. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the Board of Directors may at any time, or from time to time, appoint
a committee of at least two members of the Board of Directors, and delegate to
the committee the authority of the Board of Directors to administer the 2006
Incentive Stock Plan. Upon such appointment and delegation, the committee shall
have all the powers, privileges and duties of the Board of Directors, and shall
be substituted for the Board of Directors, in the administration of the 2006
Incentive Stock Plan, subject to certain limitations.
22
Eligibility
. Under the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, options may be granted to key employees,
officers, directors or consultants of the Company.
Terms of
Options . The term of each option granted under the 2006 Incentive Stock
Plan shall be contained in a stock option agreement between the optionee and the
Company and such terms shall be determined by the Board of Directors consistent
with the provisions of the 2006 Incentive Stock Plan, including the
following:
(a) Purchase Price . The purchase
price of the common stock subject to each incentive stock option shall not be
less than the fair market value (as set forth in the 2006 Incentive Stock Plan),
or in the case of the grant of an incentive stock option to a principal
stockholder, not less that 110% of fair market value of such common stock at the
time such option is granted. The purchase price of the common stock subject to
each non-incentive stock option shall be determined at the time such option is
granted, but in no case less than 85% of the fair market value of such common
stock at the time such option is granted;
(b) Vesting . The dates on which
each option (or portion thereof) shall be exercisable and the conditions
precedent to such exercise, if any, shall be fixed by the Board of Directors, in
its discretion, at the time such option is granted. All options or grants which
include a vesting schedule will vest in their entirety upon a change of control
transaction as described in the 2006 Incentive Stock Plan;
(c) Expiration . The expiration
of each option shall be fixed by the Board of Directors, in its discretion, at
the time such option is granted; however, unless otherwise determined by the
Board of Directors at the time such option is granted, an option shall be
exercisable for ten years after the date on which it was granted, or five years
for grants to certain executive officers. Each option shall be subject to
earlier termination or repurchase as expressly provided in the 2006 Incentive
Stock Plan or as determined by the Board of Directors, in its discretion, at the
time such option is granted;
(d) Transferability . No option
shall be transferable, except by will or the laws of descent and distribution,
and any option may be exercised during the lifetime of the optionee only by such
optionee. No option granted under the 2006 Incentive Stock Plan shall be subject
to execution, attachment or other process;
(e) Option Adjustments. The
aggregate number and class of shares as to which options may be granted under
the 2006 Incentive Stock Plan, the number and class shares covered by each
outstanding option and the exercise price per share thereof (but not the total
price), and all such options, shall each be proportionately adjusted for any
increase decrease in the number of issued common stock resulting from split-up
spin-off or consolidation of shares or any like Capital adjustment or the
payment of any stock dividend; and
(f) Termination, Modification And
Amendment . The 2006 Incentive Stock Plan (but not options previously
granted under the plan) shall terminate ten years from the date of its adoption
by the Board of Directors, and no option or shares shall be granted after
termination of the 2006 Incentive Stock Plan. Subject to certain restrictions,
the 2006 Incentive Stock Plan may at any time be terminated and from time to
time be modified or amended by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority
of the outstanding shares of the capital stock of the Company present, or
represented, and entitled to vote at a meeting duly held in accordance with the
applicable laws of the State of Nevada.
23
ITEM 12. EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN
INFORM AND SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
PRINCIPAL
STOCKHOLDERS
The
following table sets forth certain information relating to the ownership of
common stock by (i) each person known by us be the beneficial owner of more than
five percent of the outstanding shares of our common stock, (ii) each of our
directors, (iii) each of our named executive officers, and (iv) all of our
executive officers and directors as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, the
information relates to these persons, beneficial ownership as of April 15, 2009.
Except as may be indicated in the footnotes to the table and subject to
applicable community property laws, each person has the sole voting and
investment power with respect to the shares owned.
Name
of Beneficial Owner (1)
|
Common
Stock
Beneficially
Owned(2)(3)
|
Percentage
of Common Stock (2)
|
||
Vantage
Holding Ltd.(4)
|
93,318,750
|
18.3%
|
||
Milton
Hauser (5)
|
45,000,000
|
8.8%
|
||
Eric
Rosenfeld (6)
|
1,800,000
|
*
|
||
Michael
Delin
|
3,680,000
|
*
|
||
David
Dorrance (7)
|
1,980,000
|
*
|
||
All
officers and directors as
a
group (3 persons)
|
52,460,000
|
10.3%
|
||
*
Less than 1%
|
(1)
Except as otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner is c/o
Medefile International, Inc., 240 Cedar Knolls Road, Cedar Knolls, NJ, 07927
.
(2)
Applicable percentage ownership is based on 509,113,989 shares of common stock
outstanding as of April 15, 2009, together with securities exercisable or
convertible into shares of common stock within 60 days of April 15 2009for each
stockholder. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of
the Securities and Exchange Commission and generally includes voting or
investment power with respect to securities. Shares of common stock that are
currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of April 15, 2009are deemed
to be beneficially owned by the person holding such securities for the purpose
of computing the percentage of ownership of such person, but are not treated as
outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other
person.
(3)
Adjusted to reflect the payment of an in-kind dividend of 14 shares of common
stock for each share of common stock held by shareholders of record at the close
of business on January 16, 2006.
(4) Lyle
Hauser is the owner of The Vantage Group Ltd. and Vantage Holding Ltd. Lyle
Hauser is the son of Milton Hauser.
(5)
Represents (i) 42,000,000 shares of common stock owned by Milton Hauser (ii)
3,000,000 shares of common stock owned by Milton Hauser's spouse.
(6)
Represents options to purchase 1,800,000 shares of common stock.
(7)
Represents 180,000 shares of common stock owned by Mr. Dorrance, and (ii)
options to purchase 1,800,000 shares of common stock.
The
information as to shares beneficially owned has been individually furnished by
our respective directors, named executive officers and other stockholders, or
taken from documents filed with the SEC.
24
ITEM
13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
Medefile
has been able to continue operations due to the payment of company obligations
by The Vantage Group Ltd., a company owned and controlled by Lyle Hauser. Lyle
Hauser is the control person of Vantage Holding Ltd., the majority stockholder
of the Company.
During
the period July 16, 1997 (inception) to December 31, 2007, The Vantage Group
Ltd., has (i) paid an aggregate of $905,318 of the Company's obligations, (ii)
contributed $275,000 of assets to the capital of the Company, and (iii) made
loans of approximately $3,192,466 to the Company.
On April
11 2007, Medefile issued two promissory notes to The Vantage Group as evidence
of this indebtedness. One of the notes, in the principal amount of $700,000, was
payable on demand. The other note, with a principal amount of $1,115,379, was
payable no later than July 1, 2008. On November 15, 2007, the Company and
Vantage, the Company’s largest stockholder and primary source of funding,
entered into a debt conversion agreement. Pursuant to the debt conversion
agreement, Vantage agreed to convert the aggregate principal amount of
$2,100,000 of its indebtedness into an aggregate of 14,000,000 restricted shares
of common stock of the Company. In addition, the Company issued to Vantage
8,400,000 three year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 8,400,000 restricted
shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.60 per share.
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, the Company borrowed a total
of $1,245,000 against the note. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2007
and 2006, and the Company charged related party interest expense of $161,504 and
$95,670, respectively.
As of
December 31, 2008, Medefile was indebted to The Vantage Group Ltd. in the amount
of $1,102,104 including accrued interest.
On
September 23, 2008 the Company received a Cancellation of Debt from Vantage
Group Ltd, canceling the remaining balance of the Loan Payable, including all
outstanding interest as of that date. In addition Vantage Group Ltd
surrendered 14,000,000 shares of common stock and 8,400,000 warrants at
$0.60.
ITEM
14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
On
November 4, 2008, the board of directors of Medefile International, Inc.
dismissed RBSM, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting
firm. On November 4, 2008, the Company engaged L.L. Bradford & Company, LLC
(“L.L. Bradford”) as its independent registered public accounting firm for the
Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. The change in the Company’s
independent registered public accounting firm was approved by the Company’s
Board of Directors on November 4, 2008.
AUDIT
FEES
The
aggregate fees billed by L.L. Bradford for the audit and review of the Company's
annual financial statements and services that are normally provided by an
accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 was approximately
$35,000.
The
aggregate fees billed by RBSM LLP for the audit and review of the Company's
annual financial statements and services that are normally provided by an
accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements
for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006 was approximately
$74,192.
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Audit
Fees
|
$
|
35,000
|
$
|
70,692
|
||||
Audit
Related Fees
|
-
|
|||||||
Tax
Fees
|
3,500
|
|||||||
All
Other Fees
|
-
|
|||||||
Total
Fees
|
$
|
35,000
|
$
|
74,192
|
AUDIT-RELATED
FEES
No fees
were billed by L.L. Bradford for assurance and related services rendered by L.L.
Bradford that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review
of our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. No fees
were billed by RBSM LLP for assurance and related services rendered by RBSM LLP
that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our
financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
TAX
FEES
Tax fees
were billed by L.L. Bradford for professional services rendered for tax
compliance; tax advice and tax planning for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008. Tax fees were billed by RBSM LLP for professional services rendered for
tax compliance; tax advice and tax planning for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2007. No fees were billed by RBSM LLP for tax compliance;
tax advice and tax planning for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2006.
ALL
OTHER FEES
No other
fees were billed by L.L. Bradford or RBSM LLP for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2008 and 2007.
25
ITEM
15. EXHIBITS
2.1
|
Agreement
and Plan of Merger made as of November 1, 2005 among Bio-Solutions
International, Inc., OmniMed Acquisition Corp., OmniMed International,
Inc., and the shareholders of OmniMed International, Inc. (as incorporated
by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November
3, 2005).
|
3.1
|
Articles
of Incorporation (as incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB filed on April 17,
2006).
|
3.2
|
Bylaws
of the Issuer (as incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB filed on April 17,
2006).
|
3.3
|
Certificate
of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation filed on August 31, 2004 (as
incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
filed on April 17, 2006).
|
3.4
|
Articles
of Merger changing the Registrant's name to OmniMed International, Inc.
(as incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on November 22, 2005).
|
3.5
|
Articles
of Merger changing the Registrant's name to Medefile International, Inc.
(as incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on January 18, 2006).
|
3.6
|
Certificate
of Designation of Series A Preferred (as incorporated by reference to the
Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 16,
2009).
|
10.6
|
2006
Stock Incentive Plan (as incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB filed on April 17,
2006).
|
10.7
|
HSA
Bank Marketing Agreement
|
10.8
|
Promissory
Note dated April 11, 2007
|
10.9
|
Promissory
Note dated April 11, 2007
|
14.
|
Code
of Ethics
|
16.1
|
Letter
from Former Accountant (as incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 7,
2006)
|
21.1
|
Subsidiaries
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, dated xx 2,
2008.
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, dated xx 2,
2008.
|
26
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
MEDEFILE
INTERNATIONAL, INC.
|
|||
Date:
April 15, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/
Milton
Hauser
|
|
Milton
Hauser
|
|||
President,
Chief Executive Officer, Acting Chief Financial
Officer
and Director
|
|||
KNOWN BY
ALL MEN THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below
constitutes and appoints Milton Hauser his attorney-in-fact and agent with full
power of substitution and re-substitution, for him and his name, place and
stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any or all amendments to this Form
10-K and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto
said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each
and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the
foregoing, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and
agent, or his substitute, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.
In
accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
SIGNATURE
|
TITLE
|
DATE
|
||
/s/ Milton
Hauser
|
President,
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of
|
April
15, 2009
|
||
Milton
Hauser
|
the
Board of Directors
(Principal
Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|||
/s/
Michael S. Delin
|
||||
Director
|
April
15, 2009
|
|||
Michael
S. Delin
|
27
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Medefile
International, Inc.
Boca
Raton, Florida
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Medefile International,
Inc. as of December 31, 2008, and the related consolidated statement of
operation, stockholder’s equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year then
ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over
financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal
control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that
are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Medefile International, Inc.
as of December 31, 2008, and the results of its activities and cash flows for
the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States.
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that
the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the
consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses
from operations with a significant accumulated deficit, all of which raise
substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Management’s plans in regards to these matters are also described in Note 1. The
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ L.L.
Bradford & Company, LLC
April 15,
2009
Las
Vegas, Nevada
F-1
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of
Directors
Medefile
International Inc.
240 Cedar
Knolls Rd.
Cedar
Knolls, NJ 07927
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Medefile International
Inc. as of December 31, 2007 and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the year ended
December 31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
financial statements based upon our audit.
We have
conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) (United States of America). Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well
as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Medefile International Inc.
at December 31, 2007 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for
the year ended December 31, 2007 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the
Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in the Note 1 to the
accompanying financial statements, the Company has incurred significant
operating losses in current year and also in the past. These factors, among
others, raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that
might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ RBSM
LLP
|
|||
Certified
Public Accountants
|
|||
New York,
New York
March 31,
2008
F-2
Medefile
International, Inc
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
As
of
|
As
of
|
|||||||
December
|
December
|
|||||||
Assets
|
31,
2008
|
31,
2007
|
||||||
Current
assets
|
||||||||
Cash
|
7,844 | 1,367,415 | ||||||
Marketable
securities
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
- | 2,808 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
17,810 | 26,082 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
25,654 | 1,396,305 | ||||||
Furniture
and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of
|
54,514 | 63,352 | ||||||
Deposits
and other assets
|
14,475 | 14,990 | ||||||
Intangibles
|
1,339 | 1,339 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
95,982 | 1,475,986 | ||||||
Liabilities
and Stockholders' Equity
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
79,069 | 184,814 | ||||||
Deferred
revenues
|
5,942 | 6,343 | ||||||
Advance
customer payments
|
- | 50,000 | ||||||
Note
Payable
|
76,390 | - | ||||||
Note
Payable - related party
|
93,518 | 1,102,104 | ||||||
Total
Current Liabilities
|
254,919 | 1,343,261 | ||||||
Stockholders'
Equity
|
||||||||
Common
stock, $.0001 par value 300,000,000 authorized;
|
||||||||
218,493,971
and 178,733,910 shares issued and oustanding
|
||||||||
December
31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 respectively
|
21,849 | 17,873 | ||||||
Common
stock subscribed
|
- | 3,750,000 | ||||||
Additional
paid in capital
|
11,324,821 | 5,893,302 | ||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(11,505,607 | ) | (9,528,804 | ) | ||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive gain
|
- | 354 | ||||||
Total
stockholders' equity (deficit)
|
(158,937 | ) | 132,725 | |||||
Total
liability and stockholders' equity(deficit)
|
95,982 | 1,475,986 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements
F-3
Medefile
International, Inc
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
For
the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Revenue
|
$ | 53,235 | $ | 44,847 | ||||
Operating
expenses
|
1,972,229 | 4,022,396 | ||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
1,869,551 | 1,733,565 | ||||||
Depreciation
|
20,240 | 22,518 | ||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
1,992,469 | 4,044,914 | ||||||
Loss
from operations
|
(1,939,234 | ) | (4,000,067 | ) | ||||
Other
Expenses
|
||||||||
Interest
expense note payable
|
3,136 | - | ||||||
Loss
on securities
|
192 | - | ||||||
Interest
expense - related party note payable
|
34,596 | 160,779 | ||||||
Total
other expense
|
37,924 | 160,779 | ||||||
Loss
before income tax
|
(1,977,158 | ) | (4,160,846 | ) | ||||
Provision
for income tax
|
- | - | ||||||
Net
Loss
|
$ | (1,977,158 | ) | $ | (4,160,846 | ) | ||
Comprehensive
loss
|
$ | (1,977,158 | ) | $ | (4,160,846 | ) | ||
Net
loss per share: basic and diluted
|
$ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | ||
Weighted
average share outstanding
|
200,953,132 | 178,733,910 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements
F-4
Medefile
International, Inc
Consolidated
Statement of Stockholders' Equity
For
the Year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
Other
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
|
Accumulated
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Stock
|
Accumulated
|
Comprehensive
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding
|
Amount
|
APIC
|
Subscribed
|
Deficit
|
Gain
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
as of
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December
31, 2006
|
178,733,910 | $ | 17,873 | $ | 3,604,471 | $ | - | $ | (5,367,958 | ) | $ | 354 | $ | (1,745,260 | ) | |||||||||||||
Non-cash
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
compensation
|
2,288,831 | 2,288,831 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
subscribed
for
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
reduction
in notes
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
payable
|
2,100,000 | 2,100,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
subcriptions
|
1,650,000 | 1,650,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
Loss
|
(4,160,846 | ) | (4,160,846 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
as of
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December
31, 2007
|
178,733,910 | $ | 17,873 | $ | 5,893,302 | $ | 3,750,000 | $ | (9,528,804 | ) | $ | 354 | $ | 132,725 | ||||||||||||||
Common
stock issured
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
for
exercise of stock
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
options
|
37,500 | 4 | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock sale
|
2,000,000 | 200 | 299,800 | 300,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock issued
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
for
reduction
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
in
note payable
|
14,000,000 | 1,400 | 2,098,600 | (2,100,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock issued
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
for
stock subscriptions
|
11,000,000 | 1,100 | 1,648,900 | (1,650,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Recharacterize
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
comprehensive
gain
|
354 | (354 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock warrants
|
41,558 | 41,558 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
issued
for
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
compensation
|
61,120 | 61,120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock sale
|
2,000,000 | 200 | 299,800 | 300,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
cancellation
of
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
debt
by related
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
party
|
636,701 | 636,701 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cancellation
of
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
- related party
|
(14,000,000 | ) | (1,400 | ) | 1,400 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
S-8
Share issued
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
for
employees and
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
comsultants
|
24,722,561 | 2,472 | 343,644 | 346,116 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
Loss
|
(1,977,158 | ) | (1,977,158 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2008 | 218,493,971 | 21,849 | 11,324,821 | - | (11,505,608 | ) | - | (158,938 | ) |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements
F-5
Medefile
International, Inc
Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows
For
the Year Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities
|
||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (1,977,158 | ) | $ | (4,160,846 | ) | ||
|
||||||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net
|
||||||||
cash
used in operating activities
|
||||||||
Depreciation
|
20,240 | 22,518 | ||||||
Non
cash compensation
|
102,678 | 2,288,831 | ||||||
S-8
issuance of shares
|
346,116 | - | ||||||
Interest
Expense
|
3,136 | - | ||||||
Interest
Expense - related party
|
34,596 | 161,504 | ||||||
Bad
debt expense
|
(3,134 | ) | - | |||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities
|
||||||||
Accounts
Receivable
|
2,808 | (2,808 | ) | |||||
Prepaid
Expenses
|
8,272 | (16,082 | ) | |||||
Marketable
securities
|
- | 126,960 | ||||||
Deferred
revenue
|
(401 | ) | (27,525 | ) | ||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
(105,745 | ) | 720 | |||||
Deposits
and other assets
|
515 | (12,205 | ) | |||||
Advance
customer payments
|
(50,000 | ) | 50,000 | |||||
Net
Cash used in operating activities
|
(1,618,077 | ) | (1,568,933 | ) | ||||
Cash
flows from investing activities
|
||||||||
Purchase
equipment
|
(11,402 | ) | (36,628 | ) | ||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(11,402 | ) | (36,628 | ) | ||||
Cash
flows from financing activities
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from loans by related parties
|
93,518 | 1,245,000 | ||||||
Proceeds
from note payable
|
76,390 | - | ||||||
Payments
of loans from related parties
|
(500,000 | ) | (20,979 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from common stock sale
|
600,000 | - | ||||||
Proceeds
from common stock subscriptions
|
- | 1,650,000 | ||||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
269,908 | 2,874,021 | ||||||
Net
increase(decreast) in cash and cash equivalents
|
(1,359,571 | ) | 1,268,460 | |||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
1,367,415 | 98,955 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equvalents at end of period
|
$ | 7,844 | $ | 1,367,415 | ||||
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information
|
||||||||
Cash
paid during period for
|
||||||||
Cash
paid for interest
|
$ | - | $ | 20,979 | ||||
Cash
paid for income taxes
|
$ | - | $ | 2,439 | ||||
Common
stock issued for stock subscriptions
|
$ | 3,750,000 | $ | - | ||||
Cancelleation
of debt by stockholder
|
||||||||
recorded
as contribution to additional paid in capital
|
$ | 636,701 | ||||||
Common
stock to be issued to cancel debt
|
$ | - | $ | 2,100,000 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements
F-6
MEDEFILE
INTERNATION, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December
31, 2008
1. BASIS
OF PRESENTATION AND NATURE OF BUSINESS OPERATIONS
Basis of
Presentation
The
accompanying financial statements present on a consolidated basis the accounts
of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany
accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Nature of Business
Operations
On
November 1, 2005, Bio-Solutions International, Inc. ("Bio-Solutions") entered
into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Agreement") with OmniMed Acquisition
Corp., (the "Acquirer), a Nevada corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of
Bio-Solutions, OmniMed International, Inc., a Nevada corporation ("OmniMed"),
and the shareholders of OmniMed (the "OmniMed Shareholders"). Pursuant to the
Agreement, Bio-Solutions acquired all of the outstanding equity stock of OmniMed
from the OmniMed Shareholders. As consideration for the acquisition of OmniMed,
Bio-Solutions agreed to issue 9,894,900 shares of Bio-Solutions' common stock to
the OmniMed Shareholders. These issuances were deemed to be exempt under rule
506 of Regulation D and Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
since, among other things, the transaction did not involve a public offering,
the investors were accredited investors and/or qualified institutional buyers,
the investors had access to information about the company and their investment,
the investors took the securities for investment and not resale, and the Company
took appropriate measures to restrict the transfer of the
securities.
As a
result of the Agreement, the OmniMed Shareholders assumed control of
Bio-Solutions. Effective November 21, 2005 Bio-Solutions changed its name to
OmniMed International, Inc. Effective January 17, 2006 OmniMed changed its name
to Medefile International, Inc. ("Medefile" or "the Company").
Medefile
has developed a system for gathering, digitizing, storing and distributing
information for the healthcare field. Medefile's goal is to bring digital
technology to the business of medicine. Medefile intends to accomplish its
objective by providing individuals with a simple and secure way to access their
lifetime of actual medical records in an efficient and cost-effective manner.
Medefile's products and services are designed to provide Healthcare providers
with the ability to reference their patient's actual past medical records,
thereby ensuring the most accurate treatment and services possible while
simultaneously reducing redundant procedures. Medefile's primary product is the
MedeFile system, a highly secure system for gathering and maintaining medical
records. The MedeFile system is designed to gather all of its members' medical
records and create a single, comprehensive medical record that is accessible 24
hours a day, seven days a week.
Going
Concern
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America,
which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. However, the
Company has reported a net loss of $1,977,158 and $4,160,846 for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively and had an accumulated deficit of
$11,505,607 as of December 31, 2008.
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will
continue as a going concern. The operating losses raise substantial doubt about
the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The Company's ability to
obtain additional financing depends on the availability of its borrowing
capacity, the success of its growth strategy and its future performance, each of
which is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative,
regulatory, and other factors beyond the Company's control.
F-7
MEDEFILE
INTERNATION, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December
31, 2008
We will
need additional investments in order to continue operations to cash flow break
even. Additional investments are being sought, but we cannot guarantee that we
will be able to obtain such investments. Financing transactions may include the
issuance of equity or debt securities, obtaining credit facilities, or other
financing mechanisms.
However,
the trading price of our common stock could make it more difficult to obtain
financing through the issuance of equity or debt securities. Even if we are able
to raise the funds required, it is possible that we could incur unexpected costs
and expenses, fail to collect significant amounts owed to us, or experience
unexpected cash requirements that would force us to seek alternative financing.
Further, if we issue additional equity or debt securities, stockholders may
experience additional dilution or the new equity securities may have rights,
preferences or privileges senior to those of existing holders of our common
stock. If additional financing is not available or is not available on
acceptable terms, we will have to curtail our operations.
Cash and Cash
Equivalents
For
purposes of these financial statements, cash equivalents include a highly liquid
debt instruments with a maturity of less than three months.
Concentrations of Credit
Risk
Financial
instruments and related items, which potentially subject the Company to
concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents.
The Company places its cash and temporary cash investments with high credit
quality institutions. At times, such investments may be in excess of the FDIC
insurance limit.
Advertising
The
Company follows the policy of charging the costs of advertising to expense as
incurred. The Company incurred advertising costs for the year ended December 31,
2008 of approximately $118,491. The Company incurred $41,713 advertising costs
for the year ended December 31, 2007. An advertising contract
was entered into in May 2008 which included advertising and promotion through
advertising media and website promotions. Total cost of the
advertising was to be, $99,999 at signing of contract. A total of
$99,999 had been paid through June 30, 2008.
The
Company contracted with Ruckus Marketing in 2007. There developed a
disagreement between parties as to the accuracy of deliverables. The contract
was cancelled. Ruckus Market filed suit for payment and a judgment
resulted in $15,000 being due. The judgment was paid in full on July
21, 2008
F-8
MEDEFILE
INTERNATION, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December
31, 2008
Impairment of Long-Lived
Assets
The
company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS 144). The
Statement requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles
held and used by the company are reviewed for impairment whenever events or
changes in ircumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be
recoverable. Events relating to recoverability may include significant
unfavorable changes in business conditions, recurring losses, or a forecasted
inability to achieve break even operating results over an extended period. The
company evaluates the recoverability of long-lived assets based upon forecasted
undiscounted cash flows. Should an impairment in value be indicated, the
carrying value of intangible assets will be adjusted, based on estimates of
future discounted cash flows resulting from the use of and ultimate disposition
of the intangible, to be reported at the lower of the carrying amount or the
fair value less costs to sell.
Income
Taxes
The
Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting For Income Taxes". The provision for
income taxes is comprised of current and deferred components. The current
component presents the amount of federal and state income taxes that are
currently reportable to the respective tax authorities and is measured by
applying statutory rates to the Company's taxable income as reported in its
income tax returns.
Deferred
income taxes are provided for the temporary differences between the carrying
values of the Company's assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes
and their corresponding income tax basis. These temporary differences are
primarily attributable to net operating losses. The temporary differences give
rise to either a deferred tax asset or liability in the financial statements,
which is computed by applying statutory tax rates to taxable or deductible
temporary differences based upon classification (i.e., current or non-current)
of the asset or liability in the financial statements which relate to the
particular temporary difference.
Property and
Equipment
Property
and equipment are stated at cost. When retired or otherwise disposed, the
related carrying value and accumulated depreciation are removed from the
respective accounts and the net difference less any amount realized from
disposition, is reflected in earnings. Minor additions and renewals are expensed
in the year incurred. Major additions and renewals are capitalized and
depreciated over their estimated useful lives being 3 years up to 10
years.
Trademark
Costs
Trademark
costs incurred in the registration and acquisition of trademarks and trademark
rights are capitalized. These costs will be amortized over the legal life of the
related trademark once the trademark is awarded. In accordance with the
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 (SFAS No.
142), Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, the Company performs an annual
review of its identified intangible assets to determine if facts and
circumstances exist which indicate that the useful life is shorter than
originally estimated or that the carrying amount of the assets may not be
recoverable.
The
Company expenses all software costs associated with the conceptual formulation
and evaluation of alternatives until the application development stage has been
reached. Costs to improve or support the technology are expensed as these costs
are incurred.
Capitalized Software
Development Costs
The
Company's policy is to capitalize computer software costs in accordance with
Statement of Position 98-1,"Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software
Developed or Obtained for Internal Use" Under SOP 98-1, costs incurred in
creating software to gather, digitize, store and distribute medical information
once the application development stage is reached, are capitalized. The
application development stage is when a working model/concept is established.
Costs incurred in developing the product from this point until the product is
available for release to customers are capitalized and includes contracted labor
including supervision of the product developers and other outside consultant
costs. Amortization of these costs started February 2004, when the product was
first available for release to customers and is being recovered on the
straight-line basis over the estimated economic life of sixty months. The
Company reviews the amounts capitalized for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of the assets may not be
recoverable.
The
Company expenses all software costs associated with the conceptual formulation
and evaluation of alternatives until the application development stage has been
reached. Costs to improve or support the technology are expensed as these costs
are incurred.
F-9
MEDEFILE
INTERNATION, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December
31, 2008
Long-Lived
Assets
The
Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment under Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 121 "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of". Under these rules, long-term and
intangible assets are evaluated for possible impairment when events or
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of those assets may not be
recoverable. Measurement of the impairment loss, if any, is based upon the
difference between the assets carrying value in the financial statements and its
estimated fair value.
Revenue
Recognition
The
Company generates revenue from licensing the right to utilize its proprietary
software for the storage and distribution of healthcare information
to individuals and affinity groups. For revenue from product sales, the Company
recognizes revenue in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") No. 104,
"Revenue Recognition," which superseded SAB No. 101, "Revenue Recognition in
Financial Statements." SAB No.101 requires that four basic criteria must be met
before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists; (2) delivery has occurred; (3) the selling price is fixed and
determinable; and (4) collectibility is reasonably assured. Determination of
criteria (3) and (4) are based on management's judgments regarding the fixed
nature of the selling prices of the products delivered and the collectibility of
those amounts. Provisions for discounts and rebates to customers, estimated
returns and allowances, and other adjustments are provided for in the same
period the related sales are recorded. The Company defers any revenue for which
the product has not been delivered or is subject to refund until such time that
the Company and the customer jointly determine that the product has been
delivered or no refund will be required. SAB No. 104 incorporates Emerging
Issues Task Force ("EITF") No. 00-21, "Multiple-Deliverable Revenue
Arrangements." EITF No. 00-21 addresses accounting for arrangements that may
involve the delivery or performance of multiple products, services and/or rights
to use assets. The effect of implementing EITF No. 00-21 on the Company's
consolidated financial position and results of operations was not significant.
This issue addresses determination of whether an arrangement involving more than
one deliverable contains more than one unit of accounting and how the
arrangement consideration should be measured and allocated to the separate units
of accounting.
Deferred
Revenue
The
Company generally receives subscription fees for its services. From time to
time, the Company will receive quarterly or annual subscriptions paid in advance
and deferred revenue is recorded at that time. The deferred revenue is amortized
into revenue on a pro- rata basis each month. Customers with quarterly or annual
subscriptions may cancel their subscriptions and request a refund for future
months' revenues at any time. Therefore, a liability is recorded to reflect the
amounts which are potentially refundable. At December 31, 2008 the amount of
$5,942 was in deferred revenue.
Investments
The
Company's investments in marketable securities are classified as "available for
sale" securities, and are carried on the financial statements at market value.
Realized gains and losses are included in earnings; unrealized gains and losses
are reported as a separate component of stockholders' equity and as a component
of "Other Comprehensive Income."
Reclassifications
Certain
reclassifications have been made in prior year's financial statements to conform
to classifications used in the current year.
F-10
MEDEFILE
INTERNATION, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December
31, 2008
Fair Value of Financial
Instruments
The
Company's financial instruments, which include cash, prepaid expenses,
securities, and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short-term
nature of these assets and liabilities.
Off-balance Sheet
Arrangements
The
Company does not have any off-balance sheet financing or any unconsolidated
special purpose entities.
Use of
Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during
the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Liquidity
As of
December 31, 2008 we had cash and cash equivalents of
$7,844. Net cash used in operating activities for the year was
approximately $1,618,077. Current liabilities are approximately $254,919 of
which $79,069 is for accounts payable, $5,942 is Deferred
Revenues and $76,930 for a Note Payable and an additional $93,518 for
a Note Payables from a Related Party. We have negative working
capital of approximately $229,269
As
reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company
incurred net losses of $1,977,158 for the year ended December 31, 2008, and has
an accumulated deficit of $11,505,607 as of December 31, 2008. Consequently, its
operations are subject to all risks inherent in the establishment of a new
business enterprise.
We will
need additional investments in order to continue operations to cash flow break
even. Additional investments are being sought, but we cannot guarantee that we
will be able to obtain such investments. Financing transactions may include the
issuance of equity or debt securities, obtaining credit facilities, or other
financing mechanisms. However, the trading price of our common stock and the
downturn in the U.S. stock and debt markets could make it more difficult to
obtain financing through the issuance of equity or debt securities. Even if we
are able to raise the funds required, it is possible that we could incur
unexpected costs and expenses, fail to collect significant amounts owed to us,
or experience unexpected cash requirements that would force us to seek
alternative financing. Further, if we issue additional equity or debt
securities, stockholders may experience additional dilution or the new equity
securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of
existing holders of our common stock. If additional financing is not available
or is not available on acceptable terms, we will have to curtail our
operations.
Net Loss Per
Share
Basic and
diluted loss per share amounts are computed based on net loss divided by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding.
Comprehensive
Income
Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income (SFAS
130), requires the reporting of comprehensive income in addition to net income
from operations. Comprehensive income is a more inclusive financial reporting
methodology that includes disclosures of certain financial information that
historically has not been recognized in the calculation of net income. For all
of the periods presented, the Company's comprehensive income is presented in the
Statement of Comprehensive Income, and includes unrealized gains and losses on
marketable securities net of the related estimated deferred income tax effect
associated with those gains and losses.
F-11
MEDEFILE
INTERNATION, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December
31, 2008
Management
Estimates
The
presentation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
Stock Based
Compensation
On
January 1, 2006 the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123 (revised 2004) "Share-Based Payment" ("SFAS 123 (R) which requires the
measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment
awards made to employees and directors including employee stock options and
employee stock purchases related to a Employee Stock Purchase Plan based on the
estimated fair values. SFAS 123 (R) supersedes the Company's previous accounting
under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No.25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees" ("APB 25") for the periods beginning fiscal 2006.
New Accounting
Pronouncements
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value
Measurements.” SFAS No. 157 establishes a single definition of fair value
and a framework for measuring fair value, sets out a fair value hierarchy to be
used to classify the source of information used in fair value measurements, and
requires new disclosures of assets and liabilities measured at fair value based
on their level in the hierarchy. SFAS No. 157 is effective for all fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007 (January 1, 2008 for 3M) and
is to be applied prospectively. In February 2008, the FASB issued Staff
Positions No. 157-1 and No. 157-2 which partially defer the effective date of
SFAS No. 157 for one year for certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities and
remove certain leasing transactions from its scope. The Company is currently
evaluating the impacts and disclosures of this standard, but would not expect
SFAS No. 157 to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated
results of operations or financial condition.
In
September 2006, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 1N,
Financial Statements - Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when
Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements (SAB 108). SAB
108 provides guidance on how prior year misstatements should be evaluated when
determining the materiality of misstatements in the current year financial
statements. SAB 108 requires materiality to be determined by considering the
effect of prior year misstatements on both the current year balance sheet and
income statement, with consideration of their carryover and reversing effects.
SAB 108 also addresses how to correct material misstatements. The Company
adopted the provisions of this bulletin effective October 1, 2007. The Company
did not incur any material impact to its financial condition or results of
operations due to the adoption of SAB 108.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”. SFAS No. 159 permits an
entity to choose, at specified election dates, to measure eligible financial
instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently
required to be measured at fair value. An entity shall report unrealized gains
and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings
at each subsequent reporting date. Upfront costs and fees related to items for
which the fair value option is elected shall be recognized in earnings as
incurred and not deferred. SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation and
disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that
choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and
liabilities. SFAS No. 159 is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within
those fiscal years. At the effective date, an entity may elect the fair value
option for eligible items that exist at that date. The entity shall report the
effect of the first remeasurement to fair value as a cumulative-effect
adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. The Company has not
elected the fair value option for eligible items that existed as of December 31,
2007.
F-12
MEDEFILE
INTERNATION, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December
31, 2008
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, "Noncontrolling Interest
in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51" ("SFAS
No. 160"), which will change the accounting and reporting for minority
interests, which will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and
classified as a component of equity within the consolidated balance
sheets. SFAS No. 160 is effective as of the beginning of the first
fiscal year beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier
adoption is prohibited and the Company is currently evaluating the effect, if
any, that the adoption will have on its financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, “Business Combinations,”
which changes how business acquisitions are accounted. SFAS No. 141R
requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all (and
only) the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction and
establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Certain
provisions of this standard will, among other things, impact the determination
of acquisition-date fair value of consideration paid in a business combination
(including contingent consideration); exclude transaction costs from acquisition
accounting; and change accounting practices for acquired contingencies,
acquisition-related restructuring costs, in-process research and development,
indemnification assets, and tax benefits. For 3M, SFAS No. 141R is
effective for business combinations and adjustments to an acquired entity’s
deferred tax asset and liability balances occurring after December 31,
2008. The Company is currently evaluating the future impacts and
disclosures of this standard.
In
December 2007, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 110 regarding
the use of a simplified method, as discussed in SAB No. 107 (SAB 107), in
developing an estimate of expected term of plain vanilla share options in
accordance with SFAS No. 123 (R), Share-Based Payment. In particular,
the staff indicated in SAB 107 that it will accept a company's election to use
the simplified method, regardless of whether the company has sufficient
information to make more refined estimates of expected term. At the time SAB 107
was issued, the staff believed that more detailed external information about
employee exercise behavior (e.g., employee exercise patterns by industry and/or
other categories of companies) would, over time, become readily available to
companies. Therefore, the staff stated in SAB 107 that it would not expect a
company to use the simplified method for share option grants after December 31,
2007. The staff understands that such detailed information about employee
exercise behavior may not be widely available by December 31, 2007. Accordingly,
the staff will continue to accept, under certain circumstances, the use of the
simplified method beyond December 31, 2007. The Company currently uses the
simplified method for “plain vanilla” share options and warrants, and will
assess the impact of SAB 110 for fiscal year 2009. It is not believed that this
will have an impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations
or cash flows.
In March
2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of
FASB Statement No. 133. This standard requires companies to provide
enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative
instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are
accounted for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how
derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial
position, financial performance, and cash flows. This Statement is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The Company has not yet
adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 161, but does not expect it to have a
material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
In May
2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 162,
“The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”. SFAS No. 162
sets forth the level of authority to a given accounting pronouncement or
document by category. Where there might be conflicting guidance between two
categories, the more authoritative category will prevail. SFAS No. 162 will
become effective 60 days after the SEC approves the PCAOB’s amendments to AU
Section 411 of the AICPA Professional Standards. SFAS No. 162 has no effect on
the Company’s financial position, statements of operations, or cash flows at
this time.
F-13
MEDEFILE
INTERNATION, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December
31, 2008
In May
2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 163,
“Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts-and interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 60”. SFAS No. 163 clarifies how Statement 60 applies to
financial guarantee insurance contracts, including the recognition and
measurement of premium revenue and claims liabilities. This statement also
requires expanded disclosures about financial guarantee insurance contracts.
SFAS No. 163 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15,
2008, and interim periods within those years. SFAS No. 163 has no effect on the
Company’s financial position, statements of operations, or cash flows at this
time.
Certain amounts previously
reported have been reclassified to conform to the current year
presentation.
2.
FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT
Furniture
and equipment consists of the following at December 31, 2008 and
2007:
December
31, 2008
|
December
31, 2007
|
|||||||
Computer
and Equipment
|
$ | 169,286 | $ | 157,884 | ||||
Furniture
and Fixtures
|
38,618 | 38,618 | ||||||
Subtotal
|
207,904 | 196,502 | ||||||
Less
: accumulated depreciation
|
(153,390 | ) | (133,150 | ) | ||||
Total
Furniture and equipment
|
$ | 54,514 | 63,352 |
Depreciation
is calculated by using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life.
Depreciation and amortizations expense totaled $20,240 and $22,518 for the year
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
3.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The
Company has adopted SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, whereby
the Company periodically tests its intangible assets for
impairment. On an annual basis, and when there is reason to suspect
that their values have been diminished or impaired, these assets are tested for
impairment, and write-downs will be included in results from
operations. There was no impairment of acquired intangibles as of December 31,
2007.
Identifiable
intangible assets consist of the carrying value of a trademark totaling $1,339
as of December 31, 2008. The trademark acquired is considered to have an
undeterminable life, and as such will not be amortized. Instead, the trademark
is tested annually for impairment, with any impairment charged against earnings
in the Company’s consolidated statement of earnings. Management determined the
fair value of the trademark acquired exceeded its recorded book value
at December 31, 2008.
4. NOTE
PAYABLE.
On
September 26, 2008, the Company issued a Demand Note in the principal amount of
$75,000 to an individual. This Note bears interest at a rate of seven
percent per annum
December
31, 2008
|
||||
Borrowings
|
$ | 75,000 | ||
Accrued
Interest
|
1,390 | |||
Balance
December 31, 2008
|
$ | 76,390 |
F-14
MEDEFILE
INTERNATION, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December
31, 2008
5. NOTE
PAYABLE – RELATED PARTY
On July
31, 2008, the Company issued an unsecured Demand Note in the principal amount of
$44,771 to Cybervault LLC, a company wholly owned by Medefile
CEO. The Note bears interest at a rate of seven percent per
annum. Additionally, during the fourth quarter of 2008, an additional
$ 45,000 has been received from Cybervault LLC.
December
31, 2008
|
||||
Borrowings
|
$ | 89,771 | ||
Accrued
Interest
|
1,747 | |||
Balance
December 31, 2008
|
$ | 91,518 |
6. LOAN
PAYABLE - RELATED PARTY
The
Company has been and continues to be dependent upon the funding from The Vantage
Group, Ltd., (“Vantage”) the Company’s largest stockholder. On April 11,
2007, the Company issued two unsecured promissory notes to The Vantage Group as
evidence of this indebtedness outstanding. Both notes bear interest at the rate
of seven percent per annum. One note, with a principal amount of $1,115,379, was
payable on July 1, 2008. The other note, is payable on demand in the principal
amount of $700,000. During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company
borrowed a total of $1,245,000 against the demand note and repaid $20,979.
On November 15, 2007, the Company and Vantage, entered into a debt conversion
agreement. Pursuant to the debt conversion agreement, Vantage agreed to convert
the aggregate principal amount of $2,100,000, of its indebtedness into an
aggregate of 14,000,000 restricted shares of common stock of the Company. The
conversion amount was used to satisfy the note maturing on July 1, 2008, and the
remaining conversion amount was used to pay down the demand loan. In addition,
the Company issued to Vantage 8,400,000 three year warrants to purchase an
aggregate of 8,400,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock at an
exercise price of $0.60 per share. As of December 31, 2007, the shares of common
stock had not been issued and were recorded as common stock subscribed, until
issuance. The shares were issued on February 7, 2008.
As of
December 31, 2007, the Company was indebted to the Vantage Group Ltd. in the
amount of $1,102,104, including accrued interest for the demand note bearing
interest at 7% per annum. During the quarter ended March 31, 2008, the Company
made payments on the demand note to Vantage for $500,000.
On
September 23, 2008 the Company received a Cancellation of Debt from Vantage
Group Ltd, canceling the remaining balance of the Loan Payable, including all
outstanding interest as of that date. In addition Vantage
Group Ltd surrendered 14,000,000 shares of common stock and 8,400,000 warrants
at $0.60.
F-15
MEDEFILE
INTERNATION, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December
31, 2008
7.
EQUITY
Common
Stock
The
Company has authorized 300,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of
$0.0001 per share. As of December 31, 2008, the Company has 218,493,971 shares
of common stock issued and outstanding.
On
January 20, 2006, the Company paid an in-kind dividend of 14 shares of common
stock for each share of common stock held by shareholders of record at the close
of business on January 16, 2006. There were 11,915,594 shares of common stock
outstanding immediately before the in-kind dividend. A total of 166,818,316
shares of common stock were issued pursuant to the in-kind dividend, and there
were 178,733,910 shares of common stock outstanding immediately after the
in-kind dividend.
On
November 15, 2007, the Company and Vantage, the Company’s largest stockholder
and primary source of funding, entered into a debt conversion
agreement. Pursuant to the debt conversion agreement, Vantage agreed to
convert the aggregate principal amount of $2,100,000 of its indebtedness into an
aggregate of 14,000,000 restricted shares of common stock of the
Company. As of December 31, 2007, the shares of common stock had not been
issued
On
November 16, 2007, pursuant to the terms of a securities purchase agreement the
Company sold subscriptions for 11,000,000 restricted shares of the Company’s
common stock and three year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 6,600,000
restricted shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.60
per share for aggregate proceeds of $1,650,000. As of December 31,
2007, the shares of common stock had not been issued and the funds were recorded
as capital in excess of par value until issuance.
During
the quarter ended March 31, 2008, pursuant to the terms of the Purchase
Agreement, the Company issued and sold 2,000,000 restricted shares of the
Company’s common stock and three year warrants to purchase an aggregate
of 1,200,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise
price of $0.60 per share for aggregate proceeds of $300,000. The
Company claims an exemption from the registration requirements of the Act for
the private placement of these securities pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Act
and/or Regulation D promulgated thereunder since, among other things, these
transactions did not involve a public offering, the investors were accredited
investors and/or qualified institutional buyers, the investors had access to
information about us and their investment, the investors took the securities for
investment and not resale, and the Company took appropriate measures to
restrict the transfer of the securities.
The
Company issued 37,500 shares of common stock to an employee per their employment
agreement during the quarter ended March 31, 2008. The Company recognized
compensation expense of $22,125 based on the closing price of the Company’s
common stock as of the grant date.
On
September 23, 2008, in connection with the Cancellation of Debt Agreement with
Vantage Group (Note 6) 14,000,000 share of restricted common stock, previously
issued on February 27, 2008 were cancelled and returned to the
Company.
On
September 30, 2008 the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of restricted common
stock in exchange for $300,000
On
December 16, 2008 the Company issued 24,722,561 shares of common stock for
amount due of $29402 to employees and consultants. The
market value of the shares issued was $346,116.
F-16
MEDEFILE
INTERNATION, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December
31, 2008
Stock
Options
A summary
of option activity under the Plan as of December 31, 2008, and changes during
the period then ended are presented below:
Options
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
|
|||||||
Outstanding
at December 31, 2005
|
150,000 | $ | 1.17 | |||||
Granted
|
5,660,000 | 0.80 | ||||||
Exercised
|
||||||||
Forfeited
or expired
|
(150,000 | (1.17 | ||||||
Outstanding
at December 31, 2006
|
5,660,000 | 0.80 | ||||||
Issued
|
-- | -- | ||||||
Exercised
|
-- | -- | ||||||
Forfeited
or expired
|
(20,000 | $ | (2.00 | |||||
Outstanding
at December 31, 2007
|
5,640,000 | $ | 0.80 | |||||
Issued
|
-- | -- | ||||||
Excercised
|
-- | -- | ||||||
Forfeited
or Expired
|
-- | -- | ||||||
Outstanding
at December 31, 2008
|
5,640,000 | 0.80 | ||||||
Non-vested
at December 31, 2008
|
-- | $ | 0.80 | |||||
Exercisable
at December 31, 2008
|
5,640,000 | $ | 0.80 |
The
options outstanding as of December 31, 2008 have been segregated for additional
disclosure as follows:
Options
Outstanding
|
Options
Exercisable
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted
|
Average
|
Weighted
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Range
of
|
Average
|
Remaining
|
Average
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Exercise
|
Number
|
Exercise
|
Contractual
|
Number
|
Exercise
|
|||||||||||||||||
Price
|
Outstanding
|
Price
|
Life
|
Exercisable
|
Price
|
|||||||||||||||||
$
|
0.80
|
5,640,000
|
$
|
0.80
|
1.25
|
5,640,000
|
$
|
0.80
|
||||||||||||||
Total
|
5,640,000
|
$
|
0.80
|
1.25
|
5,640,000
|
$
|
0.80
|
At
December 31, 2008, the exercisable and outstanding options had no intrinsic
value. Intrinsic value represents the difference between the company’s closing
stock price on the last trading day of the fiscal period, which was $0.19 and as
of December 31, 2007, and the exercise price multiplied by the number of options
outstanding.
Stock-based
compensation expense recognized during the period is based on the value of the
portion of share-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest during
the period. Share based compensation expense recognized under SFAS 123 (R) for
the year ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was $102,678 and
$2,288,831 respectively.
On
December 16, 2008, the company issued 24,722,561 share of common stock for
payments to employees and independent contractions, the market value of the
shares issued was $351,527.
F-17
MEDEFILE
INTERNATION, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December
31, 2008
Warrants
On June
19, 2006 the Company issued 200,000 warrants to consultants for services to be
provided. The warrants vested in 50,000 increments on June 19, 2006; September
18, 2006, December 17, 2006 and March 17, 2007. The estimated value of the
compensatory warrants granted to non-employees in exchange for services and
financing expenses was determined using the Black-Scholes pricing model and the
following assumptions:
Risk-free
interest rate at grant date
|
4.75
|
%
|
||
Expected
stock price volatility
|
86
|
%
|
||
Expected
dividend payout
|
--
|
|||
Expected
option in life-years
|
4
|
As of
December 31, 2007, all warrants were fully vested. During the quarter ended
March 31, 2008, the Company issued 16,200,000 three year warrants to purchase an
aggregate of 16,200,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock at an
exercise price of $0.60 per share as part of the common stock
sales. On September 23, 2008, in connection with the Vantage
Group Ltd Cancellation of Debt Agreement, 8,400,000 warrants previously
mentioned were cancelled (See Note 8). A summary of the warrants
outstanding and exercisable appears below:
Warrants
Outstanding
|
Warrants
Exercisable
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted
|
Weighted
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Average
|
Weighted
|
Average
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Remaining
|
Average
|
Remaining
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise
|
Number
|
Contractual
|
Exercise
|
Number
|
Contractual
|
||||||||||||||||||
Prices
|
Outstanding
|
Life
(years)
|
Price
|
Exercisable
|
Life
(years)
|
||||||||||||||||||
$
|
3.50
|
50,000
|
1.47
|
$
|
3.50
|
50,000
|
1.47
|
||||||||||||||||
$
|
5.00
|
50,000
|
1.72
|
$
|
5.00
|
50,000
|
1.72
|
||||||||||||||||
$
|
6.50
|
50,000
|
1.97
|
$
|
6.50
|
50,000
|
1.97
|
||||||||||||||||
$
|
8.00
|
50,000
|
2.22
|
$
|
8.00
|
50,000
|
2.22
|
||||||||||||||||
$
|
0.60
|
7,800,000
|
2.00
|
$
|
0.60
|
7,800,000
|
2.00
|
||||||||||||||||
$
|
0.56
|
175,000
|
4.00
|
$
|
0.56
|
175,000
|
4.00
|
||||||||||||||||
8,175,000
|
2.04
|
$
|
0.73
|
8,175,000
|
2.04
|
The
Company awarded 175,000 Common Stock warrants, at an exercise price
of $0.56 per share, to former board members at the quoted stock price
on the effective date of the awards. The warrants have an expiration date of
five years from the issue date and contain provisions for a cash exercise. The
estimated value of the compensatory warrants granted to non-employees in
exchange for services and financing expenses was determined using the
Black-Scholes pricing model and the following assumptions:
Risk-free
interest rate at grant date
|
4.75
|
%
|
||
Expected
stock price volatility
|
155
|
%
|
||
Expected
dividend payout
|
--
|
|||
Expected
option in life-years
|
5
|
F-18
MEDEFILE
INTERNATION, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December
31, 2008
Transactions
involving warrants are summarized as follows:
Number
of Warrants
|
Weighted-Average
Price Per Share
|
||||
Outstanding
at December 31, 2007
|
200,000
|
$
|
5.75
|
||
Granted
|
16,375,000
|
0.60
|
|||
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
|||
Canceled
or expired
|
(8,400,000)
|
0.60
|
|||
Outstanding
at December 31, 2008
|
8,175,000
|
0.73
|
The
estimated value of the compensatory warrants granted to non-employees in
exchange for services and financing expenses was determined using the
Black-Scholes pricing model and the following assumptions:
Risk-free
interest rate at grant date
|
4.75%
|
Expected
stock price volatility
|
86%
|
Expected
dividend payout
|
--
|
Expected
option in life-years
|
4
|
8. INCOME
TAXES
The
Company has adopted Financial Accounting Standard number 109, which requires the
recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax
consequences of events that have been included in the financial statement or tax
returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined
based on the difference between financial statements and tax basis of assets and
liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the
differences are expected to reverse. Temporary differences between taxable
income reported for financial reporting purposes and income tax purposes are
insignificant.
For
income tax reporting purposes, the Company's aggregate unused net operating
losses approximate $4,600,000, expire at various times through 2027, subject to
limitations of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended. The
deferred tax asset related to the carry forward is approximately $1,669,000. The
Company has provided a valuation reserve against the full amount of the net
operating loss benefit, since in the opinion of management based upon the
earning history of the Company, it is more likely than not that the benefits
will not be realized.
9.
COMMITMENTS
Medefile
leases its main office, which is located at 301 Yamato Rd, Boca Raton,
FL 33431, commencing March 01, 2009. Medefile’s previous
location was 240 Cedar Knolls Rd, Cedar Knolls, NJ 07927 , commencing September
2007 and expiring in August 2012. By mutual agreement the lease was cancelled
and Medefile chose Florida for its main office location. With new
business development and more favorable conditions and costs with the transition
to operations in Florida. The current lease is for a term of 24
months.
2009
|
2010
|
|||||
12
Months ending 12/31
|
$
|
34,686
|
$
|
30,720
|
F-19
MEDEFILE
INTERNATION, INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December
31, 2008
On
December 10, 2008, Medefile entered into an employment agreement with Kevin
Hauser pursuant to which Kevin Hauser agreed to continue to serve as the
Company’s Vice President of Sales and New Business Development for a term of
three years. The term of his agreement shall automatically extend for
successive one year periods unless otherwise terminated by the parties in
accordance with the terms of the agreement. Pursuant to his
agreement, Kevin Hauser shall be entitled to receive an annual salary of
$216,000. He shall also be entitled to a discretionary bonus from
time to time during the term of the agreement in an amount determined by the
sole discretion of the Company’s board of directors.
On
December 10, 2008, Medefile entered into an employment agreement with Rachel
Hauser pursuant to which Rachel Hauser agreed to serve as the Company’s Director
of Marketing and Public Relations for a term of three years. The term
of his agreement shall automatically extend for successive one year periods
unless otherwise terminated by the parties in accordance with the terms of the
agreement. Pursuant to his agreement, Kevin Hauser shall be entitled
to receive an annual salary of $216,000. She shall also be entitled
to a discretionary bonus from time to time during the term of the agreement in
an amount determined by the sole discretion of the Company’s board of
directors.
10. MAJOR
CUSTOMERS
For the
years ended December 31, 2008, there was no single customer which accounted for
a majority of the revenues. and for the year ended December 31, 2007, there was
a single customer accounted for approximately 63% of revenues. We do not have a
written agreement with our customers. Therefore, the provision of services to
these customers is provided by us “at will” and the customers may decide not to
use our services at any time.
11.
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On
January 28, 2008 the Company issued 14,027,439 shares of common stock for
amounts due employees and consultants. The share issuance had a market value of
$28,055.
On
January 23, 2009 the Company issued 119,201,668 shares of common stock for
amounts due employees and consultants. The share issuance had a
market value of $214,563.
On
February 20, 2009 the Company issued 30,798,331 shares of common stock for
amounts due employees and consultants. The share issuance had a
market value of $30,798.
On March
04, 2009 the Company issued 92,913,364 shares of common stock for amounts due
employees and consultants. The share issuance had a market value of
$92,913.
On March
16, 2009 the Company issued 45,689,216 shares of common stock for amounts due
employees and consultants. The share issuance had a market value of
$45,689
On March
19, 2009 the Company cancelled 12,010,000 shares of common stock issued in
excess of shares required.
F-20