HMN FINANCIAL INC - Quarter Report: 2012 June (Form 10-Q)

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) FOR THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 0-24100

HMN FINANCIAL, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)


Delaware		41-1777397
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

1016 Civic Center Drive N.W., Rochester, MN		55901
(Address of principal executive offices)		(ZIP Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (507) 535-1200

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date.


Class		Outstanding at July 18, 2012
Common stock, $0.01 par value		4,423,589

HMN FINANCIAL, INC.

CONTENTS


		Page
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1:	Financial Statements (unaudited)

	Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011		3

	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three Months Ended and Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011		4

	Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the Six Month Period Ended June 30, 2012		5

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011		6

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		7

Item 2:	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		25

Item 3:	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk (Included in Item 2 under Market Risk)		37

Item 4:	Controls and Procedures		39

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1:	Legal Proceedings		40

Item 1A:	Risk Factors		42

Item 2:	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		42

Item 3:	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		42

Item 4:	Mine Safety Disclosures		42

Item 5:	Other Information		42

Item 6:	Exhibits		42

Signatures			43

Part I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1: Financial Statements

HMN FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets


(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
	(unaudited)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	65,618			67,840
Securities available for sale:
Mortgage-backed and related securities (amortized cost $14,035 and $19,586)		14,869			20,645
Other marketable securities (amortized cost $61,699 and $105,700)		61,420			105,469

		76,289			126,114


Loans held for sale		2,601			3,709
Loans receivable, net		496,178			555,908
Accrued interest receivable		1,980			2,449
Real estate, net		12,732			16,616
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost		4,063			4,222
Mortgage servicing rights, net		1,533			1,485
Premises and equipment, net		7,576			7,967
Prepaid expenses and other assets		1,744			2,262
Assets held for sale		0			1,583
Deferred tax asset, net		0			0

Total assets	$	670,314			790,155


Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Deposits	$	534,297			620,128
Deposits held for sale		0			36,048
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		70,000			70,000
Accrued interest payable		518			780
Customer escrows		713			933
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		5,255			5,205

Total liabilities		610,783			733,094

Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Serial preferred stock ($.01 par value): authorized 500,000 shares; issued shares 26,000		25,053			24,780
Common stock ($.01 par value): authorized 11,000,000; issued shares 9,128,662		91			91
Additional paid-in capital		52,096			53,462
Retained earnings, subject to certain restrictions		45,532			42,983
Accumulated other comprehensive income		199			471
Unearned employee stock ownership plan shares		(3,094	)		(3,191	)
Treasury stock, at cost 4,705,073 and 4,740,711 shares		(60,346	)		(61,535	)

Total stockholders’ equity		59,531			57,061

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	670,314			790,155

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

HMN FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(unaudited)


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	2012			2011			2012			2011
Interest income:
Loans receivable	$	7,523			9,301			15,319			19,204
Securities available for sale:
Mortgage-backed and related		164			290			357			614
Other marketable		192			407			441			824
Cash equivalents		19			2			46			3
Other		54			45			64			114

Total interest income		7,952			10,045			16,227			20,759


Interest expense:
Deposits		1,061			1,806			2,278			3,746
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		844			1,240			1,689			2,569

Total interest expense		1,905			3,046			3,967			6,315

Net interest income		6,047			6,999			12,260			14,444
Provision for loan losses		1,088			3,463			960			5,409

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		4,959			3,536			11,300			9,035


Non-interest income:
Fees and service charges		834			925			1,663			1,849
Mortgage servicing fees		236			250			468			500
Gain on sales of loans		620			301			1,529			796
Gain on sale of branch office		0			0			552			0
Other		104			113			288			230

Total non-interest income		1,794			1,589			4,500			3,375


Non-interest expense:
Compensation and benefits		3,219			3,512			6,632			7,072
Loss on real estate owned		174			143			97			190
Occupancy		839			916			1,721			1,856
Deposit insurance		305			407			575			811
Data processing		336			305			673			558
Other		1,485			2,209			2,903			3,797

Total non-interest expense		6,358			7,492			12,601			14,284

Income (loss) before income tax benefit		395			(2,367	)		3,199			(1,874	)
Income tax benefit		0			(76	)		0			0

Net income (loss)		395			(2,291	)		3,199			(1,874	)
Preferred stock dividends and discount		464			457			925			906

Net income (loss) available to common shareholders	$	(69	)		(2,748	)		2,274			(2,780	)


Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period	$	(93	)		438			(272	)		324

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	$	(93	)		438			(272	)		324

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common shareholders	$	(162	)		(2,310	)		2,002			(2,456	)

Basic earnings (loss) per common share	$	(0.02	)		(0.72	)		0.58			(0.73	)

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share	$	(0.02	)		(0.72	)		0.57			(0.73	)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

HMN FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity

For the Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2012

(unaudited)


(Dollars in thousands)	Preferred Stock		Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income			Unearned Employee Stock Ownership Plan Shares			Treasury Stock			Total Stock- Holders’ Equity
Balance, December 31, 2011	$	24,780		91		53,462			42,983			471			(3,191	)		(61,535	)		57,061
Net income									3,199												3,199
Other comprehensive loss												(272	)								(272	)
Preferred stock discount amortization		273				(273	)														0
Stock compensation tax benefits						4															4
Unearned compensation restricted stock awards						(1,199	)											1,199			0
Restricted stock awards forfeited						10												(10	)		0
Amortization of restricted stock awards						133															133
Preferred stock dividends accrued									(650	)											(650	)
Earned employee stock ownership plan shares						(41	)								97						56

Balance, June 30, 2012	$	25,053		91		52,096			45,532			199			(3,094	)		(60,346	)		59,531

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

HMN FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(unaudited)


	Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2012			2011
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	3,199			(1,874	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		960			5,409
Depreciation		570			640
Amortization of premiums, net		65			166
Amortization of deferred loan fees		(169	)		(294	)
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights, net		348			213
Capitalized mortgage servicing rights		(396	)		(147	)
Loss on real estate		97			190
Gains on sales of loans		(1,529	)		(796	)
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale		55,066			25,350
Disbursements on loans held for sale		(48,390	)		(19,237	)
Amortization of restricted stock awards		133			152
Amortization of unearned ESOP shares		97			97
Earned employee stock ownership shares priced below original cost		(41	)		(38	)
Stock option compensation		4			14
Decrease in accrued interest receivable		469			379
Decrease in accrued interest payable		(262	)		(194	)
Decrease in other assets		521			867
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities		(2,355	)		1,965
Other, net		99			119

Net cash provided by operating activities		8,486			12,981

Cash flows from investing activities:
Principal collected on securities available for sale		5,556			6,635
Proceeds collected on maturities of securities available for sale		60,000			80,000
Purchases of securities available for sale		(16,000	)		(69,028	)
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank Stock		0			(17	)
Redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank Stock		159			1,186
Proceeds from sales of real estate		4,219			2,463
Net decrease in loans receivable		54,508			45,473
Gain on sale of branch office		(552	)		0
Payment on sale of branch office		(36,981	)		0
Purchases of premises and equipment		(175	)		(115	)

Net cash provided by investing activities		70,734			66,597

Cash flows from financing activities:
Decrease in deposits		(81,222	)		(36,247	)
Repayment of borrowings		0			(37,500	)
Decrease in customer escrows		(220	)		(88	)

Net cash used by financing activities		(81,442	)		(73,835	)

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(2,222	)		5,743
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		67,840			20,981

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	65,618			26,724

Supplemental cash flow disclosures:
Cash paid for interest	$	4,229			6,509
Cash paid for income taxes		10			0
Supplemental noncash flow disclosures:
Transfer of loans to real estate		525			8,259
Loans transferred to loans held for sale		4,073			3,607

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

HMN FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

June 30, 2012 and 2011

(1) HMN Financial, Inc.

HMN Financial, Inc. (HMN or the Company) is a stock savings bank holding company that owns 100 percent of Home Federal Savings Bank (the Bank). The Bank has a community banking philosophy and operates retail banking and loan production offices in Minnesota and Iowa. The Bank has one wholly owned subsidiary, Osterud Insurance Agency, Inc. (OIA), which offers financial planning products and services. HMN has another wholly owned subsidiary, Security Finance Corporation (SFC), which is currently not actively engaged in any activities.

The consolidated financial statements included herein are for HMN, SFC, the Bank and OIA. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

(2) Basis of Preparation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with instructions for Form 10-Q and therefore, do not include all disclosures necessary for a complete presentation of the consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss), consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity and consolidated statements of cash flows in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. However, all normal recurring adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair presentation of the interim financial statements have been included. The results of operations for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 is not necessarily indicative of the results which may be expected for the entire year.

(3) New Accounting Standards

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-03, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860), Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements. This ASU prescribes when an entity may or may not recognize a sale upon the transfer of financial assets subject to repurchase agreements. That determination is based, in part, on whether the entity has maintained effective control over the transferred assets. The amendments in this ASU removed from the assessment of effective control (1) the criterion requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee, and (2) the collateral maintenance implementation guidance related to that criterion. Other criteria applicable to the assessment of effective control are not changed by the amendments in this ASU. This ASU is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011 and should be applied prospectively to transactions or modification of existing transactions that occur on or after the effective date. The adoption of this ASU in the first quarter of 2012 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820), Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. The amendments in this ASU change the wording used to describe the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements in order to improve consistency in wording between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. Also, the amendments in the ASU require that for each class of assets and liabilities not measured at fair value on the balance sheet but for which the fair value is disclosed, the Company shall disclose the fair value hierarchy for each asset and liability class. This ASU is effective for interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this ASU in the first quarter of 2012 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements other than to change the disclosures relating to fair value measurements.

June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), Presentation of Comprehensive Income. Prior to this ASU, U.S. GAAP allowed reporting entities three alternatives for presenting other comprehensive income and its components in financial statements. The first two options were to present this information in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The third option, which was used by the Company, was to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. This ASU eliminates the third option and therefore the

Company selected to present this information in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this ASU in the first quarter of 2012 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements other than to change the presentation of other comprehensive income as discussed above.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210). The objective of this ASU is to provide enhanced disclosures that will enable users of its financial statements to evaluate the effect or potential effect of rights of setoff associated with an entity’s financial position. This includes the effect or potential effect of rights of setoff associated with an entity’s recognized assets and recognized liabilities within the scope of this ASU. The amendments require enhanced disclosures by requiring improved information about financial instruments and derivative instruments that are either (1) offset in accordance with either Section 210-20-45 or Section 815-10-45 or (2) subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement, irrespective of whether they are offset in accordance with either Section 210-20-45 or Section 815-10-45. An entity is required to apply the amendments for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods with those annual periods. The adoption of this ASU in the first quarter of 2013 is not anticipated to have any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as it currently has no outstanding rights of setoff.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220). The amendments in this ASU supersede certain pending paragraphs in ASU 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income, to effectively defer only those changes in ASU 2011-05 that relate to the presentation of reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income. All other requirements in ASU 2011-05 are not affected by this ASU, including the requirement to report comprehensive income either in a single continuous financial statement or in two separate but consecutive financial statements. The amendments in this ASU will be temporary to allow the FASB time to redeliberate the presentation requirements for reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income for annual and interim financial statements for public, private, and non-profit entities. The adoption of this ASU in the first quarter of 2012 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements other than to change the presentation of other comprehensive income as discussed above.

(4) Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

The Company has commitments outstanding to extend credit to future borrowers that have not closed prior to the end of the quarter. The Company intends to sell these commitments, which are referred to as its “mortgage pipeline.” As commitments to originate or purchase loans enter the mortgage pipeline, the Company generally enters into commitments to sell the mortgage pipeline into the secondary market on a firm commitment or best efforts basis. The commitments to originate, purchase or sell loans on a firm commitment basis are derivatives. As a result of marking to market the mortgage pipeline and the related firm commitments to sell for the period ended June 30, 2012, the Company recorded an increase in other assets of $1,000, an increase in other liabilities of $2,000 and a loss included in the gain on sales of loans of $1,000.

The current commitments to sell loans held for sale are derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting. As a result, these derivatives are marked to market and the related loans held for sale are recorded at the lower of cost or market. The Company recorded a decrease in other liabilities of $30,000 and a gain included in the gain on sales of loans of $30,000.

(5) Fair Value Measurements

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements establishes a framework for measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities using a hierarchy system consisting of three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:

Level 1 – Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets that the Company has the ability to access.

Level 2 – Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which significant assumptions are observable in the market.

Level 3 – Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market and are used only to the extent that observable inputs are not available. These unobservable assumptions reflect our own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.

The following table summarizes the assets and liabilities of the Company for which fair values are determined on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.


	Carrying value at June 30, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Securities available for sale	$	76,289		146		76,143		0
Mortgage loan commitments		30		0		30		0

Total	$	76,319		146		76,173		0


	Carrying value at December 31, 2011
(Dollars in thousands)	Total			Level 1		Level 2			Level 3
Securities available for sale	$	126,114			613		125,501			0
Mortgage loan commitments		(94	)		0		(94	)		0

Total	$	126,020			613		125,407			0

There were no transfers between Levels 1, 2, or 3 during the three or six month periods ended June 30, 2012.

The Company may also be required, from time to time, to measure certain other financial assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. These adjustments to fair value usually result from the application of the lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

For assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in the second quarter of 2012 that were still held at June 30, 2012, the following table provides the level of valuation assumptions used to determine each adjustment and the carrying value of the related individual assets or portfolios at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011


	Carrying value at June 30, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Three months ended June 30, 2012 Total gains (losses)			Six months ended June 30, 2012 Total gains (losses)
Loans held for sale	$	2,601		0		2,601		0		26			(30	)
Mortgage servicing rights		1,533		0		1,533		0		0			0
Loans ⁽¹⁾		41,983		0		41,983		0		(273	)		(1,374	)
Real estate, net⁽²⁾		12,732		0		12,732		0		(303	)		(442	)

Total	$	58,849		0		58,849		0		(550	)		(1,846	)


	Carrying value at December 31, 2011
(Dollars in thousands)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Year ended December 31, 2011 Total Gains (Losses)
Loans held for sale	$	3,709		0		3,709		0		129
Mortgage servicing rights		1,485		0		1,485		0		0
Loans ⁽¹⁾		38,162		0		38,162		0		(4,167	)
Real estate, net⁽²⁾		16,616		0		16,616		0		(2,690	)
Assets held for sale		1,583		0		1,583		0		0
Deposits held for sale		36,048		0		36,048		0		0

Total	$	97,603		0		97,603		0		(6,728	)

(1)	Represents the carrying value and related specific reserves on loans for which adjustments are based on the appraised value of the collateral. The carrying value of loans fully charged-off is zero.

(2)	Represents the fair value and related losses of foreclosed real estate and other collateral owned that were measured at fair value subsequent to their initial classification as foreclosed assets.

(6) Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Generally accepted accounting principles require interim reporting period disclosure about the fair value of financial instruments, including assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. The fair value hierarchy level for each asset and liability, as defined in note 5, have been included in the following table for June 30, 2012 as required by the adoption of ASU 2011-04 in the first quarter of 2012. The fair value estimates are made based upon relevant market information, if available, and upon the characteristics of the financial instruments themselves. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based upon judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments and other factors. The estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are shown below.


	June 30, 2012													December 31, 2011
							Fair value hierarchy
(Dollars in thousands)	Carrying amount			Estimated fair value			Level 1		Level 2		Level 3	Contract amount		Carrying amount			Estimated fair value			Contract Amount
Financial assets:

Cash and cash equivalents	$	65,618			65,618			65,618							67,840			67,840

Securities available for sale		76,289			76,289			146		76,143					126,114			126,114

Loans held for sale		2,601			2,601					2,601					3,709			3,709

Loans receivable, net		496,178			505,096					505,096					555,908			566,266
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		4,063			4,063					4,063					4,222			4,222

Accrued interest receivable		1,980			1,980					1,980					2,449			2,449

Assets held for sale		0			0										1,583			1,605

Financial liabilities:

Deposits		534,297			534,297					534,297					620,128			620,128

Deposits held for sale		0			0										36,048			36,048
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		70,000			74,296					74,296					70,000			74,433

Accrued interest payable		518			518					518					780			780
Off-balance sheet financial instruments:

Commitments to extend credit		30			30								90,266		29			29			91,113

Commitments to sell loans		(67	)		(67	)							5,810		(94	)		(94	)		7,263

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximates their fair value.

Securities Available for Sale

The fair values of securities were based upon quoted market prices for identical or similar instruments in active markets.

Loans Held for Sale

The fair values of loans held for sale were based upon quoted market prices for loans with similar interest rates and terms to maturity.

Loans Receivable

The fair values of loans receivable were estimated for groups of loans with similar characteristics. The fair value of the loan portfolio, with the exception of the adjustable rate portfolio, was calculated by discounting the scheduled cash flows through the estimated maturity using anticipated prepayment speeds and using discount rates that reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in each loan portfolio. The fair value of the adjustable loan portfolio was estimated by grouping the loans with similar characteristics and comparing the characteristics of each group to the prices quoted for similar types of loans in the secondary market. This method of estimating fair value does not incorporate the exit-price concept of fair value prescribed by ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

The carrying amount of FHLB stock approximates its fair value.

Accrued Interest Receivable

The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable approximates its fair value since it is short-term in nature and does not present unanticipated credit concerns.

Deposits

The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts and certain money market account deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. If the fair value of the fixed maturity certificates of deposit is calculated at less than the carrying amount, the carrying value of these deposits is reported as the fair value.

The fair value estimate for deposits does not include the benefit that results from the low cost funding provided by the Company’s existing deposits and long-term customer relationships compared to the cost of obtaining different sources of funding. This benefit is commonly referred to as the core deposit intangible.

Federal Home Loan Bank Advances

The fair values of advances with fixed maturities are estimated based on discounted cash flow analysis using as discount rates the interest rates charged by the FHLB for borrowings of similar remaining maturities.

Accrued Interest Payable

The carrying amount of accrued interest payable approximates its fair value since it is short-term in nature.

Commitments to Extend Credit

The fair values of commitments to extend credit are estimated using the fees normally charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counter parties.

Commitments to Sell Loans

The fair values of commitments to sell loans are estimated using the quoted market prices for loans with similar interest rates and terms to maturity.

(7) Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Other comprehensive income (loss) is defined as the change in equity during a period from transactions and other events from nonowner sources. Comprehensive income (loss) is the total of net income (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss), which for the Company is comprised of unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale. The components of other comprehensive income (loss) and the related tax effects were as follows:


	For the three months ended June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2012								2011
(Dollars in thousands)	Before tax			Tax effect		Net of tax			Before tax		Tax effect		Net of tax
Securities available for sale:
Net unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period	$	(93	)		0		(93	)		514		76		438

Other comprehensive income (loss)	$	(93	)		0		(93	)		514		76		438


	For the six months ended June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2012								2011
(Dollars in thousands)	Before tax			Tax effect		Net of tax			Before tax		Tax effect		Net of tax
Securities available for sale:
Net unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period	$	(272	)		0		(272	)		324		0		324

Other comprehensive income (loss)	$	(272	)		0		(272	)		324		0		324

(8) Securities Available For Sale

The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair value for the securities available for sale portfolio, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.


	June 30, 2012
	Less than twelve months						Twelve months or more							Total
(Dollars in thousands)	# of Investments		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		# of Investments		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
Other marketable securities:
Corporate preferred stock		0	$	0		0		1	$	245		(455	)	$	245		(455	)

Total temporarily impaired securities		0	$	0		0		1	$	245		(455	)	$	245		(455	)


	December 31, 2011
	Less than twelve months						Twelve months or more							Total
(Dollars in thousands)	# of Investments		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		# of Investments		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
Other marketable securities:
Corporate preferred stock		0	$	0		0		1	$	175		(525	)	$	175		(525	)

Total temporarily impaired securities		0	$	0		0		1	$	175		(525	)	$	175		(525	)

We review our investment portfolio on a quarterly basis for indications of impairment. This review includes analyzing the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been lower than the cost, the market liquidity for the investment, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, including any specific events which may influence the operations of the issuer, and our intent and ability to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to recover the temporary loss.

The unrealized losses reported for corporate preferred stock at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 related to a single trust preferred security that was issued by the holding company of a small community bank. Typical of most trust preferred issuances, the issuer has the ability to defer interest payments for up to five years with interest payable on the deferred balance. In October 2009, the issuer elected to defer its scheduled interest payments as allowed by the terms of the security agreement. The issuer’s subsidiary bank has incurred operating losses due to increased provisions for loan losses but still meets the regulatory requirements to be considered “adequately capitalized” based on its most recent regulatory filing. Based on a review of the issuer, it was determined that the trust preferred security was not other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2012. The Company does not intend to sell the preferred stock and has the intent and ability to hold it for a period of time sufficient to recover the temporary loss. Management believes that the Company will receive all principal and interest payments contractually due on the security and that the decrease in the market value is primarily due to a lack of liquidity in the market for trust preferred securities and the deferral of interest by the issuer. Management will continue to monitor the credit risk of the issuer and may be required to recognize other-than-temporary impairment charges on this security in future periods.

A summary of securities available for sale at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is as follows:


(Dollars in thousands)	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses			Fair value
June 30, 2012:
Mortgage-backed securities:
FHLMC	$	8,201		438		0			8,639
FNMA		5,689		395		0			6,084
Collateralized mortgage obligations:
FHLMC		145		1		0			146

		14,035		834		0			14,869


Other marketable securities:
U.S. Government agency obligations		60,999		176		0			61,175
Corporate preferred stock		700		0		(455	)		245

		61,699		176		(455	)		61,420

	$	75,734		1,010		(455	)		76,289


(Dollars in thousands)	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses			Fair value
December 31, 2011:
Mortgage-backed securities:
FHLMC	$	11,310		553		0			11,863
FNMA		7,670		499		0			8,169
Collateralized mortgage obligations:
FHLMC		335		4		0			339
FNMA		271		3		0			274

		19,586		1,059		0			20,645


Other marketable securities:
U.S. Government agency obligations		105,000		294		0			105,294
Corporate preferred stock		700		0		(525	)		175

		105,700		294		(525	)		105,469

		$125,286		1,353		(525	)		126,114

The following table indicates amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities available for sale at June 30, 2012 based upon contractual maturity adjusted for scheduled repayments of principal and projected prepayments of principal based upon current economic conditions and interest rates.


(Dollars in thousands)	Amortized cost		Fair Value
Due less than one year	$	58,766		59,309
Due after one year through five years		16,063		16,518
Due after five years through ten years		205		217
Due after ten years		700		245

Total	$	75,734		76,289

The allocation of mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations in the table above is based upon the anticipated future cash flow of the securities using estimated mortgage prepayment speeds. The allocation of other marketable securities that have call features is based on the anticipated cash flows to the call date if it is anticipated that the security will be called, or to the maturity date if it is not anticipated to be called.

(9) Loans Receivable, Net

A summary of loans receivable at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is as follows:


(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
1-4 family	$	107,495		119,066
Commercial real estate:
Residential developments		54,707		52,746
Alternative fuels		15,193		18,882
Other		196,845		218,286

		266,745		289,914
Consumer		57,027		62,161
Commercial business:
Construction/development		602		4,786
Banking		1,942		4,899
Other		83,195		99,574

		85,739		109,259

Total loans		517,006		580,400
Less:
Unamortized discounts		64		93
Net deferred loan fees		245		511
Allowance for loan losses		20,519		23,888

Total loans receivable, net	$	496,178		555,908

(10) Allowance for Loan Losses and Credit Quality Information

The following tables summarize the allowance for loan losses for the periods ending June 30, 2012 and 2011:


(Dollars in thousands)	1-4 Family			Commercial Real Estate			Consumer			Commercial Business			Total
For the three months ended June 30, 2012:
Balance, March 31, 2012	$	3,748			11,049			1,122			5,505			21,424

Provision for losses		(83	)		975			628			(432	)		1,088
Charge-offs		0			(1,554	)		(493	)		(1,820	)		(3,867	)
Recoveries		0			1,083			11			780			1,874

Balance, June 30, 2012	$	3,665			11,553			1,268			4,033			20,519


For the six months ended June 30, 2012:
Balance, December 31, 2011		3,718			13,622			1,159			5,389			23,888

Provision for losses		(53	)		792			847			(626	)		960
Charge-offs		0			(4,184	)		(758	)		(1,828	)		(6,770	)
Recoveries		0			1,323			20			1,098			2,441

Balance, June 30, 2012	$	3,665			11,553			1,268			4,033			20,519


Allocated to:
Specific reserves	$	1,086			3,559			367			1,621			6,633
General reserves		2,632			10,063			792			3,768			17,255

Balance, December 31, 2011	$	3,718			13,622			1,159			5,389			23,888


Allocated to:
Specific reserves	$	888			3,172			609			1,343			6,012
General reserves		2,777			8,381			659			2,690			14,507

Balance, June 30, 2012	$	3,665			11,553			1,268			4,033			20,519


Loans receivable at December 31, 2011:
Individually reviewed for impairment	$	6,241			30,495			1,205			6,855			44,796
Collectively reviewed for impairment		112,825			259,419			60,956			102,404			535,604

Ending balance	$	119,066			289,914			62,161			109,259			580,400


Loans receivable at June 30, 2012:
Individually reviewed for impairment	$	7,765			33,432			2,011			4,787			47,995
Collectively reviewed for impairment		99,730			233,313			55,016			80,952			469,011

Ending balance	$	107,495			266,745			57,027			85,739			517,006


(Dollars in thousands)	1-4 Family			Commercial Real Estate			Consumer			Commercial Business			Total
For the three months ended June 30, 2011:
Balance, March 31, 2011	$	2,498			17,558			1,023			13,874			34,953

Provision for losses		954			2,376			159			(26	)		3,463
Charge-offs		(15	)		(4,633	)		(35	)		(6,249	)		(10,932	)
Recoveries		0			66			7			207			280

Balance, June 30, 2011	$	3,437			15,367			1,154			7,806			27,764


For the six months ended June 30, 2011:
Balance, December 31, 2010		2,145			24,590			924			15,169			42,828

Provision for losses		1,710			2,914			307			478			5,409
Charge-offs		(418	)		(12,209	)		(87	)		(8,557	)		(21,271	)
Recoveries		0			72			10			716			798

Balance, June 30, 2011	$	3,437			15,367			1,154			7,806			27,764

The following table summarizes the amount of classified and unclassified loans at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:


	June 30, 2012
	Classified										Unclassified
(Dollars in thousands)	Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Loss		Total		Total		Total Loans
1-4 family	$	800		18,105		738		0		19,643		87,852		107,495
Commercial real estate:
Residential developments		875		40,969		209		0		42,053		12,654		54,707
Alternative fuels		0		0		0		0		0		15,193		15,193
Other		5,435		18,690		75		0		24,200		172,645		196,845
Consumer		0		1,639		151		220		2,010		55,017		57,027
Commercial business:
Construction/development		0		314		0		0		314		288		602
Banking		0		1,942		0		0		1,942		0		1,942
Other		2,116		9,188		296		0		11,600		71,595		83,195

	$	9,226		90,847		1,469		220		101,762		415,244		517,006


	December 31, 2011
	Classified										Unclassified
(Dollars in thousands)	Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Loss		Total		Total		Total Loans
1-4 family	$	8,870		11,129		738		0		20,737		98,329		119,066
Commercial real estate:
Residential developments		444		39,709		1,113		0		41,266		11,480		52,746
Alternative fuels		0		0		0		0		0		18,882		18,882
Other		5,789		19,607		0		0		25,396		192,890		218,286
Consumer		0		857		224		124		1,205		60,956		62,161
Commercial business:
Construction/development		0		2,722		0		0		2,722		2,064		4,786
Banking		0		3,750		1,149		0		4,899		0		4,899
Other		3,203		8,056		0		0		11,259		88,315		99,574

	$	18,306		85,830		3,224		124		107,484		472,916		580,400

Classified loans represent special mention, performing substandard and non-performing loans. Loans classified as special mention are loans that have potential weaknesses that, if left uncorrected, may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the Bank’s credit position at some future date. Loans classified as substandard are loans that are generally inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor, or by the collateral pledged, if any. Loans classified as substandard have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Loans classified as doubtful have the weaknesses of those classified as substandard, with additional characteristics that make collection in full on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values questionable, and there is a high possibility of loss. A loan classified as loss is considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as an asset on the balance sheet is not warranted. Loans classified as substandard or doubtful require the Bank to perform an analysis of the individual loan and charge off any loans, or portion thereof, that are deemed uncollectible.

The aging of past due loans at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is summarized as follows:


(Dollars in thousands)	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or More Past Due		Total Past Due		Current Loans		Total Loans		Loans 90 Days or More Past Due and Still Accruing
June 30, 2012
1-4 family	$	2,336		1,063		1,068		4,467		103,028		107,495		0
Commercial real estate:
Residential developments		0		408		1,292		1,700		53,007		54,707		0
Alternative fuels		0		0		0		0		15,193		15,193		0
Other		38		1,077		1,112		2,227		194,618		196,845		0

Consumer		462		54		2		518		56,509		57,027		0
Commercial business:
Construction/development		0		0		272		272		330		602		0
Banking		0		0		0		0		1,942		1,942		0
Other		286		2,564		1,443		4,293		78,902		83,195		0

	$	3,122		5,166		5,189		13,477		503,529		517,006		0


December 31, 2011
1-4 family	$	1,876		305		1,297		3,478		115,588		119,066		0
Commercial real estate:
Residential developments		107		290		8,211		8,608		44,138		52,746		0
Alternative fuels		0		0		0		0		18,882		18,882		0
Other		350		79		5,184		5,613		212,673		218,286		0

Consumer		658		374		387		1,419		60,742		62,161		0
Commercial business:
Construction/development		286		0		0		286		4,500		4,786		0
Banking		0		0		1,149		1,149		3,750		4,899		0
Other		351		112		2,877		3,340		96,234		99,574		0

	$	3,628		1,160		19,105		23,893		556,507		580,400		0

Impaired loans include loans that are non-performing (non-accruing) and loans that have been modified in a troubled debt restructuring (TDR). The following table summarizes impaired loans and related allowances as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:


	June 30, 2012						December 31, 2011
(Dollars in thousands)	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance
Loans with no related allowance recorded:
1-4 family	$	4,016		4,337		0		2,651		2,972		0
Commercial real estate:
Residential developments		11,536		16,418		0		6,900		9,855		0
Alternative fuels		0		0		0		0		0		0
Other		4,062		5,205		0		3,745		4,381		0
Consumer		317		317		0		489		489		0
Commercial business:
Construction/development		0		0		0		340		2,311		0
Banking		0		0		0		1,149		3,248		0
Other		1,699		6,031		0		598		1,607		0

Loans with an allowance recorded:
1-4 family		3,749		3,793		888		3,590		3,590		1,086
Commercial real estate:
Residential developments		15,781		16,730		2,792		13,889		14,017		2,546
Alternative fuels		0		0		0		0		0		0
Other		2,053		2,108		380		5,961		8,272		1,013
Consumer		1,694		1,694		609		716		716		367
Commercial business:
Construction/development		213		2,185		65		0		0		0
Banking		0		0		0		0		0		0
Other		2,875		3,547		1,278		4,768		7,145		1,621

Total:
1-4 family		7,765		8,130		888		6,241		6,562		1,086
Commercial real estate:
Residential developments		27,317		33,148		2,792		20,789		23,872		2,546
Alternative fuels		0		0		0		0		0		0
Other		6,115		7,313		380		9,706		12,653		1,013
Consumer		2,011		2,011		609		1,205		1,205		367
Commercial business:
Construction/development		213		2,185		65		340		2,311		0
Banking		0		0		0		1,149		3,248		0
Other		4,574		9,578		1,278		5,366		8,752		1,621

		$47,995		62,365		6,012		44,796		58,603		6,633

The following table summarizes the average recorded investment and interest income recognized on impaired loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:


	For the three months ended June 30, 2012				For the six months ended June 30, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
Loans with no related allowance recorded:
1-4 family	$	4,092		21		3,611		48
Commercial real estate:
Residential developments		12,085		83		10,356		320
Alternative fuels		0		0		0		0
Other		3,972		5		3,896		18
Consumer		339		2		389		2
Commercial business:
Construction/development		111		0		187		0
Banking		575		0		766		0
Other		1,052		2		900		5

Loans with an allowance recorded:
1-4 family		4,148		18		3,962		41
Commercial real estate:
Residential developments		15,679		37		15,082		74
Alternative fuels		0		0		0		0
Other		4,013		1		4,662		3
Consumer		1,356		19		1,142		42
Commercial business:
Construction/development		107		0		71		0
Banking		0		0		0		0
Other		4,228		8		4,408		29

Total:
1-4 family		8,240		39		7,573		89
Commercial real estate:
Residential developments		27,764		120		25,438		394
Alternative fuels		0		0		0		0
Other		7,985		6		8,558		21
Consumer		1,695		21		1,531		44
Commercial business:
Construction/development		218		0		258		0
Banking		575		0		766		0
Other		5,280		10		5,308		34

	$	51,757		196		49,432		582



	For the three months ended June 30, 2011				For the six months ended June 30, 2011
(Dollars in thousands)	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
Loans with no related allowance recorded:
1-4 family	$	1,354		16		1,213		36
Commercial real estate:
Residential developments		5,798		14		6,027		88
Alternative fuels		1,133		0		755		0
Other		656		10		477		13
Consumer		132		0		123		2
Commercial business:
Construction/development		345		2		263		4
Banking		987		0		658		0
Other		654		3		568		17

Loans with an allowance recorded:
1-4 family		4,029		50		4,618		86
Commercial real estate:
Residential developments		15,826		192		19,599		431
Alternative fuels		2,498		0		3,330		0
Other		6,406		40		6,381		59
Consumer		347		5		296		10
Commercial business:
Construction/development		3,344		18		3,831		36
Banking		4,112		0		5,482		0
Other		11,366		63		12,020		147

Total:
1-4 family		5,383		66		5,831		122
Commercial real estate:
Residential developments		21,624		206		25,626		519
Alternative fuels		3,631		0		4,085		0
Other		7,062		50		6,858		72
Consumer		479		5		419		12
Commercial business:
Construction/development		3,689		20		4,094		40
Banking		5,099		0		6,140		0
Other		12,020		66		12,588		164

	$	58,987		413		65,641		929

At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, non-accruing loans totaled $31.1 million and $34.0 million, respectively, for which the related allowance for loan losses was $4.3 million and $5.2 million, respectively. The decrease in the related allowances is due primarily to full or partial charge-off of several non-accruing loans. All of the interest income that was recognized for non-accruing loans was recognized using the cash basis method of income recognition. Non-accruing loans for which no specific allowance has been recorded, because management determined that the value of the collateral was sufficient to repay the loan, totaled $15.8 million and $14.8 million, respectively. Non-accrual loans also include certain loans that have had terms modified in a TDR.

The non-accrual loans at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are summarized as follows:


(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011

1-4 family	$	4,409	$	4,435
Commercial real estate:
Residential developments		19,277		13,412
Alternative fuels		0		0
Other		3,045		9,246
Consumer		367		699
Commercial business:
Construction/development		214		340
Banking		0		1,149
Other		3,779		4,712

	$	31,091	$	33,993

During the third quarter of 2011, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2011-02, A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring is a Troubled Debt Restructuring (Topic 310), which modified guidance for identifying restructurings of receivables that constitute a TDR. At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 there were loans included in loans receivable, net, with terms that had been modified in a troubled debt restructuring totaling $38.2 million and $29.2 million, respectively. For the loans that were restructured in the second quarter of 2012, $1.2 million were classified but performing and $0.1 million were non-performing at June 30, 2012.

The following table summarizes troubled debt restructurings at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:


	June 30, 2012						December 31, 2011
(Dollars in thousands)	Accrual		Non-Accrual		Total		Accrual		Non-Accrual		Total
1-4 Family	$	3,356		2,694		6,050		1,806		1,999		3,805
Commercial real estate		11,110		16,094		27,204		7,837		12,221		20,058
Consumer		1,643		71		1,714		507		71		578
Commercial business		795		2,465		3,260		653		4,110		4,763

	$	16,904		21,324		38,228		10,803		18,401		29,204

There were no material commitments to lend additional funds to customers whose loans were restructured or classified as nonaccrual at June 30, 2012 or December 31, 2011.

TDR concessions can include reduction of interest rates, extension of maturity dates, forgiveness of principal and/or interest due, or acceptance of real estate or other assets in full or partial satisfaction of the debt. Loan modifications are not reported as TDR’s after 12 months if the loan was modified at a market rate of interest for comparable risk loans, and the loan is performing in accordance with the terms of the restructured agreement for the entire 12 month period. All loans classified as TDR’s are considered to be impaired.

When a loan is modified as a TDR, there may be a direct, material impact on the loans within the balance sheet, as principal balances may be partially forgiven. The financial effects of TDR’s are presented in the following table and represent the difference between the outstanding recorded balance pre-modification and post-modification, for the three month and six month periods ending June 30, 2012.


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2012						Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)	Number of Contracts		Pre- modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post- modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Number of Contracts		Pre- modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post- modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
Troubled debt restructurings:
1-4 family		0	$	0		0		27	$	3,204		3,204
Commercial real estate:
Residential developments		0		0		0		7		11,479		9,823
Alternative fuels		0		0		0		0		0		0
Other		1		321		150		6		2,814		2,586
Consumer		4		1,057		1,057		12		1,326		1,326
Commercial business:
Construction/development		0		0		0		0		0		0
Banking		0		0		0		0		0		0
Other		1		80		80		3		324		324

Total		6	$	1,458		1,287		55	$	19,147		17,263

Loans that were restructured within the 12 months preceding June 30, 2012 and defaulted during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 are presented in the table below.


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2012				Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)	Number of Contracts		Outstanding Recorded Investment		Number of Contracts		Outstanding Recorded Investment
Troubled debt restructurings that subsequently defaulted:
1-4 family		1	$	846		2	$	940
Commercial real estate:
Residential developments		0		0		0		0
Alternative fuels		0		0		0		0
Other		0		0		2		159
Consumer		0		0		0		0
Commercial business:
Construction/development		0		0		0		0
Banking		0		0		0		0
Other		0		0		3		2,777

Total		1	$	846		7	$	3,876

The Company considers a loan to have defaulted when it becomes 90 or more days past due under the modified terms, when it is placed in non-accrual status, when it becomes other real estate owned, or when it becomes non-compliant with some other material requirement of the modification agreement.

Loans that were non-accrual prior to modification remain on non-accrual for at least six months following modification. Non-accrual TDR loans that have performed according to the modified terms for six months may be returned to accruing status. Loans that were accruing prior to modification remain on accrual status after the modification as long as the loan continues to perform under the new terms.

TDR’s are reviewed for impairment following the same methodology as other impaired loans. For loans that are collateral dependent, the value of the collateral is reviewed and additional reserves may be added as needed. Loans that are not collateral dependent may have additional reserves established if deemed necessary. The allowance for loan losses on TDR’s was $3.2 million, or 15.8%, of the total $20.5 million in loan loss reserves at June 30, 2012 and $3.5 million, or 14.6%, of the total $23.9 million in loan loss reserves at December 31, 2011.

(11) Investment in Mortgage Servicing Rights

A summary of mortgage servicing activity is as follows:


(Dollars in thousands)	Six Months ended June 30, 2012			Twelve Months ended December 31, 2011			Six Months ended June 30, 2011

Mortgage servicing rights:

Balance, beginning of period	$	1,485			1,586			1,586

Originations		396			461			147

Amortization		(348	)		(562	)		(213	)


Balance, end of period	$	1,533			1,485			1,520


Fair value of mortgage servicing rights	$	1,929			1,878			2,297

All of the loans being serviced are single family loans serviced for the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) under the mortgage-backed security program or the individual loan sale program. The following is a summary of the risk characteristics of the loans being serviced at June 30, 2012.


(Dollars in thousands)	Loan Principal Balance		Weighted Average Interest Rate			Weighted Average Remaining Term		Number of Loans

Original term 30 year fixed rate	$	197,514		4.89	%		298		1,729
Original term 15 year fixed rate		104,789		4.08	%		136		1,368
Adjustable rate		330		3.50	%		307		7

The gross carrying amount of mortgage servicing rights and the associated accumulated amortization at June 30, 2012 is presented in the following table. Amortization expense was $348,000 and $213,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.


(Dollars in thousands)	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Unamortized Intangible Assets
Mortgage servicing rights	$	2,191		(658	)		1,533

Total	$	2,191		(658	)		1,533

The following table indicates the estimated future amortization expense for amortized mortgage servicing rights:


(Dollars in thousands)	Mortgage Servicing Rights
Year ended December 31,
2012	$	358
2013		345
2014		312
2015		265
2016		155
Thereafter		98

Total	$	1,533

Projections of amortization are based on existing asset balances and the existing interest rate environment as of June 30, 2012. The Company’s actual experiences may be significantly different depending upon changes in mortgage interest rates and other market conditions.

(12) Earnings (Loss) per Common Share

The following table reconciles the weighted average shares outstanding and the earnings (loss) available to common shareholders used for basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share:


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	2012			2011			2012		2011
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in basic loss per common share calculation		3,936			3,841			3,925		3,829
Net dilutive effect of:
Restricted stock awards		0			0			97		0

Weighted average number of shares outstanding adjusted for effect of dilutive securities		3,936			3,841			4,022		3,829

Income (loss) available to common shareholders	$	(69	)		(2,748	)		2,274		(2,780	)
Basic earnings (loss) per common share	$	(0.02	)		(0.72	)		0.58		(0.73	)
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share	$	(0.02	)		(0.72	)		0.57		(0.73	)

For the three months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011, there were 94,432 and 129,037 common share equivalents outstanding, respectively, that are not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share as they are anti-dilutive. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011, there were 0 and 127,351 common share equivalents outstanding, respectively, that are not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share as they are anti-dilutive.

(13) Regulatory Capital and Regulatory Oversight

The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Bank’s assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.

The Bank entered into a written Supervisory Agreement with its primary regulator, the OTS, effective February 22, 2011 that primarily relates to the Bank’s financial performance and credit quality issues. This agreement replaced the prior memorandum of understanding that the Bank entered into with the OTS on December 9, 2009. In accordance with the agreement, the Bank submitted a two year business plan in May of 2011 that the OCC (as defined below and as successor to the OTS) accepted with the expectation that the Bank would be in adherence with the OCC’s Notification of Establishment of Higher Minimum Capital Ratios, dated August 8, 2011, also known as an individual minimum capital requirement or IMCR, which required the Bank to establish and maintain a minimum core capital ratio of 8.50% by December 31, 2011, as discussed more fully below. As required by the Supervisory Agreement, the Bank submitted an updated two year capital plan in January of 2012 that the OCC may make comments upon, and require revisions to. The Bank must operate within the parameters of the final business plan and is required to monitor and submit periodic reports on its compliance with the plan. The Bank also submitted a problem asset reduction plan that the OCC has accepted. The Bank must operate within the parameters of the final problem asset plan and is required to monitor and submit periodic reports on its compliance with the plan. The Bank has also revised its loan modification policies and its program for identifying, monitoring and controlling risk associated with concentrations of credit, and improved the documentation relating to the allowance for loan and lease losses as required by the agreement. In addition, without the consent of the OCC, the Bank may not declare or pay any cash dividends, increase its total assets during any quarter in excess of the amount of the net interest credited on deposit liabilities during the prior quarter, enter into any new contractual arrangement or renew or extend any existing arrangement related to compensation or benefits with any directors or officer, make any golden parachute payments, or enter into any significant contracts with a third party service provider. The Bank believes it was in compliance with all requirements of its Supervisory Agreement at June 30, 2012.

The Company also entered into a written Supervisory Agreement with the OTS effective February 22, 2011. This agreement replaced the prior memorandum of understanding that the Company entered into with the OTS on

December 9, 2009. As required by the Supervisory Agreement, the Company submitted an updated two year capital plan in January of 2012 that the Federal Reserve Board (as successor to the OTS) may make comments upon, and to which it may require revisions. The Company must operate within the parameters of the final capital plan and is required to monitor and submit periodic reports on its compliance with the plan. In addition, without the consent of the Federal Reserve Board, the Company may not incur or issue any debt, guarantee the debt of any entity, declare or pay any cash dividends or repurchase any of the Company’s capital stock, enter into any new contractual arrangement or renew or extend any existing arrangement related to compensation or benefits with any directors or officer, or make any golden parachute payments. The Company believes it was in compliance with all requirements of its Supervisory Agreement at June 30, 2012.

References to the OTS shall mean, with respect to the Company, beginning July 21, 2011, the Federal Reserve Board (FRB) and mean, with respect to the Bank, beginning July 21, 2011, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). On July 21, 2011, the OTS was integrated into the OCC and the primary banking regulator for the Company became the FRB.

Quantitative measures established by regulations to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of Tier I (Core) capital, and risk-based capital (as defined in the regulations) to total assets (as defined in the regulations).

The Bank’s tangible assets were $669.9 million and $789.0 million, adjusted total assets were $669.7 million and $789.0 million, and its risk-weighted assets were $486.8 million and $586.0 million at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The following table presents the Bank’s capital amounts and ratios at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 for actual capital, required capital and excess capital, including ratios in order to qualify as being well capitalized under the Prompt Corrective Actions regulations.


(Dollars in thousands)
	Actual						Required to be Adequately Capitalized					Excess Capital					To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Actions Provisions
June 30, 2012	Amount			Percent of Assets⁽¹⁾			Amount		Percent of Assets⁽¹⁾			Amount		Percent of Assets⁽¹⁾			Amount		Percent of Assets⁽¹⁾
Bank stockholder’s equity	$	60,768

Less:
Net unrealized gains on certain securities available for sale		(199	)

		60,569


Tier I or core capital

Tier I capital to adjusted total assets					9.04	%	$	26,787		4.00	%	$	33,782		5.04	%	$	33,484		5.00	%

Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets					12.44	%	$	19,472		4.00	%	$	41,097		8.44	%	$	29,208		6.00	%

Plus:
Allowable allowance for loan losses		6,263

Risk-based capital	$	66,832					$	38,944				$	27,888				$	46,680


Risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets					13.73	%				8.00	%				5.73	%				10.00	%

(1)	Based upon the Bank’s adjusted total assets for the purpose of the tangible and core capital ratios and risk-weighted assets for the purpose of the risk-based capital ratio.


(Dollars in thousands)
	Actual						Required to be Adequately Capitalized					Excess Capital					To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Actions Provisions
December 31, 2011	Amount			Percent of Assets⁽¹⁾			Amount		Percent of Assets⁽¹⁾			Amount		Percent of Assets⁽¹⁾			Amount		Percent of Assets⁽¹⁾
Bank stockholder’s equity	$	57,454

Less:
Net unrealized gains on certain securities available for sale		(1,140	)

		56,314


Tier I or core capital

Tier I capital to adjusted total assets					7.14	%	$	31,560		4.00	%	$	24,754		3.14	%	$	39,450		5.00	%

Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets					9.61	%	$	23,441		4.00	%	$	32,873		5.61	%	$	35,162		6.00	%

Plus:
Allowable allowance for loan losses		7,325

Risk-based capital	$	63,639					$	46,883				$	16,756				$	58,603


Risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets					10.86	%				8.00	%				2.86	%				10.00	%

(1)	Based upon the Bank’s adjusted total assets for the purpose of the tangible and core capital ratios and risk-weighted assets for the purpose of the risk-based capital ratio.

The OCC established an IMCR for the Bank. An IMCR requires a bank to establish and maintain levels of capital greater than those generally required for a bank to be classified as “well-capitalized.” Effective December 31, 2011, the Bank was required to establish, and subsequently maintain, core capital at least equal to 8.50% of adjusted total assets, which was in excess of the Bank’s 7.14% core capital to adjusted total assets ratio at December 31, 2011. In February 2012, the Bank received a Notice of Failure to Maintain Minimum Capital Ratios from the OCC arising out of its failure to establish and maintain its IMCR of 8.50% core capital to adjusted total assets at December 31, 2011. Pursuant to the notice, the OCC required the Bank to submit by April 30, 2012 a further written capital plan of how it intended to achieve and maintain its IMCR, and a contingency plan in the event the IMCR was not achieved through the Bank’s primary plan. Because of the improved financial results and the decrease in assets experienced during the six months of 2012, the Bank’s core capital ratio improved to 8.50% at March 31, 2012 and 9.04% at June 30, 2012. In April 2012, the Bank submitted the required revised capital and contingency plan to the OCC. The OCC may make comments upon and require revisions to this plan.

The Bank’s failure to comply with the terms of the IMCR at December 31, 2011 was, and its failure to continue to comply in the future can be, deemed an unsafe and unsound banking practice and could subject it to further limits on growth and such legal actions or sanctions as the OCC considers appropriate. There can be no assurance that the Bank will continue to maintain compliance with the IMCR in the future. Possible sanctions include among others (i) the imposition of one or more cease and desist orders requiring corrective action, which are enforceable directives that may address any aspect of the Company or Bank management, operations or capital, including requirements to change management, raise equity capital, dispose of assets or effect a change of control; (ii) civil money penalties; and (iii) downgrades in the capital adequacy status of the Company and the Bank. These regulatory actions may significantly restrict the ability of the Company and the Bank to take operating and strategic actions that may be in the best interests of stockholders or compel the Company and the Bank to take operating and strategic actions that are not potentially in the best interests of stockholders.

Management believes that, as of June 30, 2012, the Bank’s capital ratios were in excess of those quantitative capital ratio standards set forth under the prompt corrective action regulations described above. The failure of the Bank to satisfy the IMCR at any time does not by itself affect the Bank’s status as “well-capitalized” within the meaning of these prompt corrective action regulations. However, there can be no assurance that the Bank will continue to maintain such status in the future. The OCC has extensive discretion in its supervisory and enforcement activities, and can adjust the requirement to be “well-capitalized” in the future.

In order to improve its capital ratios and maintain compliance with its IMCR, the Bank is, among other things, working to improve its financial results, reduce non-performing assets, and decrease the asset size of the Bank. In March 2012, the Bank also sold substantially all of the assets and liabilities associated with its Toledo, Iowa branch. If capital conditions were to deteriorate, the Bank may also determine it to be necessary or prudent to dispose of other non-strategic assets. These actions may result in changes in the Bank’s assets, liabilities and earnings, some of which may be material, during the period in which the action is taken or is consummated or over a longer period of time. Further, the Company may need, or be required by supervising banking regulators, to raise additional capital of which there can be no assurance that, if raised, it would be on terms favorable to the Company. If the Company raises capital through the issuance of additional shares of common stock or other equity securities, it would dilute the ownership interests of existing stockholders and, given our current common stock trading price, would be expected to dilute the per share book value of the Company’s common stock and could result in a change of control of the Company and the Bank.

(14) Commitments and Contingencies

The Bank issued standby letters of credit which guarantee the performance of customers to third parties. The standby letters of credit issued and available at June 30, 2012 were approximately $1.5 million, expire over the next two years, and are collateralized primarily with commercial real estate mortgages. Since the conditions under which the Bank is required to fund the standby letters of credit may not materialize, the cash requirements are expected to be less than the total outstanding commitments.

(15) Business Segments

The Bank has been identified as a reportable operating segment in accordance with the provisions of ASC 280. SFC and HMN did not meet the quantitative thresholds for determining reportable segments and therefore are included in the “Other” category.

The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources based on the segment’s net income, return on average assets and equity. Each corporation is managed separately with its own officers and board of directors, some of whom may overlap between the corporations.

The following table sets forth certain information about the reconciliation of reported profit or loss and assets for each of the Company’s reportable segments.


(Dollars in thousands)	Home Federal Savings Bank			Other			Eliminations			Consolidated Total

At or for the six months ended June 30, 2012:

Interest income - external customers	$	16,227			0			0			16,227
Non-interest income - external customers		4,500			0			0			4,500
Intersegment interest income		0			2			(2	)		0
Intersegment non-interest income		93			3,582			(3,675	)		0
Interest expense		3,969			0			(2	)		3,967
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights, net		348			0			0			348
Other non-interest expense		11,957			389			(93	)		12,253
Net income		3,586			3,195			(3,582	)		3,199
Total assets		670,229			62,033			(61,948	)		670,314

At or for the six months ended June 30, 2011:

Interest income - external customers	$	20,759			0			0			20,759
Non-interest income - external customers		3,380			0			0			3,380
Intersegment interest income		0			2			(2	)		0
Intersegment non-interest income		87			(1,292	)		1,205			0
Interest expense		6,317			0			(2	)		6,315
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights, net		213			0			0			213
Other non-interest expense		13,564			589			(87	)		14,066
Net loss		(1,288	)		(1,878	)		1,292			(1,874	)
Total assets		807,307			68,934			(68,867	)		807,374

At or for the quarter ended June 30, 2012:
Interest income - external customers	$	7,952			0			0			7,952
Non-interest income - external customers		1,794			0			0			1,794
Intersegment interest income		0			1			(1	)		0
Intersegment non-interest income		46			558			(604	)		0
Interest expense		1,906			0			(1	)		1,905
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights, net		172			0			0			172
Other non-interest expense		6,066			166			(46	)		6,186
Net income		560			393			(558	)		395
Total assets		670,229			62,033			(61,948	)		670,314

At or for the quarter ended June 30, 2011:
Interest income - external customers	$	10,045			0			0			10,045
Non-interest income - external customers		1,592			0			0			1,592
Intersegment interest income		0			1			(1	)		0
Intersegment non-interest income		44			(1,980	)		1,936			0
Interest expense		3,047			0			(1	)		3,046
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights, net		115			0			0			115
Other non-interest expense		7,103			315			(44	)		7,374
Net loss		(1,978	)		(2,293	)		1,980			(2,291	)
Total assets		807,307			68,934			(68,867	)		807,374

Item 2:

HMN FINANCIAL, INC.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-looking Information

This quarterly report and other reports filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are often identified by such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “intent,” “look,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” “seek,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “trend,” “target,” and “goal” or similar statements or variations of such terms and include, but are not limited to, those relating to increasing our core deposit relationships, reducing non-performing assets, reducing expense and generating improved financial results; the adequacy and amount of available liquidity and capital resources to the Bank; the Company’s liquidity and capital requirements; our expectations for core capital and our strategies and potential strategies for improvement thereof; changes in the size of the Bank’s loan portfolio; the recovery of the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets; the amount and mix of the Bank’s non-performing assets and the appropriateness of the allowance therefor; future losses on non-performing assets; the amount of interest-earning assets; the amount and mix of brokered and other deposits (including the Company’s ability to renew brokered deposits); the availability of alternate funding sources; the payment of dividends; the future outlook for the Company; the amount of deposits that will be withdrawn from checking and money market accounts and how the withdrawn deposits will be replaced; the projected changes in net interest income based on rate shocks; the range that interest rates may fluctuate over the next twelve months; the net market risk of interest rate shocks; the future outlook for the issuer trust preferred securities held by the Bank; and the Bank’s compliance with regulatory standards generally (including the Bank’s status as “well-capitalized”), and supervisory agreements, individual minimum capital requirements or other supervisory directives or requirements to which the Company or the Bank are or may become expressly subject, specifically, and possible responses of the OCC and FRB and the Bank and the Company to any failure to comply with any such regulatory standard, agreement or requirement. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the Company’s assumptions and expectations. These include but are not limited to the adequacy and marketability of real estate and other collateral securing loans to borrowers; federal and state regulation and enforcement, including restrictions set forth in the supervisory agreements between each of the Company and Bank and the OCC and FRB; possible legislative and regulatory changes, including changes in the degree and manner of regulatory supervision, the ability of the Company and the Bank to establish and adhere to plans and policies relating to, among other things, capital, business, non-performing assets, loan modifications, documentation of loan loss allowance and concentrations of credit that are satisfactory to the OCC and FRB, as applicable, in accordance with the terms of the Company and Bank supervisory agreements and to otherwise manage the operations of the Company and the Bank to ensure compliance with other requirements set forth in the supervisory agreements; the ability of the Company and the Bank to obtain required consents from the OCC and FRB, as applicable, under the supervisory agreements or other directives; the ability of the Bank to comply with its individual minimum capital requirement and other applicable regulatory capital requirements; enforcement activity of the OCC and FRB in the event of our non-compliance with any applicable regulatory standard, agreement or requirement; adverse economic, business and competitive developments such as shrinking interest margins, reduced collateral values, deposit outflows, changes in credit or other risks posed by the Company’s loan and investment portfolios, changes in costs associated with alternate funding sources, including changes in collateral advance rates and policies of the Federal Home Loan Bank, technological, computer-related or operational difficulties, results of litigation, and reduced demand for financial services and loan products; changes in accounting policies and guidelines, or monetary and fiscal policies of the federal government or tax laws; international economic developments; the Company’s access to and adverse changes in securities markets; the market for credit related assets; or other significant uncertainties. Additional factors that may cause actual results to differ from the Company’s assumptions and expectations include those set forth in the Company’s most recent filing on Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All forward-looking statements are qualified by, and should be considered in conjunction with, such cautionary statements. For additional discussion of the risks and uncertainties applicable to the Company, see the “Risk Factors” sections of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 and Part II, Item 1A of this and previously filed Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.

General

The earnings of the Company are primarily dependent on the Bank’s net interest income, which is the difference between interest earned on loans and investments, and the interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities such as deposits, Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances, and Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) borrowings. The difference between the average rate of interest earned on assets and the average rate paid on liabilities is the “interest rate spread”. Net interest income is produced when interest-earning assets equal or exceed interest-bearing liabilities and there is a positive interest rate spread. Net interest income and net interest rate spread are affected by changes in interest rates, the volume and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and the level of non-performing assets. The Company’s net income is also affected by the generation of non-interest income, which consists primarily of gains or losses from the sale of securities, gains from the sale of loans, fees for servicing mortgage loans, and the generation of fees and service charges on deposit accounts. The Bank incurs expenses in addition to interest expense in the form of salaries and benefits, occupancy expenses, provisions for loan losses and amortization of mortgage servicing assets. The earnings of financial institutions, such as the Bank, are also significantly affected by prevailing economic and competitive conditions, particularly changes in interest rates, government monetary and fiscal policies, and regulations of various regulatory authorities. Lending activities are influenced by the demand for and supply of business credit, single family and commercial properties, competition among lenders, the level of interest rates and the availability of funds. Deposit flows and costs of deposits are influenced by prevailing market rates of interest on competing investments, account maturities and the levels of personal income and savings.

Beginning with the Company’s 2008 fiscal year, the Company’s commercial business and commercial real estate loan portfolios have required significant allowances and charge offs due primarily to decreases in the estimated value of the underlying collateral supporting the loans, as many of these loans were made to borrowers in or associated with the real estate industry. The decrease in the estimated collateral value is primarily the result of reduced demand for real estate, particularly as it relates to single-family and commercial land developments. More stringent lending standards implemented by the mortgage industry in recent years have made it more difficult for some borrowers with marginal credit to qualify for a mortgage. This decrease in available credit and the overall weakness in the economy over the past several years reduced the demand for single family homes and the values of existing properties and developments where the Company’s commercial loan portfolio has concentrations. Consequently, our level of non-performing assets and the related provision for loan losses increased significantly in the past several years, relative to periods before 2008. The increased levels of non-performing assets, related provisions for loan losses and write offs of or allowances against goodwill and deferred taxes arising from adverse results of operations, were the primary reasons for the net losses incurred by the Company in each of the years 2008 through 2011.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Critical accounting policies are those policies that the Company’s management believes are the most important to understanding the Company’s financial condition and operating results. These critical accounting policies often involve estimates and assumptions that could have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. The Company has identified the following critical accounting policies that management believes involve the most difficult, subjective, and/or complex judgments that are inherently uncertain. Therefore, actual financial results could differ significantly depending upon the estimates, assumptions and other factors used.

Allowance for Loan Losses and Related Provision

The allowance for loan losses is based on periodic analysis of the loan portfolio. In this analysis, management considers factors including, but not limited to, specific occurrences of loan impairment, changes in the size of the portfolios, national and regional economic conditions such as unemployment data, loan portfolio composition, loan delinquencies, local economic growth rates, historical experience and observations made by the Company’s ongoing internal audit and regulatory exam processes. Loans are charged off to the extent they are deemed to be uncollectible. The Company has established separate processes to determine the appropriateness of the loan loss allowance for its homogeneous single-family and consumer loan portfolios and its non-homogeneous loan portfolios. The determination of the allowance on the homogeneous single-family and consumer loan portfolios is calculated on a pooled basis with individual determination of the allowance of all non-performing loans. The determination of the allowance for the non-homogeneous commercial, commercial real estate, and multi-family loan portfolios involves assigning standardized risk ratings and loss factors that are periodically reviewed. The loss factors are estimated based on the Company’s own loss experience and are assigned to all loans without identified credit weaknesses. For each non-performing loan, the Company also performs an individual analysis of impairment that is based on the expected cash flows or the value of the assets collateralizing the loans and establishes any necessary reserves or charges off all loans or portion thereof that are deemed uncollectable.

The appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses is dependent upon management’s estimates of variables affecting valuation, appraisals of collateral, evaluations of performance and status, and the amounts and timing of future cash flows expected to be received on impaired loans. Such estimates, appraisals, evaluations and cash flows may be subject to frequent adjustments due to changing economic prospects of borrowers or properties. The estimates are reviewed periodically and adjustments, if any, are recorded in the provision for loan losses in the periods in which the adjustments become known. Because of the size of some loans, changes in estimates can have a significant impact on the loan loss provision. The allowance is allocated to individual loan categories based upon the relative risk characteristics of the loan portfolios and the actual loss experience. The Company increases its allowance for loan losses by charging the provision for loan losses against income. The methodology for establishing the allowance for loan losses takes into consideration probable losses that have been identified in connection with specific loans as well as probable losses in the loan portfolio for which additional specific reserves are not required. Although management believes that based on current conditions the allowance for loan losses is maintained at an appropriate amount to provide for probable loan losses inherent in the portfolio as of the balance sheet date, future conditions may differ substantially from those anticipated in determining the allowance for loan losses and adjustments may be required in the future.

Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. These calculations are based on many complex factors including estimates of the timing of reversals of temporary differences, the interpretation of federal and state income tax laws and a determination of the differences between the tax and the financial reporting basis of assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ significantly from the estimates and interpretations used in determining the current and deferred income tax liabilities.

The Company maintains significant net deferred tax assets for deductible temporary differences, the largest of which relates to the allowance for loan and real estate losses and net operating loss carry forwards. For income tax purposes, only net charge-offs are deductible, not the entire provision for loan losses. Under generally accepted accounting principles, a valuation allowance is required to be recognized if it is “more likely than not” that the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The determination of the realizability of the deferred tax assets is highly subjective and dependent upon management’s judgment and evaluation of both positive and negative evidence, including the forecasts of future income, tax planning strategies and assessments of the current and future economic and business conditions. The Company considers both positive and negative evidence regarding the ultimate realizability of deferred tax assets. Positive evidence includes the ability to implement tax planning strategies to accelerate taxable income recognition and the probability that taxable income will be generated in future periods. Negative evidence includes the Company’s cumulative loss in the prior three year period, current financial performance, and the general business and economic trends. In the second quarter of 2010, the Company recorded a valuation allowance against the entire deferred tax asset balance and the Company continued to maintain a valuation reserve against the entire deferred tax asset balance at June 30, 2012. This determination was based primarily upon the existence of a three year cumulative loss position that is primarily attributable to significant provisions for loan losses incurred during the last three years. The creation of the valuation allowance, although it increased tax expense and similarly reduced tangible book value, does not have an effect on the Company’s cash flows, and may be recoverable in subsequent periods if the Company were to realize certain sustained future taxable income. It is possible that future conditions may differ substantially from those anticipated in determining the need for a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets and adjustments may be required in the future.

Determining the ultimate settlement of any tax position requires significant estimates and judgments in arriving at the amount of tax benefits to be recognized in the financial statements. It is possible that the tax benefits realized upon the ultimate resolution of a tax position may result in tax benefits that are significantly different from those estimated.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTH PERIODS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012 COMPARED TO THE SAME PERIODS ENDED JUNE 30, 2011

Net Income (Loss)

Net income for the second quarter of 2012 was $0.4 million, an improvement of $2.7 million, or 117.2%, compared to a net loss of $2.3 million for the second quarter of 2011. The net loss available to common shareholders was $69,000 for the second quarter of 2012, an improvement of $2.7 million, or 97.5%, from the net loss available to common shareholders of $2.8 million for the second quarter of 2011. Diluted loss per common share for the second quarter of 2012 was $0.02, an improvement of $0.70, or 97.2%, from the diluted loss per common share of $0.72 for the second quarter of 2011. The improvement in net income in the second quarter of 2012 was primarily due to a $2.4 million decrease in the provision for loan losses and a $1.1 million decrease in non-interest expenses between the periods. These changes to net income were partially offset by a $1.0 million decrease in net interest income due primarily to the decrease in interest earning assets between the periods.

Net income was $3.2 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2012, an improvement of $5.1 million, or 270.7%, compared to the net loss of $1.9 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2011. The net income available to common shareholders was $2.3 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2012, an improvement of $5.1 million, or 181.8%, compared to the net loss available to common shareholders of $2.8 million for the same period of 2011. Diluted earnings per share for the six month period in 2012 was $0.57, an improvement of $1.30 per share compared to the diluted loss per share of $0.73 for the same period in 2011. The improvement in net income for the six month period in 2012 was primarily due to a $4.4 million decrease in the provision for loan losses, $1.7 million decrease in non-interest expenses, $0.7 million increase in the gains recognized on the sales of loans, and a $0.6 million gain on sale of the Bank’s Toledo, Iowa branch. These changes to net income were partially offset by a $2.1 million decrease in net interest income due primarily to the decrease in interest earning assets between the periods.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income was $6.0 million for the second quarter of 2012, a decrease of $1.0 million, or 13.6%, compared to $7.0 million for the second quarter of 2011. Interest income was $8.0 million for the second quarter of 2012, a decrease of $2.0 million, or 20.8%, from $10.0 million for the same period in 2011. Interest income decreased between the periods primarily because of a $152 million decrease in the average interest-earning assets and also because of a decrease in average yields between the periods. Average interest earning assets decreased between the periods primarily because of a decrease in the commercial loan portfolio, which occurred because of declining loan demand and the Company’s focus on improving credit quality, managing net interest margin and improving capital ratios. The average yield earned on interest-earning assets was 4.90% for the second quarter of 2012, a decrease of 10 basis points from the 5.00% average yield for the second quarter of 2011. The decrease in average yield is due to the continued low interest rate environment that existed during the second quarter of 2012.

Interest expense was $1.9 million for the second quarter of 2012, a decrease of $1.1 million, or 37.5%, compared to $3.0 million for the second quarter of 2011. Interest expense decreased primarily because of the $157 million decrease in the average interest-bearing liabilities between the periods. The decrease in average interest-bearing liabilities is primarily the result of a decrease in the outstanding borrowings and brokered certificates of deposits between the periods and a decrease in other deposits as a result of the Bank’s Toledo, Iowa branch sale that was completed in the first quarter of 2012. The decrease in borrowings and brokered deposits between the periods was the result of using the proceeds from loan principal payments to fund maturing borrowings and brokered certificates of deposits. Interest expense also decreased because of the lower interest rates paid on money market accounts and certificates of deposits. The decreased rates were the result of the low interest rate environment that continued to exist during the second quarter of 2012. The average interest rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities was 1.24% for the second quarter of 2012, a decrease of 34 basis points from the 1.58% average interest rate paid in the second quarter of 2011.

Net interest margin (net interest income divided by average interest earning assets) for the second quarter of 2012 was 3.72%, an increase of 24 basis points, compared to 3.48% for the second quarter of 2011.

Net interest income was $12.3 million for the first six months of 2012, a decrease of $2.1 million, or 15.1%, from $14.4 million for the same period in 2011. Interest income was $16.2 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $4.6 million, or 21.8%, from $20.8 million for the same six month period in 2011. Interest income decreased between the periods primarily because of a $139 million decrease in the average interest-earning assets and also because of a decrease in average yields between the periods. Average interest-earning assets decreased between the periods primarily because of a decrease in the commercial loan portfolio, which occurred because of declining loan demand and the Company’s focus on improving credit quality, managing net interest margin and improving capital ratios. The average yield earned on interest-earning assets was 4.79% for the first six months of 2012, a decrease of 32 basis points from the 5.11% average yield for the first six months of 2011. The decrease in average yield is due to the continued low interest rate environment that existed during the first six months of 2012.

Interest expense was $4.0 million for the first six months of 2012, a decrease of $2.3 million, or 37.2%, compared to $6.3 million for the first six months of 2011. Interest expense decreased primarily because of the $138 million decrease in the average interest-bearing liabilities between the periods. The decrease in average interest-bearing liabilities is primarily the result of a decrease in the outstanding borrowings and brokered certificates of deposits and a decrease in other deposits as a result of the branch sale that was completed in the first quarter of 2012. The decrease in borrowings and brokered deposits between the periods was the result of using the proceeds from loan principal payments to fund maturing borrowings and brokered certificates of deposits. Interest expense also decreased because of the lower interest rates paid on money market accounts and certificates of deposits. The decreased rates were the result of the low interest rate environment that continued to exist during the first six months of 2012. The average interest rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities was 1.23% for the first six months of 2012, a decrease of 39 basis points from the 1.62% average interest rate paid in the first six months of 2011.

Net interest margin (net interest income divided by average interest earning assets) for the first six months of 2012 was 3.62%, an increase of 7 basis points, compared to 3.55% for the first six months of 2011.

A summary of the Company’s net interest margin for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011 is as follows:


	For the three month period ended
	June 30, 2012							June 30, 2011
(Dollars in thousands)	Average Outstanding Balance		Interest Earned/ Paid		Yield/ Rate⁽²⁾			Average Outstanding Balance		Interest Earned/ Paid		Yield/ Rate⁽²⁾
Interest-earning assets:
Securities available for sale	$	86,651		356		1.65	%	$	153,600		697		1.82	%
Loans held for sale		3,000		25		3.35			1,689		18		4.27
Mortgage loans, net⁽¹⁾		112,205		1,381		4.95			123,550		1,693		5.50
Commercial loans, net⁽¹⁾		351,800		5,291		6.05			422,720		6,593		6.26
Consumer loans, net⁽¹⁾		58,010		826		5.73			66,725		997		5.99
Cash equivalents		37,508		19		0.20			31,220		1		0.01
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		4,094		54		5.31			6,174		46		2.99

Total interest-earning assets		653,268		7,952		4.90			805,678		10,045		5.00

Interest-bearing liabilities:
NOW accounts		64,213		9		0.06			70,287		14		0.08
Savings accounts		39,794		19		0.19			37,455		14		0.15
Money market accounts		109,306		110		0.40			113,928		205		0.72
Certificates		210,136		644		1.23			253,241		983		1.56
Brokered deposits		46,649		279		2.41			95,329		590		2.48
Advances and other borrowings		70,000		844		4.85			110,390		1,240		4.51

Total interest-bearing liabilities		540,098							680,630
Non-interest checking		76,012							92,553
Other non-interest bearing deposits		988							976

Total interest-bearing liabilities and non-interest bearing deposits	$	617,098		1,905		1.24		$	774,159		3,046		1.58

Net interest income			$	6,047						$	6,999

Net interest rate spread						3.65	%						3.42	%

Net interest margin						3.72	%						3.48	%

(1)	Average balances of loans include non-accrual loans

(2)	Annualized


	For the six month period ended
	June 30, 2012							June 30, 2011
(Dollars in thousands)	Average Outstanding Balance		Interest Earned/ Paid		Yield/ Rate			Average Outstanding Balance		Interest Earned/ Paid		Yield/ Rate
Interest-earning assets:
Securities available for sale	$	95,954		798		1.67	%	$	151,774		1,438		1.91	%
Loans held for sale		2,892		47		3.27			1,614		35		4.37
Mortgage loans, net		114,894		2,878		5.04			125,915		3,456		5.53
Commercial loans, net		359,780		10,716		5.99			438,121		13,688		6.30
Consumer loans, net		59,390		1,679		5.69			67,690		2,025		6.03
Cash equivalents		43,728		45		0.21			27,851		3		0.02
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		4,134		64		3.11			6,432		114		3.57

Total interest-earning assets		680,772		16,227		4.79			819,397		20,759		5.11

Interest-bearing liabilities:
NOW accounts		66,809		20		0.06			74,628		34		0.09
Savings accounts		39,423		36		0.18			36,073		27		0.15
Money market accounts		110,322		238		0.43			113,821		418		0.74
Certificates		217,246		1,352		1.25			253,692		2,040		1.62
Brokered deposits		51,783		632		2.45			98,050		1,227		2.52
Advances and other borrowings		70,000		1,689		4.85			115,085		2,569		4.50

Total interest-bearing liabilities		555,583							691,349
Non-interest checking		92,019							94,339
Other non-interest bearing deposits		1,164							1,070

Total interest-bearing liabilities and non-interest bearing deposits	$	648,766		3,967		1.23		$	786,758		6,315		1.62

Net interest income			$	12,260						$	14,444

Net interest rate spread						3.56	%						3.49	%

Net interest margin						3.62	%						3.55	%

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses was $1.1 million for the second quarter of 2012, a decrease of $2.4 million, or 68.6%, from $3.5 million for the second quarter of 2011. The provision for loan losses decreased in the second quarter of 2012, compared to second quarter 2011, primarily because there were fewer decreases in the estimated value of the underlying collateral supporting commercial real estate loans that required additional allowances or charge offs in the current period when compared to the second quarter of 2011. The provision also decreased because of a decrease in the required reserves for certain risk rated commercial loans as a result of an internal loan portfolio analysis that was performed between the periods.

The provision for loan losses was $1.0 million for the first six months of 2012, a decrease of $4.4 million, or 82.3%, from $5.4 million for the same six month period in 2011. The provision for loan losses decreased in the first six months of 2012 primarily because there were fewer decreases in the estimated value of the underlying collateral supporting commercial real estate loans that required additional allowances or charge offs in the current period when compared to the first six months of 2011. The provision also decreased because of a decrease in the required reserves for certain risk rated commercial loans as a result of an internal loan portfolio analysis that was performed between the periods.

A reconciliation of the Company’s allowance for loan losses for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011 is summarized as follows:


(Dollars in thousands)	2012			2011
Balance at March 31,	$	21,424		$	34,953
Provision		1,088			3,463
Charge offs:
One-to-four family		0			(16	)
Consumer		(493	)		(34	)
Commercial business		(1,820	)		(6,249	)
Commercial real estate		(1,554	)		(4,633	)
Recoveries		1,874			280

Balance at June 30,	$	20,519		$	27,764

General allowance	$	14,507		$	15,618
Specific allowance		6,012			12,146

	$	20,519		$	27,764


(Dollars in thousands)	2012			2011
Balance at January 1,	$	23,888		$	42,828
Provision		960			5,409
Charge offs:
One-to-four family		0			(419	)
Consumer		(757	)		(86	)
Commercial business		(1,829	)		(8,557	)
Commercial real estate		(4,184	)		(12,209	)
Recoveries		2,441			798

Balance at June 30,	$	20,519		$	27,764

The decrease in the allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2012 when compared to June 30, 2011 was due primarily to the modification in the fourth quarter of 2011 of our charge off policy on non-performing loans, which required the charge off of previously established specific valuation allowances (SVAs). Previously, when a collateral-dependent loan was characterized as a loss, the Company typically established an SVA based on the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral, less any related selling costs and the actual charge off of the loan was not recorded until the foreclosure process was complete. The gross loan balance for these non-performing loans was reported as an outstanding loan with any associated SVAs included in the financial statements as part of the allowance for loan losses. Under the modified policy, which is also acceptable under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, SVAs are no longer recognized and any losses on loans secured by real estate are charged off in the period the loans, or portion thereof, are deemed uncollectible.

Non-Interest Income

Non-interest income was $1.8 million for the second quarter of 2012, an increase of $0.2 million, or 12.9%, from $1.6 million for the same period in 2011. Gains on sales of loans increased $0.3 million between the periods primarily as a result of increased single family loan originations due to the low interest rate environment that continued to exist in the second quarter of 2012. Fees and service charges decreased $91,000 primarily because of a decrease in overdraft charges between the periods.

Non-interest income was $4.5 million for the first six months of 2012, an increase of $1.1 million, or 33.3%, from $3.4 million for the first six months of 2011. Gains on sales of loans increased $0.7 million between the periods primarily as a result of increased single family loan originations due to the low interest rate environment that continued to exist during the first six months of 2012. Gain on sale of branch office increased $0.6 million as a result of the sale of the Toledo, Iowa branch in the first quarter of 2012. Fees and service charges decreased $0.2 million primarily because of a decrease in overdraft charges between the periods.

Non-Interest Expense

Non-interest expense was $6.4 million for the second quarter of 2012, a decrease of $1.1 million, or 15.1%, from $7.5 million for the same period of 2011. Other non-interest expense decreased $0.7 million primarily because of decreased real estate taxes and legal fees related to other real estate owned. Compensation and benefits decreased $0.3 million between the periods primarily because of a decrease in employees between the periods. Deposit insurance costs decreased $0.1 million primarily because of a decrease in assets between the periods.

Non-interest expense was $12.6 million for the first six months of 2012, a decrease of $1.7 million, or 11.8%, from $14.3 million for the same period of 2011. Other non-interest expense decreased $0.9 million because of decreased real estate taxes and legal fees related to other real estate owned. Compensation and benefits decreased $0.4 million primarily because of a decrease in employees between the periods. Deposit insurance costs decreased $0.2 million primarily because of a decrease in assets between the periods. Occupancy expense decreased $0.1 million between the periods primarily because of a decrease in depreciation expense. Loss on real estate owned decreased $0.1 million because of a decrease in the gains recognized on the sale of real estate owned between the periods. Data processing costs increased $0.1 million between the periods primarily because of a one time incentive that was received by the Company in the first quarter of 2011 related to a change in our ATM and debit card vendor.

Income Taxes

The effect of income taxes changed $76,000 between the periods, from a benefit of $76,000 in the second quarter of 2011 to no expense in the second quarter of 2012. In the second quarter of 2010, the Company recorded a deferred tax asset valuation reserve against its entire deferred tax asset balance and the Company continued to maintain a valuation reserve against the entire deferred tax asset balance at June 30, 2012. Since the valuation reserve is established against the entire deferred tax asset balance, no income tax expense was recorded for the second quarter of 2012. The income tax benefit in the second quarter of 2011 relates to the reversal of the taxes on the change in the fair market value of the available for sale investment portfolio that was recorded in the first quarter of 2011.

No income tax expense was recorded in the first six months of 2012 or 2011. In the second quarter of 2010, the Company recorded a deferred tax asset valuation reserve against its entire deferred tax asset balance and the Company continued to maintain a valuation reserve against the entire deferred tax asset balance at June 30, 2012. Since the valuation reserve is established against the entire deferred tax asset balance, no income tax expense was recorded for the first six months of 2012 or 2011.

Net Income (Loss) Available to Common Shareholders

The net loss available to common shareholders was $69,000 for the second quarter of 2012, an improvement of $2.6 million from the $2.7 million net loss available to common shareholders in the second quarter of 2011. The net income available to common shareholders was $2.3 million for the first six months of 2012, an improvement of $5.1 million from the $2.8 million net loss available to common shareholders in the first six months of 2011. The net loss available to common shareholders decreased for both the second quarter of 2012 and the six month period ending June 30, 2012 primarily because of the change in the net income (loss) between the periods.

The Company has deferred the last six quarterly dividend payments, beginning with the February 15, 2011 dividend payment, on its Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A issued to the United States Treasury Department as part of the TARP Capital Purchase Program. The deferred dividend payments have been accrued for payment in the future and are being reported for the deferral period as a preferred dividend requirement that is deducted from income for financial statement purposes to arrive at the net income (loss) available to common shareholders. Under the terms of the certificate of designations for the preferred stock, dividend payments may be deferred without default, but the dividend is cumulative and, since the Company failed to pay dividends for six quarters, the Treasury has the right to appoint two representatives to the Company’s board of directors, although the Treasury has not yet exercised this right. Under the terms of the Company’s and Bank’s Supervisory Agreements with their federal banking regulators, neither the Company nor the Bank may declare or pay any cash dividends, or purchase or redeem any capital stock, without prior notice to, and consent of these regulators. The Company does not anticipate requesting consent from the Federal Reserve Board to make any payments of dividends on, or purchase of, its common or preferred stock in 2012.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Non-Performing Assets

The following table summarizes the amounts and categories of non-performing assets, which consist of non-performing loans and foreclosed and repossessed assets, in the Bank’s portfolio and loan delinquency information as of the end of the three most recently completed quarters.


(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2012			March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
Non-Performing Loans:
One-to-four family real estate	$	4,409		$	5,240		$	4,435
Commercial real estate		22,322			20,498			22,658
Consumer		367			737			699
Commercial business		3,993			6,539			6,201

Total		31,091			33,014			33,993


Foreclosed and Repossessed Assets:
One-to-four family real estate		145			317			352
Commercial real estate		12,587			13,278			16,264

Total non-performing assets	$	43,823		$	46,609		$	50,609

Total as a percentage of total assets		6.54	%		6.60	%		6.40	%

Total non-performing loans	$	31,091		$	33,014		$	33,993

Total as a percentage of total loans receivable, net		6.27	%		6.14	%		6.10	%

Allowance for loan loss to non-performing loans		66.00	%		64.90	%		70.27	%


Delinquency Data:
Delinquencies ⁽¹⁾
30+ days	$	6,412		$	4,823		$	3,226
90+ days		0			0			0
Delinquencies as a percentage of loan and lease portfolio ⁽¹⁾
30+ days		1.24	%		0.86	%		0.54	%
90+ days		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%

(1)	Excludes non-accrual loans.

The increase in loans that were more than 30 days delinquent at June 30, 2012 relates primarily to one land loan totaling $1.1 million and four single family loans totaling $0.7 million that became delinquent during the quarter and were more than 30 days delinquent at June 30, 2012.

Total non-performing assets were $43.8 million at June 30, 2012, a decrease of $2.8 million, or 6.0%, from $46.6 million at March 31, 2012. Non-performing loans decreased $1.9 million and foreclosed and repossessed assets decreased $0.9 million during the second quarter of 2012. The non-performing loan and foreclosed and repossessed asset activity for the second quarter of 2012 was as follows:


(Dollars in thousands)
Non-performing loans				Foreclosed and repossessed assets
March 31, 2012	$	33,014		March 31, 2012	$	13,594
Classified as non-performing		7,478		Transferred from non-performing loans		110
Charge offs		(3,949	)	Other foreclosures/repossessions		0
Principal payments received		(5,268	)	Real estate sold		(725	)
Classified as accruing		(74	)	Net gain on sale of assets		128
Transferred to real estate owned		(110	)	Write downs and payments		(375	)

June 30, 2012	$	31,091		June 30, 2012	$	12,732

The decrease in non-performing loans during the quarter relates primarily to principal payments received and charge offs during the period. Of the $5.3 million in principal payments received during the second quarter of 2012, $2.4 million related to the payoff of a non-performing commercial real estate loan secured by an office building and $1.1 million related to the payoff of a non-performing bank stock loan. These decreases in non-performing loans were partially offset by loans that were classified as non-performing during the period. Of the $7.5 million in loans classified as non-performing, $5.7 million relates to a commercial real estate development loan located in the Bank’s primary market area. This loan is the largest non-performing loan at June 30, 2012.

Total non-performing assets were $43.8 million at June 30, 2012, a decrease of $6.8 million, or 13.4%, from $50.6 million at December 31, 2011. Non-performing loans decreased $2.9 million and foreclosed and repossessed assets decreased $3.9 million during the first six months of 2012. The non-performing loan and foreclosed and repossessed asset activity for the first six months of 2012 was as follows:


(Dollars in thousands)
Non-performing loans				Foreclosed and repossessed assets
January 1, 2012	$	33,993		January 1, 2012	$	16,616
Classified as non-performing		11,357		Transferred from non-performing loans		588
Charge offs		(6,852	)	Other foreclosures/repossessions		0
Principal payments received		(6,403	)	Real estate sold		(4,234	)
Classified as accruing		(416	)	Net gain on sale of assets		348
Transferred to real estate owned		(588	)	Write downs and payments		(586	)

June 30, 2012	$	31,091		June 30, 2012	$	12,732

The decrease in non-performing loans during the first six months of 2012 relates primarily to charge offs and principal payments received during the period. Of the $6.9 million in charge offs during the period, $2.2 million related to a commercial development loan and $1.2 million related to two residential development loans that were charged off as a result of obtaining updated appraisals of the underlying collateral. These decrease in non-performing loans were partially offset by loans that were classified as non-performing during the period. Of the $11.4 million in loans classified as non-performing, $5.7 million relates to a commercial real estate development loan located in the Bank’s primary market area. This loan is the largest non-performing loan at June 30, 2012.

The following table summarizes the number and types of our commercial real estate loans (the largest category of non-performing loans) that were non-performing as of the end of the three most recently completed quarters.


(Dollars in thousands) Property Type	#		Principal Amount of Loans June 30, 2012		#		Principal Amount of Loans March 31, 2012		#		Principal Amount of Loans December 31, 2011
Developments/land		13	$	20,630		12	$	15,615		10	$	17,465
Shopping centers/retail		2		406		3		1,375		2		1,315
Restaurants/bar		1		581		1		596		1		616
Office buildings		2		184		1		2,325		1		2,325
Other buildings		2		521		2		587		3		937

		20	$	22,322		19	$	20,498		17	$	22,658

The increase in the non-performing commercial real estate loans from March 31, 2012 is due primarily to a $5.7 million commercial real estate development loan that was classified as non-performing during the period. This increase was partially offset by a $2.4 million payoff of a non-performing commercial real estate loan secured by an office building and the partial charge offs on two residential development loans totaling $0.8 million.

The following table summarizes the number of lending relationships and industry type of commercial business loans that were non-performing as of the end of the three most recently completed quarters.


(Dollars in thousands) Industry Type	#		Principal Amount of Loans June 30, 2012		#		Principal Amount of Loans March 31, 2012		#		Principal Amount of Loans December 31, 2011
Construction/development/land		6	$	1,796		6	$	1,953		6	$	2,061
Retail		2		202		2		47		1		82
Banking		0		0		1		1,149		1		1,149
Entertainment		1		20		1		20		1		23
Utilities		2		1,394		1		2,780		1		2,792
Restaurant		1		498		1		501		0		0
Other		2		83		2		89		2		94

		14	$	3,993		14	$	6,539		12	$	6,201

The decrease in non-performing commercial business loans during the second quarter of 2012 is primarily related to the charge off of $1.6 million on a non-performing commercial business loan in the utilities industry and $1.1 million related to the payoff of a non-performing bank stock loan during the second quarter of 2012.

Dividends

The declaration of dividends is subject to, among other things, the Company’s financial condition and results of operations, the Bank’s compliance with its regulatory capital requirements, tax considerations, industry standards, economic conditions, regulatory restrictions, general business practices and other factors. Under the Bank Supervisory Agreement, no dividends can be declared or paid by the Bank to the Company without prior regulatory approval. The payment of dividends by the Company is dependent upon the Company having adequate cash or other assets that can be converted to cash to pay dividends to its stockholders. In addition, under the terms of the Company’s Supervisory Agreement, the Company may not declare or pay any cash dividends, or purchase or redeem any capital stock, without prior notice to, and consent of its regulator. The Company suspended the dividend payments to common stockholders in the fourth quarter of 2008 due to the net operating losses experienced and the challenging economic environment.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, the net cash provided by operating activities was $8.5 million. The Company collected $60.0 million from the maturities of securities, $5.6 million from principal repayments on securities, $0.2 million from the redemption of FHLB stock, and $4.2 million in proceeds from the sale of real estate. The Company purchased securities of $16.0 million, purchased premises and equipment of $0.2 million, and paid $37.0 million in connection with the Toledo, Iowa branch sale. Net loans receivable decreased $54.4 million due primarily to decreased commercial loan production. The Company had a net decrease in deposit balances of $81.2 million (primarily in brokered deposits) and paid out $0.2 million in customer escrows.

The Company has certificates of deposits with outstanding balances of $160.8 million that come due over the next 12 months, of which $25.0 million were obtained from brokers. Based upon past experience, management anticipates that the majority of the deposits will renew for another term, with the exception of the brokered deposits that are not anticipated to renew due to the Company’s desire to reduce the amount of outstanding brokered deposits. In addition, based on a regulatory directive, the Bank may not renew existing brokered deposits, or accept new brokered deposits without the prior consent of the OCC. The Company believes that deposits that do not renew will be replaced with proceeds from loan principal payments or replaced with a combination of other customer’s deposits, FHLB advances or Federal Reserve Bank borrowings. Proceeds from the sale of securities could also be used to fund unanticipated outflows of deposits.

The Company had only one deposit customer with aggregate deposits greater than $5.0 million as of June 30, 2012. The $7.1 million in funds held by this customer may be withdrawn at any time, however, management does not anticipate that these deposits will be withdrawn from the Bank over the next twelve months. If these deposits were to be withdrawn, they would be replaced with deposits from other customers or brokers, subject to regulatory approval. FHLB advances, Federal Reserve borrowings or proceeds from the sale of securities could also be used to replace unanticipated outflows of large checking and money market deposits.

The Company has $10.0 million of FHLB advances which mature beyond June 30, 2013 but have call features

that can be exercised by the FHLB during the next 12 months. If the call features are exercised, the Company has the option of requesting any advance otherwise available to it pursuant to the Credit Policy of the FHLB. Under the Company Supervisory Agreement, the Company may not incur or issue any debt without prior notice to, and the consent of, its primary regulator (FRB). Because FHLB advances are debt of the Bank, they are not affected by the Company’s restriction on incurring debt.

At June 30, 2012, the Bank had the ability to draw additional borrowings from the FHLB of $57.4 million based upon the collateral pledged, subject to a requirement to purchase additional FHLB stock and the FHLB agreeing to lend. The Bank also has the ability to draw additional borrowings of $38.8 million from the Federal Reserve Bank, based upon the loans pledged with them.

The credit policy of the FHLB relating to the collateral value of the loans collateralizing the outstanding advances with the FHLB may change such that the current collateral pledged to secure the advances is no longer acceptable or the formulas for determining the excess pledged collateral may change. If this were to happen, the Bank may not have additional collateral to pledge to secure the existing advances and the Bank may have to find alternative funding sources to replace some of the FHLB advances maturing in 2013. The FHLB could also reduce the amount of funds it will lend to the Bank. It is not anticipated that the Bank will need to find alternative funding sources to replace the outstanding FHLB advances, but if needed, excess collateral currently pledged to the FHLB could be pledged to the FRB and the Bank could borrow additional funds from the FRB based on the increased collateral levels or obtain additional deposits.

The Company’s primary source of cash is dividends from the Bank and the Bank is restricted under the Bank Supervisory Agreement from paying dividends to the Company without obtaining prior regulatory approval. At June 30, 2012, the Company had $1.2 million in cash and other assets that could readily be turned into cash. The primary use of cash by the Company is the payment of expenses. The amount of the dividend on the preferred stock accumulates at the rate of $325,000 per quarter through February 14, 2014 and $585,000 per quarter thereafter, if the shares of preferred stock are not redeemed. The Company has deferred the last six quarterly dividend payments, beginning with the February 15, 2011 dividend payment, on its Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A issued to the United States Treasury Department as part of the TARP Capital Purchase Program and has determined that it will defer the August 15, 2012 payment. Since the Company has failed to pay the dividends for six quarters, the Treasury has the right to appoint two representatives to the Company’s board of directors, although the Treasury has not yet exercised this right. The total amount of accrued but unpaid dividends totaled $2.0 million at June 30, 2012. The Company determined to defer such payments following discussions with its primary regulator. In addition, under the terms of the Company’s Supervisory Agreement, the Company may not declare or pay any cash dividends without prior notice to, and consent of, the OCC.

As required by the Company Supervisory Agreement, the Company submitted an updated two-year capital plan in January of 2012 that the Federal Reserve Board may make comments upon, and to which it may require revisions. The Company must operate within the parameters of the final capital plan and is required to monitor and submit periodic reports on its compliance with the plan. In addition, the OCC has established an IMCR for the Bank. An IMCR requires a bank to establish and maintain levels of capital greater than those generally required for a bank to be classified as “well-capitalized.” Effective December 31, 2011, the Bank was required to establish, and subsequently maintain, core capital at least equal to 8.5% of adjusted total assets, which was in excess of the Bank’s 7.14% core capital to adjusted total assets ratio at December 31, 2011. In February 2012, the Bank received a notice from the OCC arising out of its failure to establish and maintain its IMCR of 8.5% core capital to adjusted total assets at December 31, 2011. In accordance with this notice, by April 30, 2012, the OCC required the Bank to submit a further written capital plan of how it intends to achieve and maintain its IMCR, and a contingency plan in the event the IMCR is not achieved through the Bank’s primary plan. Because of the improved financial results and the decrease in assets experienced during the first six months of 2012, the Bank’s core capital ratio improved to 8.50% at March 31, 2012 and 9.04% at June 30, 2012. In April 2012, the Bank submitted the required revised capital and contingency plan to the OCC. The OCC may make comments upon, and require revisions to this plan. There can be no assurance that the Bank will continue to maintain compliance with the IMCR in the future. The Bank’s failure to comply with the terms of the IMCR at December 31, 2011 was, and its failure to continue to comply can be, deemed an unsafe and unsound banking practice and could subject it to further limits on growth and such legal actions or sanctions as the OCC considers appropriate.

The Company also serves as a source of capital, liquidity and financial support to the Bank. Based on the operating performance of the Bank or other capital demands, including the Bank’s failure to maintain the outstanding IMCR, the Company may need, or be required by supervising bank regulators, to raise additional capital. If the Company raises capital through the issuance of additional shares of common stock or other equity securities, it would dilute the ownership interests of existing stockholders and, given our current common stock trading price, would be expected to dilute the per share book value of the Company’s common stock and could result in a change of control of the Company and the Bank. New investors may also have rights, preferences and privileges senior to the Company’s current stockholders, which may adversely impact the Company’s current stockholders. The Company’s ability to raise additional capital through the issuance of equity securities, if needed, will depend on conditions in the capital markets at that time, which are outside of its control, and on the Company’s financial performance. Accordingly, the Company may not be able to raise additional capital, if needed, on favorable economic terms, or other terms acceptable to it. If the Company or the Bank cannot satisfactorily address their respective capital needs as they arise, the Company’s ability to maintain or expand its operations, their ability to maintain the Company’s capital plan and the Bank IMCR, operate without additional regulatory or other restrictions, and its operating results, could be materially adversely affected.

Market Risk

Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and rates. The Company’s market risk arises primarily from interest rate risk inherent in its investing, lending and deposit taking activities. Management actively monitors and manages its interest rate risk exposure.

The Company’s profitability is affected by fluctuations in interest rates. A sudden and substantial change in interest rates may adversely impact the Company’s earnings to the extent that the interest rates borne by assets and liabilities do not change at the same speed, to the same extent, or on the same basis. The Company monitors the projected changes in net interest income that occur if interest rates were to suddenly change up or down. The Rate Shock Table located in the Asset/Liability Management section of this report, which follows, discloses the Company’s projected changes in net interest income based upon immediate interest rate changes called rate shocks.

The Company utilizes a model that uses the discounted cash flows from its interest-earning assets and its interest-bearing liabilities to calculate the current market value of those assets and liabilities. The model also calculates the changes in market value of the interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities due to different interest rate changes.

The following table discloses the projected changes in market value to the Company’s interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities based upon incremental 100 basis point changes in interest rates from interest rates in effect on June 30, 2012.


	Market Value
(Dollars in thousands)
Basis point change in interest rates	-100			0			+100			+200
Total market risk sensitive assets	$	683,823			676,025			666,357			654,727
Total market risk sensitive liabilities		621,271			602,820			589,956			578,048
Off-balance sheet financial instruments		(356	)		0			(77	)		(125	)

Net market risk	$	62,908			73,205			76,478			76,804

Percentage change from current market value		(14.07	)%		0.00	%		4.47	%		4.92	%

The preceding table was prepared utilizing the following assumptions (the Model Assumptions) regarding prepayment and decay ratios that were determined by management based upon their review of historical prepayment speeds and future prepayment projections. Fixed rate loans were assumed to prepay at annual rates from 5% to 56%, depending on the note rate and the period to maturity. Adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs) were assumed to prepay at annual rates of between 13% and 34%, depending on the note rate and the period to maturity. Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) were projected to have prepayments based upon the underlying collateral securing the instrument and the related cash flow priority of the CMO tranche owned. Certificate accounts were assumed not to be withdrawn until maturity. Passbook accounts were assumed to decay at an annual rate of 9% and money market accounts were assumed to decay at an annual rate of 12%. Non-interest checking and NOW accounts were assumed to decay at an annual rate of 8% and commercial NOW and MMDA accounts were assumed to decay at annual rates of 12%. Commercial non-interest checking accounts were assumed to decay at an annual rate of 10%. FHLB advances were projected to be called at the first call date where the projected interest rate on similar remaining term advances exceeded the interest rate on the callable advance or investment.

Certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the foregoing table. The interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types of assets and liabilities may lag behind changes in market interest rates. The model assumes that the difference between the current interest rate being earned or paid compared to a treasury instrument or other interest index with a similar term to maturity (the Interest Spread) will remain constant over the interest changes disclosed in the table. Changes in Interest Spread could impact projected market value changes. Certain assets, such as ARMs, have features which restrict changes in interest rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the assets. The market value of the interest-bearing assets which are approaching their lifetime interest rate caps could be different from the values disclosed in the table. In the event of a change in interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels may deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the foregoing table. The ability of many borrowers to service their debt may decrease in the event of a substantial sustained interest rate increase.

Asset/Liability Management

The Company’s management reviews the impact that changing interest rates will have on its net interest income projected for the twelve months following June 30, 2012 to determine if its current level of interest rate risk is acceptable. The following table projects the estimated annual impact on net interest income during the 12 month period ending June 30, 2013 of immediate interest rate changes called rate shocks.


(Dollars in thousands)
Rate Shock in Basis Points		Projected Change in Net Interest Income			Percentage Change
	+200		1,176			5.69	%
	+100		703			3.40	%
	0		0			0.00	%
	-100		(1,400	)		(6.77	)%

The preceding table was prepared utilizing the Model Assumptions. Certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the foregoing table. In the event of a change in interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels would likely deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the foregoing table. The ability of many borrowers to service their debt may decrease in the event of a substantial increase in interest rates and could impact net interest income. The increase in interest income in a rising rate environment is primarily because more loans than deposits are scheduled to reprice in the next twelve months.

In an attempt to manage its exposure to changes in interest rates, management closely monitors interest rate risk. The Bank has an Asset/Liability Committee which meets frequently to discuss changes in the interest rate risk position and projected profitability. The Committee makes adjustments to the asset-liability position of the Bank,

which are reviewed by the Board of Directors of the Bank. This Committee also reviews the Bank’s portfolio, formulates investment strategies and oversees the timing and implementation of transactions to assure attainment of the Board’s objectives in the most effective manner. In addition, each quarter the Board reviews the Bank’s asset/liability position, including simulations of the effect on the Bank’s capital of various interest rate scenarios.

In managing its asset/liability mix, the Bank, at times, depending on the relationship between long- and short-term interest rates, market conditions and consumer preference, may place more emphasis on managing net interest margin than on better matching the interest rate sensitivity of its assets and liabilities in an effort to enhance net interest income. Management believes that the increased net interest income resulting from a mismatch in the maturity of its asset and liability portfolios can, in certain situations, provide high enough returns to justify the increased exposure to sudden and unexpected changes in interest rates.

To the extent consistent with its interest rate spread objectives, the Bank attempts to manage its interest rate risk and has taken a number of steps to restructure its balance sheet in order to better match the maturities of its assets and liabilities. In the past, more fixed rate loans were placed into the single family loan portfolio. Over the past several years, the Bank has primarily focused its fixed rate one-to-four family residential lending program on loans that are saleable to third parties and generally placed only those fixed rate loans that met certain risk characteristics into its loan portfolio. The Bank’s commercial loan production continued to be primarily in adjustable rate loans with minimum interest rate floors; however, more of these loans were structured to reprice every one, two, or three years.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements other than commitments to originate and sell loans in the ordinary course of business.

Item 4: Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act)). Based on this evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.

Changes in internal controls. There was no change in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the Company’s most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

HMN FINANCIAL, INC.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings.

From time to time, the Company is party to legal proceedings arising out of its lending and deposit operations. The Company is, and expects to become, engaged in a number of foreclosure proceedings and other collection actions as part of its collection activities. Litigation is often unpredictable and the actual results of litigation cannot be determined with any certainty.

The Company entered into a written Supervisory Agreement with the OTS effective February 22, 2011. The Supervisory Agreement replaced the prior memorandum of understanding that the Company entered into with the OTS on December 9, 2009. The material requirements of the Company Supervisory Agreement are as follows:

•

Submission of a written plan by May 31, 2011 for enhancing the consolidated capital of the Company for the period ending December 31, 2012 and review of performance no less than quarterly along with reports to the FRB (as successor to the OTS’ role as regulator of the Company) within 45 days after the end of each calendar quarter. The plan submitted by the Company prior to May 31, 2011 focused on improvement in capital levels primarily through improved earnings, reduction in non-performing assets and reduction in total assets. As required, the Company submitted an updated two-year capital plan in January 2012.

•

The Company may not declare, make or pay any cash dividends or repurchase or redeem any of the Company’s equity stock without providing advance notice to the FRB and receiving written non-objection.

•

The Company may not incur, issue, renew, rollover or pay interest or principal on any debt or commit to do so nor may it increase any current lines of credit or guarantee the debt of any entity without prior written notice and written non-objection of the FRB.

•

Limits were placed on contractual arrangements related to compensation or benefits with any directors or officers and the Company is prevented from making any golden parachute payments to officers, directors or employees.

The Bank also entered into a written Supervisory Agreement with the OTS, effective February 22, 2011. The Bank Supervisory Agreement replaced the prior memorandum of understanding that the Bank entered into with the OTS on December 9, 2009. The material requirements of the Bank Supervisory Agreement are as follows:

•

Submission of a business plan by May 31, 2011, addressing strategies for supporting the Bank’s risk profile, improving earnings and profitability and stress testing. The Bank’s Board is to review performance no less than quarterly and report to the OCC (as successor to the OTS’s role as regulator of the Bank) within 45 days after the end of each calendar quarter. The plan submitted by the Bank prior to May 31, 2011 focused on improvement in capital levels primarily through improved earnings, reduction in non-performing assets and reduction in total assets. The OCC accepted the submitted plan with the expectation that the Bank would be in adherence with the OCC’s Notification of Establishment of Higher Minimum Capital Ratios, dated August 8, 2011, requiring a minimum core capital ratio of 8.5% by December 31, 2011. The Bank submitted an updated two-year business plan in January 2012 to the OCC.

•

Submission of a detailed written plan prior to March 31, 2011 to reduce the Bank’s problem assets. The plan submitted by the Bank by March 31, 2011 was accepted by the OCC and focused on improvement in the level of problem assets as a result of continuing the actions taken in 2010 and early 2011 by the Board and management to improve credit quality and more effectively identify and manage problem loans in a proactive manner.

•

Development of individual written specific workout plans for certain large adversely classified loans or groups of loans and for foreclosed real estate owned by the Bank within 30 days of the Supervisory Agreement effective date. The plans developed by the Bank focused on improving the ultimate collection of these items by improving the Bank’s collateral position or by an orderly liquidation of the collateral securing the assets.

•

Beginning with the quarter ended June 30, 2011, the Bank is to submit quarterly asset reports to the OCC within 50 days of quarter end. The reports submitted by the Bank focused on the status of workout plans, classified assets, actions taken to reduce problem assets and recommended revisions to the problem asset plan.

•

Development by April 30, 2011 of a loan modification policy. The policy developed by the Bank focuses on enhanced supporting documentation and procedures relating to all loan restructurings, including those not determined to be troubled debt restructurings.

•

Revision of the Bank’s written credit concentration program and submission of the program by May 6, 2011 to the OTS. The plan addresses identifying, monitoring and controlling risk associated with concentrations of credit. The Bank has implemented the revisions and is monitoring the resulting information.

•

Improvement of the documentation relating to the allowance for loan and lease losses to ensure that it addressed OTS concerns. The documentation improvements related primarily to the inclusion of established specific reserves into the commercial loan migration charge-off analysis.

•

The Bank may not declare or pay any dividends or make any other capital distributions without providing advance request to the OCC and receiving written approval. The Supervisory Agreement also limits the Bank’s growth in total assets in excess of specified amounts without prior regulatory approval. The Bank’s assets grew in excess of the allowable amount in the third quarter of 2011; however, the Bank obtained prior approval from the OCC.

•

Limits are placed on contractual arrangements with third parties and contracts dealing with compensation or benefits with any directors or officers and the Bank is prevented from making any golden parachute payments to directors, officers and employees.

The Company and Bank timely submitted all plans and programs required by the Supervisory Agreements. The Company believes that it and the Bank are in compliance with all provisions of the Supervisory Agreements as of June 30, 2012. The applicable regulator may comment on and require revision of any submitted plan, program or policy. Neither the Company nor the Bank have taken any actions, or sought approval for such actions, where prior regulatory approval is required by the Supervisory Agreements other than the restriction related to asset growth and changes to the business plan. In the third quarter of 2011, the Bank requested and obtained a non-objection waiver from the OCC related to the unanticipated growth in assets during the third quarter in an amount greater than the net interest credited on deposit liabilities during the prior quarter. The Bank also received no supervisory objection to the change in the previously submitted business plan as a result of the increase in assets. The increase in assets was due to unanticipated increases in commercial deposits during the third quarter of 2011 as a result of increased cash being held by a few of the Bank’s commercial deposit customers.

The foregoing is merely a summary of the material terms of the Supervisory Agreements and reference is made to the full text of the Supervisory Agreements which are set forth as Exhibits 10.1 and 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 10, 2011.

Dissolution of the OTS did not have any material impact on the Supervisory Agreements as the Supervisory Agreements are now enforced by the FRB in the case of the Company’s Supervisory Agreement and the OCC in the case of the Bank’s Supervisory Agreement.

The OCC has established an IMCR for the Bank. An IMCR requires a bank to establish and maintain levels of capital greater than those generally required for a bank to be classified as “well-capitalized.” Effective December 31, 2011, the Bank was required to establish, and subsequently maintain, core capital at least equal to 8.5% of adjusted total assets, which was in excess of the Bank’s 7.14% core capital to adjusted total assets ratio at December 31, 2011. In February 2012, the Bank received a notice from the OCC arising out of its failure to establish and maintain its IMCR of 8.50% core capital to adjusted total assets at December 31, 2011. Pursuant to

the notice, the OCC required the Bank to submit by April 30, 2012 a further written capital plan of how it intends to achieve and maintain its IMCR, and a contingency plan in the event the IMCR is not achieved through the Bank’s primary plan. Because of improved financial results and a decrease in assets, the Bank’s core capital ratio improved to 8.50% at March 31, 2012 and 9.04% at June 30, 2012. In April 2012, the Bank submitted to the OCC the required revised written capital and contingency plan. The OCC may make comments upon, and require revisions to the plan. The Bank’s failure to comply with the terms of the IMCR was, and its failure to continue to comply can be, deemed an unsafe and unsound banking practice.

There can be no assurance that the Company and the Bank will continue to maintain compliance with the Supervisory Agreements and the IMCR in the future. Under applicable banking regulations, the failure to satisfy the terms of the Supervisory Agreements and the IMCR, and failure to otherwise comply with applicable requirements as they arise, could subject the Company, the Bank and its directors and officers to such restrictions, legal actions or sanctions as the OCC or FRB considers appropriate. Possible sanctions include among others (i) the imposition of one or more cease and desist orders requiring corrective action, which are enforceable directives that may address any aspect of the Company or Bank management, operations or capital, including requirements to change management, raise equity capital, dispose of assets or effect a change of control; (ii) civil money penalties; and (iii) downgrades in the capital adequacy status of the Company and the Bank.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

See Part I, Item 1.A. of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 for risk factors.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

The Company deferred its February 15, 2011, May 15, 2011, August 15, 2011, November 15, 2011, February 15, 2012, and May 15, 2012 regular quarterly cash dividend payments on its Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A issued to the United States Treasury Department as part of the TARP Capital Purchase Program. The Company has also determined that it will defer its August 15, 2012 dividend payment and following that deferral, the Company will have an aggregate arrearage of $2.3 million with respect to the preferred stock. For additional information on these dividend deferrals, please see Part I, Item 2, “Managements’ Discussion and Analysis Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources” of our Form 10-Q.

Since the Company failed to pay dividends for six quarters, the Treasury has the right to appoint two representatives to the Company’s board of directors, although the Treasury has not yet exercised this right. Pending the election of any such director, the Treasury has requested, and the Company has agreed, to the attendance of an observer selected by Treasury at Company board of director meetings

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

Item 5.

Other Information.

None.

Item 6.

Exhibits.

Incorporated by reference to the index to exhibits included with this report immediately following the signature page.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	HMN FINANCIAL, INC.
	Registrant

Date: August 7, 2012	By:	/s/ Bradley Krehbiel
		Bradley Krehbiel,
		Chief Executive Officer and President
		(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: August 7, 2012	By:	/s/ Jon Eberle
		Jon Eberle,
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer)

HMN FINANCIAL, INC.

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

FOR FORM 10-Q


Regulation S-K Exhibit Number	Document Attached Hereto	Reference to Prior Filing or Exhibit Number Form 10-Q	Sequential Page Numbering Where Attached Exhibits Are Located in This Report

3.1	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation	*1	N/A

3.2	Amended and Restated By-laws	*2	N/A

4	Form of Common Stock Certificate	*3	N/A

31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of CEO	31.1	Filed electronically

31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of CFO	31.2	Filed electronically

32	Section 1350 Certification of CEO and CFO	32	Filed Electronically

101	Financial statements from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2012, filed with the SEC on August 7, 2012, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL); (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, (iii) the Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the Six Month Period Ended June 30, 2012, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.	101	Filed Electronically

*1	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 1998 (File No. 0-24100).

*2	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 5, 2012 (File 0-24100).

*3	Incorporated by reference to the same numbered exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 dated April 1, 1994 (File No. 33-77212).