GOOD GAMING, INC. - Quarter Report: 2011 March (Form 10-Q)

10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

X . QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011

. TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ______ to _______

Commission File Number 333-158184

GMV WIRELESS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Nevada		26-3988293
(State of incorporation)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

345 S. End Avenue #7P

New York, NY 10280

(Address of principal executive offices)

(212) 786-1290

(Registrant’s telephone number)

with a copy to:

Carrillo Huettel & Zouvas, LLP

3033 Fifth Ave. Suite 400

San Diego, CA 92103

Telephone (619) 546-6100

Facsimile (619) 546-6060

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes X . No .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

(Not required) Yes . No .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer	.	Accelerated filer	.
Non-accelerated filer	. (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	X .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes X . No .

As of May 6, 2011, there were 44,850,000 shares of the registrant’s $0.001 par value common stock issued and outstanding.

GMV WIRELESS, INC.*

TABLE OF CONTENTS


		Page

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	3
ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	11
ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	13
ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	14

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	15
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	15
ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS	15
ITEM 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES	15
ITEM 4.	[REMOVED AND RESERVED]	16
ITEM 5.	OTHER INFORMATION	16
ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS	16

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Information included in this Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”). This information may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of GMV Wireless, Inc. (the “Company”), to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements, which involve assumptions and describe future plans, strategies and expectations of the Company, are generally identifiable by use of the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “intend,” or “project” or the negative of these words or other variations on these words or comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements are based on assumptions that may be incorrect, and there can be no assurance that these projections included in these forward-looking statements will come to pass. Actual results of the Company could differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. Except as required by applicable laws, the Company has no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason, even if new information becomes available or other events occur in the future.

*Please note that throughout this Quarterly Report, and unless otherwise noted, the words "we," "our," "us," the "Company," or "GMVW" refers to GMV Wireless, Inc.

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

GMV Wireless, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

March 31, 2011


	Index

Balance Sheets (unaudited)	4

Statements of Operations (unaudited)	5

Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)	6

Notes to the Financial Statements (unaudited)	7

GMV Wireless, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Balance Sheets

(expressed in U.S. dollars)

(unaudited)


	March 31, 2011 $	December 31, 2010 $
ASSETS

Current Assets

Cash	4,057	33,034

Total Assets	4,057	33,034
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

Current Liabilities

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	44,232	30,567
Due to related parties	16,465	11,965
Notes payable	139,600	139,600

Total Liabilities	200,297	182,132

Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)


Common Stock Authorized: 75,000,000 common shares, with a par value of $0.001 per share Issued and outstanding: 44,850,000 common shares	44,850	44,850

Additional paid-in capital	(25,451)	(25,451)

Deficit accumulated during the development stage	(215,639)	(168,497)

Total Stockholders’ Deficit	(196,240)	(149,098)

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit	4,057	33,034

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements)

GMV Wireless, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Statements of Operations

(expressed in U.S. dollars)

(unaudited)


	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 $	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 $	Accumulated from November 3, 2008 (date of inception) to March 31, 2011 $

Revenue	–	–	–

Operating Expenses

Consulting fees	20,000	–	80,000
General and administrative	605	255	2,158
Management fees	7,500	2,500	31,227
Professional fees	15,000	20,000	78,550
Transfer agent fees	518	238	14,987

Loss Before Other Expense	43,623	22,963	206,922

Other Expense

Interest Expense	(3,519)	(51)	(8,717)

Net Loss for the Period	(47,142)	(23,014)	(215,639)

Net Loss Per Share, Basic and Diluted	–	–

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding	44,850,000	44,850,000

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements)

GMV Wireless, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Statements of Cash Flows

(expressed in U.S. dollars)

(unaudited)


	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 $	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 $	Accumulated from November 3, 2008 (date of inception) to March 31, 2011 $
Operating Activities

Net loss for the period	(47,142)	(23,014)	(215,639)

Adjustment to reconcile net loss to cash used in operating activities:

Stock-based compensation	–	–	2,227
Shares issued for management fees	–	1,500	7,000

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	13,665	15,739	44,232
Due to related parties	4,500	–	16,465

Net Cash Used in Operating Activities	(28,977)	(5,775)	(145,715)

Financing activities

Proceeds from loan payable	–	7,100	139,600
Proceeds from related parties	–	–	2,649
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock	–	–	7,523

Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities	–	7,100	149,772

Increase (decrease) in Cash	(28,977)	1,325	4,057

Cash, Beginning of Period	33,034	–	–

Cash, End of Period	4,057	1,336	4,057


Supplemental Disclosures
Interest paid	–	–	–
Income tax paid	–	–	–

Non-cash investing and financing activities
Forgiveness of related party debt	–	2,649	2,649

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements)

GMV Wireless, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Financial Statements

(expressed in U.S. dollars)

(unaudited)

Nature of Operations and Continuance of Business

GMV Wireless, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated on November 3, 2008 under the laws of the State of Nevada. A substantial portion of the Company’s activities has involved developing a business plan and establishing contacts and visibility in the marketplace and the Company has not generated any revenue to date. The Company plans to engage in the business of providing wireless Internet services (“Wi-Fi”), primarily to the hospitality industry.

Going Concern

These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies that the Company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has generated no revenues to date and has never paid any dividends and is unlikely to pay dividends or generate significant earnings in the immediate or foreseeable future. As of March 31, 2011, the Company had a working capital deficit of $196,240 and an accumulated deficit of $215,639. The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon the continued financial support from its shareholders, the ability to raise equity or debt financing, and the attainment of profitable operations from the Company's future business. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include any adjustments to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

These financial statements and related notes are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and are expressed in US dollars. The Company’s fiscal year-end is December 31.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States and requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to stock-based compensation and deferred income tax asset valuation allowances. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had no cash equivalents.

Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share

The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, which requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing Diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti dilutive.

GMV Wireless, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Financial Statements

(expressed in U.S. dollars)

(unaudited)

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Interim Financial Statements

These interim unaudited financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual financial statements and in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods shown. The results of operations for such periods are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for a full year or for any future period.

Comprehensive Loss

ASC 220, Comprehensive Income, establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive loss and its components in the financial statements. As at March 31, 2011, the Company has no items that represent comprehensive loss and, therefore, has not included a schedule of comprehensive loss in the financial statements.

Financial Instruments

ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements” and ASC 825, Financial Instruments, requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. It establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to measure fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. It prioritizes the inputs into three levels that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1

Level 1 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2

Level 2 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.

Level 3

Level 3 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The Company’s financial instruments consist principally of cash, accounts payable, and amounts due to related parties. The fair value of our cash is determined based on “Level 1” inputs, which consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. We believe that the recorded values of all of our other financial instruments approximate their current fair values because of their nature and respective maturity dates or durations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09 “Subsequent Events (ASC Topic 855) “Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements” (“ASU No. 2010-09”). ASU No. 2010-09 requires an entity that is an SEC filer to evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued and removes the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date, in both issued and revised financial statements, through which the filer had evaluated subsequent events. The adoption did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.” ASU No. 2010-06 amends FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 and clarifies and provides additional disclosure requirements related to recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements and employers’ disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets. This ASU is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009. The adoption of ASU 2010-06 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

GMV Wireless, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Financial Statements

(expressed in U.S. dollars)

(unaudited)

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)

In January 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure, to require reporting entities to separately disclose the amounts and business rationale for significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and separately present information regarding purchase, sale, issuance, and settlement of Level 3 fair value measures on a gross basis. This standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 with the exception of disclosures regarding the purchase, sale, issuance, and settlement of Level 3 fair value measures which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC 505, Equity, where entities that declare dividends to shareholders that may be paid in cash or shares at the election of the shareholders are considered to be a share issuance that is reflected prospectively in EPS, and is not accounted for as a stock dividend. This standard is effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2009 and is to be applied on a retrospective basis. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In October 2009, FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to the accounting for revenue in arrangements with multiple deliverables including how the arrangement consideration is allocated among delivered and undelivered items of the arrangement. Among the amendments, this standard eliminated the use of the residual method for allocating arrangement considerations and requires an entity to allocate the overall consideration to each deliverable based on an estimated selling price of each individual deliverable in the arrangement in the absence of having vendor-specific objective evidence or other third party evidence of fair value of the undelivered items. This standard also provides further guidance on how to determine a separate unit of accounting in a multiple-deliverable revenue arrangement and expands the disclosure requirements about the judgments made in applying the estimated selling price method and how those judgments affect the timing or amount of revenue recognition. This standard, for which the Company is currently assessing the impact, will become effective on January 1, 2011.

The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect. These pronouncements did not have any material impact on the financial statements unless otherwise disclosed, and the Company does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

GMV Wireless, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Financial Statements

(expressed in U.S. dollars)

(unaudited)

Related Party Transaction

In March 2010, the former President of the Company forgave $2,649, representing all outstanding amounts owing from the Company. The amount has been recorded against the amounts due to related party with a corresponding credit to additional paid-in capital.

As of March 31, 2011, the President of the Company was owed $16,465 (2010 - $11,965). The amount owing is unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand.

Notes Payable

As of March 31, 2011, the Company issued various notes payable totalling $34,600 (2010 - $34,600) to non-related parties. These amounts owing are unsecured, due at 10% per annum, and due on demand. As of March 31, 2011, accrued interest of $3,336 has been recorded in accrued liabilities.

On September 28, 2010, the Company issued a demand note to a non-related party for $105,000 (2010 - $105,000). Under the terms of the note, the amount owing is unsecured, due interest of 10% per annum, and due on or before September 28, 2011. As of March 31, 2011, accrued interest of $5,381 has been recorded in accrued liabilities.

Common Stock

On March 9, 2011, the Company and its Board of Directors approved a thirty-to-one (30:1) forward stock split of all issued and outstanding common shares. The effect of the forward stock split increased the number of issued and outstanding common shares from 1,495,000 shares to 44,850,000 shares, and the forward stock split has been applied on a retroactive basis since the Company’s inception date.

Commitment

On February 23, 2010, the Company signed a management agreement with the President and Director of the Company. Under the terms of the management agreement, the Company will remit $2,500 per month comprised of $1,000 cash and $1,500 of common shares of the Company at $0.15 per common share. The agreement was amended on October 1, 2010 to remit $2,500 per month in cash.

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION OR PLAN OF OPERATION

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) contains forward-looking statements that involve known and unknown risks, significant uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed, or implied, by those forward-looking statements. You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of the words may, will, should, could, expects, plans, anticipates, believes, estimates, predicts, intends, potential, proposed, or continue or the negative of those terms. These statements are only predictions. In evaluating these statements, you should consider various factors which may cause our actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the exceptions reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Therefore, actual results may differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Working Capital


	March 31,	December 31,
	2011 $	2010 $
Current Assets	4,057	33,034
Current Liabilities	200,297	182,132
Working Capital (Deficit)	(196,240)	(149,098)

Cash Flows


	March 31, 2011 $	March 31, 2010 $
Cash Flows from (used in) Operating Activities	(28,977)	(5,775)
Cash Flows from (used in) Financing Activities	-	7,100
Net Increase (decrease) in Cash During Period	(28,977)	1,325

Operating Revenues

We have not generated any revenues since inception.

Operating Expenses and Net Loss

Operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2011 were $43,623 compared with $22,963 for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase of $20,660 was attributed to the fact that the Company incurred $20,000 in consulting fees and incurred an additional $5,000 in management fees as the President and Director of the Company is paid $2,500 per month whereas in prior year, the President and Director only received $2,500 per quarter. The increase was offset by a decrease in professional fees of $5,000 attribute to lower legal fees.

During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company recorded a net loss of $47,142 compared with a net loss of $23,014 for the three months ended March 31, 2010. In addition to the above, the Company incurred an increase of $3,468 of interest expense relating to debt balances of $139,600 at 10% per annum in fiscal 2011 compared to just $7,100 at 10% per annum in the same period in prior year.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As at March 31, 2011, the Company’s cash balance and total assets were $4,057 compared to $33,034 as at December 31, 2010. The decrease in total assets is attributed to the fact that the Company incurred operating expenses during the first quarter of fiscal 2011 and did not support costs with new equity or debt financing.

As at March 31, 2011, the Company had total liabilities of $200,297 compared with total liabilities of $182,132 as at December 31, 2010. The increase in total liabilities is attributed to increases in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $13,665 due to timing differences between the payment terms of various operating expenditures.

As at March 31, 2011, the Company has a working capital deficit of $196,240 compared with $149,098 at December 31, 2010 and the increase in the working capital deficit is attributed to the use of existing cash to settle obligations.

Cashflow from Operating Activities

During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company used $28,977 of cash for operating activities compared to the use of $5,775 of cash for operating activities during the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase in the use of cash for operating activities was attributed to the fact that the Company paid for outstanding and current obligations with existing cash raised from debt financing.

Cashflow from Financing Activities

During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company received $nil of proceeds from financing activities compared to $7,100 during the three months ended March 31, 2010. The decrease in proceeds from financing activities was due to the fact that the Company did not raise any new financing from debt or equity sources during the first quarter of fiscal 2011.

Going Concern

We have not attained profitable operations and are dependent upon obtaining financing to pursue any extensive acquisitions and activities. For these reasons, our auditors stated in their report on our audited financial statements that they have substantial doubt that we will be able to continue as a going concern without further financing.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no significant off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to stockholders.

Future Financings

We will continue to rely on equity sales of our common shares in order to continue to fund our business operations. Issuances of additional shares will result in dilution to existing stockholders. There is no assurance that we will achieve any additional sales of the equity securities or arrange for debt or other financing to fund our operations and other activities.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our financial statements and accompanying notes have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles applied on a consistent basis. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.

We regularly evaluate the accounting policies and estimates that we use to prepare our financial statements. A complete summary of these policies is included in the notes to our financial statements. In general, management's estimates are based on historical experience, on information from third party professionals, and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the facts and circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates made by management.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-09 (“ASU No. 2010-09”), “Subsequent Events (ASC Topic 855): Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements.” ASU No. 2010-09 requires an entity that is an SEC filer to evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued and removes the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date, in both issued and revised financial statements, through which the filer had evaluated subsequent events. The Company’s adoption of provisions of ASU No. 2010-09 did not have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06 (“ASU No. 2010-06”), “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.” ASU No. 2010-06 amends FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 and clarifies and provides additional disclosure requirements related to recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements and employers’ disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets. This ASU is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009. The Company’s adoption of provisions of ASU No. 2010-06 did not have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

In January 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC Topic 505, “Equity”, where entities that declare dividends to shareholders that may be paid in cash or shares at the election of the shareholders are considered to be a share issuance that is reflected prospectively in EPS, and is not accounted for as a stock dividend. This standard is effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2009 and is to be applied on a retrospective basis. The Company’s adoption of the amendment to ASC Topic 505 did not have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

In January 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure”, to require reporting entities to separately disclose the amounts and business rationale for significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and separately present information regarding purchase, sale, issuance, and settlement of Level 3 fair value measures on a gross basis. This standard, for which the Company is currently assessing the impact, is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 with the exception of disclosures regarding the purchase, sale, issuance, and settlement of Level 3 fair value measures which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company’s adoption of the amendment to ASC Topic 820 did not have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Management’s Quarterly Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by our company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of March 31, 2011, due to the material weaknesses resulting from the Board of Directors not currently having any independent members and no director qualifies as an audit committee financial expert as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K, and controls were not designed and in place to ensure that all disclosures required were originally addressed in our financial statements. Please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on March 29, 2011, for a complete discussion relating to the foregoing evaluation of Disclosures and Procedures.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management has also evaluated our internal control over financial reporting, and there have been no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect those controls subsequent to the date of our last evaluation.

The Company is not required by current SEC rules to include, and does not include, an auditor's attestation report. The Company's registered public accounting firm has not attested to Management's reports on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in “Internal Control - Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO").

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2011, the Company determined that there were control deficiencies that constituted material weaknesses, as described below:


1.	We do not have an Audit Committee or a financial expert on our Board of Directors –Currently, the Board of Directors acts in the capacity of the Audit Committee. All members of the Board of Directors lack sufficient financial expertise for overseeing financial reporting responsibilities.


2.	Reporting Deficiencies: We did not maintain a sufficient level of expertise in our Company to oversee the reporting and disclosure of the financial statements and related footnotes, in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles and also in accordance with SEC disclosure requirements.

Accordingly, the Company concluded that these control deficiencies resulted in a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by the Company’s internal controls.

In light of the material weaknesses discussed above, we engaged consultants to augment our reporting criteria and perform other post-closing procedures to ensure that our consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, we believe that the consolidated financial statements included in this report fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

As a result of the material weaknesses described above, management has concluded that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2011 based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by COSO.

Continuing Remediation Efforts to address deficiencies in Company’s Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Once the Company is engaged in a business of merit and has sufficient personnel available, then our Board of Directors, in particular and in connection with the aforementioned deficiencies, will establish the following remediation measures:

Our Board of Directors will nominate an audit committee or a financial expert on our Board of Directors in fiscal 2011.

We will appoint additional personnel to assist with the preparation of the Company’s monthly financial reporting, including preparation of the monthly bank reconciliations.

Changes In Internal Control and Financial Reporting

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We know of no material, existing or pending legal proceedings against our company, nor are we involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending litigation. There are no proceedings in which our director, officer or any affiliates, or any registered or beneficial shareholder, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to our interest.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

ITEM 2.

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

1. Quarterly Issuances:

During the quarter, we did not issue any unregistered securities other than as previously disclosed.

2. Subsequent Issuances:

Subsequent to the quarter, we did not issue any unregistered securities other than as previously disclosed.

ITEM 3.

DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4.

[REMOVED AND RESERVED]

ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION

On March 9, 2011, the Company effectuated a forward split of its issued and outstanding common shares, whereby every one (1) old share of common stock was exchanged for thirty (30) new shares of the Company's common stock. As a result, the issued and outstanding shares of common stock increased from 1,495,000 prior to the forward split to 44,850,000 following the forward split. The forward split shares are payable upon surrender of certificates to the Company's transfer agent. On March 9, 2011, the Company’s common stock began trading under the symbol “GMVWD”. On April 7, 2011, the "D" (appended to the symbol to reflect the dividend) was dropped and the symbol is again "GMVW."

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS


Exhibit Number	Description of Exhibit	Filing
3.01	Articles of Incorporation	Filed with the SEC on March 24, 2009 as part of our Registration Statement on Form S-1.
3.02	Bylaws	Filed with the SEC on March 24, 2009 as part of our Registration Statement on Form S-1.
10.01	Management Agreement between the Company and Mr. Mark Simon dated March 22, 2010.	Filed with the SEC on April 7, 2010 as part of our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
10.02	Promissory Note issued to Newton Management Ltd. dated September 28, 2010.	Filed with the SEC on October 8, 2010 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K.
10.03	Investors Relations Services Agreement with Blue Chip IR dated October 1, 2010	Filed with the SEC on November 15, 2010 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
10.04	Amended Management Agreement between the Company and Mr. Mark Simon dated November 4, 2010.	Filed with the SEC on November 10, 2010 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K.
14.01	Code of Ethics	Filed with the SEC on March 29, 2011 as part of our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
16.01	Letter from Former Accountant Li & Company, PC, dated March 16, 2010	Filed with the SEC on March 16, 2010 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K.
31.01	Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14	Filed herewith.
31.02	Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14	Filed herewith.
32.01	CEO and CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act	Filed herewith.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



	GMV WIRELESS, INC.

Dated: May 12, 2011	By: /s/ Mark Simon
		By: Mark Simon
		Its: Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, President, Secretary and Treasurer

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Dated: May 12, 2011

/s/ Mark Simon

By: Mark Simon

Its: Director