IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS INC - Annual Report: 2018 (Form 10-K)

  

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-K

 

(Mark One)

[X]	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018

 

[   ]

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from [____] to [____]

Commission file number 001-15757

 

IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware		33-0224167
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
13500 Evening Creek Drive N., Suite 550 San Diego, CA 92128 (Address of principal executive offices)
(858) 673-8600 (Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [  ]  No [X]

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [  ] No [X]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [  ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such a shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).  Yes [X]  No [   ]

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  [   ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company or emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.:

 

Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☒
Non–Accelerated filer	☐	Small reporting company	☒
		Emerging growth company	☐

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes [   ]  No [X]

 

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2018, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, as reported on the OTCQB marketplace was $67,362,450. This number excludes shares of common stock held by affiliates, executive officers and directors.

 

As of March 26, 2019, there were 98,510,466 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

 

 

 

IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS, INC.

 

Form 10-K

For the Year Ended December 31, 2018

 

Table of Contents

 

			Page
PART I
Item 1.		Business	1
Item 1A.		Risk Factors	14
Item 1B.		Unresolved Staff Comments	21
Item 2.		Properties	21
Item 3.		Legal Proceedings	21
Item 4.		Mine Safety Disclosures	21
PART II
Item 5.		Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	22
Item 6.		Selected Financial Data	22
Item 7.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	23
Item 7A.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	38
Item 8.		Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	39
Item 9.		Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	39
Item 9A.		Controls and Procedures	39
Item 9B.		Other Information	39
Part III
Item 10.		Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	40
Item 11.		Executive Compensation	44
Item 12.		Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholders Matters	54
Item 13.		Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	57
Item 14.		Principal Accounting Fees and Services	59
PART IV
Item 15.		Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	60
EXHIBIT INDEX			60
SIGNATURES			62

 

 

 

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT

 

 This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements regarding our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates” and similar expressions or variations of such words are intended to identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying forward-looking statements in this Annual Report. Additionally, statements concerning future matters such as the development of new products, sales levels, expense levels and other statements regarding matters that are not historical are forward-looking statements.

 

Although forward-looking statements in this Annual Report reflect the good faith judgment of our management, such statements can only be based on facts and factors currently known by us. Consequently, forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties and actual results and outcomes may differ materially from the results and outcomes discussed in or anticipated by the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences in results and outcomes include without limitation those discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” in Item 1A, as well as those discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report. Readers are urged not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements in order to reflect any event or circumstance that may arise after the date of this Annual Report. Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made in this Annual Report, which attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. 

 

PART I

 

ITEM 1.

BUSINESS

 

ImageWare Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation since 2005 and previously incorporated in California in 1987 as a California corporation, has its principal place of business at 13500 Evening Creek Drive N, Suite 550, San Diego, California 92128. We maintain a corporate website at http://www.iwsinc.com. Our common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common Stock”), is currently listed for quotation on the OTCQB marketplace under the symbol “IWSY.” As used in this Annual Report, “we,” “us,” “our,” “ImageWare,” “ImageWare Systems,” “Company” or “our Company” refers to ImageWare Systems, Inc. and all of its subsidiaries.

 

Overview

ImageWare Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) is a pioneer and leader in the emerging market for biometrically enabled software-based identity management solutions. Using those human characteristics that are unique to us all, the Company creates software that provides a highly reliable indication of a person’s identity. The Company’s “flagship” product is the patented IWS Biometric Engine®. The Company’s products are used to manage and issue secure credentials including national IDs, passports, driver licenses and access control credentials. The Company’s products also provide law enforcement with integrated mug-shot, fingerprint LiveScan and investigative capabilities. The Company also provides comprehensive authentication security software using biometrics to secure physical and logical access to facilities or computer networks or internet sites. Biometric technology is now an integral part of all markets the Company addresses and all of the products are integrated into the IWS Biometric Engine.

 

The Company is also a leading developer of mobile and cloud-based identity management solutions providing patented biometric authentication solutions for the enterprise. The Company delivers next-generation biometrics as an interactive and scalable cloud-based solution. The Company brings together cloud and mobile technology to offer multi-factor authentication for smartphone users, for the enterprise, and across industries. The Company has introduced a set of mobile and cloud solutions to provide biometric user authentication, including the GoVerifyID® mobile application and cloud-based SaaS solutions. These solutions include GoMobile Interactive (“GMI”), which provides patented, secure, dynamic messaging. More recently, the Company has introduced GoVerifyID® Enterprise Suite, which provides turnkey integration with Microsoft Windows, Microsoft Active Directory, and security products from CA, HPE, IBM, and SAP. These solutions are marketed and sold to businesses across many industries. For the healthcare industry, the Company also developed and markets a patented, FDA-Cleared, biometrically-secure enterprise-level platform for patient engagement and medication adherence.

 

Historically, we have marketed our products to government entities at the federal, state and local levels. However, the emergence of cloud-based computing, a mobile market that demands increased security and interoperable systems, and the proven success of our products in the government markets, have enabled us to enlarge our target market focus to include the emerging consumer and non-government enterprise marketplace.

 

 

Our biometric technology is a core software component of an organization’s security infrastructure and includes a multi-biometric identity management solution for enrolling, managing, identifying and verifying the identities of people by the physical characteristics of the human body. We develop, sell and support various identity management capabilities within government (federal, state and local), law enforcement, commercial enterprises, and transportation and aviation markets for identification and verification purposes. Our IWS Biometric Engine is a patented biometric identity management software platform for multi-biometric enrollment, management and authentication, managing population databases of virtually unlimited sizes. It is hardware agnostic and can utilize different types of biometric algorithms. It allows different types of biometrics to be operated at the same time on a seamlessly integrated platform. It is also offered as a Software Development Kit (“SDK”) based search engine, enabling developers and system integrators to implement a biometric solution or integrate biometric capabilities into existing applications without having to derive biometric functionality from preexisting applications. The IWS Biometric Engine combined with our secure credential platform, IWS EPI Builder, provides a comprehensive, integrated biometric and secure credential solution that can be leveraged for high-end applications such as passports, driver licenses, national IDs, and other secure documents.

 

Our law enforcement solutions enable agencies to quickly capture, archive, search, retrieve, and share digital images, fingerprints and other biometrics as well as criminal history records on a stand-alone, networked, wireless or web-based platform. We develop, sell and support a suite of modular software products used by law enforcement and public safety agencies to create and manage criminal history records and to investigate crime. Our IWS Law Enforcement solution consists of five software modules: Capture and Investigative modules, which provide a criminal booking system with related databases as well as the ability to create and print mug photo/SMT image lineups and electronic mug-books; a Facial Recognition module, which uses biometric facial recognition to identify suspects; a Web module, which provides access to centrally stored records over the Internet in a connected or wireless fashion; and a LiveScan module, which incorporates LiveScan capabilities into IWS Law Enforcement providing integrated fingerprint and palm print biometric management for civil and law enforcement use. The IWS Biometric Engine is also available to our law enforcement clients and allows them to capture and search using other biometrics such as iris or DNA.

 

Our secure credential solutions empower customers to create secure and smart digital identification documents with complete ID systems. We develop, sell and support software and design systems that utilize digital imaging and biometrics in the production of photo identification cards, credentials and identification systems. Our products in this market consist of IWS EPI Suite and IWS EPI Builder. These products allow for production of digital identification cards and related databases and records and can be used by, among others, schools, airports, hospitals, corporations or governments. We have added the ability to incorporate multiple biometrics into the ID systems with the integration of IWS Biometric Engine to our secure credential product line.

 

Our GoVerifyID products support multi-modal biometric authentication including, but not limited to, face, voice, fingerprint, iris, palm, and more. All the biometrics can be combined with or used as replacements for authentication and access control tools, including tokens, digital certificates, passwords, and PINS, to provide the ultimate level of assurance, accountability, and ease of use for corporate networks, web applications, mobile devices, and PC desktop environments. GoVerifyID provides patented multi-modal biometric identity authentication that can be used in place of passwords or as a strong second factor authentication method. GoVerifyID is provided as a cloud-based Software-as a-Service (“SaaS”) solution, thereby, eliminating complex IT deployment of biometric software and eliminating startup costs. GoVerifyID works with existing mobile devices, eliminating the need for specialized biometric scanning devices typically used with most biometric solutions.

 

GoVerifyID was built to work seamlessly with our patented technology portfolio, including GoMobile Interactive®, the secure dynamic messaging system, and the ultrascalable IWS Biometric Engine that provides anonymous biometric matching and storage. GoVerifyID is secure, simple to use, and designed to provide instant identity authentication by engaging with the biometric capture capabilities of each user’s mobile device. GoVerifyID also provides a fully open SDK for organizations that require the utmost in flexibility.

 

Our GoVerifyID Enterprise Suite for Windows easily and seamlessly integrates with a user’s existing Microsoft ecosystem/infrastructure to support the user’s extended workforce. GoVerifyID Enterprise Suite secures corporate networks from end-to-end – both applications and data – on client, server, and cloud systems with flexible user login policies to address varied trust requirements. Our GoVerifyID Enterprise Suite works with the smart devices that the workforce already uses, including iOS/Android smartphones and tablets.

    

 

   

Our GoVerifyID Enterprise Suite for Windows provides biometric authentication for the Microsoft ecosystem that secures enterprise security without compromising agility, productivity, or user experience. Its comprehensive architecture offers biometric authentication for the complete range of enterprise stakeholders, delivering secure enterprise applications and workspaces to internal employees, partners, suppliers and vendors, and customers. Out of Band authentication is provided via universally available devices, such as smartphones and tablets. In-band authentication can be enabled via fingerprint readers, iris scanners, and any Windows Biometric Framework compatible device. The server component provides easy centralized management of biometric authentication policies for all users, using a standard Snap-In to the Microsoft Management Console. It provides greater user assurance and Single Sign-On (“SSO”) convenience for all corporate systems and cloud applications. There is no compromise in agility or user experience.

 

GoVerifyID Enterprise Suite also provides options for seamless integration with leading Enterprise Identity and Access Management (“IAM”) solutions including CA SSO, IBM Security Access Manager (“ISAM”), SAP Cloud Platform, and HPE’s Aruba ClearPass. These turnkey integrations provide multi-modal biometric authentication to replace or augment passwords for use with enterprise and consumer class systems. 

 

Recent Developments

 

Creation of Series C Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock

 

On September 10, 2018, the Company filed the Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock with the Secretary of State for the State of Delaware – Division of Corporations, designating 1,000 shares of the Company’s preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, as Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series C Preferred”), each share with a stated value of $10,000 per share.

 

Series C Financing

 

From September 10, 2018 through September 21, 2018, the Company offered and sold an aggregate of 1,000 shares of Series C Preferred at a purchase price of $10,000 per share (the “Series C Financing”). The aggregate gross proceeds to the Company from the Series C Financing were $10,000,000. Issuance costs incurred in conjunction with the Series C Financing were approximately $1,211,000, resulting in net proceeds to the Company of approximately $8,789,000.

 

Amendment to Certificate of Designations of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock

 

On September 10, 2018, the Company filed an Amendment to the Certificate of Designations, Preferences, and Rights of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock with the Secretary of State for the State of Delaware – Division of Corporations, to increase the number of shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Series A Preferred”), authorized for issuance thereunder to 38,000 shares, in order to permit the Debt Exchange (as defined below).

 

Debt Exchange

 

On September 10, 2018, the Company entered into exchange agreements (the “Exchange Agreements”) with Neal Goldman and Charles Crocker, pursuant to which Messrs. Goldman and Crocker agreed to exchange approximately $6.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of outstanding debt (including accrued and unpaid interest) owed under the terms of their respective lines of credit for an aggregate of 6,896 shares of Series A Preferred (the “Debt Exchange”). As a result of the Debt Exchange, all indebtedness, liabilities and other obligations arising under the respective lines of credit were cancelled and deemed satisfied in full. Messrs. Goldman and Crocker are members of the Company’s Board of Directors and related parties.

 

Declaration of Special Dividend

 

Concurrently with the Series C Financing, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a special dividend (the “Special Dividend”) for holders of the Series A Preferred (each a “Holder”), pursuant to which each Holder received a warrant (“Dividend Warrant”) to purchase 39.87 shares of Company Common Stock for every share of Series A Preferred held, which resulted in the issuance of Dividend Warrants to the Holders as a group to purchase an aggregate of 1,493,856 shares of Common Stock. Each Dividend Warrant has an exercise price of $0.01 per share, and is exercisable immediately upon issuance; provided, however, that a Dividend Warrant may only be exercised concurrently with the conversion of shares of Series A Preferred held by a Holder into shares of Common Stock. In addition, each Dividend Warrant held by a Holder shall expire on the earliest to occur of (i) the conversion of all Series A Preferred held by such Holder into Common Stock, (ii) the redemption by the Company of all outstanding shares of Series A Preferred held by such Holder, (iii) the Dividend Warrant no longer representing the right to purchase any shares of Common Stock, and (iv) the tenth anniversary of the date of issuance. 

 

 

 

 

Industry Background

 

Biometrics and Secure Credential Markets

 

The identity and access management market are expected to grow from $7.2 billion in 2015 to $12.78 billion by 2020, at an expected Compound Annual Growth Rate (“CAGR”) of 12.2%. This growth is based on a growing demand for compliance management requirements and increasing trends in mobility devices and applications. The main drivers are:

 

 

 

 

Audit and regulation compliance is a key driving force in the market; it is growing at the highest rate and will likely continue to grow through 2020.

 

Identity management solutions are rapidly moving into risk-based programs focused on enforcement of access control and entitlement management. The enterprise is achieving major benefits from costs, but still lacks the capability to manage time-sensitive processes, including manual approvals and provisioning.

 

Cloud services to date, though increasing, still suffer from a perceived lack of security. However, large enterprises are rapidly adopting cloud models, especially in centralizing the management of identities. This adoption is being done by still using on premise identity management solutions, but also venturing into the cloud as well. This means that the use of the hybrid model, utilizing both cloud and in-house identity management solutions, is increasing.

 

We believe the biometric identity management market will continue to grow as the role of biometrics becomes more widely adopted for enhancing security and complying with government regulations and initiatives and as biometric capture devices become increasingly mobile, robust and cost effective. Our biometric and secure credentialing solutions are meeting the requirements and standards for true multi-modal biometric identity management systems, as well as providing scalability to support evolving functionality.

 

Some of the industries that can benefit from biometric-based identity management and are a major part of our examples include:

 

Healthcare

 

 

 

 

 

 

Banking

 

 

 

 

 

Retail/e-Commerce

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Government

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Law Enforcement and Public Safety Markets

 

The United States law enforcement and public safety markets are composed of federal, state and local law enforcement agencies. Our target customers include local police and sheriff’s departments, primary state law enforcement agencies, prisons, special police agencies, county constable offices, and federal agencies such as the Department of Homeland Security, FBI, DEA and ICE.

 

In addition, police agencies in foreign countries have shown interest in using the full range of IWS Law Enforcement products to meet the growing need for a flexible yet robust booking/investigative solution that includes the routine use of IWS Facial Recognition as well as the ability to use other biometrics. We continue to target agencies in foreign countries for our biometric and law enforcement solutions.

 

Law enforcement customers require demanding end-to-end solutions that incorporate robust features and functionalities, such as biometric and secure credentialing capabilities, as well as instant access to centrally maintained records for real time verification of identity and privileges. Law enforcement has long used the multiple biometrics of fingerprint and face in establishing an individual’s identity record. More recently, law enforcement is seeking capability to utilize additional biometrics such as iris and DNA. The Company’s multi-biometric platform product, the IWS Biometric Engine, allows Company customers to use as many different biometrics as desired all on a single, integrated platform.

 

Many law enforcement agencies are also moving toward a more shared experience where specific pieces of suspect/arrest data may be viewed by outside agencies allowing a suspect’s identity to be quickly defined with the end goal being the swift apprehension of the subject.

 

Products and Services

 

Our identity management solutions are primarily focused around biometrics and secure credentials providing complete, cross-functional and interoperable systems. Our biometric and secure credentialing products provide complete and interoperable solutions with features and functions required throughout the entire identity management life cycle, enabling users the flexibility to make use of any desired options, such as identity proofing and enrollment, card issuance, maintenance and access control. Our solutions offer a significant benefit that one vendor’s solution is used throughout the various stages, from establishing an applicant’s verified identity, to issuance of smart card-based credentials, to the usage and integration to physical and logical access control systems.

 

These solutions improve global communication, the integrity and authenticity of access control to facilities and information systems, as well as enhance security, increase efficiency, reduce identity fraud, and protect personal privacy.

 

We categorize our identity management products and services into three basic markets: (i) Biometrics, (ii) Secure Credential, and (iii) Law Enforcement and Public Safety. We offer a series of modular products that can be seamlessly integrated into an end-to-end solution or licensed as individual components.

 

Biometrics

 

Our biometric product line consists of the following:

 

GoMobile InteractiveTM

 

In July 2013, the Company introduced its mobile biometric identity management platform, GoMobile InteractiveTM (“GMI”). Based upon acquired patented messaging platform technology, combined with the Company’s patented IWS Biometric Engine®, GMI allows global business, service and content providers to offer users biometric security for their products, services and content on the Android or iPhone operating systems. GMI includes a standalone application that can be used as a turnkey solution, as well as an SDK, enabling integration with existing mobile applications for Android and iPhone. Targeted verticals for the product include mobile banking and value transfer, retail, healthcare and entertainment services. By supporting multi-modal biometrics on a mobile device, the Company is able to offer an out-of-band security solution that is far superior to traditional password or PIN protection, which are now failing and costing businesses billions of dollars. In addition, the GMI service supports dynamic information gathering, allowing clients to learn about their users through the use of interactive surveys that can be secured using biometrics.

 

 

 

IWS Biometric Engine

 

This is a biometric identity management platform for multi-biometric enrollment, management and authentication, managing population databases of unlimited sizes without regard to hardware or algorithm. Searches can be 1:1 (verification), 1:N (identification), X:N (investigative) and N:N (database integrity). IWS Biometric Engine is technology and biometric agnostic, enabling the use of biometric devices and algorithms from any vendor, and the support of the following biometric types: finger, face, iris, hand geometry, palm, signature, DNA, voice, 3D face and retina. IWS Biometric Engine is a second-generation solution from the Company that is based on field-proven ImageWare technology solutions that have been used to manage millions of biometric records since 1997 and is ideal for a variety of applications, including: criminal booking, background checks (civil and criminal), watch list, visa/passport and border control (air, land and sea), physical and logical access control, and other highly-secure identity management environments. The Company believes that this product will be very attractive to the emerging commercial and consumer markets as they deploy biometric identity management systems.

 

Our IWS Biometric Engine is scalable, and biometric images and templates can be enrolled either live or offline. Because it stores the enrolled images, a new algorithm can be quickly converted to support new or alternate algorithms and capture devices. The IWS Biometric Engine is built to be hardware “agnostic,” and currently supports over 100 hardware capture devices and over 70 biometric algorithms.

 

The IWS Biometric Engine is available as an SDK, as well as a platform for custom configurations to meet specific customer requirements. The added suite of products provides government, law enforcement, border management and enterprise businesses with a wide variety of application-specific solutions that address specific government mandates and technology standards. It also provides users with the ability to integrate into existing legacy systems and expand based upon specific customer requirements. This enables users to integrate a complete solution or components as needed. The application suite of products includes packaged solutions for:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IWS PIV Management Application.  The Company provides a set of Enterprise Server products within our complete PIV solution, and these software products supply server-based features and functions, while the use case for PIV requires client-based presentation of PIV data and workflow. The IWS PIV Management Application supplies the web-based graphical user interface that presents the user or client interface to the various server functions. Since the server-based applications perform specific functions for specific phases of the PIV life cycle, these server-based applications need to be bound together with additional workflow processes. The IWS PIV Management Application meets this need with software modules that interface and interconnect the server-based applications.

 

IWS PIV Middleware.  The IWS PIV Middleware product, which is NIST certified and listed on the GSA approved product list, is a library of functions that connect a card reader & PIV card on the hardware side with a software application. The library implements the specified PIV Middleware API functions that support interoperability of PIV Cards. This software has been developed in conformance with the FIPS-201 specification, and the software has been certified by the NIST Personal Identification Verification Program (“NPIVP”) Validation Authority as being compliant.

 

IWS Background Server.  The IWS Background Server is a software application designed specifically for government and law enforcement organizations to support the first stage of biometric identity management functions such as identity proofing and vetting. IWS Background Check Server automatically processes the submission of an applicant’s demographic and biographic data to investigative bureaus for background checks prior to issuing a credential.

 

 

 

IWS Desktop Security.  IWS Desktop Security is a highly flexible, scalable and modular authentication management platform that is optimized to enhance network security and usability. This architecture provides an additional layer of security to workstations, networks and systems through advanced encryption and authentication technologies. Biometric technologies (face, fingerprint, iris, voice or signature), can be seamlessly coupled with TPM chips to further enhance corporate security. USB tokens, smart cards and RFID technologies can also be readily integrated. Additional features include:

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IWS Biometric Quality Assessment & Enhancement (“IWS Biometric IQA&E”). The IWS Biometric IQA&E is a biometric image enhancement and assessment solution that assists government organizations with the ability to evaluate and enrich millions of biometric images automatically, saving time and costs associated with biometric enrollment while maintaining image and database integrity.

 

The IWS Biometric IQA&E improves the accuracy and effectiveness of biometric template enrollments. The software may be used stand-alone or in conjunction with the IWS Biometric Engine. IWS Biometric IQA&E provides automated image quality assessment with respect to relevant image quality standards from organizations such as International Civil Aviation Organization, National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”), International Organization for Standards (“ISO”) and American Association of Motor Vehicle Association (“AAMVA”). IWS Biometric IQA&E also enables organizations to conduct multi-dimensional facial recognition, which further enhances accuracy for numerous applications, including driver licenses, passports and watch lists.

 

IWS Biometric IQA&E automatically provides real-time biometric image quality analysis and feedback to improve the overall effectiveness of biometric images, thus increasing the biometric verification performance, and maintaining database and image data integrity. IWS Biometric IQA&E provides a complete platform that includes an image enhancement library for biometric types including face, finger and iris.

 

Secure Credential

 

Our secure credential products consist of the following:

 

GoVerifyID®. On November 14, 2016, the Company introduced GoVerifyID® Enterprise Suite, a multi-modal, multi-factor biometric authentication solution for the enterprise market. An algorithm-agnostic solution, GoVerify ID Enterprise Suite is an end-to-end biometric platform that seamlessly integrates with an enterprise’s existing Microsoft infrastructure, offering businesses a turnkey biometric solution for quick deployment. The Company feels that this product has the potential to dramatically accelerate adoption of its biometric solution due to the worldwide prevalence of enterprise use of the Microsoft infrastructure. Working across the entire enterprise ecosystem, GoVerifyID Enterprise Suite offers a consistent user experience and centralized administration with the highest level of security, flexibility, and usability. GoVerifyID Enterprise Suite embodies the following characteristics:

  

 

  

 

 

 

IWS Card Management.  The IWS Card Management System (“CMS”) is a comprehensive solution to support and manage the issuance of smart cards complete with the following capabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

IWS EPI Suite.  This is an ID software solution for producing, issuing, and managing secure credentials and personal identification cards. Users can efficiently manage large amounts of data, images and card designs, as well as track and issue multiple cards per person, automatically populate multiple cards and eliminate redundant data entry. IWS EPI Suite was designed to integrate with our customers’ existing security and computing infrastructure. We believe that this compatibility may be an appealing feature to corporations, government agencies, transportation departments, school boards and other public institutions.

 

IWS EPI Builder.  This is an SDK and a leading secure credential component of identity management and security solutions, providing all aspects of ID functionality from image and biometric capture to the enrollment, issuance and management of secure documents. It contains components which developers or systems integrators can use to support and produce secure credentials, including national IDs, passports, International Civil Aviation Office -compliant travel documents, smartcards and driver licenses. IWS EPI Builder enables organizations to develop custom identification solutions or incorporate sophisticated identification capabilities into existing applications including the ability to capture images, biometric and demographic data; enable biometric identification and verification (1:1 and 1:X); as well as support numerous biometric hardware and software vendors. It also enables users to add electronic identification functionality for other applications, including access control, tracking of time and attendance, point of sale transactions, human resource systems, school photography systems, asset management, inventory control, warehouse management, facilities management and card production systems.

  

IWS EPI PrintFarm.  While it is the last stage of PIV Card Issuance, the PIV smart card printing process is by no means the least important stage. Production printing of tens of thousands of PIV cards requires a significant investment and a well-engineered system. The IWS EPI PrintFarm software offers a cost-effective, yet high-performance method for high-volume card printing.

 

IWS PIV Encoder.  PIV smart cards must be programmed with specific mandatory data, digital signatures and programs in order to maintain the interoperability as well as the security features specified for the cards. The IWS PIV Encoder could be considered to be a complex device driver that properly programs the PIV smart cards. The Encoder interacts with the CMS for data payload elements. It interacts with the Certificate Authority to encrypt or sign the PIV smart card data with trusted certificates. Finally, it acts as the application-level device driver to make the specific PIV smart card encoding system properly program the smart card, regardless if the system is a standalone encoding system or one integrated into a card printer.

  

Law Enforcement and Public Safety

 

We believe our integrated suite of software products significantly reduces the inefficiencies and expands the capabilities of traditional booking and mug shot systems. Using our products, an agency can create a digital database of thousands of criminal history records, each including one or more full-color facial images, finger and palm prints, biographic text information and images of other distinctive physical features such as scars, marks and tattoos (“SMT’s”). This database can be quickly searched using text queries, or biometric technology that can compare biometric characteristics of an unknown suspect with those in the database.

 

Our investigative software products can be used to create, edit and distribute both mug photo and SMT photo lineups of any size. In addition, electronic mug books display hundreds of images for a witness to review and from which electronic selections are made. The Witness View software component records the viewing of a lineup (mug photo or SMT) detailing the images provided for viewing along with the image or images selected. In addition to a printed report, the Witness View module provides a non-editable executable file (.exe) that may be played on any computer for court exhibit viewing purposes.

 

 

 

Our IWS Law Enforcement solution consists of software modules, which may also be purchased individually. The IWS Law Enforcement Capture and Investigative modules make up our booking system and database. Our add-on modules include LiveScan, Facial Recognition, Law Enforcement Web and Witness View as well as the IWS Biometric Engine.

 

IWS Law Enforcement.  IWS Law Enforcement is a digital booking, identification and investigative solution that enables users to digitally capture, store, search and retrieve images and demographic data, including mug shots, fingerprints and SMT’s. Law enforcement may choose between submitting fingerprint data directly to the State Automated Fingerprint Identification System (“AFIS”), FBI criminal repository, or other agencies as required. Additional features and functionality include real-time access to images and data, creation of photo lineups and electronic mug books, and production of identification cards and credentials. IWS Law Enforcement also uses off-the-shelf hardware and is designed to comply with open industry standards so that it can operate on an array of systems ranging from a stand-alone personal computer to a wide area network. To avoid duplication of entries, the system can be integrated easily with several other information storage and retrieval systems, such as a records/jail management system (“RMS/JMS”) or an automated fingerprint identification system.

 

Capture.  This software module allows users to capture and store a variety of images (facial, SMT and others such as evidence photos) as well as biographical text information. Each record includes images and text information in an easy-to-view format made up of fields designed and defined by the individual agency. Current customers of this module range from agencies that capture a few thousand mug shots per year to those that capture hundreds of thousands of mug shots each year.

 

LiveScan.  This software module is FBI certified and complies with the FBI Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System (“IAFIS”) Image Quality Specifications (“IQS”) while utilizing FBI certified LiveScan devices from most major vendors. LiveScan allows users to capture single to ten prints and palm data, providing an integrated biometric management solution for both civil and law enforcement use. By adding LiveScan capabilities, law enforcement organizations further enhance the investigative process by providing additional identifiers to identify suspects involved in a crime. In addition, officers no longer need to travel to multiple booking stations to capture fingerprints and mug shots. All booking information, including images, may be located at a central designation and from there routed to the State AFIS or FBI criminal history record repository.

  

Investigative.  This software module allows users to search the database created with IWS Law Enforcement. Officers can conduct text searches in many fields, including file number, name, alias, distinctive features, and other information, such as gang membership and criminal history. The Investigative module creates a catalogue of possible matches, allowing officers or witnesses to save time by looking only at mug shots that closely resemble the description of the suspect. This module can also be used to create a line-up of similar facial images from which a witness may identify the suspect.

  

Facial Recognition.  This software module uses biometric facial recognition and retrieval technology to help authorities identify possible suspects. Images taken from surveillance videos or photographs can be searched against a digital database of facial images to retrieve any desired number of faces with similar characteristics. This module can also be used at the time of booking to identify persons using multiple aliases. Using biometrics-based technology, the application can search through thousands of facial images in a matter of seconds, reducing the time it would otherwise take a witness to flip through a paper book of facial images that may or may not be similar to the description of the suspect. The Facial Recognition module then creates a selection of possible matches ranked in order of similarity to the suspect, and a percentage confidence level is attributed to each possible match. The application incorporates search engine technology, which we license from various facial recognition algorithm providers.

 

LE Web.  This software module enables authorized personnel to access and search agency booking records stored in IWS Law Enforcement through a standard web browser from within the agency’s intranet. This module allows remote access to the IWS Law Enforcement database without requiring the user to be physically connected to the customer’s network. This application requires only that the user have access to the Internet and authorization to access the law enforcement agency’s intranet.

 

EPI Designer for Law Enforcement.  The EPI Designer for LE software is a design solution created for the IWS Law Enforcement databases based on the IWS EPI Suite program. This program allows integration with various IWS databases for the production of unique booking/inmate reports, wristbands, photo ID cards, Wanted or BOLO fliers, etc., created from the information stored in booking records. Designs can be created in minutes and quickly added to the IWS Law Enforcement system, allowing all users with appropriate permissions immediate access to the newly added form.

 

 

 

Maintenance and Customer Support

 

We offer software and hardware support to our customers. Customers can contract with us for technical support that enables them to use a toll-free number to speak with our technical support center for software support and general assistance 24 hours a day, seven days a week. As many of our government customers operate around the clock and perceive our systems as critical to their day-to-day operations, a very high percentage contract for technical support.  For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, maintenance revenue accounted for approximately 60% and 62% of our total revenue, respectively.

 

Software Customization and Fulfillment

 

We directly employ computer programmers and retain independent programmers to develop our software and perform quality control. We provide customers with software that we specifically customize to operate on their existing computer system. We work directly with purchasers of our system to ensure that the system they purchase will meet their unique needs. We configure and test the system either at our facilities or on-site and conduct any customized programming necessary to connect the system with any legacy systems already in place. We can also provide customers with a complete computer hardware system with our software already installed and configured. In either case, the customer is provided with a complete turnkey solution, which can be used immediately. When we provide our customers with a complete solution including hardware, we use off-the-shelf computers, cameras and other components purchased from other companies such as Dell or Hewlett Packard. Systems are assembled and configured either at our facilities or at the customer’s location.

  

Customers

 

We have a wide variety of domestic and international customers. Most of our IWS Law Enforcement customers are government agencies at the federal, state and local levels in the United States. Our secure credential products are also being used in Australia, Canada, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Mexico, Colombia, Costa Rica, Venezuela, Singapore, Indonesia and the Philippines. For the year ended December 31, 2018, one customer accounted for approximately 36% or $1,573,000 of total revenue and had $0 trade receivables as of the end of the year, as compared to one customer that accounted for approximately 25% or $1,089,000 of total revenue and had $201,000 trade receivables as of the end of the December 31, 2017.

  

Our Strategy

 

Our strategy is to provide patented open-architected identity management solutions including multi-biometric, secure credential and law enforcement technologies that are stand alone, integrated and/or bundled with key partners including channel relationships and large systems integrators such as United Technology Security, GCR, Unisys, Lockheed Martin, IBM and Fujitsu, among others. Key elements of our strategy for growth include the following:

  

Fully Exploit the Biometrics, Access Control and Identification Markets

 

The establishment of the Department of Homeland Security coupled with the movement by governments around the world to authenticate the identity of their citizens, employees and contractors has accelerated the adoption of biometric identification systems that can provide secure credentials and instant access to centrally maintained records for real-time verification of identity and access (physical and logical) privileges. Using our products, an organization can create secure credentials that correspond to records, including images and biographic data, in a digital database. A border guard or customs agent can stop an individual to quickly and accurately verify his identity against a database of authorized persons, and either allow or deny access as required. Our technology is also standards based and applied to facilitate activities such as federal identification mandates while complying with personal identification verification standards such as HSPD-12, International Civil Aviation Organization standards, American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators driver licenses, voter registration, immigration control and welfare fraud identification. We believe that these or very similar standards are applicable in markets throughout the world.

 

With the identity management market growing at a rapid pace, biometric identifiers are becoming recognized and accepted as integral components to the identification process in the public and private sectors. As biometric technologies (facial recognition, fingerprint, iris, etc.) are adopted, identification systems must be updated to enable their use in the field. We have built our solutions to enable the incorporation of one or multiple biometrics, which can be associated with a record and stored both in a database and on a card for later retrieval and verification without regard to the specific hardware employed. We believe the increasing demand for biometric technology will drive demand for our solutions. Our identity management products are built to accommodate the use of biometrics and meet the demanding requirements across the entire identity life cycle.

 

 

 

Expand Law Enforcement and Public Safety Markets

 

We intend to use our successful installations with customers such as the Arizona Department of Public Safety and the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department as reference accounts, and to market IWS Law Enforcement as a superior technological solution. Our recent addition of the LiveScan module and support for local AFIS to our IWS Law Enforcement will enhance its functionality and value to the law enforcement customer as well as increase the potential revenue the Company can generate from a system sale. We primarily sell directly to the law enforcement community. Our sales strategy is to increase sales to new and existing customers, including renewing supporting maintenance agreements. We have also established relationships with large systems integrators such as Sagem Morpho to OEM our law enforcement solution utilizing their worldwide sales force. We will focus our sales efforts in the near term to establish IWS Law Enforcement as the integrated mug shot and LiveScan system adopted in as many countries, states, large counties and municipalities as possible. Once we have a system installed in a region, we intend to then sell additional systems or retrieval seats to other agencies within the primary customer’s region and in neighboring regions. In addition, we plan to market our integrated investigative modules to the customer, including Facial Recognition, Web and WitnessView. As customer databases of digital mug shots grow, we expect that the perceived value of our investigative modules, and corresponding revenue from sales of those modules, will also grow.

 

Software as a Service Business Model

 

With the advent of cloud-based computing and the proliferation of smart mobile devices, which allow for reliable biometric capture and the need to secure access to data, products and services, the Company believes that the market for multi-biometric solutions will expand to encompass significant deployments of biometric systems in the commercial and consumer markets. The Company therefore intends to leverage the strength of its experience servicing existing government clients who have deployed the Company’s products for large populations, as well as its foundational patent portfolio in the field of multi-modal biometrics and the fusion of multiple biometric algorithms, to address the growing commercial and consumer market. As part of its marketing plan, the Company offered new versions of its product suite on a SaaS model during 2016. This new business model, which is intended to supplement the Company’s existing business model, will allow new commercial and consumer clients to biometrically verify identity in order to access data, products or services from mobile and desktop devices.

  

Mobile Applications

 

The Company strengthened its patent portfolio in June 2012 with the purchase of four U.S. patents relating to wireless technology from Vocel. These patents, combined with the Company’s existing foundational patents in the areas of biometric identification, verification, enrollment and fusion, provide a unique and protected foundation on which to build interactive mobile applications that are secured using biometrics.

 

The combination of our biometric identification technologies and wireless technologies has led to the development of the IWS Interactive Messaging System, which is a push application platform secured by biometrics that transforms mobile devices into a complete mobile ID, enabling companies to create applications that allow a range of unprecedented activities, from secure sharing of sensitive information to biometrically securing a mobile wallet. Identity authentication, using multi-modal biometrics gives users the confidence that their personal information is secure while the push marketing capabilities of the technology allow companies unparalleled interactivity that can be personalized to the needs and interests of their customers.

 

Sales and Marketing

 

We market and sell our products through our direct sales force and through indirect distribution channels, including systems integrators. As of December 31, 2018, we had sales and account representatives based domestically in the District of Columbia, California, Colorado, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas and Illinois and internationally in Japan, Chile and Mexico. Geographically, our sales and marketing force consisted of thirteen persons: ten persons in the United States, and three persons internationally as of December 31, 2018.

 

Our direct sales organization is supported by technical experts. Our technical experts are available by telephone and conduct on-site customer presentations in support of our sales professionals.

 

The typical sales cycle for IWS Biometric Engine and IWS Law Enforcement includes a pre-sale process to define the potential customer’s needs and budget, an on-site demonstration and conversations between the potential customer and existing customers. Government agencies are typically required to purchase large systems by including a list of requirements in a Request for Proposal, known as an “RFP,” and by allowing several companies to openly bid for the project by responding to the RFP. If our response is selected, we enter into negotiations for the contract and, if successful, ultimately receive a purchase order from the customer. This process can take anywhere from a few months to over a year.

 

 

 

Our Biometric and ID products are also sold to large integrators, direct via our sales force and to end users through distributors. Depending on the customer’s requirements, there may be instances that require an RFP. The sales cycle can vary from a few weeks to a year.

 

In addition to our direct sales force, we have developed relationships with a number of systems integrators who contract with government agencies for the installation and integration of large computer and communication systems. By acting as a subcontractor to these systems integrators, we are able to avoid the time consuming and often-expensive task of submitting proposals to government agencies, and we also gain access to large clients.

 

We also work with companies that offer complementary products, where value is created through product integration. Through teaming arrangements, we are able to enhance our products and to expand our customer base through the relationships and contracts of our strategic partners.

 

We plan to continue to market and sell our products internationally. Some of the challenges and risks associated with international sales include the difficulty in protecting our intellectual property rights, difficulty in enforcing agreements through foreign legal systems and volatility and unpredictability in the political and economic conditions of foreign countries. We believe we can work to successfully overcome these challenges.

 

Competition

 

The Law Enforcement and Public Safety Markets

 

Due to the fragmented nature of the law enforcement and public safety market and the modular nature of our product suite, we face different degrees of competition with respect to each IWS Law Enforcement module. We believe the principal bases on which we compete with respect to all of our products are:

 

 

 

 

 

Our law enforcement product line faces competition from other companies such as DataWorks Plus and 3M. Internationally, there are often a number of local companies offering solutions in most countries.

 

Secure Credential Market

 

Due to the breadth of our software offering in the secure credential market space, we face differing degrees of competition in certain market segments. The strength of our competitive position is based upon:

 

 

 

 

Our software faces competition from Datacard Corporation, a privately held manufacturer of hardware, software and consumables for the ID market, as well as small, regionally based companies.

 

Biometric Market

 

The market to provide biometric systems to the identity management market is evolving and we face competition from a number of sources. We believe that the strength of our competitive position is based on:

 

 

 

  

 

 

Our multi-biometric product faces competition from French-based Safran, Irish-based Daon, 3M and Aware Inc., none of which have offerings with the scope and flexibility of our IWS Biometric Engine and its companion suite of products or relevant patent protection.

  

Intellectual Property

 

We rely on trademark, patent, trade secret and copyright laws and confidentiality and license agreements to protect our intellectual property. We have several federally registered trademarks, including the trademark ImageWare and IWS Biometric Engine, as well as trademarks for which there are pending trademark registrations with the United States, Canadian and other International Patent & Trademark Offices.

 

We hold several issued patents and have several other patent applications pending for elements of our products. We believe we have the foundational patents regarding the use of multiple biometrics and continue to be an IP leader in the biometric arena. It is our belief that this intellectual property leadership will create a sustainable competitive advantage. We are an early pioneer in the first to file patents related to multi-modal biometrics and currently are the worldwide leader in multi-modal biometric patents, with 22 issued patents worldwide and 25 patents pending. These technologies allow biometric matching using any type of biometric modality for identity verification while protecting the privacy of an individual. It is our belief that such technology will be critical to providing biometric management solutions for the consumer market where privacy protection has been a historical issue and barrier to biometric adoption.

 

The Company strengthened its patent portfolio in June 2012 with the purchase of four U.S. patents relating to wireless technology from Vocel. These patents, combined with the Company’s existing foundational patents in the areas of biometric identification, verification, enrollment and fusion, provide a unique and protected foundation on which to build interactive mobile applications that are secured using biometrics.

 

We regard our software as proprietary and retain title to and ownership of the software we develop. We attempt to protect our rights in the software primarily through patents and trade secrets. We have not published the source code of most of our software products and require employees and other third parties who have access to the source code and other trade secret information to sign confidentiality agreements acknowledging our ownership and the nature of these materials as our trade secrets.

 

Despite these precautions, it may be possible for unauthorized parties to copy or reverse-engineer portions of our products. Although our competitive position could be threatened by disclosure or reverse engineering of this proprietary information, we believe that copyright and trademark protection are less important than other factors, such as the knowledge, ability, and experience of our personnel, name recognition and ongoing product development and support.

 

Our software products are licensed to end users under a perpetual, nontransferable, nonexclusive license that stipulates which modules can be used and how many concurrent users may use them. These forms of licenses are typically not signed by the licensee and may be more difficult to enforce than signed agreements in some jurisdictions.

 

Employees

 

We had a total of 73 and 64 full-time employees as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Our employees are not covered by any collective bargaining agreement, and we have never experienced a work stoppage. We believe that our relations with our employees are good.

 

Environmental Regulation

 

Our business does not require us to comply with any particular environmental regulations.

 

Additional Available Information

 

We make available, free of charge, at our corporate website (http://www.iwsinc.com) copies of our annual reports filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements, and all amendments to these reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. We also provide copies of our Forms 8-K, 10-K, 10-Q, and proxy statements at no charge to investors upon request. Additionally, all reports filed by us with the SEC are available free of charge via EDGAR through the SEC website at www.sec.gov.

 

 

 

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

 

Our business is subject to significant risks. You should carefully consider the risks described below and the other information in this Annual Report, including our financial statements and related notes, before you decide to invest in our Common Stock. If any of the following risks or uncertainties actually occur, our business, results of operations or financial condition could be materially harmed, the trading price of our Common Stock could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment. The risks and uncertainties described below are those that we currently believe may materially affect us; however, they may not be the only ones that we face. Additional risks and uncertainties of which we are unaware or currently deem immaterial may also become important factors that may harm our business. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligations to update any risk factors.

 

 Available cash resources may be insufficient to provide for our working capital needs for the next twelve months. In the event such cash resources are insufficient to provide for our working capital requirements, we will need to raise additional capital to continue as a going concern.

 

Duringthe year ended December 31, 2018, we consummated a preferred stock offering resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $10.0 million. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2018, we entered into an Exchange Agreement with the holders of our related party lines of credit aggregating $6.0 million in principal borrowings and accrued unpaid interest incurred under the lines of credit of approximately $0.9 million, whereby the holders agreed to exchange their notes and interest for an aggregate 6,896 shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred stock. As a result of this exchange, all amounts owed by the Company under the lines of credit were deemed satisfied in full. At December 31, 2018, we had positive working capital of approximately $3,078,000. Our principal source of liquidity at December 31, 2018 consisted of cash of $5,694,000.

 

Considering our projected cash requirements, and assuming we are unable to generate incremental revenue, our available cash may be insufficient to satisfy our cash requirements for the next twelve months from the date of this filing. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. To address our working capital requirements, management may seek additional equity and/or debt financing through the issuance of additional debt and/or equity securities or may seek strategic or other transactions intended to increase shareholder value. There are currently no formal committed financing arrangements to support our projected cash shortfall, including commitments to purchase additional debt and/or equity securities, or other agreements, and no assurances can be given that we will be successful in raising additional capital through the issuance of debt and/or equity securities, or entering into any other transaction that addresses our ability to continue as a going concern.

 

We have a history of significant recurring losses totaling approximately $186.6 million at December 31, 2018 and $170.5 million at December 31, 2017, and these losses may continue in the future.

 

As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $186.6 million and $170.5 million, respectively, and these losses may continue in the future. We expect to continue to incur significant sales and marketing, research and development, and general and administrative expense. As a result, we will need to generate significant revenue to achieve profitability, and we may never achieve profitability.

 

Our operating results have fluctuated in the past and are likely to fluctuate significantly in the future.

 

Our operating results have fluctuated in the past. These fluctuations in operating results are the consequence of the following, amongst other things:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

These factors, some of which are not within our control, will likely continue in the future. To respond to these and other factors, we may need to make business decisions that could result in failure to meet financial expectations. If our quarterly operating results fail to meet or exceed the expectations of securities analysts or investors, our stock price could drop suddenly and significantly. Most of our expense, such as employee compensation and inventory, is relatively fixed in the short term. Moreover, our expense levels are based, in part, on our expectations regarding future revenue levels. As a result, if our revenue for a particular period was below our expectations, we may not be able to proportionately reduce our operating expense for that period. Any revenue shortfall would have a disproportionately negative effect on our operating results for the period.

 

We depend upon a small number of large system sales ranging from $100,000 to in excess of $2,000,000 and we may fail to achieve one or more large system sales in the future.

 

Historically, we have derived a substantial portion of our revenue from a small number of sales of large, relatively expensive systems, typically ranging in price from $100,000 to $2,000,000. If we fail to receive orders for these large systems in a given sales cycle on a consistent basis, our business could be significantly harmed. Further, our quarterly results are difficult to predict because we cannot predict in which quarter, if any, large system sales will occur in a given year. As a result, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our results of operations are not a good indication of our future performance. In some future quarters, our operating results may be below the expectations of securities analysts and investors, in which case the market price of our Common Stock may decrease significantly.

  

Our lengthy sales cycle may cause us to expend significant resources for one year or more in anticipation of a sale to certain customers, yet we still may fail to complete the sale.

 

When considering the purchase of a large computerized identity management system, potential customers may take as long as eighteen months to evaluate different systems and obtain approval for the purchase. Under these circumstances, if we fail to complete a sale, we will have expended significant resources and received no revenue in return. Generally, customers consider a wide range of issues before committing to purchase our products, including product benefits, ability to operate with their current systems, product reliability and their own budgetary constraints. While potential customers are evaluating our products, we may incur substantial selling costs and expend significant management resources in an effort to accomplish potential sales that may never occur. In times of economic recession, our potential customers may be unwilling or unable to commit resources to the purchase of new and costly systems.

 

A significant number of our customers and potential customers are government agencies that are subject to unique political and budgetary constraints and have special contracting requirements, which may affect our ability to obtain new and retain current government customers.

 

A significant number of our customers are government agencies. These agencies often do not set their own budgets and therefore have little control over the amount of money they can spend from quarter-to-quarter or year-to-year. In addition, these agencies experience political pressure that may dictate the manner in which they spend money. Due to political and budgetary processes and other scheduling delays that may frequently occur relating to the contract or bidding process, some government agency orders may be canceled or substantially delayed, and the receipt of revenue or payments from these agencies may be substantially delayed. In addition, future sales to government agencies will depend on our ability to meet government contracting requirements, certain of which may be onerous or impossible to meet, resulting in our inability to obtain a particular contract. Common requirements in government contracts include bonding requirements, provisions permitting the purchasing agency to modify or terminate at will the contract without penalty, and provisions permitting the agency to perform investigations or audits of our business practices, any of which may limit our ability to enter into new contracts or maintain our current contracts.

 

One customer accounted for approximately 36% of our total revenue during the year ended December 31, 2018, and approximately 25% of our total revenue during the year ended December 31, 2017. In the event of any material decrease in revenue from this customer, or if we are unable to replace the revenue through the sale of our products to additional customers, our financial condition and results from operations could be materially and adversely affected.

 

   During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, one customer accounted for approximately 36% or $1,573,000 of our total revenue, and 25% or $1,089,000 of our total revenue, respectively. If this customer were to significantly reduce its relationship with the Company, or in the event the we are unable to replace the revenue through the sale of our products to additional customers, our financial condition and results from operations could be negatively impacted, and such impact would be material.

 

 

 

We occasionally rely on systems integrators to manage our large projects, and if these companies do not perform adequately, we may lose business.

 

We occasionally act as a subcontractor to systems integrators who manage large projects that incorporate our systems, particularly in foreign countries. We cannot control these companies, and they may decide not to promote our products or may price their services in such a way as to make it unprofitable for us to continue our relationship with them. Further, they may fail to perform under agreements with their customers, in which case we might lose sales to these customers. If we lose our relationships with these companies, our business, financial condition and results of operations may suffer.

 

We are dependent upon third parties for the successful integration of our products, and/or the launch of our products. Any delay in the integration of our products or the launch of third-party products may materially affect our results from operations and financial condition.

 

              Our current marketing strategy involves the distribution of our products through larger product partners and/or resellers that will either resell our product alongside theirs, OEM a white label version of our products, or sell our products fully integrated into their offerings. Our strategy leaves us largely dependent upon the successful rollout of our products by our distribution partners. We have experienced delays in the rollout of our products due to these factors during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2018, and no assurances can be given that we will not experience delays in the future. Any delays negatively affect our results from operations and financial condition.

  

If the patents we own or license, or our other intellectual property rights, do not adequately protect our products and technologies, we may lose market share to our competitors and our business, financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.

 

Our success depends significantly on our ability to protect our rights to the technologies used in our products. We rely on patent protection, trade secrets, as well as a combination of copyright and trademark laws and nondisclosure, confidentiality and other contractual arrangements to protect our technology. However, these legal means afford only limited protection and may not adequately protect our rights or permit us to gain or keep any competitive advantage. In addition, we cannot be assured that any of our current and future pending patent applications will result in the issuance of a patent to us. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) may deny or require significant narrowing of claims in our pending patent applications, and patents issued as a result of the pending patent applications, if any, may not provide us with significant commercial protection or may not be issued in a form that is advantageous to us. We could also incur substantial costs in proceedings before the PTO. These proceedings could result in adverse decisions as to the claims included in our patents.

 

Our issued and licensed patents and those that may be issued or licensed in the future may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented, which could limit our ability to stop competitors from marketing related products. Additionally, upon expiration of our issued or licensed patents, we may lose some of our rights to exclude others from making, using, selling or importing products using the technology based on the expired patents. We also must rely on contractual rights with the third parties that license technology to us to protect our rights in the technology licensed to us. Although we have taken steps to protect our intellectual property and technology, there is no assurance that competitors will not be able to design around our patents. We also rely on unpatented proprietary technology. We cannot assure you that we can meaningfully protect all our rights in our unpatented proprietary technology or that others will not independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary products or processes or otherwise gain access to our unpatented proprietary technology. We seek to protect our know-how and other unpatented proprietary technology with confidentiality agreements and intellectual property assignment agreements with our employees. However, such agreements may not provide meaningful protection for our proprietary information in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure or other breaches of the agreements or in the event that our competitors discover or independently develop similar or identical designs or other proprietary information. In addition, we rely on the use of registered and common law trademarks with respect to the brand names of some of our products. Our common law trademarks provide less protection than our registered trademarks. Loss of rights in our trademarks could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Furthermore, the laws of foreign countries may not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. If we fail to apply for intellectual property protection or if we cannot adequately protect our intellectual property rights in these foreign countries, our competitors may be able to compete more effectively against us, which could adversely affect our competitive position, as well as our business, financial condition and results of operations.

  

 

 

If third parties claim that we infringe their intellectual property rights, we may incur liabilities and costs and may have to redesign or discontinue selling certain products.

 

Whether a product infringes a patent involves complex legal and factual issues, the determination of which is often uncertain. We face the risk of claims that we have infringed on third parties’ intellectual property rights. Searching for existing intellectual property rights may not reveal important intellectual property and our competitors may also have filed for patent protection, which is not yet a matter of public knowledge, or claimed trademark rights that have not been revealed through our availability searches. Our efforts to identify and avoid infringing on third parties’ intellectual property rights may not always be successful. Any claims of patent or other intellectual property infringement, even those without merit, could: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In addition, new patents obtained by our competitors could threaten a product’s continued life in the market even after it has already been introduced.

  

If our security measures or those of our third-party data center hosting facilities, cloud computing platform providers, or third-party service partners, are breached, and unauthorized access is obtained to a customer’s data, our data or our IT systems, or authorized access is blocked or disabled, our services may be perceived as not being secure, customers may curtail or stop using our services, and we may incur significant legal and financial exposure and liabilities.

 

Our services involve the storage and transmission of our customers’ and our customers’ customers’ proprietary and other sensitive data, including financial information and other personally identifiable information. While we have security measures in place, they may be breached as a result of efforts by individuals or groups of hackers and sophisticated organizations, including state-sponsored organizations or nation-states. Our security measures could also be compromised by employee error or malfeasance, which could result in someone obtaining unauthorized access to, or denying authorized access to our IT systems, our customers’ data or our data, including our intellectual property and other confidential business information. Additionally, third parties may attempt to fraudulently induce employees or customers into disclosing sensitive information such as user names, passwords or other information to gain access to our customers’ data, our data or our IT systems.

 

We take extraordinary measures to ensure identity authentication of users who access critical IT infrastructure, including but not limited to, two-factor, multi-factor and biometric identity verification. This substantially reduces the threat of unauthorized access by bad actors using compromised user credentials.

 

 

 

Our services operate in conjunction with and are dependent on products and components across a broad ecosystem and, as illustrated by the recent Spectre and Meltdown threats, if there are security vulnerabilities in one of these components, a security breach could occur. In addition, our internal IT systems continue to evolve and we are often early adapters of new technologies and new ways of sharing data and communicating internally and with partners and customers, which increases the complexity of our IT systems. These risks are mitigated by our ability to maintain and improve business and data governance policies and processes and internal security controls, including our ability to escalate and respond to known and potential risks.

 

In addition, our customers may authorize third-party technology providers to access their customer data, and some of our customers may not have adequate security measures in place to protect their data that is stored on our servers. Because we do not control our customers or third-party technology providers, or the processing of such data by third-party technology providers, we cannot ensure the integrity or security of such transmissions or processing. Malicious third parties may also conduct attacks designed to temporarily deny customers access to our services.

 

A security breach could expose us to a risk of loss or inappropriate use of proprietary and sensitive data, or the denial of access to this data. A security breach could also result in a loss of confidence in the security of our services, damage our reputation, negatively impact our future sales, disrupt our business and lead to legal liability. Finally, the detection, prevention and remediation of known or potential security vulnerabilities, including those arising from third-party hardware or software may result in additional direct and indirect costs, for example additional infrastructure capacity to mitigate any system degradation that could result from remediation efforts.

 

We operate in foreign countries and are exposed to risks associated with foreign political, economic and legal environments and with foreign currency exchange rates.

 

We have significant foreign operations. As a result, we are exposed to risks, including among others, risks associated with foreign political, economic and legal environments and with foreign currency exchange rates. Our results may be adversely affected by, among other things, changes in government policies with respect to laws and regulations, anti-inflation measures, currency conversions, collection of receivables abroad and rates and methods of taxation.

 

We depend on key personnel, the loss of any of whom could materially adversely affect future operations.

 

Our success will depend to a significant extent upon the efforts and abilities of our executive officers and other key personnel. The loss of the services of one or more of these key employees and any negative market or industry perception arising from the loss of such services could have a material adverse effect on us and the trading price of our Common Stock. Our business will also be dependent upon our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel. Acquiring and keeping these personnel could prove more difficult or cost substantially more than estimated and we cannot be certain that we will be able to retain such personnel or attract a high caliber of personnel in the future.

   

We may have additional tax liabilities.

 

We are subject to income taxes in the United States. Significant judgments are required in determining our provisions for income taxes. In the course of preparing our tax provisions and returns, we must make calculations where the ultimate tax determination may be uncertain. Our tax returns are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and state tax authorities. There can be no assurance as to the outcome of these examinations. If the ultimate determination of taxes owed is for an amount in excess of amounts previously accrued, our operating results, cash flows, and financial condition could be adversely affected.

 

 We face competition from companies with greater financial, technical, sales, marketing and other resources, and, if we are unable to compete effectively with these competitors, our market share may decline and our business could be harmed.

 

We face competition from other established companies. A number of our competitors have longer operating histories, larger customer bases, significantly greater financial, technological, sales, marketing and other resources than we do. As a result, our competitors may be able to respond more quickly than we can to new or changing opportunities, technologies, standards or client requirements, more quickly develop new products or devote greater resources to the promotion and sale of their products and services than we can. Likewise, their greater capabilities in these areas may enable them to better withstand periodic downturns in the identity management solutions industry and compete more effectively on the basis of price and production. In addition, new companies may enter the markets in which we compete, further increasing competition in the identity management solutions industry.

 

 

 

Risks Related to Our Securities

 

Our Common Stock is subject to “penny stock” rules.

 

Our Common Stock is currently defined as a “penny stock” under Rule 3a51-1 promulgated under the Exchange Act. “Penny stocks” are subject to Rules 15g-2 through 15g-7 and Rule 15g-9, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers that sell penny stocks to persons other than established customers and institutional accredited investors. Among other things, for transactions covered by these rules, a broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchaser and have received the purchaser’s written consent to the transaction prior to sale. Consequently, these rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to sell our Common Stock and affect the ability of holders to sell their shares of our Common Stock in the secondary market. To the extent our Common Stock is subject to the penny stock regulations, the market liquidity for our shares will be adversely affected.

  

Our stock price has been volatile, and your investment in our Common Stock could suffer a decline in value.

 

There has been significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of equity securities, which is unrelated to the financial performance of the companies issuing the securities. These broad market fluctuations may negatively affect the market price of our Common Stock. You may not be able to resell your shares at or above the price you pay for those shares due to fluctuations in the market price of our Common Stock caused by changes in our operating performance or prospects and other factors.

 

Some specific factors that may have a significant effect on our Common Stock market price include:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Our future sales of our Common Stock could adversely affect its price and our future capital-raising activities could involve the issuance of equity securities, which would dilute shareholders’ investments and could result in a decline in the trading price of our Common Stock.

 

We may sell securities in the public or private equity markets if and when conditions are favorable, even if we do not have an immediate need for additional capital at that time. Sales of substantial amounts of our Common Stock, or the perception that such sales could occur, could adversely affect the prevailing market price of our Common Stock and our ability to raise capital. We may issue additional Common Stock in future financing transactions or as incentive compensation for our executive management and other key personnel, consultants and advisors. Issuing any equity securities would be dilutive to the equity interests represented by our then-outstanding shares of Common Stock. The market price for our Common Stock could decrease as the market takes into account the dilutive effect of any of these issuances. Furthermore, we may enter into financing transactions at prices that represent a substantial discount to the market price of our Common Stock. A negative reaction by investors and securities analysts to any discounted sale of our equity securities could result in a decline in the trading price of our Common Stock.

   

The holders of our preferred stock have certain rights and privileges that are senior to our Common Stock, and we may issue additional shares of preferred stock without stockholder approval that could have a material adverse effect on the market value of the Common Stock.

 

Our Board of Directors has the authority to issue a total of up to four million shares of preferred stock and to fix the rights, preferences, privileges, and restrictions, including voting rights, of the preferred stock, which typically are senior to the rights of the Common Stock, without any further vote or action by the holders of our Common Stock. The rights of the holders of our Common Stock will be subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of the preferred stock that have been issued, or might be issued in the future. Preferred stock also could have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire a majority of our outstanding voting stock. This could delay, defer, or prevent a change in control. Furthermore, holders of our preferred stock may have other rights, including economic rights, senior to the Common Stock. As a result, their existence and issuance could have a material adverse effect on the market value of the Common Stock. We have in the past issued, and may from time to time in the future issue, preferred stock for financing or other purposes with rights, preferences, or privileges senior to the Common Stock. As of March 18, 2019, we had three series of preferred stock outstanding, Series A Preferred stock, Series B Preferred stock and Series C Preferred stock.

 

The provisions of our Series A Preferred prohibit the payment of dividends on our Common Stock unless the dividends on our preferred shares are first paid. In addition, upon a liquidation, dissolution or sale of our business, the holders of our Series A Preferred will be entitled to receive, in preference to any distribution to the holders of Common Stock, initial distributions of $1,000 per share, plus all accrued but unpaid dividends. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, we had no cumulative undeclared dividends on our Series A Preferred.

 

The provisions of our Series B Preferred prohibit the payment of dividends on our Common Stock unless the dividends on our preferred shares are first paid. In addition, upon a liquidation, dissolution or sale of our business, the holders of our Series B Preferred will be entitled to receive, in preference to any distribution to the holders of Common Stock, initial distributions of $2.50 per share, plus all accrued but unpaid dividends. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, we had cumulative undeclared dividends on our Series B Preferred of approximately $8,000.

   

The provisions of our Series C Preferred prohibit the payment of dividends on our Common Stock unless the dividends on our preferred shares are first paid. In addition, upon a liquidation, dissolution or sale of our business, the holders of our Series C Preferred will be entitled to receive, in preference to any distribution to the holders of Common Stock, initial distributions of $10,000 per share, plus all accrued but unpaid dividends. As of December 31, 2017, there were no shares of Series C Preferred outstanding. As of December 31, 2018, we had cumulative undeclared dividends on our Series C Preferred of approximately $0.

 

Upon the occurrence of certain events, we may be required to redeem all or a portion of our Series C Preferred.

 

On September 10, 2018, we filed the Series C COD with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, pursuant to which Holders of the Series C Preferred may require us to redeem all or any portion of such Holder’s shares of Series C Preferred at a price per share equal to the Stated Value plus all accrued and unpaid dividends at any time from and after the third anniversary of the issuance date or in the event of the consummation of a Change of Control (as such term is defined in the Series C COD). We cannot assure you that we will maintain sufficient cash reserves or that our business will generate cash flow from operations at levels sufficient to permit us to redeem our shares of Series C Preferred if and when required to do so. In the event we have insufficient cash available or do not have access to additional third-party financings on commercially reasonable terms or at all to complete such redemption, our business, results of operations, and financial condition may be materially adversely affected.

Certain large shareholders may have certain personal interests that may affect the Company.

 

As a result of the securities issued to Goldman Capital Management and related entities controlled by Neal Goldman, a member of our Board of Directors (together, “Goldman”), Goldman beneficially owns, in the aggregate, approximately 39.5% of the Company’s outstanding voting securities as of March 26, 2019.  As a result, Goldman has the potential ability to exert influence over both the actions of the Board of Directors and the outcome of issues requiring approval by the Company’s shareholders. This concentration of ownership may have effects such as delaying or preventing a change in control of the Company that may be favored by other shareholders or preventing transactions in which shareholders might otherwise recover a premium for their shares over current market prices.

 

 

 

Our corporate documents and Delaware law contain provisions that could discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of the Company.

 

Provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition involving us that our stockholders may consider favorable. For example, our certificate of incorporation authorizes preferred stock, which carries special rights, including voting and dividend rights. With these rights, preferred stockholders could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us.

 

We are also subject to the anti-takeover provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. Under these provisions, if anyone becomes an “interested stockholder,” we may not enter into a “business combination” with that person for three years without special approval, which could discourage a third party from making a takeover offer and could delay or prevent a change of control. For purposes of Section 203, “interested stockholder” means, generally, someone owning 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock or an affiliate of ours that owned 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock during the past three years, subject to certain exceptions as described in Section 203.

 

We do not expect to pay cash dividends on our Common Stock for the foreseeable future.

 

We have never paid cash dividends on our Common Stock and do not anticipate that any cash dividends will be paid on the Common Stock for the foreseeable future. The payment of any cash dividend by us will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on, among other things, our earnings, capital, regulatory requirements and financial condition. Furthermore, the terms of our Series A Preferred, Series B Preferred and Series C Preferred directly limit our ability to pay cash dividends on our Common Stock.

 

ITEM 1B.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

 

None.

  

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES

 

Our corporate headquarters are located in San Diego, California, where we occupy 8,511 square feet of office space. The lease for such office space commenced on November 1, 2018 and terminates on April 30, 2025. Annual base rent over the lease term approximates $361,000 per year. Prior to November 1, 2018, we leased 9,927 square feet of office space in San Diego, California for approximately $30,000 per month pursuant to a lease agreement that expired in October 2018.

 

In addition to our corporate headquarters, we also occupied the following spaces at December 31, 2018:

 

  

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

There is currently no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of the Company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting the Company, our Common Stock, any of our subsidiaries or of the Company’s or our subsidiaries’ officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect.

 

ITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

 

None.

 

 

  PART II

 

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

Market Information

 

Our Common Stock does not trade on an established securities exchange. Our Common Stock is quoted under the symbol “IWSY” on the OTCQB marketplace. Any OTCQB marketplace quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commissions and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

 

The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices for our Common Stock for each quarter in 2018 and 2017:

 

2018 Fiscal Quarters	High	Low
First Quarter	$2.24	$1.50
Second Quarter	$1.90	$1.08
Third Quarter	$1.44	$0.86
Fourth Quarter	$1.01	$0.55

2017 Fiscal Quarters	High	Low
First Quarter	$1.39	$0.98
Second Quarter	$1.24	$0.81
Third Quarter	$1.50	$0.83
Fourth Quarter	$1.62	$1.25

 

Holders

 

As of March 26, 2019, we had approximately 197 registered holders of record of our Common Stock. A significant number of our shares of Common Stock were held in street name and, as such, we believe that the actual number of beneficial owners of our Common Stock is significantly higher.

 

Dividends

 

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our Common Stock. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings for use in the operation of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future determination to declare cash dividends will be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, general business conditions and other factors that our Board of Directors may deem relevant.

 

 As of December 31, 2018, and 2017, we had cumulative undeclared dividends of approximately $0 relating to our Series A Preferred, $8,000 relating to our Series B Preferred and $0 related to our Series C Preferred.

 

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

 

For a discussion of our equity compensation plans, please see Item 11 of this Annual Report.

 

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

 

We issued certain equity securities in unregistered transactions during fiscal year 2018. All of the securities issued in non-registered transactions were issued in reliance on Section 3(a)(9) and/or Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and were reported in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and in our Current Reports on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.

 

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Readers are also urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us, which attempt to advise interested parties of the factors which affect our business, including (without limitation) the disclosures made under the captions “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Risk Factors,” and in the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Overview

 

The Company is a pioneer and leader in the emerging market for biometrically enabled software-based identity management solutions. Using those human characteristics that are unique to us all, we create software that provides a highly reliable indication of a person’s identity. Our “flagship” product is our patented IWS Biometric Engine®. Scalable for small city business or worldwide deployment, our IWS Biometric Engine is a multi-biometric software platform that is hardware and algorithm independent, enabling the enrollment and management of unlimited population sizes. It allows a user to utilize one or more biometrics on a seamlessly integrated platform. Our products are used to manage and issue secure credentials, including national IDs, passports, driver licenses and access control credentials. Our products also provide law enforcement with integrated mug shot, LiveScan fingerprint and investigative capabilities. We also provide comprehensive authentication security software using biometrics to secure physical and logical access to facilities or computer networks or Internet sites. Biometric technology is now an integral part of all markets we address and all of our products are integrated into the IWS Biometric Engine. 

 

With the advent of cloud-based computing and the proliferation of smart mobile devices, which allow for reliable biometric capture and the need to secure access to data, products and services, the Company believes that the market for multi-biometric solutions will expand to encompass significant deployments of biometric systems in the commercial and consumer markets. The Company therefore intends to leverage the strength of its experience servicing existing government clients who have deployed the Company’s products for large populations, as well as its foundational patent portfolio in the field of multi-modal biometrics and the fusion of multiple biometric algorithms, to address the growing commercial and consumer market.

 

Our biometric technology is a core software component of an organization’s security infrastructure and includes a multi-biometric identity management solution for enrolling, managing, identifying and verifying the identities of people by the physical characteristics of the human body. We develop, sell and support various identity management capabilities within government (federal, state and local), law enforcement, commercial enterprises, and transportation and aviation markets for identification and verification purposes. Our IWS Biometric Engine is a patented biometric identity management software platform for multi-biometric enrollment, management and authentication, managing population databases of virtually unlimited sizes. It is hardware agnostic and can utilize different types of biometric algorithms. It allows different types of biometrics to be operated at the same time on a seamlessly integrated platform. It is also offered as an SDK based search engine, enabling developers and system integrators to implement a biometric solution or integrate biometric capabilities into existing applications without having to derive biometric functionality from pre-existing applications. The IWS Biometric Engine combined with our secure credential platform, IWS EPI Builder, provides a comprehensive, integrated biometric and secure credential solution that can be leveraged for high-end applications such as passports, driver licenses, national IDs, and other secure documents.

 

 

   

Our secure credential solutions empower customers to create secure and smart digital identification documents with complete ID systems. We develop, sell and support software and design systems which utilize digital imaging and biometrics in the production of photo identification cards, credentials and identification systems. Our products in this market consist of IWS EPI Suite and IWS EPI Builder. These products allow for the production of digital identification cards and related databases and records and can be used by, among others, schools, airports, hospitals, corporations or governments. We have added the ability to incorporate multiple biometrics into the ID systems with the integration of IWS Biometric Engine to our secure credential product line.

 

Our enterprise authentication software includes the IWS Desktop Security product, which is a comprehensive authentication management infrastructure solution providing added layers of security to workstations, networks and systems through advanced encryption and authentication technologies. IWS Desktop Security is optimized to enhance network security and usability, and uses multi-factor authentication methods to protect access, verify identity and help secure the computing environment without sacrificing ease-of-use features such as quick login. Additionally, IWS Desktop Security provides an easy integration with various smart card-based credentials including the Common Access Card (“CAC”), Homeland Security Presidential Directive 12 (“HSPD-12”), Personal Identity Verification (“PIV”) credential, and Transportation Worker Identification Credential (“TWIC”) with an organization’s access control process. IWS Desktop Security provides the crucial end-point component of a Logical Access Control System (“LACS”), and when combined with a Physical Access Control System (“PACS”), organizations benefit from a complete door to desktop access control and security model.

 

Recent Developments

 

Creation of Series C Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock

 

On September 10, 2018, the Company filed the Certificate of Designations, Preferences, and Rights of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock with the Secretary of State for the State of Delaware – Division of Corporations, designating 1,000 shares of the Company’s preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, as Series C Convertible Preferred stock, each share with a stated value of $10,000 per share.

 

Series C Financing

 

From September 10, 2018 through September 21, 2018, the Company offered and sold an aggregate of 1,000 shares of Series C Preferred at a purchase price of $10,000 per share. The aggregate gross proceeds to the Company from the Series C Financing was $10,000,000. Issuance costs incurred in conjunction with the Series C Financing were approximately $1,211,000, resulting in net proceeds to the Company of approximately $8,789,000.

 

Amendment to Certificate of Designations of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock

 

On September 10, 2018, the Company filed an Amendment to the Certificate of Designations, Preferences, and Rights of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock with the Secretary of State for the State of Delaware – Division of Corporations, to increase the number of shares of Series A Preferred authorized for issuance thereunder to 38,000 shares, in order to permit the Debt Exchange.

 

Debt Exchange

 

On September 10, 2018, the Company entered into Exchange Agreements with Neal Goldman and Charles Crocker, pursuant to which Messrs. Goldman and Crocker agreed to exchange approximately $6.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of outstanding debt (including accrued and unpaid interest) owed under the terms of their respective lines of credit for an aggregate of 6,896 shares of Series A Preferred. As a result of the Debt Exchange, all indebtedness, liabilities and other obligations arising under the respective lines of credit were cancelled and deemed satisfied in full. Messrs. Goldman and Crocker are members of the Company’s Board of Directors and related parties.

 

 

 

Declaration of Special Dividend

 

Concurrently with the Series C Financing, the Company’s Board of Directors declared the Special Dividend for Holders of the Series A Preferred, pursuant to which each Holder received a Dividend Warrant to purchase 39.87 shares of Company Common Stock for every share of Series A Preferred held, which resulted in the issuance of Dividend Warrants to the Holders as a group to purchase an aggregate of 1,493,856 shares of Common Stock. Each Dividend Warrant has an exercise price of $0.01 per share, and is exercisable immediately upon issuance; provided, however, that a Dividend Warrant may only be exercised concurrently with the conversion of shares of Series A Preferred held by a Holder into shares of Common Stock. In addition, each Dividend Warrant held by a Holder shall expire on the earliest to occur of (i) the conversion of all Series A Preferred held by such Holder into Common Stock, (ii) the redemption by the Company of all outstanding shares of Series A Preferred held by such Holder, (iii) the Dividend Warrant no longer representing the right to purchase any shares of Common Stock, and (iv) the tenth anniversary of the date of issuance.

 

Critical Accounting Estimates

 

The discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires us to utilize accounting policies and make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingencies as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during a fiscal period. The SEC considers an accounting policy to be critical if it is important to a company’s financial condition and results of operations, and if it requires significant judgment and estimates on the part of management in its application.

 

Significant estimates include the evaluation of our ability to continue as a going concern, the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, deferred tax asset valuation allowances, recoverability of goodwill, assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model to calculate the fair value of share based payments, assumptions used in the application of fair value methodologies to calculate the fair value differential of the Preferred Stock Exchange (as defined below), fair value of financial instruments issued with and affected by the Series C Financing, assumptions used in the application of revenue recognition policies and assumptions used in the application of fair value methodologies to calculate the fair value of pension assets and obligations.

 

The following are our critical accounting policies because we believe they are both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require critical management judgments and estimates about matters that are uncertain. If actual results or events differ materially from those contemplated by us in making these estimates, our reported financial condition and results of operations for future periods could be materially affected.

 

Revenue Recognition. Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”), using the modified retrospective transition method.

 

In accordance with ASC 606, revenue is recognized when control of the promised goods or services is transferred to our customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration we expect to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services.

 

The core principle of the standard is that we should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, we apply the following five step model:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At contract inception, we assess the goods and services promised in a contract with a customer and identify as a performance obligation each promise to transfer to the customer either: (i) a good or service (or a bundle of goods or services) that is distinct or (ii) a series of distinct goods or services that are substantially the same and that have the same pattern of transfer to the customer. We recognize revenue only when we satisfy a performance obligation by transferring a promised good or service to a customer.

 

Determining the timing of the satisfaction of performance obligations as well as the transaction price and the amounts allocated to performance obligations requires judgement.

 

We disclose disaggregation of our customer revenue by classes of similar products and services as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

Software licensing and royalties

 

Software licenses consist of revenue from the sale of software for identity management applications. Our software licenses are functional intellectual property and typically provide customers with the right to use our software in perpetuity as it exists when made available to the customer. We recognize revenue from software licensing at a point in time upon delivery, provided all other revenue recognition criteria are met.

 

Royalties consist of revenue from usage-based arrangements and guaranteed minimum-based arrangements. We recognize revenue for royalty arrangements at the later of (i) when the related sales occur, or (ii) when the performance obligation to which some or all of the royalty has been allocated has been satisfied.

 

Computer hardware and identification media

 

We generate revenue from the sale of computer hardware and identification media. Revenue for these items is recognized upon delivery of these products to the customer, provided all other revenue recognition criteria are met.

 

Services

 

Services revenue is comprised primarily of software customization services, software integration services, system installation services and customer training. Revenue is generally recognized upon completion of services and customer acceptance provided all other revenue recognition criteria are met.

 

Post-contract customer support (“PCS”)

 

Post contract customer support consists of maintenance on software and hardware for our identity management solutions. We recognize PCS revenue from periodic maintenance agreements. Revenue is generally recognized ratably over the respective maintenance periods provided no significant obligations remain. Costs related to such contracts are expensed as incurred.

 

Arrangements with multiple performance obligations

 

A performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the customer. In addition to selling software licenses, hardware and identification media, services and post-contract customer support on a standalone basis, certain contracts include multiple performance obligations. For such arrangements, we allocate revenue to each performance obligation based on our best estimate of the relative standalone selling price. The standalone selling price for a performance obligation is the price at which we would sell a promised good or service separately to a customer. The primary methods used to estimate standalone selling price are as follows: (i) the expected cost-plus margin approach, under which we forecast our expected costs of satisfying a performance obligation and then add an appropriate margin for that distinct good or service and (ii) the percent discount off of list price approach.

  

 

 

Contract costs

 

We recognize an asset for the incremental costs of obtaining a contract with a customer if we expect the benefit of those costs to be longer than one year. We apply a practical expedient to expense costs as incurred for costs to obtain a contract when the amortization period is one year or less.

 

Other items

 

We do not offer rights of return for our products and services in the normal course of business.

 

Sales tax collected from customers is excluded from revenue.

 

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts.  We provide an allowance for our accounts receivable for estimated losses that may result from our customers’ inability to pay. We determine the amount of allowance by analyzing historical losses, customer concentrations, customer creditworthiness, current economic trends, and the age of the accounts receivable balances and changes in our customer payment terms when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts.

 

Valuation of Goodwill, Other Intangible and Long-Lived Assets.  The Company accounts for its intangible assets under the provisions of ASC 350, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other.” In accordance with ASC 350, intangible assets with a definite life are analyzed for impairment under ASC 360-10-05 “Property, Plant and Equipment” and intangible assets with an indefinite life are analyzed for impairment under ASC 360 annually, or more often if circumstances dictate. The Company performs its annual goodwill impairment test in the fourth quarter of each year, or if required, at the end of each fiscal quarter.  In December 2018, the Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.” The provisions of ASU 2017-04 eliminate the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill to measure a goodwill impairment charge. Instead, entities will record an impairment charge based on the excess of a reporting unit's carrying amount over its fair value. Entities that have reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts will no longer be required to perform a qualitative assessment assuming they pass the simplified impairment test. 

 

The Company did not record any goodwill impairment charges for the years ended December 31, 2018 or 2017.

 

The Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate their net book value may not be recoverable. When such factors and circumstances exist, the Company compares the projected undiscounted future cash flows associated with the related asset or group of assets over their estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amount. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value, based on market value when available, or discounted expected cash flows, of those assets and is recorded in the period in which the determination is made. The Company’s management currently believes there is no impairment of its long-lived assets. There can be no assurance, however, that market conditions will not change or demand for the Company’s products under development will continue. Either of these could result in future impairment of long-lived assets.

 

There are many management assumptions and estimates underlying the determination of an impairment loss, and estimates using different, but reasonable, assumptions could produce significantly different results. Significant assumptions include estimates of future levels of revenue and operating expense. Therefore, the timing and recognition of impairment losses by us in the future, if any, may be highly dependent upon our estimates and assumptions. There can be no assurance that goodwill impairment will not occur in the future.

 

Stock-Based Compensation.  At December 31, 2018, the Company had one stock-based compensation plan for employees and nonemployee directors, which authorizes the granting of various equity-based incentives including stock options and restricted stock.

 

The Company estimates the fair value of its stock options using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model, consistent with the provisions of ASC 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation.” The fair value of stock options granted is recognized to expense over the requisite service period. Stock-based compensation expense for all share-based payment awards is recognized using the straight-line single-option method. Stock-based compensation expense is reported in general and administrative, sales and marketing, engineering and customer service expense based upon the departments to which substantially all of the associated employees report and credited to additional paid-in capital.  

  

 

 

ASC 718 requires the use of a valuation model to calculate the fair value of stock-based awards. For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company has elected to use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which incorporates various assumptions including volatility, expected life, and interest rates. The Company is required to make various assumptions in the application of the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Company has determined that the best measure of expected volatility is based on the historical weekly volatility of the Company’s Common Stock. Historical volatility factors utilized in the Company’s Black-Scholes computations for options granted during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 ranged from 57% and 64%. The Company has elected to estimate the expected life of an award based upon the SEC approved “simplified method” noted under the provisions of Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 14. The expected term used by the Company to value the grants issued in 2018 and 2017 as computed by this method was 5.17 years. The effect of the difference between the actual historical expected life and the simplified method was immaterial. The interest rate used is the risk-free interest rate and is based upon U.S. Treasury rates appropriate for the expected term. Interest rates used in the Company’s Black-Scholes calculations were 2.6% for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. Dividend yield is zero, as the Company does not expect to declare any dividends on the Company’s common shares in the foreseeable future.

 

In addition to the key assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model, the estimated forfeiture rate at the time of valuation is a critical assumption. The Company has estimated an annualized forfeiture rate of approximately 0% for corporate officers, 4.1% for members of the Board of Directors and 6.0% for all other employees. The Company reviews the expected forfeiture rate annually to determine if that percent is still reasonable based on historical experience.

 

Income Taxes. The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences related to temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for tax purposes at each year-end, based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. A valuation allowance is established when necessary based on the weight of available evidence, if it is considered more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Income tax expense is the sum of current income tax plus the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. 

 

ASC 740-10 requires a company to first determine whether it is more-likely-than-not (defined as a likelihood of more than fifty percent) that a tax position will be sustained based on its technical merits as of the reporting date, assuming that taxing authorities will examine the position and have full knowledge of all relevant information. A tax position that meets this more-likely-than-not threshold is then measured and recognized at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely to be realized upon effective settlement with a taxing authority.

 

We recognize and measure uncertain tax positions in accordance with GAAP, pursuant to which we only recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. Any tax benefits recognized in the consolidated financial statements from such positions are then measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. We report a liability for unrecognized tax benefits resulting from uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. GAAP further requires that a change in judgment related to the expected ultimate resolution of uncertain tax positions be recognized in earnings in the quarter of such change. We recognize interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.

 

We file annual income tax returns in multiple taxing jurisdictions around the world. A number of years may elapse before an uncertain tax position is audited and finally resolved. While it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular uncertain tax position, we believe that our analysis of income tax reserves reflects the most likely outcome. We adjust these reserves, if any, as well as the related interest, in light of changing facts and circumstances. Settlement of any particular position could require the use of cash.

 

Significant judgment is required in evaluating the Company’s uncertain tax positions and determining the Company’s provision for income taxes. No assurance can be given that the final tax outcome of these matters will not be different from that which is reflected in the Company’s historical income tax provisions and accruals. The Company adjusts these items in light of changing facts and circumstances. To the extent that the final tax outcome of these matters is different than the amounts recorded, such differences will impact the provision for income taxes in the period in which such determination is made.

 

 

 

The Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) limits the availability of certain tax credits and net operating losses that arose prior to certain cumulative changes in a corporation’s ownership resulting in a change of control of the Company. The Company’s use of its net operating loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards will be significantly limited because the Company believes it underwent “ownership changes,” as defined under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, in 1991, 1995, 2000, 2003, 2004, 2011 and 2012, though the Company has not performed a study to determine the limitation. The Company has reduced its deferred tax assets to zero relating to its federal and state research credits because of such limitations. The Company continues to disclose the tax effect of the net operating loss carryforwards at their original amount as the actual limitation has not yet been quantified. The Company has also established a full valuation allowance for substantially all deferred tax assets due to uncertainties surrounding its ability to generate future taxable income to realize these assets. Since substantially all deferred tax assets are fully reserved, future changes in tax benefits will not impact the effective tax rate. Management periodically evaluates the recoverability of the deferred tax assets. If it is determined at some time in the future that it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets will be realized, the valuation allowance would be reduced accordingly at that time.

 

Fair-Value Measurements. The Company accounts for fair value measurements in accordance with ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.

  

ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC 820 are described below:

 

	Level 1	Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.
	Level 2	Applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.
	Level 3	Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (supported by little or no market activity).

 

Assessing the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, considering factors specific to the asset or liability. Determining whether a fair value measurement is based on Level 1, Level 2, or Level 3 inputs is important because certain disclosures are applicable only to those fair value measurements that use Level 3 inputs. The use of Level 3 inputs may include information derived through extrapolation or interpolation which involves management assumptions as well as valuation techniques employing Monte Carlo simulation methodologies, binomial stock price models and variable conversion probabilities.

 

For a detailed discussion on the application of these and other accounting policies, see Note 2 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

  

Results of Operations

 

This management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes contained elsewhere in this Annual Report.

 

Comparison of Results for Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

 

Product Revenue  

	Twelve Months Ended December 31,
Net Product Revenue	2018	2017	$ Change	% Change
(dollars in thousands)
Software and royalties	$1,334	$1,248	$86	7%
Percentage of total net product revenue	76%	77%
Hardware and consumables	$133	$94	$39	41%
Percentage of total net product revenue	7%	6%
Services	$294	$272	$22	8%
Percentage of total net product revenue	17%	17%
Total net product revenue	$1,761	$1,614	$147	9%

 

 

Software and royalty revenue increased 7% or approximately $86,000 during the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to the corresponding period in 2017. This increase is attributable to higher identification project related revenue of approximately $193,000 and higher law enforcement project related revenue of approximately $76,000, offset by lower sales of boxed identity management software sold through our distribution channel of approximately $18,000 and lower royalty revenue of approximately $165,000. The increase in identification project related revenue and law enforcement project revenue is reflective of additional software licenses sold into existing identification projects caused by increased end-user utilization. The decrease in boxed identity management software sold through our distribution channel reflects lower procurement from two of our channel partners and the decrease in royalty revenue results primarily from lower reported usage from certain customers.

 

Revenue from the sale of hardware and consumables increased 41% or approximately $39,000 during the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to the corresponding period in 2017 due to an increase in project related solutions containing hardware.

  

Services revenue is comprised primarily of software integration services, system installation services and customer training. Such revenue increased 8% or approximately $22,000 during the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to the corresponding period in 2017, due to an increase in the service element of project related work completed during the year ended December 31, 2018.

 

We believe that the period-to-period fluctuations of identity management software revenue in project-oriented solutions are largely due to the timing of government procurement with respect to the various programs we are pursuing. Although no assurances can be given, based on management’s current visibility into the timing of potential government procurements and potential partnerships and current pilot programs, we believe that we will see an increase in government procurement and implementations with respect to identity management initiatives during 2019; however, government procurement initiatives, implementations and pilots are frequently delayed and extended, as was the case in the year ended December 31, 2018, and we cannot predict the timing of such initiatives.

 

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2018, we continued our efforts to move the Biometric Engine into cloud and mobile markets, and expand our end-user market into non-government sectors, including commercial, consumer and healthcare applications. Our approach to the markets we serve is to partner with larger integrators as resellers who have both the infrastructure and resources to sell into the worldwide market. We rely upon these partners for guidance as to when they expect revenue for our products to begin to ramp. During the year ended December 31, 2018 we saw additional customers implement GoVerify ID®, our cloud based mobile biometric authentication software as a service. Management believes that additional implementations will occur throughout 2019 resulting in increased identities under management, although no assurances can be given.

 

 Maintenance Revenue

	Twelve Months Ended December 31,
Maintenance Revenue	2018	2017	$ Change	% Change
(dollars in thousands)
Total maintenance revenue	$2,643	$2,679	$(36)	(1)%

 

Maintenance revenue was approximately $2,643,000 for the year ended December 31, 2018, as compared to approximately $2,679,000 for the corresponding periods in 2017. For the year ended December 31, 2018, identity management maintenance revenue was approximately $1,344,000 as compared to $1,311,000 for the comparable period in 2017. The increase in identity management maintenance revenue of approximately $33,000 reflects the expansion of our installed base. Law enforcement maintenance revenue was approximately $1,299,000 for the twelve months ended December 2018 as compared to $1,368,000 for the comparable period in 2017. This decrease of approximately $69,000 is primarily due to the expiration of certain law enforcement maintenance contracts.

  

We anticipate growth of our maintenance revenue through the retention of existing customers combined with the continued expansion of our installed base resulting from the completion of project-oriented work; however, we cannot predict the timing of this anticipated growth, if ever.

  

 

Cost of Product Revenue

 

	Twelve Months Ended December 31,
Cost of Product Revenue:	2018	2017	$ Change	% Change
(dollars in thousands)
Software and royalties	$11	$39	$(28)	(72)%
Percentage of software and royalty product revenue	1%	3%
Hardware and consumables	$92	$64	$28	44%
Percentage of hardware and consumables product revenue	69%	68%
Services	$102	$49	$53	108%
Percentage of services product revenue	35%	18%
Total product cost of revenue	$205	$152	$53	(35)%
Percentage of total product revenue	12%	9%

 

The cost of software and royalty product revenue decreased approximately $28,000 during the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to the corresponding period in 2017. This decrease, despite higher software and royalty product revenue of approximately $86,000, is due primarily to the 2018 period containing significant software license revenue with no associated customization costs.

 

The cost of product revenue for our hardware and consumable sales during the year ended December 31, 2018 increased approximately $28,000 as compared to the corresponding period in 2017, due primarily to higher hardware and consumable product revenue of approximately $39,000 during the 2018 period.

 

Cost of services revenue increased approximately $53,000 during the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to the corresponding period in 2017. This increase reflects higher service revenue of approximately $22,000 combined with the incurrence of certain non-recoverable project costs incurred due to implementation difficulties combined with the composition of labor resources utilized in the completion of the service element. In addition to changes in costs of services product revenue caused by revenue level fluctuations, costs of services can vary as a percentage of service revenue from period to period depending upon both the level and complexity of professional service resources utilized in the completion of the service element.

   

Cost of Maintenance Revenue

 

Maintenance cost of revenue	Twelve Months Ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2018	2017	$ Change	% Change
Total maintenance cost of revenue	$671	$839	$(168)	(20)%
Percentage of total maintenance revenue	25%	31%

 

Cost of maintenance revenue decreased approximately $168,000 during the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to the corresponding period in 2017, resulting principally from lower maintenance labor costs incurred during the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to the corresponding period in 2017 due primarily to the composition of engineering resources used in the provision of maintenance services and reductions in headcount in our customer support department.

 

 Product Gross Profit 

	Twelve Months Ended December 31,
Product gross profit	2018	2017	$ Change	% Change
(dollars in thousands)
Software and royalties	$1,323	$1,209	$114	9%
Percentage of software and royalty product revenue	99%	97%
Hardware and consumables	$41	$30	$11	37%
Percentage of hardware and consumables product revenue	31%	32%
Services	$192	$223	$(31)	(14)%
Percentage of services product revenue	65%	82%
Total product gross profit	$1,556	$1,462	$94	6%
Percentage of total product revenue	88%	91%

 

 

 

 

Software and royalty gross profit increased 9% or approximately $114,000 for the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to the corresponding period in 2017, due primarily to higher software and royalty revenue of approximately $86,000 combined with lower software and royalty cost of revenue of approximately $28,000 for the same period. This relationship is reflective of approximately $694,000 in license revenue with extremely low costs for the 2018 year. In addition to changes in costs of software and royalty product revenue caused by revenue level fluctuations, costs of products can vary as a percentage of product revenue from period to period depending upon level of software customization and third-party software license content included in product sales during a given period.

 

Hardware and consumables gross profit increased approximately $11,000 for the year ended December 31, 2018, as compared to the 2017 period. This increase resulted from higher sales of hardware and consumables in project solutions of approximately $39,000 combined with corresponding higher cost of hardware and consumables product revenue of $28,000 for the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to the corresponding period in 2017.

   

Services gross profit decreased approximately $94,000 during the year ended December 31, 2018, as compared to the corresponding period in 2017, with such decrease primarily resulting from higher service revenue of approximately $22,000 offset by higher cost of service revenue of approximately $53,000 for the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to the corresponding period in 2017.  These higher costs reflect the incurrence of certain non-recoverable project costs incurred due to implementation difficulties combined with a higher composition of more expensive labor resources.

  

Maintenance Gross Profit 

Maintenance gross profit	Twelve Months Ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2018	2017	$ Change	% Change
Total maintenance gross profit	$1,972	$1,840	$132	7%
Percentage of total maintenance revenue	75%	69%

 

Gross profit related to maintenance revenue increased 7% or approximately $132,000 for the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to the corresponding period in 2017. This increase results from lower maintenance revenue of approximately $36,000 due to the expiration of certain Law Enforcement maintenance contracts offset by lower cost of maintenance revenue of approximately $168,000 due to headcount reductions in our customer service department combined with lower maintenance labor costs incurred during the same period due to the composition of engineering resources used in the provision of maintenance services.

 

Operating Expense  

	Twelve Months Ended December 31,
Operating expense	2018	2017	$ Change	% Change
(dollars in thousands)
General and administrative	$4,285	$3,723	$562	15%
Percentage of total net revenue	97%	87%
Sales and marketing	$3,571	$2,816	$755	27%
Percentage of total net revenue	81%	66%
Research and development	$7,351	$6,324	$1,027	16%
Percentage of total net revenue	167%	147%
Depreciation and amortization	$51	$68	$(17)	(25)%
Percentage of total net revenue	1%	2%

 

General and Administrative Expense

 

General and administrative expense is comprised primarily of salaries and other employee-related costs for executive, financial, and other infrastructure personnel. General legal, accounting and consulting services, insurance, occupancy and communication costs are also included with general and administrative expense.

 

 

 

The dollar increase of approximately $562,000 in general and administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to the corresponding period in 2017 is comprised of the following major components:

 

 

 

 

 

 

We continue to focus our efforts on achieving additional future operating efficiencies by reviewing and improving upon existing business processes and evaluating our cost structure. We believe these efforts will allow us to continue to gradually decrease our level of general and administrative expense expressed as a percentage of total revenue.

 

Sales and Marketing Expense

 

Sales and marketing expense consists primarily of the salaries, commissions, other incentive compensation, employee benefits and travel expense of our sales, marketing, and business development.

 

The dollar increase in sales and marketing expense of approximately $755,000 during the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to the corresponding period in 2017, is primarily comprised of the following major components:

 

 

 

 

 

 

We anticipate that the level of expense incurred for sales and marketing during the year ended December 31, 2019 will increase as we pursue large project solution opportunities.

  

Research and Development Expense

 

Research and development expense consists primarily of salaries, employee benefits and outside contractors for new product development, product enhancements, custom integration work and related facility costs.

 

Research and development expense increased approximately $1,027,000 for the year ended December 31, 2018, as compared to the corresponding period in 2017, due primarily to the following major components:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Our level of expenditures in research and development reflects our belief that to maintain our competitive position in markets characterized by rapid rates of technological advancement, we must continue to invest significant resources in new systems and software as well as continue to enhance existing products.

 

Depreciation and Amortization

 

During the year ended December 31, 2018, depreciation and amortization expense decreased approximately $17,000 as compared to the corresponding period in 2017. The relatively small amount of depreciation and amortization reflects the relatively small property and equipment carrying value. The decrease is reflective of the full depreciation of certain fixed assets.

  

Interest Expense (Income), Net

 

For the year ended December 31, 2018, we recognized interest income of $78,000 and interest expense of $541,000. For the year ended December 31, 2017, we recognized interest income of $43,000 and interest expense of $634,000.

 

 Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2018 contains the following components:

 

 

 

  

Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 contains the following components:

 

 

 

   

Other Income

 

For the year ended December 31, 2018, we recognized other income of approximately $4,000 and other expense of $0. Other income for the year ended December 31, 2018 is comprised of approximately $4,000 from miscellaneous receipts.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2017, we recognized other income of approximately $125,000 and other expense of $0. Other income for the year ended December 31, 2017 is comprised of approximately $75,000 from the write off of certain accrued expense due the expiration of the legal statute of limitations on such liabilities. Other income also includes $50,000 from the sale of one of the Company’s non-utilized trademarks.

 

Change in Fair Value of Derivative Liabilities

 

For the year ended December 31, 2018, we recognized approximately $232,000 from the increase of derivative liabilities arising from the consummation of the Series C Financing in September 2018. Such increase was determined by management using fair value methodologies and is included as an expense under the caption “Change in fair value of derivative liabilities” in our consolidated statement of operations for twelve months ended December 31, 2018.

 

 

 

Income Tax Expense

 

During the year ended December 31, 2018, we recorded a net expense of approximately $11,000 from income taxes, as compared to a benefit of $124,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017.

 

During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, we recorded an expense for income taxes of $11,000 and a tax benefit of $124,000, respectively. The tax benefit reflects the reversal of a prior year accrual related to foreign taxes which expired due to the expiration of the statute of limitation on this foreign tax liability. The 2018 tax expense relates to taxes on income generated in certain foreign jurisdictions offset by research and development tax credits generated in certain foreign jurisdictions.

 

We have incurred consolidated pre-tax losses during the years ended December 31, 2018, and 2017, and have incurred operating losses in all prior periods. Management has determined that it is more likely than not that a tax benefit from such losses will not be realized. Accordingly, we did not record a benefit for income taxes for these periods.

 

Liquidity, Capital Resources and Going Concern

 

Historically, our principal sources of cash have included customer payments from the sale of our products, proceeds from the issuance of common and preferred stock and proceeds from the issuance of debt, including our Lines of Credit (defined below). Our principal uses of cash have included cash used in operations, product development, and payments relating to purchases of property and equipment. We expect that our principal uses of cash in the future will be for product development, including customization of identity management products for enterprise and consumer applications, further development of intellectual property, development of SaaS capabilities for existing products as well as general working capital and capital expenditure requirements. Management expects that, as our revenue grows, our sales and marketing and research and development expense will continue to grow, albeit at a slower rate and, as a result, we will need to generate significant net revenue to achieve and sustain income from operations.

 

Series A Financing

 

On September 18, 2017, the Company offered and sold a total of 11,000 shares of Series A Preferred at a purchase price of $1,000 per share (the “Series A Financing”). As a result of the Series A Financing, the Company generated net proceeds of approximately $10.9 million.

 

In addition, on September 18, 2017, the Company entered into exchange agreements with holders of all outstanding shares of the Company’s Series E Convertible Preferred Stock, Series F Convertible Preferred Stock and Series G Convertible Preferred Stock (collectively, the “Exchanged Preferred”), pursuant to which holders of the Exchanged Preferred agreed to cancel their respective shares of Exchanged Preferred in exchange for shares of Series A Preferred (the “Preferred Stock Exchange”), resulting in the issuance to the holders of Exchanged Preferred of an aggregate total of 20,021 shares of Series A Preferred.

 

Series C Financing

 

On September 10, 2018, the Company offered and sold a total of 890 shares of Series C Preferred at a purchase price of $10,000 per share, and on September 21, 2018, the Company sold an additional 110 shares of Series C Preferred at a purchase price of $10,000 per share. The total net proceeds to the Company were approximately $8,789,000, after deducting insurance costs incurred in conjunction with the Series C Financing.

 

Lines of Credit

 

Lines of credit consist of the following:

($ in thousands)	December 31, 2018	December 31, 2017
Lines of Credit with Related Parties
8% convertible lines of credit. Face value of advances under lines of credit $0 at December 31, 2018 and $6,000 at December 31, 2017. Discount on advances under lines of credit is $0 at December 31, 2018 and $226 at December 31, 2017. Maturity date was December 31, 2018; however, the lines of credit were terminated on September 10, 2018, as more thoroughly discussed below.	$—	$5,774
Total lines of credit to related parties	—	5,774
Less current portion	—	(5,774)
Long-term lines of credit to related parties	$—	$—

 

 

 

On September 10, 2018, the Company entered into Exchange Agreements with Neal Goldman and Charles Crocker, pursuant to which Messrs. Goldman and Crocker agreed to exchange approximately $6.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of outstanding debt (including accrued and unpaid interest) owed under the terms of their respective lines of credit for an aggregate of 6,896 shares of Series A Preferred. As a result of the Debt Exchange, all indebtedness, liabilities and other obligations arising under the respective lines of credit were cancelled and deemed satisfied in full.

 

The following table sets forth the Company’s activity under its former Lines of Credit for the periods indicated:

 

Balance outstanding under Lines of Credit as of December 31, 2016	$2,650
Borrowings under Lines of Credit	3,350
Repayments	—
Balance outstanding under Lines of Credit as of December 31, 2017	$6,000
Borrowings under Lines of Credit	—
Exchanges	(6,000)
Balance outstanding under Lines of Credit as of December 31, 2018	$—

  

For a more detailed discussion of the Company’s former Lines of Credit, see Note 5, Related Parties to these consolidated financial statements.

 

Going Concern and Management’s Plan

 

At December 31, 2018, we had positive working capital of approximately $3,078,000, as compared to a working capital deficit of approximately $415,000 at December 31, 2017. Our principal sources of liquidity at December 31, 2018 consisted of cash and cash equivalents of $5,694,000. Our principal sources of liquidity at December 31, 2017 consisted of cash and cash equivalents of $7,317,000.

 

Considering our projected cash requirements, and assuming we are unable to generate incremental revenue, our available cash may be insufficient to satisfy our cash requirements for the next twelve months from the date of this filing. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. To address our working capital requirements, management may seek additional equity and/or debt financing through the issuance of additional debt and/or equity securities or may seek strategic or other transactions intended to increase shareholder value. There are currently no formal committed financing arrangements to support our projected cash shortfall, including commitments to purchase additional debt and/or equity securities, or other agreements, and no assurances can be given that we will be successful in raising additional debt and/or equity securities, or entering into any other transaction that addresses our ability to continue as a going concern.

 

In view of the matters described in the preceding paragraph, recoverability of a major portion of the recorded asset amounts shown in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet is dependent upon continued operations of the Company, which, in turn, is dependent upon the Company’s ability to continue to raise capital and generate positive cash flows from operations. However, the Company operates in markets that are emerging and highly competitive. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain additional capital, operate at a profit or generate positive cash flows in the future.

 

The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. 

 

Operating Activities

 

Net cash used in operating activities was $10,310,000 during the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to $8,703,000 during the year ended December 31, 2017.  During the year ended December 31, 2018, net cash used in operating activities consisted of net loss of $12,550,000 and an increase in working capital and other assets and liabilities of $489,000. Those amounts were offset by approximately $1,751,000 of non-cash costs, including $1,298,000 in stock-based compensation, $170,000 in debt issuance cost amortization and beneficial conversion feature amortization, $51,000 in depreciation and amortization, and $232,000 in the change in fair value of derivative liabilities. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we used cash of $593,000 from increases in current assets and generated cash of $1,081,000 through increases in current liabilities and deferred revenue, excluding debt.

 

 

 

During the year ended December 31, 2017, net cash used in operating activities consisted of net loss of $10,069,000 and an increase in operating cash from changes in assets and liabilities of $195,000. We also incurred $1,171,000 in net non-cash costs including $1,151,000 in stock based compensation, $209,000 in debt issuance cost amortization and debt discount amortization, $15,000 in provision for losses on accounts receivable and $68,000 in depreciation and amortization offset by $272,000 of non-cash income primarily from the write-off of certain accrued expense due to the expiration of the statute of limitations of $222,000 and $50,000 from the sale of one of the Company’s non-utilized trademarks. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we used cash of $282,000 from increases in current assets and generated cash of $477,000 through increases in current liabilities and deferred revenue, excluding debt.

  

Investing Activities

 

Net cash used in investing activities was $240,000 for the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $45,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we used cash of $240,000 to fund capital expenditures of leasehold improvements and office furniture. For the year ended December 31, 2017, we used cash of $5,000 to fund capital expenditures of computer equipment, software and furniture and fixtures. This level of fixed asset purchases resulted primarily from the replacement of older items.

 

Financing Activities

 

We generated cash of $8,900,000 from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2018, as compared to $14,495,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we generated cash of approximately $162,000 from the exercise of 235,852 stock options resulting in the issuance of 235,852 shares of Common Stock, and generated cash of $10,000,000 in gross proceeds from the Series C Financing, offset by $1,211,000 in offering costs. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we used cash of approximately $51,000 for the payment of dividends on our Series B Preferred stock. During the year ended December 31, 2017 we generated cash of $11,000,000 from the Series A Financing, offset by $63,000 in offering costs, generated $3,350,000 from borrowings under the former Lines of Credit and generated approximately $259,000 from the exercise of 369,004 options resulting in the issuance of 369,004 shares of Common Stock. We used cash of approximately $51,000 for the payment of dividends on our Series B Preferred stock.

  

Debt

 

At December 31, 2017, the Company had $6,000,000 in outstanding debt and $527,000 in related accrued but unpaid interest. As a result of the Debt Exchange consummated on September 10, 2018, the Lines of Credit and all indebtedness, liabilities and other obligations arising thereunder were terminated, cancelled and deemed satisfied in full. As a result, no future borrowings are available under the Lines of Credit.

 

Contractual Obligations

 

Total contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of December 31, 2018 are summarized in the following table (in thousands):

 

	Payment Due by Year
	Total	Less than 1 Year	1-3 Years	3-5 Years	More than 5 Years
Operating lease obligations	$3,312	$480	$1,257	$1,575	$—
Total	$3,312	$480	$1,257	$1,575	$—

 

Real Property Leases

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prior to entering into the new lease agreement in July 2018 and moving our corporate headquarters to a new location, we occupied 9,927 of office space in San Diego, at a cost of approximately $30,000 per month.

 

Stock-Based Compensation

 

Stock-based compensation related to equity options and restricted stock has been classified as follows in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations (in thousands):

 

	Year Ended December 31,
	2018	2017
Cost of revenue	$19	$19
General and administrative	840	655
Sales and marketing	216	220
Research and development	197	200
Total	$1,272	$1,094

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

At December 31, 2018, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance, special purpose or variable interest entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. In addition, we did not engage in trading activities involving non-exchange traded contracts. As a result, we are not exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships. We do not have relationships and transactions with persons or entities that derive benefits from their non-independent relationship with us or our related parties except as disclosed elsewhere in this Annual Report.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

 

From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”), or other standard setting bodies, which are adopted by us as of the specified effective date. Unless otherwise discussed, the Company’s management believes the impact of recently issued standards not yet effective will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements upon adoption. See Note 2 to these consolidated financial statements for a detailed discussion of recently issued accounting pronouncements.

 

Impact of Inflation

 

The primary inflationary factor affecting our operations is labor costs, and we do not believe that inflation has materially affected earnings during the past four years. Substantial increases in costs and expense, particularly labor and operating expense, could have a significant impact on our operating results to the extent that such increases cannot be passed along to customers and end users.

 

ITEM 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALIT ATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

Our business extends to countries outside the United States, and we intend to continue to expand our foreign operations. As a result, our revenue and results of operations are affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates, interest rates, and other uncertainties inherent in doing business in more than one currency. In addition, our operations are exposed to risks that are associated with changes in social, political, and economic conditions in the foreign countries in which we operate, including changes in the laws and policies that govern foreign investment, as well as, to a lesser extent, changes in United States laws and regulations relating to foreign trade and investment.

 

We had approximately $88,000 and $76,000 in revenue from sources outside the United States for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. We made payments in foreign currencies to fund our foreign operations of approximately $1,009,000 and $889,000 for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Changes in currency exchange rates affect the relative prices at which we sell our products and purchase goods and services. Given the uncertainty of exchange rate fluctuations, we cannot estimate the effect of these fluctuations on our future business, product pricing, results of operations, or financial condition. We do not use foreign currency exchange contracts or derivative financial instruments for hedging or speculative purposes. To the extent foreign sales become a more significant part of our business in the future, we may seek to implement strategies which make use of these or other instruments in order to minimize the effects of foreign currency exchange on our business.

 

 

 

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

Our consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and the report of our independent registered public accounting firm are included in Item 15 of this Annual Report.

 

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

 

None.

 

ITEM 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

 

Under the supervision and with the participation of our Management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operations of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15I and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of December 31, 2018. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms.  In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework.

 

(b) Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

 

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.

 

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2018, our internal control over financial reporting was effective.

 

Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C., our independent registered public accounting firm that audited our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, which report is included in Part IV below.

 

(c) Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting.

 

The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have determined that there have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report identified in connection with the evaluation described in the above paragraph that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

ITEM 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION

 

Not applicable.

 

 

PART III

 

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

The Board of Directors and executive officers currently consist of the persons named in the table below. Each director serves for a one-year term, until his or her successor is elected and qualified, or until earlier resignation or removal. Our bylaws provide that the number of directors shall not be less than four, but no more than ten. The directors and executive officers are as follows:

 

Name		Age		Principal Occupation/Position Held With the Company
Mr. S. James Miller, Jr.		65		Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
Mr. Wayne Wetherell		66		Senior Vice President of Administration, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
Mr. David Harding		49		Senior Vice President, Chief Technical Officer
Mr. David Somerville		58		Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing
Mr. David Carey		74		Director
Mr. Guy Steve Hamm		71		Director
Mr. David Loesch		74		Director
Mr. John Cronin		64		Director
Mr. Neal Goldman		74		Director
Mr. Dana W. Kammersgard		63		Director
Mr. Charles Frischer		52		Director
Mr. Robert T. Clutterbuck		68		Director

 

S. James Miller, Jr. has served as our Chief Executive Officer since 1990 and Chairman of the Board since 1996. He also served as our President from 1990 until 2003. From 1980 to 1990, Mr. Miller was an executive with Oak Industries, Inc., a manufacturer of components for the telecommunications industry. While at Oak Industries, Mr. Miller served as a director and as Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary and Chairman/President of Oak Industries’ Pacific Rim subsidiaries. He has a J.D. from the University of San Diego School of Law and a B.A. from the University of California, San Diego.

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Miller possesses substantial managerial expertise leading the Company through its various stages of development and growth, beginning in 1990 when Mr. Miller joined the Company as President and Chief Executive Officer, and that such expertise is extremely valuable to the Board of Directors and the Company as it executes its business plan. In addition, the Board of Directors values the input provided by Mr. Miller given his legal experience.

 

Wayne Wetherell has served as our Senior Vice President, Administration and Chief Financial Officer since August 1996 and additionally as our Secretary and Treasurer since October 2005. From 1996 to May 2001, he served as Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer. From 1991 to 1996, Mr. Wetherell was the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Bilstein Corporation of America, a manufacturer and distributor of automotive parts. From 1980 to 1990 Mr. Wetherell served in various financial roles culminating as Director of Financial Planning and Analysis for Oak Industries, Inc., a manufacturer of components for the telecommunications industry traded on the NYSE. Mr. Wetherell holds a B.S. degree in Management and a M.S. degree in Finance from San Diego State University.

 

David Harding has served as our Sr. Vice President and Chief Technology Officer since January 2006. Mr. Harding has more than 25 years of technology implementation and management experience, is responsible for strategic design, technology infrastructure and core strategy from concept through delivery. Before joining us, Mr. Harding was the Chief Technology Officer at IC Solutions, Inc., where he was responsible for all technology departments including the development and management of software development, IT and quality assurance, as well as their respective hardware, software and human resource budgets from 2001 to 2003. He was the Chief Technology Officer at Thirsty.com from 1999 to 2000, the Chief Technology Officer at Fulcrum Point Technologies, Inc., from 1996 to 1999, and consultant to Access360, which is now part of IBM/Tivoli, from 1995 to 1996.

   

 

 

David Somerville has served as our Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing since January 2018. Mr. Somerville has spent over 20 years working in executive, consulting, and advisory board positions for public and private companies, supporting the world’s major service providers, enterprises, and government agencies. Mr. Somerville leads our Sales and Marketing efforts and is responsible for bringing our industry leading, patented biometric platforms to mobile and desktop users around the globe via strategic partnerships and direct sales. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Somerville held senior executive sales and business development positions at leading companies in the cybersecurity industry, including Norse Networks Inc. from January 2017 to January 2018, Fortscale Inc. from March 2016 to January 2017, Norse Corporation Inc. from September 2014 to February 2016, Cloudmark Inc. (now Proofpoint Inc.) from 2005 to March 2014, and Network Equipment Technologies, where he has consistently achieved global market leadership positions in the service provider, enterprise, and government markets. From April 2014 to September 2014, he served as the Principal at David Somerville Consulting. Mr. Somerville holds a Bachelor of Science degree in communications and electronic engineering with a minor in business studies from Edinburgh Napier University, Scotland.

 

David Carey was appointed to the Board in February 2006. Mr. Carey is a former Executive Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. Mr. Carey briefly served on the Board of Cybergy, Inc., a public company, resigning in October 2015 and currently is the Chairman of Proxy Boards for Leonard DRS Technologies and OnPoint Consulting. In addition, he is a member of the Proxy Board for Informatica Federal Operations, Corp. Mr. Carey also serves on a number of Advisory Boards. In addition, Mr. Carey worked for the CIA for 32 years until 2001. During his career at the CIA, Mr. Carey held several senior positions including that of Executive Director, often referred to as the Chief Operating Officer, or No. 3 person in the agency. Mr. Carey is a graduate of Cornell University and the University of Delaware.

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Carey’s experience as a former Executive Director of the CIA, his experience dealing with IT security matters, and the extensive contacts gained over his career working within the intelligence and security community, provide the Board with specialized expertise that assists the Company in the specific industries in which it operates.

 

Guy Steve Hamm was appointed to the Board in October 2004. Mr. Hamm served as CFO of Aspen Holding, a privately held insurance provider, from December 2005 to February 2007. In 2003, Mr. Hamm retired from PricewaterhouseCoopers, where he was a national partner-in-charge of middle market. Mr. Hamm was instrumental in growing the Audit Business Advisory Services (“ABAS”) Middle Market practice at PricewaterhouseCoopers, where he was responsible for $300 million in revenue and more than 100 partners. Mr. Hamm is a graduate of San Diego State University.

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Hamm’s experience in public accounting, together with his management experience as a Chief Financial Officer, provide the Audit Committee of the Board with the expertise needed to oversee the Company’s finance and accounting professionals, and the Company’s independent public accountants.

 

David Loesch was appointed to the Board in September 2001 after 29 years of service as a Special Agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigations (“FBI”). At the time of his retirement from the FBI, Mr. Loesch was the Assistant Director in Charge of the Criminal Justice Information Services Division of the FBI. Mr. Loesch was awarded the Presidential Rank Award for Meritorious Executive in 1998 and has served on the board of directors of the Special Agents Mutual Benefit Association since 1996. He is also a member of the International Association of Chiefs of Police and the Society of Former Special Agents of the FBI, Inc. In 1999, Mr. Loesch was appointed by former Attorney General Janet Reno to serve as one of 15 original members of the Compact Council, an organization charged with promulgating rules and procedures governing the use and exchange of criminal history records for non-criminal justice use. Mr. Loesch served in the United States Army as an Officer with the 101st Airborne Division in Vietnam. He holds a Bachelor’s degree from Canisius College and a Master’s degree in Criminal Justice from George Washington University. Mr. Loesch continues to work as a private consultant on criminal justice information sharing and the use of biometrics to help identify criminals and individuals of special concern.

  

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Loesch’s extensive service as a Special Agent with the FBI, together with his knowledge of security issues relevant to the Company’s products and markets, provides the Company and the Board of Directors with relevant input regarding the industries in which the Company competes, and the markets served by the Company. 

 

 

 

John Cronin was appointed to the Board in February 2012. Mr. Cronin is currently Managing Director and Chairman of ipCapital Group, Inc. (“ipCG”), an intellectual property consulting firm Mr. Cronin founded in 1998. During his time with ipCG, Mr. Cronin created both a unique ipCapital SysI(R) Methodology for consulting, as well as a world-class licensing and transaction process, and worked with over 700 companies, including more than 10% of the Fortune 500. Prior to forming ipCG, Mr. Cronin spent over 17 years at IBM and became its top inventor with over 100 patents and 150 patent publications. He created and ran the IBM Patent Factory, which was essential in helping IBM become number one in US patents, and the team that contributed to the startup and success of IBM’s licensing program. Additionally, Mr. Cronin serves as a member of the Board of Directors at Vermont Electric Power Company (“VELCO”), Armor Designs, Inc., Document Security Systems, and Primal Fusion, Inc., and GraphOn and as a member of the advisory board for innoPad, Inc. He holds a B.S. and a M.S.in electrical engineering, and a B.A. degree in Psychology from the University of Vermont.

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Cronin’s experience developing and extracting the value from intellectual property, and his experience serving on, and advising, boards of directors, will contribute to deliberations of our Board of Directors, and assist the Company as it capitalizes on the opportunities presented by its portfolio of intellectual property assets.

 

Neal Goldman was appointed to the Board in August 2012. Mr. Goldman is currently president, chief compliance officer and a director of Goldman Capital Management, Inc., an employee owned investment advisor that he founded in 1985. Additionally, Mr. Goldman is Chairman of Charles and Colvard, LTD, a specialty jewelry company. Mr. Goldman also served as a member of the Board of Directors and Compensation Committee for Blyth, Inc., a New York Stock Exchange-listed designer and marketer of home decorative and fragrance products.

 

Mr. Goldman is the Company’s largest shareholder and has significant investment experience.  As a result, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Goldman can provide valuable guidance to the Board of Directors as it seeks to build shareholder value.

 

Dana Kammersgard was appointed to the Board in May of 2016. Mr. Kammersgard is currently the Executive Vice President, Cloud Systems and Solutions for Seagate Technology, where he is responsible for all storage systems related products and strategies. Prior to joining Seagate Systems in 2015, he served as the President, CEO and a director of Dot Hill System Corp. (“Dot Hill”) since March 2006. He served as President of Dot Hill from August 2004 to March 2006. From August 1999 to August 2004, Mr. Kammersgard served as Dot Hill’s Chief Technical Officer. Mr. Kammersgard was a founder of Artecon, where he served as a director from its inception in 1984 until the company’s merger with Box Hill Systems Corp. in August 1999. At Artecon, Mr. Kammersgard served in various positions, including Secretary and Senior Vice President of Engineering from March 1998 until August 1999, and as Vice President of Sales and Marketing from March 1997 until March 1998. Prior to cofounding Artecon, Mr. Kammersgard was the Director of Software Development at Calma, a division of General Electric Company. Mr. Kammersgard holds a B.A. in chemistry from the University of California, San Diego.

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Kammersgard’s engineering and technical experience, coupled with his senior executive management experience with technology companies, is valuable to the Company’s Board of Directors and senior management given the technical issues and marketing challenges facing the Company.

  

Charles Frischer was appointed to the Board in September of 2017. Mr. Frischer currently works as self-employed private investor, a role he has occupied since 2009, and serves as General Partner of LF Partners, LLC. Previously, he served as a Principal at Zephyr Management, L.P. from 2005 to 2008. Prior to that, he served as a Senior Vice President at Capri Capital, where he originated commercial loans, from 1995 to 2005, and as General Manager of Ericson Memorial Studios from 1993 to 1994. Mr. Frischer holds a B.A. from Cornell University.

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Frischer’s background with capital markets and public companies is valuable to the Company’s Board of Directors and senior management.

 

Robert T. Clutterbuck was appointed to the Board as a Series A Director in September of 2017. Mr. Clutterbuck is the Founder, and has served as the Managing Director and Portfolio Manager at Clutterbuck Capital Management LLC, since 2006. Mr. Clutterbuck gained more than 30 years of experience at McDonald & Company Investments, Inc., where he specialized in advising affluent clients, professionals and corporate executives on investment management, financial planning, estate preservation and wealth transfer strategies. During his time at McDonald & Company, Mr. Clutterbuck served as Chairman and Chief Executive Partner of Key Capital Partners, and as Chief Executive Officer of McDonald Investments Inc. from 2000 to 2002. Prior to 2000, Mr. Clutterbuck served in several senior management positions within McDonald Investments Inc., including as Chief Financial Officer and Executive Managing Director of McDonald & Co. Securities, Inc., as Treasurer of McDonald & Co. Investments, Inc., and as President and Chief Operating Officer of McDonald & Co. Securities, Inc. Currently, Mr. Clutterbuck serves as an Independent Director of Westmoreland Resources GP, LLC (NYSE: WMLP), a position he has held since January 6, 2015. Mr. Clutterbuck holds a B.A. from Ohio Wesleyan University and an M.B.A from the University of Pennsylvania Wharton School of Business.

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Clutterbuck’s background with capital markets and public companies is valuable to the Company’s Board of Directors and senior management. 

 

 

 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

 

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our Common Stock and other equity securities. Such persons are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. To our knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to us and written representations that no other reports were required, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, all Section 16(a) filing requirements were complied with in a timely manner except the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Code of Ethics

 

The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics policy that applies to our directors and employees (including the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions). The Company intends to promptly disclose (i) the nature of any amendment to this code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions and (ii) the nature of any waiver, including an implicit waiver, from a provision of this code of ethics that is granted to one of these specified individuals, the name of such person who is granted the waiver and the date of the waiver on our website in the future.  A copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics can be obtained from our website at http://www.iwsinc.com.

 

Board Leadership Structure

 

Our Board of Directors has discretion to determine whether to separate or combine the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. S. James Miller has served in both roles since 1996, and our Board continues to believe that his combined role is most advantageous to the Company and our stockholders, as Mr. Miller possesses in-depth knowledge of the issues, opportunities and risks facing us, our business and our industry and is best positioned to fulfill the responsibilities of our Chief Executive Officer, as well as the Chairman’s responsibility to develop meeting agendas that focus the Board’s time and attention on the most critical matters and to facilitate constructive dialogue among Board members on strategic issues.

 

In addition to Mr. Miller’s leadership, the Board maintains effective independent oversight through a number of governance practices, including open and direct communication with management, input on meeting agendas, and regular executive sessions. 

 

Board Role in Risk Assessment

 

Management, in consultation with outside professionals, as applicable, identifies risks associated with the Company’s operations, strategies and financial statements. Risk assessment is also performed through periodic reports received by the Audit Committee from management, counsel and the Company’s independent registered public accountants relating to risk assessment and management. Audit Committee members meet privately in executive sessions with representatives of the Company’s independent registered public accountants. The Board also provides risk oversight through its periodic reviews of the financial and operational performance of the Company.

 

Director Independence

           

Our Board of Directors has determined that all of its members, other than Mr. Miller, who serves as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Goldman, who beneficially owns approximately 39.4% of the Company’s Common Stock, are “independent” within the meaning of the Nasdaq Stock Market Rules and SEC rules regarding independence.

 

 

 

Committees of the Board of Directors

 

Our Board of Directors has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, each of which has the composition and responsibilities described below.

 

Audit Committee

 

The Audit Committee provides assistance to the Board of Directors in fulfilling its legal and fiduciary obligations in matters involving our accounting, auditing, financial reporting, internal control and legal compliance functions by approving the services performed by our independent accountants and reviewing their reports regarding our accounting practices and systems of internal accounting controls. The Audit Committee also oversees the audit efforts of our independent accountants and takes those actions as it deems necessary to satisfy it that the accountants are independent of management. The Audit Committee currently consists of Messrs. Hamm (Chairman), Carey and Loesch, each of whom is a non-management member of our Board of Directors. Mr. Hamm is also our Audit Committee financial expert, as currently defined under current SEC rules. The Audit Committee met four times during the year ended December 31, 2018.  We believe that the composition of our Audit Committee meets the criteria for independence under, and the functioning of our Audit Committee complies with the applicable Nasdaq Stock Market Rules and SEC rules and regulations.

 

Compensation Committee

 

The Compensation Committee determines our general compensation policies and the compensation provided to our directors and officers. The Compensation Committee also reviews and determines bonuses for our officers and other employees. In addition, the Compensation Committee reviews and determines equity-based compensation for our directors, officers, employees and consultants and administers our stock option plans. The Compensation Committee currently consists of Messrs. Carey (Chairman), Cronin and Goldman, each of whom is a non-management member of our Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee met one time during the year ended December 31, 2018. Although Messrs. Carey and Cronin meet the criteria for independence under the applicable Nasdaq Stock Market Rules and SEC rules and regulations, Mr. Goldman is not considered independent under such requirements.

  

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee  

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for making recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding candidates for directorships and the size and composition of the Board. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for overseeing our corporate governance guidelines and reporting and making recommendations to the Board concerning corporate governance matters. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee currently consists of all the nonemployee members of the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met four times during the year ended December 31, 2018.

 

Indemnification of Officers and Directors

 

To the extent permitted by Delaware law, the Company will indemnify its directors and officers against expenses and liabilities they incur to defend, settle, or satisfy any civil or criminal action brought against them on account of their being or having been Company directors or officers unless, in any such action, they are adjudged to have acted with gross negligence or willful misconduct. 

   

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

Overview of Compensation Program

 

 The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors has responsibility for establishing, implementing and monitoring adherence to our compensation philosophy. The Board of Directors has delegated to the Compensation Committee the responsibility for determining our compensation policies and procedures for senior management, including the named executive officers, periodically reviewing these policies and procedures, and making recommendations concerning executive compensation to be considered by the full board of directors, when such approval is required under any of our plans or policies or by applicable laws. The Compensation Committee also has the principal responsibility for the administration of our stock plans, including the approval of stock option grants to the named executive officers.

 

 The compensation received by our named executive officers in fiscal year 2018 is set forth in the Summary Compensation Table, below. For 2018, the named executive officers included: (i) S. James Miller, Jr., Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer; (ii) David Harding, Senior Vice President Engineering, Chief Technical Officer, and (iii) David Somerville, Senior Vice President Sales and Marketing.

 

 

 

Compensation Philosophy

 

 In general, our executive compensation policies are designed to recruit, retain and motivate qualified executives by providing them with a competitive total compensation package based in large part on the executive’s contribution to our financial and operational success, the executive’s personal performance and increases in stockholder value as measured by the price of our common stock. We believe that the total compensation paid to our executives should be fair, reasonable and competitive.

 

 We seek to have a balanced approach to executive compensation with each primary element of compensation (base salary, variable compensation and equity incentives) designed to play a specific role. Overall, we design our compensation programs to allow for the recruitment, retention and motivation of the key executives and high-level talent required in order for us to:

 

 

 

 

Role of Executive Officers in Compensation Decisions

 

The Compensation Committee considers action on executive compensation annually. They discuss their proposed actions with the Chief Executive Officer and make recommendations for any changes to the Company’s Board of Directors. Only the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors are authorized to approve the compensation for any named executive officer. Because our Chief Executive Officer is also a member of our Board of Directors, he does not participate in any conversation or approvals related to his compensation. Compensation of new executives is based on hiring negotiations between the individuals and our Chief Executive Officer and/or Compensation Committee.

 

Elements of Compensation

 

 Consistent with our compensation philosophy and objectives, we offer executive compensation packages consisting of the following three components:

 

 

 

 

 In each fiscal year, the Compensation Committee determines the amount and relative weight of each component for all executives, including the named executive officers. Base salaries are paid in fixed amounts and thus do not encourage risk taking. For 2018, we had no incentive bonus programs.

 

We also have issued stock options focusing the recipients on the achievement of certain short- and longer-term goals and objectives. The Compensation Committee believes that these awards do not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking because the ultimate value of the awards is tied to our stock price, and the vesting schedules align our employees’ interests even more closely with those of our investors.

 

Base Salary

 

  Because our compensation philosophy stresses performance-based awards, base salary is intended to be a smaller portion of total executive compensation relative to long-term equity. Therefore, we target executive base salary at the median level of the compensation guidelines that have been approved by the Compensation Committee. In addition, the Compensation Committee takes into account the executive’s scope of responsibility and significance to the execution of our long-term strategy, past accomplishments, experience and personal performance and compares each executive’s base salary with those of the other members of senior management. The Compensation Committee may give different weighting to each of these factors for each executive, as it deems appropriate. The Compensation Committee did not retain a compensation consultant or determine a compensation peer group for 2018. In 2018, there were no changes to the base salaries paid to our named executive officers except for the contractually specified cost of living adjustments.

 

Annual Incentive Compensation

 

The Compensation Committee has not adopted an executive bonus plan for 2019.

 

 

 

Equity Awards

 

Although we do not have a mandated policy regarding the ownership of shares of Common Stock by officers and directors, we believe that granting equity awards to executives and other key employees on an ongoing basis gives them a strong incentive to maximize stockholder value and aligns their interests with those of our other stockholders on a long-term basis. Our 1999 Plan enables us to grant equity awards, as well as other types of stock-based compensation, to our executive officers and other employees. Under authority delegated to it by the board of directors, the Compensation Committee reviews and approves all equity awards granted to named executive officers under the 1999 Plan. Typically, the options granted upon the executive’s hire vest over three years with a third vesting on the one-year anniversary, and the remainder vesting quarterly over the next eight quarters. The options granted to executives in connection with an annual performance review typically begin vesting on the one-year anniversary of the grant date, and vest ratably over the following eight quarters. Our general policy is to grant the options with an exercise price equal to fair market value, which currently is the closing price of our Common Stock, as reported by the OTCQB marketplace, on the grant date.

 

We intend to grant equity awards to achieve retention and motivation:

 

 

 

 

With the Compensation Committee’s approval, we grant options to purchase shares of Common Stock when we initially hire executives and other employees, as a long-term performance incentive. The Compensation Committee has determined the size of the initial option grants to newly hired executives with reference to existing guidelines and hiring negotiations with the individual, in addition to other relevant information regarding the size and type of compensation package considered necessary to enable us to recruit, retain and motivate the executive.

 

Historically, no employee was eligible for an annual performance grant until the employee had worked for us for at least sixty days. The Compensation Committee reviews our Chief Executive Officer’s and other executives’ performance and determines whether they should be granted an option to purchase additional shares. Aside from stock award grants in connection with annual performance reviews, we do not have a policy of granting additional awards to executives and, consequently, the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee has not adopted a policy with respect to granting awards in coordination with the release of material non-public information.

        

In determining the size of equity awards the Compensation Committee takes into account the executive’s current position with and responsibilities to us.

 

Only the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee may approve options or other equity-based compensation to our executives. However, the Board of Directors has authorized our Chief Executive Officer to approve option grants to non-executive employees. All such grants must be consistent with equity incentive guidelines approved by the Compensation Committee. The exercise price for such grants must be equal to the most recent closing price of a share of the Common Stock as reported by the OTCQB marketplace on the date of grant.

        

Going forward, we intend to continue to evaluate and consider equity grants to our executives on an annual basis. We expect to consider potential equity awards for executives at the same time as we annually review our employees’ performance and determine whether to award grants for all employees.

 

Accounting and Tax Considerations

 

 Our Compensation Committee has reviewed the impact of tax and accounting treatment on the various components of our executive compensation program. Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) generally disallows a tax deduction to publicly held companies for compensation paid to “covered” executive officers, to the extent that compensation paid to such an officer exceeds $1.0 million during the taxable year. We endeavor to award compensation that will be deductible for income tax purposes, though other factors will also be considered. Our Compensation Committee may authorize compensation payments that do not comply with the exemptions to Section 162(m) when we believe that such payments are appropriate to attract and retain executive talent.

 

Say-on-Pay

 

Our stockholders have not yet had the opportunity to provide feedback on our executive compensation through an advisory vote, as we have not held an annual meeting of stockholders since 2011, at which time we were not required to hold a “Say-on-Pay” vote as we followed the disclosure guidelines of a Smaller Reporting Company.

 

 

 

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

 

As of December 31, 2018, the members of our Compensation Committee were, and currently are, David Carey (Chairman), John Cronin and Neal Goldman. None of the current or past members of our Compensation Committee is or has been an officer or employee of our Company. None of our executive officers currently serves, or in the past year has served,as a member of the compensation committee (or other board committee performing equivalent functions or, in the absence of any such committee, the entire board of directors) or director of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our Compensation Committee or our Board of Directors.

 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

 

 The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis provisions to be included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the board of directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

 

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors:

David Carey (Chairman) John Cronin Neal Goldman

 

 

 

Summary Compensation Table

 

The following table sets forth certain information about the compensation paid or accrued during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 to our Chief Executive Officer and each of our two most highly compensated executive officers other than our Chief Executive Officer who were serving as executive officers at December 31, 2018, and whose annual compensation exceeded $100,000 during such year or would have exceeded $100,000 during such year if the executive officer were employed by the Company for the entire fiscal year (collectively the “Named Executive Officers”).

 

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary	Stock Awards	Option Awards (1)(2)	All Other Compensation	Total
S. James Miller, Jr.	2018	$387,787	$-	$199,408	$19,967(3)	$607,163
Chairman of the Board and	2017	$380,076	$-	$174,125	$19,913	$574,114
Chief Executive Officer
David Harding	2018	$275,000	$-	$161,481	$5,288(4)	$441,769
Vice President and	2017	$280,288	$-	$163,885	$4,788	$448,961
Chief Technical Officer
David Somerville	2018	$230,631	$-	$90,400	$67,089(5)	$388,120
Sr. Vice President Sales    and Marketing