Everi Holdings Inc. - Quarter Report: 2012 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
x |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
OR
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO
Commission file no 001 32622
GLOBAL CASH ACCESS HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE |
|
20-0723270 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer I.D. No.) |
Incorporation or Organization) |
|
|
|
|
|
3525 EAST POST ROAD, SUITE 120 |
|
|
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA |
|
89120 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(800) 833-7110
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer x |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
As of October 29, 2012 there were 66,596,777 shares of the Registrants $0.001 par value per share common stock outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM 1. UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
GLOBAL CASH ACCESS HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(amounts in thousands, except par value)
(unaudited)
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, | ||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 | ||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
46,940 |
|
$ |
55,535 |
Restricted cash and cash equivalents |
|
200 |
|
455 | ||
Settlement receivables |
|
113,989 |
|
80,246 | ||
Other receivables, net |
|
10,076 |
|
16,885 | ||
Inventory |
|
7,266 |
|
7,087 | ||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
16,564 |
|
15,406 | ||
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements, net |
|
14,357 |
|
15,577 | ||
Goodwill, net |
|
180,152 |
|
180,122 | ||
Other intangible assets, net |
|
33,327 |
|
38,216 | ||
Deferred income taxes, net |
|
106,484 |
|
119,538 | ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total assets |
|
$ |
529,355 |
|
$ |
529,067 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
| ||
Settlement liabilities |
|
$ |
158,438 |
|
$ |
141,827 |
Accounts payable |
|
34,809 |
|
32,223 | ||
Accrued expenses |
|
18,608 |
|
21,159 | ||
Borrowings |
|
126,500 |
|
174,000 | ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total liabilities |
|
338,355 |
|
369,209 | ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 5) |
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
| ||
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 500,000 shares authorized and 87,375 and 85,651 shares issued at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively |
|
87 |
|
86 | ||
Convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 50,000 shares authorized and 0 shares outstanding at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively |
|
- |
|
- | ||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
214,612 |
|
204,735 | ||
Retained earnings |
|
119,216 |
|
97,925 | ||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
2,504 |
|
2,340 | ||
Treasury stock, at cost, 20,714 and 20,686 shares at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively |
|
(145,419) |
|
(145,228) | ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total stockholders equity |
|
191,000 |
|
159,858 | ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
529,355 |
|
$ |
529,067 |
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
GLOBAL CASH ACCESS HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(amounts in thousands, except per share)
(unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 | ||||
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cash advance |
|
$ |
57,520 |
|
$ |
50,913 |
|
$ |
172,557 |
|
$ |
152,036 |
ATM |
|
76,411 |
|
71,044 |
|
233,361 |
|
213,450 | ||||
Check services |
|
6,611 |
|
6,479 |
|
19,731 |
|
19,813 | ||||
Other revenues |
|
9,282 |
|
8,452 |
|
22,705 |
|
21,031 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total revenues |
|
149,824 |
|
136,888 |
|
448,354 |
|
406,330 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cost of revenues |
|
111,373 |
|
106,953 |
|
333,566 |
|
317,900 | ||||
Operating expenses |
|
19,463 |
|
18,529 |
|
55,910 |
|
51,922 | ||||
Amortization |
|
2,650 |
|
1,929 |
|
7,317 |
|
6,250 | ||||
Depreciation |
|
1,695 |
|
1,867 |
|
5,260 |
|
6,201 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Operating income |
|
14,643 |
|
7,610 |
|
46,301 |
|
24,057 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest expense, net of interest income |
|
3,586 |
|
4,414 |
|
12,133 |
|
14,167 | ||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
943 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest expense, net |
|
3,586 |
|
4,414 |
|
12,133 |
|
15,110 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Income before income tax provision |
|
11,057 |
|
3,196 |
|
34,168 |
|
8,947 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Income tax provision |
|
3,977 |
|
1,356 |
|
12,878 |
|
4,356 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income |
|
7,080 |
|
1,840 |
|
21,290 |
|
4,591 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Foreign currency translation |
|
236 |
|
(218) |
|
164 |
|
(191) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
7,316 |
|
$ |
1,622 |
|
$ |
21,454 |
|
$ |
4,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income per share - basic |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income per share - diluted |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic |
|
66,108 |
|
64,712 |
|
65,673 |
|
64,597 | ||||
Diluted |
|
67,601 |
|
64,751 |
|
67,031 |
|
64,708 |
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
GLOBAL CASH ACCESS HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
(amounts in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| |||||
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income |
|
$ |
21,290 |
|
|
$ |
4,591 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Amortization of financing costs |
|
1,081 |
|
|
988 |
| ||
Amortization of intangibles |
|
7,317 |
|
|
6,250 |
| ||
Depreciation |
|
5,260 |
|
|
6,201 |
| ||
Loss on sale or disposal of assets |
|
112 |
|
|
216 |
| ||
Provision for bad debts |
|
2,586 |
|
|
4,016 |
| ||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
- |
|
|
943 |
| ||
Stock-based compensation |
|
3,951 |
|
|
5,238 |
| ||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Settlement receivables |
|
(33,676 |
) |
|
10,266 |
| ||
Other receivables, net |
|
5,682 |
|
|
(829 |
) | ||
Inventory |
|
(6 |
) |
|
(2,575 |
) | ||
Prepaid and other assets |
|
(1,329 |
) |
|
(3,477 |
) | ||
Deferred income taxes |
|
12,556 |
|
|
4,092 |
| ||
Settlement liabilities |
|
16,509 |
|
|
(12,221 |
) | ||
Accounts payable |
|
2,582 |
|
|
505 |
| ||
Accrued expenses |
|
(2,496 |
) |
|
(4,030 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
41,419 |
|
|
20,174 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Purchase of property, equipment, leasehold improvements and other intangibles |
|
(7,353 |
) |
|
(6,227 |
) | ||
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets |
|
448 |
|
|
- |
| ||
Changes in restricted cash and cash equivalents |
|
255 |
|
|
(14 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(6,650 |
) |
|
(6,241 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Repayments against old credit facility |
|
- |
|
|
(208,750 |
) | ||
Securing of new credit facility |
|
- |
|
|
214,000 |
| ||
Issuance costs of new credit facility |
|
(676 |
) |
|
(7,099 |
) | ||
Repayments against new credit facility |
|
(47,500 |
) |
|
(35,000 |
) | ||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
5,946 |
|
|
591 |
| ||
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
(191 |
) |
|
(156 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
(42,421 |
) |
|
(36,414 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
NET EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
(943 |
) |
|
191 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
(8,595 |
) |
|
(22,290 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - Beginning of Period |
|
55,535 |
|
|
60,636 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - End of Period |
|
$ |
46,940 |
|
|
$ |
38,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
11,402 |
|
|
$ |
15,202 |
|
Cash paid for taxes, net of refunds |
|
$ |
267 |
|
|
$ |
336 |
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
GLOBAL CASH ACCESS HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
1. BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Overview
Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. (Holdings) is a holding company, the principal asset of which is the capital stock of Global Cash Access, Inc. (GCA). Unless otherwise indicated, the terms the Company, Holdings, we, us and our refer to Holdings together with its consolidated subsidiaries. Holdings was formed on February 4, 2004 for the purpose of holding all of the outstanding capital stock of GCA and to guarantee the obligations under our senior secured credit facilities.
We are a global provider of cash access and data intelligence services and solutions to the gaming industry. Our services and solutions provide gaming establishment patrons access to cash through a variety of methods, including automated teller machine (ATM) cash withdrawals, credit card cash access transactions, point-of-sale (POS) debit card transactions, check verification and warranty services and money transfers. In addition, we also provide products and services that improve credit decision-making, automate cashier operations and enhance patron marketing activities for gaming establishments. We also sell and service cash access devices such as slot machine ticket redemption and jackpot kiosks to the gaming industry.
The Company owns and operates a credit reporting agency for the gaming industry through a wholly-owned subsidiary, Central Credit, LLC (Central Credit), which provides credit information services and credit reporting history on gaming patrons to various gaming establishments. Central Credit operates in both international and domestic gaming markets. The results of operations of Central Credit have been reflected in other revenues. The Company also owns Western Money Systems (Western Money), a manufacturer of redemption kiosk devices. The results of operations of Western Money have been reflected in other revenues.
In November 2011, we acquired substantially all of the assets of MCA Processing LLC (MCA), a provider of ATM, debit card and credit card cash access services to gaming establishments and also a manufacturer, seller, licensor and servicer of redemption kiosk devices.
Basis of Presentation
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Some of the information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of results for the interim periods have been made. The results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full fiscal year.
These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the annual consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included within the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the 2011 10-K).
Use of Estimates
The Company has made estimates and judgments affecting the amounts reported in these financial statements and the accompanying notes. The actual results may differ from these estimates. These accounting estimates incorporated into the Companys consolidated financial statements include, but are not limited to:
· the estimated reserve for warranty expense associated with our check warranty receivables;
· the valuation and recognition of share-based compensation;
· the valuation allowance on our deferred income tax assets; and
· the estimated cash flows in assessing the recoverability of long-lived assets.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation
The unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements presented include the accounts of Holdings and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Earnings Applicable to Common Stock
Basic earnings per share are calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the dilutive effect of potential common stock resulting from equity grants.
The weighted-average number of common shares outstanding used in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| ||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic(1) |
|
66,108 |
|
64,712 |
|
65,673 |
|
64,597 |
|
Potential dilution from equity grants(2) |
|
1,493 |
|
39 |
|
1,358 |
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - diluted |
|
67,601 |
|
64,751 |
|
67,031 |
|
64,708 |
|
(1) Included in the calculation of weighted average common shares outstanding basic are 70 and 40 and 16 and 44 unvested shares of restricted common stock of Holdings granted in share-based payment transactions for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, that are participating securities because such shares have voting rights as well as the right to participate in dividend distributions made by the Company to its common stockholders.
(2) The potential dilution excludes the weighted average effect of stock options to acquire 5.5 million and 6.9 million and 9.0 million and 8.2 million shares of common stock of Holdings for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, because the application of the treasury stock method, as required, makes them anti-dilutive.
Warranty Receivables
In the check services transactions provided by Central Credit, Central Credit warrants check cashing transactions performed at gaming establishments. If a gaming establishment chooses to have a check warranted, it sends a request to a check warranty service provider asking whether it will warrant the check. Upon approval, the gaming establishment then pays the patron the check amount and deposits the check. If the check is dishonored by the patrons bank, the gaming establishment invokes the warranty and the check warranty service provider purchases the check from the gaming establishment for the full check amount and then pursues collection activities on its own. All amounts paid out to the gaming establishment related to these items result in a warranty receivable from the patron. This amount is recorded in other receivables, net on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. On a monthly basis, Central Credit evaluates the collectability of the outstanding balances and establishes a reserve for the face amount of the expected losses on these receivables. The warranty expense associated with this reserve is included within cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) in the condensed consolidated statements of income. The Company writes off substantially all warranty receivables that are generally older than one year in age.
A summary of the activity for the check warranty reserve for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, is as follows (amounts in thousands):
|
|
Amount |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Balance, December 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
6,756 |
|
|
|
|
| |
Warranty expense provision |
|
2,633 |
| |
Charge offs against reserve |
|
(3,896 |
) | |
|
|
|
| |
Balance, September 30, 2012 |
|
$ |
5,493 |
|
Fair Values of Financial Instruments
The fair value of a financial instrument represents the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based upon relevant market information about the financial instrument.
The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and cash equivalents, other receivables, net, settlement receivables, settlement liabilities, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximates fair value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments. The fair value of GCAs borrowings are estimated based on quoted market prices for the same issue. The fair values of all other financial instruments, including amounts outstanding under the ATM funding agreements approximate their book values as the instruments are short-term in nature or contain market rates of interest.
GCA uses the market approach when measuring the fair value of an asset or liability for recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements categorized within Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Level 1 inputs are quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted market prices that are directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information from market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities to measure fair value. Level 3 inputs indicate that the fair value is determined using pricing inputs that are unobservable for the investment and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the investment. Significant management estimates and judgment are used in the determination of the fair value of Level 3 pricing inputs.
Interest Rate Cap
In conjunction with the terms and conditions of the New Senior Credit Facility, as described in Note 6, GCA purchased a $150.0 million notional amount interest rate cap with an effective date of January 5, 2012 and a term of three years. GCA purchased this interest rate cap to partially reduce the Companys exposure to increases in the London Interbank Offer Rate (LIBOR) above 1.5% during the term of the interest rate cap with respect to its variable rate debt obligations under the New Senior Credit Facility and its obligations under the Contract Cash Solutions Agreement with Wells Fargo. This interest rate cap is recorded in other assets in the balance sheet, and is marked-to-market based on a quoted market price with the effects offset in the income statement. The interest rate cap carrying value and fair value approximate each other and these values are considered insignificant as of September 30, 2012.
The following table presents the fair value and carrying value of GCAs borrowings (amounts in thousands):
|
|
Level of |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
September 30, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
New senior secured credit facility |
|
1 |
|
$ |
128,398 |
|
$ |
126,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
December 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
New senior secured credit facility |
|
1 |
|
$ |
173,565 |
|
$ |
174,000 |
|
Inventory
Inventory consists primarily of finished goods such as redemption kiosk devices, and includes work-in-progress and parts. The cost of inventory includes cost of materials, labor, overhead and freight. Inventory is stated at lower of cost or market accounted for using the average cost method.
Statement of Cash Flows Correction
Subsequent to the issuance of our Interim Quarterly report filed on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011, we determined that our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for this period should have reported a use of cash for the purchase of fixed assets, an investing activity, rather than a use of cash as inventory purchases, an operating activity. As a result, net cash provided by operating activities and net cash used in investing activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 were adjusted from amounts previously reported, as indicated in the table below.
Management has determined that adjusting amounts previously reported for net cash provided by operating activities and net cash used in investing activities in 2011 are not material corrections of the interim financial statements. These amounts were presented correctly in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 12, 2012.
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2011 |
| ||||
|
|
As previously |
|
As corrected |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Changes in inventory |
|
$ |
(5,307) |
|
$ |
(2,575 |
) |
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
17,442 |
|
$ |
20,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Purchase of property, equipment, leasehold improvements and other intangibles |
|
$ |
(3,495) |
|
$ |
(6,227 |
) |
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
$ |
(3,509) |
|
$ |
(6,241 |
) |
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, which provides amendments stating that an entity has the option first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events and circumstances indicates that it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. If, after assessing the totality of events and circumstances, an entity concludes that it is not more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired, then the entity is not required to take further action. However, if an entity concludes otherwise, then it is required to determine the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset and perform the quantitative impairment test by comparing the fair value with the carrying amount in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification 350 - Goodwill and Other. An entity also has the option to bypass the qualitative assessment for any indefinite-lived intangible asset in any period and proceed directly to performing the quantitative impairment test. An entity will be able to resume performing the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period. These amendments are intended to reduce cost and complexity by providing an entity with the option to make a qualitative assessment about the likelihood that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired to determine whether it should perform a quantitative test. The amendments also enhance the consistency of impairment testing guidance among long-lived asset categories by permitting an entity to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to calculate the assets fair value when testing an indefinite-lived intangible asset for impairment, which is equivalent to the impairment testing requirements for other long-lived assets. We will assess the impairment of our intangible assets and determine the most appropriate form of action, whether to perform a qualitative assessment to ascertain the validity of a quantitative measure or to bypass the qualitative assessment and conduct a quantitative impairment test. Adoption of this amended guidance is not expected to have an impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
3. ATM FUNDING AGREEMENTS
The Companys Contract Cash Solutions Agreement with Wells Fargo allows for the Company to utilize funds owned by Wells Fargo to provide the currency needed for normal operating requirements for the Companys ATMs. For the use of these funds, the Company pays Wells Fargo a cash usage fee on the average daily balance of funds utilized multiplied by a contractually defined cash usage rate.
Under this agreement, all currency supplied by Wells Fargo remains the sole property of Wells Fargo at all times until it is dispensed, at which time Wells Fargo obtains an interest in the corresponding settlement receivable. As the cash is never an asset of ours, supplied cash is not reflected on our balance sheet.
In June 2012, the Company and Wells Fargo amended the Contract Cash Solutions Agreement to increase the maximum amount of cash to be provided to GCA from $400.0 million to $500.0 million, and the initial term of the Contract Cash Solutions Agreement was extended from November 30, 2013 until November 30, 2014.
As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the outstanding balances of ATM cash utilized by GCA from Wells Fargo were $327.2 million and $467.8 million, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the cash usage fees incurred by the Company were $0.7 million and $2.5 million and $0.6 million and $1.9 million, respectively, and are reflected as interest expense within the condensed consolidated statements of income.
The Company is responsible for any losses of cash in the ATMs under its agreement with Wells Fargo. The Company is self-insured related to this risk. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company incurred no material losses related to this self-insurance.
Site Funded ATMs
The Company operates ATMs at certain customer gaming establishments where the gaming establishment provides the cash required for the ATM operational needs. GCA is required to reimburse the customer for the amount of cash dispensed from these Site-Funded ATMs. The Site-Funded ATM liability is included within settlement liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets and was $96.7 million and $85.9 million as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.
4. BENEFIT PLANS
In January 2005, the Company adopted the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2005 Plan) to attract and retain the best available personnel, to provide additional incentives to employees, directors and consultants and to promote the success of the Companys business. The 2005 Plan is administered by the Board of Directors but may be administered by our Compensation Committee. The administrator of the 2005 Plan has the authority to select individuals who are to receive options or other equity incentive awards under the 2005 Plan and to specify the terms and conditions of grants of options or other equity incentive awards, the vesting provisions, the term and the exercise price.
Generally, stock options and restricted stock granted under the 2005 Plan (other than those granted to non-employee directors) will vest at a rate of 25% of the shares underlying the option after one year and the remaining shares vest in equal portions over the following 36 months, such that all shares are vested after four years. Unless otherwise provided by the administrator, an option granted under the 2005 Plan generally expires ten years from the date of grant. Stock options are issued at the closing market price on the date of grant.
A summary of stock option award activity under the 2005 Plan as of September 30, 2012 and changes during the nine months ended is as follows:
|
|
Number of |
|
Weighted Average |
|
Weighted |
|
Aggregate |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Balance outstanding - December 31, 2011 |
|
9,227,541 |
|
$ |
6.87 |
|
6.9 |
|
$ |
5,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Granted |
|
2,260,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Exercised |
|
(1,464,507) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Canceled or forfeited |
|
(340,761) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Balance outstanding - September 30, 2012 |
|
9,682,273 |
|
$ |
7.07 |
|
6.8 |
|
$ |
19,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Balance exercisable - September 30, 2012 |
|
5,662,015 |
|
$ |
8.49 |
|
5.4 |
|
$ |
7,578 |
|
The fair value of options was determined as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| ||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
1.0% |
|
2.5% |
|
Expected life of options (in years) |
|
6.3 |
|
6.3 |
|
Expected volatility |
|
62.2% |
|
62.9% |
|
Expected dividend yield |
|
0.0% |
|
0.0% |
|
As of September 30, 2012, there was $10.2 million in unrecognized compensation expense related to options expected to vest. This cost is expected to be recognized on a straight-line basis over a weighted average period of 2.7 years. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company granted options to acquire approximately 2.3 million shares of common stock, received $5.9 million in proceeds from the exercise of options and recorded $3.7 million in non-cash compensation expense related to options granted that are expected to vest. There were no options granted during the three months ended September 30, 2012. The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $3.31. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 were $2.9 million and $5.1 million, respectively.
As of September 30, 2011, there was $8.2 million in unrecognized compensation expense related to options expected to vest. This cost was expected to be recognized on a straight-line basis over a weighted average period of 0.9 years. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company granted options to acquire approximately 2.1 million shares of common stock, received $0.6 million in proceeds from the exercise of options and recorded $5.4 million in non-cash compensation expense related to options granted that are expected to vest.
Restricted Stock
The Company began issuing restricted stock to employees in the first quarter of 2006. The vesting provisions are similar to those applicable to stock options. Because these restricted shares are issued primarily to employees of the Company, many of the shares issued will be withheld by the Company to satisfy the statutory withholding requirements applicable to the restricted stock grants. Therefore, as these awards vest the actual number of shares outstanding as a result of the restricted stock awards is reduced. These shares will vest over a period of four years. There are certain restricted stock shares that have rights to the dividends declared and voting rights, and, therefore, the shares are considered issued and outstanding prior to vesting.
A summary of all non-vested awards for the Companys time-based restricted stock awards as of September 30, 2012 is as follows:
|
|
Shares |
|
Weighted |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Balance outstanding - December 31, 2011 |
|
198,279 |
|
$ |
2.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Granted |
|
65,000 |
|
|
| |
Vested |
|
(126,332) |
|
|
| |
Forfeited |
|
(3,509) |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Balance outstanding - September 30, 2012 |
|
133,438 |
|
$ |
4.35 |
|
As of September 30, 2012, there was $0.5 million in unrecognized compensation expense related to shares of time-based restricted shares expected to vest. This cost is expected to be recognized on a straight-line basis over a weighted average period of 2.6 years. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, there were 126,332 shares of time-based restricted shares vested, and we recorded $0.3 million in non-cash compensation expense related to restricted stock granted that is expected to vest. The total fair value of shares vested during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 were $0.3 million and $1.0 million, respectively.
As of September 30, 2011, there was $0.6 million in unrecognized compensation expense related to shares of time-based restricted shares expected to vest. This cost was expected to be recognized on a straight-line basis over a weighted average period of 0.5 years. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, there were 201,991 shares of time-based restricted shares vested, and we recorded a credit of $0.1 million in non-cash compensation expense related to the restricted stock granted that is expected to vest.
5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation Claims and Assessments
Automated Systems America, Inc.
On July 7, 2010, an action was commenced by Automated Systems America, Inc. in the United States District Court, Central District of California, against Holdings, GCA and certain current employees of GCA. The complaint seeks a declaratory judgment of invalidity, unenforceability and non-infringement of certain patents owned by the Company and alleges antitrust violations of Section 2 of the Sherman Act, unfair competition violations under the Lanham Act and tortuous interference and defamation per se. The plaintiff seeks damages in excess of $2.0 million, punitive damages, and a trebling of damages associated with the allegations under Section 2 of the Sherman Act. On March 3, 2011, the Company filed a motion to dismiss this action. In February 2012, the District Court entered an order granting the Companys motion to dismiss this action without prejudice, allowing the plaintiff to file a new complaint if it elected to do so. The plaintiff subsequently filed an amended complaint alleging substantially similar claims to those contained in the original complaint, and the Company has filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint. The Company has not accrued any amounts related to this matter as the Company does not believe it is probable that a loss has been incurred and has meritorious defenses and will vigorously defend this action.
We are also subject to a variety of other claims and suits that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of our business. We do not believe the liabilities, if any, which may ultimately result from the outcome of such matters, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse impact on our financial position, liquidity or results of operations.
6. BORROWINGS
On March 1, 2011, GCA, together with its sole stockholder, Holdings entered into a Credit Agreement (the Credit Agreement) with certain lenders, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Administrative Agent and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as Syndication Agent. The Credit Agreement provides for a $210.0 million term loan facility and a $35.0 million revolving credit facility (the New Senior Credit Facility). The revolving credit facility includes provisions for the issuance of up to $10.0 million of letters of credit and up to $5.0 million in swing-line loans. We used the proceeds from the New Senior Credit Facility to repay all outstanding indebtedness under our existing senior secured credit facility under the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and to defease our senior subordinated notes.
The Credit Agreement also contains an increase option permitting GCA to arrange with existing lenders and/or new lenders for them to provide up to an aggregate of $50.0 million in additional term loan commitments. All $210.0 million of available borrowings under the term loan facility were borrowed concurrent with the establishment of the New Senior Credit Facility. Once repaid, no amounts under the term loan facility may be re-borrowed. In addition, $4.0 million of available borrowings under the revolving credit facility were borrowed concurrent with the establishment of the New Senior Credit Facility. Once repaid, amounts under the revolving credit facility may be re-borrowed.
The term loan requires principal repayments of one quarter of 1% of the aggregate initial principal amount of term loans, adjusted for any non-mandatory prepayments per quarter, as well as annual mandatory prepayment provisions based on an excess cash flow sweep equal to a fixed percentage of excess cash flow (as defined in the Credit Agreement). The remaining principal is due on the maturity date, March 1, 2016. GCA may prepay the loans and terminate the commitments at any time after the first year, without premium or penalty, subject to certain qualifications set forth in the Credit Agreement. Furthermore, the Credit Agreement contains mandatory prepayment provisions which, under certain circumstances, such as asset or equity sales, obligate GCA to apply defined portions of its cash flow to prepayment of the New Senior Credit Facility.
Borrowings under the New Senior Credit Facility bear interest at either (x) a specified base rate plus a 4.50% margin, or (y) LIBOR plus a 5.50% margin. The base rate minimum is 2.50% and the LIBOR minimum is 1.50%. Interest in respect of base rate loans is payable quarterly in arrears and interest in respect of LIBOR loans is payable in arrears at the end of the applicable interest period and every three months in the case of interest periods in excess of three months. Interest is also payable at the time of repayment of any loans and at maturity. As of September 30, 2012, we had $126.5 million of outstanding indebtedness under the New Senior Credit Facility, all of which is outstanding under the term loan facility.
The weighted average interest rate, inclusive of the applicable margin of 550 basis points, was 7.0%. We also had no amounts outstanding under our letter of credit sub facility that is part of our revolving credit facility as of September 30, 2012. The New Senior Credit Facility is unconditionally guaranteed by Holdings and each direct and indirect domestic subsidiary of GCA. All amounts owing under the New Senior Credit Facility are secured by a first priority perfected security interest in all stock (but only 65% of the stock of foreign subsidiaries), other equity interests and promissory notes owned by GCA and a first priority perfected security interest in all other tangible and intangible assets owned by GCA and the guarantors.
On September 24, 2012, the Company entered into an amendment to its Credit Agreement. The amendment modifies certain financial covenants contained in the Credit Agreement with respect to the Companys ability to make capital expenditures, dividends and stock repurchases. Specifically, the Company, together with its subsidiaries, may make an additional $15.0 million of capital expenditures, as such term is defined in the Credit Agreement, during the remainder of the term of the Credit Agreement, which amount is in addition to any other permitted capital expenditures under the Credit Agreement. In addition, the Credit Agreement provided that the Company could make certain dividends or stock repurchases if, among other things, the Companys total leverage ratio (as calculated under the Credit Agreement) was less than 2.0 to 1. The amendment provides that the Company may now make certain dividends and stock repurchases if, among other things, its total leverage ratio is less than 2.5 to 1.
The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, financial covenants, representations and warranties and events of defaults. As of September 30, 2012, the Company is in compliance with the required covenants.
7. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Michael Rumbolz, who serves as a member of our Board of Directors, also serves as a member of the board of directors of Affinity Gaming LLC (Affinity Gaming). The Company provides various cash access products and services to Affinity Gaming that are insignificant to the Companys net income. Mr. Rumbolz receives both cash and equity compensation from Affinity Gaming in consideration for serving on the board of directors of Affinity Gaming, however, none of this consideration is tied in any manner to the Companys performance or obligations under its cash access agreements with Affinity Gaming. In addition, Mr. Rumbolz was not involved in the negotiation of the Companys cash access agreements with Affinity Gaming.
In October 2012, the Company entered into a long-term lease agreement related to office space for its corporate headquarters. Voit Real Estate Services (Voit) acted as the Companys broker in connection with this transaction. Kevin J. Higgins is an Executive Vice President of Voit, and is the brother of Mary E. Higgins, our Chief Financial Officer. The total estimated rental payments owing by the Company under the lease agreement total $11.8 million and Voit is entitled to receive approximately $0.4 million as compensation for acting as the Companys broker.
8. INCOME TAX
The Companys effective income tax rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 was 36.0% and 37.7% respectively, both of which were greater than the statutory federal rate of 35.0% due in part to state taxes and the non-deductible, non-cash compensation expenses related to incentive stock options. The Companys effective income tax rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 was 42.4% and 48.7% respectively, both of which were greater than the statutory federal rate of 35.0% due in part to state taxes, the non-deductible, non-cash compensation expenses related to incentive stock options and the cancellation or forfeiture of non-qualified stock options.
The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance. As of September 30, 2012, there has been no material change to the balance of unrecognized tax benefits reported at December 31, 2011.
9. SEGMENT INFORMATION
Operating segments are components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or decision-making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Companys chief operating decision-making group consists of the Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer. The operating segments are reviewed separately because each represents products or services that can be, and often are, marketed and sold separately to our customers.
The Company operates in three distinct business segments: (1) cash advance, (2) ATM and (3) check services. These segments are monitored separately by management for performance against its internal forecast and are consistent with the Companys internal management reporting. Other lines of business, none of which exceed the quantitative thresholds for segment reporting, include Western Money, credit reporting services and Casino Marketing Services, among others.
The Company does not allocate depreciation and amortization expenses to the business segments. Certain corporate overhead expenses have been allocated to the segments for identifiable items related to such segments or based on a reasonable methodology.
The Companys business is predominantly domestic, with no specific regional concentrations and no significant assets in foreign locations.
Major Customers
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, none of our customers had combined revenues from all segments equal to or exceeding 10.0%. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, our five largest customers accounted for approximately 32.8% and 31.9% and 29.1% and 29.1%, respectively, of our total revenue.
The accounting policies of the operating segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies.
The tables below present the results of operations by operating segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively (amounts in thousands):
|
|
Cash |
|
|
|
Check |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
Advance |
|
ATM |
|
Services |
|
Other |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Revenues |
|
$ |
57,520 |
|
$ |
76,411 |
|
$ |
6,611 |
|
$ |
9,282 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
149,824 |
|
Operating income |
|
15,785 |
|
7,951 |
|
3,822 |
|
4,673 |
|
(17,588) |
|
14,643 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Revenues |
|
$ |
50,913 |
|
$ |
71,044 |
|
$ |
6,479 |
|
$ |
8,452 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
136,888 |
|
Operating income |
|
7,789 |
|
8,659 |
|
3,579 |
|
4,393 |
|
(16,810) |
|
7,610 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Revenues |
|
$ |
172,557 |
|
$ |
233,361 |
|
$ |
19,731 |
|
$ |
22,705 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
448,354 |
|
Operating income |
|
48,388 |
|
25,620 |
|
11,017 |
|
11,563 |
|
(50,287) |
|
46,301 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Revenues |
|
$ |
152,036 |
|
$ |
213,450 |
|
$ |
19,813 |
|
$ |
21,031 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
406,330 |
|
Operating income |
|
23,375 |
|
27,157 |
|
11,168 |
|
10,029 |
|
(47,672) |
|
24,057 |
|
The table below presents total assets by operating segment as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively (amounts in thousands):
|
|
September 30, 2012 |
|
December 31, 2011 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash Advance |
|
$ |
169,133 |
|
$ |
164,515 |
|
ATM |
|
117,925 |
|
98,418 |
| ||
Check services |
|
33,842 |
|
37,231 |
| ||
Other |
|
35,231 |
|
39,570 |
| ||
Corporate |
|
173,224 |
|
189,333 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Assets |
|
$ |
529,355 |
|
$ |
529,067 |
|
10. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Board of Directors of the Company has authorized and approved a new share repurchase program granting the Company the authority to repurchase up to $40.0 million of outstanding Company common stock over a two year period, which is expected to commence in the first quarter of 2013. The Company intends to finance the share repurchases with cash on hand. The repurchase program authorizes the Company to buy its common stock from time to time through open market, privately negotiated or other transactions, including pursuant to trading plans established in accordance with Rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or by a combination of such methods. The share repurchase program is subject to prevailing market conditions and other considerations and may be suspended or discontinued at any time, and supersedes all other outstanding share repurchase programs of the Company.
In October 2012, the Company entered into a long-term lease agreement related to office space for its corporate headquarters. The total estimated rental payments owing by the Company under the lease agreement total $11.8 million.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Our Managements Discussion and Analysis of our Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) begins with an overview of our business which includes our business goals, certain trends, risks and challenges. We then discuss our results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 as compared to the same period for 2011, respectively, including any recently issued accounting pronouncements, if applicable. This is followed by a description of our liquidity and capital resources, including discussions about sources and uses of cash, our borrowings, deferred tax asset, other liquidity needs and off-balance sheet arrangements. We conclude with a discussion of critical accounting policies and their impact on our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
You should read the following discussion together with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes to those financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K (our 2011 10-K). When reviewing our MD&A, you should also refer to the description of our Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates in our 2011 10-K because understanding these policies and estimates is important in order to fully understand our reported financial results and our business outlook for future periods. In addition to historical information, this discussion contains forward-looking statements as defined in the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In this context, forward-looking statements often address our expected future business and financial performance, and often contain words such as expect, anticipate, intend, plan, believe, seek, or will. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or assumed, including, but not limited to, the following: the timing and the extent of a recovery in the gaming industry, if any; gaming establishment and patron preferences; national and international economic conditions; changes in gaming regulatory, card association and statutory requirements; regulatory and licensing difficulties; competitive pressures; operational limitations; gaming market contraction; changes to tax laws; uncertainty of litigation outcomes; interest rate fluctuations; inaccuracies in underlying operating assumptions; unanticipated expenses or capital needs; technological obsolescence; and employee turnover. If any of these assumptions prove to be incorrect, the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements regarding our future results of operations are unlikely to be realized. Additional factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are included under the heading Risk Factors. These factors include, but are not limited to, those set forth in our press releases, reports and other filings made with the SEC. These cautionary statements qualify all of our forward-looking statements, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual future results to differ materially from those presently anticipated due to a variety of factors, including those discussed in Item 1A of our 2011 10-K.
Overview
We are a global provider of cash access and data intelligence services and solutions to the gaming industry. Our services and solutions provide gaming establishment patrons access to cash through a variety of methods, including Automated Teller Machine (ATM) cash withdrawals, credit card cash access transactions, point-of-sale (POS) debit card transactions, check verification and warranty services and money transfers. In addition, we also provide products and services that improve credit decision-making, automate cashier operations and enhance patron marketing activities for gaming establishments. We also sell and service cash access devices such as slot machine ticket redemption and jackpot kiosks to the gaming industry.
Trends
Our strategic planning and forecasting processes include the consideration of economic and industry-wide trends that may impact our business. We have identified the more material positive and negative trends affecting our business as the following:
· |
Although the gaming sector in the United States has experienced revenue declines over the last several years, in 2012, it has stabilized, and modestly improved, as compared to the last several years. Gaming activity continues to expand into more domestic and international markets. |
|
|
· |
The implementation of the Durbin Amendment in October 2011, under the Federal Reserve Boards Final Rule that imposes caps on the amount of the debit card interchange fees, and the second quarter 2012 implementation by the card associations of a reduction in the interchange fees paid by issuing banks on ATM transactions, continues to have a material impact on our financial performance during 2012. This is due to the decrease in the amount of interchange expense that we are required to pay on both PIN-based and signature-based debit card transactions and the decrease in revenue on our ATM transactions. We believe that more changes are likely to be imposed as the industry continues to respond to these significant changes. |
|
|
· |
There continues to be a migration from the use of traditional paper checks and cash to electronic payments. |
· |
The Company is facing increased competition from smaller competitors in the gaming cash access market and may face additional competition from gaming equipment manufacturers and systems providers. |
|
|
· |
The cash access industry in the gaming sector has become increasingly competitive and is having an adverse effect on the Companys operating margins with respect to new customers and existing customers that have renewed their cash access agreements with the Company. |
|
|
· |
There is increasing governmental oversight related to the cost of transaction processing and related fees to the consumer. We expect the financial services and payments industries to respond to these legislative acts by changing other fees and costs, which may negatively impact our business in the future. |
Results of Operations
Three months ended September 30, 2012 compared to three months ended September 30, 2011
The following table presents our unaudited condensed consolidated results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively (dollars in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
September 30, 2012 |
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
Sep-12 vs Sep-11 |
| |||||||||
|
|
$ |
|
% |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
$ Variance |
|
% Var |
| |||
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Cash advance |
|
$ |
57,520 |
|
38.4% |
|
$ |
50,913 |
|
37.2% |
|
$ |
6,607 |
|
13% |
|
ATM |
|
76,411 |
|
51.0% |
|
71,044 |
|
51.9% |
|
5,367 |
|
8% |
| |||
Check services |
|
6,611 |
|
4.4% |
|
6,479 |
|
4.7% |
|
132 |
|
2% |
| |||
Other revenues |
|
9,282 |
|
6.2% |
|
8,452 |
|
6.2% |
|
830 |
|
10% |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total revenues |
|
149,824 |
|
100.0% |
|
136,888 |
|
100.0% |
|
12,936 |
|
9% |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Cost of revenues |
|
111,373 |
|
74.3% |
|
106,953 |
|
78.1% |
|
4,420 |
|
4% |
| |||
Operating expenses |
|
19,463 |
|
13.0% |
|
18,529 |
|
13.5% |
|
934 |
|
5% |
| |||
Amortization |
|
2,650 |
|
1.8% |
|
1,929 |
|
1.4% |
|
721 |
|
37% |
| |||
Depreciation |
|
1,695 |
|
1.1% |
|
1,867 |
|
1.4% |
|
(172) |
|
(9)% |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Operating income |
|
14,643 |
|
9.8% |
|
7,610 |
|
5.6% |
|
7,033 |
|
92% |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net interest expense |
|
3,586 |
|
2.4% |
|
4,414 |
|
3.2% |
|
(828) |
|
(19)% |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Income before income tax provision |
|
11,057 |
|
7.4% |
|
3,196 |
|
2.4% |
|
7,861 |
|
246% |
| |||
Income tax provision |
|
3,977 |
|
2.7% |
|
1,356 |
|
1.0% |
|
2,621 |
|
193% |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net income |
|
$ |
7,080 |
|
4.7% |
|
$ |
1,840 |
|
1.4% |
|
$ |
5,240 |
|
285% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Other data (unaudited): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Aggregate dollar amount processed (in billions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Cash advance |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
9% |
|
ATM |
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
|
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
14% |
|
Check warranty |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
0% |
|
Number of transactions completed (in millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Cash advance |
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
8% |
| |||
ATM |
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
6% |
| |||
Check warranty |
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
- |
|
0% |
|
Total Revenues
Total revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2012 were $149.8 million, an increase of $12.9 million, or 9%, as compared to the same period in the prior year. The primary driver of the increase in revenue was due to the MCA asset acquisition.
Cash advance revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2012 were $57.5 million, an increase of $6.6 million, or 13%, as compared to the same period in the prior year. This was primarily due to the revenues derived from the contracts acquired in the MCA asset acquisition coupled with modest growth in our base businesses.
ATM revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2012 were $76.4 million, an increase of $5.4 million, or 8%, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2011. The growth in the quarter was primarily due to the revenues derived from the contracts acquired in the MCA asset acquisition and an increase in surcharge revenues.
In addition, the ATM segment was impacted by a $2.9 million decrease in revenue attributable to the recent reduction in interchange reimbursement rates that were implemented by various card associations in the second quarter 2012.
Check services revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2012 were $6.6 million, an increase of $0.1 million, or 2%, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2011.
Other revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2012 were $9.3 million, an increase of $0.8 million, or 10%. This was primarily due to the sales of redemption devices by Western Money.
We provide our cash access products and related services almost exclusively to the gaming establishments for the purpose of enabling gaming patrons to access cash. As a result, our business depends on consumer demand for gaming.
Costs and Expenses
Costs of revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2012 were $111.4 million, an increase of $4.4 million, or 4%, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2011. This increase was primarily due to the increase in revenues discussed previously; however, the other significant impact on our cost of revenues was a decrease in the interchange costs associated with the implementation of the Durbin Amendment in October of 2011.
Operating expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2012 were $19.5 million, an increase of $0.9 million, or 5%, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2011. The increase in operating expenses is primarily due to higher payroll and related costs, partially offset by a reduction in professional fees and consulting costs.
Depreciation and amortization expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2012 were $4.3 million, an increase of $0.5 million, or 14%, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2011. This was primarily due to an increase in amortization expenses associated with the MCA acquisition and amortization of capitalized internal software costs; partially offset by a decrease in depreciation related to certain fixed assets being fully depreciated.
Primarily as a result of the factors described above, operating income for the three months ended September 30, 2012 was $14.6 million, an increase of $7.0 million, or 92%, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2011. The operating margin for the Company increased to 10% for the three months ended September 30, 2012 from 6% for the same period in 2011.
Interest expense, net, was $3.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012, a decrease of $0.8 million, or 19%, as compared to the same period in 2011. This decrease was related to a $1.0 million reduction in interest charges due to the lower outstanding debt balance. This decrease in interest expense was partially offset by a $0.1 million increase in interest charges related to a higher average outstanding balance on the vault cash supplied by Wells Fargo and a slightly higher average cash usage rate and an interest charge associated with the change in fair value of the interest rate cap during the quarter of approximately $0.1 million.
Income tax expense for the three months ended September 30, 2012 was $4.0 million, an increase of $2.6 million, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2011. The increase in income tax expense for the three months ended September 30, 2012 was directly related to the increase in income from operations before income tax expense of $7.9 million. The provision for income tax reflected an effective income tax rate of 36.0% for the three months ended September 30, 2012, which was greater than the statutory federal rate of 35.0% due in part to state taxes and the non-deductible, non-cash compensation expenses related to incentive stock options. The provision for income tax reflected an effective income tax rate of 42.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2011, which was greater than the statutory federal rate of 35.0% due in part to state taxes, the non-deductible, non-cash compensation expenses related to incentive stock options and the cancellation or forfeiture of non-qualified stock options.
Primarily as a result of the foregoing, net income was $7.1 million, an increase of $5.2 million, or 285%, for the three months ended September 30, 2012, as compared to the same period in 2011.
Nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to nine months ended September 30, 2011
The following table presents our unaudited condensed consolidated results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively (dollars in thousands):
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
September 30, 2012 |
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
Sep-12 vs Sep-11 |
| |||||||||
|
|
$ |
|
% |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
$ Variance |
|
% Var |
| |||
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Cash advance |
|
$ |
172,557 |
|
38.5% |
|
$ |
152,036 |
|
37.4% |
|
$ |
20,521 |
|
13% |
|
ATM |
|
233,361 |
|
52.0% |
|
213,450 |
|
52.5% |
|
19,911 |
|
9% |
| |||
Check services |
|
19,731 |
|
4.4% |
|
19,813 |
|
4.9% |
|
(82) |
|
(0)% |
| |||
Other revenues |
|
22,705 |
|
5.1% |
|
21,031 |
|
5.2% |
|
1,674 |
|
8% |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total revenues |
|
448,354 |
|
100.0% |
|
406,330 |
|
100.0% |
|
42,024 |
|
10% |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Cost of revenues |
|
333,566 |
|
74.4% |
|
317,900 |
|
78.2% |
|
15,666 |
|
5% |
| |||
Operating expenses |
|
55,910 |
|
12.5% |
|
51,922 |
|
12.8% |
|
3,988 |
|
8% |
| |||
Amortization |
|
7,317 |
|
1.6% |
|
6,250 |
|
1.6% |
|
1,067 |
|
17% |
| |||
Depreciation |
|
5,260 |
|
1.2% |
|
6,201 |
|
1.5% |
|
(941) |
|
(15)% |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Operating income |
|
46,301 |
|
10.3% |
|
24,057 |
|
5.9% |
|
22,244 |
|
92% |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Interest expense, net of interest income |
|
12,133 |
|
2.7% |
|
14,167 |
|
3.5% |
|
(2,034) |
|
(14)% |
| |||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
- |
|
0.0% |
|
943 |
|
0.2% |
|
(943) |
|
(100)% |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net interest expense |
|
12,133 |
|
2.7% |
|
15,110 |
|
3.7% |
|
(2,977) |
|
(20)% |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Income before income tax provision |
|
34,168 |
|
7.6% |
|
8,947 |
|
2.2% |
|
25,221 |
|
282% |
| |||
Income tax provision |
|
12,878 |
|
2.9% |
|
4,356 |
|
1.1% |
|
8,522 |
|
196% |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net income |
|
$ |
21,290 |
|
4.7% |
|
$ |
4,591 |
|
1.1% |
|
$ |
16,699 |
|
364% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Other data (unaudited): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Aggregate dollar amount processed (in billions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Cash advance |
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
|
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
12% |
|
ATM |
|
$ |
10.5 |
|
|
|
$ |
9.2 |
|
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
14% |
|
Check warranty |
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
0% |
|
Number of transactions completed (in millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Cash advance |
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
9% |
| |||
ATM |
|
56.0 |
|
|
|
52.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
8% |
| |||
Check warranty |
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
- |
|
0% |
|
Total Revenues
Total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 were $448.4 million, an increase of $42.0 million, or 10%, as compared to the same period in the prior year. The primary driver of the increase in revenue was due to the MCA asset acquisition coupled with modest growth in our base business for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, as compared to the same period of 2011.
Cash advance revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 were $172.6 million, an increase of $20.5 million, or 13%, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2011. This was primarily due to the revenues derived from the contracts acquired in the MCA asset acquisition coupled with modest growth in our base business.
ATM revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 were $233.4 million, an increase of $19.9 million, or 9%, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The growth in the quarter was primarily due to the revenues derived from the contracts acquired in the MCA asset acquisition and an increase in surcharge revenues. In addition, the ATM segment was impacted by a $5.5 million decrease in revenue attributable to the recent reduction in interchange reimbursement rates that were implemented by various card associations in the second quarter 2012.
Check services revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 were $19.7 million, consistent with the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
Other revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 were $22.7 million, an increase of $1.7 million, or 8%. This was primarily due to the sales of redemption devices by Western Money.
We provide our cash access products and related services almost exclusively to the gaming establishments for the purpose of enabling gaming patrons to access cash. As a result, our business depends on consumer demand for gaming.
Costs and Expenses
Costs of revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 were $333.6 million, an increase of $15.7 million, or 5%, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2011. This increase was primarily due to the additional revenues discussed previously; however, the other significant impact on our cost of revenues was a decrease in the interchange costs associated with the implementation of the Durbin Amendment in October of 2011.
Operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 were $55.9 million, an increase of $4.0 million, or 8%, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The increase in operating expenses was primarily due to higher payroll and related costs, ATM processing and direct operating costs, franchise taxes and repairs and maintenance expenses; partially offset by a reduction in professional fees and consulting costs and stock-based compensation expenses.
Depreciation and amortization expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 were $12.6 million, consistent with the nine months ended September 30, 2011. This was primarily due to a decrease in depreciation related to certain fixed assets being fully depreciated, partially offset by an increase in amortization expenses associated with the MCA asset acquisition and amortization of capitalized internal software costs.
Primarily as a result of the factors described above, operating income for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $46.3 million, an increase of $22.2 million, or 92%, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The operating margin for the Company increased to 10% for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 from 6% for the same period in 2011.
Interest expense, net, was $12.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, a decrease of $3.0 million, or 20%, as compared to same period in 2011. The 2011 nine month figures included approximately $1.8 million that was associated with the debt refinancing in March of 2011, ($0.9 million loss on early extinguishment of debt and $0.8 million of defeasance costs related to the debt), and the remaining savings in 2012 came from a $2.6 million reduction in interest charges due to the lower outstanding debt balance. This decrease in interest expense was partially offset by a $0.6 million increase in interest charges related to a higher average outstanding balance on the vault cash supplied by Wells Fargo and a slightly higher average cash usage rate and an interest charge associated with the change in fair value of the interest rate cap acquired during the nine month period of approximately $0.8 million.
Income tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $12.9 million, an increase of $8.5 million, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The increase in income tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was directly related to the increase in income from operations before income tax expense of $25.2 million. The provision for income tax reflected an effective income tax rate of 37.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, which was greater than the statutory federal rate of 35.0% due in part to state taxes and the non-deductible, non-cash compensation expenses related to incentive stock options. The provision for income tax reflected an effective income tax rate of 48.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, which was greater than the statutory federal rate of 35.0% due in part to state taxes, the non-deductible, non-cash compensation expenses related to incentive stock options and the cancellation or forfeiture of non-qualified stock options.
Primarily as a result of the foregoing, net income was $21.3 million, an increase of $16.7 million, or 364%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, as compared to the same period in 2011.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, which provides amendments stating that an entity has the option first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events and circumstances indicates that it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. If, after assessing the totality of events and circumstances, an entity concludes that it is not more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired, then the entity is not required to take further action. However, if an entity concludes otherwise, then it is required to determine the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset and perform the quantitative impairment test by comparing the fair value with the carrying amount in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 350 - Goodwill and Other. An entity also has the option to bypass the qualitative assessment for any indefinite-lived intangible asset in any period and proceed directly to performing the quantitative impairment test. An entity will be able to resume performing the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period. These amendments are intended to reduce cost and complexity by providing an entity with the option to make a qualitative assessment about the likelihood that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired to determine whether it should perform a quantitative test.
The amendments also enhance the consistency of impairment testing guidance among long-lived asset categories by permitting an entity to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to calculate the assets fair value when testing an indefinite-lived intangible asset for impairment, which is equivalent to the impairment testing requirements for other long-lived assets. We will assess the impairment of our intangible assets and determine the most appropriate form of action, whether to perform a qualitative assessment to ascertain the validity of a quantitative measure or to bypass the qualitative assessment and conduct a quantitative impairment test. Adoption of this amended guidance is not expected to have an impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview
Information about our financial position as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is presented below:
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Balance sheet data (at end of period): |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
46,940 |
|
$ |
55,535 |
|
Total assets |
|
529,355 |
|
529,067 |
| ||
Total borrowings |
|
126,500 |
|
174,000 |
| ||
Stockholders equity |
|
191,000 |
|
159,858 |
| ||
Cash Resources
Our cash balance, cash flows and credit facilities are expected to be sufficient to meet our recurring operating commitments and to fund our planned capital expenditures. Cash and cash equivalents at September 30, 2012 included cash in non-U.S. jurisdictions of approximately $5.9 million. Generally, these funds are available for operating and investment purposes within the jurisdiction in which they reside but may be subject to taxation in the U.S. upon repatriation.
We provide cash access and related services to our customers. These services involve the movement of funds between the various parties associated with cash access transactions, and this activity results in a balance due to us at the end of each business day that we recoup over the next few business days. The balances due to us are included in settlement receivables. As of September 30, 2012, approximately $114.0 million was due to us, and we received these funds in early October 2012. As of September 30, 2012, we had approximately $158.4 million in settlement liabilities due to our customers for these cash access services that were paid in early October 2012.
Sources and Uses of Cash
The following table sets forth a summary of our cash flow activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively (in thousands), and should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows:
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| |||||
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash flow data: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
41,419 |
|
|
$ |
20,174 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(6,650 |
) |
|
(6,241 |
) | ||
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
(42,421 |
) |
|
(36,414 |
) | ||
Net effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents |
|
(943 |
) |
|
191 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(8,595 |
) |
|
(22,290 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
55,535 |
|
|
60,636 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
46,940 |
|
|
$ |
38,346 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities was approximately $41.4 million and $20.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, an increase of $21.2 million. This was primarily due to an increase in net income of $16.7 million and the impact from the change in operating assets and liabilities of $8.1 million; partially offset by the adjustments to reconcile net income to cash of $3.6 million.
Net cash used in investing activities was approximately $6.6 million and $6.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, an increase of $0.4 million. This was primarily due to additional capital expenditures of approximately $1.1 million, partially offset by a reduction in restricted cash and cash equivalents of $0.3 million and the proceeds from sale of fixed assets of $0.4 million.
Net cash used in financing activities was approximately $42.4 million and $36.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, an increase of $6.0 million. This was primarily due to additional principal payments of $12.5 million on our existing credit facility, partially offset by an increase of $5.4 million in proceeds from the exercise of stock options.
Deferred Tax Asset
At September 30, 2012, we had a net deferred income tax asset of $106.5 million. We recognized a deferred tax asset upon our conversion from a limited liability company to a corporation on May 14, 2004. Prior to that time, all tax attributes flowed through to the members of the limited liability company. The principal component of the deferred tax asset is a difference between our assets for financial accounting and tax purposes. This difference results from a significant balance of acquired goodwill of approximately $687.4 million that was generated as part of the conversion to a corporation plus approximately $97.6 million in pre-existing goodwill carried over from periods prior to the conversion. Both of these assets are recorded for tax purposes but not for accounting purposes. This asset is amortized over 15 years for tax purposes, resulting in annual pretax income being $52.3 million lower for tax purposes than for financial accounting purposes. At an estimated blended domestic effective tax rate of 36.1%, this results in tax payments being approximately $18.9 million less than the annual provision for income taxes shown on the income statement for financial accounting purposes, or the amount of the annual provision, if less. There is an expected aggregate of $124.4 million in cash savings over the remaining life of the portion of our deferred tax asset related to the conversion. This deferred tax asset may be subject to certain limitations. We believe that it is more likely than not that we will be able to utilize our deferred tax asset. However, the utilization of this tax asset is subject to many factors beyond our control including our earnings, a change of control of the Company and future estimations of earnings.
Other Liquidity Needs and Resources
The Companys Contract Cash Solutions Agreement with Wells Fargo allows for the Company to utilize funds owned by Wells Fargo to provide the currency needed for normal operating requirements for the Companys ATMs. For the use of these funds, the Company pays Wells Fargo a cash usage fee on the average daily balance of funds utilized multiplied by a contractually defined cash usage rate. Under this agreement, all currency supplied by Wells Fargo remains the sole property of Wells Fargo at all times until it is dispensed, at which time Wells Fargo obtains an interest in the corresponding settlement receivable. As the cash is never an asset of ours, supplied cash is not reflected on our balance sheet.
In June 2012, the Company and Wells Fargo amended the Contract Cash Solutions Agreement to increase the maximum amount of cash to be provided to GCA from $400.0 million to $500.0 million, and the initial term of the Contract Cash Solutions Agreement was extended from November 30, 2013 until November 30, 2014.
As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the outstanding balances of ATM cash utilized by GCA from Wells Fargo were $327.2 million and $467.8 million, respectively.
Under the terms of the Contract Cash Solutions Agreement, we pay a monthly cash usage fee based upon the product of the average daily dollars outstanding in all ATMs multiplied by a contractually defined cash usage rate. This cash usage rate is determined by an applicable LIBOR plus a mutually agreed upon margin.
We are exposed to interest rate risk to the extent that the applicable LIBOR increases, subject to the interest rate cap purchased in January 2012.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the cash usage fees incurred by the Company were $0.7 million and $2.5 million and $0.6 million and $1.9 million, respectively, and are reflected as interest expense within the condensed consolidated statements of income.
The Company is responsible for any losses of cash in the ATMs under its agreement with Wells Fargo. The Company is self-insured related to this risk. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company incurred no material losses related to this self-insurance.
We also need supplies of cash to support our foreign operations. For some foreign jurisdictions, such as the United Kingdom, applicable law and cross-border treaties allow us to transfer funds between our domestic and foreign operations efficiently. For other foreign jurisdictions, we must rely on the supply of cash generated by our operations in those foreign jurisdictions, and the cost of repatriation is prohibitive. For example, Global Cash Access (Canada), Inc. (GCA Canada), the subsidiary through which we operate in Canada, generates a supply of cash that is sufficient to support its operations, and all cash generated through such operations is expected to be retained by GCA Canada. As we expand our operations into new foreign jurisdictions, we must rely on treaty-favored cross-border transfers of funds, the supply of cash generated by our operations in those foreign jurisdictions or alternate sources of working capital.
On September 24, 2012, the Company entered into an amendment to its Credit Agreement. The amendment modifies certain financial covenants contained in the Credit Agreement with respect to the Companys ability to make capital expenditures, dividends and stock repurchases. Specifically, the Company, together with its subsidiaries, may make an additional $15.0 million of capital expenditures, as such term is defined in the Credit Agreement, during the remainder of the term of the Credit Agreement, which amount is in addition to any other permitted capital expenditures under the Credit Agreement. In addition, the Credit Agreement provided that the Company could make certain dividends or stock repurchases if, among other things, the Companys total leverage ratio (as calculated under the Credit Agreement) was less than 2.0 to 1. The amendment provides that the Company may now make certain dividends and stock repurchases if, among other things, its total leverage ratio is less than 2.5 to 1.
We believe that borrowings available under the New Senior Credit Facility, together with our anticipated operating cash flows, will be adequate to meet our anticipated future requirements for working capital, capital expenditures and scheduled interest payments. Although no additional financing is currently contemplated, we may seek, if necessary or otherwise advisable and to the extent permitted under the terms of the New Senior Credit Facility, additional financing through bank borrowings or public or private debt or equity financings. We cannot ensure that additional financing, if needed, will be available to us, or that, if available, the financing will be on terms favorable to us. The terms of any additional debt or equity financing that we may obtain in the future could impose additional limitations on our operations and/or management structure. We also cannot ensure that the estimates of our liquidity needs are accurate or that new business developments or other unforeseen events will not occur, resulting in the need to raise additional funds.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Wells Fargo Contract Cash Solutions Agreement. We obtain currency to meet the normal operating requirements of our domestic ATMs pursuant to the Contract Cash Solutions Agreement with Wells Fargo. Under this agreement, all currency supplied by Wells Fargo remains the sole property of Wells Fargo at all times until it is dispensed, at which time Wells Fargo obtains an interest in the corresponding settlement receivable. Because it is never an asset of ours, supplied cash is not reflected on our balance sheet. At September 30, 2012, the total currency obtained from Wells Fargo pursuant to this agreement was $327.2 million. Because Wells Fargo obtains an interest in our settlement receivables, there is no liability corresponding to the supplied cash reflected on our balance sheet. The fees that we pay to Wells Fargo for cash usage pursuant to this agreement are reflected as interest expense in our financial statements. Foreign gaming establishments supply the currency needs for the ATMs located on their premises.
Effects of Inflation
Our monetary assets, consisting primarily of cash and receivables, are not significantly affected by inflation. Our non-monetary assets, consisting primarily of our deferred tax asset, goodwill and other intangible assets, are not affected by inflation. We believe that replacement costs of equipment, furniture and leasehold improvements will not materially affect our operations. However, the rate of inflation affects our operating expenses, such as those for salaries and benefits, armored carrier expenses, telecommunications expenses and equipment repair and maintenance services, which may not be readily recoverable in the financial terms under which we provide our cash access products and services to gaming establishments and their patrons.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect our reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities in our consolidated financial statements.
The SEC has defined a companys critical accounting policies as the ones that are most important to the portrayal of the financial condition and results of operations, and which require management to make its most difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain.
There were no material changes to the critical accounting policies and estimates discussed in the Companys audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011, included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 12, 2012.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
In the normal course of business, we are exposed to foreign currency exchange risk. We operate and conduct business in foreign countries and, as a result, are exposed to movements in foreign currency exchange rates. Our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk related to our foreign operations is not material to our results of operations, cash flows or financial position. At present, we do not hedge this risk, but continue to evaluate such foreign currency translation risk exposure.
Wells Fargo supplies us with currency needed for normal operating requirements of our domestic ATMs pursuant to the Contract Cash Solutions Agreement. Under the terms of this agreement, we pay a monthly cash usage fee based upon the product of the average daily dollars outstanding in all such ATMs multiplied by a margin that is tied to LIBOR. We are, therefore, exposed to interest rate risk to the extent that the applicable LIBOR increases. As of September 30, 2012, the currency supplied by Wells Fargo pursuant to this agreement was $327.2 million.
Based upon the average outstanding amount of currency to be supplied by Wells Fargo pursuant to this agreement during the three months ended September 30, 2012, which was $314.3 million, each 1% increase in the applicable LIBOR would have a $3.1 million impact on income before taxes over a 12-month period. Foreign gaming establishments supply the currency needs for the ATMs located on their premises.
Our Credit Facility bears interest at rates that can vary over time. We have the option of having interest on the outstanding amounts under these credit facilities paid based on a base rate or based on LIBOR. We have historically elected to pay interest based on LIBOR, and we expect to continue to pay interest based on LIBOR of various maturities. As of September 30, 2012, the weighted average interest rate, inclusive of the applicable margin of 550 basis points, was 7.0%. Based upon the outstanding balance on the Credit Facility of $126.5 million on September 30, 2012, each 1% increase in the applicable LIBOR would have a $1.3 million impact on interest expense over a 12-month period.
In January 2012, we entered into a three year $150.0 million interest rate cap agreement pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Credit Facility, which partially mitigates our exposure to any increases to LIBOR to the extent LIBOR rises above 1.5% during the term of the interest rate cap agreement.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As required by Rule 13a-15(b) promulgated under the Exchange Act, our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the design and operating effectiveness as of September 30, 2012 of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act. Based on this evaluation our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2012.
We believe the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in such reports is accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Automated Systems America, Inc.
On July 7, 2010, an action was commenced by Automated Systems America, Inc. in the United States District Court, Central District of California, against Holdings, GCA and certain current employees of GCA. The complaint seeks a declaratory judgment of invalidity, unenforceability and non-infringement of certain patents owned by the Company and alleges antitrust violations of Section 2 of the Sherman Act, unfair competition violations under the Lanham Act and tortuous interference and defamation per se. The plaintiff seeks damages in excess of $2.0 million, punitive damages, and a trebling of damages associated with the allegations under Section 2 of the Sherman Act. On March 3, 2011, the Company filed a motion to dismiss this action. The Company maintains insurance that may provide for reimbursement of some of the expenses associated with this action. In February 2012, the District Court entered an order granting the Companys motion to dismiss this action without prejudice, allowing the plaintiff to file a new complaint if it elected to do so. The plaintiff subsequently filed an amended complaint alleging substantially similar claims to those contained in the original complaint, and the Company has filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint. The Company has not accrued any amounts related to this matter as the Company does not believe it is probable that a loss has been incurred and has meritorious defenses and will vigorously defend this action.
We are also subject to a variety of other claims and suits that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe the liabilities, if any, which may ultimately result from the outcome of such matters, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse impact on our financial position, liquidity or results of operations.
A small number of investment funds beneficially control a significant percentage of the voting power of our common stock, which may allow them to significantly influence matters requiring stockholder approval and, in certain cases, may raise conflicts of interest issues.
As of March 1, 2012, five investment funds beneficially owned 38.6% of our common stock, including BlackRock, which beneficially owned 8.3% of our common stock. In addition, Patrick Olson, one of the members of our Board of Directors, is a member of the Global Executive Committee of BlackRock. Although we have no voting agreements or arrangements with any of the funds, and, to our knowledge, the funds are not affiliated with one another, each of the funds, individually or collectively, could be in a position to substantially influence the outcome of any corporate actions requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and mergers, acquisitions and other significant corporate transactions. These investment funds may delay, or prevent, a change of control from occurring even if the change of control could appear to benefit the stockholders. These investment funds, and Mr. Olson in his role with BlackRock, may also have interests that differ from yours and may vote in a way with which you disagree and which may be adverse to your interests.
There are a number of factors that may affect the Companys business and financial results or stock price. A complete description of these factors is set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. Other than the risk factor stated above, there have been no material changes to those factors in the nine months ended September 30, 2012.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
ISSUER PURCHASES AND WITHHOLDING OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Dollar |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares |
|
Value of Shares that |
| ||
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Average |
|
Purchased as Part of |
|
May Yet Be Purchased |
| ||
|
|
Shares |
|
Share |
|
Publicly Announced |
|
Under the Plans or |
| ||
|
|
Withheld |
|
Withheld |
|
Plans or Programs |
|
Programs |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Rule 10b-18 Repurchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
7/1/12 7/31/12 |
|
- |
(1) |
- |
|
- |
(1) |
$ |
17,324,976 |
(4) | |
8/1/12 8/31/12 |
|
- |
(1) |
- |
|
- |
(1) |
$ |
17,324,976 |
(4) | |
9/1/12 9/30/12 |
|
- |
(1) |
- |
|
- |
(1) |
$ |
17,324,976 |
(4) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Sub-Total |
|
- |
(1) |
- |
|
- |
(1) |
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Tax Withholdings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
7/1/12 7/31/12 |
|
3,031 |
(2) |
$ |
7.46 |
(3) |
3,031 |
(2) |
$ |
- |
(4) |
8/1/12 8/31/12 |
|
3,017 |
(2) |
6.57 |
(3) |
3,017 |
(2) |
$ |
- |
(4) | |
9/1/12 9/30/12 |
|
3,299 |
(2) |
7.79 |
(3) |
3,299 |
(2) |
$ |
- |
(4) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Sub-Total |
|
9,347 |
(2) |
7.29 |
(3) |
9,347 |
(2) |
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total |
|
9,347 |
|
$ |
7.29 |
|
9,347 |
|
|
|
(1) |
For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, there were no repurchases of common stock pursuant to the Rule 10b-18 share repurchases authorization that we publicly announced on February 16, 2010. Our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $25.0 million worth of common stock. The share buyback program does not obligate us to repurchase any specific number of shares and can be suspended or terminated at any time. |
|
|
(2) |
Represents the shares of common stock that were withheld from restricted stock awards to satisfy the minimum applicable tax withholding obligations incident to the vesting of such restricted stock awards. There are no limitations on the number of shares of common stock that may be withheld from restricted stock awards to satisfy the minimum tax withholding obligations incident to the vesting of restricted stock awards. |
|
|
(3) |
Represents the average price per share of shares of common stock withheld from restricted stock awards on the date of withholding. |
|
|
(4) |
Represents the maximum approximate dollar value of shares of common stock available for repurchase pursuant to Rule 10b-18 share repurchase authorization at the end of the stated period. As of September 30, 2012, the maximum dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased pursuant to the Rule 10b-18 share buyback program is $17.3 million. However, there are no limitations on the number of shares of common stock that may be withheld from restricted stock awards to satisfy the minimum applicable tax withholding obligations incident to the vesting of such restricted stock awards. |
On November 6, 2012, Scott Betts, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, advised the Board of Directors of the Company of his intention to retire as Chief Executive Officer of the Company effective December 31, 2012. Mr. Betts will remain an employee of the Company in a strategic planning role through March 2013. Mr. Betts will continue to serve as a Board member of the Company following his retirement as Chief Executive Officer of the Company. David Lopez, President of the Company, will assume the role of Chief Executive Officer upon Mr. Betts retirement.
Patrick Olson, a director of the Company, advised the Company that he will be resigning from the Board of Directors of the Company as of December 31, 2012.
Exhibit No. |
|
Description. |
|
|
|
10.1* |
|
Employment Agreement with Robert Myhre, effective October 1, 2012. |
|
|
|
10.2* |
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement for Robert Myhre. |
|
|
|
10.3* |
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Robert Myhre. |
|
|
|
31.1* |
|
Certification of Scott Betts, Chief Executive Officer of Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. dated November 7, 2012 in accordance with Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2* |
|
Certification of Mary E. Higgins, Chief Financial Officer of Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. dated November 7, 2012 in accordance with Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1* |
|
Certification of Scott Betts, Chief Executive Officer of Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. dated November 7, 2012 in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2* |
|
Certification of Mary E. Higgins, Chief Financial Officer of Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. dated November 7, 2012 in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
101.INS** |
|
XBRL Instance Document. |
|
|
|
101.SCH** |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
|
|
|
101.CAL** |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
101.DEF** |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
101.LAB** |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
101.PRE** |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
* |
Filed herewith. |
|
|
** |
Pursuant to applicable securities laws and regulations, the Company is deemed to have complied with the reporting obligation relating to the submission of interactive data files in such exhibits and is not subject to liability under any anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws as long as the Company has made a good faith attempt to comply with the submission requirements and promptly amends the interactive data files after becoming aware that the interactive data files fails to comply with the submission requirements. Users of this data are advised that, pursuant to Rule 406T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under these sections. |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
November 7, 2012 |
|
|
GLOBAL CASH ACCESS HOLDINGS, INC. |
| ||
(Date) |
|
|
(Registrant) |
| ||
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Mary E. Higgins | |
|
|
|
|
|
Mary E. Higgins | |
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer | |
|
|
|
|
|
(For the Registrant and as | |
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Financial Officer) | |
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. |
|
Description. |
|
|
|
10.1* |
|
Employment Agreement with Robert Myhre, effective October 1, 2012. |
|
|
|
10.2* |
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement for Robert Myhre. |
|
|
|
10.3* |
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Robert Myhre. |
|
|
|
31.1* |
|
Certification of Scott Betts, Chief Executive Officer of Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. dated November 7, 2012 in accordance with Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2* |
|
Certification of Mary E. Higgins, Chief Financial Officer of Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. dated November 7, 2012 in accordance with Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1* |
|
Certification of Scott Betts, Chief Executive Officer of Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. dated November 7, 2012 in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2* |
|
Certification of Mary E. Higgins, Chief Financial Officer of Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. dated November 7, 2012 in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
101.INS** |
|
XBRL Instance Document. |
|
|
|
101.SCH** |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
|
|
|
101.CAL** |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
101.DEF** |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
101.LAB** |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
101.PRE** |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
* |
Filed herewith. |
|
|
** |
Pursuant to applicable securities laws and regulations, the Company is deemed to have complied with the reporting obligation relating to the submission of interactive data files in such exhibits and is not subject to liability under any anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws as long as the Company has made a good faith attempt to comply with the submission requirements and promptly amends the interactive data files after becoming aware that the interactive data files fails to comply with the submission requirements. Users of this data are advised that, pursuant to Rule 406T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under these sections. |