Gen Digital Inc. - Quarter Report: 2012 December (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended December 28, 2012
or
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Transition Period from to
Commission File Number 000-17781
Symantec Corporation
(Exact name of the registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 77-0181864 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. employer | |
incorporation or organization) | Identification no.) | |
350 Ellis Street, | ||
Mountain View, California | 94043 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(650) 527-8000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer | þ | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ
Shares of Symantec common stock, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding as of January 25, 2013: 689,188,741shares.
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Period Ended December 28, 2012
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | ||||
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||||
3 | ||||
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 28, 2012 and March 30, 2012 |
3 | |||
4 | ||||
5 | ||||
6 | ||||
7 | ||||
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
17 | |||
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
27 | |||
27 | ||||
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION | ||||
28 | ||||
28 | ||||
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
28 | |||
29 | ||||
30 |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 28, 2012 |
March 30, 2012 * |
|||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 4,200 | $ | 3,162 | ||||
Short-term investments |
52 | 49 | ||||||
Trade accounts receivable, net |
1,081 | 940 | ||||||
Inventories |
20 | 28 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
193 | 205 | ||||||
Other current assets |
270 | 249 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current assets |
5,816 | 4,633 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
1,130 | 1,100 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
1,065 | 1,337 | ||||||
Goodwill |
5,843 | 5,826 | ||||||
Other long-term assets |
108 | 124 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
$ | 13,962 | $ | 13,020 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 317 | $ | 324 | ||||
Accrued compensation and benefits |
454 | 416 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
3,298 | 3,444 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
982 | | ||||||
Other current liabilities |
431 | 321 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current liabilities |
5,482 | 4,505 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
2,094 | 2,039 | ||||||
Long-term deferred revenue |
508 | 529 | ||||||
Long-term deferred tax liabilities |
321 | 288 | ||||||
Long-term income taxes payable |
341 | 393 | ||||||
Other long-term obligations |
60 | 94 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities |
8,806 | 7,848 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8) |
||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Symantec Corporation stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Common stock |
7 | 7 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
7,232 | 7,773 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
202 | 173 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(2,285 | ) | (2,859 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total Symantec Corporation stockholders equity |
5,156 | 5,094 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interest in subsidiary |
| 78 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total stockholders equity |
5,156 | 5,172 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 13,962 | $ | 13,020 | ||||
|
|
|
|
* | Derived from audited financial statements. |
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
December 28, 2012 |
December 30, 2011 |
December 28, 2012 |
December 30, 2011 |
|||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
(In millions, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Content, subscription, and maintenance |
$ | 1,521 | $ | 1,462 | $ | 4,494 | $ | 4,353 | ||||||||
License |
270 | 253 | 664 | 696 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total net revenue |
1,791 | 1,715 | 5,158 | 5,049 | ||||||||||||
Cost of revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Content, subscription, and maintenance |
256 | 233 | 752 | 695 | ||||||||||||
License |
27 | 16 | 62 | 33 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
16 | 22 | 53 | 67 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total cost of revenue |
299 | 271 | 867 | 795 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Gross profit |
1,492 | 1,444 | 4,291 | 4,254 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing |
730 | 711 | 2,038 | 2,073 | ||||||||||||
Research and development |
249 | 242 | 745 | 728 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
117 | 113 | 336 | 324 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
71 | 73 | 215 | 217 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring and transition |
27 | 5 | 85 | 25 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total operating expenses |
1,194 | 1,144 | 3,419 | 3,367 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
298 | 300 | 872 | 887 | ||||||||||||
Interest income |
4 | 2 | 9 | 10 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(38 | ) | (27 | ) | (102 | ) | (87 | ) | ||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
20 | (2 | ) | 15 | (4 | ) | ||||||||||
Loss from joint venture |
| | | (27 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income before income taxes |
284 | 273 | 794 | 779 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
72 | 32 | 217 | 166 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income |
212 | 241 | 577 | 613 | ||||||||||||
Less: Loss attributable to noncontrolling interest |
| 1 | | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income attributable to Symantec Corporation stockholders |
$ | 212 | $ | 240 | $ | 577 | $ | 613 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income per share attributable to Symantec Corporation stockholdersbasic |
$ | 0.31 | $ | 0.33 | $ | 0.82 | $ | 0.82 | ||||||||
Net income per share attributable to Symantec Corporation stockholdersdiluted |
$ | 0.30 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.81 | $ | 0.82 | ||||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding attributable to |
||||||||||||||||
Symantec Corporation stockholdersbasic |
693 | 734 | 704 | 745 | ||||||||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding attributable to |
||||||||||||||||
Symantec Corporation stockholdersdiluted |
702 | 740 | 710 | 752 |
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
December 28, 2012 |
December 30, 2011 |
December 28, 2012 |
December 30, 2011 |
|||||||||||||
(Unaudited) (In millions) |
||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 212 | $ | 241 | $ | 577 | $ | 613 | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes: |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments: |
||||||||||||||||
Translation adjustments |
| 2 | 15 | (10 | ) | |||||||||||
Reclassification adjustments for loss included in net income |
(2 | ) | | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net foreign currency translation adjustments |
(2 | ) | 2 | 14 | (11 | ) | ||||||||||
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities |
14 | | 15 | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes |
12 | 2 | 29 | (11 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Comprehensive income |
224 | 243 | 606 | 602 | ||||||||||||
Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
1 | 1 | 2 | (8 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Comprehensive income attributable to Symantec Corporation stockholders |
$ | 223 | $ | 242 | $ | 604 | $ | 610 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
December 28, 2012 |
December 30, 2011 |
|||||||
(Unaudited) (In millions) |
||||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Net income |
$ | 577 | $ | 613 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation |
213 | 200 | ||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
268 | 284 | ||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs and discounts |
44 | 46 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
125 | 123 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
26 | 38 | ||||||
Excess income tax benefit from the exercise of stock options |
(2 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||
Loss from joint venture |
| 27 | ||||||
Other |
(3 | ) | 4 | |||||
Net change in assets and liabilities, excluding effects of acquisitions: |
||||||||
Trade accounts receivable, net |
(144 | ) | 12 | |||||
Inventories |
9 | (3 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable |
(8 | ) | 9 | |||||
Accrued compensation and benefits |
40 | (49 | ) | |||||
Deferred revenue |
(150 | ) | (108 | ) | ||||
Income taxes payable |
39 | 3 | ||||||
Other assets |
(45 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||
Other liabilities |
(8 | ) | 30 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
981 | 1,214 | ||||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(245 | ) | (199 | ) | ||||
Cash payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
(28 | ) | (364 | ) | ||||
Purchases of held-to-maturity securities |
| (47 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from sale of held-to-maturity securities |
46 | | ||||||
Other |
3 | (1 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(224 | ) | (611 | ) | ||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Net proceeds from sales of common stock under employee stock benefit plans |
100 | 95 | ||||||
Excess income tax benefit from the exercise of stock options |
2 | 6 | ||||||
Tax payments related to restricted stock units |
(14 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||
Repurchases of common stock |
(701 | ) | (693 | ) | ||||
Purchase of additional interest in subsidiary |
(92 | ) | | |||||
Repayments of debt and other obligations |
| (602 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from debt issuance, net of discount |
996 | | ||||||
Debt issuance costs |
(7 | ) | | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
284 | (1,216 | ) | |||||
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents |
(3 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
1,038 | (623 | ) | |||||
Beginning cash and cash equivalents |
3,162 | 2,950 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Ending cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 4,200 | $ | 2,327 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Symantec Corporation (Symantec, we, us, our, and the Company refer to Symantec Corporation and all of its subsidiaries) as of December 28, 2012 and March 30, 2012, and for the three and nine months ended December 28, 2012 and December 30, 2011, have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions on Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In accordance with those rules and regulations, we have omitted certain information and notes normally provided in our annual consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring items, except as otherwise noted, necessary for the fair presentation of our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the interim periods. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2012. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended December 28, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the entire fiscal year.
Significant Accounting Policies
There have been no material changes in our significant accounting policies for the nine months ended December 28, 2012 as compared to the significant accounting policies described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2012.
Recently Issued Authoritative Guidance
In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an accounting standards update that requires us to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements associated with certain financial and derivative instruments to enable users of our financial statements to better understand the effect of those arrangements on our financial position. The new guidance is applicable to us on a retrospective basis in the first quarter of fiscal 2014. We do not expect that this guidance will materially impact our disclosures included in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
In July 2012, the FASB issued an accounting standards update that gives entities an option to perform a qualitative impairment assessment for indefinite-lived intangible assets that may allow them to avoid performing the annual fair value calculation. We adopted this guidance in fiscal 2013 on a prospective basis and it did not have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Note 2. Fair Value Measurements
Amounts for assets and liabilities measured at fair value are based on an expected exit price, representing the amount that would be received on the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability, as the case may be, in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value may be based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The authoritative guidance on fair value measurements establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value on either a recurring or nonrecurring basis whereby inputs, used in valuation techniques, are assigned a hierarchical level. The following are the hierarchical levels of inputs to measure fair value:
| Level 1: Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. |
| Level 2: Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the assets or liabilities; or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means. |
| Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflecting our own assumptions incorporated in valuation techniques used to determine fair value. These assumptions are required to be consistent with market participant assumptions that are reasonably available. |
7
Assets Measured and Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
There have been no transfers between fair value measurement levels during the nine months ended December 28, 2012. The following table summarizes our assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
As of December 28, 2012 | As of March 30, 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Equivalents |
$ | 3,219 | $ | | $ | 3,219 | $ | 1,483 | $ | | $ | 1,483 |
Cash equivalents consist of money market funds which are valued based on quoted market prices of the identical underlying security.
Note 3. Business Combination
On April 2, 2012, we completed the acquisition of a privately-held provider of mobile application management. In exchange for all of the voting equity interests of the acquired company, we paid a total purchase price of $28 million in cash. The objective of the acquisition is to extend our enterprise mobility portfolio to include a cross-platform mobile application protection solution to help organizations protect and isolate corporate data and applications across both corporate-owned and personally-owned devices. The results of operations of the acquired company have been included in our Security and Compliance segment since the date of acquisition. Supplemental pro forma information for the acquired company was not material to our financial results and therefore has not been included. The purchase price allocation resulted in goodwill of $24 million and intangible assets of $4 million. Goodwill, which is not tax deductible, resulted primarily from our expectation of synergies from the integration of the acquired companys technology into our product offerings. Intangible assets included developed technology and customer relationships, which are amortized over their estimated useful lives of five and nine years, respectively.
Note 4. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill were as follows:
Consumer | Security and Compliance |
Storage and Server Management |
Services | Total | ||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net balance as of March 30, 2012 |
$ | 355 | $ | 2,486 | $ | 2,985 | $ | | $ | 5,826 | ||||||||||
Addition (1) |
| 24 | | | 24 | |||||||||||||||
Adjustments |
| (1 | ) | (6 | ) | | (7 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net balance as of December 28, 2012 |
$ | 355 | $ | 2,509 | $ | 2,979 | $ | | $ | 5,843 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | See Note 3 for the business combination completed in the first quarter of fiscal 2013. |
Intangible assets, net
As of December 28, 2012 | As of March 30, 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net Carrying Amount |
Weighted- Average Remaining Useful Life |
Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net Carrying Amount |
Weighted- Average Remaining Useful Life |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Customer relationships |
$ | 2,211 | $ | (1,700 | ) | $ | 511 | 2 years | $ | 2,219 | $ | (1,499 | ) | $ | 720 | 3 years | ||||||||||||||||
Developed technology |
1,914 | (1,705 | ) | 209 | 4 years | 1,914 | (1,654 | ) | 260 | 4 years | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Finite-lived tradenames |
146 | (107 | ) | 39 | 3 years | 146 | (96 | ) | 50 | 3 years | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Patents |
26 | (17 | ) | 9 | 5 years | 75 | (65 | ) | 10 | 6 years | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Indefinite-lived tradenames |
297 | | 297 | | 297 | | 297 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Intangible assets, net |
$ | 4,594 | $ | (3,529 | ) | $ | 1,065 | 2 years | $ | 4,651 | $ | (3,314 | ) | $ | 1,337 | 3 years | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
Total amortization expense for intangible assets that have finite lives was $87 million and $268 million for the three and nine months ended December 28, 2012, respectively, and $95 million and $284 million for the three and nine months ended December 30, 2011, respectively. Total future amortization expense for intangible assets that have finite lives as of December 28, 2012, is as follows (in millions):
Remainder of fiscal 2013 |
$ | 86 | ||
2014 |
210 | |||
2015 |
157 | |||
2016 |
106 | |||
2017 |
87 | |||
Thereafter |
122 | |||
|
|
|||
Total |
$ | 768 | ||
|
|
Note 5. Supplemental Financial Information
Property and Equipment, net
As of | ||||||||
December 28, 2012 |
March 30, 2012 |
|||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||
Computer hardware and software |
$ | 1,778 | $ | 1,640 | ||||
Office furniture and equipment |
173 | 176 | ||||||
Buildings |
520 | 489 | ||||||
Leasehold improvements |
312 | 284 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
2,783 | 2,589 | |||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
(1,807 | ) | (1,663 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
976 | 926 | |||||||
Construction in progress |
75 | 95 | ||||||
Land |
79 | 79 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Property and equipment, net |
$ | 1,130 | $ | 1,100 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense was $72 million and $213 million for the three and nine months ended December 28, 2012, respectively, and $66 million and $200 million for the three and nine months ended December 30, 2011, respectively.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
As of | ||||||||
December 28, 2012 |
March 30, 2012 |
|||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of taxes |
$ | 185 | $ | 171 | ||||
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes |
17 | 2 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
$ | 202 | $ | 173 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense), net
In the third quarter of fiscal 2013, we began receiving a tax incentive from the China tax bureau in a form of value-added tax (VAT) refunds. The tax incentive is provided to software companies that perform research and development activities with respect to software in China. The refunds relate to VAT collected on qualifying software product sales. This tax incentive plan was updated late in 2011 and it enabled companies to retrospectively apply the rules back to January 2011. We recognized refunds of $27 million, which were included in Other income (expense), net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
9
Note 6. Debt
In the first quarter of fiscal 2013, we issued $600 million in principal amount of 2.75% interest-bearing senior notes (2.75% Notes) due June 15, 2017 and $400 million in principal amount of 3.95% interest-bearing senior notes (3.95% Notes) due June 15, 2022, for an aggregate principal amount of $1.0 billion. The 2.75% Notes and 3.95% Notes are senior unsecured obligations that rank equally in right of payment with all of our existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated obligations and are redeemable by us at any time, subject to a make-whole premium. Our proceeds were $1.0 billion, less issuance discount of $4 million resulting from sale of the notes at a yield slightly above the stated coupon rate. We also incurred issuance costs of $6 million. Both the discount and issuance costs are being amortized as incremental interest expense over the respective terms of the notes. Interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on the 15th of June and December, beginning December 15, 2012. As of December 28, 2012, the aggregate fair value of these senior notes was $1.02 billion using Level 2 inputs, which is based on market prices for similar debt instruments and resulting yields.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2013, we amended our senior unsecured revolving credit facility (credit facility) agreement. The amendment extended the term of the credit facility to June 7, 2017 and revolving loans under the credit facility will bear interest, at our option, either at a rate equal to a) LIBOR plus a margin based on debt ratings, as defined in the credit facility agreement or b) the banks base rate plus a margin based on debt ratings, as defined in the credit facility agreement. Under the terms of this credit facility, we must comply with certain financial and non-financial covenants, including a covenant to maintain a specified ratio of debt to EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization). As of December 28, 2012, we were in compliance with all required covenants, and no amounts were outstanding.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2007, we issued 1.00% Convertible Senior Notes (1.00% Notes), maturing in June 2013. As of December 28, 2012, the balance of $1.0 billion for the 1.00% Notes is included in Current portion of long-term debt in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 28, 2012, the aggregate fair value of these 1.00% Notes was $1.06 billion using Level 2 inputs, which is based on market prices for similar convertible debt instruments and resulting yields.
Note 7. Restructuring and Transition
Exit and disposal costs
Our exit and disposal costs consist primarily of costs associated with closing or consolidating certain facilities. Facilities costs generally include rent expense and lease termination costs, less estimated sublease income. Largely as a result of business acquisitions, management may deem certain leased facilities to be excess to requirements and make a plan to exit them either at the time of acquisition or after the acquisition in conjunction with our efforts to integrate and streamline our operations. As of December 28, 2012, liabilities for these excess facility obligations at several locations around the world are expected to be paid over the respective lease terms, the longest of which extends through fiscal 2018.
Transition and other related costs
Transition and other related costs primarily consist of severance associated with the integration of acquisitions in efforts to streamline our business operations, which include outplacement services, health insurance coverage, and legal costs. These costs also consist of consulting costs associated with the planning and design phases of implementing a new enterprise resource planning system.
Restructuring and transition summary
March 30, 2012 | Costs, Net
of Adjustments (1) |
Cash Payments | December 28, 2012 |
|||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Exit and disposal costs |
$ | 16 | $ | 1 | $ | (11 | ) | $ | 6 | |||||||
Transition and other related costs |
84 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total restructuring and transition |
$ | 85 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet: |
||||||||||||||||
Other current liabilities |
$ | 8 | $ | 3 | ||||||||||||
Other long-term obligations |
8 | 3 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total restructuring liabilities |
$ | 16 | $ | 6 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Total net adjustments were not material for the nine months ended December 28, 2012. Transition and other related costs primarily consist of $46 million of severance costs and $36 million in consulting costs associated with the planning and design phases of implementing a new enterprise resource planning system. Restructuring and transition costs are included in our Other segment. |
10
Note 8. Commitments and Contingencies
Indemnification
In the ordinary course of business, we may provide indemnifications of varying scope and terms to customers, vendors, lessors, business partners, subsidiaries and other parties with respect to certain matters, including, but not limited to, losses arising out of our breach of agreements or representations and warranties made by us. In addition, our bylaws contain indemnification obligations to our directors, officers, employees and agents, and we have entered into indemnification agreements with our directors and certain of our officers to give such directors and officers additional contractual assurances regarding the scope of the indemnification set forth in our bylaws and to provide additional procedural protections. We maintain director and officer insurance, which may cover certain liabilities arising from our obligation to indemnify our directors and officers. It is not possible to determine the aggregate maximum potential loss under these indemnification agreements due to the limited history of prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. Such indemnification agreements might not be subject to maximum loss clauses. Historically, we have not incurred material costs as a result of obligations under these agreements and we have not accrued any liabilities related to such indemnification obligations in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
We provide limited product warranties and the majority of our software license agreements contain provisions that indemnify licensees of our software from damages and costs resulting from claims alleging that our software infringes the intellectual property rights of a third party. Historically, payments made under these provisions have been immaterial. We monitor the conditions that are subject to indemnification to identify if a loss has occurred.
Litigation contingencies
During the first quarter of fiscal 2013, we were advised by the Commercial Litigation Branch of the Department of Justices Civil Division and the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorneys Office for the District of Columbia that the government is investigating our compliance with certain provisions of our U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) Multiple Award Schedule Contract No. GS-35F-0240T effective January 24, 2007, including provisions relating to pricing, country of origin, accessibility, and the disclosure of commercial sales practices. We are cooperating with the investigation and we are unable, at this time, to predict the likely outcome. It is possible that the investigation could lead to claims or findings of violations of the False Claims Act in connection with our GSA contracting activity. Violations of the False Claims Act could result in the imposition of damages, including up to treble damages, plus civil penalties in some cases.
We are also involved in a number of other judicial and administrative proceedings that are incidental to our business. Although adverse decisions (or settlements) may occur in one or more of the cases, it is not possible to estimate the possible loss or losses from each of these cases. The final resolution of these lawsuits, individually or in the aggregate, is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flow.
Note 9. Stock Repurchases
The following table summarizes our stock repurchases:
Three Months Ended December 28, 2012 |
Nine Months Ended December 28, 2012 |
|||||||
(In millions, except per share data) | ||||||||
Total number of shares repurchased attributable to Symantec Corporation |
11 | 42 | ||||||
Dollar amount of shares repurchased attributable to Symantec Corporation |
$ | 200 | $ | 701 | ||||
Average price paid per share |
$ | 17.94 | $ | 16.49 | ||||
Range of price paid per share |
$ | 17.05 - $19.09 | $ | 13.09 - $19.56 |
We have repurchased shares on a quarterly basis since the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 under various stock repurchase programs. On January 25, 2012, we announced that our Board of Directors approved a $1.0 billion stock repurchase program. This program does not have an expiration date, and as of December 28, 2012, $283 million remain authorized for future repurchases. See Note 15 below for additional information regarding a subsequent event with respect to stock repurchases.
11
Note 10. Segment Information
As of December 28, 2012, our five reportable segments are the same as our operating segments and are as follows:
| Consumer: Our Consumer segment focuses on delivering internet security for PCs, tablets and mobile devices along with services such as online backup, online family protection and remote help to individual users and home offices. |
| Security and Compliance: Our Security and Compliance segment focuses on providing large, medium, and small-sized businesses with solutions for endpoint security and management, compliance, mail security, data loss prevention, encryption, managed security services, and authentication services. These solutions allow our customers to secure, provision, and remotely manage their laptops, PCs, mobile devices, and servers. We also provide our customers with solutions delivered through our cloud and appliance security offerings. |
| Storage and Server Management: Our Storage and Server Management segment focuses on providing large, medium, and small-sized businesses with storage and server management, backup, archiving, eDiscovery, and data protection solutions across heterogeneous storage and server platforms, as well as solutions delivered through our cloud and appliance offerings. |
| Services: Our Services segment provides customers with implementation services and solutions designed to assist them in maximizing the value of their Symantec software. Our offerings include consulting, business critical services, and education. |
| Other: Our Other segment is comprised of sunset products and products nearing the end of their life cycle. It may include certain general and administrative expenses; amortization of intangible assets; impairment of goodwill, intangible assets, and other long-lived assets; stock-based compensation; restructuring and transition expenses; and certain indirect costs that are not charged to the operating segments described above, such as interest income and expense. |
There were no intersegment sales for the three and nine months ended December 28, 2012 or December 30, 2011. The following table summarizes the results of our operating segments:
Consumer | Security and Compliance |
Storage and Server Management |
Services | Other | Total Company |
|||||||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three months ended December 28, 2012: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net revenue |
$ | 530 | $ | 527 | $ | 666 | $ | 68 | $ | | $ | 1,791 | ||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
30 | % | 29 | % | 37 | % | 4 | % | 0 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
227 | 174 | 263 | 12 | (378 | ) | 298 | |||||||||||||||||
Operating margin |
43 | % | 33 | % | 39 | % | 18 | % | * | |||||||||||||||
Three months ended December 30, 2011: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net revenue |
$ | 525 | $ | 510 | $ | 618 | $ | 62 | $ | | $ | 1,715 | ||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
31 | % | 30 | % | 36 | % | 3 | % | 0 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
251 | 138 | 241 | 11 | (341 | ) | 300 | |||||||||||||||||
Operating margin |
48 | % | 27 | % | 39 | % | 18 | % | * | |||||||||||||||
Nine months ended December 28, 2012: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net revenue |
$ | 1,579 | $ | 1,540 | $ | 1,845 | $ | 194 | $ | | $ | 5,158 | ||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
31 | % | 30 | % | 36 | % | 3 | % | 0 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
748 | 463 | 734 | 33 | (1,106 | ) | 872 | |||||||||||||||||
Operating margin |
47 | % | 30 | % | 40 | % | 17 | % | * | |||||||||||||||
Nine months ended December 30, 2011: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net revenue |
$ | 1,581 | $ | 1,459 | $ | 1,821 | $ | 188 | $ | | $ | 5,049 | ||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
31 | % | 29 | % | 36 | % | 4 | % | 0 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
763 | 330 | 775 | 29 | (1,010 | ) | 887 | |||||||||||||||||
Operating margin |
48 | % | 23 | % | 43 | % | 15 | % | * |
* | Percentage not meaningful |
12
Note 11. Stock-based Compensation
The following table summarizes the total stock-based compensation expense recognized in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
December 28, 2012 |
December 30, 2011 |
December 28, 2012 |
December 30, 2011 |
|||||||||||||
(In millions, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenue |
$ | 4 | $ | 4 | $ | 12 | $ | 12 | ||||||||
Sales and marketing |
18 | 20 | 51 | 52 | ||||||||||||
Research and development |
13 | 13 | 37 | 36 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
7 | 9 | 25 | 23 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense |
42 | 46 | 125 | 123 | ||||||||||||
Tax benefit associated with stock-based compensation expense |
(12 | ) | (13 | ) | (36 | ) | (35 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net stock-based compensation expense |
$ | 30 | $ | 33 | $ | 89 | $ | 88 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net stock-based compensation expense per share attributable to Symantec Corporation stockholdersbasic |
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.12 | ||||||||
Net stock-based compensation expense per share attributable to Symantec Corporation stockholdersdiluted |
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.12 |
The following table summarizes additional information pertaining to our stock-based compensation:
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
December 28, 2012 |
December 30, 2011 |
|||||||
($ in millions, except per grant | ||||||||
Restricted stock |
||||||||
Weighted-average fair value per grant |
$ | 15.41 | $ | 18.17 | ||||
Fair value of awards granted |
169 | 188 | ||||||
Total fair value of awards vested |
47 | 84 | ||||||
Total unrecognized compensation expense |
248 | 240 | ||||||
Weighted-average remaining vesting period |
3 years | 3 years | ||||||
Performance-based restricted stock |
||||||||
Weighted-average fair value per grant |
$ | 16.15 | $ | 23.58 | ||||
Fair value of awards granted |
29 | 11 | ||||||
Total fair value of awards vested |
4 | | ||||||
Total unrecognized compensation expense |
18 | 8 | ||||||
Weighted-average remaining vesting period |
2 years | 2 years | ||||||
Stock options |
||||||||
Weighted-average fair value per grant |
$ | 4.07 | $ | 5.23 | ||||
Total intrinsic value of stock options exercised |
20 | 34 | ||||||
Total unrecognized compensation expense |
17 | 37 | ||||||
Weighted-average remaining vesting period |
2 years | 3 years |
During the first quarter of fiscal 2013, we granted 112,923 Restricted Stock Awards to members of our Board of Directors. Each award had a fair value of $15.94 and vested immediately upon grant. As a result, we recorded approximately $2 million of stock-based compensation expense for these awards during the first quarter of fiscal 2013.
Performance-based restricted stock units and performance-contingent stock units
During the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and 2012, we granted performance-based restricted stock units (PRUs) to certain senior level employees under our 2004 Plan. The PRU grants are in lieu of the stock option grants typically awarded as part of our annual compensation program. These PRUs can be earned depending upon the achievement of a company-specific performance condition and a market condition as follows: (1) our achievement of annual target earnings per share for the applicable fiscal year and (2) our two and three year cumulative relative total shareholder return ranked against that of other companies that are included in the Standard & Poors 500 Index. These PRUs are also subject to a three year continued service vesting provision with earlier vesting permitted under certain conditions, such as upon a change of control of the Company. The determination of the fair value of these awards takes into consideration the likelihood of achievement of the market condition.
13
On July 24, 2012, Enrique Salem, our former President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO), resigned from the Company. Our Board of Directors appointed Stephen M. Bennett as our new President and CEO in addition to his role as our Chairman of the Board of Directors, effective July 25, 2012. During the second quarter of fiscal 2013, we granted 115,000 PRUs to our new CEO. These PRUs are subject to vesting based on the same terms and conditions as the aforementioned fiscal 2013 PRU grants, except that the target number of shares our CEO will be eligible to receive at the end of the three-year performance period will be not less than 80,000 shares. The compensation expense for these PRUs is initially based on the probability of achieving the target level of the company-specific performance condition, and will be adjusted for subsequent changes in the estimated or actual outcome of this performance condition. Additionally, we granted 450,000 performance-contingent stock units (PCSUs) to our new CEO based on the achievement of specified performance metrics. The PCSUs are also subject to an underlying continued service vesting condition. Each performance metric is based on the average twenty day trailing closing price of Symantecs common stock (the Average Closing Price) over a three-year period beginning with the second quarter of fiscal 2013. During this three-year period, 150,000 shares from this grant will vest during the fiscal quarter (if any) when the Average Closing Price first exceeds $18.00, $20.00 and $22.00, respectively. The lowest Price Threshold of $18.00 was achieved during the quarter ended September 28, 2012 and, as a result, 150,000 PCSUs were vested and released to Mr. Bennett on October 22, 2012. If the higher price thresholds are not achieved during the three-year period, the remaining PCSUs will be forfeited. The compensation expense is amortized using the graded vesting attribution method over the derived service periods. The fair value and derived service period for each of these three tranches are calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation option pricing model.
Note 12. Income Taxes
The effective tax rate was approximately 25% and 27% for the three and nine months ended December 28, 2012, and 12% and 21% for the three and nine months ended December 30, 2011, respectively.
For the three and nine months ended December 28, 2012, the tax expense was reduced by $7 million and $18 million, respectively, in tax benefits resulting from tax settlements, lapses of statutes of limitations and adjustments to prior year items. These tax benefits were offset by a $9 million tax expense from an increase in valuation allowance on state research tax credits for the nine months ended December 28, 2012. For the three and nine months ended December 30, 2011, we recognized a $52 million tax benefit arising from the VERITAS 2002 through 2005 IRS Appeals matters, as discussed below, partially offset by a $4 million tax expense resulting from a change in valuation allowance for certain deferred tax assets. We further recognized $2 million of tax expense and an additional $14 million tax benefit in the three and nine months ended December 30, 2011, respectively, for discrete events primarily related to tax settlements, lapses of statutes of limitations, and adjustments to prior year items.
The provision for the nine months ended December 28, 2012 and December 30, 2011 otherwise reflects a forecasted tax rate of 29% (this excludes the tax benefit from our joint venture with Huawei Technologies Co., Limited, which was sold in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012). The forecasted tax rates for both periods presented reflect the benefits of lower-taxed international earnings, domestic manufacturing incentives, and research and development credits (the U.S. federal R&D tax credit expired on December 31, 2011), partially offset by state income taxes.
On January 2, 2013, the President signed into law the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012. Under prior law, a taxpayer was entitled to a research tax credit for qualifying amounts paid or incurred on or before December 31, 2011. The 2012 Taxpayer Relief Act extends the research credit for two years until December 31, 2013 for amounts paid or incurred after December 31, 2011. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, we expect to recognize a benefit of approximately $10 million for qualifying amounts incurred in fiscal 2013 and in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012.
We are a U.S.-based multinational company subject to tax in the U.S. and multiple international tax jurisdictions. Substantially all of our international earnings were generated by subsidiaries in Ireland and Singapore. Our results of operations would be adversely affected to the extent that our geographical mix of income becomes more weighted toward jurisdictions with higher tax rates and would be favorably affected to the extent the relative geographic mix shifts to lower tax jurisdictions. Any change in our mix of earnings is dependent upon many factors and is therefore difficult to predict.
14
On December 2, 2009, we received a Revenue Agents Report from the IRS for the VERITAS 2002 through 2005 tax years assessing additional taxes due. We contested $80 million of the tax assessed and all penalties. As a result of negotiations with IRS Appeals in the three and nine months ended December 30, 2011, we remeasured our liability for unrecognized tax benefits, resulting in a tax benefit of $52 million. We executed the final closing agreement for the VERITAS 2002 through 2005 tax years on December 26, 2012. Accordingly, we recorded a further tax benefit of $3 million during the three and nine months ended December 28, 2012 based on the closing agreement.
The timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain, and the amounts ultimately paid, if any, upon resolution of the issues raised by the taxing authorities may differ materially from the amounts accrued for each year. Although potential resolution of uncertain tax positions involve multiple tax periods and jurisdictions, it is reasonably possible that the gross unrecognized tax benefits related to these audits could decrease (whether by payment, release, or a combination of both) in the next 12 months by between $135 million and $250 million. Depending on the nature of the settlement or expiration of statutes of limitations, we estimate at least $15 million could affect our income tax provision and therefore benefit the resulting effective tax rate. As of December 28, 2012, we have $184 million on deposit with the IRS pertaining to U.S. tax matters in the VERITAS 2002 through 2005 audit cycle as well as the Symantec 2005 through 2008 audit cycle.
We continue to monitor the progress of ongoing tax controversies and the impact, if any, of the expiration of the statute of limitations in various taxing jurisdictions.
Note 13. Earnings Per Share
The components of earnings per share attributable to Symantec Corporation stockholders are as follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
December 28, 2012 |
December 30, 2011 |
December 28, 2012 |
December 30, 2011 |
|||||||||||||
(In millions, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 212 | $ | 240 | $ | 577 | $ | 613 | ||||||||
Net income per sharebasic |
$ | 0.31 | $ | 0.33 | $ | 0.82 | $ | 0.82 | ||||||||
Net income per sharediluted |
$ | 0.30 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.81 | $ | 0.82 | ||||||||
Weighted-average outstanding common sharesbasic |
693 | 734 | 704 | 745 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive potential shares issuable from assumed exercise of stock options |
2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive potential shares related to stock award plans |
7 | 4 | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Weighted-average shares outstandingdiluted |
702 | 740 | 710 | 752 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Anti-dilutive weighted-average stock options (1) |
16 | 34 | 19 | 30 | ||||||||||||
Anti-dilutive weighted-average restricted stock (1) |
| 1 | | |
(1) | For the periods presented, the effects of the Convertible Senior Notes, and the warrants issued and the option purchased in connection with the Convertible Senior Notes, were excluded because they have no impact on diluted earnings per share until certain average stock prices are attained. |
Note 14. Noncontrolling Interest
As of March 30, 2012, we owned 54% of VeriSign Japan K.K. (VeriSign Japan), obtained through our acquisition of VeriSign, Inc.s authentication and identity business during the second quarter of fiscal 2011. In July 2012, we completed a tender offer and paid $92 million to acquire VeriSign Japan common shares and stock rights, increasing our ownership percentage to 92%. In November 2012, we acquired the remaining 8% interest for $19 million, which will be paid in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013.
15
VeriSign Japan is a wholly-owned subsidiary as of December 28, 2012. The effect of the change in our ownership interest in VeriSign Japan on our equity is as follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
December 28, 2012 |
December 30, 2011 |
December 28, 2012 |
December 30, 2011 |
|||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Symantec Corporation stockholders |
$ | 212 | $ | 240 | $ | 577 | $ | 613 | ||||||||
Transfers to noncontrolling interest: |
||||||||||||||||
Decrease in Symantec Corporation stockholders paid-in capital for purchase of 37,368 and 204,189 VeriSign Japan common shares and stock rights for the three and nine months ended December 28, 2012, respectively |
(5 | ) | | (35 | ) | | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net transfers to noncontrolling interest |
(5 | ) | | (35 | ) | | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Change from net income attributable to Symantec Corporation stockholders and transfers to noncontrolling interest |
$ | 207 | $ | 240 | $ | 542 | $ | 613 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 15. Subsequent Events
On January 23, 2013, we announced a capital allocation program that includes plans to initiate a quarterly cash dividend policy with the first payment expected to occur in the first quarter of fiscal 2014. We expect the initial dividend rate to yield 2.5% based on Symantecs closing stock price of $20.86 on January 22, 2013. Future declarations of dividends and payment dates will be subject to the Board of Directors determination. As of the date of this filing, the Board of Directors has not declared a dividend in connection with the adoption of this policy.
Also on January 23, 2013, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized a new $1.0 billion stock repurchase program commencing in the Companys fiscal year 2014, which begins on March 30, 2013. This program does not have an expiration date.
16
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-looking statements and factors that may affect future results
The discussion below contains forward-looking statements, which are subject to safe harbors under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements include references to our ability to utilize our deferred tax assets, as well as statements including words such as expects, plans, anticipates, believes, estimates, predicts, projects, and similar expressions. In addition, statements that refer to projections of our future financial performance, anticipated growth and trends in our businesses and in our industries, the anticipated impacts of acquisitions, our intent to pay quarterly cash dividends in the future, the actions we intend to take as part of our new strategy, the expected impact of our new strategy and other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. These statements are only predictions, based on our current expectations about future events and may not prove to be accurate. We do not undertake any obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events occurring or circumstances arising after the date of this report. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and our actual results, performance, or achievements could differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements on the basis of several factors, including those that we discuss in Risk Factors, set forth in Part I, Item 1A, of our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2012 and in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 11, 2012. We encourage you to read that section carefully.
Fiscal calendar
We have a 52/53-week fiscal accounting year ending on the Friday closest to March 31. The three months ended December 28, 2012 and December 30, 2011 both consisted of 13 weeks. The nine months ended December 28, 2012 and December 30, 2011 both consisted of 26 weeks.
OVERVIEW
Our business
Symantec is a global provider of security, storage, and systems management solutions that help organizations and consumers secure and manage their information-driven world. Our software and services protect against advanced threats enabling confidence wherever information is used or stored.
On July 24, 2012, Enrique Salem, our former President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO), resigned from the Company. Our Board of Directors (the Board) appointed Stephen M. Bennett as our new President and CEO in addition to his role as our Chairman of the Board, effective July 25, 2012. On January 21, 2013, the Board appointed Daniel H. Schulman, a current independent member of the Board, as our non-executive Chairman of the Board. Mr. Schulman replaces Mr. Bennett, who remains our President, CEO and member of the Board.
New strategy announcement
On January 23, 2013, we announced our new strategy, with a particular focus on future offerings and improving our operations and organizational structure. The new strategy has financial as well as other implications for us.
Future Offerings
Symantecs goal is to continue to improve its existing products and services, and at the same time develop new, innovative products and services that solve important unmet or underserved needs.
These future offerings are intended to align with meeting three key customer needs: Making it simple to be productive and protected at home and work; keeping businesses safe and compliant; and keeping business information and applications up and running. As such, Symantec is focusing on and considering the development of offerings in the following core areas: Mobile Workforce Productivity, Norton Protection, Norton Cloud, Information Security Services, Identity/Content-Aware Security Gateway, Data Center Security, Business Continuity Platform, Integrated Backup, Cloud-Based Information Management, and Object Storage Platform.
17
We will increase our investment in research and development and home-grown innovation to better meet next generation needs. Symantec will also establish strategic partnerships where it can integrate what it does with others to add even more value for customers.
Operations and Organization
Our sales process will continue to rely on the channel to address smaller to mid-sized enterprises, which will free up Symantecs sales force to focus on the largest opportunities to generate new business. Symantec will also broaden the scope of its dedicated renewals team and enhance the marketing organization with more strategic resources and capability to accelerate organic revenue growth.
In order to make the company more flexible and able to adapt quicker to the needs of customers, more emphasis will be placed on giving front-line employees greater empowerment, input and discretion in addressing customers needs on a day to day basis. As such, there will be fewer executive and middle management positions, resulting in a reduction of the workforce. This process of right-sizing is expected to be largely completed by the end of June 2013.
Financial Implications of New Strategy
The coming year will include significant transitions as we begin to improve our growth capabilities, develop our dedicated renewals team, refocus our direct field sales representatives on new business, eliminate duplicative organization and operating structures and right size the company. Our income and cash flow from operations may be impacted by severance charges and capital expenditures as we invest in our people, processes and technology to execute on our organic growth strategy in the coming year.
Our operating segments
Our operating segments are significant strategic business units that offer different products and services, distinguished by customer needs. Since the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, we have operated in five operating segments: Consumer, Security and Compliance, Storage and Server Management, Services, and Other. Our reportable segments are the same as our operating segments. As a result of the new strategy, we will analyze our operations and organization structure and modify our segment reporting structure as necessary.
Financial results and trends
Revenue increased by $76 million and $109 million for the three and nine months ended December 28, 2012, respectively, as compared to the same periods last year. Fluctuations in the U.S. dollar compared to foreign currencies adversely impacted our revenue by $16 million and $127 million for the three and nine months ended December 28, 2012, respectively, as compared to the same periods last year.
Cost of revenue increased by $28 million and $72 million for the three and nine months ended December 28, 2012, respectively, as compared to the same periods last year. Operating expenses increased by $50 million and $52 million for the three and nine months ended December 28, 2012, as compared to the same periods last year. We experienced favorable foreign currency effects of approximately $14 million and $82 million on our operating expenses for the three and nine months ended December 28, 2012, respectively, as compared to the same periods last year.
Critical accounting estimates
There have been no material changes in the matters for which we make critical accounting estimates in the preparation of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements during the nine months ended December 28, 2012 as compared to those disclosed in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2012.
Recently issued authoritative guidance
Information with respect to recently issued authoritative guidance is in Note 1 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
18
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Total net revenue
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 28, | December 30, | Change in | December 28, | December 30, | Change in |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | $ | % | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Content, subscription, and maintenance revenue |
$ | 1,521 | $ | 1,462 | $ | 59 | 4 | % | $ | 4,494 | $ | 4,353 | $ | 141 | 3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
85 | % | 85 | % | 87 | % | 86 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
License revenue |
$ | 270 | $ | 253 | $ | 17 | 7 | % | $ | 664 | $ | 696 | $ | (32 | ) | (5 | )% | |||||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
15 | % | 15 | % | 13 | % | 14 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total net revenue |
$ | 1,791 | $ | 1,715 | $ | 76 | 4 | % | $ | 5,158 | $ | 5,049 | $ | 109 | 2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Content, subscription, and maintenance revenue increased for the three and nine months ended December 28, 2012, as compared to the same periods last year, primarily due to increases in revenue from our Storage and Server Management segment of $31 million and $68 million, respectively, and our Security and Compliance segment of $19 million and $73 million, respectively.
License revenue includes revenue from software licenses, appliances, and certain revenue-sharing arrangements. License revenue increased for the three months ended December 28, 2012, as compared to the same period last year, primarily due to an increase in revenue from our Storage and Server Management segment of $17 million. License revenue decreased for the nine months ended December 28, 2012, as compared to the same period last year, primarily due to a decline in revenue from our Storage and Server Management segment of $44 million, partially offset by an increase in revenue from our Security and Compliance segment of $7 million.
Net revenue and operating income by segment
Consumer segment
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 28, | December 30, | Change in |
December 28, | December 30, | Change in |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | $ | % | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer revenue |
$ | 530 | $ | 525 | $ | 5 | 1 | % | $ | 1,579 | $ | 1,581 | $ | (2 | ) | 0 | % | |||||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
30 | % | 31 | % | 31 | % | 31 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer operating income |
$ | 227 | $ | 251 | $ | (24 | ) | (10 | )% | $ | 748 | $ | 763 | $ | (15 | ) | (2 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Percentage of Consumer revenue |
43 | % | 48 | % | 47 | % | 48 | % |
Consumer revenue remained consistent for the three and nine months ended December 28, 2012 as compared to the same periods last year. Of the total consumer revenue recognized in the three and nine months ended December 28, 2012, 89% and 88%, respectively, was generated from our electronic channel sales, which were derived from online sales (including new subscriptions, renewals and upgrades).
Consumer operating income decreased for the three months ended December 28, 2012, as compared to the same period last year, primarily due to increased salaries and wages of $10 million, which was attributable to higher headcount, higher cost of revenue of $8 million, which was attributable to higher OEM royalty fees, and increased advertising expense of $7 million for search engine advertising. For the nine months ended December 28, 2012, as compared to the same period last year, Consumer operating income decreased primarily due to higher salaries and wages of $24 million, which was attributable to higher headcount, higher cost of revenue of $17 million, which was attributable to higher OEM royalty fees, and increased outside service fees of $6 million, partially offset by lower advertising promotion expense of $36 million, which was primarily from lower OEM placement fees.
19
Security and Compliance segment
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 28, | December 30, | Change in | December 28, | December 30, | Change in |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | $ | % | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Security and Compliance revenue |
$ | 527 | $ | 510 | $ | 17 | 3 | % | $ | 1,540 | $ | 1,459 | $ | 81 | 6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
29 | % | 30 | % | 30 | % | 29 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Security and Compliance operating income |
$ | 174 | $ | 138 | $ | 36 | 26 | % | $ | 463 | $ | 330 | $ | 133 | 40 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Percentage of Security and Compliance revenue |
33 | % | 27 | % | 30 | % | 23 | % |
Security and Compliance revenue increased for the three and nine months ended December 28, 2012, as compared to the same periods last year, primarily due to increases in our trust services offerings of $11 million and $51 million, respectively, and our managed security services of $7 million and $18 million, respectively. Additionally, for the nine months ended December 28, 2012, our data loss prevention products increased by $8 million, as compared to the same period last year. The revenue from our trust services offerings for the three and nine months ended December 30, 2011 was lower than would have otherwise been the case due to purchase accounting fair value adjustments to deferred revenue.
Security and Compliance operating income increased for the three and nine months ended December 28, 2012, as compared to the same periods last year, primarily due to increased revenue and lower overall operating expenses of $22 million and $72 million, respectively. The decreased operating expenses were mainly due to lower salaries and wages.
Storage and Server Management segment
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 28, | December 30, | Change in | December 28, | December 30, | Change in |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | $ | % | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Storage and Server Management revenue |
$ | 666 | $ | 618 | $ | 48 | 8 | % | $ | 1,845 | $ | 1,821 | $ | 24 | 1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
37 | % | 36 | % | 36 | % | 36 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Storage and Server Management operating income |
$ | 263 | $ | 241 | $ | 22 | 9 | % | $ | 734 | $ | 775 | $ | (41 | ) | (5 | )% | |||||||||||||||
Percentage of Storage and Server Management revenue |
39 | % | 39 | % | 40 | % | 43 | % |
Storage and Server Management revenue increased for the three months ended December 28, 2012, as compared to the same period last year, due to the overall growth within our information management portfolio of $48 million. For the nine months ended December 28, 2012, as compared to the prior period, the increase in Storage and Server Management revenue was attributable to overall growth within our information management portfolio of $52 million, partially offset by a $27 million decrease in our storage management portfolio. The growth within the comparative periods of our information management portfolio was mainly driven by our NetBackup offerings, which increased by $52 million and $81 million, respectively, and our Enterprise Vault products, which increased by $14 million and $31 million, respectively, partially offset by declines in our Backup Exec offerings of $21 million and $68 million, respectively, as compared to the same periods last year.
Storage and Server Management operating income increased for the three months ended December 28, 2012, as compared to the same period last year, due to higher revenue, partially offset by higher cost of revenue of $18 million, which was attributable to growth in the appliances business coupled with increased services costs. For the nine months ended December 28, 2012, as compared to the same period last year, operating income decreased primarily from higher cost of revenue of $45 million and higher salaries and wages of $21 million. The increased cost of revenue was due to growth in the appliances business coupled with higher services costs. The increased salaries and wages expense was due to increased headcount, which was mainly attributable to our LiveOffice LLC acquisition.
Services segment
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 28, | December 30, | Change in | December 28, | December 30, | Change in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | $ | % | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Services revenue |
$ | 68 | $ | 62 | $ | 6 | 10 | % | $ | 194 | $ | 188 | $ | 6 | 3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
4 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | 4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Services operating income |
$ | 12 | $ | 11 | $ | 1 | 9 | % | $ | 33 | $ | 29 | $ | 4 | 14 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Percentage of Services revenue |
18 | % | 18 | % | 17 | % | 15 | % |
20
Services revenue increased from our business critical services offerings for the three and nine months ended December 28, 2012, respectively, as compared to the same periods last year. Services operating income remained consistent for the three and nine months ended December 28, 2012, as compared to the same periods last year.
Other segment
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 28, | December 30, | Change in |
December 28, | December 30, | Change in |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | $ | % | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other revenue |
$ | | $ | | $ | | * | $ | | $ | | $ | | * | ||||||||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other operating loss |
$ | (378 | ) | $ | (341 | ) | $ | (37 | ) | (11 | )% | $ | (1,106 | ) | $ | (1,010 | ) | $ | (96 | ) | (10 | )% | ||||||||||
Percentage of Other revenue |
* | * | * | * |
* | Percentage not meaningful |
Our Other segment consists primarily of sunset products and products nearing the end of their life cycle. The operating loss of our Other segment includes certain general and administrative expenses, amortization of intangible and other assets, charges such as stock-based compensation, restructuring and transition expenses, and certain indirect costs that are not charged to the other operating segments.
Net revenue by geographic region
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 28, | December 30, | Change in |
December 28, | December 30, | Change in |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | $ | % | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Americas (U.S., Canada and Latin America) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer Segment |
$ | 311 | $ | 302 | $ | 9 | 3 | % | $ | 920 | $ | 904 | $ | 16 | 2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Security and Compliance Segment |
279 | 275 | 4 | 1 | % | 819 | 774 | 45 | 6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Storage and Server Management Segment |
331 | 321 | 10 | 3 | % | 946 | 940 | 6 | 1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Services Segment |
35 | 34 | 1 | 3 | % | 102 | 104 | (2 | ) | (2 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total Americas |
$ | 956 | $ | 932 | $ | 24 | 3 | % | $ | 2,787 | $ | 2,722 | $ | 65 | 2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
53 | % | 55 | % | 54 | % | 54 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
EMEA (Europe, Middle East, Africa) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer Segment |
$ | 131 | $ | 133 | $ | (2 | ) | (2 | )% | $ | 388 | $ | 415 | $ | (27 | ) | (7 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Security and Compliance Segment |
134 | 131 | 3 | 2 | % | 389 | 393 | (4 | ) | (1 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||
Storage and Server Management Segment |
215 | 188 | 27 | 14 | % | 549 | 544 | 5 | 1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Services Segment |
18 | 16 | 2 | 13 | % | 49 | 49 | | 0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total EMEA |
$ | 498 | $ | 468 | $ | 30 | 6 | % | $ | 1,375 | $ | 1,401 | $ | (26 | ) | (2 | )% | |||||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
28 | % | 27 | % | 27 | % | 28 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Pacific/Japan |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer Segment |
$ | 88 | $ | 90 | $ | (2 | ) | (2 | )% | $ | 271 | $ | 262 | $ | 9 | 3 | % | |||||||||||||||
Security and Compliance Segment |
114 | 104 | 10 | 10 | % | 332 | 292 | 40 | 14 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Storage and Server Management Segment |
120 | 109 | 11 | 10 | % | 350 | 337 | 13 | 4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Services Segment |
15 | 12 | 3 | 25 | % | 43 | 35 | 8 | 23 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total Asia Pacific/Japan |
$ | 337 | $ | 315 | $ | 22 | 7 | % | $ | 996 | $ | 926 | $ | 70 | 8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
19 | % | 18 | % | 19 | % | 18 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total net revenue |
$ | 1,791 | $ | 1,715 | $ | 76 | 4 | % | $ | 5,158 | $ | 5,049 | $ | 109 | 2 | % |
Fluctuations in the U.S. dollar compared to foreign currencies adversely impacted our international revenue by $16 million and $127 million for the three and nine months ended December 28, 2012, respectively, as compared to the same periods last year. Our international sales are and will continue to be a significant portion of our revenue. As such, revenue will continue to be affected by foreign currency exchange rates as compared to the U.S. dollar. We are unable to predict the extent to which revenue in future periods will be impacted by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. If international sales continue to become a greater portion of our total sales in the future, changes in foreign currency exchange rates may have a potentially greater impact on our revenue and operating results.
21
Cost of revenue
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 28, | December 30, | Change in |
December 28, | December 30, | Change in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | $ | % | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of content, subscription, and maintenance |
$ | 256 | $ | 233 | $ | 23 | 10 | % | $ | 752 | $ | 695 | $ | 57 | 8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
As a percentage of related revenue |
17 | % | 16 | % | 17 | % | 16 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of license |
$ | 27 | $ | 16 | $ | 11 | 69 | % | $ | 62 | $ | 33 | $ | 29 | 88 | % | ||||||||||||||||
As a percentage of related revenue |
10 | % | 6 | % | 9 | % | 5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
$ | 16 | $ | 22 | $ | (6 | ) | (27 | )% | $ | 53 | $ | 67 | $ | (14 | ) | (21 | )% | ||||||||||||||
As a percentage of total net revenue |
1 | % | 1 | % | 1 | % | 1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenue |
$ | 299 | $ | 271 | $ | 28 | 10 | % | $ | 867 | $ | 795 | $ | 72 | 9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross margin |
83 | % | 84 | % | 83 | % | 84 | % |
Cost of content, subscription, and maintenance consists primarily of technical support costs, costs of billable services, and fees to OEMs under revenue-sharing agreements. Cost of content, subscription, and maintenance increased for the three and nine months ended December 28, 2012, as compared to the same periods of last year, primarily due to higher technical support, services, and OEM royalty costs. The increased costs were due to growth in our business and higher payments to major OEM partners as part of revenue-sharing arrangements.
Cost of license consists primarily of royalties paid to third parties under technology licensing agreements, appliances manufacturing costs, and other direct material costs. Cost of license increased for the three and nine months ended December 28, 2012, as compared to the same periods of last year, primarily due to the higher direct costs associated with the appliances business.
Intangible assets are comprised of developed technologies and patents from acquired companies. Amortization of intangible assets decreased for the three and nine months ended December 28, 2012, as compared to the same periods of last year, due to certain developed technologies becoming fully amortized, partially offset by the incremental amortization associated with our fiscal 2012 acquisitions.
Operating expenses
Our operating expenses were largely in line as a percentage of total net revenue for the three and nine months ended December 28, 2012, as compared to the same periods of last year.
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 28, | December 30, | Change in | December 28, | December 30, | Change in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | $ | % | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing expense |
$ | 730 | $ | 711 | $ | 19 | 3 | % | $ | 2,038 | $ | 2,073 | $ | (35 | ) | (2 | )% | |||||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
41 | % | 41 | % | 40 | % | 41 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research and development expense |
$ | 249 | $ | 242 | $ | 7 | 3 | % | $ | 745 | $ | 728 | $ | 17 | 2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
14 | % | 14 | % | 14 | % | 14 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expense |
$ | 117 | $ | 113 | $ | 4 | 4 | % | $ | 336 | $ | 324 | $ | 12 | 4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
7 | % | 7 | % | 7 | % | 6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
$ | 71 | $ | 73 | $ | (2 | ) | (3 | )% | $ | 215 | $ | 217 | $ | (2 | ) | (1 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
4 | % | 4 | % | 4 | % | 4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring and transition |
$ | 27 | $ | 5 | $ | 22 | * | $ | 85 | $ | 25 | $ | 60 | * | ||||||||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
2 | % | 0 | % | 2 | % | 0 | % |
* | Percentage not meaningful |
Sales and marketing expense increased for the three months ended December 28, 2012, as compared to the same period of last year, primarily due to higher salaries and wages of $8 million, which was attributable to higher headcount to support the growth of our business and higher search engine advertising expense of $8 million. For the nine months ended December 28, 2012, as compared to the same period last year, the decrease was primarily due to lower promotional expenses of $49 million, which was attributable to lower OEM placement fees, partially offset by higher salaries and wages of $26 million.
Research and development expense increased for the three and nine months ended December 28, 2012, as compared to the same periods last year, from higher salaries and wages expenses of $6 million and $18 million, respectively. The higher salaries and wages are attributed to increased headcount to support our continued investment in product development.
22
General and administrative expense remained relatively consistent for the three and nine months ended December 28, 2012, as compared to the same periods of last year.
Intangible assets are comprised of customer relationships and tradenames. Amortization of intangible assets was slightly lower for the three and nine months ended December 28, 2012, as compared to the same periods of last year.
For the three and nine months ended December 28, 2012, we recognized transition and other related costs of $28 million and $84 million, respectively. Transition and other related costs include severance costs of $6 million and $46 million and consulting costs of $22 million and $38 million for those respective periods. These consulting costs are associated with the planning and design phases of implementing a new enterprise resource planning system. For the three and nine months ended December 30, 2011, we recognized transition and other related costs of $5 million and $18 million, respectively. Also, for the nine months ended December 30, 2011, we recognized facilities costs of $5 million and severance costs of $2 million. For further information on restructuring and transition costs, see Note 7 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Non-operating income (expense), net
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 28, | December 30, | Change in |
December 28, | December 30, | Change in |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | $ | % | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 4 | $ | 2 | $ | 9 | $ | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(38 | ) | (27 | ) | (102 | ) | (87 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
20 | (2 | ) | 15 | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss from joint venture |
| | | (27 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | (14 | ) | $ | (27 | ) | $ | 13 | 48 | % | $ | (78 | ) | $ | (108 | ) | $ | 30 | 28 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage of total net revenue |
(1 | )% | (2 | )% | (2 | )% | (2 | )% |
Net non-operating expense decreased for the three and nine months ended December 28, 2012, as compared to the same periods of last year, primarily due to a tax incentive received from the China tax bureau in the form of value-added tax refunds of $27 million, which were included in Other income (expense), net. See Note 5 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2013, we issued $600 million in principal amount of 2.75% interest-bearing senior notes due June 15, 2017 and $400 million in principal amount of 3.95% interest-bearing senior notes due June 15, 2022, which resulted in additional quarterly interest expense of $8 million starting in the second quarter of fiscal 2013.
During prior year periods, we recorded our proportionate share of our joint ventures net loss one quarter in arrears. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, we sold our ownership interest in the joint venture to Huawei Technologies Co., Limited.
Provision for income taxes
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 28, | December 30, | Change in | December 28, | December 30, | Change in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | $ | % | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
$ | 72 | $ | 32 | $ | 40 | 125 | % | $ | 217 | $ | 166 | $ | 51 | 31 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Effective tax rate on earnings |
25 | % | 12 | % | 27 | % | 21 | % |
The effective tax rate was approximately 25% and 27% for the three and nine months ended December 28, 2012, and 12% and 21% for the three and nine months ended December 30, 2011, respectively. For further information on our effective tax rate, see Note 12 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
We are a U.S.-based multinational company subject to tax in the U.S. and multiple international tax jurisdictions. Substantially all of our international earnings were generated by subsidiaries in Ireland and Singapore. Our results of operations would be adversely affected to the extent that our geographical mix of income becomes more weighted toward jurisdictions with higher tax rates and would be favorably affected to the extent the relative geographic mix shifts to lower tax jurisdictions. Any change in our mix of earnings is dependent upon many factors and is therefore difficult to predict.
23
On December 2, 2009, we received a Revenue Agents Report from the IRS for the VERITAS 2002 through 2005 tax years assessing additional taxes due. We contested $80 million of the tax assessed and all penalties. As a result of negotiations with IRS Appeals in the three and nine months ended December 30, 2011, we remeasured our liability for unrecognized tax benefits, resulting in a tax benefit of $52 million. We executed the final closing agreement for the VERITAS 2002 through 2005 tax years on December 26, 2012. Accordingly, we recorded a further tax benefit of $3 million during the three and nine months ended December 28, 2012 based on the closing agreement.
The timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain, and the amounts ultimately paid, if any, upon resolution of the issues raised by the taxing authorities may differ materially from the amounts accrued for each year. Although potential resolution of uncertain tax positions involve multiple tax periods and jurisdictions, it is reasonably possible that the gross unrecognized tax benefits related to these audits could decrease (whether by payment, release, or a combination of both) in the next 12 months by between $135 million and $250 million. Depending on the nature of the settlement or expiration of statutes of limitations, we estimate at least $15 million could affect our income tax provision and therefore benefit the resulting effective tax rate. As of December 28, 2012, we have $184 million on deposit with the IRS pertaining to U.S. tax matters in the VERITAS 2002 through 2005 audit cycle as well as the Symantec 2005 through 2008 audit cycle.
We continue to monitor the progress of ongoing tax controversies and the impact, if any, of the expiration of the statute of limitations in various taxing jurisdictions.
Noncontrolling interest
In fiscal 2011, we completed the acquisition of the identity and authentication business of VeriSign, Inc., including a controlling interest in its subsidiary VeriSign Japan K.K. (VeriSign Japan), a publicly traded company on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. Given our majority ownership interest of 54% in VeriSign Japan, the accounts of VeriSign Japan have been consolidated with our accounts, and a noncontrolling interest has been recorded for the noncontrolling investors interests in the equity and operations of VeriSign Japan. In July 2012, we completed a tender offer and paid $92 million to acquire VeriSign Japan common shares and stock rights, which increased our ownership percentage to 92%. In November 2012, we acquired the remaining 8% interest for $19 million, which will be paid in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. As of December 28, 2012, VeriSign Japan is a wholly-owned subsidiary. See Note 14 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Sources of Cash
We have historically relied on cash flow from operations, borrowings under a credit facility, and issuances of debt and equity securities for our liquidity needs. As of December 28, 2012, we had cash and cash equivalents of $4.2 billion and an unused credit facility of $1.0 billion resulting in a liquidity position of $5.2 billion.
Senior Notes: In the first quarter of fiscal 2013, we issued $600 million in principal amount of 2.75% senior notes due June 15, 2017 and $400 million in principal amount of 3.95% senior notes due June 15, 2022, for an aggregate principal amount of $1.0 billion. In the second quarter of fiscal 2011, we issued $350 million in principal amount of 2.75% senior notes due September 15, 2015 and $750 million in principal amount of 4.20% senior notes due September 15, 2020, for an aggregate principal amount of $1.1 billion.
Revolving Credit Facility: In the second quarter of fiscal 2011, we entered into a $1.0 billion senior unsecured revolving credit facility (credit facility), which was amended in the first quarter of 2013 to extend the term to June 7, 2017. Under the terms of this credit facility, we must comply with certain financial and non-financial covenants, including a debt to EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) covenant. As of December 28, 2012, we were in compliance with all required covenants, and there was no outstanding balance on the credit facility.
We believe that our existing cash and investment balances, our borrowing capacity, our ability to issue new debt instruments, and cash generated from operations will be sufficient to meet our working capital and capital expenditure requirements, as well as any cash dividends to be paid under the capital allocation program announced in January 2013 and repurchases of our stock, for at least the next 12 months.
24
Uses of Cash
Our principal cash requirements include working capital, capital expenditures, payments of principal and interest on our debt, and payments of taxes. Also, we may, from time to time, engage in the open market purchase of our convertible notes prior to their maturity. In January 2013, the Company announced a capital allocation program, which includes plans to initiate a quarterly cash dividend. In addition, we regularly evaluate our ability to repurchase stock, pay debts and acquire other businesses. As of December 28, 2012, $2.4 billion in cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities were held by our foreign subsidiaries. We have provided U.S. deferred taxes on a portion of our undistributed foreign earnings sufficient to address the incremental U.S. tax that would be due if we needed such portion of these funds to support our operations in the U.S.
Acquisitions: During the nine months ended December 28, 2012, we acquired a privately-held provider of mobile application management for an aggregate payment of $28 million, net of cash acquired. During the nine months ended December 30, 2011, we acquired Clearwell Systems Inc. for an aggregate payment of $364 million, net of cash acquired.
Convertible Senior Notes: During the nine months ended December 30, 2011, the remaining balance of our 0.75% convertible senior notes matured and we settled with the holders with a cash payment of $600 million. We intend to use $1.0 billion of our cash and cash equivalents to repay our 1.00% Convertible Senior Notes that mature in June 2013. Accordingly, we may use a substantial portion of our cash and cash equivalents held in the U.S. to repay these notes upon maturity.
Stock Repurchases: During the nine months ended December 28, 2012, we repurchased 42 million shares, or $701 million, of our common stock. During the nine months ended December 30, 2011, we repurchased 39 million shares, or $693 million, of our common stock. On January 23, 2013, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized a new $1.0 billion stock repurchase program commencing in the Companys fiscal year 2014, in addition to the remaining $283 million in the current board authorized stock repurchase plan.
Noncontrolling Interest: In July 2012, we completed a tender offer and paid $92 million to acquire VeriSign Japan common shares and stock rights, which increased our ownership percentage to 92%. In November 2012, we acquired the remaining 8% interest for $19 million, which will be paid in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. As of December 28, 2012, VeriSign Japan is a wholly-owned subsidiary.
Dividend Program: On January 23, 2013, we announced a dividend program under which we intend to pay a quarterly cash dividend beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2014. We expect the initial dividend rate to yield 2.5% based on Symantecs closing stock price of $20.86 on January 22, 2013. The dividend policy, future declarations of dividends, and payment dates will be subject to the Board of Directors continuing determination that the policy and the declaration of dividends thereunder are in the best interest of our stockholders and are in compliance with applicable law. The Board of Directors retains the power to modify, suspend, or cancel our dividend policy in any manner and at any time that it may deem necessary or appropriate in the future. As of the date of this filing, the Board of Directors has not declared a dividend in connection with the adoption of this policy.
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes, for the periods indicated, selected items in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
December 28, 2012 |
December 30, 2011 |
|||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in): |
||||||||
Operating activities |
$ | 981 | $ | 1,214 | ||||
Investing activities |
(224 | ) | (611 | ) | ||||
Financing activities |
284 | (1,216 | ) |
25
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was $981 million for the nine months ended December 28, 2012, which resulted from net income of $577 million adjusted for non-cash items, which largely included depreciation and amortization charges of $525 million and stock-based compensation expense of $125 million. These amounts were partially offset by decreases in deferred revenue of $150 million and increases in trade receivables of $144 million.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $1.2 billion for the nine months ended December 30, 2011, which resulted from net income of $613 million adjusted for non-cash items, which largely included depreciation and amortization charges of $530 million, stock-based compensation expense of $123 million, and an increase in deferred income taxes of $38 million. These amounts were partially offset by decreases in deferred revenue of $108 million.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $224 million for the nine months ended December 28, 2012 and was primarily due to capital expenditures of $245 million and payments for an acquisition, net of cash acquired, of $28 million, offset by the proceeds from the sale of held-to-maturity securities of $46 million.
Net cash used in investing activities was $611 million for the nine months ended December 30, 2011, which was due to payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired, of $364 million, $199 million paid for capital expenditures, and $47 million for our short-term investments.
Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities was $284 million for the nine months ended December 28, 2012 and was primarily due to the proceeds from our issuance of $600 million in principal amount of 2.75% interest-bearing senior notes due June 15, 2017 and $400 million in principal amount of 3.95% interest-bearing senior notes due June 15, 2022, net of discount, of $996 million, offset by the repurchases of our common stock of $701 million.
Net cash used in financing activities was $1.2 billion for the nine months ended December 30, 2011, which was due to repurchases of our common stock of $693 million and the extinguishment of our outstanding 0.75% Notes of $600 million.
Contractual Obligations
There have been no significant changes during the nine months ended December 28, 2012 to the contractual obligations disclosed in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, set forth in Part II, Item 7, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2012, except for the amount of purchase obligations and the addition of the Senior Notes and related interest. The table below sets forth these changes but does not update the other line items in the contractual obligations table that appears in the section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K described above:
Payments Due By Periods | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Remainder of Fiscal 2013 |
Fiscal 2014 and Fiscal 2015 |
Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2017 |
Fiscal 2018 and Thereafter |
||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Notes (1) |
$ | 2,100 | $ | | $ | | $ | 350 | $ | 1,750 | ||||||||||
Interest payments on Senior Notes (1) |
491 | 18 | 148 | 131 | 194 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations (2) |
555 | 368 | 165 | 21 | 1 |
(1) | In the second quarter of fiscal 2011, we issued $350 million in principal amount of 2.75% interest-bearing senior notes due December 15, 2015 and $750 million in principal amount of 4.20% interest-bearing senior notes due December 15, 2020. In the first quarter of fiscal 2013, we issued $600 million in principal amount of 2.75% interest-bearing senior notes due June 15, 2017 and $400 million in principal amount of 3.95% interest-bearing senior notes due June 15, 2022. Interest payments were calculated based on terms of the related senior notes. For further information on the senior notes issued in the first quarter of fiscal 2013, see Note 6 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
26
(2) | These amounts are associated with agreements for purchases of goods or services generally including agreements that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum, or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. The table above also includes agreements to purchase goods or services that have cancellation provisions requiring little or no payment. The amounts under such contracts are included in the table above because management believes that cancellation of these contracts is unlikely and we expect to make future cash payments according to the contract terms or in similar amounts for similar materials. |
Indemnifications
In the ordinary course of business, we may provide indemnifications of varying scope and terms to customers, vendors, lessors, business partners, subsidiaries and other parties with respect to certain matters, including, but not limited to, losses arising out of our breach of agreements or representations and warranties made by us. In addition, our bylaws contain indemnification obligations to our directors, officers, employees and agents, and we have entered into indemnification agreements with our directors and certain of our officers to give such directors and officers additional contractual assurances regarding the scope of the indemnification set forth in our bylaws and to provide additional procedural protections. We maintain director and officer insurance, which may cover certain liabilities arising from our obligation to indemnify our directors and officers. It is not possible to determine the aggregate maximum potential loss under these indemnification agreements due to the limited history of prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. Such indemnification agreements might not be subject to maximum loss clauses. Historically, we have not incurred material costs as a result of obligations under these agreements and we have not accrued any liabilities related to such indemnification obligations in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
We provide limited product warranties and the majority of our software license agreements contain provisions that indemnify licensees of our software from damages and costs resulting from claims alleging that our software infringes the intellectual property rights of a third party. Historically, payments made under these provisions have been immaterial. We monitor the conditions that are subject to indemnification to identify if a loss has occurred.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
There have been no significant changes in our market risk exposures during the nine months ended December 28, 2012 as compared to the market risk exposures disclosed in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, set forth in Part II, Item 7A, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2012, except the interest rate risk related to the addition of the Senior Notes.
Interest rate risk
As of December 28, 2012, we had $2.1 billion in principal amount of fixed-rate Senior Notes outstanding, with a carrying amount of $2.1 billion and a fair value of $2.17 billion, which fair value is based on Level 2 inputs of market prices for similar debt instruments and resulting yields. On December 28, 2012, a hypothetical 50 bps increase or decrease in market interest rates would change the fair value of the fixed-rate debt by a decrease of approximately $56 million and an increase of approximately $58 million, respectively. However, this hypothetical change in interest rates would not impact the interest expense on the fixed-rate debt.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The SEC defines the term disclosure controls and procedures to mean a companys controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported, within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuers management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management. Our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded, based on an evaluation of the effectiveness of our
27
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act) by our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of the end of the period covered by this report.
(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the nine months ended December 28, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
(c) Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Information with respect to this Item may be found in Note 8 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
A description of the risks associated with our business, financial condition, and results of operations is set forth in Part 1, Item 1A, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2012. Other than the changes to such description set forth in Exhibit 99.01 on our current report on Form 8-K filed on June 11, 2012, which are incorporated herein by reference, there have been no material changes in our risks from such description.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Stock repurchases during the three months ended December 28, 2012 were as follows:
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Total Number of Shares Purchased |
Average Price Paid per Share |
Total Number of Shares Purchased Under Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
Maximum Dollar Value of Shares May Yet Be Purchased Under Plans or Programs |
|||||||||||||
(In millions, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
September 29, 2012 to October 26, 2012 |
7 | $ | 17.82 | 7 | $ | 362 | ||||||||||
October 27, 2012 to November 23, 2012 |
4 | $ | 18.13 | 4 | $ | 283 | ||||||||||
November 24, 2012 to December 28,2012 |
| $ | | | $ | 283 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
11 | $ | 17.94 | 11 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
For information regarding our stock repurchase programs, see Note 9 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
28
EXHIBIT INDEX
Incorporated by Reference | ||||||||||||||||||||
Exhibit Number |
Exhibit Description |
Form | File Number |
Exhibit | File Date |
Filed with this 10-Q | ||||||||||||||
10.01* | Employment Offer Letter, dated December 19, 2012, between Symantec Corporation and Stephen Gillett | 8-K | 000-17781 | 10.01 | 12/19/12 | |||||||||||||||
31.01 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X | ||||||||||||||||||
31.02 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X | ||||||||||||||||||
32.01 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X | ||||||||||||||||||
32.02 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X | ||||||||||||||||||
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | X | ||||||||||||||||||
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Schema Linkbase Document | X | ||||||||||||||||||
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document | X | ||||||||||||||||||
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document | X | ||||||||||||||||||
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Labels Linkbase Document | X | ||||||||||||||||||
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document | X |
* | Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
| This exhibit is being furnished rather than filed, and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing, in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K. |
29
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SYMANTEC CORPORATION (Registrant) | ||
By: | /s/ Stephen M. Bennett | |
Stephen M. Bennett President and Chief Executive Officer | ||
By: | /s/ James A. Beer | |
James A. Beer Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Date: January 29, 2013
30
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
Q3 FY13 Form 10-Q
EXHIBIT INDEX
Incorporated by Reference | ||||||||||||||||||||
Exhibit Number |
Exhibit Description |
Form | File Number |
Exhibit | File Date |
Filed with this 10-Q | ||||||||||||||
10 .01* | Employment Offer Letter, dated December 19, 2012, between Symantec Corporation and Stephen Gillett | 8-K | 000-17781 | 10.01 | 12/19/12 | |||||||||||||||
31 .01 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X | ||||||||||||||||||
31 .02 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X | ||||||||||||||||||
32 .01 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X | ||||||||||||||||||
32 .02 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X | ||||||||||||||||||
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | X | ||||||||||||||||||
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Schema Linkbase Document | X | ||||||||||||||||||
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document | X | ||||||||||||||||||
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document | X | ||||||||||||||||||
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Labels Linkbase Document | X | ||||||||||||||||||
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document | X |
* | Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
| This exhibit is being furnished rather than filed, and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing, in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K. |
31