Leet Technology Inc. - Annual Report: 2017 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017

OR

For the transition period from_____________ to _____________.

Commission file number 000-55053

Blow & Drive Interlock Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (877) 238-4492

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, par value $0.0001

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to and post such files). Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [  ] No [X]

Aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates: $2,742,645 as based on last reported sales price of such stock on June 30, 2017. The voting stock held by non-affiliates on that date consisted of 13,378,754 shares of common stock the closing stock price was $0.205.

Applicable Only to Registrants Involved in Bankruptcy Proceedings During the Preceding Five Years:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes [  ]No [  ]

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. As of April 8, 2019, there were 30,211,875 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, issued and outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

List hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the document is incorporated: (1) Any annual report to security holders; (2) Any proxy or information statement; and (3) Any prospectus filed pursuant to rule 424(b) or (c) of the Securities Act of 1933. The listed documents should be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual report to security holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980). None.

Blow & Drive Interlock Corporation

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

Forward Looking Statements

This Annual Report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). These statements are based on management’s beliefs and assumptions, and on information currently available to management. Forward-looking statements include the information concerning possible or assumed future results of operations of the Company set forth under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition or Plan of Operation.” Forward-looking statements also include statements in which words such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate,” “consider,” or similar expressions are used.

Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. They involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. The Company’s future results and shareholder values may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements.

ITEM 1 – BUSINESS

Corporate History

We were incorporated under the name Jam Run Acquisition Corporation on July 2, 2013 in the State of Delaware. From inception through early February 2014, we were a blank check company and qualified as an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act which became law in April, 2012, with a business plan of entering into a transaction with a foreign or domestic private company in order for that company to become a reporting company as part of the process toward the public trading of its stock.

On February 6, 2014, we issued 9,700,000 shares of our common stock, representing approximately 97% of our then-outstanding shares to Laurence Wainer for $1,970. In connection with this transaction, we changed our name Blow & Drive Interlock Corporation and Mr. Wainer became our sole officer and director.

On March 7, 2017, we entered into an Debt Conversion and Series A Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) with Mr. Wainer, one of our officers and directors at that time, under which we agreed to create a new series of non-convertible preferred stock entitled “Series A Preferred Stock,” with One Million (1,000,000) shares authorized and the following rights: (i) no dividend rights; (ii) no liquidation preference over the Company’s common stock; (iii) no conversion rights; (iv) no redemption rights; (v) no call rights by the Company; (vi) each share of Series A Convertible Preferred stock will have one hundred (100) votes on all matters validly brought to the Company’s common stockholders; and Mr. Wainer agreed to acquire 1,000,000 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, once created, in exchange for Mr. Wainer forgiving $25,537 in accrued salary we owed to him as of December 31, 2016. The Series A Preferred Stock was created with the State of Delaware by filing a Certificate of Designation on March 13, 2017. The description of the SPA set forth in this report is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of that document, which is attached hereto as Exhibit 10.26 and is incorporated herein by reference.

On January 2, 2019, Mr. Wainer closed the transaction that was the subject of an Agreement to Purchase Common Stock and Preferred Stock (the “Agreement”) between Mr. Wainer and The Doheny Group, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company (“Doheny Group”), under which Doheny Group acquired 8,924,000 shares of our common stock (the “Common Shares”) and One Million (1,000,000) shares of our Series A Preferred Stock (the “Preferred Shares” and together with the Common Shares, the “Shares”), from Mr. Wainer in exchange for $30,000. Combined, the Shares represent approximately 84% of our outstanding voting rights. Mr. David Haridim is the principal of Doheny and was appointed to our Board of Directors and as our sole executive officer. We were a party to the Agreement solely for the purpose of acknowledging certain representations and warranties about the company in the Agreement. The description of the Agreement set forth in this report is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of that document, which is attached hereto as Exhibit 10.20 and is incorporated herein by reference.

Our offices are located at 1427 S. Robertson Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90035, telephone number (877) 238-4492.

Business Overview

General

We manufacture, market, lease, install and monitor a Breath Alcohol Ignition Interlock Device (BAIID) we developed known as the BDI-747 Ignition Interlock Device (the “BDI-747/1”), which is a mechanism that is installed on the steering column of an automobile and into which a driver exhales prior to starting their vehicle. The device in turn provides a blood-alcohol concentration analysis. If the driver’s blood-alcohol content is higher than a certain pre-programmed limit, the device prevents the ignition from engaging and the automobile from starting. These devices are often required for use by DUI or DWI (“driving under the influence” or “driving while intoxicated”) offenders as part of a mandatory court or motor vehicle department program. The BDI-747/1 has met the 2013 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) guidelines for Breath Alcohol Ignition Interlock Devices [Federal Register Volume 78, Number 89] as an authorized BAIID [Element Materials Technology/Report # ESP018444P June 17, 2015]. The BDI-747/1 is manufactured by BDI Manufacturing Inc., a subsidiary of Blow & Drive Interlock, Inc., from parts and supplies from C4 Development Ltd.

The primary market for the BDI-747/1 Ignition Interlock Device is as a breathalyzer device to be used by persons convicted of a driving under the influence of alcohol. In order for the BDI-747/1 to be used in states for persons convicted of driving under the influence the device must be approved by each individual state. The process to get the device approved varies greatly state-to-state. As of December 31, 2017, the BDI-747/1 was approved for use in five states, namely Oregon, Texas, Arizona, Kentucky, and Tennessee. As of December 31, 2018, the BDI-747/1 device was approved in Oregon, Texas, Arizona, and Kentucky. As of March 31, 2019, the BDI-747/1 device was only approved in Arizona and Texas. The states where our BDI-747/1 device is approved has decreased primarily as a result of new state certification rules that require increased capital investment that we are not to afford.

In states where the BDI-747/1 is approved as a BAIID, we lease the BDI-747/1 devices to offenders, typically for twelve months, but the time could differ on a case-by-case basis depending on the sentence received by the offender. In some states we market, lease, install and support the devices directly and in other states we sell distributorships to authorized distributors allowing them to lease, install, service, remove and support the BDI-747/1 devices. Currently, we lease the devices directly in the states we are approved, except West Phoenix, Arizona and Lubbock, Texas, where we have licensed distributors that lease the devices.

In states where we lease the devices directly to consumers, we typically charge between $89-$189 in upfront fees for the user (which covers one month of the lease payment), and then between $69-$89/month for the other eleven months of the lease for the typical one year lease. The lease payment covers the installation of the device in the consumer’s vehicle, the rental of the device, recalibration of the device as required by each state (typically every 30 to 60 days) and the monitoring services for the device, which are then reported to the state in accordance with each state’s requirements. In states and areas where we do not have a direct presence, which we only have in Phoenix, Arizona, we contract with independent service centers, such as car alarm installation companies or other auto services companies, to perform the installations of our BDI-747/1 device, which centers must be approved by the states in which we perform the installations. Because our devices are installed in consumers’ vehicles are part of a judicially-mandated program, and since the use of the device controls the individual’s driving privileges, collection rates of the monthly leasing fees is close to 100%. The failure to make the payment could be a violation of the consumer’s sentence or probation and could cause them to lose the device and their driving privileges.

In areas where we have a distributor, in our typical distributorship arrangement, we charge the distributor a flat fee distributorship territory fee up front (which fee varies based on the size and location of the distributorship), a $150 per unit registration fee, and then a $35 monthly fee for each device the distributor has in its inventory. These fees may vary on a case-by-case basis. The relationship with our distributors may either be on an exclusive or non-exclusive basis depending upon the location of the distributorship and the fees charged.

As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately 1,558 units on the road, with approximately 1,451 devices being leased directly from us and approximately 107 devices leased through our distributors, compared to December 31, 2016, when we had approximately 1,075 units on the road, with approximately 327 devices being leased directly from us and approximately 748 devices leased through our distributors. Notably, as of December 31, 2018, we had approximately 1,100 units on the road, with approximately 885 devices being leased directly from us and approximately 215 devices leased through our distributors. The decrease in the total number of devices we have on the road is primarily due to the fact the BDI-747/1 devices was approved in fewer states in 2018 compared to 2017.

Due to the decrease in the number of states where our BDI-747/1 device is approved, and the resulting decrease in the number of devices we have on the road, our management is currently exploring all options related to our business, including, but not limited to: (i) taking out loans or selling our stock in order to raise money to continue, and try to expand, our current business; (ii) trying to acquire a synergistic business and grow our current business; or (iii) selling our current business and trying to find another business to, in or out of our current business segment, to take over the public corporation.

Our website is www.blowanddrive.com.

Principal Products and Services

Our only product is the BDI-747/1 Breath Alcohol Ignition Interlock Device. The BDI-747/1 device is used to detect alcohol in a person’s system by measuring the level of alcohol in a person’s breath by having them blow into the device and determining whether that level is over or under a preset level set by the installer or a trained technician. The pre-determined level differs by state, but is typically around .02. The device is approximately the size of a smartphone which is installed directly onto a vehicle’s steering column. The device requires the driver to exhale into the device prior to starting the vehicle. The device will prevent the vehicle from starting if the driver’s blood-alcohol content exceeds the predetermined set level.

(photo of BDI-747/1)

Our device, designed by Well Electric, incorporates the latest technology and design in the market for such devices. The device has both GPS and video capabilities. The device has a fuel cell sensor and a color display screen. The external camera mounting can wrap around the automobile’s rear view mirror. The device is powered by either an internal battery or a power cable from a control box which supports both 24V and 12V batteries. The device has both USB communication capabilities and WiFi (with approval from service provider).

The specifications for our ignition interlock device are as follows:

The BDI-747/1 unit takes about 30-45 minutes to install in a vehicle, depending on the vehicle. The ignition interlock component is installed on the steering column. Currently, our cost to order the requisite supplies and assemble the BDI-747/1 units is approximately $350-$500 per unit depending on the specifications of the unit. The device requires recalibration in accordance with state requirements, typically every 30 to 60 days.

Marketing

In 2017, most of our marketing consisted of getting approval for our BDI-747/1 device in as many states as possible. By gaining approval in a state our BDI-747/1 device appears on that state’s list of approved breathalyzer ignition interlock devices. Someone convicted of driving under the influence that is required to use a breathalyzer ignition interlock device must choose one from the list of state-approved devices. As a result, by gaining approvals in states, our device is automatically disseminated to our targeted consumers by the state. In addition to trying to obtain approvals in as many states as we can, our other marketing efforts related to our BDI-747/1 device have largely consisted of speaking with various individuals and companies that are in the breathalyzer ignition interlock device industry, such as companies in the business of conducting educational courses for individuals convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol, companies in the business of installing ignition interlock devices, and individuals involved in the approval process for breathalyzer ignition interlock devices.

In addition to marketing our BDI-747/1 device directly to consumers, we have also marketed our distributorship opportunities to various individuals and companies that are in the breathalyzer ignition interlock device industry. In the past, the efforts have included radio and television advertisements of our distributorship program. Although we are not currently running any radio or television advertisements for our distributorship program, we may do so again in the future. We have also discussed these opportunities with various companies and individuals in the industry, similar to what we have done with our marketing of our BDI-747/1 device.

Manufacturing

We are the primary manufacturer of our BDI-747/1 device, through our wholly-owned subsidiary, BDI Manufacturing, Inc., an Arizona corporation. However, we do utilize a supply and assembly company called C4 Development Ltd., a Hong Kong corporation (“C4 Development”). On June 29, 2015, we entered into a Supply Agreement with C4 Development, under which C4 Development supplies us with a part known as the “PCB with Alcohol Tester.” This device has certain parts utilized in our BDI-747/1 device, but the PCB with Alcohol Tester is not a device, by itself, that is capable of obtaining approval from the NHTSA as a breath alcohol interlock device. Once we obtain these parts for a device from C4 Development, we compile the components to the devices at our facility in Phoenix, Arizona in order to create our BDI-747/1 device.

Competition

The business of breathalyzer ignition interlock device industry is competitive, and from time-to-time new companies may appear on the list of approved providers in various states, however, there is a high barrier to entry due to the cost of development fees, manufacturing fees, NHSTA-approved testing, and state field testing. We compete with a number of successful companies in the industry, including, but not limited to, LifeSafer®, Smart Start®, Intoxalock®, Guardian Interlock Systems and Dräger. These larger companies have greater financial resources than we do, have approval in most (if not all) states, and likely have 50,000 of their respective ignition interlock devices on the road each. By comparison as of March 31, 2019, we were approved in two states and had approximately 1,100 units on the road. Although we believe our BDI-747/1 device compares favorably to the interlock devices provided by our competitors, we will need to raise significant capital and gain approval in most states in order capitalize on our BDI-747/1 device. We believe if we do this we will be able to compete better with these larger competitors.

Due to the state approvals necessary to service the judicially-mandated breath analyzer ignition interlock market we believe there is a barrier to entry that will discourage too many other companies from entering the industry. Not only must a new entrant develop and manufacture a breathalyzer device, it must meet the NHTSA requirements, and then get approved by state regulators, all of which can be costly. The complexities and costs of meeting all these steps should keep new entrants into the industry to a minimum.

Intellectual Property

We currently have a utility patent for our BDI Model #1 power line filter, which is used with our BDI-747 Breath Alcohol Ignition Interlock Device to prevent interference from electromagnetic waves. Although we do not have any other formal intellectual property protection over our BDI-747/1 device (such as device patents or trademarks), we do have general intellectual property protections provided by federal and state laws that prohibit unfair business practices, etc.

Government Regulation

Ignition interlock devices must be certified by the states in which a company intends to market and lease the devices. Before applying for certification to any state, the devices are sent to an independent laboratory for testing and certification that the device meets or exceeds the guidelines published by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration as the Model Specifications for Breath Alcohol Ignition Interlock Devices. Each state has its own set of certification guidelines that must be met. Typically the requirements for state certification are met once the device is certified by an independent laboratory as meeting or exceeding the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s published guidelines.

Our BDI-747/1 device was certified by an independent testing laboratory in June 2015. As of December 31, 2017, the BDI-747/1 was approved for use in five states, namely Oregon, Texas, Arizona, Kentucky, and Tennessee. As of December 31, 2018, the BDI-747/1 device was approved in Oregon, Texas, Arizona, and Kentucky. As of March 31, 2019, the BDI-747/1 device was only approved in Arizona and Texas.

Employees

As of December 31, 2017, we had seven independent contractors, which primarily install, calibrate, remove and monitor our BDI-747/1 devices. Mr. Laurence Wainer, our President and Secretary at December 31, 2017, was an independent contractor. At December 31, 2017, we had approximately 35 installers and technicians working in the states where we approved that are independent contractors.

As of December 31, 2018, we had four independent contractors, which primarily install, calibrate, remove and monitor our BDI-747/1 devices. Mr. Laurence Wainer, our President and Secretary at December 31, 2018, was an independent contractor. We have approximately 25 installers and technicians working in the states where we approved that are independent contractors.

Available Information

We are a fully reporting issuer, subject to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our Quarterly Reports, Annual Reports, and other filings can be obtained from the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days during the hours of 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. You may also obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. The Commission maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the Commission at http://www.sec.gov.

ITEM 1A. – RISK FACTORS.

As a smaller reporting company we are not required to provide a statement of risk factors. However, we believe this information may be valuable to our shareholders for this filing. We reserve the right to not provide risk factors in our future filings. Our primary risk factors and other considerations include:

We have a limited operating history and historical financial information upon which you may evaluate our performance.

You should consider, among other factors, our prospects for success in light of the risks and uncertainties encountered by companies that, like us, are in their early stages of development. We may not successfully address these risks and uncertainties or successfully implement our existing and new products. If we fail to do so, it could materially harm our business and impair the value of our common stock. Even if we accomplish these objectives, we may not generate the positive cash flows or profits we anticipate in the future. We were incorporated in Delaware on July 2, 2013. Our business to date business focused on developing, manufacturing, and getting independent certification and state approvals for our BDI-747/1 device, hiring management and staff personnel, contracting with distributors and leasing and servicing our products. Unanticipated problems, expenses and delays are frequently encountered in establishing a new business and developing new products. These include, but are not limited to, inadequate funding, lack of consumer acceptance, competition, product development, and inadequate sales and marketing. The failure by us to meet any of these conditions would have a materially adverse effect upon us and may force us to reduce or curtail operations. No assurance can be given that we can or will ever operate profitably.

We may not be able to meet our future capital needs.

To date, we have not generated sufficient revenue to meet our capital needs, and we may not be able to in the future. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including our ability to develop our products, cash flow from operations, and competing market developments. We will need additional capital in the near future. Any equity financings will result in dilution to our then-existing stockholders. Sources of debt financing may result in high interest expense. Any financing, if available, may be on unfavorable terms. If adequate funds are not obtained, we will be required to reduce or curtail operations.

If we cannot obtain additional funding, our product development and commercialization efforts may be reduced or discontinued and we may not be able to continue operations.

We have historically experienced negative cash flows from operations since our inception and we expect the negative cash flows from operations to continue for the foreseeable future. Unless and until we are able to generate higher revenues, we expect such losses to continue for the foreseeable future. As discussed in our financial statements, there exists substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern.

Product manufacturing and development efforts are highly dependent on the amount of cash and cash equivalents on hand combined with our ability to raise additional capital to support our future operations through one or more methods, including but not limited to, issuing additional equity or debt.

In addition, we may also raise additional capital through additional equity offerings, and licensing our future products in development. While we will continue to explore these potential opportunities, there can be no assurances that we will be successful in raising sufficient capital on terms acceptable to us, or at all, or that we will be successful in licensing our future products. Based on our current projections, we believe we have insufficient cash on hand to meet our obligations as they become due based on current assumptions. The uncertainties surrounding our future cash inflows have raised substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern.

Current economic conditions and capital markets are in a period of disruption and instability which could adversely affect our ability to access the capital markets, and thus adversely affect our business and liquidity.

The current economic conditions and financial crisis have had, and will continue to have, a negative impact on our ability to access the capital markets, and thus have a negative impact on our business and liquidity. The shortage of liquidity and credit combined with the substantial losses in worldwide equity markets could lead to an extended worldwide recession. We may face significant challenges if conditions in the capital markets do not improve. Our ability to access the capital markets has been and continues to be severely restricted at a time when we need to access such markets, which could have a negative impact on our business plans. Even if we are able to raise capital, it may not be at a price or on terms that are favorable to us. We cannot predict the occurrence of future disruptions or how long the current conditions may continue.

Because we face intense competition, we may not be able to operate profitably in our markets.

The market for our product is highly competitive and is becoming more so, which could hinder our ability to successfully market our products. We may not have the resources, expertise or other competitive factors to compete successfully in the future. We expect to face additional competition from existing competitors and new market entrants in the future. Many of our competitors have greater name recognition and more established relationships in the industry than we do. As a result, these competitors may be able to:

If our products do not gain state approvals, are removed in jurisdictions where previously approved, and/or do not meet expected market acceptance, prospects for our sales revenue may be affected.

We use the BDI-747/1 device in the judicially-mandated market for DUI offenders. The judicially-mandated market is where a breathalyzer device is required by law as a punishment for the committing a crime. As a result, sales and servicing of our product is dependent upon us gaining approval in each individual state and/or locality where we want to lease our products. This result can be expensive and time-consuming and there is no guarantee we will be successful in obtaining approval in all the states where we apply and if we don’t get approval in a sufficient number of states the market for our products will suffer. Additionally, even if we gain state approval, there is no guarantee our products will stay as an approved device (we could get our approval revoked in one or more states) or will be chosen by a sufficient number of DUI offenders in those states to provide us with sufficient revenues to pay our expenses.

We plan to lease the BDI-747/1 device in many states through third-party distributors. If we are unsuccessful in finding qualified distributors or our distributors do not perform well, our business could suffer.

While we have a retail location in Phoenix, Arizona, and may open more in the future, under our current business plan we plan to lease the BDI-747/1 device through third-party distributors in many regions and states. If we are unable to find qualified distributors in certain regions and/or states, and/or the distributors we contract with do not perform well, then we may not lease and service as many of our BDI-747/1 devices as we anticipate, and our business would suffer as a result.

If critical components become unavailable or our suppliers delay their production of our key components, our business will be negatively impacted.

Currently, we rely on a primary supplier to supply us with the primary components for our BDI-747/1 device, which we then use to complete the assembly at our location in Phoenix, Arizona. As a result, the stability of component supply is crucial to our ability to get sufficient supplies to manufacture our products. Due to the fact we currently assemble our device from “off the shelf” parts and components, some of our critical devices and components are supplied by certain third-party manufacturers, and we may be unable to acquire necessary amounts of key components at competitive prices.

If we are successful in our growth, outsourcing the production of certain parts and components would be one way to reduce manufacturing costs. We plan to select these particular manufacturers based on their ability to consistently produce these products according to our requirements in an effort to obtain the best quality product at the most cost effective price. However, the loss of all or one of these suppliers or delays in obtaining shipments would have an adverse effect on our operations until an alternative supplier could be found, if one may be located at all. If we get to that stage of growth, such loss of manufacturers could cause us to breach any contracts we have in place at that time and would likely cause us to lose sales.

If our contract manufacturers fail to meet our requirements for quality, quantity and timeliness, our business growth could be harmed.

We obtain the primary components for the BDI-747/1 device from a third party supplier. This supplier likely procures most of the raw materials to make our device from third parties. If these companies were to terminate their agreements with our supplier, or our supplier with us, without adequate notice, or fail to provide the required capacity and quality on a timely basis, we would be delayed in our ability or unable to process and deliver our products to our customers.

Our products could contain defects or they may be installed or operated incorrectly, which could reduce sales of those products or result in claims against us.

Although we have quality assurance practices to ensure good product quality, defects still may be found in the future in our future products.

End-users could lose their confidence in our products and us if they unexpectedly use defective products or use our products improperly. This could result in loss of revenue, loss of profit margin, or loss of market share. Moreover, because our products may be employed in the automotive industry, if one of our products is a cause, or perceived to be the cause, of injury or death in a car accident, we would likely be subject to a claim. If we were found responsible it could cause us to incur liability which could interrupt or even cause us to terminate some or all of our operations.

If we are unable to recruit and retain qualified personnel, our business could be harmed.

Our growth and success highly depend on qualified personnel. Competition in the industry could cause us difficulty in recruiting or retaining a sufficient number of qualified technical personnel, which could harm our ability to develop new products. If we are unable to attract and retain necessary key talents, it would harm our ability to develop competitive product and retain good customers and could adversely affect our business and operating results.

Our BDI-747/1 device has lost its approval in a number of states and our number of devices on the road has been declining. At some point our business may not be viable. Our management is currently exploring all options regarding our current business, as well as other businesses.

Due to the decrease in the number of states where our BDI-747/1 device is approved, and the resulting decrease in the number of devices we have on the road, our management is currently exploring all options related to our business, including, but not limited to: (i) taking out loans or selling our stock in order to raise money to continue, and try to expand, our current business; (ii) trying to acquire a synergistic business and grow our current business; or (iii) selling our current business and trying to find another business to, in or out of our current business segment, to take over the public corporation. In the event we take out loans to fund our operations and/or public filing requirements, the terms of such financing may be on terms not favorable to us and could lead to a significant decrease in our stock price. In the event we sell our existing business or undergo a merger or business combination transaction our shareholders could incur significant dilution due to shares of our stock being issued to any incoming business.

As of December 31, 2017, our internal controls were not effective which led to material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting and, as a result, we may not be able to report our financial results accurately or timely and in the future could have a problem to detecting fraud, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

An effective internal control environment is necessary for us to produce reliable financial reports and is an important part of our effort to prevent financial fraud. We are required to periodically evaluate the effectiveness of the design and operation of our internal controls over financial reporting. Based on these evaluations, we may conclude that enhancements, modifications, or changes to internal controls are necessary or desirable. While management evaluates the effectiveness of our internal controls on a regular basis, these controls may not always be effective, and as of December 31, 2017 they were not effective. There are inherent limitations on the effectiveness of internal controls, including collusion, management override, and failure of human judgment. In addition, control procedures are designed to reduce rather than eliminate business risks. If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, or if management or our independent registered public accounting firm discovers material weaknesses in our internal controls, we may be unable to produce reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, including subjecting us to sanctions or investigation by regulatory authorities, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission. Any such actions could result in an adverse reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which could cause the market price of our common stock to decline or limit our access to capital.

Our common stock has been thinly traded and we cannot predict the extent to which a trading market will develop.

Our common stock is quoted on the OTC Pink-tier of OTC Markets. Our common stock is thinly traded compared to larger more widely known companies. Thinly traded common stock can be more volatile than common stock trading in an active public market. We cannot predict the extent to which an active public market for our common stock will develop or be sustained after this offering.

Because we are subject to the “penny stock” rules, the level of trading activity in our stock may be reduced.

Our common stock is traded on the OTC Markets. Broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in “penny stocks” are regulated by certain penny stock rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Penny stocks, like shares of our common stock, generally are equity securities with a price of less than $5.00, other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on NASDAQ. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document that provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction, and, if the broker-dealer is the sole market maker, the broker-dealer must disclose this fact and the broker-dealer’s presumed control over the market, and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. In addition, broker-dealers who sell these securities to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors” must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. Consequently, these requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity, if any, in the secondary market for a security subject to the penny stock rules, and investors in our common stock may find it difficult to sell their shares.

ITEM 1B – UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

This Item is not applicable to us as we are not an accelerated filer, a large accelerated filer, or a well-seasoned issuer; however, we have not received written comments from the Commission staff regarding our periodic or current reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 within the last 180 days before the end of our last fiscal year.

ITEM 2 – PROPERTIES

As of December 31, 2017, our executive offices, consisted of approximately 1,200 square feet, were located at 5503 Cahuenga Blvd., #203, Los Angeles, California 91601. Under our lease of these premises, we were paying $2,212 per month and the lease was to run through January 2020, but this lease was transferred to another entity when Mr. Wainer sold his controlling interest to Doheny Group, LLC, a limited liability company controlled by David Haridim, our sole officer and director.

As of January 2, 2019, our executive offices are located at 1427 S. Robertson Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90035, and we have this location rent free from our executive officer.

As of January 2, 2019, our manufacturing facility is located at 2352 E. University Drive, Suite D-105, Phoenix, AZ 85034, under the terms of a two year lease that ran from October 31, 2016 to October 31, 2018, at $1,030 per month. Beginning in November 2018 the lease went to month-to-month at $1,696 per month.

ITEM 3 - LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On February 21, 2018, we filed a Complaint in the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, County of Maricopa against EZ Interlock, LLC (Blow & Drive Interlock Corp. v. EZ Interlock, LLC (Case No. CV2018-051689, Superior Court of the State of Arizona, Maricopa County) for Conversion, Implied/Quasi Contract and Quantum Meruit, Unjust Enrichment, Tortious Interference with Business Expectancy/Prospective Business Relations, and Lost Profits. The basis for our lawsuit was that EZ Interlock an authorized installer of ours in the State of Arizona, was a customer of BDI Interlock, LLC, one of our distributors, and EZ Interlock was installing our BDI-747/1 devices for customers in Arizona and collecting fees from such customers, but stopped remitting payment to BDI Interlock, LLC, which, in turn, was unable to remit funds to us. We filed the lawsuit to have EZ Interlock stop installing our devices, return our devices in its possession, and pay the amounts owed to BDI Interlock and us for the customers paying EZ Interlock for our devices. EZ Interlock filed an Answer and Counterclaim on July 23, 2018. Shortly after filing our Complaint, the Court granted our request for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction from continuing to install devices and return the devices in its possession. On February 7, 2019, our new management elected to dismiss the lawsuit, without prejudice, based on their opinion that our chances of recovering money from EZ Interlock was slim compared to amount that would be necessary to fund the litigation. We received most of our devices back from EZ Interlock. No discovery was conducted during the litigation.

In the ordinary course of business, we are from time to time involved in various pending or threatened legal actions. The litigation process is inherently uncertain and it is possible that the resolution of such matters might have a material adverse effect upon our financial condition and/or results of operations. However, in the opinion of our management, other than as set forth herein, matters currently pending or threatened against us are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

ITEM 4 – MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

There is no information required to be disclosed under this Item.

PART II

ITEM 5 - MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

Our common stock is currently quoted on the OTCQB-tier of OTC Markets under the symbol “BDIC.” We were listed on June 30, 2015. The following table sets forth the high and low bid information for each quarter within the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, as best we could estimate from publicly-available information. The information reflects prices between dealers, and does not include retail markup, markdown, or commission, and may not represent actual transactions.

The Securities Enforcement and Penny Stock Reform Act of 1990 requires additional disclosure relating to the market for penny stocks in connection with trades in any stock defined as a penny stock. The Commission has adopted regulations that generally define a penny stock to be any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to a few exceptions which we do not meet. Unless an exception is available, the regulations require the delivery, prior to any transaction involving a penny stock, of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the risks associated therewith.

We have not adopted any stock option or stock bonus plans.

Holders

As of December 31, 2017, there were 24,776,266 shares of our common stock outstanding held by 105 holders of record and numerous shares held in brokerage accounts. As of March 20, 2019, there were 30,211,875 shares of our common stock outstanding held by 137 holders of record. Of these shares, 18,640,960 were held by non-affiliates. As of June 30, 2017, we had 13,378,754 shares held by non-affiliates. On the cover page of this filing we value the 13,378,754 shares held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2017 at $2,742,645. These shares were valued at $0.205 per share, based on our closing share price on June 30, 2017.

As of December 31, 2017, there were 1,000,000 shares of our preferred stock outstanding, with all shares being Series A Preferred Stock. Our Series A Preferred has One Million (1,000,000) shares authorized and the following rights: (i) no dividend rights; (ii) no liquidation preference over our common stock; (iii) no conversion rights; (iv) no redemption rights; (v) no call rights; (vi) each share of Series A Convertible Preferred stock will have one hundred (100) votes on all matters validly brought to our common stockholders. As of December 31, 2017, all 1,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock were held by Laurence Wainer, our then sole officer and director. As of March 20, 2019, the 1,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock are held by The Doheny Group, LLC, a limited liability company controlled by David Haridim, our sole officer and director.

Warrants

We currently have one warrant outstanding to purchase our common stock:

On November 1, 2016, we issued Mr. David Haridim a warrant to acquire 50,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.10 per share. The warrant has an exercise period of four years from the date of issuance. The issuance of the warrant was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. The investor was sophisticated, familiar with our operations, and there was no solicitation.

Dividends

There have been no cash dividends declared on our common stock, and we do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Dividends are declared at the sole discretion of our Board of Directors.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

There are no outstanding options or warrants to purchase shares of our common stock under any equity compensation plans.

Currently, we do not have any equity compensation plans. As a result, we did not have any options, warrants or rights outstanding under equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2017.

Recent Issuance of Unregistered Securities

During the three months ended December 31, 2017, we issued the following unregistered securities. All such securities were issued pursuant exemptions from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as a transaction by an issuer not involving any public offering, as noted below.

During the three months ended December 31, 2017, we issued an aggregate of 2,099,502 shares of our common stock and issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 469,880 shares of common stock to 22 non-affiliated investors in exchange for $270,939. The warrants have an exercise price of $1.00 per share and expire four (4) years from the date of issuance. Based on the representations made the investors in their Common Stock Purchase and Warrant Agreement the investors were sophisticated, familiar with our operations, and there was no solicitation. As a result, the issuances of the securities were exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

If our stock is listed on an exchange we will be subject to the Securities Enforcement and Penny Stock Reform Act of 1990 requires additional disclosure relating to the market for penny stocks in connection with trades in any stock defined as a penny stock. The Commission has adopted regulations that generally define a penny stock to be any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to a few exceptions which we do not meet. Unless an exception is available, the regulations require the delivery, prior to any transaction involving a penny stock, of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the risks associated therewith.

ITEM 6 – SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

As a smaller reporting company we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

ITEM 7 - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

Disclaimer Regarding Forward Looking Statements

In this document we make a number of statements, referred to as “forward-looking statements”, that are intended to convey our expectations or predictions regarding the occurrence of possible future events or the existence of trends and factors that may impact our future plans and operating results. The safe harbor for forward-looking statements provided by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 does not apply to us. We note, however, that these forward-looking statements are derived, in part, from various assumptions and analyses we have made in the context of our current business plan and information currently available to us and in light of our experience and perceptions of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments and other factors we believe to be appropriate in the circumstances. You can generally identify forward-looking statements through words and phrases such as “seek,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “budget,” “project,” “may be,” “may continue,” “may likely result,” and similar expressions. When reading any forward looking-statement you should remain mindful that all forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain as they are based on current expectations and assumptions concerning future events or future performance of our company, and that actual results or developments may vary substantially from those expected as expressed in or implied by that statement for a number of reasons or factors, including those relating to:

Each forward-looking statement should be read in context with, and with an understanding of, the various other disclosures concerning our company and our business made elsewhere in this document as well as other public reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement as a prediction of actual results or developments. We are not obligated to update or revise any forward-looking statement contained in this document to reflect new events or circumstances unless and to the extent required by applicable law.

Overview and Outlook

We are a previous development stage company that was incorporated in the State of Delaware in July 2013. In the year ending December 31, 2017, we generated total revenues of $1,235,433, compared to $303,765 in the year ending December 31, 2016.

We market distributorships and lease a breath alcohol ignition interlock device called the BDI-747/1, which is a mechanism that is installed on the steering column of an automobile and into which a driver exhales. The device in turn provides a blood-alcohol concentration analysis. If the driver’s blood-alcohol content is higher than a certain pre-programmed limit, the device prevents the ignition from engaging and the automobile from starting. These devices are often required for use by DUI or DWI (“driving under the influence” or “driving while intoxicated”) offenders as part of a mandatory court or motor vehicle department program.

We paid Well Electric, a company located in China with experience in design and manufacture of ignition interlock devices, $30,000 to design and manufacture the prototype ignition interlock device for us. Well Electric produced six prototype devices for us which we received in November 2014.

At July 27, 2015 we began production of our patent pending BDI Model #1 power line filter to attach to our BDI-747 Breath Alcohol Ignition Interlock Device which together were certified by NHSTA on June 17, 2015 to work to together to meet or exceed 2013 NHSTA guidelines.

As of December 31, 2017, the BDI-747/1 was approved for use in five states, namely Oregon, Texas, Arizona, Kentucky, and Tennessee. As of December 31, 2018, the BDI-747/1 device was approved in Oregon, Texas, Arizona, and Kentucky. As of March 31, 2019, the BDI-747/1 device was only approved in Arizona and Texas. The states where our BDI-747/1 device is approved has decreased primarily as a result of new state certification rules that require increased capital investment that we are not able to afford.

We have a storefront location in Phoenix, Arizona and contract with four qualified contractors to install, calibrate, remove and monitor the devices. Our business plan includes growth of the company by continuing to complete and submit more state applications and to build up our service infrastructure by utilizing our own retail infrastructure, distributors and franchisees.

As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately 1,558 units on the road, with approximately 1,451 devices being leased directly from us and approximately 107 devices leased through our distributors. As of December 31, 2018, we had approximately 1,100 units on the road, with approximately 885 devices being leased directly from us and approximately 215 devices leased through our distributors. The decrease in the total number of devices we have on the road is primarily due to the fact the BDI-747/1 devices was approved in fewer states in 2018 compared to 2017.

Due to the decrease in the number of states where our BDI-747/1 device is approved, and the resulting decrease in the number of devices we have on the road, our management is currently exploring all options related to our business, including, but not limited to: (i) taking out loans or selling our stock in order to raise money to continue, and try to expand, our current business; (ii) trying to acquire a synergistic business and grow our current business; or (iii) selling our current business and trying to find another business to, in or out of our current business segment, to take over the public corporation.

Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016

Operating Loss; Net Loss

Our net loss increased by $1,853,096, from $856,219 to $2,709,315 from the year ended 2016 compared to 2017. Our operating loss increased by $1,026,239, from $501,139 to $1,527,378 for the same periods. The change in our net loss for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to the prior year is primarily a result of significant increases in our operating expenses and our other expenses, partially offset by an increase in our revenues. These changes are detailed below.

Revenue

During the year ended December 31, 2017 we had $1,235,433 in revenues, with $926,454 coming from revenue from the monthly recurring payments we received from our customers that rent our BDI-747/1 breathalyzer device for the ongoing monitoring services related to the devices, and $308,979 coming from revenues paid to us from our distributors, compared to $212,128 and $91,637 from these revenue sources for the same period one year ago. Our revenue increased during the year ended December 31, 2017 due to us having approximately 1,558 units on the road, compared to the year ended December 31, 2016, when we had approximately 1,075 units on the road. We expect the revenue we receive from monitoring our devices on the road, as well as revenue from distributors, will increase in any periods we have more devices on the road versus the comparable period and will decrease in any period we have fewer units on the road versus the comparable period. We do not believe our revenues will increase if our number of devices on the road decreases since we do not believe we will charge more for leasing the BDI-747/1 device than what we charge now in the foreseeable future.

Cost of Revenue

Our cost of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $160,797, compared to $41,168 for the year ended December 31, 2016. Our cost of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $153,059 for the revenue we received for the ongoing maintenance for units we lease to customers, and $7,738 related to the revenue we received from distributors. Our cost of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $38,276 for the revenue we received for the ongoing maintenance for units we lease to customers, and $2,892 related to the revenue we received from distributors.

Payroll

Our payroll increased by $326,389, from $147,231 to $473,620, from the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to December 31, 2017. The significant increase in our payroll expense was primarily a result of us contracting with additional personnel in 2017 as a result of having a more units on the road.

Professional Fees

Our professional fees increased during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. Our professional fees were $146,406 for the year ended December 31, 2017 and $92,705 for the year ended December 31, 2016. These fees are largely related to fees paid for legal, accounting and audit services. We expect these fees to continue grow steadily if our business expands. In the event we undertake an unusual transaction, such as an acquisition or file a registration statement, we would expect these fees to substantially increase during that period.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased by $383,610, from $458,351 for the year ended December 31, 2016 to $841,961 for the year ended December 31, 2017. This increase was primarily related to increases in advertising, consulting services ad certain public company compliance costs.

Depreciation

We had depreciation of $338,044 for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $65,449 for the same period one year ago. Our depreciation expense in 2017 and 2016 was primarily related to the depreciation of the BDI-747/1 devices.

Impairment of Fixed Assets

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we had impairment of fixed assets of $801,983, compared to $0 during 2016. The impairment of our fixed assets is a result of our management currently determining whether our current business model and operations are viable. Until this determination has been made, we have elected to impair our assets.

Interest Expense

Interest expense increased by $728,707 from $214,708 for the year ended December 31, 2016 to $943,415 for the year ended December 31, 2017. For both periods these amounts are largely due to the interest we owe on outstanding debt including amortization of debt discount costs. The interest expense significantly increased for the period ended December 31, 2017, compared to the same period one year ago, due to our increase in outstanding debt compared to one year ago, and the related accretion of the substantial amount of debt discount associated with the debt.

Change in Fair Value of Derivative Liability

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we had a change in fair value of derivative liability of $68,078 compared to ($22,231) for the same period in 2016. The change in fair value of derivative liability for both periods, relates to the conversion feature of a promissory note we had outstanding during this period. Since the conversion price on the promissory note is calculated based on a discount to the closing price of our common stock, as our closing price fluctuates it changes the fair value of the derivative liability.

Loss on Extinguishment of Debt

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we had a loss on extinguishment of debt of $305,000 compared to $116,541 for the same period in 2016. The loss on extinguishment of debt in the year ended December 31, 2017, relates to the conversion of a note balance totaling $43,561.50 owed to Mr. Laurence Wainer into shares of our Series A Preferred Stock. The loss on extinguishment of debt in the year ended December 31, 2016, relates to the deemed extinguishment of royalty note #1 as discussed in Note 6 to the financial statements.

Liquidity and Capital Resources for Year Ended December 31, 2017 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2016

Introduction

During the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, because of our operating losses, we did not generate positive operating cash flows. Our cash on hand as of December 31, 2017 was $31,874 and our cash used in operations is approximately $50,000 per month. As a result, we have short term cash needs. These needs are being satisfied through proceeds from the sales of our securities and loans from both related parties and third parties. We currently do not believe we will be able to satisfy our cash needs from our revenues for some time.

Our cash, current assets, total assets, current liabilities, and total liabilities as of December 31, 2017 and as of December 31, 2016, respectively, are as follows:

Our current assets decreased as of December 31, 2017 as compared to December 31, 2016, due to us having less cash on hand, and less accounts receivable, net. The significant decrease in our total assets between the two periods was also related to the decrease in our cash on hand, accounts receivable, net, as well as the significant decrease in furniture and equipment, net as of December 31, 2017. The significant decrease in our furniture and equipment, net is a result of us impairing our BDI-747/1 breathalyzer devices while our management determines and viability of our existing business operations.

Our current liabilities increased by $103,446, as of December 31, 2017 as compared to December 31, 2016. This increase was primarily due to increases in our notes payable-related party, convertible notes payable, royalty notes payable, accrued payables, accrued interest revenue, and derivative liability, partially offset by an increase in accrued expenses.

In order to repay our obligations in full or in part when due, we will be required to raise significant capital from other sources. There is no assurance, however, that we will be successful in these efforts.

Sources and Uses of Cash

Operations

We had net cash used in operating activities of $384,641 for the year ended December 31, 2017, as compared to $431,021 for the year ended December 31, 2016. For the period in 2017, the net cash used in operating activities consisted primarily of our net loss of ($2,709,315), adjusted primarily by impairment of long-lived assets of $804,322, depreciation of $338,044, shares and warrants issued for services of $14,191, loss on extinguishment of debt of $305,000, write off of debt discount due to refinance of $352,511, loss on disposal of property and equipment of $98,800, change in fair value of derivative liability of ($61,254), and amortization of debt discount of $361,676, as well as changes in accrued expenses of ($9,045), deferred revenue of $22,047, deposits of $1,123, accounts payable of $6,552, inventory of $10,650, prepaid expenses of ($294), accrued royalties payable of $58,026, and accounts receivable of $22,325. For the period in 2016, the net cash used in operating activities consisted primarily of our net loss of ($856,219) (restated), adjusted primarily by change in fair value of derivative liability of $22,231, shares issued for services of $236,933, amortization of debt discount of $158,665, depreciation of $65,449, and loss on extinguishment of debt of $116,541 as well as changes in accrued expenses of $24,624, deferred revenue of $80,657 (restated), deposits of ($250,029), prepaid expenses of $212, inventory of ($285), accrued royalties payable of $1,967, accounts payable of $17,883, and accounts receivable of ($49,650).

Investments

We had cash used in investing activities in the year ended December 31, 2017 of $634,820, compared to $376,148 for December 31, 2016. For the year ended December 31, 2017, cash used in investing activities consisted of $884,820 of purchase of furniture and equipment, offset by $250,000 deposits used against the cost of purchasing interlock units. For the year ended December 31, 2016, cash used in investing activities consisted entirely of purchases of furniture and equipment.

Financing

Our net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $935,026, compared to $914,375 for the year ended December 31, 2016. For the year ended December 31, 2017, our net cash from financing activities consisted of proceeds from notes payable of $50,000, proceeds from notes payable-related party of $250,400, proceeds from issuance of common stock of $849,037, and proceeds from issuance of convertible notes payable of $5,000, partially offset by repayments of notes payable of ($56,662), payments on convertible notes payable of ($50,000), and payments on note payable related party of ($112,749). For the year ended December 31, 2016, our net cash from financing activities consisted of proceeds from notes payable of $209,980, proceeds from notes payable-related party of $666,220, and proceeds from issuance of common stock of $187,500, partially offset by repayments of notes payable of ($100,603) and payments on note payable-related party of ($48,722).

Contractual Obligations

As of December 31, 2017, we had the following contractual obligations for 2017 through 2021:

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off balance sheet arrangements.

ITEM 7A – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

As a smaller reporting company we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

ITEM 8 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

For a list of financial statements and supplementary data filed as part of this Annual Report, see the Index to Financial Statements beginning at page F-1 of this Annual Report.

ITEM 9 - CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

There are no items required to be reported under this Item.

ITEM 9A - CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (our Principal Accounting Officer), of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined) in Exchange Act Rules 13a – 15(c) and 15d – 15(e)). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, who are our principal executive officer and principal financial officers, respectively, concluded that, as of the end of the period ended December 31, 2017, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective (1) to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (2) to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to us, including our chief executive and chief financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (our Principal Accounting Officer) do not expect that our disclosure controls or internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. No matter how well conceived and operated, our disclosure controls and procedures can provide only a reasonable level of assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented if there exists in an individual a desire to do so. There can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

Furthermore, smaller reporting companies face additional limitations. Smaller reporting companies employ fewer individuals and find it difficult to properly segregate duties. Often, one or two individuals control every aspect of the company’s operation and are in a position to override any system of internal control. Additionally, smaller reporting companies tend to utilize general accounting software packages that lack a rigorous set of software controls.

(b) Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act, as amended, as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (our Principal Financial Officer), and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States and includes those policies and procedures that:

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment, Management has identified the following three material weaknesses that have caused management to conclude that, as of December 31, 2017, our disclosure controls and procedures, and our internal control over financial reporting, were not effective at the reasonable assurance level:

1. We do not have sufficient segregation of duties within accounting functions, which is a basic internal control. Due to our size and nature, segregation of all conflicting duties may not always be possible and may not be economically feasible. However, to the extent possible, the initiation of transactions, the custody of assets and the recording of transactions should be performed by separate individuals. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have segregation of duties on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

2. We have not documented our internal controls. We have limited policies and procedures that cover the recording and reporting of financial transactions and accounting provisions. As a result we may be delayed in our ability to calculate certain accounting provisions. While we believe these provisions are accounted for correctly in the attached audited financial statements our lack of internal controls could lead to a delay in our reporting obligations. We are required to provide written documentation of key internal controls over financial reporting. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have written documentation of our internal controls and procedures on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

3. Effective controls over the control environment were not maintained. Specifically, a formally adopted written code of business conduct and ethics that governs our employees, officers, and directors was not in place. Additionally, management has not developed and effectively communicated to our employees its accounting policies and procedures. This has resulted in inconsistent practices. Further, our Board of Directors does not currently have any independent members and no director qualifies as an audit committee financial expert as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K. Since these entity level programs have a pervasive effect across the organization, management has determined that these circumstances constitute a material weakness.

4. Currently, we do not have ability systematic approach to timely and accurately record unearned revenue and revenue, convertible debt transactions, deferred revenue, and derivative liabilities in the financial statements and have needed additional time, beyond the filing deadlines set by the Commission, to file our periodic reports.

To address these material weaknesses, management performed additional analyses and other procedures to ensure that the financial statements included herein fairly present, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. Accordingly, we believe that the consolidated financial statements included in this report fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

(c) Remediation of Material Weaknesses

In order to remediate the material weakness in our documentation, evaluation and testing of internal controls, we hope to hire additional qualified and experienced personnel to assist us in remedying this material weakness.

(d) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There are no changes to report during our fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2017.

ITEM 9B – OTHER INFORMATION

There are no events required to be disclosed by the Item.

PART III

ITEM 10 – DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth the names and ages of our directors, director nominees, and executive officers as of December 31, 2017, the principal offices and positions with the Company held by each person and the date such person became a director or executive officer of the Company. The executive officers of the Company are elected annually by the Board of Directors. The directors serve one-year terms until their successors are elected. The executive officers serve terms of one year or until their death, resignation, or removal by the Board of Directors. Unless described below, there are no family relationships among any of the directors and officers.

Business Experience

The following is a brief account of the education and business experience of each director and executive officer during at least the past five years, indicating each person’s principal occupation during the period, and the name and principal business of the organization by which he was employed.

Laurence Wainer serves as our sole director and our President, Chief Executive Officer and Secretary. Mr. Wainer has built his career as an entrepreneur in Southern California beginning with a vending business which he started while attending San Diego State University. From 2009 to 2011 Mr. Wainer built a tax resolution company, Authorized Tax Relief, located in Los Angeles, California. From 2011 to September 2013, Mr. Wainer was employed as a consultant for LWIN Consulting. Mr. Wainer founded Blow & Drive Interlock Corporation in 2014 as a result of his commitment to help create safer roads for sober drivers, having been personally affected by drunk drivers.

The following table sets forth the names and ages of our directors, director nominees, and executive officers as of March 20, 2019, the principal offices and positions with the Company held by each person and the date such person became a director or executive officer of the Company. The executive officers of the Company are elected annually by the Board of Directors. The directors serve one-year terms until their successors are elected. The executive officers serve terms of one year or until their death, resignation, or removal by the Board of Directors. Unless described below, there are no family relationships among any of the directors and officers.

Business Experience

The following is a brief account of the education and business experience of each director and executive officer during at least the past five years, indicating each person’s principal occupation during the period, and the name and principal business of the organization by which he was employed.

David Haridim, age 36, was appointed as our President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary on January 2, 2019. He was also appointed to our Board of Directors on the same date. Mr. Haridim has been the Manager of The Doheny Group, LLC since January 2016. The Doheny Group, LLC invests in private and public companies in different industries and Mr. Haridim, as the Manager of The Doheny Group analyzes and approves any and all investments made by The Doheny Group, LLC. Prior to founding The Doheny Group, LLC, Mr. Haridim was the managing partner at Whitestone International Group. Mr. Haridim attended Southwestern School of Law, graduating with a J.D. in 2012.

Term of Office

Our directors hold office until the next annual meeting or until their successors have been elected and qualified, or until they resign or are removed. Our board of directors appoints our officers, and our officers hold office until their successors are chosen and qualify, or until their resignation or their removal.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among our directors or officers.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

Our directors and executive officers have not been involved in any of the following events during the past ten years:

Committees

All proceedings of the board of directors for the year ended December 31, 2017 were conducted by resolutions consented to in writing by the board of directors and filed with the minutes of the proceedings of our board of directors. Our company currently does not have nominating, compensation or audit committees or committees performing similar functions nor does our company have a written nominating, compensation or audit committee charter. Our board of directors does not believe that it is necessary to have such committees because it believes that the functions of such committees can be adequately performed by the board of directors.

We do not have any defined policy or procedural requirements for shareholders to submit recommendations or nominations for directors. The board of directors believes that, given the stage of our development, a specific nominating policy would be premature and of little assistance until our business operations develop to a more advanced level. Our company does not currently have any specific or minimum criteria for the election of nominees to the board of directors and we do not have any specific process or procedure for evaluating such nominees. The board of directors will assess all candidates, whether submitted by management or shareholders, and make recommendations for election or appointment.

A shareholder who wishes to communicate with our board of directors may do so by directing a written request addressed to our president at the address appearing on the first page of this annual report.

Audit Committee Financial Expert

Our board of directors has determined that it does not have an audit committee member that qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K. We believe that the audit committee members are collectively capable of analyzing and evaluating our financial statements and understanding internal controls and procedures for financial reporting. In addition, we believe that retaining an independent director who would qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” would be overly costly and burdensome and is not warranted in our circumstances given the early stages of our development and the fact that we have not generated revenues to date.

Nomination Procedures For Appointment of Directors

As of December 31, 2017, we did not effect any material changes to the procedures by which our stockholders may recommend nominees to our board of directors.

Code of Ethics

We do not have a code of ethics.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company’s directors and executive officers and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and other equity securities of the Company. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent shareholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, to the Company’s knowledge, the following delinquencies occurred:

Indemnification of Directors and Officers

Article Fourteen of our Articles of Incorporation provides that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, no director or officer shall be personally liable to the corporation or its shareholders for damages for breach of any duty owed to the corporation or its shareholders. In addition, the corporation shall have the power, in its bylaws or in any resolution of its stockholders or directors, to indemnify the officers and directors of the corporation against any liability as may be determined to be in the best interests of this corporation, and in conjunction therewith, to buy, at the corporation’s expense, policies of insurance.

Article XI of our Bylaws further addresses indemnification of our directors and officers and allows us to indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by the General Corporation Law of Delaware.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Act”) may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the small business issuer pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the small business issuer has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.

ITEM 11 - EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The particulars of compensation paid to the following persons:

who we will collectively refer to as the named executive officers, for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, and 2015, are set out in the following summary compensation table:

Summary Compensation

The following table provides a summary of the compensation received by the persons set out therein for each of our last three fiscal years:

As noted above, on January 2, 2019, Mr. David Haridim, the principal of Doheny Group, LLC, was appointed to our Board of Directors and as our sole executive officer. Since his appointment neither he nor Doheny Group, LLC has received any compensation from us as salary, royalties, stock, or otherwise.

Employment Contracts

On November 15, 2016, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Abraham Summers through Gnosiis International, LLC. Under the terms of the employment agreement, we agreed to employ Mr. Summers as our Chief Financial Officer until terminated by either party. Under the employment agreement we agreed to compensate Gnosiis and Mr. Summers an aggregate of 80% of the compensation paid by us to Mr. Laurence Wainer, our President, with 50% of the compensation paid to Mr. Summers as an employee and 50% paid to Gnosiis for consulting services. On June 19, 2017, we entered into a Termination of Services Agreement, under which the agreements we had with Mr. Summers and Gnosiis International, LLC, were terminated effective immediately. Mr. Summers also relinquished his right to serve on our Board of Director and Gnosiis relinquished any anti-dilution rights that mandated us to issue Gnosiis additional shares when we issued shares of our common stock. Under the Termination of Services of Agreement, we paid Mr. Summers $55,000 and issued Gnosiis 294,321 shares of our common stock .

In September 11, 2015 we entered into an independent contract agreement with Mr. Laurence Wainer for his services as our sole executive officer. Under the terms of the agreement, we agreed to pay Mr. Wainer $4,000 per month for his services as our sole executive officer. The agreement is for an initial term of one year, which will automatically renew for one year periods unless terminated in accordance with the agreement.

Long-Term Incentive Plans. We do not provide its officers or employees with pension, stock appreciation rights, long-term incentive or other plans and has no intention of implementing any of these plans for the foreseeable future.

Employee Pension, Profit Sharing or other Retirement Plans. We do not have a defined benefit, pension plan, profit sharing or other retirement plan, although it may adopt one or more of such plans in the future.

Director Compensation

The following table sets forth director compensation for 2017:

No director received compensation for the fiscal years December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016. We have no formal plan for compensating our directors for their service in their capacity as directors, although such directors are expected in the future to receive stock options to purchase common shares as awarded by our board of directors or (as to future stock options) a compensation committee which may be established. Directors are entitled to reimbursement for reasonable travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meetings of our board of directors. Our board of directors may award special remuneration to any director undertaking any special services on our behalf other than services ordinarily required of a director.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth certain information concerning outstanding stock awards held by the Named Executive Officers on December 31, 2017:

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

There were no outstanding stock options or stock appreciation rights granted to our executive officers and directors at December 31, 2017.

Aggregated Option Exercises

There were no options exercised by any officer or director of our company during our twelve month period ended December 31, 2017.

Long-Term Incentive Plan

Currently, our company does not have a long-term incentive plan in favor of any director, officer, consultant or employee of our company.

ITEM 12 - SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth, as of April 8, 2019, certain information with respect to our equity securities owned of record or beneficially by (i) each Officer and Director of the Company; (ii) each person who owns beneficially more than 5% of each class of the Company’s outstanding equity securities; and (iii) all Directors and Executive Officers as a group.

Common Stock

Series A Preferred Stock

The issuer is not aware of any person who owns of record, or is known to own beneficially, ten percent or more of the outstanding securities of any class of the issuer, other than as set forth above. The issuer is not aware of any person who controls the issuer as specified in Section 2(a)(1) of the 1940 Act. There are no classes of stock other than common stock issued or outstanding. The Company does not have an investment advisor.

ITEM 13 - CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

On March 7, 2017, we entered into an Debt Conversion and Series A Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) with Laurence Wainer, one of our officers and directors (“Wainer”), under which we agreed to create a new series of non-convertible preferred stock entitled “Series A Preferred Stock,” with One Million (1,000,000) shares authorized and the following rights: (i) no dividend rights; (ii) no liquidation preference over the Company’s common stock; (iii) no conversion rights; (iv) no redemption rights; (v) no call rights by the Company; (vi) each share of Series A Convertible Preferred stock will have one hundred (100) votes on all matters validly brought to the Company’s common stockholders; and Wainer agreed to acquire 1,000,000 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, once created, in exchange for Wainer forgiving $25,537 in accrued salary we owed to him as of December 31, 2017.

As additional consideration for Wainer’s acquisition of the Series A Preferred Shares we entered into a Lockup Agreement with Wainer dated March 7, 2017 (the “Lockup Agreement”). Under the Lockup Agreement Wainer agreed to refrain selling 8,000,000 out of the approximately 9,700,000 shares of our common stock he owns until the expiration of the Lockup Period, as defined in the Lockup Agreement. The description of the Lockup Agreement set forth in this report is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of that document, which is attached hereto as Exhibit 10.2 and is incorporated herein by reference.

On November 30, 2015, we entered into a Finder’s Fee Agreement with Gnosiis International, LLC, a Wyoming entity controlled by Mr. Abraham Summers, who is now our Chief Financial Officer. Under the Finder’s Fee Agreement we agreed to contract with Gnosiis to assist us with finding financing for the company, as well as for consulting services in connection with economics, project management and business development. Under the agreement, we agreed to pay Gnosiis one share for every dollar in financing closed by us as a result of Gnosiis’ efforts. On September 30, 2016, in connection with the Loan and Security Agreement we entered into with The Doheny Group, LLC, we issued Gnosiis 533,100 shares of our common stock. We also compensate Gnosiis weekly for consulting services provided to us.

On November 15, 2016, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Abraham Summers through Gnosiis. Under the terms of the employment agreement, we agreed to employ Mr. Summers as our Chief Financial Officer until terminated by either party. Under the employment agreement we agreed to compensate Gnosiis and Mr. Summers an aggregate of 80% of the compensation paid by us to Mr. Laurence Wainer, our President, with 50% of the compensation paid to Mr. Summers as an employee and 50% paid to Gnosiis for consulting services. The compensation is to be paid weekly and shall be at least $500 per week.

In September 11, 2015 we entered into an independent contract agreement with Mr. Laurence Wainer for his services as our sole executive officer. Under the terms of the agreement, we agreed to pay Mr. Wainer $4,000 per month for his services as our sole executive officer. The agreement is for an initial term of one year, which will automatically renew for one year periods unless terminated in accordance with the agreement.

Corporate Governance

As of December 31, 2017, our Board of Directors consisted of Laurence Wainer. As of December 31, 2017, we did not have any directors that qualified as “independent directors” as the term is used in NASDAQ rule 5605(a)(2).

Our current Board of Directors consists of David Haridim as our sole director.

ITEM 14 – PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Audit fees

The aggregate fees billed for the two most recently completed fiscal periods ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 for professional services rendered by Benjamin & Young, LLP and Redwitz, Inc., respectively, for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements, quarterly reviews of our interim consolidated financial statements and services normally provided by the independent accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for these fiscal periods were as follows:

In the above table, “audit fees” are fees billed by our company’s external auditor for services provided in auditing our company’s annual financial statements for the subject year. “Audit-related fees” are fees not included in audit fees that are billed by the auditor for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit review of our company’s financial statements. “Tax fees” are fees billed by the auditor for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. “All other fees” are fees billed by the auditor for products and services not included in the foregoing categories.

Policy on Pre-Approval by Audit Committee of Services Performed by Independent Auditors

The board of directors pre-approves all services provided by our independent auditors. All of the above services and fees were reviewed and approved by the board of directors before the respective services were rendered.

The board of directors has considered the nature and amount of fees billed by Benjamin & Young, LLP and Redwitz, Inc. and believes that the provision of services for activities unrelated to the audit is compatible with maintaining Benjamin & Young, LLP and Redwitz, Inc. independence.

PART IV

ITEM 15 - EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)(1) Financial Statements

For a list of financial statements and supplementary data filed as part of this Annual Report, see the Index to Financial Statements beginning at page F-1 of this Annual Report.

(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules

We do not have any financial statement schedules required to be supplied under this Item.

(a)(3) Exhibits

Refer to (b) below.

* Filed herewith

** XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

ITEM 8 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

INDEX

Supplementary Data

Not applicable

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

Of Blow & Drive Interlock Corporation

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Blow & Drive Interlock Corporation (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Substantial Doubt About the Company’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered losses from operations and cash outflows from operating activities that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Benjamin & Young, LLP

We served as the Company’s Auditor since 2018

Anaheim, California

June 7, 2019

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Blow & Drive Ignition Interlock Corporation

and subsidiary:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Blow & Drive Ignition Interlock Corporation and subsidiary (the Company) as of December 31, 2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ (deficit) equity, and cash flows for the year then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Blow & Drive Ignition Interlock Corporation and subsidiary as of December 31, 2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has incurred recurring losses from operations and has limited cash resources, which raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ Redwitz, Inc.

Irvine, California

April 17, 2017, except for the items disclosed in Note 3 to the financial statements as to which the date is May 18, 2018

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

BLOW & DRIVE INTERLOCK CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

BLOW & DRIVE INTERLOCK CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

BLOW & DRIVE INTERLOCK CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)