ON4 COMMUNICATIONS INC. - Annual Report: 2011 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2011

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from [ ] to [ ]

Commission file number 001-34297

ON4 COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 480.525.4361

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $0.0001 par value
(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 the Securities Act.
Yes [     ]     No[ x ]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act
Yes [    ]     No[ x ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the last 90 days.
Yes[ x ]     No [     ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes[ x ]     No [    ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
[     ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes [    ]     No[ x ]

State the aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and ask price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

The aggregate market value of Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on April 30, 2011 was $559,386.48 based on a $0.01 closing price for the Common Stock on April 30, 2011. For purposes of this computation, all executive officers and directors have been deemed to be affiliates. Such determination should not be deemed to be an admission that such executive officers and directors are, in fact, affiliates of the Registrant.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date.

66,602,490 shares of common stock issued & outstanding as of January 30, 2012

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.

2

Table of Contents

3

PART I

This annual report contains forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may”, “should”, “expects”, “plans”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “predicts”, “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the risks in the section entitled “Risk Factors”, that may cause our or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.

Our financial statements are stated in United States Dollars (US$) and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

In this annual report, unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in United States dollars and all references to “common shares” refer to the common shares in our capital stock.

As used in this annual report, the terms “we”, “us”, “our” and “our company” refer to On4 Communications, Inc., and, unless otherwise indicated.

Corporate Overview

We were incorporated as a Delaware company on June 4, 2001 under the name Sound Revolution Inc. On July 2, 2009 we changed our name to On4 Communications, Inc. Our address is Suite 102 – 628 West 12^th Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V5Z 1M8. Our telephone number is (480) 525-4361.

Our common stock is quoted on the Pink Sheets Quotation system under the symbol “ONCI.PK”.

Corporate History

We were incorporated as a Delaware company on June 4, 2001 under the name Sound Revolution Inc. On July 2, 2009 we changed our name to On4 Communications, Inc.

On March 12, 2009, we entered into a merger agreement with On4 Communications, Inc., a private Arizona company incorporated on June 5, 2006 (“On4”). We subsequently amended this agreement on April 7, 2009, and on May 1, 2009 we completed the merger with On4, with us as the surviving entity. Upon the completion of the merger, we had three wholly-owned subsidiaries: (i) Charity Tunes Inc., a Delaware company incorporated on June 27, 2005 for the purpose of operating a website for the distribution of music online; (ii) Sound Revolution Recordings Inc., a British Columbia, Canada company incorporated on June 20, 2001 for the purpose of carrying on music marketing services in British Columbia; and (iii) PetsMobility Inc., a Delaware company incorporated on March 23, 2006 for the purpose of operating the website www.petsmo.com and related business.

On April 29, 2010 we sold our interest in PetsMobility, excluding certain specific assets, to On4 Communications Inc., a private Canadian company and our shareholder (“On4 Canada”) pursuant to an asset purchase agreement in exchange for On4 Canada returning 2,000,000 shares of our common stock to our treasury for cancellation. On October 29, 2010 we amended the asset purchase agreement to clarify certain terms of the purchase and sale.

4

On March 16, 2011 we sold our interest in Charity Tunes and Sound Revolution to Empire Success, LLC, a private Nevada limited liability company, in exchange for $15,000 and 6,300 shares of Empire’s common stock. As a result, we currently have no subsidiaries.

On November 3, 2011 we entered into a binding Letter of Intent (the “LOI”) to acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of NetCents Systems Ltd. (“NetCents”), a private Alberta corporation engaged in the development and implementation of a unique and secure electronic payment system for online merchants and consumers. The Letter of Intent provides for a period of due diligence which will lead to a formal agreement whereby we will acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding capital of NetCents.

On November 4, 2011, in accordance with the terms of the LOI with NetCents, we received the resignation of Cameron Robb as the Company’s Director, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and that of Gord Jessop as the Company’s President and Chief Operating Officer. Concurrently on November 4, 2011, Clayton Moore was appointed as our President and Chief Executive Officer, Ryan Madson as our Chief Operating Officer, Tom Locke as our Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer, and John Kaczmarowski as our Chief Technical Officer. Messrs Moore and Madson are shareholders of NetCents and Mr. Moore is the president and director of Net Cents.

Also on November 4, 2011, Clayton Moore, Steve Allmen, and Tom Locke were appointed as directors of the Company.

On December 15th, 2011, we entered into a share exchange agreement with NetCents Systems Ltd., an Alberta company (“NetCents”) and the Selling Shareholders of NetCents. Pursuant to the terms of the Share Exchange Agreement, our Company and NetCents agreed to engage in a share exchange which, if completed, would result in NetCents becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of our Company.

The following is a description of the material terms and conditions of the Share Exchange Agreement:

Also on December 15, 2011 NetCents received the approval for the Share Exchange Agreement and the share exchange transaction from holders of approximately 76% of its voting securities through written resolution in lieu of holding a meeting.

5

Our Current Business

We are a development stage company, providing wireless communications services to telecommunication companies, consumers and businesses. Our platform comprises global positioning system (“GPS”) device management, location-based services (“LBS”) capabilities, and the broadcasting of proprietary and non-proprietary content. LBS is a term used to describe the delivery of information and entertainment content to consumers with mobile devices based on the geographical position of the mobile device. We intend to deliver LBS via two-way communication tracking devices with applications that are able to track people, pets, assets and inventory. Our solution platform integrates various location-aware devises, such as GPS receivers, and transmits data to a range of devices, including Web browsers, instant messengers, short message service/mail, and mobile phones.

Subsidiaries

As at the year ended October 31, 2011, we do not have any subsidiaries.

Research and Development Expenditures

We have incurred $nil in research and development expenditures over the last two fiscal years.

Employees

As of October 31, 2011, are only employees are our directors and officers. We plan to hire additional employees when circumstances warrant.

REPORTS TO SECURITY HOLDERS

We are required to file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission and our filings are available to the public over the internet at the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov. The public may read and copy any materials filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission at the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street N.E. Washington D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the Securities and Exchange Commission at 1-800-732-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and formation statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC, at http://www.sec.gov.

As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Our principal offices are located at Suite 102 – 628 West 12^th Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V5Z 1M8. Our office space at this location consists of approximately 300 square feet and is provided without charge on a month-to-month basis by our Director, Tom Locke. We believe that our office space and facilities are sufficient to meet our present needs and do not anticipate any difficulty securing alternative or additional space, as needed, on terms acceptable to us.

6

Other than as set out below, there are no proceedings in which any of our directors, officers or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial shareholder, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to our company.

On May 10, 2011 Saks Tierney, P.A., filed a complaint against our company in Maricopa County (Arizona) Superior Court seeking payment of $17,504.47 in unpaid fees for legal services rendered, plus pre and post-judgement interest at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum; plus the Saks Tierney’s reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. We did not respond to the complaint and on June 23, 2011, Saks Tierney submitted an Application for entry of Default. We became in default of the complaint on July 8, 2011 and, on September 9, 2011, Saks Tierney entered a motion to take default judgment against us. Further to our ongoing negotiations with Saks Tierney to arrange a settlement of the unpaid legal fees, Saks Tierney filed a Notice of Dismissal to dismiss the complaint on September 15, 2011.

PART II

In the United States, our common shares are quoted on the Pink Sheet Quotation Systems under the symbol “ONCI.PK.” The following quotations, obtained from Yahoo Finance, reflect the high and low bids for our common shares based on inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not represent actual transactions.

Our common shares were originally quoted for trading on the OTCBB on June 23, 2005 under the symbol “SRVN.OB”.

The high and low bid prices of our common stock for the periods indicated below are as follows:

(1) Over-the-counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not represent actual transactions.

7

Our shares are issued in registered form. Holladay Stock Transfer, Inc., 2939 N 67th Place, Scottsdale, AZ 85251, is the registrar and agent for our common and preferred shares.

On October 31, 2011, the shareholders' list showed 77 registered shareholders, 66,602,490 common shares and no preferred shares outstanding.

Dividend Policy

We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock and have no present intention of paying any dividends on the shares of our common stock. Our current policy is to retain earnings, if any, for use in our operations and in the development of our business. Our future dividend policy will be determined from time to time by our board of directors.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities; Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities

We did not sell any equity securities which were not registered under the Securities Act during the year ended October 31, 2011 that were not otherwise disclosed on our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or our current reports on Form 8-K filed during the year ended October 31, 2011.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

We have no long-term incentive plans, other than the 2006 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan described below.

2006 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan

On September 18, 2006 our directors approved the adoption of our 2006 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan (amended October 10, 2006) which permits our company to grant up to 1,500,000 options to acquire shares of common stock, to directors, officers, employees and consultants of our company.

Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

We did not purchase any of our shares of common stock or other securities during our fourth quarter of our fiscal year ended October 31, 2011.

8

As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes for the years ended October 31, 2011 and October 31, 2010 that appear elsewhere in this annual report. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to those discussed below and elsewhere in this annual report, particularly in the section entitled "Risk Factors" beginning on page 6 of this annual report.

Our audited consolidated financial statements are stated in United States Dollars and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

Cash Requirements

Over the next 12 months we intend to operate as a business development Company. We anticipate that we will incur the following operating expenses during this period:

We believe that we will require additional funds to implement our growth strategy. These funds may be raised through equity financing, debt financing, or other sources, which may result in further dilution in the equity ownership of our shares. There is no assurance that we will be able to maintain operations at a level sufficient for an investor to obtain a return on their investment in our common stock. Further, we may continue to be unprofitable.

Purchase of Significant Equipment

We do not anticipate the purchase or sale of any plant or significant equipment during the next 12 months.

Going Concern

There may be some doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Our company's continuance as a going concern is dependent on its Directors and principal stockholders in providing financial support in the short term and receiving sufficient sublicense payments to discharge our company’s liabilities. In the event that these are not achieved, the assets may not be realized or liabilities discharged at their carrying amounts, and differences from the carrying amounts reported in these consolidated financial statements could be material.

9

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to stockholders.

Results of Operations for the Years Ended October 31, 2011 and 2010

The following summary of our results of operations should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements for the years ended October 31, 2011 and 2010.

Our operating results for the years ended October 31, 2011 and 2010 are summarized as follows:

Expenses

Our operating expenses from continuing operations for the years ended October 31, 2011 and 2010 are outlined in the table below:

Operating expenses for the year ended October 31, 2011 are equal to 4.2 percent of the expenses incurred by us during fiscal 2010. The higher expenses in fiscal 2010 were primarily the result of greater business activity, higher consulting fees, and impairment of goodwill. During fiscal 2011, the Company had limited operations as it sold its remaining two subsidiaries in March 2011.

Equity Compensation

On September 18, 2006 our directors approved the adoption of our 2006 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan (amended on October 10, 2006) which permits our company to grant up to 1,500,000 options to acquire shares of common stock, to directors, officers, employees and consultants of our company. Other than the aforementioned 2006 Option Plan, we do not have any other equity compensation plans or arrangements.

10

Liquidity and Financial Condition

As of October 31, 2011, our company had working capital deficit of $1,546,877, which is consistent with the working capital deficit of $1,550,109 as at October 31, 2010. This is due to the fact that the Company had minimal operating activity during the year due to the sale of its subsidiaries and lack of sufficient cash flows.

The decrease in net cash used in operating activities was due to the fact that the Company did not raise any new equity or debt financing to sustain a full year of operating activities. During the year ended October 31, 2011, the Company raised $15,000 in investing activities relating to the proceeds received from the sale of Sound Revolution Recordings Inc. and Charity Tunes Inc. The Company did not have any financing activities during the year.

Contractual Obligations

As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide tabular disclosure obligations.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and are presented in US dollars, unless otherwise noted.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to the useful life and recoverability of long-lived assets, recoverability of goodwill and intangible assets, fair value of convertible debt, stock-based compensation, bad debt expenses, and deferred income tax asset valuation allowances. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.

11

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Our company considers all highly liquid instruments with maturity dates of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment, consisting primarily of computer hardware and office equipment, is stated at cost and is amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated lives of the related assets of three and five years, respectively.

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consist of patents and trademarks related to the TX200 mobile communication device. Intangible assets acquired are initially recognized and measured at cost and is being amortized straight-line over the estimated useful life of ten years. Impairment tests are conducted annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset may be impaired. The impairment test compares the carrying amount of the intangible asset with our fair value, and an impairment loss is recognized in income for the excess, if any. The amortization methods and estimated useful lives of intangible assets are reviewed annually.

Website Development Costs

Website development costs consist of costs incurred to develop internet websites to promote, advertise, and earn revenue with respect to our company’s business operations. Costs are capitalized in accordance with ASC 350-50, Web Site Development Costs, and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of three years commencing when the internet web site has been completed.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

In accordance with ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment, our company tests long-lived assets or asset groups for recoverability when events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. Circumstances which could trigger a review include, but are not limited to: significant decreases in the market price of the asset; significant adverse changes in the business climate or legal factors; accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction of the asset; current period cash flow or operating losses combined with a history of losses or a forecast of continuing losses associated with the use of the asset; and current expectation that the asset will more likely than not be sold or disposed significantly before the end of our estimated useful life. Recoverability is assessed based on the carrying amount of the asset and our fair value which is generally determined based on the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and the eventual disposal of the asset, as well as specific appraisal in certain instances. An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount is not recoverable and exceeds fair value.

Investment

Our company accounts for the investment described in Note 4 pursuant to ASC 320, Debt and Equity Securities. As the fair value of the investment is nominal, not readily determinable, and the estimation of fair value is not practicable, our company has recorded the fair value at $1.

Earnings Per Share

Our company computes net loss per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings per Share, which requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) on the face of the consolidated statements of operations. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti-dilutive.

12

Foreign Currency Translation

Our company’s functional currency and our reporting currency is the United States dollar and foreign currency transactions are primarily undertaken in Canadian dollars. Monetary balance sheet items expressed in foreign currencies are translated into US dollars at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated at historical rates. Revenues and expenses are translated at average rates for the period, except for amortization, which is translated on the same basis as the related asset. Gains and losses arising on translation or settlement of foreign currency denominated transactions or balances are included in the determination of income.

Comprehensive Income/Loss

ASC 220, Comprehensive Income, establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive loss and our components in the consolidated financial statements. As at October 31, 2011 and 2010, our company had no items representing comprehensive income/loss.

Stock-based Compensation

Our company records stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Based Compensation and ASC 505-50 - Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees. All transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.

Income Taxes

Our company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method in accordance with ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes. The asset and liability method provides that deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and for operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the currently enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Our company records a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is believed more likely than not to be realized.

Our company files federal income tax returns in the United States. Our company may be subject to a reassessment of federal taxes by tax authorities for a period of three years from the date of the original notice of assessment in respect of any particular taxation year. In certain circumstances, the federal statute of limitations can reach beyond the standard three year period. The statute of limitations in the United States for income tax assessment varies from state to state. Tax authorities have not audited any of our company’s income tax returns.

Our company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in tax expense. During the year ended October 31, 2011 and 2010, there were no charges for interest or penalties.

Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measures

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements, requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to measure fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. ASC 820 prioritizes the inputs into three levels that may be used to measure fair value:

13

Level 1

Level 1 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2

Level 2 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.

Level 3

Level 3 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

Our company’s financial instruments consist primarily of cash, investment securities, accounts payable, accrued interest payable, amounts due to related parties, and notes payable. Pursuant to ASC 820, the fair value of our cash is determined based on “Level 1” inputs, which consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. We believe that the recorded values of all of our other financial instruments approximate their current fair values because of their nature and respective maturity dates or durations.

Recent accounting pronouncements

In January 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC 505, Equity, where entities that declare dividends to shareholders that may be paid in cash or shares at the election of the shareholders are considered to be a share issuance that is reflected prospectively in EPS, and is not accounted for as a stock dividend. This standard is effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2009 and is to be applied on a retrospective basis. The adoption of this standard did not have a significant impact on our company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure, to require reporting entities to separately disclose the amounts and business rationale for significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and separately present information regarding purchase, sale, issuance, and settlement of Level 3 fair value measures on a gross basis. This standard, for which our company is currently assessing the impact, is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 with the exception of disclosures regarding the purchase, sale, issuance, and settlement of Level 3 fair value measures which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this standard did not have a significant impact on our company’s consolidated financial statements.

Our company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect and that may impact our financial statements and does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

14

ON4 COMMUNICATIONS INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

Financial Statements

Years Ended October 31, 2011 and 2010

(Expressed in US dollars)

15

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
On4 Communications Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of On4 Communications Inc. (A Development Stage Company) as of October 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the years then ended and accumulated from June 5, 2006 (Date of Inception) to October 31, 2011. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. An audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of October 31, 2011 and 2010, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended and accumulated from June 5, 2006 (Date of Inception) to October 31, 2011, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has not generated significant revenue, has a working capital deficit, and has incurred operating losses since inception. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ SATURNA GROUP CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS LLP

Vancouver, Canada

January 30^th, 2012

F-1

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements)

F-2

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements)

F-3

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements)

F-4

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements)

F-5

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements)

F-6

F-7

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment, consisting primarily of computer hardware and office equipment, is stated at cost and is amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated lives of the related assets of three and five years, respectively. Intangible Assets Intangible assets consist of patents and trademarks related to the TX200 mobile communication device.

Intangible assets acquired are initially recognized and measured at cost and is being amortized straight-line over the estimated useful life of ten years. Impairment tests are conducted annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset may be impaired. The impairment test compares the carrying amount of the intangible asset with its fair value, and an impairment loss is recognized in income for the excess, if any. The amortization methods and estimated useful lives of intangible assets are reviewed annually.

Goodwill

In accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other, goodwill is required to be tested for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if certain indicators arise, using the guidance specifically provided.

Management reviews goodwill at least annually, and on an interim basis when conditions require, evaluates events or changes in circumstances that may indicate impairment in the carrying amount of such assets. An impairment loss is recognized in the statement of operations in the period that the related asset is deemed to be impaired.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

In accordance with ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment, the Company tests long-lived assets or asset groups for recoverability when events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. Circumstances which could trigger a review include, but are not limited to: significant decreases in the market price of the asset; significant adverse changes in the business climate or legal factors; accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction of the asset; current period cash flow or operating losses combined with a history of losses or a forecast of continuing losses associated with the use of the asset; and current expectation that the asset will more likely than not be sold or disposed significantly before the end of its estimated useful life. Recoverability is assessed based on the carrying amount of the asset and its fair value which is generally determined based on the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and the eventual disposal of the asset, as well as specific appraisal in certain instances. An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount is not recoverable and exceeds fair value.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.

Advertising Costs

The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. For the year ended October 31, 2011, advertising costs were $nil (2010 - $10,648).

Earnings Per Share

The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings per Share, which requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) on the face of the statements of operations. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti-dilutive.

Stock-based Compensation

The Company records stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Based Compensation and ASC 505-50 - Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees. All transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.

F-8

Foreign Currency Translation

The Company’s functional currency and its reporting currency is the United States dollar and foreign currency transactions are primarily undertaken in Canadian dollars. Monetary balance sheet items expressed in foreign currencies are translated into US dollars at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated at historical rates. Revenues and expenses are translated at average rates for the period, except for amortization, which is translated on the same basis as the related asset. Gains and losses arising on translation or settlement of foreign currency denominated transactions or balances are included in the determination of income.

Comprehensive Income

ASC 220, Comprehensive Income, establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive loss and its components in the financial statements. As at October 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had no items representing comprehensive income or loss.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method in accordance with ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes. The asset and liability method provides that deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and for operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the currently enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is believed more likely than not to be realized.

The Company files federal income tax returns in the United States. The Company may be subject to a reassessment of federal taxes by tax authorities for a period of three years from the date of the original notice of assessment in respect of any particular taxation year. In certain circumstances, the federal statute of limitations can reach beyond the standard three year period. The statute of limitations in the United States for income tax assessment varies from state to state. Tax authorities have not audited any of the Company’s income tax returns.

The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in tax expense. During the year ended October 31, 2011 and 2010, there were no charges for interest or penalties.

Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measures

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements, requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to measure fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. ASC 820 prioritizes the inputs into three levels that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1

Level 1 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2

Level 2 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.

Level 3

Level 3 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The Company’s financial instruments consist primarily of cash, accounts payable, accrued interest payable, amounts due to related parties, and notes payable. Pursuant to ASC 820, the fair value of our cash is determined based on “Level 1” inputs, which consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. We believe that the recorded values of all of our other financial instruments approximate their current fair values because of their nature and respective maturity dates or durations.

F-9

F-10

F-11

F-12

F-13

A summary of the status of the Company’s non-vested shares and changes during the years ended October 31, 2011 and 2010 is presented below:

Additional information regarding stock options as of October 31, 2011, is as follows:

At October 31, 2011, the Company had no unvested options or unrecognized compensation expense.

F-14

The significant components of deferred income tax assets and liabilities as at October 31, 2011 and 2010, after applying enacted corporate income tax rates, are as follows:

The Company has incurred operating losses of $7,221,111 which, if unutilized, will expire through to 2031. Deferred tax benefits, which may arise as a result of these losses, have not been recognized in these financial statements, and have been offset by a valuation allowance. The following table lists the fiscal year in which the loss was incurred and the expiration date of the operating:

F-15

F-16

There were no disagreements related to accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, internal controls or auditing scope or procedure during the two fiscal years and interim periods.

Management’s Report on Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 , as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our president (who is acting as our principal executive officer and as our principal financial officer and principle accounting officer) to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure

As of October 31, 2011, the end of our fiscal year covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our president (also our principal executive officer and our principal financial and accounting officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, our president (also our principal executive officer and our principal financial and accounting officer) concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this annual report.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Responsibility, estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of control procedures. The objectives of internal control include providing management with reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorized use or disposition, and that transactions are executed in accordance with management’s authorization and recorded properly to permit the preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2011. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Our management has concluded that, as of October 31, 2011, our internal control over financial reporting is effective. Our management reviewed the results of their assessment with our Board of Directors.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit our Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Inherent limitations on effectiveness of controls

Internal control over financial reporting has inherent limitations which include but is not limited to the use of independent professionals for advice and guidance, interpretation of existing and/or changing rules and principles, segregation of management duties, scale of organization, and personnel factors. Internal control over financial reporting is a process which involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis, however these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process and it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

16

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the year ended October 31, 2011 that have materially or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

On November 4, 2011, Clayton Moore was appointed as a director, president and chief executive officer of our company, Steven Allmen was appointed a director, Ryan Madson was appointed chief operating officer, Tom Locke was appointed as a director, chief financial officer, secretary and treasurer and John Kaczmarowski was appointed chief technical officer.

PART III

The following individuals serve as the directors and executive officers of our company as of the date of this annual report. All directors of our company hold office until the next annual meeting of our shareholders or until their successors have been elected and qualified. The executive officers of our company are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until their death, resignation or removal from office.

Business Experience

The following is a brief account of the education and business experience during at least the past five years of each director, executive officer and key employee of our company, indicating the person’s principal occupation during that period, and the name and principal business of the organization in which such occupation and employment were carried out.

Clayton Moore – President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Mr. Moore is the founder and visionary of NetCents Systems Ltd. (“NetCents”). After attending Caledonia College (British Columbia) and specializing in Business Administration, Mr. Moore began his career in the service industry as General Manager for Silver Springs, a large restaurant establishment in Radium Hot Springs, British Columbia. After spending time in various management positions in the service industry, Mr. Moore was inspired to create the first version of the NetCents Payment System. He spent the next 5 years creating and funding the development of his first company, The Cybux Cash Card Company Ltd. (“Cybux”). Cybux was tested in the British Columia school systems and was eventually sold to a third party which led to the creation of the next generation, a payment system designed with total anonymity and security for buying goods and services over the internet known as NetCents. Mr. Moore has been President of NetCents since its incorporation in 2006.

17

Tom Locke – Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Director

Mr. Locke has a Master’s Degree in Mathematics and is an MBA graduate of York University in Toronto. He has over 25 years experience at the corporate level in the sports, entertainment and technology industries. Mr. Locke played an integral role in the founding of Rainmaker Digital Pictures Corporation in 1995. Prior to this he was President and CEO of Gastown Post & Transfer, Western Canada’s largest independent post-production facility, which evolved into Rainmaker. Over the past 15 years, he has studied and consulted on the impact of digital technology in business. In addition to speaking at various functions and conferences, he has sat on a number of provincial, national and international boards covering a wide range of interests. Throughout his career he has supported the concept of community investment and has given significant time to charitable and not-for-profit endeavors.

Steven Allmen –Director

Steven Allmen has over twenty years of experience working with leading companies in the loyalty, retail, telecom, financial services and marketing sectors. His experience in delivering strategic partnerships and business solutions has enabled companies to achieve results and build market leadership through innovative use of technology and business strategy. Mr. Allmen has practical business experience across multiple industries having held senior positions at Aeroplan Canada (current), The Hudson's Bay Company, Air Miles and Compusearch Micromarketing. By combining his years of experience and comprehensive understanding of market trends, Mr. Allmen can effectively advise our company on business development strategies, new product development and partnership programs that yield immediate results. Mr. Allmen is currently the VP, New Partner Development, Aeroplan Canada at Groupe Aeroplan and is responsible for new partner development, securing strategic alliances and negotiating new contracts for Aeroplan, Canada's premier coalition loyalty program. Mr. Allmen holds a BA, Political Science and History from York University.

Ryan Madson – Chief Operating Office

Mr. Madson is a versatile professional who has spent the better part of his career in executive positions in the automotive and high tech industries. As a graduate of business and engineering at Malispina University he has the skill set in management and marketing required to execute the business plan of NetCents. As CEO of Cybux, Mr. Madson, working with parents, teachers and school boards, created and developed a successful rollout of a school cash card program that was integrated into six school districts with a total of 20 schools.

John Kaczmarowski – Chief Technical Officer

Mr. Kaczmarowski began his professional career in 1982, after graduating in the field of Political Science from the University of St. Thomas in St. Paul, MN. Mr. Kaczmarowski worked for 12 years building a project-oriented software development firm with clients including American Express, Knight- Ridder Media, Dagens Nyheter (Sweden), Travelers Insurance and Pillsbury Co. Since 1993, Mr. Kaczmarowski has been at the forefront of business-centric web-based development launching a successful enterprise-class SaaS system for human resource management, served as the CTO of a major online entertainment company with gross annual revenues exceeding $2 billion US and founded and launched a successful local SEO and location-based services SaaS firm. Mr. Kaczmarowski has participated in some of the largest dot.com launches of the last 15 years. His strengths include enterprise-class system architecture, finance, insurance and banking intelligence, payment processing systems and location-based service delivery.

18

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between any of our directors, executive officers and proposed directors or executive officers.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

None of our directors, executive officers, promoters or control persons has been involved in any of the following events during the past five years:

1. A petition under the Federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law was filed by or against, or a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer was appointed by a court for the business or property of such person, or any partnership in which he was a general partner at or within two years before the time of such filing, or any corporation or business association of which he was an executive officer at or within two years before the time of such filing;

2. Such person was convicted in a criminal proceeding or is a named subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);

3. Such person was the subject of any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining him from, or otherwise limiting, the following activities:

4. Such person was the subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any Federal or State authority barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the right of such person to engage in any activity described in paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity;

5. Such person was found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commission to have violated any Federal or State securities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated;

6. Such person was found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated any Federal commodities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated;

7. Such person was the subject of, or a party to, any Federal or State judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of:

19

8. Such person was the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26))), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29))), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our executive officers and directors and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial statements of beneficial ownership, reports of changes in ownership and annual reports concerning their ownership of our shares of common stock and other equity securities, on Forms 3, 4 and 5, respectively. Executive officers, directors and greater than 10% shareholders are required by the Securities and Exchange Commission regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file.

Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received by our company, or written representations from certain reporting persons that no Form 5s were required for those persons, we believe that, during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2011, all filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners as well as our officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners of our subsidiaries were complied with.

Code of Ethics

We have not yet adopted a code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions because we have not yet finalized the content of such a code. Companies whose equity securities are quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board are not currently required to implement a code of ethics.

Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert

Our board of directors has determined that it does not have a member of its audit committee that qualifies as an "audit committee financial expert" as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K, and is "independent" as the term is used in Item 7(d)(3)(iv) of Schedule 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

We believe that the members of our board of directors are collectively capable of analyzing and evaluating our financial statements and understanding internal controls and procedures for financial reporting. We believe that retaining an independent director who would qualify as an "audit committee financial expert" would be overly costly and burdensome and is not warranted in our circumstances given the early stages of our development and the fact that we have not generated any material revenues to date. In addition, we currently do not have nominating, compensation or audit committees or committees performing similar functions nor do we have a written nominating, compensation or audit committee charter. Our board of directors does not believe that it is necessary to have such committees because it believes the functions of such committees can be adequately performed by our board of directors.

The particulars of the compensation paid to the following persons:

20

our principal executive officer;

each of our two most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers at the end of the years ended October 31, 2011 and 2010; and

up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided under (b) but for the fact that the individual was not serving as our executive officer at the end of the years ended October 31, 2011 and 2010,

who we will collectively refer to as the named executive officers of our company, are set out in the following summary compensation table, except that no disclosure is provided for any named executive officer, other than our principal executive officers, whose total compensation did not exceed $100,000 for the respective fiscal year:

On November 4, 2011, Clayton Moore was appointed as a director, president and chief executive officer of our company, Steven Allmen was appointed a director, Ryan Madson was appointed chief operating officer, Tom Locke was appointed as a director, chief financial officer, secretary and treasurer and John Kaczmarowski was appointed chief technical officer.

There are no arrangements or plans in which we provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for directors or executive officers. Our directors and executive officers may receive share options at the discretion of our board of directors in the future. We do not have any material bonus or profit sharing plans pursuant to which cash or non-cash compensation is or may be paid to our directors or executive officers, except that share options may be granted at the discretion of our board of directors.

Stock Option Plan

On September 18, 2006 our directors approved the adoption of our 2006 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan (amended on October 10, 2006) which permits our company to grant up to 1,500,000 options to acquire shares of common stock, to directors, officers, employees and consultants of our company. Other than the aforementioned 2006 Non-Qualified Option Plan, we do not have any other equity compensation plans or arrangements.

21

2011 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

No equity or non-equity awards were granted to the named executives in 2011.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

There were no outstanding equity awards as at October 31, 2011.

Option Exercises

During our Fiscal year ended October 31, 2011, there were no options exercised by our named officers.

Compensation of Directors

We do not have any agreements for compensating our directors for their services in their capacity as directors, although such directors are expected in the future to receive stock options to purchase shares of our common stock as awarded by our board of directors.

We have determined that none of our directors are independent directors, as that term is used in Item 7(d)(3)(iv)(B) of Schedule 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and as defined by Rule 4200(a)(15) of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules.

Pension, Retirement or Similar Benefit Plans

There are no arrangements or plans in which we provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for directors or executive officers. We have no material bonus or profit sharing plans pursuant to which cash or non-cash compensation is or may be paid to our directors or executive officers, except that stock options may be granted at the discretion of the board of directors or a committee thereof.

Indebtedness of Directors, Senior Officers, Executive Officers and Other Management

None of our directors or executive officers or any associate or affiliate of our company during the last two fiscal years, is or has been indebted to our company by way of guarantee, support agreement, letter of credit or other similar agreement or understanding currently outstanding.

The following table sets forth, as of January 30, 2012, certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common shares by each shareholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common shares, as well as by each of our current directors and executive officers as a group. Each person has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of common stock, except as otherwise indicated. Beneficial ownership consists of a direct interest in the shares of common stock, except as otherwise indicated.

22

23

Changes in Control

On December 15th, 2011, we entered into a share exchange agreement with NetCents Systems Ltd., an Alberta company (“NetCents”). Pursuant to the terms of the Share Exchange Agreement, our Company and NetCents agreed to engage in a share exchange which, if completed, would result in NetCents becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of our Company.

The following is a description of the material terms and conditions of the Share Exchange Agreement:

Consummation of the above referenced transaction would result in a change of control of our Company. Other than the aforementioned Share Exchange Agreement, we are unaware of any contract or other arrangement or provisions of our Articles or Bylaws the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change of control of our company. There are not any provisions in our Articles or Bylaws, the operation of which would delay, defer, or prevent a change in control of our company.

As at October 31, 2011, we owed $405,753 (October 31, 2010 - $327,049) to Gordon Jessop, our former President, Chief Operating Officer, and Director, for advances made by him in respect of operating funds, and services provided on behalf of the Company. The amounts owing are unsecured, non-interest bearing, and due on demand.

Except as disclosed herein, no director, executive officer, shareholder holding at least 5% of shares of our common stock, or any family member thereof, had any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction, or proposed transaction during the year ended October 31, 2011, in which the amount involved in the transaction exceeded or exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total assets at the year end for the last three completed fiscal years.

24

Director Independence

We currently act with three directors, consisting of Clayton Moore, Steven Allmen and Tom Locke. We have determined that none of our directors is an “independent director” as defined in NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 4200(a)(15).

We do not have a standing audit, compensation or nominating committee, but our entire board of directors acts in such capacities. We believe that our members of our board of directors are capable of analyzing and evaluating our financial statements and understanding internal controls and procedures for financial reporting. The board of directors of our company does not believe that it is necessary to have an audit committee because we believe that the functions of an audit committee can be adequately performed by the board of directors. In addition, we believe that retaining an independent director who would qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” would be overly costly and burdensome and is not warranted in our circumstances given the early stages of our development.

The aggregate fees billed for the most recently completed fiscal year ended October 31, 2011 and for fiscal year ended October 31, 2010 for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of the financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for these fiscal periods were as follows:

Our board of directors pre-approves all services provided by our independent auditors. All of the above services and fees were reviewed and approved by the board of directors either before or after the respective services were rendered.

Our board of directors has considered the nature and amount of fees billed by our independent auditors and believes that the provision of services for activities unrelated to the audit is compatible with maintaining our independent auditors’ independence.

PART IV

25

26

27

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

28