Annual Statements Open main menu

HMN FINANCIAL INC - Quarter Report: 2012 June (Form 10-Q)

Form 10-Q
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

 

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012

OR

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) FOR THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File Number 0-24100

 

 

HMN FINANCIAL, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)

 

 

 

Delaware   41-1777397

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)

1016 Civic Center Drive N.W., Rochester, MN   55901
(Address of principal executive offices)   (ZIP Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (507) 535-1200

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer   ¨    Accelerated filer   ¨
Non-accelerated filer   ¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    Smaller reporting company   x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date.

 

Class

  

Outstanding at July 18, 2012

Common stock, $0.01 par value    4,423,589

 

 

 


Table of Contents

HMN FINANCIAL, INC.

CONTENTS

 

          Page  

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

  

Item 1:

  

Financial Statements (unaudited)

  
  

Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011

     3   
  

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three Months Ended and Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

     4   
  

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the Six Month Period Ended June 30, 2012

     5   
  

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

     6   
  

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

     7   

Item 2:

  

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

     25   

Item 3:

  

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk (Included in Item 2 under Market Risk)

     37   

Item 4:

  

Controls and Procedures

     39   

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

  

Item 1:

  

Legal Proceedings

     40   

Item 1A:

  

Risk Factors

     42   

Item 2:

  

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

     42   

Item 3:

  

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

     42   

Item 4:

  

Mine Safety Disclosures

     42   

Item 5:

  

Other Information

     42   

Item 6:

  

Exhibits

     42   

Signatures

        43   

 

2


Table of Contents

Part I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1: Financial Statements

HMN FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

(Dollars in thousands)

   June 30,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 
     (unaudited)        
Assets     

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 65,618        67,840   

Securities available for sale:

    

Mortgage-backed and related securities (amortized cost $14,035 and $19,586)

     14,869        20,645   

Other marketable securities (amortized cost $61,699 and $105,700)

     61,420        105,469   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
     76,289        126,114   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loans held for sale

     2,601        3,709   

Loans receivable, net

     496,178        555,908   

Accrued interest receivable

     1,980        2,449   

Real estate, net

     12,732        16,616   

Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost

     4,063        4,222   

Mortgage servicing rights, net

     1,533        1,485   

Premises and equipment, net

     7,576        7,967   

Prepaid expenses and other assets

     1,744        2,262   

Assets held for sale

     0        1,583   

Deferred tax asset, net

     0        0   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 670,314        790,155   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity     

Deposits

   $ 534,297        620,128   

Deposits held for sale

     0        36,048   

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

     70,000        70,000   

Accrued interest payable

     518        780   

Customer escrows

     713        933   

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

     5,255        5,205   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     610,783        733,094   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

    

Stockholders’ equity:

    

Serial preferred stock ($.01 par value): authorized 500,000 shares; issued shares 26,000

     25,053        24,780   

Common stock ($.01 par value): authorized 11,000,000; issued shares 9,128,662

     91        91   

Additional paid-in capital

     52,096        53,462   

Retained earnings, subject to certain restrictions

     45,532        42,983   

Accumulated other comprehensive income

     199        471   

Unearned employee stock ownership plan shares

     (3,094     (3,191

Treasury stock, at cost 4,705,073 and 4,740,711 shares

     (60,346     (61,535
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

     59,531        57,061   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $ 670,314        790,155   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

HMN FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(unaudited)

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
    Six Months Ended
June 30,
 

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

   2012     2011     2012     2011  

Interest income:

        

Loans receivable

   $ 7,523        9,301        15,319        19,204   

Securities available for sale:

        

Mortgage-backed and related

     164        290        357        614   

Other marketable

     192        407        441        824   

Cash equivalents

     19        2        46        3   

Other

     54        45        64        114   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest income

     7,952        10,045        16,227        20,759   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Interest expense:

        

Deposits

     1,061        1,806        2,278        3,746   

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

     844        1,240        1,689        2,569   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest expense

     1,905        3,046        3,967        6,315   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest income

     6,047        6,999        12,260        14,444   

Provision for loan losses

     1,088        3,463        960        5,409   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

     4,959        3,536        11,300        9,035   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-interest income:

        

Fees and service charges

     834        925        1,663        1,849   

Mortgage servicing fees

     236        250        468        500   

Gain on sales of loans

     620        301        1,529        796   

Gain on sale of branch office

     0        0        552        0   

Other

     104        113        288        230   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-interest income

     1,794        1,589        4,500        3,375   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-interest expense:

        

Compensation and benefits

     3,219        3,512        6,632        7,072   

Loss on real estate owned

     174        143        97        190   

Occupancy

     839        916        1,721        1,856   

Deposit insurance

     305        407        575        811   

Data processing

     336        305        673        558   

Other

     1,485        2,209        2,903        3,797   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-interest expense

     6,358        7,492        12,601        14,284   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income tax benefit

     395        (2,367     3,199        (1,874

Income tax benefit

     0        (76     0        0   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

     395        (2,291     3,199        (1,874

Preferred stock dividends and discount

     464        457        925        906   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss) available to common shareholders

   $ (69     (2,748     2,274        (2,780
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

        

Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period

   $ (93     438        (272     324   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

   $ (93     438        (272     324   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common shareholders

   $ (162     (2,310     2,002        (2,456
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Basic earnings (loss) per common share

   $ (0.02     (0.72     0.58        (0.73
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share

   $ (0.02     (0.72     0.57        (0.73
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

HMN FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity

For the Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2012

(unaudited)

 

(Dollars in thousands)

   Preferred
Stock
     Common
Stock
     Additional
Paid-in
Capital
    Retained
Earnings
    Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
    Unearned
Employee
Stock
Ownership
Plan
Shares
    Treasury
Stock
    Total
Stock-
Holders’
Equity
 

Balance, December 31, 2011

   $ 24,780         91         53,462        42,983        471        (3,191     (61,535     57,061   

Net income

             3,199              3,199   

Other comprehensive loss

               (272         (272

Preferred stock discount amortization

     273            (273             0   

Stock compensation tax benefits

           4                4   

Unearned compensation restricted stock awards

           (1,199           1,199        0   

Restricted stock awards forfeited

           10              (10     0   

Amortization of restricted stock awards

           133                133   

Preferred stock dividends accrued

             (650           (650

Earned employee stock ownership plan shares

           (41         97          56   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance, June 30, 2012

   $ 25,053         91         52,096        45,532        199        (3,094     (60,346     59,531   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

HMN FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(unaudited)

 

     Six Months Ended
June 30,
 

(Dollars in thousands)

   2012     2011  

Cash flows from operating activities:

    

Net income (loss)

   $ 3,199        (1,874

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by operating activities:

    

Provision for loan losses

     960        5,409   

Depreciation

     570        640   

Amortization of premiums, net

     65        166   

Amortization of deferred loan fees

     (169     (294

Amortization of mortgage servicing rights, net

     348        213   

Capitalized mortgage servicing rights

     (396     (147

Loss on real estate

     97        190   

Gains on sales of loans

     (1,529     (796

Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale

     55,066        25,350   

Disbursements on loans held for sale

     (48,390     (19,237

Amortization of restricted stock awards

     133        152   

Amortization of unearned ESOP shares

     97        97   

Earned employee stock ownership shares priced below original cost

     (41     (38

Stock option compensation

     4        14   

Decrease in accrued interest receivable

     469        379   

Decrease in accrued interest payable

     (262     (194

Decrease in other assets

     521        867   

Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities

     (2,355     1,965   

Other, net

     99        119   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

     8,486        12,981   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

    

Principal collected on securities available for sale

     5,556        6,635   

Proceeds collected on maturities of securities available for sale

     60,000        80,000   

Purchases of securities available for sale

     (16,000     (69,028

Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

     0        (17

Redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

     159        1,186   

Proceeds from sales of real estate

     4,219        2,463   

Net decrease in loans receivable

     54,508        45,473   

Gain on sale of branch office

     (552     0   

Payment on sale of branch office

     (36,981     0   

Purchases of premises and equipment

     (175     (115
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by investing activities

     70,734        66,597   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

    

Decrease in deposits

     (81,222     (36,247

Repayment of borrowings

     0        (37,500

Decrease in customer escrows

     (220     (88
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used by financing activities

     (81,442     (73,835
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     (2,222     5,743   

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

     67,840        20,981   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

   $ 65,618        26,724   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Supplemental cash flow disclosures:

    

Cash paid for interest

   $ 4,229        6,509   

Cash paid for income taxes

     10        0   

Supplemental noncash flow disclosures:

    

Transfer of loans to real estate

     525        8,259   

Loans transferred to loans held for sale

     4,073        3,607   

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

6


Table of Contents

HMN FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

June 30, 2012 and 2011

(1) HMN Financial, Inc.

HMN Financial, Inc. (HMN or the Company) is a stock savings bank holding company that owns 100 percent of Home Federal Savings Bank (the Bank). The Bank has a community banking philosophy and operates retail banking and loan production offices in Minnesota and Iowa. The Bank has one wholly owned subsidiary, Osterud Insurance Agency, Inc. (OIA), which offers financial planning products and services. HMN has another wholly owned subsidiary, Security Finance Corporation (SFC), which is currently not actively engaged in any activities.

The consolidated financial statements included herein are for HMN, SFC, the Bank and OIA. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

(2) Basis of Preparation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with instructions for Form 10-Q and therefore, do not include all disclosures necessary for a complete presentation of the consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss), consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity and consolidated statements of cash flows in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. However, all normal recurring adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair presentation of the interim financial statements have been included. The results of operations for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 is not necessarily indicative of the results which may be expected for the entire year.

(3) New Accounting Standards

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-03, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860), Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements. This ASU prescribes when an entity may or may not recognize a sale upon the transfer of financial assets subject to repurchase agreements. That determination is based, in part, on whether the entity has maintained effective control over the transferred assets. The amendments in this ASU removed from the assessment of effective control (1) the criterion requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee, and (2) the collateral maintenance implementation guidance related to that criterion. Other criteria applicable to the assessment of effective control are not changed by the amendments in this ASU. This ASU is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011 and should be applied prospectively to transactions or modification of existing transactions that occur on or after the effective date. The adoption of this ASU in the first quarter of 2012 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820), Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. The amendments in this ASU change the wording used to describe the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements in order to improve consistency in wording between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. Also, the amendments in the ASU require that for each class of assets and liabilities not measured at fair value on the balance sheet but for which the fair value is disclosed, the Company shall disclose the fair value hierarchy for each asset and liability class. This ASU is effective for interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this ASU in the first quarter of 2012 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements other than to change the disclosures relating to fair value measurements.

June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), Presentation of Comprehensive Income. Prior to this ASU, U.S. GAAP allowed reporting entities three alternatives for presenting other comprehensive income and its components in financial statements. The first two options were to present this information in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The third option, which was used by the Company, was to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. This ASU eliminates the third option and therefore the

 

7


Table of Contents

Company selected to present this information in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this ASU in the first quarter of 2012 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements other than to change the presentation of other comprehensive income as discussed above.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210). The objective of this ASU is to provide enhanced disclosures that will enable users of its financial statements to evaluate the effect or potential effect of rights of setoff associated with an entity’s financial position. This includes the effect or potential effect of rights of setoff associated with an entity’s recognized assets and recognized liabilities within the scope of this ASU. The amendments require enhanced disclosures by requiring improved information about financial instruments and derivative instruments that are either (1) offset in accordance with either Section 210-20-45 or Section 815-10-45 or (2) subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement, irrespective of whether they are offset in accordance with either Section 210-20-45 or Section 815-10-45. An entity is required to apply the amendments for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods with those annual periods. The adoption of this ASU in the first quarter of 2013 is not anticipated to have any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as it currently has no outstanding rights of setoff.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220). The amendments in this ASU supersede certain pending paragraphs in ASU 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income, to effectively defer only those changes in ASU 2011-05 that relate to the presentation of reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income. All other requirements in ASU 2011-05 are not affected by this ASU, including the requirement to report comprehensive income either in a single continuous financial statement or in two separate but consecutive financial statements. The amendments in this ASU will be temporary to allow the FASB time to redeliberate the presentation requirements for reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income for annual and interim financial statements for public, private, and non-profit entities. The adoption of this ASU in the first quarter of 2012 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements other than to change the presentation of other comprehensive income as discussed above.

(4) Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

The Company has commitments outstanding to extend credit to future borrowers that have not closed prior to the end of the quarter. The Company intends to sell these commitments, which are referred to as its “mortgage pipeline.” As commitments to originate or purchase loans enter the mortgage pipeline, the Company generally enters into commitments to sell the mortgage pipeline into the secondary market on a firm commitment or best efforts basis. The commitments to originate, purchase or sell loans on a firm commitment basis are derivatives. As a result of marking to market the mortgage pipeline and the related firm commitments to sell for the period ended June 30, 2012, the Company recorded an increase in other assets of $1,000, an increase in other liabilities of $2,000 and a loss included in the gain on sales of loans of $1,000.

The current commitments to sell loans held for sale are derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting. As a result, these derivatives are marked to market and the related loans held for sale are recorded at the lower of cost or market. The Company recorded a decrease in other liabilities of $30,000 and a gain included in the gain on sales of loans of $30,000.

(5) Fair Value Measurements

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements establishes a framework for measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities using a hierarchy system consisting of three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:

Level 1 – Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets that the Company has the ability to access.

Level 2 – Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which significant assumptions are observable in the market.

 

8


Table of Contents

Level 3 – Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market and are used only to the extent that observable inputs are not available. These unobservable assumptions reflect our own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.

The following table summarizes the assets and liabilities of the Company for which fair values are determined on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

 

                                                           
     Carrying value at June 30, 2012  
(Dollars in thousands)    Total      Level 1      Level 2      Level 3  

Securities available for sale

   $ 76,289         146         76,143         0   

Mortgage loan commitments

     30         0         30         0   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $   76,319         146           76,173         0   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

                                                           
     Carrying value at December 31, 2011  
(Dollars in thousands)    Total     Level 1      Level 2     Level 3  

Securities available for sale

   $ 126,114        613         125,501        0   

Mortgage loan commitments

     (94     0         (94     0   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $ 126,020        613         125,407        0   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

There were no transfers between Levels 1, 2, or 3 during the three or six month periods ended June 30, 2012.

The Company may also be required, from time to time, to measure certain other financial assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. These adjustments to fair value usually result from the application of the lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

For assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in the second quarter of 2012 that were still held at June 30, 2012, the following table provides the level of valuation assumptions used to determine each adjustment and the carrying value of the related individual assets or portfolios at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011

 

     Carrying value at June 30, 2012               
(Dollars in thousands)    Total      Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Three
months
ended

June  30,
2012

Total
gains
(losses)
    Six
months
ended

June  30,
2012

Total
gains
(losses)
 

Loans held for sale

   $ 2,601         0         2,601         0         26        (30

Mortgage servicing rights

     1,533         0         1,533         0         0        0   

Loans (1)

     41,983         0         41,983         0         (273     (1,374

Real estate, net (2)

     12,732         0         12,732         0         (303     (442
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $ 58,849         0         58,849         0         (550     (1,846
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

     Carrying value at December 31, 2011         

(Dollars in thousands)

   Total      Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Year ended
December 31,
2011 Total
Gains
(Losses)
 

Loans held for sale

   $ 3,709         0         3,709         0         129   

Mortgage servicing rights

     1,485         0         1,485         0         0   

Loans (1)

     38,162         0         38,162         0         (4,167

Real estate, net (2)

     16,616         0         16,616         0         (2,690

Assets held for sale

     1,583         0         1,583         0         0   

Deposits held for sale

     36,048         0         36,048         0         0   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 97,603         0         97,603         0         (6,728
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) Represents the carrying value and related specific reserves on loans for which adjustments are based on the appraised value of the collateral. The carrying value of loans fully charged-off is zero.
(2) Represents the fair value and related losses of foreclosed real estate and other collateral owned that were measured at fair value subsequent to their initial classification as foreclosed assets.

 

9


Table of Contents

(6) Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Generally accepted accounting principles require interim reporting period disclosure about the fair value of financial instruments, including assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. The fair value hierarchy level for each asset and liability, as defined in note 5, have been included in the following table for June 30, 2012 as required by the adoption of ASU 2011-04 in the first quarter of 2012. The fair value estimates are made based upon relevant market information, if available, and upon the characteristics of the financial instruments themselves. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based upon judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments and other factors. The estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are shown below.

 

     June 30, 2012      December 31, 2011  
                  Fair value hierarchy                          

(Dollars in thousands)

   Carrying
amount
    Estimated
fair value
    Level 1      Level 2      Level 3    Contract
amount
     Carrying
amount
    Estimated
fair value
    Contract
Amount
 

Financial assets:

                      

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 65,618        65,618        65,618                  67,840        67,840     

Securities available for sale

     76,289        76,289        146         76,143               126,114        126,114     

Loans held for sale

     2,601        2,601           2,601               3,709        3,709     

Loans receivable, net

     496,178        505,096           505,096               555,908        566,266     

Federal Home Loan Bank stock

     4,063        4,063           4,063               4,222        4,222     

Accrued interest receivable

     1,980        1,980           1,980               2,449        2,449     

Assets held for sale

     0        0                    1,583        1,605     

Financial liabilities:

                      

Deposits

     534,297        534,297           534,297               620,128        620,128     

Deposits held for sale

     0        0                    36,048        36,048     

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

     70,000        74,296           74,296               70,000        74,433     

Accrued interest payable

     518        518           518               780        780     

Off-balance sheet financial instruments:

                      

Commitments to extend credit

     30        30                 90,266         29        29        91,113   

Commitments to sell loans

     (67     (67              5,810         (94     (94     7,263   

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximates their fair value.

Securities Available for Sale

The fair values of securities were based upon quoted market prices for identical or similar instruments in active markets.

Loans Held for Sale

The fair values of loans held for sale were based upon quoted market prices for loans with similar interest rates and terms to maturity.

Loans Receivable

The fair values of loans receivable were estimated for groups of loans with similar characteristics. The fair value of the loan portfolio, with the exception of the adjustable rate portfolio, was calculated by discounting the scheduled cash flows through the estimated maturity using anticipated prepayment speeds and using discount rates that reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in each loan portfolio. The fair value of the adjustable loan portfolio was estimated by grouping the loans with similar characteristics and comparing the characteristics of each group to the prices quoted for similar types of loans in the secondary market. This method of estimating fair value does not incorporate the exit-price concept of fair value prescribed by ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.

 

10


Table of Contents

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

The carrying amount of FHLB stock approximates its fair value.

Accrued Interest Receivable

The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable approximates its fair value since it is short-term in nature and does not present unanticipated credit concerns.

Deposits

The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts and certain money market account deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. If the fair value of the fixed maturity certificates of deposit is calculated at less than the carrying amount, the carrying value of these deposits is reported as the fair value.

The fair value estimate for deposits does not include the benefit that results from the low cost funding provided by the Company’s existing deposits and long-term customer relationships compared to the cost of obtaining different sources of funding. This benefit is commonly referred to as the core deposit intangible.

Federal Home Loan Bank Advances

The fair values of advances with fixed maturities are estimated based on discounted cash flow analysis using as discount rates the interest rates charged by the FHLB for borrowings of similar remaining maturities.

Accrued Interest Payable

The carrying amount of accrued interest payable approximates its fair value since it is short-term in nature.

Commitments to Extend Credit

The fair values of commitments to extend credit are estimated using the fees normally charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counter parties.

Commitments to Sell Loans

The fair values of commitments to sell loans are estimated using the quoted market prices for loans with similar interest rates and terms to maturity.

(7) Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Other comprehensive income (loss) is defined as the change in equity during a period from transactions and other events from nonowner sources. Comprehensive income (loss) is the total of net income (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss), which for the Company is comprised of unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale. The components of other comprehensive income (loss) and the related tax effects were as follows:

 

     For the three months ended June 30,  
(Dollars in thousands)    2012     2011  
   Before tax     Tax effect      Net of tax     Before tax      Tax effect      Net of tax  

Securities available for sale:

               

Net unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period

   $ (93     0         (93     514         76         438   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

   $ (93     0         (93     514         76         438   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

     For the six months ended June 30,  
(Dollars in thousands)    2012     2011  
   Before tax     Tax effect      Net of tax     Before tax      Tax effect      Net of tax  

Securities available for sale:

               

Net unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period

   $ (272     0         (272     324         0         324   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

   $ (272     0         (272     324         0         324   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

(8) Securities Available For Sale

The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair value for the securities available for sale portfolio, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

 

11


Table of Contents

 

     June 30, 2012  
     Less than twelve months      Twelve months or more     Total  

(Dollars in thousands)

   # of
Investments
     Fair
Value
     Unrealized
Losses
     # of
Investments
     Fair
Value
     Unrealized
Losses
    Fair
Value
     Unrealized
Losses
 

Other marketable securities:

                      

Corporate preferred stock

     0       $ 0         0         1       $ 245         (455   $ 245         (455
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total temporarily impaired securities

     0       $ 0         0         1       $ 245         (455   $ 245         (455
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

     December 31, 2011  
     Less than twelve months      Twelve months or more     Total  

(Dollars in thousands)

   # of
Investments
     Fair
Value
     Unrealized
Losses
     # of
Investments
     Fair
Value
     Unrealized
Losses
    Fair
Value
     Unrealized
Losses
 

Other marketable securities:

                      

Corporate preferred stock

     0       $ 0         0         1       $ 175         (525   $ 175         (525
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total temporarily impaired securities

     0       $ 0         0         1       $ 175         (525   $ 175         (525
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

We review our investment portfolio on a quarterly basis for indications of impairment. This review includes analyzing the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been lower than the cost, the market liquidity for the investment, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, including any specific events which may influence the operations of the issuer, and our intent and ability to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to recover the temporary loss.

The unrealized losses reported for corporate preferred stock at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 related to a single trust preferred security that was issued by the holding company of a small community bank. Typical of most trust preferred issuances, the issuer has the ability to defer interest payments for up to five years with interest payable on the deferred balance. In October 2009, the issuer elected to defer its scheduled interest payments as allowed by the terms of the security agreement. The issuer’s subsidiary bank has incurred operating losses due to increased provisions for loan losses but still meets the regulatory requirements to be considered “adequately capitalized” based on its most recent regulatory filing. Based on a review of the issuer, it was determined that the trust preferred security was not other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2012. The Company does not intend to sell the preferred stock and has the intent and ability to hold it for a period of time sufficient to recover the temporary loss. Management believes that the Company will receive all principal and interest payments contractually due on the security and that the decrease in the market value is primarily due to a lack of liquidity in the market for trust preferred securities and the deferral of interest by the issuer. Management will continue to monitor the credit risk of the issuer and may be required to recognize other-than-temporary impairment charges on this security in future periods.

A summary of securities available for sale at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is as follows:

 

(Dollars in thousands)

   Amortized
cost
     Gross
unrealized
gains
     Gross
unrealized
losses
    Fair value  

June 30, 2012:

          

Mortgage-backed securities:

          

FHLMC

   $ 8,201         438         0        8,639   

FNMA

     5,689         395         0        6,084   

Collateralized mortgage obligations:

          

FHLMC

     145         1         0        146   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 
     14,035         834         0        14,869   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other marketable securities:

          

U.S. Government agency obligations

     60,999         176         0        61,175   

Corporate preferred stock

     700         0         (455     245   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 
     61,699         176         (455     61,420   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 
   $ 75,734         1,010         (455     76,289   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

12


Table of Contents

 

(Dollars in thousands)

   Amortized
cost
     Gross
unrealized
gains
     Gross
unrealized
losses
    Fair value  

December 31, 2011:

          

Mortgage-backed securities:

          

FHLMC

   $ 11,310         553         0        11,863   

FNMA

     7,670         499         0        8,169   

Collateralized mortgage obligations:

          

FHLMC

     335         4         0        339   

FNMA

     271         3         0        274   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 
     19,586         1,059         0        20,645   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other marketable securities:

          

U.S. Government agency obligations

     105,000         294         0        105,294   

Corporate preferred stock

     700         0         (525     175   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 
     105,700         294         (525     105,469   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 
     $125,286         1,353         (525     126,114   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following table indicates amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities available for sale at June 30, 2012 based upon contractual maturity adjusted for scheduled repayments of principal and projected prepayments of principal based upon current economic conditions and interest rates.

 

(Dollars in thousands)

   Amortized
cost
     Fair
Value
 

Due less than one year

   $ 58,766         59,309   

Due after one year through five years

     16,063         16,518   

Due after five years through ten years

     205         217   

Due after ten years

     700         245   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 75,734         76,289   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The allocation of mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations in the table above is based upon the anticipated future cash flow of the securities using estimated mortgage prepayment speeds. The allocation of other marketable securities that have call features is based on the anticipated cash flows to the call date if it is anticipated that the security will be called, or to the maturity date if it is not anticipated to be called.

(9) Loans Receivable, Net

A summary of loans receivable at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is as follows:

 

(Dollars in thousands)

   June 30,
2012
     December 31,
2011
 

1-4 family

   $ 107,495         119,066   

Commercial real estate:

     

Residential developments

     54,707         52,746   

Alternative fuels

     15,193         18,882   

Other

     196,845         218,286   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
     266,745         289,914   

Consumer

     57,027         62,161   

Commercial business:

     

Construction/development

     602         4,786   

Banking

     1,942         4,899   

Other

     83,195         99,574   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
     85,739         109,259   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans

     517,006         580,400   

Less:

     

Unamortized discounts

     64         93   

Net deferred loan fees

     245         511   

Allowance for loan losses

     20,519         23,888   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans receivable, net

   $ 496,178         555,908   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

13


Table of Contents

(10) Allowance for Loan Losses and Credit Quality Information

The following tables summarize the allowance for loan losses for the periods ending June 30, 2012 and 2011:

 

(Dollars in thousands)    1-4 Family     Commercial
Real Estate
    Consumer     Commercial
Business
    Total  

For the three months ended June 30, 2012:

          

Balance, March 31, 2012

   $ 3,748        11,049        1,122        5,505        21,424   

Provision for losses

     (83     975        628        (432     1,088   

Charge-offs

     0        (1,554     (493     (1,820     (3,867

Recoveries

     0        1,083        11        780        1,874   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance, June 30, 2012

   $ 3,665        11,553        1,268        4,033        20,519   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2012:

          

Balance, December 31, 2011

     3,718        13,622        1,159        5,389        23,888   

Provision for losses

     (53     792        847        (626     960   

Charge-offs

     0        (4,184     (758     (1,828     (6,770

Recoveries

     0        1,323        20        1,098        2,441   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance, June 30, 2012

   $ 3,665        11,553        1,268        4,033        20,519   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Allocated to:

          

Specific reserves

   $ 1,086        3,559        367        1,621        6,633   

General reserves

     2,632        10,063        792        3,768        17,255   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2011

   $ 3,718        13,622        1,159        5,389        23,888   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Allocated to:

          

Specific reserves

   $ 888        3,172        609        1,343        6,012   

General reserves

     2,777        8,381        659        2,690        14,507   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance, June 30, 2012

   $ 3,665        11,553        1,268        4,033        20,519   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loans receivable at December 31, 2011:

          

Individually reviewed for impairment

   $ 6,241        30,495        1,205        6,855        44,796   

Collectively reviewed for impairment

     112,825        259,419        60,956        102,404        535,604   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

   $ 119,066        289,914        62,161        109,259        580,400   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loans receivable at June 30, 2012:

          

Individually reviewed for impairment

   $ 7,765        33,432        2,011        4,787        47,995   

Collectively reviewed for impairment

     99,730        233,313        55,016        80,952        469,011   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

   $ 107,495        266,745        57,027        85,739        517,006   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)   1-4 Family     Commercial
Real Estate
    Consumer     Commercial
Business
    Total  

For the three months ended June 30, 2011:

         

Balance, March 31, 2011

  $ 2,498        17,558        1,023        13,874        34,953   

Provision for losses

    954        2,376        159        (26     3,463   

Charge-offs

    (15     (4,633     (35     (6,249     (10,932

Recoveries

    0        66        7        207        280   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance, June 30, 2011

  $ 3,437        15,367        1,154        7,806        27,764   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2011:

         

Balance, December 31, 2010

    2,145        24,590        924        15,169        42,828   

Provision for losses

    1,710        2,914        307        478        5,409   

Charge-offs

    (418     (12,209     (87     (8,557     (21,271

Recoveries

    0        72        10        716        798   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance, June 30, 2011

  $ 3,437        15,367        1,154        7,806        27,764   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following table summarizes the amount of classified and unclassified loans at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

 

     June 30, 2012  
     Classified      Unclassified         

(Dollars in thousands)

   Special
    Mention    
         Substandard              Doubtful              Loss              Total              Total          Total
    Loans    
 

1-4 family

   $ 800         18,105         738         0         19,643         87,852         107,495   

Commercial real estate:

                    

Residential developments

     875         40,969         209         0         42,053         12,654         54,707   

Alternative fuels

     0         0         0         0         0         15,193         15,193   

Other

     5,435         18,690         75         0         24,200         172,645         196,845   

Consumer

     0         1,639         151         220         2,010         55,017         57,027   

Commercial business:

                    

Construction/development

     0         314         0         0         314         288         602   

Banking

     0         1,942         0         0         1,942         0         1,942   

Other

     2,116         9,188         296         0         11,600         71,595         83,195   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 9,226         90,847         1,469         220         101,762         415,244         517,006   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

14


Table of Contents

 

     December 31, 2011  
     Classified      Unclassified         

(Dollars in thousands)

   Special
    Mention    
         Substandard              Doubtful              Loss              Total              Total          Total
    Loans    
 

1-4 family

   $ 8,870         11,129         738         0         20,737         98,329         119,066   

Commercial real estate:

                    

Residential developments

     444         39,709         1,113         0         41,266         11,480         52,746   

Alternative fuels

     0         0         0         0         0         18,882         18,882   

Other

     5,789         19,607         0         0         25,396         192,890         218,286   

Consumer

     0         857         224         124         1,205         60,956         62,161   

Commercial business:

                    

Construction/development

     0         2,722         0         0         2,722         2,064         4,786   

Banking

     0         3,750         1,149         0         4,899         0         4,899   

Other

     3,203         8,056         0         0         11,259         88,315         99,574   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 18,306         85,830         3,224         124         107,484         472,916         580,400   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Classified loans represent special mention, performing substandard and non-performing loans. Loans classified as special mention are loans that have potential weaknesses that, if left uncorrected, may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the Bank’s credit position at some future date. Loans classified as substandard are loans that are generally inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor, or by the collateral pledged, if any. Loans classified as substandard have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Loans classified as doubtful have the weaknesses of those classified as substandard, with additional characteristics that make collection in full on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values questionable, and there is a high possibility of loss. A loan classified as loss is considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as an asset on the balance sheet is not warranted. Loans classified as substandard or doubtful require the Bank to perform an analysis of the individual loan and charge off any loans, or portion thereof, that are deemed uncollectible.

The aging of past due loans at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is summarized as follows:

 

(Dollars in thousands)    30-59
Days
Past Due
     60-89
Days
Past Due
     90 Days
or More
Past Due
     Total
Past Due
     Current
Loans
     Total
Loans
     Loans
90 Days
or More
Past Due
and Still
Accruing
 

June 30, 2012

                    

1-4 family

   $ 2,336         1,063         1,068         4,467         103,028         107,495         0   

Commercial real estate:

                    

Residential developments

     0         408         1,292         1,700         53,007         54,707         0   

Alternative fuels

     0         0         0         0         15,193         15,193         0   

Other

     38         1,077         1,112         2,227         194,618         196,845         0   

Consumer

     462         54         2         518         56,509         57,027         0   

Commercial business:

                    

Construction/development

     0         0         272         272         330         602         0   

Banking

     0         0         0         0         1,942         1,942         0   

Other

     286         2,564         1,443         4,293         78,902         83,195         0   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 3,122         5,166         5,189         13,477         503,529         517,006         0   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

December 31, 2011

                    

1-4 family

   $ 1,876         305         1,297         3,478         115,588         119,066         0   

Commercial real estate:

                    

Residential developments

     107         290         8,211         8,608         44,138         52,746         0   

Alternative fuels

     0         0         0         0         18,882         18,882         0   

Other

     350         79         5,184         5,613         212,673         218,286         0   

Consumer

     658         374         387         1,419         60,742         62,161         0   

Commercial business:

                    

Construction/development

     286         0         0         286         4,500         4,786         0   

Banking

     0         0         1,149         1,149         3,750         4,899         0   

Other

     351         112         2,877         3,340         96,234         99,574         0   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 3,628         1,160         19,105         23,893         556,507         580,400         0   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

15


Table of Contents

Impaired loans include loans that are non-performing (non-accruing) and loans that have been modified in a troubled debt restructuring (TDR). The following table summarizes impaired loans and related allowances as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

 

     June 30, 2012      December 31, 2011  

(Dollars in thousands)

   Recorded
Investment
     Unpaid
Principal
Balance
     Related
Allowance
     Recorded
Investment
     Unpaid
Principal
Balance
     Related
Allowance
 

Loans with no related allowance recorded:

                 

1-4 family

   $ 4,016         4,337         0         2,651         2,972         0   

Commercial real estate:

                 

Residential developments

     11,536         16,418         0         6,900         9,855         0   

Alternative fuels

     0         0         0         0         0         0   

Other

     4,062         5,205         0         3,745         4,381         0   

Consumer

     317         317         0         489         489         0   

Commercial business:

                 

Construction/development

     0         0         0         340         2,311         0   

Banking

     0         0         0         1,149         3,248         0   

Other

     1,699         6,031         0         598         1,607         0   

Loans with an allowance recorded:

                 

1-4 family

     3,749         3,793         888         3,590         3,590         1,086   

Commercial real estate:

                 

Residential developments

     15,781         16,730         2,792         13,889         14,017         2,546   

Alternative fuels

     0         0         0         0         0         0   

Other

     2,053         2,108         380         5,961         8,272         1,013   

Consumer

     1,694         1,694         609         716         716         367   

Commercial business:

                 

Construction/development

     213         2,185         65         0         0         0   

Banking

     0         0         0         0         0         0   

Other

     2,875         3,547         1,278         4,768         7,145         1,621   

Total:

                 

1-4 family

     7,765         8,130         888         6,241         6,562         1,086   

Commercial real estate:

                 

Residential developments

     27,317         33,148         2,792         20,789         23,872         2,546   

Alternative fuels

     0         0         0         0         0         0   

Other

     6,115         7,313         380         9,706         12,653         1,013   

Consumer

     2,011         2,011         609         1,205         1,205         367   

Commercial business:

                 

Construction/development

     213         2,185         65         340         2,311         0   

Banking

     0         0         0         1,149         3,248         0   

Other

     4,574         9,578         1,278         5,366         8,752         1,621   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     $47,995         62,365         6,012         44,796         58,603         6,633   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

16


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the average recorded investment and interest income recognized on impaired loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:

 

     For the three months ended
June 30, 2012
     For the six months ended
June 30, 2012
 

(Dollars in thousands)

   Average
Recorded
Investment
     Interest
Income
Recognized
     Average
Recorded
Investment
     Interest
Income
Recognized
 

Loans with no related allowance recorded:

           

1-4 family

   $ 4,092         21         3,611         48   

Commercial real estate:

           

Residential developments

     12,085         83         10,356         320   

Alternative fuels

     0         0         0         0   

Other

     3,972         5         3,896         18   

Consumer

     339         2         389         2   

Commercial business:

           

Construction/development

     111         0         187         0   

Banking

     575         0         766         0   

Other

     1,052         2         900         5   

Loans with an allowance recorded:

           

1-4 family

     4,148         18         3,962         41   

Commercial real estate:

           

Residential developments

     15,679         37         15,082         74   

Alternative fuels

     0         0         0         0   

Other

     4,013         1         4,662         3   

Consumer

     1,356         19         1,142         42   

Commercial business:

           

Construction/development

     107         0         71         0   

Banking

     0         0         0         0   

Other

     4,228         8         4,408         29   

Total:

           

1-4 family

     8,240         39         7,573         89   

Commercial real estate:

           

Residential developments

     27,764         120         25,438         394   

Alternative fuels

     0         0         0         0   

Other

     7,985         6         8,558         21   

Consumer

     1,695         21         1,531         44   

Commercial business:

           

Construction/development

     218         0         258         0   

Banking

     575         0         766         0   

Other

     5,280         10         5,308         34   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 51,757         196         49,432         582   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     For the three months ended
June 30, 2011
     For the six months ended
June 30, 2011
 

(Dollars in thousands)

   Average
Recorded
Investment
     Interest
Income
Recognized
     Average
Recorded
Investment
     Interest
Income
Recognized
 

Loans with no related allowance recorded:

           

1-4 family

   $ 1,354         16         1,213         36   

Commercial real estate:

           

Residential developments

     5,798         14         6,027         88   

Alternative fuels

     1,133         0         755         0   

Other

     656         10         477         13   

Consumer

     132         0         123         2   

Commercial business:

           

Construction/development

     345         2         263         4   

Banking

     987         0         658         0   

Other

     654         3         568         17   

Loans with an allowance recorded:

           

1-4 family

     4,029         50         4,618         86   

Commercial real estate:

           

Residential developments

     15,826         192         19,599         431   

Alternative fuels

     2,498         0         3,330         0   

Other

     6,406         40         6,381         59   

Consumer

     347         5         296         10   

Commercial business:

           

Construction/development

     3,344         18         3,831         36   

Banking

     4,112         0         5,482         0   

Other

     11,366         63         12,020         147   

Total:

           

1-4 family

     5,383         66         5,831         122   

Commercial real estate:

           

Residential developments

     21,624         206         25,626         519   

Alternative fuels

     3,631         0         4,085         0   

Other

     7,062         50         6,858         72   

Consumer

     479         5         419         12   

Commercial business:

           

Construction/development

     3,689         20         4,094         40   

Banking

     5,099         0         6,140         0   

Other

     12,020         66         12,588         164   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 58,987         413         65,641         929   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, non-accruing loans totaled $31.1 million and $34.0 million, respectively, for which the related allowance for loan losses was $4.3 million and $5.2 million, respectively. The decrease in the related allowances is due primarily to full or partial charge-off of several non-accruing loans. All of the interest income that was recognized for non-accruing loans was recognized using the cash basis method of income recognition. Non-accruing loans for which no specific allowance has been recorded, because management determined that the value of the collateral was sufficient to repay the loan, totaled $15.8 million and $14.8 million, respectively. Non-accrual loans also include certain loans that have had terms modified in a TDR.

 

17


Table of Contents

The non-accrual loans at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are summarized as follows:

 

(Dollars in thousands)    June 30,
2012
     December 31,
2011
 

1-4 family

   $ 4,409       $ 4,435   

Commercial real estate:

     

Residential developments

     19,277         13,412   

Alternative fuels

     0         0   

Other

     3,045         9,246   

Consumer

     367         699   

Commercial business:

     

Construction/development

     214         340   

Banking

     0         1,149   

Other

     3,779         4,712   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 31,091       $ 33,993   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

During the third quarter of 2011, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2011-02, A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring is a Troubled Debt Restructuring (Topic 310), which modified guidance for identifying restructurings of receivables that constitute a TDR. At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 there were loans included in loans receivable, net, with terms that had been modified in a troubled debt restructuring totaling $38.2 million and $29.2 million, respectively. For the loans that were restructured in the second quarter of 2012, $1.2 million were classified but performing and $0.1 million were non-performing at June 30, 2012.

The following table summarizes troubled debt restructurings at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

 

     June 30, 2012      December 31, 2011  

(Dollars in thousands)

   Accrual      Non-Accrual      Total      Accrual      Non-Accrual      Total  

1-4 Family

   $ 3,356         2,694         6,050         1,806         1,999         3,805   

Commercial real estate

     11,110         16,094         27,204         7,837         12,221         20,058   

Consumer

     1,643         71         1,714         507         71         578   

Commercial business

     795         2,465         3,260         653         4,110         4,763   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 16,904         21,324         38,228         10,803         18,401         29,204   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

There were no material commitments to lend additional funds to customers whose loans were restructured or classified as nonaccrual at June 30, 2012 or December 31, 2011.

TDR concessions can include reduction of interest rates, extension of maturity dates, forgiveness of principal and/or interest due, or acceptance of real estate or other assets in full or partial satisfaction of the debt. Loan modifications are not reported as TDR’s after 12 months if the loan was modified at a market rate of interest for comparable risk loans, and the loan is performing in accordance with the terms of the restructured agreement for the entire 12 month period. All loans classified as TDR’s are considered to be impaired.

When a loan is modified as a TDR, there may be a direct, material impact on the loans within the balance sheet, as principal balances may be partially forgiven. The financial effects of TDR’s are presented in the following table and represent the difference between the outstanding recorded balance pre-modification and post-modification, for the three month and six month periods ending June 30, 2012.

 

18


Table of Contents

 

     Three Months Ended June 30, 2012      Six Months Ended June 30, 2012  

(Dollars in thousands)

   Number
of
Contracts
     Pre-
modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
     Post-
modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
     Number
of
Contracts
     Pre-
modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
     Post-
modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
 

Troubled debt restructurings:

                 

1-4 family

     0       $ 0         0         27       $ 3,204         3,204   

Commercial real estate:

                 

Residential developments

     0         0         0         7         11,479         9,823   

Alternative fuels

     0         0         0         0         0         0   

Other

     1         321         150         6         2,814         2,586   

Consumer

     4         1,057         1,057         12         1,326         1,326   

Commercial business:

                 

Construction/development

     0         0         0         0         0         0   

Banking

     0         0         0         0         0         0   

Other

     1         80         80         3         324         324   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     6       $ 1,458         1,287         55       $ 19,147         17,263   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Loans that were restructured within the 12 months preceding June 30, 2012 and defaulted during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 are presented in the table below.

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30, 2012
     Six Months Ended
June 30, 2012
 

(Dollars in thousands)

   Number
of
Contracts
     Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
     Number
of
Contracts
     Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
 

Troubled debt restructurings that subsequently defaulted:

           

1-4 family

     1       $ 846         2       $ 940   

Commercial real estate:

           

Residential developments

     0         0         0         0   

Alternative fuels

     0         0         0         0   

Other

     0         0         2         159   

Consumer

     0         0         0         0   

Commercial business:

           

Construction/development

     0         0         0         0   

Banking

     0         0         0         0   

Other

     0         0         3         2,777   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     1       $ 846         7       $ 3,876   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The Company considers a loan to have defaulted when it becomes 90 or more days past due under the modified terms, when it is placed in non-accrual status, when it becomes other real estate owned, or when it becomes non-compliant with some other material requirement of the modification agreement.

Loans that were non-accrual prior to modification remain on non-accrual for at least six months following modification. Non-accrual TDR loans that have performed according to the modified terms for six months may be returned to accruing status. Loans that were accruing prior to modification remain on accrual status after the modification as long as the loan continues to perform under the new terms.

TDR’s are reviewed for impairment following the same methodology as other impaired loans. For loans that are collateral dependent, the value of the collateral is reviewed and additional reserves may be added as needed. Loans that are not collateral dependent may have additional reserves established if deemed necessary. The allowance for loan losses on TDR’s was $3.2 million, or 15.8%, of the total $20.5 million in loan loss reserves at June 30, 2012 and $3.5 million, or 14.6%, of the total $23.9 million in loan loss reserves at December 31, 2011.

 

19


Table of Contents

(11) Investment in Mortgage Servicing Rights

A summary of mortgage servicing activity is as follows:

 

(Dollars in thousands)

   Six
Months
ended
June 30,
2012
    Twelve
Months
ended

December  31,
2011
    Six
Months
ended

June  30,
2011
 

Mortgage servicing rights:

      

Balance, beginning of period

   $ 1,485        1,586        1,586   

Originations

     396        461        147   

Amortization

     (348     (562     (213
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance, end of period

   $ 1,533        1,485        1,520   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Fair value of mortgage servicing rights

   $ 1,929        1,878        2,297   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

All of the loans being serviced are single family loans serviced for the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) under the mortgage-backed security program or the individual loan sale program. The following is a summary of the risk characteristics of the loans being serviced at June 30, 2012.

 

(Dollars in thousands)

   Loan
Principal
Balance
     Weighted
Average

Interest
Rate
    Weighted
Average
Remaining
Term
     Number
of
Loans
 

Original term 30 year fixed rate

   $ 197,514         4.89     298         1,729   

Original term 15 year fixed rate

     104,789         4.08     136         1,368   

Adjustable rate

     330         3.50     307         7   

The gross carrying amount of mortgage servicing rights and the associated accumulated amortization at June 30, 2012 is presented in the following table. Amortization expense was $348,000 and $213,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

 

(Dollars in thousands)

   Gross
Carrying
Amount
     Accumulated
Amortization
    Unamortized
Intangible
Assets
 

Mortgage servicing rights

   $ 2,191         (658     1,533   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $ 2,191         (658     1,533   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following table indicates the estimated future amortization expense for amortized mortgage servicing rights:

 

(Dollars in thousands)

   Mortgage
Servicing
Rights
 

Year ended December 31,

  

2012

   $ 358   

2013

     345   

2014

     312   

2015

     265   

2016

     155   

Thereafter

     98   
  

 

 

 

Total

   $ 1,533   
  

 

 

 

Projections of amortization are based on existing asset balances and the existing interest rate environment as of June 30, 2012. The Company’s actual experiences may be significantly different depending upon changes in mortgage interest rates and other market conditions.

 

20


Table of Contents

(12) Earnings (Loss) per Common Share

The following table reconciles the weighted average shares outstanding and the earnings (loss) available to common shareholders used for basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share:

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
    Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)    2012     2011     2012      2011  

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in basic loss per common share calculation

     3,936        3,841        3,925         3,829   

Net dilutive effect of:

         

Restricted stock awards

     0        0        97         0   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Weighted average number of shares outstanding adjusted for effect of dilutive securities

     3,936        3,841        4,022         3,829   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Income (loss) available to common shareholders

   $ (69     (2,748     2,274         (2,780

Basic earnings (loss) per common share

   $ (0.02     (0.72     0.58         (0.73

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share

   $ (0.02     (0.72     0.57         (0.73

For the three months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011, there were 94,432 and 129,037 common share equivalents outstanding, respectively, that are not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share as they are anti-dilutive. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011, there were 0 and 127,351 common share equivalents outstanding, respectively, that are not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share as they are anti-dilutive.

(13) Regulatory Capital and Regulatory Oversight

The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Bank’s assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.

The Bank entered into a written Supervisory Agreement with its primary regulator, the OTS, effective February 22, 2011 that primarily relates to the Bank’s financial performance and credit quality issues. This agreement replaced the prior memorandum of understanding that the Bank entered into with the OTS on December 9, 2009. In accordance with the agreement, the Bank submitted a two year business plan in May of 2011 that the OCC (as defined below and as successor to the OTS) accepted with the expectation that the Bank would be in adherence with the OCC’s Notification of Establishment of Higher Minimum Capital Ratios, dated August 8, 2011, also known as an individual minimum capital requirement or IMCR, which required the Bank to establish and maintain a minimum core capital ratio of 8.50% by December 31, 2011, as discussed more fully below. As required by the Supervisory Agreement, the Bank submitted an updated two year capital plan in January of 2012 that the OCC may make comments upon, and require revisions to. The Bank must operate within the parameters of the final business plan and is required to monitor and submit periodic reports on its compliance with the plan. The Bank also submitted a problem asset reduction plan that the OCC has accepted. The Bank must operate within the parameters of the final problem asset plan and is required to monitor and submit periodic reports on its compliance with the plan. The Bank has also revised its loan modification policies and its program for identifying, monitoring and controlling risk associated with concentrations of credit, and improved the documentation relating to the allowance for loan and lease losses as required by the agreement. In addition, without the consent of the OCC, the Bank may not declare or pay any cash dividends, increase its total assets during any quarter in excess of the amount of the net interest credited on deposit liabilities during the prior quarter, enter into any new contractual arrangement or renew or extend any existing arrangement related to compensation or benefits with any directors or officer, make any golden parachute payments, or enter into any significant contracts with a third party service provider. The Bank believes it was in compliance with all requirements of its Supervisory Agreement at June 30, 2012.

The Company also entered into a written Supervisory Agreement with the OTS effective February 22, 2011. This agreement replaced the prior memorandum of understanding that the Company entered into with the OTS on

 

21


Table of Contents

December 9, 2009. As required by the Supervisory Agreement, the Company submitted an updated two year capital plan in January of 2012 that the Federal Reserve Board (as successor to the OTS) may make comments upon, and to which it may require revisions. The Company must operate within the parameters of the final capital plan and is required to monitor and submit periodic reports on its compliance with the plan. In addition, without the consent of the Federal Reserve Board, the Company may not incur or issue any debt, guarantee the debt of any entity, declare or pay any cash dividends or repurchase any of the Company’s capital stock, enter into any new contractual arrangement or renew or extend any existing arrangement related to compensation or benefits with any directors or officer, or make any golden parachute payments. The Company believes it was in compliance with all requirements of its Supervisory Agreement at June 30, 2012.

References to the OTS shall mean, with respect to the Company, beginning July 21, 2011, the Federal Reserve Board (FRB) and mean, with respect to the Bank, beginning July 21, 2011, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). On July 21, 2011, the OTS was integrated into the OCC and the primary banking regulator for the Company became the FRB.

Quantitative measures established by regulations to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of Tier I (Core) capital, and risk-based capital (as defined in the regulations) to total assets (as defined in the regulations).

The Bank’s tangible assets were $669.9 million and $789.0 million, adjusted total assets were $669.7 million and $789.0 million, and its risk-weighted assets were $486.8 million and $586.0 million at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The following table presents the Bank’s capital amounts and ratios at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 for actual capital, required capital and excess capital, including ratios in order to qualify as being well capitalized under the Prompt Corrective Actions regulations.

 

(Dollars in thousands)                                                    
     Actual     Required to be
Adequately
Capitalized
    Excess Capital     To Be Well
Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective
Actions Provisions
 

June 30, 2012

   Amount     Percent
of
Assets  (1)
    Amount      Percent
of
Assets  (1)
    Amount      Percent
of
Assets  (1)
    Amount      Percent
of
Assets  (1)
 

Bank stockholder’s equity

   $ 60,768                    

Less:

                   

Net unrealized gains on certain securities available for sale

     (199                 
  

 

 

                  
     60,569                    
  

 

 

                  

Tier I or core capital

                   

Tier I capital to adjusted total assets

       9.04   $ 26,787         4.00   $ 33,782         5.04   $ 33,484         5.00

Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets

       12.44   $ 19,472         4.00   $ 41,097         8.44   $ 29,208         6.00

Plus:

                   

Allowable allowance for loan losses

     6,263                    
  

 

 

                  

Risk-based capital

   $ 66,832        $ 38,944         $ 27,888         $ 46,680      
  

 

 

                  

Risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets

       13.73        8.00        5.73        10.00

 

(1) Based upon the Bank’s adjusted total assets for the purpose of the tangible and core capital ratios and risk-weighted assets for the purpose of the risk-based capital ratio.

 

(Dollars in thousands)                                                    
     Actual     Required to be
Adequately
Capitalized
    Excess Capital     To Be Well
Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective
Actions Provisions
 

December 31, 2011

   Amount     Percent
of
Assets  (1)
    Amount      Percent
of
Assets  (1)
    Amount      Percent
of
Assets  (1)
    Amount      Percent
of
Assets  (1)
 

Bank stockholder’s equity

   $ 57,454                    

Less:

                   

Net unrealized gains on certain securities available for sale

     (1,140                 
  

 

 

                  
     56,314                    
  

 

 

                  

Tier I or core capital

                   

Tier I capital to adjusted total assets

       7.14   $ 31,560         4.00   $ 24,754         3.14   $ 39,450         5.00

Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets

       9.61   $ 23,441         4.00   $ 32,873         5.61   $ 35,162         6.00

Plus:

                   

Allowable allowance for loan losses

     7,325                    
  

 

 

                  

Risk-based capital

   $ 63,639        $ 46,883         $ 16,756         $ 58,603      
  

 

 

                  

Risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets

       10.86        8.00        2.86        10.00

 

(1) Based upon the Bank’s adjusted total assets for the purpose of the tangible and core capital ratios and risk-weighted assets for the purpose of the risk-based capital ratio.

 

22


Table of Contents

The OCC established an IMCR for the Bank. An IMCR requires a bank to establish and maintain levels of capital greater than those generally required for a bank to be classified as “well-capitalized.” Effective December 31, 2011, the Bank was required to establish, and subsequently maintain, core capital at least equal to 8.50% of adjusted total assets, which was in excess of the Bank’s 7.14% core capital to adjusted total assets ratio at December 31, 2011. In February 2012, the Bank received a Notice of Failure to Maintain Minimum Capital Ratios from the OCC arising out of its failure to establish and maintain its IMCR of 8.50% core capital to adjusted total assets at December 31, 2011. Pursuant to the notice, the OCC required the Bank to submit by April 30, 2012 a further written capital plan of how it intended to achieve and maintain its IMCR, and a contingency plan in the event the IMCR was not achieved through the Bank’s primary plan. Because of the improved financial results and the decrease in assets experienced during the six months of 2012, the Bank’s core capital ratio improved to 8.50% at March 31, 2012 and 9.04% at June 30, 2012. In April 2012, the Bank submitted the required revised capital and contingency plan to the OCC. The OCC may make comments upon and require revisions to this plan.

The Bank’s failure to comply with the terms of the IMCR at December 31, 2011 was, and its failure to continue to comply in the future can be, deemed an unsafe and unsound banking practice and could subject it to further limits on growth and such legal actions or sanctions as the OCC considers appropriate. There can be no assurance that the Bank will continue to maintain compliance with the IMCR in the future. Possible sanctions include among others (i) the imposition of one or more cease and desist orders requiring corrective action, which are enforceable directives that may address any aspect of the Company or Bank management, operations or capital, including requirements to change management, raise equity capital, dispose of assets or effect a change of control; (ii) civil money penalties; and (iii) downgrades in the capital adequacy status of the Company and the Bank. These regulatory actions may significantly restrict the ability of the Company and the Bank to take operating and strategic actions that may be in the best interests of stockholders or compel the Company and the Bank to take operating and strategic actions that are not potentially in the best interests of stockholders.

Management believes that, as of June 30, 2012, the Bank’s capital ratios were in excess of those quantitative capital ratio standards set forth under the prompt corrective action regulations described above. The failure of the Bank to satisfy the IMCR at any time does not by itself affect the Bank’s status as “well-capitalized” within the meaning of these prompt corrective action regulations. However, there can be no assurance that the Bank will continue to maintain such status in the future. The OCC has extensive discretion in its supervisory and enforcement activities, and can adjust the requirement to be “well-capitalized” in the future.

In order to improve its capital ratios and maintain compliance with its IMCR, the Bank is, among other things, working to improve its financial results, reduce non-performing assets, and decrease the asset size of the Bank. In March 2012, the Bank also sold substantially all of the assets and liabilities associated with its Toledo, Iowa branch. If capital conditions were to deteriorate, the Bank may also determine it to be necessary or prudent to dispose of other non-strategic assets. These actions may result in changes in the Bank’s assets, liabilities and earnings, some of which may be material, during the period in which the action is taken or is consummated or over a longer period of time. Further, the Company may need, or be required by supervising banking regulators, to raise additional capital of which there can be no assurance that, if raised, it would be on terms favorable to the Company. If the Company raises capital through the issuance of additional shares of common stock or other equity securities, it would dilute the ownership interests of existing stockholders and, given our current common stock trading price, would be expected to dilute the per share book value of the Company’s common stock and could result in a change of control of the Company and the Bank.

(14) Commitments and Contingencies

The Bank issued standby letters of credit which guarantee the performance of customers to third parties. The standby letters of credit issued and available at June 30, 2012 were approximately $1.5 million, expire over the next two years, and are collateralized primarily with commercial real estate mortgages. Since the conditions under which the Bank is required to fund the standby letters of credit may not materialize, the cash requirements are expected to be less than the total outstanding commitments.

 

23


Table of Contents

(15) Business Segments

The Bank has been identified as a reportable operating segment in accordance with the provisions of ASC 280. SFC and HMN did not meet the quantitative thresholds for determining reportable segments and therefore are included in the “Other” category.

The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources based on the segment’s net income, return on average assets and equity. Each corporation is managed separately with its own officers and board of directors, some of whom may overlap between the corporations.

The following table sets forth certain information about the reconciliation of reported profit or loss and assets for each of the Company’s reportable segments.

 

(Dollars in thousands)

   Home
Federal
Savings
Bank
    Other     Eliminations     Consolidated
Total
 

At or for the six months ended June 30, 2012:

        

Interest income - external customers

   $ 16,227        0        0        16,227   

Non-interest income - external customers

     4,500        0        0        4,500   

Intersegment interest income

     0        2        (2     0   

Intersegment non-interest income

     93        3,582        (3,675     0   

Interest expense

     3,969        0        (2     3,967   

Amortization of mortgage servicing rights, net

     348        0        0        348   

Other non-interest expense

     11,957        389        (93     12,253   

Net income

     3,586        3,195        (3,582     3,199   

Total assets

     670,229        62,033        (61,948     670,314   

At or for the six months ended June 30, 2011:

        

Interest income - external customers

   $ 20,759        0        0        20,759   

Non-interest income - external customers

     3,380        0        0        3,380   

Intersegment interest income

     0        2        (2     0   

Intersegment non-interest income

     87        (1,292     1,205        0   

Interest expense

     6,317        0        (2     6,315   

Amortization of mortgage servicing rights, net

     213        0        0        213   

Other non-interest expense

     13,564        589        (87     14,066   

Net loss

     (1,288     (1,878     1,292        (1,874

Total assets

     807,307        68,934        (68,867     807,374   

At or for the quarter ended June 30, 2012:

        

Interest income - external customers

   $ 7,952        0        0        7,952   

Non-interest income - external customers

     1,794        0        0        1,794   

Intersegment interest income

     0        1        (1     0   

Intersegment non-interest income

     46        558        (604     0   

Interest expense

     1,906        0        (1     1,905   

Amortization of mortgage servicing rights, net

     172        0        0        172   

Other non-interest expense

     6,066        166        (46     6,186   

Net income

     560        393        (558     395   

Total assets

     670,229        62,033        (61,948     670,314   

At or for the quarter ended June 30, 2011:

        

Interest income - external customers

   $ 10,045        0        0        10,045   

Non-interest income - external customers

     1,592        0        0        1,592   

Intersegment interest income

     0        1        (1     0   

Intersegment non-interest income

     44        (1,980     1,936        0   

Interest expense

     3,047        0        (1     3,046   

Amortization of mortgage servicing rights, net

     115        0        0        115   

Other non-interest expense

     7,103        315        (44     7,374   

Net loss

     (1,978     (2,293     1,980        (2,291

Total assets

     807,307        68,934        (68,867     807,374   

 

24


Table of Contents

Item 2:

HMN FINANCIAL, INC.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-looking Information

This quarterly report and other reports filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are often identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “intent,” “look,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” “seek,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “trend,” “target,” and “goal” or similar statements or variations of such terms and include, but are not limited to, those relating to increasing our core deposit relationships, reducing non-performing assets, reducing expense and generating improved financial results; the adequacy and amount of available liquidity and capital resources to the Bank; the Company’s liquidity and capital requirements; our expectations for core capital and our strategies and potential strategies for improvement thereof; changes in the size of the Bank’s loan portfolio; the recovery of the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets; the amount and mix of the Bank’s non-performing assets and the appropriateness of the allowance therefor; future losses on non-performing assets; the amount of interest-earning assets; the amount and mix of brokered and other deposits (including the Company’s ability to renew brokered deposits); the availability of alternate funding sources; the payment of dividends; the future outlook for the Company; the amount of deposits that will be withdrawn from checking and money market accounts and how the withdrawn deposits will be replaced; the projected changes in net interest income based on rate shocks; the range that interest rates may fluctuate over the next twelve months; the net market risk of interest rate shocks; the future outlook for the issuer trust preferred securities held by the Bank; and the Bank’s compliance with regulatory standards generally (including the Bank’s status as “well-capitalized”), and supervisory agreements, individual minimum capital requirements or other supervisory directives or requirements to which the Company or the Bank are or may become expressly subject, specifically, and possible responses of the OCC and FRB and the Bank and the Company to any failure to comply with any such regulatory standard, agreement or requirement. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the Company’s assumptions and expectations. These include but are not limited to the adequacy and marketability of real estate and other collateral securing loans to borrowers; federal and state regulation and enforcement, including restrictions set forth in the supervisory agreements between each of the Company and Bank and the OCC and FRB; possible legislative and regulatory changes, including changes in the degree and manner of regulatory supervision, the ability of the Company and the Bank to establish and adhere to plans and policies relating to, among other things, capital, business, non-performing assets, loan modifications, documentation of loan loss allowance and concentrations of credit that are satisfactory to the OCC and FRB, as applicable, in accordance with the terms of the Company and Bank supervisory agreements and to otherwise manage the operations of the Company and the Bank to ensure compliance with other requirements set forth in the supervisory agreements; the ability of the Company and the Bank to obtain required consents from the OCC and FRB, as applicable, under the supervisory agreements or other directives; the ability of the Bank to comply with its individual minimum capital requirement and other applicable regulatory capital requirements; enforcement activity of the OCC and FRB in the event of our non-compliance with any applicable regulatory standard, agreement or requirement; adverse economic, business and competitive developments such as shrinking interest margins, reduced collateral values, deposit outflows, changes in credit or other risks posed by the Company’s loan and investment portfolios, changes in costs associated with alternate funding sources, including changes in collateral advance rates and policies of the Federal Home Loan Bank, technological, computer-related or operational difficulties, results of litigation, and reduced demand for financial services and loan products; changes in accounting policies and guidelines, or monetary and fiscal policies of the federal government or tax laws; international economic developments; the Company’s access to and adverse changes in securities markets; the market for credit related assets; or other significant uncertainties. Additional factors that may cause actual results to differ from the Company’s assumptions and expectations include those set forth in the Company’s most recent filing on Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All forward-looking statements are qualified by, and should be considered in conjunction with, such cautionary statements. For additional discussion of the risks and uncertainties applicable to the Company, see the “Risk Factors” sections of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 and Part II, Item 1A of this and previously filed Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.

 

25


Table of Contents

General

The earnings of the Company are primarily dependent on the Bank’s net interest income, which is the difference between interest earned on loans and investments, and the interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities such as deposits, Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances, and Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) borrowings. The difference between the average rate of interest earned on assets and the average rate paid on liabilities is the “interest rate spread”. Net interest income is produced when interest-earning assets equal or exceed interest-bearing liabilities and there is a positive interest rate spread. Net interest income and net interest rate spread are affected by changes in interest rates, the volume and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and the level of non-performing assets. The Company’s net income is also affected by the generation of non-interest income, which consists primarily of gains or losses from the sale of securities, gains from the sale of loans, fees for servicing mortgage loans, and the generation of fees and service charges on deposit accounts. The Bank incurs expenses in addition to interest expense in the form of salaries and benefits, occupancy expenses, provisions for loan losses and amortization of mortgage servicing assets. The earnings of financial institutions, such as the Bank, are also significantly affected by prevailing economic and competitive conditions, particularly changes in interest rates, government monetary and fiscal policies, and regulations of various regulatory authorities. Lending activities are influenced by the demand for and supply of business credit, single family and commercial properties, competition among lenders, the level of interest rates and the availability of funds. Deposit flows and costs of deposits are influenced by prevailing market rates of interest on competing investments, account maturities and the levels of personal income and savings.

Beginning with the Company’s 2008 fiscal year, the Company’s commercial business and commercial real estate loan portfolios have required significant allowances and charge offs due primarily to decreases in the estimated value of the underlying collateral supporting the loans, as many of these loans were made to borrowers in or associated with the real estate industry. The decrease in the estimated collateral value is primarily the result of reduced demand for real estate, particularly as it relates to single-family and commercial land developments. More stringent lending standards implemented by the mortgage industry in recent years have made it more difficult for some borrowers with marginal credit to qualify for a mortgage. This decrease in available credit and the overall weakness in the economy over the past several years reduced the demand for single family homes and the values of existing properties and developments where the Company’s commercial loan portfolio has concentrations. Consequently, our level of non-performing assets and the related provision for loan losses increased significantly in the past several years, relative to periods before 2008. The increased levels of non-performing assets, related provisions for loan losses and write offs of or allowances against goodwill and deferred taxes arising from adverse results of operations, were the primary reasons for the net losses incurred by the Company in each of the years 2008 through 2011.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Critical accounting policies are those policies that the Company’s management believes are the most important to understanding the Company’s financial condition and operating results. These critical accounting policies often involve estimates and assumptions that could have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. The Company has identified the following critical accounting policies that management believes involve the most difficult, subjective, and/or complex judgments that are inherently uncertain. Therefore, actual financial results could differ significantly depending upon the estimates, assumptions and other factors used.

Allowance for Loan Losses and Related Provision

The allowance for loan losses is based on periodic analysis of the loan portfolio. In this analysis, management considers factors including, but not limited to, specific occurrences of loan impairment, changes in the size of the portfolios, national and regional economic conditions such as unemployment data, loan portfolio composition, loan delinquencies, local economic growth rates, historical experience and observations made by the Company’s ongoing internal audit and regulatory exam processes. Loans are charged off to the extent they are deemed to be uncollectible. The Company has established separate processes to determine the appropriateness of the loan loss allowance for its homogeneous single-family and consumer loan portfolios and its non-homogeneous loan portfolios. The determination of the allowance on the homogeneous single-family and consumer loan portfolios is calculated on a pooled basis with individual determination of the allowance of all non-performing loans. The determination of the allowance for the non-homogeneous commercial, commercial real estate, and multi-family loan portfolios involves assigning standardized risk ratings and loss factors that are periodically reviewed. The loss factors are estimated based on the Company’s own loss experience and are assigned to all loans without identified credit weaknesses. For each non-performing loan, the Company also performs an individual analysis of impairment that is based on the expected cash flows or the value of the assets collateralizing the loans and establishes any necessary reserves or charges off all loans or portion thereof that are deemed uncollectable.

 

26


Table of Contents

The appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses is dependent upon management’s estimates of variables affecting valuation, appraisals of collateral, evaluations of performance and status, and the amounts and timing of future cash flows expected to be received on impaired loans. Such estimates, appraisals, evaluations and cash flows may be subject to frequent adjustments due to changing economic prospects of borrowers or properties. The estimates are reviewed periodically and adjustments, if any, are recorded in the provision for loan losses in the periods in which the adjustments become known. Because of the size of some loans, changes in estimates can have a significant impact on the loan loss provision. The allowance is allocated to individual loan categories based upon the relative risk characteristics of the loan portfolios and the actual loss experience. The Company increases its allowance for loan losses by charging the provision for loan losses against income. The methodology for establishing the allowance for loan losses takes into consideration probable losses that have been identified in connection with specific loans as well as probable losses in the loan portfolio for which additional specific reserves are not required. Although management believes that based on current conditions the allowance for loan losses is maintained at an appropriate amount to provide for probable loan losses inherent in the portfolio as of the balance sheet date, future conditions may differ substantially from those anticipated in determining the allowance for loan losses and adjustments may be required in the future.

Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. These calculations are based on many complex factors including estimates of the timing of reversals of temporary differences, the interpretation of federal and state income tax laws and a determination of the differences between the tax and the financial reporting basis of assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ significantly from the estimates and interpretations used in determining the current and deferred income tax liabilities.

The Company maintains significant net deferred tax assets for deductible temporary differences, the largest of which relates to the allowance for loan and real estate losses and net operating loss carry forwards. For income tax purposes, only net charge-offs are deductible, not the entire provision for loan losses. Under generally accepted accounting principles, a valuation allowance is required to be recognized if it is “more likely than not” that the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The determination of the realizability of the deferred tax assets is highly subjective and dependent upon management’s judgment and evaluation of both positive and negative evidence, including the forecasts of future income, tax planning strategies and assessments of the current and future economic and business conditions. The Company considers both positive and negative evidence regarding the ultimate realizability of deferred tax assets. Positive evidence includes the ability to implement tax planning strategies to accelerate taxable income recognition and the probability that taxable income will be generated in future periods. Negative evidence includes the Company’s cumulative loss in the prior three year period, current financial performance, and the general business and economic trends. In the second quarter of 2010, the Company recorded a valuation allowance against the entire deferred tax asset balance and the Company continued to maintain a valuation reserve against the entire deferred tax asset balance at June 30, 2012. This determination was based primarily upon the existence of a three year cumulative loss position that is primarily attributable to significant provisions for loan losses incurred during the last three years. The creation of the valuation allowance, although it increased tax expense and similarly reduced tangible book value, does not have an effect on the Company’s cash flows, and may be recoverable in subsequent periods if the Company were to realize certain sustained future taxable income. It is possible that future conditions may differ substantially from those anticipated in determining the need for a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets and adjustments may be required in the future.

Determining the ultimate settlement of any tax position requires significant estimates and judgments in arriving at the amount of tax benefits to be recognized in the financial statements. It is possible that the tax benefits realized upon the ultimate resolution of a tax position may result in tax benefits that are significantly different from those estimated.

 

27


Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTH PERIODS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012 COMPARED TO THE SAME PERIODS ENDED JUNE 30, 2011

Net Income (Loss)

Net income for the second quarter of 2012 was $0.4 million, an improvement of $2.7 million, or 117.2%, compared to a net loss of $2.3 million for the second quarter of 2011. The net loss available to common shareholders was $69,000 for the second quarter of 2012, an improvement of $2.7 million, or 97.5%, from the net loss available to common shareholders of $2.8 million for the second quarter of 2011. Diluted loss per common share for the second quarter of 2012 was $0.02, an improvement of $0.70, or 97.2%, from the diluted loss per common share of $0.72 for the second quarter of 2011. The improvement in net income in the second quarter of 2012 was primarily due to a $2.4 million decrease in the provision for loan losses and a $1.1 million decrease in non-interest expenses between the periods. These changes to net income were partially offset by a $1.0 million decrease in net interest income due primarily to the decrease in interest earning assets between the periods.

Net income was $3.2 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2012, an improvement of $5.1 million, or 270.7%, compared to the net loss of $1.9 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2011. The net income available to common shareholders was $2.3 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2012, an improvement of $5.1 million, or 181.8%, compared to the net loss available to common shareholders of $2.8 million for the same period of 2011. Diluted earnings per share for the six month period in 2012 was $0.57, an improvement of $1.30 per share compared to the diluted loss per share of $0.73 for the same period in 2011. The improvement in net income for the six month period in 2012 was primarily due to a $4.4 million decrease in the provision for loan losses, $1.7 million decrease in non-interest expenses, $0.7 million increase in the gains recognized on the sales of loans, and a $0.6 million gain on sale of the Bank’s Toledo, Iowa branch. These changes to net income were partially offset by a $2.1 million decrease in net interest income due primarily to the decrease in interest earning assets between the periods.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income was $6.0 million for the second quarter of 2012, a decrease of $1.0 million, or 13.6%, compared to $7.0 million for the second quarter of 2011. Interest income was $8.0 million for the second quarter of 2012, a decrease of $2.0 million, or 20.8%, from $10.0 million for the same period in 2011. Interest income decreased between the periods primarily because of a $152 million decrease in the average interest-earning assets and also because of a decrease in average yields between the periods. Average interest earning assets decreased between the periods primarily because of a decrease in the commercial loan portfolio, which occurred because of declining loan demand and the Company’s focus on improving credit quality, managing net interest margin and improving capital ratios. The average yield earned on interest-earning assets was 4.90% for the second quarter of 2012, a decrease of 10 basis points from the 5.00% average yield for the second quarter of 2011. The decrease in average yield is due to the continued low interest rate environment that existed during the second quarter of 2012.

Interest expense was $1.9 million for the second quarter of 2012, a decrease of $1.1 million, or 37.5%, compared to $3.0 million for the second quarter of 2011. Interest expense decreased primarily because of the $157 million decrease in the average interest-bearing liabilities between the periods. The decrease in average interest-bearing liabilities is primarily the result of a decrease in the outstanding borrowings and brokered certificates of deposits between the periods and a decrease in other deposits as a result of the Bank’s Toledo, Iowa branch sale that was completed in the first quarter of 2012. The decrease in borrowings and brokered deposits between the periods was the result of using the proceeds from loan principal payments to fund maturing borrowings and brokered certificates of deposits. Interest expense also decreased because of the lower interest rates paid on money market accounts and certificates of deposits. The decreased rates were the result of the low interest rate environment that continued to exist during the second quarter of 2012. The average interest rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities was 1.24% for the second quarter of 2012, a decrease of 34 basis points from the 1.58% average interest rate paid in the second quarter of 2011.

Net interest margin (net interest income divided by average interest earning assets) for the second quarter of 2012 was 3.72%, an increase of 24 basis points, compared to 3.48% for the second quarter of 2011.

 

28


Table of Contents

Net interest income was $12.3 million for the first six months of 2012, a decrease of $2.1 million, or 15.1%, from $14.4 million for the same period in 2011. Interest income was $16.2 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $4.6 million, or 21.8%, from $20.8 million for the same six month period in 2011. Interest income decreased between the periods primarily because of a $139 million decrease in the average interest-earning assets and also because of a decrease in average yields between the periods. Average interest-earning assets decreased between the periods primarily because of a decrease in the commercial loan portfolio, which occurred because of declining loan demand and the Company’s focus on improving credit quality, managing net interest margin and improving capital ratios. The average yield earned on interest-earning assets was 4.79% for the first six months of 2012, a decrease of 32 basis points from the 5.11% average yield for the first six months of 2011. The decrease in average yield is due to the continued low interest rate environment that existed during the first six months of 2012.

Interest expense was $4.0 million for the first six months of 2012, a decrease of $2.3 million, or 37.2%, compared to $6.3 million for the first six months of 2011. Interest expense decreased primarily because of the $138 million decrease in the average interest-bearing liabilities between the periods. The decrease in average interest-bearing liabilities is primarily the result of a decrease in the outstanding borrowings and brokered certificates of deposits and a decrease in other deposits as a result of the branch sale that was completed in the first quarter of 2012. The decrease in borrowings and brokered deposits between the periods was the result of using the proceeds from loan principal payments to fund maturing borrowings and brokered certificates of deposits. Interest expense also decreased because of the lower interest rates paid on money market accounts and certificates of deposits. The decreased rates were the result of the low interest rate environment that continued to exist during the first six months of 2012. The average interest rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities was 1.23% for the first six months of 2012, a decrease of 39 basis points from the 1.62% average interest rate paid in the first six months of 2011.

Net interest margin (net interest income divided by average interest earning assets) for the first six months of 2012 was 3.62%, an increase of 7 basis points, compared to 3.55% for the first six months of 2011.

A summary of the Company’s net interest margin for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011 is as follows:

 

     For the three month period ended  
     June 30, 2012     June 30, 2011  
(Dollars in thousands)    Average
Outstanding
Balance
     Interest
Earned/
Paid
     Yield/
Rate (2)
    Average
Outstanding
Balance
     Interest
Earned/
Paid
     Yield/
Rate (2)
 

Interest-earning assets:

                

Securities available for sale

   $ 86,651         356         1.65   $ 153,600         697         1.82

Loans held for sale

     3,000         25         3.35        1,689         18         4.27   

Mortgage loans, net (1)

     112,205         1,381         4.95        123,550         1,693         5.50   

Commercial loans, net (1)

     351,800         5,291         6.05        422,720         6,593         6.26   

Consumer loans, net (1)

     58,010         826         5.73        66,725         997         5.99   

Cash equivalents

     37,508         19         0.20        31,220         1         0.01   

Federal Home Loan Bank stock

     4,094         54         5.31        6,174         46         2.99   
  

 

 

    

 

 

      

 

 

    

 

 

    

Total interest-earning assets

     653,268         7,952         4.90        805,678         10,045         5.00   

Interest-bearing liabilities:

                

NOW accounts

     64,213         9         0.06        70,287         14         0.08   

Savings accounts

     39,794         19         0.19        37,455         14         0.15   

Money market accounts

     109,306         110         0.40        113,928         205         0.72   

Certificates

     210,136         644         1.23        253,241         983         1.56   

Brokered deposits

     46,649         279         2.41        95,329         590         2.48   

Advances and other borrowings

     70,000         844         4.85        110,390         1,240         4.51   
  

 

 

    

 

 

      

 

 

    

 

 

    

Total interest-bearing liabilities

     540,098              680,630         

Non-interest checking

     76,012              92,553         

Other non-interest bearing deposits

     988              976         
  

 

 

         

 

 

       

Total interest-bearing liabilities and non-interest bearing deposits

   $ 617,098         1,905         1.24      $ 774,159         3,046         1.58   
  

 

 

    

 

 

      

 

 

    

 

 

    

Net interest income

      $ 6,047            $ 6,999      
     

 

 

         

 

 

    

Net interest rate spread

           3.65           3.42
        

 

 

         

 

 

 

Net interest margin

           3.72           3.48
        

 

 

         

 

 

 

 

(1) Average balances of loans include non-accrual loans
(2) Annualized

 

29


Table of Contents
     For the six month period ended  
     June 30, 2012     June 30, 2011  
(Dollars in thousands)    Average
Outstanding
Balance
     Interest
Earned/
Paid
     Yield/
Rate
    Average
Outstanding
Balance
     Interest
Earned/
Paid
     Yield/
Rate
 

Interest-earning assets:

                

Securities available for sale

   $ 95,954         798         1.67   $ 151,774         1,438         1.91

Loans held for sale

     2,892         47         3.27        1,614         35         4.37   

Mortgage loans, net

     114,894         2,878         5.04        125,915         3,456         5.53   

Commercial loans, net

     359,780         10,716         5.99        438,121         13,688         6.30   

Consumer loans, net

     59,390         1,679         5.69        67,690         2,025         6.03   

Cash equivalents

     43,728         45         0.21        27,851         3         0.02   

Federal Home Loan Bank stock

     4,134         64         3.11        6,432         114         3.57   
  

 

 

    

 

 

      

 

 

    

 

 

    

Total interest-earning assets

     680,772         16,227         4.79        819,397         20,759         5.11   

Interest-bearing liabilities:

                

NOW accounts

     66,809         20         0.06        74,628         34         0.09   

Savings accounts

     39,423         36         0.18        36,073         27         0.15   

Money market accounts

     110,322         238         0.43        113,821         418         0.74   

Certificates

     217,246         1,352         1.25        253,692         2,040         1.62   

Brokered deposits

     51,783         632         2.45        98,050         1,227         2.52   

Advances and other borrowings

     70,000         1,689         4.85        115,085         2,569         4.50   
  

 

 

    

 

 

      

 

 

    

 

 

    

Total interest-bearing liabilities

     555,583              691,349         

Non-interest checking

     92,019              94,339         

Other non-interest bearing deposits

     1,164              1,070         
  

 

 

         

 

 

       

Total interest-bearing liabilities and non-interest bearing deposits

   $ 648,766         3,967         1.23      $ 786,758         6,315         1.62   
  

 

 

    

 

 

      

 

 

    

 

 

    

Net interest income

      $ 12,260            $ 14,444      
     

 

 

         

 

 

    

Net interest rate spread

           3.56           3.49
        

 

 

         

 

 

 

Net interest margin

           3.62           3.55
        

 

 

         

 

 

 

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses was $1.1 million for the second quarter of 2012, a decrease of $2.4 million, or 68.6%, from $3.5 million for the second quarter of 2011. The provision for loan losses decreased in the second quarter of 2012, compared to second quarter 2011, primarily because there were fewer decreases in the estimated value of the underlying collateral supporting commercial real estate loans that required additional allowances or charge offs in the current period when compared to the second quarter of 2011. The provision also decreased because of a decrease in the required reserves for certain risk rated commercial loans as a result of an internal loan portfolio analysis that was performed between the periods.

The provision for loan losses was $1.0 million for the first six months of 2012, a decrease of $4.4 million, or 82.3%, from $5.4 million for the same six month period in 2011. The provision for loan losses decreased in the first six months of 2012 primarily because there were fewer decreases in the estimated value of the underlying collateral supporting commercial real estate loans that required additional allowances or charge offs in the current period when compared to the first six months of 2011. The provision also decreased because of a decrease in the required reserves for certain risk rated commercial loans as a result of an internal loan portfolio analysis that was performed between the periods.

A reconciliation of the Company’s allowance for loan losses for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011 is summarized as follows:

 

(Dollars in thousands)

   2012     2011  

Balance at March 31,

   $ 21,424      $ 34,953   

Provision

     1,088        3,463   

Charge offs:

    

One-to-four family

     0        (16

Consumer

     (493     (34

Commercial business

     (1,820     (6,249

Commercial real estate

     (1,554     (4,633

Recoveries

     1,874        280   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at June 30,

   $ 20,519      $ 27,764   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

General allowance

   $ 14,507      $ 15,618   

Specific allowance

     6,012        12,146   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   $ 20,519      $ 27,764   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

30


Table of Contents

(Dollars in thousands)

   2012     2011  

Balance at January 1,

   $ 23,888      $ 42,828   

Provision

     960        5,409   

Charge offs:

    

One-to-four family

     0        (419

Consumer

     (757     (86

Commercial business

     (1,829     (8,557

Commercial real estate

     (4,184     (12,209

Recoveries

     2,441        798   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at June 30,

   $ 20,519      $ 27,764   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The decrease in the allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2012 when compared to June 30, 2011 was due primarily to the modification in the fourth quarter of 2011 of our charge off policy on non-performing loans, which required the charge off of previously established specific valuation allowances (SVAs). Previously, when a collateral-dependent loan was characterized as a loss, the Company typically established an SVA based on the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral, less any related selling costs and the actual charge off of the loan was not recorded until the foreclosure process was complete. The gross loan balance for these non-performing loans was reported as an outstanding loan with any associated SVAs included in the financial statements as part of the allowance for loan losses. Under the modified policy, which is also acceptable under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, SVAs are no longer recognized and any losses on loans secured by real estate are charged off in the period the loans, or portion thereof, are deemed uncollectible.

Non-Interest Income

Non-interest income was $1.8 million for the second quarter of 2012, an increase of $0.2 million, or 12.9%, from $1.6 million for the same period in 2011. Gains on sales of loans increased $0.3 million between the periods primarily as a result of increased single family loan originations due to the low interest rate environment that continued to exist in the second quarter of 2012. Fees and service charges decreased $91,000 primarily because of a decrease in overdraft charges between the periods.

Non-interest income was $4.5 million for the first six months of 2012, an increase of $1.1 million, or 33.3%, from $3.4 million for the first six months of 2011. Gains on sales of loans increased $0.7 million between the periods primarily as a result of increased single family loan originations due to the low interest rate environment that continued to exist during the first six months of 2012. Gain on sale of branch office increased $0.6 million as a result of the sale of the Toledo, Iowa branch in the first quarter of 2012. Fees and service charges decreased $0.2 million primarily because of a decrease in overdraft charges between the periods.

Non-Interest Expense

Non-interest expense was $6.4 million for the second quarter of 2012, a decrease of $1.1 million, or 15.1%, from $7.5 million for the same period of 2011. Other non-interest expense decreased $0.7 million primarily because of decreased real estate taxes and legal fees related to other real estate owned. Compensation and benefits decreased $0.3 million between the periods primarily because of a decrease in employees between the periods. Deposit insurance costs decreased $0.1 million primarily because of a decrease in assets between the periods.

Non-interest expense was $12.6 million for the first six months of 2012, a decrease of $1.7 million, or 11.8%, from $14.3 million for the same period of 2011. Other non-interest expense decreased $0.9 million because of decreased real estate taxes and legal fees related to other real estate owned. Compensation and benefits decreased $0.4 million primarily because of a decrease in employees between the periods. Deposit insurance costs decreased $0.2 million primarily because of a decrease in assets between the periods. Occupancy expense decreased $0.1 million between the periods primarily because of a decrease in depreciation expense. Loss on real estate owned decreased $0.1 million because of a decrease in the gains recognized on the sale of real estate owned between the periods. Data processing costs increased $0.1 million between the periods primarily because of a one time incentive that was received by the Company in the first quarter of 2011 related to a change in our ATM and debit card vendor.

 

31


Table of Contents

Income Taxes

The effect of income taxes changed $76,000 between the periods, from a benefit of $76,000 in the second quarter of 2011 to no expense in the second quarter of 2012. In the second quarter of 2010, the Company recorded a deferred tax asset valuation reserve against its entire deferred tax asset balance and the Company continued to maintain a valuation reserve against the entire deferred tax asset balance at June 30, 2012. Since the valuation reserve is established against the entire deferred tax asset balance, no income tax expense was recorded for the second quarter of 2012. The income tax benefit in the second quarter of 2011 relates to the reversal of the taxes on the change in the fair market value of the available for sale investment portfolio that was recorded in the first quarter of 2011.

No income tax expense was recorded in the first six months of 2012 or 2011. In the second quarter of 2010, the Company recorded a deferred tax asset valuation reserve against its entire deferred tax asset balance and the Company continued to maintain a valuation reserve against the entire deferred tax asset balance at June 30, 2012. Since the valuation reserve is established against the entire deferred tax asset balance, no income tax expense was recorded for the first six months of 2012 or 2011.

Net Income (Loss) Available to Common Shareholders

The net loss available to common shareholders was $69,000 for the second quarter of 2012, an improvement of $2.6 million from the $2.7 million net loss available to common shareholders in the second quarter of 2011. The net income available to common shareholders was $2.3 million for the first six months of 2012, an improvement of $5.1 million from the $2.8 million net loss available to common shareholders in the first six months of 2011. The net loss available to common shareholders decreased for both the second quarter of 2012 and the six month period ending June 30, 2012 primarily because of the change in the net income (loss) between the periods.

The Company has deferred the last six quarterly dividend payments, beginning with the February 15, 2011 dividend payment, on its Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A issued to the United States Treasury Department as part of the TARP Capital Purchase Program. The deferred dividend payments have been accrued for payment in the future and are being reported for the deferral period as a preferred dividend requirement that is deducted from income for financial statement purposes to arrive at the net income (loss) available to common shareholders. Under the terms of the certificate of designations for the preferred stock, dividend payments may be deferred without default, but the dividend is cumulative and, since the Company failed to pay dividends for six quarters, the Treasury has the right to appoint two representatives to the Company’s board of directors, although the Treasury has not yet exercised this right. Under the terms of the Company’s and Bank’s Supervisory Agreements with their federal banking regulators, neither the Company nor the Bank may declare or pay any cash dividends, or purchase or redeem any capital stock, without prior notice to, and consent of these regulators. The Company does not anticipate requesting consent from the Federal Reserve Board to make any payments of dividends on, or purchase of, its common or preferred stock in 2012.

 

32


Table of Contents

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Non-Performing Assets

The following table summarizes the amounts and categories of non-performing assets, which consist of non-performing loans and foreclosed and repossessed assets, in the Bank’s portfolio and loan delinquency information as of the end of the three most recently completed quarters.

 

(Dollars in thousands)

   June 30,
2012
    March 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 

Non-Performing Loans:

      

One-to-four family real estate

   $ 4,409      $ 5,240      $ 4,435   

Commercial real estate

     22,322        20,498        22,658   

Consumer

     367        737        699   

Commercial business

     3,993        6,539        6,201   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

     31,091        33,014        33,993   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Foreclosed and Repossessed Assets:

      

One-to-four family real estate

     145        317        352   

Commercial real estate

     12,587        13,278        16,264   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-performing assets

   $ 43,823      $ 46,609      $ 50,609   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total as a percentage of total assets

     6.54     6.60     6.40
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-performing loans

   $ 31,091      $ 33,014      $ 33,993   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total as a percentage of total loans receivable, net

     6.27     6.14     6.10
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Allowance for loan loss to non-performing loans

     66.00     64.90     70.27
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Delinquency Data:

      

Delinquencies (1)

      

30+ days

   $ 6,412      $ 4,823      $ 3,226   

90+ days

     0        0        0   

Delinquencies as a percentage of loan and lease portfolio (1)

      

30+ days

     1.24     0.86     0.54

90+ days

     0.00     0.00     0.00

 

(1) Excludes non-accrual loans.

The increase in loans that were more than 30 days delinquent at June 30, 2012 relates primarily to one land loan totaling $1.1 million and four single family loans totaling $0.7 million that became delinquent during the quarter and were more than 30 days delinquent at June 30, 2012.

Total non-performing assets were $43.8 million at June 30, 2012, a decrease of $2.8 million, or 6.0%, from $46.6 million at March 31, 2012. Non-performing loans decreased $1.9 million and foreclosed and repossessed assets decreased $0.9 million during the second quarter of 2012. The non-performing loan and foreclosed and repossessed asset activity for the second quarter of 2012 was as follows:

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Non-performing loans

     Foreclosed and repossessed assets   

March 31, 2012

   $ 33,014     

March 31, 2012

   $ 13,594   

Classified as non-performing

     7,478     

Transferred from non-performing loans

     110   

Charge offs

     (3,949  

Other foreclosures/repossessions

     0   

Principal payments received

     (5,268  

Real estate sold

     (725

Classified as accruing

     (74  

Net gain on sale of assets

     128   

Transferred to real estate owned

     (110  

Write downs and payments

     (375
  

 

 

      

 

 

 

June 30, 2012

   $ 31,091     

June 30, 2012

   $ 12,732   
  

 

 

      

 

 

 

The decrease in non-performing loans during the quarter relates primarily to principal payments received and charge offs during the period. Of the $5.3 million in principal payments received during the second quarter of 2012, $2.4 million related to the payoff of a non-performing commercial real estate loan secured by an office building and $1.1 million related to the payoff of a non-performing bank stock loan. These decreases in non-performing loans were partially offset by loans that were classified as non-performing during the period. Of the $7.5 million in loans classified as non-performing, $5.7 million relates to a commercial real estate development loan located in the Bank’s primary market area. This loan is the largest non-performing loan at June 30, 2012.

 

33


Table of Contents

Total non-performing assets were $43.8 million at June 30, 2012, a decrease of $6.8 million, or 13.4%, from $50.6 million at December 31, 2011. Non-performing loans decreased $2.9 million and foreclosed and repossessed assets decreased $3.9 million during the first six months of 2012. The non-performing loan and foreclosed and repossessed asset activity for the first six months of 2012 was as follows:

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Non-performing loans

    

Foreclosed and repossessed assets

  

January 1, 2012

   $ 33,993     

January 1, 2012

   $ 16,616   

Classified as non-performing

     11,357     

Transferred from non-performing loans

     588   

Charge offs

     (6,852  

Other foreclosures/repossessions

     0   

Principal payments received

     (6,403  

Real estate sold

     (4,234

Classified as accruing

     (416  

Net gain on sale of assets

     348   

Transferred to real estate owned

     (588  

Write downs and payments

     (586
  

 

 

      

 

 

 

June 30, 2012

   $ 31,091     

June 30, 2012

   $ 12,732   
  

 

 

      

 

 

 

The decrease in non-performing loans during the first six months of 2012 relates primarily to charge offs and principal payments received during the period. Of the $6.9 million in charge offs during the period, $2.2 million related to a commercial development loan and $1.2 million related to two residential development loans that were charged off as a result of obtaining updated appraisals of the underlying collateral. These decrease in non-performing loans were partially offset by loans that were classified as non-performing during the period. Of the $11.4 million in loans classified as non-performing, $5.7 million relates to a commercial real estate development loan located in the Bank’s primary market area. This loan is the largest non-performing loan at June 30, 2012.

The following table summarizes the number and types of our commercial real estate loans (the largest category of non-performing loans) that were non-performing as of the end of the three most recently completed quarters.

 

(Dollars in thousands)

Property Type

   #      Principal
Amount
of Loans

June 30,
2012
     #      Principal
Amount
of Loans

March 31,
2012
     #      Principal
Amount of
Loans

December 31,
2011
 

Developments/land

     13       $ 20,630         12       $ 15,615         10       $ 17,465   

Shopping centers/retail

     2         406         3         1,375         2         1,315   

Restaurants/bar

     1         581         1         596         1         616   

Office buildings

     2         184         1         2,325         1         2,325   

Other buildings

     2         521         2         587         3         937   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     20       $ 22,322         19       $ 20,498         17       $ 22,658   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The increase in the non-performing commercial real estate loans from March 31, 2012 is due primarily to a $5.7 million commercial real estate development loan that was classified as non-performing during the period. This increase was partially offset by a $2.4 million payoff of a non-performing commercial real estate loan secured by an office building and the partial charge offs on two residential development loans totaling $0.8 million.

The following table summarizes the number of lending relationships and industry type of commercial business loans that were non-performing as of the end of the three most recently completed quarters.

 

(Dollars in thousands)

Industry Type

   #      Principal
Amount
of Loans

June 30,
2012
     #      Principal
Amount
of Loans

March 31,
2012
     #      Principal
Amount of
Loans

December 31,
2011
 

Construction/development/land

     6       $ 1,796         6       $ 1,953         6       $ 2,061   

Retail

     2         202         2         47         1         82   

Banking

     0         0         1         1,149         1         1,149   

Entertainment

     1         20         1         20         1         23   

Utilities

     2         1,394         1         2,780         1         2,792   

Restaurant

     1         498         1         501         0         0   

Other

     2         83         2         89         2         94   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     14       $ 3,993         14       $ 6,539         12       $ 6,201   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The decrease in non-performing commercial business loans during the second quarter of 2012 is primarily related to the charge off of $1.6 million on a non-performing commercial business loan in the utilities industry and $1.1 million related to the payoff of a non-performing bank stock loan during the second quarter of 2012.

 

34


Table of Contents

Dividends

The declaration of dividends is subject to, among other things, the Company’s financial condition and results of operations, the Bank’s compliance with its regulatory capital requirements, tax considerations, industry standards, economic conditions, regulatory restrictions, general business practices and other factors. Under the Bank Supervisory Agreement, no dividends can be declared or paid by the Bank to the Company without prior regulatory approval. The payment of dividends by the Company is dependent upon the Company having adequate cash or other assets that can be converted to cash to pay dividends to its stockholders. In addition, under the terms of the Company’s Supervisory Agreement, the Company may not declare or pay any cash dividends, or purchase or redeem any capital stock, without prior notice to, and consent of its regulator. The Company suspended the dividend payments to common stockholders in the fourth quarter of 2008 due to the net operating losses experienced and the challenging economic environment.

The Company has deferred the last six quarterly dividend payments, beginning with the February 15, 2011 dividend payment, on its Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A issued to the United States Treasury Department as part of the TARP Capital Purchase Program. The deferred dividend payments have been accrued for payment in the future and are being reported for the deferral period as a preferred dividend requirement that is deducted from income for financial statement purposes to arrive at the net income (loss) available to common shareholders. Under the terms of the certificate of designations for the preferred stock, dividend payments may be deferred without default, but the dividend is cumulative and, since the Company failed to pay dividends for six quarters, the Treasury has the right to appoint two representatives to the Company’s board of directors, although the Treasury has not yet exercised this right. Under the terms of the Company’s and Bank’s Supervisory Agreements with their federal banking regulators, neither the Company nor the Bank may declare or pay any cash dividends, or purchase or redeem any capital stock, without prior notice to, and consent of these regulators. The Company does not anticipate requesting consent from the Federal Reserve Board to make any payments of dividends on, or purchase of, its common or preferred stock in 2012.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, the net cash provided by operating activities was $8.5 million. The Company collected $60.0 million from the maturities of securities, $5.6 million from principal repayments on securities, $0.2 million from the redemption of FHLB stock, and $4.2 million in proceeds from the sale of real estate. The Company purchased securities of $16.0 million, purchased premises and equipment of $0.2 million, and paid $37.0 million in connection with the Toledo, Iowa branch sale. Net loans receivable decreased $54.4 million due primarily to decreased commercial loan production. The Company had a net decrease in deposit balances of $81.2 million (primarily in brokered deposits) and paid out $0.2 million in customer escrows.

The Company has certificates of deposits with outstanding balances of $160.8 million that come due over the next 12 months, of which $25.0 million were obtained from brokers. Based upon past experience, management anticipates that the majority of the deposits will renew for another term, with the exception of the brokered deposits that are not anticipated to renew due to the Company’s desire to reduce the amount of outstanding brokered deposits. In addition, based on a regulatory directive, the Bank may not renew existing brokered deposits, or accept new brokered deposits without the prior consent of the OCC. The Company believes that deposits that do not renew will be replaced with proceeds from loan principal payments or replaced with a combination of other customer’s deposits, FHLB advances or Federal Reserve Bank borrowings. Proceeds from the sale of securities could also be used to fund unanticipated outflows of deposits.

The Company had only one deposit customer with aggregate deposits greater than $5.0 million as of June 30, 2012. The $7.1 million in funds held by this customer may be withdrawn at any time, however, management does not anticipate that these deposits will be withdrawn from the Bank over the next twelve months. If these deposits were to be withdrawn, they would be replaced with deposits from other customers or brokers, subject to regulatory approval. FHLB advances, Federal Reserve borrowings or proceeds from the sale of securities could also be used to replace unanticipated outflows of large checking and money market deposits.

The Company has $10.0 million of FHLB advances which mature beyond June 30, 2013 but have call features

 

35


Table of Contents

that can be exercised by the FHLB during the next 12 months. If the call features are exercised, the Company has the option of requesting any advance otherwise available to it pursuant to the Credit Policy of the FHLB. Under the Company Supervisory Agreement, the Company may not incur or issue any debt without prior notice to, and the consent of, its primary regulator (FRB). Because FHLB advances are debt of the Bank, they are not affected by the Company’s restriction on incurring debt.

At June 30, 2012, the Bank had the ability to draw additional borrowings from the FHLB of $57.4 million based upon the collateral pledged, subject to a requirement to purchase additional FHLB stock and the FHLB agreeing to lend. The Bank also has the ability to draw additional borrowings of $38.8 million from the Federal Reserve Bank, based upon the loans pledged with them.

The credit policy of the FHLB relating to the collateral value of the loans collateralizing the outstanding advances with the FHLB may change such that the current collateral pledged to secure the advances is no longer acceptable or the formulas for determining the excess pledged collateral may change. If this were to happen, the Bank may not have additional collateral to pledge to secure the existing advances and the Bank may have to find alternative funding sources to replace some of the FHLB advances maturing in 2013. The FHLB could also reduce the amount of funds it will lend to the Bank. It is not anticipated that the Bank will need to find alternative funding sources to replace the outstanding FHLB advances, but if needed, excess collateral currently pledged to the FHLB could be pledged to the FRB and the Bank could borrow additional funds from the FRB based on the increased collateral levels or obtain additional deposits.

The Company’s primary source of cash is dividends from the Bank and the Bank is restricted under the Bank Supervisory Agreement from paying dividends to the Company without obtaining prior regulatory approval. At June 30, 2012, the Company had $1.2 million in cash and other assets that could readily be turned into cash. The primary use of cash by the Company is the payment of expenses. The amount of the dividend on the preferred stock accumulates at the rate of $325,000 per quarter through February 14, 2014 and $585,000 per quarter thereafter, if the shares of preferred stock are not redeemed. The Company has deferred the last six quarterly dividend payments, beginning with the February 15, 2011 dividend payment, on its Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A issued to the United States Treasury Department as part of the TARP Capital Purchase Program and has determined that it will defer the August 15, 2012 payment. Since the Company has failed to pay the dividends for six quarters, the Treasury has the right to appoint two representatives to the Company’s board of directors, although the Treasury has not yet exercised this right. The total amount of accrued but unpaid dividends totaled $2.0 million at June 30, 2012. The Company determined to defer such payments following discussions with its primary regulator. In addition, under the terms of the Company’s Supervisory Agreement, the Company may not declare or pay any cash dividends without prior notice to, and consent of, the OCC.

As required by the Company Supervisory Agreement, the Company submitted an updated two-year capital plan in January of 2012 that the Federal Reserve Board may make comments upon, and to which it may require revisions. The Company must operate within the parameters of the final capital plan and is required to monitor and submit periodic reports on its compliance with the plan. In addition, the OCC has established an IMCR for the Bank. An IMCR requires a bank to establish and maintain levels of capital greater than those generally required for a bank to be classified as “well-capitalized.” Effective December 31, 2011, the Bank was required to establish, and subsequently maintain, core capital at least equal to 8.5% of adjusted total assets, which was in excess of the Bank’s 7.14% core capital to adjusted total assets ratio at December 31, 2011. In February 2012, the Bank received a notice from the OCC arising out of its failure to establish and maintain its IMCR of 8.5% core capital to adjusted total assets at December 31, 2011. In accordance with this notice, by April 30, 2012, the OCC required the Bank to submit a further written capital plan of how it intends to achieve and maintain its IMCR, and a contingency plan in the event the IMCR is not achieved through the Bank’s primary plan. Because of the improved financial results and the decrease in assets experienced during the first six months of 2012, the Bank’s core capital ratio improved to 8.50% at March 31, 2012 and 9.04% at June 30, 2012. In April 2012, the Bank submitted the required revised capital and contingency plan to the OCC. The OCC may make comments upon, and require revisions to this plan. There can be no assurance that the Bank will continue to maintain compliance with the IMCR in the future. The Bank’s failure to comply with the terms of the IMCR at December 31, 2011 was, and its failure to continue to comply can be, deemed an unsafe and unsound banking practice and could subject it to further limits on growth and such legal actions or sanctions as the OCC considers appropriate.

 

36


Table of Contents

In order to improve its capital ratios and maintain compliance with its IMCR, the Bank is, among other things, working to improve its financial results, reduce non-performing assets, and decrease the asset size of the Bank. In March 2012, the Bank also sold substantially all of the assets and liabilities associated with its Toledo, Iowa branch. If capital conditions were to deteriorate, the Bank may also determine it to be necessary or prudent to dispose of other non-strategic assets. These actions may result in changes in the Bank’s assets, liabilities and earnings, some of which may be material, during the period in which the action is taken or is consummated or over a longer period of time.

The Company also serves as a source of capital, liquidity and financial support to the Bank. Based on the operating performance of the Bank or other capital demands, including the Bank’s failure to maintain the outstanding IMCR, the Company may need, or be required by supervising bank regulators, to raise additional capital. If the Company raises capital through the issuance of additional shares of common stock or other equity securities, it would dilute the ownership interests of existing stockholders and, given our current common stock trading price, would be expected to dilute the per share book value of the Company’s common stock and could result in a change of control of the Company and the Bank. New investors may also have rights, preferences and privileges senior to the Company’s current stockholders, which may adversely impact the Company’s current stockholders. The Company’s ability to raise additional capital through the issuance of equity securities, if needed, will depend on conditions in the capital markets at that time, which are outside of its control, and on the Company’s financial performance. Accordingly, the Company may not be able to raise additional capital, if needed, on favorable economic terms, or other terms acceptable to it. If the Company or the Bank cannot satisfactorily address their respective capital needs as they arise, the Company’s ability to maintain or expand its operations, their ability to maintain the Company’s capital plan and the Bank IMCR, operate without additional regulatory or other restrictions, and its operating results, could be materially adversely affected.

Market Risk

Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and rates. The Company’s market risk arises primarily from interest rate risk inherent in its investing, lending and deposit taking activities. Management actively monitors and manages its interest rate risk exposure.

The Company’s profitability is affected by fluctuations in interest rates. A sudden and substantial change in interest rates may adversely impact the Company’s earnings to the extent that the interest rates borne by assets and liabilities do not change at the same speed, to the same extent, or on the same basis. The Company monitors the projected changes in net interest income that occur if interest rates were to suddenly change up or down. The Rate Shock Table located in the Asset/Liability Management section of this report, which follows, discloses the Company’s projected changes in net interest income based upon immediate interest rate changes called rate shocks.

The Company utilizes a model that uses the discounted cash flows from its interest-earning assets and its interest-bearing liabilities to calculate the current market value of those assets and liabilities. The model also calculates the changes in market value of the interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities due to different interest rate changes.

The following table discloses the projected changes in market value to the Company’s interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities based upon incremental 100 basis point changes in interest rates from interest rates in effect on June 30, 2012.

 

     Market Value  
(Dollars in thousands)                         

Basis point change in interest rates

   -100     0     +100     +200  

Total market risk sensitive assets

   $ 683,823        676,025        666,357        654,727   

Total market risk sensitive liabilities

     621,271        602,820        589,956        578,048   

Off-balance sheet financial instruments

     (356     0        (77     (125
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net market risk

   $ 62,908        73,205        76,478        76,804   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Percentage change from current market value

     (14.07 )%      0.00     4.47     4.92
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

37


Table of Contents

The preceding table was prepared utilizing the following assumptions (the Model Assumptions) regarding prepayment and decay ratios that were determined by management based upon their review of historical prepayment speeds and future prepayment projections. Fixed rate loans were assumed to prepay at annual rates from 5% to 56%, depending on the note rate and the period to maturity. Adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs) were assumed to prepay at annual rates of between 13% and 34%, depending on the note rate and the period to maturity. Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) were projected to have prepayments based upon the underlying collateral securing the instrument and the related cash flow priority of the CMO tranche owned. Certificate accounts were assumed not to be withdrawn until maturity. Passbook accounts were assumed to decay at an annual rate of 9% and money market accounts were assumed to decay at an annual rate of 12%. Non-interest checking and NOW accounts were assumed to decay at an annual rate of 8% and commercial NOW and MMDA accounts were assumed to decay at annual rates of 12%. Commercial non-interest checking accounts were assumed to decay at an annual rate of 10%. FHLB advances were projected to be called at the first call date where the projected interest rate on similar remaining term advances exceeded the interest rate on the callable advance or investment.

Certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the foregoing table. The interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types of assets and liabilities may lag behind changes in market interest rates. The model assumes that the difference between the current interest rate being earned or paid compared to a treasury instrument or other interest index with a similar term to maturity (the Interest Spread) will remain constant over the interest changes disclosed in the table. Changes in Interest Spread could impact projected market value changes. Certain assets, such as ARMs, have features which restrict changes in interest rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the assets. The market value of the interest-bearing assets which are approaching their lifetime interest rate caps could be different from the values disclosed in the table. In the event of a change in interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels may deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the foregoing table. The ability of many borrowers to service their debt may decrease in the event of a substantial sustained interest rate increase.

Asset/Liability Management

The Company’s management reviews the impact that changing interest rates will have on its net interest income projected for the twelve months following June 30, 2012 to determine if its current level of interest rate risk is acceptable. The following table projects the estimated annual impact on net interest income during the 12 month period ending June 30, 2013 of immediate interest rate changes called rate shocks.

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Rate Shock in
Basis Points

    Projected
Change in Net
Interest Income
    Percentage
Change
 
  +200        1,176        5.69
  +100        703        3.40
  0        0        0.00
  -100        (1,400     (6.77 )% 

The preceding table was prepared utilizing the Model Assumptions. Certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the foregoing table. In the event of a change in interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels would likely deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the foregoing table. The ability of many borrowers to service their debt may decrease in the event of a substantial increase in interest rates and could impact net interest income. The increase in interest income in a rising rate environment is primarily because more loans than deposits are scheduled to reprice in the next twelve months.

In an attempt to manage its exposure to changes in interest rates, management closely monitors interest rate risk. The Bank has an Asset/Liability Committee which meets frequently to discuss changes in the interest rate risk position and projected profitability. The Committee makes adjustments to the asset-liability position of the Bank,

 

38


Table of Contents

which are reviewed by the Board of Directors of the Bank. This Committee also reviews the Bank’s portfolio, formulates investment strategies and oversees the timing and implementation of transactions to assure attainment of the Board’s objectives in the most effective manner. In addition, each quarter the Board reviews the Bank’s asset/liability position, including simulations of the effect on the Bank’s capital of various interest rate scenarios.

In managing its asset/liability mix, the Bank, at times, depending on the relationship between long- and short-term interest rates, market conditions and consumer preference, may place more emphasis on managing net interest margin than on better matching the interest rate sensitivity of its assets and liabilities in an effort to enhance net interest income. Management believes that the increased net interest income resulting from a mismatch in the maturity of its asset and liability portfolios can, in certain situations, provide high enough returns to justify the increased exposure to sudden and unexpected changes in interest rates.

To the extent consistent with its interest rate spread objectives, the Bank attempts to manage its interest rate risk and has taken a number of steps to restructure its balance sheet in order to better match the maturities of its assets and liabilities. In the past, more fixed rate loans were placed into the single family loan portfolio. Over the past several years, the Bank has primarily focused its fixed rate one-to-four family residential lending program on loans that are saleable to third parties and generally placed only those fixed rate loans that met certain risk characteristics into its loan portfolio. The Bank’s commercial loan production continued to be primarily in adjustable rate loans with minimum interest rate floors; however, more of these loans were structured to reprice every one, two, or three years.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements other than commitments to originate and sell loans in the ordinary course of business.

Item 4: Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act)). Based on this evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.

Changes in internal controls. There was no change in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the Company’s most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

 

39


Table of Contents

HMN FINANCIAL, INC.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

From time to time, the Company is party to legal proceedings arising out of its lending and deposit operations. The Company is, and expects to become, engaged in a number of foreclosure proceedings and other collection actions as part of its collection activities. Litigation is often unpredictable and the actual results of litigation cannot be determined with any certainty.

The Company entered into a written Supervisory Agreement with the OTS effective February 22, 2011. The Supervisory Agreement replaced the prior memorandum of understanding that the Company entered into with the OTS on December 9, 2009. The material requirements of the Company Supervisory Agreement are as follows:

 

   

Submission of a written plan by May 31, 2011 for enhancing the consolidated capital of the Company for the period ending December 31, 2012 and review of performance no less than quarterly along with reports to the FRB (as successor to the OTS’ role as regulator of the Company) within 45 days after the end of each calendar quarter. The plan submitted by the Company prior to May 31, 2011 focused on improvement in capital levels primarily through improved earnings, reduction in non-performing assets and reduction in total assets. As required, the Company submitted an updated two-year capital plan in January 2012.

 

   

The Company may not declare, make or pay any cash dividends or repurchase or redeem any of the Company’s equity stock without providing advance notice to the FRB and receiving written non-objection.

 

   

The Company may not incur, issue, renew, rollover or pay interest or principal on any debt or commit to do so nor may it increase any current lines of credit or guarantee the debt of any entity without prior written notice and written non-objection of the FRB.

 

   

Limits were placed on contractual arrangements related to compensation or benefits with any directors or officers and the Company is prevented from making any golden parachute payments to officers, directors or employees.

The Bank also entered into a written Supervisory Agreement with the OTS, effective February 22, 2011. The Bank Supervisory Agreement replaced the prior memorandum of understanding that the Bank entered into with the OTS on December 9, 2009. The material requirements of the Bank Supervisory Agreement are as follows:

 

   

Submission of a business plan by May 31, 2011, addressing strategies for supporting the Bank’s risk profile, improving earnings and profitability and stress testing. The Bank’s Board is to review performance no less than quarterly and report to the OCC (as successor to the OTS’s role as regulator of the Bank) within 45 days after the end of each calendar quarter. The plan submitted by the Bank prior to May 31, 2011 focused on improvement in capital levels primarily through improved earnings, reduction in non-performing assets and reduction in total assets. The OCC accepted the submitted plan with the expectation that the Bank would be in adherence with the OCC’s Notification of Establishment of Higher Minimum Capital Ratios, dated August 8, 2011, requiring a minimum core capital ratio of 8.5% by December 31, 2011. The Bank submitted an updated two-year business plan in January 2012 to the OCC.

 

   

Submission of a detailed written plan prior to March 31, 2011 to reduce the Bank’s problem assets. The plan submitted by the Bank by March 31, 2011 was accepted by the OCC and focused on improvement in the level of problem assets as a result of continuing the actions taken in 2010 and early 2011 by the Board and management to improve credit quality and more effectively identify and manage problem loans in a proactive manner.

 

   

Development of individual written specific workout plans for certain large adversely classified loans or groups of loans and for foreclosed real estate owned by the Bank within 30 days of the Supervisory Agreement effective date. The plans developed by the Bank focused on improving the ultimate collection of these items by improving the Bank’s collateral position or by an orderly liquidation of the collateral securing the assets.

 

40


Table of Contents
   

Beginning with the quarter ended June 30, 2011, the Bank is to submit quarterly asset reports to the OCC within 50 days of quarter end. The reports submitted by the Bank focused on the status of workout plans, classified assets, actions taken to reduce problem assets and recommended revisions to the problem asset plan.

 

   

Development by April 30, 2011 of a loan modification policy. The policy developed by the Bank focuses on enhanced supporting documentation and procedures relating to all loan restructurings, including those not determined to be troubled debt restructurings.

 

   

Revision of the Bank’s written credit concentration program and submission of the program by May 6, 2011 to the OTS. The plan addresses identifying, monitoring and controlling risk associated with concentrations of credit. The Bank has implemented the revisions and is monitoring the resulting information.

 

   

Improvement of the documentation relating to the allowance for loan and lease losses to ensure that it addressed OTS concerns. The documentation improvements related primarily to the inclusion of established specific reserves into the commercial loan migration charge-off analysis.

 

   

The Bank may not declare or pay any dividends or make any other capital distributions without providing advance request to the OCC and receiving written approval. The Supervisory Agreement also limits the Bank’s growth in total assets in excess of specified amounts without prior regulatory approval. The Bank’s assets grew in excess of the allowable amount in the third quarter of 2011; however, the Bank obtained prior approval from the OCC.

 

   

Limits are placed on contractual arrangements with third parties and contracts dealing with compensation or benefits with any directors or officers and the Bank is prevented from making any golden parachute payments to directors, officers and employees.

The Company and Bank timely submitted all plans and programs required by the Supervisory Agreements. The Company believes that it and the Bank are in compliance with all provisions of the Supervisory Agreements as of June 30, 2012. The applicable regulator may comment on and require revision of any submitted plan, program or policy. Neither the Company nor the Bank have taken any actions, or sought approval for such actions, where prior regulatory approval is required by the Supervisory Agreements other than the restriction related to asset growth and changes to the business plan. In the third quarter of 2011, the Bank requested and obtained a non-objection waiver from the OCC related to the unanticipated growth in assets during the third quarter in an amount greater than the net interest credited on deposit liabilities during the prior quarter. The Bank also received no supervisory objection to the change in the previously submitted business plan as a result of the increase in assets. The increase in assets was due to unanticipated increases in commercial deposits during the third quarter of 2011 as a result of increased cash being held by a few of the Bank’s commercial deposit customers.

The foregoing is merely a summary of the material terms of the Supervisory Agreements and reference is made to the full text of the Supervisory Agreements which are set forth as Exhibits 10.1 and 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 10, 2011.

Dissolution of the OTS did not have any material impact on the Supervisory Agreements as the Supervisory Agreements are now enforced by the FRB in the case of the Company’s Supervisory Agreement and the OCC in the case of the Bank’s Supervisory Agreement.

The OCC has established an IMCR for the Bank. An IMCR requires a bank to establish and maintain levels of capital greater than those generally required for a bank to be classified as “well-capitalized.” Effective December 31, 2011, the Bank was required to establish, and subsequently maintain, core capital at least equal to 8.5% of adjusted total assets, which was in excess of the Bank’s 7.14% core capital to adjusted total assets ratio at December 31, 2011. In February 2012, the Bank received a notice from the OCC arising out of its failure to establish and maintain its IMCR of 8.50% core capital to adjusted total assets at December 31, 2011. Pursuant to

 

41


Table of Contents

the notice, the OCC required the Bank to submit by April 30, 2012 a further written capital plan of how it intends to achieve and maintain its IMCR, and a contingency plan in the event the IMCR is not achieved through the Bank’s primary plan. Because of improved financial results and a decrease in assets, the Bank’s core capital ratio improved to 8.50% at March 31, 2012 and 9.04% at June 30, 2012. In April 2012, the Bank submitted to the OCC the required revised written capital and contingency plan. The OCC may make comments upon, and require revisions to the plan. The Bank’s failure to comply with the terms of the IMCR was, and its failure to continue to comply can be, deemed an unsafe and unsound banking practice.

There can be no assurance that the Company and the Bank will continue to maintain compliance with the Supervisory Agreements and the IMCR in the future. Under applicable banking regulations, the failure to satisfy the terms of the Supervisory Agreements and the IMCR, and failure to otherwise comply with applicable requirements as they arise, could subject the Company, the Bank and its directors and officers to such restrictions, legal actions or sanctions as the OCC or FRB considers appropriate. Possible sanctions include among others (i) the imposition of one or more cease and desist orders requiring corrective action, which are enforceable directives that may address any aspect of the Company or Bank management, operations or capital, including requirements to change management, raise equity capital, dispose of assets or effect a change of control; (ii) civil money penalties; and (iii) downgrades in the capital adequacy status of the Company and the Bank.

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

See Part I, Item 1.A. of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 for risk factors.

 

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

 

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

The Company deferred its February 15, 2011, May 15, 2011, August 15, 2011, November 15, 2011, February 15, 2012, and May 15, 2012 regular quarterly cash dividend payments on its Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A issued to the United States Treasury Department as part of the TARP Capital Purchase Program. The Company has also determined that it will defer its August 15, 2012 dividend payment and following that deferral, the Company will have an aggregate arrearage of $2.3 million with respect to the preferred stock. For additional information on these dividend deferrals, please see Part I, Item 2, “Managements’ Discussion and Analysis Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources” of our Form 10-Q.

Since the Company failed to pay dividends for six quarters, the Treasury has the right to appoint two representatives to the Company’s board of directors, although the Treasury has not yet exercised this right. Pending the election of any such director, the Treasury has requested, and the Company has agreed, to the attendance of an observer selected by Treasury at Company board of director meetings

 

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

 

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

 

Item 6. Exhibits.

Incorporated by reference to the index to exhibits included with this report immediately following the signature page.

 

42


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

    HMN FINANCIAL, INC.
    Registrant
Date: August 7, 2012     By:   /s/ Bradley Krehbiel
      Bradley Krehbiel,
      Chief Executive Officer and President
      (Principal Executive Officer)
Date: August 7, 2012     By:   /s/ Jon Eberle
      Jon Eberle,
      Chief Financial Officer
      (Principal Financial Officer)

 

43


Table of Contents

HMN FINANCIAL, INC.

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

FOR FORM 10-Q

 

Regulation
S-K
Exhibit
Number
   Document Attached Hereto    Reference
to Prior
Filing or
Exhibit
Number
Form 10-Q
   Sequential Page
Numbering Where
Attached Exhibits Are
Located in This Report

    3.1

   Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation    *1    N/A

    3.2

   Amended and Restated By-laws    *2    N/A

    4

   Form of Common Stock Certificate    *3    N/A

  31.1

   Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of CEO    31.1    Filed electronically

  31.2

   Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of CFO    31.2    Filed electronically

  32  

   Section 1350 Certification of CEO and CFO    32    Filed Electronically

101

   Financial statements from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2012, filed with the SEC on August 7, 2012, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL); (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, (iii) the Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the Six Month Period Ended June 30, 2012, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.    101    Filed Electronically

 

*1 Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 1998 (File No. 0-24100).
*2 Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 5, 2012 (File 0-24100).
*3 Incorporated by reference to the same numbered exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 dated April 1, 1994 (File No. 33-77212).

 

44