iSign Solutions Inc. - Quarter Report: 2006 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
X
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
quarterly period ended: June
30, 2006
OR
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
transition period from
to
Commission
File Number: 000-19301
COMMUNICATION
INTELLIGENCE CORPORATION
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
94-2790442
|
|||
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
|||
incorporation
or organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
275
Shoreline Drive, Suite 500, Redwood Shores, CA 94065-1413
(Address
of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's
telephone number, including area code: (650)
802-7888
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days.
Yes
|
X
|
No
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer (Check one).
large
accelerated filer
|
accelerated
filer
|
X
|
non-accelerated
filer
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Section
12b-2 of the exchange Act)
Yes
|
No
|
X
|
Number
of
shares outstanding of the registrant’s Common Stock, as of August 11, 2006:
107,557,161.
INDEX
Page
No.
|
|
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item
1. Financial
Statements
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2006 (unaudited) and December
31, 2005
|
3
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six-Month
Periods
Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited)
|
4
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the
Three
and Six-Month Periods Ended June 30, 2006 (unaudited)
|
5
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six-Month Periods
Ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited)
|
6
|
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
7
|
Item
2. Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
|
20
|
Item
3. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
31
|
Item
4. Controls
and Procedures
|
32
|
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item
1. Legal
Proceedings
|
32
|
Item
1A. Risk
Factors
|
32
|
Item
2. Unregistered
Sale of Securities and Use of proceeds
|
32
|
Item
3. Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
32
|
Item
4. Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
32
|
Item
5. Other
Information
|
33
|
Item
6. Exhibits
|
|
(a)
Exhibits
|
33
|
Signatures
|
34
|
-2-
Communication
Intelligence Corporation
and
Subsidiary
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In
thousands)
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Unaudited
|
|||||||
Assets
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
1,698
|
$
|
2,849
|
|||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
428
|
483
|
|||||
Deferred
financing costs - current portion
|
91
|
121
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
152
|
168
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
2,369
|
3,621
|
|||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
188
|
147
|
|||||
Patents
and trademarks
|
4,096
|
4,285
|
|||||
Capitalized
software development costs
|
516
|
283
|
|||||
Deferred
financing costs - long term
|
30
|
100
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
30
|
30
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
7,229
|
$
|
8,466
|
|||
Liabilities
and Stockholders’ equity
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
361
|
$
|
288
|
|||
Accrued
compensation
|
243
|
235
|
|||||
Other
accrued liabilities
|
254
|
283
|
|||||
Deferred
revenue
|
591
|
557
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
1,449
|
1,363
|
|||||
Convertible
notes, net of unamortized fair value assigned to
the
beneficial conversion feature and warrants of $368 and $674
at
June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively
|
1,015
|
1,169
|
|||||
Minority
interest
|
73
|
78
|
|||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Stockholders’
equity:
|
|||||||
Preferred
Stock, $.01 par value, 10,000 shares authorized,
0
outstanding at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Common
stock $.01 par value; 125,000 shares authorized,
107,557
and 106,542 shares issued and outstanding at
June
30, 2006 and December 31, 2005
|
1,076
|
1,065
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
90,078
|
89,517
|
|||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(86,311
|
)
|
(84,575
|
)
|
|||
Accumulated
foreign currency translation adjustment
|
(151
|
)
|
(151
|
)
|
|||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
4,692
|
5,856
|
|||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$
|
7,229
|
$
|
8,466
|
The
accompanying notes form an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements
- 3 -
Communication
Intelligence Corporation
and
Subsidiary
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Unaudited
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Revenues
|
|||||||||||||
eSignature
|
$
|
310
|
$
|
1,012
|
$
|
804
|
$
|
1,343
|
|||||
Natural
input
|
138
|
197
|
345
|
445
|
|||||||||
Total
Revenues
|
$
|
448
|
$
|
1,209
|
$
|
1,149
|
$
|
1,788
|
|||||
Operating
costs and expenses:
|
|||||||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
|||||||||||||
eSignature
|
26
|
29
|
84
|
51
|
|||||||||
Natural
input
|
3
|
−
|
12
|
−
|
|||||||||
Research
and development
|
143
|
242
|
426
|
545
|
|||||||||
Sales
and marketing
|
433
|
328
|
779
|
637
|
|||||||||
General
and administrative
|
655
|
559
|
1,158
|
1,068
|
|||||||||
Total
operating costs and expenses
|
1,260
|
1,158
|
2,459
|
2,301
|
|||||||||
Income
(loss) from operations
|
(812
|
)
|
51
|
(1,310
|
)
|
(513
|
)
|
||||||
Other
(expense)
|
|||||||||||||
Interest
and other income (expense), net
|
14
|
(10
|
)
|
30
|
(9
|
)
|
|||||||
Interest
expense
|
(26
|
)
|
(68
|
)
|
(56
|
)
|
(140
|
)
|
|||||
Amortization
of loan discount and deferred financing cost (Note 8)
|
(104
|
)
|
(813
|
)
|
(405
|
)
|
(1,273
|
)
|
|||||
Minority
interest
|
3
|
6
|
5
|
13
|
|||||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(925
|
)
|
$
|
(834
|
)
|
$
|
(1,736
|
)
|
$
|
(1,922
|
)
|
|
Basic
and diluted loss per common share
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
Weighted
average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted
|
107,552
|
102,382
|
107,199
|
102,034
|
The
accompanying notes form an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements
- 4 -
Communication
Intelligence Corporation
and
Subsidiary
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
Unaudited
(In
thousands, except share amounts)
Shares
Outstanding
|
Common
Stock
|
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||
Balances
as of December 31, 2005
|
106,542
|
$
|
1,065
|
$
|
89,517
|
$
|
(84,575
|
)
|
$
|
(151
|
)
|
$
|
5,856
|
||||||
Shares
issued on conversion of notes
|
931
|
10
|
421
|
431
|
|||||||||||||||
Stock
based employee compensation
|
56
|
56
|
|||||||||||||||||
Stock
based service expense
|
6
|
6
|
|||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
loss:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
(811
|
)
|
(811
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive loss
|
(810
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balances
as of March 31, 2006
|
107,473
|
$
|
1,075
|
$
|
90,000
|
$
|
(85,386
|
)
|
$
|
(150
|
)
|
$
|
5,539
|
||||||
Shares
issued on conversion of notes
|
64
|
1
|
29
|
30
|
|||||||||||||||
Shares
issued for services
|
19
|
−
|
|||||||||||||||||
Stock
based employee compensation
|
49
|
49
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
(925
|
)
|
(925
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
(1
|
)
|
(1
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive loss
|
(926
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balances
as of June 30, 2006
|
107,556
|
$
|
1,076
|
$
|
90,078
|
$
|
(86,311
|
)
|
$
|
(151
|
)
|
$
|
4,692
|
The
accompanying notes form an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements
-
5-
Communication
Intelligence Corporation
and
Subsidiary
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Unaudited
(In
thousands)
Six
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(1,736
|
)
|
$
|
(1,922
|
)
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash
used
for operating activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
278
|
531
|
|||||
Amortization
of discount on convertible notes
|
306
|
952
|
|||||
Deferred
financing costs
|
100
|
||||||
Stock
based employee compensation
|
105
|
-
|
|||||
Stock
issued for services
|
6
|
-
|
|||||
Provision
for doubtful accounts
|
-
|
11
|
|||||
Loss
on disposal of fixed assets
|
-
|
38
|
|||||
Minority
interest
|
(5
|
)
|
(13
|
)
|
|||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
55
|
(64
|
)
|
||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
16
|
(29
|
)
|
||||
Accounts
payable
|
73
|
26
|
|||||
Accrued
compensation
|
8
|
(1
|
)
|
||||
Other
accrued liabilities
|
(24
|
)
|
(55
|
)
|
|||
Deferred
revenue
|
34
|
52
|
|||||
Net
cash used for operating activities
|
(784
|
)
|
(474
|
)
|
|||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
Acquisition
of property and equipment
|
(85
|
)
|
(35
|
)
|
|||
Capitalized
software development costs
|
(277
|
)
|
(193
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash used for investing activities
|
(362
|
)
|
(228
|
)
|
|||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|||||||
Payments
on short-term debt
|
-
|
(6
|
)
|
||||
Payments
on long-term debt
|
-
|
(3
|
)
|
||||
Principal
payments on capital lease obligations
|
(5
|
)
|
(5
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash used for financing activities
|
(5
|
)
|
(54
|
)
|
|||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Net
decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
(1,151
|
)
|
(756
|
)
|
|||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
2,849
|
4,736
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
1,698
|
$
|
3,980
|
Supplemental
Disclosure of Non Cash Financing Activities
Convertible
Notes converted to common stock
|
$
|
460
|
$
|
1,135
|
|||
Supplementary
disclosure of cash flow information
|
|||||||
Interest
paid
|
$
|
26
|
$
|
143
|
The
accompanying notes form an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements
-
6 -
Communication
Intelligence Corporation
And
Subsidiary
Notes
to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Form
10-Q
Item1. Interim
financial statements and basis of presentation
1. Nature
of business
The
financial information contained herein should be read in conjunction with the
Company's consolidated audited financial statements and notes thereto included
in its Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31,
2005.
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of
Communication Intelligence Corporation and its subsidiary (the “Company” or
“CIC”) have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all of
the
information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for complete consolidated financial
statements. In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements included in this quarterly report reflect all adjustments
(consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that the Company considers
necessary for a fair presentation of its financial position at the dates
presented and the Company’s results of operations and cash flows for the periods
presented. The Company’s interim results are not necessarily indicative of the
results to be expected for the entire year.
The
Company develops and markets electronic signature software, biometric
verification software for handwritten signatures and handwritten data entry
software solutions aimed at emerging, large potential markets such as
e-commerce, workflow automation, corporate security, smart handheld devices
such
as handheld computers & smartphones and the Palm OS
aftermarket.
The
Company’s core software technologies include electronic signature, biometric
signature verification, cryptography, electronic ink recording tools
(SignatureOne™, InkTools®, Sign-it®, iSign® and Sign-On®), operating systems
extensions that enable pen input (PenX™) and multilingual handwriting
recognition systems (Jot®) and the Handwriter® Recognition System.
The
Company offers a wide range of multi-platform software products that enable
or
enhance pen-based computing. The Company's core technologies are classified
into
two broad categories: "transaction and communication enabling technologies"
and
"natural input technologies".
Transaction
and communication enabling technologies have been fundamental to the Company’s
development of software for electronic signatures, handwritten biometric
signature verification, data security, data compression, and electronic ink
capture. These technologies are designed to provide a cost-effective means
for
securing electronic transactions, providing network and device access control,
and enabling workflow automation of traditional paper form processing. CIC
believes that these technologies offer more efficient methods for conducting
electronic transactions while providing greater user authentication
functionality, heightened data security, and increased user
productivity.
Natural
input technologies are designed to allow users to interact with handheld
devices, including PDA’s and smartphones, by using an electronic pen or "stylus"
as the primary input device or in conjunction with a keyboard. CIC's natural
input offerings include multilingual handwriting recognition systems, software
keyboards, and predictive text entry technologies.
Going
Concern
The
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared
assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has
suffered recurring losses from operations that raise a substantial doubt about
its ability to continue as a going concern. At June 30, 2006, the Company’s
accumulated deficit was approximately $86,300 and the Company had working
capital of $920. The Company.
- 7 -
Communication
Intelligence Corporation
And
Subsidiary
Notes
to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Form
10-Q
Item1. Interim
financial statements and basis of presentation (continued)
1. Nature
of business (continued)
filed
a
registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission that was
declared effective January 2005, pursuant to a financing of convertible notes
(See Note 6 of the condensed consolidated financial statements). There can
be no
assurance that the Company will have adequate capital resources to fund planned
operations or that additional funds will be available to the Company when
needed, or if available, will be available on favorable terms or in amounts
required by the Company. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate capital
resources to fund operations, it may be required to delay, scale back or
eliminate some or all of its operations, which may have a material adverse
effect on the Company's business, results of operations and ability to operate
as a going concern. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements
do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty.
Recent
Pronouncements
In
December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
Statement of Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment”,
which replaces SFAS No. 123. SFAS No. 123(R) requires public companies
to recognize an expense for share-based payment arrangements, including stock
options and grants and employee stock purchase plans. The statement eliminates
a
company’s ability to account for share-based compensation transactions using APB
25, and generally requires, instead that such transactions be accounted for
using a fair-value based method. SFAS No. 123(R) requires a company to
measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of
equity instruments based on the fair value of the award on the date of grant,
and to recognize the cost over the period during which the employee is required
to provide service in exchange for the award. SFAS No. 123(R) became
effective for the Company in the quarter ending March 31, 2006. The impact
of SFAS No. 123(R) was approximately $49 and $104, respectively, for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2006 and it is likely that the adoption of SFAS
No. 123(R) will continue to have a material impact on the Company’s
financial position and results of operations in the future.
In
March
2005, the SEC released Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (“SAB 107”),
“Share-Based Payment,” which provides interpretive guidance related to the
interaction between SFAS No. 123(R) and certain SEC rules and regulations.
It also provides the SEC staff’s views regarding valuation of share-based
payment arrangements.
On
August
31, 2005, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FSP FAS 123R-1, "Classification
and Measurement of Freestanding Financial Instruments Originally Issued in
Exchange for Employee Services under FASB Statement No. 123R."
In
this
FSP, the FASB decided to defer the requirements in FASB Statement No. 123
(Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, that make a freestanding financial
instrument subject to the recognition and measurement requirements of other
GAAP
when the rights conveyed by the instrument are no longer dependent on the holder
being an employee. The guidance in this FSP should be applied upon initial
adoption of Statement 123R. The FSP includes transition guidance for those
entities that have already adopted Statement 123R in their financial
statements.
In
February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 155 “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial
Instruments, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140”. This Statement
amends FASB Statements No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, and No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of
Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities.” This Statement resolves
issues addressed in Statement 133 Implementation Issue No. D1, Application
of
Statement 133 to Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial
Assets.
- 8 -
Communication
Intelligence Corporation
And
Subsidiary
Notes
to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Form
10-Q
Item1. Interim
financial statements and basis of presentation (continued)
1. Nature
of business (continued)
SFAS
155:
a.
Permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that
contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation
b.
Clarifies which interest-only strips and principal-only strips are not subject
to the requirements of Statement 133
c.
Establishes a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets
to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid
financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation
d.
Clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are
not embedded derivatives.
e.
Amends
Statement 140 to eliminate the prohibition on a qualifying special-purpose
entity from holding a derivative financial instrument that pertains to a
beneficial interest other than another derivative financial
instrument.
SFAS
155
is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after the
beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006.
The fair value election provided for in paragraph 4(c) of SFAS 155 may also
be
applied upon adoption of SFAS 155 for hybrid financial instruments that had
been
bifurcated under paragraph 12 of FASB Statement 133 prior to the adoption of
SFAS 155. Earlier adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an entity’s
fiscal year, provided the entity has not yet issued financial statements,
including financial statements for any interim period for that fiscal year.
Provisions of this Statement may be applied to instruments that an entity holds
at the date of adoption on an instrument-by-instrument basis. The Company is
in
the process of evaluating the impact of SFAS 155.
In
June
2006, FASB ratified the consensuses reached in the EITF 06-3: How Sales Taxes
Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be
Presented in the Income Statement (That Is, Gross Versus Net Presentation).
For
taxes within the scope of this issue, the consensus will indicate that gross
vs.
net income statement classification of that tax is an accounting policy
decision. The consensus itself will not require an entity to change its current
policy related to the classification of these taxes. However, voluntarily
changing from gross to net presentation or vice versa would be considered a
change in accounting policy, which would require the application of FASB
Statement No. 154, Accounting
Changes and Error Corrections.
As a
result, any such change would need to be considered preferable. The EITF will
emphasize that the consensus on this issue should not be used as a basis for
concluding that a particular presentation (e.g., gross presentation) is
preferable. In addition, for taxes within the scope of this issue that are
significant in amount, the consensus will require the following disclosures:
(a)
the
accounting policy elected for these taxes and (b)
the
amounts of the taxes reflected gross (as revenue) in the income statement on
an
interim and annual basis for all periods presented. The latter disclosure may
be
provided on an aggregate basis. This consensus will be effective in interim
and
annual periods beginning after December 15, 2006, with earlier application
permitted. The Company does not believe that EITF 06-3 will have an impact
on
its financial statement presentation.
In
July
2006, the FASB issued FIN 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,
an interpretation of FASB Statement 109"("FIN 48") which clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in accordance with SFAS
No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes." FIN 48 is a comprehensive model for
how
a company should recognize, measure, present, and disclose in its financial
statements uncertain tax positions that the company has taken or expects to
take
on a tax return. If an income tax position exceeds a more likely than not
(greater than 50%) probability of success upon tax audit, the company will
recognize an income tax benefit in its financial statements. Additionally,
companies are required to accrue interest and related
- 9 -
Communication
Intelligence Corporation
And
Subsidiary
Notes
to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Form
10-Q
Item1. Interim
financial statements and basis of presentation (continued)
1. Nature
of business (continued)
penalties,
if applicable, on all tax exposures consistent with jurisdictional tax laws.
The
effective date of this interpretation will be fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2006 and the Company is currently in the process of evaluating
the
impact of this interpretation on its consolidated financial statements.
2. Cash
and cash equivalents
The
Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of
up
to 90 days to be cash equivalents.
Cash
and
cash equivalents consist of the following:
June
30,
2006
|
December
31,
2005
|
||||||
Unaudited
|
|||||||
Cash
in bank
|
$
|
116
|
$
|
213
|
|||
Money
market
|
1,582
|
2,636
|
|||||
$
|
1,698
|
$
|
2,849
|
3. Accounts
receivable concentration
For
the
six months ended June 30, 2006, two customers accounted for 65% of net accounts
receivable. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, one customer accounted
for
38% of net accounts receivable.
4. Patents
The
Company performs intangible asset impairment analyses on a quarterly basis
in
accordance with the guidance in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No.
142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” ("SFAS 142") and Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long Lived Assets” ("SFAS 144"). The Company follows SFAS 144 in
response to changes in industry and market conditions that affect its patents.
The Company then determines if an impairment of its assets has occurred. The
Company reassesses the lives of its patents and tests for impairment quarterly
in order to determine whether the book value of each patent exceeds the fair
value of each patent. Fair value is determined by estimating future cash flows
from the products that are and will be protected by the patents and considering
the additional factors listed in Critical Accounting Policies.
Management
recognizes that revenues have fluctuated based on comparable prior periods,
and
may continue to fluctuate based upon historical experience of the time involved
to close large sales transactions. Management has obtained an independent
valuation of its patents as of December 31, 2005, to support its assertion
that
no impairment of the carrying value of the patents existed. The Company believes
that its quarterly impairment analysis and the December 31, 2005 independent
valuation continue to be valid, and no impairment in the carrying values of
the
patents exists at June 30, 2006.
Amortization
of patent costs was $94 and $189 for each of the three and six month periods
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.
- 10 -
Communication
Intelligence Corporation
And
Subsidiary
Notes
to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Form
10-Q
5. Deferred
revenue
Deferred
revenue is recorded for post-contract support and is recognized as revenue
when
costs are incurred or over the support period, generally twelve months,
whichever is longer.
6. Convertible
Notes
In
November 2004, the Company entered into a unsecured Note and Warrant Purchase
Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) and a Registration Rights Agreement (the
“Registration Rights Agreement, each dated as of October 28, 2004). The Purchase
Agreement does not require the Company to deliver registered shares upon
exercise of the warrants. However the Company was required to file a
registration statement providing for the resale of the shares that are issuable
upon the conversion of the notes and the exercise of the warrants. The
registration statement was filed on December 22, 2004 and was declared effective
on January 26, 2005.
The
conversion right contained in the Purchase Agreement was analyzed under
paragraphs 6 and 12 of SFAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities” to determine its proper classification in the Company’s
balance sheet. The Company also reviewed the liquidated damages clauses
contained in the Registration Rights Agreement that could potentially be payable
if the registration statement was not declared effective within 120 days of
the
closing, with reference to SFAS 5. The Company determined that it was highly
unlikely and not probable, that the Company would incur liquidated damages.
However, in light of EITF Issue 05-04 “The Effect of a Liquidated Damages Clause
on a Freestanding Financial Instrument Subject to EITF 00-19, “Accounting for
Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a
Company’s Own Stock”, the Company effectively has accounted for the Registration
Rights Agreement and the financial instrument under View C contained in EITF
05-04. The Company would not have recorded a liability at the inception of
the
debt, or at subsequent reporting dates, or until the Registration Rights
Agreement was declared effective or thereafter, as our assessment of the
likelihood that the probability of actually paying the liquidated damages was
zero. Therefore, the Purchase Agreement was recorded as a debt and equity
transaction with no recorded asset or liability associated with the conversion
feature or liquidated damage clause included in the Registration Rights
Agreement.
The
financing discussed above, a combination of debt and equity, closed November
2,
2004. The proceeds to the Company were approximately $3,885, net of $310 in
commissions and legal expenses. H.C. Wainwright & Co., Inc. (“Wainwright”)
acted as placement agent. As placement agent for the Company, at closing
Wainwright received $731 in commissions, legal fees and warrants. The
commissions of approximately $285 and legal fees of $25, mentioned above, were
paid in cash. The Company issued warrants to Wainwright to acquire 1,218 shares
of the Company’s common stock. Of the warrants issued, 870 are exercisable at
$0.462 and 348 are exercisable at $0.508. The Company has ascribed the value
of
$421 to the Wainwright warrants, which is recorded as deferred financing costs
in the balance sheet at December 31, 2004. The fair value ascribed to the
Wainwright warrants was estimated on the commitment date using the Black-Scholes
pricing model with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 3.21%;
expected life of 3 years; expected volatility of 100%; and expected dividend
yield of 0%. The Company has used and expects to continue to use the proceeds
of
the financing for additional working capital.
Under
the
terms of the financing, the Company issued to certain accredited investors
convertible promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $4,195 and
warrants to acquire 3,632 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise
price of $0.508 per share. The notes accrue interest at the rate of 7% per
annum, payable semi-annually, and are convertible into shares of the Company’s
common stock at the rate of $0.462 per share. The Company has ascribed a value
of $982 to the investor warrants, which is recorded as a discount to notes
payable in the balance sheet. The fair value ascribed to the warrants was
estimated on the commitment date using the Black-Scholes pricing model with
the
following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 3.21%; expected life of 3
years; expected volatility of 100%; and expected dividend yield of 0%. In
- 11 -
Communication
Intelligence Corporation
And
Subsidiary
Notes
to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Form
10-Q
addition
to the fair value ascribed to the warrants, the Company has ascribed $1,569
to
the beneficial conversion feature in the convertible notes, which is recorded
as
a discount to notes payable in the balance sheet. The values ascribed to the
warrants and beneficial conversion feature follow the guidance of the EITF
Issue
No. 98-5, “Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion
Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Ratios”, and ETIF Issue No.
00-27, “Application of Issue No. 98-5 to Certain Convertible Instruments” of the
FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force. The fair value of the warrants and beneficial
conversion feature is amortized to expense over the life of the convertible
notes or upon earlier conversion using the effective interest method. During
the
three and six month periods ended June 30, 2006, the Company had amortized
to
interest expense approximately $104 and $405 of the loan discount and deferred
financing costs. The balance due under the convertible notes is shown net of
the
remaining $368 unamortized discount on the accompanying consolidated balance
sheet. During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2006, the investors
converted $30 and $460 of the notes in exchange for 65 and 996 shares of the
Company’s common stock. If the remaining aggregate principal amount owing under
the notes is converted, the Company will issue 2,993 shares of its common stock.
If the notes are not converted, all remaining principal and accrued but unpaid
interest will be due October 28, 2007. The Company may pay accrued interest
in
cash or in shares of Company common stock, issued at the market price for the
common stock calculated prior to the interest payment. The Company has not
paid
and does not intend to pay accrued interest with shares of its common
stock.
The
warrants described above expire on October 28, 2009. The Company may call the
warrants if the Company’s common stock trades at $1.00 or above for 20
consecutive trading days after the date that is 20 days following the
effectiveness of a registration statement providing for the resale of the shares
issued upon the conversion of the notes and exercise of the warrants. Wainwright
will be paid approximately $28 in the aggregate if all of the investor warrants
are exercised. The Company will receive additional proceeds of approximately
$1,845 if all of the investor warrants are exercised.
Interest
expense related to convertible debt for the three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2006 was $129 and $461, including $104 and $405 related to amortization
of debt discount and deferred financing costs, respectively. For the three
and
six month periods ended June 30, 2005, interest expense related to convertible
debt was $878 and $1,410, including $813 and $1,272 related to amortization
of
debt discount and deferred financing costs, respectively.
7. Net
(loss) per share
The
Company calculates net loss per share under the provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, “Earnings Per Share” (“SFAS 128”). SFAS
128 requires the disclosure of both basic net loss per share, which is based
on
the weighted average number of shares outstanding, and when applicable, diluted
income per share, which is based on the weighted average number of shares and
dilutive potential shares outstanding. For the three month period ended June
30,
2006, 6,401 shares of common stock subject to outstanding options, 2,993 shares
issuable upon the conversion of the convertible notes and 4,850 warrants were
excluded from the calculation of dilutive earnings per share because the
exercise or conversion of such options and warrants would be anti-dilutive.
For
the three month period ended June 30, 2005, 5,778 shares of common stock subject
to outstanding options, 6,624 shares issuable upon the conversion of the
convertible notes and 4,850 warrants were excluded from the calculation of
dilutive earnings per share because the exercise or conversion of such options
and warrants would be anti-dilutive.
- 12 -
Communication
Intelligence Corporation
And
Subsidiary
Notes
to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Form
10-Q
7. Net
(loss) per share (continued)
Three
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||
June
30, 2006
|
June
30, 2005
|
||||||||||||||||||
Net
Loss
|
Weighted
Average
Shares
Outstanding
|
Per-Share
Amount
|
Net
Loss
|
Weighted
Average
Shares
Outstanding
|
Per-Share
Amount
|
||||||||||||||
Basic
(loss) per share:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Loss
available to stockholders
|
$
|
(925
|
)
|
107,552
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
$
|
(834
|
)
|
102,382
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|||||
Effect
of dilutive securities
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Stock
options
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
Diluted
(loss)
|
$
|
(925
|
)
|
107,552
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
$
|
(834
|
)
|
102,382
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
For
the
six-month period ended June 30, 2006, 6,401 shares of common stock subject
to
outstanding options, 2,993 shares issuable upon the conversion of the
convertible notes and 4,850 warrants were excluded from the calculation of
dilutive earnings per share because the exercise or conversion of such options
and warrants would be anti-dilutive. For the six-month period ended June 30,
2005, 5,778 shares of common stock subject to outstanding options, 6,624 shares
issuable upon the conversion of the convertible notes and 4,850 warrants were
excluded from the calculation of dilutive earnings per share because the
exercise or conversion of such options and warrants would be
anti-dilutive.
Six
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||
June
30, 2006
|
June
30, 2005
|
||||||||||||||||||
Net
Loss
|
Weighted
Average
Shares
Outstanding
|
Per-Share
Amount
|
Net
Loss
|
Weighted
Average
Shares
Outstanding
|
Per-Share
Amount
|
||||||||||||||
Basic
(loss) per share:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Loss
available to stockholders
|
$
|
(1,736
|
)
|
107,199
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
$
|
(1,922
|
)
|
102,034
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|||||
Effect
of dilutive securities
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Stock
options
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||
Diluted
(loss)
|
$
|
(1,736
|
)
|
107,199
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
$
|
(1,922
|
)
|
102,034
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
8. Common
Stock Options
The
Company has two stock-based employee compensation plans and also
grants options to employees, directors and consultants outside of the 1999
Plan
and 1994 Plan pursuant to individual plans. These plans are more fully described
in Note 7 of the Company’s Form 10K/A.
On
January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based
Payment,
(“SFAS
123(R)”) which establishes standards for the accounting of transactions in which
an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services, primarily
focusing on accounting for transactions where an entity obtains employee
services in share-based payment transactions. SFAS No. 123(R) requires a
public entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange
for
an
- 13 -
Communication
Intelligence Corporation
And
Subsidiary
Notes
to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Form
10-Q
8. Common
Stock Options (continued)
award
of
equity instruments, including stock options, based on the grant-date fair value
of the award and to recognize it as compensation expense over the period the
employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award, usually
the
vesting period. SFAS 123(R) supersedes the Company’s previous accounting under
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees
(APB 25)
for periods beginning in fiscal 2006. In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange
Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB 107) relating to SFAS
123(R). The Company has applied the provisions of SAB 107 in its adoption of
SFAS 123(R).
The
Company adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective transition method,
which requires the application of the accounting standard as of January 1,
2006, the first day of the Company’s fiscal year 2006. The Company’s
Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the three and six-month periods
ended June 30, 2006 reflect the impact of SFAS 123(R). In accordance with the
modified prospective transition method, the Company’s Consolidated Financial
Statements for prior periods have not been restated to reflect, and do not
include, the impact of SFAS 123(R).
SFAS
123(R) requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-based payment
awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The value of the
portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as
expense over the requisite service periods in the Company’s Consolidated
Statement of Operations. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company
accounted for stock-based awards to employees and directors using the intrinsic
value method in accordance with APB 25 as allowed under Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation
(SFAS
123). Under the intrinsic value method, no stock-based compensation expense
had
been recognized in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations, other
than as related to option grants to employees and consultants below the fair
market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant.
Stock-based
compensation expense recognized during the period is based on the value of
the
portion of share-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest during
the period. Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Company’s
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the first two quarters of fiscal 2006
included compensation expense for share-based payment awards granted prior
to,
but not yet vested as of December 31, 2005, based on the grant date fair value
estimated in accordance with the pro forma provisions of SFAS 123 and
compensation expense for the share-based payment awards granted subsequent
to
December 31, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance
with the provisions of SFAS 123(R). As stock-based compensation expense
recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the first two
quarters of fiscal 2006 is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it
has
been reduced for estimated forfeitures. SFAS 123(R) requires forfeitures to
be
estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods
if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The estimated average
forfeiture rates for the six months ended June 30, 2006, of approximately 20.3%
for grants is based on historical forfeiture experience. In the Company’s pro
forma information required under SFAS 123 for the periods prior to fiscal 2006,
the Company accounted for forfeitures as they occurred.
SFAS
123(R) requires the cash flows resulting from the tax benefits resulting from
tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those options
to be classified as financing cash flows. Due to the Company’s loss position,
there were no such tax benefits during the three and six months ended June
30,
2006. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R) those benefits would have been
reported as operating cash flows had the Company received any tax benefits
related to stock option exercises.
The
fair
value of stock-based awards to employees and directors is calculated using
the
Black-Scholes option pricing model, even though this model was developed to
estimate the fair value of freely tradable, fully transferable options without
vesting restrictions, which differ significantly from the Company’s stock
options.
- 14 -
Communication
Intelligence Corporation
And
Subsidiary
Notes
to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Form
10-Q
8. Common
Stock Options (continued)
The
Black-Scholes model also requires subjective assumptions, including future
stock
price volatility and expected time to exercise, which greatly affect the
calculated values. The expected term of options granted is derived from
historical data on employee exercises and post-vesting employment termination
behavior. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S Treasury rates in effect during
the corresponding period of grant. The expected volatility is based on the
historical volatility of the Company’s stock price. These factors could change
in the future, affecting the determination of stock-based compensation expense
in future periods.
Valuation
and Expense Information under SFAS 123(R)
The
weighted-average fair value of stock-based compensation is based on the single
option valuation approach. Forfeitures are estimated and it is assumed no
dividends will be declared. The estimated fair value of stock-based compensation
awards to employees is amortized using the accrual method over the vesting
period of the options. The fair value calculations are based on the following
assumptions:
Three
and Six Months Ended
June
30, 2006
|
||
Risk
free interest rate
|
3.65%
- 5.11%
|
|
Expected
life (years)
|
3.66
-7.00
|
|
Expected
volatility
|
82.1%
|
|
Expected
dividends
|
None
|
The
following table summarizes the allocation of stock-based compensation expense
related to stock option grants under SFAS 123(R) for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2006. There were no stock options exercises during the three
and
six months Ended June 30, 2006, except for 19 shares exercised by a consultant
that were issued for services.
Three
Months Ended
June
30, 2006
|
Six
Months Ended
June
30, 2006
|
||||||
Research
and development
|
$
|
9
|
$
|
34
|
|||
Sales
and marketing
|
12
|
38
|
|||||
General
and administrative
|
7
|
11
|
|||||
Director
options
|
21
|
21
|
|||||
Stock-based
compensation expense included in operating expenses
|
$
|
49
|
$
|
104
|
As
a
result of adopting SFAS 123(R) on January 1, 2006, the Company’s net loss
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was higher by $48 and $104
than
it would have been had the Company continued to account for share-based
compensation under APB Opinion No. 25. The change in the Company’s net
loss per common share, basic and diluted, for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2006, as a result of adopting SFAS 123(R) on January 1, 2006 was
not material when compared to the result had it continued to account for
share-based compensation under APB Opinion No. 25.
- 15 -
Communication
Intelligence Corporation
And
Subsidiary
Notes
to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Form
10-Q
8. Common
Stock Options (continued)
A
summary
of option activity under the Company’s plans as of June 30, 2006 is as
follows:
Options
|
Shares
(000)
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
Weighted
average Remaining Contractual Term
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
|
|||||||||
Outstanding
at January 01, 2006
|
8,591
|
$
|
0.75
|
||||||||||
Granted
|
844
|
$
|
0.58
|
||||||||||
Exercised
|
(19
|
)
|
$
|
0.42
|
|||||||||
Forfeited
or expired
|
(3,015
|
)
|
$
|
0.77
|
|||||||||
Outstanding
at June 30, 2006
|
6,401
|
$
|
0.73
|
5.59
|
$
|
−
|
|||||||
Vested
and expected to vest at June 30, 2006
|
5,537
|
$
|
0.77
|
5.44
|
$
|
−
|
|||||||
Exercisable
at June 30, 2006
|
5,537
|
$
|
0.77
|
5.44
|
$
|
−
|
The
following table summarizes significant ranges of outstanding and exercisable
options as of June 30, 2006:
Options
Outstanding
|
Options
Exercisable
|
|||||||||||||||
Range
of Exercise Prices
|
Number
Outstanding
|
Weighted
Average Remaining Contractual Life(in years)
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
Number
Outstanding
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
|||||||||||
$
0.00 - $0.50
|
2,111
|
6.0
|
$
|
0.40
|
1,397
|
$
|
0.39
|
|||||||||
0.51
- 1.00
|
3,636
|
5.7
|
$
|
0.73
|
3,486
|
$
|
0.74
|
|||||||||
1.01
- 2.00
|
562
|
4.1
|
$
|
1.51
|
562
|
$
|
1.51
|
|||||||||
2.01
- 3.00
|
50
|
1.3
|
$
|
3.00
|
50
|
$
|
3.00
|
|||||||||
3.01
- 7.50
|
42
|
2.0
|
$
|
3.42
|
42
|
$
|
3.42
|
|||||||||
6,401
|
5.6
|
$
|
0.73
|
5,537
|
$
|
0.77
|
The
per
share weighted average fair value of options granted during the six months
ended
June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005 was $0.30 and $0.41,
respectively.
- 16 -
Communication
Intelligence Corporation
And
Subsidiary
Notes
to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Form
10-Q
8. Common
Stock Options (continued)
A
summary
of the status of the Company’s nonvested shares as of June 30, 2006 is as
follows:
Nonvested
Shares
|
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair
Value
|
|||||
Nonvested
at January 1, 2006
|
402
|
$
|
0.36
|
||||
Granted
|
844
|
$
|
0.30
|
||||
Vested
|
(382
|
)
|
$
|
0.38
|
|||
Nonvested
at June 30, 2006
|
864
|
$
|
0.33
|
As
of
June 30, 2006, there was $183 of total unrecognized compensation cost related
to
nonvested share-based compensation arrangements. The unrecognized compensation
cost is expected to be realized over a weighted average period of 3
years.
Pro
Forma Information Under SFAS 123 for Periods Prior to Fiscal 2006
Prior
to
fiscal 2006, the weighted-average fair value of stock-based compensation to
employees was based on the single option valuation approach. Forfeitures were
recognized as they occurred and it was assumed no dividends would be declared.
The estimated fair value of stock-based compensation awards to employees was
amortized using the straight-line method over the vesting period of the options.
The weighted-average fair value calculations were based on the following
assumptions for the Company’s stock option plans:
Six
Months Ended
June
30, 2005
|
||
Risk
free interest rate
|
3.91%
|
|
Expected
life (years)
|
6.4
|
|
Expected
volatility
|
90%
|
Three
Months
|
Six
months
|
||||||
Ended
June 30,
|
Ended
June 30,
|
||||||
2005
|
2005
|
||||||
Net
loss available to stockholders:
|
|||||||
As
reported
|
$
|
(834
|
)
|
$
|
(1,922
|
)
|
|
Add:
Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported results
of
operations, net of related tax effect
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Deduct:
Total stock based employee compensation expense determined under
fair
value based method, net of tax
|
(116
|
)
|
(168
|
)
|
|||
Pro
forma
|
$
|
(950
|
)
|
$
|
(2,090
|
)
|
|
Basic
and diluted loss per share available to stockholders:
|
|||||||
As
reported
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
Pro
forma
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
- 17 -
Communication
Intelligence Corporation
And
Subsidiary
Notes
to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Form
10-Q
9. Comprehensive
(loss)
Total
comprehensive income (loss) was as follows:
Three
Months Ended
June
30,
|
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Net
(loss)
|
$
|
(925
|
)
|
$
|
(834
|
)
|
$
|
(1,736
|
)
|
$
|
(1,922
|
)
|
|
Other
comprehensive income (loss):
|
|||||||||||||
Cumulative
translation adjustment
|
(1
|
)
|
7
|
−
|
9
|
||||||||
Total
comprehensive (loss)
|
$
|
(926
|
)
|
$
|
(827
|
)
|
$
|
(1,736
|
)
|
$
|
(1,913
|
)
|
10. Segment
Information
The
Company identifies reportable revenue in one segment, handwriting recognition.
Handwriting recognition software is an aggregate of two revenue categories;
eSignature and natural input. All handwriting recognition software is developed
around the Company’s core technology. All sales represent sales to external
customers.
Prior
to
January 1, 2006, the Company reported revenue and results in two segments,
Handwriting Recognition, described above, and System Integration. System
integration represented the sale and installation, by the Joint Venture in
China, of third party computer equipment and systems that utilize the Company’s
products. The system integration business had become highly competitive with
a
low barrier to entry. It was increasingly comprised of small Chinese owned
businesses with virtually no differentiation in service offerings and primarily
competing on price and relationships. The Company decided in late 2003 not
to
continue in or expand this low margin, labor intensive business, which would
require significant increases in base costs to provide the required turn-key
capabilities. Our focus in China is on the emerging high potential
workflow/office automation market leveraging our eSignature technology and
strategic channel partners.
The
accounting policies followed by the segment are the same as those described
in
the “Critical Accounting Policies.” Segment data includes revenues and allocated
costs charged to the operating segment.
The
tables below present information about reporting segments for the periods
indicated:
Three
Months Ended
June
30,
|
Six
Months Ended
June
30,
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Handwriting
Recognition
|
Handwriting
Recognition
|
Handwriting
Recognition
|
Handwriting
Recognition
|
||||||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
448
|
$
|
1,209
|
$
|
1,149
|
$
|
1,788
|
|||||
Income
(loss) from Operations
|
$
|
(812
|
)
|
$
|
51
|
$
|
(1,310
|
)
|
$
|
(513
|
)
|
For
the
three months ended June 30, 2006 three customers accounted for 54% total
handwriting recognition segment revenues. For the three months ended June 30,
2005, one customer accounted for 40% of total handwriting recognition segment
revenue. For the six months ended June 30, 2006 two customers accounted for
38%
of total handwriting recognition segment revenue. For the six months ended
June
30, 2005, one customer accounted for 27% of total handwriting recognition
segment revenue.
-
18-
Communication
Intelligence Corporation
And
Subsidiary
Notes
to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Form
10-Q
11. Subsequent
event
In
August
2006, the Company established a credit facility pursuant to a note and warrant
purchase agreement with an investor. The terms of the agreement allow the
Company to borrow, on demand and during a period not to exceed eighteen months,
an aggregate principal amount of up to six hundred thousand dollars ($600,000).
Upon each draw, the Company will be required to issue warrants to purchase
a pro
rata number of shares of its common stock, with a maximum number of 3,111,000
to
be issued if the entire $600,000 is drawn. The notes will bear interest at
the
rate of fifteen percent (15%) per annum payable quarterly in cash. The warrants
will have a three year life and an exercise price of $0.51. In the event the
credit facility is not drawn upon, the Company shall issue to the investor,
as a
standby commitment fee, 335,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The
Warrants will include piggyback registration rights, for the underlying shares,
to participate in any future registrations of the Company’s common stock.
-
19 -
Communication
Intelligence Corporation
And
Subsidiary
Notes
to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Form
10-Q
Forward
Looking Statements
Certain
statements contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including without
limitation, statements containing the words “believes”, “anticipates”, “hopes”,
“intends”, “expects”, and other words of similar import, constitute “forward
looking” statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. Such statements involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual events to differ
materially from expectations. Such factors include those set fourth in the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005 and
delineated as follows:
· |
Technological,
engineering, manufacturing, quality control or other circumstances
that
could delay the sale or shipment of products;
|
· |
Economic,
business, market and competitive conditions in the software industry
and
technological innovations that could affect the Company’s
business;
|
· |
The
Company’s inability to protect its trade secrets or other proprietary
rights, operate without infringing upon the proprietary rights of
others
and prevent others from infringing on the proprietary rights of the
Company; and
|
· |
General
economic and business conditions and the availability of sufficient
financing.
|
Except
as
otherwise required by applicable laws, the Company undertakes no obligation
to
publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
Item
2. Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
The
following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the
Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto included in Part 1, Item 1 of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q and
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations” set forth in the Company’s Annual report on Form 10-K/A for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.
Overview
The
Company was incorporated in Delaware in October 1986. Except for 2004, in each
year since its inception, the Company incurred losses. For the five-year period
ended December 31, 2005, operating losses aggregated approximately $8,000 and
at
December 31, 2005 the Company's accumulated deficit was approximately $85,000.
At June 30, 2006, the Company’s accumulated deficit was approximately
$86,300.
Total
revenue of $448 for the three months ended June 30, 2006 decreased 63% compared
to revenues of $1,209 in the corresponding quarter of the prior year. The
decrease in revenue is due primarily to the absence of large deployments in
the
current quarter such as Snap-On Credit LC, American General Life &
Assurance, Everypath and Bell South aggregating $637, that were closed in the
corresponding quarter of the prior year. Total revenues of $1,149 for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 decreased 36% compared to revenues of $1,788 in
the
corresponding six months of the prior year. Total revenue for eSignature
solutions of $804 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 decreased 40% or $539
compared to eSignature revenue of $1,343 in the corresponding six months of
the
prior year. This decrease in revenue is primarily attributable to the absence
of
large orders discussed above.
The
net
loss for the three months ended June 30, 2006 was $925, which included $104
in
non-cash charges to interest expense for prepaid financing costs and loan
discount amortization related to the convertible notes, compared with a net
loss
of $834 in the corresponding prior year period. Operating expenses increased
approximately 9%, or $102, to $1,231, from $1,129 for the three months ended
June 30, 2006 compared to the prior year period. The increase primarily reflects
increases in sales and marketing headcount and non cash employee stock
compensation charges to expense in the current period required under SFAS 123R
.
The net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2006 of $1,736, which included
$405 in non-cash charges to interest expense for prepaid financing costs and
loan discount amortization related to the convertible notes, represents an
improvement of $186 compared to the net loss of $1,922 in the corresponding
six
months of the prior year. The decrease in the net loss is primarily due to
a
reduction in the amount of the non-cash amortization expense associated with
the
convertible debt.
- 20 -
Communication
Intelligence Corporation
And
Subsidiary
Notes
to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Form
10-Q
Our
ability to predict quarterly sales continues to be challenged by the emerging
market realities of our eSignature business. We believe that the benefits of
risk mitigation, both legal and compliance related, together with the ROI
potential afforded by our solutions are recognized by our pilot and proof of
concept customers. We
believe the delay in large follow-on rollouts is partially due to customer
requirements for a more complete solution to their overall eSignature needs.
This involved gathering feedback from key early deployments necessary to develop
new products and extensions required to meet the needs of both end-users and
channel partners. The Company believes that these new products and extensions,
including both multi-modal biometrics and PDF and HTML/Web based products,
will
provide a comprehensive range of solutions to address the needs of the larger
mainstream segment of the banking, insurance and financial services market.
The
Company also believes the delays reflect the time necessary for market
evaluation of our newer products. Such delays are inherent with a transition
from the early adopter phase of an emerging market to market takeoff where
large
mainstream companies commit to the technology, decide on who their preferred
supplier will be and fund large scale deployments.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The
preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) requires
us to make judgments, assumptions, and estimates that affect the amounts
reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes. We
consider certain accounting policies related to revenue recognition, valuation
of inventories, accounts receivable, acquired intangibles and impairment of
long-lived assets including goodwill to be critical policies due to the
estimation process involved in each. Management discusses its estimates and
judgments with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.
For
a
more detailed description on the application of these and other accounting
policies, see Note 2 of the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
(“the 2005 Form 10-K/A”). Reference is also made to the discussion of the
application of these critical accounting policies and estimates contained in
Management’s Discussion and Analysis in our 2005 Form 10-K/A. During the three
and six months ended June 30, 2006, there were no significant or material
changes in the application of critical accounting policies that would require
an
update to the information provided in the 2005 Form 10-K/A except for the
following addition to the critical accounting policies:
Revenue
Recognition.
Revenue
is recognized when earned in accordance with applicable accounting standards,
including AICPA Statement of Position ("SOP") No. 97-2, Software Revenue
Recognition, as amended, Staff Accounting Bulletin 104 ("SAB 104") and the
interpretive guidance issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission and
EITF
issue 00-21 of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force.
In
December 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Staff
Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 104, “Revenue Recognition.” The adoption of
SAB 104 did not impact the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
We
recognize revenue from software license agreements upon delivery of the software
provided that persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, collection is
determined to be probable and no significant obligations remain. Deferred
revenue is recorded for post-contract support and is recognized as costs are
incurred or over the support period whichever is longer. Vendor specific
objective evidence of the fair value of the elements contained in these software
license agreements is based on the price determined by management having the
relevant authority when the element is not yet sold separately.
The
allowance for doubtful accounts is based on our assessment of the collectibility
of specific customer accounts and an assessment of international, political
and
economic risk as well as the aging of the accounts receivable. If there is
a
change in actual defaults from our historical experience, our estimates of
recoverability of amounts due us could be affected and we will adjust the
allowance accordingly.
- 21 -
Communication
Intelligence Corporation
And
Subsidiary
Notes
to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Form
10-Q
Intangible
Assets.
The
Company performs intangible asset impairment analyses on a quarterly basis
in
accordance with the guidance in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No.
142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” ("SFAS 142") and Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long Lived Assets” ("SFAS 144"). The Company follows SFAS 144 in
response to changes in industry and market conditions that affect its patents.
The Company then determines if an impairment of its assets has occurred. The
Company reassesses the lives of its patents and tests for impairment quarterly
in order to determine whether the book value of each patent exceeds the fair
value of each patent. Fair value, while subjective, is determined by estimating
future cash flows from the products that are and will be protected by the
patents, considering the following additional factors:
· |
whether
there are legal, regulatory or contractual provisions known to it
that
limit the useful life of each patent to less than the assigned useful
life;
|
· |
whether
the Company needs to incur material costs or make modifications in
order
for it to continue to be able to realize the protection afforded
by the
patents;
|
· |
whether
any effects of obsolescence or significant competitive pressure on
the
Company's current or future products are expected to reduce the
anticipated cash flow from the products covered by the
patents;
|
· |
whether
demand for products utilizing the patented technology will diminish,
remain stable or increase; and
|
· |
whether
the current markets for the products based on the patented technology
will
remain constant or will grow over the useful lives assigned to the
patents.
|
Management
recognizes that revenues have fluctuated from comparable prior periods, and
may
continue to fluctuate based upon historical experience of the time involved
to
close large sales transactions. Management has obtained an independent valuation
of its patents as of December 31, 2005, to support its assertion that no
impairment of the carrying value of the patents existed. The Company believes
that its quarterly impairment analysis and the December 31, 2005 independent
valuation continue to be valid, and no impairment in the carrying values of
the
patents exists at June 30, 2006.
Sources
of Revenues.
To date,
the Company's revenues have been derived principally from end-users,
manufacturers, retailers and distributors of computer products in North America,
Europe and the Pacific Rim. The Company performs periodic credit evaluations
of
its customers and does not require collateral. The Company maintains reserves
for potential credit losses. Historically, such losses have been insignificant
and within management's expectations and reserves.
Stock-based
Compensation Expense. On
January 1, 2006, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment,” (“SFAS 123(R)”) which
requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all
share-based payment awards made to our employees and directors including
employee stock options and employee stock purchases related to the 2000 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan based on estimated fair values. We adopted SFAS 123(R)
using
the modified prospective transition method, which requires the application
of
the accounting standard as of January 1, 2006, the first day of our fiscal
year 2006. Our Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the three and
six
month periods ended June 30, 2006 reflect the impact of SFAS 123(R). In
accordance with the modified prospective transition method, our Consolidated
Financial Statements for prior periods have not been restated to reflect, and
do
not include, the impact of SFAS 123(R). The value of the portion of the award
that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the requisite
service periods in our Consolidated Statement of Operations. Prior to the
adoption of SFAS 123(R), we accounted for stock-based awards to employees and
directors using the intrinsic value method in accordance with APB 25 as allowed
under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation
(SFAS
123). As stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Consolidated
Statement of Operations for the first quarter of fiscal 2006 is based on awards
ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures.
SFAS
123(R) requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised,
if
necessary, in subsequent periods if
actual
forfeitures differ from those estimates. The estimated average forfeiture rates
for the six months ended June 30, 2006, of approximately 20.3% for grants were
based on historical forfeiture experience. In our pro forma information required
under SFAS 123 for the periods prior to fiscal 2006, we accounted for
forfeitures as they occurred.
- 22 -
Communication
Intelligence Corporation
And
Subsidiary
Notes
to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Form
10-Q
Stock-based
compensation expense recognized under SFAS 123(R) for the three and six month
periods ended June 30, 2006 was $49 and $104, determined by the Black-Scholes
valuation model, and consisting of stock-based compensation expense related
to
employee and director stock options. As of June 30, 2006, total unrecognized
compensation costs related to unvested stock options was $183, which is expected
to be recognized as an expense over a weighted average period of approximately
3
years. Subsequent to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), we have not made any changes
in the type of incentive equity instruments or added any performance conditions
to the incentive options. See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
for additional information.
Software
Development Costs.
Software
development costs are accounted for in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 86, "Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software
to
be Sold, Leased or Otherwise Marketed" ("SFAS 86"). Under SFAS 86,
capitalization of software development costs begins upon the establishment
of
technological feasibility, subject to net realizable value considerations.
In
the Company's case, capitalization commences upon the completion of a working
model and generally ends upon the release of the product. The capitalized costs
are amortized to cost of sales on a straight line basis over the estimated
life
of the product, generally three years. During the three and six month periods
ended June 30, 2006, $232 and $277 in engineering costs were capitalized. The
Company expects that capitalization of engineering costs will be consistent
with
prior period amounts and reflect new product development and
enhancements.
Research
and Development.
Research
and development costs are charged to expense as incurred.
Foreign
Currency Translation.
We
consider the functional currency of the Company’s China joint venture to be the
respective local currency and, accordingly, gains and losses from the
translation of the local foreign currency financial statements are included
as a
component of "accumulated foreign currency translation adjustment" in our
consolidated balance sheets. Foreign currency assets and liabilities are
translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates prevailing at the end of the
period, except for non-monetary assets and liabilities that are translated
at
historical exchange rates. Revenues and expenses are translated at the average
exchange rates in effect during each period, except for those expenses included
in balance sheet accounts, which are translated at historical exchange
rates.
Net
foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included as components of
“interest and other income (expense), net" in the Company's consolidated
statements of operations. Due to the stability of the currency in China, net
foreign currency transaction gains and losses were not material for the three
and six month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.
Net
Operating Loss Carryforwards.
Utilization of the Company's net operating losses may be subject to an annual
limitation due to the ownership change limitations provided by the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 and similar state provisions. As a result, a portion of
the
Company's net operating loss carryforwards may not be available to offset future
taxable income. The Company has provided a full valuation allowance for deferred
tax assets at June 30, 2006 based upon the Company's history of
losses.
Segments. We
report
in one segment: handwriting recognition. Handwriting recognition includes
online/retail revenues and corporate sales, including eSignature and natural
input/original equipment manufacturers ("OEM") revenues. Handwriting recognition
represents the sale of software for electronic signatures, handwritten biometric
signature verification, data security, data compression, and electronic ink
capture. It also includes the sale of natural input technologies that are
designed to allow users to interact with handheld devices. All handwriting
recognition software is developed around our core technology. Handwriting
recognition product revenues are generated through a direct sales force to
individual or enterprise end users (see discussion under revenues - Handwriting
recognition). We also license a version of our handwriting recognition software
to OEM's. The handwriting recognition software is included as part of the OEM's
product offering. From time to time, we are required to develop an interface
(port) for our software to run on a new customer's hardware platform or within
the customer's software operating system. The development contract revenues
are
included in the handwriting recognition segment.
- 23 -
Communication
Intelligence Corporation
And
Subsidiary
Notes
to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Form
10-Q
Results
of Operations
The
following table provides unaudited financial information for our
segment.
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Segment
revenues:
|
|||||||||||||
Handwriting
recognition
|
|||||||||||||
eSignature
|
$
|
269
|
$
|
856
|
$
|
722
|
$
|
1,185
|
|||||
eSignature
China
|
41
|
156
|
82
|
158
|
|||||||||
Natural
input
|
138
|
197
|
345
|
445
|
|||||||||
Total
handwriting recognition
|
$
|
448
|
$
|
1,209
|
$
|
1,149
|
$
|
1,788
|
|||||
Cost
of Sales
|
|||||||||||||
eSignature
|
$
|
26
|
$
|
29
|
$
|
84
|
$
|
51
|
|||||
Natural
input
|
3
|
-
|
12
|
-
|
|||||||||
Total
cost of sales
|
$
|
29
|
$
|
29
|
$
|
96
|
$
|
51
|
|||||
Operating
cost and expenses
|
|||||||||||||
Research
and development
|
$
|
143
|
$
|
242
|
$
|
426
|
$
|
545
|
|||||
Sales
and Marketing
|
433
|
328
|
779
|
637
|
|||||||||
General
and administrative
|
655
|
559
|
1,158
|
1,068
|
|||||||||
Total
operating costs and expenses
|
$
|
1,231
|
$
|
1,129
|
$
|
2,363
|
$
|
2,250
|
|||||
Interest
and other income (expense), net
|
$
|
17
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
$
|
35
|
$
|
4
|
||||
Interest
expense
|
(130
|
)
|
(881
|
)
|
(461
|
)
|
(1,413
|
)
|
|||||
Net
(loss)
|
$
|
(925
|
)
|
$
|
(834
|
)
|
$
|
(1,736
|
)
|
$
|
(1,922
|
)
|
|
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
|||||||||||||
Cost
of sales, capitalized software costs
|
$
|
29
|
$
|
17
|
$
|
57
|
$
|
20
|
|||||
General
and administrative
|
94
|
94
|
189
|
189
|
|||||||||
Total
amortization of intangible assets
|
$
|
123
|
$
|
112
|
$
|
246
|
$
|
209
|
|||||
Revenues
eSignature
revenue. eSignature
revenues are derived from channel partners and end users. eSignature revenues
decreased 69%, or $702, to $310 for the three months ended June 30, 2006, as
compared to $1,012 in the prior year period. For the six months ended June
30,
2006, eSignature revenues decreased 40%, or $539, to $804, as compared to $1,343
in the prior year period. The changes to eSignature revenues are discussed
more
fully below.
eSignature
revenues through channel partners for the three months ended June 30, 2006,
decreased 87%, or $143, to $22, as compared to $165 in the prior year period.
The decrease is due primarily to orders placed by two of the Company’s resellers
aggregating $128 in the prior year period. For the six month period ended June
30, 2006, eSignature sales through channel partners decreased 51%, or $123,
to
$118, as compared to $241 in the prior year period.
- 24 -
Communication
Intelligence Corporation
And
Subsidiary
Notes
to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Form
10-Q
eSignature
revenues from sales to end users decreased 64%, or $444, to $247, for the three
months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $691 in the prior year period. The
decrease in eSignature sales to end users was due primarily to the
absence of large deployments in the current quarter such as Snap-On Credit
LC
and American General Life & Assurance, which aggregated $510 in the prior
year period.
For the
six months ended June 30, 2006, eSignature revenues from sales to end users
decreased 36%, or $340, to $604, as compared to $944 in the prior year period.
The decrease is due to the absence of large deployments discussed above,
compared to the prior year period.
eSignature
revenues in China decreased 74%, or $115, to $41, for the three months ended
June 30, 2006, as compared to $156 in the prior year period. For the six months
ended June 30, 2006, eSignature revenues in China decreased 48%, or $76, to
$82,
as compared to $158 in the prior year period. The decrease in China eSignature
revenues was due to the initial purchase of licenses pursuant to an agreement
made in 2005 with eCom Asia Pacific Pty Ltd (“eCom”). The agreement appoints
eCom as exclusive master reseller for CIC products to end users and resellers
with the authority and responsibility to create optimal distribution channels
within the People’s Republic of China. The agreement provides for guaranteed
minimum quarterly royalties over a two-year period. eCom is one of the world’s
most experienced eSignature solutions providers and has been a proven reseller
and integrator of CIC eSignature products in the Asia Pacific region for over
six years. eCom has highly visible deployments, including Prudential Plc in
Singapore, Malaysia and Hong Kong. The partnership with eCom is targeted to
achieve our objective of establishing enhanced sales coverage in China
leveraging our new SignatureOne™
technology
with a trusted and proven partner. The Company believes that the channel partner
strategy will deliver increasing and sustained revenue growth.
Our
ability to predict quarterly sales continues to be challenged by the emerging
market realities of our eSignature business. The Company made an investment
in
new sales personal in 2005 and 2006. The Company believes that this investment
will increase corporate eSignature revenues in the near term through a stronger
focus and presence in its target markets. In addition, the Company believes
that
the sales of smaller pilot deployments of its products to customers will lead
to
greater sales in future periods as the customers roll out their applications
on
wider scales. However, the timing of customer product roll outs is difficult
to
project due to many factors beyond the Company’s control. The Company views
eSignature as a high potential revenue market and intends to continue to place
increasing focus on this market.
Natural
Input revenues.
Natural
Input revenues are derived from OEM’s and web-based sales.
Revenue
from the sales of the Company’s natural input products, which include Jot,
decreased 30%, or $59, to $138 for the three months ended June 30, 2006, as
compared to $197 in the prior year period. For the six months ended June 30,
2006 revenues from the sales of the Company’s natural input products decreased
22% or $100, to $345 as compared to $445 in the prior year period. The reasons
for the decline are discussed below.
Natural
input product revenues through OEM’s decreased 29%, or $56, to $138 for the
three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $194 in the prior year period.
The
decrease is due primarily to a decrease in royalties received from Palm Source
and development contract revenues from Sony Ericsson compared to the prior
year
period. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, natural input revenues decreased
17%, or $72, to $346, as compared to $418 in the prior year period. The lower
reported revenues from Palm Source and Sony Ericsson are the primary reason
for
the decline in natural input revenues. In addition one of the Company’s OEMs
discontinued one of its products that included the Company’s Jot software in
December of 2005, which impacted revenues by approximately $7 and $13 for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively.
There
were no online/retail revenues for the three and six months ended June 30,
2006,
as compared to $3 and $27 in the prior year period. In early 2003, PalmSource
announced that it had licensed CIC’s Jot handwriting recognition software to
replace Graffiti® as the standard and only handwriting software on all new Palm
Powered® devices. The embedding of Jot on Palm related devices had a negative
impact on the online/retail sales by limiting the number of older units that
would be upgraded. The transition to Jot based PalmSource operating systems
by
OEM’s was completed in the third quarter of 2004 and the Company no longer
offers its products through online/retail outlets. CIC has phased out the
consumer offering of its Palm OS products. Jot continues to be embedded in
the
PalmSource OS that is used by leading handheld computer and smartphones
suppliers.
- 25
-
Communication
Intelligence Corporation
And
Subsidiary
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Form
10-Q
Cost
of Sales
Cost
of
sales includes online/retail, corporate and China software sales costs. Such
costs are comprised of royalty and import tax payments, third party hardware
costs, direct mail costs, engineering direct costs and amortization of
intangible assets excluding patents. There was no change in cost of sales for
the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the prior year period.
However, amortization of capitalized software development costs increased $8
while engineering cost related to development contracts decreased $8 for the
three months ended June 30, 2006 as compared to the prior year. The amortization
of software development costs will continue to increase as new products are
developed and enhancements are developed and capitalized. For the six months
ended June 30, 2006, cost of sales increased 88%, or $45, to $96, as compared
to
$51 in the prior year period. The increase was primarily due to the engineering
costs associated with SnapOn Credit LP development contract revenue and
increased amortization of capitalized software development costs as compared
to
the prior year period. Cost of sales may vary in the future depending on the
customer’s decision to purchase its software solution and third party hardware
as a complete package, from the Company, rather than buying individual
components from separate vendors, non-recurring engineering work for customer
requested applications and increasing amortization of capitalized software
development costs.
eSignature
and natural input channel partner and OEM cost of sales decreased 10%, or $3,
to
$26 for the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $29 in the prior
year
period. The decrease was primarily due to lower engineering cost associated
with
development contract revenues, offset by increased amortization of capitalized
software development costs compared to the prior year. For the six months ended
June 30, 2006, eSignature cost of sales increased 65%, or $33, to $84, as
compared to $51 in the prior year period. The increase was primarily due to
engineering costs associated with SnapOn Credit LP development contract revenue
and amortization of capitalized software development costs. Increases in
eSignature cost of sales in the future may be driven by the amount of third
party hardware that is sold with the Company’s software solutions, engineering
costs associated with development contracts and increased amortization of
software development costs capitalized in future periods associated with
enhancements and new product development.
Natural
input cost of sales increased to $3 for the three months ended June 30, 2006
compared to $0 in the prior year period. The increase is due to the amortization
of software development costs capitalized during 2005 for enhancements and
upgrades to the Jot products. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, natural
input cost of sales increased $12 compared to $0 in the prior year period.
The
increase is due to the reasons stated for the three month period discussed
above. The Company no longer offers its products through online/retail outlets.
Jot continues to be the de facto standard, embedded in the PalmSource OS that
is
used by many leading handheld computer and smartphones suppliers. In addition,
major device manufacturers, such as Sony-Ericsson, continue to embed Jot in
their products.
Operating
expenses
Research
and Development Expenses.
Research and Development expense decreased 41%, or $99, to $143 for the three
months ended June 30, 2006, as compared to $242 in the prior year period. For
the six months ended June 30, 2006, engineering expenses decreased 22%, or
$119,
to $426 as compared to $545 in the prior year. Engineering expenses consist
primarily of salaries and related costs, outside engineering, maintenance items,
and allocated facilities expenses.
Salaries
and related expense increased 11%, or $30, to $309 for the three months ended
June 30, 2006, as compared to $279 in the prior year period. For the six months
ended June 30, 2005, engineering salaries increased 23%, or $122, to $650,
as
compared to $528 in the prior year period. The increase is due primarily to
the
increase of one engineer compared to the prior year periods. Stock based
compensation expense, included for the first time as expense, was $9 and $34
for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2006. There was no comparable expense
in
the prior year period.
Outside
engineering cost and expenses increased 250%, or $5, to $7 for the three months
ended June 30, 2006, compared to $2 in the prior year period. The increase
was
due to consulting services associated with the Company’s web-site development.
For the six months ended June 30, 2006, outside engineering costs decreased
84%,
or $47 to $9, as compared to $56 in the prior year period. The decrease was
due
primarily to the utilization of outside engineering services to complete several
projects compared to the prior year. The Company maintains a relationship with
an outside engineering group familiar with its products and may draw on its
services, as required, which could have a material effect on the amount of
outside engineering expense reported.
-
26-
Communication
Intelligence Corporation
And
Subsidiary
Notes
to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Form
10-Q
Facilities
allocation decreased 16%, or $11, to $59 for the three months ended June 30,
2006, compared to $70 in the prior year period. For the six months ended June
30, 2006, facilities allocation decreased 25%, or $35, to $105, as compared
to
$140 in the prior year period. Despite the increased engineering head count,
the
facilities allocation decreased due to a reduction in the Company’s rent expense
resulting from a renegotiation of the Company’s office lease.
Capitalized
software development costs increased 160%, or $144, to $234 for the three month
period ended June 30, 2006, as compared to $90 in the prior year period. For
the
six months ended June 30, 2006 capitalized software development costs increased
47%, or $88, to $277, as compared to $189 in the prior year period. The increase
in capitalized software development was due to new product development and
significant upgrades and enhancements being made to the Company’s eSignature
products. The new product development, as well as the upgrades and enhancements,
currently being capitalized will be completed in the third and fourth quarters
of 2006. Capitalization of software development costs is expected to be
consistent with the increased amounts reported for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2006 for the foreseeable future. Engineering costs transferred
to
cost of sales decreased 80%, or $8, to $2 for the three months ended June 30,
2006, compared to $10 in the prior year period. For the six months ended June
30, 2006, engineering costs transferred to cost of sales increased 81%, or
$17,
to $38, as compared to $21 in the prior year. The change is due to the amount
of
development services purchased by a customer in the current three and six month
periods.
Sales
and Marketing Expenses.
Sales
and marketing expenses increased 32%, or $105, to $433 for the three months
ended June 30, 2006, compared to $328 in the prior year period. For the six
months ended June 30, 2006, sales and marketing expense increased 22%, or $142,
to $779, as compared to $637 in the prior year period. Sales and marketing
expenses consist of salaries, commissions and related expenses, professional
services, advertising and promotion, general office and allocated facilities
expenses.
Salaries
and related expense increased 9%, or $14, to $164 for the three months ended
June 30, 2006, as compared to $150 in the prior year period. For the six months
ended June 30, 2006, sales and marketing salaries increased 28%, or $78, to
$358, as compared to $280 in the prior year period. The increase in salaries
and
related expense was due primarily to the increase of three sales employees
and,
to a lesser extent, increases in employee salaries. Stock based compensation
expense, included for the first time as expense was $12 and $38 for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2006. There was no comparable expense in the
prior
year periods.
Travel
and related expenses increased 79%, or $11, to $25 for the three months ended
June 30, 2006, as compared to $14 in the prior year period. For the six months
ended June 30, 2006, travel and related costs increased 74%, or $20, to $47,
as
compared to $27 in the prior year period. The increase is due to the increased
headcount and sales related activities compared to the prior year periods.
Recruiting expense increased 450%, or $36, to $44 for the three months ended
June 30, 2006, compared to $8 in the prior year period. For the six months
ended
June 30, 2006, recruiting expenses decreased 38%, or $29, to $47, as compared
to
$76 in the prior year period. The Company expects that recruiting expense will
remain at an increased level compared to the prior year as it continues staffing
the sales and marketing departments. Professional service expense increased
600%, or $6, to $7 for the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $1
in
the prior year period. The increase is due to consulting services associated
with the Company’s web-site. For the six month period ended June 30, 2006
professional services decreased 57%, or $12, to $9, as compared to $21 in the
prior year period. The decrease is due to not sponsoring health care focus
groups related to the eSignature market as was done in the prior year period.
Commission expense decreased 76%, or $51, to $16 for the three months ended
June
30, 2006, compared to $67 in the prior year period. For the six months ended
June 30, 2006, commission expense decreased 46%, or $36, to $42, as compared
to
$78 in the prior year. The decrease in the commission expense over the three
and
six month periods is due to lower sales.
Other
expense, including general office and allocated facilities expenses increased
53%, or $47, to $135 for the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to
$88
in the prior year period. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, other expenses
increased 24%, or $36, to $188, as compared to $152 in the prior year period.
The increase is due to the additional headcount and sales related activities
compared to the prior year periods.
-
27-
Communication
Intelligence Corporation
And
Subsidiary
Notes
to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Form
10-Q
The
Company anticipates that sales and marketing expenses will continue to increase
in the near term as the Company strengthens its sales efforts through increasing
headcount to pursue new opportunities in the eSignature market space. The
Company continues to pursue a channel strategy for its eSignature products.
The
Company believes the channel strategy, along with its current and potential
partners, will produce increasing revenues in the near term. Our ability to
predict quarterly sales continues to be challenged by the emerging market
realities of our eSignature business.
General
and Administrative Expenses.
General
and administrative expenses increased 17%, or $96, to $655, for the three months
ended June 30, 2006, compared to $559 in the prior year period. For the six
months ended June 30, 2006, general and administrative expenses increased 8%,
or
$90, to $1,158 as compared to $1,068 in the prior year period. General and
administrative expense consists of salaries, professional fees, investor
relations expenses, patent amortization and office and allocated facilities
costs.
Salaries
and wages increased 8%, or $15, to $209 for the three months ended June 30,
2006, compared to $194 in the prior year period. For the six months ended June
30, 2006, salaries expense increased 12%, or $44, to $422 as compared to $378
in
the prior year period. The increase was due primarily to increases in employee
salaries. Stock based compensation expense, included for the first time as
an
expense, was $7 and $11 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006. There
was no comparable expense in the prior year period.
Professional
service expenses, which include consulting, legal and outside accounting fees,
increased 22%, or $33, to $184 for the three months ended June 30, 2006, as
compared to $151 in the prior year period. The increase was due to increases
in
accounting and audit expenses related to the prior year audit. For the six
months ended June 30, 2006, professional service expense increased 5%, or $15,
to $303, as compared to $288 in the prior year period. The increase was due
primarily to the reason discussed above. Insurance expense increased 17%, or
$4,
to $27 for the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $23 in the prior
year period. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, insurance expense increased
15%, or $7, to $54, as compared to $47 in the prior year period. The increase
is
due to increased premiums for the Company’s D&O insurance policies compared
to the prior year. Other administrative expenses increased 19%, or $37, to
$228
for the three months ended June 30, 2006, as compared to $191 in the prior
year
period. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, other expenses increased 4%,
or
$13, to $368, as compared to $355 in the prior year period. The increase was
due
primarily to investor related expenses normally incurred in the third quarter.
The Company believes that its General and Administrative expenses will remain
fairly stable for the balance of the year.
Interest
and other income (expense), net
Interest
and other income (expense), net increased
$24, to $14 for the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the prior
year
period. The increase was due to the disposal of fixed assets by our joint
venture in China, in the prior year period. For the six months ended June 30,
2006, interest and other income (expense), net increased $39 to $30 as compared
to the prior year. This increase is primarily due to the disposal of fixed
assed
discussed above.
Interest
expense
Interest
expense decreased 62%, or $42, to $26 for the three months ended June 30, 2006,
compared to $68 in the prior year period. The decrease was primarily due to
conversion of long term debt into shares of the Company’s common stock since
June 30, 2005. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, interest expense
decreased 60%, or $84, to $56, as compared to $140 in the prior year period.
The
decrease was primarily due to conversion of long term debt into shares of the
Company’s common stock as discussed above.
-
28-
Communication
Intelligence Corporation
And
Subsidiary
Notes
to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Form
10-Q
Non-cash
charges for the amortization of prepaid financing costs, and warrant and
beneficial conversion feature costs associated with the convertible notes
decreased 87%, or $709, to $104 for the three months ended June 30 2006 as
compared to $813 in the prior year period. For the six months ended June 30,
2006, non-cash charges for the amortization decreased 68%, or $868, to $405,
as
compared to $1,273 in the prior year period. (See Note 6 of the condensed
consolidated financial statements). The reason for the decrease in the non-cash
charges is discussed above. The Company will be required to amortize an
additional $368 to interest expense over the remaining life of the convertible
notes or sooner if the notes are converted before the due date.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
At
June
30, 2006, cash and cash equivalents totaled $1,698 compared to cash and cash
equivalents of $2,849 at December 31, 2005. The decrease in cash of $1,151
was
primarily due to cash used in operating activities of $784, acquisition of
property and equipment amounting to $85, capitalization of software development
costs of $277 and payments of capital lease obligations of $5. Total current
assets are $2,369 at June 30, 2006, compared to $3,621 at December 31, 2005.
As
of June 30, 2006, the Company's principal sources of funds included its cash
and
cash equivalents aggregating $1,698.
Accounts
receivable decreased $55 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to
the
December 31, 2005 balance, due primarily to the decrease in recurring
maintenance billings and sales compared to the prior quarter.
The
Company expects the development of the eSignature market will ultimately result
in more consistent revenue on a quarter to quarter basis and therefore, less
fluctuation in accounts receivable from quarter to quarter.
Deferred
financing costs, including the current and non-current portion, decreased $100
over the six months ended June 30, 2006 as the result of amortization to
interest expense.
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets decreased $16 for the six months ended June
30, 2006, compared to December 31, 2005, due to amortization of annual fees
or
maintenance and support costs over the six months. Generally, annual insurance
premiums and maintenance and support fees are prepaid in December and June
of
each year and, therefore, the balances typically begin to decrease in the first
and third quarters as the prepaid balances are amortized.
Accounts
payable increased $73 for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to
December 31, 2005, due to increased professional fees and recruiting fees
utilized during the quarter. Accounts payable balances typically increase in
the
second and fourth quarters when the insurance and annual maintenance and support
fees are incurred. Materials used in cost of sales may impact accounts payable
depending on the amount of third party hardware sold as part of the software
solution.
Current
liabilities, which include deferred revenue, were $1,449 at June 30, 2006,
compared to $1,363 at December 31, 2005. Deferred revenue, totaling $591 at
June
30, 2006, compared to $557 at December 31, 2005, primarily reflects advance
payments for products and maintenance fees from the Company's licensees which
are generally recognized as revenue by the Company when all obligations are
met
or over the term of the maintenance agreement.
In
November 2004, the Company entered into an unsecured Note and Warrant Purchase
Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) and a Registration Rights Agreement (the
“Registration Rights Agreement), each dated as of October 28, 2004). The
Purchase Agreement does not require the Company to deliver registered shares
upon exercise of the warrants. However the Company was required to file a
registration statement providing for the resale of the shares that are issuable
upon the conversion of the notes and the exercise of the warrants. The
registration statement was filed on December 22, 2004 and was declared effective
on January 26, 2005.
The
conversion right contained in the Purchase Agreement was analyzed under
paragraphs 6 and 12 of SFAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities” to determine its proper classification in the Company’s
balance sheet. The Company also reviewed the liquidated damages clauses
contained in the Registration Rights Agreement that could potentially be payable
if the registration statement was not declared effective within 120 days of
the
closing, with reference to SFAS 5. The Company determined that it was highly
unlikely and not probable, that the Company would incur liquidated damages.
However, in light of EITF Issue 05-04 “The Effect of a Liquidated Damages Clause
on a Freestanding Financial Instrument Subject to EITF 00-19, “Accounting for
Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a
Company’s Own Stock”, the Company effectively has accounted for the Registration
Rights Agreement and the financial instrument under View C contained in EITF
05-04. The Company would not have recorded a liability at the inception of
the
debt, or at subsequent reporting dates, or until the Registration Rights
Agreement was declared effective or thereafter, as our assessment of the
likelihood that the probably of actually paying the liquidated damages was
zero.
Therefore the Purchase Agreement was recorded as a debt and equity transaction
with no recorded asset or liability associated with the conversion feature
or
liquidated damage clause included in the Registration Rights
Agreement.
- 29 -
Communication
Intelligence Corporation
And
Subsidiary
Notes
to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Form
10-Q
The
financing discussed above, a combination of debt and equity, closed November
2,
2004. The proceeds to the Company were approximately $3,885, net of $310 in
commissions and legal expenses. H.C. Wainwright & Co., Inc. (“Wainwright”)
acted as placement agent. As placement agent for the Company, at closing
Wainwright received $731 in commissions, legal fees and warrants. The
commissions of approximately $285 and legal fees of $25, mentioned above, were
paid in cash. The Company issued warrants to Wainwright to acquire 1,218 shares
of the Company’s common stock. Of the warrants issued, 870 are exercisable at
$0.462 and 348 are exercisable at $0.508. The Company has ascribed the value
of
$421 to the Wainwright warrants, which is recorded as deferred financing costs
in the balance sheet at December 31, 2004. The fair value ascribed to the
Wainwright warrants was estimated on the commitment date using the Black-Scholes
pricing model with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 3.21%;
expected life of 3 years; expected volatility of 100%; and expected dividend
yield of 0%. The Company has used and expects to continue to use the proceeds
of
the financing for additional working capital.
Under
the
terms of the financing, the Company issued to certain accredited investors
convertible promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $4,195 and
warrants to acquire 3,632 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise
price of $0.508 per share. The notes accrue interest at the rate of 7% per
annum, payable semi-annually, and are convertible into shares of the Company’s
common stock at the rate of $0.462 per share. The Company has ascribed a value
of $982 to the investor warrants, which is recorded as a discount to notes
payable in the balance sheet. The fair value ascribed to the warrants was
estimated on the commitment date using the Black-Scholes pricing model with
the
following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 3.21%; expected life of 3
years; expected volatility of 100%; and expected dividend yield of 0%. In
addition to the fair value ascribed to the warrants, the Company has ascribed
$1,569 to the beneficial conversion feature in the convertible notes, which
is
recorded as a discount to notes payable in the balance sheet. The values
ascribed to the warrants and beneficial conversion feature follow the guidance
of the EITF Issue No. 98-5, “Accounting for Convertible Securities with
Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Ratios”,
and EITF Issue No. 00-27, “Application of Issue No. 98-5 to Certain Convertible
Instruments” of the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force. The fair value of the
warrants and beneficial conversion feature is amortized to expense over the
life
of the convertible notes or upon earlier conversion using the effective interest
method. During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2006, the Company
had amortized to interest expense approximately $104 and $405 of the loan
discount and deferred financing costs. The balance due under the convertible
notes is shown net of the remaining $368 unamortized discount on the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet. During the three and six months ended
June 30, 2006, the investors converted $30 and $460 of the notes in exchange
for
65 and 996 shares of the Company’s common stock. If the remaining aggregate
principal amount owing under the notes is converted, the Company will issue
2,993 shares of its common stock. If the notes are not converted, all remaining
principal and accrued but unpaid interest will be due October 28, 2007. The
Company may pay accrued interest in cash or in shares of Company common stock,
issued at the market price for the common stock calculated prior to the interest
payment. The Company has not paid and does not intend to pay accrued interest
with shares of its common stock.
The
warrants described above expire on October 28, 2009. The Company may call the
warrants if the Company’s common stock trades at $1.00 or above for 20
consecutive trading days after the date that is 20 days following the
effectiveness of a registration statement providing for the resale of the shares
issued upon the conversion of the notes and exercise of the warrants. Wainwright
will be paid approximately $28 in the aggregate if all of the investor warrants
are exercised. The Company will receive additional proceeds of approximately
$1,845 if all of the investor warrants are exercised.
-
30-
Communication
Intelligence Corporation
And
Subsidiary
Notes
to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Form
10-Q
Interest
expense related to convertible debt for the three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2006 was $129 and $461, including $104 and $405 related to amortization
of debt discount and deferred financing costs, respectively. For the three
and
six month periods ended June 30, 2005, interest expense related to convertible
debt was $878 and $1,410, including $813 and $1,272 related to amortization
of
debt discount and deferred financing costs, respectively.
The
Company has the following material commitments as of June 30, 2006:
Payments
due by period
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual
obligations
|
Total
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
Thereafter
|
|||||||||||||||
Long-term
debt (1)
|
$
|
1,015
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
1,015
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||||
Operating
lease commitments (2)
|
1,416
|
124
|
236
|
264
|
272
|
280
|
240
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
contractual cash obligations
|
$
|
2,431
|
$
|
124
|
$
|
1,251
|
$
|
264
|
$
|
272
|
$
|
280
|
$
|
240
|
1. |
Long-term
debt is net of approximately $368 in discounts representing the fair
value
of warrants issued to the investors and the beneficial conversion
feature
associated with the convertible
notes.
|
2. |
The
operating lease commenced on November 1, 2002. The lease was renegotiated
in December 2005 and extended for an additional 60 months. The base
rent
will increase approximately 3% per annum over the term of the lease,
which
expires on October 31, 2011.
|
The
Company has suffered recurring losses from operations that raise a substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. There can be no
assurance that the Company will have adequate capital resources to fund planned
operations or that any additional funds will be available to it when needed,
or
if available, will be available on favorable terms or in amounts required by
it.
If the Company is unable to obtain adequate capital resources to fund
operations, it may be required to delay, scale back or eliminate some or all
of
its operations, which may have a material adverse effect on its business,
results of operations and ability to operate as a going concern. The financial
statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome
of
this uncertainty.
Item
3. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest
Rate Risk
The
Company has an investment portfolio of fixed income securities that are
classified as cash equivalents. These securities, like all fixed income
instruments, are subject to interest rate risk and will fall in value if the
market interest rates increase. The Company attempts to limit this exposure
by
investing primarily in short term securities. The Company did not enter into
any
short-term security investments during the three and six months ended June
30,
2006.
Foreign
Currency Risk
From
time
to time, the Company makes certain capital equipment or other purchases
denominated in foreign currencies. As a result, the Company’s cash flows and
earnings are exposed to fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency
exchange rates. The Company attempts to limit these exposures through
operational strategies and generally has not hedged currency
exposures.
- 31 -
Communication
Intelligence Corporation
And
Subsidiary
Notes
to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Form
10-Q
Future
Results and Stock Price Risk
The
Company's stock price may be subject to significant volatility. The public
stock
markets have experienced significant volatility in stock prices in recent years.
The stock prices of technology companies have experienced particularly high
volatility, including, at times, severe price changes that are unrelated or
disproportionate to the operating performance of such companies. The trading
price of the Company's common stock could be subject to wide fluctuations in
response to, among other factors, quarter-to-quarter variations in operating
results, announcements of technological innovations or new products by the
Company or its competitors, announcements of new strategic relationships by
the
Company or its competitors, general conditions in the computer industry or
the
global economy in general, or market volatility unrelated to the Company's
business and operating results.
Item
4.
Controls
and Procedures
Under
the
supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including
the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company
has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure
controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(c) as
of the
end of the period covered by this quarterly report.
Based
on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
have
concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There
were no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the
date
of their evaluation.
Part
II-Other Information
Item
1. Legal
Proceedings
None
Item
1A. Risk
Factors
For
the
three and six months ended June 30, 2006, there were no material changes in
the
risk factors discussed in the Company’s annual report on From
10-K/A.
Item
2. Unregistered
Sale of Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item
3. Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
None
Item
4. Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The
Company held its Annual Meeting of Stockholders on June 14, 2006. The number
of
shares of common stock with voting rights as of the record date represented
at
the meeting either in person or by proxy was 99,696 shares, or 93% of the
eligible outstanding Common Stock of the Company. One proposal was voted upon
by
the stockholders. The proposal and the voting results are as
follows:
Proposal
1
The
five
persons listed below received the most votes in favor of election at the annual
meeting and, accordingly were elected as directors to serve until the next
Annual Meeting or until his successor is elected or appointed.
Name
|
For
|
|||
Guido
DiGregorio
|
97,456
|
|||
Louis
P. Panetta
|
97,837
|
|||
C.
B. Sung
|
96,771
|
|||
David
E. Welch
|
97,904
|
-
32-
Communication
Intelligence Corporation
And
Subsidiary
Notes
to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Form
10-Q
Item
5. Other
Information
None
Item
6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits
Exhibit
Number
|
Document
|
2.0
|
Second
Amended Plan of Reorganization of the Company, incorporated herein
by
reference to the Company's Form 8-K filed October 24,
1994.
|
2.1
|
Orderly
Liquidation Valuation, Exhibit F to the Second Amended Plan of
Reorganization, incorporated herein by reference to the Company's
Form 8-K filed October 19, 1994.
|
2.2
|
Order
Confirming Plan of Reorganization, incorporated herein by reference
to the
Company's Form 8-K filed November 14, 1994.
|
3.1
|
Certificate
of Incorporation of the Company, as amended, incorporated herein
by
reference to Exhibits 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4 to the Company's Registration
Statement on Form 10 (File No. 0-19301).
|
3.2
|
Certificate
of Amendment to the Company's Certificate of Incorporation (authorizing
the reclassification of the Class A Common Stock and Class B
Common Stock into one class of Common Stock) as filed with the Delaware
Secretary of State's office on November 1, 1991, incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 3 to Amendment 1 on Form 8 to the
Company's Form 8-A (File No. 0-19301).
|
3.3
|
By-laws
of the Company adopted on October 6, 1986, incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the Company's Registration Statement on
Form 10 (File No. 0-19301).
|
*31.1
|
Certification
of Company’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
*31.2
|
Certificate
of Company’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
*32.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 USC Section 1750, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
*32.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 USC Section 1750, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
*
|
Filed
herewith.
|
- 33
-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
COMMUNICATION
INTELLIGENCE CORPORATION
|
||
Registrant
|
||
August
11, 2006
|
/s/
Francis V. Dane
|
|
Date
|
Francis
V. Dane
|
|
(Principal
Financial Officer and Officer Duly Authorized to Sign on Behalf of
the
Registrant)
|
-
34-