Finward Bancorp - Quarter Report: 2016 June (Form 10-Q)

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016 or

Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

For the transition period from to ______

Commission File Number: 0-26128

NorthWest Indiana Bancorp

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Indiana	35-1927981
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
or organization)

9204 Columbia Avenue
Munster, Indiana	46321
(Address of principal executive offices)	(ZIP code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (219) 836-4400

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller Reporting Company x

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

There were 2,860,157 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, without par value, outstanding at July 22, 2016.

NorthWest Indiana Bancorp

Index

			Page
			Number
PART I	Financial Information

	Item 1.	Unaudited Financial Statements

		Consolidated Balance Sheets, June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015	1

		Consolidated Statements of Income, Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015	2

		Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015	3

		Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity, Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015	3

		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015	4

		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	5-19

	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	20-30

	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	31

	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	31

PART II.	Other Information

SIGNATURES			33

EXHIBITS
	31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
	31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
	32.1	Section 1350 Certifications
	101	XBRL Interactive Data File

NorthWest Indiana Bancorp

Consolidated Balance Sheets

	June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2016			December 31,
	(unaudited)			2015
ASSETS

Cash and non-interest bearing deposits in other financial institutions	$	12,593		$	9,915
Interest bearing deposits in other financial institutions		17,385			773
Federal funds sold		1,347			845

Total cash and cash equivalents		31,325			11,533

Securities available-for-sale		243,233			233,350
Loans held-for-sale		1,837			2,435
Loans receivable		586,127			571,898
Less: allowance for loan losses		(7,337	)		(6,953	)
Net loans receivable		578,790			564,945
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		3,000			3,000
Accrued interest receivable		3,001			3,000
Premises and equipment		18,840			18,942
Foreclosed real estate		1,116			1,590
Cash value of bank owned life insurance		18,663			18,426
Goodwill		2,792			2,561
Other assets		6,793			5,111

Total assets	$	909,390		$	864,893

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Deposits:
Non-interest bearing	$	99,273		$	100,031
Interest bearing		649,640			614,844
Total		748,913			714,875
Repurchase agreements		17,585			18,508
Borrowed funds		39,001			39,493
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		17,430			11,108

Total liabilities		822,929			783,984

Stockholders' Equity:
Preferred stock, no par or stated value;
10,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding		-			-
Common stock, no par or stated value; 10,000,000 shares authorized;
shares issued: June 30, 2016 - 2,916,195		-			-
December 31, 2015 - 2,907,455
shares outstanding: June 30, 2016 - 2,860,157
December 31, 2015 - 2,851,417
Additional paid-in capital		4,586			4,519
Accumulated other comprehensive income		3,979			1,406
Retained earnings		77,896			74,984

Total stockholders' equity		86,461			80,909

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	909,390		$	864,893

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

NorthWest Indiana Bancorp

Consolidated Statements of Income

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	June 30,				June 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Interest income:
Loans receivable
Real estate loans	$	5,514	$	4,709	$	11,190	$	9,230
Commercial loans		907		855		1,789		1,669
Consumer loans		6		5		12		9
Total loan interest		6,427		5,569		12,991		10,908
Securities		1,523		1,505		3,068		3,019
Other interest earning assets		2		11		8		20

Total interest income		7,952		7,085		16,067		13,947

Interest expense:
Deposits		441		345		870		679
Repurchase agreements		25		17		49		33
Borrowed funds		126		113		253		228

Total interest expense		592		475		1,172		940

Net interest income		7,360		6,610		14,895		13,007
Provision for loan losses		288		198		584		485

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		7,072		6,412		14,311		12,522

Noninterest income:
Fees and service charges		716		711		1,379		1,343
Wealth management operations		434		387		857		816
Gain on sale of loans held-for-sale, net		291		354		541		734
Gain on sale of securities, net		165		137		418		530
Increase in cash value of bank owned life insurance		121		106		237		210
Gain on sale of foreclosed real estate, net		42		23		74		24
Other		1		14		2		25

Total noninterest income		1,770		1,732		3,508		3,682

Noninterest expense:
Compensation and benefits		3,071		3,198		6,633		6,371
Occupancy and equipment		964		885		1,868		1,786
Data processing		338		313		663		628
Federal deposit insurance premiums		131		109		268		243
Marketing		130		145		244		258
Other		1,308		1,020		2,371		2,016

Total noninterest expense		5,942		5,670		12,047		11,302

Income before income tax expenses		2,900		2,474		5,772		4,902
Income tax expenses		658		498		1,286		999

Net income	$	2,242	$	1,976	$	4,486	$	3,903

Earnings per common share:
Basic	$	0.78	$	0.69	$	1.57	$	1.37
Diluted	$	0.78	$	0.69	$	1.57	$	1.37

Dividends declared per common share	$	0.28	$	0.27	$	0.55	$	0.52

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

NorthWest Indiana Bancorp

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	June 30,						June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015

Net income	$	2,242		$	1,976		$	4,486		$	3,903

Net change in net unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale:
Unrealized gains/(losses) arising during the period		1,956			(3,038	)		4,315			(1,874	)
Less: reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income		(165	)		(137	)		(418	)		(530	)
Net securities gain/(loss) during the period		1,791			(3,175	)		3,897			(2,404	)
Tax effect		(608	)		1,080			(1,323	)		822
Net of tax amount		1,183			(2,095	)		2,574			(1,582	)

Net change in unrealized gain on postretirement benefit:
Amortization of net actuarial gain		(1	)		-			(1	)		(1	)
Net loss during the period		(1	)		-			(1	)		(1	)
Net of tax amount		(1	)		-			(1	)		(1	)
Other comprehensive income, net of tax		1,182			(2,095	)		2,573			(1,583	)

Comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax	$	3,424		$	(119	)	$	7,059		$	2,320

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

NorthWest Indiana Bancorp

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	June 30,						June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015

Balance at beginning of period	$	83,802		$	77,912		$	80,909		$	76,165

Comprehensive income:
Net income		2,242			1,976			4,486			3,903
Net unrealized gains/(losses) on securities available-for-sale, net of reclassifications and tax effects		1,183			(2,095	)		2,574			(1,582	)
Amortization of unrecognized gain on postretirement benefit		(1	)		-			(1	)		(1	)
Comprehensive income, net of tax		3,424			(119	)		7,059			2,320

Stock based compensation expense		36			25			67			47
Cash dividends		(801	)		(769	)		(1,574	)		(1,483	)

Balance at end of period	$	86,461		$	77,049		$	86,461		$	77,049

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

NorthWest Indiana Bancorp

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(unaudited)

	Six Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	June 30,
	2016			2015
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	4,486		$	3,903
Adjustments to reconcile net income to
net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities:
Origination of loans for sale		(18,798	)		(28,058	)
Sale of loans originated for sale		19,934			29,963
Depreciation and amortization, net of accretion		1,264			1,115
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights		27			41
Stock based compensation expense		67			47
Gain on sale of securities, net		(418	)		(530	)
Gain on sale of loans held-for-sale, net		(541	)		(734	)
Gain on sale of foreclosed real estate, net		(74	)		(24	)
Provision for loan losses		584			485
Net change in:
Interest receivable		1			(61	)
Other assets		(3,295	)		(1,120	)
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		6,322			3,606
Total adjustments		5,073			4,730
Net cash - operating activities		9,559			8,633

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from maturities and pay downs of securities available-for-sale		23,898			20,688
Proceeds from sales of securities available-for-sale		15,613			19,183
Purchase of securities available-for-sale		(45,612	)		(49,424	)
Net change in loans receivable		(14,412	)		(19,064	)
Proceeds from sale of Federal Home Loan Bank stock		-			1,055
Purchase of premises and equipment, net		(629	)		(386	)
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed real estate, net		531			321
Change in cash value of bank owned life insurance		(237	)		(210	)
Net cash - investing activities		(20,848	)		(27,837	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net change in deposits		34,038			34,188
Proceeds from FHLB advances		6,000			-
Repayment of FHLB advances		(15,000	)		(4,000	)
Change in other borrowed funds		7,585			3,600
Dividends paid		(1,542	)		(1,422	)
Net cash - financing activities		31,081			32,366
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		19,792			13,162
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		11,533			21,963
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	31,325		$	35,125

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	1,177		$	943
Income taxes		1,055			1,000
Noncash activities:
Transfers from loans to foreclosed real estate	$	56		$	104
Transfers to goodwill		231			-

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

NorthWest Indiana Bancorp

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 - Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of NorthWest Indiana Bancorp (the “Bancorp”), its wholly-owned subsidiaries NWIN Risk Management, Inc. (a captive insurance subsidiary) and Peoples Bank SB (the “Bank”), and the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiaries, Peoples Service Corporation, NWIN, LLC, NWIN Funding, Incorporated, and Columbia Development Company, LLC. The Bancorp’s business activities include being a holding company for the Bank as well as a holding company for NWIN Risk Management, Inc. The Bancorp’s earnings are primarily dependent upon the earnings of the Bank. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with instructions for Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not include all disclosures required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete presentation of consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, the consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly the consolidated balance sheets of the Bancorp as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, and the consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, and changes in stockholders’ equity for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 and consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. The income reported for the six month period ended June 30, 2016 is not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

Note 2 - Use of Estimates

Preparing financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period, as well as the disclosures provided. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Estimates associated with the allowance for loan losses, fair values of foreclosed real estate, loan servicing rights, investment securities, deferred tax assets, goodwill, accrued withdrawal liability for the defined benefit plan, and the status of contingencies are particularly susceptible to material change in the near term.

Note 3 – Securities

The estimated fair value of available-for-sale securities and the related gross unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income were as follows:

	(Dollars in thousands)
			Gross		Gross			Estimated
	Cost		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
	Basis		Gains		Losses			Value
June 30, 2016
Money market fund	$	1,603	$	-	$	-		$	1,603
U.S. government sponsored entities		32,144		58		-			32,202
Collateralized mortgage obligations and residential mortgage-backed securities		106,705		2,853		(22	)		109,536
Municipal securities		91,729		6,289		-			98,018
Collateralized debt obligations		5,056		-		(3,182	)		1,874
Total securities available-for-sale	$	237,237	$	9,200	$	(3,204	)	$	243,233

	(Dollars in thousands)
			Gross		Gross			Estimated
	Cost		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
	Basis		Gains		Losses			Value
December 31, 2015
Money market fund	$	525	$	-	$	-		$	525
U.S. government sponsored entities		17,496		1		(66	)		17,431
Collateralized mortgage obligations and residential mortgage-backed securities		118,628		1,021		(476	)		119,173
Municipal securities		89,506		3,986		(5	)		93,487
Collateralized debt obligations		5,096		-		(2,362	)		2,734
Total securities available-for-sale	$	231,251	$	5,008	$	(2,909	)	$	233,350

The estimated fair value of available-for-sale debt securities at June 30, 2016, by contractual maturity, were as follows. Securities not due at a single maturity date, primarily collateralized mortgage obligations and residential mortgage-backed securities, are shown separately.

	(Dollars in thousands)
	Available-for-sale
	Estimated
	Fair		Tax-Equivalent
June 30, 2016	Value		Yield (%)
Due in one year or less	$	1,974		6.84
Due from one to five years		25,343		2.30
Due from five to ten years		34,553		4.26
Due over ten years		71,827		4.49

Collateralized mortgage obligations and residential mortgage-backed securities		109,536		2.39
Total	$	243,233		3.30

Sales of available-for-sale securities were as follows for the six months ended:

	(Dollars in thousands)
	June 30,			June 30,
	2016			2015

Proceeds	$	15,613		$	19,183
Gross gains		436			532
Gross losses		(18	)		(2	)

Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) balances, net of tax, related to available-for-sale securities, were as follows:

	(Dollars in thousands)
	Unrealized gain/(loss)
Ending balance, December 31, 2015	$	1,378
Current period change		2,574
Ending balance, June 30, 2016	$	3,952

Securities with carrying values of approximately $31.3 million and $31.1 million were pledged as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, as collateral for repurchase agreements, public funds, and for other purposes as permitted or required by law.

Securities with gross unrealized losses at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 not recognized in income are as follows:

	(Dollars in thousands)
	Less than 12 months				12 months or longer					Total
	Estimated				Estimated					Estimated
	Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
	Value		Losses		Value		Losses			Value		Losses
June 30, 2016
U.S. government sponsored entities	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-		$	-	$	-
Collateralized mortgage obligations and residential mortgage-backed securities		-		-		2,570		(22	)		2,570		(22	)
Municipal securities		-		-		-		-			-		-
Collateralized debt obligations		-		-		1,874		(3,182	)		1,874		(3,182	)
Total temporarily impaired	$	-	$	-	$	4,444	$	(3,204	)	$	4,444	$	(3,204	)
Number of securities								6					6

	(Dollars in thousands)
	Less than 12 months					12 months or longer					Total
	Estimated					Estimated					Estimated
	Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
	Value		Losses			Value		Losses			Value		Losses
December 31, 2015
U.S. government sponsored entities	$	9,429	$	(66	)	$	-	$	-		$	9,429	$	(66	)
Collateralized mortgage obligations and residential mortgage-backed securities		39,386		(232	)		8,045		(244	)		47,431		(476	)
Municipal securities		1,512		(5	)		-		-			1,512		(5	)
Collateralized debt obligations		-		-			2,734		(2,362	)		2,734		(2,362	)
Total temporarily impaired	$	50,327	$	(303	)	$	10,779	$	(2,606	)	$	61,106	$	(2,909	)
Number of securities				37					11					48

Unrealized losses on securities have not been recognized into income because the securities are of high credit quality or have undisrupted cash flows. Management has the intent and ability to hold those securities for the foreseeable future, and the decline in fair value is largely due to changes in interest rates and volatility in securities markets. The fair values are expected to recover as the securities approach maturity.

Note 4 - Loans Receivable

Loans receivable are summarized below:

	(Dollars in thousands)
	June 30, 2016			December 31, 2015
Loans secured by real estate:
Residential, including home equity	$	211,063		$	213,951
Commercial real estate, construction & land development, and other dwellings		274,079			259,478
Commercial participations purchased		299			310
Total loans secured by real estate		485,441			473,739
Consumer		527			535
Commercial business		72,361			68,813
Government		28,388			29,062
Subtotal		586,717			572,149
Less:
Net deferred loan origination fees		(184	)		(174	)
Undisbursed loan funds		(406	)		(77	)
Loan receivables	$	586,127		$	571,898

(Dollars in thousands)	Residential Real Estate, Including Home Equity			Consumer			Commercial Real Estate, Construction & Land Development, and Other Dwellings			Commercial Participations Purchased			Commercial Business		Government			Total

The Bancorp's activity in the allowance for loan losses, by loan segment, is summarized below for the three months ended June 30, 2016:

Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning Balance	$	1,731		$	44		$	4,601		$	13		$	747	$	72		$	7,208
Charge-offs		(164	)		(8	)		-			-			-		-			(172	)
Recoveries		-			1			-			-			12		-			13
Provisions		203			-			6			(4	)		87		(4	)		288
Ending Balance	$	1,770		$	37		$	4,607		$	9		$	846	$	68		$	7,337

The Bancorp's activity in the allowance for loan losses, by loan segment, is summarized below for the three months ended June 30, 2015:

Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning Balance	$	1,965		$	21		$	3,694		$	10		$	815	$	81		$	6,586
Charge-offs		(73	)		(9	)		(5	)		-			-		-			(87	)
Recoveries		-			-			-			-			2		-			2
Provisions		(364	)		19			527			9			13		(6	)		198
Ending Balance	$	1,528		$	31		$	4,216		$	19		$	830	$	75		$	6,699

The Bancorp's activity in the allowance for loan losses, by loan segment, is summarized below for the six months ended June 30, 2016:

Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning Balance	$	1,711		$	38		$	4,422		$	14		$	698	$	70		$	6,953
Charge-offs		(212	)		(12	)		-			-			-		-			(224	)
Recoveries		-			4			-			-			20		-			24
Provisions		271			7			185			(5	)		128		(2	)		584
Ending Balance	$	1,770		$	37		$	4,607		$	9		$	846	$	68		$	7,337

The Bancorp's activity in the allowance for loan losses, by loan segment, is summarized below for the six months ended June 30, 2015:

Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning Balance	$	1,878		$	17		$	3,645		$	13		$	733	$	75		$	6,361
Charge-offs		(101	)		(14	)		(59	)		-			-		-			(174	)
Recoveries		-			1			22			-			4		-			27
Provisions		(249	)		27			608			6			93		-			485
Ending Balance	$	1,528		$	31		$	4,216		$	19		$	830	$	75		$	6,699

(Dollars in thousands)	Residential Real Estate, Including Home Equity		Consumer		Commercial Real Estate, Construction & Land Development, and Other Dwellings		Commercial Participations Purchased		Commercial Business		Government		Total

The Bancorp's allowance for loan losses impairment evaluation and loan receivables are summarized below at June 30, 2016:

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	138	$	-	$	6	$	9	$	263	$	-	$	416

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	1,632	$	37	$	4,601	$	-	$	583	$	68	$	6,921

LOAN RECEIVABLES
Ending balance	$	210,880	$	528	$	274,080	$	299	$	71,952	$	28,388	$	586,127

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	2,252	$	-	$	374	$	88	$	500	$	-	$	3,214

Ending balance: purchased credit impaired individually evaluated for impairment	$	1,364	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	1,364

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	207,264	$	528	$	273,706	$	211	$	71,452	$	28,388	$	581,549

The Bancorp's allowance for loan losses impairment evaluation and loan receivables are summarized below at December 31, 2015:

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	149	$	-	$	171	$	14	$	22	$	-	$	356

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	1,562	$	38	$	4,251	$	-	$	676	$	70	$	6,597

LOAN RECEIVABLES
Ending balance	$	213,755	$	535	$	259,479	$	310	$	68,757	$	29,062	$	571,898

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	227	$	-	$	5,298	$	92	$	96	$	-	$	5,713

Ending balance: purchased credit impaired individually evaluated for impairment	$	1,691	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	1,691

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	211,837	$	535	$	254,181	$	218	$	68,661	$	29,062	$	564,494

The Bancorp's credit quality indicators are summarized below at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

	(Dollars in thousands)
	Corporate Credit Exposure - Credit Risk Portfolio By Creditworthiness Category
	Commercial Real Estate, Construction & Land Development, and Other Dwellings				Commercial Participations Purchased				Commercial Business				Government
Loan Grades	2016		2015		2016		2015		2016		2015		2016		2015
2 Moderate risk	$	259	$	270	$	-	$	-	$	6,795	$	6,526	$	-	$	-
3 Above average acceptable risk		3,379		7,136		-		-		8,099		4,313		1,000		-
4 Acceptable risk		131,448		129,353		194		199		31,530		31,735		27,388		29,062
5 Marginally acceptable risk		91,221		74,342		-		-		12,389		12,225
6 Pass/monitor		41,417		38,337		17		19		11,333		11,774		-		-
7 Special mention (watch)		5,949		4,707		-		-		742		601		-		-
8 Substandard		407		5,334		88		92		1,064		1,583		-		-
Total	$	274,080	$	259,479	$	299	$	310	$	71,952	$	68,757	$	28,388	$	29,062

	(Dollars in thousands)
	Consumer Credit Exposure - Credit Risk Profile Based On Payment Activity
	Residential Real Estate, Including Home Equity				Consumer
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Performing	$	206,433	$	209,583	$	528	$	535
Non-performing		4,447		4,172		-		-
Total	$	210,880	$	213,755	$	528	$	535

The Bancorp has established a standard loan grading system to assist management, lenders and review personnel in their analysis and supervision of the loan portfolio. The use and application of theses grades by the Bancorp is uniform and conforms to regulatory definitions. The loan grading system is as follows:

2 – Moderate risk

Borrower consistently internally generates sufficient cash flow to fund debt service, working assets, and some capital expenditures. Risk of default considered low.

3 – Above average acceptable risk

Borrower generates sufficient cash flow to fund debt service and some working assets and/or capital expansion needs. Profitability and key balance sheet ratios are at or slightly above peers. Current trends are positive or stable. Earnings may be level or trending down slightly or be erratic; however, positive strengths are offsetting. Risk of default is reasonable but may warrant collateral protection.

4 – Acceptable risk

Borrower generates sufficient cash flow to fund debt service, but most working asset and all capital expansion needs are provided from external sources. Profitability ratios and key balance sheet ratios are usually close to peers but one or more ratios (e.g. leverage) may be higher than peer. Earnings may be trending down over the last three years. Borrower may be able to obtain similar financing from other banks with comparable or less favorable terms. Risk of default is acceptable but requires collateral protection.

5 – Marginally acceptable risk

Borrower may exhibit excessive growth, declining earnings, strained cash flow, increasing leverage and/or weakening market position that indicate above average risk. Limited additional debt capacity, modest coverage, and average or below average asset quality, margins and market share. Interim losses and/or adverse trends may occur, but not to the level that would affect the Bank’s position. The potential for default is higher than normal but considered marginally acceptable based on prospects for improving financial performance and the strength of the collateral.

6 – Pass/monitor

The borrower has significant weaknesses resulting from performance trends or management concerns. The financial condition of the company has taken a negative turn and may be temporarily strained. Cash flow may be weak but cash reserves remain adequate to meet debt service. Management weaknesses are evident. Borrowers in this category will warrant more than the normal level of supervision and more frequent reporting.

7 – Special mention (watch)

Special mention credits are considered bankable assets with no apparent loss of principal or interest envisioned but requiring a high level of management attention. Assets in this category are currently protected but are potentially weak. These borrowers are subject to economic, industry, or management factors having an adverse impact upon their prospects for orderly service of debt. The perceived risk in continued lending is considered to have increased beyond the level where such loans would normally be granted. These assets constitute an undue and unwarranted credit risk, but not to the point of justifying a classification of Substandard.

8 – Substandard

This classification consists of loans which are inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged. Financial statements normally reveal some or all of the following: poor trends, lack of earnings and cash flow, excessive debt, lack of liquidity, and the absence of creditor protection. Loans are still considered collectible, but due to increased risks and defined weaknesses of the credit, some loss could be incurred in collection if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Performing loans are loans that are paying as agreed and are approximately less than ninety days past due on payments of interest and principal.

One residential real estate loan in the amount of $2 million was modified as a troubled debt restructuring during the second quarter of 2016. No troubled debt restructurings have subsequently defaulted during the periods presented. All of the loans classified as troubled debt restructurings are also considered impaired. The valuation basis for the Bancorp’s troubled debt restructurings is based on the present value of cash flows, unless consistent cash flows are not present, then the fair value of the collateral securing the loan is the basis for valuation.

The Bancorp's individually evaluated impaired loans are summarized below:

	As of June 30, 2016						For the six months ended June 30, 2016
(Dollars in thousands)	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
Residential real estate, including home equity	$	3,452	$	5,717	$	-	$	2,882	$	64
Commercial real estate, construction & land development, and other dwellings		356		356		-		1,855		-
Commercial participations purchased		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial business		237		237		-		271		2
With an allowance recorded:
Residential real estate, including home equity		164		164		138		171		-
Commercial real estate, construction & land development, and other dwellings		18		18		6		18		-
Commercial participations purchased		88		88		9		90		3
Commercial business		263		263		263		103		-
Total:
Residential real estate, including home equity	$	3,616	$	5,881	$	138	$	3,053	$	64
Commercial real estate, construction & land development, and other dwellings	$	374	$	374	$	6	$	1,873	$	-
Commercial participations purchased	$	88	$	88	$	9	$	90	$	3
Commercial business	$	500	$	500	$	263	$	374	$	2

	As of December 31, 2015						For the six months ended June 30, 2015
(Dollars in thousands)	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
Residential real estate, including home equity	$	1,741	$	4,737	$	-	$	1,246	$	14
Commercial real estate, construction & land development, and other dwellings		5,075		5,075		-		-		-
Commercial participations purchased		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial business		74		74		-		-		-
With an allowance recorded:
Residential real estate, including home equity		177		177		149		-		-
Commercial real estate, construction & land development, and other dwellings		223		223		171		5,068		43
Commercial participations purchased		92		92		14		98		4
Commercial business		22		22		22		287		2
Total:
Residential real estate, including home equity	$	1,918	$	4,914	$	149	$	1,246	$	14
Commercial real estate, construction & land development, and other dwellings	$	5,298	$	5,298	$	171	$	5,068	$	43
Commercial participations purchased	$	92	$	92	$	14	$	98	$	4
Commercial business	$	96	$	96	$	22	$	287	$	2

As part of the previously disclosed acquisitions of First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Hammond (“First Federal”), which closed during the second quarter of 2014, and Liberty Savings Bank (‘Liberty”), which closed during the third quarter of 2015, the Bancorp acquired loans for which there was evidence of credit quality deterioration since origination and it was determined that it was probable that the Bancorp would be unable to collect all contractually required principal and interest payments. At June 30, 2016, total purchased credit impaired loans with unpaid principal balances totaled $3.6 million with a recorded investment of $1.4 million. First Federal purchased credit impaired loans with unpaid principal balances totaled $1.7 million with a recorded investment of $787 thousand. Liberty purchased credit impaired loans with unpaid principal balances totaled $1.9 million with a recorded investment of $577 thousand.

The Bancorp’s age analysis of past due loans is summarized below:

	(Dollars in thousands)
	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans		Recorded Investments Greater than 90 Days and Accruing
June 30, 2016
Residential real estate, including home equity	$	4,721	$	1,473	$	3,607	$	9,801	$	201,079	$	210,880	$	461
Consumer		-		-		-		-		528		528		-
Commercial real estate, construction & land development, and other dwellings		3,098		227		156		3,481		270,599		274,080		5
Commercial participations purchased		-		-		88		88		211		299		-
Commercial business		389		396		168		954		70,998		71,952		-
Government		-		-		-		-		28,388		28,388		-
Total	$	8,208	$	2,096	$	4,019	$	14,324	$	571,803	$	586,127	$	466

December 31, 2015
Residential real estate, including home equity	$	5,559	$	2,430	$	3,055	$	11,044	$	202,711	$	213,755	$	377
Consumer		-		-		-		-		535		535		-
Commercial real estate, construction & land development, and other dwellings		-		211		710		921		258,558		259,479		-
Commercial participations purchased		-		-		92		92		218		310		-
Commercial business		67		177		22		266		68,491		68,757		-
Government		-		-		-		-		29,062		29,062		-
Total	$	5,626	$	2,818	$	3,879	$	12,323	$	559,575	$	571,898	$	377

The Bancorp's loans on nonaccrual status are summarized below:

	(Dollars in thousands)
	June 30, 2016		December 31, 2015
Residential real estate, including home equity	$	3,985	$	4,172
Consumer		-		-
Commercial real estate, construction & land development, and other dwellings		407		915
Commercial participations purchased		88		92
Commercial business		431		22
Government		-		-
Total	$	4,911	$	5,201

Note 5 - Foreclosed Real Estate

Foreclosed real estate at period-end is summarized below:

	(Dollars in thousands)
	June 30,		December 31,
	2016		2015
Residential real estate, including home equity	$	102	$	496
Commercial real estate, construction & land development and other dwellings		1,014		1,014
Commercial business		-		80
Total	$	1,116	$	1,590

Note 6 – Goodwill, Other Intangible Assets, and Acquisition Related Accounting

The Bancorp established a goodwill balance totaling $2.8 million with the acquisition of First Federal and Liberty Savings. Goodwill of $2.0 million was established with the acquisition of First Federal and goodwill of $803 thousand was established with the acquisition of Liberty Savings. Goodwill is tested annually for impairment. Goodwill arising from business combinations represents the value attributable to unidentifiable intangible assets in the business acquired. The Bancorp’s goodwill relates to the value inherent in the banking industry and that value is dependent upon the ability of the Bancorp to provide quality, cost effective banking services in a competitive marketplace. If the implied fair value of goodwill is lower than its carrying amount, goodwill impairment is indicated and goodwill is written down to its implied fair value. There has not been any impairment of goodwill identified or recorded. During the first quarter of 2015, estimates of fair values related to a pool of loans with a single borrower were determined to be lower than originally estimated. This change, net of related estimated adjustments, led to the addition of $377 thousand to goodwill and $423 thousand to purchased credit impaired loan balances during the period ended March 31, 2015. During the second quarter of 2016, original estimates related to Liberty goodwill components were adjusted. Estimates of fair values related to a pool of purchased loans were determined to be lower than originally estimated, which led to the addition of $178 thousand to goodwill. Fixed asset valuations were also determined to be higher than originally estimated, which led to a reduction of $109 thousand to goodwill. Also, the valuation of the accrued withdrawal liability for the defined benefit plan was determined to be higher than originally estimated leading to the addition of $161 thousand to goodwill. Goodwill totaled $2.8 million at June 30, 2016 compared to $2.6 million at December 31, 2015.

In addition to goodwill, a core deposit intangible of $93 thousand for the acquisition of First Federal was established and is being amortized over 7.9 years on a straight line basis. Approximately $6 thousand of amortization was taken during the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. It is estimated that $6 thousand of additional amortization will occur during 2016 and the remaining amount of $60 thousand will be equally amortized through to the first quarter of 2022. A core deposit intangible of $471 thousand for the acquisition of Liberty Savings was established and is being amortized over 8.2 years on a straight line basis. Approximately $29 thousand of amortization was taken during the six months ended June 30, 2016, with no amortization occurring during the six months ended June 30, 2015. It is estimated that $29 thousand of additional amortization will occur during 2016 and the remaining amount of $385 thousand will be equally amortized through to the third quarter of 2023.

For the First Federal acquisition, as part of the fair value of loans receivable, a net fair value discount was established for residential real estate, including home equity lines of credit, of $1.1 million that is being accreted over 55 months on a straight line basis. Approximately $102 thousand of accretion was taken into income for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $118 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2015. It is estimated that $90 thousand of additional accretion will occur in 2016, with estimated accretion of $181 thousand occurring in 2017, and $151 thousand occurring in 2018. Similarly, for the Liberty Savings acquisition, as part of the fair value of loans receivable, a net fair value discount was established for residential real estate, including home equity lines of credit, of $1.2 million that is being accreted over 44 months on a straight line basis. Approximately $163 thousand of accretion was taken into income for the six months ended June 30, 2016, and it is estimated an additional $158 thousand of accretion will occur during 2016, $315 thousand of accretion will occur annually through to 2018, and accretion of $53 thousand will occur during 2019.

For the First Federal acquisition, as part of the fair value of certificates of deposit, a fair value premium was established of $276 thousand that is being amortized over 17 months on a straight line basis. No amortization was taken as expense during the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $100 thousand of amortization expense during the six months ended June 30, 2015, as the amortization period ended during 2015. For the Liberty Savings acquisition, as part of the fair value of certificates of deposit, a fair value premium was established of $124 thousand that is being amortized over 17 months on a straight line basis. Approximately $44 thousand of amortization was taken as expense during the six months ended June 30, 2016. It is estimated that an additional $37 thousand of amortization will occur during 2016.

Note 7 - Concentrations of Credit Risk

The primary lending area of the Bancorp encompasses all of Lake County in northwest Indiana, where a majority of loan activity is concentrated. The Bancorp is also an active lender in Porter County, and to a lesser extent, LaPorte, Newton and Jasper counties in Indiana, and Lake, Cook and Will counties in Illinois. Substantially all loans are secured by specific items of collateral including residences, commercial real estate, land development, business assets and consumer assets.

Note 8 - Earnings per Share

Earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per common share computations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	June 30,				June 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Basic earnings per common share:
Net income as reported	$	2,242	$	1,976	$	4,486	$	3,903
Weighted average common shares outstanding		2,859,003		2,851,417		2,856,938		2,850,175
Basic earnings per common share	$	0.78	$	0.69	$	1.57	$	1.37
Diluted earnings per common share:
Net income as reported	$	2,242	$	1,976	$	4,486	$	3,903
Weighted average common shares outstanding		2,859,003		2,851,417		2,856,938		2,850,175
Add: Dilutive effect of assumed stock option exercises		750		-		750		-
Weighted average common and dilutive potential common shares outstanding		2,859,753		2,851,417		2,857,688		2,850,175
Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.78	$	0.69	$	1.57	$	1.37

Note 9 - Stock Based Compensation

The Bancorp’s 2015 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the Plan), which was adopted by the Bancorp’s Board of Directors on February 27, 2015 and approved by the Bancorp’s shareholders on April 24, 2015, permits the grant of equity awards for up to 250,000 shares of common stock. Awards granted under the Plan may be in the form of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, unrestricted stock, performance shares, or performance units.

As required by the Stock Compensation Topic, companies are required to record compensation cost for stock options and awards provided to employees in return for employment service. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, stock based compensation expense of $67 thousand was recorded, compared to $47 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2015. It is anticipated that current outstanding unvested options and awards will result in additional compensation expense of approximately $76 thousand in 2016 and $152 thousand in 2017.

There were no incentive stock options granted during the first six months of 2016 or 2015. When options are granted, the cost is measured at the fair value of the options when granted, and this cost is expensed over the employment service period, which is normally the vesting period of the options or awards.

A summary of incentive option activity under the Bancorp’s stock option and incentive plans described above for the six months ended June 30, 2016 follows:

					Weighted-
			Weighted-		Average
			Average		Remaining		Aggregate
			Exercise		Contractual		Intrinsic
Incentive options	Shares		Price		Term		Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2016		750	$	28.50
Granted		-		-
Exercised		-		-
Forfeited		-		-
Expired		-	$	-
Outstanding at June 30, 2016		750	$	28.50		1.7		-
Exercisable at June 30, 2016		750	$	28.50		1.7		-

There were 8,740 shares of restricted stock granted during the first six months of 2016 compared to 7,250 shares granted during the first six months of 2015. Restricted stock awards are issued with an award price equal to the market price of the Bancorp’s common stock on the award date and vests five years after the grant date. Forfeiture provisions exist for personnel that separate employment before the vesting period expires. A summary of restricted stock activity under the Bancorp’s incentive stock option and incentive plans described above for the six months ended June 30, 2016 follows:

			Weighted-
			Average
			Grant Date
Restricted stock	Shares		Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1, 2016		19,725	$	25.15
Granted		8,740		30.10
Vested		-		-
Forfeited		-		-
Nonvested at June 30, 2016		28,465	$	26.67

Note 10 - Adoption of New Accounting Standards

Update Number 2014-09 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). This accounting standard update adopts a standardized approach for revenue recognition and was a joint effort with the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). The new revenue recognition standard is based on a core principle of recognizing revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This update does not apply to financial instruments. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) also issued ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), to defer the effective date of ASU 2014-09. The ASU is now effective for public business entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 (therefore, for the year ending December 31, 2018 for the Bancorp). Early adoption is permitted for public business entities with certain caveats. Management does not believe the adoption of this update will have a material effect on the Bancorp’s consolidated financial statements.

Update Number 2016-01 – Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. The amendments in this accounting standard update require all equity investments to be measured at fair value with changes in the fair value recognized through net income (other than those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee). The amendments in this accounting standard update also require an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments. In addition, the amendments in this accounting standard update eliminate the requirement to disclose the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost for entities that are not public business entities and the requirement to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet for public business entities. This accounting standard update is effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Management is in the process of evaluating the impact of this update on the Bancorp’s consolidated financial statements.

Update Number 2016-02 – Leases (Topic 842) Lessees As a result of a joint effort by the FASB and the IASB to improve financial reporting, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which finalizes (1) Discussion Paper No. 1680-100, Leases—Preliminary Views, (2) Proposed ASU No. 1850-100, Leases (Topic 840), and (3) Proposed ASU No. 2013-270, Leases (Topic 842)—a revision of the 2010 proposed FASB Accounting Standards Update, Leases (Topic 840). Moreover, ASU No. 2016-02 seeks to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and by disclosing key information about leasing arrangements.

To satisfy the foregoing objective, the FASB has created Topic 842, Leases, which supersedes Topic 840. In fact, current GAAP requires lessees and lessors to classify their leases as either capital leases or operating leases and to account for those leases differently, but those accounting models have been criticized for failing to meet the needs of users of financial statements because they do not always provide a faithful representation of leasing transactions. Thus, under the new guidance, Topic 842, a lessee will be required to recognize assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms of more than 12 months. Consistent with current GAAP, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee will depend primarily on its classification as a finance or an operating lease (i.e., the classification criteria for distinguishing between finance leases and operating leases are substantially similar to the classification criteria for distinguishing between capital leases and operating leases under the previous guidance).

However, unlike current GAAP, which requires only capital leases to be recognized on the balance sheet, ASU No. 2016-02 will require both operating and finance leases to be recognized on the balance sheet. Additionally, the ASU will require disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases, including qualitative and quantitative requirements.

Notably, lessor accounting will remain largely unchanged from current GAAP. However, the ASU contains some targeted improvements that are intended to align, where necessary, lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and with the updated revenue recognition guidance issued in 2014.This ASU is effective for Public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Management does not believe the adoption of this update will have a material effect on the Bancorp’s consolidated financial statements.

Update Number 2016-09 – Compensation- Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. This ASU provides for the simplification of several aspects of the accounting for share based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of the awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. Some of these simplifications only apply to nonpublic entities. Public business entities must apply the amendments in this Update for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. Management does not believe the adoption of this update will have a material effect on the Bancorp’s consolidated financial statements.

Update Number 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. This ASU finalizes Proposed ASU No. 2012-260, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Subtopic 825-15), and adds Topic 326, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses, to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date by replacing the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates.

Prior GAAP included multiple credit impairment objectives that generally delayed recognition of the full amount of credit losses until it was probable that the loss would occur. The new guidance eliminates the probable initial recognition threshold and, instead, reflects an entity’s current estimate of all expected credit losses. The new guidance broadens the information that an entity must consider in developing its expected credit loss estimate for assets measured either collectively or individually to include forecasted information, as well as past events and current conditions. There is no specified method for measuring expected credit losses, and an entity is allowed to apply methods that reasonably reflect its expectations of the credit loss estimate. Although an entity may still use its current systems and methods for recording the allowance for credit losses, under the new rules, the inputs used to record the allowance for credit losses generally will need to change to appropriately reflect an estimate of all expected credit losses and the use of reasonable and supportable forecasts. The accounting for purchased credit impaired financial assets under the amendments will make the allowance for credit losses more comparable between originated assets and purchased financial assets, as well as reduce complexity with the accounting for interest income.

Additionally, credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities will now have to be presented as an allowance rather than as a write-down. This approach is an improvement to current GAAP, because unlike current GAAP, which prohibits reflecting reversals of credit losses, an entity will be able to record reversals of credit losses in current-period net income in situations in which the estimate of credit losses declines, thereby aligning the income statement recognition of credit losses with the reporting period in which the changes occur.

This ASU is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Management is in the process of evaluating the impact adoption of this update will have on the Bancorp’s consolidated financial statements.

Note 11 - Fair Value

The Fair Value Measurements Topic establishes a hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The Topic describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

The fair values of securities available-for-sale are determined on a recurring basis by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges or pricing models utilizing significant observable inputs such as matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities. Different judgments and assumptions used in pricing could result in different estimates of value. In certain cases where market data is not readily available because of a lack of market activity or little public disclosure, values may be based on unobservable inputs and classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

At the end of each reporting period, securities held in the investment portfolio are evaluated on an individual security level for other-than-temporary impairment in accordance with the Investments – Debt and Equity Securities Topic. Impairment is other-than-temporary if the decline in the fair value is below its amortized cost and it is probable that all amounts due according to the contractual terms of a debt security will not be received. Significant judgments are required in determining impairment, which include making assumptions regarding the estimated prepayments, loss assumptions and the change in interest rates. The Bancorp considers the following factors when determining an other-than-temporary impairment for a security: the length of time and the extent to which the market value has been less than amortized cost; the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer; the underlying fundamentals of the relevant market and the outlook for such market for the near future; an assessment of whether the Bancorp (1) has the intent to sell the debt securities or (2) more likely than not will be required to sell the debt securities before their anticipated market recovery. If either of these conditions is met, management will recognize other-than-temporary impairment. If, in management’s judgment, an other-than-temporary impairment exists, the cost basis of the security will be written down for the credit loss, and the unrealized loss will be transferred from accumulated other comprehensive loss as an immediate reduction of current earnings.

The Bancorp’s management utilizes a specialist to perform an other-than-temporary impairment analysis for each of its four pooled trust preferred securities. The analysis is performed semiannually on June 30 and December 31 and utilizes analytical models used to project future cash flows for the pooled trust preferred securities based on current assumptions for prepayments, default and deferral rates, and recoveries. The projected cash flows are then tested for impairment consistent with the Investments – Other Topic and the Investments – Debt and Equity Securities Topic. The other-than-temporary impairment testing compares the present value of the cash flows from quarter to quarter to determine if there is a “favorable” or “adverse” change. Other-than-temporary impairment is recorded if the projected present value of cash flows is lower than the book value of the security. To perform the semi-annual other-than-temporary impairment analysis, management utilizes current reports issued by the trustee, which contain principal and interest tests, waterfall distributions, note valuations, collection detail and credit ratings for each pooled trust preferred security. In addition, a detailed review of the performing collateral was performed. The review of the collateral began with a review of financial information provided by SNL Financial, a comprehensive database, widely used in the industry, which gathers financial data on banks and thrifts from U.S. GAAP financial statements for public companies (annual and quarterly reports on Forms 10-K and 10-Q, respectively), as well as regulatory reports for private companies, including consolidated financial statements for bank holding companies (FR Y-9C reports) and parent company-only financial statements for bank holding companies (FR Y-9LP reports) filed with the Federal Reserve, and bank call reports filed with the FDIC and the Office of the Comptroller of Currency. Using the information sources described above, for each bank and thrift examined the following items were examined: nature of the issuer’s business, years of operating history, corporate structure, loan composition and loan concentrations, deposit mix, asset growth rates, geographic footprint and local economic environment. The issuers’ historical financial performance was reviewed and their financial ratios were compared to appropriate peer groups of regional banks or thrifts with similar asset sizes. The analysis focused on six broad categories: profitability (revenue streams and earnings quality, return on assets and shareholder’s equity, net interest margin and interest rate sensitivity), credit quality (charge-offs and recoveries, non-current loans and total non-performing assets as a percentage of total loans, loan loss reserve coverage and the adequacy of the loan loss provision), operating efficiency (non-interest expense compared to total revenue), capital adequacy (Tier-1, total capital and leverage ratios and equity capital growth), leverage (tangible equity as a percentage of tangible assets, short-term and long-term borrowings and double leverage at the holding company) and liquidity (the nature and availability of funding sources, net non-core funding dependence and quality of deposits). In addition, for publicly traded companies’ stock price movements were reviewed and the market price of publicly traded debt instruments was examined. The other-than-temporary impairment analysis indicated that the Bancorp’s four pooled trust preferred securities had no additional other-than-temporary impairment during the period ended June 30, 2016.

The table below shows the credit loss roll forward on a year-to-date basis for the Bancorp’s pooled trust preferred securities that have been classified with other-than-temporary impairment:

	(Dollars in thousands)
	Collateralized debt obligations
	other-than-temporary impairment
Ending balance, December 31, 2015	$	271
Additions not previously recognized		-
Ending balance, June 30, 2016	$	271

The following table contains information regarding the Bancorp’s pooled trust preferred securities impairment evaluation as of June 30, 2016:

Cusip	74043CAC1			74042TAJ0			01449TAB9			01450NAC6
Deal name	PreTSL XXIV			PreTSL XXVII			Alesco IX			Alesco XVII
Class		B-1			C-1			A-2A			B
Lowest credit rating assigned		CC			CC			BB			CCC
Number of performing banks		57			32			61			48
Number of performing insurance companies		13			7			10			n/a
Number of issuers in default		19			7			2			4
Number of issuers in deferral		4			3			3			4
Defaults & deferrals as a % of performing collateral		35.76	%		23.23	%		4.38	%		15.27	%
Subordination:
As a % of performing collateral		9.98	%		-0.36	%		47.59	%		26.92	%
As a % of performing collateral - adjusted
for projected future defaults		4.84	%		-8.15	%		43.89	%		22.99	%
Other-than-temporary impairment model assumptions:
Defaults:
Year 1 - issuer average		1.80	%		2.40	%		2.20	%		1.70	%
Year 2 - issuer average		1.80	%		2.40	%		2.20	%		1.70	%
Year 3 - issuer average		1.80	%		2.40	%		2.20	%		1.70	%
> 3 Years - issuer average		(1	)		(1	)		(1	)		(1	)
Discount rate - 3 month Libor, plus implicit yield spread at purchase		1.48	%		1.23	%		1.27	%		1.44	%
Recovery assumptions		(2	)		(2	)		(2	)		(2	)
Prepayments		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%
Other-than-temporary impairment	$	41		$	132		$	36		$	62

(1) - Default rates > 3 years are evaluated on a issuer by issuer basis and range from 0.25% to 5.00%.

(2) - Recovery assumptions are evaluated on a issuer by issuer basis and range from 0% to 15% with a five year lag.

In the preceding table, the Bancorp’s subordination for each trust preferred security is calculated by taking the total performing collateral and subtracting the sum of the total collateral within the Bancorp’s class and the total collateral within all senior classes, and then stating this result as a percentage of the total performing collateral. This measure is an indicator of the level of collateral that can default before potential cash flow disruptions may occur. In addition, management calculates subordination assuming future collateral defaults by utilizing the default/deferral assumptions in the Bancorp’s other-than-temporary-impairment analysis. Subordination assuming future default/deferral assumptions is calculated by deducting future defaults from the current performing collateral. At June 30, 2016, management reviewed the subordination levels for each security in context of the level of current collateral defaults and deferrals within each security; the potential for additional defaults and deferrals within each security; the length of time that the security has been in “payment in kind” status; and the Bancorp’s class position within each security.

Management calculated the other-than-temporary impairment model assumptions based on the specific collateral underlying each individual security. The following assumption methodology was applied consistently to each of the four pooled trust preferred securities: For collateral that has already defaulted, no recovery was assumed; no cash flows were assumed from collateral currently in deferral, with the exception of the recovery assumptions. The default and recovery assumptions were calculated based on a detailed collateral review. The discount rate assumption used in the calculation of the present value of cash flows is based on the discount margin (i.e., credit spread) at the time each security was purchased using the original purchase price. The discount margin is then added to the appropriate 3-month LIBOR forward rate obtained from the forward LIBOR curve.

At June 30, 2016, three of the trust preferred securities with a cost basis of $3.8 million continue to be in “payment in kind” status. The Bancorp’s securities that are classified as “payment in kind” are a result of not receiving the scheduled quarterly interest payments. For the securities in “payment in kind” status, management anticipates to receive the unpaid contractual interest payments from the issuer, because of the self-correcting cash flow waterfall provisions within the structure of the securities. When a tranche senior to the Bancorp’s position fails the coverage test, the Bancorp’s interest cash flows are paid to the senior tranche and recorded as a reduction of principal. The coverage test represents an over collateralization target by stating the balance of the performing collateral as a percentage of the balance of the Bancorp’s tranche, plus the balance of all senior tranches. The principal reduction in the senior tranche continues until the appropriate coverage test is passed. As a result of the principal reduction in the senior tranche, more cash is available for future payments to the Bancorp’s tranche. Consistent with the Investments – Debt and Equity Securities Topic, management considered the failure of the issuer of the security to make scheduled interest payments in determining whether a credit loss existed. Management will not capitalize the “payment in kind” interest payments to the book value of the securities and will keep these securities in non-accrual status until the quarterly interest payments resume.

Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis

There were no transfers to or from Levels 1 and 2 during the six months ended June 30, 2016. Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:

			(Dollars in thousands)
			Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2016 Using
(Dollars in thousands)	Estimated Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Available-for-sale debt securities:
Money market fund	$	1,603	$	1,603	$	-	$	-
U.S. government sponsored entities		32,202		-		32,202		-
Collateralized mortgage obligations and residential mortgage-backed securities		109,536		-		109,536		-
Municipal securities		98,018		-		98,018		-
Collateralized debt obligations		1,874		-		-		1,874
Total securities available-for-sale	$	243,233	$	1,603	$	239,756	$	1,874

			(Dollars in thousands)
			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015 Using
(Dollars in thousands)	Estimated Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Available-for-sale debt securities:
Money market fund	$	525	$	525	$	-	$	-
U.S. government sponsored entities		17,431		-		17,431		-
Collateralized mortgage obligations and residential mortgage-backed securities		119,173		-		119,173		-
Municipal securities		93,487		-		93,487		-
Collateralized debt obligations		2,734		-		-		2,734
Total securities available-for-sale	$	233,350	$	525	$	230,091	$	2,734

A roll forward of available-for-sale securities, which require significant adjustment based on unobservable data, are presented in the following table:

	(Dollars in thousands)
	Estimated Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	Available-for- sale securities
Beginning balance, January 1, 2015	$	2,432
Included in earnings		-
Total unrealized gains, included in other comprehensive income		302
Transfers in and/or (out) of Level 3		-
Ending balance, December 31, 2015	$	2,734

Beginning balance, January 1, 2016	$	2,734
Included in earnings		-
Total unrealized losses, included in other comprehensive income		(860	)
Transfers in and/or (out) of Level 3		-
Ending balance, June 30, 2016	$	1,874

Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below:

			(Dollars in thousands)
			Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2016 Using
(Dollars in thousands)	Estimated Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Impaired loans	$	4,162	$	-	$	-	$	4,162
Foreclosed real estate		1,116		-		-		1,116

			(Dollars in thousands)
			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015 Using
(Dollars in thousands)	Estimated Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Impaired loans	$	7,048	$	-	$	-	$	7,048
Foreclosed real estate		1,590		-		-		1,590

The fair value of impaired loans with specific allocations of the allowance for loan losses or loans for which charge-offs have been taken is generally based on a present value of cash flows or, for collateral dependent loans, based on recent real estate appraisals. Appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. The recorded investment in impaired loans was approximately $4.6 million and the related specific reserves totaled approximately $416 thousand, resulting in a fair value of impaired loans totaling approximately $4.2 million, at June 30, 2016. The recorded investment of impaired loans was approximately $7.4 million and the related specific reserves totaled approximately $356 thousand, resulting in a fair value of impaired loans totaling approximately $7.0 million, at December 31, 2015. Fair value is determined, where possible, using market prices derived from an appraisal or evaluation, which are considered to be Level 2 inputs. However, certain assumptions and unobservable inputs are often used by the appraiser, therefore, qualifying the assets as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of foreclosed real estate is similarly determined by using the results of recent real estate appraisals. The numerical range of unobservable inputs for these valuation assumptions is not meaningful to this presentation.

The following table shows carrying values and related estimated fair values of financial instruments as of the dates indicated. Estimated fair values are further categorized by the inputs used to measure fair value. Items that are not financial instruments are not included.

	June 30, 2016				Estimated Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2016 Using
(Dollars in thousands)	Carrying Value		Estimated Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	31,325	$	31,325	$	31,325	$	-	$	-
Securities available-for-sale		243,233		243,233		1,603		239,756		1,874
Loans held-for-sale		1,837		1,865		1,865		-		-
Loans receivable, net		578,790		576,960		-		-		576,960
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		3,000		3,000		-		3,000		-
Accrued interest receivable		3,001		3,001		-		3,001		-

Financial liabilities:
Non-interest bearing deposits		99,273		99,273		99,273		-		-
Interest bearing deposits		649,640		649,499		457,246		192,253		-
Repurchase agreements		17,585		17,584		13,420		4,164		-
Borrowed funds		39,001		39,251		1,901		37,350		-
Accrued interest payable		40		40		-		40		-

	December 31, 2015				Estimated Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015 Using
(Dollars in thousands)	Carrying Value		Estimated Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	11,533	$	11,533	$	11,533	$	-	$	-
Securities available-for-sale		233,350		233,350		525		230,091		2,734
Loans held-for-sale		2,435		2,504		2,504		-		-
Loans receivable, net		564,945		561,122		-		-		561,122
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		3,000		3,000		-		3,000		-
Accrued interest receivable		3,000		3,000		-		3,000		-

Financial liabilities:
Non-interest bearing deposits		100,031		100,031		100,031		-		-
Interest bearing deposits		614,844		614,226		420,354		193,872		-
Repurchase agreements		18,508		18,476		13,628		4,848		-
Borrowed funds		39,493		39,504		393		39,111		-
Accrued interest payable		45		45		-		45		-

The following methods were used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments presented in the preceding table for the periods ended June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

Cash and cash equivalents carrying amounts approximate fair value. The fair values of securities available-for-sale are obtained from broker pricing (Level 2), with the exception of collateralized debt obligations, which are valued by a third-party specialist (Level 3). Loans held-for-sale comprise residential mortgages and are priced based on values established by the secondary mortgage markets (Level 1). The estimated fair value for net loans receivable is based on estimates of the rate the Bancorp would charge for similar such loans, applied for the time period until estimated repayment, in addition to appraisals which may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach (Level 3). Federal Home Loan Bank stock is estimated at book value due to restrictions that limit the sale or transfer of the security. Fair value of accrued interest receivable and payable approximates book value, as the carrying values are determined using the observable interest rate, balance, and last payment date.

Non-interest and interest bearing deposits, which include checking, savings, and money market deposits, are estimated to have fair values based on the amount payable as of the reporting date (Level 1). The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit (included in interest bearing deposits) are based on estimates of the rate the Bancorp would pay on similar deposits, applied for the time period until maturity (Level 2). Estimated fair values for short-term repurchase agreements, which represent sweeps from demand deposits to accounts secured by pledged securities, are estimated based on the amount payable as of the reporting date (Level 1). Longer-term repurchase agreements, with contractual maturity dates of three months or more, are based on estimates of the rate the Bancorp would pay on similar deposits, applied for the time period until maturity (Level 2). Short-term borrowings are generally only held overnight, therefore, their carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value (Level 1). The fair value of FHLB Advances (included in borrowed funds) are estimated by discounting the future cash flows using quoted rates from the FHLB for similar advances with similar maturities (Level 2). The estimated fair value of other financial instruments, and off-balance sheet loan commitments, approximate cost and are not considered significant to this presentation.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Summary

NorthWest Indiana Bancorp (the “Bancorp”) is a financial holding company registered with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Peoples Bank SB (“the Bank”), an Indiana savings bank, and NWIN Risk Management, Inc., a captive insurance company, are wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Bancorp. The Bancorp has no other business activity other than being a holding company for the Bank and NWIN Risk Management, Inc.

At June 30, 2016, the Bancorp had total assets of $909.4 million, total loans of $586.1 million and total deposits of $748.9 million. Stockholders' equity totaled $86.5 million or 9.51% of total assets, with a book value per share of $30.23. Net income for the quarter ended June 30, 2016, was $2.2 million, or $0.78 earnings per common share for both basic and diluted calculations. For the quarter ended June 30, 2016, the return on average assets (ROA) was 1.02%, while the return on average stockholders’ equity (ROE) was 10.49%. Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2016, was $4.5 million, or $1.57 earnings per common share for both basic and diluted calculations. For the quarter ended June 30, 2016, ROA was 1.03%, while the ROE was 10.64%.

Recent Developments

Regulatory Environment. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Dodd-Frank Act") contains comprehensive provisions governing the practices and oversight of financial institutions and other participants in the financial markets. The Dodd-Frank Act regulates, among other institutions, community banks, thrifts, and small bank and thrift holding companies, such as the Bancorp, through a variety of measures, including increased capital requirements and enhanced supervisory authority. The federal banking regulators have implemented and continue to propose new regulations and supervisory guidance under the Dodd-Frank Act and otherwise. The impact of the evolving regulatory environment on the Bancorp’s business and operations depends upon a number of factors, including supervisory priorities and actions, the actions of our competitors and other financial institutions, and the behavior of consumers. Regulatory developments could negatively impact our business strategies, require us to limit or change our business practices, limit our product offerings, invest more management time and resources in compliance efforts, or limit our ability to pursue certain business opportunities and obtain related required regulatory approvals. Regulatory developments also could impact our strategies, the value of our assets, or otherwise adversely affect our business. In addition, the additional expense, time, and resources needed to comply with ongoing regulatory requirements may impact our business and results of operations.

Regulatory Capital Rules. In 2013, the Federal Reserve approved final rules that substantially amended the regulatory risk-based capital rules applicable to the Bancorp and the Bank. The FDIC and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) subsequently approved these rules. The final rules implement the “Basel III” regulatory capital reforms and changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act.

The rules include new risk-based capital and leverage ratios, which were instituted in 2015 and will continue to be phased in through 2019, and refine the definition of what constitutes “capital” for purposes of calculating those ratios. The minimum capital level requirements applicable to the Bancorp and the Bank under the final rules are: (i) a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 6%; (iii) a total capital ratio of 8%; and (iv) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4% for all institutions. The final rules also establish a “capital conservation buffer” above the new regulatory minimum capital requirements, which must consist entirely of common equity Tier 1 capital. The capital conservation buffer was instituted on January 1, 2016 and will be phased-in over four years, as follows: the maximum buffer will be 0.625% of risk-weighted assets for 2016, 1.25% for 2017, 1.875% for 2018, and 2.5% for 2019 and thereafter. This will result in the following minimum ratios beginning in 2019: (i) a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 7.0%, (ii) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5%, and (iii) a total capital ratio of 10.5%. Under the final rules, institutions are subject to limitations on paying dividends, engaging in share repurchases, and paying discretionary bonuses if its capital level falls below the buffer amount. These limitations establish a maximum percentage of eligible retained income that could be utilized for such actions.

The final rules also implement revisions and clarifications consistent with Basel III regarding the various components of Tier 1 capital, including common equity, unrealized gains and losses, as well as certain instruments that will no longer qualify as Tier 1 capital, some of which will be phased out over time. However, the final rules provide that small depository institution holding companies with less than $15 billion in total assets as of December 31, 2009 (which includes the Bancorp) will be able to permanently include non-qualifying instruments that were issued and included in Tier 1 or Tier 2 capital prior to May 19, 2010 in additional Tier 1 or Tier 2 capital until they redeem such instruments or until the instruments mature.

The final rules also contain revisions to the prompt corrective action framework, which is designed to place restrictions on insured depository institutions, including the Bank, if their capital levels begin to show signs of weakness. Under the prompt corrective action requirements, which are designed to complement the capital conservation buffer, insured depository institutions are required to meet the following increased capital level requirements in order to qualify as “well capitalized:” (i) a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 6.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 8%; (iii) a total capital ratio of 10%; and (iv) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 5%.

Additionally, the final rules set forth certain changes for the calculation of risk-weighted assets. The standardized approach final rule utilizes an increased number of credit risk exposure categories and risk weights, and also addresses: (i) an alternative standard of creditworthiness consistent with Section 939A of the Dodd-Frank Act; (ii) revisions to recognition of credit risk mitigation; (iii) rules for risk weighting of equity exposures and past due loans; (iv) revised capital treatment for derivatives and repo-style transactions; and (v) disclosure requirements for top-tier banking organizations with $50 billion or more in total assets that are not subject to the “advance approach rules” that apply to banks with greater than $250 billion in consolidated assets. Based on our current capital composition and levels, we believe we are in compliance with the requirements as set forth in the final rules.

Financial Condition

During the six months ended June 30, 2016, total assets increased by $44.5 million (5.1%), with interest-earning assets increasing by $40.6 million (5.0%). At June 30, 2016, interest-earning assets totaled $852.9 million compared to $812.3 million at December 31, 2015. Earning assets represented 93.8% of total assets at June 30, 2016 and 93.9% of total assets at December 31, 2015. Growth in total assets and interest earning assets for the six months was the result of internally generated growth.

Net loans receivable totaled $586.1 million at June 30, 2016, compared to $571.9 million at December 31, 2015. The loan portfolio, which is the Bancorp’s largest asset, is the primary source of both interest and fee income. The Bancorp’s lending strategy emphasizes quality loan growth, product diversification, and competitive and profitable pricing.

The Bancorp’s end-of-period loan balances were as follows:

	June 30,
	2016					December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	(unaudited)					2015
	Balance		% Loans			Balance		% Loans

Construction & land development	$	45,376		7.7	%	$	41,524		7.3	%
1-4 first liens		176,847		30.2	%		179,527		31.4	%
Multifamily		45,174		7.7	%		45,524		8.0	%
Commercial real estate		183,828		31.4	%		172,741		30.2	%
Commercial business		71,952		12.3	%		68,757		12.0	%
1-4 Junior Liens		1,016		0.2	%		1,065		0.2	%
HELOC		30,332		5.2	%		29,880		5.2	%
Lot loans		2,684		0.5	%		3,283		0.6	%
Consumer		528		0.1	%		535		0.1	%
Government		28,388		4.7	%		29,062		5.0	%
Loans receivable	$	586,127		100.0	%	$	571,898		100.0	%

Adjustable rate loans / loans receivable	$	333,770		56.9	%	$	311,386		54.4	%

	June 30,
	2016			December 31,
	(unaudited)			2015

Loans receivable to total assets		64.5	%		66.1	%
Loans receivable to earning assets		68.7	%		70.4	%
Loans receivable to total deposits		78.3	%		80.0	%

The Bancorp is primarily a portfolio lender. Mortgage banking activities historically have been limited to the sale of fixed rate mortgage loans with contractual maturities greater than 15 years. These loans are identified as held for sale when originated and sold, on a loan-by-loan basis, in the secondary market. The Bancorp will also retain fixed rate mortgage loans with a contractual maturity greater than 15 years on a limited basis. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Bancorp originated $18.8 million in new fixed rate mortgage loans for sale, compared to $28.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2015. Net gains realized from the mortgage loan sales totaled $541 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $734 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2015. At June 30, 2016, the Bancorp had $1.8 million in loans that were classified as held for sale, compared to $2.4 million at December 31, 2015.

The allowance for loan losses (ALL) is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses, increased by the provision for loan losses, and decreased by charge-offs net of recoveries. A loan is charged-off against the allowance by management as a loss when deemed uncollectible, although collection efforts continue and future recoveries may occur. The determination of the amounts of the ALL and provisions for loan losses is based on management’s current judgments about the credit quality of the loan portfolio with consideration given to all known relevant internal and external factors that affect loan collectability as of the reporting date. The appropriateness of the current period provision and the overall adequacy of the ALL are determined through a disciplined and consistently applied quarterly process that reviews the Bancorp’s current credit risk within the loan portfolio and identifies the required allowance for loan losses given the current risk estimates.

Non-performing loans include those loans that are 90 days or more past due and those loans that have been placed on non-accrual status. Non-performing loans totaled $5.4 million at June 30, 2016, compared to $5.6 million at December 31, 2015, a decrease of $200 thousand or 3.6%. The decrease in non-performing loans for the first six months of 2016 is partially the result of the payoff of one non-accruing commercial real estate loan in the amount of $522 thousand, as well as the result of borrowers generally making more timely payments during the year. The ratio of non-performing loans to total loans was 0.92% at June 30, 2016, compared to 0.98% at December 31, 2015. The ratio of non-performing loans to total assets was 0.59% at June 30, 2016, compared to 0.64% at December 31, 2015. At June 30, 2016, all non-performing loans are also accounted for on a non-accrual basis, except for seven loans totaling $466 thousand that remained accruing and more than 90 days past due.

Loans internally classified as substandard totaled $5.6 million at June 30, 2016, compared to $11.3 million at December 31, 2015 a decrease of $5.7 million or 50.2%. The decrease in substandard loans is primarily due to the payoff of one accruing commercial real estate hotel loan in the amount of $4.4 million and one non-accruing commercial real estate loan in the amount of $522 thousand. Substandard loans include non-performing loans and potential problem loans, where information about possible credit issues or other conditions causes management to question the ability of such borrowers to comply with loan covenants or repayment terms. No loans were internally classified as doubtful or loss at June 30, 2016 or December 31, 2015. In addition to identifying and monitoring non-performing and other classified loans, management maintains a list of watch loans. Watch loans represent loans management is closely monitoring due to one or more factors that may cause the loan to become classified as substandard. Watch loans totaled $14.1 million at June 30, 2016, compared to $13.5 million at December 31, 2015, an increase of $521 thousand or 3.9%. The increase in watch loans is due to the addition of four commercial real estate notes with balances of $1.5 million that were newly classified as watch.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that a borrower will be unable to pay all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. At June 30, 2016, impaired loans totaled $4.6 million, compared to $7.4 million at December 31, 2015 a decrease of $2.8 million or 37.8%. The decrease in impaired loans for the first six months of 2016 is primarily the result of the aforementioned payoff of one accruing commercial real estate hotel loan and one non-accruing commercial real estate loan. The June 30, 2016, impaired loan balances consist of ten commercial real estate and commercial business loans totaling $874 thousand that are secured by business assets and real estate, and are personally guaranteed by the owners of the businesses. In addition, seventy-two residential real estate and home equity line of credit loans totaling $3.4 million, which are troubled debt restructurings or purchased credit impaired, have also been classified as impaired. At June 30, 2016 the ALL contained $416 thousand in specific reserves for impaired loans, compared to $356 thousand at December 31, 2015. There were no other loans considered to be impaired loans as of June 30, 2016. Typically, management does not individually classify smaller-balance homogeneous loans, such as residential mortgages or consumer loans, as impaired, unless they are troubled debt restructurings.

Purchased loans acquired in a business combination are recorded at estimated fair value on their purchase date. Purchased loans with evidence of credit quality deterioration since origination are considered purchased credit impaired loans. Expected future cash flows at the purchase date in excess of the fair value of loans are recorded as interest income over the life of the loans if the timing and amount of the future cash flows is reasonably estimable (“accretable yield”). The difference between contractually required payments and the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition is referred to as the non-accretable difference and represents probable losses in the portfolio. In determining the acquisition date fair value of purchased credit impaired loans, and in subsequent accounting, the Bancorp aggregates these purchased loans into pools of loans by common risk characteristics, such as credit risk rating and loan type. Subsequent to the purchase date, increases in cash flows over those expected at the purchase date are recognized as interest income prospectively. Subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows will generally result in a provision for loan losses. During the first six months of 2015, initial estimates of fair values related to a pool of First Federal loans with a single borrower were found to be lower than expected. This change led to the addition of $423 thousand to purchased credit impaired loan balances. During the second quarter of 2016, initial estimates of fair values related to a pool of Liberty loans were found to be lower than expected. This change led to the addition of $178 thousand to non-accretable discount. Also increasing the purchased credit impaired loan balance was the addition of 43 loans acquired from Liberty. At June 30, 2016, purchased credit impaired loans with unpaid principal balances totaled $3.6 million with a recorded investment of $1.4 million.

At June 30, 2016, the Bancorp classified three loans totaling $2.1 million as troubled debt restructurings, which involves modifying the terms of a loan to forego a portion of interest or principal or reducing the interest rate on the loan to a rate materially less than market rates, or materially extending the maturity date of a loan. The Bancorp’s troubled debt restructurings includes one loan to a residential real estate developer for $2.0 million for which an extension of term and reduction in rate and two commercial business loans totaling $71 thousand for which a reduction in principal payments was granted. At June 30, 2016, all $2.1 million of the Bancorp’s loans classified as troubled debt restructurings are accruing loans. The valuation basis for the Bancorp’s troubled debt restructurings is based on the present value of expected future cash flows; unless consistent cash flows are not present, then the fair value of the collateral securing the loan is the basis for valuation.

At June 30, 2016, management is of the opinion that there are no loans, except certain of those discussed above, where known information about possible credit problems of borrowers causes management to have serious doubts as to the ability of such borrowers to comply with the present loan repayment terms and which will imminently result in such loans being classified as past due, non-accrual or a troubled debt restructure. Management does not presently anticipate that any of the non-performing loans or classified loans would materially impact future operations, liquidity or capital resources.

For the six months ended June 30, 2016, $584 thousand in provisions to the ALL were required, compared to $485 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2015, an increase of $99 thousand or 20.4%. The ALL provision increase for the current six month period is primarily a result of increased originations and overall loan portfolio growth. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, charge-offs, net of recoveries, totaled $200 thousand, compared to charge-offs, net of recoveries of $147 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The net loan charge-offs for 2016 were comprised of $212 thousand in residential real estate loans, $8 thousand in consumer loans, and net loan recoveries of $20 thousand in commercial business loans. The ALL provisions take into consideration management’s current judgments about the credit quality of the loan portfolio, loan portfolio balances, changes in the portfolio mix and local economic conditions. In determining the provision for loan losses for the current period, management has given consideration to risks associated with the local economy, changes in loan balances and mix, and asset quality.

The ALL-to-total loans was 1.25% at June 30, 2016, compared to 1.22% at December 31, 2015. The ALL-to-non-performing loans (coverage ratio) was 136.43% at June 30, 2016, compared to 124.66% at December 31, 2015. The June 30, 2016 balance in the ALL account of $7.3 million is considered adequate by management after evaluation of the loan portfolio, past experience and current economic and market conditions. While management may periodically allocate portions of the allowance for specific problem loans, the whole allowance is available for any loan charge offs that occur. The allocation of the ALL reflects performance and growth trends within the various loan categories, as well as consideration of the facts and circumstances that affect the repayment of individual loans, and loans which have been pooled as of the evaluation date, with particular attention given to non-performing loans and loans which have been classified as substandard, doubtful or loss. Management has allocated reserves to both performing and non-performing loans based on current information available.

At June 30, 2016, foreclosed real estate totaled $1.1 million, which was comprised of eleven properties, compared to $1.6 million and seventeen properties at December 31, 2015. The decrease in foreclosed real estate is the result of the sale of properties. Net gains from foreclosed real estate totaled $74 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2016, and were the result of proceeds received from the sale of foreclosed properties. At the end of June 2016 all of the Bancorp’s foreclosed real estate is located within its primary market area.

The primary objective of the Bancorp’s investment portfolio is to provide for the liquidity needs of the Bancorp and to contribute to profitability by providing a stable flow of dependable earnings. Funds are generally invested in federal funds, interest bearing balances in other financial institutions, U.S. government securities, federal agency obligations, obligations of state and local municipalities and corporate securities. The securities portfolio, all of which is designated as available-for-sale, totaled $243.2 million at June 30, 2016, compared to $233.4 million at December 31, 2015, an increase of $9.9 million (4.2%). The increase in the securities portfolio is a result of continued investment of excess liquidity in securities. At June 30, 2016, the securities portfolio represented 28.5% of interest-earning assets and 26.7% of total assets compared to 28.7% of interest-earning assets and 27.0% of total assets at December 31, 2015.

The Bancorp’s end-of-period investment portfolio and other short-term investments and stock balances were as follows:

	June 30,
	2016					December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	(unaudited)					2015
	Balance		% Securities			Balance		% Securities

Money market fund	$	1,603		0.7	%	$	525		0.2	%
U.S. government sponsored entities		32,202		13.2	%		17,431		7.5	%
Collateralized mortgage obligations and
residential mortgage-backed securities		109,536		45.0	%		119,173		51.1	%
Municipal securities		98,018		40.3	%		93,487		40.0	%
Collateralized debt obligations		1,874		0.8	%		2,734		1.2	%
Total securities available-for-sale	$	243,233		100.0	%	$	233,350		100.0	%

	June 30,
	2016		December 31,		YTD
(Dollars in thousands)	(unaudited)		2015		Change
	Balance		Balance		$		%

Interest bearing deposits in other financial institutions	$	17,385	$	773	$	16,612		2149.0	%
Fed funds sold		1,347		845		502		59.4	%
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		3,000		3,000		-		0.0	%

The net increase in interest bearing balances in other financial institutions and the net increase in fed funds sold is primarily the result of the Bancorp’s deposit gathering efforts and the timing of investing those funds in earning assets. Federal Home Loan Bank stock corresponds to stock ownership requirements based on borrowing needs.

Deposits are a fundamental and cost-effective source of funds for lending and other investment purposes. The Bancorp offers a variety of products designed to attract and retain customers, with the primary focus on building and expanding relationships.

The Bancorp’s end-of-period deposit portfolio balances were as follows:

	June 30,
	2016		December 31,		YTD
(Dollars in thousands)	(unaudited)		2015		Change
	Balance		Balance		$			%

Checking	$	258,272	$	247,616	$	10,656			4.3	%
Savings		123,497		118,453		5,044			4.3	%
Money market		174,750		154,316		20,434			13.2	%
Certificates of deposit		192,394		194,490		(2,096	)		-1.1	%
Total deposits	$	748,913	$	714,875	$	34,038			4.8	%

The Bancorp’s core deposits include checking, savings, and money market accounts. The overall increase in core deposits is a result of management’s sales efforts along with current customer preferences for short-term, liquid investment alternatives.

The Bancorp’s borrowed funds are primarily used to fund asset growth not supported by deposit generation. The Bancorp’s end-of-period borrowing balances were as follows:

	June 30,
	2016		December 31,		YTD
(Dollars in thousands)	(unaudited)		2015		Change
	Balance		Balance		$			%

Repurchase agreements	$	17,585	$	18,508	$	(923	)		-5.0	%
Borrowed funds		39,001		39,493		(492	)		-1.2	%
Total borrowed funds	$	56,586	$	58,001	$	(1,415	)		-2.4	%

Repurchase agreements decreased as part of normal account fluctuations within that product line. Borrowed funds decreased as FHLB fixed advances matured and were not replaced.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

For the Bancorp, liquidity management refers to the ability to generate sufficient cash to fund current loan demand, meet deposit withdrawals, and pay dividends and operating expenses. Because profit and liquidity are often conflicting objectives, management attempts to maximize the Bank’s net interest margin by making adequate, but not excessive, liquidity provisions. Furthermore, funds are managed so that future profits will not be significantly impacted as funding costs increase.

Changes in the liquidity position result from operating, investing and financing activities. Cash flows from operating activities are generally the cash effects of transactions and other events that enter into the determination of net income. The primary investing activities include loan originations, loan repayments, investments in interest bearing balances in other financial institutions, and the purchase, sale, and maturity of investment securities. Financing activities focus almost entirely on the generation of customer deposits. In addition, the Bancorp utilizes borrowings (i.e., repurchase agreements, FHLB advances and federal funds purchased) as a source of funds.

During the six months ended June 30, 2016, cash and cash equivalents increased by $19.8 million compared to a $13.2 million increase for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The primary sources of cash and cash equivalents were increased deposits, sales of loans originated for sale, and proceeds from maturities, pay downs, calls, and sales of available-for-sale securities. The primary uses of cash and cash equivalents were loan originations, the purchase of securities, and the repayment of FHLB advances. Cash provided by operating activities totaled $9.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to cash provided of $8.6 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2015. The increase in cash from operating activities was primarily a result of an increase in clearing accounts that facilitate customer transactions. Cash outflows from investing activities totaled $20.8 million for the current period, compared to cash outflows of $27.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The decreased cash outflows for the current six months were primarily related to reduced purchase of securities and origination of loans receivable. Net cash inflows from financing activities totaled $31.0 million during the current period compared to net cash inflows of $32.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The decrease in net cash inflows from financing activities was primarily a result of less reliance on the Federal Home Loan Bank advances. On a cash basis, the Bancorp paid dividends on common stock of $1.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and $1.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015.

At June 30, 2016, outstanding commitments to fund loans totaled $117.9 million. Approximately 52.0% of the commitments were at variable rates. Standby letters of credit, which are conditional commitments issued by the Bancorp to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party, totaled $8.3 million at June 30, 2016. Management believes that the Bancorp has sufficient cash flow and borrowing capacity to fund all outstanding commitments and letters of credit, while maintaining proper levels of liquidity.

Management strongly believes that maintaining a high level of capital enhances safety and soundness. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, stockholders' equity increased by $5.6 million (6.9%). During the six months ended June 30, 2016, stockholders’ equity was primarily increased by net income of $4.5 million and an increase to accumulated other comprehensive income of $2.6 million. Decreasing stockholders’ equity was the declaration of $1.6 million in cash dividends. On April 24, 2014 the Bancorp’s Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program to repurchase up to 50,000 shares of the Bancorp’s outstanding common stock, from time to time and subject to market conditions, on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. The stock repurchase program does not expire and is only limited by the number of shares that can be purchased. The stock repurchase program will be reviewed annually by the Board of Directors. No shares were repurchased during the first six months of 2016 or 2015.

The Bancorp is subject to risk-based capital guidelines adopted by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the FRB), and the Bank is subject to risk-based capital guidelines adopted by the FDIC. As applied to the Bancorp and the Bank, the FRB and FDIC capital requirements are substantially the same. These regulations divide capital into multiple tiers. The first tier (Common Equity Tier 1 Capital) includes common shareholders’ equity, after deductions for various items including goodwill and certain other intangible assets, and after certain other adjustments. Common Equity Tier 1 Capital also includes accumulated other comprehensive income (for organizations that do not make opt-out elections). The next tier (Tier 1 Capital) is comprised of Common Equity Tier 1 Capital plus other qualifying capital instruments such as perpetual noncumulative preferred stock and junior subordinated debt issued to trusts, and other adjustments. The third tier (Tier 2 Capital) includes instruments such as subordinated debt that have a minimum original maturity of at least five years and are subordinated to the claims of depositors and general creditors, total capital minority interest not included in Tier 1 Capital, and limited amounts of the allowance for loan losses, less applicable regulatory adjustments and deductions. The Bancorp and the Bank are required to maintain a Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio of 4.5%, a Tier 1 Capital ratio of 6%, and a Total Capital ratio (comprised of Tier 1 Capital plus Tier 2 Capital) of 8%. In addition, the capital regulations provide for a minimum leverage ratio (Tier 1 capital to adjusted average assets) of 4%.

The Dodd-Frank Act required the FRB to set minimum capital levels for bank holding companies that are as stringent as those required for insured depository subsidiaries. However, under the FRB’s “Small Bank Holding Company” exemption from consolidated bank holding company capital requirements, bank holding companies and savings and loan holding companies with less than $1 billion in consolidated assets, such as the Bancorp, are exempt from consolidated regulatory capital requirements, unless the FRB determines otherwise in particular cases.

The following table shows that, at June 30, 2016, and December 31, 2015, the Bancorp’s and Bank’s capital exceeded all applicable regulatory capital requirements. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Bancorp’s and Bank’s regulatory capital ratios continued to be negatively impacted by regulatory requirements regarding collateralized debt obligations. The regulatory requirements state that for collateralized debt obligations that have been downgraded below investment grade by the rating agencies, increased risk based asset weightings are required. The Bancorp currently holds four pooled trust preferred securities with a cost basis of $5.1 million. Three of these investments currently have ratings that are below investment grade. As a result, approximately $18.5 million of risk based assets are generated by the trust preferred securities in the Bancorp’s and Bank’s total risk based capital calculation. The Bancorp’s and the Bank’s regulatory capital ratios were substantially the same at both June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. The dollar amounts are in millions.

(Dollars in millions)											Minimum Required To Be
						Minimum Required For					Well Capitalized Under Prompt
	Actual					Capital Adequacy Purposes					Corrective Action Regulations
At June 30, 2016	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
Common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets	$	78.3		12.4	%	$	28.5		4.5	%	$	41.1		6.5	%
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets	$	78.3		12.4	%	$	37.9		6.0	%	$	50.6		8.0	%
Total capital to risk-weighted assets	$	85.7		13.6	%	$	50.6		8.0	%	$	63.2		10.0	%
Tier 1 capital to adjusted average assets	$	78.3		9.0	%	$	35.0		4.0	%	$	43.8		5.0	%

(Dollars in millions)											Minimum Required To Be
						Minimum Required For					Well Capitalized Under Prompt
	Actual					Capital Adequacy Purposes					Corrective Action Regulations
At December 31, 2015	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
Common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets	$	76.0		12.4	%	$	27.6		4.5	%	$	39.9		6.5	%
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets	$	76.0		12.4	%	$	36.8		6.0	%	$	49.1		8.0	%
Total capital to risk-weighted assets	$	83.0		13.5	%	$	49.1		8.0	%	$	61.3		10.0	%
Tier 1 capital to adjusted average assets	$	76.0		9.0	%	$	33.9		4.0	%	$	42.3		5.0	%

The Bancorp’s ability to pay dividends to its shareholders is primarily dependent upon the Bank’s ability to pay dividends to the Bancorp. Under Indiana law, the Bank may pay dividends from its undivided profits (generally, earnings less losses, bad debts, taxes and other operating expenses) as is considered expedient by the Bank’s Board of Directors. However, the Bank must obtain the approval of the Indiana Department of Financial Institutions (DFI) if the total of all dividends declared by the Bank during the current year, including the proposed dividend, would exceed the sum of retained net income for the year to date plus its retained net income for the previous two years. For this purpose, “retained net income,” means net income as calculated for call report purposes, less all dividends declared for the applicable period. An exemption from DFI approval would require that the Bank have been assigned a composite uniform financial institutions rating of 1 or 2 as a result of the most recent federal or state examination; the proposed dividend would not result in a Tier 1 leverage ratio below 7.5%; and that the Bank not be subject to any corrective action, supervisory order, supervisory agreement, or board approved operating agreement. The aggregate amount of dividends that may be declared by the Bank in 2016, without the need for qualifying for an exemption or prior DFI approval, is $9.2 million plus 2016 net profits. Moreover, the FDIC and the Federal Reserve Board may prohibit the payment of dividends if it determines that the payment of dividends would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice in light of the financial condition of the Bank. On May 20, 2016 the Board of Directors of the Bancorp declared a second quarter dividend of $0.28 per share. The Bancorp’s second quarter dividend was paid to shareholders on July 5, 2016.

Results of Operations - Comparison of the Quarter Ended June 30, 2016 to the Quarter Ended June 30, 2015

For the quarter ended June 30, 2016, the Bancorp reported net income of $2.2 million, compared to net income of $2.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2015, an increase of $266 thousand (13.5%). For the current quarter the ROA was 1.02%, compared to 1.00% for the quarter ended June 30, 2015. The ROE was 10.49% for the quarter ended June 30, 2016, compared to 10.03% for the quarter ended June 30, 2015.

Net interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2016 was $7.4 million, an increase of $750 thousand (11.3%), compared to $6.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2015. The weighted-average yield on interest-earning assets was 3.87% for the three months ended June 30, 2016, compared to 3.80% for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The weighted-average cost of funds for the quarter ended June 30, 2016, was 0.30%, compared to 0.27% for the quarter ended June 30, 2015. The impact of the 3.87% return on interest earning assets and the 0.30% cost of funds resulted in an interest rate spread of 3.57% for the current quarter, compared to 3.54% for the quarter ended June 30, 2015. Compared to the three months ended June 30, 2015, total interest income increased by $867 thousand (12.2%) while total interest expense increased by $117 thousand (24.6%). The net interest margin was 3.58% for the three months ended June 30, 2016, compared to 3.55% for the quarter ended June 30, 2015. On a tax equivalent basis, the Bancorp’s net interest margin was 3.82% for the three months ended June 30, 2016, compared to 3.80% for the quarter ended June 30, 2015. Comparing the net interest margin on a tax equivalent basis more accurately compares the returns on tax-exempt loans and securities to those on taxable interest-earning assets.

During the three months ended June 30, 2016, interest income from loans increased by $858 thousand (15.4%), compared to the three months ended June 30, 2015. The change was due to an increase in average balances as a result of acquisition activity in the third quarter of 2015. The weighted-average yield on loans outstanding was 4.43% for the current quarter, compared to 4.47% for the three months ended June 30, 2015. Loan balances averaged $580.7 million for the current quarter, an increase of $82.9 million (16.7%) from $497.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. During the three months ended June 30, 2016, interest income on securities and other interest bearing balances increased by $9 thousand (0.6%), compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2015. The change was due to an increase in the weighted-average yield. The weighted-average yield on securities and other interest bearing balances was 2.52%, for the current quarter, compared to 2.46% for the three months ended June 30, 2015. Securities balances averaged $241.9 million for the current quarter, down $5.2 million (2.1%) from $247.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. Other interest bearing balances averaged $2.0 million for the current period, down $16.7 million (89.4%) from $18.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The decrease in other interest bearing balances is a result of increased loan origination and investments in securities.

Interest expense on deposits increased by $96 thousand (27.8%) during the current quarter compared to the three months ended June 30, 2015. The change was due to an increase in average balances outstanding and higher average cost. The weighted-average rate paid on deposits for the three month period ended June 30, 2016 was 0.30% compared to 0.27% for the three months ended June 30, 2015. Total deposit balances averaged $781.9 million for the current quarter, an increase of $75.3 million (10.7%) from $706.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2015. Interest expense on borrowed funds increased by $21 thousand (16.2%) during the current quarter due to an increase in average balances compared to the three months ended June 30, 2015. The weighted-average cost of borrowed funds was 1.01% for the current quarter, compared to 1.02% for the three months ended June 30, 2015. Borrowed funds averaged $60.0 million during the quarter ended June 30, 2016, an increase of $8.9 million (17.4%) from $51.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2015.

Noninterest income for the quarter ended June 30, 2016 was $1.8 million, an increase of $38 thousand (2.2%) from $1.7 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2015. During the current quarter, fees and service charges totaled $716 thousand, an increase of $5 thousand (0.7%) from $711 thousand for the quarter ended June 30, 2015. Fees from Wealth Management operations totaled $434 thousand for the quarter ended June 30, 2016, an increase of $47 thousand (12.1%) from $387 thousand for the quarter ended June 30, 2015. The increase in Wealth Management income is related to market value changes of assets under management and the timing of one-time fees between the two time periods. Gains from loan sales totaled $291 thousand for the current quarter, a decrease of $63 thousand (17.8%), compared to $354 thousand for the quarter ended June 30, 2015. The decrease in gains from the sale of loans is a result of reduced demand. Gains from the sale of securities totaled $165 thousand for the current quarter, an increase of $28 thousand (20.4%) from $137 thousand for the quarter ended June 30, 2015. Current market conditions continued to provide opportunities to maintain securities cash flows, while recognizing gains from the sales of securities. Income from an increase in the cash value of bank owned life insurance totaled $121 thousand for the current quarter, an increase of $15 thousand (14.2%) from $106 thousand for the quarter ended June 30, 2015. Gains on foreclosed real estate totaled $42 thousand for the quarter ended June 30, 2016, an increase of $19 thousand (82.6%), compared to gains of $23 thousand for the quarter ended June 30, 2015. Other noninterest income totaled $1 thousand for the quarter, a decrease of $13 thousand (92.9%) compared to $14 thousand for the quarter ended June 30, 2015.

Noninterest expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2016 was $5.9 million, an increase of $272 thousand (4.8%) from $5.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. During the current quarter, compensation and benefits totaled $3.1 million, a decrease of $127 thousand (4.0%) from $3.2 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2015. The decrease in compensation and benefits is the result of the Bancorp’s ongoing management of compensation costs. Occupancy and equipment expense totaled $964 thousand for the current quarter, an increase of $79 thousand (8.9%), compared to $885 thousand for the quarter ended June 30, 2015. The increase in occupancy and equipment expense is the result of higher building operating expenses, while also maintaining two new locations from the acquisition of Liberty Savings Bank. Data processing expense totaled $338 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2016, an increase of $25 thousand (8.0%) from $313 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2015. Data processing expense has increased as a result of increased system utilization. Federal deposit insurance premiums expense totaled $131 thousand for the current quarter, an increase of $22 thousand (20.2%), compared to $109 thousand for the quarter ended June 30, 2015. Marketing expense totaled $130 thousand for the current quarter, a decrease of $15 thousand (10.3%), compared to $145 thousand for the quarter ended June 30, 2015. The Bancorp proactively markets its products, but varies its timing based on projected benefits and needs. Other expense totaled $1.3 million for the current quarter, an increase of $288 thousand (28.2%), compared to $1.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2015. The increase in other operating expenses is related to the acquisition of another banking institution during 2015 and the establishment of a captive insurance subsidiary during the quarter. The Bancorp’s efficiency ratio was 65.1% for the quarter ended June 30, 2016, compared to 68.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The ratio is determined by dividing total noninterest expense by the sum of net interest income and total noninterest income for the period and the decrease can be attributed to higher net interest income and noninterest income relative to noninterest expense.

Income tax expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2016 totaled $658 thousand, compared to income tax expense of $498 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2015, an increase of $160 thousand (32.1%). The combined effective federal and state tax rates for the Bancorp was 22.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2016, compared to 20.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The Bancorp’s higher current quarter effective tax rate is a result of a larger increase to earnings relative to increased tax preferred income.

Results of Operations - Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015

For the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Bancorp reported net income of $4.5 million, compared to net income of $3.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015, an increase of $266 thousand (13.5%). For the current six months the ROA was 1.03%, compared to 0.99% for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The ROE was 10.64% for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to 9.95% for the six months ended June 30, 2015.

Net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was $14.9 million, an increase of $1.9 million (14.5%), compared to $13.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The weighted-average yield on interest-earning assets was 3.92% for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to 3.78% for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase of the weighted-average yield for interest earning assets was positively affected by approximately $200 thousand dollars of outstanding interest income received from the payoff of one non-accruing commercial real estate loan with a balance of $522 thousand. The weighted-average cost of funds for the six months ended June 30, 2016, was 0.30%, compared to 0.27% for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The impact of the 3.92% return on interest earning assets and the 0.30% cost of funds resulted in an interest rate spread of 3.62% for the current six months, compared to 3.51% for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Compared to the six months ended June 30, 2015, total interest income increased by $2.1 million (15.2%) while total interest expense increased by $232 thousand (24.7%). The net interest margin was 3.64% for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to 3.53% for the six months ended June 30, 2015. On a tax equivalent basis, the Bancorp’s net interest margin was 3.88% for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to 3.78% for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Comparing the net interest margin on a tax equivalent basis more accurately compares the returns on tax-exempt loans and securities to those on taxable interest-earning assets.

During the six months ended June 30, 2016, interest income from loans increased by $2.1 million (19.1%), compared to the six months ended June 30, 2015. The change was primarily due to an increase in weighted average yield and average balances. The weighted-average yield on loans outstanding was 4.51% for the current six months, compared to 4.42% for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Loan balances averaged $576.7 million for the current six months, an increase of $82.6 million (16.7%) from $494.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, interest income on securities and other interest bearing balances increased by $37 thousand (1.2%), compared to the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase was due to an increase in weighted-average yield. The weighted-average yield on securities and other interest bearing balances was 2.54%, for the current six months, compared to 2.49% for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Securities balances averaged $242.7 million for the current six months, down $1.0 million (0.4%) from $243.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Other interest bearing balances averaged $3.3 million for the current period, down $13.2 million (80.2%) from $16.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015.

Interest expense on deposits increased by $191 thousand (28.1%) during the current six months compared to the six months ended June 30, 2015. The change was due to an increase in average balances and the weighted-average rate paid on deposits. The weighted-average rate paid on deposits for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was 0.24%, compared to 0.21%, for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Total deposit balances averaged $718.6 million for the current six months, up $70.0 million (10.8%) from $648.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Interest expense on borrowed funds increased by $41 thousand (15.7%) during the current six months due to higher average balances, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2015. The weighted-average cost of borrowed funds was 1.00% for the current six months, compared to 1.02% for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Borrowed funds averaged $60.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2016, an increase of $9.3 million (18.1%) from $51.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015.

Noninterest income for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was $3.5 million, a decrease of $174 thousand (4.7%) from $3.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. During the current six months, fees and service charges totaled $1.38 million, an increase of $36 thousand (2.7%) from $1.34 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase in fees and service charges is the result of the Bancorp’s growing depository base. Fees from Wealth Management operations totaled $857 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2016, an increase of $41 thousand (5.0%) from $816 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase in Wealth Management income is related to market value changes in assets under management and the timing of one time fees. Gains from loan sales totaled $541 thousand for the current six months, a decrease of $193 thousand (26.3%), compared to $734 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The decrease in gains from the sale of loans is a result of decreased demand. Gains from the sale of securities totaled $418 thousand for the current six months, a decrease of $112 thousand (21.1%) from $530 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Current market conditions provided opportunities to manage securities cash flows, while recognizing gains from the sales of securities. Income from an increase in the cash value of bank owned life insurance totaled $237 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2016, an increase of $27 thousand (12.9%), compared to $210 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Gains on foreclosed real estate totaled $74 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2016, an increase of $50 thousand (208.3%) from $24 thousand in gains for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Other noninterest income totaled $2 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2016, a decrease of 23 thousand (92.0%) from $25 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2015.

Noninterest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was $12.0 million, an increase of $745 thousand (6.6%) from $11.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. During the current six months, compensation and benefits totaled $6.6 million, an increase of $262 thousand (4.1%) from $6.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase in compensation and benefits is the result of the Bancorp’s ordinary course annual adjustments to salaries. Occupancy and equipment totaled $1.9 million for the current six months, an increase of $82 thousand (4.6%), compared to $1.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase in occupancy and equipment expense is the result of higher building operating expenses and acquisition activity that occurred in the third quarter of 2015. Data processing expense totaled $663 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2016, an increase of $35 thousand (5.6%) from $628 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Data processing expense has increased as a result of increased system utilization. Federal deposit insurance premium expense totaled $268 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2016, an increase of $25 thousand (10.3%) from $243 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase was the result of a larger asset base due to acquisition activity from the third quarter of 2015. Marketing expense related to banking products totaled $244 thousand for the current six months, a decrease of $14 thousand (5.4%) from $258 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The Bancorp continues to proactively market its products, but varies its timing based on projected benefits and needs. Other expenses related to banking operations totaled $2.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, an increase of $355 thousand (17.6%) from $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase in other operating expenses is related to the acquisition of another banking institution during the second half 2015 and the establishment of a captive insurance subsidiary during 2016. The Bancorp’s efficiency ratio was 65.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to 67.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The ratio is determined by dividing total noninterest expense by the sum of net interest income and total noninterest income for the period and the decrease can be attributed to higher net interest income relative to higher noninterest income and noninterest expense.

Income tax expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2016 totaled $1.3 million, compared to income tax expense of $1.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015, an increase of $287 thousand (28.7%). The combined effective federal and state tax rates for the Bancorp was 22.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to 20.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The Bancorp’s higher current period effective tax rate is a result of a larger increase to earnings relative to increased tax preferred income.

Critical Accounting Policies

Critical accounting policies are those accounting policies that management believes are most important to the portrayal of the Bancorp’s financial condition and that require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments. The Bancorp’s critical accounting policies from December 31, 2015 remain unchanged.

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements contained in this report that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words or phrases “would be,” “will allow,” “intends to,” “will likely result,” “are expected to,” “will continue,” “is anticipated,” “estimate,” “project,” or similar expressions are also intended to identify “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. The Bancorp cautions readers that forward-looking statements, including without limitation those relating to the Bancorp’s future business prospects, interest income and expense, net income, liquidity, and capital needs are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements, due to, among other things, factors identified in this report, including those identified in the Bancorp’s 2015 Form 10-K.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not Applicable.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

(a)

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

The Bancorp maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Sections 13a – 15(e) and 15d – 15(e)) of regulations promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Bancorp in the reports that it files or submits under the "Exchange Act" is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. These disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Bancorp in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Bancorp's management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Bancorp's chief executive officer and chief financial officer evaluate the effectiveness of the Bancorp's disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of each quarter. Based on that evaluation as of June 30, 2016, the Bancorp’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of that date in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the Bancorp under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

(b)

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

There was no change in the Bancorp's internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the Bancorp’s evaluation of controls that occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2016 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Bancorp's internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - Other Information

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

There are no matters reportable under this item.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

Not Applicable.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

On April 24, 2014 the Bancorp’s Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program to repurchase up to 50,000 shares of the Bancorp’s outstanding common stock, from time to time and subject to market conditions, on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. The stock repurchase program does not expire and is only limited by the number of shares that can be purchased. The stock repurchase program will be reviewed annually by the Board of Directors. No shares were repurchased during the six months ended June 30, 2016 under the stock repurchase program.

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid per Share	Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Maximum Number of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Program(1)
January 1, 2016 – January 31, 2016		-	N/A		-		48,828
February 1, 2016 – February 29, 2016		-	N/A		-		48,828
March 1, 2016 – March 31, 2016		-	N/A		-		48,828
April 1, 2016 – April 30, 2016		-	N/A		-		48,828
May 1, 2016 – May 31, 2016		-	N/A		-		48,828
June 1, 2016 – June 30, 2016		-	N/A		-		48,828

(1)

The stock repurchase program was announced on April 24, 2014, whereby the Bancorp is authorized to repurchase up to 50,000 shares of the Bancorp’s common stock outstanding. There is no express expiration date for this program.

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

There are no matters reportable under this item.

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

Not Applicable.

Item 5.

Other Information

There are no matters reportable under this item.

Item 6.

Exhibits

Exhibit
Number	Description
31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
32.1	Section 1350 Certifications.
101	The following materials from the Bancorp’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016, formatted in an XBRL Interactive Data File: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity; (iv) Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income; (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, with detailed tagging of notes and financial statement schedules.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	NORTHWEST INDIANA BANCORP

Date: July 25, 2016	/s/ Benjamin J. Bochnowski
	Benjamin J. Bochnowski
	President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: July 25, 2016	/s/ Robert T. Lowry
	Robert T. Lowry
	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
	Officer and Treasurer