FIRST NORTHERN COMMUNITY BANCORP - Quarter Report: 2009 May (Form 10-Q)

form10_q.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

———————————

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2009



TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______________ to _______________

Commission File Number 000-30707

First Northern Community Bancorp

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

California	68-0450397
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

195 N. First Street, Dixon, California	95620
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

707-678-3041

(Registrant’s telephone number including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x

No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes r

No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Large accelerated filer ¨

Accelerated filer x

Non-accelerated filer ¨

Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ¨

No x

The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of May 8, 2009 was 9,009,462.

FIRST NORTHERN COMMUNITY BANCORP

INDEX

		Page

PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1	Financial Statements

	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	3

	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income	4

	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income	5

	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	6

	Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7

Item 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	20

Item 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	32

Item 4	Controls and Procedures	33

PART II: OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A	Risk Factors	33

Item 2	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	36

Item 4	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	37

Item 6	Exhibits	38

SIGNATURES		38

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

FIRST NORTHERN COMMUNITY BANCORP

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share amounts)

	March 31,			December 31,
	2009			2008
	(unaudited)			(audited)
Assets

Cash and due from banks	$	36,292		$	25,150
Federal funds sold		77,710			40,860
Investment securities – available-for-sale		47,522			42,106
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $14,463 at March 31, 2009
and $14,435 at December 31, 2008		480,583			516,968
Loans held-for-sale		5,159			2,192
Stock in Federal Home Loan Bank and other equity securities, at cost		2,311			2,311
Premises and equipment, net		7,707			7,620
Other Real Estate Owned		3,657			4,368
Accrued interest receivable and other assets		27,483			29,227

Total Assets	$	688,424		$	670,802

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Liabilities:

Demand deposits	$	163,999		$	181,600
Interest-bearing transaction deposits		124,335			123,614
Savings and MMDA's		165,356			155,656
Time, under $100,000		56,752			64,252
Time, $100,000 and over		78,354			59,596
Total deposits		588,796			584,718

FHLB Advances and other borrowings		13,981			18,259
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities		5,779			5,796

Total liabilities		608,556			608,773

Stockholders' Equity:
Preferred stock, no par value; $1,000 per share liquidation
preference, 18,500 shares authorized; 17,390 shares issued and
outstanding at March 31, 2009 and none at December 31, 2008		16,732			—
Common stock, no par value; 16,000,000 shares authorized;
8,973,645 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2009 and
8,608,802 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2008		61,990			58,983
Additional paid in capital		977			977
Retained earnings		174			2,026
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income		(5	)		43
Total stockholders’ equity		79,868			62,029

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	688,424		$	670,802

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

FIRST NORTHERN COMMUNITY BANCORP

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

	Three months			Three months
	ended			ended
	March 31, 2009			March 31, 2008
Interest and Dividend Income:
Loans	$	7,937		$	9,240
Federal funds sold		19			290
Due from banks interest bearing accounts		31			268
Investment securities
Taxable		194			498
Non-taxable		262			358
Other earning assets		—			29
Total interest and dividend income		8,443			10,683
Interest Expense:
Deposits		1,062			1,912
Other borrowings		158			86
Total interest expense		1,220			1,998
Net interest income		7,223			8,685
Provision for loan losses		1,106			3,659
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		6,117			5,026
Other operating income:
Service charges on deposit accounts		863			924
Gains on other real estate owned		2			—
Gains on sales of loans held-for-sale		174			100
Investment and brokerage services income		149			177
Mortgage brokerage income		15			1
Loan servicing income		96			47
Fiduciary activities income		98			97
ATM fees		58			69
Signature based transaction fees		139			139
Gains on sales of available-for-sale securities		—			511
Other income		146			207
Total other operating income		1,740			2,272
Other operating expenses:
Salaries and employee benefits		3,648			4,107
Occupancy and equipment		998			912
Data processing		447			399
Stationery and supplies		123			116
Advertising		161			175
Directors’ fees		52			52
Other real estate owned expense and write-downs		724			78
Other expense		1,515			1,402
Total other operating expenses		7,668			7,241
Income before benefit for income taxes		189			57
Benefit for income taxes		(264	)		(3	)

Net income	$	453		$	60

Preferred stock dividends and accretion	$	(51	)		—
Net income available to common shareholders	$	402		$	60

Basic income per share	$	0.04		$	0.01
Diluted income per share	$	0.04		$	0.01

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

FIRST NORTHERN COMMUNITY BANCORP

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT

OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(in thousands, except share amounts)

															Accumulated
										Additional					Other
	Preferred		Common Stock				Comprehensive			Paid-in		Retained			Comprehensive
	Stock		Shares		Amounts		Income (Loss)			Capital		Earnings			Loss			Total

Balance at December 31, 2008	$	—		8,608,802	$	58,983				$	977	$	2,026		$	43		$	62,029

Comprehensive income (loss):

Net income							$	453					453						453

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

Unrealized holding losses on securities arising during the current period, net of tax effect of $31								(48	)
Total other comprehensive loss, net of tax effect of $31								(48	)							(48	)		(48	)


Comprehensive income							$	405

Issuance of preferred stock		16,726																	16,726
Issuance of common stock warrants						664													664
4% stock dividend				346,011		2,249							(2,249	)					—
Dividend on preferred stock													(45	)					(45	)
Accretion of preferred stock		6											(6	)					—
Cash in lieu of fractional shares													(5	)					(5	)
Stock-based compensation and related tax benefits						94													94
Common shares issued, stock options exercised, net of swapped shares				18,832		—

Balance at March 31, 2009	$	16,732		8,973,645	$	61,990				$	977	$	174		$	(5	)	$	79,868

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

FIRST NORTHERN COMMUNITY BANCORP

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	(in thousands)
	Three months ended March 31, 2009			Three months ended March 31, 2008
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Net Income	$	453		$	60
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		244			264
Provision for loan losses		1,106			3,659
Stock plan accruals		94			123
Tax benefit for stock options		—			20
Gains on sales of available-for-sale securities		—			(511	)
(Gains) losses on sales of other real estate owned		(2	)		—
Write-downs on other real estate owned		713			69
Gains on sales of loans held-for-sale		(174	)		(100	)
Proceeds from sales of loans held-for-sale		31,392			13,220
Originations of loans held-for-sale		(34,185	)		(12,650	)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Increase in accrued interest receivable and other assets		1,776			1,121
Decrease in accrued interest payable and other liabilities		(62	)		(1,543	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		1,355			3,732

Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Net (increase) decrease in investment securities		(5,496	)		13,098
Net decrease in loans		35,279			8,992
Net increase in other interest earning assets		—			(28	)
Purchases of premises and equipment, net		(331	)		(287	)
Net cash provided by investing activities		29,452			21,775

Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Net increase (decrease) in deposits		4,078			(22,053	)
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock		16,726			—
Proceeds from issuance of common stock warrants		664			—
Net decrease in FHLB advances and other borrowings		(4,278	)		(4,718	)
Cash dividends paid		(5	)		(10	)
Tax benefit for stock options		—			(20	)
Repurchase of stock		—			(1,356	)
Net cash provided by (used) in financing activities		17,185			(28,157	)

Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents		47,992			(2,650	)
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of period		66,010			99,030
Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of period	$	114,002		$	96,380

Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	1,260		$	2,113

Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Preferred stock dividend payable and accretion	$	51			—
Transfer of loans held-for-investment to other real estate owned		—		$	406
Stock dividend distributed	$	2,249		$	8,642

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

FIRST NORTHERN COMMUNITY BANCORP

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2009 and 2008 and December 31, 2008

1.	BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of First Northern Community Bancorp (the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Articles 9 and 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results expected for the full year. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report to stockholders and Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP also requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements:

In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations, which requires most identifiable assets, liabilities, non-controlling interests, and goodwill acquired in a business combination to be recorded at “full fair value” at the acquisition date. SFAS No. 141R applies to all business combinations, including combinations among mutual entities and combinations by contract alone. Under SFAS No. 141R, all business combinations will be accounted for by applying the acquisition method. SFAS No. 141R is effective for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier application is prohibited. SFAS No. 141R will be applied to business combinations occurring after the effective date. The Company currently does not have any business combination contemplated that are expected to be closed after the effective date; therefore, the adoption of SFAS No. 141R will not have an impact, if any, on the consolidated financial statements or results of operations of the Company.

In December 2007, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110 (“SAB No. 110”), Certain Assumptions Used in Valuation Methods, which extends the use of the “simplified” method, under certain circumstances, in developing an estimate of expected term of “plain vanilla” share options in accordance with SFAS No. 123R. Prior to SAB No. 110, SAB No. 107 stated that the simplified method was only available for grants made up to December 31, 2007. The Company currently plans to continue to use the simplified method in developing an estimate of expected term of stock options.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities and thereby improving the transparency of financial reporting. It is intended to enhance the current disclosure framework in SFAS 133 by requiring that objectives for using derivative instruments be disclosed in terms of underlying risk and accounting designation. This disclosure better conveys the purpose of derivative use in terms of the risks that the entity is intending to manage. SFAS 161 was effective for the Company on January 1, 2009 and will result in additional disclosures if the Company enters into any material derivative or hedging activities.

In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principals (SFAS 162). SFAS 162 is intended to improve financial statements that are presented in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principals for non-governmental entities. SFAS 162 is effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the PCAOB amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principals.

Management does not believe the adoption of SFAS 162 will have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In June, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities, (“FSP EITF 03-6-1”). The Staff Position provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and must be included in the earnings per share computation. FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. All prior-period earnings per share data presented must be adjusted retrospectively. Early application is not permitted. The adoption of the Staff Position had no material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

On April 9, 2009, the FASB issued three Staff Positions (FSPs) intended to provide additional application guidance and enhance disclosures regarding fair value measurements and impairments of securities. FSP FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly”, provides guidelines for making fair value measurements more consistent with the principles presented in FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, enhances consistency in financial reporting by increasing the frequency of fair value disclosures. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments”, provides additional guidance designed to create greater clarity and consistency in accounting for and presenting impairment losses on securities.

FSP FAS 157-4 relates to determining fair values when there is no active market or where the price inputs being used represent distressed sales. It reaffirms the need to use judgment to ascertain if a formerly active market has become inactive and in determining fair values when markets have become inactive.

FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 relate to fair value disclosures for any financial instruments that are not currently reflected on the balance sheet of companies at fair value. Prior to issuing this FSP, fair values for these assets and liabilities were only disclosed once a year. The FSP now requires these disclosures on a quarterly basis, providing qualitative and quantitative information about fair value estimates for all those financial instruments not measured on the balance sheet at fair value.

FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 on other-than-temporary impairments are intended to bring greater consistency to the timing of impairment recognition, and provide greater clarity to investors about the credit and noncredit components of impaired debt securities that are not expected to be sold. The measure of impairment in comprehensive income remains fair value. The FSP also requires increased and timelier disclosures sought by investors regarding expected cash flows, credit losses, and an aging of securities with unrealized losses.

The FSPs are effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, but entities may early adopt the FSPs for the interim and annual periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company is currently assessing the impact of these FSPs on its financial statements.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period balances in order to conform to the current year presentation.

2. ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

The allowance for loan losses is maintained at levels considered adequate by management to provide for loan losses that can be reasonably anticipated. The allowance is based on management's assessment of various factors affecting the loan portfolio, including problem loans, economic conditions and loan loss experience, and an overall evaluation of the quality of the underlying collateral. See discussion on page 29 “Asset Quality” regarding impaired/problem loans.

Changes in the allowance for loan losses during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 and for the year ended December 31, 2008 were as follows:

	(in thousands)

	Three months ended March 31,						Year ended December 31,
	2009			2008			2008
Balance, beginning of period	$	14,435		$	10,876		$	10,876
Provision for loan losses		1,106			3,659			16,164
Loan charge-offs		(1,570	)		(3,066	)		(13,324	)
Loan recoveries		492			178			719
Balance, end of period	$	14,463		$	11,647		$	14,435

3.	MORTGAGE OPERATIONS

Transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities are accounted for and reported based on consistent application of a financial-components approach that focuses on control. Transfers of financial assets that are sales are distinguished from transfers that are secured borrowings. Retained interests (mortgage servicing rights) in loans sold are measured by allocating the previous carrying amount of the transferred assets between the loans sold and retained interests, if any, based on their relative fair value at the date of transfer. Fair values are estimated using discounted cash flows based on a current market interest rate.

The Company recognizes a gain and a related asset for the fair value of the rights to service loans for others when loans are sold. The Company sold substantially its entire conforming long-term residential mortgage loans originated during the three months ended March 31, 2009 for cash proceeds equal to the fair value of the loans.

The recorded value of mortgage servicing rights is included in other assets, and is amortized in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated net servicing revenues. The Company assesses capitalized mortgage servicing rights for impairment based upon the fair value of those rights at each reporting date. For purposes of measuring impairment, the rights are stratified based upon the product type, term and interest rates. Fair value is determined by discounting estimated net future cash flows from mortgage servicing activities using discount rates that approximate current market rates and estimated prepayment rates, among other assumptions. The amount of impairment recognized, if any, is the amount by which the capitalized mortgage servicing rights for a stratum exceeds their fair value. Impairment, if any, is recognized through a valuation allowance for each individual stratum.

At March 31, 2009, the Company had $5,159,000 of mortgage loans held-for-sale. At March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company serviced real estate mortgage loans for others of $138,443,000 and $122,734,000, respectively.

The following table summarizes the Company’s mortgage servicing rights assets as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.

	(in thousands)
	December 31, 2008			Additions			Reductions		March 31, 2009

Mortgage servicing rights	$	978		$	186		$	52	$	1,112
Valuation allowance		(85	)		(119	)		—		(204	)
Mortgage servicing rights, net of valuation allowance	$	893		$	67		$	52	$	908

4. OUTSTANDING SHARES AND EARNINGS PER SHARE

On January 22, 2009, the Board of Directors of the Company declared a 4% stock dividend payable as of March 31, 2009 to shareholders of record as of February 27, 2009. All income per share amounts have been adjusted to give retroactive effect to stock dividends.

Earnings Per Share (EPS)

Basic EPS includes no dilution and is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS includes all common stock equivalents (“in-the-money” stock options, unvested restricted stock, stock units, warrants and rights, convertible bonds and preferred stock), which reflects the potential dilution of securities that could share in the earnings of an entity.

The following table presents a reconciliation of basic and diluted EPS for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008

(in thousands, except share and earnings per share amounts)
	Three months ended
	March 31,
	2009			2008
Basic earnings per share:
Net income	$	453		$	60
Preferred stock dividend and accretion	$	(51	)		—
Net income available to common shareholders	$	402		$	60

Weighted average common shares outstanding		8,964,482			9,157,511
Basic EPS	$	0.04		$	0.01

Diluted earnings per share:
Net income	$	453		$	60
Preferred stock dividend and accretion	$	(51	)		—
Net income available to common shareholders	$	402		$	60

Weighted average common shares outstanding		8,964,482			9,157,511

Effect of dilutive options		26,407			193,376

Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding		8,990,889			9,350,887
Diluted EPS	$	0.04		$	0.01

Options not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because they would have had an anti-dilutive effect amounted to 429,954 shares and 120,366 shares for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 respectively. In addition, 352,977 warrants issued to the US Treasury were not used in the computation of diluted earnings per share because they would have had an anti-dilutive effect.

5.	STOCK PLANS

The following table presents the activity related to stock options for the three months ended March 31, 2009.

	Number of Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Aggregate Intrinsic Value		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)
Options outstanding at Beginning of Period		555,591		$	10.71

Granted		8,000		$	4.50

Cancelled / Forfeited		(1,840	)	$	3.65

Exercised		(41,415	)	$	3.81	$	101,246

Options outstanding at End of Period		520,336		$	11.19	$	17,998		4.79

Exercisable (vested) at End of Period		462,840		$	10.40	$	14,078		4.41

The weighted average fair value of options granted during the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 was $1.75 per share.

As of March 31, 2009, there was $240,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.63 years.

There was $45,000 of recognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options for the three months ended March 31, 2009.

A summary of the weighted average assumptions used in valuing stock options during the three months ended March 31, 2009 is presented below:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2009
Risk Free Interest Rate	2.00%

Expected Dividend Yield	0.00%

Expected Life in Years	5

Expected Price Volatility	41.39%

The following table presents the activity related to restricted stock for the three months ended March 31, 2009.

	Number of Shares			Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value		Aggregate Intrinsic Value		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)
Options outstanding at Beginning of Period		31,071		$	16.03

Granted		9,300		$	4.50

Cancelled / Forfeited		—			—

Exercised/Released/Vested		(4,554	)	$	14.79	$	22,551

Options outstanding at End of Period		35,817		$	13.20	$	178,727	8.90

The weighted average fair value of options granted during the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 was $4.50 per share.

As of March 31, 2009, there was $306,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.76 years.

There was $31,000 of recognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options for the three months ended March 31, 2009.

The Company has a 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”). Under the plan, the Company is authorized to issue to eligible employees shares of common stock. There are 292,136 (adjusted for the 2009 stock dividend) shares authorized under the ESPP. The ESPP will terminate February 27, 2017. The ESPP is implemented by participation periods of not more than twenty-seven months each. The Board of Directors determines the commencement date and duration of each participation period. The Board of Directors approved the current participation period of November 24, 2008 to November 23, 2009. An eligible employee is one who has been continually employed for at least ninety (90) days prior to commencement of a participation period. Under the terms of the ESPP, employees can choose to have up to 10 percent of their compensation withheld to purchase the Company’s common stock each participation period. The purchase price of the stock is 85 percent of the lower of the fair market value on the last trading day before the date of participation or the fair market value on the last trading day during the participation period.

As of March 31, 2009, there was $53,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to ESPP grants. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 0.75 years.

There was $18,000 of recognized compensation cost related to ESPP grants for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009.

The weighted average fair value at grant date during the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 was $2.36.

A summary of the weighted average assumptions used in valuing ESPP grants during the three months ended March 31, 2009 is presented below:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2009
Risk Free Interest Rate	0.95%

Expected Dividend Yield	0.00%

Expected Life in Years	1.00

Expected Price Volatility	48.13%

6. EXECUTIVE SALARY CONTINUATION PLAN

The Company has an unfunded non-contributory defined benefit pension plan provided in two forms to a select group of highly compensated employees.

Four executives have Salary Continuation Plans providing retirement benefits between $50,000 and $100,000 based on responsibilities and tenure at the Company. The retirement benefits are paid for 10 years following retirement at age 65. Reduced retirement benefits are available after age 55 and 10 years of service.

The Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan is intended to provide a fixed annual benefit for 10 years plus 6 months for each full year of service over 10 years (limited to 180 months total) subsequent to retirement at age 65. Reduced benefits are payable as early as age 55 if the participant has at least 10 years of service. Two employees currently have Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan agreements. The agreements provide a target benefit of 2% (2.5% for the CEO) times years of service multiplied by final average compensation. Final average compensation is defined as three-year average salary plus seven-year average bonus. The target benefit is reduced by benefits from social security and the Company's profit sharing plan. The maximum target benefit is 50% of final average compensation.

	Three months ended March 31,
	2009			2008
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost
Service Cost	$	3,990		$	33,232
Interest Cost		26,418			29,684
Amortization of Plan Gain		(8,180	)		—
Amortization of prior service cost		21,821			21,821
Net periodic benefit cost	$	44,049		$	84,737

The Company estimates that the annual net periodic benefit cost will be $176,196 for the year ended December 31, 2009 This compares to an annual net periodic benefit cost of $336,855 for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Estimated Contributions for Fiscal 2009

For unfunded plans, contributions to the Executive Salary Continuation Plan are the benefit payments made to participants. At December 31, 2008 the Company expected to make benefit payments of $54,144 in connection with the Executive Salary Continuation Plan during fiscal 2009.

7.	DIRECTORS’ RETIREMENT PLAN

The Company has an unfunded non-contributory defined benefit pension plan ("Directors’ Retirement Plan"). The Directors’ Retirement Plan provides a retirement benefit equal to $1,000 per year of service as a director up to a maximum benefit of $15,000. The retirement benefit is payable monthly for 10 years following retirement at age 65. Reduced retirement benefits are available after age 55 and 10 years of service.

	Three months ended March 31,
	2009		2008
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost
Service Cost	$	11,088	$	14,424
Interest Cost		7,921		7,731
Amortization of net loss		—		—
Net periodic benefit cost	$	19,009	$	22,155

The Company estimates that the annual net periodic benefit cost will be $76,034 for the year ended December 31, 2009. This compares to annual net periodic benefit costs of $88,622 for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Estimated Contributions for Fiscal 2009

For unfunded plans, contributions to the Directors’ Retirement Plan are the benefit payments made to participants. At December 31, 2008 the Company expected to make cash contributions of $15,000 to the Directors’ Retirement Plan during fiscal 2009.

8.	FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

The Company utilizes fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Securities available-for-sale, trading securities and derivatives are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, the Company may be required to record at fair value other assets on a non-recurring basis, such as loans held-for-sale, loans held-for-investment and certain other assets. These non-recurring fair value adjustments typically involve application of lower of cost or market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

Fair Value Hierarchy

Under SFAS No. 157, the Company groups assets and liabilities at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:

	Level 1	Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.

	Level 2	Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

	Level 3	Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow models, and similar techniques and include management judgment and estimation which may be significant.

Following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities recorded at fair value.

Investment Securities Available-for-Sale

Investment securities available-for-sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted market prices, if available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the security’s credit rating, prepayment assumptions, and other factors such as credit loss assumptions. Level 1 securities include those traded on an active exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange, U.S. Treasury securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets and money market funds. Level 2 securities include mortgage-backed securities issued by government sponsored entities, municipal bonds and corporate debt securities. Securities classified as Level 3 include asset-backed securities in less liquid markets.

Loans Held-for-Sale

Loans held-for-sale are carried at the lower of cost or market value. The fair value of loans held-for-sale is based on what secondary markets are currently offering for portfolios with similar characteristics. As such, the Company classifies loans subjected to non-recurring fair value adjustments as Level 2.

Loans

The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time to time, a loan is considered impaired and an allowance for loan losses is established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as individually impaired, the Company measures impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan” (SFAS No. 114). The fair value of impaired loans is estimated using one of several methods, including collateral value, market value of similar debt, enterprise value, liquidation value and discounted cash flows. Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the fair value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such loans. At March 31, 2009, substantially all of the total impaired loans were evaluated based on the fair value of the underlying collateral securing the loan. In accordance with SFAS No. 157, impaired loans where an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral require classification in the fair value hierarchy. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the Company records the impaired loan as non-recurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable market price, the Company records the impaired loan as non-recurring Level 3.

Loan Servicing Rights

Loan servicing rights are subject to impairment testing. A valuation model, which utilizes a discounted cash flow analysis using interest rates and prepayment speed assumptions currently quoted for comparable instruments and a discount rate determined by management, is used in the completion of impairment testing. If the valuation model reflects a value less than the carrying value, loan servicing rights are adjusted to fair value through a valuation allowance as determined by the model. As such, the Company classifies loan servicing rights subjected to non-recurring fair value adjustments as Level 3.

Assets Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The table below presents the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2009 by SFAS No. 157 valuation hierarchy.


(in thousands)
March 31, 2009	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Investment securities available-for-sale	$	47,522	$	1,312	$	46,210	$	—

Total investments at fair value	$	47,522	$	1,312	$	46,210	$	—

Assets Recorded at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis

The Company may be required, from time to time, to measure certain assets at fair value on a non-recurring basis in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These include assets that are measured at the lower of cost or market that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period.

Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are included in the table below by level within the fair value hierarchy as of March 31, 2009.


(in thousands)
March 31, 2009	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Impaired loans	$	17,244	$	—	$	—	$	17,244
Loan servicing rights		908		—		—		908

Total impaired loans and loan servicing rights at fair value	$	18,152	$	—	$	—	$	18,152

9.	PREFERRED STOCK AND COMMON STOCK WARRANTS

On March 13, 2009, we issued to the U.S. Treasury 17,390 shares of our Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, par value $0.01 per share, having a liquidation preference per share equal to $1,000. The Series A Preferred Stock pays cumulative dividends at a rate of 5% per year for the first five years and thereafter at a rate of 9% per year. At any time, we may, at our option, subject to any necessary bank regulatory approval, redeem the Series A Preferred Stock at a price equal to its liquidation preference plus accrued and unpaid dividends. The Series A Preferred Stock is generally non-voting. We are not permitted to increase dividends on our common shares above the amount of the last quarterly cash dividend per share declared prior to March 13, 2009 without the U.S. Treasury’s approval (but this does not affect our ability to declare and pay stock dividends) unless all of the Series A Preferred Shares have been redeemed or transferred by the U.S. Treasury to unaffiliated third parties. The consent of the U.S. Treasury generally is required for us to make any stock repurchase (other than in connection with the administration of any employee benefit plan in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practice), unless all of the Series A Preferred Shares have been redeemed or transferred by the U.S. Treasury to unaffiliated third parties. Further, our common shares may not be repurchased if we are in arrears on the payment of Series A Preferred Shares dividends. The U.S. Treasury, as part of the preferred stock issuance, received a warrant to purchase 352,977 shares of our common stock at an initial exercise price of $7.39. The warrant has been adjusted for a 4% stock dividend issued on March 31, 2009. The proceeds from the U.S. Treasury were allocated based on the relative fair value of the warrants as compared with the fair value of the preferred stock. The fair value of the warrants was determined using a valuation model which incorporates assumptions including our common stock price, dividend yield, stock price volatility and the risk-free interest rate. The fair value of the preferred stock is determined based on assumptions regarding the discount rate (market rate) on the preferred stock which was estimated to be approximately 12% at the date of issuance. The discount on the preferred stock will be accreted to par value using a constant effective yield of approximately 5.9% over a ten-year term, which is the expected life of the preferred stock.

ITEM 2.

FIRST NORTHERN COMMUNITY BANCORP

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and subject to the "safe harbor" created by those sections. Forward-looking statements include the information concerning possible or assumed future results of operations of the Company set forth under the heading "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in this Report. Forward-looking statements also include statements in which words such as "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "plan," "believe," estimate," "consider" or similar expressions are used, and include assumptions concerning the Company's operations, future results, and prospects. These forward-looking statements are based upon current expectations and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions, which are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from those set forth in or implied by the forward-looking statements and related assumptions. Some factors that may cause actual results to differ from the forward-looking statements include the following: (i) the effect of changing regional and national economic conditions, including the continuing fiscal challenges for the State of California and the financial crisis affecting the banking system and financial markets; (ii) uncertainty regarding the economic outlook resulting from the continuing hostilities in the Middle East and the war on terrorism, as well as actions taken or to be taken by the United States or other governments as a result of further acts or threats of terrorism; (iii) significant changes in interest rates and prepayment speeds; (iv) credit risks of commercial, agricultural, real estate, consumer and other lending activities; (v) adverse effects of current and future federal and state banking or other laws and regulations or governmental fiscal or monetary policies including legislative responses to the financial crisis affecting the banking system and financial markets; (vi) competition in the banking industry; (vii) changes in demand for loan products and other bank products; (viii) changes in accounting standards; (ix) our participation in the U.S. Treasury TARP Capital Purchase Program; and (x) other external developments which could materially impact the Company's operational and financial performance. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances arising after the date on which they are made. For additional information concerning risks and uncertainties related to the Company and its operations, please refer to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and Item 1A. of Part II of this Report.

The following is a discussion and analysis of the significant changes in the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and of the significant changes in income and expenses reported in the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income as of and for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 and should be read in conjunction with the Company's consolidated 2008 financial statements and the notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report to Stockholders and Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, along with other financial information included in this Report.

INTRODUCTION

This overview of Management’s Discussion and Analysis highlights selected information in this Report and may not contain all of the information that is important to you. For a more complete understanding of trends, events, commitments, uncertainties, liquidity, capital resources and critical accounting estimates, you should carefully read this entire Report, together with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Our subsidiary, First Northern Bank of Dixon (the “Bank”), is a California state-chartered bank that derives most of its revenues from lending and deposit taking in the Sacramento Valley region of Northern California. Interest rates, business conditions and customer confidence all affect our ability to generate revenues. In addition, the regulatory environment and competition can challenge our ability to generate those revenues.

Significant results and developments during the first quarter 2009 include:

· Net income of $0.45 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, compared to $0.06 million earned in the same fiscal period last year.

· Diluted income per common share for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was $0.04, compared to diluted income per common share of $0.01 reported in the same period last year (per common share data has been adjusted for stock dividends).

· Net interest income decreased in the three months ended March 31, 2009 by $1.5 million, or 16.8%, to $7.2 million from $8.7 million in the same period last year. The decrease in net interest income was primarily attributable to decreases in the average volume of interest-earning assets combined with a decrease in interest yields, which was partially offset by a decrease in interest costs. Net interest margin decreased from 5.56% for the three-month period ending March 31, 2008 to 4.89% for the same period ending March 31, 2009.

· Provision for loan losses of $1.1 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 compared to a provision for loan losses of $3.7 million for the same period in 2008. The decrease in the provision for loan losses during the three-month period in 2009 was primarily due to reduced deterioration in collateral values and repayment abilities of some of the Bank's customers centered in the Company's residential construction and construction related commercial segment of the loan portfolio affected by the repercussions of the country's housing market crisis, as compared to the same period last year.

· Total assets at March 31, 2009 were $688.4 million, an increase of $7.8 million, or 1.15%, from levels at March 31, 2008.

· Total net loans at March 31, 2009 (including loans held-for-sale) decreased $0.05 million, or 0.01%, to $485.7 million compared to March 31, 2008.

· Total investment securities at March 31, 2009 decreased $14.6 million, or 23.56%, to $47.5 million compared to March 31, 2008.

· Total deposits of $588.8 million at March 31, 2009, represented a decrease of $11.8 million, or 1.96%, compared to March 31, 2008.

· Issuance of Series A Preferred Stock and warrant to the U.S. Treasury under the Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program for proceeds to the Company before issuance costs and expenses of $17.39 million.

SUMMARY

The Company recorded net income of $453,000 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, representing an increase of $393,000 from net income of $60,000 for the same period in 2008.

The following table presents a summary of the results for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.

(in thousands, except per share and percentage amounts)

	Three months			Three months
	ended			ended
	March 31, 2009			March 31, 2008

For the Period:

Net Income	$	453		$	60

Basic Earnings Per Common Share*	$	0.04		$	0.01

Diluted Earnings Per Common Share*	$	0.04		$	0.01

Return on Average Assets		0.27	%		0.03	%

Net Income / Beginning Equity		2.92	%		0.38	%


At Period End:

Total Assets		688,424			680,589

Total Loans, Net (including loans held-for-sale)		485,742			485,788

Total Investment Securities		47,522			62,166

Total Deposits		588,796			600,618

Loan-To-Deposit Ratio		82.5			80.9

*Adjusted for stock dividends

FIRST NORTHERN COMMUNITY BANCORP

Distribution of Average Statements of Condition and Analysis of Net Interest Income

(in thousands, except percentage amounts)

	Three months ended							Three months ended
	March 31, 2009							March 31, 2008
	Average				Yield/			Average				Yield/
	Balance		Interest		Rate			Balance		Interest		Rate
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Loans (1)	$	498,384	$	7,937		6.46	%	$	487,786	$	9,240		7.60	%
Federal funds sold		53,993		19		0.14	%		39,190		290		2.97	%
Interest bearing due from banks		2,501		31		5.03	%		22,808		268		4.71	%
Investment securities, taxable		17,191		194		4.58	%		40,669		498		4.91	%
Investment securities, non-taxable (2)		25,013		262		4.25	%		34,332		358		4.18	%
Other interest earning assets		2,311		—		—			2,200		29		5.29	%
Total interest-earning assets		599,393		8,443		5.71	%		626,985		10,683		6.83	%
Non-interest-earning assets:
Cash and due from banks		39,181							25,140
Premises and equipment, net		8,366							7,961
Other real estate owned		4,339							1,042
Accrued interest receivable and other assets		26,707							24,895
Total average assets		677,986							686,023

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing transaction deposits		124,093		176		0.58	%		130,753		324		0.99	%
Savings and MMDA’s		163,404		283		0.70	%		178,334		568		1.28	%
Time, under $100,000		67,080		267		1.61	%		44,809		333		2.98	%
Time, $100,000 and over		62,750		336		2.17	%		70,568		687		3.90	%
FHLB advances and other borrowings		17,344		158		3.69	%		10,393		86		3.32	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		434,671		1,220		1.14	%		434,857		1,998		1.84	%
Non-interest-bearing liabilities:
Non-interest-bearing demand deposits		174,520							179,420
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities		5,931							6,444
Total liabilities		615,122							620,721
Total stockholders’ equity		62,864							65,302
Total average liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	677,986						$	686,023
Net interest income and net interest margin (3)			$	7,223		4.89	%			$	8,685		5.56	%

1. Average balances for loans include loans held-for-sale and non-accrual loans and are net of the allowance for loan losses, but non-accrued interest thereon is excluded. Loan interest income includes loan fees of approximately $490 and $713 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
2. Interest income and yields on tax-exempt securities are not presented on a taxable equivalent basis.
3. Net interest margin is computed by dividing net interest income by total average interest-earning assets.

CHANGES IN FINANCIAL CONDITION

The assets of the Company set forth in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets reflect a $11,142,000 increase in cash and due from banks, a $36,850,000 increase in Federal funds sold, a $5,416,000 increase in investment securities available-for-sale, a $36,385,000 decrease in net loans held-for-investment, a $2,967,000 increase in loans held-for-sale, a $711,000 decrease in other real estate owned and a $1,744,000 decrease in accrued interest receivable and other assets from December 31, 2008 to March 31, 2009. The increase in cash and due from banks was largely the result of an increase in non-interest bearing due from banks accounts. The increase in Federal funds sold was due, in large part, to a decrease in net loans held-for-investment, and an increase in deposits, which was partially offset by an increase in investment securities available-for-sale. The increase in investment securities available-for-sale was primarily the result of purchases of agency mortgage-back securities and was moderately offset by a decrease in agency bonds. Management evaluated the unrealized loss associated with the investment securities available-for-sale and no decline was considered “other than temporary” at March 31, 2009. Due to the fact the Company has the ability and intent to hold these investments until a market price recovery or maturity, these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired. The decrease in loans held-for-investment was in large part due to decreases in the following loan categories: commercial and industrial; agricultural; equipment; true equipment leases; real estate commercial and construction and real estate SBA (Small Business Administration), which were partially offset by increases in home equity loans and overdrafts. The increase in loans held-for-sale was in real estate loans and was due, for the most part, to an increase in the origination of loans. The Company originated approximately $34,359,000 in residential mortgage loans during the first three months of 2009, which was offset by approximately $31,392,000 in loan sales during this period. The decrease in other real estate owned was due to a decline in the value of other real estate owned. The decrease in accrued interest receivable and other assets was mainly due to decreases in suspense items, which was partially offset by increases in the cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance.

The liabilities of the Company set forth in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets reflect an increase in total deposits of $4,078,000 at March 31, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008. The increase in deposits was due to increases the following deposit accounts: savings; money market; interest-bearing transaction and time deposits, which was partially offset by a decrease in demand deposit accounts. The primary reason for the increase in deposits was due to the ongoing economic impact of the deterioration of the stock market and as a result a flight to federally insured deposit accounts has ensued. The decrease in demand deposit accounts is due in large part to impact of the slowing real estate activity in the communities served by the Bank. Since the peak in the real estate market, deposits in the real estate related business accounts show consistent reduction in average and end of period balances while the number of customers has remained stable. Federal Home Loan Bank advances (“FHLB advances”) and other borrowings decreased $4,278,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008, due to a decrease in FHLB advances.

CHANGES IN RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Interest Income

The Federal Open Market Committee decreased the Federal Funds rate by approximately 213 basis points during the twelve-month period ended March 31, 2009.

Interest income on loans for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 was down 14.1% from the same period in 2008, decreasing from $9,240,000 to $7,937,000. The decrease in interest income on loans for the three-month period ended as compared to the same period a year ago was primarily due to a 114 basis point decrease in loan yields, which was partially offset by an increase in average loans.

Interest income on investment securities available-for-sale for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 was down 46.7% from the same period in 2008, decreasing from $856,000 to $456,000. The decrease in interest income on investment securities for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 as compared to the same period a year ago was primarily due to a decrease in average investment securities combined with a 25 basis point decrease in investment securities yields.

Interest income on Federal Funds sold for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 was down 93.5% from the same period in 2008, decreasing from $290,000 to $19,000. The decrease for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 as compared to the same period a year ago was primarily due to a 283 basis point decrease in Federal Funds yields, which was partially offset by an increase in average Federal Funds sold.

Interest income on interest-bearing due from banks for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 was down 88.4% from the same period in 2008, decreasing from $268,000 to $31,000. The decrease in interest income on interest-bearing due from banks for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 as compared to the same period a year ago was due to a decrease in average interest-bearing due from banks, which was partially offset by a 32 basis point increase in interest yields.

Interest Expense

The decrease in general market interest rates decreased the Company’s cost of funds in the first three months of 2009 compared to the same period a year ago.

Interest expense on deposits and other borrowings for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 was down 38.9% over the same period in 2008 from $1,998,000 to $1,220,000. The decrease in interest expense during the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 was primarily due to a 70 basis point decrease in the Company’s average cost of funds.

Provision for Loan Losses

There was a provision for loan losses of $1,106,000 for three-month period ended March 31, 2009 compared to a provision for loan losses of $3,659,000 for the same period in 2008. The allowance for loan losses was approximately $14,463,000, or 2.92% of total loans, at March 31, 2009 compared to $14,435,000, or 2.71% of total loans, at December 31, 2008. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level considered adequate by management to provide for probable loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio.

The decrease in the provision for loan losses during the three-month period in 2009 was primarily due to reduced deterioration in collateral values and repayment abilities of some of the Bank's customers centered in the Company's residential construction and construction-related commercial segment of the loan portfolio affected by the repercussions of the country's housing market crisis.

Provision for Unfunded Lending Commitment Losses

There was no provision for unfunded lending commitment losses for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 compared to a recovery of provision of $41,000 for the same period in 2008.

The provision for unfunded lending commitment losses is included in non-interest expense.

Other Operating Income

Other operating income was down 23.4% for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 from the same period in 2008, decreasing from $2,272,000 to $1,740,000.

This decrease was primarily due to decreases in gains on available-for-sale securities, service charges on deposit accounts, and investment brokerage services income, which was partially offset by increases in gains on sales of loans held-for-sale and loan servicing income. There were no sales of securities in the first quarter of 2009 and this was the reason for the decrease in gains on available-for-sale securities as compared to the sale of securities during the first quarter of 2008. The decrease in service charges on deposit accounts was due to a decrease in overdraft fees and service charges on business checking accounts. The decrease in investment brokerage services income was due to a decrease in the demand for those services. The increase in gains on sales of loans held-for-sale was due to increased sold loans as compared to the same period in 2008. The increase in loan servicing income was due to an increase in the booked income for the Company’s mortgage servicing asset.

Other Operating Expenses

Total other operating expenses was up 5.90% for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 from the same period in 2008, increasing from $7,241,000 to $7,668,000.

The principal reasons for the increase in other operating expenses in the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 were increases in the following: occupancy and equipment expense; data processing; stationary and supplies; other real estate owned expense and other miscellaneous operating expense, which were partially offset by decreases in salaries and benefits, and advertising. The increase in occupancy and equipment expense was due to increases in the following: rent expense; equipment maintenance; and solar equipment rental, which was partially offset by decreases in other equipment rental; and depreciation on furniture and equipment and computer hardware. The increase in data processing costs was due to increased expenses associated with maintaining and monitoring the Company’s data communications network and internet banking system. The increase in stationery and supplies was due to an increase in supply usage. The increase in other real estate owned expense was due to write-downs and maintenance expenses related to OREO properties. The decrease in salaries and benefits was due, for the most part, to decreases in the following: profit sharing expenses due to decreased profits, contingent sick-pay and vacation-pay; stock compensation expense; deferred loan processing costs; and worker’s compensation expense, which were partially offset by increases in merit salaries and; commissions paid. The decrease in advertising costs was due to a decrease in printed materials and related costs.

The following table sets forth other miscellaneous operating expenses by category for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.

	(in thousands)

	Three		Three
	months		months
	ended		ended
	March 31,		March 31,
	2009		2008
Other miscellaneous operating expenses
Recovery of provision for unfunded lending commitments	$	—	$	(41	)
FDIC assessments		216		120
Contributions		19		23
Legal fees		109		69
Accounting and audit fees		124		246
Consulting fees		52		105
Postage expense		98		65
Telephone expense		69		64
Public relations		38		104
Training expense		20		61
Loan origination expense		260		100
Computer software depreciation		53		61
Other miscellaneous expense		457		425

Total other miscellaneous operating expenses	$	1,515	$	1,402

Income Taxes

The Company’s tax rate, the Company’s income or loss before taxes and the amount of tax relief provided by non-taxable earnings primarily affect the Company’s provision for income taxes.

In the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company’s benefit for income taxes increased $261,000 from the same period last year, from a benefit of $3,000 to benefit of $264,000.

The increase in benefit for income taxes for all periods presented is primarily attributable to the respective level of earnings combined with the interim effective tax rate and the incidence of allowable deductions, in particular non-taxable municipal bond income, tax credits generated from low-income housing investments, solar tax credits, excludable interest income and, for California franchise taxes, higher excludable interest income on loans within designated enterprise zones.

Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes

The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” on January 1, 2007. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company recognized an increase for unrecognized tax benefits. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits for the three months ended March 31, 2009 is as follows:


	(in thousands)
Balance at January 1, 2009	$	122
Additions for tax positions taken in the current period		—
Reductions for tax positions taken in the current period		—
Additions for tax positions taken in prior years		—
Reductions for tax positions taken in prior years		—
Decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities		—
Decreases as a result of a lapse in statue of limitations		—

Balance at March 31, 2009	$	122

The Company does not anticipate any significant increase or decrease in unrecognized tax benefits during 2009. If recognized, the entire amount of the unrecognized tax benefits would affect the effective tax rate.

The Company classifies interest and penalties as a component of the provision for income taxes. At March 31, 2009, unrecognized interest and penalties were $27 thousand. The tax years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005 remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service. The tax years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005, and 2004 remain subject to examination by the California Franchise Tax Board. The deductibility of these tax positions will be determined through examination by the appropriate tax jurisdictions or the expiration of the tax statute of limitations.

Off-Balance Sheet Commitments

The following table shows the distribution of the Company’s undisbursed loan commitments at the dates indicated.

	(in thousands)

		March 31, 2009		December 31, 2008

Undisbursed loan commitments		$	205,387	$	198,615
Standby letters of credit			5,042		5,715
		$	210,429	$	204,330

The reserve for unfunded lending commitments amounted to $1,021,000 at March 31, 2009, which was unchanged from December 31, 2008. The reserve for unfunded lending commitments is included in other liabilities.

Asset Quality

The Company manages asset quality and credit risk by maintaining diversification in its loan portfolio and through review processes that include analysis of credit requests and ongoing examination of outstanding loans and delinquencies, with particular attention to portfolio dynamics and loan mix. The Company strives to identify loans experiencing difficulty early enough to correct the problems, to record charge-offs promptly based on realistic assessments of current collateral values and to maintain an adequate allowance for loan losses at all times.

It is generally the Company’s policy to discontinue interest accruals once a loan is past due for a period of 90 days as to interest or principal payments. When a loan is placed on non-accrual, interest accruals cease and uncollected accrued interest is reversed and charged against current income. Payments received on non-accrual loans are applied against principal. A loan may only be restored to an accruing basis when it again becomes well secured and in the process of collection or all past due amounts have been collected.

Non-accrual loans amounted to $17,244,000 at March 31, 2009 and were comprised of eight commercial loans totaling $1,779,000, two agricultural loans totaling $177,000, one consumer loan totaling $99,000, nine commercial real estate loans totaling $7,844,000, eighteen residential construction loans totaling $6,874,000 and two residential mortgage loans totaling $471,000. At December 31, 2008, non-accrual loans amounted to $13,545,000 and were comprised of six commercial loans totaling $2,619,000, six commercial real estate loans totaling $4,184,000, eleven residential construction loans totaling $6,309,000, one residential mortgage loan totaling $334,000, and one consumer loan totaling $99,000. Non-accrual loans amounted to $18,623,000 at March 31, 2008 and were comprised of three commercial loans totaling $287,000, two agricultural loans totaling $101,000, and twenty-eight real estate loans totaling $18,235,000.

The Company had loans restructured and in compliance with modified terms totaling $2,145,000 at March 31, 2009. The Company had no restructured loans at March 31, 2008 and had loans restructured and in compliance with modified terms totaling $2,682,000 at December 31, 2008.

Total impaired loans at March 31, 2009, consisting of loans on non-accrual status, totaled $17,244,000, the majority of the impaired loans were in management's opinion adequately collateralized based on recently obtained appraised property values or guaranteed by a governmental entity; for the unsecured portion of the impaired loans, specific reserves amounting to $314,000 were allocated to these loans. See “Allowance for Loan Losses” below for additional information. No assurance can be given that the existing or any additional collateral will be sufficient to secure full recovery of the obligations owed under these loans.

The Company had loans 90 days past due and still accruing totaling $2,511,000, $348,000 and $713,000 at March 31, 2009 and 2008 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

The Company had loans restructured and in compliance with modified terms totaling $2,145,000, -0- and 2,682,000 March 31, 2009 and 2008 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

OREO is made up of property that the Company has acquired by deed in lieu of foreclosure or through foreclosure proceedings, and property that the Company does not hold title to but is in actual control of, known as in-substance foreclosure. The estimated fair value of the property is determined prior to transferring the balance to OREO. The balance transferred to OREO is the lesser of the estimated fair market value of the property, or the book value of the loan, less estimated cost to sell. A write-down may be deemed necessary to bring the book value of the loan equal to the appraised value. Appraisals or loan officer evaluations are then done periodically thereafter charging any additional write-downs to the appropriate expense account.

OREO amounted to $3,657,000, $1,215,000, and $4,368,000 for the periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, and December 31, 2008, respectively. The decrease in OREO at March 31, 2009 from the balance at December 31, 2008 was due, for the most part, to write-downs of OREO properties.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The Company’s Allowance for Loan Losses is maintained at a level believed by management to be adequate to provide for loan losses that can be reasonably anticipated. The allowance is increased by provisions charged to operating expense and reduced by net charge-offs. The Company makes credit reviews of the loan portfolio and considers current economic conditions, loan loss experience, and other factors in determining the adequacy of the reserve balance. The allowance for loan losses is based on estimates, and actual losses may vary from current estimates.

The following table summarizes the loan loss experience of the Company for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, and for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Analysis of the Allowance for Loan Losses
(Amounts in thousands, except percentage amounts)

	Three months ended March 31,						Year ended December 31,
	2009			2008			2008

Balance at beginning of period	$	14,435		$	10,876		$	10,876
Provision for loan losses		1,106			3,659			16,164
Loans charged-off:
Commercial		(251	)		(184	)		(2,224	)
Agriculture		—			—			(88	)
Real estate mortgage		—			(82	)		(299	)
Real estate construction		(1,235	)		(2,696	)		(10,265	)
Consumer loans to individuals		(84	)		(104	)		(488	)

Total charged-off		(1,570	)		(3,066	)		(13,324	)

Recoveries:
Commercial		6			4			153
Agriculture		—			50			56
Real estate mortgage		—			32			32
Real estate construction		425			—			159
Consumer loans to individuals		61			92			319

Total recoveries		492			178			719

Net charge-offs		(1,078	)		(2,888	)		(12,605	)

Balance at end of period	$	14,463		$	11,647		$	14,435

Ratio of net charge-offs
To average loans outstanding during the period		(0.21	%)		(0.58	%)		(2.33	%)
Allowance for loan losses
To total loans at the end of the period		2.92	%		2.34	%		2.71	%
To non-performing loans at the end of the period		73.21	%		61.39	%		101.24	%

Non-performing loans totaled $19,755,000, $18,971,000, and $14,258,000 at March 31, 2009 and 2008, and December 31, 2008, respectively.

Deposits

Deposits are one of the Company’s primary sources of funds. At March 31, 2009, the Company had the following deposit mix: 28.1% in savings and MMDA deposits, 22.9% in time deposits, 21.1% in interest-bearing transaction deposits and 27.9% in non-interest-bearing transaction deposits. Non-interest-bearing transaction deposits enhance the Company’s net interest income by lowering its cost of funds.

The Company obtains deposits primarily from the communities it serves. No material portion of its deposits has been obtained from or is dependent on any one person or industry. The Company accepts deposits in excess of $100,000 from customers. These deposits are priced to remain competitive.

Maturities of time certificates of deposits of $100,000 or more outstanding at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are summarized as follows:

	(in thousands)
	March 31, 2009		December 31, 2008
Three months or less	$	25,325	$	27,753
Over three to twelve months		43,045		26,595
Over twelve months		9,984		5,248
Total	$	78,354	$	59,596

The increase in time certificates of deposit (CD's) of $100,000 or more is primarily attributable to the lack of investor confidence in the stock market.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

In order to serve our market area, the Company must maintain adequate liquidity and adequate capital. Liquidity is measured by various ratios with the most common being the ratio of net loans to deposits (including loans held-for-sale). This ratio was 82.5% on March 31, 2009. In addition, on March 31, 2009, the Company had the following short-term investments: $77,710,000 in Federal funds sold; $2,500,000 in Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (“CDARS”); $2,791,000 in securities due within one year; and $3,862,000 in securities due in one to five years.

To meet unanticipated funding requirements, the Company maintains short-term unsecured lines of credit with other banks totaling $15,000,000 at March 31, 2009; additionally the Company has a line of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank, on which the current borrowing capacity is $124,316,000.

The Company’s primary source of liquidity on a stand-alone basis is dividends from the Bank. Dividends from the Bank are subject to regulatory restrictions.

As of March 31, 2009, the Bank’s capital ratios exceeded applicable regulatory requirements. The following table presents the capital ratios for the Bank, compared to the standards for well-capitalized depository institutions, as of March 31, 2009.

	(amounts in thousands except percentage amounts)
	Actual					Adequately			Well Capitalized
						Capitalized			Ratio
	Capital		Ratio			Ratio			Requirement
Leverage	$	74,855		11.07	%		4.0	%		5.0	%
Tier 1 Risk-Based	$	74,855		13.63	%		4.0	%		6.0	%
Total Risk-Based	$	81,826		14.90	%		8.0	%		10.0	%

CPP Participation

On March 13, 2009 the Company received $17,390,000 from the U.S. Treasury in exchange for 17,390 shares of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, par value $0.01 per share (Preferred Shares) and a warrant to purchase 352,977 shares of common stock at $7.39 per share under the Capital Purchase Program (CPP). The Company used the proceeds from this sale, net of issuance costs and expenses, for general working capital. The Preferred Shares qualify as Tier 1 capital for regulatory purposes and rank senior to common stock and bear a cumulative dividend rate of five percent per annum for the first five years they are outstanding and a rate of nine percent per annum thereafter. The Preferred Shares have no maturity date and rank senior to the Common Stock with respect to the payment of dividends and distributions and amounts payable upon liquidation, dissolution and winding up of the Company. Subject to the approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Preferred Shares are redeemable at the option of the Company at any time at 100% of their liquidation preference. The Board of Directors and management believe it was prudent to participate in the CPP because (i) the cost of capital under this program may be significantly lower than the cost of capital otherwise available to the Company at this time, and (ii) despite being well-capitalized, additional capital under this program provides the Company and First Northern Bank further flexibility to meet future capital needs that may arise in the current uncertain economic environment.

The U.S. Treasury may not transfer a portion or portions of the warrant with respect to, and/or exercise the warrant for more than one-half of, the 352,977 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrant, in the aggregate, until the earlier of (i) the date on which the Company has redeemed the Preferred Shares and (ii) December 31, 2009. In the event the Company redeems the Preferred Shares pursuant to the terms of the CPP prior to December 31, 2009, the number of the shares of common stock underlying the portion of the warrant then held by the U.S. Treasury will be reduced by one-half of the shares of common stock originally covered by the warrant.

The Purchase Agreement pursuant to which the Preferred Shares and the warrant were sold contains limitations on the payment of dividends on Common Stock, including with respect to the payment of cash dividends (but does not affect our ability to declare and pay stock dividends) and on the Company’s ability to repurchase its common stock, and subjects the Company to certain of the executive compensation limitations included in Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008. As a condition to the closing of the transaction, each of Owen J. Onsum, Louise A. Walker, Patrick S. Day and Robert M. Walker, the Company’s Senior Executive Officers (as defined in the Purchase Agreement), executed a voluntary waiver of any claim against the U.S. Treasury or the Company for any changes to such Senior Executive Officer’s compensation or benefits that are required to comply with the regulations issued by the U.S. Treasury under the CPP as published in the Federal Register on October 20, 2008 and acknowledging that the regulation may require modification of the compensation, bonus, incentive and other benefit plans, arrangements and policies and agreements (including so-called “golden parachute” agreements) as they relate to the period the U.S. Treasury holds any equity or debt securities of the Company acquired through the TARP Capital Purchase Program.

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company believes that there have been no material changes in the quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk as of March 31, 2009, from those presented in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, which are incorporated by reference herein.

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) have concluded that the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of March 31, 2009. This conclusion is based on an evaluation conducted under the supervision and with the participation of management. Disclosure controls and procedures are those controls and procedures which ensure that information required to be disclosed in this filing is accumulated and communicated to management and is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported in a timely manner and in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, there were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results and the following information.

The capital and credit markets have been experiencing significant volatility and disruption for more than 12 months. In some cases, the markets have produced downward pressure on stock prices and credit availability for certain issuers without regard to those issuers’ underlying financial strength. If current levels of market disruption and volatility continue or worsen, there can be no assurance that we will not experience an adverse effect, which may be material, on our ability to access capital and on our business, financial condition and results of operations. As a result of these volatile and disrupted credit markets, our customers’ ability to raise capital and refinance maturing obligations could be adversely affected, and this could result in a further adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations as contributing to a widening of credit spreads and a general lack of liquidity in the marketplace, all of which can result in a further adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The U.S. and global economies have experienced a slowing of economic growth, unprecedented volatility in the financial markets, and significant deterioration in sectors of the U.S. residential real estate markets, all of which present challenges for the banking and financial services industry

Commencing in 2007 and continuing throughout 2009, certain adverse financial developments have impacted the U.S. and global economies and financial markets and present challenges for the banking and financial services industry and for First Northern. These developments include a general slowing of economic growth both globally and in the U.S. which has prompted the Congress to adopt an economic stimulus bill which President Bush signed into law on February 13, 2008, and which prompted the Federal Reserve Board to decrease its discount rate and the federal funds rate numerous times in the first three months of 2008. In addition, financial and credit conditions in the domestic residential real estate markets have deteriorated significantly, particularly in the subprime sector. These conditions in turn have led to significant deterioration in certain financial markets, particularly the markets for subprime residential mortgage-backed securities and for collateralized debt obligations backed by residential mortgage-backed securities. On July 30, 2008, President Bush signed into law a housing bill which grants the U.S. Treasury Department broad authority to safeguard Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and authorizes the Federal Housing Administration to insure up to $300 billion in refinanced mortgages. In the third quarter of 2008, the volatility and disruption in the capital and credit markets reached unprecedented levels. On October 3, 2008, President Bush signed into law the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA) in response to the recent financial crises affecting the banking system and financial markets. EESA is intended as a response to the financial crises affecting the banking system and financial markets. Under EESA, the U.S. Treasury will have the authority to, among other things, purchase up to $700 billion of mortgages, mortgage-backed securities and certain other financial instruments from financial institutions for the purpose of stabilizing and providing liquidity to the U.S. financial markets. Further, pursuant to the EESA, on October 14, 2008, the U.S. Treasury announced a voluntary Capital Purchase Program pursuant to which the U.S. Treasury will purchase up to $250 billion in senior preferred stock of qualifying U.S. financial institutions. On October 13, 2008, the U.S. Treasury announced that it had agreed, under the authority of the new law, with the nine largest banks in the U.S. to purchase an aggregate of $125 billion in senior preferred stock in such banks and that it would allocate an additional $125 billion to the purchase of senior preferred stock in other banking institutions. The purpose of the program is to provide substantial new capital to the U.S. banking industry. It cannot be predicted whether this recent legislation will result in significant improvement in financial and economic conditions affecting the banking industry. If, notwithstanding the federal government’s recent fiscal and monetary measures, the U.S. economy were to remain in a recessionary condition for an extended period, this would present additional significant challenges for the U.S. banking and financial services industry and for First Northern. While it is difficult to predict how long these conditions will exist and which markets and businesses of our company may be affected, these factors could continue to present risks for some time for the industry and our company.

On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed into law the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) in an attempt to reverse the U.S. economic downturn. A large portion of the ARRA is devoted to new federal spending programs designed to increase economic output, decrease unemployment and invest in national infrastructure. Of the $787 billion in federal spending appropriated by the ARRA, $286 billion will be devoted to tax cuts, $120 billion will be used to fund infrastructure projects and $381 billion will be allocated for social programs and other spending. A substantial portion of the appropriation funds will go directly to the states, which was a key element in the budget approved by the California Legislature and signed by Governor Schwarzenegger on February 20, 2009.

On March 31, 2009, the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) announced the Public-Private Investment Program (PPIP) that seeks to eliminate “toxic” real estate-backed assets from the balance sheets of United States financial institutions through partnerships with private investors in an attempt to restore the normal functioning of secondary markets for securities backed by such assets, encourage the extension of credit and restore investor confidence in financial institutions. The PPIP will create Public-Private Investment Funds that will use private equity investment, equity investment from the U.S. Treasury, U.S. Treasury debt financing, and FDIC-guaranteed debt to purchase “toxic” real estate assets and securities backed by such assets. The U.S. Treasury has committed to furnish up to $100 billion of capital for the PPIP.

It cannot be predicted whether this recent legislation will result in significant improvement in financial and economic conditions affecting the banking industry. If, notwithstanding the federal government’s recent fiscal and monetary measures, the U.S. economy were to remain in a recessionary condition for an extended period, this would present additional significant challenges for the U.S. banking and financial services industry and for First Northern. While it is difficult to predict how long these conditions will exist and which markets and businesses of our company may be affected, these factors could continue to present risks for some time for the industry and our company.

Adverse economic factors affecting certain industries we serve could adversely affect our business

We are subject to certain industry-specific economic factors. For example, a portion of our total loan portfolio is related to residential real estate, especially in California. Increases in residential mortgage loan interest rates could have an adverse effect on our operations by depressing new mortgage loan originations, which in turn could negatively impact our title and escrow deposit levels. Additionally, a further downturn in the residential real estate and housing industries in California could have an adverse effect on our operations and the quality of our real estate and construction loan portfolio. Although we do not engage in subprime or negative amortization lending, effects of recent subprime market challenges, combined with the ongoing deterioration in the U.S. and California real estate markets, could result in further price reductions in single family home prices and a lack of liquidity in refinancing markets. These factors could adversely impact the quality of our residential construction, residential mortgage and construction related commercial portfolios in various ways, including by decreasing the value of the collateral for our loans. These factors could also negatively affect the economy in general and thereby our overall loan portfolio.

We provide financing to, and receive deposits from, businesses in a number of other industries that may be particularly vulnerable to industry-specific economic factors, including the home building, commercial real estate, retail, agricultural, industrial, and commercial industries. The home building industry in California has been especially adversely impacted by the deterioration in residential real estate markets, which has lead us to take additional provisions and charge-offs against credit losses in this portfolio. Continued increases in fuel prices and energy costs could adversely affect businesses in several of these industries. Industry-specific risks are beyond our control and could adversely affect our portfolio of loans, potentially resulting in an increase in non-performing loans or charge-offs and a slowing of growth or reduction in our loan portfolio.

Because Of Our Participation In The Capital Purchase Program, We Are Subject To Several Restrictions Including Restrictions On Our Ability To Declare Or Pay Dividends And Repurchase Our Shares As Well As Restrictions On Compensation Paid To Our Executive Officers.

Pursuant to the terms of the CPP, our ability to declare or pay dividends on any of our shares is limited. Specifically, we are unable to declare dividend payments on common shares, junior preferred shares or pari passu preferred shares if we are in arrears on the payment of dividends on the Preferred Shares. Further, we are not permitted to increase dividends on our common shares above the amount of the last quarterly cash dividend per share declared prior to March 13, 2009 without the U.S. Treasury’s approval (but does not affect our ability to declare and pay stock dividends) unless all of the Preferred Shares have been redeemed or transferred by the U.S. Treasury to unaffiliated third parties. In addition, our ability to repurchase our shares is restricted. The consent of the U.S. Treasury generally is required for us to make any stock repurchase (other than in connection with the administration of any employee benefit plan in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practice), unless all of the Preferred Shares have been redeemed or transferred by the U.S. Treasury to unaffiliated third parties. Further, common shares, junior preferred shares or pari passu preferred shares may not be repurchased if we are in arrears on the payment of Preferred Share dividends. Finally, the terms of the UST Agreement allow the U.S. Treasury to impose additional restrictions, including those on dividends and including unilateral amendments required to comply with changes in applicable federal law.

Pursuant to the terms of the CPP, we are required to adopt the U.S. Treasury’s current standards for executive compensation and corporate governance for the period during which the U.S. Treasury holds the equity securities issued pursuant to the CPP, including the common shares that may be issued upon exercise of the warrant. These standards generally apply to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and the three next most highly compensated Senior Executive Officers. The standards include: (i) ensuring that incentive compensation plans and arrangements for Senior Executive Officers do not encourage unnecessary and excessive risks that threaten our value; (ii) required clawback of any bonus or incentive compensation paid (or under a legally binding obligation to be paid) to a Senior Executive Officer based on materially inaccurate financial statements or other materially inaccurate performance metric criteria; (iii) prohibition on making “golden parachute payments” to Senior Executive Officers; and (iv) agreement not to claim a deduction, for federal income tax purposes, for compensation paid to any of the Senior Executive Officers in excess of $500,000 per year.

The adoption of ARRA on February 17, 2009 imposed certain new executive compensation and corporate expenditure limits on all current and future CPP participants, including the Company, until the institution has repaid the U.S. Treasury. The new standards include (but are not limited to): (i) prohibitions on bonuses, retention awards and other incentive compensation, other than restricted stock grants which do not fully vest during the CPP period with a value not greater than one-third of an employee’s total annual compensation; (ii) prohibitions on payments for departure from a company for any reason, except for payments for services performed or benefits accrued; (iii) an expanded clawback of bonuses, retention awards, and incentive compensation if payment is based on materially inaccurate statements of earnings, revenues, gains or other criteria; (iv) prohibitions on compensation plans that encourage manipulation of reported earnings; (v) retroactive review of bonuses, retention awards and other compensation previously provided by CPP recipients if found by the U.S. Treasury to be inconsistent with the purposes of CPP or otherwise contrary to public interest; (vi) required establishment of a company-wide policy regarding “excessive or luxury expenditures,” and; (vii) inclusion in a participant’s proxy statements for annual shareholder meetings of a nonbinding “Say on Pay” shareholder vote on the compensation of executives.

If we are unable to redeem the Series A preferred shares prior to March 13, 2014, the cost of this capital to us will increase substantially on that date, from 5.0% per annum to 9.0% per annum.

Depending on our financial condition at the time, this increase in the annual dividend rate on the Series A preferred shares could have a material negative effect on our earnings.

The risk factors in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as modified by the additional information above, are incorporated herein by reference. The risks described above and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and/or operating results.

ITEM 2.

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

On March 13, 2009 we issued 17,390 Preferred Shares and a warrant to purchase 352,977 shares of our common stock to the U.S. Treasury in a private offering exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. See "Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations--CPP Participation" for more information.

Repurchases of Equity Securities

On September 22, 2007, the Company approved a new stock repurchase program effective September 22, 2007 to replace the Company’s previous stock repurchase plan that commenced May 1, 2006. The new stock repurchase program, which will remain in effect until September 21, 2009, allows repurchases by the Company in an aggregate of up to 4% of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock over each rolling twelve-month period.

The consent of the U.S. Treasury generally is required for us to make any stock repurchase (other than in connection with the administration of any employee benefit plan in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practice), unless all of the Preferred Shares have been redeemed or transferred by the U.S. Treasury to unaffiliated third parties. Further, our common shares may not be repurchased if we are in arrears on the payment of Preferred Share dividends.

The Company made no purchases of its common stock during the quarter ended March 31, 2009:


Period	Total number of shares purchased	Average price paid per share	Number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs	Maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs
January 1 – January 31, 2009	—	—	—	255,026
February 1 – February 28, 2009	—	—	—	305,022
March 1 – March 31, 2009	—	—	—	357,732
Total	—	—	—	357,732

A 4% stock dividend was declared on January 22, 2009 with a record date of February 27, 2009 and is reflected in the number of shares purchased and average prices paid per share.

ITEM 4.

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

(a)

The Company held a special meeting of shareholders (the “Special Meeting”) on February 26, 2009.

(b)

Proxies for the Special Meeting were solicited pursuant to the rules set forth in Regulation 14A promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

(c)	The votes of the shareholders received and tabulated at the meeting were as follows:

(1)	Proposal 1. Proposal to amend Article 4 of our Articles of Incorporation to authorize the issuance of up to 18,500 shares of preferred stock, which First Northern Community Bancorp may only use to participate in the CPP.

For	4,940,009
Against	311,937
Abstain	110,776
Broker-non votes	-0-

(2)	Proposal 2. Proposal to amend Article 5 of First Northern Community Bancorp ‘s Articles of Incorporation to create an exception to the preemptive rights provided to our shareholders with respect to the common stock subject to the warrants that would be issued to the Treasury pursuant to the CPP.

For	4,960,010
Against	291,378
Abstain	111,334
Broker-non votes	-0-

(3)

Proposal 3. Proposal to approve the adjournment or postponement of the Special Meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies, in the event (a) there are not
sufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting to adopt Proposals 1 or 2, or (b) a quorum is not present at the time of the Special Meeting.

For	6,099,865
Against	324,370
Abstain	127,479
Broker-non votes	-0-

(4)	Proposal 4. In their discretion, the proxy holders are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

For	6,056,785
Against	370,913
Abstain	124,016
Broker-non votes	-0-

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS

Exhibit Number	Exhibit

3.1	Amended Articles of Incorporation of the Company – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K on December 31, 2006 and Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 9, 2009
3.2	Certificate of Determination – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 9, 2009
4.1	Letter Agreement, dated March 13, 2009, including Securities Purchase Agreement – Standard Terms attached thereto as Exhibit A, between First Northern Community Bancorp and the United States Department of the Treasury, as modified by the Side Letter Agreement, dated March 13, 2009, between First Northern Community Bancorp and the United States Department of the Treasury, as modified by the California Side Letter Agreement, dated March 13, 2009, between First Northern Community Bancorp and the United States Department of the Treasury (filed herewith)
4.2	Warrant to purchase 352,977 Shares of Common Stock (common shares) of First Northern Community Bancorp, issued to the United States Department of the Treasury on March 13, 2009 (filed herewith)
*10.1	Form of Senior Executive Officer Waiver (filed herewith)
31.1	Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

* Management contract or compensation plan or arrangement in which executive officers are eligible to participate

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

			FIRST NORTHERN COMMUNITY BANCORP

Date:	May 8, 2009	By:	/s/ Louise A. Walker

			Louise A. Walker, Sr. Executive Vice President / Chief Financial Officer
			(Principal Financial Officer and Duly Authorized Officer)