MPHASE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. - Quarter Report: 2007 March (Form 10-Q)

 UNITED STATES
 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

   FORM 10-Q

  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

 FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2007

  COMMISSION FILE NO. 000-24969

  mPhase Technologies, Inc.
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

  ISSUER’S TELEPHONE NUMBER, (203) 838-2741

INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT (1) HAS FILED ALL REPORTS REQUIRED TO BE FILED BY SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, DURING THE PRECEDING 12 MONTHS (OR FOR SHORTER PERIOD THAT THE REGISTRANT WAS REQUIRED TO FILE SUCH REPORT), AND (2) HAS BEEN SUBJECT TO SUCH FILING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PAST 90 DAYS.

 YES    X         NO ___

THE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING OF EACH OF THE REGISTRANT’S CLASSES OF COMMON STOCK AS OF May 14, 2007 IS 361,759,535 SHARES, ALL OF ONE CLASS OF $.01 STATED VALUE COMMON STOCK.

mPHASE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

INDEX

4

mPHASE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

 (A Development Stage Company)

Consolidated Balance Sheet

5

mPHASE TECHNOLOGIES, INC

 (A Development Stage Company)

 Consolidated Statements of Operations

 (Unaudited)

6

mPHASE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

 (A Development Stage Company)

 Consolidated Statements of Operations

 (Unaudited)

7

mPHASE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

 (A Development Stage Company)

Consolidated Statement of Changes in

Shareholders’ Deficit

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

8

mPHASE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

 (A Development Stage Company)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow
(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
 

9

mPHASE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

 (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 (UNAUDITED)

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

NATURE OF OPERATIONS - mPhase Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") was organized on October 2, 1996 and is in the development stage, as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 7, "Accounting and Reporting by Development Stage Enterprises." The Company’s present activities are focused on the commercial deployment of its proprietary IPTV or TV+ solution and DSL component products. The Company is also engaged in exploratory research though Lucent Technologies Inc. of electronic sensors and power cells (nanotechnology). Since mPhase is in the development stage, the accompanying consolidated financial statements should not be regarded as typical for normal operating periods.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION - The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and pursuant to the regulations of the Securities Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring nature) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the nine months ending March 31, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for a full fiscal year. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2006.

Through March 31, 2007, the Company had incurred cumulative (a) development stage losses totaling approximately $162,520,429, (b) stockholders’ deficit of ($2,634,400), and (c) negative cash flow from operations equal to $73,398,128. At March 31, 2007, the Company had $315,055 of cash, cash equivalents and $2,770 of trade receivables to fund short-term working capital requirements. The Company's ability to continue as a going concern and its future success is dependent upon its ability to raise capital in the near term to: (1) satisfy its current obligations, (2) continue its research and development efforts, and (3) allow the successful wide scale development, deployment and marketing of its products.

USE OF ESTIMATES - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

LOSS PER COMMON SHARE, BASIC AND DILUTED - The Company accounts for net loss per common share in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 128, "EARNINGS PER SHARE" ("EPS"). SFAS No. 128 requires the disclosure of the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the entity. Common equivalent shares have been excluded from the computation of diluted EPS for all periods presented since their affect is anti dilutive.

2. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

10

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

MICROPHASE CORPORATION

mPhase’s President, Chief Operating Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company are also officers of Microphase and mPhase’s President and Chairman of the Board are shareholders of Microphase. On May 1, 1997, the Company entered into an agreement with Microphase, whereby it will use office space as well as the administrative services of Microphase, including the use of accounting personnel. This agreement was for $5,000 per month and was on a month-to-month basis. In July 1998, the office space agreement was revised to $10,000, in January 2000 to $11,050 per month, in July 2001 to $11,340 per month, in July 2002 to $12,200 per month, in January 2003 to $10,000 per month, and in July 2003 to $18,000 per month. Additionally, in July 1998, mPhase entered into an agreement with Microphase, whereby mPhase reimburses Microphase $40,000 per month for technical research and development. In January 2003 the technical research and development agreement was revised to $20,000 per month, and in July 2003 it was further revised to $5,000 per month for technical and research development, $5,000 per month for administrative services and $5,000 per month under the office space agreement. Beginning July 1, 2006, billings for all of the above services has been $5,000 per month. In addition, Microphase also charges fees for specific projects on a project-by-project basis. During the nine months ended March 31, 2006 and 2007 and from inception (October 2, 1996) to March 31, 2007, $261,583 $243,099 and $7,649,309 respectively, have been charged to expense.

As a result of the foregoing transactions as of March 31, 2007, the Company had a $230,645 payable to Microphase.

JANIFAST LTD.

The Company purchases products and incurs certain research and development expenses with Janifast Ltd., which is owned by U.S. Janifast Holdings, Ltd., a company in which three directors of mPhase are significant shareholders and one is an officer, in connection with the manufacturing of POTS Splitter shelves and component products including cards and filters sold by the Company.

During the nine months ended March 31, 2006 and 2007 and the period from inception (October 2, 1996) to March 31, 2007, $241,472, $134,715 and $16,031,811 respectively have been charged by Janifast to inventory or is included in operating expenses in the accompanying statements of operations.

As a result of the foregoing transactions as of March 31, 2007, the Company had $10,752 payable to Janifast.

OTHER RELATED PARTIES

On August 30, 2004, the Company paid $100,000 in cash to Piper Rudnick LLP, outside legal counsel to the Company as part of a renegotiated settlement agreement that was originally effective as of March 31, 2002. The Company was in arrears with respect to payments due under the original settlement agreement and as part of the renegotiated agreement agreed to make the following payments:

a.     $25,000 on each of December 1, 2004, March 1, 2005, June 1,2005, September 1, 2005 and a $50,000 payment on December 1, 2005. Thereafter the Company was obligated to pay $25,000 on each of March 1, 2006, June 1, 2006, and September 1, 2006 with a final payment of $75,000 on December 1, 2006.

b.    The Company also delivered a 5 year cashless warrant to purchase $150,000 worth of common stock at $.25 per share. The warrant was valued pursuant to EITF 96-18, the ascribed value of the warrant minus the debt cancelled resulting loss of $40,500.

As of March 31, 2007, the Company has made each payment owed to Piper Rudnick LLP, with the exception of the $25,000 payment due September 1, 2006 and the $75,000 payment due December 1, 2006.

Mr. Abraham Biderman was employed until September 30, 2003 by our former investment-banking firm Lipper & Company. During the nine months ended March 31, 2007, Mr. Biderman’s affiliated firm of Palladium Capital Advisors earned an estimated finder’s fee of $468,650 which includes 566,667 shares of the Company’s stock with an estimated value of $85,000.

In addition, at various points during the current fiscal year Messrs, Durando, Dotoli and Smiley provided $490,000 in bridge loans to the Company which was evidenced by individual promissory notes. During December 2006, Messrs Durando and Dotoli agreed to convert their notes, in the amounts of $130,000 and $200,000 respectively, to a deferred compensation arrangement, the repayment terms of which have not been specified. Mr. Smiley has extended bridge loans to the Company of $160,000, evidenced by promissory notes for $101,000 and a $60,000 note with a 12% rate of interest. Both of the foregoing promissory notes are payable on demand.

11

mPHASE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

 (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 (UNAUDITED)

In addition to the above, the Company has paid the legal expenses of directors and officers involved in the Packetport.com litigation. Such expenses have amounted to approximately $433,000 in the nine months ended March 31,2007. (See note re: contingencies)

12

mPHASE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 (UNAUDITED)

3. EQUITY TRANSACTIONS

Private Placements

During the quarter ended September 30, 2006, the Company issued 6,780,716 shares of its common stock together with 5,555,556 of  5 year warrants to purchase one share each of the Company’s common stock, with an exercise price of $.18 per share in private placements generating net proceeds of $1,104,000.

During the quarter ended December 31, 2006, the Company issued 6,622,223 shares of its common stock together with 5 year warrants to purchase 1,388,889 of   the Company’s common stock, with an exercise price of $.18 per share in private placements generating net proceeds of $833, 866. Included in these amounts are finders fees paid in cash and 566,667 additional shares of common stock.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2007, the Company issued 14,973,083 shares of its common stock. In Private placements generating net proceeds of $1,787,850; included in this amount is an estimate of finders fees to be paid of $198,650.

Warrant Exercise

During the quarter ended September 30, 2006, the Company issued 138,889 shares of its common stock pursuant to the exercise of warrants, generating net proceeds of $25,000 to the Company.

During the quarter ended December 31, 2006, the Company issued 12,101,780 shares of its common stock pursuant to the exercise of warrants, generating net proceeds of $1,669,668 to the Company. In addition, the Company issued to certain investors new 5 year   warrants to purchase 11,111,112 of the Company’s common stock, with exercise prices ranging from $.15 - $.18 per share.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2007, the Company issued 2,500,000 shares of its common stock pursuant to the exercise of warrants, generating net proceeds of $375,000 to the Company.

Stock Options and Warrants Issued for Services.

During the nine months ended March 31, 2007, the Company authorized the issuance of 4,015,000 in options and warrants of 2,044,440 to employees, officers, and consultants granting the right to purchase a like amount of common shares. Pursuant to the adoption of FAS 123(R), the Company recognized an expense in the amount of $785,259, all of which has been included in general and administrative expense. The fair value of options granted was estimated as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes stock option pricing model, based on the following weighted average assumptions: annual expected return of 0%, annual volatility of approximately 80%, based on a risk-free interest rate of 4.8% and expected option life of 5 years.

During the nine months ended March 31, 2007, the Board of Directors authorized the issuance of 1,822,983 shares of common stock, with an aggregate value of $339,388 as compensation to consultants and employees. The stock value ranged in price from $.17 to $.20 per share, the fair value on the date of the awards.

Other Equity Transactions

During the nine months ended March 31, 2007, the Company converted accounts payable of $909,294 into 5,617,062 shares of common stock.

In addition, during the nine month period ended March 31, 2007, the Company became obligated to issue 11,007,819 of its common stock as reparation to affect revised pricing on previous private placements. This additional consideration was afforded to past investors who agreed to make an additional cash investment as part of a new private placement. The cost of such consideration was estimated to be the fair value of such shares at the time of the investment $1,202,730.

13

4. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

mPhase has entered into various agreements with Georgia Tech Research ("GTRC") and its affiliate, Georgia Tech Applied Research Corporation, ("GTARC"), pursuant to which the Company receives technical assistance in developing the commercialization of its Digital Video and Data Delivery System. The amount incurred by the Company for GTRC technical assistance with respect to its research and development activities during the quarters ended March 31, 2006 and 2007 totaled $0 and $0 respectively and $13,539,952 from the period from inception through March 31, 2007. If and when sales commence utilizing its legacy DVDDS digital broadcast television platform, mPhase will be obligated to pay to GTRC a royalty up to 5% of product sales, as defined.

As of March 31, 2007, mPhase was obligated to pay Lucent Technologies, Inc. $200,000 for work performed in connection with the development of its Nanotechnology product line. The Company has incurred expense relative to such research with Lucent totaling   a approximately $1,600,000 in the nine month period ended March 31, 2007.

Other significant contractual obligations require the Company to pay Magpie Telecom Insiders Inc, $265,000 related to the development of its TV+ product. This contract expired in January 2007 and involved total research expense of $910,000 for the nine months ended March, 31 2007 of which $415,000 was paid by the issuance of 2,441,176 shares of common stock valued at $.17 per share.

In addition, the Company had an agreement with Velankani Information Systems to further develop its TV+ product. During the nine months ended March 31, 2007, the Company incurred research expense of $896,957 of which $239,294 was paid by the issuance of 1,407,617 shares of common stock valued at $.17 per share. The Company owed Velankani $342,802 as of March 31, 2007.

Finally, the Company has a support, licensing and upgrade agreement with Espial Group relating to the TV+ system, extending to December 31, 2008. This contract involves payments totaling $1,172,000 of which $514,000 will be due after March 31, 2007, in calendar year 2007, and $250,000 is due in 2008.

From time to time, mPhase may be involved in various legal proceedings and other matters arising in the normal course of business. On November 15, 2005 a civil enforcement action (c.v. action no. 3:05 cv1747) was filed in Federal District Court in the State of Connecticut against Packetport.com, Inc. and others including Messrs. Durando and Dotoli in their individual capacity for alleged violations of the federal securities laws in connection with their activities as Officers and Directors of Packetport.com during the year 1999-2000. A summary of the Complaint is contained in SEC Litigation Release No. 19465 dated November 15, 2005. The original complaint may be accessed on the SEC web site under  http://www.sec.gov/litigation . As noted in other public filings with the SEC, mPhase Technologies, Inc. is not named as a party to the civil action. Both Messrs. Durando and Dotoli continue to deny any wrongdoing and will vigorously defend all allegations in the complaint.

In a ruling (3:05 CV 1747 (PCD)), dated March 21, 2007, the Honorable Peter C. Dorsey, Senior U.S. District Court Judge for the United States District Court  For The District Of Connecticut, granted a motion by defendants, Ronald A. Durando and Packetport Inc. joined by defendants Gustave T. Dotoli , Microphase Corporation and Packetport.com, Inc. to dismiss under Federal Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure the civil lawsuit filed on November 15, 2005 by the Securities and Exchange Commission against Packetport.com, Inc. et. al for lack of prosecution The SEC has filed a motion for reconsideration of such ruling with the court.

14

5. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

During the month of April 2007, the Company received a total of $1,260,000 from investors in a Private Placement pursuant to Rule 506 of Resolution D and the Securities Act of 1933, requiring the issuance of approximately 9,692,000 shares of Common stock.

The Company also approved various incentive compensation arrangements with employees and consultants involving the issuance of common stock and the granting of options to purchase such stock. In total, 12,150,000 of common shares with an estimated value of $1,822,000 and 2,600,000 options with an estimated value $230,000 of were issued under such program. Included in this amount were grants to the Messer’s Durando, Dotoli and Smiley of 4,000,000, 3,000,000 and 1,750,000 of restricted shares of common shares respectively for which an expense has been incurred of approximately $1,312,000. The exercise price of options granted ranged from $.20 to $.25 cents per share.

16

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONS AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS    

The following is management’s discussion and analysis of certain significant factors, which have affected mPhase’s financial position and should be read in conjunction with the accompanying financial statements, financial data, and the related notes.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SAFE HARBOR PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995:

Some of the statements contained in or incorporated by reference in this Form 10-Q discuss the Company’s plans and strategies for its business or state other forward-looking statements, as this term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "plan," "intend," "should," "seek," "will," and similar expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying them. These forward-looking statements include, among others, statements concerning the Company’s expectations regarding its working capital requirements, gross margin, results of operations, business, growth prospects, competition and other statements of expectations, beliefs, future plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends, and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. Any forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those results expressed in or implied by the statements contained herein.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

OVERVIEW

mPhase, a New Jersey corporation, founded in 1996 is a publicly-held company with over 17,000 shareholders and approximately 362 million shares of common stock outstanding. The Company’s common stock is traded on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board under the ticker symbol XDSL. We are headquartered in Norwalk, Connecticut with offices in Little Falls, NJ and New York, N.Y. mPhase shares common office space with Microphase Corporation, a privately held company. Microphase is a leader in the field of radio frequency and filtering technologies within the defense and telecommunications industry. It has been in operation for over 50 years and supports mPhase with both engineering and administrative and financial resources as needed.

mPhase is a developer of broadband communications products, specifically, IP TV plus a digital subscriber line (DSL) products for telecommunications service providers around the world. In February of 2004 mPhase has entered into the new and emerging area of Nanotechnology. Since our inception in 1996, we have been a development-stage company and operating activities have related primarily to research and development, establishing third-party manufacturing relationships and developing product brand recognition among telecommunications service providers.

Description of Operations

Since our inception in 1996, our primary activities through fiscal year 2003 consisted of designing, manufacturing and testing our flagship products designed to enable telephone service providers to deliver digital broadcast television over DSL. Fiscal years 2004 and 2005 marked a significant shift of the Company’s focus, in response to technology advancements with respect to the delivery of video data using internet protocol. The Company has shifted it telecommunications solution focus from technology for the delivery of broadcast television high speed internet and voice over DSL to the development of middleware/software for carrier class delivery of IP TV over copper, fiber, coax or any infrastructure representing a combination of the foregoing that is used by a telecommunications service provider. Our current release of our IPTV solution is a carrier class middleware designed for a very high degree of reliability and scalability which the Company believes are critical requirements for any telecommunications service provider seeking to deploy IPTV. The Company has shifted as of May of 2006 its software development an integration work from Lucent Technologies, Inc. to Velankani and has engaged Magpie Insiders, Inc and Espial for development of portions of its IPTV solution. This shift has taken place over the past two years and has culminated in our flagship product, namely, our current release of our TV+ solution. This product is scheduled for final testing in the third quarter of fiscal year 2007 as part of an initial deployment of 1000 ports with a major telecommunications service provider in the Ukraine. Subject to passing a product acceptance test, the Company plans to deploy its IPTV middleware to initially 6,000 customers of such telecommunications service provider for the delivery of IPTV. We have not, as yet, derived any significant revenue from our TV+ solution, which is the culmination of several earlier versions that have been changed to accommodate the latest in technological innovation and market demand for IPTV. The Company’s recent entry into the field of nanotechnology is focused upon exploratory development of batteries with significantly longer shelf lives and enhanced capabilities and magnetometer sensor devices with potentially wide applicability for both military and commercial security applications. The Company believes that such development is consistent with its strategy of being a pioneer of high growth technology products and potentially diversifies its product mix.

16

mPhase introduced its first TV over DSL platform, the Traverser™ Digital Video and Data Delivery System ("DVDDS"), in 1998. The DVDDS is a patented end to end system that enables a telecommunications service provider to deliver up to several hundred channels of motion picture experts group two ("MPEG-2") standard broadcast digital television, high speed internet and voice over copper telephone lines between a central office facility of the provider and a customer’s premise. mPhase has not, as yet, derived any material revenues from sales of the DVDDS. The DVDDS is a proprietary technology developed in conjunction with Georgia Tech Research Corporation (GTRC) and is one of the first systems of its kind developed. The system is the only system on the market that utilizes non- Internet Protocol ("IP") transmission over ADSL. The DVDDS has been discontinued and replaced by the Company Company’s TV + solution.

For mPhase the shift from its original DVDDS hardware/software end to end system to IPTV middleware marks a change in strategy from selling a complete proprietary platform to providing an industry-standards solution The Company believes that the demand for the TV+ system will initially be greatest in markets primarily outside of the United States that do not have a hybrid fiber coaxial cable ("HFC") infrastructure necessary for cable TV or fiber to the curb necessary for very fast DSL (VDSL).

As noted above, we are currently deploying for Comstar, Odessa, a major telecommunications service provider in the Ukraine, our TV+ solution as a test deployment expected to be completed by June 30, 2007. The Company believes that a successful deployment in the Ukraine of up to 6,000 customers of the IPTV solution in fiscal year 2008 could represent its first major breakthrough in sales of the IPTV resulting in potential additional deployments in the Ukraine and Russia.

Currently the TV+ solution, utilizes a communications framework based upon Internet Protocol (IP) instead of Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) that was used in earlier versions of our middleware comprising the TV+ solution. ATM is an industry standard for transportation of data based upon a packaging of information into a fixed-size cell format for transportation across networks. Many telecommunications service providers currently deploy equipment that handles this protocol because it can support voice, video, data and multimedia applications simultaneously with a high degree of reliability. IP is another transport protocol that maintains network information and routes packets across networks. IP packets are larger and can hold more data than ATM cells. Historically, there have been concerns that service providers would be unable to provide the same quality of service with IP because it is not optimized for time-sensitive signals such as broadcast television and voice. Nevertheless, there is a greater demand by telecommunication service providers for IP systems for delivery of television, voice and high-speed data because such systems are significantly more cost effective to deploy based upon greater scalability.

Our current Release of the TV+ solution is a system management software/middleware product that will operate with both the Lucent Stinger as well as the DSLAM’s and multicast video transport products of other major vendors. Release 6.0 of the TV system will also be able to send multiple TV channels over both fiber, coax as well as down a single DSL line over copper using ADSL2 supported DSLAM’s and be capable of delivery of Video on Demand. We believe that our TV+ solution is an open standards-based, carrier class technology with tremendous scalability and enables a telecommunications service provider to custom tailor the deployment of feature rich IP television, high speed internet and voice. Such solution enables a telecommunications service provider to significantly enhance revenue, margins with a very high rate of return as compared to the traditional economics for delivery of telephone voice services only. In addition, Teleco’s around the world are under increased pressure to delivery multiple converged services in order to retain their traditional telephone voice customers. The TV+ solution may be used in combination with any vendors set top box designed for the delivery of IP TV of all major vendors. The solution allows a service provider to start small and test its take rate among customers with a maximum of flexibility of design, features and cost allowing it to enter the market for converged services to its customers on an optimal basis.

mPhase has transformed itself from a developer of closed end proprietary technology for the delivery of TV over DSL to a Company that has developed a carrier class middleware/software solution for the delivery of IP TV using a standards-based platform designed to provide telecommunications with maximum flexibility in system configuration with components from all major vendors. . mPhase’s current IPTV solution is designed to be used over fiber, coax and copper or any combination thereof currently deployed by a telecommunications service provider. In addition our IPTV solution may be used with other telecommunications transport technology such as Multicast Routers instead of DSLAM’s for the delivery of voice, data and IPTV. The Company believes the initial major deployments and the resultant revenues of its Flagship product, the TV+ platform, are not expected until the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007, which along with any upturn of spending in the telephone industry will also increase sales and improve the Company’s margins and provide the Company with the opportunity to attain profitability

mPhase DSL Component Products. mPhase continues to design and market a line of DSL component products ranging from commodity items such as POTS splitters. Most notable in the suite of DSL component products is the recently introduced VDSL customer premises POTS Splitter product. The VDSL product reflects a migration of technological development for the delivery of Broadcast Television providers such as ATT/Bell South that are deploying fiber to the curb in combination with VDSL to the home.. Additionally, as competition for high speed Internet expands, the market is witnessing a reduction in price. Therefore, it has become imperative that telecommunications service providers lower the operational costs involved with supporting DSL services.

17

Nanotechnology

Effective February 3, 2004, mPhase has entered into a Development Agreement with Lucent Technologies, Inc. to commercialize the use of nano power cell technology. The initial agreement was for a 12 month period of exploratory development at the cost of $100,000 per month of a new form of power cell having a shelf life far in excess of conventional battery technology. In March of 2005 the Company extended such Agreement for another 12 months at the cost of $100,000 per month to continue development of the nano power cell product. We believe that this arrangement with the Bell Labs division of Lucent will give mPhase the opportunity to develop and offer breakthrough battery technology and other potential applications, initially to the government market for defense and homeland security and ultimately to the commercial market. It is anticipated that the initial applications for nano power cells will address the need to supply emergency and reserve power to a broad range of products for the defense department.

The Company believes that its entry into this new field of high technology growth will provide product diversification without negatively affecting its focus upon its IPTV solution. The Company developed a lab prototype of its first nano power cell product that was completed in the second quarter of fiscal year 2006. The Company is unable, at this time, to predict when significant commercialization and material revenues will be derived from its entry into the Nanotechnology business.

On March 10, 2005, the Company announced an agreement with the Bell Labs research and development arm of Lucent Technologies, Inc. to co-develop using the science of nanotechnology and commercialize uncooled magnetic ultra-sensitive sensors for a host of defense and civilian applications. The sensors, technically referred to as magnetometers, are based upon Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS) using designs based upon fundamental breakthroughs made in the past few years at Bell Labs as part of the New Jersey Nanotechnology Consortium. Initial tests of theses MEMS magnetometers indicate sensitivities 1000 times those achieved in presently available uncooled magnetometers. Such devices are designed to create a new generation of ultra sensitive magnetic field sensors that will enable military combatants to detect with greater accuracy and range hostile military forces. Commercial applications may include inexpensive navigational components for mobile phones to sensing devices for identification used in homeland security products, as well as sensors used in diagnostic systems for detection of metal fatigue for numerous industrial applications.

In May of 2006, the Company renewed through February 2007 and March 2007 each of its Development Agreements with Lucent Technologies, Inc. with respect to its battery and magnetometer products being developed through the science of nanotechnology at a cost of $100,000 per month each. The Company has entered into an interim agreement with Lucent for the period covering March 1, 2007 through April 27, 2007 to continue development work on the nano power cell technology and is currently in negotiations to renew both Development Agreements covering the battery and magnetometer for an additional 12 months at a cost of $100,000 each.

Nano Battery:

mPhase Technologies along with its partner Lucent/Bell Labs, has been jointly conducting research since February 2004 that demonstrates control and manipulation of fluids on super hydrophobic surfaces to create power cells by controlling wetting behavior of electrolyte on nanostructured electrode surfaces. The scientific research conducted this year has set the groundwork for continued exploration in the development of intelligent nanotechnology power cells (nano-batteries), and forms a path to commercialization of the technology for a broad range of market opportunities. During the first half of 2005 the battery team has been testing modifications and enhancements to the internal design of the battery to optimize its power and energy density characteristics, as well as making engineering improvements that will assist in making the battery easier to manufacture when the project research that level of maturity.

In June of 2005, the battery project was expanded to include a joint technical development effort through December 2005 between mPhase and Rutgers University to potentially incorporate a Lithium based design. This work program has initial started as a modest technology effort to help characterize and test the nano battery design using Lithium chemistry and determine if the current design is capable of supporting the lithium based chemistry. Based on the results of the testing with Rutgers University during 2006, mPhase has decided that sufficient technical progress has been made to warrant the extension of the development agreement with Rutgers University though 2007 and mPhase may decide to accelerate the work effort as milestones are achieved.

Magnetometer:

In March 2005, mPhase and Lucent Technologies’ Bell Laboratories entered into a joint effort to develop an extremely sensitive magnetometer. Magnetometers can be used in a wide range of applications that include military surveillance, securing the retail environment, automotive sensors and actuators, industrial processing, medical imaging, scientific measurements, detection of mineral deposits and even air and space exploration. In sensor networks ultra-sensitive magnetometers can be used, for example, to detect and accurately pinpoint battlefield objects or they might also be used to study the workings of the human brain.

Magnetometers work by sensing changes in magnetic fields due to the motion of magnetic objects or changes in electrical currents generated by those objects. The magnetometer detects these objects by measuring time-varying magnetic signals that are superimposed on the combination of earth’s background field (used to orient compasses) and static magnetic fields due to nearby magnetic objects.

18

Highly Sensitive Magnetometers - The enhanced sensitivity of these devices results from two scientific advances recently made researchers at Lucent Bell Labs. Presently, the highest sensitivity magnetometers commercially available require cooling to cryogenic temperatures. Called SQUIDs (for Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices) these devices only work at the temperature where liquid helium boils, -455 degrees below zero Fahrenheit, making such magnetometers expensive and bulky and therefore ill-suited for remote-sensing applications. Room temperature magnetometers, on the other hand, are less sensitive, and use technology that was developed in World War II for detecting submarines.

The new technology being developed by Bell Labs and mPhase employs a number of different designs based on Micro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS). These designs use the very high "Quality Factor (Q)" of the mechanical resonance in single crystals of silicon. A resonance is similar to the fundamental frequency of a tuning fork. When tapped, a tuning fork will vibrate for a length of time inversely proportional to the internal friction of vibration within the metal of the tuning fork. A comparable tuning fork made from single crystal silicon, which has less internal friction than the hardest metal, will vibrate almost a thousand times longer. Based on this principal, a device employing a high Q resonator will have enhanced amplitude of vibration at the resonance frequency, and hence will display a greater sensitivity to external perturbations that affect its resonance frequency. By coupling the mechanical motion of a bar or a paddle constructed from silicon to the ambient magnetic field, this high mechanical sensitivity can be converted to high magnetic field sensitivity. The technical approach that the team is developing can be achieved either statically with an integrated magnetic film, or dynamically through motion of the silicon bar or paddle.

Lower Sensitivity Magnetometers - In addition to applications requiring very high sensitive magnetometer, there is a potential for a growing market for lower sensitivity magnetometers used for applications requiring digital compass functional for navigation and GPS augmented and denied environments. Many of these applications may reside in consumer based devices such as enhanced cell telephones, Personal Digital Assistants (PDA) and specialty devices used for navigation systems. mPhase see this opportunity as a potential source of high volume distribution of this technology and has initiated research and development resources to build magnetometer designs that would support these types of applications.

The Benefits of MEMS - Commercial magnetometers using purely electronic detection, such as Hall, magneto-resistance or flux-gate devices, have sensitivities limited by their electronic Q-factor. This Q-factor depends on the natural electrical resistance, or electronic friction, of the metal in the circuit. For room-temperature operations it is therefore difficult to reduce the electrical Q-factor. Mechanical resonators made from semiconductor-grade silicon, on the other hand, exhibit mechanical Q-factors, approaching 100,000 at room temperature. In all, these new, smaller and less costly magnetometers should be 100-1000 times more sensitive than existing commercial devices, thus enabling a new class of sensor systems that mPhase plans on commercializing.

The mPhase and Lucent magnetometer team has successfully reached an early milestone and have produced a number MEM based sensor samples from the clean room facilities and are working on integrating them into the surrounding electronic circuitry so that measurement, characterization and sensitivity testing can be conducted.

Financial Highlights

Revenues. To date, all material revenues have been generated from sales of the POTS Splitter Shelves and other DSL component products to a small number of telecommunications companies. mPhase believes that future revenues are difficult to predict because of (i) the length and variability of the commercial roll-out of the IPTV to various telecommunications service providers and (ii) the Company’s recent entry into the Nanotechnology business. Since the Company believes that there may be a significant international market for its TV+ IPTV solution involving many different countries, with different regulations, certifications and commercial practices than the United States, future revenues are highly subject to the changing variables and uncertainties.

The Company believes that significant deployments and resulting revenues from the deployment of the TV+ are not expected until the end of calendar year 2007. The Company further believes that an increase in capital expenditures in the telecommunications industry will increase sales, improve margins and that the Company will be profitable in the future. The Company does not expect to derive any material revenue from its Nanotechnology product development until fiscal year 2008

Cost of revenues. The costs necessary to generate revenues from the sale of POTS Splitter Shelves and other related DSL component products include direct material, labor and manufacturing. mPhase paid these costs to Janifast Ltd., which has facilities in the People’s Republic of China and is owned by and managed by certain senior executives of the Company. The cost of revenues also includes certain royalties paid to Microphase Corporation, a privately held corporation organized in 1955, which shares certain common management with the Company and is majority-owned by a director of mPhase. Costs for future production of the TV + Platform will consist primarily of payments to manufacturers to acquire the necessary components and assemble the product

Research and development. Research and development expenses consist principally of the payments made to various subcontractors and Microphase, for development of the VDSL POTS Splitter product, the TV+ IPTV solution and nanotechnology products. The IPTV+ solution consists primarily of middleware/software designed for the delivery of feature rich, carrier class, broadcast TV, high speed internet and voice by telecommunications service providers open using standards based equipment and transport configurations. All research and development costs are expensed as incurred.

19

Selling, general and administrative. Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and related expenses for personnel engaged in direct marketing of the TV+, VDSL customer premises splitter product and Nanotechnology battery product, as well as support functions including executive, legal and accounting personnel. Certain administrative activities are outsourced on a monthly fee basis to Microphase Corporation. Finally, mPhase leases the principal office from Microphase Corporation.

Non-Cash compensation charges. The Company makes extensive use of stock grants, options and warrants as a form of compensation to employees, directors and outside consultants. We incurred non-cash compensation charges totaling $60,196,024 from inception (October 2, 1996) through March 31, 2007, of which $2,318,519 was included in research and development expenses and $58,319,301 was included in general and administrative expenses.

Development stage losses/ Liquidity.  As of March 31, 2007, the Company has incurred cumulative development stage losses of $162,520,429 and negative cash flow from operations of $73,398,128. The auditors report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006 includes the statement that there is substantial doubt of the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management estimates that the Company needs to raise approximately $10,000,000 during the next 12 months to continue its present level of operations. As of March 31, 2007, the Company had a negative net worth of $2,634,400 compared to a negative net worth of $606,085 as of June 30, 2006 as a result of continuing net losses.

20

THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2007 VS. MARCH 31, 2006

REVENUE

Total revenues were $15,155 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to $284,197 for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The decrease was primarily attributable to the elimination of the Company’s legacy asymmetric digital subscriber line  POTS Splitter product.

COST OF SALES

Cost of sales was $2,817 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to $256,404 in the comparable prior period in 2006. This change is a result of product mix and the phasing out of the Pots Splitter business line.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Research and development expenses was $1,250,680 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to $2,298,183 during the comparable period in 2006 or a decrease of $1,047,503. This decrease is primarily due to development and testing contracts related to both the IPTV and the magnetometer and power cell contracts. Such vendors include Lucent Technologies and other vendors such as Magpie, Velankani, Bitband and Espial all managed by mPhase.

The Company expects to continue research and development efforts throughout fiscal year 2007 as the Company continues its development of the TV+ and Nanotechnology product lines. To broaden and diversify its current line of business into additional high growth technology areas, the Company plans to continue its development efforts with the Bell labs division of Lucent Technologies, Inc. to commercialize the use of nano power cell technology. Lucent/ Bell Labs is developing for mPhase micro-power source arrays fabricated using nanotextured, super hydrophobic materials. This continuing  business arrangement with Lucent Bell Labs will give mPhase the opportunity to develop and offer breakthrough battery technology applications, initially for products such as radio frequency identification tags (RFID tags) for both commercial and  government market segments including defense and homeland security. The initial applications for the nano power cell technology will address the need to supply emergency and reserved power to a wide range of electronic devices for the defense department. In addition the Company plans to continue its research and development efforts with respect to the magnetometer product line using the science of Nanotechnology.

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $1,644,895 for the three months ending March 31, 2007 down from $ 4,819,598 or a decrease of $3,174,703 from the comparable period in 2006. The decrease in the selling, general and administrative costs is comprised primarily of a decrease in stock based compensation of approximately $3,084,484. This decline is offset in part by increases related to payroll of $ 161,625 and smaller increases across a broad range of expense categories.

OTHER INCOME AND (EXPENSE)

Other Income and (Expense) amounted to net expense of $357,617 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to a net expense of $503,330 for the comparable period ended March 31, 2006. This decrease is primarily due to non recurring reduction in losses resulting from extinguishment of debt in the prior period.

NET LOSS

The Company recorded a net loss of $3,263,529 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to a net loss of $7,610,198 for the three months ended March 31, 2006. This represents a loss per common share of $.01 for the three month period ended March 31, 2007 as compared to a loss per common share of $.03 for the three months ending March 31, 2006; based upon weighted average common shares outstanding of 327,195,047 and 262,539,165 during the periods ending March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The decrease in net loss is primarily related to the above mentioned decrease in stock based compensation.

21

NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2007 VS. MARCH 31, 2006

REVENUE

Total revenues were $135,743 for the nine months ended March 31, 2007 compared to $832,999 for the nine months ended March 31, 2006. The decrease was attributable primarily to the phasing out of the Company’s ADSL POTS Splitter line of products and its emphasis on developing a new VDSL customer premises POTS Splitter product to meet market advancements in technology.

COST OF SALES

Cost of sales was $88,207 for the nine months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to $729,475 in the comparable prior period. The decrease is a direct result of the aforementioned phasing out of the POTS Splitter line of business.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Research and development expenses were $4,964,404 for the nine months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to $6,120,253 during the comparable period in 2006; or a decrease of $1,155,849. The Company incurred most of its research and development expenses with vendors including Lucent, Microphase, Magpie Insiders, Inc., Bitband, Espial, Velankani and other strategic vendors. In the nine month period ended March 31, 2007 such charges totaled $4,410,520 as compared to $5,333,363 during the comparable period in 2006. During the nine month period ended March 31, 2007, expenses incurred to third party vendors amounted to $1.6 million and $2.8 million for services related to Nanotechnology and IPTV, respectively. During the nine month period ended March 31, 2006, expenses incurred to third party vendors amounted to $2 million and $3.3 million for services related to Nanotechnology and IPTV, respectively.

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $5,012,073 for the nine months ended March 31, 2007 down from $8,002,079 or an decrease of $2,990,006 from the comparable period in 2006. Included in selling, general and administrative costs are non-cash charges relating to the issuance of common stock and options to employees and consultants, which totaled $1,124,647 for the nine months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to $4,510,350 for the comparable period ended March 31, 2006 resulting in a decrease of $3,385,703. This decrease was offset by increases in payroll related costs which increased by approximately $383,304, investor relations and marketing which increased by $130,115 and legal and professional which increased by approximately $296,456.

OTHER INCOME AND (EXPENSE)

Other Income and (Expense) amounted to net expense of $1,065,117 for the nine months ended March 31, 2007 compared to a net expense of $4,927,800 for the comparable period ended March 31, 2006. This decrease is primarily owing to reparation expense which declined from $5,167,740 in 2006 versus $1,202,730 in 2007.

NET LOSS

The Company recorded a net loss of $11,060,372 for the nine months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to a loss of $19,004,252 for the nine months ended March 31, 2006. This represents a loss per common share of $.04 for the nine month period ended March 31, 2007 as compared to a loss per common share of $.09 for the nine months ending March 31, 2006; based upon weighted average common shares outstanding of 309,018,261 and 211,186,500 during the periods ending March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Approximately $1.2 million of the decrease in the Company’s net loss was the result of reparation cost in connection with the reduction in the strike price of certain warrants and issuance of additional shares in connection with private placements.

22

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

As required, mPhase has adopted the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") No. 101, "Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements", which provides guidelines on applying generally accepted accounting principals to revenue recognition based upon the interpretations and practices of the SEC. The Company recognizes revenue for its POTS Splitter Shelf and Other DSL component products at the time of shipment, at which time, no other significant obligations of the Company exist, other than normal warranty support.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Research and development costs are charged to operations as incurred in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS"), No.2, "Accounting for Research and Development Cost."

INCOME TAXES

mPhase accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method in accordance with SFAS No.109 "Accounting for Income Taxes." Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using currently enacted tax rates. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in results of operations in the period that includes the enactment date. Because of the uncertainty as to their future realizability, net deferred tax assets, consisting primarily of net operating loss carry forwards, have been fully reserved for. Accordingly, no income tax benefit for the net operating loss has been recorded in the accompanying financial statements.

Utilization of net operating losses generated through March 31, 2007 may be limited due to "changes in control" of our common stock that occurred.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

On July 1, 2005, the Company adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 123R, "Share-Based Payment" (SFAS 123R). SFAS 123R revised SFAS 123, "Accounting for Stock Based Compensation" and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees." SFAS 123R requires companies to measure and recognize compensation expense for all employee stock-based payments at fair value over the service period underlying the arrangement. Therefore, the Company is now required to record the grant-date fair value of its stock-based payments (i.e., stock options and other equity-based compensation) in the statement of operations. The Company adopted FAS 123R using the "modified prospective" method, whereby fair value of all previously-granted employee stock-based arrangements that remained unvested at July 1, 2005 and all grants made on or after July 1, 2005 have been included in the Company’s determination of stock-based compensation expense for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2006 and March 31, 2007.

INVENTORY RESERVE AND VALUATION ALLOWANCE

The Company carries its inventory at the lower of cost, determined on a first in, first out basis, or market. Inventory consists mainly of equipment to be included in deployment of an IPTV project. In determining the lower of cost or market, the Company periodically reviews and estimates a valuation allowance to reserve for technical obsolescence and marketability.

23

MATERIAL RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

MICROPHASE CORPORATION

mPhase’s President, Chief Operating Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company are also officers of Microphase and mPhase’s President and Chairman of the Board are shareholders of Microphase. On May 1, 1997, the Company entered into an agreement with Microphase, whereby it will use office space as well as the administrative services of Microphase, including the use of accounting personnel. This agreement was for $5,000 per month and was on a month-to-month basis. In July 1998, the office space agreement was revised to $10,000, in January 2000 to $11,050 per month, in July 2001 to $11,340 per month, in July 2002 to $12,200 per month, in January 2003 to $10,000 per month, and in July 2003 to $18,000 per month. Additionally, in July 1998, mPhase entered into an agreement with Microphase, whereby mPhase reimburses Microphase $40,000 per month for technical research and development. In January 2003 the technical research and development agreement was revised to $20,000 per month, and in July 2003 it was further revised to $5,000 per month for technical and research development, $5,000 per month for administrative services and $5,000 per month under the office space agreement. Beginning July 1, 2006, billings for all of the above services has been $5,000 per month. In addition, Microphase also charges fees for specific projects on a project-by-project basis.

During the nine months ended March 31, 2006 and 2007 and from inception (October 2, 1996) to December 31, 2007, $261,583, $243,099 and $7,649,309 respectively, have been charged to expense.

As a result of the foregoing transactions as of March 31, 2007 the Company had a $230,645 payable to Microphase.

The Company is obligated to pay a 3% royalty to Microphase on revenues from its proprietary Traverser (TM) Digital Video and Data Delivery System and DSL component products. For the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2007, mPhase recorded royalties to Microphase totaling $108,266 and $0, respectively.

JANIFAST LTD.

The Company purchases products and incurs certain research and development expenses with Janifast Ltd., which is owned by U.S. Janifast Holdings, Ltd., a company in which three directors of mPhase are significant shareholders and one is an officer, in connection with the manufacturing of POTS Splitter shelves and component products including cards and filters sold by the Company.

During the nine months ended March 31, 2006 and 2007 and the period from inception (October 2, 1996) to March 31, 2007, $241,472 and $134,715 respectively have been charged by Janifast to inventory or is included in operating expenses in the accompanying statements of operations.

As a result of the foregoing transactions as of March 31, 2007, the Company had $10,752 payable to Janifast.

24

OTHER RELATED PARTIES

On August 30, 2004, the Company paid $100,000 in cash to Piper Rudnick LLP, outside legal counsel to the Company as part of a renegotiated settlement agreement that was originally effective as of March 31, 2002. The Company was in arrears with respect to payments due under the original settlement agreement and as part of the renegotiated agreement agreed to make the following payments:

a.     $25,000 on each of December 1, 2004, March 1, 2005, June 1,2005, September 1, 2005 and a $50,000 payment on December 1, 2005. Thereafter the Company was obligated to pay $25,000 on each of March 1, 2006, June 1, 2006, and September 1, 2006 with a final payment of $75,000 on December 1, 2006.

b.     The Company also delivered a 5 year cashless warrant to purchase $150,000 worth of common stock at $.25 per share. The warrant was valued pursuant to EITF 96-18, the ascribed value of the warrant minus the debt cancelled resulting loss of $40,500.

As of March 31, 2007, the Company has made each payment owed to Piper Rudnick LLP, with the exception of the $75,000 final payment that was due December 1, 2006.

Mr. Abraham Biderman was employed until September 30, 2003 by our former investment-banking firm Lipper & Company. During the nine months ended March 31, 2007, Mr. Biderman’s affiliated firm of Palladium Capital Advisors earned a cash finder’s fee of $468,650 which includes 566,667 shares of the Company’s stock with an estimated value of $85,000.

In addition, at various points during the current fiscal year but prior to March 31, 2007, Messrs, Durando, Dotoli and Smiley provided $490,000 in bridge loans to the Company which was evidenced by individual promissory notes. Subsequently, Messrs Durando and Dotoli agreed to convert their notes, in the amounts of $130,000 and $200,000 respectively, to a deferred compensation arrangement, the repayment terms of which have not been specified. Mr. Smiley has extended bridge loans to the Company of $160,000, evidenced by promissory notes for $101,000 and a $60,000 note with a 12% rate of interest. Both of the foregoing promissory notes are payable on demand.

In addition to the above, the Company has paid the legal expenses of directors and officers involved in the Packetport.com litigation. Such expenses have amounted to approximately $433,000 in the nine months ended March 31,2007. (See note re: contingencies)

25

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

At March 31, 2007, mPhase had working capital deficit of $3,011,440 as compared to working capital deficit of $1,093,784 at June 30, 2006. Through March 31, 2007, the Company had incurred development stage losses totaling $11,060,372.

Historically, mPhase has funded its operations and capital expenditures primarily through private placements of common stock. Management expects that its ongoing financial needs will continue to be provided by such financing activities and believes that the sales of its IPTV and VDSL customer premise splitters will provide some offset to cash flow used in operations, although there can be no assurance of such events. At March 31, 2007, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $315,055 compared to $1,359,925 on June 30, 2006. At March 31, 2007 the Company also had accounts receivable of $2,770 and inventory of $476,534. This compared to $106,237 of accounts receivable and $161,270 of inventory at June 30, 2006.

Cash used in operating activities was $6,730,469 during the nine months ending March 31, 2007. The cash used in operating activities consists principally of the net loss offset in part by significant changes in assets and liabilities, including an increase in accounts payable of $1,049,017, non-cash charges of $1,124,647 for common stock and options issued for services and $1,202,730 for reparations. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern and its future success is dependent upon its ability to raise capital in the near term to: (1) satisfy its current obligations, (2) continue its research and development efforts, and (3) the successful wide scale development, deployment and marketing of its products.

As of March 31, 2007, mPhase was obligated to pay Lucent Technologies, Inc. $200,000 for work performed in connection with the development of its Nanotechnology product line. The Company has incurred expense relative to such research with Lucent totaling   a approximately $1,600,000 in the nine month period ended March 31, 2007. Extension of such contracts is currently being negotiated and will involve a royalty agreement sharing potential revenue.

Other significant contractual obligations require the Company to pay Magpie Telecom Insiders Inc, $265,000 related to the development of its TV+ product. This contract expired in January 2007 and involved total research expense of $910,000 for the nine months ended March 31, 2007 of which $415,000 was paid by the issuance of 2,441,176 shares of common stock valued at $.17 per share.

In addition, the Company had an agreement with Velankani Information Systems to further develop its TV+ product. During the nine months ended March 31, 2007, the Company incurred research expense of $896,957 of which $239,294 was paid by the issuance of 1,407,617 shares of common stock valued at $.17 per share . The Company owed Velankani $342,802 as of March 31, 2007. Although no formal agreement currently exists the company and Velankani continue in its efforts to deploy the IPTV system.

Finally, the Company has a support, licensing and upgrade agreement with Espial Group for relating to the TV+ system , extending  to December 31, 2008. This contract involves payments totaling $1,172,000 of which $514,000 is due in 2007 and $250,000 is due in 2008.

LOSSES DURING THE DEVELOPMENT STAGE AND MANAGEMENT’S PLANS

From inception (October 2, 1996) through March 31, 2007 (unaudited), the Company has incurred development stage losses and has an accumulated deficit of $162,520,429 and a stockholders’ deficit of $2,634,400. The report of the Company’s outside auditors, Rosenberg, Rich, Baker, Berman and Company with respect to its latest audited 10K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006, stated that "there is substantial doubt of the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern".

We continue our efforts to raise additional funds through private placements of our common stock and strategic alliances, the proceeds of which are required to fund continuing expenditures and the controlled development stage rollout of our TV+. However, there can be no assurance that mPhase will generate sufficient revenues to provide positive cash flows from operations or that sufficient capital will be available, when needed, or at terms that we deem to be reasonable.

We have evaluated our cash requirements for the remainder of fiscal year 2007 based upon certain assumptions, including our ability to raise additional financing and sales of our TV+ products. Additional investments in development of the TV+ and Nanotechnology battery products will be required in the next 3 months. The Company anticipates that it will need to raise, at a minimum, approximately $3-$5 million, primarily in private placements of its common stock with accredited investors for fiscal year ended June 30, 2007. In the alternative, the Company may need to decrease certain administrative and research and development expenses.

Management believes that the up to $10 million to be raised, in new Private Placements in the capital markets, will be sufficient to cover its current operating expenses and permit the company to maintain its present operational levels over the next 12 months. This amount may be supplemented with additional funds that could  be received from investors, currently holding warrants to purchase  shares of common stock ranging from $.17 upward that could  be exercised during the next 12 months should the price of the Company’s common stock trade substantially “in the money” from the price of such warrants.

26

Should these cash flows not be available to us, we believe we would have the ability to revise our operating plan and make certain further reductions in expenses, so that our resources which were available at March 31, 2007, plus financing to be secured during the balance of fiscal year 2007, and expected TV+ revenues, will be sufficient to meet our obligations through the end of fiscal year 2008. We have continued to experience operating losses and negative cash flows. To date, we have funded our operations with a combination of component sales debt conversions with related parties and strategic vendors, and private equity offerings. Management

believes that we will be able to secure the necessary financing in the short-term to fund our operations into our next fiscal year. However, failure to raise additional funds, or generate significant cash flows through revenues, could have a material adverse effect on our ability to achieve our intended business objectives.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company is not exposed to changes in interest rates as the Company has no debt arrangements and no investments in certain held-to-maturity securities. Under our current policies, we do not use interest rate derivative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes. A hypothetical 100 basis point adverse move in interest rates along the entire interest rate yield curve would not materially affect the fair value of any financial instruments at March 31, 2007.

 ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Under the supervision and with the participation of management including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14c and of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

27

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

mPhase was advised in April 2002 that following an investigation by the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the staff intended to recommend that the Commission file a civil injunctive action against Packetport.com, Inc. ("Packetport") and its Officer’s and Directors. Such recommendation related to alleged civil violations by Packetport and such Officers and Directors of various sections of the Federal Securities Laws. The staff has alleged civil violations of Sections 5 and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b) and 13(d) of the Securities Exchanges Act of 1034. mPhase Directors and Officers also serve as Directors and Officers of Packetport. On November 15, 2005, a civil enforcement action was filed in Federal District Court against Microphase Corporation and the CEO and COO of mPhase Corporation. mPhase is not named as a party in connection with this matter. As noted in other public filings of mPhase, the CEO and COO of mPhase as well as Microphase continue to deny any wrongdoing in connection with the Civil Action filed and intend to vigorously defend any and all counts set forth in such action. In a ruling (3:05 CV 1747 (PCD)), dated March 21, 2007, the Honorable Peter C. Dorsey, Senior U.S. District Court Judge for the United States District Court  For The District Of Connecticut, granted a motion by defendants, Ronald A. Durando and Packetport Inc. joined by defendants Gustave T. Dotoli, Microphase Corporation and Packetport.com, Inc. to dismiss under Federal Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure the civil lawsuit filed on November 15, 2005 by the Securities and Exchange Commission against Packetport.com, Inc. et. al for lack of prosecution. The SEC has filed a motion for reconsideration of such ruling with the court.

From time to time mPhase may be involved in various legal proceedings and other matters arising in the normal course of business.

ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES

Private Placements

During the quarter ended September 30, 2006, the Company issued 6,780,716 shares of its common stock together with 5,555,556 of  5 year warrants to purchase one share each of the Company’s common stock, with an exercise price of $.18 per share in private placements generating net proceeds of $1,104,000.

During the quarter ended December 31, 2006, the Company issued 6,622,223 shares of its common stock together with 5 year warrants to purchase 1,388,889 of   the Company’s common stock, with an exercise price of $.18 per share in private placements generating net proceeds of $833, 866. Included in these amounts are finders fees paid in cash and 566,667 additional shares of common stock.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2007, the Company issued 14,973,083 shares of its common stock. In private placements generating net proceeds of $1,787,850, included in these amounts are finders fees paid in cash and $198,650.

Warrant Exercise

During the quarter ended September 30, 2006, the Company issued 138,889 shares of its common stock pursuant to the exercise of warrants, generating net proceeds of $25,000 to the Company.

During the quarter ended December 31, 2006, the Company issued 12,101,780 shares of its common stock pursuant to the exercise of warrants, generating net proceeds of $1,669,668 to the Company. In addition, the Company issued to certain investors new 5 year   warrants to purchase 11,111,112 of the Company’s common stock, with exercise prices ranging from $.15 - $.18 per share.

During the quarter March 31, 2007, the Company issued 2,500,000 shares of its common stock pursuant to the exercise of warrants, generating net proceeds of $375,000 to the Company.

Stock Options and Warrants Issued for Services.

During the nine months ended March 31, 2007, the Company authorized the issuance of 4,015,000 in options and warrants of 2,044,440 to employees, officers, and consultants granting the right to purchase a like amount of common shares. Pursuant to the adoption of FAS 123(R), the Company recognized an expense in the amount of $785,259, all of which has been included in general and administrative expense. The fair value of options granted was estimated as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes stock option pricing model, based on the following weighted average assumptions: annual expected return of 0%, annual volatility of approximately 80%, based on a risk-free interest rate of 4.8% and expected option life of 5 years.

During the nine months ended March 31, 2007, the Board of Directors authorized the issuance of 1,822,933 shares of common stock, with an aggregate value of $339,388 as compensation to consultants and employees. The stock value ranged in price from $.17 to $.20 per share, the fair value on the date of the awards.

28

Other Equity Transactions

During the nine months ended March 31, 2007, the Company converted accounts payable of $909,294 into 5,617,062 shares of common stock.

In addition, during the nine month period ended March 31, 2007, the Company became obligated to issue 11,007,819 of its common stock as reparation to affect revised pricing on previous private placements. This additional consideration was afforded to past investors who agreed to make an additional cash investment as part of a new private placement. The cost of such consideration was estimated to be the fair value of such shares at the time of the investment $1,202,730.

 ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

 ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

 ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(1)  In a Form 8k filed on March 23, 2007, mPhase Technologies, Inc. , a New Jersey corporation announced a  ruling (3:05 CV 1747 (PCD)), dated March 21, 2007, the Honorable Peter C. Dorsey, Senior U.S. District Court Judge for the United States District Court  For The District Of Connecticut, granted a motion by defendants, Ronald A. Durando and Packetport Inc. joined by defendants Gustave T. Dotoli , Microphase Corporation and Packetport.com, Inc. to dismiss under Federal Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure the civil lawsuit filed on November 15, 2005 by the Securities and Exchange Commission against Packetport.com, Inc. et. al for lack of prosecution. mPhase was not named as a defendant in the lawsuit.

(2) On a Form 8K filed on April 17, 2007, mPhase Technologies, Inc., a New Jersey corporation ("mPhase"), announced that it is creating a new subsidiary to which it will transfer all of its nanotechnology assets and liabilities  and which it will eventually issue stock to new investors that will be registered as a new publicly-held company. mPhase currently plans a private placement of a small percentage of stock in the  new company. mPhase will continue to own and hold shares constituting a significant majority of such stock such that the subsidiary will continue to be consolidated for both financial reporting and tax reporting purposes with mPhase Technologies, Inc. Exhibit 99.1: Press release dated April 17, 2007 of mPhase Technologies, Inc.

EXHIBITS.

29

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant, has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

30