PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORP /MA - Quarter Report: 2011 August (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended August 31, 2011
OR
o | Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
Commission File Number: 0-19417
PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
MASSACHUSETTS (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
04-2746201 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
14 Oak Park
Bedford, Massachusetts 01730
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip code)
Telephone Number: (781) 280-4000
Bedford, Massachusetts 01730
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip code)
Telephone Number: (781) 280-4000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of September 30, 2011, there were 64,024,000 shares of the registrants common stock, $.01 par
value per share, outstanding.
PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED AUGUST 31, 2011
INDEX
2
Table of Contents
PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited)
(In thousands)
August 31, | November 30, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and equivalents |
$ | 257,769 | $ | 286,559 | ||||
Short-term investments |
88,774 | 35,837 | ||||||
Total cash and short-term investments |
346,543 | 322,396 | ||||||
Accounts receivable (less allowances of $4,794 in 2011 and
$4,980 in 2010) |
83,887 | 119,273 | ||||||
Other current assets |
22,835 | 27,910 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
15,157 | 14,279 | ||||||
Total current assets |
468,422 | 483,858 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
66,344 | 58,207 | ||||||
Acquired intangible assets, net |
65,343 | 83,208 | ||||||
Goodwill |
238,588 | 238,343 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
31,981 | 29,214 | ||||||
Long-term investments and other assets |
40,082 | 43,993 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 910,760 | $ | 936,823 | ||||
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Current portion, long-term debt |
$ | 376 | $ | 388 | ||||
Accounts payable |
6,219 | 13,176 | ||||||
Accrued compensation and related taxes |
28,143 | 44,920 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
11,609 | 4,083 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
37,378 | 36,148 | ||||||
Short-term deferred revenue |
144,713 | 138,961 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
228,438 | 237,676 | ||||||
Long-term debt, less current portion |
| 276 | ||||||
Long-term deferred revenue |
5,026 | 2,908 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
2,481 | 2,378 | ||||||
Other non-current liabilities |
3,787 | 5,253 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12) |
||||||||
Shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Common stock and additional paid-in capital; authorized, 200,000
shares in 2011 and 100,000 shares in 2010; issued and outstanding, 64,267 shares in 2011
and 66,528 shares in 2010 |
340,118 | 347,604 | ||||||
Retained earnings, including accumulated other
comprehensive losses of $(3,110) in 2011 and $(9,138) in 2010 |
330,910 | 340,728 | ||||||
Total shareholders equity |
671,028 | 688,332 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 910,760 | $ | 936,823 | ||||
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended Aug. 31, | Nine Months Ended Aug. 31, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Software licenses |
$ | 38,713 | $ | 44,748 | $ | 135,466 | $ | 136,093 | ||||||||
Maintenance and services |
89,621 | 83,989 | 261,789 | 247,847 | ||||||||||||
Total revenue |
128,334 | 128,737 | 397,255 | 383,940 | ||||||||||||
Costs of revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Cost of software licenses |
2,321 | 2,025 | 7,023 | 5,633 | ||||||||||||
Cost of maintenance and services |
20,529 | 17,845 | 58,203 | 53,086 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of acquired intangibles for
purchased
technology |
3,966 | 4,839 | 11,871 | 15,222 | ||||||||||||
Total costs of revenue |
26,816 | 24,709 | 77,097 | 73,941 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
101,518 | 104,028 | 320,158 | 309,999 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing |
45,251 | 39,362 | 134,261 | 122,707 | ||||||||||||
Product development |
19,107 | 21,941 | 60,103 | 68,481 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
20,342 | 11,937 | 45,937 | 38,167 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of other acquired intangibles |
1,937 | 2,733 | 6,193 | 7,833 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring expense |
1,369 | 11,533 | 4,627 | 37,508 | ||||||||||||
Acquisition-related expenses |
| 53 | | 468 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
88,006 | 87,559 | 251,121 | 275,164 | ||||||||||||
Income from operations |
13,512 | 16,469 | 69,037 | 34,835 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||||||||||
Interest income and other |
309 | 615 | 1,611 | 2,677 | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency (loss) gain |
(1,083 | ) | (2,335 | ) | (2,215 | ) | 2,278 | |||||||||
Total other income (expense), net |
(774 | ) | (1,720 | ) | (604 | ) | 4,955 | |||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes |
12,738 | 14,749 | 68,433 | 39,790 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
4,137 | 5,505 | 21,352 | 12,495 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 8,601 | $ | 9,244 | $ | 47,081 | $ | 27,295 | ||||||||
Earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.71 | $ | 0.43 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.69 | $ | 0.41 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
65,861 | 64,836 | 66,581 | 63,420 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
67,280 | 66,636 | 68,728 | 65,673 | ||||||||||||
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)
(In thousands)
Nine Months Ended August 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 47,081 | $ | 27,295 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment |
6,569 | 8,296 | ||||||
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
18,064 | 23,055 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
18,755 | 13,201 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
(3,768 | ) | (1,155 | ) | ||||
Tax benefit from stock plans |
5,945 | 6,058 | ||||||
Excess tax benefit from stock plans |
(3,998 | ) | (3,486 | ) | ||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects
from acquisitions: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
40,255 | 13,342 | ||||||
Other current assets |
4,244 | (3,296 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
(27,240 | ) | (2,999 | ) | ||||
Income taxes payable |
11,466 | (6,717 | ) | |||||
Deferred revenue |
755 | (3,059 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
118,128 | 70,535 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchases of investments available for sale |
(105,125 | ) | (14,552 | ) | ||||
Sales and maturities of investments available for sale |
50,435 | 30,896 | ||||||
Redemptions at par by issuers of auction rate securities |
6,300 | 18,990 | ||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(13,956 | ) | (7,091 | ) | ||||
Acquisitions |
| (49,186 | ) | |||||
Decrease in other non-current assets |
(814 | ) | 280 | |||||
Net cash used for investing activities |
(63,160 | ) | (20,663 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Issuance of common stock |
41,496 | 67,814 | ||||||
Excess tax benefit from stock plans |
3,998 | 3,486 | ||||||
Withholding tax payments related to net issuance of restricted
stock units |
(1,720 | ) | (711 | ) | ||||
Payment of long-term debt |
(276 | ) | (266 | ) | ||||
Payment of issuance costs for revolving line of credit |
(752 | ) | | |||||
Repurchase of common stock |
(134,892 | ) | (29,336 | ) | ||||
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities |
(92,146 | ) | 40,987 | |||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
8,388 | (11,683 | ) | |||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and equivalents |
(28,790 | ) | 79,176 | |||||
Cash and equivalents, beginning of period |
286,559 | 175,873 | ||||||
Cash and equivalents, end of period |
$ | 257,769 | $ | 255,049 | ||||
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Note 1: Basis of Presentation
We have prepared the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements pursuant to
the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regarding interim
financial reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes
required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete
financial statements and these unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended November 30, 2010.
We have made no significant changes in the application of our significant accounting policies other
than required changes that were disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended November 30, 2010.
We have prepared the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements on the same
basis as the audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, and these
financial statements include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments,
necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the interim periods presented. The operating
results for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results expected
for the full fiscal year.
Common Stock Split
On December 20, 2010, our Board of Directors approved a three-for-two common stock split in the
form of a stock dividend. Shareholders received one additional share for every two shares held.
The distribution was made on January 28, 2011 to shareholders of record at the close of business on
January 12, 2011. All share and per share amounts in this Quarterly Report have been restated to
reflect the stock split.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Testing Goodwill for Impairment
In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update No. 2011-08, IntangiblesGoodwill and Other (Topic 350)Testing Goodwill for Impairment
(ASU 2011-08), to allow entities to use a qualitative approach to determine whether it is more
likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. If after
performing the qualitative assessment an entity determines it is not more likely than not that the
fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step
impairment test is unnecessary. However if an entity concludes otherwise, then it is required to
perform the first step of the two-step goodwill impairment test. ASU 2011-08 is effective for us in
fiscal 2013 and earlier adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of our
pending adoption of ASU 2011-08 on our consolidated financial statements.
Presentation of Comprehensive Income
In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic
220) Presentation of Comprehensive Income (ASU 2011-05), to require an entity to present the
total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other
comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two
separate but consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present the components of
other comprehensive income as part of the statement of equity. ASU 2011-05 is effective for us in
our first quarter of fiscal 2013 and should be applied retrospectively. The adoption of ASU
2011-05 is not anticipated to have any impact on our financial position or results of operations.
Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements
In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common
Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial
Reporting Standards (Topic 820)Fair Value Measurement (ASU 2011-04), to provide a consistent
definition of fair value and ensure that the fair value measurement and disclosure requirements are
similar between U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and International Financial
Reporting Standards. ASU 2011-04 changes certain fair value measurement principles and enhances
the disclosure requirements particularly for Level 3 fair value measurements (as defined in Note 7
below). ASU 2011-04 is effective for us in
6
Table of Contents
our first quarter of fiscal 2012 and should be applied prospectively. The adoption of ASU 2011-04
is not anticipated to have any impact on our financial position or results of operations.
Note 2: Earnings Per Share
We compute basic earnings per share using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.
We compute diluted earnings per share using the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding plus the weighted average effect of outstanding dilutive stock options and restricted
stock units, using the treasury stock method, and outstanding deferred stock units. The following
table provides the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share on an interim basis:
(In thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended Aug. 31, | Nine Months Ended Aug. 31, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 8,601 | $ | 9,244 | $ | 47,081 | $ | 27,295 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
65,861 | 64,836 | 66,581 | 63,420 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive impact from common stock
Equivalents |
1,419 | 1,800 | 2,147 | 2,253 | ||||||||||||
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
67,280 | 66,636 | 68,728 | 65,673 | ||||||||||||
Earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.71 | $ | 0.43 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.69 | $ | 0.41 | ||||||||
We excluded stock awards representing approximately 3,098,000 shares and 4,944,000 shares of common
stock from the calculation of diluted earnings per share in the third quarter of fiscal years 2011
and 2010, respectively, because these awards were anti-dilutive. We excluded stock awards
representing approximately 1,386,000 shares and 4,397,000 shares of common stock from the
calculation of diluted earnings per share in the first nine months of fiscal years 2011 and 2010,
respectively, because these awards were anti-dilutive.
Note 3: Stock-based Compensation
Stock-based compensation expense reflects the fair value of stock-based awards measured at the
grant date and recognized over the relevant service period. We estimate the fair value of each
stock-based award on the measurement date using either the current market price of the stock or the
Black-Scholes option valuation model. The Black-Scholes option valuation model incorporates
assumptions as to stock price volatility, the expected life of options, a risk-free interest rate
and dividend yield. We recognize stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the
service period of the award, which is generally five years for options granted prior to fiscal
2011, four years for options granted in 2011, and three years for restricted stock units.
The following table provides the classification of stock-based compensation as reflected in our
consolidated statements of operations:
(In thousands)
Three Months Ended Aug. 31, | Nine Months Ended Aug. 31, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Cost of software licenses |
$ | | $ | 7 | $ | 7 | $ | 22 | ||||||||
Cost of maintenance and services |
428 | 225 | 800 | 684 | ||||||||||||
Sales and marketing |
1,952 | 1,340 | 4,144 | 4,132 | ||||||||||||
Product development |
1,319 | 1,066 | 3,877 | 3,139 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
5,769 | 1,351 | 9,927 | 4,689 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring |
| 210 | | 535 | ||||||||||||
Total stock-based
compensation expense |
$ | 9,468 | $ | 4,199 | $ | 18,755 | $ | 13,201 | ||||||||
CEO Separation Agreement.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2011, we entered into an amendment to the existing Severance
Agreement with Richard D. Reidy, our President and Chief Executive Officer, dated as of October 13,
2009 (the Existing Separation Agreement). The
7
Table of Contents
amendment was entered into on July 31, 2011 in connection with our announcement that Mr. Reidy will
terminate employment when his successor is named. Mr. Reidy will continue as our President and
Chief Executive Officer until his successor commences employment.
The amendment to the Existing Separation Agreement entitles Mr. Reidy to the payments and benefits
set forth in the Existing Separation Agreement, which includes severance and acceleration of
vesting of Mr. Reidys unvested equity to the extent such equity would have vested during the
twenty-four months following termination of employment. The amendment to the Existing Separation
Agreement also provides for an extension of the period of time during which Mr. Reidy may exercise
his vested stock options following his termination from three months to a total of fifteen months.
The amendment provides that the extended exercise period is in consideration of Mr. Reidys
agreement to remain as President and Chief Executive Officer until his successor commences
employment. This extended exercise period will not apply if Mr. Reidy voluntarily terminates
employment prior to February 29, 2012.
We have estimated that the vesting of stock options representing the right to purchase
approximately 340,000 shares of our common stock and approximately 88,000 restricted stock units
will be accelerated upon termination of Mr. Reidys employment and we have recognized aggregate
stock-based compensation expense of $3.8 million in connection with the vesting acceleration. We
also will incur $0.6 million of stock-based compensation associated with this extension of the
exercise period, of which $0.1 million was recognized during the third quarter of fiscal 2011. The
remaining portion of this expense will be recognized over Mr. Reidys remaining employment period.
Note 4: Income Taxes
We provide for deferred income taxes resulting from temporary differences between financial and
taxable income. We record valuation allowances to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is
more likely than not to be realized. We have not provided for U.S. income taxes on the
undistributed earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries, as these earnings have been permanently reinvested
or would be principally offset by foreign tax credits.
Our federal and state income tax returns are closed by statute for all years prior to fiscal 2008
and we are no longer subject to audit for those periods. Certain state taxing authorities are
currently examining our income tax returns for years through fiscal 2010. Tax authorities for
certain non-U.S. jurisdictions are also examining returns affecting unrecognized tax benefits, none
of which are material to our balance sheet, cash flows or statements of operations. With some
exceptions, we are generally no longer subject to tax examinations in non-U.S. jurisdictions for
years prior to fiscal 2006.
The U.S. research and development credit was retroactively reinstated in December 2010. As a
result, in the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we recorded a tax benefit of $2.0 million related to
qualifying research and development activities from the period of January 2010 through November
2010.
We believe that we have adequately provided for any reasonably foreseeable outcomes related to our
tax audits and that any settlement will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated
financial position or results of operations. However, there can be no assurances as to the possible
outcomes.
Note 5: Investments
A summary of our cash, cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments at August 31, 2011 is as
follows:
(In thousands)
Cost | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
Security Type | Basis | Gains | Losses | Value | ||||||||||||
Cash |
$ | 182,777 | $ | | $ | | $ | 182,777 | ||||||||
Money market funds |
58,319 | | | 58,319 | ||||||||||||
State and municipal bond obligations |
85,977 | 317 | (8 | ) | 86,286 | |||||||||||
Auction rate securities municipal bonds |
27,200 | | (3,603 | ) | 23,597 | |||||||||||
Auction rate securities student loans |
12,700 | | (1,831 | ) | 10,869 | |||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
19,173 | | (12 | ) | 19,161 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 386,146 | $ | 317 | $ | (5,454 | ) | $ | 381,009 | |||||||
8
Table of Contents
Such amounts are classified on our balance sheet at August 31, 2011 as follows:
(In thousands)
Cash and | Short-term | Long-term | ||||||||||
Security Type | Equivalents | Investments | Investments | |||||||||
Cash |
$ | 182,777 | $ | | $ | | ||||||
Money market funds |
58,319 | | | |||||||||
State and municipal bond obligations |
9,174 | 77,112 | | |||||||||
Auction rate securities municipal bonds |
| | 23,597 | |||||||||
Auction rate securities student loans |
| | 10,869 | |||||||||
Corporate bonds |
7,499 | 11,662 | | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 257,769 | $ | 88,774 | $ | 34,466 | ||||||
For each of the auction rate securities (ARS), we evaluated the risks related to the structure,
collateral and liquidity of the investment, and forecasted the probability of issuer default,
auction failure and a successful auction at par or a redemption at par for each future auction
period. The weighted average cash flow for each period was then discounted back to present value
for each security. Based on this methodology, we determined that the fair value of our non-current
ARS investments is $34.5 million, and the temporary impairment charge recorded at August 31, 2011
in accumulated other comprehensive loss to reduce the value of our available-for-sale ARS
investments was $5.4 million.
We will not be able to access these remaining funds until a future auction for these ARS is
successful, we sell the securities in a secondary market, or they are redeemed by the issuer. As
such, these remaining investments currently lack short-term liquidity and are therefore classified
as long-term investments on the balance sheet at August 31, 2011. However, based on our cash and
short-term investments balance of $346.5 million, our new $150 million revolving credit facility
and expected operating cash flows, we do not anticipate the lack of liquidity associated with these
ARS to adversely affect our ability to conduct business and believe we have the ability to hold the
affected securities throughout the currently estimated recovery period. Therefore, the impairment
on these securities is considered only temporary in nature. If the credit rating of either the
security issuer or the third-party insurer underlying the investments deteriorates significantly,
we may be required to adjust the carrying value of the ARS through an other-than-temporary
impairment charge to earnings.
A summary of our cash, cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments at November 30, 2010 is
as follows:
(In thousands)
Cost | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
Security Type | Basis | Gains | Losses | Value | ||||||||||||
Cash |
$ | 154,718 | $ | | $ | | $ | 154,718 | ||||||||
Money market funds |
122,415 | | | 122,415 | ||||||||||||
State and municipal bond obligations |
25,484 | 207 | (10 | ) | 25,681 | |||||||||||
US government and agency securities |
10,000 | | | 10,000 | ||||||||||||
Auction rate securities municipal bonds |
27,200 | | (3,560 | ) | 23,640 | |||||||||||
Auction rate securities student loans |
19,000 | | (2,997 | ) | 16,003 | |||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
9,418 | | (21 | ) | 9,397 | |||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
185 | | | 185 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 368,420 | $ | 207 | $ | (6,588 | ) | $ | 362,039 | |||||||
9
Table of Contents
Such amounts are classified on our balance sheet at November 30, 2010 as follows:
(In thousands)
Cash and | Short-term | Long-term | ||||||||||
Security Type | Equivalents | Investments | Investments | |||||||||
Cash |
$ | 154,718 | $ | | $ | | ||||||
Money market funds |
122,415 | | | |||||||||
State and municipal bond obligations |
1,926 | 23,755 | | |||||||||
US government and agency securities |
7,500 | 2,500 | | |||||||||
Auction rate securities municipal bonds |
| | 23,640 | |||||||||
Auction rate securities student loans |
| | 16,003 | |||||||||
Corporate bonds |
| 9,397 | ||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
| 185 | | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 286,559 | $ | 35,837 | $ | 39,643 | ||||||
The fair value of debt securities at August 31, 2011 and November 30, 2010, by contractual
maturity, is as follows:
(In thousands)
Aug. 31, 2011 | Nov. 30, 2010 | |||||||
Due in one year or less (1) |
$ | 107,523 | $ | 70,285 | ||||
Due after one year |
32,390 | 14,621 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 139,913 | $ | 84,906 | ||||
(1) | Includes ARS which are tendered for interest-rate setting purposes periodically throughout the year. Beginning in February 2008, auctions for these securities began to fail, and therefore these investments currently lack short-term liquidity. The remaining contractual maturities of these securities range from 13 to 31 years. |
Investments with continuous unrealized losses and their related fair values are as follows at
August 31, 2011:
(In thousands)
Less Than | 12 Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||
12 Months | or Greater | Total | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
Security Type | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | ||||||||||||||||||
State and municipal bond obligations |
$ | 15,292 | $ | (8 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | 15,292 | $ | (8 | ) | ||||||||||
Auction rate securities municipal
bonds |
| | 23,597 | (3,603 | ) | 23,597 | (3,603 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Auction rate securities student loans |
| | 10,869 | (1,831 | ) | 10,869 | (1,831 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
9,068 | (12 | ) | | | 9,068 | (12 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 24,360 | $ | (20 | ) | $ | 34,466 | $ | (5,434 | ) | $ | 58,826 | $ | (5,454 | ) | |||||||||
Investments with continuous unrealized losses and their related fair values are as follows at
November 30, 2010:
(In thousands)
Less Than | 12 Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||
12 Months | or Greater | Total | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
Security Type | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | ||||||||||||||||||
State and municipal bond obligations
|
$ | 6,506 | $ | (10 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | 6,506 | $ | (10 | ) | ||||||||||
Auction rate securities municipal
bonds
|
| | 23,640 | (3,560 | ) | 23,640 | (3,560 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Auction rate securities student loans
|
| | 16,003 | (2,997 | ) | 16,003 | (2,997 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds
|
9,397 | (21 | ) | | | 9,397 | (21 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 15,903 | $ | (31 | ) | $ | 39,643 | $ | (6,557 | ) | $ | 55,546 | $ | (6,588 | ) | |||||||||
10
Table of Contents
The unrealized losses associated with state and municipal obligations and corporate bonds and
notes are attributable to changes in interest rates. The unrealized losses associated with ARS are
discussed above. Management does not believe any unrealized losses represent other-than-temporary
impairments based on our evaluation of available evidence as of August 31, 2011.
Note 6: Derivative Instruments
We generally use foreign currency option contracts that are not designated as hedging instruments
to hedge economically a portion of forecasted international cash flows for up to one year in the
future. All foreign currency option contracts are recorded at fair value in other current assets
on the balance sheet at the end of each reporting period and expire within one year. In the third
quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2011, mark-to-market losses of less than $0.1 million and
$0.5 million, respectively, on foreign currency option contracts were recorded in other income in
the statement of operations.
We also use forward contracts that are not designated as hedging instruments to hedge economically
the impact of the variability in exchange rates on accounts receivable and collections denominated
in certain foreign currencies. We generally do not hedge the net assets of our international
subsidiaries. All forward contracts are recorded at fair value in other current assets on the
balance sheet at the end of each reporting period and expire within 90 days. In the third quarter
and first nine months of fiscal 2011, realized and unrealized losses of $0.6 million and $2.6
million, respectively, from our forward contracts were recognized in other income in the statement
of operations. These losses were substantially offset by realized and unrealized gains on the
offsetting positions.
The table below details outstanding foreign currency forward and option contracts at August 31,
2011 where the notional amount is determined using contract exchange rates:
(In thousands)
Notional Value | Fair Value | |||||||
Foreign currency forward contracts to sell U.S. dollars |
$ | 4,168 | $ | 26 | ||||
Foreign currency forward contracts to purchase U.S. dollars |
31,104 | (109 | ) | |||||
Foreign currency option contracts to purchase U.S. dollars |
22,775 | | ||||||
Total |
$ | 58,047 | $ | (83 | ) | |||
The table below details outstanding foreign currency forward and option contracts at November 30,
2010 where the notional amount is determined using contract exchange rates:
(In thousands)
Notional Value | Fair Value | |||||||
Foreign currency forward contracts to sell U.S. dollars |
$ | 36,856 | $ | 317 | ||||
Foreign currency forward contracts to purchase U.S. dollars |
13,837 | 54 | ||||||
Foreign currency option contracts to purchase U.S. dollars |
22,775 | 496 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 73,468 | $ | 867 | ||||
11
Table of Contents
Note 7: Fair Value Measurements
The following table details the fair value measurements within the fair value hierarchy of our
financial assets at August 31, 2011:
(In thousands)
Fair Value Measurements at the Reporting Date Using | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in | ||||||||||||||||
Active Markets | Significant Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
Aug. 31, | Using Identical | Observable Inputs | Unobservable | |||||||||||||
Description | 2011 | Assets (Level 1) | (Level 2) | Inputs (Level 3) | ||||||||||||
Money market funds |
$ | 58,319 | $ | 58,319 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
State and municipal bond obligations |
86,286 | | 86,286 | | ||||||||||||
Auction rate securities municipal bonds |
23,597 | | | 23,597 | ||||||||||||
Auction rate securities student loans |
10,869 | | | 10,869 | ||||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
19,161 | | 19,161 | | ||||||||||||
Foreign exchange derivatives |
(83 | ) | | (83 | ) | | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | 198,149 | $ | 58,319 | $ | 105,364 | $ | 34,466 | ||||||||
The following table details the fair value measurements within the fair value hierarchy of our
financial assets at November 30, 2010:
(In thousands)
Fair Value Measurements at the Reporting Date Using | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in | ||||||||||||||||
Active Markets | Significant Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
Nov. 30, | Using Identical | Observable Inputs | Unobservable | |||||||||||||
Description | 2010 | Assets (Level 1) | (Level 2) | Inputs (Level 3) | ||||||||||||
Money market funds |
$ | 122,415 | $ | 122,415 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
State and municipal bond obligations |
25,681 | | 25,681 | | ||||||||||||
US government and agency securities |
10,000 | | 10,000 | | ||||||||||||
Auction rate securities municipal bonds |
23,640 | | | 23,640 | ||||||||||||
Auction rate securities student loans |
16,003 | | | 16,003 | ||||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
9,397 | | 9,397 | | ||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
185 | | 185 | | ||||||||||||
Foreign exchange derivatives |
867 | | 867 | | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 208,188 | $ | 122,415 | $ | 46,130 | $ | 39,643 | ||||||||
The valuation technique used to measure fair value for our Level 1 and Level 2 assets is a market
approach, using prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving
identical or comparable assets. The valuation technique used to measure fair value for our Level 3
assets is an income approach, where the expected weighted average future cash flows were discounted
back to present value for each asset.
12
Table of Contents
The following table reflects the activity for our financial assets measured at fair value using
Level 3 inputs for each period presented:
(In thousands)
Three Months Ended Aug. 31, | Nine Months Ended Aug. 31, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 34,784 | $ | 49,705 | $ | 39,643 | $ | 58,454 | ||||||||
Redemptions and repurchases |
(100 | ) | (10,265 | ) | (6,300 | ) | (18,990 | ) | ||||||||
Unrealized (loss) gain included in accumulated
other comprehensive income |
(218 | ) | 264 | 1,123 | 240 | |||||||||||
Unrealized gain on ARS trading securities
included
in other income |
| 1,049 | | 1,596 | ||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on put option related to ARS
rights
offering included in other income |
| (1,049 | ) | | (1,596 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, end of period |
$ | 34,466 | $ | 39,704 | $ | 34,466 | $ | 39,704 | ||||||||
Note 8: Comprehensive Income
The components of comprehensive income include, in addition to net income, foreign currency
translation adjustments and unrealized gains and losses on investments. The following table
provides the composition of comprehensive income on an interim basis:
(In thousands)
Three Months Ended Aug. 31, | Nine Months Ended Aug. 31, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net income, as reported |
$ | 8,601 | $ | 9,244 | $ | 47,081 | $ | 27,295 | ||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
134 | 2,915 | 5,086 | (6,925 | ) | |||||||||||
Unrealized (losses) gains on investments |
(100 | ) | 169 | 942 | 289 | |||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
$ | 8,635 | $ | 12,328 | $ | 53,109 | $ | 20,659 | ||||||||
Note 9: Common Stock Repurchases
We purchased and retired approximately 5,154,000 shares and 1,496,000 shares of our common stock
for $134.9 million and $29.3 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010,
respectively.
On June 27, 2011, the Board of Directors increased and extended our stock buyback program by
authorizing the repurchase of an additional $100 million of our common stock (or an aggregate of
$200 million) until May 31, 2012. The shares may be repurchased from time to time in open market
transactions or privately negotiated transactions at our discretion, subject to securities laws,
market conditions and other factors. The remaining balance under this authorization was
approximately $65 million at August 31, 2011.
Note 10: Goodwill
Goodwill is the amount by which the cost of acquired net assets in a business acquisition exceeded
the fair value of net identifiable assets on the date of purchase. Goodwill in certain foreign
jurisdictions changes each period due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. During the
first quarter of fiscal 2011, we completed our annual testing for impairment of goodwill and, based
on those tests, concluded that no impairment of goodwill existed as of December 15, 2010. For
purposes of the annual impairment test, we assigned goodwill of $61.1 million to the Application
Development Platforms operating segment, $76.8 million to the Enterprise Business Solutions
operating segment and $100.4 million to the Enterprise Data Solutions operating segment. All of
our operating segments had an estimated fair value that was substantially in excess of the carrying
value and none was at potential risk of failing step-one of our goodwill impairment analysis. See
Note 11 for a description of each operating segment. Through the date and time our condensed
consolidated financial statements were issued, no triggering events have occurred that would
indicate that a potential impairment of goodwill exists in any of our operating segments.
13
Table of Contents
Note 11: Segment Information
Operating segments, as defined under generally accepted accounting principles, are components of an
enterprise about which discrete financial information is available and regularly reviewed by the
chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance. We
internally report results to our chief operating decision maker on both a business unit basis and a
functional basis. Our business units represent our segments for financial reporting purposes.
However, our organization is managed primarily on a functional basis. We assign dedicated costs
and expenses directly to each business unit. We utilize an allocation methodology to assign all
other costs and expenses to each business unit. A significant portion of the total costs and
expenses assigned to each business unit are allocated. We disclose revenue and operating income
based upon internal accounting methods. Our chief operating decision maker is our Chief Executive
Officer.
We have three business units, each of which meet the criteria for segment reporting: (1)
Application Development Platforms, which includes the OpenEdge, Orbix and ObjectStore product sets;
(2) Enterprise Business Solutions, which includes the Apama, Sonic, Actional, Savvion and Fuse
product sets; and (3) Enterprise Data Solutions, which includes the DataDirect Connect, DataDirect
Shadow and DataServices product sets.
We do not manage our assets or capital expenditures by segment or assign other income and income
taxes to segments. We manage and report such items on a consolidated company basis.
The following table provides revenue and income (losses) from operations for our reportable
segments on an interim basis:
(In thousands)
Three months ended Aug. 31, | Nine months ended Aug. 31, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Application Development Platform segment |
$ | 79,550 | $ | 77,238 | $ | 242,523 | $ | 243,696 | ||||||||
Enterprise Business Solutions segment |
30,091 | 35,097 | 101,455 | 87,651 | ||||||||||||
Enterprise Data Solutions segment |
18,711 | 16,480 | 53,370 | 53,732 | ||||||||||||
Reconciling items |
(18 | ) | (78 | ) | (93 | ) | (1,139 | ) | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 128,334 | $ | 128,737 | $ | 397,255 | $ | 383,940 | ||||||||
Income (loss) from operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Application Development Platform segment |
$ | 45,351 | $ | 48,719 | $ | 140,190 | $ | 151,505 | ||||||||
Enterprise Business Solutions segment |
(18,844 | ) | (4,431 | ) | (34,922 | ) | (30,957 | ) | ||||||||
Enterprise Data Solutions segment |
3,959 | (4,591 | ) | 6,361 | (12,207 | ) | ||||||||||
Reconciling items |
(16,954 | ) | (23,228 | ) | (42,592 | ) | (73,506 | ) | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 13,512 | $ | 16,469 | $ | 69,037 | $ | 34,835 | ||||||||
The reconciling items within revenue represent purchase accounting adjustments for deferred revenue
related to acquisitions. The reconciling items within income from operations represent
amortization of acquired intangibles, stock-based compensation, restructuring and
acquisition-related expenses, purchase accounting adjustments for deferred revenue and certain
unallocated administrative expenses. Reconciling items are excluded from segment measurements, as
such amounts are not deducted from internal measurements of segment revenue or operating income.
Revenue attributed to North America includes sales to customers in the United States and Canada and
licenses to certain multinational organizations, substantially all of which is invoiced from the
United States. Revenue from Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA), Latin America and Asia Pacific
includes shipments to customers in each region, not including certain multinational organizations,
plus export shipments into each region that are billed from the United States. Information relating
to revenue from external customers from different geographical areas is as follows:
(In thousands)
Three months ended Aug. 31, | Nine months ended Aug. 31, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
North America |
$ | 59,629 | $ | 62,079 | $ | 184,567 | $ | 181,367 | ||||||||
EMEA |
48,005 | 46,422 | 152,328 | 144,894 | ||||||||||||
Latin America |
10,411 | 9,579 | 28,984 | 28,613 | ||||||||||||
Asia Pacific |
10,279 | 10,657 | 31,376 | 29,066 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 128,334 | $ | 128,737 | $ | 397,255 | $ | 383,940 | ||||||||
14
Table of Contents
Note 12: Contingencies
We are subject to various legal proceedings and claims, either asserted or unasserted, which arise
in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these claims cannot be predicted with
certainty, management does not believe that the outcome of any of these other legal matters will
have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
On January 21, 2010, JuxtaComm Technologies (JuxtaComm) filed a complaint in the Eastern District
of Texas against Progress Software, two of our subsidiaries and 19 other defendants, alleging
infringement of JuxtaComms US patent 6,195,662 (System for Transforming and Exchanging Data
Between Distributed Heterogeneous Computer Systems). In its complaint, JuxtaComm alleges that
certain of the products within our Sonic, Fuse, DataDirect Connect and DataServices product sets
infringe JuxtaComms patent. In its complaint, JuxtaComm seeks unspecified monetary damages and
permanent injunctive relief.
In May 2010, we filed a response to this complaint in which we denied all claims. The discovery
phase of this litigation has commenced. Trial is scheduled for January 3, 2012.
We intend to defend the action vigorously. While we believe that we have valid defenses to
JuxtaComms claims, litigation is inherently unpredictable and we cannot make an estimate of the
range of potential loss. It is possible that our business, financial position, or results of
operations could be negatively affected by an unfavorable resolution of this action.
Note 13: Restructuring Charges
During fiscal 2010, our management approved, committed to and initiated plans to restructure and
improve efficiencies in our operations as a result of certain management and organizational
changes. Restructurings were undertaken in the first and third quarters of 2010, during which we
reduced our global workforce primarily within the development, sales and administrative
organizations. This workforce reduction was conducted across all geographies and also resulted in a
consolidation of offices in certain location. During the nine months ended August 31, 2011, we
incurred $4.6 million of additional expense. Certain activities related to the third fiscal quarter
2010 restructuring continued through the nine months ended August 31, 2011 and are expected to
continue through the end of fiscal 2011. The total costs of the fiscal 2010 restructurings
primarily relate to employee severance and facilities related expenses, and are recorded to the
restructuring expense line item within our consolidated statements of operations. The excess
facilities and other costs represent facilities costs for unused space and termination costs of
automobile leases for employees included in the workforce reduction.
As part of the restructuring plan, we also increased our investment and expansion of development
and administration operations in India, where we have run a successful development organization for
several years. As a result of this increased investment and expansion, during the past twelve
months, we increased the size of our product development organization in Hyderabad, India, from
about a third of our development resources to about half. In connection with this initiative, we
moved and added additional product group functions as well as certain administrative functions to
India. This expansion in India has resulted in the reduction of our development and administration
operations headcount in other geographies in which we operate.
Through these initiatives, we expect to incur aggregate future pre-tax restructuring charges and
pre-tax non-recurring transition expenses of approximately $1 million to $2 million over the
remaining three months of fiscal 2011, primarily comprising costs for severance, transition costs
and consolidation of facilities. The transition expenses are necessary to ramp up the new, more
efficient capabilities ahead of switching over from the existing cost structure. We will report
these restructuring charges and transition expenses in our financial results as they are incurred
during the phase-in period.
15
Table of Contents
A summary of activity for all restructuring actions is as follows:
(In thousands)
Excess Facilities | Employee Severance | |||||||||||
and Other Costs | and Related Benefits | Total | ||||||||||
Balance, December 1, 2010 |
8,627 | 4,016 | 12,643 | |||||||||
Additional reserves related to Q3 2010 restructuring
and adjustments to initial reserves |
1,350 | 3,277 | 4,627 | |||||||||
Cash disbursements |
(4,500 | ) | (5,929 | ) | (10,429 | ) | ||||||
Translation adjustments and other |
638 | 52 | 690 | |||||||||
Balance, August 31, 2011 |
$ | 6,115 | $ | 1,416 | $ | 7,531 | ||||||
The amounts included under cash disbursements for excess facilities costs are net of proceeds
received from sublease agreements. The balance of the employee severance and related benefits is
expected to be paid over a period of time ending in fiscal 2011. The balance of the excess
facilities and related costs is expected to be paid over a period of time ending in fiscal 2013.
For all restructuring reserves described above, the short-term portion of $5.1 million is included
in other accrued liabilities and the long-term portion of $2.4 million is included in other
non-current liabilities on the balance sheet at August 31, 2011.
Note 14: Line of Credit
On August 15, 2011, we entered into a credit agreement (the Credit Agreement) for an unsecured
credit facility with J.P. Morgan and other lenders that matures on August 15, 2016, at which time
all amounts outstanding must be repaid. The credit facility provides for a revolving line of
credit in the amount of $150 million, with a sublimit for the issuance of standby letters of credit
in a face amount up to $25 million and swing line loans up to $20 million. The credit facility
also permits us to increase the revolving line of credit by up to an additional $75 million subject
to receiving further commitments from lenders and certain other conditions. We intend to utilize
the line of credit for general corporate purposes, including acquisitions, stock repurchases and
working capital.
Revolving loans accrue interest at a per annum rate based on our choice of either (i) the LIBOR
rate plus a margin ranging from 1.25% to 1.75% or (ii) the base rate plus a margin ranging from
.25% to .75%, both depending on our consolidated leverage ratio. The base rate is defined as the
highest of (i) the administrative agents prime rate (ii) the federal funds rate plus 1/2 of 1.00%,
and (iii) the LIBOR rate for a one month interest period plus a margin equal to 1.00%. A quarterly
commitment fee on the undrawn portion of the revolving credit facility is required, at a per annum
rate ranging from 0.25% to 0.35%, depending on our consolidated leverage ratio. The loan
origination fee and issuance costs incurred upon consummation of the Credit Agreement will be
amortized through interest expense over the five-year term of the facility. Other customary fees
and letter of credit fees may be charged and will be expensed as they are incurred.
Accrued interest on the loans is payable quarterly in arrears with respect to base rate loans and
at the end of each interest rate period (or at each three month interval in the case of loans with
interest periods greater than three months) with respect to LIBOR rate loans. We may prepay,
terminate or reduce the loan commitments in whole or in part at any time, without premium or
penalty, subject to certain conditions and reimbursement of certain costs in the case of LIBOR rate
loans. The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants. We are also
required to maintain compliance with a consolidated leverage ratio of 3.00 to 1.00 and a
consolidated interest coverage ratio of 3.00 to 1.00. As of August 31, 2011, there were no amounts
outstanding under the Credit Agreement, and we are in compliance with our covenants.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 contains certain safe harbor provisions
regarding forward-looking statements. This Form 10-Q, and other information provided by us or
statements made by our directors, officers or employees from time to time, may contain
forward-looking statements and information, which involve risks and uncertainties. Actual future
results may differ materially. Statements indicating that we expect, estimate, believe, are
planning or plan to are forward-looking, as are other statements concerning future financial
results, product offerings or other events that have not yet occurred. There are several important
factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those
anticipated by the forward-looking statements, including but not limited to the following: the
receipt and shipment of new
16
Table of Contents
orders; the timely release and market acceptance of new products and
/or enhancements to our existing products; the growth rates of certain market segments; the
positioning of our products in those market segments; the customer demand and acceptance of our new
product initiative, the Progress RPM suite; variations in the demand for professional services and
technical support; pricing pressures and the competitive environment in the software industry; the
continued uncertainty in the U.S. and international economies, which could result in fewer sales of
our products and may otherwise harm our business; business and consumer use of the Internet; our
ability to complete and integrate acquisitions; our ability to realize the expected benefits and
anticipated synergies from acquired businesses; our ability to penetrate international markets and
manage our international operations; and those factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A (Risk Factors)
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2010. Although we have
sought to identify the most significant risks to our business, we cannot predict whether, or to
what extent, any of such risks may be realized. We also cannot assure you that we have identified
all possible issues which we might face. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking
statements that we make.
Overview
We are a global enterprise software company that enables organizations to achieve higher levels of
business performance by improving their operational responsiveness. Operational responsiveness is
the ability of business processes and systems to respond to changing business conditions and
customer interactions as they occur. We offer a portfolio of best-in-class, real-time business
solutions providing visibility into business systems and processes, event processing to respond to
business events that could affect performance, and business process management enabling businesses
to continually improve business processes with no disruption to their business. We also provide
enterprise data solutions (data access and integration) and application development platforms (for
application development and management, and SaaS enablement). We maximize the benefits of
operational responsiveness while minimizing information technology complexity and total cost of
ownership.
Our segment reporting consists of three business units: Application Development Platforms,
Enterprise Business Solutions and Enterprise Data Solutions. Our product lines comply with open
standards, deliver high levels of performance and scalability and provide a low total cost of
ownership. Our products are generally sold under perpetual licenses, but certain product lines and
business activities also utilize a term or subscription licensing model. A complete discussion of
our business units is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended November
30, 2010.
We see the most significant factors impacting our results for the remainder of fiscal 2011 as the
macroeconomic climate, our international operations, the success of our shift in selling focus and
the success of our product initiative, the Progress RPM suite, each of which is discussed below.
The United States and many foreign economies continue to experience uncertainty driven by varying
macroeconomic conditions. Although some of these economies have shown signs of improvement,
macroeconomic recovery remains uneven. Uncertainty in the macroeconomic environment and associated
global economic conditions have resulted in extreme volatility in credit, equity, and foreign
currency markets, including the European sovereign debt markets and volatility in various markets
including the financial services sector. During the third fiscal quarter, some customers,
particularly in financial services, delayed software investments in response to this macroeconomic
uncertainty. The continuation of this climate could cause our customers to further delay, forego
or reduce the amount of their investments in our products or delay payments of amounts due to us.
We derive a significant portion of our revenue from international operations, which are primarily
conducted in foreign currencies. As a result, changes in the value of these foreign currencies
relative to the U.S. dollar have and will continue to significantly impact our results of
operations. For example, in the third quarter of fiscal 2011, the year-over-year decrease in the
value of the U.S. dollar against most major currencies positively affected the translation of our
results into U.S. dollars.
During the past year, we have made a number of investments and changes in our field organization,
particularly within our direct field organization, designed to enhance our solution selling
capabilities. As a result, we have completed an increasing number of larger transactions.
However, we have not yet fully achieved the benefits of these investments and changes, which has
negatively impacted our results. In addition, our dependence on larger transactions as a result of
our shift to an industry vertical and solutions focus has made us, and is expected to continue to
make us, more susceptible to quarter-to-quarter revenue fluctuations. This is because our revenue
growth rates, particularly within our EBS business unit, are dependent on our ability to license to
direct customers, which can lead to longer deal cycles and potential delays in purchasing decisions
as a result of macroeconomic conditions.
During fiscal 2010, we announced a new product initiative, the Progress RPM suite, which is the
integration of products within our EBS business unit, and is designed to enable businesses to gain
visibility into critical processes, immediately respond to events and continuously improve business
performance through the Progress Control Tower, a unified interactive environment.
We believe the Progress RPM suite will enhance our competitiveness within our markets and our
long-term
17
Table of Contents
growth prospects and we achieved significant growth in sales of these products. However,
the introduction and integration of new products is a complex process involving inherent risks, and
to which we devote significant resources. We cannot predict the impact of new or enhanced products
on our overall sales and we may not generate sufficient revenues to justify their costs.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP). These accounting principles require us to make certain estimates,
judgments and assumptions. We believe that the estimates, judgments and assumptions upon which we
rely are reasonable based upon information available to us at the time that these estimates,
judgments and assumptions are made. These estimates, judgments and assumptions can affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements as well as
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. To the extent there are
material differences between these estimates, judgments or assumptions and actual results, our
financial statements will be affected. The accounting policies that reflect our more significant
estimates, judgments and assumptions and which we believe are the most critical to aid in fully
understanding and evaluating our reported financial results include the following:
| Revenue Recognition | ||
| Allowance for Doubtful Accounts | ||
| Goodwill and Intangible Assets | ||
| Income Tax Accounting | ||
| Stock-Based Compensation | ||
| Investments in Debt Securities | ||
| Restructuring Charges |
In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by
GAAP and does not require managements judgment in its application. There are also areas in which
managements judgment in selecting among available alternatives would not produce a materially
different result. Our senior management has reviewed these critical accounting policies and related
disclosures with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.
During the first nine months of fiscal 2011, there were no significant changes in our critical
accounting policies and estimates. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations in Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
November 30, 2010 for a more complete discussion of our critical accounting policies and estimates.
18
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
The following table provides certain income and expense items as a percentage of total revenue, and
the percentage change in dollar amounts of such items compared with the corresponding period in the
previous fiscal year:
Percentage of Total Revenue | Period-to-Period Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | Three | Nine | |||||||||||||||||||||
Aug. 31, | Aug. 31, | Aug. 31, | Aug. 31, | Month | Month | |||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | Period | Period | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Software licenses |
30 | % | 35 | % | 34 | % | 35 | % | (13 | )% | 0 | % | ||||||||||||
Maintenance and services |
70 | 65 | 66 | 65 | 7 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total revenue |
100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Costs of revenue: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of software licenses |
2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 25 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost of maintenance and services |
16 | 14 | 15 | 14 | 15 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of acquired
intangibles for purchased
technology |
3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | (18 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total costs of revenue |
21 | 19 | 20 | 19 | 9 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
79 | 81 | 80 | 81 | (2 | ) | 3 | |||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing |
35 | 31 | 34 | 32 | 15 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Product development |
15 | 17 | 15 | 18 | (13 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
16 | 9 | 12 | 10 | 70 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of other acquired
intangibles |
1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | (29 | ) | (21 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Restructuring expense |
1 | 9 | 1 | 10 | (88 | ) | (88 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Acquisition-related expenses |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | * | * | ||||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
68 | 68 | 63 | 72 | 1 | (9 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Income from operations |
11 | 13 | 17 | 9 | (18 | ) | 98 | |||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense) |
(1 | ) | (2 | ) | 0 | 1 | (55 | ) | (112 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Income before provision for taxes |
10 | 11 | 17 | 10 | (14 | ) | 72 | |||||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | (25 | ) | 71 | |||||||||||||||||
Net income |
7 | % | 7 | % | 12 | % | 7 | % | (7 | )% | 72 | % | ||||||||||||
* | not meaningful |
Revenue. Our total revenue decreased slightly from $128.7 million in the third quarter of fiscal
2010 to $128.3 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2011. Total revenue would have decreased by
6% if exchange rates had been constant in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 as compared to exchange
rates in effect in the third quarter of fiscal 2010. Total revenue increased 3% from $383.9
million in the first nine months of fiscal 2010 to $397.3 million in the first nine months of
fiscal 2011. Total revenue would have been flat if exchange rates had been constant in the first
nine months of fiscal 2011 as compared to exchange rates in effect in the first nine months of
fiscal 2010. Revenue from our Enterprise Business Solutions product line increased in the first
nine months of fiscal 2011 as compared to the first nine months of fiscal 2010, partially offset by
a decrease in our Enterprise Data Solutions and Application Development Platforms product lines.
Software license revenue decreased 13% from $44.7 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 to
$38.7 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2011. Software license revenue would have decreased
by 17% if exchange rates had been constant in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 as compared to
exchange rates in effect in the third quarter of fiscal 2010. Software license revenue decreased
from $136.1 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2010 to $135.5 million in the first nine
months of fiscal 2011. Software license revenue would have decreased by 3% if exchange rates had
been constant in the first nine months of fiscal 2011 as compared to exchange rates in effect in
the first nine months of fiscal 2010. Excluding the impact of changes in exchange rates, the
decrease in the first nine months of fiscal 2011 in software license revenue was due to a decrease
in our Application Development Platforms product line partially offset by increases in the
Enterprise Business Solutions and Enterprise Data Solutions product lines.
Maintenance and services revenue increased 7% from $84.0 million in the third quarter of fiscal
2010 to $89.6 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2011. Maintenance revenue increased 8% and
professional services revenue increased 1% in the third
19
Table of Contents
quarter of fiscal 2011 as compared to the
third quarter of fiscal 2010. Maintenance and services revenue would have been flat if exchange
rates had been constant in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 as compared to exchange rates in effect
in the third quarter of fiscal 2010. Maintenance and services revenue increased 6% from $247.8
million in the first nine months of fiscal 2010 to $261.8 million in the first nine months of
fiscal 2011. Maintenance and services revenue would have increased by 2% if exchange rates had
been constant in the first nine months of fiscal 2011 as compared to exchange rates in effect in
the first nine months of fiscal 2010. Excluding the impact of changes in exchange rates, the
increase in maintenance and services revenue in the first nine months of fiscal 2011 was primarily
the result of growth in our installed customer base of maintenance renewals and a slight increase
in our professional services revenue primarily from our Enterprise Business Solutions product line.
Total revenue generated in North America decreased 4% from $62.1 million in the third quarter of
fiscal 2010 to $59.6 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 and represented 48% of total
revenue in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to 46% in the third quarter of fiscal 2011.
Total revenue generated in markets outside North America increased 3% from $66.7 million in the
third quarter of fiscal 2010 to $68.7 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 and represented
52% of total revenue in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to 54% in the third quarter of
fiscal 2011. Total revenue generated in markets outside North America would have represented 51%
of total revenue if exchange rates had been constant in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 as compared
to the exchange rates in effect in the third quarter of fiscal 2010. Revenue from two of the three
major regions outside North America, consisting of EMEA and Latin America, each increased in the
third quarter of fiscal 2011 as compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2010, which was partially
offset by a decrease in revenue from Asia Pacific.
Total revenue generated in North America increased 2% from $181.4 million in the first nine months
of fiscal 2010 to $184.6 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2011 and represented 47% of
total revenue in the first nine months of fiscal 2010 and 46% of total revenue in the first nine
months of fiscal 2011. Total revenue generated in markets outside North America increased 5% from
$202.6 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2010 to $212.7 million in the first nine months
of fiscal 2011 and represented 53% of total revenue in the first nine months of fiscal 2010
compared to 54% of total revenue in the first nine months of fiscal 2011. Revenue from the three
major regions outside North America, consisting of EMEA, Asia Pacific and Latin America, each
increased in the first nine months of fiscal 2011 as compared to the first nine months of fiscal
2010. Total revenue generated in markets outside North America would have represented 52% of total
revenue if exchange rates had been constant in the first nine months of fiscal 2011 as compared to
the exchange rates in effect in the first nine months of fiscal 2010.
Cost of Software Licenses. Cost of software licenses consists primarily of costs of
royalties, electronic software distribution costs, duplication and packaging. Cost of software
licenses increased 15% from $2.0 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 to $2.3 million in the
third quarter of fiscal 2011, and increased as a percentage of software license revenue from 5% to
6%. Cost of software licenses increased 25% from $5.7 million in the first nine months of fiscal
2010 to $7.0 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2011, and increased as a percentage of
software license revenue from 4% in the first nine months of fiscal 2010 to 5% in the first nine
months of fiscal 2011. The increase for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2011 was
primarily due to higher royalty expense for products and technologies licensed or resold from third
parties. Cost of software licenses as a percentage of software license revenue varies from period
to period depending upon the relative product mix.
Cost of Maintenance and Services. Cost of maintenance and services consists primarily of costs of
providing customer support, consulting and education. Cost of maintenance and services increased
15% from $17.8 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 to $20.5 million in the third quarter of
fiscal 2011, and increased as a percentage of maintenance and services revenue from 21% to 23%.
Cost of maintenance and services increased 10% from $53.1 million in the first nine months of
fiscal 2010 to $58.2 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2011, and increased as a percentage
of maintenance and services revenue from 21% to 22%. Cost of maintenance and services increased in
the third quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2011 as compared to the third quarter and
first nine months of fiscal 2010 due to higher professional services costs associated with higher
professional services revenue and the increased investments in the infrastructure of our
professional services organization.
Amortization of Acquired Intangibles for Purchased Technology. Amortization of acquired
intangibles for purchased technology primarily represents the amortization of the value assigned to
technology-related intangible assets obtained in business combinations. Amortization of acquired
intangibles for purchased technology decreased 18% from $4.9 million in the third quarter of fiscal
2010 to $4.0 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2011. Amortization of acquired intangibles for
purchased technology decreased 22% from $15.2 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2010 to
$11.9 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2011. The decrease was due to the completion of
amortization of certain intangible assets acquired in prior years.
Gross Profit. Our gross profit decreased 2% from $104.0 million in the third quarter of fiscal
2010 to $101.5 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2011. Our gross profit as a percentage of
total revenue decreased from 81% in the third quarter of fiscal
20
Table of Contents
2010 compared to 79% in the third
quarter of fiscal 2011. Our gross profit increased 3% from $310.0 million in the first nine months
of fiscal 2010 to $320.2 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2011. Our gross profit as a
percentage of total revenue decreased from 81% in the first nine months of fiscal 2010 compared to
80% in the first nine months of fiscal 2011. The decrease in our gross profit percentage in the
third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2011 was due to the increase in cost of maintenance
and services and third party royalties partially offset by lower amortization expense of acquired
intangibles for purchased technology, as described above.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses increased 15% from $39.4 million in the third
quarter of fiscal 2010 to $45.3 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2011, and increased as a
percentage of total revenue from 31% to 35%. Sales and marketing expenses increased 9% from $122.7
million in the first nine months of fiscal 2010 to $134.3 million in the first nine months of
fiscal 2011, and increased as a percentage of total revenue from 32% to 34%. The increase in sales
and marketing expenses in the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2011 was due to higher
headcount related expenses and costs associated with investments in the field organization in
support of our industry vertical and solutions focus.
Product Development. Product development expenses decreased 13% from $21.9 million in the third
quarter of fiscal 2010 to $19.1 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2011, and decreased as a
percentage of revenue from 17% to 15%. Product development expenses decreased 12% from $68.5
million in the first nine months of fiscal 2010 to $60.1 million in the first nine months of fiscal
2011, and decreased as a percentage of revenue from 18% to 15%. The decrease in the third quarter
and first nine months of fiscal 2011 was primarily due to headcount-related savings from the
restructuring activities that occurred in fiscal 2010.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses include the costs of our finance,
human resources, legal, information systems and administrative departments. General and
administrative expenses increased 70% from $11.9 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 to
$20.3 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2011, and increased as a percentage of revenue from 9%
to 16%. General and administrative expenses increased 20% from $38.2 million in the first nine
months of fiscal 2010 to $45.9 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2011, and increased as a
percentage of revenue from 10% to 12%. The increase was primarily due to employee separation costs
of $6.4 million related to the amended separation arrangements we entered into with Richard D.
Reidy, our President and Chief Executive Officer. The separation costs included a charge $3.9
million of stock-based compensation and $2.5 million of future cash payments.
Restructuring Expenses. Restructuring expenses decreased from $11.5 million in the third quarter
of fiscal 2010 to $1.4 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2011. Restructuring expenses
decreased from $37.5 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2010 to $4.6 million in the first
nine months of fiscal 2011. Restructuring expenses in the third quarter and the first nine months
of fiscal 2011 included ongoing costs related to decisions from the Q3 2010 restructuring
activities. Restructuring expenses in the first nine months of fiscal 2010 also included employee
severance, excess facilities costs for unused space and termination costs of automobile leases for
terminated employees in connection with the large work-force reductions undertaken in fiscal 2010.
Amortization of Other Acquired Intangibles. Amortization of other acquired intangibles primarily
represents the amortization of value assigned to non-technology-related intangible assets obtained
in business combinations. Amortization of other acquired intangibles decreased from $2.7 million
in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 to $1.9 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2011.
Amortization of other acquired intangibles decreased from $7.8 million in the first nine months of
fiscal 2010 to $6.2 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2011. The decrease in the third
quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2011 was due to the completion of amortization of certain
intangible assets acquired in prior years.
Acquisition-related Expenses. Acquisition-related expenses in the first nine months of fiscal 2010
primarily relate to the transaction costs, primarily professional services fees, associated with
the acquisition of Savvion.
Income (loss) From Operations. Income from operations decreased from $16.5 million in the third
quarter of fiscal 2010 to $13.5 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2011. Income from
operations increased from $35.8 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2010 to $69.0 million in
the first nine months of fiscal 2011. The increase in the first nine months of fiscal 2011 as
compared to the first nine months of fiscal 2010 was primarily the result of higher revenue and
costs savings associated with our restructuring activities, partially offset by the restructuring
charges that occurred in the first and third quarters of 2010.
On a segment basis, operating income from our Application Development Platforms business unit
decreased 7% from $48.7 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 to $45.4 million in the third
quarter of fiscal 2011. The operating loss from our Enterprise Business Solutions business unit
increased from $(4.4) million in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 to $(18.8) million in the third
quarter of fiscal 2011. The operating income (loss) from our Enterprise Data Solutions business
unit increased from a loss of $(4.6) million in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 to income of $4.0
million in the third quarter of fiscal 2011.
21
Table of Contents
Operating income from our Application Development Platforms business unit decreased 7% from $151.5
million in the first nine months of fiscal 2010 to $140.2 million in the first nine months of
fiscal 2011. The operating loss from our Enterprise Business Solutions business unit increased
from $(31.0) million in the first nine months of fiscal 2010 to $(34.9) million in the first nine
months of fiscal 2011. The operating income (loss) from our Enterprise Data Solutions business
unit increased from a loss of $(12.2) million in the first nine months of fiscal 2010 to income of
$6.4 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2011. See further discussion of segment reporting
in footnote 12 of the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report.
Other Income (Expense). Other income, primarily consisting of interest income and foreign currency
gains and losses, decreased from $(1.7) million in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 to $(0.8)
million in the third quarter of fiscal 2011. Other income decreased from $5.0 million in the first
nine months of fiscal 2010 to $(0.6) million in the first nine months of fiscal 2011. The decrease
in the first nine months of fiscal 2011 was primarily due to the increase in the value of our
foreign currency average rate option contracts and an insurance settlement gain related to a
pre-acquisition contingency assumed as part of a prior acquisition, both of which occurred in
fiscal 2010.
Provision for Income Taxes. Our effective tax rate was 31.2% in the first nine months of 2011 as
compared to 31.4% in the first nine months of fiscal 2010. The effective tax rate in the first
nine months of fiscal 2011 included a tax benefit of $2.0 million related to qualifying research
and development activities from the period January 2010 through November 2010 offset by the shift
of taxable income to jurisdictions with higher tax rates.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash and Short-term Investments
At the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2011, our cash and short-term investments totaled $346.5
million. The increase of $24.1 million since the end of fiscal 2010 was primarily due to cash
generated from operations and issuances of common stock upon exercise of stock options, partially
offset by cash used for share repurchases. As of August 31, 2011 we had cash and cash equivalents
of $157.4 million held in accounts outside the United States which would be subject to taxation in
the United States if repatriated, principally offset by foreign tax credits.
On August 15, 2011, we entered into a credit agreement (the Credit Agreement) for an unsecured
credit facility with J.P. Morgan and other lenders that matures on August 15, 2016, at which time
all amounts outstanding must be repaid. The credit facility provides for a revolving line of
credit in the amount of $150 million, with a sublimit for the issuance of standby letters of credit
in a face amount up to $25 million and swing line loans up to $20 million. The credit facility
also permits us to increase the revolving line of credit by up to an additional $75 million subject
to receiving further commitments from lenders and certain other conditions. We intend to utilize
the line of credit for general corporate purposes, including acquisitions, stock repurchases and
working capital.
Revolving loans accrue interest at a per annum rate based on our choice of either (i) the LIBOR
rate plus a margin ranging from 1.25% to 1.75% or (ii) the base rate plus a margin ranging from
.25% to .75%, both depending on our consolidated leverage ratio. The base rate is defined as the
highest of (i) the administrative agents prime rate (ii) the federal funds rate plus 1/2 of 1.00%,
and (iii) the LIBOR rate for a one month interest period plus a margin equal to 1.00%. A quarterly
commitment fee on the undrawn portion of the revolving credit facility is required, at a per annum
rate ranging from 0.25% to 0.35%, depending on our consolidated leverage ratio. The loan
origination fee and issuance costs incurred upon consummation of the Credit Agreement will be
amortized through interest expense over the five-year term of the facility. Other customary fees
and letter of credit fees may be charged and will be expensed as they are incurred.
Accrued interest on the loans is payable quarterly in arrears with respect to base rate loans and
at the end of each interest rate period (or at each three month interval in the case of loans with
interest periods greater than three months) with respect to LIBOR rate loans. We may prepay,
terminate or reduce the loan commitments in whole or in part at any time, without premium or
penalty, subject to certain conditions and reimbursement of certain costs in the case of LIBOR rate
loans. The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants. We are also
required to maintain compliance with a consolidated leverage ratio of 3.00 to 1.00 and a
consolidated interest coverage ratio of 3.00 to 1.00. As of August 31, 2011, there were no amounts
outstanding under the Credit Agreement, and we are in compliance with our covenants.
Auction Rate Securities
In addition to the $346.5 million of cash and short-term investments, we had investments with a
fair value of $34.5 million related to auction rate securities (ARS) that are classified as
long-term investments. These ARS are floating rate securities with longer-term maturities that
were marketed by financial institutions with auction reset dates at primarily 28 or 31 day
intervals
22
Table of Contents
to provide short-term liquidity. The remaining contractual maturities of these
securities range from 13 to 31 years. The underlying collateral of the ARS consist of municipal
bonds, which are insured by monoline insurance companies, and student loans, which are supported by
the federal government as part of the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP) and by the
monoline insurance companies.
Beginning in February 2008, auctions for these securities began to fail, and the interest rates for
these ARS reset to the maximum rate per the applicable investment offering document. At November
30, 2010, our ARS investments classified as long-term investments totaled $46.2 million at par
value. During the first nine months of fiscal 2011, noncurrent ARS totaling $6.3 million were
redeemed at par by the issuers, resulting in a net reduction of the par value of our ARS
investments classified as long-term investments to $39.9 million. These ARS are classified as
available-for-sale securities.
For each of the ARS classified as available-for-sale, we evaluated the risks related to the
structure, collateral and liquidity of the investment, and forecasted the probability of issuer
default, auction failure and a successful auction at par or a redemption at par for each future
auction period. The weighted average cash flow for each period was then discounted back to present
value for each security. Based on this methodology, we determined that the fair value of our
non-current ARS investments is $34.5 million at August 31, 2011, and we have recorded a temporary
impairment charge in accumulated other comprehensive income of $5.4 million to reduce the value of
our available-for-sale ARS investments.
We will not be able to access these remaining funds until a future auction for these ARS is
successful, we sell the securities in a secondary market, or they are redeemed by the issuer. As
such, these remaining investments currently lack short-term liquidity and are therefore classified
as long-term investments on our consolidated balance sheet at August 31, 2011. Based on our cash
and short-term investments balance of $346.5 million, our new revolving credit facility and
expected operating cash flows, we do not anticipate the lack of liquidity associated with these ARS
to adversely affect our ability to conduct business and believe we have the ability to hold the
affected securities throughout the currently estimated recovery period. Therefore, the impairment
on these securities is considered only temporary in nature. If the credit rating of either the
security issuer or the third-party insurer underlying the investments deteriorates significantly,
we may be required to adjust the carrying value of the ARS through an impairment charge.
Cash Flows from Operations
We generated $118.1 million in cash from operations in the first nine months of fiscal 2011 as
compared to $70.5 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2010. The increase in cash generated
from operations in the first nine months of fiscal 2011 over the first nine months of fiscal 2010
was primarily due to improvements in working capital, primarily accounts receivable, and higher
profitability.
A summary of our cash flows from operations for the first nine months of fiscal years 2011 and 2010
is as follows:
(In thousands)
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Net income |
$ | 47,081 | $ | 27,295 | ||||
Depreciation, amortization and other noncash charges |
43,387 | 44,552 | ||||||
Tax benefit (deficiency) from stock plans |
1,947 | 2,572 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
25,713 | (3,884 | ) | |||||
Total |
$ | 118,128 | $ | 70,535 | ||||
Accounts receivable decreased by $35.4 million from the end of fiscal 2010. Accounts receivable
days sales outstanding, or DSO, was the same at 59 days at the end of the third quarter of fiscal
2011 as compared to the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2010 and decreased fifteen days from the
end of fiscal 2010. We target a DSO range of 60 to 80 days.
Cash Flows from Investing and Financing Activities
As described above, on August 15, 2011, we entered into a Credit Agreement (the Credit Agreement)
for an unsecured credit facility with J.P. Morgan and other lenders that matures on August 15,
2016, at which time all amounts outstanding must be repaid. The credit facility provides for a
revolving line of credit in the amount of $150 million, with a sublimit for the issuance of standby
letters of credit in a face amount up to $25 million and swing line loans up to $20 million. The
credit facility also permits the Company to increase the revolving line of credit by up to an
additional $75 million subject to receiving further commitments from lenders and certain other
conditions. As of August 31, 2011, there were no amounts outstanding under the line of credit..
23
Table of Contents
We purchased property and equipment totaling $14.0 million in the first nine months of fiscal
2011 as compared to $7.1 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2010. The purchases consisted
primarily of computer equipment and software and building and leasehold improvements.
We purchased and retired approximately 5,154,000 shares and 1,496,000 shares of our common stock
for $134.9 million and $29.3 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010,
respectively.
We received $41.5 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2011 from the exercise of stock
options and the issuance of shares under our employee stock purchase plan as compared to $67.8
million in the first nine months of fiscal 2010.
We expect to pursue acquisitions during the remainder of fiscal 2011, although we can make no
assurances that we will be able to identify and complete any acquisitions. Our acquisition strategy
has been to expand our business and/or add complimentary products and technologies to our existing
product sets. To the extent that we complete any future acquisitions, our cash position could be
reduced.
Indemnification Obligations
We include standard intellectual property indemnification provisions in our licensing agreements in
the ordinary course of business. Pursuant to our product license agreements, we will indemnify,
hold harmless, and agree to reimburse the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the
indemnified party, generally business partners or customers, in connection with certain patent,
copyright or other intellectual property infringement claims by third parties with respect to our
products. Other agreements with our customers provide indemnification for claims relating to
property damage or personal injury resulting from the performance of services by us or our
subcontractors. Historically, our costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims relating to such
indemnity agreements have been insignificant. Accordingly, the estimated fair value of these
indemnification provisions is immaterial.
Liquidity Outlook
We believe that existing cash balances together with funds generated from operations and our new
revolving credit facility will be sufficient to finance our operations and meet our foreseeable
cash requirements (including planned acquisitions, capital expenditures, lease commitments,
restructuring obligations, debt payments and other long-term obligations) through at least the next
twelve months.
Revenue Backlog
Our aggregate revenue backlog at August 31, 2011 was approximately $167 million, of which $150
million was included on our balance sheet as deferred revenue, primarily related to unexpired
maintenance and support contracts. At August 31, 2011, the remaining amount of backlog of
approximately $17 million was composed of multi-year licensing arrangements, which are not included
on the balance sheet and not subject to our normal accounting controls for information that is
either reported in or derived from our basic financial statements.
Our aggregate revenue backlog at August 31, 2010 was approximately $159 million, of which $138
million was included on our balance sheet as deferred revenue, primarily related to unexpired
maintenance and support contracts. At August 31, 2010, the remaining amount of backlog of
approximately $21 million was composed of multi-year licensing arrangements of approximately $16
million and open software license orders received but not shipped of approximately $5 million,
which are not included on the balance sheet and not subject to our normal accounting controls for
information that is either reported in or derived from our basic financial statements.
We typically fulfill most of our software license orders within 30 days of acceptance of a
purchase order. Assuming all other revenue recognition criteria have been met, we recognize
software license revenue upon shipment of the product, or if delivered electronically, when the
customer has the right to access the software. Because there are many elements governing when
revenue is recognized, including when orders are shipped, credit approval obtained, completion of
internal control processes over revenue recognition and other factors, management has some control
in determining the period in which certain revenue is recognized. We frequently have open software
license orders at the end of the quarter which have not shipped or have otherwise not met all the
required criteria for revenue recognition. Although the amount of open software license orders may
vary at any time, we generally do not believe that the amount, if any, of such software license
orders at the end of a particular quarter is a reliable indicator of future performance. In
addition, there is no industry standard for the definition of backlog and there may be an element
of estimation in determining the amount. As such, direct comparisons with other companies may be
difficult or potentially misleading.
24
Table of Contents
Legal and Other Regulatory Matters
See discussion regarding legal and other regulatory matters in Part II, Item 1. Legal
Proceedings.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Our only significant off-balance sheet commitments relate to operating lease obligations. Future
annual minimum rental lease payments are detailed in Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2010. We have
no off-balance sheet arrangements within the meaning of Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Testing Goodwill for Impairment
In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update No. 2011-08, IntangiblesGoodwill and Other (Topic 350)Testing Goodwill for Impairment
(ASU 2011-08), to allow entities to use a qualitative approach to determine whether it is more
likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. If after
performing the qualitative assessment an entity determines it is not more likely than not that the
fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step
impairment test is unnecessary. However if an entity concludes otherwise, then it is required to
perform the first step of the two-step goodwill impairment test. ASU 2011-08 is effective for us in
fiscal 2013 and earlier adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of our
pending adoption of ASU 2011-08 on our consolidated financial statements.
Presentation of Comprehensive Income
In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic
220) Presentation of Comprehensive Income (ASU 2011-05), to require an entity to present the
total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other
comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two
separate but consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present the components of
other comprehensive income as part of the statement of equity. ASU 2011-05 is effective for us in
our first quarter of fiscal 2013 and should be applied retrospectively. The adoption of ASU
2011-05 is not anticipated to have any impact on our financial position or results of operations.
Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements
In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common
Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial
Reporting Standards (Topic 820)Fair Value Measurement (ASU 2011-04), to provide a consistent
definition of fair value and ensure that the fair value measurement and disclosure requirements are
similar between U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and International Financial
Reporting Standards. ASU 2011-04 changes certain fair value measurement principles and enhances
the disclosure requirements particularly for Level 3 fair value measurements (as defined in Note 7
below). ASU 2011-04 is effective for us in our first quarter of fiscal 2012 and should be applied
prospectively. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 is not anticipated to have any impact on our financial
position or results of operations.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
During the first nine months of fiscal 2011, there were no significant changes to our quantitative
and qualitative disclosures about market risk. Please refer to Part II, Item 7A. Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal
year ended November 30, 2010 for a more complete discussion of the market risks we encounter.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
25
Table of Contents
under the
Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on
this evaluation,
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period
covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective at the reasonable assurance level to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and that such information is
accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting. No changes in our internal control over
financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended August 31, 2011 that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are subject to various legal proceedings and claims, either asserted or unasserted, which arise
in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these claims cannot be predicted with
certainty, management does not believe that the outcome of any of these other legal matters will
have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
On January 21, 2010, JuxtaComm Technologies (JuxtaComm) filed a complaint in the Eastern District
of Texas against Progress Software, two of our subsidiaries and 19 other defendants, alleging
infringement of JuxtaComms US patent 6,195,662 (System for Transforming and Exchanging Data
Between Distributed Heterogeneous Computer Systems). In its complaint, JuxtaComm alleges that
certain of the products within our Sonic, Fuse, DataDirect Connect and DataServices product sets
infringe JuxtaComms patent. In its complaint, JuxtaComm seeks unspecified monetary damages and
permanent injunctive relief.
In May 2010, we filed a response to this complaint in which we denied all claims. The discovery
phase of this litigation has commenced. Trial is scheduled for January 3, 2012.
We intend to defend the action vigorously. While we believe that we have valid defenses to
JuxtaComms claims, litigation is inherently unpredictable and we cannot make an estimate of the
range of potential loss. It is possible that our business, financial position, or results of
operations could be negatively affected by an unfavorable resolution of this action.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
We operate in a rapidly changing environment that involves certain risks and uncertainties, some of
which are beyond our control. In addition to the information provided in this report, please refer
to Part I, Item 1A (Risk Factors) in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
November 30, 2010 for a more complete discussion regarding certain factors that could materially
affect our business, financial condition or future results.
Our new revolving credit facility contains certain restrictions that may limit our ability to
operate our business.
On August 15, 2011, we entered into a credit agreement for a $150 million revolving credit
facility. The agreements governing this revolving credit facility contain, and any other future
loan agreement we enter into may contain, restrictive covenants that limit our ability to operate
our business, including, in each case subject to certain exceptions, restrictions on our ability
to:
| incur indebtedness; | ||
| make acquisitions or dispositions | ||
| grant liens; | ||
| enter into certain mergers or sell all or substantially all of our assets; | ||
| make certain payments on our equity, including paying dividends; | ||
| make investments; | ||
| change our business; | ||
| enter into transactions with our affiliates; and | ||
| enter into certain restrictive agreements. |
26
Table of Contents
In addition, the revolving credit facility requires us to comply with various financial
covenants and additional affirmative and negative covenants. Our ability to comply with these
covenants is dependent upon our future performance, which will be subject to many factors, some of
which are beyond our control, including prevailing economic conditions. If we are not able to
comply with these covenants and there are then amounts outstanding under the revolving credit
facility, we would be required to repay all such outstanding amounts. We would also not be allowed
to borrow additional amounts under the revolving credit facility. If our cash is utilized to repay
the outstanding amount under the revolving credit facility, we could experience an immediate
reduction in working capital available to operate our business, which could be significant.
As a result of these covenants, our ability to respond to changes in business and economic
conditions and to obtain additional financing, if needed, may be significantly restricted, and we
may be prevented from engaging in transactions that might otherwise be beneficial to us, such as
strategic acquisitions.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Items 2(a) and 2(b) are not applicable.
(c) Stock Repurchases
Information related to our repurchases of our common stock by month in the third quarter of fiscal
2011 is as follows:
(in thousands, except per share data)
Total Number of | Approximate Dollar Value | |||||||||||||||
Shares Purchased | Of Shares that May | |||||||||||||||
Total Number | Average | as Part of Publicly | Yet Be Purchased | |||||||||||||
Of Shares | Price Paid | Announced Plans | Under the Plans or | |||||||||||||
Period: | Purchased | per Share | or Programs | Programs (1) | ||||||||||||
June 2011 |
| | | $ | 135,101 | |||||||||||
July 2011 |
1,703 | $ | 25.42 | 1,703 | 91,818 | |||||||||||
August 2011 |
1,258 | $ | 21.23 | 1,258 | 65,108 | |||||||||||
Total |
2,961 | $ | 23.64 | 2,961 | $ | 65,108 | ||||||||||
(1) | On October 1, 2010, the Board of Directors authorized, for the period from October 1, 2010 through September 30, 2011, the purchase of up to $100 million of our common stock, at such times that management deems such purchases to be an effective use of cash. On June 27, 2011, the Board of Directors increased and extended our stock buyback program by authorizing the repurchase of an additional $100 million of our common stock (or an aggregate of $200 million) until May 31, 2012. The shares may be repurchased from time to time in open market transactions or privately negotiated transactions at our discretion, subject to securities laws, market conditions and other factors. The remaining balance under this authorization was approximately $65 million at August 31, 2011. |
27
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed or furnished as part of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q:
Exhibit No. | Description | |
31.1*
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Richard D. Reidy | |
31.2*
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Charles F. Wagner, Jr. | |
32.1**
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act | |
101***
|
The following materials from Progress Software Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended August 31, 2011, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of August 31, 2011 and November 30, 2010; (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended August 31, 2011 and August 31, 2010; (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended August 31, 2011 and August 31, 2010 and (iv) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
* | Filed herewith | |
** | Furnished herewith | |
*** | Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections. |
28
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORPORATION
(Registrant)
(Registrant)
Dated: October 11, 2011 | /s/ Richard D. Reidy | |||
Richard D. Reidy | ||||
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
||||
Dated: October 11, 2011 | /s/ Charles F. Wagner, Jr. | |||
Charles F. Wagner, Jr. | ||||
Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
||||
Dated: October 11, 2011 | /s/ Chris B. Andersen | |||
Chris B. Andersen | ||||
Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) |
||||
29