e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
March 30, 2008
|
|
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission File
No. 0-24993
LAKES ENTERTAINMENT,
INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
41-1913991
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
130 Cheshire Lane, Suite 101
Minnetonka, Minnesota
|
|
55305
(Zip Code)
|
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
|
(952) 449-9092
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer o
|
|
Accelerated
filer þ
|
Non-accelerated
filer o (Do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
As of May 5, 2008, there were 24,915,675 shares of
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding.
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
2
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(balances include $5.0 million and $3.9 million of WPT
Enterprises, Inc.)
|
|
$
|
8,644
|
|
|
$
|
9,248
|
|
Investments in marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(balances include $8.5 million and $23.0 million of
WPT Enterprises, Inc.)
|
|
|
8,511
|
|
|
|
53,546
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
5,045
|
|
|
|
3,570
|
|
Notes receivable
|
|
|
1,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
3,367
|
|
|
|
3,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
26,700
|
|
|
|
69,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
16,743
|
|
|
|
16,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term assets related to Indian casino projects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivable from Indian tribes
|
|
|
77,899
|
|
|
|
78,795
|
|
Land held for development
|
|
|
7,663
|
|
|
|
7,631
|
|
Intangible assets , net of accumulated amortization of
$4.4 million and $2.8 million
|
|
|
64,987
|
|
|
|
65,910
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5,116
|
|
|
|
5,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term assets related to Indian casino projects
|
|
|
155,665
|
|
|
|
157,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in marketable securities
|
|
|
38,849
|
|
|
|
4,200
|
|
Investments in unconsolidated investee
|
|
|
2,923
|
|
|
|
2,923
|
|
Deferred tax asset
|
|
|
4,498
|
|
|
|
4,878
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets
|
|
|
46,800
|
|
|
|
12,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
245,908
|
|
|
$
|
256,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
1,753
|
|
|
$
|
1,559
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
15,471
|
|
|
|
16,272
|
|
Accrued payroll and related costs
|
|
|
2,574
|
|
|
|
2,788
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
1,984
|
|
|
|
2,870
|
|
Current portion of contract acquisition costs payable, net of
$1.3 million and $1.2 million discount
|
|
|
2,206
|
|
|
|
1,903
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
2,166
|
|
|
|
2,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
26,154
|
|
|
|
27,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract acquisition costs payable, net of $2.2 million and
$2.5 million discount
|
|
|
6,737
|
|
|
|
7,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
32,891
|
|
|
|
34,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest in subsidiary
|
|
|
12,587
|
|
|
|
13,995
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A convertible, nonvoting preferred stock,
$.01 par value with no dividend rights and no liquidation
preference; authorized 7,500 shares; 4,458 issued and
outstanding at March 30, 2008 and December 30, 2007
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; authorized
200,000 shares; 24,916 and 24,516 issued and outstanding at
March 30, 2008, and December 30, 2007, respectively
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
192,658
|
|
|
|
190,228
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
9,861
|
|
|
|
16,766
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings (loss)
|
|
|
(2,383
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
200,430
|
|
|
|
207,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
245,908
|
|
|
$
|
256,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements
3
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except
|
|
|
|
per share data)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
License fee income
|
|
$
|
3,576
|
|
|
$
|
3,768
|
|
Host fees, sponsorship, online gaming and other
|
|
|
1,405
|
|
|
|
755
|
|
Management, consulting and development fees
|
|
|
4,580
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
9,561
|
|
|
|
4,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
10,892
|
|
|
|
9,741
|
|
Production costs
|
|
|
2,670
|
|
|
|
2,152
|
|
Net impairment losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets related to Indian casino
projects
|
|
|
1,681
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
15,431
|
|
|
|
12,419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on notes
receivable
|
|
|
(1,983
|
)
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(7,853
|
)
|
|
|
(7,282
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
835
|
|
|
|
1,138
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(367
|
)
|
|
|
(316
|
)
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,830
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense), net
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
(3,098
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes and minority interest in net loss of
subsidiary
|
|
|
(7,323
|
)
|
|
|
(10,380
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
688
|
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before minority interest in net loss of subsidiary
|
|
|
(8,011
|
)
|
|
|
(10,702
|
)
|
Minority interest in net loss of subsidiary
|
|
|
1,106
|
|
|
|
881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss applicable to common shareholders
|
|
|
(6,905
|
)
|
|
|
(9,821
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive earnings (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (loss) on marketable securities, net of tax
|
|
|
(2,397
|
)
|
|
|
23
|
|
Change in estimated fair value of derivative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(9,302
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,389
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss applicable to common shareholders per share
basic and diluted
|
|
($
|
0.28
|
)
|
|
($
|
0.43
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding basic
and diluted
|
|
|
24,604
|
|
|
|
22,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements
4
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(6,905
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,821
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Amortization of debt discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Decrease in value of warrant liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,272
|
)
|
Amortization of intangible assets related to Indian casino
projects
|
|
|
1,681
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
461
|
|
|
|
1,232
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,783
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on notes receivable
|
|
|
1,983
|
|
|
|
(1,227
|
)
|
Minority interest in net loss of subsidiary
|
|
|
(1,106
|
)
|
|
|
(881
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
Net impairment losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(1,492
|
)
|
|
|
566
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(339
|
)
|
|
|
(783
|
)
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
(801
|
)
|
|
|
34
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(885
|
)
|
|
|
403
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
(1,669
|
)
|
Contract acquisition costs payable
|
|
|
(301
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(6,930
|
)
|
|
|
(11,051
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of marketable securities
|
|
|
(13,887
|
)
|
|
|
(26,630
|
)
|
Sale / maturity of marketable securities
|
|
|
21,877
|
|
|
|
33,785
|
|
Collections on notes receivable
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Increases in long-term assets related to Indian casino projects
|
|
|
(2,153
|
)
|
|
|
(6,598
|
)
|
Advances on notes receivable
|
|
|
(1,117
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(374
|
)
|
|
|
(614
|
)
|
Increase in other long-term assets
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
4,651
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,735
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105,000
|
)
|
Cash proceeds from issuance of common and preferred stock
|
|
|
1,675
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
Cash proceeds from sale of notes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
1,675
|
|
|
|
10,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(604
|
)
|
|
|
(834
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
9,248
|
|
|
|
9,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
8,644
|
|
|
$
|
8,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements
5
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of
Lakes Entertainment, Inc., a Minnesota corporation
(Lakes or the Company), have been
prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) applicable to interim
financial information. Accordingly, certain information normally
included in the annual financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States has been condensed
and/or
omitted. As of March 30, 2008, Lakes owned approximately
61% of WPT Enterprises, Inc. (WPTE). Accordingly,
Lakes unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements include the unaudited results of operations of WPTE,
and a substantial portion of Lakes revenues for the
periods reported have been derived from WPTEs business.
For further information, please refer to the annual audited
consolidated financial statements of the Company, and the
related notes included within the Companys Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 30, 2007, previously filed with
the SEC on March 12, 2008, from which the balance sheet
information as of that date is derived.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered
necessary for a fair presentation have been included, consisting
only of normal recurring adjustments. The results for the
current interim period are not necessarily indicative of the
results to be expected for the full year.
Certain minor reclassifications to amounts previously reported
have been made to conform to the current period presentation.
These reclassifications had no effect on net loss or
shareholders equity as previously presented.
|
|
2.
|
Fair
Value Measurement
|
On December 31, 2007, the Company adopted the methods of
fair value as described in Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS No. 157), to value its financial
assets. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 in the first
quarter of 2008 did not impact net income.
The Companys financial instruments that are measured at
estimated fair value use inputs from among the three levels of
the fair value hierarchy set forth in SFAS No. 157 as
follows:
Level 1 inputs: Unadjusted quoted prices in
active markets for identical assets or liabilities, which prices
are available at the measurement date.
Level 2 inputs: Include quoted prices for
similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices
for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that
are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are
observable for the asset or liability (i.e. interest
rates, yield curves, etc.) and inputs that are derived
principally from or corroborated by observable market data by
correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).
Level 3 inputs: Unobservable inputs that reflect
managements estimates about the assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
Management develops these inputs based on the best information
available, including internally-developed data.
In estimating fair value, the Company utilizes valuation
techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and
minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible.
None of the Companys financial assets are measured using
level 2 inputs.
6
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Financial assets carried at fair value as of March 30, 2008
are classified in the table below in one of the three categories
described above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds(*)
|
|
$
|
1,807
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,807
|
|
Auction rate securities(*)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,756
|
|
|
|
36,756
|
|
Corporate preferred securities(*)
|
|
|
7,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,837
|
|
Certificates of deposit(*)
|
|
|
960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
960
|
|
Notes receivable from Indian Tribes (**)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,899
|
|
|
|
77,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at estimated fair value (***)
|
|
$
|
10,604
|
|
|
$
|
114,655
|
|
|
$
|
125,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
See Note 3. |
|
(**) |
|
See Note 4. |
|
(***) |
|
The Company chose not to elect the fair value option as offered
by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities including an amendment of FAS 115,
for its financial assets and liabilities that had not been
previously carried at fair value. Therefore, material financial
assets and liabilities not carried at fair value are still
reported at carrying values. |
For financial assets that utilize Level 1 inputs, the
Company utilizes direct observable price quotes in active
markets (corporate paper, municipal bond and certificate of
deposit markets) for identical assets.
Due to the lack of observable market quotes on the
Companys auction rate securities (ARS)
portfolio, the Company utilizes valuation models that rely
exclusively on Level 3 inputs, including those that are
based on managements estimates of expected cash flow
streams and collateral values, default risk underlying the
security, discount rates and overall capital market liquidity.
The valuation of the Companys ARS investment portfolio is
subject to uncertainties and evolving market conditions that are
difficult to predict. Factors that may impact the Companys
valuation include changes to credit ratings of the securities as
well as to the underlying assets supporting those securities,
rates of default of the underlying assets, underlying collateral
value, discount rates, and ongoing strength and quality of
market credit and liquidity.
In addition, due to the lack of observable market quotes on the
Companys notes receivable from Indian tribes, the Company
utilizes valuation models that rely exclusively on Level 3
inputs including those that are based on managements
estimates of expected cash flow streams, casino opening dates
and probabilities of casinos opening, projected pre- and
post-opening date interest rates, and discount rates. The
estimated casino opening date used in the valuation reflects the
weighted-average of three scenarios: a base case (which is based
on the Companys forecasted casino opening date) and one
and two years out from the base case. The projected pre- and
post-opening interest rates are based upon the one year
U.S. Treasury Bill spot-yield curve per Bloomberg and the
specific assumptions on contract term, stated interest rate and
casino opening date. The discount rate for the projects is based
on the yields available on certain financial instruments at the
valuation date, the risk level of equity investments in general,
and the specific operating risks associated with open and
operating gaming enterprises similar to each of the projects. In
estimating this discount rate, market data of other public
gaming related companies is also considered. The probability
applied to each project is based upon a weighting of four
different scenarios with the fourth scenario assuming the casino
never opens. The first three scenarios assume the casino opens
but applies different opening dates as discussed above. The
probability weighting applied to each scenario captures the
element of risk in these projects and is based upon the status
of each project, review of the critical milestones and
likelihood of achieving the milestones.
7
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table summarizes the activity for those financial
assets where fair value measurements are estimated utilizing
Level 3 inputs (ARS and notes receivable from Indian
tribes) (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARS
|
|
|
Indian Tribes
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Beginning balance December 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
38,300
|
|
|
$
|
78,795
|
|
|
$
|
117,095
|
|
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in other comprehensive loss(*)
|
|
|
(2,419
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,419
|
)
|
Included in net unrealized losses on notes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,983
|
)
|
|
|
(1,983
|
)
|
Advances, allocation to intangible, other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,087
|
|
|
|
1,087
|
|
Purchases, issuances and settlements
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance March 30, 2008 (unaudited)
|
|
$
|
36,756
|
|
|
$
|
77,899
|
|
|
$
|
114,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
The Company considers the decline in the estimated fair value of
its ARS to be temporary. Accordingly, the related unrealized
loss is included in accumulated other comprehensive loss in the
shareholders equity section of the balance sheet as of
March 30, 2008. |
|
|
3.
|
Investment
in marketable securities
|
The Companys investment portfolio includes investments in
ARS. The types of ARS investments that the Company owns are
backed by student loans, the majority of which are guaranteed
under the Federal Family Education Loan Program
(FFELP), and all of which have credit ratings of AAA
or Aaa. As of March 30, 2008 and December 30, 2007,
investments in marketable securities with original maturity
dates beyond three months consist of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
March 30, 2008
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Maturity dates less than one year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term municipal bonds
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
1,002
|
|
Corporate preferred securities
|
|
|
6,814
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
6,837
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,486
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
8,511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Final maturity dates greater than one year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal bonds
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
805
|
|
Auction rate securities
|
|
|
39,175
|
|
|
|
(2,419
|
)
|
|
|
36,756
|
|
Corporate preferred securities
|
|
|
994
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
41,257
|
|
|
$
|
(2,408
|
)
|
|
$
|
38,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
December 30, 2007
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Maturity dates less than one year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. treasury and agency securities
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
Auction rate securities
|
|
|
38,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,300
|
|
Short-term municipal bonds
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1,001
|
|
Corporate preferred securities
|
|
|
12,464
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
12,473
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
53,436
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
53,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity dates greater than one year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal bonds
|
|
$
|
1,827
|
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,824
|
|
Corporate preferred securities
|
|
|
1,985
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
1,992
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,196
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
4,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the first quarters of 2008 and 2007 the amount of
unrealized gains (losses) previously reported as other
comprehensive income that were realized and included in the
unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations and
comprehensive loss were not material.
As a result of current liquidity issues surrounding the
Companys ARS, the Companys ARS were reclassified
from short-term to long-term investments in marketable
securities as of March 30, 2008.
|
|
4.
|
Long-term
assets related to Indian casino projects notes
receivable
|
The majority of the assets related to Indian casino projects are
in the form of notes receivable due from the Indian tribes
pursuant to the Companys development, financing,
consulting and management agreements. The repayment terms of the
loans are specific to each Indian tribe and are dependent upon
the operating performance of each gaming facility. Repayments of
the loans are required to be made only if distributable profits
are available from the operation of the related casinos. In
addition, repayment of the loans and the development, financing,
consulting and management fees under contracts are subordinated
to certain other financial obligations of the respective
operations. Generally, the order of priority of payments from
the casinos cash flows is as follows: a certain minimum
monthly priority payment to the Indian tribe; repayment of
senior debt associated with construction and equipping of the
casino with interest accrued thereon; repayment of various debt
with interest accrued thereon due to Lakes; development,
financing, consulting and management fees to Lakes; and other
obligations, with the remaining funds distributed to the Indian
tribe.
9
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Information with respect to the estimated fair value of notes
receivable activity primarily related to three separate projects
for the Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians (Pokagon
Band), Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians
(Shingle Springs Tribe) and the Jamul Indian Village
(Jamul Tribe) is summarized in the following table
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shingle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pokagon
|
|
|
Springs
|
|
|
Jamul
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band
|
|
|
Tribe
|
|
|
Tribe
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
100,544
|
|
|
$
|
40,912
|
|
|
$
|
20,754
|
|
|
$
|
2,098
|
|
|
$
|
164,308
|
|
Advances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,321
|
|
|
|
5,606
|
|
|
|
2,639
|
|
|
|
13,566
|
|
Sale of Pokagon Band notes receivable
|
|
|
(102,114
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(102,114
|
)
|
Allocation to intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,536
|
)
|
|
|
(2,212
|
)
|
|
|
(641
|
)
|
|
|
(4,389
|
)
|
Consulting contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
Changes in estimated fair value(*)
|
|
|
1,570
|
|
|
|
8,895
|
|
|
|
(2,742
|
)
|
|
|
(494
|
)
|
|
|
7,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
53,592
|
|
|
$
|
21,406
|
|
|
$
|
3,797
|
|
|
$
|
78,795
|
|
Advances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
656
|
|
|
|
1,085
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
1,902
|
|
Allocation to intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
(565
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(758
|
)
|
Consulting contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
Changes in estimated fair value(*)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(962
|
)
|
|
|
(975
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(1,983
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
53,140
|
|
|
$
|
20,951
|
|
|
$
|
3,808
|
|
|
$
|
77,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
The changes in estimated fair value of notes receivable related
to Indian casino projects are recorded as unrealized gains
(losses) within the unaudited condensed consolidated statements
of operations and comprehensive loss. |
Pokagon Band. Lakes has a five-year
contract to manage the Four Winds Casino Resort for the Pokagon
Band in New Buffalo Township, Michigan near Interstate 94. Lakes
began managing the Four Winds Casino Resort when it opened to
the public on August 2, 2007. The Four Winds Casino Resort
is located near the first Interstate 94 exit in southwestern
Michigan and approximately 75 miles east of Chicago. The
facility features approximately 3,000 slot machines and
approximately 85 table games as well as multiple restaurants and
bars, a parking garage, a hotel and other facilities.
Shingle Springs Tribe. Lakes has
contracts to develop and subsequently manage for seven years the
Red Hawk Casino, which is being built on the Rancheria of the
Shingle Springs Band in El Dorado County, California, adjacent
to U.S. Highway 50, approximately 30 miles east of
Sacramento, California. The terms and assumptions
10
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
used to value the notes receivable at estimated fair value
related to the Shingle Springs Tribe are as follows (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 30, 2008
|
|
As of December 30, 2007
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Face value of note (principal and interest)
|
|
$69,661
|
|
$67,585
|
|
|
($48,287 principal and $21,374
|
|
($47,632 principal and $19,953 interest)
|
|
|
interest)
|
|
|
Estimated months until casino opens (weighted-average of three
scenarios)
|
|
9 months
|
|
12 months
|
Projected interest rate until casino opens
|
|
7.31%
|
|
9.12%
|
Projected interest rate during the loan repayment term
|
|
9.13%
|
|
10.16%
|
Discount rate
|
|
15%
|
|
15%
|
Repayment terms of note(*)
|
|
84 months
|
|
84 months
|
Probability rate of casino opening (weighting of four scenarios)
|
|
95%
|
|
95%
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Note is payable in even monthly installments over the seven-year
term of the management agreement subsequent to the casino
opening. |
On April 30, 2007 a construction permit was issued for the
U.S. Highway 50 interchange project, which provides direct
access to the Red Hawk Casino site. Construction began on the
U.S. Highway 50 interchange on May 7, 2007. On
June 28, 2007 an affiliate of the Shingle Springs Tribe
closed on a $450 million senior note financing to fund the
Red Hawk Casino project, and site construction commenced. The
Red Hawk Casino is planned to open in late 2008.
Jamul
Tribe.
Lakes has contracts to develop and finance a casino to be built
on the reservation of the Jamul Tribe located on Interstate 94,
approximately 20 miles east of San Diego, California
(the Jamul Casino). The terms and
11
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
assumptions used to value the notes receivable at estimated fair
value related to the Jamul Tribe are as follows (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 30, 2008
|
|
As of December 30, 2007
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Face value of note (principal and interest)
|
|
$44,420
|
|
$42,426
|
|
|
($31,199 principal and $13,221 interest)
|
|
($30,114 principal and $12,312 interest)
|
Estimated months until casino opens (weighted-average of three
scenarios)
|
|
29 months
|
|
29 months
|
Projected interest rate until casino opens
|
|
7.48%
|
|
9.12%
|
Projected interest rate during the loan repayment term
|
|
10.23%
|
|
10.46%
|
Discount rate
|
|
20.00%
|
|
20.00%
|
Projected repayment terms of note
|
|
120 months
|
|
120 months
|
Probability rate of casino opening (weighting of four scenarios)
|
|
85%
|
|
85%
|
The Jamul Casino project has been delayed due to issues with
road access to the proposed casino site. The Jamul Tribe has
submitted an encroachment permit application to CalTrans, which
will result in a project study report to determine the optimal
access point for traffic to the Jamul Casino without disruption
of traffic on the state highway. The Jamul Tribe has continued
construction on their reservation of the driveway road leading
to the Jamul Casino site. In addition to its work with CalTrans,
the Jamul Tribe has submitted an application to the Bureau of
Indian Affairs (the BIA) for recognition of an
access drive across its land to create a second means of access
to the site over an Indian reservation road. Lakes and the
leaders of the Jamul Tribe are currently evaluating plans for
the Jamul Casino to determine when construction of the facility
will start and when casino operations will begin. Lakes
continues to believe that adequate financing will be obtained
and the project will be successfully completed.
12
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
Other
long-term assets related to Indian casino projects
|
Intangible assets. Intangible assets
consist of costs associated with the acquisition of the
management, development, consulting or financing contracts
related to tribal gaming projects and are periodically evaluated
for impairment after they are initially recorded. Information
with respect to the intangible assets related to the acquisition
of management, development, consulting or financing contracts by
project is summarized as follows, (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shingle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pokagon
|
|
|
Springs
|
|
|
Jamul
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band
|
|
|
Tribe
|
|
|
Tribe
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
23,573
|
|
|
$
|
20,387
|
|
|
$
|
9,760
|
|
|
$
|
559
|
|
|
$
|
54,279
|
|
Allocation of advances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,536
|
|
|
|
2,212
|
|
|
|
641
|
|
|
|
4,389
|
|
Acquisition of contract rights
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
10,078
|
|
Amortization(*)
|
|
|
(2,798
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(2,805
|
)
|
Impairment loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
30,775
|
|
|
$
|
21,923
|
|
|
$
|
11,972
|
|
|
$
|
1,240
|
|
|
$
|
65,910
|
|
Allocation of advances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
758
|
|
Amortization(*)
|
|
|
(1,679
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1,681
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 30, 2008 (unaudited)
|
|
$
|
29,096
|
|
|
$
|
22,069
|
|
|
$
|
12,537
|
|
|
$
|
1,285
|
|
|
$
|
64,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Amortization expense related to the Four Winds Casino Resort
commenced upon opening in August of 2007. |
Land held for development. Land held
for development is comprised of land held for possible transfer
to Indian tribes for use in certain of the future casino resort
projects. In the event that this land is not transferred to the
tribes, the Company has the right to sell it. These assets are
evaluated for impairment in combination with intangible assets
related to the acquisition of the management, development,
consulting or financing contracts and other assets related to
the Indian casino projects. As of March 30, 2008 and
December 30, 2007, land held for development related to
Indian casino projects was $7.7 million and
$7.6 million, respectively, recorded at its cost. As of
March 30, 2008, land held for development primarily related
to land near the location of the planned Jamul Casino project.
Other. As of March 30, 2008 and
December 30, 2007 other assets related to Indian casino
projects were approximately $5.1 million and
$5.2 million, respectively. Included in this category are
costs incurred related to the Indian casino projects which have
not yet been included as part of the notes receivable because of
timing of the payment of these costs. When paid, these amounts
will be allocated between notes receivable and intangible assets
related to the acquisition of the management, development,
consulting or financing contracts and will be evaluated for
changes in fair value or impairment, respectively. These amounts
vary from period to period due to timing of payment. Also
included in this category are receivables from related parties
of $4.3 million that are directly related to the
development and opening of Lakes Indian casino projects.
|
|
6.
|
Contract
acquisition costs payable
|
Upon opening of the Four Winds Casino Resort, the Company became
obligated to pay approximately $11 million to an unrelated
third party as part of an agreement associated with the Company
obtaining the management contract with the Pokagon Band. The
payment is payable quarterly over the term of the five-year
management agreement for the Four Winds Casino Resort. The
Company is also obligated to pay approximately $3 million
over 24 months to a separate unrelated third party on
behalf of the Pokagon Band in accordance with the management
contract which commenced when the casino opened. These
obligations do not have a stated interest rate and have payments
terms which extend beyond one fiscal year. As a result, these
obligations have been recorded at their net present value with
effective interest rates of 16.7% and 14.1%, respectively, and
the difference between
13
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
the face amount and the net present value of the obligations is
recorded as a discount, which is amortized to interest expense
as the payments are made pursuant to the respective agreements.
During 2006, the Lyle Berman Family Partnership (the
Partnership) purchased a portion of the first
obligation discussed above from the unrelated third party and
receives approximately $0.3 million per year of the payment
stream related to this obligation during the five-year term of
the management contract of the Four Winds Casino Resort. Lyle
Berman, Lakes Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, does
not have an ownership or other beneficial interest in the
Partnership. Neil I. Sell, a director of Lakes, is one of the
trustees of the irrevocable trusts for the benefit of Lyle
Bermans children that are the partners in the Partnership.
|
|
7.
|
Share-based
compensation
|
Consolidated share-based compensation expense related to
employee stock options was $0.5 million and
$1.2 million for the three months ended March 30, 2008
and April 1, 2007, respectively.
No income tax benefit was recognized in Lakes unaudited
condensed consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive loss for share-based compensation arrangements for
the three months ended March 30, 2008 and April 1,
2007. Management assessed the likelihood that the deferred tax
assets relating to future tax deductions from share-based
compensation will be recovered from future taxable income and
determined that a valuation allowance is necessary to the extent
that management currently believes it is more likely than not
that tax benefits will not be realized. Managements
determination is based primarily on historical earnings
volatility, the relatively short operating history of WPTE, and
Lakes current stages of planned operational activities.
Lakes and WPTE both use a Black-Scholes option-pricing model to
value stock options, which requires the consideration of
historical employee exercise behavior data and the use of a
number of assumptions including volatility of the
companies stock prices, the weighted-average risk-free
interest rate, and the weighted-average expected life of the
options.
The following values represent the average per grant for the
indicated variables used to value options granted during the
three months ended March 30, 2008 and April 1, 2007,
respectively. There have been no significant changes to the
assumptions thus far in 2008 and none are expected during the
remainder of 2008.
Lakes
stock option plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
Key valuation assumptions:
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007 (*)
|
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.66
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
8.18 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
48.77
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeiture rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
There were no options granted during the three months ended
April 1, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
|
Expected dividend yield As the Company does not pay
dividends, the dividend rate variable in the Black-Scholes model
is zero.
|
|
|
|
Risk free interest rate The risk free interest rate
assumption is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in
effect at the time of grant and with maturities consistent with
the expected term of options.
|
|
|
|
Expected term (in years) The expected term of
employee stock options represents the weighted-average period
that the stock options are expected to remain outstanding. It is
based upon an analysis of the historical
|
14
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
behavior of option holders during the period from September 1995
to March 30, 2008. Management believes historical data is
reasonably representative of future exercise behavior.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility The volatility assumption is
based on the historical weekly price data of Lakes stock
over a two-year period. Management evaluated whether there were
factors during that period which were unusual and which would
distort the volatility figure if used to estimate future
volatility and concluded that there were no such factors.
|
|
|
|
Forfeiture rate As share-based compensation expense
recognized is based on awards ultimately expected to vest,
expense for grants beginning upon adoption of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123R,
Share-Based Payment-Revised 2004
(SFAS 123R) will be reduced for estimated
forfeitures. SFAS 123R requires forfeitures to be estimated
at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent
periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The
Company has reviewed the historical forfeitures which are
minimal, and as such will amortize the grants to the end of the
vesting period and will adjust for forfeitures at the end of the
term.
|
The following table summarizes Lakes stock option activity
during the three months ended March 30, 2008 and
April 1, 2007 (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-avg.
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
|
outstanding
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
for grant
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 30, 2007
|
|
|
4,345,650
|
|
|
|
3,842,200
|
|
|
|
584,750
|
|
|
$
|
6.08
|
|
Authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
196,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(196,000
|
)
|
|
|
5.73
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled/expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(400,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 30, 2008
|
|
|
4,141,650
|
|
|
|
3,798,200
|
|
|
|
388,750
|
|
|
$
|
6.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
4,716,400
|
|
|
|
3,712,350
|
|
|
|
35,500
|
|
|
$
|
6.15
|
|
Authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled/expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(112,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at April 1, 2007
|
|
|
4,603,900
|
|
|
|
4,025,750
|
|
|
|
35,500
|
|
|
$
|
6.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table summarizes significant ranges of Lakes
outstanding and exercisable options as of March 30, 2008
(unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at March 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at March 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
remaining
|
|
|
Weighted-average
|
|
|
intrinsic
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
intrinsic
|
|
Range of exercise prices
|
|
outstanding
|
|
|
contractual life
|
|
|
exercise price
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
exercisable
|
|
|
average price
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
$ (3.25 3.63)
|
|
|
280,200
|
|
|
|
3.2 years
|
|
|
$
|
3.46
|
|
|
$
|
313,416
|
|
|
|
280,200
|
|
|
$
|
3.46
|
|
|
$
|
313,416
|
|
(3.64 5.45)
|
|
|
2,010,700
|
|
|
|
1.5 years
|
|
|
|
4.23
|
|
|
|
731,511
|
|
|
|
1,908,700
|
|
|
|
4.21
|
|
|
|
731,511
|
|
(5.46 7.26)
|
|
|
179,000
|
|
|
|
8.4 years
|
|
|
|
6.92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
7.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.27 9.08)
|
|
|
1,382,000
|
|
|
|
5.6 years
|
|
|
|
8.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,357,000
|
|
|
|
8.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.09 10.90)
|
|
|
52,500
|
|
|
|
8.2 years
|
|
|
|
10.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,950
|
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.91 12.71)
|
|
|
72,250
|
|
|
|
3.0 years
|
|
|
|
11.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,600
|
|
|
|
11.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.72 14.53)
|
|
|
95,000
|
|
|
|
6.9 years
|
|
|
|
14.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,250
|
|
|
|
14.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.54 16.34)
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
6.8 years
|
|
|
|
16.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
16.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16.35 18.16)
|
|
|
65,000
|
|
|
|
3.6 years
|
|
|
|
17.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,500
|
|
|
|
18.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,141,650
|
|
|
|
3.6 years
|
|
|
$
|
6.25
|
|
|
$
|
1,044,927
|
|
|
|
3,798,200
|
|
|
$
|
6.08
|
|
|
$
|
1,044,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the preceding table represents
the total pre-tax intrinsic value, based on Lakes closing
stock price of $4.58 on March 28, 2008, which would have
been received by the option holders had all option holders
exercised their options as of that date. Options exercised
during the three months ended March 30, 2008 did not have
an intrinsic value. The total intrinsic value of options
exercised during the three months ended April 1, 2007 was
$0.5 million. As of March 30, 2008, Lakes
unrecognized share-based compensation was approximately
$1.3 million, which is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 3.0 years. The weighted-average
grant-date fair value of stock options granted during the three
months ended March 30, 2008 was $3.35 per share.
WPTE
stock option plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
April 1,
|
|
Key valuation assumptions:
|
|
2008(*)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.47
|
%
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 years
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73.84
|
%
|
Forfeiture rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.16
|
%
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
There were no options granted during the three months ended
March 30, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
Expected dividend yield As WPTE does not pay
dividends, the dividend rate variable in the Black-Scholes model
is zero.
|
|
|
|
Risk free interest rate The risk free interest rate
assumption is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in
effect at the time of grant and with maturities consistent with
the expected term of options.
|
|
|
|
Expected term (in years) Due to WPTEs limited
operating history including stock option exercises and
forfeitures, WPTE calculated expected term for each grant using
the Simplified Method in accordance with Staff
Accounting Bulletins 107 and 110.
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility As WPTE has a relatively short
operating history and no definitive peer or peer groups,
expected volatility was based on historical volatility of
WPTEs stock price since it began trading in August 2004.
|
16
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeiture rate As share-based compensation expense
recognized is based on awards ultimately expected to vest,
expense for grants beginning upon adoption of SFAS 123R
will be reduced for estimated forfeitures. SFAS 123R
requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and
revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual
forfeitures differ from those estimates. WPTE used historical
data to estimate employee departure behavior in estimating
future forfeitures.
|
The following table summarizes WPTE stock option activity during
the three months ended March 30, 2008 and April 1,
2007 (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-avg.
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
|
outstanding
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
for grant
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 30, 2007
|
|
|
2,920,857
|
|
|
|
1,322,206
|
|
|
|
267,150
|
|
|
$
|
5.66
|
|
Authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled/expired
|
|
|
(83,600
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,600
|
|
|
|
4.33
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 30, 2008
|
|
|
2,837,257
|
|
|
|
1,412,373
|
|
|
|
350,750
|
|
|
$
|
5.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
2,318,166
|
|
|
|
1,050,200
|
|
|
|
983,501
|
|
|
$
|
6.76
|
|
Authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
287,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(287,000
|
)
|
|
|
4.80
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled/expired
|
|
|
(90,466
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,466
|
|
|
|
8.49
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at April 1, 2007
|
|
|
2,514,700
|
|
|
|
1,010,533
|
|
|
|
786,967
|
|
|
$
|
6.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes significant ranges of WPTE
outstanding and exercisable options as of March 30, 2008
(unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding
|
|
|
Options exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-avg.
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Range of
|
|
Number
|
|
|
remaining
|
|
|
avg. exercise
|
|
|
intrinsic
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
intrinsic
|
|
exercise prices
|
|
outstanding
|
|
|
contractual life
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
exercisable
|
|
|
avg. price
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
$ 0.0049
|
|
|
111,340
|
|
|
|
3.91
|
|
|
$
|
0.0049
|
|
|
$
|
168,691
|
|
|
|
111,340
|
|
|
$
|
0.0049
|
|
|
$
|
168,691
|
|
$ 1.87 4.80
|
|
|
1,260,350
|
|
|
|
9.25
|
|
|
|
3.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,533
|
|
|
|
4.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 5.18 9.92
|
|
|
1,305,566
|
|
|
|
6.73
|
|
|
|
7.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,107,166
|
|
|
|
7.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
$11.95 14.51
|
|
|
154,000
|
|
|
|
7.37
|
|
|
|
12.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
12.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
$15.05 19.50
|
|
|
6,001
|
|
|
|
7.31
|
|
|
|
15.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,334
|
|
|
|
16.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,837,257
|
|
|
|
7.77
|
|
|
$
|
5.70
|
|
|
$
|
168,691
|
|
|
|
1,412,373
|
|
|
$
|
7.20
|
|
|
$
|
168,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the preceding table represents
the total pre-tax intrinsic value, based on WPTEs closing
stock price of $1.52 on March 28, 2008, which would have
been received by the option holders had all option holders
exercised their options as of that date. No options were
exercised during the three months ended March 30, 2008 and
April 1, 2007, respectively. As of March 30, 2008,
WPTEs unrecognized share-based compensation was
approximately $2.4 million, which is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period
17
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
of 2.7 years. There were no options granted during the
three months ended March 30, 2008. The weighted-average
grant-date fair value of stock options granted during the three
months ended April 1, 2007 was $3.27 per share.
Both Lakes and WPTE issue new shares of common stock upon the
exercise of options.
For all periods, basic loss applicable to common shareholders
per share is calculated by dividing net loss applicable to
common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding. Stock options that could potentially dilute
the loss applicable to shareholders per share in the future of
4,141,650 and 4,603,900 shares were not included in the
computation of diluted loss applicable to common shareholders
per share for the three months ended March 30, 2008 and
April 1, 2007, respectively, because the effects would have
been anti-dilutive for those periods due to net losses.
Management has evaluated all evidence and determined that
historical net losses (excluding net realized and unrealized
gains on notes receivable) generated over the past five years,
outweighed the current positive evidence that the Company
believes exists surrounding its ability to generate significant
income from its long-term assets related to Indian casino
projects. Therefore, the Company has recorded a 100% valuation
allowance against deferred tax assets arising from net operating
loss carryforwards and other ordinary items at March 30,
2008, and December 30, 2007, as management has concluded
that is it more likely than not that the tax benefits will not
be realized in the foreseeable future.
The Company also has deferred tax assets related to capital
losses of approximately $8.1 million as of March 30,
2008. The realization of these benefits is dependent on the
generation of capital gains during the applicable carryforward
periods. The Company believes that it will have capital gains in
future years to utilize a portion of these benefits due to
significant appreciation in its investment in WPTE, which has a
minimal cost basis. The Company owns approximately
12.5 million shares of WPTE common stock valued at
approximately $19 million as of March 30, 2008, based
upon the closing stock price as reported by the NASDAQ Global
Market. However, as of the first quarter of 2008, the Company
has recorded a valuation allowance against the portion of the
capital losses that are not expected to be covered by future
sales of WPTE based on the price of WPTEs common stock at
March 30, 2008, combined with volume restrictions on how
many WPTE shares Lakes can sell, and Lakes will monitor and
adjust this valuation allowance on a quarterly basis, if
necessary. As of March 30, 2008, the valuation allowance
was $3.6 million, resulting in a net deferred tax asset
related to capital losses of $4.5 million.
Louisiana Department of Revenue litigation tax
matter. The Louisiana Department of Revenue
maintains a position that Lakes owes additional Louisiana
corporation income tax for the period ended January 3, 1999
and the tax years ended 1999 through 2001 and additional
Louisiana corporation franchise tax for the tax years ended 2000
through 2002. This determination is the result of an audit of
Louisiana tax returns filed by Lakes for the tax periods at
issue and relates to the reporting of income earned by Lakes in
connection with the managing of two Louisiana-based casinos.
Lakes may be required to pay an assessment of up to
$8.6 million, plus interest, if it is not successful in
this matter. Lakes management has determined that it is
more likely than not that it will be able to support its
position related to this tax matter. A liability has been
recorded for an estimated settlement including accrued interest
and fees, which is included as part of income taxes payable on
the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. Interest
expense related to this uncertain tax position is recorded as a
component of income tax expense.
WPTE litigation. In 2006, a legal
action was commenced against WPTE by seven poker players that
alleged, among other things, an unfair business practice of
WPTE. On April 18, 2008, WPTE settled the lawsuit without
cost
18
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
by agreeing to implement a new standard player release form to
be provided to all players at all future WPT tournaments and
events.
Miscellaneous legal matters. Lakes and
its subsidiaries (including WPTE) are involved in various other
inquiries, administrative proceedings, and litigation relating
to contracts and other matters arising in the normal course of
business. While any proceeding or litigation has an element of
uncertainty, management currently believes that the likelihood
of an unfavorable outcome is remote. Accordingly, no provision
for loss has been recorded in connection therewith.
Lakes principal business is the development, financing and
management of gaming-related properties. Additionally, the
Company is the majority owner of WPTE. All of Lakes and
substantially all of WPTEs operations to date are
conducted in the United States. Episodes of the World Poker
Tour®
television series are distributed internationally primarily by a
third party distributor. Lakes segments reported below (in
millions) are the segments of the Company for which separate
financial information is available and for which operating
results are evaluated by the chief operating decision-maker in
deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.
The total assets in Corporate and Eliminations below
primarily relate to Lakes short-term investments, deferred
tax assets, Lakes corporate office building and
construction in progress related to a Company-owned casino
project in Vicksburg, Mississippi. Costs in Corporate and
Eliminations below have not been allocated to the other
segments because these costs are not easily allocable and to do
so would not be practical.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industry Segments
|
|
|
|
Indian
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
casino
|
|
|
WPTE
|
|
|
Corporate &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
projects
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Total assets as of March 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
159.9
|
|
|
$
|
36.6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
49.4
|
|
|
$
|
245.9
|
|
Total assets as of December 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
158.2
|
|
|
$
|
41.7
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
56.2
|
|
|
$
|
256.1
|
|
For the three months ended March 30, 2008
Revenue
|
|
$
|
4.6
|
|
|
$
|
3.2
|
|
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.6
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.3
|
)
|
|
|
(7.9
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets related to Indian casino
projects
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
For the three months ended April 1, 2007
Revenue
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
3.5
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.0
|
|
Net impairment charges
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|
|
(7.3
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Lakes Margin Account
Agreement. Effective April 11, 2008,
Lakes entered into an agreement with UBS Financial Services Inc
for the purpose of borrowing
and/or
obtaining credit in a principal amount not to exceed
$11.0 million (the Margin Account Agreement).
Lakes has made an initial draw under the Margin Account
Agreement in the principal amount of $3.0 million to be
used for working capital purposes. The Margin Account Agreement
is secured by Lakes ARS. Amounts borrowed under the Margin
Account Agreement are due and
19
LAKES
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
payable on demand and bear interest at a floating rate of
interest per annum equal to the sum of the prevailing daily
30-day LIBOR
plus 25 basis points.
Lakes joint venture with Myohionow.com,
LLC. Effective as of April 29, 2008,
Lakes Ohio Development, LLC, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary
of Lakes, entered into a joint venture agreement with
Myohionow.com, LLC (Myohio) dated
April 29, 2008 (the Agreement) for the
purpose of placing on the November 4, 2008 Ohio statewide
election ballot a referendum to amend the Ohio constitution to
permit a casino resort to be located at the intersections of
Interstate 71 and State Route 73 in Clinton County, Ohio (the
Referendum) and, if approved, developing and
operating the proposed casino resort in Clinton County, Ohio.
Lakes is planning to loan approximately $8 million to the
joint venture through August at an interest rate of 10% per
annum, and an additional amount from August to the November
election depending on various factors including polling numbers,
market studies, and media efforts. Lakes will be required to
seek additional sources of financing to fund the additional
costs Lakes plans to incur from August to the November of 2008
election. Lakes is currently exploring several financing
alternatives and expects to be able to obtain funding as
necessary. The amounts loaned will be repaid only upon the
successful development, opening and operation of this proposed
casino. Although the Agreement provides that Lakes will
initially own 80% of the joint venture, Lakes anticipates that
its ownership will be reduced to not more than 70% at the time
the proposed casino resort opens as a result of contingent
factors arising from the passage of the Referendum and financing
the development of the proposed casino resort.
If the Referendum passes, the joint venture must advance to the
owners of Myohio an annual amount totaling approximately
$250,000 to be paid in equal monthly installments commencing on
December 1, 2008, as an advance of any profit distributions
due and payable to Myohio, which will be offset against the
first such profit distribution. As compensation for Lakes
management services for the casino resort once open, Lakes shall
be paid one percent of the gross casino revenues.
20
|
|
ITEM 2.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
Overview
We develop, finance and manage Indian-owned casino properties.
We currently have development and management or financing
agreements with four separate tribes for casino operations in
Michigan, California, and Oklahoma for a total of five separate
casino projects as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
We are currently managing the Cimarron Casino for the Iowa Tribe
of Oklahoma, a federally recognized Indian Tribe, and the Iowa
Tribe of Oklahoma, a federally-chartered corporation
(collectively, the Iowa Tribe) in Perkins, Oklahoma,
under a seven-year management contract, which commenced in 2006.
|
|
|
|
We have a five-year contract to manage the Four Winds Casino
Resort for the Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians (the
Pokagon Band) in New Buffalo Township, Michigan near
Interstate 94. Lakes began managing the Four Winds Casino Resort
when it opened to the public on August 2, 2007. The Four
Winds Casino Resort is located near the first Interstate 94 exit
in southwestern Michigan and approximately 75 miles east of
Chicago. The facility features approximately 3,000 slot machines
and approximately 85 table games as well as multiple
restaurants and bars, a parking garage, a hotel and other
facilities.
|
|
|
|
We have contracts to develop and subsequently manage for seven
years the Red Hawk Casino, which is being built on the Rancheria
of the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians (the Shingle
Springs Tribe) in El Dorado County, California,
adjacent to U.S. Highway 50, approximately 30 miles
east of Sacramento, California. The Red Hawk Casino is planned
to open in late 2008.
|
|
|
|
We have contracts to develop and finance a casino to be built on
the reservation of the Jamul Indian Village (the Jamul
Tribe) located on Interstate 94, approximately
20 miles east of San Diego, California (the
Jamul Casino). The Jamul Casino project has been
delayed due to issues with road access to the proposed Jamul
Casino site. The Jamul Tribe has submitted an encroachment
permit application to CalTrans, which will result in a project
study report to determine the optimal access point for traffic
to the Jamul Casino without disruption of traffic on the state
highway. The Jamul Tribe has continued construction on their
reservation of the driveway road leading to the Jamul Casino
site. In addition to its work with CalTrans, the Jamul Tribe has
submitted an application to the Bureau of Indian Affairs (the
BIA) for recognition of an access drive across its
land to create a second means of access to the site over an
Indian reservation road. We and the leaders of the Jamul Tribe
are currently evaluating plans for the Jamul Casino facility to
determine when construction of the facility will start and when
casino operations will begin. We continue to believe that
adequate financing will be obtained and the project will be
successfully completed.
|
|
|
|
We have a consulting agreement and management contract with the
Iowa Tribe in connection with developing, equipping and managing
the Ioway Casino Resort which is planned to be built near Route
66 and approximately 25 miles northeast of Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma. The Iowa Tribe is currently leasing and acquiring land
from tribal members, which is held in trust for the individual
tribal members by the United States Government. These
transactions need to be approved by the BIA. Lakes submitted its
management contract with the Iowa Tribe for the Ioway Casino
Resort to the National Indian Gaming Commission (the
NIGC) for review in 2005. The NIGC has stated that
it is waiting for the BIA to approve all land leases before it
will issue an opinion on the management contract.
|
We have also explored, and continue to explore, other
development projects with Indian tribes. We are also involved in
other business activities, including potential development of a
non-Indian casino in Mississippi, pursuing potential development
of a non-Indian casino in Ohio, and the development of new table
games for licensing to both Tribal and non-Tribal casinos. In
addition, as of March 30, 2008, we owned approximately 61%
of WPTE, a separate publicly-held company principally engaged in
the creation of internationally branded entertainment and
consumer projects driven by the development, production and
marketing of televised programming based on gaming themes, the
development and operation of an online gaming website, the
licensing and sale of branded products and the sale of corporate
sponsorships. Our consolidated financial statements include the
results of operations of WPTE.
21
WPTE creates internationally branded entertainment and consumer
products driven by the development, production and marketing of
televised programming based on gaming themes. WPTE created the
World Poker
Tour®,
or WPT, a television show based on a series of high-stakes poker
tournaments that currently airs on the Game Show Network
(GSN) and the Travel Channel (TRV) in
the United States, and has been licensed for broadcast globally.
WPTE offers a real-money online gaming website, which prohibits
wagers from players in the United States and other
restricted jurisdictions. WPTE also has operations in mainland
China, pursuant to its agreement with the China Leisure Sports
Administrative Center (the CLSAC) where WPTE is
developing and marketing the WPT China National Traktor Poker
Tour. In January 2008, WPTE launched ClubWPT.com, an innovative
subscription-based online poker club targeted to the estimated
60 million poker players in the United States and currently
offered in 38 States. WPTE currently licenses its brand to
companies in the business of poker equipment and instruction,
apparel, publishing, electronic and wireless entertainment,
DVD/home entertainment, casino games and giftware and is also
engaged in the sale of corporate sponsorships. WPTE has four
business segments:
WPT Studios, WPTEs multi-media entertainment
division, generates revenue from the domestic and international
licensing of television broadcasts, international television
sponsorship revenue and through casino host fees. Since
WPTEs inception, the WPT Studios division has been
responsible for 73% of total revenue. WPTE licensed Season One
through Season Five of the WPT series to TRV for telecast in the
United States under an exclusive license agreement (the
TRV Agreement). Prior to 2007, WPTE also licensed
Season One of the Professional Poker
Tourtm
(PPT) television series to TRV. On April 2,
2007, WPTE entered into an agreement (the GSN
Agreement) with GSN, pursuant to which GSN agreed to
license from WPTE Season Six of the WPT series for the payment
of a $300,000 license fee per episode. Under the TRV Agreement,
WPTE received an average of $477,000 per episode for Season
Five. WPTE has license agreements for the distribution of WPT
and PPT episodes into international territories, for which WPTE
receives license fees, net of WPTEs agents sales fee
and agreed upon sales and marketing expenses. WPTE also collects
annual host fees from member casinos that host WPT events
(WPTEs member casinos).
Since WPTEs inception, domestic television distribution
fees from the TRV Agreement, an agreement with TRV relating to
the PPT series and the GSN Agreement have been responsible for
approximately 56% of WPTEs total revenue. For each season
covered by the TRV Agreement and related options, TRV has
exclusive rights to exhibit the episodes in that season an
unlimited number of times on its television network in the
United States for four years, or three years in the case of
Season One of the WPT.
Under both the TRV and GSN Agreements, TRV and GSN pay fixed
license fees for each episode WPTE produces, which are payable
at various times during the pre-production, production and
post-production process and are recognized upon receipt and
acceptance of the completed episode. Television production costs
related to WPT episodes are generally capitalized and charged to
cost of revenues as revenues are recognized. Therefore, the
timing and number of episodes involved in the various seasons of
the series affect the timing of the revenues and expenses of the
WPT Studios business. For Season Six of the WPT, WPTE is
scheduled to produce a total of 23 episodes, production of which
began in May of 2007 and WPTE expects to be completed by July
2008, with telecasts of the episodes scheduled to air between
March 2008 and August 2008. Pursuant to the GSN Agreement, they
have an exclusive option to license Season Seven of the WPT
series which expires on May 24, 2008.
From 2004 until December 2006, WPTE licensed its shows
internationally through an exclusive agreement with Alfred Haber
Distribution, Inc. (Alfred Haber). In December 2006,
WPTE notified Alfred Haber that they would no longer be the
international distributor for WPTE shows, since WPTE began
utilizing its internal staff and resources to distribute its
shows into the international marketplace. During 2007, WPTE came
to an arrangement with Alfred Haber whereby they provide
non-exclusive assistance on international licensing matters on a
case-by-case
basis based on substantially the same terms as WPTEs
previous relationship with them.
In December 2006, WPTE signed a multi-year agreement with
PartyGaming Plc (PartyGaming), owner of
PartyPoker.com, pursuant to which they will sponsor certain
international television broadcasts of the WPT and PPT.
PartyGaming pays WPTE fixed fees for entering into broadcast
sponsorship arrangements that meet certain requirements, with
maximum payment levels for each of the covered seasons of each
series. For the quarter ended
22
March 30, 2008, WPTE recognized revenues of
$0.7 million from the PartyGaming agreement. No revenues
were recognized for the quarter ended April 1, 2007.
WPT Global Marketing includes branded consumer products,
sponsorship and partnerships, and event management divisions.
WPTEs branded consumer products division generates revenue
principally from royalties from the licensing of WPTEs
brand to companies seeking to use the WPT brand and logo in the
retail sales of their consumer products.
WPTE domestic sponsorship and event management division
generates revenue from corporate sponsorship and management of
televised and live events. During 2007, WPTE signed a three-year
agreement with Blue Diamond Almonds to sponsor Seasons Six,
Seven and Eight of the WPT. In return for online and event
presence, Blue Diamond will pay approximately $0.2 million
per season. WPTE also signed an agreement with Southwest
Airlines to be the official airline of the WPT for Season Six.
In February 2006, WPTE launched an events division offering help
in designing special programs for corporations, meeting planners
and charitable organizations for entertainment purposes only.
WPT Online includes the international real money gaming
website at WorldPokerTour.com and content website at
WorldPokerTour.com, which includes poker tournament coverage and
live updates thereof, statistics, poker player information, an
online merchandise store, and ClubWPT.com which launched in
January 2008.
In 2006, WPTE decided to commission the development of its own
software for WPTEs online poker room. WPTE licensed a
software platform from CyberArts Licensing, LLC, and hired
approximately 30 employees in Israel to develop the
software and support infrastructure. However, the development of
the CyberArts-based site ceased on April 23, 2007, when
WPTE entered into a three year software supply and support
agreement (the Agreement) with CryptoLogic. As a
result of the decision to utilize CryptoLogic and move away from
the internally-developed online gaming platform based on
CyberArts software, WPTE wrote off certain property and
equipment and related capitalized costs of approximately
$2.3 million during the second quarter of 2007. In addition
to the write off of assets, WPTE curtailed its Israel operations
and closed one of its two offices during the second quarter of
2007 and in the fourth quarter of 2007, WPTE closed the
remaining office in Israel.
Pursuant to the Agreement, CryptoLogic operates an online gaming
site for WPTE featuring a poker room and casino games utilizing
its proprietary software, in exchange for a percentage of the
revenue generated from the site. WPTE is entitled to
approximately 80% of net gaming revenues, as defined below, from
the operation of the site. Under the Agreement, WPTE is also a
member in a centralized online gaming network (the
Network) with several other licensees of CryptoLogic
pursuant to which players are able to play on WPTE branded
gaming site on the Network.
On June 14, 2007, CryptoLogic delivered the poker software
to WPTE and the online poker room became operational on
June 28, 2007. On July 26, 2007, CryptoLogic delivered
10 casino games (the Initial Casino). Effective
March 5, 2008, WPTE executed an amendment to the Agreement,
exercising its option for a full suite of casino games (the
Full Casino) with an annual minimum guarantee
payable to CryptoLogic from WPTE of approximately
$0.8 million, and WPTE exercised its option to have
CryptoLogic develop two additional poker language rooms in
Spanish and German for $0.1 million. In a separate
amendment to the agreement dated March 5, 2008, WPTE agreed
to extend the term of the License Agreement with CryptoLogic an
additional year through June 30, 2011.
As a result of the amendments, WPTE is now entitled to the
following percentages of net gaming revenue: (a) 100% of
the first $37,500 per month, (b) 79% of revenue in excess
of $37,500 but less than $500,000 per month; and (d) 80% of
the revenue in excess of $500,000 per month. CryptoLogic is
entitled to earn minimum guaranteed revenue associated with the
Initial Casino of $500,000 per year or $125,000 per quarter and
upon launch of the Full Casino, CryptoLogic will be entitled to
a minimum revenue guarantee of $750,000 per year or $187,500 per
quarter. For the quarter ended March 30, 2008, the minimum
revenue guarantee to CryptoLogic exceeded WPTEs share of
net revenues by approximately $101,000, which will be netted
against future settlements due from CryptoLogic.
If, at any time after the nine-month anniversary of the go-live
date, monthly gaming revenues fall below $0.5 million for
three consecutive months, CryptoLogic has the right to terminate
the Agreement on 90 days written
23
notice. However, WPTE may prevent any such termination through
payment of the shortfall of CryptoLogics percentage of
such gaming revenue within 30 days of receipt of
CryptoLogics notice of termination.
For the three months ended March 30, 2008, WPTEs
online gaming business generated approximately $240,000 in net
revenues, compared to costs of revenues of approximately
$181,000. Online revenues are presented gross of CryptoLogic
costs and net of network promotions, bonuses, and cash
incentives provided to patrons.
The non-gaming website at WorldPokerTour.com includes poker
tournament coverage and live updates thereof, statistics, poker
player information, an online merchandise store and ClubWPT.com
which launched in January 2008. ClubWPT.com offers a monthly
subscription package for $19.95 per month, as well as discounted
quarterly and annual options. In return, members receive
exclusive club benefits and points which make them eligible to
enter into over 5,000 live poker and elimination black jack
tournaments, sit-n-go poker tournaments and poker ring games for
a chance to win over $100,000 in cash and prizes each month
which could include a $10,000 seat into a WPT televised
main event. Non-subscribers who do not wish to purchase the
other club benefits are offered a free or alternative means of
entry.
WPTE uses a third party service provider, Ultimate Blackjack
Tour, LLC (UBT), to operate its subscription-based
online service for ClubWPT.com, which includes supporting the
software, technical operations and customer service. In return
for UBTs services, UBT earns a percentage of net revenues
which is calculated as subscriber fees less certain costs (which
are allocated on a
customer-by-customer
basis) including chargebacks, prize pool, club content,
financial charges and compliance fees.
WPT China. On August 6, 2007, WPTE
entered into a cooperation agreement (the Cooperation
Agreement) with the CLSAC, a Chinese government-sanctioned
body with authority over certain leisure sports, including the
popular Chinese national card game Traktor Poker or
Tuo La Ji. Pursuant to the Cooperation
Agreement, WPTE has the right to brand and exploit the WPT China
National Traktor Poker Tour (the Traktor Poker Tour)
during the five year term of the Cooperation Agreement.
Additionally, WPTE is afforded certain marketing and sponsorship
rights in conjunction with the Traktor Poker Tour, including the
right to sanction and derive revenue from third-party branding
at tour events, the right to exploit films and other content
generated in conjunction with the Traktor Poker Tour in all
media and WPTE expects the largest opportunities to stem from
online and mobile subscriptions. Furthermore, the CLSAC agreed
to organize no less than 15 Traktor Poker Tour events each year
during the term, to secure placement of the championship finals
on a major Chinese television station, and to promote the
Traktor Poker Tour. In exchange, WPTE pays a yearly fee to the
CLSAC, which started at approximately $0.5 million for the
first year and increases by ten percent annually for the
remaining four years of the term. WPTE also has a unilateral
option to extend the agreement for an additional five years,
provided that the yearly fee for the first year of the renewed
term, will increase by 25% from the fifth year of the term.
On October 12, 2007, WPTE officially launched the inaugural
season of the Traktor Poker Tour in Lanzhou, Gansu, and to date,
the WPTE has completed the 15 regional preliminary tournaments.
The Traktor Poker Tour Season One champion will be crowned at
the championship event in mid-2008 and WPTE expects the event to
be televised on a major Chinese broadcaster.
Results
of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in
conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the three months ended March 30, 2008.
Three
months ended March 30, 2008 compared to the three months
ended April 1, 2007
Revenues. Consolidated revenues for the first
quarter of 2008 increased to $9.6 million, or 92.3% from
the prior-year period. Lakes revenue increased to
$4.6 million, primarily due to a full quarter contribution
of management fees from the Four Winds Casino Resort, which is
owned by the Pokagon Band, compared to no contribution from the
Four Winds Casino Resort in the prior-year period. Revenue
related to WPTE increased to $5.0 million for the first
quarter of 2008, compared to $4.5 million in the prior-year
period. This increase was due to
24
an increase in hosting and sponsorship revenues, primarily
driven by international television sponsorship revenues that did
not exist in the prior-year period.
Selling, general and administrative
expenses. Selling, general and administrative
expenses increased $1.2 million from the prior-year period
to $10.9 million due to $1.6 million in development
costs associated with the proposed Ohio casino resort project.
For the first quarter of 2008, Lakes selling, general and
administrative expenses were $5.5 million and consisted
primarily of payroll and related expenses of $2.2 million,
including share-based compensation, the development costs
associated with the Ohio casino resort project of
$1.6 million and professional fees of $0.6 million.
WPTEs selling, general and administrative expenses
increased $0.2 million from the prior-year period to
$5.4 million in the first quarter of 2008. WPTEs
selling, general and administrative expenses consisted primarily
of payroll and related expenses of $2.0 million, including
share-based compensation, promotional costs of $1.3 million
and professional fees of $0.8 million.
Production costs. WPTEs production costs
increased by approximately $0.5 million in the first
quarter of 2008 compared to the 2007 period. The increase was
primarily a result of the delivery of seven episodes of Season
Six of the WPT in the current period versus the delivery of five
episodes of Season Five in the prior year period.
Gross margins. WPTEs overall gross
margins were 46% in the first quarter of 2008 compared to 52% in
the 2007 period. Domestic television licensing margins were 6%
in the first quarter of 2008 compared to 37% in the 2007 period.
The decrease was principally because of the lower fees per
episode under the GSN contract. The lower domestic television
margins in the first quarter of 2008 were partially offset by
increased margin contribution from international television and
sponsorship.
Amortization of intangible assets related to Indian casino
projects. Amortization of intangible assets
related to Indian casino projects was $1.7 million for the
first quarter of 2008. This amortization related primarily to
the intangible assets associated with the Four Winds Casino
Resort, which began when it opened to the public on
August 2, 2007. Amortization of intangible assets related
to the Indian casino projects for the first quarter of 2007 was
not material.
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on notes
receivable. Net realized and unrealized gains
(losses) on notes receivable relate primarily to our notes
receivable from Indian tribes, which are adjusted to estimated
fair value, based upon the current status of the related tribal
casino projects and evolving market conditions. In the first
quarter of 2008, we reported net unrealized losses on notes
receivable of $2.0 million, compared to net realized and
unrealized gains of $0.2 million in the prior-year period.
Net unrealized losses in the first quarter of 2008 were due
primarily to a decrease in projected pre- and post-opening date
interest rates, due to current market conditions related to the
notes receivable related to the Red Hawk Casino project with the
Shingle Springs Tribe and the notes receivable related to the
Jamul Casino project with the Jamul Tribe.
Other income (expense). Other income (expense)
for the first quarter of 2008 was $0.5 million compared to
($3.1) million for the first quarter of 2007. In March
2007, Lakes then existing $105 million credit
agreement was repaid in conjunction with the Pokagon notes
receivable participation transaction. This repayment resulted in
a loss on extinguishment of debt of approximately
$3.8 million during the first quarter of 2007.
Income Taxes. The income tax provision was
$0.7 million and $0.3 million for the three months
ended March 30, 2008 and April 1, 2007, respectively.
Our effective tax rates were 9% and 3% for the first quarter of
2008 and the corresponding 2007 period, respectively.
Lakes income tax provision in the current year period
consists primarily of a valuation allowance against deferred tax
assets related to capital losses for the portion that are not
expected to be realized through future sales of WPTE common
stock as described below, and approximately $0.3 million of
interest on a Louisiana tax audit matter (Note 10 to the
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included
in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q).
In the prior year period, the income tax provision was primarily
related to Lakes interest on an audit matter.
Minority interest. The minority interest in
WPTEs loss was approximately $1.1 million and
$0.9 million for the three months ended March 30, 2008
and April 1, 2007, respectively. WPTEs net losses
were $2.8 million and $2.3 million for the three
months ended March 30, 2008 and April 1, 2007,
respectively.
25
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
As of March 30, 2008, we had $8.6 million in cash and
cash equivalents, $8.5 million in short-term investments in
marketable securities, and $38.8 million in long-term
investments in marketable securities. Of these amounts,
$3.6 million in cash and cash equivalents related to Lakes
and $25.5 million in long-term investments related to
Lakes. All other amounts related to WPTE. All of Lakes
long-term investments in marketable securities and
$11.3 million of WPTEs long-term investments in
marketable securities were auction rate securities
(ARS) (See Note 3 to the unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements included in Part I,
Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q).
As a result of current liquidity issues surrounding our ARS
discussed below, our ARS were reclassified from short-term to
long-term investments in marketable securities as of
March 30, 2008. The types of ARS investments that both
Lakes and WPTE own are backed by student loans, the majority of
which are guaranteed under the Federal Family Education Loan
Program (FFELP), and all had credit ratings of AAA
or Aaa. Neither Lakes nor WPTE own any other type of ARS
investments. None of our investments in ARS qualify, or have
ever been classified in our consolidated financial statements,
as cash or cash equivalents.
Historically, these types of ARS investments have been highly
liquid using an auction process that resets the applicable
interest rate at predetermined intervals, typically every 7 to
35 days, to provide liquidity at par. However, as a result
of the recent liquidity issues experienced in the global credit
and capital markets, the auctions for all of our ARS began
failing in February 2008, when sell orders exceeded buy orders.
The failures of these auctions do not affect the value of the
collateral underlying the ARS, and we will continue to earn and
receive interest on our ARS at contractually set rates. However,
we will not be able to liquidate our ARS until the issuer calls
the security, a successful auction occurs, a buyer is found
outside of the auction process or the security matures. During
April of 2008, we received account statements dated
March 30, 2008, from the firms managing our ARS which
estimated the fair value of our ARS. We analyzed these
statements and have concluded that a temporary decline in
estimated fair value of $2.4 million related to our ARS has
occurred as a result of the current lack of liquidity. This
consolidated decline in fair value includes $1.3 million
related to Lakes and $1.1 million related to WPTE. Since we
consider the decline in the estimated fair value of our ARS to
be temporary, the related unrealized loss is included in
accumulated other comprehensive loss in the shareholders
equity section of our balance sheet as of March 30, 2008.
Lakes entered into a client agreement with UBS Financial
Services Inc effective April 11, 2008 for the purpose of
borrowing
and/or
obtaining credit in a principal amount not to exceed
$11.0 million (the Margin Account Agreement).
Lakes made an initial draw under the Margin Account Agreement in
the principal amount of $3.0 million to be used for working
capital purposes. We will be required to seek additional sources
of financing to fund additional costs we plan to incur between
August and November of this year associated with the recently
announced Ohio casino resort project. These costs are dependent
on various factors including polling numbers, market studies and
media efforts. Lakes is currently exploring several financing
alternatives and expects to be able to obtain funding as
necessary. WPTE does not believe that any lack of liquidity
during the next 12 months relating to its ARS will have an
impact on its ability to fund its operations.
As discussed above or otherwise, we may from time to time seek
additional capital to fund our development costs which will
require us to obtain additional sources of financing. If the
financing is in the form of equity financing it will be dilutive
to Lakes shareholders, and any debt financing may involve
additional restrictive covenants. An inability to raise such
funds when needed might require Lakes to delay, scale back or
eliminate some of its expansion and development goals.
WPTE intends to use funds currently on hand for working capital
and capital expenditures associated with the expansion of WPTE
online gaming, media, and other businesses and for general
corporate purposes. WPTE anticipates that sales and marketing
costs will increase significantly in upcoming quarters as WPTE
markets its real money online gaming website and its
subscription-based online site, ClubWPT.com. In addition, WPTE
intends to invest significantly in international expansion,
including developing and marketing the Traktor Poker Tour. WPTE
expects that cash, cash equivalents and investments in
marketable securities on hand and generated from operations will
be sufficient to fund WPTEs working capital and
capital expenditure requirements for at least the next
12 months even considering the current liquidity issues
with ARS. If these securities remain illiquid for a period
greater than 12 months, then WPTE may be required to seek
additional working capital to fund its operations or
26
fund its expansion plans. To raise working capital, WPTE may
seek to sell additional equity securities, issue debt or
convertible securities, or seek to obtain credit facilities
through financial institutions.
Lakes agreements with tribal partners require that we
provide certain financing for project development in the form of
loans, which has been Lakes major use of cash over the
past three years, in addition to on-going corporate costs. These
loans to our tribal partners are interest bearing; however, the
loans and related interest are not due until the casino is built
and has established profitable operations. In the event that the
casinos are not built, our only recourse is to attempt to
liquidate assets of the development, if any, excluding any land
in trust.
Lakes cash forecast requirements do not include
construction-related costs that will be incurred when projects
begin construction. The construction of our pending casino
projects will depend on the ability of the tribes
and/or Lakes
to obtain financing for the projects. If such financing cannot
be obtained on acceptable terms, it may not be possible to
complete these projects, which could have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations and financial condition. In
order to assist the tribes, we may be required to guarantee the
tribes debt financing or otherwise provide support for the
tribes obligations. Guarantees by us, if any, will
increase our potential exposure in the event of a default by any
of these tribes.
We believe that our casino development projects currently in
progress will be constructed and ultimately, along with those
currently operating, will achieve profitable operations;
however, no assurance can be made that this will occur. If this
does not occur, it is likely that we would incur substantial or
complete losses on our notes receivable from Indian tribes and
related intangible assets associated with the acquisition of the
management, development, consulting and financing contracts. In
addition, if our casino development projects currently in
progress are not completed or, upon completion, fail to
successfully compete in the highly competitive market for gaming
activities, we may lack the funds to compete for and develop
future gaming or other business opportunities and our business
could be adversely affected to the extent that we may be forced
to cease our operations entirely.
The following table summarizes the remaining contractual
obligations as of March 30, 2008 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment due by period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than
|
|
Contractual obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
1-3 years
|
|
|
3-5 years
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Remaining casino development commitment(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jamul Tribe(2)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Shingle Springs Tribe(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pokagon Band(4)
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iowa Tribe Ioway Project(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lakes operating lease(6)
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
WPTE operating leases(7)
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
WPTE purchase obligations(8)
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20.1
|
|
|
$
|
6.3
|
|
|
$
|
7.1
|
|
|
$
|
4.7
|
|
|
$
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We may be required to provide a guarantee of tribal debt
financing or otherwise provide support for the tribal
obligations related to any of the projects (see (2),
(3) and (5) below). Any guarantees by us or similar
off-balance sheet liabilities will increase our potential
exposure in the event of a default by any of these tribes. No
such guarantees or similar off-balance sheet liabilities existed
at March 30, 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
Effective March 30, 2006, we entered into a development
financing and services agreement with the Jamul Tribe. As part
of the agreement, we will use our best efforts to obtain
financing of up to $350 million from which advances will be
made to the Jamul Tribe to pay for the design and construction
of a casino project. The current plan is for a smaller scale
gaming facility that will become a solely class II
electronic gaming device facility which will not require a
compact with the State of California. The agreement between
Lakes and the Jamul Tribe is being modified to reflect the new
economics of the revised casino plan but will not be subject to
approval by the State of California or the NIGC. |
27
|
|
|
(3) |
|
The development agreement between Lakes and the Shingle Springs
Tribe, as amended, provided for Lakes to make certain
pre-construction advances to the Shingle Springs Tribe in the
form of a transition loan and land loan up to a maximum combined
amount of $75.0 million. On June 28, 2007, an
affiliate of the Shingle Springs Tribe closed on a
$450 million senior note financing to fund the Red Hawk
Casino project. The transition loan remains outstanding as of
March 30, 2008. The land loan was repaid to Lakes,
including accrued interest, on June 28, 2007 in connection
with the close of the $450 million senior note financing. |
|
(4) |
|
Upon opening of the Four Winds Casino Resort, we became
obligated to pay approximately $11 million to an unrelated
third party as part of an agreement associated with our
obtaining the management contract with the Pokagon Band. The
payment is payable quarterly for five years. We are also
obligated to pay approximately $3 million over
24 months to a separate unrelated third party on behalf of
the Pokagon Band in accordance with the management contract
which commenced when the casino opened. These obligations do not
have a stated interest rate and have payments terms which extend
beyond one fiscal year. As a result, these obligations have been
recorded at their net present value, with effective interest
rates of 16.7% and 14.1%, respectively, and the difference
between the face amount and the net present value of the
obligations is recorded as a discount, which is amortized to
interest expense as the payments are made pursuant to the
respective agreement. During 2006, the Lyle Berman Family
Partnership purchased a portion of the first obligation
discussed above from the unrelated third party. (Note 6 to
the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in
Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q). |
|
(5) |
|
We have agreed to make advances to the Iowa Tribe subject to a
project budget to be agreed upon by us and the Iowa Tribe and
certain other conditions. The development loan will be for
preliminary development costs under the Ioway project budget. We
have also agreed to use reasonable efforts to assist the Iowa
Tribe in obtaining permanent financing for any projects
developed under the Iowa consulting agreement. |
|
(6) |
|
Lakes leases an airplane under a non-cancelable operating lease
that expires on March 1, 2018. |
|
(7) |
|
WPTE operating lease obligations include rent payments for WPTE
corporate offices pursuant to two lease agreements. For the
first lease, monthly lease payments are approximately $40,000
and escalate to approximately $45,000 over the remaining lease
term. For the second lease, monthly lease payments are
approximately $31,000 and escalate up to approximately $33,000
over the remaining lease term. The lease obligations presented
also include rent payments for WPTEs office facility in
London. The amounts set forth in the table above include monthly
lease payments through June 2011. |
|
(8) |
|
WPTE purchase obligations includes the operational expenses
associated with the development of WorldPokerTour.com. These
obligations relate to the gaming and non-gaming aspects of the
website. Also included are operational expenses related to WPT
China. Additionally, included in purchase obligations are open
purchase orders of approximately $0.6 million as of
March 30, 2008; a three year base retainer with Antonio
Esfandiari, who serves as WPTEs spokesperson for both
online gaming and ClubWPT.com; and minimum guaranteed revenue to
CryptoLogic associated with the Initial Casino of
$0.5 million per year or $0.1 million per quarter.
Upon launch of the Full Casino, projected to be delivered by
June 2008, CryptoLogic will be entitled to a minimum revenue
guarantee of $0.8 million per year or $0.2 million per
quarter. |
We have incurred cumulative development and land costs of
approximately $6.4 million and $2.9 million,
respectively, relating to the development of a Company-owned
non-Indian casino in Vicksburg, Mississippi. These costs are
included in property and equipment as construction in progress
and land, respectively. We have received various regulatory
approvals to develop our own casino near Vicksburg, Mississippi.
Lakes is continuing to evaluate whether to proceed with this
project, but in any event does not expect further development
efforts before 2009.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
This Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations discusses our consolidated
financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance
with United States generally accepted accounting principles. The
preparation of these financial statements requires us to make
estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the balance sheet date and reported amounts of
revenue and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing
basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those
related to revenue recognition, long-term assets related to
Indian casino projects, deferred television costs, investments,
litigation costs, income taxes, share-based compensation and
28
derivative financial instruments. We base our estimates and
judgments on historical experience and on various other factors
that are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of
which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying
values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent
from other sources. Actual results may differ from these
estimates.
We believe the following critical accounting policies involve
the more significant judgments and estimates used in the
preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue recognition. Revenue from the
management, development, and financing of, and consulting with,
Indian-owned casino gaming facilities is recognized as it is
earned pursuant to each respective agreement. See further
discussion below under the caption Long-term assets
related to Indian casino projects.
Revenue from the domestic and international distribution of
WPTEs television series is recognized as earned under the
following criteria established by the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position
(SOP)
No. 00-2,
Accounting by Producers or Distributors of Films
(SOP 00-2):
|
|
|
|
|
Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;
|
|
|
|
The show/episode is complete, and in accordance with the terms
of the arrangement, has been delivered or is available for
immediate and unconditional delivery;
|
|
|
|
The license period has begun and the customer can begin its
exploitation, exhibition or sale;
|
|
|
|
The sellers price to the buyer is fixed and
determinable; and
|
|
|
|
Collectibility is reasonably assured.
|
In accordance with the terms of the WPT agreements, WPTE
recognized domestic television license revenues upon the receipt
and acceptance of completed episodes by TRV and GSN. However,
due to restrictions and practical limitations applicable to
WPTEs operating relationships with foreign networks, WPTE
does not consider collectibility of international television
license revenues to be reasonably assured, and accordingly, WPTE
does not recognize such revenue unless the payment has been
received. Additionally, WPTE presents certain international
distribution license fee revenues net of the distributors
fees, as the distributor is the primary obligor in the
transaction with the ultimate customer pursuant to Emerging
Issue Task Force (EITF)
99-19,
Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an
Agent
(EITF 99-19).
Product licensing revenues are recognized when the underlying
royalties from the sales of the related products are earned.
WPTE recognizes minimum revenue guarantees, if any, ratably over
the term of the license or as earned royalties based on actual
sales of the related products, if greater. WPTE presents product
licensing fees gross of licensing commissions, which are
recorded as selling and administrative expenses as WPTE is the
primary obligor in the transaction with the ultimate customer
pursuant to
EITF 99-19.
Online gaming revenues are recognized monthly based on detailed
statements received from CryptoLogic, WPTEs online gaming
service provider for online poker and casino activity. In
accordance with
EITF 99-19,
WPTE presents online gaming revenues gross of service provider
costs (including the service providers management fee,
royalties and credit card processing that are recorded as cost
of revenues) as WPTE has the ability to adjust price and
specifications of the online gaming site, WPTE bears the
majority of the credit risk and WPTE is responsible for the
sales and marketing of the gaming site. WPTE includes certain
cash promotional expenses related to free bets and deposit
bonuses along with customer charge backs as direct reductions of
revenue. All other promotional expenses are generally recorded
as sales and marketing expenses.
Event hosting fees are paid by host casinos for the privilege of
hosting the events and are recognized as the episodes that
feature the host casino are aired. Sponsorship revenues are
recognized as the episodes that feature the sponsor are aired.
Licensing advances and guaranteed payments collected, but not
yet earned, by WPTE, as well as casino host fees and sponsorship
receipts collected prior to the airing of episodes, are
classified as deferred revenue in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets.
Deferred television costs. WPTE
accounts for deferred television costs in accordance with
SOP 00-2.
Deferred television costs include direct production, overhead
and development costs stated at the lower of cost or
29
net realizable value based on anticipated revenue. Production
overhead includes incremental costs associated with the
productions such as, office facilities and insurance. Shared
facility costs are allocated to episodes based on headcount.
Production overhead insurance costs are allocated to television
costs based on number of episodes. WPTE does not currently have
any revenues in excess of those subject to existing contractual
relationships. Capitalized television production costs for each
episode are expensed as revenues are recognized upon delivery
and acceptance of the completed episode. WPTE management
estimates that 100% of the $1.8 million in capitalized
deferred television costs at March 30, 2008, are expected
to be expensed in connection with episode deliveries by the end
of 2008, and are therefore presented as current assets.
Share-based compensation expense. We
use the Black-Scholes option pricing method to establish fair
value of options. Our determination of fair value of share-based
payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing
model is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions
regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables.
These variables include, but are not limited to, our expected
stock price volatility and actual and projected employee stock
option exercise behaviors. Any changes in these assumptions may
materially affect the estimated fair value of the share-based
award.
Income taxes. We account for income
taxes under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes
(SFAS No. 109). Under this method, we
determine deferred tax assets and liabilities based upon the
difference between the financial statement and tax bases of
assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the
year in which the differences are expected to affect taxable
income. We assess the likelihood that deferred tax assets will
be recovered from future taxable income and establish a
valuation allowance when management believes recovery is not
likely.
In the first quarter of 2007, we adopted the provisions of FASB
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes, (FIN 48). FIN 48
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized in financial statements in accordance with
SFAS No. 109. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition
threshold and measurement attribute for a tax position taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides
guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and
transition. Lakes records changes in accrued interest related to
uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense.
Long-term
assets related to Indian casino projects:
Notes receivable. We have formal procedures
governing our evaluation of opportunities for potential
Indian-owned casino development projects that we follow before
entering into agreements to provide financial support for the
development of these projects. We determine whether there is
probable future economic benefit prior to recording any asset
related to the Indian casino project. We initially evaluate the
following factors involving critical milestones that affect the
probability of developing and operating a casino:
|
|
|
|
|
Has the U.S. Governments Bureau of Indian Affairs
federally recognized the tribe as a tribe?
|
|
|
|
Does the tribe hold or have the right to acquire land to be
used for the casino site?
|
|
|
|
Has the Department of the Interior put the land into trust
for purposes of being used as a casino site?
|
|
|
|
Has the tribe entered into a gaming agreement with the state
in which the land is located, if required by the state?
|
|
|
|
Has the tribe obtained approval by the National Indian Gaming
Commission of the management agreement?
|
|
|
|
Do other legal and political obstacles exist that could block
development of the project and, if so, what is the likelihood of
the tribe successfully prevailing?
|
|
|
|
An evaluation by management of the financial projections of
the project given the projects geographic location and the
feasibility of the projects success given such
location;
|
|
|
|
The structure and stability of the tribal government;
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
The scope of the proposed project, including the physical
scope of the contemplated facility and the expected financial
scope of the related development;
|
|
|
|
An evaluation of the proposed projects ability to be
built as contemplated and the likelihood that financing will be
available; and
|
|
|
|
The nature of the business opportunity to us, including
whether the project would be a financing, development
and/or
management opportunity.
|
We account for our notes receivable from the tribes as
in-substance structured notes in accordance with the guidance
contained in Emerging Issues Task Force Consensus
No. 96-12,
Recognition of Interest Income and balance Sheet
Classification of Structured Notes (EITF
No. 96-12).
Under their terms, the notes do not become due and payable
unless the projects are completed and operational, and
distributable profits are available from the operations.
However, in the event our development activity is terminated
prior to completion, we generally retain the right to collect in
the event of completion by another developer. Because the stated
rate of the notes receivable alone is not commensurate with the
risk inherent in these projects (at least prior to commencement
of operations), the estimated fair value of the notes receivable
is generally less than the amount advanced. At the date of each
advance, the difference between the estimated fair value of the
note receivable and the actual amount advanced is recorded as an
intangible asset, and the two assets are accounted for
separately.
Subsequent to its initial recording at estimated fair value, the
note receivable portion of the advance is adjusted to its
current estimated fair value at each balance sheet date using
then current assumptions including typical market discount
rates, and expected repayment terms as may be affected by
estimated future interest rates and opening dates, with the
latter affected by changes in project-specific circumstances
such as ongoing litigation, the status of regulatory approval
and other factors previously noted. The notes receivable are not
adjusted to a fair value estimate that exceeds the face value of
the note plus accrued interest, if any. Due to uncertainties
surrounding the projects, no interest income is recognized
during the development period, but changes in estimated fair
value of the notes receivable still held as of the balance sheet
date are recorded as unrealized gains or losses in our unaudited
condensed consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive loss.
Upon opening of the casino, any difference between the then
estimated fair value of the notes receivables and the amount
contractually due under the notes will be amortized into income
using the effective interest method over the remaining term of
the note. Such notes would then be evaluated for impairment
pursuant to SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors
for Impairment of a Loan.
Intangible assets related to Indian casino
projects. Intangible assets related to the
acquisition of the management, development, consulting or
financing contracts are accounted for using the guidance in
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS No. 142). Pursuant to that
guidance, the assets are periodically evaluated for impairment
based on the estimated cash flows from the contract on an
undiscounted basis. In the event the carrying value of the
intangible assets, in combination with the carrying value of
land held for development and other assets associated with the
Indian casino projects described below, were to exceed the
undiscounted cash flow, an impairment would be recorded. Such an
impairment would be measured based on the difference between the
fair value and carrying value of the assets. In accordance with
SFAS No. 142, we will amortize the intangible assets
related to the acquisition of the management, development,
consulting or financing contracts under the straight-line method
over the term of the contracts which will commence when the
related casinos open. In addition to the intangible asset
associated with the cash advances to tribes described above,
these assets include actual costs incurred to acquire our
interest in the projects from third parties.
Land held for development. Included in land
held for development is land held for possible transfer to
Indian tribes for use in certain of the future casino resort
projects. In the event that this land is not transferred to the
tribes, we have the right to sell it. We evaluate these assets
for impairment in combination with intangible assets related to
acquisition of management, development, consulting or financing
contracts and other assets related to the Indian casino projects
as discussed above.
Other. Included in this category are costs
incurred related to the Indian casino projects, which have not
yet been included as part of the notes receivable because of
timing of the payment of these costs. When paid, these amounts
are allocated between notes receivable and intangible assets
related to the acquisition of management,
31
development, consulting or financing contracts and will be
evaluated for changes in fair value or impairment, respectively,
as described above. These amounts vary from period to period due
to timing of payment of these costs. Also included in this
category are receivables from related parties that are directly
related to the development and opening of Lakes Indian
casino projects.
In addition, we incur certain non-reimbursable costs related to
the projects that are not included in notes receivable, which
are expensed as incurred. These costs include salaries, travel
and certain legal costs.
As of March 30, 2008 and December 30, 2007, the
condensed consolidated balance sheets include long-term assets
related to Indian casino projects of $155.7 million and
$157.5 million, respectively. The amounts are as follows by
project (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shingle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pokagon
|
|
|
Springs
|
|
|
Jamul
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band
|
|
|
Tribe
|
|
|
Tribe
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Notes receivable, at estimated fair value
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
53,140
|
|
|
$
|
20,951
|
|
|
$
|
3,808
|
|
|
$
|
77,899
|
|
Intangible assets related to Indian casino projects
|
|
|
29,096
|
|
|
|
22,069
|
|
|
|
12,537
|
|
|
|
1,285
|
|
|
|
64,987
|
|
Land held for development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,815
|
|
|
|
848
|
|
|
|
7,663
|
|
Other
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
1,028
|
|
|
|
3,261
|
|
|
|
5,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,156
|
|
|
$
|
75,976
|
|
|
$
|
41,331
|
|
|
$
|
9,202
|
|
|
$
|
155,665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shingle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pokagon
|
|
|
Springs
|
|
|
Jamul
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band
|
|
|
Tribe
|
|
|
Tribe
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Notes receivable, at estimated fair value
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
53,592
|
|
|
$
|
21,406
|
|
|
$
|
3,797
|
|
|
$
|
78,795
|
|
Intangible assets related to Indian casino projects
|
|
|
30,775
|
|
|
|
21,923
|
|
|
|
11,972
|
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
|
|
65,910
|
|
Land held for development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,783
|
|
|
|
848
|
|
|
|
7,631
|
|
Other
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
|
|
3,288
|
|
|
|
5,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,835
|
|
|
$
|
76,282
|
|
|
$
|
41,222
|
|
|
$
|
9,173
|
|
|
$
|
157,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The key assumptions and criteria used in the determination of
the estimated fair value of the notes receivable are primarily
significant unobservable level three inputs, which are estimated
casino opening date, projected pre- and post-opening date
interest rates, discount rates and probability of projects
opening. The estimated casino opening date used in the valuation
reflects the weighted average of three scenarios: a base case
(which is based on the Companys forecasted casino opening
date) and one and two years out from the base case. The
projected interest rates are based upon the one year
U.S. Treasury Bill spot yield curve per Bloomberg and the
specific assumptions on contract term, stated interest rate and
casino opening date. The discount rate for the projects is based
on the yields available on certain financial instruments at the
valuation date, the risk level of equity investments in general,
and the specific operating risks associated with open and
operating gaming enterprises similar to each of the projects. In
estimating this discount rate, market data of other public
gaming related companies is considered. The probability applied
to each project is based upon a weighting of four different
scenarios with the fourth scenario assuming the casino never
opens. The first three scenarios assume the casino opens but
applies different opening dates as discussed above. The
probability weighting applied to each scenario captures the
element of risk in these projects and is based upon the status
of each project, review of the critical milestones and
likelihood of achieving the milestones.
32
The following table provides the key assumptions used to value
the notes receivable at estimated fair value (dollars in
thousands):
Shingle
Springs Tribe:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 30, 2008
|
|
As of December 30, 2007
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Face value of note (principal and interest)
|
|
$69,661
|
|
$67,585
|
|
|
($48,287 principal and $21,374 interest)
|
|
($47,632 principal and $19,953 interest)
|
Estimated months until casino opens (weighted-average of three
scenarios)
|
|
9 months
|
|
12 months
|
Projected interest rate until casino opens
|
|
7.31%
|
|
9.12%
|
Projected interest rate during the loan repayment term
|
|
9.13%
|
|
10.16%
|
Discount rate
|
|
15%
|
|
15%
|
Repayment terms of note(*)
|
|
84 months
|
|
84 months
|
Probability rate of casino opening (weighting of four scenarios)
|
|
95%
|
|
95%
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Note is payable in even monthly installments over the course of
the management agreement subsequent to the casino opening. |
See also the discussion included below under Description
of each Indian casino project and evaluation of critical
milestones Shingle Springs.
Jamul
Tribe:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 30, 2008
|
|
As of December 30, 2007
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Face value of note (principal and interest)
|
|
$44,420
|
|
$42,426
|
|
|
($31,199 principal and $13,221 interest)
|
|
($30,114 principal and $12,312 interest)
|
Estimated months until casino opens (weighted-average of three
scenarios)
|
|
29 months
|
|
29 months
|
Projected interest rate until casino opens
|
|
7.48%
|
|
9.12%
|
Projected interest rate during the loan repayment term
|
|
10.23%
|
|
10.46%
|
Discount rate
|
|
20.00%
|
|
20.00%
|
Projected repayment terms of note
|
|
120 months
|
|
120 months
|
Probability rate of casino opening (weighting of four scenarios)
|
|
85%
|
|
85%
|
See also the discussion below included under the caption
Description of each Indian casino project and evaluation
of critical milestones Jamul Tribe.
33
The following table represents a sensitivity analysis prepared
by Lakes of the notes receivable from the Jamul Tribe and
Shingle Springs Tribe, based upon changes in the probability
rate of the casino opening by five percentage points and the
estimated casino opening date by one year:
March 30,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated fair
|
|
|
Sensitivity analysis
|
|
|
|
value notes
|
|
|
5% less
|
|
|
One year
|
|
|
|
|
|
5% increased
|
|
|
One year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
receivable
|
|
|
probable
|
|
|
delay
|
|
|
Both
|
|
|
probability
|
|
|
sooner
|
|
|
Both
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Shingle Springs
|
|
$
|
53,140
|
|
|
$
|
50,289
|
|
|
$
|
49,636
|
|
|
$
|
46,969
|
|
|
$
|
55,991
|
|
|
$
|
56,887
|
|
|
$
|
59,935
|
|
Jamul
|
|
|
20,951
|
|
|
|
19,699
|
|
|
|
18,777
|
|
|
|
17,653
|
|
|
|
22,203
|
|
|
|
23,372
|
|
|
|
24,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
74,091
|
|
|
$
|
69,988
|
|
|
$
|
68,413
|
|
|
$
|
64,622
|
|
|
$
|
78,194
|
|
|
$
|
80,259
|
|
|
$
|
84,702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 30,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated fair
|
|
|
Sensitivity analysis
|
|
|
|
value notes
|
|
|
5% less
|
|
|
One year
|
|
|
|
|
|
5% increased
|
|
|
One year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
receivable
|
|
|
probable
|
|
|
delay
|
|
|
Both
|
|
|
probability
|
|
|
sooner
|
|
|
Both
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Shingle Springs
|
|
$
|
53,592
|
|
|
$
|
50,732
|
|
|
$
|
50,998
|
|
|
$
|
48,275
|
|
|
$
|
56,452
|
|
|
$
|
56,316
|
|
|
$
|
59,319
|
|
Jamul
|
|
$
|
21,406
|
|
|
$
|
20,151
|
|
|
$
|
19,540
|
|
|
$
|
18,395
|
|
|
$
|
22,661
|
|
|
$
|
23,450
|
|
|
$
|
24,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
74,998
|
|
|
$
|
70,883
|
|
|
$
|
70,538
|
|
|
$
|
66,670
|
|
|
$
|
79,113
|
|
|
$
|
79,766
|
|
|
$
|
84,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The assumption changes used in the sensitivity analysis above
are hypothetical. The effect of the variation in the probability
assumption and estimated opening date on the estimated fair
value of the notes receivable from Indian tribes was calculated
without changing any other assumptions; however, in reality,
changes in these factors may result in changes in another. For
example, the change in probability could be associated with a
change in discount rate, which might magnify or counteract the
sensitivities.
The following represents the nature of the advances to the
tribes. The table represents the total amount of advances, which
represent the principal amount of the notes receivable, as of
March 30, 2008 and December 30, 2007. The notes
receivable are carried on the unaudited condensed consolidated
balance sheet as of March 30, 2008 and the audited
consolidated balance sheet as of December 30, 2007 at their
estimated fair values of $77.9 million and
$78.8 million, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Shingle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances Principal Balance
|
|
Springs
|
|
|
Jamul
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Note receivable, pre-construction(a),(c)
|
|
$
|
48,287
|
|
|
$
|
30,249
|
|
|
$
|
3,650
|
|
|
$
|
82,186
|
|
Note receivable, land(b),(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
986
|
|
|
|
1,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
48,287
|
|
|
$
|
31,199
|
|
|
$
|
4,636
|
|
|
$
|
84,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
Shingle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances Principal Balance
|
|
Springs
|
|
|
Jamul
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Note receivable, pre-construction(a),(c)
|
|
$
|
47,632
|
|
|
$
|
29,164
|
|
|
$
|
3,490
|
|
|
$
|
80,286
|
|
Note receivable, land(b),(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
986
|
|
|
|
1,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
47,632
|
|
|
$
|
30,114
|
|
|
$
|
4,476
|
|
|
$
|
82,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
We fund certain costs incurred to develop the casino project.
These costs relate to construction costs, legal fees in
connection with various regulatory approvals and litigation,
environmental costs and design consulting, and |
34
|
|
|
|
|
we, in order to obtain the development agreement and management
contract, agree to advance a monthly amount used by the tribe
for a variety of tribal expenses. |
|
(b) |
|
We purchased land to be used and transferred to the tribe in
connection with the casino project. |
|
(c) |
|
Amounts listed in the other column represents amounts advanced
under the agreements with the Iowa Tribe. |
The notes receivable pre-construction advances consist of the
following principal amounts advanced to the Shingle Springs
Tribe and Jamul Tribe at March 30, 2008 and
December 30, 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
Shingle Springs Tribe
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monthly stipend
|
|
$
|
10,165
|
|
|
$
|
9,640
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
2,022
|
|
|
|
2,141
|
|
Legal
|
|
|
14,193
|
|
|
|
14,193
|
|
Environmental
|
|
|
1,739
|
|
|
|
1,739
|
|
Design
|
|
|
11,474
|
|
|
|
11,225
|
|
Gaming license
|
|
|
3,726
|
|
|
|
3,726
|
|
Lobbyist
|
|
|
4,968
|
|
|
|
4,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
48,287
|
|
|
$
|
47,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
Jamul Tribe
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monthly stipend
|
|
$
|
5,224
|
|
|
$
|
5,069
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
1,628
|
|
|
|
1,210
|
|
Legal
|
|
|
4,369
|
|
|
|
4,342
|
|
Environmental
|
|
|
2,289
|
|
|
|
2,288
|
|
Design
|
|
|
13,228
|
|
|
|
12,782
|
|
Gaming license
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
779
|
|
Lobbyist
|
|
|
2,697
|
|
|
|
2,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,249
|
|
|
$
|
29,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluation
of impairment related to our long-term assets related to Indian
casino projects, excluding the notes receivable, which are
valued at fair value:
Management periodically evaluates the intangible assets, land
held for development and other costs associated with each of the
projects for impairment. The assets are periodically evaluated
for impairment based on the estimated undiscounted cash flows
from the management contract on an undiscounted basis. In the
event the carrying value of the intangible assets, in
combination with the carrying value of land held for development
and other assets associated with the Indian casino projects were
to exceed the undiscounted cash flow, an impairment would be
recorded. Such impairment would be measured based on the
difference between the fair value and carrying value of the
assets.
The financial models prepared by management for each project are
based upon the scope of each of the projects, which are
supported by a feasibility study as well as a market analysis
where the casino will be built. We (as predecessor to Grand
Casinos Inc.) began developing Indian casino projects in 1990
and demonstrated success from the day the first Indian casino
opened in 1991 through the expiration of the Coushatta
management contract in 2002. Additionally, we have been managing
the Cimarron Casino since 2006, as well as the Four Winds Casino
Resort since August of 2007. This successful history legitimizes
many of the key assumptions supporting the financial models.
Projections for each applicable casino development were
developed based on analysis of published information pertaining
to the particular markets in which our Indian casinos will be
located and are updated quarterly based on evolving events and
market conditions. In addition, we have many years of casino
35
operations experience, which provides a basis for our revenue
expectations. The projections were prepared by us not for
purposes of the valuation at hand but rather for purposes of our
and the tribes business planning.
The primary assumptions included within managements
financial model for each Indian casino project is as follows:
Jamul
Tribe
Lakes and the Jamul Tribe have consulted with third party
advisors as to the architectural feasibility of a plan to build
a casino with related amenities such as parking on the six acres
of reservation land held by the Jamul Tribe and have concluded
that such a project could be successfully built assuming
adequate financing can be obtained. The gaming facility is
currently planned to be a class II electronic gaming device
facility which will not require a compact. The agreement between
Lakes and the Jamul Tribe will also be modified to reflect the
new economics of the revised casino plan but will not be subject
to approval by the State of California or the NIGC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. of Class II electronic gaming devices
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
No. of Table games
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
No. of Poker tables
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Win/Class II electronic gaming devices/day 1st
year
|
|
$
|
172
|
|
|
$
|
172
|
|
Win/Table game/day 1st year
|
|
$
|
471
|
|
|
$
|
471
|
|
Win/Poker table/day 1st year
|
|
$
|
312
|
|
|
$
|
312
|
|
The San Diego market contains other Indian-owned casinos in
the surrounding area, each of which is self-managed. Because of
the proprietary nature of those operations no public information
is readily attainable. However, based on the apparent successful
nature of their operations (large casinos which continually
expand, new hotel developments, new golf courses, etc.) coupled
with our knowledge of their operations, we feel that a
successful operation can be built.
Shingle
Springs Tribe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 30,
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
No. of Class III slot machines
|
|
349
|
|
349
|
No. of Class II electronic gaming devices
|
|
1,751
|
|
1,751
|
No. of Table games
|
|
75
|
|
75
|
Win/Class II & III electronic gaming devices/slot
machine/day 1st year
|
|
$350
|
|
$350
|
Win/Table game/day 1st year
|
|
$1,275
|
|
$1,275
|
Expected increase (decrease) in management fee cash flows
|
|
Year 2 17.6%
|
|
Year 2 17.6%
|
|
|
Year 3 10.5%
|
|
Year 3 10.5%
|
|
|
Year 4 7.9%
|
|
Year 4 7.9%
|
|
|
Year 5 8.8%
|
|
Year 5 8.8%
|
|
|
Year 6 (4.0)%
|
|
Year 6 (4.0)%
|
|
|
(management fees were
|
|
(management fees were
|
|
|
reduced in year six)
|
|
reduced in year six)
|
|
|
Year 7 5.0%
|
|
Year 7 5.0%
|
In the Sacramento market, there is one other Indian casino that
is managed by a public company. Management considered the
available information related to this other Indian casino when
projecting management fees from the Red Hawk Casino. Based on
the apparent successful nature of their operations coupled with
our knowledge of their operations, we feel that our forecast of
operations is within the revenue metrics of the market.
36
As of March 30, 2008 and December 30, 2007 no
impairment was recognized on the Shingle Springs or Jamul
projects.
Description
of each Indian casino project and evaluation of critical
milestones:
Pokagon
Band
Business arrangement. On August 2, 2007,
the Four Winds Casino Resort in New Buffalo, Michigan opened to
the public. We receive approximately 24% of net income up to a
certain level and 19% of net income over that level, as a
management fee. The term of the management contract is five
years, which began on August 2, 2007. Payment of our
management fee is subordinated to the Pokagon Gaming
Authoritys senior indebtedness relating to the Four Winds
Casino Resort. The Pokagon Band may also buy out the management
contract after two years from the opening date. The buy out
amount is calculated based upon the previous 12 months of
management fees earned multiplied by the remaining number of
years under the management contract, discounted back to the
present value at the time the buy out occurs. The NIGC approved
the management contract in March 2006.
Shingle
Springs Tribe
Business arrangement. Plans for the Red Hawk
Casino project include an approximately 278,000 square-foot
facility (including approximately 88,000 square feet of
gaming space) to be located adjacent to the planned Shingle
Springs Rancheria exit, approximately 35 miles east of
downtown Sacramento, on U.S. Highway 50. The Red Hawk
Casino is currently planned to feature approximately 2,100
gaming devices and approximately 75 table games, a high stakes
gaming room, as well as restaurants, enclosed parking and other
facilities.
We acquired our initial interest in the development and
management contracts for the Red Hawk Casino from
KAR Shingle Springs in 1999 and formed a joint
venture, in which the contracts were held, between us and
KAR Shingle Springs. On January 30, 2003, we
purchased the remaining KAR Shingle Springs
partnership interest in the joint venture. In connection with
the purchase transaction, we entered into separate agreements
with the two individual owners of KAR Shingle
Springs (Kevin M. Kean and Jerry A. Argovitz). Under the
agreement with Mr. Kean, he may elect to serve as a
consultant to us during the term of the casino management
contract if he is found suitable by relevant gaming regulatory
authorities. In such event, Mr. Kean will be entitled to
receive annual consulting fees equal to 15% of the management
fees received by us from the Red Hawk Casino operations, less
certain costs of these operations. If Mr. Kean is not found
suitable by relevant gaming regulatory authorities or otherwise
elects not to serve as a consultant, he will be entitled to
receive annual payments of $1 million from the Red Hawk
Casino project during the term of the respective casino
management contract (but not during any renewal term of such
management contract).
Under the agreement with Mr. Argovitz, if he is found
suitable by relevant gaming regulatory authorities he may elect
to re-purchase his respective original equity interest in our
subsidiary and then be entitled to obtain a 15% equity interest
in our entity that holds the rights to the management contract
with the Red Hawk Casino project. If he is not found suitable or
does not elect to purchase equity interests in our subsidiary,
Mr. Argovitz would receive annual payments of
$1 million from the Red Hawk Casino project from the date
of election through the term of the respective casino management
contract (but not during any renewal term of such management
contract).
The development agreement, as amended, provided for us to make
certain pre-construction advances to the Shingle Springs Tribe
in the form of a transition loan and land loan up to a maximum
combined amount of $75.0 million. On June 28, 2007 an
affiliate of the Shingle Springs Tribe closed on a
$450 million senior note financing to fund the Red Hawk
Casino project. The principal balance of the transition loan as
of March 30, 2008 was approximately $48.3 million. The
land loan was repaid to Lakes, including accrued interest, on
June 28, 2007 in connection with the close of the
$450 million senior note financing.
The amended development agreement provides for us to assist in
the design, development and construction of the facility as well
as manage the pre-opening, opening and continued operations of
the casino and related amenities for a period of seven years
from the date the casino opens. As compensation for our
management services, we will receive a management fee between
21% and 30% of net income (as that term is defined by the
management contract) of the operations annually for the first
five years with a declining percentage in years six and seven.
37
Payment of our management fee is subordinated to the repayment
of $450 million senior note financing of the affiliate of
the Shingle Springs Tribe and a minimum priority payment to the
Shingle Springs Tribe. The Shingle Springs Tribe has the right
to terminate the agreement after five years from the opening of
the casino if any of certain required elements of the project
have not been developed. The management contract also includes
provisions that allow the Shingle Springs Tribe to buy out the
management contract after four years from the opening date. The
buy out amount is calculated based upon the previous
12 months of management fees earned multiplied by the
remaining number of years under the contract, discounted back to
the present value at the time the buy out occurs.
Our evaluation of the critical milestones. The
following table outlines the status of each of the following
primary milestones necessary to complete the Red Hawk Casino
project as of March 30, 2008, December 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006. Both the positive and negative evidence
was reviewed during our evaluation of the critical milestones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Critical milestone
|
|
|
March 30, 2008
|
|
|
December 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
Federal recognition of the tribe
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
Possession of usable land corresponding with needs based on
Lakes project plan
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
Usable land placed in trust by Federal government
|
|
|
Not necessary, as land is reservation land.
|
|
|
Not necessary, as land is reservation land.
|
|
|
Not necessary, as land is reservation land.
|
|
Usable county agreement, if applicable
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
Usable state compact that allows for gaming consistent with
that outlined in Lakes project plan
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
NIGC approval of management contract in current and desired
form
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes approval received in 2004.
|
|
Resolution of all litigation and legal obstacles
|
|
|
No However, such obstacles have not interfered with
construction of the highway interchange or the casino project to
date. See below.
|
|
|
No However, such obstacles have not interfered with
construction of the highway interchange or the casino project to
date. See below.
|
|
|
No See below.
|
|
Financing for construction
|
|
|
Yes. On June 28, 2007 an affiliate of the Shingle Springs Tribe
closed on a $450 million senior note financing to fund the Red
Hawk Casino project in Shingle Springs, California. The Shingle
Springs Tribe intends to close on commitments to fund
approximately $65 million under secured furniture, furnishings
and equipment financing to finance costs associated with
equipping and furnishing the Red Hawk Casino.
|
|
|
Yes. On June 28, 2007 an affiliate of the Shingle Springs Tribe
closed on a $450 million senior note financing to fund the Red
Hawk Casino project in Shingle Springs, California. The Shingle
Springs Tribe intends to seek commitments to fund approximately
$65 million under secured furniture, furnishings and equipment
financing to finance costs associated with equipping and
furnishing the Red Hawk Casino.
|
|
|
No, however the Shingle Springs Tribe has engaged investment
banks to assist with obtaining financing.
|
|
Any other significant project milestones or contingencies,
the outcome of which could have a material affect on the
probability of project completion as planned
|
|
|
No others known at this time by Lakes.
|
|
|
No others known at this time by Lakes.
|
|
|
No others known at this time by Lakes.
|
|
Our evaluation and conclusion regarding the above critical
milestones and progress: The Shingle Springs
Tribe is a federally recognized tribe, has a compact with the
State of California and owns approximately 160 acres of
reservation land on which the casino is being built. During July
2004, we received notification from the NIGC
38
that the development and management contract between the Shingle
Springs Tribe and us, allowing us to manage a Class II and
Class III casino, was approved by the NIGC.
The Red Hawk Casino is currently planned to open with 349
Class III slot machines and approximately 1,751
Class II electronic gaming devices. Under the form of
tribal-state compact first signed by the State of California
with the Shingle Springs Tribe in 1999, the Shingle Springs
Tribe is allowed to operate up to 350 Class III slot
machines without licenses from the state. This form of compact
allows California tribes to operate additional Class II
electronic gaming devices. Under these tribal-state compacts,
there is a state-wide limitation on the aggregate number of
Class III slot machine licenses that are available. Tribes
who have entered into new tribal-state compacts or amendments to
the 1999 form of tribal-state compact in general are allowed to
operate an unlimited number of Class II electronic gaming
devices without the need for obtaining additional licenses,
subject to the payment of additional fees to the state,
including, in recent cases, fees based on a percentage of slot
net win. Currently, the Shingle Springs Tribe has
not amended its tribal-state compact. If the compact is not
renegotiated and amended, the tribe could operate under its
existing compact which allows for up to 350 Class III slot
machines and an unlimited number of Class II electronic
gaming devices. Management believes that this number of gaming
devices is adequate to equip the planned development, and
therefore, the availability of additional slot licenses is not
an issue that could prevent the project from progressing.
On April 30, 2007, a construction permit was issued for the
U.S. Highway 50 interchange project, which provides direct
access to the Shingle Springs Rancheria on which the Red Hawk
Casino project is being built, and construction began on the
U.S. Highway 50 interchange on May 7, 2007. On
March 25, 2008, the California Third District Court of
Appeal in Sacramento rejected the challenge of Voices for Rural
Living in two appeals claiming deficiencies in the environmental
impact report (EIR) prepared for the
U.S. Highway 50 interchange. The court upheld the EIR in
all respects, rejecting all of the arguments advanced by Voices
for Rural Living.
On June 28, 2007 an affiliate of the Shingle Springs Tribe
closed on a $450 million senior note financing to fund the
Red Hawk Casino project. Construction of the Red Hawk Casino
also began during June of 2007. The close of the
$450 million senior note financing, the construction
progress made on the U.S. Highway 50 interchange, and the
commencement of construction on the Red Hawk Casino project
increased the estimated probability of opening the casino
development project from 85% at the end of 2006 to 95% as of
March 30, 2008.
As a result of achieving the critical milestones as described
above, the casino is planned to open in late 2008.
Jamul
Tribe
Business arrangement. The Jamul Tribe has an
approximate
six-acre
reservation on which the casino project is currently planned to
be built. The reservation is located near San Diego,
California. Under the current compact that the Jamul Tribe has
with the State of California (the State) and based
upon requirements in other compacts approved by the State in
2004, the Jamul Tribe completed a Tribal Environmental Impact
Statement/Report that was approved by the Jamul Tribes
General Council with a record of decision issued by the Jamul
Tribe on December 16, 2006. Since that time, the Jamul
Tribe has received comments from various state agencies
including the representative from the California Governors
office. The Jamul Tribe and the State have met on several
occasions in an attempt to address the States comments
related to compact requirements. Throughout 2007, Lakes and the
Jamul Tribe were evaluating the Jamul Tribes alternatives
of pursuing a new compact, complying with certain requirements
in their existing compact or building and operating a casino
based solely on class II electronic gaming devices. The
proposed gaming facility has been reduced in size and scope
because the States comments on the Jamul Tribes
existing compact or a proposed new compact is expected to take
more time than is currently acceptable to the Jamul Tribe. The
current plan is for a smaller scale gaming facility that will
become a solely class II electronic gaming device facility
which will not require a compact. The agreement between Lakes
and the Jamul Tribe (discussed below) will also be modified to
reflect the new economics of the revised casino plan but will
not be subject to approval by the State or the NIGC.
Effective March 30, 2006, Lakes entered into a development
financing and services agreement with the Jamul Tribe to assist
the Jamul Tribe in developing the Jamul Casino which the Jamul
Tribe will manage. As part of the current agreement, Lakes will
use its best efforts to obtain financing of up to
$350 million, from which advances will be made to the Jamul
Tribe to pay for the design and construction of the Jamul
Casino. Under the current
39
development financing and services agreement, Lakes is entitled
to receive a flat fee of $15 million for its development
design services, and a flat fee of $15 million for its
construction oversight services, payable evenly over the first
five years after the opening date of the Jamul Casino. In
connection with Lakes financing of the Jamul Casino, the
Jamul Tribe is required to pay interest over a ten-year period
on sums advanced by Lakes equal to the rate charged to Lakes for
obtaining the necessary funds plus five percent. Amounts
previously advanced by Lakes to the Jamul Tribe in connection
with the Jamul Tribes proposed casino resort are included
in the development financing and services agreement financing
amount. However, as discussed above, this agreement will be
modified and there can be no assurance that third party
financing will be available with acceptable terms. If Lakes is
unable to obtain the appropriate amount of financing for this
project, the project may not be completed as planned.
Lakes acquired its initial interest in the development agreement
and management contract for the Jamul casino from
KAR Jamul in 1999 and formed a joint venture in
which the contracts were held between Lakes and KAR
Jamul. This development agreement and a management contract have
been submitted to the NIGC for approval. On January 30,
2003, Lakes purchased the remaining KAR Jamuls
partnership interest in the joint venture. In connection with
the purchase transaction, Lakes entered into separate agreements
with the two individual owners of KAR Jamul
(Mr. Kean and Mr. Argovitz). The term of the contract
is expected to be five or seven years. Under the current
agreement with Mr. Kean, he may elect to serve as a
consultant to Lakes during the term of the casino agreement if
he is found suitable by relevant gaming regulatory authorities.
In such event, Mr. Kean will be entitled to receive annual
consulting fees equal to 20% of the management fees received by
Lakes from the Jamul Casino operations, less certain costs of
these operations. If Mr. Kean is not found suitable by
relevant gaming regulatory authorities or otherwise elects not
to serve as a consultant, he will be entitled to receive annual
payments of $1 million from the Jamul Casino project during
the term of the respective casino agreement (but not during any
renewal term of such agreement).
Under the current agreement with Mr. Argovitz, if he is
found suitable by relevant gaming regulatory authorities he may
elect to re- purchase his respective original equity interest in
the Lakes subsidiary and then be entitled to obtain a 20%
equity interest in the Lakes entity that holds the rights
to the development financing and services agreement with the
Jamul Tribe. If he is not found suitable or does not elect to
purchase equity interests in the Lakes subsidiary,
Mr. Argovitz may elect to receive annual payments of
$1 million from the Jamul Casino project from the date of
election through the term of the respective casino agreement
(but not during any renewal term of such agreement).
Our evaluation of the critical milestones. The
following table outlines the status of each of the following
primary milestones necessary to complete the Jamul project as of
March 30, 2008, December 30, 2007 and
40
December 31, 2006. Both the positive and negative evidence
was reviewed during our evaluation of the critical milestones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Critical milestone
|
|
|
March 30, 2008
|
|
|
December 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
Federal recognition of the tribe
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
Possession of usable land corresponding with needs based on
Lakes project plan
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
Usable land placed in trust by Federal government
|
|
|
Not necessary, as the land is reservation land.
|
|
|
Not necessary, as land is reservation land.
|
|
|
Not necessary, as land is reservation land.
|
|
Usable county agreement, if applicable
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Usable state compact that allows for gaming consistent with
that outlined in Lakes project plan
|
|
|
N/A the Jamul Tribes current plan is to operate a
solely class II electronic gaming device facility, which
does not require a compact with the State.
|
|
|
N/A the Jamul Tribes current plan is to operate a
solely class II electronic gaming device facility, which
does not require a compact with the State.
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
NIGC approval of management contract in current and desired
form
|
|
|
N/A as the Jamul Tribes current plan is to operate a
solely class II electronic gaming device facility, which
does not need to be approved by the NIGC.
|
|
|
N/A as the Jamul Tribes current plan is to operate a
solely class II electronic gaming device facility, which
does not need to be approved by the NIGC.
|
|
|
N/A as the Jamul Tribe and Lakes entered into a development
financing and services agreement in March 2006, which does not
need to be approved by the NIGC.
|
|
Resolution of all litigation and legal obstacles
|
|
|
N/A, there has been some local opposition regarding the project.
|
|
|
N/A, there has been some local opposition regarding the project.
|
|
|
N/A, there has been some local opposition regarding the project.
|
|
Financing for construction
|
|
|
No, however, preliminary discussions with investment bankers
regarding assisting in obtaining financing have taken place.
|
|
|
No, however, preliminary discussions with investment bankers
regarding assisting in obtaining financing have taken place.
|
|
|
No, however, preliminary discussions with investment bankers
regarding assisting in obtaining financing have taken place.
|
|
Any other significant project milestones or contingencies,
the outcome of which could have a material affect on the
probability of project completion as planned
|
|
|
Yes. The current plan is for the gaming facility to be a solely
class II electronic gaming device facility. The agreement
between Lakes and the Jamul Tribe will also be modified to
reflect the new economics of the revised casino plan but will
not be subject to approval by the State of California or the
NIGC. See below for a discussion relating to road access to the
proposed Jamul Casino site.
|
|
|
Yes. The current plan is for the gaming facility to be a solely
class II electronic gaming device facility. The agreement
between Lakes and the Jamul Tribe will also be modified to
reflect the new economics of the revised casino plan but will
not be subject to approval by the State of California or the
NIGC.
|
|
|
Yes. The Jamul Tribe and the State of California have had a
series of recent meetings to discuss what requirements the State
has to either allow the project to be built as currently planned
or to enter into a new compact similar to those approved in 2004
for other tribes in the State. Based on these discussions, the
Jamul Tribe is evaluating which of any of these requirements are
acceptable or in lieu of a compact, building a casino based
solely on class II electronic gaming devices.
|
|
Our evaluation and conclusion regarding the above critical
milestones and progress. As discussed above, we
entered into a development financing and services agreement with
the Jamul Tribe in March 2006, which eliminated the need for
land contiguous to the reservation land to be taken into trust.
There is no requirement that the NIGC approve the development
financing and services agreement. The Jamul Casino is planned to
be built on the Jamul Tribes existing six acres of
reservation land. Reservation land qualifies for gaming without
going through a
land-in-trust
process.
We have consulted with third-party advisors as to the
architectural feasibility of the alternative plan and have been
assured that the project can be successfully built on the
reservation land. Lakes has completed economic models for the
proposed facility and concluded that it would result in a
successful operation assuming that adequate financing can be
obtained. The Jamul Casino project has been delayed due to
issues with road access to the proposed Jamul Casino site. The
Jamul Tribe has submitted an encroachment permit application to
CalTrans, which will
41
result in a project study report to determine the optimal access
point for traffic to the Jamul Casino without disruption of
traffic on the state highway. The Jamul Tribe has continued
construction on their reservation of the driveway road leading
to the Jamul Casino site. In addition to its work with CalTrans,
the Jamul Tribe has submitted an application to the BIA for
recognition of an access drive across its land to create a
second means of access to the site over an Indian reservation
road.
We and the leaders of the Jamul Tribe are currently evaluating
plans for the Jamul Casino facility to determine when
construction of the facility will start and when casino
operations will begin. We continue to believe that adequate
financing will be obtained and the project will be successfully
completed.
Iowa
Tribe
Business arrangement. On March 15, 2005,
Lakes, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, entered into
consulting agreements and management contracts with the Iowa
Tribe. The agreements became effective as of January 27,
2005. Lakes will consult on development of the Ioway Casino
Resort, a new first class casino with ancillary amenities and
facilities to be located on Indian land approximately
25 miles northeast of Oklahoma City along Route 66 until
regulatory approvals are received for the management contract
for the Ioway Casino Resort; and currently manages operations at
the Cimarron Casino, located in Perkins Oklahoma.
Each of the projects has a gaming consulting agreement
(Iowa Consulting Agreement) and a management
contract (Iowa Management Contract), independent of
the other project. Key terms relating to the agreements for the
projects are as follows:
Ioway Casino Resort. For its gaming
development consulting services under the Iowa Consulting
Agreement related to the Ioway Casino Resort, Lakes will receive
a development fee of $4 million paid upon the opening of
the Ioway Casino Resort, and a flat monthly fee of $500,000 for
120 months commencing upon the opening of the project.
Lakes has also agreed to make advances to the Iowa Tribe,
subject to a project budget to be agreed upon by Lakes and the
Iowa Tribe and certain other conditions. The development loan
will be for preliminary development costs under the Ioway Casino
Resort budget. Lakes has also agreed to use reasonable efforts
to assist the Iowa Tribe in obtaining permanent financing for
any projects developed under the Iowa Consulting Agreement.
The Iowa Management Contract for the Ioway Casino Resort is
subject to the approval of the NIGC and certain other
conditions. For its performance under the Iowa Management
Contract, Lakes will be entitled to receive management fees of
approximately 30% of net income, as defined in the agreement,
for each month during the term of the Iowa Management Contract.
The Iowa Management Contract term is seven years from the first
day that Lakes is able to commence management of the Ioway
Casino Resort gaming operations under all legal and regulatory
requirements (the Commencement Date), provided that
the Iowa Tribe has the right to buy out the remaining term of
the Iowa Management Contract after the Ioway Casino Resort has
been in continuous operation for four years, for an amount based
on the then present value of estimated future management fees.
If the Iowa Tribe elects to buy-out the contract, all
outstanding amounts owed to Lakes become immediately due and
payable if not already paid. Subject to certain conditions,
Lakes agreed to make advances for the Ioway Casino Resorts
working capital requirements, if needed, during the first month
after the Commencement Date. The advances are to be repaid
through an operating note payable from revenues generated by
future operations of the Ioway Casino Resort bearing interest at
two percent over the prime rate. Lakes also agrees to fund any
shortfall in certain minimum monthly Ioway Casino Resort
payments to the Iowa Tribe by means of non-interest bearing
advances under the same operating note.
Cimarron Casino. Lakes has entered into a
separate gaming consulting agreement (the Cimarron
Consulting Agreement) and management contract (the
Cimarron Management Contract) with the Iowa Tribe
with respect to the Cimarron Casino. Lakes has been operating
under the Cimarron Management Contract since mid-2006 after it
was approved by the NIGC. Prior to that time, Lakes operated
under the Cimarron Consulting Agreement and earned a flat
monthly fee of $50,000. The annual fee under the Cimarron
Management Contract is 30% of net income in excess of
$4 million.
Arrangement with Consultant. Lakes has an
agreement with Kevin Kean that will compensate him for his
consulting services (relating to the Iowa Tribe) rendered to
Lakes. Under this arrangement, subject to Mr. Kean
obtaining certain regulatory approvals, Mr. Kean will
receive 20% of Lakes fee compensation that is received
under the Iowa
42
Consulting Agreement, Iowa Management Contract and Cimarron
Management Contract with the Iowa Tribe (i.e., six percent of
the incremental total net income or 20% of Lakes 30%
share). This agreement provides that payments will be due to
Mr. Kean when Lakes is paid by the Iowa Tribe, assuming he
has been found suitable by the NIGC.
Our evaluation of the Ioway Casino Resort. The
following table outlines the status of each of the following
primary milestones necessary to complete the Ioway Casino Resort
as of March 30, 2008, December 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006. Both the positive and negative evidence
was reviewed during our evaluation of the critical milestones:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Critical milestone
|
|
|
March 30, 2008
|
|
|
December 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
Federal recognition of the tribe
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
Possession of usable land corresponding with needs based on
Lakes project plan
|
|
|
Yes, the Iowa Tribe has members that own a 74-acre allotment on
US Route 66 midway between the access points to Warwick and
Chandler, Oklahoma from I44. The Iowa Tribe has obtained the
rights to purchase and/or lease substantially all of this parcel
from the allottees. An additional 100 acres of fee land has
been optioned to provide the necessary site area for the
beginning of the project before the casino resort development
can begin.
|
|
|
Yes, the Iowa Tribe has members that own a 74-acre allotment on
US Route 66 midway between the access points to Warwick and
Chandler, Oklahoma from I44. The Iowa Tribe has obtained the
rights to purchase and/or lease substantially all of this parcel
from the allottees. An additional 100 acres of fee land has
been optioned to provide the necessary site area for the
beginning of the project before the casino resort development
can begin.
|
|
|
Yes, the Iowa Tribe has members that own a 74-acre allotment on
US Route 66 midway between the access points to Warwick and
Chandler, Oklahoma from I44. The Iowa Tribe has obtained the
rights to purchase and/or lease this parcel from the allottees.
An additional 100 acres of fee land has been optioned to
provide the necessary site area for the beginning of the project.
|
|
Usable land placed in trust by Federal government
|
|
|
Yes, the Iowa Tribe is currently leasing and acquiring land from
tribal members, which is held in trust for the individual tribal
members by the United States Government. These transactions
will need to be approved by the BIA.
|
|
|
Yes, the Iowa Tribe is currently leasing and acquiring land from
tribal members, which is held in trust for the individual tribal
members by the United States Government. These transactions
will need to be approved by the BIA.
|
|
|
Yes, the Iowa Tribe is currently leasing and acquiring land from
tribal members, which is held in trust for the individual tribal
members by the United States Government. These transactions
will need to be approved by the BIA.
|
|
Usable county agreement, if applicable
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Usable state compact that allows for gaming consistent with
that outlined in Lakes project plan
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
NIGC approval of management contract in current and desired
form
|
|
|
No, submitted to the NIGC for review on April 22, 2005. An EA
was prepared and on September 12, 2007, the NIGC issued their
notice of approval of a Finding Of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) for the EA. The 30 day public comment
period for the FONSI ended on November 2, 2007 without any
comment from the public. The expiration of the comment period
now allows the NIGC to approve the management contract. The NIGC
has stated that it is waiting for the BIA to approve all land
leases before it will issue an opinion on the management
contract. There have been no comments on the consulting
agreement from the NIGC and is therefore considered operative.
|
|
|
No, submitted to the NIGC for review on April 22, 2005. An EA
was prepared and on September 12, 2007, the NIGC issued their
notice of approval of a FONSI for the EA. The 30 day public
comment period for the FONSI ended on November 2, 2007 without
any comment from the public. The expiration of the comment
period now allows the NIGC to approve the management contract.
The NIGC has stated that it is waiting for the BIA to approve
all land leases before it will issue an opinion on the
management contract. There have been no comments on the
consulting agreement from the NIGC and is therefore considered
operative.
|
|
|
No, submitted to the NIGC for review on April 22, 2005. An EA is
currently being prepared and is necessary for the management
contract to be approved. Completion of the EA is expected by
Spring 2007. There have been no comments on the consulting
agreement from the NIGC and is therefore considered operative.
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Critical milestone
|
|
|
March 30, 2008
|
|
|
December 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
Resolution of all litigation and legal obstacles
|
|
|
None at this time.
|
|
|
None at this time.
|
|
|
None at this time.
|
|
Financing for construction
|
|
|
No, however, preliminary discussions with lending institutions
has occurred.
|
|
|
No, however, preliminary discussions with lending institutions
has occurred.
|
|
|
No, however, preliminary discussions with lending institutions
has occurred.
|
|
Any other significant project milestones or contingencies,
the outcome of which could have a material affect on the
probability of project completion as planned
|
|
|
No others known at this time by Lakes.
|
|
|
No others known at this time by Lakes.
|
|
|
No others known at this time by Lakes.
|
|
Our evaluation and conclusion regarding the above critical
milestones and progress. Long-term assets have
been recorded as it is considered probable that the Ioway Casino
Resort will result in economic benefit to us sufficient to
recover our investment. Based upon the above status of all
primary milestones and the projected fees to be earned under the
consulting agreements and management contracts, no impairment
has been recorded.
The Iowa Tribe is currently leasing and acquiring land from
tribal members, which is held in trust for the individual tribal
members by the United States Government. These transactions need
to be approved by the BIA. Lakes submitted its management
contract with the Iowa Tribe for the Ioway Casino Resort to the
NIGC for review in 2005. The NIGC has stated that it is waiting
for the BIA to approve all land leases before it will issue an
opinion on the management contract. The Ioway Casino Resort
could open in early 2010, pending the necessary regulatory
approvals.
Recently
issued accounting pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements-an amendment of ARB No. 51
(SFAS No. 160), which establishes
accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling
interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008, and early adoption is
prohibited. We are currently evaluating the effect that
SFAS No. 160 will have on our financial position,
results of operations and operating cash flows.
Seasonality
We believe that the operations of all casinos to be managed by
us will be affected by seasonal factors, including holidays,
weather and travel conditions. WPTEs license revenues are
affected by the timetable for delivery of episodes to TRV.
Regulation
and taxes
We and our casino projects are subject to extensive regulation
by state gaming authorities. We will also be subject to
regulation, which may or may not be similar to current state
regulations, by the appropriate authorities in any jurisdiction
where we may conduct gaming activities in the future. Changes in
applicable laws or regulations could have an adverse effect on
us.
The gaming industry represents a significant source of tax
revenues to regulators. From time to time, various federal
legislators and officials have proposed changes in tax law, or
in the administration of such law, affecting the gaming
industry. It is not possible to determine the likelihood of
possible changes in tax law or in the administration of such
law. Such changes, if adopted, could have a material adverse
effect on our future financial position, results of operations
and cash flows.
Off-balance
sheet arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are
reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our
financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or
expenses, results of operations, liquidity,
44
capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to
investors, except for the financing commitments previously
discussed.
Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a
safe harbor for forward-looking statements. Certain
information included in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
and other materials filed or to be filed by Lakes with the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) as well as information included in oral
statements or other written statements made or to be made by
Lakes contain statements that are forward-looking, such as plans
for future expansion and other business development activities
as well as other statements regarding capital spending,
financing sources and the effects of regulation (including
gaming and tax regulation) and competition.
Such forward looking information involves important risks and
uncertainties that could significantly affect the anticipated
results in the future and, accordingly, actual results may
differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking
statements made by or on behalf of Lakes.
These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to,
obtaining a sufficient number of signatures to place the Ohio
casino resort project on the November 4, 2008 Ohio
statewide election ballot or if the referendum is placed on that
ballot, that the referendum will pass or if the referendum
passes, that it will not subsequently be challenged or that
other developments will not prevent or delay the project; need
for current financing to meet Lakes operational and
development needs; those relating to the inability to complete
or possible delays in completion of Lakes casino projects,
including various regulatory approvals and numerous other
conditions which must be satisfied before completion of these
projects; possible termination or adverse modification of
management or development contracts; Lakes operates in a highly
competitive industry; possible changes in regulations; reliance
on continued positive relationships with Indian tribes and
repayment of amounts owed to Lakes by Indian tribes; possible
need for future financing to meet Lakes expansion goals;
risks of entry into new businesses; reliance on Lakes
management; and the fact that the WPT Enterprises, Inc. (NASDAQ:
WPTE) (WPTE) shares held by Lakes are currently not
liquid assets, and there is no assurance that Lakes will be able
to realize value from these holdings equal to the current or
future market value of WPTE common stock. There are also risks
and uncertainties relating to WPTE that may have a material
effect on Lakes consolidated results of operations or the
market value of the WPTE shares held by Lakes, including
WPTEs significant dependence on the GSN as a current
source of revenue, and the risk that GSN will not exercise its
options to air seasons of the WPT series beyond Season Six;
difficulty of predicting the growth of WPTEs online casino
business, which is a relatively new industry with an increasing
number of market entrants; reliance on the efforts of
CryptoLogic to develop and maintain the online gaming website in
compliance with WPTEs business model and applicable gaming
laws; the potential that WPTEs television programming will
fail to maintain a sufficient audience; the risk that WPTE may
not be able to protect its entertainment concepts, current and
future brands and other intellectual property rights; the risk
that competitors with greater financial resources or marketplace
presence might develop television programming that would
directly compete with WPTEs television programming; risks
associated with future expansion into new or complementary
businesses; the termination or impairment of WPTEs
relationships with key licensing and strategic partners; and
WPTEs dependence on its senior management team. For more
information, review Lakes filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. For further information regarding the risks
and uncertainties, see the Risk Factors section in
Item 1A of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
for the year ended December 30, 2007.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
Our financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents and
marketable securities. Our main investment objectives are the
preservation of investment capital and the maximization of
after-tax returns on our investment portfolio. Consequently, we
invest with only high-credit-quality issuers and limit the
amount of credit exposure to any one issuer.
Our cash and cash equivalents are not subject to significant
interest rate risk due to the short maturities of these
instruments. As of March 30, 2008, the carrying value of
our cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value. We also
hold short-term investments consisting of marketable debt
securities (principally consisting of commercial
45
paper, corporate bonds, and government securities) having a
weighted-average duration of one year or less. Consequently,
such securities are not subject to significant interest rate
risk. We also hold long-term investments in marketable
securities which consist of ARS. The types of ARS investments
that we own are backed by student loans, the majority of which
are guaranteed under the FFELP, and all have credit ratings of
AAA or Aaa.
Historically, these types of ARS investments have been highly
liquid using an auction process that resets the applicable
interest rate at predetermined intervals, typically every 7 to
35 days, to provide liquidity at par. However, as a result
of the recent liquidity issues experienced in the global credit
and capital markets, the auctions for all of our ARS failed
beginning in February 2008 when sell orders exceeded buy orders.
The failures of these auctions do not affect the value of the
collateral underlying the ARS, and we will continue to earn and
receive interest on our ARS at contractually set rates. However,
we will not be able to liquidate our ARS until the issuer calls
the security, a successful auction occurs, a buyer is found
outside of the auction process or the security matures. During
April 2008, we received account statements dated March 30,
2008, from the firms managing our ARS which estimated the fair
value of our ARS. We analyzed these statements and have
concluded that a decrease of $2.4 million in the estimated
fair value of the ARS we hold has occurred as a result of the
current lack of liquidity. We consider declines in the estimated
fair value of our ARS due to lack of liquidity to be temporary
impairments that have been recorded as an unrealized loss in the
shareholders equity section of our balance sheet as of
March 30, 2008.
Our primary exposure to market risk associated with changes in
interest rates involves our long-term assets related to Indian
casino projects in the form of notes receivable due from our
tribal partners for the development and construction of
Indian-owned casinos. The loans earn interest based upon a
defined reference rate. The floating interest rate will generate
more or less interest income if interest rates rise or fall. Our
notes receivable from Indian tribes related to properties under
development bear interest generally at prime plus one percent or
two percent, however, the interest is only payable if the casino
is successfully opened and distributable profits are available
from casino operations. We record our notes receivable at
estimated fair value, and subsequent changes in estimated fair
value are recorded as unrealized gains or losses in our
consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss. As
of March 30, 2008, we had $77.9 million of notes
receivable, at fair value with a floating interest rate
(principal amount of $84.1 million). Based on the
applicable current reference rates and assuming all other
factors remain constant, interest income for a 12 month
period would be approximately $6.1 million. A reference
rate increase of 100 basis points would result in an
increase in interest income of $0.8 million. A
100 basis point decrease in the reference rate would result
in a decrease of $0.8 million in interest income over the
same 12 month period.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
Under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our chief executive officer and chief
financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as such term is defined under
Rules 13a-15(e)
and Rule 15d 15(e) promulgated under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of the end of
the period covered by this quarterly report. Based on their
evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial
officer concluded that Lakes Entertainment, Inc.s
disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
There have been no changes (including corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies or material weaknesses) in
our internal control over financial reporting during the three
months ended March 30, 2008 that have materially affected,
or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
46
Part II.
Other Information
|
|
ITEM 1.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
WPTE
litigation.
In 2006, a legal action was commenced against WPTE by seven
poker players that alleged, among other things, an unfair
business practice of WPTE. On April 18, 2008, WPTE settled
this lawsuit without cost by agreeing to implement a new
standard player release form to be provided to all players at
all future WPT tournaments and events.
Miscellaneous
legal matters.
We and our subsidiaries (including WPTE) are involved in various
other inquiries, administrative proceedings, and litigation
relating to contracts and other matters arising in the normal
course of business. While any proceeding or litigation has an
element of uncertainty, management currently believes that the
likelihood of an unfavorable outcome is remote. Accordingly, no
provision for loss has been recorded in connection therewith.
There have been no material changes to our risk factors
identified in the Risk Factors section in
Item 1A of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
for the year ended December 30, 2007 except for the
following, which has been updated in its entirety:
If we
are unable to liquidate our investments in ARS to provide
liquidity when and as needed, and we are unable to obtain
additional financing in order to satisfy our cash requirements,
we may be forced to delay, scale back or eliminate some of our
expansion and development goals, or cease our operations
entirely.
Lakes entered into a client agreement with UBS effective
April 11, 2008 for the purpose of borrowing
and/or
obtaining credit in a principal amount not to exceed
$11.0 million (the Margin Account Agreement).
Lakes has made an initial draw under the Margin Account
Agreement in the principal amount of $3.0 million to be
used for working capital purposes. Lakes will be required to
seek additional sources of financing to fund additional costs it
plans to incur between August and November of this year
associated with the recently announced Ohio casino resort
project. These costs are dependent on various factors including
polling numbers, market studies and media efforts. Lakes is
currently exploring several financing alternatives and expects
to be able to obtain funding as necessary. WPTE does not believe
that any lack of liquidity during the next 12 months
relating to its ARS will have an impact on its ability to fund
its operations.
If additional financing is in the form of equity financing it
will be dilutive to our shareholders, and any debt financing may
involve additional restrictive covenants. We may raise
additional capital through either public or private financings
or the sale of some or all of our shares of WPTE. An inability
to raise such funds when needed might require us to delay, scale
back or eliminate some of our expansion and development goals.
In addition, we have the following new risk factors:
If the
referendum to amend the Ohio constitution to permit casino
gaming fails to get put on the November 4, 2008 Ohio
statewide election ballot, or if the referendum is put on the
ballot but it is not passed by the Ohio voters, or if the
referendum passes but it is subsequently challenged or other
events prevent the Ohio project, it is unlikely we will be
repaid amounts loaned to the joint venture.
We plan to loan the joint venture with Myohinow.com, LLC
approximately $8 million through August and an additional
amount from August to the November election depending on various
factors to fund the efforts to place the referendum to amend the
Ohio constitution to permit casino gaming on the
November 4, 2008 Ohio statewide election ballot and to
ensure that the referendum is passed by the Ohio voters. If the
proposed Ohio casino resort project does not proceed because the
referendum is not placed on the ballot, or the referendum
doesnt pass if placed
47
on the ballot or if the referendum passes but it is subsequently
challenged or other events prevent the Ohio project, it is
unlikely we will be repaid the amounts loaned to the joint
venture.
We may
be adversely impacted by economic factors beyond our control and
may incur additional impairment charges to our investment
portfolio.
As of March 30, 2008, we had $39.2 million of
principal invested in auction rate securities (ARS).
The types of ARS investments that we own are backed by student
loans, the majority of which are guaranteed under the Federal
Family Education Loan Program (FFELP), and all have
credit ratings of AAA or Aaa. We do not own any other type of
ARS investments. The estimated fair value of our ARS holdings at
March 30, 2008, was $36.8 million, which reflects a
$2.4 million adjustment to the principal value of
$39.2 million. We recorded an unrealized pre-tax loss of
$2.4 million in other comprehensive loss as a reduction in
shareholders equity, reflecting an impairment to our ARS
holdings that we have concluded as a temporary decline in value.
The credit and capital markets have continued to deteriorate
since the first quarter of 2008. If uncertainties in these
markets continue, these markets deteriorate further or we
experience any ratings downgrades on any ARS investments in our
portfolio, we may incur additional impairments to our ARS
investment portfolio, which could negatively affect our
financial condition, cash flow
and/or
reported earnings.
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibits
|
|
Description
|
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of CEO pursuant to Securities Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of CFO pursuant to Securities Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
48
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report on
Form 10-Q
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
LAKES ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
Registrant
Lyle Berman
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Timothy J. Cope
President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Dated: May 9, 2008
49