Rekor Systems, Inc. - Annual Report: 2018 (Form 10-K)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
☒ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018
OR
☐TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period
from to
Commission File Number: 001-55833
Novume Solutions, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
81-5266334
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
14420 Albemarle Point Place, Suite 200
Chantilly, VA, 20151
|
|
20151
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
(703) 953-3838
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area
Code)
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
Common
stock, par value $0.0001 per share
|
|
The
Nasdaq Capital Market
|
Securities
Registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as
defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports
pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past
90 days. Yes ☒
No ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to submit and post such
files). Yes ☒
No ☐
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not
contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting
company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of
“large accelerated filer,” “accelerated
filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and
“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer ☐
|
Accelerated
filer ☐
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer ☒
|
|
Smaller
reporting company ☒
Emerging
growth company ☐
|
If an
emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant
has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying
with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
The
aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting and
non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as
of June 29, 2018 was approximately $23.7 million.
As of
March 31, 2019, the Registrant had 19,367,619 shares of common
stock, $0.0001 par value per share outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
PAGE
|
PART I
|
|
|
Business
|
4
|
|
Our
Markets
|
|
|
Risk
Factors
|
10
|
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
25
|
|
Properties
|
25
|
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
25
|
|
Mine
Safety Disclosures
|
25
|
|
PART II
|
|
|
Market
for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
26
|
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
27
|
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
27
|
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
|
44
|
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data.
|
45
|
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure.
|
79
|
|
Controls
and Procedures.
|
80
|
|
Other
Information.
|
80
|
|
PART
III
|
|
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
81
|
|
Executive
Compensation
|
85
|
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
|
88
|
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
89
|
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
90
|
|
Part
IV
|
|
|
Exhibits,
Financial Statements Schedules
|
91
|
|
Form
10-K Summary.
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
Unless
the context requires otherwise, all references in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K (the “Annual Report”) to
“Novume Solutions, Inc.,” “Novume,”
“Company,” “we,” “our” and
“us” refer to Novume Solutions, Inc. and its
consolidated subsidiaries.
SPECIAL NOTE ON FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This
Annual Report contains forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. All statements
other than statements of historical facts contained in this Annual
Report, including statements regarding our future results of
operations and financial position, business strategy, prospective
products and services, timing and likelihood of success, plans and
objectives of management for future operations, and future results
of current and anticipated products and services, are
forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and
unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may
cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be
materially different from any future results, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking
statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking
statements by terms such as “may,” “will,”
“should,” “expect,” “plan,”
“anticipate,” “could,”
“intend,” “target,” “project,”
“contemplates,” “believes,”
“estimates,” “predicts,”
“potential” or “continue” or the negative
of these terms or other similar expressions. These forward-looking
statements speak only as of the date of this Annual Report and are
subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions
described under the sections in this Annual Report entitled
“Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Because forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks
and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted or quantified
and some of which are beyond our control, you should not rely on
these forward-looking statements as predictions of future events.
We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement
as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise.
Business
Overview
We
provide services and products to both government and private sector
clients, with an emphasis on public safety, risk management and
workforce solutions. Currently, as a leading provider of support
services to the government contracting market, our primary clients
are companies that serve the government. We provide professional
services that offer scalable and compliant outsourced support to
these companies. We help these clients capture business by winning
government contracts and perform their contract requirements. We
also provide specialized staffing services primarily in the
aerospace and aviation industries to help clients manage risk by
giving them the tools to be prepared for, and respond to,
disruptive events and creating secure environments.
A small
but growing part of our business provides and manages public safety
products and systems. As part of this business, we have been
working since 2017 to develop and field test a line of mobile
products and related services for use by law enforcement and other
public safety entities. These operations are conducted by our Rekor
Recognition Systems, Inc. subsidiary, which was formerly named
Brekford Traffic Safety, Inc. and is herein referred to as
“Brekford”. In connection with this effort, in March
2019 we acquired substantially all of the assets of OpenALPR
Technology, Inc., as more fully described below. These assets are
now held in our new subsidiary, OpenALPR Software Solutions, LLC
(“OpenALPR”). For the purpose of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K any references to OpenALPR are to
OpenALPR Technology, Inc. prior to March 12, 2019 and to OpenALPR
Software Solutions, LLC on and after March 12, 2019. The
technology we acquired currently has the capability to analyze
images produced by almost any Internet Protocol (“IP”)
camera and identify license plates from over 70 countries, as well
as the make, model and color of the vehicle. Our new line of mobile
public safety equipment employs this technology and ownership of
the rights to the technology allows us to protect what we believe
are significant competitive advantages for this new line of
products. In addition, due to the advantages we see in the accuracy
and speed of this technology, as well as its ability to be used
with many widely available camera systems, we also believe that
this technology can be used more broadly in the global vehicle
recognition system market and serve other large markets in the
transportation, security and logistics areas, as more fully
described below.
As a
result of the increasing involvement of technology in our
operations, our Board of Directors has determined to organize our
operations into two separate divisions, commencing with the first
quarter of 2019. One division will be responsible for our
businesses that provide professional services for the government
contracting market, and staffing services for the aerospace and
aviation markets, while the other division will be responsible for
our activities in developing technology and distributing and
licensing products and services for the public safety, vehicle
recognition markets. In connection with this internal
reorganization, we also expect to evaluate the possibility of
reconfiguring, selling or discontinuing various business assets or
entities.
4
Description of Services and Products
Professional and Specialty Staffing Services
Government Contracting Support
Our
services assist government contractors with critical aspects of
their business. Our services include: market intelligence and
opportunity identification; capture and strategic advisory;
proposal strategy and development; teaming support; and managed
human capital services. Our services also help commercially-focused
firms gain entry into the government contracting market. Since
1998, we have assisted our clients with over $144 billion of
government contract awards.
Specialty Staffing Services
We
provide quality specialized contract personnel, temp-to-hire
professionals, direct hires, and temporary or seasonal hires to the
Department of Defense and a diverse group of companies in the
aerospace and aviation industry nationally and have been
instrumental in placing highly-skilled technical professionals in
some of the world’s most prestigious engineering firms and
government facilities for over 20 years. Some of the professionals
that we place in the aerospace and aviation industry include: FAA
certified airframe and power plant mechanics; avionics and embedded
software engineers; FCC certified avionic technicians; licensed
aircraft inspectors; flight test engineers; process/repair
engineers; and simulation engineers. Specialty staffing is a
service that most large aviation and aerospace companies need due
to the time-sensitive aspects of their contracts, and our customers
use specialty staffing to fulfill a variety of roles.
Vehicle Recognition, Public Safety and Risk Management Products and
Services
Vehicle Recognition and Public
Safety Products and
Services
In
2018, we provided traffic safety systems to a number of
municipalities in North America. These systems include hardware
that identifies red light and school safety zone traffic violations
and software that captures and records forensic images, analyses
the images to provide data and supports citation management
services. Since 2017, we have been working to develop and
field-test a line of mobile vehicle recognition products and
related services for use by law enforcement and other public safety
entities. These products include innovative systems that assist in
identifying and enforcing violations involving emergency vehicles
and school buses, as well as other products and services that can
identify vehicles using fixed- and mobile-camera systems. These
products have applications for electronic toll collection, traffic
management, parking, insurance and banking industries, as well as
law enforcement.
In
March 2019, we acquired substantially all of the assets of a
software development company, OpenALPR, as more fully described
below. With this acquisition, we currently provide vehicle
recognition and data management services covering paid contracts
for over 9,000 cameras to customers in over 70 countries. The
services, which operate in many installations at over a 99%
accuracy rate, include a web server, self-managed database, and
access to a powerful, cross-platform application programming
interface. The software employs a convolutional neural network
architecture to classify images and features include seamless video
analysis and data analytics. Current customers include law
enforcement agencies, highway authorities, parking system
operators, private security companies, and wholesale and retail
operations supporting logistics and customer loyalty
programs.
Risk Management Products and Services
We help
clients to both anticipate and evaluate risks and manage disruptive
events when they occur. We assess, audit, develop, train and test
strategies and programs encompassing predictive intelligence,
business continuity, risk assessment, crisis management and
communications, emergency and cyber incident response, behavioral
risk and threat assessment, and workplace violence prevention. We
are focused on prevention, in addition to planning and response
initiatives. For example, BERTHA®, our behavioral risk and
threat assessment program, positions schools, businesses and other
organizations to prevent violence from occurring. This program
helps our clients to identify early warning signs that may be
exhibited by an individual before they are on a path to violence.
In 2018, to complement our existing risk assessment, training and
certification programs for child care programs and schools, we
launched our FirstSight™ program to actively
monitor social media activities of concern and provide assistance
in taking appropriate preventive actions.
5
The Government Contracting Support Industry
According
to the U. S. Treasury, the total dollar value of federal government
contracts awarded over each of the last ten fiscal years has ranged
from a high of approximately $560 billion in fiscal year 2010 to a
low of approximately $440 billion in fiscal year 2015, creating a
stable markets for support services. According to the U.S. federal
government’s System for Award Management (“SAM”)
database, as of March 18, 2019, there were over 492,000 government
contractors, of which over 49,000 are located in Washington, DC,
Maryland and Virginia, many of which are located in an area
commonly known as the “Beltway” and are in close
proximity to our headquarters. The U.S. federal government’s
contract spending in Washington, DC, Maryland and Virginia was more
than $115 billion in fiscal year 2018, according to
USASpending.gov. This represents over 21% of the $544 billion of
total contract spending in fiscal year 2018. We believe these
factors provide growth opportunities for us.
Because
of the geographic concentration of these clients, there is also a
large, but fragmented, concentration of service providers for these
companies. Although the businesses that provide resources to the
government contracting sector are diverse and highly fragmented,
their clients have many common needs resulting from the basic
qualifications and standard requirements inherent in the government
procurement process. We believe that there may be additional
opportunities for consolidation in this sector, both in the
Washington, DC market, and in other parts of the country, but our
immediate goal is to improve our ability to serve this sector by
pooling our subsidiaries’ resources and client
contacts.
Clients
To be a
government contractor, a company must be able to meet rigid
standards. As a result, our clients are typically well-established,
financially-stable businesses with both a reputation for excellence
and high standards and a demonstrated ability to survive and
prosper through innovation and adaptation. The U.S. federal
government’s SAM database as of March 18, 2019 includes over
492,000 government contractors and over 49,000 are located in
Washington, DC, Maryland and Virginia. Government contractors range
from small privately-owned lifestyle companies to members of the
Fortune 100. Since 1983, we have served thousands of these
entities. In 2018, we provided services to 14 of the Top 100
largest federal contractors (based on their fiscal 2017 prime
contracts in IT, systems integration, professional services and
telecommunications) as identified by Washington Technology
(https://washingtontechnology.com/toplists/top-100-lists/2018.aspx).
Marketing and Sales
We
obtain client engagements primarily through business development
efforts, cross-selling of our services to existing clients, and
maintaining client relationships, as well as referrals from
existing and former clients. Our business development efforts
emphasize lead generation, industry group networking and corporate
visibility. Most of our business development efforts are led by
members of our professional teams, who are also responsible for
managing projects. Our business development efforts are further
supported by personnel located at our corporate headquarters. We
are working to position ourselves as a preferred, single-source
provider of specialized professional services to our clients. As
our service offerings become more diverse, we anticipate increasing
our cross-selling opportunities. Our goals are to offer a broader
range of services to existing clients and to broaden our client
base using our existing value-added solutions.
Competition
In the
government contracting industry, the sectors in which we operate
are highly fragmented and characterized by many smaller companies
generally having fewer than ten employees. These companies tend to
focus their operations on local customers or specialized niche
activities. As a result, we compete with many smaller, more
specialized companies that concentrate their resources in
particular areas of expertise. The extent of our competition varies
according to sectors and geographic areas. We believe we compete on
quality of service, relevant experience, staffing capabilities,
reputation, geographic presence, stability, and price. Price
differentiation remains an important element in competitive
tendering and is a significant factor in bidding for contracts. The
importance of the foregoing factors varies widely based upon the
nature, location, and scale of our clients’ needs. We believe
that certain economies of scale can be realized by service
providers that establish a national presence and reputation for
providing high-quality and cost-effective services. Our ability to
compete successfully will depend upon the effectiveness of our
marketing efforts, the strength of our client relationships, our
ability to accurately estimate costs and bid for work, the quality
of the work we perform and our ability to hire and train qualified
personnel.
6
Competitive Strengths
We
believe we have developed a strong reputation for quality service
in the government contracting market based upon our
industry-recognized depth of experience, ability to attract and
retain quality professionals, and expertise across multiple service
sectors. We employ seasoned professionals with a broad array of
specialties, a strong customer service orientation and in many
cases, the required professional certifications and advanced
degrees. As of March 31, 2019, 100% of our management and staff
involved with proposal services received a Foundation Certification
by the Association of Proposal Management Professionals. Our
executive officers have significant operating and management
experience and have been involved in analyzing potential
acquisition transactions. We place a high priority on attracting,
motivating and retaining top professionals to serve our clients,
and our compensation system emphasizes the use of performance-based
incentives, including opportunities for stock ownership, to achieve
this objective. The services that we provide are highly-specialized
professional services that have high barriers to entry. While we
have a base of in-house professionals, we also have access to a
very large group of consultants who can provide subject matter
expertise for unique projects and who can supplement our workforce
based on client demand. Our combination of niche market experience
and professionals with requisite expertise has enabled us to
develop strong relationships with our core clients. By serving
clients on a long-term basis, we are able to gain a deep
understanding of their overall business needs as well as the unique
technical requirements of their projects. This increased
understanding gives us the opportunity to provide superior value to
our clients by allowing us to more fully assess and better manage
the risks inherent in their projects.
Growth Strategies
In the
government contracting market, we seek to expand our market share
in our current areas of expertise. The universe of providers that
service our clients is fragmented and diverse. Drawing on the
insights and experience of our combined leadership team, we expect
to both increase our contact with, and improve our understanding
of, the needs of the enterprises we serve. By working together
under common leadership, we believe our combined companies can
better identify the qualities in our companies that the
world’s leading businesses value most. We will then work to
further enhance each company’s ability to perform in these
areas by providing material support as well as exchanges of talent
and ideas. By using our increased contact with our clients, we will
also be working to enhance our clients’ awareness of these
capabilities across our subsidiaries.
Vehicle Recognition and Public Safety Industry
The
market for vehicle recognition products and services is diverse and
includes: toll collection and traffic management; parking
management and enforcement; safe cities programs; government,
military, corporate, community and personal security; and wholesale
and large retail logistics and customer loyalty programs, as well
as public safety. Currently, our presence in these markets through
OpenALPR and Brekford is small and concentrated mostly in North
America. In 2016, IHS Market estimated that the number of cameras
installed in North America would grow to over 60 million security
cameras by 2016 and that 130 million surveillance cameras would be
shipped globally in 2018. A substantial percentage of these cameras
provide digital images that can be transferred over electronic
networks and analyzed by software from OpenALPR.
Clients
Our
clients in the public safety and vehicle recognition markets
include governmental entities in the United States and Canada and
major retailers, private security companies and parking management
companies in these countries and others. We continue to explore new
applications to further expand this growing client base. Brekford
developed a first-of-its-kind camera and data management system
designed to track and monitor violations of “move over”
laws. The National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund reports
that during the period from 2009 through 2018, 122 police officers
have been killed when struck by vehicles in the United States. The
Emergency Responder Safety Institute estimates that about seven
emergency workers and 50 tow operators are killed annually by
passing vehicles in U.S. In addition, we believe that there are
many unreported injuries and near misses.
Marketing and Sales
We
offer our products services in the public safety and vehicle
recognition markets through a combination of programs. For existing
traffic safety clients, our services include hardware installation
and maintenance, as well as forensic database and citation
management services. With the launch of our new Guardian line, the
products and services we provide for law enforcement are expected
to concentrate increasingly on the leasing of our hardware in
conjunction with software services, based on processing fees.
OpenALPR currently sells licenses for the use of its software on a
per camera basis, as well as selling the services of license plate
recognitions and database storage and support.
7
Competition
Our
current emphasis in the public safety and vehicle recognition
markets is on products and services that include license plate
recognition features. There are several large operators currently
engaged in providing these products and services, including ELSAG
North America (a subsidiary of Leonardo – Società
per azioni), Genetec Inc., Vigilant Solutions (now a division of
Motorola Solutions), and ARH Inc. (based in Hungary). These vendors
generally supply camera systems that use computer vision techniques
based on optical character recognition algorithms to generate data
in the form of license plate numbers with issuing jurisdiction.
There are also a number of competitors developing and marketing
artificial intelligence-based ALPR systems, including Sighthound
Inc., PlateSmart Technologies, INEX Technologies, NueralLabs,
Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Co., Ltd., ARH, Inc. and NDI
Recognition Systems, among others. The software developed by
OpenALPR uses specialized neural network algorithms and takes
advantage of over five years of machine learning using images from
across the globe. Comparisons made by both OpenALPR personnel and
independent evaluators indicate OpenALPR has high levels of
accuracy for recognition of license plate numbers and issuing
jurisdiction. In addition, the software can identify the make,
model and color of the car and provides accurate readings from the
images produced by lower-cost security cameras, which avoids the
need to use specialized camera equipment. As a result, we believe
that our products and services in this market currently can offer
significant advantages in accuracy, usability and price that
provide us with a competitive edge.
Competitive Strengths
In the
public safety and vehicle recognition market, we believe we have,
and can further develop, the following competitive
strengths:
●
Higher Accuracy Rates for Vehicle
Recognitions. Most existing vehicle recognition systems
currently in place are accurate only within specified parameters of
vehicle speed, viewing angles and lighting conditions. We believe
OpenALPR software achieves superior accuracy rates under broader
parameters of vehicle speed, viewing angles and lighting
conditions.
●
Ability to Detect Make, Model and Color of
Vehicle. We believe the ability to determine the make, model
and color of a vehicle, in addition to the number and resident
jurisdiction of a license plate, significantly enhances the value
of our products and services as compared to systems that provide
more limited recognition data or lower accuracy rates.
●
Functionality with any Internet Protocol
Cameras. The optical character recognition-based systems
marketed by our competitors in the public safety and vehicle
recognition market often require customized cameras, while OpenALPR
supports images captured by almost any digital camera that provides
images that can be sent over the Internet. This allows us to create
products and solutions using relatively inexpensive,
consumer-grade, mass market components that are readily available,
significantly smaller and lighter, and less expensive than products
currently being used.
●
Increased Mobility. Because of the
range and size of the cameras that can be used with OpenALPR
software, Brekford’s new Guardian line of products will have
significant advantages for use in mobile applications, such as law
enforcement vehicles.
Growth Strategies
Our
current emphasis for growth is to concentrate available resources
on expanding sales of products and services that exploit the
competitive advantages of our license plate reading technology. In
particular, we are working to further develop our existing
cloud-based subscription services for smaller clients and license
our technology to original equipment manufacturers and large
government and commercial customers for use with new and existing
security, logistics, traffic management, vehicle location and
customer loyalty systems. In pursuing larger government and
enterprise clients, we intend to use the contacts, capabilities and
resources of our legacy professional services businesses as we seek
to expand our market. We are also working to develop a single
operating system for use in connection with a variety of components
in public safety vehicles, which will support products sold by
other providers, as well as ours. In addition, we are taking steps
toward qualifying our OpenALPR-based products and services to be
available on the U.S. General Services Administration’s GSA
Schedules Program.
At the
same time that we are working to develop the sales and marketing
capabilities to support sales of new products, our development plan
for technology-related products and services includes increasing
our capabilities relating to subscription-based solutions providing
access to software as a service (“SaaS”), as well as a
bundling hardware and software as part of equipment leasing
programs.
In
connection with our risk mitigation and crisis risk services, we
are working to increase awareness of our initiatives by educating
others on emerging threats and strategies to combat those threats
through no-fee webinars, stress tests, and social media and blog
articles. We partner with industry associations and aggregators to
deliver meaningful risk mitigation strategies and education. We
also serve clients ranging from large global companies to main
street businesses across all industry sectors. We offer
services to clients that enhance their ability to manage risk and
respond to adverse events, thereby minimizing people, brand,
reputation, financial, legal and regulatory impacts.
8
Through
our various businesses, we occasionally become aware of situations
where our resources can play a critical role in bringing an
organization to the next level in its development. Under
appropriate circumstances we may acquire, receive or retain an
interest in these organizations as part of our enterprise
initiative. For example, we have retained a 19.9% interest in
Global Public Safety, Inc., a growing provider of upfitting
services for law enforcement vehicles, formerly owned by Brekford
and now owned by LB&B Associates, Inc.
Our History
We are
a Delaware corporation that was formed in February 2017 to
effectuate the mergers of, and become a holding company for
KeyStone Solutions, Inc. (“KeyStone”). Our services are currently provided
through seven wholly owned subsidiaries: AOC Key Solutions, Inc.
(“AOC Key Solutions”); Brekford; Firestorm Solutions,
LLC and Firestorm Franchising, LLC (collectively referred to as
“Firestorm” or the “Firestorm Entities”);
Global Technical Services, Inc. (“GTS”) and Global
Contract Professionals, Inc. (“GCP”) (collectively
referred to as “Global” or the “Global
Entities”); and as of March 12, 2019, OpenALPR. In 2018, the operations of Novume Media, Inc.
(“Novume Media”) were discontinued. On February
28, 2019, we changed the name of Brekford to Rekor Recognition
Systems, Inc. For narrative purposes, all references to Brekford
are to this subsidiary under the name Brekford Traffic Safety, Inc.
before February 28, 2019 and under the name Rekor Recognitions
Systems, Inc. on and after February 28, 2019.
AOC Key
Solutions was originally organized in 1983. Brekford was organized
in 1996. The Firestorm Entities were organized in 2005. The Global
Entities were formed in 1989. OpenALPR was organized in
2015.
Acquisitions
Listed
below is a summary of our acquisitions since January 2017.
Additional information is provided in this Annual Report on Form
10-K under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Conditions and Results of Operations.”
●
OpenALPR – On March 12, 2019, we
completed our acquisition of substantially all of the assets of
OpenALPR.
●
Secure Education Consultants – On
January 1, 2018, we completed our acquisition of certain assets of
Secure Education Consultants, LLC (“Secure Education”)
by Firestorm Solutions, LLC (“Firestorm
Solutions”).
●
BC Management – On December 31,
2017, we completed its acquisition of certain assets of BC
Management, Inc. (“BC Management”) by Firestorm
Solutions.
●
Global Acquisition – On October
1, 2017, we completed our acquisition of GTS and GCP (the
“Global Merger”).
●
Brekford – On August 28, 2017,
KeyStone and Brekford became wholly
owned subsidies of Novume by way of merger. For the purpose of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K, any references to KeyStone are to
KeyStone Solutions, Inc. prior to August 28, 2017 and to KeyStone
Solutions, LLC on and after August 28, 2017.
●
Firestorm – On January 25, 2017,
we acquired the Firestorm Entities.
Reportable Segments
In
2018, we conducted core operations through our primary operating
subsidiaries: AOC Key Solutions, Firestorm, Global and
Brekford.
Based
on its analysis of operations, management has determined for the
year ended December 31, 2018, Novume has only one operating and
reportable segment. In 2018, the chief operating decision-maker did
not consider entity, product, service or regional results
separately and used aggregate results to make operating and
strategic decisions. Therefore, we believe our entire operations
were covered under a single reportable segment. With the recent
acquisition of OpenALPR, we anticipate, beginning with the first quarter of 2019, changing
our operating and reportable segments from one segment to two
segments. The two segments are expected to reflect our separate
management focus both on technology products and services and on
professional services.
Employees
As of
March 31, 2019, Novume had 505 employees, of which 122 were full
time and 373 were project-based staff provided to our clients. We
consider our employee relations to be good. To date, we have been
able to locate and engage highly-qualified employees as needed and
do not expect our growth efforts to be constrained by a lack of
qualified personnel. We will, however, need to engage significant
additional highly qualified personnel for our planned initiatives
in the public safety and vehicle recognition markets.
Trends and Seasonality
We
generate revenues from fees and reimbursable expenses for
professional services primarily billed on an hourly rate,
time-and-materials (“T&M”) basis. In the
professional services and specialty staffing areas, or clients are
typically invoiced monthly, with revenue recognized as the services
are provided. Currently, T&M contracts represent over 87% of
our client engagements in these areas and do not provide us with a
high degree of predictability of future period performance.
Approximately 12% of our contracts are fixed-fee engagements which
can be invoiced once for the entire job, or there could be several
“progress” invoices for accomplishing various phases,
reaching contractual milestones or on a periodic
basis.
9
Novume’s
financial results have been impacted principally by the demand by
clients for support in the professional services and specialty
staffing areas, the degree to which full-time staff can be kept
occupied in revenue-generating activities, success of the sales
team in generating client engagements, and number of business days
in each quarter. The number of business days on which revenue is
generated by our staff and consultants is affected by the number of
vacation days taken, as well as the number of holidays in each
quarter. There are typically fewer business work days available in
the fourth quarter of the year, which can impact revenues during
that period. The staff utilization rate can also be affected by
seasonal variations in the demand for services from clients. Since
earnings may be affected by these seasonal variations, results for
any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results that may
be achieved for a full fiscal year.
Unexpected
changes in the demand for our services can result in significant
variations in revenues, and present a challenge to optimal hiring,
staffing and use of consultants. The volume of work performed can
vary from period to period.
In our
public safety activities, our revenues have typically been based on
monthly reimbursements under long term contracts. These have been
based on revenue generated in connection with the activities, which
can vary according to seasonal trends. With the new line of
products and services the Company is currently marketing, we expect
to also experience seasonal variations where our income is based on
the number of vehicle recognitions provided. However, we are also
working to expand the number of contracts that provide fixed
monthly payments on a per-camera basis.
Insurance and Risk Management
We
maintain insurance covering professional liability and claims
involving bodily injury, property and economic loss. We consider
our present limits of coverage, deductibles, and reserves to be
adequate. Whenever possible, we endeavor to eliminate or reduce the
risk of loss on a project through the use of quality assurance and
control, risk management, workplace safety, and other similar
methods.
Risk
management is an integral part of our project management approach
for fixed-price contracts and our project execution process. We
also evaluate risk through internal risk analyses in which our
management reviews higher-risk projects, contracts, or other
business decisions that require corporate legal and risk management
approval.
Regulation
We are
regulated in some of the fields in which we operate. When working
with governmental agencies and entities, we must comply with laws
and regulations relating to the formation, administration, and
performance of contracts. These laws and regulations contain terms
that, among other things may require certification and disclosure
of all costs or pricing data in connection with various contract
negotiations. We also work with U.S. federal government contractors
and have staff cleared to work on classified materials. Two of our
leased facilities are cleared for classified material. We are
subject to the laws and regulations that restrict the use and
dissemination of information classified for national security
purposes.
To help
ensure compliance with these laws and regulations, our employees
are sometimes required to complete tailored ethics and other
compliance training relevant to their position and our
operations.
Risk Factors
Risks Relating to Our Corporate Structure and Business
We are currently not profitable and we may be unable to become
profitable on a quarterly or annual basis.
For the
year ended December 31, 2018, we had a loss from operations
before taxes of $5,703,499. We cannot assure that we will be
profitable in the future. Our ability to become profitable in
future periods could be impacted by budgetary constraints,
government and political agendas, economic instability and other
items that are not in our control. We cannot assure that our
financial performance will sustain a sufficient level to completely
support operations. A significant portion of our expenses are fixed
in advance. As such, we generally are unable to reduce our expenses
significantly in the short-term to compensate for any unexpected
delay or decrease in anticipated revenues or increases in planned
investments. In addition, we have experienced and expect to
continue to experience significant expenses related to acquisitions
and the development of new products and services. As a result, we
may continue to experience operating losses and net losses in the
future, which would make it difficult to fund operations and
achieve our business plan and could cause the market price of our
common stock to decline.
10
We have not been a leading provider of vehicle recognition devices
in the past and do not have the level of established contacts and
existing business relationships that some of our competitors
have.
Although
it is growing, our presence in the public safety and vehicle
recognition market has been limited and has only recently, with the
acquisition of assets from OpenALPR, extended beyond the United
States and Canada. As a result of this, although we believe our
products and services have significant competitive advantages, we
may encounter difficulties in establishing widespread market
acceptance of our products in various markets and regions. Early
successes in penetrating these markets and regions may not be able
to be sustained once our ability to compete with our more
established competitors comes to their attention. They may seek to
develop more competitive products before their existing contracts
expire, reduce prices, use to advantage their past association as a
trusted provider and their superior financial and marketing
resources and use other stratagems to competitive advantage, which
could significantly impact our ability to grow as rapidly as we
expect.
If we experience declining or flat revenues and fail to manage such
declines effectively, we may be unable to execute our business
plans and may experience future weaknesses in operating
results.
To
achieve future growth, we will need to continue to add additional
qualified personnel, and invest in additional research and
development and sales and marketing activities, which could lead to
increases in our expenses and future declines in operating results.
In addition, our future expansion is expected to place a
significant strain on our managerial, administrative, operational,
financial and other resources. If we are unable to manage these
activities or any revenue declines successfully, our business,
financial condition and results of operations could be adversely
affected.
If we are unable to attract new customers to our services on a
cost-effective basis, our revenue and results of operations will be
adversely affected.
We must
continue to attract a large number of customers on a cost-effective
basis. We rely on a variety of marketing methods to attract new
customers to our services. Our ability to attract new customers
also depends on the competitiveness of the pricing of our services.
If our current marketing initiatives are not successful or become
unavailable, if the cost of such initiatives were to significantly
increase, or if our competitors offer similar services at lower
prices, we may not be able to attract new customers on a
cost-effective basis and, as a result, our revenue and results of
operations would be adversely affected.
If we are unable to retain our existing customers, our revenue and
results of operations would be adversely affected.
With
the addition of OpenALPR, some of the technical services offered by
us are sold pursuant to agreements that are on a short-term
subscription basis. Customers have no obligation to renew their
subscriptions after their subscription period expires, and these
subscriptions may not be renewed on the same or more profitable
terms. As a result, our ability to stain our growth depends in part
on subscription renewals. We may not be able to accurately predict
future trends in customer renewals, and our customers’
renewal rates may decline or fluctuate because of several factors,
including their satisfaction or dissatisfaction with our services,
the prices of our services, the prices of services offered by our
competitors or reductions in our customers’ spending levels.
If our customers do not renew their subscriptions for our services,
renew on less favorable terms, or do not purchase additional
functionality or subscriptions, our revenue may grow more slowly
than expected or decline, and our profitability and gross margins
may be harmed.
Our sales cycles for enterprise and government clients can be long,
unpredictable and require considerable time and expense, which may
cause our operating results to fluctuate.
The
timing of our revenue from sales to enterprise and government
clients is difficult to predict. These efforts require us to
educate our clients about the use and benefit of our services,
including the technical capabilities and potential cost savings to
an organization. Enterprise clients typically undertake a
significant evaluation process that has in the past, resulted in
lengthy sales cycles, typically several months. We spend
substantial time, effort and money on our enterprise sales efforts
without any assurance that these efforts will produce any sales. In
addition, service subscriptions are frequently subject to budget
constraints and unplanned administrative, processing and other
delays. If sales expected from a specific client for a particular
reporting period are not realized in that period or at all, our
results could fall short of expectations and our business,
operating results and financial condition could be adversely
affected.
If our efforts to build a strong brand identity are not successful,
we may not be able to attract or retain subscribers and our
operating results may be adversely affected.
We
believe that building and maintaining a strong brand identity plays
an important role in attracting and retaining customers for our
products and users for our services, who may have other options
from which to obtain services. We are currently involved in a major
initiative to establish a new brand for our technology products and
services in the public safety and vehicle recognition markets,
which will require time and expense. In order to build a strong
brand, we believe that we must offer innovative service offerings
that our customers and subscribers value, and also market and
promote those service offerings through effective marketing
campaigns, promotions and communications with our customer base.
From time to time, clients and subscribers may express
dissatisfaction with our services or react negatively to our
strategic business decisions, such as changes that we make in
pricing, features or service offerings, including the
discontinuance of a free service. To the extent that client
dissatisfaction with our services or strategic business decisions
is widespread or not adequately addressed, our brand identity may
suffer and, as a result, our ability to attract and retain clients
and subscribers may be adversely affected, which could adversely
affect our operating results.
11
We may not be able to capitalize on potential emerging market
opportunities and new services that we introduce may not generate
the revenue and earnings we anticipated, which may adversely affect
our business.
Our
business strategy involves identifying emerging market
opportunities which we can capitalize on by successfully developing
and introducing new services or enhancing existing services
designed to address those market opportunities. We have made, and
expect to continue to make, investments in research and development
in an effort to capitalize on potential emerging market
opportunities that we have identified in the public safety and
vehicle recognition markets. Emerging markets and opportunities
often take time to fully develop, and they attract a significant
number of competitors. If the emerging markets we have targeted
ultimately fail to materialize as we or others have anticipated or
if potential clients choose to adopt solutions offered by our
competitors rather than our own solutions, we may not be able to
generate the revenue and earnings we anticipated, and our business
and results of operations would be adversely affected.
Industry consolidation may result in increased
competition.
Some of
our competitors have made or may make acquisitions or may enter
into partnerships or other strategic relationships to offer a more
comprehensive service than they individually had offered. In
addition, new entrants not currently considered to be competitors
may enter the market through acquisitions, partnerships or
strategic relationships. We expect these trends to continue as
companies attempt to strengthen or maintain their market positions.
Many of the companies driving this trend have significantly greater
financial, technical and other resources than we do and may be
better positioned to acquire and offer complementary services and
technologies. The companies resulting from such combinations may
create more compelling service offerings and may offer greater
pricing flexibility than we can or may engage in business practices
that make it more difficult for us to compete effectively,
including on the basis of price, sales and marketing programs,
technology or service functionality. These pressures could result
in a substantial loss of customers or a reduction in our
revenues.
We may not be able to respond to rapid technological changes in
time to address the needs of our customers, which could have a
material adverse effect on our sales and
profitability.
The
cloud-based services markets in which some of our newer services
compete are characterized by rapid technological change, the
frequent introduction of new services and evolving industry
standards. Our ability to remain competitive will depend in large
part on our ability to continue to enhance our existing services
and develop new service offerings that keep pace with these
markets’ rapid technological developments. Additionally, to
achieve market acceptance for our services, we must effectively
anticipate and offer services that meet changing client demands in
a timely manner. Clients may require features and capabilities that
our current services do not have. If we fail to develop services
that satisfy customer requirements in a timely and cost-effective
manner, our ability to renew services with existing clients and our
ability to create or increase demand for our services will be
harmed, and our revenue and results of operations would be
adversely affected.
The success of our business will depend, in part, on the continued
services of certain key personnel and our ability to attract and
retain qualified personnel.
The
success of our business will depend, in part, on the continued
services of certain members of our management. In particular, the
loss of the services of Robert A. Berman, as President and Chief
Executive Officer and a director, could have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations, and financial
condition. Our inability to attract and retain qualified personnel
could significantly disrupt our business.
We face
competition for qualified individuals from numerous professional
services and technology companies. For example, our competitors may
be able to attract and retain a more qualified professional and
technical personnel by offering more competitive compensation
packages. If we are unable to attract new personnel and retain our
current personnel, we may not be able to develop and maintain our
services at the same levels as our competitors and we may,
therefore, lose potential customers and sales penetration in
certain markets. It may also be
difficult to attract and retain qualified individuals in the
timeframe demanded by our clients. Furthermore, some of our
contracts may require us to employ only individuals who have
particular government security clearance levels. Our failure to
attract and retain key individuals could impair our ability to
provide services to our clients and conduct our business
effectively. Our failure to attract and retain suitably
qualified individuals could have an adverse effect on our ability
to implement our business plan and, as a result, our ability to
compete would decrease, our operating results would suffer and our
revenues would decrease.
12
We may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions
which we consummate and we may be subject to business
uncertainties.
We acquired the Firestorm Entities, Brekford, the Global Entities
and BC Management in 2017, certain assets of Secure
Education in January 2018, and
substantially all of the assets of OpenALPR in March 2019. We are
continuing to integrate the operations of these acquired companies
that previously operated independently. There can be no assurance
that we will not encounter significant difficulties in integrating
the respective operations of these companies or that they will
achieve the results of operations that we
expected.
The difficulties of integrating the acquisitions may include, among
others: unanticipated issues in integration of information,
communications, and other systems; unanticipated incompatibility of
logistics, marketing, and administration methods; aligning the
business cultures of both companies; preserving important strategic
client relationships; consolidating corporate and administrative
infrastructures and eliminating duplicative operations; and
coordinating geographically separate organizations.
Uncertainties
about the effect of our recent acquisitions on employees and
customers may have an adverse effect on our Company. These
uncertainties may impair our ability to attract, retain and
motivate key personnel for a period of time after the acquisitions,
and could cause customers, suppliers and others that deal with us
to seek to change existing business relationships with us, which
may have an adverse effect on our Company. Employee retention may
be particularly challenging, as employees may experience
uncertainty about their future roles with the Company.
The achievement of the benefits expected from integration of
acquired companies may require us to incur significant costs. The
incurrence of any such costs, as well as any unexpected costs or
delays, in connection with such integration, could have a material
adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial
condition.
We may be required to write-down certain assets after completing
our required annual evaluations, which may affect our reported
financial results.
The
initial determination of the fair value of assets we acquire upon
consummation of an acquisition is based upon an internal
valuation. We are required to analyze
the carrying value of our acquired intangibles and goodwill on an
annual basis going forward. After the detailed annual
evaluation of the carrying value of the intangible assets, as
supported by external analysis, we may be required to make
adjustments to our consolidated balance sheet and/or statement of
operations. Any adjustments will affect our reported financial
results.
We may be required to redeem our outstanding shares of Series A
Preferred Stock.
The
holders of our outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock
(consisting of 502,327 shares as of March 31, 2019), will have the
right to require the Company to redeem their shares, at any time
from and after November 8, 2021, at a price of $15.00 per share
plus any accrued but unpaid dividends (such accrued but unpaid
Series A Preferred Stock dividends are equal to an aggregate of
$263,721 as of March 31, 2019). In the event that the market price
of our common stock does not exceed the conversion price of the
Series A Preferred Stock at the time of redemption, the holder of
outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock are likely to
require us to redeem the shares, which would likely have a material
adverse effect on our liquidity, capital resources and business
prospects.
Our significant debt obligations could impair our liquidity and
financial condition. If we default on our secured debt, the lender
may foreclose on our assets.
As of
December 31, 2018, we (through our Global Entities subsidiaries)
had $1,094,766 outstanding under our line of credit with Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association (“WFB”), secured by
one of our subsidiary’s accounts receivable. WFB agreed to
advance Global Entities, 90% of all eligible accounts with a
maximum facility amount of $5,000,000. If we default on this debt,
the lender may foreclose on its collateral, which would have a
material adverse effect on our business and operations. As of March
31, 2019, $283,170 was outstanding under this line of
credit.
13
As of
December 31, 2018, we (through our AOC Key Solutions subsidiary)
had $566,447 outstanding under an account purchase agreement with
WFB, pursuant to which AOC Key Solutions agreed to sell and assign
to WFB certain collateral, including all of its accounts. WFB
agreed to advance to our subsidiary, 90% of all eligible accounts
with a maximum facility amount of $3,000,000. A default under this
agreement would have a material, adverse effect on our business and
operations. As of March 31, 2019, $397,178 was outstanding under
this line of credit.
On
April 3, 2018, Novume and Brekford entered into a transaction
pursuant to which an institutional investor loaned $2,000,000 to
Novume and Brekford (the “2018 Promissory Note”). In
addition, Novume had $500,000 of subordinated Notes due to Avon
Road Partners, L.P. and had $1,000,000 of additional subordinated
notes outstanding in connection with its acquisition of
Firestorm.
As a
result, as of December 31, 2018, we had $3,589,706 of notes
payable, exclusive of unamortized interest and financing costs, and
$1,661,212 due on lines of credit.
On
March 12, 2019, Novume entered into a note purchase agreement
pursuant to which investors loaned $20,000,000 to Novume (the
“Note Purchase Agreement”) of which $2,000,000 was used
to retire in its entirety the 2018 Promissory Note and $500,000 was
used to retire in its entirety the subordinated note with Avon Road
Partners, L.P. The notes are due and payable on March 11, 2021 and
bear interest at 16% per annum, of which at least 10% per annum
shall be paid in cash. The full remaining portion of all interest,
if any, accrues and is to be paid at maturity or earlier
redemption. The notes are secured by a security interest in
substantially all of the assets of Novume. The Note Purchase
Agreement has an effective interest rate of 24.87%.
Our
current debt obligations could: require us to dedicate a
substantial portion of our cash flow to payments of interest, which
reduces the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital,
capital expenditures and meet other corporate requirements; make it
more difficult for us to satisfy our other obligations; impede us
from obtaining additional financing in the future; impose
restrictions on us with respect to the use of our available cash;
place us at a competitive disadvantage when compared to our
competitors who have less debt; and make us more vulnerable in the
event of a downturn in our business prospects. In addition, unless
we are able to retire or refinance the debt issued pursuant to the
Note Purchase Agreement on or prior to March 11, 2021, we could be
held in default, which would substantially impair the value of our
assets and our common stock.
We may issue additional notes or other debt securities, or
otherwise incur substantial additional debt which may adversely
affect our leverage and financial condition and thus negatively
impact the value of our stockholders’ investment in the
Company.
The
anticipated cash needs of our business could change significantly
as we pursue business opportunities, if our business plans change,
if economic conditions change from those currently prevailing or
from those now anticipated, or if other unexpected circumstances
arise that may have a material effect on the cash flow or
profitability of our business. If we require additional capital
resources to grow our business, either internally or through
acquisition, we may need to seek to secure additional debt
financing. We may not be able to obtain financing arrangements on
acceptable terms or in amounts sufficient to meet our needs in the
future.
The
incurrence of debt could have a variety of negative effects,
including: default and foreclosure on our assets if our operating
revenues are insufficient to repay our debt obligations;
acceleration of our obligations to repay the indebtedness and
increased interest payments if we breach covenants that include the
maintenance of certain financial ratios or reserves without a
waiver or renegotiation of that covenant; and limitations on our
ability to borrow additional amounts for expenses, capital
expenditures, acquisitions, debt service requirements, execution of
our strategy and other purposes and other disadvantages compared to
our competitors who have less debt.
Our business has significant working capital needs and if we are
unable to satisfy those needs from cash generated from our
operations or borrowings, our financial condition will be adversely
affected.
We
require significant amounts of working capital to operate our
business. If we experience a significant and sustained drop in
operating profits, or if there are unanticipated reductions in cash
inflows or increases in cash outlays, we may be subject to cash
shortfalls. If such a shortfall were to occur for even a brief
period, it could have a significant adverse effect on our business.
In particular, we use working capital to pay interest expenses and
expenses relating to our employees and temporary workers and to
satisfy our workers’ compensation liabilities. Generally, we
pay our workers on a biweekly basis while we generally receive
payments from our customers 30 to 60 days after billing. As a
result, we must maintain sufficient cash availability to pay
employees and independent contractors and fund related payroll
liabilities prior to receiving payment from customers.
We have
derived working capital for our operations primarily through cash
from operating activities from our subsidiaries, revolving lines of
credit, issuance of debt, the sale of assets and the sale of our
equity. We believe that our current sources of capital are adequate
to meet our working capital needs. However, our available sources
of capital are limited. If our working capital needs increase in
the future, we may be forced to seek additional sources of capital,
which may not be available on commercially reasonable
terms.
14
Any
future failure to comply with the covenants which may occur under
our promissory notes and revolving credit facilities could result
in an event of default which, if not cured or waived, could trigger
increased interest payments or prepayment obligations which could
adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Uncertainties in the interpretation and application of the Tax Cuts
and Jobs Act of 2017 could materially affect our tax obligations
and effective tax rate.
The Tax
Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“TCJA”), was enacted on
December 22, 2017 and has affected U.S. tax law by changing U.S.
federal income taxation of U.S. corporations. The expected impact
of the TCJA was reflected in our consolidated financial statements
in the period it was enacted. In our 2018 Consolidated Financial
Statements, we have completed our assessment of the final impact of
the TCJA and determined that there were no material adjustments to
the expected amounts previously recorded. However, the TCJA is
complex and additional interpretative guidance may be issued that
could affect the final assessment made that could impact our
deferred tax assets.
Our operating results may be harmed if we are required to collect
sales or other related taxes for our subscription services or pay
regulatory fees in jurisdictions where we have not historically
done so.
Primarily
due to the nature of our cloud-based services in certain states and
countries, we do not believe we are required to collect sales or
other related taxes from our customers in certain states or
countries. However, one or more other states or countries may seek
to impose sales, regulatory fees or other tax collection
obligations on us, including for past sales by us or our resellers
and other partners. A successful assertion that we should be
collecting sales or other related taxes on our services or paying
regulatory fees could result in substantial tax liabilities for
past sales, discourage customers from purchasing our services or
otherwise harm our business and operating results.
Improper disclosure of confidential and personal data could result
in liability and harm to our reputation.
Our
handling and storage of the data we collect from some of our
employees, customers and vendors, and our processing of data, which
may include confidential or personally identifiable information,
through the services we provide, may be subject to a variety of
laws and regulations, which have been adopted by various federal,
state and foreign governments to regulate the collection,
distribution, use and storage of personal information of
individuals. Several foreign countries in which we conduct
business, including the European Economic Area (“EEA”)
and Canada, currently have in place, or have recently proposed,
laws or regulations concerning privacy, data protection and
information security, which are more restrictive than those imposed
in the United States. Some of these laws are in their early stages
and we cannot yet determine the impact these revised laws and
regulations, if implemented, may have on our business. However, any
failure or perceived failure by us to comply with these privacy
laws, regulations, policies or obligations or any security incident
that results in the unauthorized release or transfer of personally
identifiable information or other customer data in our possession,
could result in government enforcement actions, litigation, fines
and penalties and/or adverse publicity, all of which could have an
adverse effect on our reputation and business.
For
example, the EEA-wide General Data Protection Regulation
(“GDPR”) became applicable on May 25, 2018,
replacing the data protection laws of each EEA member state. The
GDPR implemented more stringent operational requirements for
processors and controllers of personal data, including, for
example, expanded disclosures about how personal information is to
be used, limitations on retention of information, increased
requirements to erase an individual’s information upon
request, mandatory data breach notification requirements and higher
standards for data controllers to demonstrate that they have
obtained valid consent for certain data processing activities. It
also significantly increases penalties for non-compliance,
including where we act as a service provider (e.g. data processor).
If our privacy or data security measures fail to comply with
applicable current or future laws and regulations, we may be
subject to litigation, regulatory investigations, enforcement
notices requiring us to change the way we use personal data or our
marketing practices, fines, for example, of up to 20 million
Euros or up to 4% of the total worldwide annual turnover of the
preceding financial year (whichever is higher) under the GDPR, or
other liabilities, as well as negative publicity and a potential
loss of business.
Data
protection regulation remains an area of increased focus in all
jurisdictions and data protection regulations continue to evolve.
There is no assurance that we will be able to meet new requirements
that may be imposed on the transfer of personally identifiable
information from the EU to the United States without incurring
substantial expense or at all. European and/or multi-national
customers may be reluctant to purchase or continue to use our
services due to concerns regarding their data protection
obligations. In addition, we may be subject to claims, legal
proceedings or other actions by individuals or governmental
authorities if they have reason to believe that our data privacy or
security measures fail to comply with current or future laws and
regulations.
Moreover,
we must ensure that certain vendors and customers who have access
to such information also have the appropriate privacy policies,
procedures and protections in place. Although we take customary
measures to protect such information, the continued occurrence of
high-profile data breaches provides evidence of an external
environment increasingly hostile to information security. If our
security measures are breached as a result of third-party action,
employee or subcontractor error, malfeasance or otherwise, and, as
a result, someone obtains unauthorized access to customer data, our
reputation may be damaged, our business may suffer and we could
incur significant liability. Techniques used to obtain unauthorized
access or to sabotage systems change frequently and are growing
increasingly sophisticated. As a result, we may be unable to
anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative
measures.
15
This
environment demands that we continuously improve our design and
coordination of security controls throughout the Company. Despite
these efforts, it is possible that our security controls over data,
training, and other practices we follow may not prevent the
improper disclosure of personally identifiable or other
confidential information.
If an
actual or perceived breach of our security occurs, we could be
liable under laws and regulations that protect personal or other
confidential data resulting in increases costs or loss of revenues
and the market perception of our services could be
harmed.
Our business could be negatively impacted by cyber and other
security threats or disruptions.
We face
various cyber and other security threats, including attempts to
gain unauthorized access to sensitive information and networks;
insider threats; threats to the security of our facilities and
infrastructure; and threats from terrorist acts or other acts of
aggression. Cyber threats are constant and evolving and include,
but are not limited to, computer viruses, malicious software,
destructive malware, attacks by computer hackers attempts to gain
unauthorized access to data, disruption or denial of service
attacks, and other electronic security breaches that could lead to
disruptions in mission critical systems, unauthorized release or
loss of confidential, personal or otherwise protected information
(ours or that of our employees, customers or subcontractors), and
corruption of data, networks or systems. In addition, we could be
impacted by cyber threats or other disruptions or vulnerabilities
found in products we use or in our partners’ or
customers’ systems that are used in connection with our
business. Our clients and subcontractors face similar threats
and/or they may not be able to detect or deter them, or effectively
to mitigate resulting losses. These threats could damage our
reputation as well as our subcontractor’s ability to perform
and could affect our client’s ability to pay.
Although
we use various procedures and controls to monitor and mitigate the
risk of these threats to us, our clients and our partners, there
can be no assurance that these procedures and controls will be
sufficient. The impact of these factors is difficult to predict,
but one or more of them could result in the loss of information or
capabilities, harm to individuals or property, damage to our
reputation and/or require remedial actions or lead to loss of
business, regulatory actions potential liability and financial
loss, any one of which could have a material adverse effect on our
financial position, results of operations and/or cash
flows.
We are dependent upon technology services, and if we experience
damage, service interruptions or failures in our computer and
telecommunications systems, our customer and worker relationships
and our ability to attract new customers may be adversely
affected.
Our
business could be interrupted by damage to or disruption of our
computer, telecommunications equipment, software systems, or
software applications. Our customers’ businesses may be
adversely affected by any system, application or equipment failure
we experience. As a result of any of the foregoing, our
relationships with our customers may be impaired, we may lose
customers, our ability to attract new customers may be adversely
affected and we could be exposed to contractual liability.
Precautions in place to protect us from, or minimize the effect of,
such events may not be adequate.
In
addition, the failure or disruption of mail, communications and/or
utilities could cause an interruption or suspension of our
operations or otherwise harm our business. Our property and
business interruption insurance may be inadequate to compensate us
for all losses that may occur as a result of any system or
operational failure or disruption and, as a result, revenue,
profits and operating results could be adversely
affected.
If we do not keep pace with rapid technological changes and
evolving industry standards, we will not be able to remain
competitive, and the demand for our services will likely
decline.
The
markets in which we operate are in general characterized by the
following factors: changes due to rapid technological advances;
additional qualification requirements related to technological
challenges; and evolving industry standards and changes in the
regulatory and legislative environment. Our future success will
depend upon our ability to anticipate and adapt to changes in
technology and industry standards, and to effectively develop,
introduce, market and gain broad acceptance of new product and
service enhancements incorporating the latest technological
advancements.
We operate in highly-competitive industries, some with low barriers
to entry, and may be unable to compete successfully against
existing or new competitors.
Our
business is competitive, and we compete with companies in highly
competitive industries that may have greater name recognition and
financial resources, as well as many independent sole-proprietors
who sell themselves as outsourced resources. We also compete with
providers of outsourcing services, systems integrators, computer
systems consultants and other providers of services. We expect that
the level of competition will remain high, which could limit our
ability to maintain or increase our market share or
profitability.
16
The
needs of our clients change and evolve regularly. Accordingly, our
success depends on our ability to develop services and solutions
that address these changing needs of our clients, and to provide
people and technology needed to deliver these services and
solutions. In order to compete effectively in our markets, we must
target our potential customers carefully, continue to improve our
efficiencies and the scope and quality of our services, and rely on
our service quality, innovation, and client relations to provide
services on a cost-effective basis to our clients. Our competitors
may be able to provide clients with different or greater
capabilities or technologies or better contract terms than we can
provide, including technical qualifications, past contract
experience, geographic presence, price and the availability of
qualified professional personnel.
Based on recent technological developments, the market for
outsourced services may diminish. Some of our competitors are
beginning to advertise for various services on line, including
experts for sale, anonymous authors to complete certain proposal
sections for an “introductory fee,” and even selling
entire proposals on-line, sometimes by overseas vendors at
extremely low prices. If these companies are successful at
providing traditional consulting services at prices we cannot
compete with, it may diminish the demand for some of our services,
which may adversely affect our revenues, results of operations and
financial condition.
In
addition, heightened competition among our existing competitors,
especially on a price basis, or by new entrants into the market,
could create additional competitive pressures that may reduce our
margins and adversely affect our business. If our competitive
advantages are not compelling or sustainable, then we are unlikely
to increase or sustain profits and our stock price could
decline.
Our business is subject to risks associated with geographic market
concentration.
The
geographic concentration of revenue greater than 10% of our
consolidated revenue in fiscal years 2018 and 2017 was generated in
the following areas:
State
|
2018
|
2017
|
Texas
|
29.5%
|
34.7%
|
Virginia
|
26.4%
|
29.5%
|
Georgia
|
12.5%
|
8.4%
|
Consequently,
economic conditions in these regions could reduce demand for our
products and services, increase costs or otherwise have a material
adverse effect on our financial position and results of future
operations.
A downturn of the U.S. or global economy could result in our
customers using fewer products and services or becoming unable to
pay us for our services on a timely basis or at all, which would
materially adversely affect our business.
Because
demand for our solutions and services are sensitive to changes in
the level of economic activity, our business may suffer during
economic downturns. During periods of weak economic growth or
economic contraction, the demand for outsourced services could
decline. When demand drops, our operating profit could be impacted
unfavorably as we experience a deleveraging of our selling and
administrative expense base because expenses may not decline as
quickly as revenues. In periods of decline, we can only reduce
selling and administrative expenses to a certain level without
negatively impacting the long-term potential of our
business.
Additionally,
during economic downturns companies may slow the rate at which they
pay their vendors, or they may become unable to pay their
obligations. If our customers become unable to pay amounts owed to
us, or pay us more slowly, then our cash flow and profitability may
suffer significantly.
We may be exposed to employment-related claims and losses,
including class action lawsuits, which could have a material
adverse effect on our business.
We
typically place or assign personnel in the workplaces of other
businesses. The risks of these activities include possible claims
relating to: wrongful termination or denial of employment; damage
to customer facilities due to negligence; violations of employment
rights related to employment screening or privacy issues;
fraudulent or criminal activity; misappropriation of funds; misuse
of customer proprietary information; inadvertent assignment of
illegal aliens; and discrimination and harassment.
We may
incur fines and other losses or negative publicity with respect to
these claims. In addition, these claims may give rise to
litigation, which could be time-consuming and expensive. New
employment and labor laws and regulations may be proposed or
adopted that may increase the potential exposure of employers to
employment-related claims and litigation. There can be no assurance
that the corporate policies we have in place to help reduce our
exposure to these risks will be effective or that we will not
experience losses as a result of these risks. There can also be no
assurance that the insurance policies we have purchased to insure
against certain risks will be adequate or that insurance coverage
will remain available on commercially reasonable terms or be
sufficient in amount or scope of coverage.
17
We are dependent on workers’ compensation insurance coverage
at commercially reasonable terms.
We
provide workers’ compensation insurance for our employees and
temporary workers and are contractually obligated to collateralize
our workers’ compensation obligations under our
workers’ compensation program through irrevocable letters of
credit, surety bonds or cash. A significant portion of our
workers’ compensation program renews annually on January 1 of
each year, and as part of the renewal, could be subject to an
increase in collateral. In addition, collateral requirements can be
significant and place pressure on our liquidity and working capital
capacity. Further, we cannot be certain we will be able to obtain
appropriate types or levels of insurance in the future or that
adequate replacement policies will be available on commercially
reasonable terms. Depending on future changes in collateral
requirements, we could be required to seek additional sources of
capital in the future, which may not be available on commercially
reasonable terms, or at all. The loss of our workers’
compensation insurance coverage would prevent us from doing
business in the majority of our markets
Any future Congressional spending cuts, delays in the completion of
the appropriation process or condition that affects the U.S.
Government could adversely impact our operating
results.
Following the U.S. government shutdown that began in December 2018
and ended in January 2019, there still remains uncertainty
regarding how, or if, sequestration cuts will be applied in the
U.S. government’s 2020 fiscal year and beyond. Despite the
temporary easing of sequestration cuts from prior legislation, the
calls for cuts could resurface. That, plus other deficit reduction
pressures which may arise in the future, may result in
congressional constraint on discretionary spending by the U.S.
government will remain a question for a number of
years.
If annual appropriations bills are not enacted on a timely basis
for future fiscal years, the U.S. government may once again operate
under continuing resolution(s), thus abating request for proposal
(“RFP”) processes and restricting new contracts or
program starts and resulting in government slowdowns, or even
shutdowns. The uncertainty regarding the volume of RFPs issued by
the U.S. government could have long-term impacts for our industry
and our Company. Because we generate significant revenues from
clients that bid on contracts with U.S. government agencies, our
operating results could be adversely affected by government
slowdowns or shutdowns, spending caps or changes in national
budgetary priorities. In addition, delays in RFP releases, slow
program starts or uncertainty in the award of contracts or task
orders could adversely impact our operating results.
Any condition or occurrence that affects society or the U.S.
government can also impact government contractors. Because our
Company maintains a significant presence among government
contractors, we could be adversely affected by a national or
international event that undermines confidence in the government or
financial markets. Any impact on federal spending could have a
negative effect on our revenue and adversely affect our future
results.
If our contractors and subcontractors fail to satisfy their
obligations to us or other parties, or if we are unable to maintain
these relationships, our revenue, profitability, and growth
prospects could be adversely affected.
We depend on contractors and subcontractors in conducting our
business. There is a risk that we may have disputes with our
contractors or subcontractors arising from, among other things, the
quality and timeliness of work performed by the contractor or
subcontractor, client concerns about the contractor or
subcontractor, or our failure to extend existing task orders or
issue new task orders under a contract or subcontract. In addition,
if any of our subcontractors fail to perform the agreed-upon
services, go out of business, or fail to perform on a project, then
our ability to fulfill our obligations as a prime contractor may be
jeopardized and we may be contractually responsible for the work
performed by those contractors or subcontractors. Historically, our
relationship with our contractors and subcontractors have been
good, and we have not experienced any material failure of
performance by our contractors and subcontractors. However, there
can be no assurance that such experience will continue and the
absence of qualified subcontractors with which we have a
satisfactory relationship could adversely affect the quality of our
service and our ability to perform under some of our
contracts.
We also rely on relationships with other contractors when we act as
their subcontractor or joint venture partner. Our future revenue
and growth prospects could be adversely affected if other
contractors eliminate or reduce their subcontracts or teaming
arrangement relationships with us or if a government agency
terminates or reduces these other contractors’ programs, does
not award them new contracts, or refuses to pay under a
contract.
18
Our business is directly tied to the success of our government
contracting clients, which are increasingly reliant on ID/IQ
contracts. ID/IQ contracts are not firm orders for services, and we
may generate limited or no revenue from these contracts which could
adversely affect our operating performance.
ID/IQ contracts are typically awarded to multiple contractors, and
the award of an ID/IQ contract does not represent a firm order for
services. Generally, under an ID/IQ contract, the government is not
obligated to order a minimum of services or supplies from its
contractor, irrespective of the total estimated contract value. In
effect, an ID/IQ award acts as a “license,” permitting
a government contractor to bid on task orders issued under the
ID/IQ contract, but not guaranteeing the award of individual task
orders. Following an award under a multi-award ID/IQ program, the
customer develops requirements for task orders that are
competitively bid against all of the contract awardees. However,
many contracts also permit the U.S. government to direct work to a
specific contractor. Our clients may not win new task orders under
these contracts for various reasons, including price, past
performance and responsiveness, among others. We support our
government contractor clients both when they compete to get the
umbrella ID/IQ contract and subsequently when we help the winners
of those contracts compete for individual tasks. The proposals for
both stages can be relatively brief and require quick turn-arounds,
thus potentially reducing some opportunities to be awarded
significant turn-key engagements. While it is possible that the
increased importance of winning the umbrella ID/IQ contract will
prompt clients to hire outside firms to prepare their proposals, it
is also likely that government contractors will decide to prepare
ID/IQ proposals without the assistance from outside
experts.
We incur substantial costs as a result of operating as a public
company and our management is required to devote substantial time
to related compliance matters.
As a
public company, we incur significant legal, accounting, and other
expenses. under rules implemented by the United States Securities
and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and The Nasdaq Stock
Market (“Nasdaq”). These impose various requirements on
public companies, including establishing and maintaining effective
disclosure and financial controls and corporate governance
practices. Our management team will need to devote a substantial
amount of time to these compliance requirements and we may need to
hire additional personnel. Moreover, these rules and regulations
will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will
make some activities more time-consuming and costly.
Pursuant
to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we are required to
furnish a report by our management on our internal control over
financial reporting. To achieve compliance with Section 404,
we engage in a process to document and evaluate our internal
control over financial reporting, which is both costly and
challenging. In this regard, we will need to continue to dedicate
internal resources, potentially engage outside consultants, and
adopt a detailed work plan to assess and document the adequacy of
internal control over financial reporting, continue steps to
improve control processes as appropriate, validate through testing
that controls are functioning as documented, and implement a
continuous reporting and improvement process for internal control
over financial reporting.
In
addition, changing laws, regulations, and standards relating to
corporate governance and public disclosure are creating uncertainty
for public companies, increasing legal and financial compliance
costs, and making some activities more time consuming. These laws,
regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations,
in many cases due to their lack of specificity and, as a result,
their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance
is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result
in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher
costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and
governance practices. We intend to invest resources to comply with
evolving laws, regulations, and standards, and this investment may
result in increased general and administrative expenses and divert
management’s time and attention from revenue-generating
activities to compliance activities. If our efforts to comply with
new laws, regulations and standards differ from the activities
intended by regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities
related to their application and practice, regulatory authorities
may initiate legal proceedings against us and our business may be
harmed.
As a public company, complying with applicable rules and
regulations will make it more expensive for us to obtain director
and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to incur
substantially higher costs to obtain and maintain the same or
similar coverage.
We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over
financial reporting. If we fail to develop or maintain an effective
system of internal controls, we may not be able to accurately
report our financial results or prevent fraud. As a result, current
and potential stockholders could lose confidence in our financial
reporting, which would harm our business and the trading price of
our securities.
In
connection with the audit of our consolidated financial statements
for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, our management
concluded that the Company had material weaknesses in its internal
controls because we did not have adequately designed internal
controls to ensure the timely preparation and review of the
accounting for certain complex, non-routine transactions by those
with appropriate technical expertise, which was necessary to
provide reasonable assurance that the Company’s consolidated
financial statements and related disclosures would be prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States of America. In addition, we did not have adequately
designed and documented financial close and management review
controls to properly detect and prevent certain accounting errors
and omitted disclosures in the footnotes to the consolidated
financial statements. As defined in the Standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board, a material weakness is a
deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control
over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable
possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s
annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be
prevented or detected on a timely basis. Our management is
executing a plan to remediate the material weaknesses, although
there can be no assurance that such our plan will be
successful.
19
Management continues to review and assess our internal controls to
ensure we have adequate internal financial and accounting controls.
However, any failure to maintain or implement required new or
improved controls, or any difficulties we encounter in their
implementation, could result in additional material weaknesses, and
cause us to fail to meet our periodic reporting obligations or
result in material misstatements in our financial statements. Any
such failure could also adversely affect the results of periodic
management evaluations regarding the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting that are required with respect to
annual reports that we will file. The existence of a material
weakness could result in errors in our financial statements that
could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations and cause
investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information
which may lead to a decline in our stock price.
Our ability to use our net operating losses to offset future
taxable income may be subject to certain limitations, which could
subject our business to higher tax liability.
We may be limited in the portion of net operating loss carry
forwards that we can offset future taxable income for U.S. federal
and state income tax purposes. As of December 31, 2018, we
had federal and state net operating loss carryforwards, or NOLs, of
approximately $9.7 million and $0.5 million, net of federal tax
effect, respectively. A lack of future taxable income could
adversely affect our ability to use these NOLs. In addition, future
changes in our stock ownership, including through acquisitions, could result in ownership
changes under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code and may
result in a limitation on the amount of NOL carry forwards that
could be used annually to offset future taxable income and taxes
payable. Our NOLs at December 31, 2018 may also be impaired under
similar provisions of state law, and may expire unused or
underused, which would prevent us from using our NOL carry forwards
to offset future taxable income.
We may need to raise additional capital in the future, which may
not be available on acceptable terms, or at all.
We have
experienced fluctuations in earnings and cash flows from operations
from year to year. If our business declines, we may need to raise
additional capital to pursue acquisitions or expand our operations.
Such additional capital may be raised through bank borrowings, or
other debt or equity financings. We cannot assure you that any
additional capital will be available on a timely basis, on
acceptable terms, or at all, and such additional financing may
result in further dilution to our stockholders.
Our
capital requirements will depend on many factors, including, but
not limited to: our ability to increase revenue, reduce net losses
or generate net income; market acceptance of our services, and the
overall level of sales of our services; our need to respond to
technological advancements and our competitors’ introductions
of new products, services or technologies; our ability to control
costs; promptness of customer payments; our ability to successfully
negotiate arrangements with credit providers; and enhancements to
subsidiaries’ infrastructure and systems; government
procurement.
If our
capital requirements are materially different from those currently
planned, we may need additional capital sooner than anticipated. If
additional funds are raised through the issuance of equity or
convertible debt securities, the percentage ownership of our
stockholders will be reduced and such securities may have rights,
preferences and privileges senior to our common stock. Additional
equity or debt financing may not be available on favorable terms,
on a timely basis, or at all. If adequate funds are not available
or are not available on acceptable terms, we may be unable to
continue our operations as planned, develop or enhance our
products, expand our sales and marketing programs, take advantage
of future opportunities or respond to competitive pressures, or we
may be forced to sell assets at prices below their stated
value.
Assertions by a third party that our services and solutions
infringe its intellectual property, whether or not correct, could
subject us to costly and time-consuming litigation or expensive
licenses.
There is frequent litigation in the software and technology
industries based on allegations of infringement or other violations
of intellectual property rights. We may in the future be, subject
to third-party patent infringement or other intellectual
property-related lawsuits as we face increasing competition and
become increasingly visible. Regardless of the merit of these
claims, they can be time-consuming, result in costly litigation and
diversion of technical and management personnel or require us to
develop a non-infringing technology or enter into license
agreements. Because of the potential for court awards that are
difficult to predict, it is not unusual to find even arguably
unmeritorious claims settled for significant amounts. In addition,
our service agreements may require us to indemnify our customers
from certain third-party intellectual property infringement claims,
which could increase our costs as a result of defending such claims
and may require that we pay damages if there were an adverse ruling
related to any such claims. These types of claims could harm our
relationship with our customers, deter future customers from
subscribing to our services or expose us to further litigation.
These costs, monetary or otherwise, associated with defending
against third party allegations of infringement could have negative
effects on our business, financial condition and operating
results.
20
If our services are used to commit intentional or illegal acts, we
may incur significant liabilities, our services may be perceived as
not secure, and customers may curtail or stop using our
services.
Certain
services offered by us enable customers to capture data from video
images. We do not control the use or content of information
accessed by our customers through our services. If our services are
used to commit bad or illegal acts, we may become subject to claims
and subject to other potential liabilities. As a result, defending
such claims could be expensive and time-consuming, and we could
incur significant liability to individuals or businesses who were
the targets of such acts. As a result, our business may suffer and
our reputation may be damaged.
We use a limited number of data centers to deliver our services.
Any disruption of service at these facilities could harm our
business.
Our
cloud-based services are hosted from third-party data center
facilities located in various parts of the U.S. We do not control
the operation of these facilities. The owners of our data center
facilities have no obligation to renew their agreements with us on
commercially reasonable terms, or at all. If we are unable to renew
these agreements on commercially reasonable terms, we may be
required to transfer to new data center facilities, and we may
incur significant costs and possible service interruption in
connection with doing so. Any changes in third-party service levels
at our data centers or any errors, defects, disruptions or other
performance problems with our services could harm our reputation
and may damage our clients’ businesses. Interruptions in our
services might reduce our revenue, cause us to issue credits to
clients, subject us to potential liability, cause clients to
terminate their subscriptions or harm our renewal
rates.
Our
data centers are vulnerable to damage or interruption from human
error, intentional bad acts, pandemics, earthquakes, hurricanes,
floods, fires, war, terrorist attacks, power losses, hardware
failures, systems failures, telecommunications failures and similar
events. The occurrence of a natural disaster, an act of terrorism,
vandalism or other misconduct, a decision to close the facilities
without adequate notice or other unanticipated problems could
result in lengthy interruptions in our services.
Our long-term success depends, in part, on our ability to expand
the sales of our services to customers located outside of the
United States, and thus our business is susceptible to risks
associated with international sales and operations.
We
currently maintain offices and have sales personnel inside of the
United States, however, we plan on expanding our international
operations. Our international expansion efforts may not be
successful. In addition, conducting international operations
subjects us to other risks than those we have generally faced in
the United States. These risks include: localization of our
services and adaptation for local practices, legal standards and
regulatory requirements; difficulties in managing and staffing
international operations; fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
dependence on customers, third parties, and channel partners with
whom we do not have extensive experience; potentially adverse tax
consequences, including the complexities of foreign value-added or
other tax systems; reduced or varied protection for intellectual
property rights in some countries; and increased financial
accounting and reporting burdens and complexities. Operating in
international markets also requires significant management
attention and financial resources. The investment and additional
resources required to establish operations and manage growth in
other countries may not produce desired levels of revenue or
profitability.
Our success depends in large part on our ability to protect and
enforce our intellectual property rights.
We rely
on a combination of patent, copyright, service mark, trademark and
trade secret laws, as well as confidentiality procedures and
contractual restrictions, to establish and protect our intellectual
property rights, all of which provide only limited protection. In
addition, we have patented certain technologies used to provide our
services. We cannot assure you any future patents issued will not
be challenged, invalidated or circumvented. Any patents that may
issue in the future from future patent applications may not provide
sufficiently broad protection or they may not prove to be
enforceable in actions against alleged infringers. Also, we cannot
assure you that any future service mark or trademark registrations
will be issued for pending or future applications or that any
registered service marks or trademarks will be enforceable or
provide adequate protection of our proprietary rights.
We
endeavor to enter into agreements with our employees and
contractors and agreements with parties with whom we do business to
limit access to and disclosure of our proprietary information. The
steps we have taken, however, may not prevent unauthorized use or
the reverse engineering of our technology. Moreover, others may
independently develop technologies that are competitive to ours or
infringe our intellectual property. Enforcement of our intellectual
property rights also depends on our successful legal actions
against these infringers, but these actions may not be successful,
even when our rights have been infringed.
21
Furthermore,
effective patent, trademark, service mark, copyright and trade
secret protection may not be available in every country in which
our services are available. In addition, the legal standards
relating to the validity, enforceability and scope of protection of
intellectual property rights in Internet-related industries are
uncertain and still evolving.
Our use of “open source” software could negatively
affect our ability to sell our services and subject us to possible
litigation.
A
portion of the technologies we license incorporate so-called
“open source” software, some of which we have created,
and we may incorporate additional open source software in the
future. Open source software is generally licensed by its authors
or other third-parties under open source licenses. If we fail to
comply with these licenses, we may be subject to certain
conditions, including requirements that we offer our services that
incorporate the open source software for no cost, that we make
available source code for modifications or derivative works we
create based upon, incorporating or using the open source software
and/or that we license such modifications or derivative works under
the terms of the particular open source license. If an author or
other third-party that distributes such open source software were
to allege that we had not complied with the conditions of one or
more of these licenses, we could be required to incur significant
legal expenses defending against such allegations and could be
subject to significant damages, enjoined from the sale of our
services that contained the open source software and required to
comply with the foregoing conditions, which could disrupt the
distribution and sale of some of our services.
Material defects or errors in the software that we use to deliver
our services could harm our reputation, result in significant costs
to us and impair our ability to sell our services.
The
software applications underlying our services are inherently
complex and may contain material defects or errors, particularly
when first introduced or when new versions or enhancements are
released. Any defects that cause interruptions to the availability
of our services could result in: a reduction in sales or delay in
market acceptance of our services; sales credits or refunds to
customers; loss of existing customers and difficulty in attracting
new customers; reputational harm; and diversion of internal
resources. The costs incurred in correcting any material defects or
errors in our services may be substantial and could harm our
operating results.
Government regulation of the Internet, telecommunications and other
communications technologies could harm our business and operating
results.
As
Internet commerce and telecommunications continue to evolve,
increasing regulation by federal, state or foreign governments and
agencies becomes more likely. Any increase in regulation could
affect our clients’ ability to collect and share data,
potentially reducing demand for our products and services. In
addition, taxation of products and services provided over the
Internet or other charges imposed by government agencies or by
private organizations for accessing the Internet or utilizing
telecommunications services may also be imposed. Any regulation
imposing greater fees for Internet use or restricting the exchange
of information over the Internet could diminish the viability of
our services, which could harm our business and operating
results.
Risks Relating to our Common Stock
There has been a limited public market for our common stock, the
stock price of our common stock may be volatile or may decline
regardless of our performance, and you may not be able to resell
your shares at or above the public offering price.
Our
common stock was previously quoted on the OTCQX and has been
trading on the Nasdaq since January 10, 2018. There is no
established trading market for some of our securities and there has
been a limited public market for our common stock. The market
prices of the securities of newly listed companies can be highly
volatile. The market price of our common stock may fluctuate
significantly in response to numerous factors, many of which are
beyond our control, including: variations in our results of
operations, cash flows, and other financial metrics
and non-financial metrics, and how those results compare
to analyst expectations; variations in general market, financial
markets, economic, and political conditions in the United States;
failure of securities analysts to initiate or maintain coverage of
us, changes in financial estimates by any securities analysts who
follow our company, or our failure to meet these estimates or the
expectations of investors; sales of shares of our common stock by
us or our stockholders; rumors and market speculation involving us
or other companies in our industry; new laws, regulations, or
executive orders, or new interpretations of existing laws or
regulations applicable to our business; lawsuits threatened or
filed against us, or unfavorable determinations or settlements in
any such suits; and developments or disputes concerning our
intellectual property or our technology, or third-party proprietary
rights.
In
addition, the stock markets have shown the capacity to experience
extreme price and volume fluctuations that can have short- and
long-term effects on the market prices of equity securities of many
companies. Stock prices of many companies have fluctuated in a
manner unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance
of those companies. In the past, stockholders have instituted
securities class action litigation following periods of market
volatility. If we were to become involved in securities litigation,
it could subject us to substantial costs, divert resources and the
attention of management from our business, and harm our
business.
22
Our common stock may be delisted from the Nasdaq Capital
Market.
We may
be unable to maintain the listing of our common stock on the
Nasdaq. On December 13, 2018, we received a letter from the Nasdaq
indicating that the Company is required to maintain a minimum bid
price of $1 per share of its common stock. The Company's closing
bid price of its common stock had been less than $1 for the
previous 30 consecutive business days. As such, the Company was not
compliant with the minimum bid price requirements under Nasdaq
Listing Rule 5550(a)(2). The letter from Nasdaq provided the
Company with a compliance period of 180 calendar days, or until
June 11, 2019, to regain compliance with the minimum bid price
requirement. If at any time during this 180-day compliance period
the closing bid price of the Company’s common stock is at
least $1 for a minimum of 10 consecutive business days, then Nasdaq
will provide the Company with written confirmation of compliance
and the matter will be closed.
In the
event that our common stock were to be delisted from the Nasdaq, we
expect that it would be traded on the OTCQB or OTCQX, which are
unorganized, inter-dealer, over-the-counter markets which provide
significantly less liquidity than the Nasdaq or other national
securities exchanges. In the event that our common stock were to be
delisted from the Nasdaq, it may have a material adverse effect on
the trading and price of our common stock.
If, for
any reason, Nasdaq should delist our common stock from trading on
its exchange and we are unable to obtain listing on another
national securities exchange or take action to restore our
compliance with the Nasdaq continued listing requirements, a
material adverse effect on our shareholders may occur due to a
reduction in some or all of the following: the market price of our
common shares; the liquidity of our common shares; our ability to
obtain financing for the continuation of our operations; the number
of market makers in our common shares; and the number of
institutional and general investors that will consider investing in
our common shares.
In the
event that our common stock were to be delisted from the Nasdaq, it
may be considered a “penny stock.” Securities
broker-dealers participating in sales of our common stock would
then be subject to the “penny stock” regulations set
forth in Rules 15g-2 through 15g-9 promulgated under the Exchange
Act. Generally, brokers may be less willing to execute transactions
in securities subject to the “penny stock” rules. This
may make it more difficult for investors to dispose of our common
stock and cause a decline in the market value of our
stock.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or
publishes inaccurate or unfavorable reports about our business, our
stock price and trading volume could decline.
The
trading market for our common stock will depend in part on the
research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish
about us or our business, our market and our competitors. We do not
have any control over these analysts. If one or more of the
analysts who cover us downgrade our shares or change their opinion
of our shares, our share price would likely decline. If one or more
of these analysts cease covering us or fail to regularly publish
reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets,
which could cause our share price or trading volume to
decline.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock may
cause the price of our common stock to decline.
As of
March 31, 2019, we have outstanding a total of 19,367,619 shares of
common stock and 3,973,163 warrants. Based on shares outstanding as
of March 31, 2019, 9,470,959 shares of common stock, or 48.9%, are
held by our officers, directors and their affiliated entities, and
will be subject to volume limitations under Rule 144 under the
Securities Act and various vesting agreements. In addition,
4,859,947 shares of our common stock that are subject to
outstanding options and warrants as of March 31, 2019, as well as
974,487 shares issuable upon the conversion of our Series A
Preferred Stock, and 481,722 shares issuable upon the conversion of
our Series B Preferred Stock, will become eligible for sale in the
public market to the extent permitted by the provisions of various
vesting agreements, and Rules 144 and 701 under the Securities
Act.
We
cannot predict what effect, if any, sales of our shares in the
public market or the availability of shares for sale will have on
the market price of our common stock. However, future sales of
substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market,
including shares issued on exercise of outstanding options, or the
perception that such sales may occur, could adversely affect the
market price of our common stock.
We also
expect that significant additional capital may be needed in the
future to continue our planned operations. To raise capital, we may
sell common stock, convertible securities or other equity
securities in one or more transactions at prices and in a manner we
determine from time to time. These sales, or the perception in the
market that the holders of a large number of shares intend to sell
shares, could reduce the market price of our common
stock.
23
Investors may experience future dilution as a result of future
equity offerings.
In
order to raise additional capital, we may in the future offer
additional shares of our common stock or other securities
convertible into or exchangeable for our common stock. We cannot
assure investors that we will be able to sell shares or other
securities in any other offering at a price per share that is equal
to or greater than the price per share paid by investors, and
investors purchasing our shares or other securities in the future
could have rights superior to existing stockholders. The price per
share at which we sell additional shares of our common stock or
other securities convertible into or exchangeable for our common
stock in future transactions may be higher or lower than the price
per share paid by investors.
We do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock for the
foreseeable future.
We have
never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock and
do not intend to pay any cash dividends on our common stock in the
foreseeable future. Our Series A Preferred Stock and our Series B
Preferred Stock are entitled to quarterly dividends as set forth in
more detail in the section entitled “Description of Capital
Stock.” We currently anticipate that for the foreseeable
future we will retain all of our future earnings for the
development, operation and growth of our business and for general
corporate purposes. Any future determination to pay dividends on
our common stock in will be at the discretion of our Board of
Directors. Accordingly, investors must rely on sales of their
common stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, as
the only way to realize any future gains on their
investments.
Our executive officers, directors, principal stockholders and their
affiliates will continue to exercise significant influence over our
company, which will limit your ability to influence corporate
matters and could delay or prevent a change in corporate
control.
As of
March 31, 2019, our executive officers, directors, five percent or
greater stockholders and their respective affiliates owned in the
aggregate approximately 48.9% of our common stock.
These
stockholders have the ability to influence us through this
ownership position and may be able to determine all matters
requiring stockholder approval. For example, these stockholders may
be able to control elections of directors, amendments of our
organizational documents, or approval of any merger, sale of
assets, or other major corporate transaction. This may prevent or
discourage unsolicited acquisition proposals or offers for our
common stock that you may feel are in your best interest as one of
our stockholders. The interests of this group of stockholders may
not always coincide with your interests or the interests of other
stockholders and they may act in a manner that advances their best
interests and not necessarily those of other stockholders,
including seeking a premium value for their common stock, and might
affect the prevailing market price for our common
stock.
We are a “smaller reporting company” and, as a result
of the reduced disclosure and governance requirements applicable to
smaller reporting companies, our common stock may be less
attractive to investors.
We are
a “smaller reporting company,” meaning that we are not
an investment company, an asset-backed issuer, or a majority-owned
subsidiary of a parent company that is not a “smaller
reporting company,” have a public float of less than
$75 million and have annual revenues of less than
$50 million during the most recently completed fiscal year. As
a “smaller reporting company,” we are subject to lesser
disclosure obligations in our SEC filings compared to other
issuers. Specifically, "smaller reporting companies" are able to
provide simplified executive compensation disclosures in their
filings, are exempt from the provisions of Section 404(b) of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requiring that independent registered public
accounting firms provide an attestation report on the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting and have certain other
decreased disclosure obligations in their SEC filings, including,
among other things, only being required to provide two years of
audited consolidated financial statements in annual reports.
Decreased disclosures in our SEC filings due to our status a
“smaller reporting company” may make it harder for
investors to analyze our operating results and financial
prospects.
Delaware law and provisions in our certificate of incorporation and
bylaws could make a merger, tender offer or proxy contest
difficult, thereby depressing the trading price of our common
stock.
The anti-takeover provisions of the Delaware General
Corporation Law, or the DGCL, may discourage, delay or
prevent a change of control by prohibiting us from engaging in a
business combination with stockholders owning in excess of 15% of
our outstanding voting stock for a period of three years after the
person becomes an interested stockholder, even if a change of
control would be beneficial to our existing stockholders. In addition, our certificate of
incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that may make the
acquisition of our company more difficult, including that:
the request of one or more stockholders holding shares in the
aggregate entitled to cast not less than 35% of the vote at a
meeting is required to call a stockholder meeting. These provisions
could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for
you and other stockholders to elect directors of your choosing and
cause us to take certain actions you desire.
24
Unresolved Staff
Comments
Not
applicable.
Properties
Our
principal executive offices are located at 14200 Albemarle Point
Place, Suite 200, Chantilly, Virginia. We do not own any real
property. We currently operate out of seven leased locations and
our lease terms range from month-to-month to multiyear commitments.
We do not consider any of our leased properties to be materially
important to us. While we believe it is necessary to maintain
offices through which our services are coordinated, we feel there
are sufficient available office rental properties to adequately
serve our needs should we need to relocate or expand our
operations.
Legal Proceedings
We may
from time to time be subject to various legal proceedings and
claims, either asserted or unasserted, which arise in the ordinary
course of business. While the outcome of these claims cannot be
predicted with certainty, we do not believe that the outcome of any
of these legal matters will have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations or financial condition. As of March 31, 2019,
we were not aware of any material legal proceedings or
claims.
Mine Safety Disclosures
Not
applicable.
25
Our
common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the
symbol “NVMM”.
As of
April 9, 2019, there were 55 registered holders of record of our
common stock, excluding stockholders for whom shares are held in
“nominee” or “street name.” The actual
number of common stockholders is greater than the number of record
holders, and includes stockholders who are beneficial owners, but
whose shares are held in street name by brokers and other nominees.
This number of holders of record also does not include stockholders
whose shares may be held in trust by other entities.
Dividend Policy
We have
never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock and
we have declared and paid cash dividends for our preferred stock.
We currently do not anticipate paying any cash dividends for the
foreseeable future. Instead, we anticipate that all of our earnings
will be used to provide working capital, to support our operations,
and to finance the growth and development of our business,
including potentially the acquisition of, or investment in,
businesses, technologies or products that complement our existing
business. Any future determination relating to dividend policy will
be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend
on a number of factors, including, but not limited to, our future
earnings, capital requirements, financial condition, future
prospects, applicable Delaware law, which provides that dividends
are only payable out of surplus or current net profits and other
factors our Board of Directors might deem relevant.
Sales of Unregistered Securities
On
January 1, 2018, as consideration for its acquisition of the assets
of Secure Education, Novume issued 33,333 shares of its common
stock valued at $163,332, warrants to purchase 33,333 shares of its
common stock, exercisable over a period of five years, at an
exercise price of $5.44 per share, valued at $65,988, and warrants
to purchase 33,333 of its common stock, exercisable over a period
of five years, at an exercise price of $6.53 per share, valued at
$57,484, to the sellers.
On April 3, 2018, Novume issued 35,000 shares of its common stock
to an institutional investor in connection with a loan provided by
such investor.
On October 16, 2018, Novume issued 96,924 shares of its common
stock in exchange for the extinguishment of warrants.
On
March 12, 2019, as partial consideration for its acquisition of
certain assets of OpenALPR, Novume issued 600,000 shares of its
common stock to the seller, valued at $396,600. On the same date,
Novume issued senior secured promissory notes in an aggregate
principal amount of $20.0 million and warrants to purchase
2,500,000 shares of its common stock, which are immediately
exercisable at an exercise price of $0.74 per share, to certain
individuals and entities.
The
foregoing issuances were issued in reliance upon the exemptions
from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
provided by Section 4(a)(2) and Rule 506 of Regulation D
promulgated thereunder.
26
Use of Proceeds
In
November 2018, Novume completed a public offering of its common
stock (the “Offering”) and issued and sold 4,125,000
shares of its common stock at a public offering price of $0.80 per
share.
The
offer and sale of all of the shares in the offering was registered
under the Securities Act pursuant to a registration statement on
Form S-3 (File No. 333-224423) (the “S-3 Registration
Statement”), which was declared effective by the SEC on April
30, 2018, a preliminary prospectus supplement to the S-3
Registration Statement filed with the SEC on October 25, 2018 (the
“Preliminary Prospectus Supplement”), a free writing
prospectus filed with the SEC on October 24, 2018 (the “Free
Writing Prospectus”), and a final prospectus supplement to
the S-3 Registration Statement filed with the SEC on October 31,
2018 (the “Final Prospectus Supplement” and the S-3
Registration Statement as supplemented by the Preliminary
Prospectus Supplement and the Final Prospectus Supplement, together
with the Free Writing Prospectus, the “Registration
Statement”). Under the Registration Statement, Novume
registered 4,125,000 shares of common stock and 618,750 shares of
common stock issuable upon exercise of the underwriters’
option to purchase additional shares of common stock at a public
offering price of $0.80 per share for a registered aggregate
offering price of approximately $3.8 million. Following the sale of
the shares in connection with the closing of the Offering on
November 1, 2018, the Offering terminated. The Offering commenced
on October 24, 2018 and did not terminate until the sale of all of
the shares offered. ThinkEquity, a division of Fordham Financial
Management, Inc. and The Benchmark Company, LLC acted as joint
book-running managers of the Offering.
Novume
received aggregate gross proceeds from the Offering of
approximately $3.3 million, and aggregate net
proceeds of approximately $2.8 million after deducting underwriting
discounts and commissions of $0.2 million and offering expenses of
$0.3 million, for total expenses, including underwriting discounts
and commissions of $0.5 million. No payments for such expenses were
made directly or indirectly to (i) any of Novume’s officers,
directors, or their associates, (ii) any persons owning 10% or more
of any class of Novume’s equity securities or (iii) any of
Novume’s affiliates.
There
has been no material change in Novume’s planned use of the
net proceeds from the Offering as described in the Final Prospectus
Supplement.
As a
“smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of
Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to provide information
required by this Item.
The following management’s discussion and analysis of our
financial condition and results of operations should be read in
conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements
and related notes included in this Annual Report and the historical
financial statements of Brekford, KeyStone, Firestorm and Global,
and the related notes thereto.
Overview
We
began operations upon the merger of KeyStone and Brekford in August
2017. Through strategic acquisitions, we have grown our business,
which today operates through our subsidiaries, as
follows:
●
AOC Key
Solutions. AOC Key
Solutions is based in Chantilly, Virginia and provides consulting
and technical support services to assist clients seeking U.S.
federal government contracts in the technology, telecommunications,
defense, and aerospace industries.
●
Firestorm. Firestorm
is based in Roswell, Georgia and is a leader in crisis management,
crisis communications, emergency response, and business continuity,
including workplace violence prevention, cyber-breach response,
communicable illness/pandemic planning, predictive intelligence,
and other emergency, crisis and disaster preparedness initiatives.
Through BC Management, Firestorm offers leading executive search
services for business continuity, disaster recovery, crisis
management and risk management professionals. In addition, through
Secure Education, comprised of an expert team of highly trained,
former U.S. Secret Service Agents, Firestorm assists clients by
designing customized plans, conducting security assessments,
delivering training, and responding to critical
incidents.
●
Brekford.
Brekford, is based in Hanover,
Maryland and is a leading public safety technology service provider
of fully integrated automated traffic safety enforcement solutions,
including speed, red light, and distracted driving cameras, as well
as citation management software and secure electronic evidence
storage
27
●
Global.
Global is based in Fort Worth, Texas,
and provides the U.S. Department of Defense and the
aerospace industry with experienced maintenance and modification
specialists.
●
OpenALPR. OpenALPR
is based in Boston, Massachusetts and provides ALPR technology used
by both law enforcement and commercial clients.
In
selective situations, we will also seek to serve as a partner or
incubator for businesses where an understanding of government
contracting and contacts with seasoned providers of government
services or products can be instrumental to success. In making
arrangements for the merger with Brekford, Novume assisted it in
arranging the sale Brekford’s legacy vehicle unfitting
business to LB&B Associates Inc., a long-term client of AOC Key
Solutions, retaining a 19.9% interest. We expect to continue our
efforts to find low-risk, high-reward opportunities by using our
knowledge base and strategic position to facilitate transactions
that can provide financial returns without significant operating or
balance sheet exposure.
General
The
information provided in this discussion and analysis of
Novume’s financial condition and results of operations covers
the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. During this period, the
Company completed the acquisition of Firestorm, the Brekford
Merger, the acquisition of Global and the purchase of certain
assets of BC Management and Secure Education, as more fully
described below.
The
financial information in this section for the period prior to the
January 25, 2017 acquisition of Firestorm is prepared on a
consolidated basis for KeyStone and AOC Key Solutions. The
financial information for periods subsequent to January 25, 2017 is
prepared on a consolidated basis for KeyStone, AOC Key Solutions
and Firestorm. For periods subsequent to the Brekford Merger on
August 28, 2017, the financial information is prepared on a
consolidated basis for Novume, AOC Key Solutions, Firestorm and
Brekford. For periods subsequent to the Global acquisition on
October 1, 2017, the financial information is prepared on a
consolidated basis for Novume, AOC Key Solutions, Firestorm,
Brekford and Global. Thus, on December 31, 2017, the financial
information prepared on a consolidated basis includes Novume, AOC
Key Solutions, Firestorm, Brekford, Global and BC Management. For
periods subsequent to December 31, 2017, the financial information
prepared on a consolidated basis includes all of these entities and
Secure Education.
Our
financial results are impacted principally by the demand by clients
for our services, the degree to which full-time staff can be kept
occupied in revenue-generating activities, the success of our sales
team in generating client engagements, and the number of business
days in each quarter. The number of business days on which revenue
is generated by our staff and consultants in the federal government
contracting and aerospace industries is affected by the number of
vacation days taken, as well as the number of holidays in each
quarter. There are typically fewer business work days available in
the fourth quarter of the year, which can impact revenues during
that period. The staff utilization rate can also be affected by
seasonal variations in the demand for services from clients. Since
earnings may be affected by these seasonal variations, results for
any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results that may
be achieved for a full fiscal year.
Unexpected
changes in the demand for our services can result in significant
variations in revenues, and present a challenge to optimal hiring,
staffing and use of consultants. The volume of work performed can
vary from period to period.
The
statements of operations and other information provided in this
discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of
operations of Novume should be read in conjunction with the Novume
audited consolidated financial statements and the historical
financial statements of Brekford, KeyStone, Firestorm and Global,
and the related notes thereto which were filed with the SEC by
either KeyStone or Novume.
Acquisitions
Secure Education Consultants Acquisition
On
January 1, 2018, Novume completed its acquisition of certain assets
of Secure Education. Secure Education’s security and
safety experts provide customized emergency protocols and critical
incident response training for schools and child care organizations
and will further augment the risk mitigation and crisis management
services we provide to our clients. Consideration paid as part of
this acquisition included: (a) $99,197 in cash, (b) 33,333 shares
of Novume common stock valued at $163,332; (c) warrants to purchase
33,333 shares of Novume common stock, exercisable over a period of
five years, at an exercise price of $5.44 per share valued at
$65,988 and (d) warrants to purchase 33,333 of Novume common stock,
exercisable over a period of five years at an exercise price of
$6.53 per share valued at $57,484. The purchase price allocation
for Secure Education as a business combination is included in our
consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2018. Secure
Education results are included in our statement of operations for
the period beginning January 1, 2018. The acquisition of the assets
of Secure Education resulted in Firestorm being able to offer a new
service of critical incident response training and security
assessments of facilities for clients, in addition to
Firestorm’s crisis responses and staffing services. The
acquisition of Secure Education did not result in the survival of
Secure Education as part of Novume.
28
BC Management Acquisition
On
December 31, 2017, Novume completed its acquisition of certain
assets of BC Management through Firestorm. Consideration paid as
part of this acquisition included: (a) $100,000 in cash, (b) 33,333
shares of Novume common stock valued at $163,332, (c) warrants to
purchase 33,333 shares of Novume common stock, exercisable over a
period of five years, at an exercise price of $5.44 per share
valued at $65,988 and (d) warrants to purchase 33,333 shares of
Novume common stock, exercisable over a period of five years, at an
exercise price of $6.53 per share valued at $57,484. The purchase
price allocation for BC Management as a business combination is
included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements
at December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017. BC Management results
are included in our statement of operations for the period
beginning after December 31, 2017. The acquisition of the assets of
BC Management resulted in Firestorm being able to offer a new
service of staffing and placement solutions for clients in the risk
management industry, in addition to Firestorm’s existing
crisis responses and training services. The acquisition of BC
Management did not result in the survival of BC Management as part
of Novume.
Global Acquisition
On
October 1, 2017 (the “Global Closing Date”), the
Company completed its acquisition of GTS and GCP. Consideration
paid as part Global Merger included: (a) $750,000 in cash, (b)
375,000 shares of Novume common stock and (c) 240,861 shares of
Novume Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (the
“Novume Series B Preferred Stock”). In addition to the
merger consideration, Novume paid $365,037 to satisfy in full all
of the outstanding debt of GTS and GCP at closing, except for
certain intercompany debt and ordinary course debt, and amounts due
under (a) the Secured Account Purchase Agreement dated
August 22, 2012 by and between GTS and WFB (the “GTS Wells Fargo Credit
Facility”) and (b) the Secured Account Purchase Agreement
dated August 22, 2012 by and between GCP and WFB (the
“GCP Wells Fargo Credit Facility” and together with the
GTS Wells Fargo Credit Facility, the “Wells Fargo Credit
Facilities”), which will remain in effect following the
consummation of the Global Merger. In connection with the Wells
Fargo Credit Facilities, Novume has delivered to WFB, general
continuing guaranties dated September 29, 2017 and effective upon
the Global Closing Date of the Global Merger (the “Wells
Fargo Guaranty Agreements”), guaranteeing the Guaranteed
Obligations of GTS and GCP (as defined in the Wells Fargo Guaranty
Agreements) under the Wells Fargo Credit Facilities, and paid
$175,000 in the aggregate to reduce the current borrowed amounts
under the Wells Fargo Credit Facilities as of the Global Closing
Date.
As part
of the Global Merger, the Company created 240,861 shares of $0.0001
par value Novume Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock
(the “Series B Preferred Stock”). All Series B
Preferred Stock was issued at a price of $10.00 per share as part
of the acquisition of the Global Merger. The Series B Preferred
Stock is entitled to quarterly cash dividends of 1.121% (4.484% per
annum) per share. Dividends accrue quarterly and dividend payments
for declared dividends are due within five business days following
the end of a quarter. The Series B Preferred Stock has a conversion
price of $5.00 per share. Each Series B Preferred Stock has an
automatic conversion feature based on the share price of
Novume.
The
acquisition of Global resulted in a contribution of additional
revenues to the Company's human resource-based business. Since the
Global Entities have a relatively high cost of revenues, their
operating margins are lower than those for other subsidiaries.
There were no material changes to how we operate our business
following the acquisition of Global.
Brekford Acquisition
On
August 28, 2017, the mergers by and among Novume, KeyStone,
Brekford, Brekford Merger Sub, Inc. (“Brekford Merger
Sub”), and KeyStone Merger Sub, LLC (“KeyStone Merger
Sub”), were consummated (the
“Brekford Merger”) as a result of a merger agreement
(the “Brekford Merger Agreement”). As a result,
Brekford became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Novume, and
Brekford Merger Sub ceased to exist. KeyStone Merger Sub also
became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Novume, and KeyStone
Solutions, Inc. ceased to exist. When KeyStone Merger Sub filed its
certificate of merger with the Secretary of State of Delaware, it
immediately effectuated a name-change to KeyStone Solutions, LLC,
the name by which it is now known. For the purpose of this document
any references to KeyStone are to KeyStone Solutions, Inc. prior to
August 28, 2017 and to KeyStone Solutions, LLC on and after August
28, 2017.
Upon completion of the Brekford Merger, the merger consideration
was issued in accordance with the terms of the Brekford Merger
Agreement. Immediately upon completion of the Brekford Merger, the
pre-merger stockholders of KeyStone owned approximately 80% of the
issued and outstanding capital stock of the Novume on a
fully-diluted basis, and the pre-merger stockholders of Brekford
owned approximately 20% of the issued and outstanding capital stock
of the Novume on a fully-diluted basis.
29
Firestorm Acquisition
On
January 25, 2017, we acquired each of the Firestorm Entities for
the following consideration: $500,000 in cash; $1,000,000 in the
aggregate in the form of four unsecured, subordinated promissory
notes with interest (of which interest on $500,000 of the notes is
payable at an interest rate of 7% and interest on $500,000 of the
notes is payable at an interest rate of 2%) payable over, and
principal due after, five years (of which $907,407 was recorded to
notes payable to reflect the net fair value of the notes issued due
to the difference in interest rates); 488,094 (946,875 post
Brekford Merger) shares of Novume common stock; warrants to
purchase 162,699 (315,627 post Brekford Merger) shares of Novume
common stock, exercisable over a period of five years, at an
exercise price of $2.58 per share; and warrants to purchase 162,699
(315,627 post Brekford Merger) shares of Novume common stock,
exercisable over a period of five years, at an exercise price of
$3.61 per share.
Agreement to Acquire Assets of OpenALPR
On
September 17, 2018, we entered into a Letter of Intent with
OpenALPR Technology, Inc., which set forth the parties’
intent to consummate a transaction pursuant to which we would
acquire the assets of OpenALPR Technology, Inc. OpenALPR
Technology, Inc. is a privately-held Boston, Massachusetts-based
company that provides ALPR technology used by both law enforcement
and commercial clients. Following this agreement, on October 9,
2018, we entered into a Management Services Agreement (the
“MSA”) with OpenALPR Technology, Inc. whereby we agreed to provide services to support
the continued growth of its platform. These services include sales,
call center and customer support, engineering, marketing and
website services along with business strategy, contract and other
back office functions. The MSA provides for Novume to receive
compensation on a time and materials basis for most services and a
commission basis for sales of OpenALPR Technology, Inc.
products. On November 14, 2018,
we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset
Purchase Agreement”) by and among Novume, OpenALPR
Technology, Inc. and Matthew Hill pursuant to which we would
purchase all of the assets of OpenALPR and its subsidiaries, except
for certain excluded assets, and assume certain liabilities as
provided for in the Asset Purchase Agreement (the “OpenALPR
Acquisition”). The Asset Purchase Agreement was amended on
February 15, 2019 and March 8, 2019 and on March 12, 2019, we
completed our acquisition of OpenALPR, as more fully described
below.
Key Trends, Developments and Challenges
U.S. Government Spending and the Government Contractor Industry
Generally
In
March 2018, the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2018 was signed
into law and it provided $1.3 trillion in funding for the U.S.
government through September 2018. The Act also appropriated $500
billion in new federal outlays for defense and domestic programs to
be spent over a two-year period. Prior to the beginning of the 2019
U.S. government fiscal year, Congress enacted some of its
appropriations bills and provided for continuing resolutions into
December 2018 for other appropriations bills. Upon the expiration
of the continuing resolutions, those departments and agencies
funded by the continuing resolution shut down from December 22,
2018 to January 25, 2019, a period of 34 days and the longest U.S.
government shutdown in history. In February 2019, the remaining
appropriations bills were enacted to fund the U.S. government
through September 2019. The continuing resolutions in 2018 and
related government shutdown reduced the number of RFPs issued by
the government and thus diminished revenue opportunities for AOC
Key Solutions.
While
we had anticipated an increasing demand for our services based upon
an expected increase in the volume of federal government spending
and as our clients elect to outsource their bid and proposal
activities, it is still not clear how government spending will be
impacted beyond 2019. The administration does have some discretion
to delay spending on programs previously authorized.
The
federal government fiscal year starts on October 1 and ends on
September 30. Thus, some of our revenues for 2018 were based on
budget authorizations made in 2017. On March 23, 2018, the
Consolidated Appropriations Act (the “2018 Act”) was
signed into law. It provided $1.3 trillion in funding through
September 2018 and anticipated $500 billion in new federal spending
for defense and domestic programs over two years, including
significant increases military procurements. We believe that
increased defense spending will flow down to government contractors
and provide them with new opportunities to offer national defense
products and services to the federal government. The 2018 Act also
provides more than $2.3 billion in new funding for threat
identification, mental health, training, and school safety programs
at the Departments of Justice, Education, and Health and Human
Services. The legislation also lifts statutory budget caps and
increases funding for emergency disaster aid funding. It also lifts
the debt ceiling and extends certain health care and tax
authorizations. While we anticipate an increasing demand for our
services in 2019 based upon an expected increase in the volume of
federal government spending and as our clients elect to outsource
their bid and proposal activities, it is still not clear how
government spending will be impacted beyond 2019.
30
NeoSystems Merger
We filed a Registration Statement on Form S-1 with the SEC on
January 25, 2018. A significant portion of the proceeds from the
proposed offering were to be used for the planned acquisition of
NeoSystems LLC (“NeoSystems”) under an agreement and
plan of merger entered into on November 16, 2017 (the
“NeoSystems Merger Agreement”). On March 7, 2018, we
received notice of termination of the NeoSystems Merger Agreement.
Pursuant to the NeoSystems Merger Agreement, Novume paid NeoSystems
$225,000 in required payments, which was recorded as a selling,
general and administrative expense in the year ended December 31,
2018. No securities were sold in connection with the offering
contemplated by the Registration Statement on Form S-1 and it was
withdrawn on November 26, 2018.
Sale of Note
On February 13, 2018, Brekford sold a note receivable from Global
Public Safety, LLC (“Global Public Safety”), which it
had received as part of the purchase price consideration in
connection with the sale of its legacy upfitting business prior to
its acquisition by Novume as a result of the merger with KeyStone
in 2017. On December 31, 2017, based on the decision to sell the
note receivable to an unrelated third party, we reclassified the
note receivable balance to a current asset and wrote down $450,000
as other expense, thus reducing the balance to $1,475,000. Brekford
continues to retain a 19.9% interest in Global Public
Safety.
Promissory Notes
2018 Promissory Note
On
April 3, 2018, Novume and Brekford entered into a transaction
pursuant to which an institutional investor (the
“Lender”) loaned $2,000,000 to Novume and Brekford (the
“2018 Promissory Note”). The 2018 Promissory Note is
discussed in further detail in this Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations
under the heading “Liquidity and Capital
Resources.”
2019 Promissory Note
On
March 12, 2019, Novume entered into a note purchase agreement
pursuant to which investors (the “2019 Lenders”) loaned
$20,000,000 to Novume (the “2019 Promissory Note”) and
the Company issued to the 2019 Lenders warrants to purchase
2,500,000 shares of Novume common stock (the “March 2019
Warrants”). The 2019 Promissory Note and March 2019 Warrants
are discussed in further detail this in Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of
Operations under “Liquidity and Capital
Resources.”
Other
than as discussed above and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form
10-K, we are not aware of any trends, events or uncertainties that
are likely to have a material effect on our financial
condition.
Sale of Common Stock
On
November 1, 2018, Novume issued 4,125,000 shares of common stock
through an underwritten public offering at a public offering price
of $0.80 per share. Net proceeds to Novume was approximately $2.8
million. In addition, we granted underwriters a 45-day option to
purchase up to 618,750 additional shares of common stock to cover
over-allotment, if any. The underwriters did not exercise this
option and the options were cancelled. As part of this transaction,
we also issued to the underwriter warrants to purchase an aggregate
of 206,250 shares of common stock, exercisable over a period of
five years, at an exercise price of $1.00 per share. The
underwriter warrants have a value of approximately $0.2 million and
are exercisable commencing April 27, 2019 and expire on October 29,
2023.
Components of Revenues and Expenses
Revenues
We
principally derive revenues from fees for services generated on a
T&M basis. Revenues for T&M contracts are recognized based
on the number of hours worked by the employees or consultants at an
agreed-upon rate per hour set forth in standard rate sheets or as
written from time to time in contracts or purchase orders.
Time-and-materials contracts represent most of our client
engagements and do not provide us with a high degree of
predictability of performance for future periods. Revenues related
to firm-fixed-price contracts are recognized in two ways, either as
services are provided for longer term contracts or upon completion
of the project for short-term contracts. Revenue from the sale of
individual franchises is recognized when the contract is signed and
collectability is assured, unless the franchisee is required to
perform certain training before operations commence.
31
Costs of Revenues
Direct costs of revenues consist primarily of that portion of
technical and non-technical salaries and wages and payroll-related
costs incurred in connection with fee generating projects. Direct
costs of revenues also include production expenses, sub-consultant
services, and other expenses that are incurred in connection with
our fee generating projects. Direct costs of revenues exclude that
portion of technical and non-technical salaries and wages related
to marketing efforts, vacations, holidays, and other time not spent
directly generating fees under existing contracts. Such costs are
included in operating expenses. We expense direct costs of revenues
when incurred.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Operating expenses include the costs of the marketing and support
staffs, other marketing expenses, management and administrative
personnel costs, payroll taxes, bonuses and employee benefits for
these employees and the portion of salaries and wages not allocated
to direct costs of revenues for those employees who provide our
services. Operating expenses also include facility costs,
depreciation and amortization, professional services, legal and
accounting fees, and administrative operating costs. We expense
operating costs when incurred.
Results of Operations – Comparison of the Years Ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017
Consolidated
operating results for year ended December 31, 2017 include
operating results for Novume as a holding company, AOC Key
Solutions and Firestorm (“Legacy Novume”) for the
period from January 25, 2017 through December 31, 2017, Brekford
for the period from August 28, 2017 through December 31, 2017 and
Global for the period from October 1, 2017 through December 31,
2017. Consolidated operating results for the year ended December
31, 2018 include AOC Key Solutions, Brekford, Firestorm and Global
for the full year.
Novume Solutions, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
Revenue
|
$48,562,441
|
$22,135,818
|
Cost
of revenue
|
34,765,781
|
13,792,473
|
Gross
profit
|
13,796,660
|
8,343,345
|
|
|
|
Operating
expense
|
|
|
Selling,
general, and administrative expenses
|
18,833,280
|
12,981,744
|
Loss
from operations
|
(5,036,620)
|
(4,638,399)
|
Other
expense
|
|
|
Interest
expense
|
(609,461)
|
(213,492)
|
Other
income (expense)
|
(28,168)
|
(483,909)
|
Total
other expense
|
(637,629)
|
(697,401)
|
Loss
before taxes
|
(5,674,249)
|
(5,335,800)
|
Income
tax (expense) benefit
|
(29,250)
|
294,666
|
Net
loss
|
$(5,703,499)
|
$(5,041,134)
|
Year Ended December 31, 2018 Compared to Year Ended December 31,
2017
Revenue
Total
revenue for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 increased by
$26,426,623, or 119%, to $48,562,441 compared to $22,135,818 for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, which includes four months
of revenue from Brekford of $914,345 and three months of revenue
from Global of $5,645,747. The increase is largely due to the
inclusion of a full year of revenue from entities acquired during
2017. Aggregate revenue attributable to Brekford and Global for the
year ended December 31, 2018 was $32,029,913. Aggregate revenue
attributable to Legacy Novume for the year ended December 31, 2018
was $16,532,528, an increase of 6.1% compared to the prior year
period due to an increase in revenue attributable to the
integration of BC Management and Secure Education into
Firestorm.
32
Cost of Revenue
Total
cost of revenue for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018
increased by $20,973,308, or 152%, to $34,765,781, compared to
$13,792,473 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, which
includes four months of cost of revenue from Brekford of $445,082
and three months cost of revenue from Global of $4,983,044.
Aggregate cost of revenue attributable to Brekford and Global for
the year ended December 31, 2018 was $26,429,965. The cost of
revenue attributable to Legacy Novume for the year ended December
31, 2018 was $8,335,816, a decrease of 0.3% compared to the prior
year period attributable to the allocation of internal and external
labor.
Gross Profit
Total
gross profit for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 increased
by $5,453,315, or 65%, to $13,796,660, compared to $8,343,345 for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, which includes four months
of gross profit from Brekford of $469,263 and three months of
revenue from Global of $662,703. The increase is largely due to the
inclusion of a full year of gross profit from entities acquired
during 2017. Aggregate gross profit attributable to Brekford and
Global for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $5,599,947. The
gross profit attributable to Legacy Novume for the year ended
December 31, 2018 was $8,196,713, an increase of 13.7% compared to
the prior year period attributable to an increase in revenue due to
acquisitions.
The
gross profit margin was 28.4% for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2018, compared to 37.7% for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2017. The gross profit margin for Brekford and Global was 17.5% and
17.3%, while the gross profit margin for Legacy Novume for the
fiscal years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was 49.6% and 46.3%,
respectively. Due to the nature of professional services staffing
at Global, which has greater costs of services compared to
professional services support providers such as AOC Key Solutions
and Firestorm, the addition of Global has a natural impact of
lowering the consolidated gross profit.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Total
selling, general and administrative expenses
(“SG&A”) for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2018 increased by $5,851,536, or 45.1%, to $18,833,280, compared to
$12,981,744 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, which
includes four months of SG&A from Brekford of $890,627 and
three months of SG&A from Global of $726,006. Aggregate
SG&A attributable to Brekford and Global for the year ended
December 31, 2018 was $6,326,584. SG&A attributable to Legacy
Novume for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $12,506,696, an
increase of 10.2% compared to the prior year period. This was
primarily related to additional staff, professional and legal fees
related to financings, board and corporate expenses, and expenses
related to maintaining compliance with applicable listing rules and
SEC requirements. As percentage of revenue, our SG&A expenses
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 decreased to 38.6%
compared to 58.6% for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2017.
We
anticipate that our SG&A expenses may continue to increase,
however, at a reduced pace in future periods. These increases may
include costs related to hiring of personnel and fees to outside
consultants, lawyers and accountants as well as expenses related to
maintaining compliance with applicable listing rules and SEC
requirements, insurance, and investor relations
activities.
Other Expense
Other
expense, net, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 was
$637,629 compared to other expense of $697,401 for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2017. The change was related to an increase of
$395,969 of interest expense and an impairment of $262,140 related
to our investment in Global Public Safety, offset by approximately
$200,000 for the reversal of a prior year accrued expense and
adjustment to holdback consideration. The net decrease also
includes $133,755 as a result of the effect of the exchange of
warrants in connection with the issuance of common stock, offset by
a $78,228 reversal of derivative liability in 2018, compared to a
prior year expense of $60,000. Furthermore, the prior year included
the $450,000 write-down related for the sale of the note receivable
from Global Public Safety.
Income Tax Expense
The
income tax expense for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, was
$29,250 and is due primarily to the state income taxes as compared
to an income tax benefit of $294,666 for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2017. We established a valuation allowance against
deferred tax assets in the fourth quarter of 2017 and have
continued to maintain a full valuation allowance through the year
ended December 31, 2018; therefore, there was no tax benefit
recognized for the losses incurred for the year ended December 31,
2018. The $29,250 represents a provision for state income taxes for
2018.
As of
December 31, 2018, we had federal and state net operating loss
(“NOL”) carryforwards to utilize in the U.S. of
approximately $9.7 million and $0.5 million, net of federal tax
effect, respectively. It was determined that it is
more-likely-than-not that the NOLs will not be realized. These NOLs
are scheduled to begin to expire in 2034 and $4.7 million are
grandfathered under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act; thus, these NOLs are
not subject to the annual 80 percent limitation. NOLs generated in
2018 of $5.0 million will be carried forward indefinitely and are
subject to the annual 80 percent limitation. As of December 31,
2018 and 2017, we had a valuation allowance of approximately $2.3
million and $1.3 million, respectively.
33
Net Loss
Net
loss for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, was $5,703,499
compared to a net loss of $5,041,134 for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2017. The net loss per common share was $0.44 for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, compared to a net loss per
common share of $0.51 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.
The net loss margin was 11.7% for the year ended December 31, 2018,
compared to a net loss margin of 22.8% for the year ended December 31, 2017.
The increase in net loss for the year ended December 31, 2018
compared to the prior year period was attributable to the factors
described above.
Cash Flow
We
believe our existing cash and net cash flow will fund our
operations over the next twelve months.
The net
cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities for
the periods below were as follows:
|
For the Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
Net
cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
Operating
activities
|
$(2,052,844)
|
$(3,167,146)
|
Investing
activities
|
395,146
|
(289,657)
|
Financing
activities
|
2,467,669
|
2,625,428
|
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents:
|
$809,971
|
$(831,375)
|
Cash Used in Operating Activities
For the
year ended December 31, 2018, net cash used in operating activities
was $2,052,844. Cash was used primarily to fund our loss from
operations of $5,703,499 and was affected by the decrease in
current liabilities of $229,578, and by an increase in current
assets of $1,513,675. Novume also incurred non-cash expenses of
$1,969,601 including depreciation and amortization, share-based
compensation, warrant expense, impairment of investment,
amortization of financing related costs and intangibles, and
changes in fair value of derivative liability and deferred
rent.
For the
year ended December 31, 2017, net cash used in operating activities
was $3,167,146. Cash was used primarily to fund our operations and
was affected by increases in accounts payable and accrued expenses,
offset by increases in accounts receivable. The Company also
incurred non-cash expenses including depreciation and
amortization.
Cash Provided by and Used in Investing Activities
For the
year ended December 31, 2018, net cash provided by investing
activities of $395,146 was primarily the result of $1,475,000 of
proceeds from the sale of a note receivable offset by the
development of new products including the capitalization of
software development costs and the purchase of computer hardware
and equipment.
For the
year ended December 31, 2017, net cash used in investing activities
of $289,657 related to the purchase of computer hardware and
equipment.
Cash Provided by Financing Activities
For the
year ended December 31, 2018, net cash provided by financing
activities of $2,467,669 related to the net proceeds from the
issuance of common stock of $2,796,500, the proceeds from notes
payable of $2,000,000, and the exercise of options of $23,450
offset by the net short-term repayments of $1,945,057, the payment
of Series A and Series B Preferred Stock dividends of $344,724 and
the payment of financing costs of $62,500.
For the
year ended December 31, 2017, net cash provided by financing
activities of $2,625,428 related to proceeds from the issuance of
preferred stock of $1,745,347, net of fees, the acquisition of
Brekford of $1,943,760, net of cash acquired, net proceeds from
short-term borrowing of $650,221, and the net proceeds from the
exercise of warrants of $125,006 offset by the acquisition of
Global of $1,069,693, net of cash acquired, the payment of Series A
Preferred Stock dividends of $251,509, the acquisition of Firestorm
of $417,704, net of cash acquired, and the acquisition of BC
Management of $100,000, net of cash acquired.
34
Non-Cash Financing Activities
In
October 2018, we issued 96,924 shares of Novume common stock,
valued at $133,755, as consideration for the extinguishment of
warrants.
In
April 2018, we issued 35,000 shares of Novume common stock, valued
at $126,000, as consideration in connection with the 2018
Promissory Note.
In
January 2018, we acquired the assets of Secure Education. The
non-cash consideration for this acquisition included the issuance
of 33,333 shares of our common stock valued at $163,332 and the
issuance of 66,666 Novume common stock warrants valued at
$123,472.
In
December 2017, the Company acquired the assets of BC Management.
The non-cash consideration for this acquisition included the
issuance of 33,333 shares of Novume common stock valued at $163,332
and the issuance of 66,666 Novume common stock warrants valued at
$123,472.
In
October 2017, the Company acquired Global. The non-cash
consideration for this acquisition included a holdback liability of
$200,000, the issuance of 375,000 shares of Novume common stock
valued at $566,288 and the issuance of 240,861 shares of Novume
Series B preferred stock valued at $2,408,610.
In
August 2017, the Company merged with Brekford. The non-cash
consideration for the merger included the issuance of 3,287,187
shares of Novume common stock valued at $5,851,193.
In
January 2017, KeyStone acquired Firestorm. The non-cash
consideration for this acquisition included notes payable of
$907,407 and the issuance of 946,875 shares (post merger exchange)
of Novume common stock and 631,254 warrants valued at
$1,203,986.
Lease Obligations
During
2017 and 2018, we leased office space in Chantilly, Virginia under
the terms of a ten-year lease expiring October 31, 2019. The
lease contained one five-year renewal option. The lease terms
included an annual increase in base rent and expenses of 2.75%,
which have been amortized ratably over the lease term.
During
this same period, we subleased office space in Chantilly, Virginia
with an initial term of two years, with eight one-year options for
the subtenant to renew the lease through October 31, 2019.
This sublease provided for annual increases in base rent and
expenses of 2.90%. The initial term ended October 31, 2011 and
the subtenant exercised the renewal options through 2014. On
April 7, 2015, the sublease was amended to sublease more space
to the subtenant and change the rental calculation. The sublease
provided for an offset of $182,534 to rent expense for each of the
years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Effective
December 31, 2018, we terminated the original lease agreement for
the Chantilly, Virginia space, and on January 1, 2019, we entered
into a new agreement as sublessor for a portion of the original
space occupied in this location. This sublease includes annual
increases in base rent and expenses of 2.75% and expires on June
30, 2024, with a right to renew subject to the sublessor renewing
its lease.
We also
lease office space in: New Orleans, Louisiana on a month-to-month
basis; Roswell, Georgia under a lease expiring in January 2022; and
Fort Worth, Texas under a three-year lease expiring in March 2021.
In addition, we lease office space from Global Public Safety on a
month-to-month basis and we also lease space under an operating
lease expiring on April 30, 2019. Furthermore, we lease office
space in Grand Rapids, Michigan under a lease expiring on April 30,
2019.
Rent
expense, net, for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was
$790,999 and $605,264, respectively, and is included in selling,
general and administrative expenses.
We are
finalizing the adoption of ASU 2016-02, Leases, effective January 1, 2019, and
will be adopting the standard using the optional transition method
by recognizing a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet
at January 1, 2019 and not revising prior period presented amounts.
The processes that are in final refinement related to our full
implementation of the standard include: finalizing our estimates
related to the applicable incremental borrowing rate at January 1,
2019; and process enhancements for refining our financial reporting
procedures to develop the additional required qualitative and
quantitative disclosures required beginning in 2019. We have
elected the following practical expedients: we have not reassessed
whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, we
have not reassessed lease classification for any expired or
existing leases; we have not reassessed initial direct costs for
any existing leases; and we have not separated lease and nonlease
components.
35
The
standard will have a material impact on our consolidated balance
sheets, but will not have a material impact on our consolidated
statements of operations. The most significant impact will be the
recognition of right-of-use ("ROU") assets and lease liabilities
for operating leases.
Adoption
of the standard will result in the recognition of additional
recognition of ROU assets and
lease liabilities for operating leases ranging between $0.8 million
to $1.2 million as of January 1, 2019.
As of
December 31, 2018, the future obligations over the primary terms of
the long-term leases expiring through 2024 are as
follows:
2019
|
$348,222
|
2020
|
337,437
|
2021
|
252,262
|
2022
|
193,898
|
2023
|
189,682
|
Thereafter
|
81,834
|
Total
|
$1,403,335
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
During
2017 and 2018, we funded our operations primarily through cash from
operating activities from our subsidiaries, revolving lines of
credit, issuance of debt, the sale of assets and the sale of
equity. As of December 31, 2018, we had unrestricted cash and cash
equivalents of $2,767,183 and working capital deficit of $43,871
which includes the early retirement of $2.5 million of long-term
debt in March 2019, as compared to unrestricted cash and cash
equivalents of $1,957,212 and working capital of $2,750,577 as of
December 31, 2017.
In
November 2016, KeyStone commenced an offering of up to 3,000,000
Units (the "Reg A Offering"). At the initial closing of the Reg A
Offering, on December 23, 2016, we sold 301,570 Units and
received aggregate gross proceeds of $3,015,700. At the second
closing of the Reg A Offering, on January 23, 2017, we sold
119,757 Units and received aggregate gross proceeds of $1,197,570.
At the third and final closing of the Reg A Offering, on March 21,
2017, we sold 81,000 Units and received aggregate gross proceeds of
$810,000. As reported our Current Report on Form I-U, as filed with
the SEC on March 22, 2017, the Reg A Offering is closed,
effective as of the third closing.
Following
the Brekford Merger, all outstanding shares of KeyStone Series A
Preferred Stock were exchanged for the right to receive one share
of Novume Series A Preferred Stock. Novume Series A Preferred Stock
will be entitled to quarterly dividends in the amount of $0.175 (7%
per annum) per share, being an identical per annum percentage per
share dividend as received by holders of KeyStone Series A
Preferred Stock prior to the Brekford Merger. Dividends accrue
quarterly and dividend payments for declared dividends are due
within five business days following the end of a
quarter.
On April 7, 2017, we paid cash dividends of $75,694 to
shareholders of record of Series A Preferred Stock as of
March 30, 2017. On July 8, 2017, October 7, 2017, January 5,
2018, April 6, 2018 and July 9, 2018, we paid cash dividends of
$87,907 to shareholders of record of Series A Preferred Stock as of
the end of the previous month. On September 30, 2018,
December 31, 2018 and March 31, 2019, we accrued dividends of
$87,907 on each of these dates
to Series A Preferred Stock shareholders of record. Accrued
dividends payable to Series A Preferred Stock shareholders were
$175,814 and $87,907 as of December 31, 2018 and 2017,
respectively.
As part
of the Global Merger, we issued 240,861 shares of $0.0001 par value
Series B Preferred Stock. All Series B Preferred Stock was issued
at a price of $10.00 per share as part of the acquisition of the
Global Merger. The Series B Preferred Stock has a conversion price
of $5.00 per share. Each Series B Preferred Stock has an automatic
conversion feature based on the share price of Novume. The Series B
Preferred Stock is entitled to quarterly cash dividends of 1.121%
(4.484% per annum) per share. Dividends accrue quarterly and
dividend payments for declared dividends are due within five
business days following the end of a quarter. On December 31, 2017,
we declared and accrued dividends of $27,001 payable to Series B
shareholders of record on December 31, 2017.
On January 5, 2018, April 6, 2018 and July 9, 2018, we paid cash
dividends of $27,001 to shareholders of record of Series B
Preferred Stock as of the end of the previous month. On
September 30, 2018, December 31, 2018 and March 31, 2019, we
accrued dividends of $27,001 on
each of these dates to Series B Preferred Stock shareholders of
record. Accrued dividends payable to Series B Preferred Stock
shareholders were $54,002 and $27,001 as of December 31, 2018 and
2017, respectively.
36
Operating
assets and liabilities consist primarily of receivables from billed
and unbilled services, accounts payable, accrued expenses, current
portion of long-term debt and lines of credit, and accrued payroll
and related benefits. The volume of billings and timing of
collections and payments affect these account
balances.
Global
has revolving lines of credit with WFB (“the Global Wells
Agreements”). WFB agreed to
advance to Global, 90% of all
eligible accounts with a maximum facility amount of $5,000,000.
Interest is payable under the Global Wells Agreements at a monthly
rate equal to the Three-Month LIBOR in effect from time to time
plus 3% plus a margin of 3%. Payment of the revolving lines
of credit is secured by the accounts receivable of Global.
The terms of the Global Wells
Agreements ran through December 31, 2018, with automatic renewal
terms of 12 months. The current terms of the Global Wells
Agreements run through December 31, 2019. WFB or Global
may terminate the Global Wells
Agreements upon at least 60 days’ written notice prior to the
last day of the current term. The principal balance at
December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 was $1,094,766 and
$2,057,259, respectively. As part of the lines of credit
agreements, Global must maintain certain financial covenants.
Global met all financial covenant requirements for the year ended
December 31, 2018.
On November 12, 2017, AOC Key Solutions entered into an Account Purchase Agreement and
related agreements (the “AOC Wells Agreement”) with
WFB. Pursuant to the AOC Wells Agreement, AOC Key Solutions
agreed to sell and assign to WFB all
of its Accounts (as such term is defined in Article 9 of the
Uniform Commercial Code), constituting accounts arising out of
sales of Goods (as such term is defined in Article 9 of the Uniform
Commercial Code) or rendition of services that WFB deems to be
eligible for borrowing under the AOC Wells Agreement. WFB agreed to
advance to AOC Key Solutions,
90% of all eligible accounts with a maximum facility amount of
$3,000,000. Interest is payable under the AOC Wells Agreement at a
monthly rate equal to the Daily One Month LIBOR in effect from time
to time plus 5%. The AOC Wells Agreement also provides for a
deficit interest rate equal to the then applicable interest rate
plus 50% and a default interest rate equal to the then applicable
interest rate or deficit interest rate, plus 50%. The initial term
of the AOC Wells Agreement runs through December 31, 2018 (the
“Initial Term”), with automatic renewal terms of 12
months (the “Renewal Term”), commencing on the first
day after the last day of the Initial Term. AOC Key
Solutions may terminate the AOC Wells
Agreement upon at least 60 days’ prior written notice, but no
more than 120 days’ written notice, prior to and effective as
of the last day of the Initial Term or the Renewal Term, as the
case may be. WFB may terminate the AOC Wells Agreement at any time
and for any reason upon 30 days’ written notice or without
notice upon the occurrence of an Event of Default (as such term is
defined in the AOC Wells Agreement) after the expiration of any
grace or cure period. The principal balance at December 31,
2018 and December 31, 2017 was $566,447 and $1,606,327,
respectively. As part of the line of credit agreement, AOC Key
Solutions must maintain certain financial covenants. AOC Key
Solutions met all financial covenant requirements for the year
ended December 31, 2018.
On
March 16, 2016, Novume entered into a Subordinated Note and
Warrant Purchase Agreement (the “Avon Road Note Purchase
Agreement”) pursuant to which Novume agreed to issue up to
$1,000,000 in subordinated debt (the "Avon Road Note") and warrants
to purchase up to 242,493 shares of Novume’s common stock
(“Avon Road Subordinated Note Warrants”). The exercise
price for the Avon Road Subordinated Note Warrants is equal to
$1.031 per share of common stock. Subordinated notes with a
face amount of $500,000 and Avon Road Subordinated Note Warrants to
purchase 121,247 shares of Novume’s common stock have been
issued pursuant to the Avon Road Note Purchase Agreement to Avon
Road Partners, L.P. (“Avon Road”), an affiliate of
Robert Berman, Novume’s President and CEO and a member of our
Board of Directors. The Avon Road Subordinated Note Warrants had an
expiration date of March 16, 2019 and qualified for equity
accounting as the warrants did not fall within the scope of ASC
Topic 480, Distinguishing
Liabilities from Equity. The debt discount is being
amortized as interest expense on a straight-line basis, which
approximates the effective interest method, through the maturity
date of the note payable. The Avon Road Note accrues simple
interest on the unpaid principal of the note at a rate equal to the
lower of (a) 9% per annum, or (b) the highest rate
permitted by applicable law. Interest is payable monthly, and the
note was to mature on March 16, 2019. The effective interest
rate of the Avon Road Note is 12.9%. On October 23, 2018, the
maturity date of this note was extended to March 16, 2020. On March
12, 2019, the $500,000 balance due on the Avon Road Note was
retired in its entirety.
On
April 3, 2018, Novume and Brekford entered into a transaction
pursuant to which an institutional investor (the
“Lender”) loaned $2,000,000 to Novume and Brekford (the
“2018 Promissory Note”). The loan was originally due
and payable on May 1, 2019 and bears interest at 15% per annum,
with a minimum of 15% interest payable if the loan is repaid prior
to May 1, 2019. On October 24, 2018, Novume and Brekford entered
into a note amendment with the Lender by which the maturity date of
the note was extended to May 1, 2020 (the “2018 Promissory
Note Amendment”). In
consideration for the agreement of the Lender to extend the
maturity date, the Company agreed to pay the Lender $62,500.
The 2018 Promissory Note Amendment further provides for payment of
interest through May 1, 2019, if the principal is repaid before May
1, 2019, and for the payment of interest through May 1, 2020, if
the principal is repaid after May 1, 2019 and before May 1, 2020.
The loan is secured by a security interest in all of the assets of
Brekford. In addition, Novume issued 35,000 shares of common stock
to the Lender, which shares contain piggy-back registration rights.
If the shares are not so registered on the next selling shareholder
registration statement, Novume shall be obligated to issue an
additional 15,000 shares to the Lender. Upon any sale of Brekford
or its assets, the Lender will be entitled to receive 7% of any
proceeds received by Novume or Brekford in excess of $5 million
(the “Lender’s Participation”). In addition,
commencing January 1, 2020, the Lender shall be paid 7% of
Brekford’s earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization, less any capital expenditures, which amount would be
credited for any payments that might ultimately be paid to the
Lender as its Lender’s Participation, if any. At April 3,
2018, the fair value of shares issued was $126,000. At October 24,
2018, an additional $65,000 fee was paid and designated as
financing costs related to the 2018 Promissory Note Amendment.
Amortized financing cost for the year ended December 31, 2018 was
determined to be $96,378 and is included in interest expense. The
2018 Promissory Note has an effective interest rate of 19.5%. On
March 12, 2019, the $2,000,000 balance due on the 2018 Promissory
Note was retired in its entirety and Novume paid to the Lender
$1,050,000 of consideration for the Lender’s Participation
and $50,000 of interest due through May 1, 2019.
37
Novume
has generated losses since its inception in August 2017 and has
relied on cash on hand, external bank lines of credit, issuance of
debt, the sale of a note and the sale of common stock to provide
cash for operations. We attribute losses to merger costs, financing
costs, public company corporate overhead, lower than expected
revenue and lower gross profit of some of our subsidiaries. As of
and for the year ended December 31, 2018, Novume incurred a net
loss from continuing operations of approximately $5.7 million and
used approximately $2.1 million in net cash from operating
activities from continuing operations. Novume had total cash and
cash equivalents of approximately $2.8 million as of December 31,
2018 and a net working capital deficit of $0.04 million which
includes the early retirement of $2.5 million of long-term debt in
March 2019.
On
November 1, 2018, we issued 4,125,000 shares of common stock
through an underwritten public offering at a public offering price
of $0.80 per share. Net proceeds to Novume was approximately $2.8
million. In addition, we granted underwriters a 45-day option to
purchase up to 618,750 additional shares of common stock to cover
over-allotment, if any. The underwriters did not exercise this
option and the options were cancelled. As part of this transaction,
the Company also issued to the underwriter warrants to purchase an
aggregate of 206,250 shares of common stock, exercisable over a
period of five years, at an exercise price of $1.00 per share. The
underwriter warrants have a value of approximately $0.2 million and
are exercisable commencing April 27, 2019 and expire on October 29,
2023.
On
March 12, 2019, Novume entered into a transaction pursuant to which
investors (the “2019 Lenders”) loaned $20,000,000 to
Novume (the “2019 Promissory Note”) and the Novume
issued to the 2019 Lenders warrants to purchase 2,500,000 shares of
Novume common stock (the “March 2019 Warrants”). The
loan is due and payable on March 11, 2021 and bears interest at 16%
per annum, of which at least 10% per annum shall be paid in cash.
The full remaining portion of all interest, if any, shall accrue
and be paid-in-kind. The notes also require (a) a premium, if paid
before the maturity date, (b) a $1,000,000 exit fee due at
maturity, and (c) compliance with affirmative, negative and
financial covenants. Transaction costs were approximately $403,250
for a work fee payable over 10 months, $290,000 in legal fees and a
$200,000 closing fee. The loan is secured by a security interest in
substantially all of the assets of Novume. The March 2019 Warrants
are exercisable over a period of five years, at an exercise price
of $0.74 per share, and are valued at $832,500. The warrants are
exercisable commencing March 12, 2019 and expire on March 12, 2024.
The 2019 Promissory Note has an effective interest rate of
24.87%.
No
additional sources of capital have been obtained or committed
through the date these consolidated financial statements were
available to be issued, except as noted in Recent Events below.
Although certain of our subsidiaries are profitable, due to the
operating costs associated with being a public company and expenses
related to product development and commercialization costs at other
subsidiaries, we anticipate that we will operate at a loss for the
foreseeable future.
As of
December 31, 2018, Novume did not have any material commitments for
capital expenditures.
Recent Events
Leasing Agreements
On
January 1, 2019, AOC Key Solutions entered into a new agreement as
sublessor for a portion of the original space occupied in
Chantilly, Virginia. This sublease includes annual increases in
base rent and expenses of 2.75% and expires on June 30, 2024, with
a right to renew subject to the sublessor renewing its
lease.
On
February 19, 2019, Secure Education entered into a lease assignment
transferring its interest in and to the lease for its office space
in Grand Rapids, Michigan, effective April 30, 2019.
Establishment of Novume 401(k) Plan
On
January 1, 2019, we established the Novume Solutions, Inc. 401(k)
Plan (the “Novume 401(k) Plan”), a Qualified Automatic
Contribution Arrangement (QACA) safe harbor plan, and the AOC Key
Solutions, Brekford, and GCP 401(k) plans were amended and merged
into the Novume 401(k) Plan. Employees that satisfied the
eligibility requirements became participants in the Novume 401(k)
Plan. Novume contributes an amount equal to the sum of 100% of a
participant’s elective deferrals that do not exceed 1% of
participant’s compensation, plus 50% of the
participant’s elective deferrals that exceed 1% of the
participants compensation, but do not exceed 6% of the
participant’s compensation. Employee contributions are fully vested and
matching contributions are subject to a two-year service vesting
schedule.
Series A Preferred Stock and Unit Warrants Designated as OTCQB
Securities
On
February 15, 2019, the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock and
Unit Warrants which had been designated as securities trading on
the OTC Markets OTCQX exchange were transferred to being designated
as trading on the OTC Markets OTCQB exchange.
38
2019 Promissory Note
On
March 12, 2019, Novume entered into a note purchase agreement
pursuant to which investors (the “2019 Lenders”) loaned
$20,000,000 to Novume (the “2019 Promissory Note”) and
the Company issued to the 2019 Lenders warrants to purchase
2,500,000 shares of Novume common stock (the “March 2019
Warrants”). The 2019 Promissory Note and March 2019 Warrants
are discussed in further detail in this Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of
Operations under “Liquidity and Capital
Resources.”
Payoff of $500,000 Avon Road Note
On
March 12, 2019, the $500,000 principal balance due on the Avon Road
Note was retired in its entirety.
Payoff of $2,000,000 Promissory Note
On
March 12, 2019, the $2,000,000 principal balance due on the 2018
Promissory Note was retired in its entirety and the Company paid to
the lender $1,050,000 of consideration for the lender’s
participation and $50,000 of interest due through May 1,
2019.
Amendments to the OpenALPR Asset Purchase Agreement and OpenALPR
Acquisition
On
February 15, 2019, the Company entered into Amendment No. 1 to the
OpenALPR Asset Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which the parties
agreed to amend the Base Purchase Price to $7,000,000, subject to
adjustment after closing, issue a promissory note in the amount of
$5,000,000, and issue 600,000 shares of Novume common stock as
consideration for the acquisition of OpenALPR’s
assets.
On
March 8, 2019, the Company entered into Amendment No. 2 to the
OpenALPR Asset Purchase Agreement which eliminated the working capital adjustment
set forth in the OpenALPR Asset Purchase Agreement, as amended, and replaced it
with an adjustment for prepaid maintenance
contracts.
On
March 12, 2019, we completed the acquisition of all of the assets
of OpenALPR, except for certain excluded assets, and assumed
certain liabilities, through Brekford. Consideration paid as part
of this acquisition was: (a) $7,000,000 in cash, subject to
adjustment after closing; (b) 600,000 shares of Novume common
stock, and (c) a promissory note in the principal amount of
$5,000,000 pursuant to the 2019 Promissory Note, together with an
accompanying warrant to purchase 625,000 shares of Novume common
stock, exercisable over a period of five years at an exercise price
of $0.74 per share, valued at $208,125. The purchase price is
subject to adjustment based upon the allocation of prepaid
maintenance revenue as of the closing date. As the OpenALPR
acquisition has recently been completed, we are currently in the
process of completing the purchase price allocation treating the
OpenALPR acquisition as a business combination. The purchase price
allocation for OpenALPR will be included in our consolidated
financial statements in the first quarter of the year ending
December 31, 2019. As of March 31, 2019, there are 625,000 OpenALPR
warrants outstanding.
Hill Employment Agreement
On
March 12, 2019, concurrent with the execution of the OpenALPR
Purchase Agreement, the Hill Employment Agreement became effective,
pursuant to which Mr. Hill will serve as Novume’s Chief
Science Officer. The Hill Employment Agreement provides for a term
of three years unless earlier terminated pursuant to the terms
thereof which term renews for additional one-year terms until
terminated upon ninety days advance notice. Mr. Hill will earn an
annual base compensation of $165,000.
Either
party may terminate the Hill Employment Agreement with or without
cause with notice as contemplated by the Hill Employment Agreement,
provided however, if Mr. Hill determines to terminate his
employment, he shall provide Novume with at least six months prior
written notice. The Hill Employment Agreement provides for the
payment of severance under certain circumstances as outlined
therein.
Increased Focus on Technology Products and Services and Intention
to Change Name and Segment Businesses
On March 29, 2019, we announced that our Board of Directors
approved changing the Company's name to Rekor Systems, Inc. The
planned name change is a result of our recent acquisition of assets
of OpenALPR and increased focus on technology products and
services, and aligns with the renaming of Brekford Traffic Safety,
Inc. to Rekor Recognition Systems, Inc. To complement the
planned name change to Rekor Systems, Inc., Novume has applied to
the Nasdaq Capital Market to change its trading symbol to
“REKR.”
39
Beginning with the first quarter of 2019, we anticipate changing
our operating and reportable segments from one segment to two
segments. The two segments are expected to reflect our focus on
both technology products and services and professional
services.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, Contractual Obligations and
Commitments
As of
the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we did not have any
off-balance sheet arrangements that have had or are reasonably
likely to have a material effect on our financial condition,
revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital
resources or capital expenditures.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of
operations is based upon Novume’s consolidated financial
statements which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(“GAAP”). The preparation of these consolidated
financial statements requires the management of Novume to make
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts in our
consolidated financial statements.
We
believe the application of accounting policies, and the estimates
inherently required therein, are reasonable. These accounting
policies and estimates are periodically reevaluated, and
adjustments are made when facts and circumstances dictate a change.
Novume bases its estimates on historical experience and on various
other assumptions that management of Novume believes to be
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form
management’s basis for making judgments about the carrying
values of assets and liabilities that may not be readily apparent
from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates
under different assumptions or conditions, or if management made
different judgments or utilized different estimates.
Novume’s
accounting policies are further described in its historical audited
consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes
included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Novume has identified the
following critical accounting policies:
Revenue Recognition
We
recognize revenues for the provision of services when persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been rendered or
delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, and the
collectability of the related revenue is reasonably assured. Novume
principally derives revenues from fees for services generated on a
project by project basis. Revenues for time-and-materials contracts
are recognized based on the number of hours worked by our employees
or consultants at an agreed upon rate per hour set forth in our
standard rate sheet or as written from time to time in our
contracts or purchase orders. These costs are recognized in the
period in which services are performed.
Revenues
related to firm-fixed-price contracts are recognized upon
completion of the project as these projects are typically
short-term in nature.
The
agreements entered into in connection with a project, whether on a
time-and-materials basis or firm-fixed-price basis, typically allow
our clients to terminate early due to breach or for convenience
with 30-days’ notice. In the event of termination, the client
is contractually required to pay for all time, materials and
expenses incurred by us through the effective date of the
termination.
For automated traffic safety enforcement revenue, we recognize the
revenue when the required collection efforts, from citizens, are
completed and posted to the municipality’s account. The
respective municipality is then billed depending on the terms of
the respective contract, typically 15 days after the preceding
month while collections are reconciled. For contracts where we
receive a percentage of collected fines, revenue is calculated
based upon the posted payments from citizens multiplied by our
contractual percentage. For contracts where we receive a specific
fixed monthly fee regardless of citations issued or collected,
revenue is recorded once the amount collected from citizens exceeds
the monthly fee per camera. Our fixed fee contracts typically have
a revenue neutral provision whereby the municipality’s
payment to us cannot exceed amounts collected from citizens within
a given month.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts
receivable are customer obligations due under normal trade terms.
We perform continuing credit evaluations of its clients’
financial condition, and we generally do not require
collateral.
Management
reviews accounts receivable to determine if any receivables will
potentially be uncollectible. Factors considered in the
determination include, among other factors, number of days an
invoice is past due, client historical trends, available credit
ratings information, other financial data and the overall economic
environment. Collection agencies may also be utilized if management
so determines.
40
We
record an allowance for doubtful accounts based on specifically
identified amounts that are believed to be uncollectible. We also
record as an additional allowance a certain percentage of aged
accounts receivable, based on historical experience and our
assessment of the general financial conditions affecting its
customer base. If actual collection experience changes, revisions
to the allowance may be required. After all reasonable attempts to
collect an account receivable have failed, the amount of the
receivable is written off against the allowance. The balance in the
allowance for doubtful accounts was $24,405 and $24,000 as of
December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Income Taxes
We use
the liability method of accounting for income taxes as set forth in
the authoritative guidance for accounting for income taxes. This
method requires an asset and liability approach for the recognition
of deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the consolidated financial
statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and
their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable
income in the years in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax
assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in
income in the period that includes the enactment date.
Management has evaluated the recoverability of the net deferred
income tax assets and the level of the valuation allowance required
with respect to such net deferred income tax assets. After
considering all available facts, the Company fully reserved for its
net deferred tax assets because management believes that it is more
likely than not that their benefits will not be realized in future
periods. The Company will continue to evaluate its net deferred tax
assets to determine whether any changes in circumstances could
affect the realization of their future benefit. If it is determined
in future periods that portions of the Company’s net deferred
income tax assets satisfy the realization standard, the valuation
allowance will be reduced accordingly.
The tax effects of uncertain tax positions are recognized in the
consolidated financial statements only if the position is more
likely than not to be sustained on audit, based on the technical
merits of the position. For tax positions meeting the more likely
than not threshold, the amount recognized in the consolidated
financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than
50% likelihood of being realized. It is our accounting policy to
account for ASC 740-10-25-related penalties and interest as a
component of the income tax provision in the consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive loss.
As of
December 31, 2018 and 2017, our evaluation revealed no uncertain
tax positions that would have a material impact on the financial
statements. The 2015 through 2017 tax years remain subject to
examination by the IRS, as of December 31, 2018. Our management
does not believe that any reasonably possible changes will occur
within the next twelve months that will have a material impact on
the financial statements.
Going Concern and Management’s Plan
Beginning
with the year ended December 31, 2017 and all annual and
interim periods thereafter, management will assess going concern
uncertainty in the Company’s consolidated financial
statements to determine whether there is sufficient cash on hand
and working capital, including available borrowings on loans and
external bank lines of credit, to operate for a period of at least
one year from the date the consolidated financial statements are
issued or available to be issued, which is referred to as the
“look-forward period”, as defined in GAAP. As part of
this assessment, based on conditions that are known and reasonably
knowable to management, management will consider various scenarios,
forecasts, projections, estimates and will make certain key
assumptions, including the timing and nature of projected cash
expenditures or programs, its ability to delay or curtail
expenditures or programs and its ability to raise additional
capital, if necessary, among other factors. Based on this
assessment, as necessary or applicable, management makes certain
assumptions around implementing curtailments or delays in the
nature and timing of programs and expenditures to the extent it
deems probable those implementations can be achieved and management
has the proper authority to execute them within the look-forward
period.
The
Company has generated losses since its inception in August 2017 and
has relied on cash on hand, external bank lines of credit, the sale
of a note, debt financing and a public offering of its common stock
to support cashflow from operations. The Company attributes losses
to merger costs, public company corporate overhead and investments
made by some of our subsidiary operations. As of and for the year
ended December 31, 2018, the Company had a net loss of
approximately $5.7 million and working capital deficit of
approximately $0.04 million which includes the early retirement of
$2.5 million of long-term debt in March 2019. The Company’s
net cash position was increased by approximately $4.0 million in
March 2019 by the issuance of $20 million senior secured notes, of
which $5 million was non-cash, offset by $7 million of cash paid
for the acquisition of OpenALPR, and approximately $4.0 million
related to the extinguishment of debt and associated
fees.
41
Management
believes that based on relevant conditions and events that are
known and reasonably knowable, that its current forecasts and
projections, for one year from the date of the filing of the
consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form
10-K, indicate the Company’s ability to continue operations
as a going concern for that one-year period. The Company is
actively monitoring its operations, cash on hand and working
capital. The Company has contingency plans to reduce or defer
expenses and cash outlays should operations weaken in the
look-forward period or additional financing is not
available.
New Accounting Pronouncements
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Not Yet Adopted
In August 2018, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update
(“ASU”) No.
2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic
820), Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements
for Fair Value Measurement (“ASU 2018-13”). This ASU modifies the
disclosure requirements for fair value measurements by removing,
modifying or adding certain disclosures. ASU 2018-13 is effective
for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019 and interim
periods within those annual periods, with early adoption permitted.
The amendments on changes in unrealized gains and losses, the range
and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to
develop Level 3 fair value measurements, and the narrative
description of measurement uncertainty should be applied
prospectively for only the most recent interim or annual period
presented in the initial fiscal year of adoption. All other
amendments should be applied retrospectively to all periods
presented upon their effective date. We are currently evaluating
the effect that ASU 2018-13 will have on our consolidated financial
statements and related disclosures.
In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No.
2018-07, Compensation – Stock
Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based
Payment Accounting (“ASU
2018-01”). This ASU is intended to simplify aspects of
share-based compensation issued to non-employees by making the
guidance consistent with the accounting for employee share-based
compensation. ASU 2018-07 is effective for annual periods beginning
after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those annual
periods, with early adoption permitted but no earlier than an
entity’s adoption date of Topic 606. We will adopt the
provisions of this ASU in the first quarter of 2019. Adoption of
the new standard is not expected to have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12,
Derivatives and
Hedging (Topic 815), which
provides guidance related to accounting for hedging activities.
This guidance expands strategies that qualify for hedge accounting,
changes how many hedging relationships are presented in the
financial statements, and simplifies the application of hedge
accounting in certain situations. The standard will be effective
for us beginning July 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted for
any interim or annual period before the effective date. Adoption of
the standard will be applied using a modified retrospective
approach through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained
earnings as of the effective date. We are currently evaluating the
impact of this standard on our consolidated financial statements,
including accounting policies, processes, and
systems.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04,
Intangibles -
Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill
Impairment. To simplify the
subsequent measurement of goodwill, the update requires only a
single-step quantitative test to identify and measure impairment
based on the excess of a reporting unit's carrying amount over its
fair value. A qualitative assessment may still be completed first
for an entity to determine if a quantitative impairment test is
necessary. The update is effective for fiscal year 2021 and is to
be adopted on a prospective basis. Early adoption is permitted for
interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing
dates after January 1, 2017. The Company is
currently evaluating the effect that this update will have on its
financial statements and related disclosures.
In June
2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic
326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments
(“ASU 2016-13”) which requires the measurement and
recognition of expected credit losses for financial assets held at
amortized cost. ASU 2016-13 replaces the existing incurred loss
impairment model with an expected loss methodology, which will
result in more timely recognition of credit losses. ASU 2016-13 is
effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods within
those years beginning after December 15, 2019. We are currently in
the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-13
on our consolidated financial statements.
In
February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases. This ASU is a comprehensive new
leases standard that amends various aspects of existing guidance
for leases and requires additional disclosures about leasing
arrangements. It will require companies to recognize lease assets
and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases classified as
operating leases under previous GAAP. Topic 842 retains a
distinction between finance leases and operating leases. The
classification criteria for distinguishing between finance leases
and operating leases are substantially similar to the
classification criteria for distinguishing between capital leases
and operating leases in the previous leases guidance. The ASU is
effective for annual periods beginning after December 15,
2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years; earlier
adoption is permitted. We are finalizing the adoption of the new standard
effective January 1, 2019 and will be adopting the standard using
the optional transition method by recognizing a cumulative-effect
adjustment to the balance sheet at January 1, 2019 and not revising
prior period presented amounts. The processes that are in final
refinement related to our full implementation of the standard
include: finalizing our estimates related to the applicable
incremental borrowing rate at January 1, 2019; and process
enhancements for refining our financial reporting procedures to
develop the additional required qualitative and quantitative
disclosures required beginning in 2019. We have elected the
following practical expedients: we have not reassessed whether any
expired or existing contracts are or contain leases; we have not
reassessed lease classification for any expired or existing leases;
we have not reassessed initial direct costs for any existing
leases; and it has not separated lease and nonlease components.
The
standard will have a material impact on our consolidated balance
sheets, but will not have a material impact on our consolidated
statements of operations. The most significant impact will be the
ROU assets and lease liabilities for operating leases.
Adoption
of the standard will result in the recognition of additional ROU
assets and lease liabilities for operating leases ranging between
$0.8 million to $1.2 million as of January 1,
2019.
42
There
are currently no other accounting standards that have been issued
but not yet adopted that will have a significant impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows upon adoption.
Recently Adopted
In May
2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers,
as a new Topic, Accounting Standards Codification
(“ASC”) Topic 606, which supersedes existing accounting
standards for revenue recognition and creates a single framework.
Additional updates to Topic 606 issued by the FASB in 2015 and 2016
include the following:
●
ASU
No. 2015-14, Revenue from
Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective
Date, which defers the effective date of the new guidance
such that the new provisions will now be required for fiscal years,
and interim periods within those years, beginning after
December 15, 2017.
●
ASU
No. 2016-08, Revenue from
Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent
Considerations, which clarifies the implementation guidance
on principal versus agent considerations (reporting revenue gross
versus net).
●
ASU
No. 2016-10, Revenue from
Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance
Obligations and Licensing, which clarifies the
implementation guidance on identifying performance obligations and
classifying licensing arrangements.
●
ASU
No. 2016-12, Revenue from
Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and
Practical Expedients, which clarifies the implementation
guidance in a number of other areas.
The
underlying principle is to use a five-step analysis of transactions
to recognize revenue when promised goods or services are
transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the
consideration that is expected to be received for those goods or
services. The standard permits the use of either a retrospective or
modified retrospective application. ASU 2014-09 and ASU 2016-12 are
effective for annual reporting periods beginning
after December 15, 2017.
On
January 1, 2018, we adopted Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with
Customers, using the modified retrospective method. We have
aggregated and reviewed our contracts that are within the
scope of Topic 606. Based on our evaluation, we do not anticipate
the adoption of Topic 606 will have a material impact on
our balance sheet or related consolidated statements of
operations, equity or cash flows. The impact of adopting Topic 606
to the Novume relates to: (1) a change to franchisee agreements
recorded prior to 2017; and (2) the timing of certain contractual
agreements which we deemed as immaterial. Revenue recognition
related to our other revenue streams will remain substantially
unchanged.
In
March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment
Accounting. The standard reduces complexity in several
aspects of the accounting for employee share-based compensation,
including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as
either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement
of cash flows. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those
fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. We adopted this
standard, electing to use estimated forfeitures, and the impact of
the adoption was not material to our consolidated financial
statements.
In January 2016, the FASB, issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall
(Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets
and Financial Liabilities,
which amends the guidance in U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles on the classification and measurement of financial
instruments. Changes to the current guidance primarily affect the
accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the
fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements
for financial instruments. In addition, the ASU clarifies guidance
related to the valuation allowance assessment when recognizing
deferred tax assets resulting from unrealized losses on
available-for-sale debt securities. The new standard is effective
for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15,
2017, and are to be adopted by means of a cumulative-effect
adjustment to the balance sheet at the beginning of the first
reporting period in which the guidance is effective. The
Company adopted this standard and the impact of the adoption was
not material to the consolidated financial statements.
In
January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01 Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying
the Definition of a Business (“ASU 2017-01”).
ASU 2017-01 provides guidance to evaluate whether transactions
should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or
businesses. If substantially all of the fair value of the gross
assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single asset
or a group of similar assets, the assets acquired (or disposed of)
are not considered a business. We adopted ASU 2017-01 as of January
1, 2017.
43
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Compensation - Stock
Compensation: Scope of Modification Accounting, which provides guidance about which changes to
the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an
entity to apply modification accounting. An entity will account for
the effects of a modification unless the fair value of the modified
award is the same as the original award, the vesting conditions of
the modified award are the same as the original award and the
classification of the modified award as an equity instrument or
liability instrument is the same as the original award. The update
is effective for fiscal year 2019. The update is to be adopted
prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date.
Early adoption is permitted. We adopted this ASU in 2018 and the
impact was not material to our consolidated financial statements
and related disclosures.
We do
not believe that any other recently issued and adopted accounting
standards, in addition to those referenced above, had a material
effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
about Market Risk.
As a
“smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of
Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to provide information
required by this Item.
44
Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
Page
|
46
|
|
47
|
|
48
|
|
49
|
|
50
|
|
51
|
45
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the
Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Novume
Solutions, Inc.
Opinions on the Financial Statements
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Novume
Solutions, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December
31, 2018 and 2017, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows, for the years
then ended, including the related notes (collectively referred to
as the "consolidated financial statements"). In our opinion, the
consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31,
2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows
for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinions
These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on the Company's consolidated financial statements based on our
audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and
are required to be independent with respect to the Company in
accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and
the PCAOB.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.
The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to
perform, audits of its internal control over financial reporting.
As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose
of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's
internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express
no such opinion.
Our
audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of
material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements,
whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that
respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a
test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the
consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included
evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation
of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
s/s BD & Company, Inc.
BD
& Company, Inc.
We have
served as the Company's auditor since 2017.
Owings
Mills, MD
April
11, 2019
46
Novume Solutions, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance
Sheets
|
December 31, 2018
|
December 31, 2017
|
Assets
|
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$2,767,183
|
$1,957,212
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
5,264,949
|
6,707,294
|
Inventory
|
72,702
|
155,716
|
Note
receivable
|
-
|
1,475,000
|
Other
current assets, net
|
425,530
|
635,566
|
Total
current assets
|
8,530,364
|
10,930,788
|
Property and Equipment
|
|
|
Capitalized
Software
|
913,455
|
52,400
|
Furniture
and fixtures
|
302,243
|
211,885
|
Office
equipment
|
544,533
|
524,131
|
Camera
systems
|
553,758
|
462,399
|
Vehicles
|
36,020
|
10,020
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
95,422
|
72,918
|
Total
fixed assets
|
2,445,431
|
1,333,753
|
Less:
accumulated depreciation
|
(978,150)
|
(633,014)
|
Net
property and equipment
|
1,467,281
|
700,739
|
Goodwill
|
3,092,616
|
3,092,616
|
Intangibles,
net
|
4,834,503
|
5,468,874
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
Investment
at cost
|
-
|
262,140
|
Deposits
and other long-term assets
|
130,485
|
143,583
|
Total
other assets
|
130,485
|
405,723
|
Total
assets
|
$18,055,249
|
$20,598,740
|
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
|
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
$1,593,726
|
$1,390,877
|
Accrued
expenses
|
2,643,027
|
3,060,512
|
Lines
of credit
|
1,661,212
|
3,663,586
|
Notes
payable, current portion
|
2,469,211
|
-
|
Deferred
revenue
|
207,059
|
117,636
|
Total
current liabilities
|
8,574,235
|
8,232,611
|
Long-Term Liabilities
|
|
|
Notes
payable
|
964,733
|
1,405,994
|
Deferred
rent
|
8,475
|
53,217
|
Total
long-term liabilities
|
973,208
|
1,459,211
|
Total
liabilities
|
9,547,443
|
9,691,822
|
|
|
|
Series
A Cumulative Convertible Redeemable Preferred stock, $0.0001 par
value, 505,000 shares authorized and 502,327 shares issued and
outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and 2017,
respectively
|
5,051,683
|
4,396,580
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' Equity
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 30,000,000 shares
authorized, 18,767,619 and
14,463,364 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2018
and 2017, respectively
|
1,877
|
1,447
|
Preferred
stock, $0.0001 par value, 2,000,000 authorized, 505,000 shares
designated as Series A and 240,861 shares designated as Series B as
of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
|
-
|
-
|
Series
B Cumulative Convertible Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value,
240,861 shares authorized, issued and outstanding as of December
31, 2018 and 2017, respectively
|
24
|
24
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
15,518,013
|
12,342,527
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
(12,063,791)
|
(5,833,660)
|
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
3,456,123
|
6,510,338
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$18,055,249
|
$20,598,740
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
47
Novume Solutions, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
Revenue
|
$48,562,441
|
$22,135,818
|
Cost
of revenue
|
34,765,781
|
13,792,473
|
Gross
profit
|
13,796,660
|
8,343,345
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses
|
|
|
Selling,
general, and administrative expenses
|
18,833,280
|
12,981,744
|
Loss
from operations
|
(5,036,620)
|
(4,638,399)
|
Other
expense
|
|
|
Interest
expense
|
(609,461)
|
(213,492)
|
Other
income (expense)
|
(28,168)
|
(483,909)
|
Total
other expense
|
(637,629)
|
(697,401)
|
Loss
before income taxes
|
(5,674,249)
|
(5,335,800)
|
(Provision)
benefit from income taxes
|
(29,250)
|
294,666
|
Net
loss
|
$(5,703,499)
|
$(5,041,134)
|
|
|
|
Loss
per common share - basic
|
$(0.44)
|
$(0.51)
|
Loss
per common share - diluted
|
$(0.44)
|
$(0.51)
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
|
|
Basic
|
15,409,014
|
11,767,304
|
Diluted
|
15,409,014
|
11,767,304
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
48
Novume Solutions, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
|
Shares of Common Stock
|
Common Stock
|
Shares of Series B Preferred Stock
|
Series B Preferred Stock
|
Additional Paid-In Capital
|
Accumulated Deficit
|
Total Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
|
Balance as of January 1, 2017
|
5,000,000
|
$500
|
-
|
$-
|
$1,976,549
|
$(430,395)
|
$1,546,654
|
Net
common stock issued in Firestorm acquisition
|
488,094
|
49
|
-
|
-
|
976,237
|
-
|
976,286
|
Effect
of contribution to Novume Solutions, Inc. on August 28,
2017
|
5,158,503
|
516
|
-
|
-
|
(516)
|
-
|
-
|
Net
common stock issued in Brekford acquisition
|
3,287,187
|
329
|
-
|
-
|
5,850,864
|
-
|
5,851,193
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
408,465
|
-
|
408,465
|
Issuance
of warrants
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
418,424
|
-
|
418,424
|
Exercise
of warrants
|
121,247
|
12
|
-
|
-
|
124,994
|
-
|
125,006
|
Equity
issued in Global acquisition
|
375,000
|
38
|
240,861
|
24
|
2,974,836
|
-
|
2,974,898
|
Net
common stock issued in BC Management acquisition
|
33,333
|
3
|
-
|
-
|
163,329
|
-
|
163,332
|
Preferred
stock dividends
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(362,131)
|
(362,131)
|
Accretion
of Series A preferred stock
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(550,655)
|
-
|
(550,655)
|
Net
loss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(5,041,134)
|
(5,041,134)
|
Balance as of December 31, 2017
|
14,463,364
|
1,447
|
240,861
|
24
|
12,342,527
|
(5,833,660)
|
6,510,338
|
Adjustment
to adopt new accounting guidance revenue recognition
(1)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(67,000)
|
(67,000)
|
Balance as of January 1, 2018
|
14,463,364
|
1,447
|
240,861
|
24
|
12,342,527
|
(5,900,660)
|
6,443,338
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
464,509
|
-
|
464,509
|
Issuance
of warrants
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
123,472
|
-
|
123,472
|
Issues
of common stock, net of costs
|
4,125,000
|
413
|
-
|
-
|
2,796,087
|
-
|
2,796,500
|
Issuance
of common stock for the extinguishment of warrants
|
96,924
|
9
|
-
|
-
|
133,746
|
-
|
133,755
|
Net
common stock issued in Secure Education Consultants
acquisition
|
33,333
|
3
|
-
|
-
|
163,329
|
-
|
163,332
|
Issuance
related to note payable
|
35,000
|
4
|
-
|
-
|
125,997
|
-
|
126,001
|
Issuance
upon exercise of stock options
|
13,998
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
23,449
|
-
|
23,450
|
Preferred
stock dividends
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(459,632)
|
(459,632)
|
Accretion
of Series A preferred stock
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(655,103)
|
-
|
(655,103)
|
Net
loss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(5,703,499)
|
(5,703,499)
|
Balance as of December 31, 2018
|
18,767,619
|
$1,877
|
240,861
|
$24
|
$15,518,013
|
$(12,063,791)
|
$3,456,123
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
49
Novume Solutions, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$(5,703,499)
|
$(5,041,134)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
345,136
|
142,545
|
Provision
for losses on accounts receivable
|
-
|
24,000
|
Deferred
taxes
|
-
|
(294,666)
|
Share-based
compensation
|
464,509
|
408,465
|
Amortization
of financing costs
|
94,466
|
109,236
|
Deferred
rent
|
(11,213)
|
(20,076)
|
Warrant
expense
|
133,755
|
67,491
|
Change
in fair value of derivative liability
|
(78,228)
|
60,000
|
Amortization
of intangibles
|
1,021,176
|
546,410
|
Loss
on notes receivable writedown
|
-
|
450,000
|
Allowance
for other receivables
|
134,817
|
-
|
Impairment
of investment
|
262,140
|
-
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
1,442,345
|
(158,512)
|
Inventory
|
83,014
|
12,056
|
Deposits
|
(86,099)
|
(95,060)
|
Other
current assets
|
74,415
|
(183,622)
|
Accounts
payable
|
202,849
|
(398,315)
|
Accrued
expenses
|
(454,850)
|
1,033,893
|
Deferred
revenue
|
22,423
|
95,143
|
Note
receivable
|
-
|
75,000
|
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(2,052,844)
|
(3,167,146)
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
|
|
|
Proceeds
from sale of note receivable
|
1,475,000
|
-
|
Capital
expenditures
|
(1,079,854)
|
(289,657)
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
395,146
|
(289,657)
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
|
|
|
Proceeds
from short-term borrowings
|
41,255,962
|
7,761,384
|
Repayments
of short-term borrowings
|
(43,201,019)
|
(7,111,163)
|
Proceeds
from notes payable
|
2,000,000
|
-
|
Acquisition
of Firestorm - net of cash acquired
|
-
|
(417,704)
|
Acquisition
of Brekford - net of cash acquired
|
-
|
1,943,760
|
Acquisition
of Global - net of cash required
|
-
|
(1,069,693)
|
Acquisition
of BC Management
|
-
|
(100,000)
|
Net
proceeds from exercise of options
|
23,450
|
-
|
Net
proceeds from exercise of warrants
|
-
|
125,006
|
Net
proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
2,796,500
|
-
|
Net
proceeds from issuance of preferred stock
|
-
|
1,745,347
|
Payment
of deferred offering costs
|
-
|
-
|
Payment
of preferred dividends
|
(344,724)
|
(251,509)
|
Payment
of financing costs
|
(62,500)
|
-
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
2,467,669
|
2,625,428
|
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
809,971
|
(831,375)
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
1,957,212
|
2,788,587
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$2,767,183
|
$1,957,212
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
50
Novume Solutions, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements
December 31, 2018 and 2017
NOTE 1 – NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND
RECAPITALIZATION
Nature of Operations
Novume Solutions, Inc. (the “Company” or
“Novume”) was formed in February 2017 to effectuate the
mergers of, and become a holding company for KeyStone Solutions,
Inc. (“KeyStone”) and Brekford Traffic Safety, Inc.
(“Brekford”). For the purpose of this
document any references to KeyStone are to KeyStone Solutions, Inc.
prior to August 28, 2017 and to KeyStone Solutions, LLC on and
after August 28, 2017. Our
services are provided through seven wholly owned subsidiaries: AOC
Key Solutions, Inc. (“AOC Key Solutions”); Firestorm
Solutions, LLC and Firestorm Franchising, LLC (collectively
referred to as “Firestorm” or “Firestorm
Entities”); Brekford; Global Technical Services, Inc.
(“GTS”) and Global Contract Professionals; Inc.
(“GCP”) (collectively referred to as
“Global” or the "Global Entities"). In 2018, the
operations of Novume Media, Inc. (“Novume Media”) were
discontinued.
In February 2019, the Company organized OpenALPR Software
Solutions, LLC (“OpenALPR”). On February 28,
2019, we renamed Brekford to Rekor Recognition Systems, Inc. For
narrative purposes, all references to Brekford before February 28,
2019 are to Brekford Traffic Safety, Inc. and to Rekor Recognitions
Systems, Inc. on and after February 28, 2019. In March 2019, Novume acquired substantially all
of the assets and certain liabilities of OpenALPR Technology, Inc.
(“OpenALPR Technology”). The Company’s current
plan is for OpenALPR to operate as a subsidiary of Brekford (see
Note 3). For the purpose of this
document any references to OpenALPR are to OpenALPR Technology,
Inc. prior to March 12, 2019 and to OpenALPR Software Solutions,
LLC on and after March 12, 2019.
For narrative purposes, Company and Novume references include AOC
Key Solutions, Brekford, KeyStone, Firestorm and Global entities.
The financial results of Brekford are included in the results of
operations from August 28, 2017 through December 31, 2018 (see Note
3). The historical financial statements for Novume prior to the
merger with Brekford reflect the historical financial statements of
KeyStone. In this document, references to KeyStone are to KeyStone
Solutions, Inc. prior to August 28, 2017, and to KeyStone
Solutions, LLC on and after, August 28, 2017 and references to
Novume prior to August 28, 2017 are to KeyStone.
KeyStone was formed in March 2016 as a holding company for its
wholly owned subsidiary AOC Key Solutions, Inc., which is
headquartered in Chantilly, Virginia. AOC Key Solutions provides
consulting and technical support services to assist clients seeking
U.S. Federal government contracts in the technology,
telecommunications, defense, and aerospace industries.
On January 25, 2017, Novume (KeyStone) acquired Firestorm (see Note
3), a leader in crisis management, crisis communications, emergency
response, and business continuity, including workplace violence
prevention, cyber-breach response, communicable illness/pandemic
planning, predictive intelligence, and other emergency, crisis and
disaster preparedness initiatives. Firestorm is headquartered in
Roswell, Georgia. The financial results of Firestorm are included
in the results of operations from January 25, 2017 through December
31, 2018.
Brekford, headquartered in Hanover, Maryland, is a leading public
safety technology service provider of fully-integrated automated
traffic safety enforcement solutions, including speed, red light,
and move-over and automatic license plate reading systems.
The
financial results of Brekford are included in the results of
operations from August 28, 2017, through December 31,
2018.
On October 1, 2017, Novume acquired Global (see Note 3). Global
provides temporary contract professional and skilled labor to
businesses throughout the United States. Contracts to provide such
services vary in length, usually less than one year. Global’s
corporate offices are located in Fort Worth, Texas. The financial
results of Global are included in the results of operations from
October 1, 2017 through December 31, 2018.
On December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2018, Firestorm acquired
certain assets of BC Management, Inc. (“BC Management”)
and Secure Education Consultants, LLC (“Secure
Education”), respectively (see Note 3). These acquisitions
provide risk management staffing and customized emergency protocols
and critical incident response training. Results of operations for
both BC Management and Secure Education have been included in the
financial statements of Novume since January 1, 2018.
On October 9, 2018, the Company entered into a Management Services
Agreement (the “MSA”) with OpenALPR, whereby the
Company provides support services. These services include sales,
call center and customer support, engineering, marketing and
website services along with business strategy, contract and other
back office functions. The MSA provides for the Company to receive
compensation on a time and materials basis for most services and a
commission basis for sales, and the Company has determined that the
compensation was not material. On March 12, 2019, the Company
acquired substantially all of the assets and liabilities of
OpenALPR Technology (see Note 17), a software development
company. The assets acquired are now held within OpenALPR Software
Solutions, LLC. OpenALPR software currently has the capability to
analyze video images produced by almost any Internet Protocol
(“IP”) camera and identify vehicle license plates from
over 70 countries while also providing the make, model and color of
the vehicle.
51
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Novume,
the parent company, and its wholly owned subsidiaries AOC Key
Solutions, Inc., Brekford Traffic Safety Inc., Novume Media, Inc.,
Chantilly Petroleum, LLC, Firestorm Solutions, LLC, Firestorm
Franchising, LLC, Global Technical Services, Inc. and Global
Contract Professionals, Inc.
The
consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America (“GAAP”) and in accordance with the
accounting rules under Regulation S-X, as promulgated by the
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). All
significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
Certain
amounts in the prior year's financial statements have been
reclassified to conform to the current year's
presentation.
In the
opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair
presentation for the periods presented have been reflected as
required by Regulation S-X, Rule 10-01. All necessary adjustments
are of a normal, recurring nature.
Going Concern Assessment
Beginning
with the year ended December 31, 2017 and all annual and
interim periods thereafter, management will assess going concern
uncertainty in the Company’s consolidated financial
statements to determine whether there is sufficient cash on hand
and working capital, including available borrowings on loans and
external bank lines of credit, to operate for a period of at least
one year from the date the consolidated financial statements are
issued or available to be issued, which is referred to as the
“look-forward period”, as defined in GAAP. As part of
this assessment, based on conditions that are known and reasonably
knowable to management, management will consider various scenarios,
forecasts, projections, estimates and will make certain key
assumptions, including the timing and nature of projected cash
expenditures or programs, its ability to delay or curtail
expenditures or programs and its ability to raise additional
capital, if necessary, among other factors. Based on this
assessment, as necessary or applicable, management makes certain
assumptions around implementing curtailments or delays in the
nature and timing of programs and expenditures to the extent it
deems probable those implementations can be achieved and management
has the proper authority to execute them within the look-forward
period.
The
Company has generated losses since its inception in August 2017 and
has relied on cash on hand, external bank lines of credit, the sale
of a note, debt financing and a public offering of its common stock
to support cashflow from operations. The Company attributes losses
to merger costs, public company corporate overhead and investments
made by some of our subsidiary operations. As of and for the year
ended December 31, 2018, the Company had a net loss of
approximately $5.7 million and working capital deficit of
approximately $0.04 million which includes the early retirement of
$2.5 million of long-term debt in March 2019. The Company’s
net cash position was increased by approximately $4.0 million in
March 2019 by the issuance of $20 million senior secured notes, of
which $5 million was non-cash, offset by $7 million of cash paid
for the acquisition of OpenALPR, and approximately $4.0 million
related to the extinguishment of debt and associated fees (see Note
17).
Management
believes that based on relevant conditions and events that are
known and reasonably knowable, that its current forecasts and
projections, for one year from the date of the filing of the
consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form
10-K, indicate the Company’s ability to continue operations
as a going concern for that one-year period. The Company is
actively monitoring its operations, cash on hand and working
capital. The Company has contingency plans to reduce or defer
expenses and cash outlays should operations weaken in the
look-forward period or additional financing is not
available.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Novume
considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with the
maturity of three months or less to be cash
equivalents.
Brekford
makes collections on behalf of certain client jurisdictions. Cash
balances designated for these client jurisdictions as of December
31, 2018 and 2017 were $608,557 and $641,103, respectively, and
correspond to equal amounts of related accounts
payable.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful
Accounts
Accounts
receivable are customer obligations due under normal trade terms.
The Company performs continuing credit evaluations of its
clients’ financial condition, and the Company generally does
not require collateral.
52
Management
reviews accounts receivable to determine if any receivables will
potentially be uncollectible. Factors considered in the
determination include, among other factors, number of days an
invoice is past due, client historical trends, available credit
ratings information, other financial data and the overall economic
environment. Collection agencies may also be utilized if management
so determines.
The
Company records an allowance for doubtful accounts based on
specifically identified amounts that are believed to be
uncollectible. The Company also considers recording as an
additional allowance a certain percentage of aged accounts
receivable, based on historical experience and the Company’s
assessment of the general financial conditions affecting its
customer base. If actual collection experience changes, revisions
to the allowance may be required. After all reasonable attempts to
collect an account receivable have failed, the amount of the
receivable is written off against the allowance. Based on the
information available, the Company determined that an allowance for
loss of $24,405 and $24,000 was required at December 31, 2018 and
2017, respectively.
Accounts
receivable at December 31, 2018 and 2017 included $1,124,705 and
$1,259,089 in unbilled contracts respectively related to work
performed in the year in which the receivable was recorded. The
amounts were billed in the subsequent year.
Inventory
Inventory
principally consists of parts held temporarily until installed for
service. Inventory is valued at the lower of cost or market value.
The cost is determined by the lower of first-in, first-out
(“FIFO”) method, while market value is determined by
replacement cost for components and replacement parts.
Other Current Assets, Net
Other assets are recorded at net realizable value consisting of the
carrying amount less an allowance for uncollectible accounts,
as necessary. In the Brekford Merger on August 28, 2017, a
refund of $134,818 was due from the prior financing company. The
balance due remains outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and the
Company has established a valuation allowance of
$134,818.
Property and Equipment
The
cost of furniture and fixtures and equipment is depreciated over
the useful lives of the related assets. Leasehold improvements are
amortized over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the
terms of the lease. Depreciation and amortization is recorded on
the straight-line basis.
The
range of estimated useful lives used for computing depreciation are
as follows:
Furniture and fixtures
|
2 - 10 years
|
Office equipment
|
2 - 5 years
|
Leasehold improvements
|
3 - 15 years
|
Internally developed software
|
3 - 5 years
|
Automobiles
|
3 - 5 years
|
Camera systems
|
3 years
|
The
Company capitalizes eligible costs related to internally-developed
software in accordance with ASC 985-20 which were incurred during
the application development stage. Capitalized internally-developed
software costs, net, not yet placed in service were $913,455 and
$52,400 as of December 31, 2018 and 2017,
respectively.
Repairs
and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Expenditures for
additions, improvements and replacements are capitalized.
Depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended December
31, 2018 and 2017 was $345,136 and $142,545,
respectively.
Business Combination
Management
conducts a valuation analysis on the tangible and intangible assets
acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date thereof.
During the measurement period, which may be up to one year from
the acquisition date,
we may record adjustments to the fair value of these tangible and
intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed,
with the corresponding offset to goodwill. In addition, uncertain
tax positions and
tax-related valuation allowances are initially established in
connection with a business combination as of the acquisition date. Upon the
conclusion of the measurement period or final determination of the fair value of
assets acquired or liabilities assumed, whichever comes first, any
subsequent adjustments
are recorded to our consolidated statements of
operations.
53
Amounts
paid for acquisitions are allocated to the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the
date of acquisition. We allocate a portion of the purchase price to
the fair value of identifiable intangible assets. The fair value of
identifiable intangible assets is based on detailed valuations that
use information and assumptions provided by management. We allocate
any excess purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible
and intangible assets acquired to goodwill.
We
recorded goodwill and intangible assets for the mergers and
acquisitions that occurred in 2017 and 2018. The BC Management,
Secure Education and Firestorm acquisitions were asset
acquisitions, which created both book and tax bases in goodwill and
non-goodwill intangible assets. BC Management’s acquisition
resulted in $0.4 million of non-goodwill intangible assets. Secure
Education’s acquisition resulted in $0.4 million of
non-goodwill intangible assets. The Firestorm acquisition resulted
in $2.5 million of non-goodwill intangible assets. Brekford and
Global were stock acquisitions and only have book basis in the
goodwill and intangible assets. The fair value assigned to
Brekford’s intangible and goodwill is $0.6 million and $1.4
million, respectively. The GTS and GCP goodwill and intangible
assets resulted in a fair value of $1.6 million and $2.6 million,
respectively, and corresponding net deferred tax liability of $0.5
million. As a result of the deferred tax liability, an adjustment
was recorded to goodwill to account for the tax effect of the
deferred tax liability in the year ended December 31,
2017.
Goodwill and Other Intangibles
In
applying the acquisition method of accounting, amounts assigned to
identifiable assets and liabilities acquired were based on
estimated fair values as of the date of acquisition, with the
remainder recorded as goodwill. Identifiable
intangible assets are initially valued at fair value using
generally accepted valuation methods appropriate for the type
of intangible asset. Identifiable intangible assets
with definite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives
and are reviewed for impairment if indicators of impairment
arise. Intangible assets with indefinite lives are tested
for impairment within one year of acquisitions or annually as
of October 1, and whenever indicators of impairment
exist. The
fair value of intangible assets are
compared with their carrying values, and an impairment loss would
be recognized for the amount by which a carrying amount exceeds its
fair value. No material impairments have been recorded through
December 31, 2018.
Acquired identifiable
intangible assets are amortized over the following
periods:
Acquired Intangible Asset
|
|
Amortization Basis
|
Expected Life
(years)
|
Customer-Related
|
|
Straight-line
basis
|
5-15
|
Marketing-Related
|
|
Straight-line
basis
|
4
|
Technology-Based
|
|
In
line with underlying cash flows or straight-line basis
|
3
|
Revenue Recognition
The
Company recognizes revenues for the provision of services when
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been
rendered or delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable
and the collectability of the related revenue is reasonably
assured. The Company principally derives revenues from fees for
services generated on a project-by-project basis. Revenues for
time-and-materials contracts are recognized based on the number of
hours worked by the employees or consultants at an agreed-upon rate
per hour set forth in the Company’s contracts or purchase
orders. Revenues related to firm-fixed-price contracts are
primarily recognized upon completion of the project as these
projects are typically short-term in nature. Revenue from the sale
of individual franchises is recognized when the contract is signed
and collectability is assured, unless the franchisee is required to
perform certain training before operations commence. The franchisor
has no obligation to the franchisee relating to store development
and the franchisee is considered operational at the time the
franchise agreement is signed or when required training is
completed, if applicable. Royalties from individual franchises are
earned based upon the terms in the franchising agreement which are
generally the greater of $1,000 or 8% of the franchisee’s
monthly gross sales.
For automated traffic safety enforcement revenue, the Company
recognizes the revenue when the required collection efforts, from
citizens, are completed and posted to the municipality’s
account. The respective municipality is then billed depending on
the terms of the respective contract, typically 15 days after the
preceding month while collections are reconciled. For contracts
where the Company receives a percentage of collected fines, revenue
is calculated based upon the posted payments from citizens
multiplied by the Company’s contractual percentage. For
contracts where the Company receives a specific fixed monthly fee
regardless of citations issued or collected, revenue is recorded
once the amount collected from citizens exceeds the monthly fee per
camera. Brekford’s fixed-fee contracts typically have a
revenue neutral provision whereby the municipality’s payment
to Brekford cannot exceed amounts collected from citizens within a
given month.
54
Advertising
The
Company expenses all non-direct-response advertising costs as
incurred. Such costs were not material for the years ended December
31, 2018 and 2017.
Use of Estimates
Management
uses estimates and assumptions in preparing financial statements.
Those estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities, and the reported revenues and expenses. Actual amounts
may differ from these estimates. On an on-going basis, the Company
evaluates its estimates, including those related to collectability
of accounts receivable, fair value of debt and equity instruments
and income taxes. The Company bases its estimates on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that are
believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of
which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value
of assets and liabilities that are not apparent from other sources.
Actual results may differ from those estimates under different
assumptions or conditions.
Income Taxes
Income
tax expense consists of U.S. federal and state income taxes. We are
required to pay income taxes in certain state jurisdictions.
Historically, AOC Key Solutions and GCP initially elected to be
taxed under the provisions of Subchapter S of the Internal Revenue
Code. Under those provisions, neither AOC Key Solutions nor GCP
paid federal corporate income tax, and in most instances state
income tax, on its taxable income. AOC Key Solutions revoked its S
Corporation election upon the March 15, 2016 merger with
KeyStone and GCP revoked its S Corporation election upon the
acquisition by Novume, and are therefore, subject to corporate
income taxes. Firestorm is a single-member LLC with KeyStone as the
sole member.
We use
the liability method of accounting for income taxes as set forth in
the authoritative guidance for accounting for income taxes. This
method requires an asset and liability approach for the recognition
of deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the consolidated financial
statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and
their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable
income in the years in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax
assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in
income in the period that includes the enactment date.
Management has evaluated the recoverability of the net deferred
income tax assets and the level of the valuation allowance required
with respect to such net deferred income tax assets. After
considering all available facts, the Company fully reserved for its
net deferred tax assets because management believes that it is not
more likely than not that their benefits will be realized in future
periods. The Company will continue to evaluate its net deferred tax
assets to determine whether any changes in circumstances could
affect the realization of their future benefit. If it is determined
in future periods that portions of the Company’s net deferred
income tax assets satisfy the realization standard, the
valuation allowance will be reduced accordingly. As of December 31,
2018 the Company has gross federal and state NOL carry forwards of
$9.7 million and $0.5 million, net of federal tax effects,
respectively. These NOLs are scheduled to begin to expire in 2034
and $4.7 million are grandfathered under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act;
thus, these NOLs are not subject to the 80 percent limitation. NOLs
generated in 2018 of $5.0 million will be carried forward
indefinitely and are subject to the annual 80 percent limitation.
The Company also has a valuation allowance of $2.3 million recorded
against its net deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2018.
The tax effects of uncertain tax positions are recognized in the
consolidated financial statements only if the position is more
likely than not to be sustained on audit, based on the technical
merits of the position. For tax positions meeting the more likely
than not threshold, the amount recognized in the consolidated
financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than
50% likelihood of being realized. It is our accounting policy to
account for ASC 740-10-related penalties and interest as a
component of the income tax provision in the consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive loss.
As of
December 31, 2018 and 2017, our evaluation revealed no uncertain
tax positions that would have a material impact on the financial
statements. The 2015 through 2017 tax years remain subject to
examination by the IRS, as of December 31, 2018. Our management
does not believe that any reasonably possible changes will occur
within the next twelve months that will have a material impact on
the financial statements.
On
December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the
“2017 Act”) was enacted, which changes U.S. tax law and
includes various provisions that impact our Company. The 2017 Act
effects our Company by: changing U.S. tax rates; increasing the
Company’s ability to use accumulated net operating losses
generated after December 31, 2017; and limiting the Company’s
ability to deduct interest.
55
Equity-Based Compensation
The
Company recognizes equity-based compensation based on the
grant-date fair value of the award on a straight-line basis over
the requisite service period, net of estimated forfeitures. Total
equity-based compensation expense included in selling, general and
administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements
of operations for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was
$464,509 and $408,465, respectively.
The
Company estimates the fair value of stock options using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The use of the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model requires the use of subjective assumptions,
including the fair value and projected volatility of the underlying
common stock and the expected term of the award.
The
fair value of each option granted has been estimated as of the date
of the grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the
following assumptions during the years ended December 31, 2018 and
2017:
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
||
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
3.03%
|
|
1.00% - 2.17%
|
Expected term
|
5 years
|
|
0.3 – 6.1 years
|
Volatility
|
88.5%
|
|
70.0%
|
Dividend yield
|
0%
|
|
0%
|
Estimated annual forfeiture rate at time of grant
|
0%
|
|
0% - 30%
|
Risk-Free Interest Rate – The yield on actively traded
non-inflation indexed U.S. Treasury notes with the same maturity as
the expected term of the underlying grants was used as the average
risk-free interest rate.
Expected Term – The expected term of
options granted was determined based on management’s
expectations of the options granted which are expected to remain
outstanding.
Expected Volatility – Because the Company’s common stock has only
been publicly traded since late August 2017, there is not a
substantive share price history to calculate volatility and, as
such, the Company has elected to use the calculated value
method.
Dividend Yield – The Black-Scholes option
pricing model requires an expected dividend yield as an input. The
Company has not issued common stock dividends in the past nor does
the Company expect to issue common stock dividends in the
future.
Forfeiture Rate – This is the estimated
percentage of equity grants that are expected to be forfeited or
cancelled on an annual basis before becoming fully vested. The
Company estimates the forfeiture rate based on past turnover data,
level of employee receiving the equity grant, and vesting terms,
and revises the rate if subsequent information indicates that the
actual number of instruments that will vest is likely to differ
from the estimate. The cumulative effect on current and prior
periods of a change in the estimated number of awards likely to
vest is recognized in compensation cost in the period of the
change.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The
carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for
cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable
approximate fair value as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 because of
the relatively short-term maturity of these financial instruments.
The carrying amount reported for long-term debt approximates fair
value as of December 31, 2018, given management’s evaluation
of the instrument’s current rate compared to market rates of
interest and other factors.
The
determination of fair value is based upon the fair value framework
established by Accounting Standards Codification
(“ASC”) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
(“ASC 820”). Fair value is defined as the exit price,
or the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants as of the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a
hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes
the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable
inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when
available. Observable inputs are inputs market participants would
use in valuing the asset or liability and are developed based on
market data obtained from sources independent of the Company.
Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect our assumptions about
the factors market participants would use in valuing the asset or
liability. The guidance establishes three levels of inputs that may
be used to measure fair value:
56
Level 1 –
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities.
Level 2 –
Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly
or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other
inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable
market data for substantially the full term of the assets or
liabilities.
Level 3 –
Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market
activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets
or liabilities.
Assets
and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the
lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value
measurements. Changes in the observability of valuation inputs may
result in a reclassification of levels for certain securities
within the fair value hierarchy.
The
Company determined that the value of the remaining balance of the
note receivable at December 31, 2017 approximated its recorded
value, and the Company sold the note in February 2018 for proceeds
of $1,400,000.
The Company’s goodwill and other intangible assets are
measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis using Level 2 and
Level 3 inputs.
The
Company has concluded that its Series A Preferred Stock is a Level
3 financial instrument and that the fair value approximates the
carrying value, which includes the accretion of the discounted
interest component through December 31, 2018. There were no changes
in levels during the years ended December 31, 2018 and
2017.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial
instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations
of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents,
and accounts receivable. Concentrations of credit risk with respect
to accounts receivable are minimal due to the collection history
and due to the nature of the Company’s client base. The
Company limits its credit risk with respect to cash by maintaining
cash balances with high-quality financial institutions. At times,
the Company’s cash may exceed U.S. Federally insured limits,
and as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company had
$2,176,907 and $1,707,212, respectively, of cash and cash
equivalents on deposit that exceeded the federally insured
limit.
Earnings per Share
Basic
earnings per share, or EPS, is computed using the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS
is computed using the weighted average number of common and
potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period,
except for periods of net loss for which no potentially dilutive
securities are included because their effect would be
anti-dilutive. Potentially dilutive securities consist of common
stock issuable upon exercise of stock options or warrants using the
treasury stock method. Potentially dilutive securities issuable
upon conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock are calculated
using the if-converted method.
The
Company calculates basic and diluted earnings per common share
using the two-class method. Under the two-class method, net
earnings are allocated to each class of common stock and
participating security as if all of the net earnings for the period
had been distributed. Participating securities consist of preferred
stock that contain a nonforfeitable right to receive dividends and
therefore are considered to participate in undistributed earnings
with common stockholders.
On
August 28, 2017, the Company effected a 1.9339-to-1 stock exchange
related to its acquisition of Brekford. The per share amounts have
been updated to show the effect of the exchange on earnings per
share as if the exchange occurred at the beginning of 2017. The
impact of the stock exchange is also shown on the Company’s
Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity.
Segment Reporting
The
Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC Topic
280, Segment Reporting,
requires that an enterprise report selected information about
reportable segments in its financial reports issued to its
stockholders. Based on its analysis of current operations,
management has determined that the Company has only one operating
segment, which is Novume. Management will continue to reevaluate
its segment reporting as the Company grows and matures. However,
the chief operating decision-makers currently use combined results
to make operating and strategic decisions, and, therefore, the
Company believes its entire operation is currently covered under a
single reportable segment for the years ended December 31, 2018 and
2017. Beginning with the first quarter
of 2019, the Company anticipates changing its operating and
reportable segments from one segment to two segments. The two
segments are expected to reflect the Company’s focus on both
technology products and services and professional
services.
57
New Accounting Pronouncements
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Not Yet Adopted
In August 2018, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No.
2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic
820), Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements
for Fair Value Measurement (“ASU 2018-13”). This ASU modifies the
disclosure requirements for fair value measurements by removing,
modifying or adding certain disclosures. ASU 2018-13 is effective
for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019 and interim
periods within those annual periods, with early adoption permitted.
The amendments on changes in unrealized gains and losses, the range
and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to
develop Level 3 fair value measurements, and the narrative
description of measurement uncertainty should be applied
prospectively for only the most recent interim or annual period
presented in the initial fiscal year of adoption. All other
amendments should be applied retrospectively to all periods
presented upon their effective date. The Company is currently
evaluating the effect that ASU 2018-13 will have on its
consolidated financial statements and related
disclosures.
In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No.
2018-07, Compensation – Stock
Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based
Payment Accounting (“ASU
2018-01”). This ASU is intended to simplify aspects of
share-based compensation issued to non-employees by making the
guidance consistent with the accounting for employee share-based
compensation. ASU 2018-07 is effective for annual periods beginning
after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those annual
periods, with early adoption permitted but no earlier than an
entity’s adoption date of Topic 606. The Company will adopt
the provisions of this ASU in the first quarter of 2019. Adoption
of the new standard is not expected to have a material impact on
the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related
disclosures.
In August 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
(“ASU”) No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic
815), which provides guidance
related to accounting for hedging activities. This guidance expands
strategies that qualify for hedge accounting, changes how many
hedging relationships are presented in the financial statements,
and simplifies the application of hedge accounting in certain
situations. The standard will be effective for us beginning July 1,
2019, with early adoption permitted for any interim or annual
period before the effective date. Adoption of the standard will be
applied using a modified retrospective approach through a
cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the
effective date. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of
this standard on its consolidated financial statements, including
accounting policies, processes, and systems.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04,
Intangibles -
Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill
Impairment. To simplify the
subsequent measurement of goodwill, the update requires only a
single-step quantitative test to identify and measure impairment
based on the excess of a reporting unit's carrying amount over its
fair value. A qualitative assessment may still be completed first
for an entity to determine if a quantitative impairment test is
necessary. The update is effective for fiscal year 2021 and is to
be adopted on a prospective basis. Early adoption is permitted for
interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing
dates after January 1, 2017. The Company will test
goodwill for impairment within one year of the acquisition or
annually as of October 1, and whenever indicators of
impairment exist. The Company is currently evaluating the
effect that this update will have on its financial statements and
related disclosures.
In June
2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13 Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic
326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments
(“ASU 2016-13”) which requires the measurement and
recognition of expected credit losses for financial assets held at
amortized cost. ASU 2016-13 replaces the existing incurred loss
impairment model with an expected loss methodology, which will
result in more timely recognition of credit losses. ASU 2016-13 is
effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods within
those years beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company is
currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption
of ASU 2016-13 on its consolidated financial
statements.
In
February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases. This ASU is a comprehensive new
leases standard that amends various aspects of existing guidance
for leases and requires additional disclosures about leasing
arrangements. It will require companies to recognize lease assets
and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases classified as
operating leases under previous GAAP. Topic 842 retains a
distinction between finance leases and operating leases. The
classification criteria for distinguishing between finance leases
and operating leases are substantially similar to the
classification criteria for distinguishing between capital leases
and operating leases in the previous leases guidance. The ASU is
effective for annual periods beginning after December 15,
2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years; earlier
adoption is permitted. The Company is
finalizing its adoption of the new standard effective January 1,
2019 and will be adopting the standard using the optional
transition method by recognizing a cumulative-effect adjustment to
the balance sheet at January 1, 2019 and not revising prior period
presented amounts. The processes that are in final refinement
related to the Company’s full implementation of the standard
include: finalizing the Company’s estimates related to the
applicable incremental borrowing rate at January 1, 2019; and
process enhancements for refining the Company’s financial
reporting procedures to develop the additional required qualitative
and quantitative disclosures required beginning in 2019. The
Company has elected the following practical expedients: it has not
reassessed whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain
leases; it has not reassessed lease classification for any expired
or existing leases; it has not reassessed initial direct costs for
any existing leases; and it has not separated lease and nonlease
components.
58
The standard will have a material impact on the Company’s
consolidated balance sheets, but will not have a material impact on
its consolidated statements of operations. The most significant
impact will be the recognition of right-of-use (“ROU”)
assets and lease liabilities for operating leases.
Adoption of the standard will result in the recognition of
additional ROU assets and lease liabilities for operating leases
ranging between $0.8 million to $1.2 million as of January 1,
2019.
There
are currently no other accounting standards that have been issued,
but not yet adopted, that will have a significant impact on the
Company’s consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows upon adoption.
Recently Adopted
In May
2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers,
as a new Topic, ASC Topic 606, which supersedes existing accounting
standards for revenue recognition and creates a single framework.
Additional updates to Topic 606 issued by the FASB in 2015 and 2016
include the following:
●
ASU
No. 2015-14, Revenue from
Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective
Date, which defers the effective date of the new guidance
such that the new provisions will now be required for fiscal years,
and interim periods within those years, beginning after
December 15, 2017.
●
ASU
No. 2016-08, Revenue from
Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent
Considerations, which clarifies the implementation guidance
on principal versus agent considerations (reporting revenue gross
versus net).
●
ASU
No. 2016-10, Revenue from
Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance
Obligations and Licensing, which clarifies the
implementation guidance on identifying performance obligations and
classifying licensing arrangements.
●
ASU
No. 2016-12, Revenue from
Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and
Practical Expedients, which clarifies the implementation
guidance in a number of other areas.
The
underlying principle is to use a five-step analysis of transactions
to recognize revenue when promised goods or services are
transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the
consideration that is expected to be received for those goods or
services. The standard permits the use of either a retrospective or
modified retrospective application. ASU 2014-09 and ASU 2016-12 are
effective for annual reporting periods beginning
after December 15, 2017.
On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers,
using the modified retrospective method. Novume has aggregated and
reviewed its contracts that are within the scope of Topic 606.
Based on its evaluation, Novume does not anticipate the adoption of
Topic 606 will have a material impact on its balance sheet or
related consolidated statements of operations, equity or cash
flows. The impact of adopting Topic 606 to the Company relates to:
(1) a change to franchisee agreements recorded prior to 2017; and
(2) the timing of certain contractual agreements which the Company
deemed as immaterial. Revenue recognition related to the
Company’s other revenue streams remained substantially
unchanged following the adoption of Topic 606 and therefore did not
have a material impact on its revenues. The comparative information has not been restated
and continues to be reported under the accounting standards in
effect for those periods.
59
The
following tables summarize the impact of adopting ASC 606 on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2018:
|
As of December 31, 2018
|
||
|
As Reported
|
Adjustments
|
Balance Without Adoption of 606
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
Deferred
revenue
|
$207,059
|
$(10,999)
|
$196,060
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
$(12,063,791)
|
$10,999
|
$(12,052,792)
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2018
|
||
|
As Reported
|
Adjustments
|
Balance Without Adoption of 606
|
Consolidated Statement of Operations
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
$48,562,441
|
$(56,001)
|
$48,506,440
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$(5,703,499)
|
$(56,001)
|
$(5,759,500)
|
Net
loss per share:
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
$(0.44)
|
$-
|
$(0.44)
|
Diluted
|
$(0.44)
|
$-
|
$(0.44)
|
The adoption of ASC 606 did not affect the Company's
reported total amounts of cash flows from operating, investing or
financing activities in its consolidated statements of cash
flows.
Practical
Expedients Election ‒ Costs
to Obtain and Fulfill a Contract ‒ The Company’s
incremental costs of obtaining a contract consist of sales
commissions. As part of the Company's
adoption of ASC 606, the Company elected to use the practical
expedient to expense costs to obtain a
contract as incurred when the amortization period would have been
one year or less. As of December 31, 2018, costs
incurred to fulfill contracts in excess of one year have been
immaterial to date.
Revenue Recognition ‒
The Company generates substantially
all revenues from providing professional services to clients. A
single contract could include one or multiple performance
obligations. For those contracts that have multiple performance
obligations, the Company allocates the total transaction price to
each performance obligation based on its relative standalone
selling price, which is determined based on our overall pricing
objectives, taking into consideration market conditions and other
factors.
Revenue is recognized when control of the goods and services
provided are transferred to our customers, in an amount that
reflects the consideration the Company expects to be entitled to in
exchange for those goods and services using the following
steps:
●
Identification of
the contract, or contracts, with a customer
●
Identification of
the performance obligations in the contract
●
Determination of
the transaction price
●
Allocation of the
transaction price to the performance obligations in the
contract
●
Recognition of
revenue when, or as, performance obligations are
satisfied
The
Company accounts for a contract when it has approval and commitment
from both parties, the rights of the parties are identified,
payment terms are identified, the contract has commercial substance
and collectability of consideration is probable.
Disaggregated Revenue ‒ The
Company disaggregates revenue from contracts with customers by
contract type, as it believes it best depicts how the nature,
amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows are
affected by economic factors.
60
The
Company’s revenue by contract type is as
follows:
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Time
& materials
|
$42,559,925
|
$19,553,770
|
Fixed
price
|
5,905,181
|
2,225,179
|
Franchising
|
97,335
|
356,869
|
Total
revenue
|
$48,562,441
|
$22,135,818
|
Performance Obligations
‒ Performance obligations for three different types of
services are discussed below:
●
Time and Material
Services ‒
Revenues for time and material
contracts are recognized as a single promise to provide hourly
support or staff augmentation. Revenue is based on the number of
hours worked by the employees or consultants at an agreed-upon rate
per hour set forth in standard rate sheets or as written from time
to time in contracts or purchase orders.
●
Firm-Fixed-Price
Services ‒
Revenues related to firm-fixed-price
contracts are primarily a single promise to provide a specific
service, such as a site assessment or report. Revenues
related to firm-fixed-price contracts are recognized in two ways,
either as services are provided for longer term contracts or upon
completion of the project for short-term contracts.
●
Franchising
Services ‒
Revenue from the sale of individual
franchises represents a single promise to provide a distinctive
system that offers critical decision support, planning and
consulting to individuals, corporate entities and government
agencies. As no additional services are provided under the
franchising sale, revenue is recognized when the contract is signed
and collectability is assured, unless the franchisee is required to
perform certain training before operations commence. Royalty and
advertising and promotion services are provided over the term of
the franchise and therefore revenue from these services are
recognized over time based on the monthly fee per the contract
terms.
Accounts Receivable,
Net ‒ Accounts
receivable, net, are amounts due from customers where there is an
unconditional right to consideration. Unbilled receivables
of $1,124,705 and $1,259,089
are included in this balance at December 31, 2018 and 2017,
respectively. The payment of consideration related to these
unbilled receivables is subject only to the passage of
time.
The Company reviews accounts receivable on a periodic basis to
determine if any receivables will potentially be uncollectible.
Estimates are used to determine the amount of the allowance for
doubtful accounts necessary to reduce accounts receivable to its
estimated net realizable value. The estimates are based on an
analysis of past due receivables, historical bad debt trends,
current economic conditions, and customer specific information.
After the Company has exhausted all collection efforts, the
outstanding receivable balance relating to services provided is
written off against the allowance. Additions to the provision for
bad debt are charged to expense.
The
Company determined that an allowance for loss of $24,405 and
$24,000 was required at December 31, 2018 and 2017,
respectively.
In
March 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment
Accounting. The standard reduces complexity in several
aspects of the accounting for employee share-based compensation,
including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as
either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement
of cash flows. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those
fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted
this standard and the impact of the adoption was not material to
the consolidated financial statements.
In January 2016, the FASB, issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall
(Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets
and Financial Liabilities,
which amends the guidance in U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles on the classification and measurement of financial
instruments. Changes to the current guidance primarily affect the
accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the
fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements
for financial instruments. In addition, the ASU clarifies guidance
related to the valuation allowance assessment when recognizing
deferred tax assets resulting from unrealized losses on
available-for-sale debt securities. The new standard is effective
for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15,
2017, and are to be adopted by means of a cumulative-effect
adjustment to the balance sheet at the beginning of the first
reporting period in which the guidance is effective. The
Company adopted this standard and the impact of the adoption was
not material to the consolidated financial statements.
In
January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01 Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying
the Definition of a Business (“ASU 2017-01”).
ASU 2017-01 provides guidance to evaluate whether transactions
should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or
businesses. If substantially all of the fair value of the gross
assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single asset
or a group of similar assets, the assets acquired (or disposed of)
are not considered a business. The Company adopted ASU 2017-01 as
of January 1, 2017.
61
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Compensation - Stock
Compensation: Scope of Modification Accounting, which provides guidance about which changes to
the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an
entity to apply modification accounting. An entity will account for
the effects of a modification unless the fair value of the modified
award is the same as the original award, the vesting conditions of
the modified award are the same as the original award and the
classification of the modified award as an equity instrument or
liability instrument is the same as the original award. The update
is effective for fiscal year 2019. The update is to be adopted
prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date.
Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted this ASU in 2018
and the impact of the adoption was not material to its consolidated
financial statements and related disclosures.
NOTE 3 – ACQUISITIONS
Secure Education Consultants Acquisition
On
January 1, 2018, Novume completed its acquisition of certain assets
of Secure Education through Firestorm. Consideration paid as part
of this acquisition included: (a) $99,197 in cash, (b) 33,333
shares of Novume common stock valued at $163,332; (c) warrants to
purchase 33,333 shares of Novume common stock, exercisable over a
period of five years, at an exercise price of $5.44 per share,
valued at $65,988 and (d) warrants to purchase 33,333 of Novume
common stock, exercisable over a period of five years at an
exercise price of $6.53 per share, valued at $57,484.
The
Company has completed its analysis of the purchase price
allocation. The Company recorded $386,001 of customer relationships
as intangibles. The table below shows the final breakdown related
to the Secure Education acquisition:
Cash
paid
|
$99,197
|
Common
stock issued
|
163,332
|
Warrants
issued, at $5.44
|
65,988
|
Warrants
issued, at $6.53
|
57,484
|
Total
consideration
|
386,001
|
Less
intangible and intellectual property
|
(386,001)
|
Net
goodwill recorded
|
$-
|
BC Management Acquisition
On
December 31, 2017, Novume completed its acquisition of certain
assets of BC Management, Inc. (“BC Management”).
Consideration paid as part of this acquisition included: (a)
$100,000 in cash, (b) 33,333 shares of Novume common stock valued
at $163,332 and (c) 66,666 warrants to purchase Novume common stock
valued at $123,472.
The
preliminary purchase price has been allocated to the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed based on fair values as of the
acquisition date. Since the acquisition of BC Management occurred
on December 31, 2017, the results of operations for BC Management
have not been included in the Company’s Consolidated
Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31,
2017.
The
Company has completed its analysis of the purchase price allocation
which was the same as the preliminary allocation. The Company
recorded $386,004 of customer relationships as intangibles. The
table below shows the final breakdown related to the BC Management
acquisition:
Cash
paid
|
$100,000
|
Common
stock issued
|
163,332
|
Warrants
issued, at $5.44
|
65,988
|
Warrants
issued, at $6.53
|
57,484
|
Total
consideration
|
386,804
|
Less
intangible and intellectual property
|
(386,804)
|
Net
goodwill recorded
|
$-
|
Global Acquisition
On
October 1, 2017, Novume completed its acquisition of Global by
purchasing GTS and GCP. Consideration paid as part of the Global
acquisition included: (a) $750,000 in cash, (b) 375,000 shares of
Novume common stock valued at $566,288 and (c) 240,861 shares of
Novume Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (the
“Novume Series B Preferred Stock”) valued at
$2,408,610. In addition to the merger consideration, Novume paid
$365,037 to satisfy in full all of the outstanding debt of GTS and
GCP at closing, except for certain intercompany debt and ordinary
course debt, and amounts due under (a) the Secured Account Purchase
Agreement dated August 22, 2012 by and between GTS and
(“WFB”) (the “GTS
Wells Fargo Credit Facility”) and (b) the Secured Account
Purchase Agreement dated August 22, 2012 by and between GCP
and WFB (the “GCP Wells Fargo Credit Facility” and
together with the GTS Wells Fargo Credit Facility, the “Wells
Fargo Credit Facilities”), which have remained in effect
following the consummation of the Global Acquisition. In connection
with the Wells Fargo Credit Facilities, Novume delivered general
continuing guaranties, dated September 29, 2017 to WFB,
guaranteeing the Guaranteed Obligations of GTS and GCP (as defined
in the Wells Fargo Guaranty Agreements) under the Wells Fargo
Credit Facilities, and paid $175,000 in the aggregate to reduce the
current borrowed amounts under the Wells Fargo Credit Facilities as
of October 1, 2017. Additionally, Novume assumed $2,462,276 of
Global’s liabilities.
62
As part
of the Global acquisition, the Company issued 240,861 shares of
$0.0001 par value Novume Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred
Stock (the “Series B Preferred Stock”). All Series B
Preferred Stock was issued at a price of $10.00 per share as part
of the acquisition of Global. The Series B Preferred Stock is
entitled to quarterly cash dividends of 1.12% (4.48% per annum) per
share. The Series B Preferred Stock has a conversion price of $5.00
per share. Each Series B Preferred Stock has an automatic
conversion feature based on the share price of Novume (see Note 9).
The Company measured the holdback consideration in April 2018 and
determined that the contingent liability should be decreased by
$94,657. In accordance with ASC 805-10-25, a contingent
consideration classified as an asset or liability shall be
recognized in earnings, and $94,657 was recognized as other income
for the year ended December 31, 2018. As of December 31, 2017, the
Company had $200,000 of holdback consideration included in accrued
expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company paid
$105,343 of the holdback consideration.
The
Company completed its analysis of the purchase price allocation in
2017. The table below shows the final breakdown related to the
Global acquisition:
Assets
acquired
|
$4,384,668
|
Liabilities
acquired
|
(4,384,417)
|
Net assets
acquired
|
251
|
Less intangible
assets
|
2,574,000
|
Consideration paid
(see below)
|
4,264,934
|
Net goodwill
recorded
|
$1,690,683
|
|
|
Cash
consideration
|
$550,000
|
Cash paid towards
acquired liabilities
|
540,037
|
Total cash
paid
|
1,090,037
|
Holdback
consideration
|
200,000
|
Common stock
consideration
|
566,288
|
Series B Preferred
Stock consideration
|
2,408,610
|
Total acquisition
consideration
|
$4,264,934
|
The
determination of the fair value of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed, includes approximately $2.6 million of
intangible and intellectual property and approximately $1.7 million
of goodwill.
Brekford Acquisition
On
August 28, 2017, the mergers by and among Novume, KeyStone,
Brekford, Brekford Merger Sub, Inc., and KeyStone Merger Sub, LLC,
were
consummated (the “Brekford Merger”). As a result,
Brekford became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Novume, and Brekford
Merger Sub ceased to exist. KeyStone Merger Sub, LLC also became a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Novume, and KeyStone Solutions, Inc.
ceased to exist. When KeyStone Merger Sub, Inc. filed its
certificate of merger with the Secretary of State of Delaware, it
immediately effectuated a name-change to KeyStone Solutions, LLC,
the name by which it is now known.
Upon completion of the Brekford Merger, the merger consideration
was issued in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement.
Immediately upon completion of the Brekford Merger, the pre-merger
stockholders of KeyStone owned approximately 80% or 13,548,837 of
the issued and outstanding capital stock of Novume on a
fully-diluted basis, and the pre-merger stockholders of Brekford
owned approximately 20% or 3,375,084 shares of the issued and
outstanding capital stock of Novume on a fully-diluted
basis.
The
Company completed its analysis of the purchase price allocation in
2017. The table below shows the final breakdown related to the
Brekford acquisition:
Common
stock issued
|
$5,851,193
|
Total
consideration
|
5,851,193
|
Less
cash received
|
(1,943,778)
|
Less
note receivable
|
(2,000,000)
|
Less
other assets
|
(1,139,007)
|
Less
intangible assets
|
(558,412)
|
Plus
liabilities assumed
|
1,191,937
|
Net
goodwill recorded
|
$1,401,933
|
The
determination of the fair value of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed, includes approximately $0.6 million of
intangible and intellectual property and approximately $1.4 million
of goodwill.
63
Firestorm Acquisition
On
January 25, 2017, the Company acquired each of the Firestorm
Entities for the following consideration: $500,000 in cash;
$1,000,000 in the aggregate in the form of four unsecured,
subordinated promissory notes with interest (of which interest on
$500,000 of the notes is payable at an interest rate of 7% and
interest on $500,000 of the notes is payable at an interest rate of
2%) payable over, and principal due after, five years (of which
$907,407 was recorded to notes payable to reflect the net fair
value of the notes issued due to the difference in interest rates);
488,094 (946,875 post Brekford Merger) shares of Novume common
stock; warrants to purchase 162,699 (315,627 post Brekford Merger)
shares of Novume common stock, exercisable over a period of five
years, at an exercise price of $2.58 per share; and warrants to
purchase 162,699 (315,627 post Brekford Merger) shares of Novume
common stock, exercisable over a period of five years, at an
exercise price of $3.61 per share.
The
Company completed its analysis of the purchase price allocation in
2017. The table below shows the final breakdown related to the
Firestorm acquisition:
Cash
paid
|
$500,000
|
Notes
payable issued
|
907,407
|
Common
stock issued
|
976,286
|
Warrants
issued, at $2.58
|
125,411
|
Warrants
issued, at $3.61
|
102,289
|
Total
consideration
|
2,611,393
|
Less
cash received
|
(82,296)
|
Less
other assets
|
(137,457)
|
Less
intangible and intellectual property
|
(2,497,686)
|
Plus
liabilities assumed
|
106,046
|
Net
goodwill recorded
|
$-
|
The
determination of the fair value of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed includes approximately $2.5 million of
intangible and intellectual property. In connection with the
acquisition, Novume also entered into employment agreements with
Harry Rhulen, James Satterfield and Suzanne Loughlin (the
“Firestorm Principals”). On December 28, 2018, the
Firestorm Principals resigned and their employment agreements were
terminated effective with their resignations. Any Firestorm
Principals’ unvested options expired concurrently with their
termination. The Firestorm Principals had 90 days from the date of
their termination to exercise any vested options and they did not
do so.
Operations of Combined Entities
The
following 2017 unaudited pro-forma combined financial information
gives effect to the acquisition of Firestorm, the merger with
Brekford and the acquisition of Global as if they were consummated
January 1, 2017. This 2017 unaudited pro-forma financial
information is presented for information purposes only and is not
intended to present actual results that would have been attained
had the acquisition been completed as of January 1, 2017 (the
beginning of the earliest period presented) or to project potential
operating results as of any future date or for any future
periods.
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
Revenues
|
$48,562,441
|
$42,828,709
|
Net
loss
|
$(5,703,499)
|
$(6,183,910)
|
Basic
earnings (loss) per share
|
$(0.44)
|
$(0.52)
|
Diluted
earnings (loss) per share
|
$(0.44)
|
$(0.52)
|
|
|
|
Basic
Number of Shares
|
15,409,014
|
13,592,532
|
Diluted
Number of Shares
|
15,409,014
|
13,592,532
|
NOTE 4 – INVESTMENT AT COST AND NOTES RECEIVABLE
On
February 6, 2017, prior to the Brekford Merger, Brekford entered
into a Contribution and Unit Purchase Agreement (the “CUP
Agreement”) with LB&B Associates Inc.
(“LB&B”) and Global Public Safety, LLC
(“Global Public Safety”).
The
closing for the transaction set forth in the CUP Agreement occurred
on February 28, 2017 (the “GPS Closing”) and on such
date the Company contributed substantially all of the assets and
certain liabilities related to its vehicle services business to
Global Public Safety. On the GPS
Closing, the Company sold units representing 80.1% of the units
of Global Public Safety to
LB&B for $6,048,394, after certain purchase price adjustments
of prepaid expenses and unbilled customer deposits. $4,048,394 was
paid in cash, including a $250,000 deposit that was paid on
February 6, 2017, and $2,000,000 was paid by LB&B issuing the
Company a promissory note receivable (the “GPS Promissory
Note”). After the GPS Closing, the Company continues to own
19.9% of the units of Global Public Safety after the transaction. The Company is accounting
for this as an investment at cost. The Company recorded an
impairment of $262,140 related to the investment in Global Public
Safety for the year end December 31,
2018.
64
The GPS Promissory Note is subordinated to the LB&B’s
senior lender and accrues interest at a rate of 3% per annum. The
maturity date of the GPS Promissory Note was March 31, 2022. The
GPS Promissory Note was to be repaid as follows: (a) $75,000 plus
all accrued interest on each of September 30, 2017; December 31,
2017; March 31, 2018, June 30, 2018 and September 30, 2018 (or, in
the event any such date is not a business day, the first business
day after such date), (b) $100,000 plus all accrued interest on
each of December 31, 2018; March 31, 2019; June 30, 2019 and
September 30, 2019 (or, in the event any such date is not a
business day, the first business day after such date) (c) $125,000
plus all accrued interest on each of December 31, 2019; March 31,
2020; June 30, 2020; September 30, 2020, December 31, 2020; March
31, 2021, June 31, 2021; September 30, 2021; and December 31, 2021
(or, in the event any such date is not a business day, the first
business day after such date), and (d) $100,000 on March 31,
2022. The GPS Promissory Note
was secured pursuant to the terms of a Pledge Agreement (the
“LB&B Pledge Agreement”) between the Company and
LB&B. Pursuant to the LB&B Pledge Agreement LB&B,
granted the Company a continuing second-priority lien and security
interest in the LB&B’s units of Global Public
Safety, subject to liens of the
LB&B’s senior lender. As of December 31, 2017, the
Company reclassified the note receivable balance to a current asset
and wrote down $450,000 based on the decision to sell the note
receivable to an unrelated third-party. The sale was consummated in
February 2018. The current portion of notes receivable was $0 and
$1,475,000 as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
In connection with the sale, the Company indemnified the unrelated
third-party buyer for any amount of principal and interest not paid
by LB&B.
NOTE 5 – IDENTIFIABLE INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The following provides a breakdown of identifiable intangible
assets as of December 31, 2018:
|
Customer Relationships
|
Marketing Related
|
Technology Based
|
Total
|
Identifiable
intangible assets, gross
|
$5,588,677
|
$730,000
|
$83,412
|
$6,402,089
|
Accumulated
amortization
|
(1,332,868)
|
(234,718)
|
-
|
(1,567,586)
|
Identifiable
intangible assets, net
|
$4,255,809
|
$495,282
|
$83,412
|
$4,834,503
|
In connection with the acquisition of Firestorm, Global, Brekford,
BC Management and Secure Education, the Company identified
intangible assets of $2,497,686, $2,574,000, $558,412,
$386,804 and $386,801 respectively, representing trade names,
customer relationships and technology. These assets are being
amortized on a straight-line basis over their weighted average
estimated useful life of 7.8 years and amortization expense
amounted to $1,021,176 and $456,410 for the years ended December
31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
As of December 31, 2018, the estimated annual amortization expense
for each of the next five fiscal years and thereafter is as
follows:
2019
|
$1,048,980
|
2020
|
1,048,980
|
2021
|
996,778
|
2022
|
238,155
|
2023
|
154,596
|
Thereafter
|
1,347,014
|
Total
|
$4,834,503
|
65
NOTE 6 – SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW
INFORMATION
Supplemental
disclosures of cash flow information for the years ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017 was as follows:
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
Cash
paid for interest
|
$478,693
|
$213,455
|
Cash
paid for taxes
|
$13,607
|
$-
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of common stock for the extinguishment of warrants
|
$133,755
|
$-
|
Common
stock issued in connection with note payable
|
$126,001
|
$-
|
Warrants
issued in connection with issuance of Series A Preferred
Stock
|
$-
|
$67,491
|
Notes
payable for equipment purchase
|
$31,824
|
$-
|
|
|
|
Business
Combinations:
|
|
|
Current
assets
|
$-
|
$5,263,445
|
Property
and equipment
|
$-
|
$382,159
|
Intangible
assets
|
$386,001
|
$6,015,285
|
Goodwill
|
$-
|
$3,092,616
|
Other
non-current assets
|
$-
|
$271,381
|
Note
receivable, long-term
|
$-
|
$1,700,000
|
Assumed
liabilities
|
$-
|
$(5,069,709)
|
Deferred
revenue
|
$-
|
$(22,493)
|
Other
non-current liabilities
|
$-
|
$(16,584)
|
Issuance
of common stock
|
$(163,332)
|
$(7,784,560)
|
Issuance
of Series B preferred stock
|
$-
|
$(2,408,610)
|
Notes
payable
|
$-
|
$(1,117,253)
|
Issuance
of common stock warrants
|
$(123,472)
|
$(123,473)
|
On April 7, 2017, Novume paid cash dividends of $75,694 to
shareholders of record of Series A Preferred Stock as of
March 30, 2017. On July 8, 2017, October 7, 2017, January 5,
2018, April 6, 2018 and July 9, 2018, the Company paid cash
dividends of $87,907 to shareholders of record of Series A
Preferred Stock as of the end of the previous month. On
September 30, 2018, December 31, 2018 and March 31, 2019, the
Company accrued dividends of $87,907 to Series A Preferred Stock
shareholders of record. Accrued dividends payable to Series A
Preferred Stock shareholders were $175,814 and $87,907 as of
December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
On January 5, 2018, April 6, 2018 and July 9, 2018, the Company
paid cash dividends of $27,001 to shareholders of record of Series
B Preferred Stock as of the end of the previous month. On
September 30, 2018, December 31, 2018 and March 31, 2019, the
Company accrued dividends of $27,001 to Series B Preferred Stock
shareholders of record. Accrued dividends payable to Series B
Preferred Stock shareholders were $54,002 and $27,001 as of
December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
NOTE 7 – DEBT
Line of Credit
Global
has revolving lines of credit with WFB under the Wells Fargo Credit
Facilities. WFB agreed to advance
to Global, 90% of all eligible
accounts with a maximum facility amount of $5,000,000. Interest is
payable under the Wells Fargo Credit Facilities at a monthly rate equal to the Three-Month LIBOR
in effect from time to time plus 3% plus the Margin. The Margin is
3%. Payment of the revolving lines of credit is secured by
the accounts receivable of Global. The
terms of the Wells Fargo Credit Facilities ran through December 31, 2018, with automatic
renewal terms of 12 months. The current term of the Wells
Fargo Credit Facilities run through December 31, 2019. WFB or
Global may terminate the Wells
Fargo Credit Facilities upon at least
60 days’ written notice prior to the last day of the
current term. The principal balance at December 31, 2018 and
December 31, 2017 was $1,094,766 and $2,057,259, respectively. As
part of the lines of credit agreements, Global must maintain
certain financial covenants. Global met all financial covenant
requirements for the year ended December 31, 2018.
66
On November 12, 2017, AOC Key Solutions entered into an Account Purchase Agreement and
related agreements (the “AOC Wells Agreement”) with
WFB. Pursuant to the AOC Wells Agreement, AOC Key Solutions
agreed to sell and assign to WFB all
of its Accounts (as such term is defined in Article 9 of the
Uniform Commercial Code), constituting accounts arising out of
sales of Goods (as such term is defined in Article 9 of the Uniform
Commercial Code) or rendition of services that WFB deems to be
eligible for borrowing under the AOC Wells Agreement. WFB agreed to
advance to AOC Key Solutions,
90% of all eligible accounts with a maximum facility amount of
$3,000,000. Interest is payable under the AOC Wells Agreement at a
monthly rate equal to the Daily One Month LIBOR in effect from time
to time plus 5%. The AOC Wells Agreement also provides for a
deficit interest rate equal to the then applicable interest rate
plus 50% and a default interest rate equal to the then applicable
interest rate or deficit interest rate, plus 50%. The initial term
of the AOC Wells Agreement runs through December 31, 2018 (the
“Initial Term”), with automatic renewal terms of 12
months (the “Renewal Term”), commencing on the first
day after the last day of the Initial Term. AOC Key
Solutions may terminate the AOC Wells
Agreement upon at least 60 days’ prior written notice, but no
more than 120 days’ written notice, prior to and effective as
of the last day of the Initial Term or the Renewal Term, as the
case may be. WFB may terminate the AOC Wells Agreement at any time
and for any reason upon 30 days’ written notice or without
notice upon the occurrence of an Event of Default (as such term is
defined in the Agreement) after the expiration of any grace or cure
period. The principal balance at December 31, 2018 and
December 31, 2017 was $566,447 and $1,606,327, respectively. As
part of the line of credit agreement, AOC Key Solutions must
maintain certain financial covenants. AOC Key Solutions met all
financial covenant requirements for the year ended December 31,
2018.
Long-Term Debt
On
March 16, 2016, Novume entered into a Subordinated Note and
Warrant Purchase Agreement (the “Avon Road Note Purchase
Agreement”) pursuant to which Novume agreed to issue up to
$1,000,000 in subordinated debt (the "Avon Road Note") and warrants
to purchase up to 242,493 shares of Novume’s common stock
(“Avon Road Subordinated Note Warrants”). The exercise
price for the Avon Road Subordinated Note Warrants is equal to
$1.031 per share of common stock. Subordinated notes with a
face amount of $500,000 and Avon Road Subordinated Note Warrants to
purchase 121,247 shares of Novume’s common stock have been
issued pursuant to the Avon Road Note Purchase Agreement to Avon
Road Partners, L.P. (“Avon Road”), an affiliate of
Robert Berman, Novume’s CEO and a member of Novume’s
Board of Directors. The Avon Road Subordinated Note Warrants had an
expiration date of March 16, 2019 and qualified for equity
accounting as the warrants did not fall within the scope of ASC
Topic 480, Distinguishing
Liabilities from Equity. The debt discount is being
amortized as interest expense on a straight-line basis, which
approximates the effective interest method, through the maturity
date of the note payable. The effective interest rate of the Avon
Road Note Purchase Agreement is 12.9%.
The
Avon Road Note accrues simple interest on the unpaid principal of
the note at a rate equal to the lower of (a) 9% per
annum, or (b) the highest rate permitted by applicable law.
Interest is payable monthly, and the note was to mature on
March 16, 2019. On October 23, 2018, the maturity date of this
note was extended to March 16, 2020. On March 12, 2019, the
$500,000 balance due on the Avon Road Note was retired in its
entirety (see Note 17).
On
January 25, 2017, pursuant to the terms of the Novume acquisition
of the membership interests in the Firestorm Entities, the Company
issued $1,000,000 in the aggregate in the form of four unsecured,
subordinated promissory notes issued by Novume with interest
payable over five years after the Firestorm Closing Date, to Lancer
Financial Group, Inc. (“Lancer”) and the Firestorm
Principals. The principal amount of the note payable to Lancer is
$500,000. The principal amount of the note payable to
Mr. Rhulen is $166,666.66. The principal amount of the notes
payable to each of Mr. Satterfield and Ms. Loughlin is
$166,666.67. The Firestorm Principal notes are payable at an
interest rate of 2% and the Lancer note is payable at an interest
rate of 7%. The notes mature on January 25, 2022. The balance of
these notes payable was $938,272 and $924,383, net of unamortized
interest, as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, to
reflect the amortized fair value of the notes issued due to the
difference in interest rates of $61,728 and $75,617,
respectively.
On
April 3, 2018, Novume and Brekford entered into a transaction
pursuant to which an institutional investor (the
“Lender”) loaned $2,000,000 to Novume and Brekford (the
“2018 Promissory Note”). The loan was originally due
and payable on May 1, 2019 and bears interest at 15% per annum,
with a minimum of 15% interest payable if the loan is repaid prior
to May 1, 2019. On October 24, 2018, Novume and Brekford entered
into a note amendment with the Lender by which the maturity date of
the note was extended to May 1, 2020 (the “2018 Promissory
Note Amendment”). The 2018 Promissory Note Amendment further
provides for payment of interest through May 1, 2019, if the
principal is repaid before May 1, 2019, and for the payment of
interest through May 1, 2020, if the principal is repaid after May
1, 2019 and before May 1, 2020. The loan is secured by a security
interest in all of the assets of Brekford. In addition, Novume
issued 35,000 shares of common stock to the Lender, which shares
contain piggy-back registration rights. If the shares are not so
registered on the next selling shareholder registration statement,
Novume shall be obligated to issue an additional 15,000 shares to
the Lender. Upon any sale of Brekford or its assets, the Lender
will be entitled to receive 7% of any proceeds received by Novume
or Brekford in excess of $5 million (the “Lender’s
Participation”). In addition, commencing January 1, 2020, the
Lender shall be paid 7% of Brekford’s earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, less any capital
expenditures, which amount would be credited for any payments that
might ultimately be paid to the Lender as its Lender’s
Participation, if any. At April 3, 2018, the fair value of shares
issued was $126,000. At October 24, 2018, an additional $62,500 fee
was paid as consideration for extending the maturity date to May 1,
2020 (as described above) and designated as financing costs related
to the 2018 Promissory Note Amendment. Amortized financing cost for
the year ended December 31, 2018 was determined to be $96,378 and
is included in interest expense. The 2018 Promissory Note has an
effective interest rate of 19.5%. On March 12, 2019, the $2,000,000
balance due on the 2018 Promissory Note was retired in its entirety
(see Note 17).
67
The
principal amounts due for long-term notes payable described above
and a minor equipment note payable are shown below as of December
31, 2018:
|
Short-term
|
Long-term
|
Total
|
2019
|
$2,563,245
|
$-
|
$2,563,245
|
2020
|
-
|
4,665
|
4,665
|
2021
|
-
|
4,959
|
4,959
|
2022
|
-
|
1,005,273
|
1,005,273
|
2023
|
-
|
11,564
|
11,564
|
Thereafter
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Total
|
2,563,245
|
1,026,461
|
3,589,706
|
|
|
|
|
Less
unamortized interest
|
-
|
(61,728)
|
(61,728)
|
Less
unamortized financing costs
|
(94,034)
|
-
|
(94,034)
|
|
2,469,211
|
964,733
|
3,433,944
|
Current
portion of long-term debt
|
(2,469,211)
|
-
|
(2,469,211)
|
Long-term
debt
|
$-
|
$964,733
|
$964,733
|
NOTE 8 – INCOME TAXES
The
Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on
differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets
and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and
laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to
reverse. A valuation allowance is established when necessary to
reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
In determining the need for a valuation allowance, management
reviews both positive and negative evidence pursuant to the
requirements of ASC Topic 740, including current and historical
results of operations, future income projections and the overall
prospects of the Company’s business.
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the
“2017 Act”) was enacted, which changes U.S. tax law and
includes various provisions that impact our company. The 2017 Act
effects our company by (i) changing U.S. tax rates, (ii) increasing
the Company’s ability to utilize accumulated net operating
losses generated after December 31, 2017, and (iii) impacts the
estimates of our deferred tax assets and liabilities.
The
expense (benefit) benefit from income taxes for the years ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017 consists of the following:
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
Current:
|
|
|
State
|
$29,250
|
$23,919
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
Federal
|
$82,893
|
$(311,211)
|
State
|
(82,893)
|
(7,374)
|
Expense
(benefit) from income taxes
|
$29,250
|
$(294,666)
|
The
components of deferred income tax assets and liabilities are as
follows at December 31, 2018 and 2017:
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
Deferred
tax assets:
|
|
|
Fixed
assets
|
$-
|
$14,604
|
Amortizable
start-up costs
|
34,439
|
-
|
Accrual
and others
|
240,646
|
507,052
|
Interest
expense carryforward
|
147,260
|
|
Net
operating loss carryforward
|
2,517,900
|
1,513,921
|
Valuation
allowance
|
(2,308,460)
|
(1,342,108)
|
|
631,785
|
693,469
|
|
|
|
Deferred
tax liabilities:
|
|
|
Goodwill
and Intangibles
|
(551,301)
|
(693,469)
|
Fixed
assets
|
(80,484)
|
-
|
Total
deferred tax assets, net
|
$-
|
$-
|
68
The
difference between the income tax provision computed at the U.S.
Federal statutory rate and the effective tax rate is as follows for
the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017:
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
U.S.
statutory federal rate
|
21.0%
|
34.0%
|
(Decrease)
increase in taxes resulting from:
|
|
|
State
income tax rate, net of U.S. Federal benefit
|
2.9%
|
5.1%
|
Acquisition
related costs
|
0.0%
|
-6.8%
|
Impact
of changes in tax rates
|
-0.1%
|
-16.9%
|
True-ups
|
-5.7%
|
0.0%
|
Other
|
-1.6%
|
-4.0%
|
Valuation
allowance
|
-17.0%
|
-5.8%
|
Effective
tax rate
|
-0.5%
|
5.6%
|
The
Company files income tax returns in the United States and in
various state and foreign jurisdictions. No U.S. Federal, state or
foreign income tax audits were in process as of December 31,
2018.
Management has evaluated the recoverability of the net deferred
income tax assets and the level of the valuation allowance required
with respect to such net deferred income tax assets. After
considering all available facts, the Company fully reserved for its
net deferred tax assets because management believes that it is not
more likely than not that their benefits will be realized in future
periods. The Company will continue to evaluate its deferred tax
assets to determine whether any changes in circumstances could
affect the realization of their future benefit. If it is determined
in future periods that portions of the Company’s net deferred
income tax assets satisfy the realization standard, the valuation
allowance will be reduced accordingly.
At
December 31, 2018, Novume had gross net operating loss
carryforwards of $9,733,277 and a valuation allowance of $2,308,460
recorded against its net deferred tax assets.
At
December 31, 2017, Novume had gross net operating loss
carryforwards of $5,909,378 and a valuation allowance of $1,342,108
recorded against its net deferred tax assets.
For the
years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, Novume did not record any
interest or penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits. It is
the Company’s policy to record interest and penalties related
to unrecognized tax benefits as part of income tax expense. The
2015 through 2017 tax years remain subject to examination by the
IRS.
NOTE 9 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common Stock
The
Company is authorized to issue 30,000,000 shares of common stock,
$0.0001 par value. As of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017,
the issued and outstanding common shares of Novume were 18,767,619
and 14,463,364, respectively.
On
March 15, 2016, the stockholders of AOC Key Solutions formed
KeyStone as a holding company with the same proportionate ownership
percentage as AOC Key Solutions. Pursuant to the KeyStone Merger
Agreement, the stockholders exchanged 100% of the outstanding
common stock of AOC Key Solutions for 5,000,000 (9,699,720 post
merger exchange) shares newly issued KeyStone common stock,
representing 100% of the outstanding common stock. The formation of
KeyStone provided for 25,000,000 authorized shares of KeyStone
$0.0001 par value common stock. As of December 31, 2016,
5,000,000 (9,699,720 post merger exchange) shares of KeyStone
common stock were issued and outstanding.
In
January 2017, the Company issued 488,094 (946,875 post Brekford
merger exchange) shares of KeyStone common stock as consideration
as part of its acquisition of Firestorm.
Upon completion of the KeyStone and Brekford merger on August 28,
2017, the pre-merger stockholders of KeyStone owned approximately 80%
of the issued and outstanding capital stock of the Company on a
fully-diluted basis, and the pre-merger stockholders of Brekford
owned approximately 20% of the issued and outstanding capital stock
of Novume on a fully-diluted basis. As consideration, in accordance
with the terms of the Brekford Merger Agreement, the Company issued
5,158,503 shares of Novume common stock to former KeyStone
shareholders and 3,287,187 shares of Novume common stock to
former Brekford shareholders.
69
In
October 2017, the Company issued 375,000 shares of Novume common
stock as consideration as part of its acquisition of
Global.
In
December 2017, the Company issued 33,333 shares of Novume common
stock as consideration as part of its acquisition of BC
Management.
In
January 2018, the Company issued 33,333 shares of Novume common
stock as consideration as part of its acquisition of Secure
Education.
In
April 2018, the Company issued 35,000 shares of Novume common stock
as additional consideration to the Lender in connection with the
2018 Promissory Note.
As part
of its acquisition of Brekford on August 29, 2017, the Company
assumed warrants to purchase 56,000 shares of Novume common stock
(the “Brekford Warrants”) (see Note 10). Effective
October 16, 2018, the Company entered into exchange agreements with
holders of the Brekford Warrants pursuant to which the Company
issued to the holders an aggregate of 96,924 shares of common stock
in exchange for the return of the warrants to the Company for
cancellation.
On
November 1, 2018, the Company issued 4,125,000 shares of common
stock through an underwritten public offering at a public offering
price of $0.80 per share. Net proceeds to the Company was
approximately $2.8 million. In addition, the Company granted
underwriters a 45-day option to purchase up to 618,750 additional
shares of common stock to cover over-allotment, if any. The
underwriters did not exercise this option and the options were
cancelled. As part of the consideration to the underwriters, the
Company issued to the underwriters warrants to purchase an
aggregate of 206,250 shares of common stock, exercisable over a
period of five years, at an exercise price of $1.00 per share. The
underwriter warrants have a value of approximately $0.2 million and
are exercisable commencing April 27, 2019 and expire on October 29,
2023.
On
December 13, 2018, the Company received a letter from the Nasdaq
indicating that the Company is required to maintain a minimum bid
price of $1 per share of its common stock. The Company's closing
bid price of its common stock had been less than $1 for the
previous 30 consecutive business days. As such, the Company was not
compliant with the minimum bid price requirements under Nasdaq
Listing Rule 5550(a)(2). The letter from Nasdaq provided the
Company with a compliance period of 180 calendar days, or until
June 11, 2019, to regain compliance with the minimum bid price
requirement. If at any time during this 180-day compliance period
the closing bid price of the Company’s common stock is at
least $1 for a minimum of 10 consecutive business days, then Nasdaq
will provide the Company with written confirmation of compliance
and the matter will be closed.
In the
event that the Company’s common stock were to be delisted
from the Nasdaq, management expects that it would be traded on the
OTCQB or OTCQX, which are unorganized, inter-dealer,
over-the-counter markets which provides significantly less
liquidity than the Nasdaq or other national securities exchanges.
In the event that the Company’s common stock were to be
delisted from the Nasdaq, it may have a material adverse effect on
the trading and price.
For the
year ended December 31, 2018, the Company issued 13,998 shares of Novume common stock
related to the exercise of common stock options.
For the
year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company issued
4,304,255 and 9,463,364 shares
of Novume common stock, respectively.
On
February 15, 2019, the Company entered into Amendment No. 1 to the
OpenALPR Purchase Agreement (see Note 12), pursuant to which the
Company agreed to issue 600,000 shares of Novume common stock as
partial consideration for the acquisition of the assets of
OpenALPR. On March 12, 2019, the Company issued 600,000 shares of
Novume common stock pursuant to the acquisition of
OpenALPR.
Preferred Stock
The
Company is authorized to issue up to 2,000,000 shares of preferred
stock, $0.0001 par value. The Company’s preferred stock may
be entitled to preference over the common stock with respect to the
distribution of assets of the Company in the event of liquidation,
dissolution or winding-up of the Company, whether voluntarily or
involuntarily, or in the event of any other distribution of assets
of the Company among its shareholders for the purpose of the
winding-up of its affairs. The authorized but unissued shares of
the preferred stock may be divided into, and issued in, designated
series from time to time by one or more resolutions adopted by the
Board of Directors of the Company. The Board of Directors of the
Company, in its sole discretion, has the power to determine the
relative powers, preferences and rights of each series of preferred
stock.
70
Series A Cumulative Convertible Redeemable Preferred
Stock
Of the
2,000,000 authorized shares of preferred stock, 500,000 shares were
initially designated as $0.0001 par value Series A Cumulative
Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock (the “Series A
Preferred Stock”). The number of designated shares of the
Series A Preferred Stock was increased to 505,000 shares on March
20, 2017.
In
November 2016, KeyStone commenced a Regulation A Offering (the
“Reg A Offering”) of up to 3,000,000 Units. Each Unit
(post merger exchange) consisted of one share of Series A Preferred
Stock and one Unit Warrant to purchase 0.48 shares of
Novume’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.03 per
share. The holders of Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to
quarterly dividends of 7.0% per annum per share.
The
holders of Series A Preferred Stock have a put right to convert
each share into common stock at an initial conversion price and a
specified price which increases annually based on the passage of
time beginning in November 2019. The holders of Series A Preferred
Stock also have a put right after 60 months from the issuance date
to redeem any or all of the Series A Preferred Stock at a
redemption price of $15.00 per share plus any accrued but unpaid
dividends. Novume has a call right after 36 months from the
issuance date to redeem all of the Series A Preferred Stock at a
redemption price which increases annually based on the passage of
time beginning in November 2019. The Series A Preferred Stock
contains an automatic conversion feature based on a qualified
initial public offering in excess of $30,000,000 or a written
agreement by at least two-thirds of the holders of Series A
Preferred Stock at an initial conversion price and a specified
price which increases annually based on the passage of time
beginning in November 2016. Based on the terms of the Series A
Preferred Stock, the Company concluded that the Series A Preferred
Stock should be classified as temporary equity in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2018 and
2017.
The Reg
A Offering Units were sold at $10 per Unit in minimum investment
amounts of $5,000. There were three closings related to the sales
of the Units. The gross proceeds, which the Company deemed to be
fair value, from the first closing on December 23, 2016
totaled $3,015,700 with the issuance of 301,570 shares of Series A
Preferred Stock and 301,570 Unit Warrants. On January 23,
2017, the Company completed its second closing of the Reg A
Offering for the sale and issuance of 119,757 shares of Series A
Preferred Stock and 119,757 Unit Warrants with the Company
receiving aggregate gross proceeds of $1,197,570.
On
March 21, 2017, the Company completed its third and final
closing of the Reg A Offering for the sale and issuance of 81,000
shares of Series A Preferred Stock and 81,000 Unit Warrants with
the Company receiving aggregate gross proceeds of
$810,000.
The
aggregate total sold in the Reg A Offering through and including
the third and final closing was 502,327 Units, or 502,327 shares of
Series A Preferred Stock and 502,327 Unit Warrants, for total gross
proceeds to the Company of $5,023,270. The Reg A Offering is now
closed.
Novume
adjusts the value of the Series A Preferred Stock to redemption
value at the end of each reporting period. The adjustment to the
redemption value is recorded through additional paid in capital of
$655,103 and $550,655 for the years ended December 31, 2018 and
2017, respectively.
As of
December 31, 2018 and 2017, 502,327 shares of Series A Preferred
Stock were issued and outstanding.
The
Series A Preferred Stock is entitled to quarterly cash dividends of
$0.175 (7% per annum) per share. Dividends accrue quarterly and
dividend payments for declared dividends are due within five
business days following the end of a quarter. On April 7, 2017, Novume paid cash dividends
of $75,694 to shareholders of record of Series A Preferred Stock as
of March 30, 2017. On July 8, 2017, October 7, 2017, January
5, 2018, April 6, 2018 and July 9, 2018, the Company paid cash
dividends of $87,907 to shareholders of record of Series A
Preferred Stock as of the end of the previous month. On
September 30, 2018, December 31, 2018 and March 31, 2019, the
Company accrued dividends of $87,907 to Series A Preferred Stock
shareholders of record. Accrued dividends payable to Series A
Preferred Stock shareholders were $175,814 and $87,907 as of
December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
The
Unit Warrants expire on November 8, 2023. The Unit Warrants are
required to be measured at fair value at the time of issuance and
classified as equity. The Company determined that under the
Black-Scholes option pricing model, the aggregate fair value at the
dates of issuance was $169,125. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017,
502,327 Unit Warrants were outstanding.
Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock
Of the
2,000,000 authorized shares of preferred stock, 240,861 shares are
designated as $0.0001 par value Novume Series B Cumulative
Convertible Preferred Stock (the "Series B Preferred Stock"). As
part of the Global Merger, the Company issued 240,861 shares of
$0.0001 par value Series B Preferred Stock. All Series B Preferred
Stock was issued at a price of $10.00 per share as part of the
acquisition of the Global Merger. The Series B Preferred Stock has
a conversion price of $5.00 per share. Each Series B Preferred
Stock has an automatic conversion feature based on the share price
of Novume. The Series B Preferred Stock is entitled to quarterly
cash dividends of 1.121% (4.484% per annum) per share. Dividends
accrue quarterly and dividend payments for declared dividends are
due within five business days following the end of a quarter.
On January 5, 2018, April 6, 2018 and
July 9, 2018, the Company paid cash dividends of $27,001 to
shareholders of record of Series B Preferred Stock as of the end of
the previous month. On September 30, 2018, December 31, 2018
and March 31, 2019, the Company accrued dividends of $27,001 to Series B Preferred Stock
shareholders of record. Accrued dividends payable to Series B
Preferred Stock shareholders were $54,002 and $27,001 as of
December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
71
Warrants
The
Company has a total of 1,473,163 and 1,256,247 warrants issued and
outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. These
warrants are exercisable and convertible for a total of 1,214,491
and 997,575 shares of Novume
common stock as of December 31, 2018 and 2017,
respectively.
The
exercise price for the Brekford Warrant is $7.50 and they expire on
March 31, 2020. Effective October 16, 2018, the Company entered
into exchange agreements with holders of the Brekford Warrant
pursuant to which the Company issued to the holders an aggregate of
96,924 shares of common stock in exchange for the return of the
warrants to the Company for cancellation. As of December 31, 2018,
no Brekford Warrants were outstanding. As of December 31, 2017,
there were 56,000 Brekford Warrants outstanding (see Note
10).
As part
of the Reg A Offering in fiscal year 2016 and 2017, Novume issued
502,327 Unit Warrants to the holders of Series A Preferred Stock.
The exercise price for these Unit Warrants is $1.03 and they are
convertible into a total of 243,655 shares of Novume common stock.
The Unit Warrants expire on November 23, 2023. As of December 31,
2018 and 2017, there are 502,327 Unit Warrants
outstanding.
On
March 16, 2016, Novume entered into a Subordinated Note and
Warrant Purchase Agreement (the “Avon Road Note Purchase
Agreement”) pursuant to which Novume agreed to issue up to
$1,000,000 in subordinated debt and warrants to purchase up to
242,493 shares of Novume’s common stock (“Avon Road
Subordinated Note Warrants”). The exercise price for the Avon
Road Subordinated Note Warrants is equal to $1.031 per share
of common stock. Subordinated notes with a face amount of $500,000
and Avon Road Subordinated Note Warrants to purchase 121,247 shares
of Novume’s common stock have been issued pursuant to the
Avon Road Note Purchase Agreement to Avon Road, an affiliate of
Robert Berman, Novume’s CEO and a member of Novume’s
Board of Directors. These warrants were exercised on December 11,
2017 for proceeds of $125,006 and there are no Avon Road
Subordinated Note Warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and
2017. On March 12, 2019, the $500,000 principal balance due on the
Avon Road Note was retired in its entirety (see Note
17).
Pursuant
to its acquisition of Firestorm on January 24, 2017, Novume issued
warrants to purchase 315,627 shares of Novume common stock,
exercisable over a period of five years, at an exercise price of
$2.5744 per share; and warrants to purchase 315,627 Novume Common
Shares, exercisable over a period of five years, at an exercise
price of $3.6083 per share. The expiration date of the Firestorm
warrants is January 24, 2022. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017,
there are 631,254 Firestorm warrants outstanding.
Pursuant
to its acquisition of BC Management on December 31, 2017, Novume
issued warrants to purchase 33,333 shares of Novume common stock,
exercisable over a period of five years, at an exercise price of
$5.44 per share; and warrants to purchase 33,333 Novume common
stock, exercisable over a period of five years, at an exercise
price of $6.53 per share. The expiration date of the BC Management
warrants is December 31, 2022. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017,
there are 66,666 BC Management warrants outstanding.
Pursuant
to its acquisition of Secure Education on January 1, 2018, Novume
issued warrants to purchase 33,333 shares of Novume common stock,
exercisable over a period of five years, at an exercise price of
$5.44 per share; and warrants to purchase 33,333 Novume common
stock, exercisable over a period of five years, at an exercise
price of $6.53 per share. The expiration date of the Secure
Education warrants is January 1, 2023. As of December 31, 2018,
there are 66,666 Secure Education warrants
outstanding.
On
November 1, 2018, in connection with the underwritten public
offering, the Company issued to the underwriters warrants to
purchase 206,250 shares of Novume common stock, exercisable over a
period of five years, at an exercise price of $1.00 per share. The
underwriter warrants have a value of approximately $0.2 million and
are exercisable commencing April 27, 2019 and expire on October 29,
2023.
NOTE 10 – WARRANT DERIVATIVE LIABILITY
On
March 17, 2015, Brekford issued a Warrant (“Brekford
Warrant”), which permits the holder to purchase 56,000 shares
of common stock with an exercise price of $7.50 per share and a
life of five years.
The
Brekford Warrant exercise price is subject to anti-dilution
adjustments that allow for its reduction in the event the Company
subsequently issues equity securities, including shares of common
stock or any security convertible or exchangeable for shares of
common stock, for no consideration or for consideration less than
$7.50 a share. The Company accounted for the conversion option of
the Brekford Warrant in accordance with ASC Topic 815. Accordingly,
the conversion option is not considered to be solely indexed to the
Company’s own stock and, as such, is recorded as a liability.
The derivative liability associated with the Brekford Warrant has
been measured at fair value at December 31, 2017 using the Black
Scholes option-pricing model. The assumptions used in the
Black-Scholes model are as follows: dividend yield of 0%;
expected volatility of 70.0% - 81.6%; weighted average risk-free
interest rate of 1.89%; expected life of 2.21-2.71 years; and
estimated fair value of the common stock of $1.80-$4.90 per
share.
72
Effective
October 16, 2018, the Company entered into exchange agreements with
holders of the Brekford Warrant pursuant to which the Company
issued to the holders an aggregate of 96,924 shares of common stock
in exchange for the return of the warrants to the Company for
cancellation and extinguishment of the warrant
liability.
At
December 31, 2018 and 2017, the outstanding fair value of the
derivative liability was $0 and $78,228, respectively.
NOTE 11 – COMMON STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
On
March 16, 2016, two stockholders of the Company entered into
an option agreement with Avon Road (collectively, the “Avon
Road Parties”). Under the terms of this agreement Avon Road
paid the stockholders $10,000 each (a total of $20,000) for the
right to purchase, on a simultaneous and pro-rata basis, up to
4,318,856 shares of Novume’s common stock owned by those two
shareholders at $0.52 per share, which was determined to be the
fair value. The option agreement had a two-year term which would
have expired on March 16, 2018. On September 7, 2017, the Avon
Road Parties entered into an amended and restated option agreement
which extended the right to exercise the option up to and including
March 21, 2019 (the “Amended and Restated Option
Agreement”). Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Option
Agreement, Avon Road exercised the option to purchase 4,318,856
shares of Novume’s common stock. As of December 31, 2018,
Avon Road may be deemed to be the beneficial owner with shared
voting and dispositive power of 4,440,104 shares of Novume common
stock in the aggregate, or 23.7% of the class of securities. Mr.
Robert A. Berman may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of
4,462,104 shares of Novume common stock in the aggregate, or 23.8%
of the class of securities. As the general partner of Avon Road,
Mr. Berman may be deemed to share with Avon Road (and not with any
third-party) the power to vote or direct the vote of and to dispose
or direct the disposition of the 4,440,104 shares of Novume common
stock beneficially owned by Avon Road, or 23.7% of the class of
securities. In addition, as of December 31, 2018, Mr. James
McCarthy now holds directly 2,725,836 shares of Novume common and
he may be deemed to be the beneficial owner with sole voting and
dispositive power of 2,725,836 shares of Novume common stock, or
14.5% of the class of securities.
NOTE 12 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Operating Leases
During
2017 and 2018, AOC Key Solutions leased office space in Chantilly,
Virginia under the terms of a ten-year lease expiring
October 31, 2019. The lease contained one five-year renewal
option. The lease terms included an annual increase in base rent
and expenses of 2.75%, which have been amortized ratably over the
lease term.
During
this same period, AOC Key Solutions was the lessor in an agreement
to sublease office space in Chantilly, Virginia with an initial
term of two years, with eight one-year options for the subtenant to
renew the lease through October 31, 2019. This sublease
provided for annual increases in base rent and expenses of 2.90%.
The initial term ended October 31, 2011 and the subtenant
exercised the renewal options through 2014. On April 7, 2015,
the sublease was amended to sublease more space to the subtenant
and change the rental calculation. The sublease provided for an
offset of $182,534 to rent expense for each of the years ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Effective
December 31, 2018, AOC Key Solutions terminated the original lease
agreement for the Chantilly, Virginia space, and on January 1,
2019, AOC Key Solutions entered into a new agreement as sublessor
for a portion of the original space occupied in this location. This
sublease includes annual increases in base rent and expenses of
2.75% and expires on June 30, 2024, with a right to renew subject
to the sublessor renewing its lease.
AOC Key
Solutions also leases office space in New Orleans, Louisiana under
the terms of a three-year lease which expired on May 31, 2018,
and lease payments are currently being made on a month-to-month
basis.
Firestorm
leases office space in Roswell, Georgia under the terms of a lease
expiring on January 31, 2022 and in Grand Rapids, Michigan under a
lease which expires April 30, 2019.
Brekford
leases office space from Global Public Safety, LLC on a
month-to-month basis. Brekford also leases space under an operating
lease expiring on April 30, 2019.
Global
leases office space in Fort Worth, Texas under the terms of a lease
expiring on January 31, 2022.
73
Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was
$790,999 and $605,264, respectively, and is included in selling,
general and administrative expenses. As of December 31, 2018, the
future obligations over the primary terms of Novume’s
long-term leases expiring through 2024 are as
follows:
2019
|
$348,222
|
2020
|
337,437
|
2021
|
252,262
|
2022
|
193,898
|
2023
|
189,682
|
Thereafter
|
81,834
|
Total
|
$1,403,335
|
The Company is currently finalizing the impact of the FASB’s
new lease standard, ASU 2016-02, on its Consolidated Financial
Statements and related disclosures, as described in Note 2 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
NeoSystems
The Company planned to acquire NeoSystems LLC
(“NeoSystems”) through a forward merger under an
agreement entered into on November 16, 2017. The consummation of
the merger was subject to, among other things, the completion of
the Qualifying Offering by February 28, 2018, the proceeds of which
were expected to be used in connection with the contemplated
acquisition of NeoSystems. On March 7, 2018, the Company received
notice of termination of the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the
“NeoSystems Merger Agreement”). The stated basis of
termination by NeoSystems was due to the Company’s failure to
complete a Qualifying Offering, as defined in the NeoSystems Merger
Agreement, by February 28, 2018. The terms of the NeoSystems Merger
Agreement provided that upon termination, the Company was required
to pay certain fees and expenses of legal counsel, financial
advisors, investment bankers and accountants, which shall not
exceed in the aggregate $450,000 (the “Breakup Fee”).
During 2018, the Company paid NeoSystems a Breakup Fee of $225,000
which was recorded as a selling, general and administrative
expense.
OpenALPR Asset Purchase Agreement
On
November 14, 2018, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase
Agreement (the “OpenALPR Purchase Agreement”) by and
among Novume, OpenALPR and Matthew Hill pursuant to which the
Company will purchase all of the assets of OpenALPR and its
subsidiaries, except for certain excluded assets, and assume
certain liabilities as provided for in the OpenALPR Purchase
Agreement (the “OpenALPR Acquisition”). As
consideration for the OpenALPR Acquisition, Novume shall pay
$15,000,000, subject to certain adjustments, provided that OpenALPR
may elect to receive up to 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s
common stock, par value, $0.0001 per share, in lieu of up to
$5,000,000 in cash valued at a price per share of $5.
On
February 15, 2019, the Company entered into Amendment No. 1 to the
OpenALPR Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which the parties agreed
to amend the Base Purchase Price to $7,000,000, subject to
adjustment after closing, issue a promissory note in the amount of
$5,000,000, and issue 600,000 shares of Novume common stock as
consideration for the acquisition of OpenALPR’s
assets.
On
March 8, 2019, the Company entered into Amendment No. 2 to the
OpenALPR Asset Purchase Agreement which eliminated the working capital adjustment
set forth in the OpenALPR Asset Purchase Agreement, as amended, and replaced it
with an adjustment for prepaid maintenance
contracts.
On
March 12, 2019, the Company completed the acquisition of all of the
assets of OpenALPR, except for certain excluded assets, and assumed
certain liabilities, through Brekford. Consideration paid as part
of this acquisition was: (a) $7,000,000 in cash, subject to
adjustment after closing; (b) 600,000 shares of Novume common
stock, and (c) a promissory note in the principal amount of
$5,000,000 pursuant to the 2019 Promissory Note, together with an
accompanying warrant to purchase 625,000 shares of Novume common
stock, exercisable over a period of five years at an exercise price
of $0.74 per share, valued at $208,125 (see Note 17). As the
OpenALPR acquisition has recently been completed, the Company is
currently in the process of completing the purchase price
allocation treating the OpenALPR acquisition as a business
combination. The purchase price allocation for OpenALPR will be
included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements
in the first quarter of the year ending December 31, 2019. As of
March 31, 2019, there are 625,000 OpenALPR warrants
outstanding.
Hill Employment Agreement
Also,
on November 14, 2018, concurrent with the execution of the OpenALPR
Purchase Agreement, the Company entered into an employment
agreement with Matthew Hill (the “Hill Employment
Agreement”) which became effective as of March 12, 2019, the
closing date of the OpenALPR Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which
Mr. Hill began serving as the Company’s Chief Science
Officer. The Hill Employment Agreement provides for a term of three
years unless earlier terminated pursuant to the terms thereof which
term renews for additional one-year terms until terminated upon
ninety days advance notice. Mr. Hill will earn an annual base
compensation of $165,000.
74
Either
party may terminate the Hill Employment Agreement with or without
cause with notice as contemplated by the Hill Employment Agreement,
provided however, if Mr. Hill determines to terminate his
employment, he shall provide the Company with at least six months
prior written notice. The Hill Employment Agreement provides for
the payment of severance under certain circumstances as outlined
therein.
NOTE 13 – EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
In
August 2017, the Company approved and adopted the 2017 Equity Award
Plan (the “2017 Plan”) which replaced the 2016 Equity
Award Plan (the “2016 Plan”). The 2017 Plan permits the
granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted
and unrestricted stock awards, phantom stock, performance awards
and other stock-based awards for the purpose of attracting and
retaining quality employees, directors and consultants. Maximum
awards available under the 2017 Plan were initially set at
3,000,000 shares.
Stock Options
Stock
options granted under the 2017 Plan may be either incentive stock
options (“ISOs”) or non-qualified stock options
(“NSOs”). ISOs may be granted to employees and NSOs may
be granted to employees, directors, or consultants. Stock options
are granted at exercise prices as determined by the Board of
Directors. The vesting period is generally three to four years with
a contractual term of 10 years.
The
2017 Plan is administered by the Administrator, which is currently
the Board of Directors of the Company. The Administrator has the
exclusive authority, subject to the terms and conditions set forth
in the 2017 Plan, to determine all matters relating to awards under
the 2017 Plan, including the selection of individuals to be granted
an award, the type of award, the number of shares of Novume common
stock subject to an award, and all terms, conditions, restrictions
and limitations, if any, including, without limitation, vesting,
acceleration of vesting, exercisability, termination, substitution,
cancellation, forfeiture, or repurchase of an award and the terms
of any instrument that evidences the award.
Novume
has also designed the 2017 Plan to include a number of provisions
that Novume’s management believes promote best practices by
reinforcing the alignment of equity compensation arrangements for
nonemployee directors, officers, employees, consultants and
stockholders’ interests. These provisions include, but are
not limited to, the following:
No Discounted Awards. Awards that have
an exercise price cannot be granted with an exercise price less
than the fair market value on the grant date.
No Repricing Without Stockholder
Approval. Novume cannot, without stockholder approval,
reduce the exercise price of an award (except for adjustments in
connection with a Novume recapitalization), and at any time when
the exercise price of an award is above the market value of Novume
common stock, Novume cannot, without stockholder approval, cancel
and re-grant or exchange such award for cash, other awards or a new
award at a lower (or no) exercise price.
No Evergreen Provision. There is no
evergreen feature under which the shares of common stock authorized
for issuance under the 2017 Plan can be automatically
replenished.
No Automatic Grants. The 2017 Plan does
not provide for “reload” or other automatic grants to
recipients.
No Transferability. Awards generally
may not be transferred, except by will or the laws of descent and
distribution or pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order,
unless approved by the Administrator.
No Tax Gross-Ups. The 2017 Plan does
not provide for any tax gross-ups.
No Liberal Change-in-Control
Definition. The change-in-control definition contained in
the 2017 Plan is not a “liberal” definition that would
be activated on mere stockholder approval of a
transaction.
“Double-trigger” Change in Control
Vesting. If awards granted under the 2017 Plan are assumed
by a successor in connection with a change in control of Novume,
such awards will not automatically vest and pay out solely as a
result of the change in control, unless otherwise expressly set
forth in an award agreement.
No Dividends on Unearned Performance
Awards. The 2017 Plan prohibits the current payment of
dividends or dividend equivalent rights on unearned
performance-based awards.
75
Limitation on Amendments. No
amendments to the 2017 Plan may be made without stockholder
approval if any such amendment would materially increase the number
of shares reserved or the per-participant award limitations under
the 2017 Plan, diminish the prohibitions on repricing stock options
or stock appreciation rights, or otherwise constitute a material
change requiring stockholder approval under applicable laws,
policies or regulations or the applicable listing or other
requirements of the principal exchange on which Novume’s
shares are traded.
Clawbacks. Awards based on the
satisfaction of financial metrics that are subsequently reversed,
due to a financial statement restatement or reclassification, are
subject to forfeiture.
When
making an award under the 2017 Plan, the Administrator may
designate the award as “qualified performance-based
compensation,” which means that performance criteria must be
satisfied in order for an employee to be paid the award. Qualified
performance-based compensation may be made in the form of
restricted common stock, restricted stock units, common stock
options, performance shares, performance units or other stock
equivalents. The 2017 Plan includes the performance criteria the
Administrator has adopted, subject to stockholder approval, for a
“qualified performance-based compensation”
award.
A
summary of stock option activity under the Company’s 2017
Plan for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 is as
follows:
|
Number of Shares
Subject to Option
|
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
|
Weighted Average
Remaining Contractual Term
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
|
Outstanding
Balance at January 1, 2017
|
58,499
|
$1.68
|
9.29
|
|
Granted
|
1,638,331
|
2.21
|
9.29
|
|
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Forfeited
|
(1,455)
|
(1.55)
|
(9.07)
|
|
Expired
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Outstanding
Balance at December 31, 2017
|
1,695,375
|
$2.19
|
9.26
|
$4,590,714
|
Granted
|
48,499
|
0.73
|
9.85
|
|
Exercised
|
(13,998)
|
1.68
|
9.50
|
|
Forfeited
|
(450,633)
|
1.82
|
8.71
|
|
Expired
|
(51,686)
|
1.36
|
8.53
|
|
Outstanding
Balance at December 31, 2018
|
1,227,557
|
$2.13
|
8.39
|
$-
|
Exercisable
at December 31, 2018
|
823,472
|
$1.87
|
8.32
|
$-
|
Vested
and expected to vest at December 31, 2018
|
1,107,236
|
$2.08
|
8.37
|
$-
|
Stock
compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017
was $464,509 and $408,465, respectively, and is included in
selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations. The weighted average grant
date fair value of options granted for the years ended December 31,
2018 and 2017 was $0.73 and $2.21, respectively. The intrinsic
value of the stock options granted during the years ended December
31, 2018 and 2017, was $0 and $4,399,570, respectively. The total
fair value of shares that became vested after grant during the
years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $325,095 and $1,624,252,
respectively.
As of
December 31, 2018, there was $428,557 of unrecognized stock
compensation expense related to unvested stock options granted
under the 2017 Plan that will be recognized over a weighted average
period of 1.75 years.
NOTE 14 – EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN
AOC Key
Solutions has a defined contribution savings plan under Section
401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) (the
“AOC 401(k) Plan”) which was amended on January 1,
2013, as required by the Code. Pursuant to the amended AOC 401(k)
Plan, AOC Key Solutions will make nondiscretionary “safe
harbor” matching contributions for all participants of 100%
of the participant’s salary deferrals up to 3%, and 50% of
deferrals up to the next 2%, of the participant’s
compensation.
Brekford has a defined contribution savings plan under Section
401(k) of the Code (the “Brekford 401(k) Plan”). The
Brekford 401(k) Plan is a defined contribution plan, which covers
substantially all U.S.-based employees who have completed three
months of service. The Brekford 401(k) Plan provides that Brekford
will match 50% of the participant salary deferrals up to 3% of a
participant’s compensation for all participants.
76
GCP
also maintains a 401(k) plan (the “GCP 401(k) Plan”),
which was amended September 15, 2014. However, GCP has not
historically made matching contributions to the GCP 401(k)
Plan.
The
amount of contributions recorded by the Company under these plans
during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were $158,893 and
$144,932, respectively.
On
January 1, 2019, Novume established the Novume Solutions, Inc.
401(k) Plan (the “Novume 401(k) Plan”), a Qualified
Automatic Contribution Arrangement (QACA) safe harbor plan, and the
AOC 401(k) Plan, the Brekford 401(k) Plan, and the GCP 401(k) Plan
were amended and merged into the Novume 401(k) Plan. Employees that
satisfied the eligibility requirements became participants in the
Novume 401(k) Plan. Novume contributes an amount equal to the sum
of 100% of a participant’s elective deferrals that do not
exceed 1% of participant’s compensation, plus 50% of the
participant’s elective deferrals that exceed 1% of the
participants compensation, but do not exceed 6% of the
participant’s compensation. Employee contributions are fully vested and
matching contributions are subject to a two-year service vesting
schedule.
NOTE 15 – INVENTORY
As of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, inventory consisted
entirely of parts of $72,702 and $155,716,
respectively.
NOTE 16 – EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
The
following table provides information relating to the calculation of
earnings (loss) per common share:
|
For the Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
Basic and diluted
(loss) earnings per share
|
|
|
Net
(loss) earnings from continuing operations
|
$(5,703,499)
|
$(5,041,134)
|
Less:
preferred stock accretion
|
(655,103)
|
(550,655)
|
Less:
preferred stock dividends
|
(459,632)
|
(362,131)
|
Net
income (loss) attributable to shareholders
|
(6,818,234)
|
(5,953,920)
|
Weighted
average common shares outstanding - basic
|
15,409,014
|
11,767,304
|
Basic
(loss) earnings per share
|
$(0.44)
|
$(0.51)
|
Weighted
average common shares outstanding - diluted
|
15,409,014
|
11,767,304
|
Diluted
(loss) earnings per share
|
$(0.44)
|
$(0.51)
|
Common
stock equivalents excluded due to anti-dilutive effect
|
3,898,257
|
2,362,877
|
As the
Company had a net loss for the year ended December 31, 2018, the
following 3,898,257 potentially dilutive securities were excluded
from diluted loss per share as the Company had a net loss:
1,214,491 for outstanding
warrants, 974,487 related to
the Series A Preferred Stock, 481,722 related to the Series B Preferred
Stock and 1,227,557 related to outstanding options.
For the
year ended December 31, 2017, the following potentially
2,362,877 dilutive securities
were excluded from diluted loss per share as the Company had a net
loss: 968,766 for outstanding
warrants, 932,070 related to
the Series A Preferred Stock, 120,430 related to the Series B Preferred
Stock and 341,611 related to
outstanding options. In addition, 64,082 options were excluded from the
diluted loss per share calculations as the exercise price of these
shares exceeded the per share value of the common
stock.
(Loss) Earnings Per Share under Two –
Class Method
The
Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock have the
non-forfeitable right to participate on an as converted basis at
the conversion rate then in effect in any common stock dividends
declared and, as such, is considered a participating security. The
Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock are
included in the computation of basic and diluted loss per share
pursuant to the two-class method. Holders of the Series A Preferred
Stock and Series B Preferred Stock do not participate in
undistributed net losses because they are not contractually
obligated to do so.
The
computation of diluted (loss) earnings per share attributable to
common stockholders reflects the potential dilution that could
occur if securities or other contracts to issue shares of common
stock that are dilutive were exercised or converted into shares of
common stock (or resulted in the issuance of shares of common
stock) and would then share in our earnings. During the periods in
which we record a loss attributable to common stockholders,
securities would not be dilutive to net loss per share and
conversion into shares of common stock is assumed not to
occur.
77
The
following table provides a reconciliation of net (loss) to
preferred shareholders and common stockholders for purposes of
computing net (loss) per share for the years ended December 31,
2018 and 2017:
|
For the Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
Net
(loss) earnings from continuing operations
|
$(5,703,499)
|
$(5,041,134)
|
Less:
preferred stock accretion
|
(655,103)
|
(550,655)
|
Less:
preferred stock dividends
|
(459,632)
|
(362,131)
|
Net
income (loss) attributable to shareholders
|
$(6,818,234)
|
$(5,953,920)
|
Denominator
(basic):
|
|
|
Weighted
average common shares outstanding
|
15,409,014
|
11,767,304
|
Participating
securities - Series A preferred stock
|
974,487
|
932,070
|
Participating
securities - Series B preferred stock
|
481,722
|
120,430
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
16,865,223
|
12,819,804
|
|
|
|
Loss per common
share - basic under two-class method
|
$(0.40)
|
$(0.46)
|
|
|
|
Denominator
(diluted):
|
|
|
Weighted
average common shares outstanding
|
15,409,014
|
11,767,304
|
Participating
securities - Series A preferred stock
|
974,487
|
932,070
|
Participating
securities - Series B preferred stock
|
481,722
|
120,430
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
16,865,223
|
12,819,804
|
|
|
|
Loss per common
share - basic under two-class method
|
$(0.40)
|
$(0.46)
|
NOTE 17 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Leasing Agreements
On
January 1, 2019, AOC Key Solutions entered into a new agreement as
sublessor for a portion of the original space occupied in
Chantilly, Virginia. This sublease includes annual increases in
base rent and expenses of 2.75% and expires on June 30, 2024, with
a right to renew subject to the sublessor renewing its
lease.
On
February 19, 2019, Secure Education entered into a lease assignment
transferring its interest in and to the lease for its office space
in Grand Rapids, Michigan, effective April 30, 2019.
Establishment of Novume 401(k) Plan
On
January 1, 2019, Novume established the Novume Solutions, Inc.
401(k) Plan (the “Novume 401(k) Plan”), a Qualified
Automatic Contribution Arrangement (QACA) safe harbor plan, and the
AOC 401(k) Plan, the Brekford 401(k) Plan, and the GCP 401(k) Plan
were amended and merged into the Novume 401(k) Plan (see Note 14).
Employees that satisfied the eligibility requirements became
participants in the Novume 401(k) Plan. Novume contributes an
amount equal to the sum of 100% of a participant’s elective
deferrals that do not exceed 1% of participant’s
compensation, plus 50% of the participant’s elective
deferrals that exceed 1% of the participants compensation, but do
not exceed 6% of the participant’s compensation. Employee contributions are fully vested and
matching contributions are subject to a two-year service vesting
schedule.
Amendments to the OpenALPR Asset Purchase Agreement
On
February 15, 2019, the Company entered into Amendment No. 1 to the
OpenALPR Asset Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which the parties
agreed to amend the Base Purchase Price to $7,000,000, subject to
adjustment after closing, issue a promissory note in the amount of
$5,000,000, and issue 600,000 shares of Novume common stock as
consideration for the acquisition of OpenALPR’s
assets.
78
On
March 8, 2019, the Company entered into Amendment No. 2 to the
OpenALPR Asset Purchase Agreement which eliminated the working capital adjustment
set forth in the OpenALPR Asset Purchase Agreement, as amended, and replaced it
with an adjustment for prepaid maintenance
contracts.
Series A Preferred Stock and Unit Warrants Designated as OTCQB
Securities
On
February 15, 2019, the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock and
Unit Warrants which had been designated as securities trading on
the OTC Markets OTCQX exchange were transferred to being designated
as trading on the OTC Markets OTCQB exchange.
Renaming of Brekford to Rekor Recognition Systems,
Inc.
On
February 28, 2019, the Company renamed Brekford to Rekor
Recognition Systems, Inc. (see Note 1).
2019 Promissory Note
On
March 12, 2019, Novume entered into a note purchase agreement
pursuant to which investors (the “2019 Lenders”) loaned
$20,000,000 to Novume (the “2019 Promissory Note”) and
the Company issued to the 2019 Lenders warrants to purchase
2,500,000 shares of Novume common stock (the “March 2019
Warrants”). The loan is due and payable on March 11, 2021 and
bears interest at 16% per annum, of which at least 10% per annum
shall be paid in cash. The full remaining portion of all interest,
if any, shall accrue and be paid-in-kind. The notes also require
(a) a premium, if paid before the maturity date, (b) a $1,000,000
exit fee due at maturity, and (c) compliance with affirmative,
negative and financial covenants. Transaction costs were
approximately $403,250 for a work fee payable over 10 months,
$290,000 in legal fees and a $200,000 closing fee. The loan is
secured by a security interest in substantially all of the assets
of Novume. The March 2019 Warrants are exercisable over a period of
five years, at an exercise price of $0.74 per share, and are valued
at $832,500. The warrants are exercisable commencing March 12, 2019
and expire on March 12, 2024. The 2019 Promissory Note has an
effective interest rate of 24.87%.
Payoff of $500,000 Avon Road Note
On
March 12, 2019, the $500,000 principal balance due on the Avon Road
Note was retired in its entirety (see Note 9).
Payoff of $2,000,000 Promissory Note
On
March 12, 2019, the $2,000,000 principal balance due on the 2018
Promissory Note was retired in its entirety and the Company paid to
the Lender $1,050,000 of consideration for the Lender’s
Participation and $50,000 of interest due through May 1, 2019 (see
Note 7).
OpenALPR Acquisition
On
March 12, 2019 and pursuant to the OpenALPR Asset Purchase
Agreement, as amended, the Company completed the acquisition of all
of the assets of OpenALPR, except for certain excluded assets, and
assumed certain liabilities, through Brekford. Consideration paid
as part of this acquisition was: (a) $7,000,000 in cash, subject to
adjustment after closing; (b) 600,000 shares of Novume common
stock, and (c) a promissory note in the principal amount of
$5,000,000 pursuant to the 2019 Promissory Note (as defined above),
together with an accompanying warrant to purchase 625,000 shares of
Novume common stock, exercisable over a period of five years at an
exercise price of $0.74 per share, valued at $208,125. As the
OpenALPR acquisition has recently been completed, the Company is
currently in the process of completing the purchase price
allocation treating the OpenALPR acquisition as a business
combination. The purchase price allocation for OpenALPR will be
included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements
in the first quarter of the year ending December 31, 2019. As of
March 31, 2019, there are 625,000 OpenALPR warrants
outstanding.
Hill Employment Agreement
On
March 12, 2019, concurrent with the execution of the OpenALPR
Purchase Agreement, the Hill Employment Agreement became effective,
pursuant to which Mr. Hill will serve as Chief Science Officer of
the Company (see Note 12).
Changes in and Disagreements with
Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None
79
Item 9A.
Controls
and Procedures.
Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls and
Procedures
In
designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures,
management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter
how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable
assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We
carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the
participation of management, including our principal executive
officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of
our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) of the
Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Annual
Report. Based on this review, our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls
and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level
as of December 31, 2018.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
Our
management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined
in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act.
Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on the
criteria set forth in “Internal Control – Integrated
Framework (2013)” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment
and due to the material weaknesses described below, our management
concluded that, as of December 31, 2018, our internal control over
financial reporting was not effective.
Attestation Report of Registered Public Accounting
Firm
This
Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our
independent registered public accounting firm because
non-accelerated filers are not required to provide such a
report.
Management Progress on Addressing Material Weaknesses
We
identified material weaknesses for the
year ended December 31, 2017, which were related to our internal
control over financial reporting. To address the material
weaknesses, we hired a Chief Accounting Officer, formed a
disclosure control committee, educated our Board of Directors on
SEC filings and triggering events for financial reporting,
implemented a financial reporting timetable, reviewed procedures
for draft documents, implemented monthly certification of financial
reports, tracked monthly financial activity, and had our executives
review financial results and budgets. In addition, we augmented our
accounting reporting staff by hiring an accounting manager and are
realigning our accounting staff in order to strengthen internal
controls over financial reporting. These efforts, which are
ongoing, have improved the design and operational effectiveness of
our control processes and systems for financial reporting, however,
our management concluded that as of December 31, 2018, the material
weaknesses identified for the year ended December 31, 2017 had not
been remediated.
Changes to Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Other
than as described in this Item 9A, there were no changes in our
internal control over financial reporting during our most recent
fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
Other Information.
None.
80
The
following table sets forth our directors and executive
officers.
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
Executive Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
Robert
A. Berman
|
|
59
|
|
President
and Chief Executive Officer, and Director
|
Matthew
Hill
|
|
35
|
|
Chief
Science Officer
|
Riaz
Latifullah
|
|
62
|
|
Executive
Vice President, Corporate Development and Principal Financial &
Accounting Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
James
K. McCarthy
|
|
67
|
|
Chairman
of the Board and Strategic Advisor
|
Paul A. de
Bary
|
|
72
|
|
Lead
Director
|
Glenn
Goord
|
|
67
|
|
Director
|
David
Hanlon
|
|
74
|
|
Director
|
Christine J.
Harada
|
|
46
|
|
Director
|
Richard
Nathan, Ph.D.
|
|
74
|
|
Director
|
Directors
James K. McCarthy has served the Chairman of our Board of
Directors since March 2016 and as Strategic Advisor to our Company
since April 2018. Mr. McCarthy served
as our Chief Strategy Officer from March 2016 to March 2017, and
from April 2017 to March 2018, was the host of The Bridge, a weekly 30-minute broadcast television program
produced by us devoted exclusively to bridging the gap between the
government and the private sector. Mr. McCarthy founded AOC
Key Solutions in 1983 and served as its Technical Director until
our acquisition of AOC Key Solutions in March 2016. At AOC Key
Solutions, Mr. McCarthy’s career spans over 30 years of
marketing strategy creation, proposal development, and oral
presentation coaching to contractors seeking to expand their market
shares or to enter the government contracts market sector.
Mr. McCarthy has worked at AOC Key Solutions since 1983.
Mr. McCarthy has served in an advisory role with the George
Washington University, Virginia Science and Technology Campus,
Technology Accelerator and has been a frequent speaker with the
George Mason University Procurement and Technical Assistance
Center. Mr. McCarthy has also served on the board of Coalition
for Government Procurement and on the Veterans Institute for
Procurement GovCon Council. Mr. McCarthy holds a BA in Political
Science and Government and an MA in Public Policy and Government
from Ohio University. We believe Mr. McCarthy is qualified to serve
on our board of directors due to his extensive executive leadership
and management experience and his deep knowledge of government
contracting.
Robert Berman has served as our President and Chief
Executive Officer and a member of our Board of Directors since
March 2016. Since January 2000, Mr. Berman has served as the
General Partner of Avon Road Partners, L.P., a limited partnership
investing in real estate and the broadcast media industry. From
2006 through March 2015, Mr. Berman held the office of Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer at Cinium Financial Services Corporation, a
privately-held specialty finance company, and its predecessor,
Upper Hudson Holdings, LLC. We believe Mr. Berman is qualified to
serve on our Board of Directors due to his extensive executive
leadership and management experience, his experience in private
equity and with public companies, and his understanding of
financial markets and mergers and acquisitions.
Richard Nathan, Ph.D., has served on our Board of Directors
since March 2016. From April 2016 until his retirement in February
2018, Dr. Nathan served as our Chief Operating Officer. Prior to
that, Dr. Nathan was the Chief Executive Officer of AOC Key
Solutions, where he worked for over 17 years. Dr. Nathan has over
45 years of corporate management, program management and business
and proposal development experience and experience managing service
and technical contracts for federal departments and agencies and
state governments. Dr. Nathan holds a BS in Chemistry from the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a PhD in Chemistry from
the Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn. We believe Dr. Nathan is
qualified to serve on our board of directors due to his technical
background, executive leadership experience and understanding of
government contracting and the aviation and aerospace
industries.
Glenn Goord has served on our board of directors since March
2016. From 1996 until his retirement in 2006, Mr. Goord served as
Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional
Services (“NYSDCS”), where he oversaw the state prison
system. Mr. Goord received the Carl Robison Award, the highest
honor bestowed by the Middle Atlantic States Correctional
Association, in 1997. In 1998 he received the Charles Evans Hughes
Award for public service from the Albany based Capital Area Chapter
for the American Society for Public Administration (ASPA). In 2002,
ASPA awarded Mr. Goord its highest honor, the Governor Alfred
E. Smith Award, for his direction of the NYSDCA’s efforts to
aid New York City following the September 11, 2001 terrorist
attack. Mr. Goord holds a BA in Psychology from Fairleigh Dickinson
University. We believe Mr. Goord is qualified to serve on our board
of directors due to his experience with government operations and
procurement.
81
Paul A. de Bary has served on our board of directors since
January 2017 and as Lead Directors since November 2017. Mr. de Bary
been a member of the board of managers of TDI, LLC, an agent for a
manufacturer of digital X-ray systems for medical, veterinary and
industrial applications since 2001. He has also served as chairman
of the Board of Ethics of the Town of Greenwich, Connecticut since
2008. From 1996 to 2015, he was a managing director at Marquette de
Bary Co., Inc., a New York based broker-dealer, where he served as
a financial advisor for state and local government agencies, public
and private corporations and non-profit organizations, as well as
general counsel. He previously served as a director of Empire
Resorts, Inc. (Nasdaq: NYNY) from 1996 to 2010, where he served as
chairman of its audit committee as well as, at various times
throughout his tenure as a director, a member of the governance and
compensation committees and various special committees. Mr. de
Bary is a member of the American Bar Association, the New York
State Bar Association and the Association of the Bar of the City of
New York. Mr. de Bary holds a JD, an MBA and an A.B. from
Columbia University. We believe Mr. de Bary is qualified to serve
on our board of directors due to his legal and investment
experience and his experience as a member of several boards of
directors, including those of public companies.
Christine J. Harada has served on our board of directors
since August 2017. Ms. Harada has over 20 years of experience
leading government and management consulting organizations. From
November 2015 to January 2017, she served as the Federal Chief
Sustainability Officer. Prior to that role, Ms. Harada was the
Acting Chief of Staff of the U.S. General Services Administration
(“GSA”) from March 2015 through November 2015. While at
the GSA, Ms. Harada also served as Associate Administrator,
Government-wide Policy and Chief Acquisition Officer for the GSA
from June 2014 through February 2015. Ms. Harada’s private
sector experience includes serving as Global Manager,
Transformation/Large Scale Change Practice at the Boston Consulting
Group from May 2013 through June 2014, and her tenure as a
principal at Booz Allen Hamilton from January 2004 through April
2013. Ms. Harada holds an M.A., in International Studies from the
Lauder Institute and an MBA, Finance from the Wharton School at the
University of Pennsylvania. She also holds an M.S. in
Aeronautics/Astronautics from Stanford University and a B.S.
Aeronautics/Astronautics from the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology. We believe Ms. Harada is qualified to serve on our
board of directors due to her knowledge of the operations of the
federal government and of corporate best practices.
David Hanlon has served on our board directors since
November 2018. Mr. Hanlon is a
founding principal of Executive Hospitality Partners, a strategic
and asset management firm. Since 2008, he has served as Chief
Executive Officer of Hanlon Investments which provides project
development consulting services to casinos, hotels and resorts. Mr.
Hanlon has served as a member of Cornell University’s
Industry Advisory Board, as well as on the Board of Directors of
the Cornell Football Association, and was elected to be a lifetime
member of the Cornell University Administrative Advisory Board. He
was also an advisor to the Wharton Entrepreneurial Program. Mr.
Hanlon holds a B.S. in Hotel Administration from Cornell, an MBA in
Finance and an M.S. in Accounting from the Wharton School at the
University of Pennsylvania, and graduated from the Advanced
Management Program at the Harvard Business School. We believe Mr.
Hanlon is qualified to serve on our board of directors due to his
leadership and executive management experience and experience
serving on public company boards of directors.
Riaz Latifullah has served as our Executive Vice President,
Corporate Development since August 2017 and our Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer since April 2018. Mr. Latifullah previously
served as our Chief Financial Officer from March 2016 to August
2017. Prior to joining Novume, Mr. Latifullah served as the Chief
Financial Officer of the American Grandparents
Association/Grandparents.com from July 2014 to December 2015. From
June 2001 to June 2014, Mr. Latifullah served as a business
consultant, Vice President, Financial Management, Senior Director
Strategic Markets and Director Brand Operations for AARP, a
non-profit organization that advocates on behalf of people over age
50. Mr. Latifullah holds an MBA from Stanford University, an M.S.E.
in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering from the University of
Michigan and a B.S. in Marine Engineering from the U.S. Merchant
Marine Academy.
Matthew Hill has served as our Chief Science Officer since
March 2019. From June 2015, Mr. Hill led OpenALPR Technology, Inc.,
a software company he created. From December 2010 to February 2016,
Mr. Hill served as an Engineering Director for Riverbed Technology,
Inc. From June 2005 to December 2010, Mr. Hill worked as an
Applications Engineer for OPNET Technologies, Inc., which was
subsequently acquired by Riverbed. Mr. Hill holds a B.S. in
Computer Engineering from the University of Virginia.
Board Independence
All of
our directors, other than Robert A. Berman, James McCarthy, and
Richard Nathan, qualify as “independent” in accordance
with the listing requirements of Nasdaq. The Nasdaq independence
definition includes a series of objective tests, including that the
director is not, and has not been for at least three years, one of
our employees and that neither the director nor any of his family
members has engaged in various types of business dealings with us.
In addition, as required by Nasdaq rules, our Board of Directors
has made a subjective determination as to each independent director
that no relationships exist, which, in the opinion of our Board of
Directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent
judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. In
making these determinations, our Board of Directors reviewed and
discussed information provided by the directors and us with regard
to each director’s business and personal activities and
relationships as they may relate to us and our management. Mr.
Berman is not independent because he is the President and Chief
Executive Officer of our company. Mr. McCarthy is not independent
because he serves as Strategic Advisor to our Company. Dr. Nathan
is not independent because he served as our Chief Operating Officer
until February 2018.
82
There
are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive
officers.
Board Committees
Our
Board has established three standing committees – audit, compensation, and
governance – each of
which operates under a charter that has been approved by our
board.
Our
Board has determined that all of the members of each of the
board’s three standing committees are independent as defined
under the rules of the Nasdaq. In addition, all members of the
Audit Committee meet the independence requirements contemplated by
Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the
Exchange Act.
The
Chair and members of each committee are summarized in the table
below:
Name
|
|
Audit
Committee
|
|
Compensation
Committee
|
|
Corporate
Governance Committee
|
Christine
Harada
|
|
Member
|
|
Member
|
|
Chair
|
Paul de
Bary
|
|
Chair
|
|
-
|
|
Member
|
Glenn
Goord
|
|
Member
|
|
Chair
|
|
-
|
David
Hanlon
|
|
-
|
|
Member
|
|
Member
|
Audit Committee
We have
an Audit Committee comprised of directors who are
“independent” within the meaning of Nasdaq Rule
5605(b)(1). The Audit Committee assists our Board in overseeing the
financial reporting process and maintaining the integrity of our
financial statements, and of our financial reporting processes and
systems of internal audit controls, and our compliance with legal
and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee is responsible for
reviewing the qualifications, independence and performance of our
independent registered public accounting firm and review our
internal controls, financial management practices and investment
functions and compliance with financial legal and regulatory
requirements. The Audit Committee is also responsible to perform
risk and risk management assessments as well as to prepare any
report of the Audit Committee that may be required by the proxy
rules of the SEC to be included in the Corporation’s annual
proxy statement. Our Board has identified and appointed Paul de
Bary as the “audit committee financial expert,” as
defined by the SEC in Item 407 of Regulation S-K. Mr. de Bary
serves as the Chair of the Audit Committee, and is joined on the
committee by Ms. Harada and Mr. Goord.
Compensation Committee
We have
a Compensation Committee comprised of members who are
“Non-Employee Directors” within the meaning of Rule
16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange Act”). The Compensation Committee is
responsible for overseeing the establishment and maintenance of our
overall compensation and incentive programs to discharge the
Board’s responsibilities relating to compensation of our
executive officers and directors, including establishing criteria
for evaluating performance and setting appropriate levels of
compensation, and to produce an annual report on executive
compensation for inclusion in our proxy statement in accordance
with the rules and regulations of the SEC. The Compensation
Committee advises and makes recommendations to our Board on all
matters concerning director compensation. Mr. Goord serves as Chair
of the Compensation Committee and is joined by Ms. Harada and Mr.
Hanlon.
Corporate Governance Committee
Our
Board has a Corporate Governance Committee that (1) reviews and
recommends improvements to our governance guidelines and corporate
policies; (2) monitors compliance with our Code of Conduct; (3)
trains new members of the Board of Directors; (4) reviews the
performance of the Board of Directors and its various committees
and makes recommendations intended to improve that performance, (5)
evaluates and makes recommendations concerning changes in the
charters of the various Committees of the Board of Directors, (6)
evaluates the performance of the Chief Executive Officer of the
Corporation, (7) oversees the development and implementation of
succession planning for Corporation senior management positions;
(8) identifies and recommends candidates for nomination as members
of the Board of Directors and its committees and (9) such other
matters as may be required to ensure compliance with applicable
federal and state laws or the requirements of any exchange on which
the Company maintains a listing for our securities. Ms. Harada
currently serves as the Chair of the Corporate Governance Committee
and is joined on the committee by Mr. Hanlon and Mr. de
Bary.
83
Compensation of Novume Directors
The following table provides the total compensation for each person
who served as a non-employee member of our Board of Directors
during fiscal year 2018, including all compensation awarded to,
earned by or paid to each person who served as a non-employee
director for some portion or all of fiscal year
2018:
Name
|
Fees earned or paid in cash
($)
|
Stock awards
($)
|
Option awards
($)
|
Non-equity incentive plan compensation
($)
|
Nonqualified deferred compensation earnings
($)
|
All other compensation
($)
|
Total
($)
|
Paul
de Bary (2)
|
65,925
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
65,925
|
Glenn
Goord (3)
|
49,444
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
49,444
|
Christine
Harada (4)
|
49,722
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
49,722
|
Marta
Tienda (5)
|
30,486
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
30,486
|
David
Hanlon (6)
|
4,167
|
-
|
34,289
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
38,456
|
(1)
|
The
amount shown reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of option
awards computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards
Board Accounting Standards Codification 718.
|
(2)
|
As of
December 31, 2018, Mr. de Bary held fully-vested options to
purchase 48,499 shares of our common stock at a strike price of $1.5464 per
share.
|
(3)
|
As of
December 31, 2018, Mr. Goord held fully-vested options to
purchase 48,499 shares of our common stock at a strike price of $1.2887 per
share.
|
(4)
|
As of
December 31, 2018, Ms. Harada held fully-vested options to
purchase 48,499 shares of our common stock at a strike price of $1.6753 per
share.
|
(5)
|
As of
December 31, 2018, Dr. Tienda held fully-vested options to
purchase 48,499 shares of our common stock at a strike price of $3.81 per
share.
|
(6)
|
As of
December 31, 2018, Mr. Hanlon held fully-vested options to
purchase 48,499 shares of our common stock at a strike price of $0.73 per
share.
|
Our non-employee directors are compensated for their services as
follows:
|
|
Board Meeting Fee
|
Committee Meeting Fee
|
||
Position
|
Annual Fee
(1) ($)
|
In Person
($)
|
Telephonic
($)
|
In Person
($)
|
Telephonic
($)
|
Board
Member
|
25,000
|
1,000
|
500
|
500
|
250
|
Audit
Committee Chair
|
20,000
|
1,500
|
500
|
500
|
250
|
Compensation
Committee Chair
|
10,000
|
1,500
|
500
|
500
|
250
|
Governance
Committee Chair
|
10,000
|
1,500
|
500
|
500
|
250
|
Special
Committee
|
-
|
1,500
|
500
|
500
|
250
|
Lead
Director
|
10,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(1)
|
Payments are made on a quarterly basis.
|
Directors
who are officers or employees of Novume or its subsidiaries do not
receive any compensation for service on our Board, but employee
directors will be reimbursed for expenses incurred in attending
meetings of our Board or any committees thereof. Directors are also eligible to receive
additional compensation in the form of options to purchase Novume
common stock or grants of restricted stock and may receive
additional compensation for special services performed as a
Director, including service on special committees of the Board of
Directors. Other than an initial grant to Mr. Hanlon, as shown
above, no award of options or grants of restricted stock were made
to any Director in 2018. All of the then current Directors except
Mr. Berman and Dr. Tienda served on a special committee in 2018 and
the non-employee Directors on that special committee are expected
to receive additional compensation in connection with such service
in 2019.
84
Code of Ethics
We have
a written Code of Conduct, which serves as our Code of Ethics, that
applies to all of our employees, including our principal executive
officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer
or controller, or persons performing similar functions. Our Code of
Conduct is available on our website at www.novume.com. If we amend
or grant a waiver of one or more of the provisions of our Code of
Conduct, we intend to satisfy the requirements under Item 5.05 of
Form 8-K regarding the disclosure of amendments to or waivers from
provisions of our Code of Conduct by posting the required
information on our website. Our website is not part of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance
Section
16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive
officers and stockholders who beneficially own more than 10% of any
class of our equity securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of
the Exchange Act to file initial statements of beneficial ownership
of securities and statements of changes in beneficial ownership of
securities with respect to our equity securities with the SEC.
Based solely on our review of such forms, we believe that there has
been compliance with all Section 16(a) filing requirements
applicable to such Reporting Persons with respect to the year ended
December 31, 2018, except that the following form was filed late:
one Form 4 (reporting one transaction) for Paul A. de
Bary.
Executive Compensation
This
section discusses material components of our 2018 compensation
program for our named executive officers identified in the 2018
Summary Compensation Table below.
2018 Summary Compensation
Table
Name and principal position
|
Year
|
Salary
($)
|
|
Bonus
($)
|
|
Options Awards
($)
|
|
All other compensation
($)
|
|
Total
($)
|
Robert Berman
|
2018
|
395,000
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
395,000
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
2017
|
395,000
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
395,000
|
James K. McCarthy
|
2018
|
328,628
|
(1)
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
11,000
|
(2)
|
339,628
|
Strategic
Advisor (3)
|
2017
|
293,231
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
8,931
|
(2)
|
302,162
|
Riaz Latifullah (4)
|
2018
|
271,667
|
|
100,000
|
(5)
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
371,667
|
Chief Financial Officer, EVP Corporate Development, and Principal
Financial & Accounting Officer
|
2017
|
258,333
|
|
-
|
|
97,251
|
(6)
|
-
|
|
355,584
|
(1)
|
Amount includes compensation for unused paid time
off.
|
|
(2)
|
Amount represents 401(k) matching contribution.
|
|
(3)
|
Mr. James McCarthy served as: Chief Strategy Officer of KeyStone
through March 31, 2017; Host of The Bridge produced by Novume Media from April 2017 through
March 2018; and Strategic Advisor of AOC Key Solutions since April
2018.
|
|
(4)
|
Mr. Latifullah served as Chief Financial Officer until August 28,
2017 at which time he transitioned to EVP of Corporate Development.
He currently serves as our Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer.
|
|
(5)
|
Amount represents subjective bonus.
|
|
(6)
|
Amount
represents the fair value of the issuance of 174,595 stock options
to Mr. Latifullah on December 23, 2016.
|
Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table
The
primary components of our compensation program for named executive
officers include salary, cash incentive compensation and equity
incentive awards.
85
Base Salary
We pay
our executive officers a base salary as the fixed component of our
compensation program for named executive officers. In 2018, we
increased Mr. Latifullah’s base salary from $225,000 to
$285,000 per year effective March 1, 2018 due to an increase in his
roles and responsibilities which included that of Principal
Accounting and Financial Officer. The base salaries for Messrs.
McCarthy and Berman were not adjusted in 2018.
Bonus Payments
We
offer our named executive officers the opportunity to earn annual
cash bonuses to compensate them for attaining short-term company
and individual goals as approved by our Board of Directors. For
2018, bonuses were based on attaining goals relating to individual
performance. The Compensation Committee decided that Mr. Latifullah
was eligible to receive a discretionary bonus with respect to
fiscal year 2018 due to individual contributions related to
corporate efforts, but that otherwise no discretionary bonuses
would be paid to the named executive officers.
Equity Incentive Awards
In
August 2017, the Company approved and adopted the 2017 Equity Award
Plan (the “2017 Plan”). The purpose of the 2017 Plan is
to promote the interests of Novume (including its subsidiaries and
affiliates, if any) and its stockholders by using equity interests
in Novume to attract, retain and motivate its management,
nonemployee directors and other eligible persons and to encourage
and reward their contributions to our performance and
profitability. The 2017 Plan permits the granting of stock options,
stock appreciation rights, restricted and unrestricted stock
awards, phantom stock, performance awards and other stock-based
awards for the purpose of attracting and retaining quality
employees, directors and consultants. The 2017 Plan reserved
3,000,000 shares of our common stock for future grants from time to
time under awards administered by our Board of
Directors.
Novume
has also designed the 2017 Plan to include a number of provisions
that Novume’s management believes promote best practices by
reinforcing the alignment of equity compensation arrangements for
nonemployee directors, officers, employees, consultants and
stockholders’ interests. These provisions include, but are
not limited to, the following: no discounted awards; no repricing
without stockholder approval; no evergreen provision; no automatic
grants; no transferability; no tax gross-ups; no liberal
change-in-control definition; “double-trigger”
change-in-control vesting; no dividends on unearned performance
awards; limitation on amendments; and Clawbacks. The 2017 Plan is
administered by the Novume Board of Directors.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The
following table sets forth information with respect to unexercised
stock options, stock that has not vested, and equity incentive plan
awards held by our named executive officers at December 31,
2018.
|
Option Awards
|
Stock Awards
|
||||
Name
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options -
Exercisable
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options -
Unexercisable
|
Option Exercise Price
($)
|
Option Expiration Date
|
Number of Shares of Stock that Have not Vested
|
Market Value of Shares of Stock that Have not Vested
($)
|
Robert
Berman
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
James K.
McCarthy
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Riaz Latifullah
(1)
|
160,046
|
14,549
|
1.42
|
12/23/26
|
-
|
-
|
(1)
|
The
option was granted on December 23, 2016, vests in equal monthly
installments over 24 months starting March 1, 2017 and fully vested
on March 1, 2019.
|
86
Employment Agreements and Potential Payments Upon Termination or
Change in Control
We have
entered into employment agreements with our executive officers.
Certain material terms of these agreements are described
below.
Berman Employment Agreement
The
Employment Agreement with Robert Berman (the “Berman
Employment Agreement”) provides that Mr. Berman will
serve as our Chief Executive Officer. The agreement has an initial
term, which was effective as of December 23, 2016, of five years
with automatically renewing one-year terms thereafter.
Mr. Berman’s base salary is $395,000 per year, and he is
eligible for a bonus as determined by our Compensation Committee.
Mr. Berman is also eligible to receive all such other benefits
as are provided to other management employees.
In the
event of a change of control, as defined in the Berman Employment
Agreement, whether during the initial term or thereafter, we shall
have the right to terminate the Berman Employment Agreement. In the
event we exercise the option to terminate Mr. Berman’s
agreement, we will be required to pay Mr. Berman an amount
equal to Mr. Berman’s base salary per annum multiplied
by the number of years and portions thereof remaining under the
Berman Employment Agreement. Mr. Berman may be terminated by
the Company for cause, as defined in the Berman Employment
Agreement.
Mr. Berman
also agreed as consideration for entering into the Berman
Employment Agreement, that for the period during his employment and
for twelve months thereafter, he will not compete with the Company
in the “Geographic Area”, as defined in the Berman
Employment Agreement, and he will not solicit any of our
existing employees, suppliers or customers.
James K. McCarthy Offer Letter
The
amended and restated James K. McCarthy Offer Letter (the
“McCarthy Offer Letter”) provides that
Mr. McCarthy will serve as our Host and Moderator – The Bridge on TV. Mr. McCarthy served
as Chief Strategy Officer of KeyStone
through March 31, 2017; Host of The Bridge produced by Novume Media from April 2017 through
March 2018; and Strategic Advisor of AOC Key Solutions since April
2018. His employment is at will, subject to providing
120-days’ notice of resignation or termination. We may pay
Mr. McCarthy’s salary in lieu of notice for some or all
of the 120-day notice period. His base salary is $298,989 per year,
and he is eligible for a bonus as determined by our Compensation
Committee. Mr. McCarthy will also be eligible to receive all
such other benefits as are provided to other management
employees.
Mr. McCarthy
also agreed that, for the period during his employment and for two
years thereafter, he will not compete with the Company in the
“Restricted Territory”, as defined in Exhibit A to the
McCarthy Offer Letter, and he will not solicit any of our existing
employees, suppliers or customers.
Richard Nathan Employment Agreement
The
employment agreement with Richard Nathan (the “Nathan
Employment Agreement”) provided for Dr. Nathan to serve
as our Chief Operating Officer for a term until December 31,
2017, with an option to extend the term. Dr. Nathan retired as
Chief Operating Officer effective February 28, 2018. His base
salary was $225,200 per year, and he was eligible for a bonus as
determined by our Compensation Committee. Dr. Nathan also
agreed that, for two years after his employment: he will not
compete with the Company in the “Restricted Territory”,
as defined in Exhibit A to the Nathan Employment Agreement; and he
will not solicit any of our existing employees, suppliers or
customers.
Riaz Latifullah Employment Agreement
On
March 29, 2018, Mr. Latifullah and Novume entered into a Second
Restated, Amended and Supplemental Employment Agreement (the
“Amended Latifullah Agreement”). The Amended Latifullah
Agreement provides for an annual base salary of $285,000 effective
March 1, 2018, eligibility for a bonus as determined by our
Compensation Committee and eligibility to receive all such other
benefits as are provided to other management
employees.
The
Amended Latifullah Agreement may be terminated with or without
cause, as defined in the agreement. Subject to certain conditions,
the Amended Latifullah Agreement provides that, if Mr. Latifullah
is terminated without cause, or if he leaves for good reason, he
will be provided a severance package equal to six (6) months of
base salary and such percentage of health premiums as would have
been paid for by Novume during the corresponding time period.
Additionally, half of all unvested options issued to Mr. Latifullah
under the Amended Latifullah Agreement would vest
immediately.
87
Mr. Latifullah
also agreed that, for the period during his employment and for one
year thereafter, he will not compete with Novume in the
“Restricted Territory”, as defined in Exhibit A to the
Latifullah Employment Agreement, and he will not solicit any of
Novume’s existing employees, suppliers or
customers.
Mr.
Latifullah currently serves as our EVP of Corporate Development and
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer.
Matthew Hill Employment Agreement
On
November 14, 2018, concurrent with the execution of the OpenALPR
Purchase Agreement, the Company entered into an employment
agreement with Matthew Hill (the “Hill Employment
Agreement”) which became effective as of March 12, 2019, the
closing date of the OpenALPR Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which
Mr. Hill began serving as Novume’s Chief Science Officer. The
Hill Employment Agreement provides for a term of three years unless
earlier terminated pursuant to the terms thereof which term renews
for additional one-year terms until terminated upon ninety days
advance notice. Mr. Hill will earn an annual base salary of
$165,000.
Either
party may terminate the Hill Employment Agreement with or without
cause with notice as contemplated by the Hill Employment Agreement,
provided however, if Mr. Hill resigns, he shall provide the Company
with at least six months prior written notice. The Hill Employment
Agreement provides for the payment of severance under certain
circumstances as outlined therein.
Mr. Hill
also agreed that, for the period during his employment and for one
year thereafter, he will not compete with Novume in the
“Restricted Territory”, as defined in Exhibit A to the
Hill Employment Agreement, and he will not solicit any of
Novume’s existing employees, suppliers or
customers.
Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation
plans
The
following table provides information about our equity compensation
plans as of December 31, 2018.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
|
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding
options, warrants and rights
(a)
|
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants
and rights
(b)
|
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities reflected in column (a))(c)
|
Equity
compensation plans approved by security holders
|
1,227,557
|
$2.13
|
1,758,445
|
Total
|
1,227,557
|
$2.13
|
1,758,445
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The
following table sets forth, as March 31, 2019, information
concerning the beneficial ownership of our common stock by, each
person or group of persons known to beneficially own more than 5%
of the outstanding shares of our common stock, each person who
is our executive officer or director, and all such executive
officers and directors as a group. Beneficial ownership and
percentage ownership are determined in accordance with the rules of
the SEC. Under these rules, beneficial ownership generally includes
any shares as to which the individual or entity has sole or shared
voting power or investment power and includes any shares that an
individual or entity has the right to acquire beneficial ownership
of within 60 days of March 31, 2019 through the exercise of any
option, warrant, conversion privilege or similar right. In
computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and
the percentage ownership of that person, shares of our common stock
that could be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options and
warrants that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2019 are
considered to be outstanding. These shares, however, are not
considered outstanding when computing the percentage ownership of
any other person.
88
To our
knowledge, except as indicated in the footnotes to the following
table, all beneficial owners named in this table have sole voting
and investment power with respect to all shares shown as
beneficially owned by them. Percentage of ownership is based on
19,367,619 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 31,
2019.
|
Shares Beneficially Owned
|
||
Name (1)
|
Number of Shares (2)
|
|
Percent of class
|
Directors and Named Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
Robert
A. Berman
|
4,462,104
|
(3)
|
23.0%
|
James
McCarthy
|
2,725,835
|
|
14.1%
|
Richard
Nathan
|
1,612,772
|
(4)
|
8.3%
|
Matthew
Hill
|
1,225,000
|
(5)
|
6.1%
|
Paul
de Bary
|
68,499
|
(6)
|
*
|
Glenn
Goord
|
138,499
|
(7)
|
*
|
Christine
Harada
|
58,499
|
(6)
|
*
|
David
Hanlon
|
58,499
|
(6)
|
*
|
Riaz
Latifullah
|
174,595
|
(8)
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
5% or Greater Shareholders
|
|
|
|
Avon
Road Partners, L.P.
|
4,440,104
|
(3)
|
22.9%
|
All
directors and named executive officers as a group (9
persons)
|
10,524,302
|
|
51.5%
|
* Less
than 1%
(1)
The address of
those listed is c/o Novume Solutions, Inc., 14420 Albemarle Point
Place, Suite 200, Chantilly, VA, 20151. Unless otherwise indicated,
all shares are owned directly by the beneficial owner.
(2)
Based on 19,367,619
shares of our common stock issued and outstanding as of the March
31, 2019.
(3)
As the general
partner of Avon Road, Mr. Berman may be deemed to be the beneficial
owner of 4,462,104 shares of Novume common stock, or 23.0% of the
class of securities. He may be deemed to share with Avon Road (and
not with any third-party) the power to vote or direct the vote of
and to dispose or direct the disposition of the 4,440,104 shares of
Novume common stock beneficially owned by Avon Road, or 22.9% of
the class of securities.
(4)
Consists of:
1,593,020 shares of our common stock; a Unit Warrant to purchase
4,849 shares of our common stock exercisable within 60 days of
March 31, 2019; and 14,903 shares of our common stock acquirable
through the conversion of 10,000 shares of Novume Series A
Preferred Stock.
(5)
Consists of 600,000
shares of Novume common stock and warrants to purchase 625,000
shares of our common stock.
(6)
Consists of options
to purchase 58,499 shares of our common stock exercisable within 60
days of March 31, 2019.
(7)
Consists of 80,000
shares of Novume common stock and options to purchase 58,499 shares
of our common stock exercisable within 60 days of March 31,
2019.
(8)
Consists of options
to purchase 174,595 shares of our common stock exercisable within
60 days of March 31, 2019.
Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions, and Director Independence
In
addition to the executive officer and director compensation
arrangements discussed above under “Compensation of Novume
Directors” and “Executive Compensation,” the
following is a description of each transaction since January 1,
2017 and
any currently proposed transaction in which: we have been or are to
be a participant; the amount involved exceeded or will exceed
the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total
assets at year-end for the last two completed fiscal years; and any
of our directors, executive officers, holders of more than five
percent of our capital stock, or any immediate family member
of, or person sharing the household with, any of these individuals,
had or will have a direct or indirect material
interest.
Avon Road Note Purchase Agreement
On
March 16, 2016, we entered into a Subordinated Note and
Warrant Purchase Agreement (the “Avon Road Note Purchase
Agreement”) pursuant to which we agreed to issue up to
$1,000,000 in subordinated debt (the “Avon Road Note”)
and warrants to purchase up to 242,493 shares of our common stock
(the “Avon Road Subordinated Note Warrants”). The
exercise price for the Avon Road Subordinated Note Warrants is
$1.031 per share of common stock. Subordinated notes with a
face amount of $500,000 and Avon Road Subordinated Note Warrants to
purchase 121,247 shares of our common stock have been issued
pursuant to the Avon Road Note Purchase Agreement to Avon Road, an
affiliate of Robert Berman, Novume’s Chief Executive Officer
and a member of our Board of Directors. The Avon Road Subordinated
Note Warrants expire on March 16, 2019.
89
The
Avon Road Note accrues simple interest on the unpaid principal of
the note at a rate equal to the lower of (a) 9% per
annum, or (b) the highest rate permitted by applicable law.
Interest is payable monthly with a maturity date of March 16,
2019. The effective interest rate of the Avon Road Note is 12.9%.
On October 23, 2018, the maturity date of this note was extended to
March 16, 2020. On March 12, 2019, the $500,000 balance due on the
Avon Road Note was retired in its entirety.
Principal Accountant Fees
and Services
The
Audit Committee reviews and pre-approves both audit and all
permissible non-audit services provided by our independent
registered public accounting firm. Since our Audit Committee was
formed on August 28, 2017, accounting fees and services incurred
prior to August 28, 2017 were reviewed and pre-approved by the
Board of Directors.
BD
& Company, Inc. (“BD & Company”) has served as
our principal auditor since May 2017. They did not provide any
services, and no fees were paid to them, in 2016. CohnReznick LLP
(“CohnReznick”) provided principal auditor services
from November 3, 2016 through April 28, 2017, but did not issue an
audit report. Ericksen, Krentel & Laporte, LLP (“Ericksen
Krentel”) served as our principal auditor in 2016 and
provided accounting services in 2017.
The
Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of services,
other than services rendered in connection with the audit of our
annual financial statements, is compatible with maintaining BD
& Company’s independence. The Audit Committee has
determined that the rendering of non-audit services by BD &
Company during 2017 and 2018 was compatible with maintaining the
firm’s independence.
Aggregate
fees billed or incurred related to the following years for
professional services rendered by BD & Company for 2018 and
2017 are set forth below.
|
2018
|
2017
|
Audit
fees
|
$204,782
|
$241,661
|
Audit-related
fees
|
104,380
|
-
|
Tax
fees
|
39,825
|
24,875
|
All
other fees
|
-
|
-
|
Total
|
$348,987
|
$266,536
|
Aggregate
fees billed or incurred related to the following years for
professional services rendered by CohnReznick LLP for 2018 and 2017
are set forth below.
|
2018
|
2017
|
Audit
fees
|
$-
|
$35,850
|
Audit-related
fees
|
-
|
-
|
Tax
fees
|
-
|
-
|
All
other fees
|
-
|
-
|
Total
|
$-
|
$35,850
|
Aggregate
fees billed or incurred related to the following years for
professional services rendered by Ericksen Krentel for 2018 and
2017 are set forth below.
|
2018
|
2017
|
Audit
fees
|
$-
|
$-
|
Audit-related
fees
|
-
|
-
|
Tax
fees
|
-
|
-
|
All
other fees
|
-
|
25,128
|
Total
|
$-
|
$25,128
|
Audit
Fees for 2018 and 2017 include fees associated with the audits of
the annual financial statements and the quarterly reviews of the
unaudited interim financial statements included in the
Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. Audit-related fees
for 2018 primarily include costs associated with SEC filings and
the supplemental audit and disclosure document for the
Company’s franchising business. Tax fees for 2018 and 2017
include fees associated with the preparation and reviews of tax
returns, advising on the impact of local tax laws, and tax
planning. All other fees for 2017 include accounting services
related to annual financial reporting.
90
Exhibits, Financial Statements
Schedules
1. Financial Statements
The
Novume Solutions, Inc. financial statements are included in Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
2. Financial Schedules
None.
91
3. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|
|
||||||
Exhibit
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
FilingDate
|
|
Filed/
FurnishedHerewith
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second
Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger dated July 12,
2017, by and among Novume Solutions, Inc., KeyStone Solutions,
Inc., Brekford Traffic Safety, Inc., KeyStone Merger Sub, LLC, and
Brekford Merger Sub, Inc.
|
|
S-4/A
|
|
333-216014
|
|
2.1
|
|
7/13/17
|
|
|
||
|
|
Agreement
and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 21, 2017, by and among
Novume Solutions, Inc., Global Technical Services Merger Sub, Inc.,
Global Contract Professionals Merger Sub, Inc., Global Technical
Services, Inc., Global Contract Professionals, Inc. and Paul
Milligan
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-55833
|
|
2.1
|
|
9/22/17
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agreement
and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 16, 2017, by and among
Novume Solutions, Inc., NeoSystems Holding, LLC, NeoSystems HoldCo,
Inc., NeoSystems LLC, Robert W. Wilson, Jr., in his personal
capacity, Michael Tinsley, in his personal capacity and Michael
Tinsley as the Stockholders’ Agent
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-55833
|
|
2.1
|
|
11/20/17
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Novume Solutions, Inc.
as filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware on August 21,
2017
|
|
8-K
|
|
333-216014
|
|
3.1
|
|
8/25/17
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificate
of Designations of Series A Cumulative Convertible Redeemable
Preferred Stock as filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware on
August 25, 2017
|
|
8-K
|
|
333-216014
|
|
4.1
|
|
8/25/17
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificate
of Designations of Novume Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred
Stock as filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware on August
21, 2017
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-55833
|
|
4.2
|
|
10/4/17
|
|
|
|
|
Amended
and Restated Bylaws of Novume Solutions, Inc.
|
|
8-K
|
|
333-216014
|
|
3.2
|
|
8/25/17
|
|
|
||
|
Form of
Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued by Novume Solutions, Inc. on
January 25, 2017
|
|
S-4/A
|
|
333-216014
|
|
4.3
|
|
6/9/17
|
|
|
||
|
Form of
Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued by Novume Solutions, Inc. on
January 25, 2017
|
|
S-4/A
|
|
333-216014
|
|
4.4
|
|
6/9/17
|
|
|
||
|
Form of
Warrant issued by Novume Solutions, Inc. on March 12,
2019
|
|
8-K
|
|
001-38338
|
|
4.1
|
|
3/18/19
|
|
|
||
|
Unsecured
Subordinated Promissory Note issued to Harry Rhulen by Novume
Solutions, Inc. on September 29, 2017
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-55833
|
|
10.2
|
|
10/3/17
|
|
|
||
|
|
Unsecured
Subordinated Promissory Note issued to Suzanne Loughlin by Novume
Solutions, Inc. on September 29, 2017
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-55833
|
|
10.3
|
|
10/3/17
|
|
|
92
|
|
Unsecured
Subordinated Promissory Note issued to James Satterfield by Novume
Solutions, Inc. on September 29, 2017
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-55833
|
|
10.4
|
|
10/3/17
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured
Subordinated Promissory Note issued to Lancer Financial Group, Inc.
by Novume Solutions, Inc. on September 29, 2017
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-55833
|
|
10.5
|
|
10/3/17
|
|
|
|
Form of
Senior Secured Note issued by Novume Solutions, Inc. on March 12,
2019
|
|
8-K
|
|
001-38338
|
|
4.2
|
|
3/18/19
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note
Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 12, 2019, by and among Novume
Solutions, Inc., Cedarview Capital Management, LP, the Guarantors
from time to time party thereto, U.S. Bank National Association,
and the Purchasers from time to time party thereto
|
|
8-K
|
|
001-38338
|
|
4.3
|
|
3/18/19
|
|
|
|
|
Registration
Rights Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2017, by and among Novume
Solutions, Inc., G&W Ventures Inc. and Paul
Milligan
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-55833
|
|
4.1
|
|
10/4/17
|
|
|
|
2017
Equity Award Plan of Novume Solutions, Inc.
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-220864
|
|
4.7
|
|
10/6/17
|
|
|
|
|
Employment
Agreement, dated as of March 16, 2016, by and between KeyStone
Solutions, Inc. and Robert A. Berman
|
|
1-A
|
|
024-10551
|
|
6.1
|
|
5/12/16
|
|
|
|
|
Employment
Agreement, dated August 1, 2016, by and between KeyStone Solutions,
Inc. and Riaz Latifullah
|
|
1-A/A
|
|
024-10551
|
|
6.11
|
|
9/2/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated,
Amended and Supplemental Employment Agreement, dated as of August
28, 2017, by and between Novume Solutions, Inc. and Riaz
Latifullah
|
|
8-K
|
|
333-216014
|
|
10.2
|
|
8/29/17
|
|
|
|
|
Second
Restated, Amended and Supplemental Employment Agreement, dated as
of March 29, 2018, by and between Novume Solutions, Inc. and Riaz
Latifullah
|
|
10-K
|
|
001-38338
|
|
10.24
|
|
4/12/18
|
|
|
|
|
Amended
and Restated Offer Letter, dated as of January 8, 2018, by and
between AOC Key Solutions, Inc. and James McCarthy
|
|
S-1/A
|
|
333-221789
|
|
10.6
|
|
1/10/18
|
|
|
|
Employment
Agreement, dated as of November 14, 2018, by and between Novume
Solutions, Inc. and Matthew Hill
|
|
8-K
|
|
001-38338
|
|
10.2
|
|
11/15/18
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assignment
and Assumption Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2017, by and
between KeyStone Solutions LLC and Novume Solutions,
Inc.
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-55833
|
|
10.1
|
|
10/3/17
|
|
|
|
|
General
Continuing Guaranty, dated as of October 4, 2017, by and between
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Novume Solutions, Inc.
for Global Technical Services, Inc.
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-55833
|
|
10.1
|
|
10/4/17
|
|
|
|
|
General
Continuing Guaranty, dated as of October 4, 2017, by and between
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Novume Solutions, Inc.
for Global Contract Professionals, Inc.
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-55833
|
|
10.2
|
|
10/4/17
|
|
|
93
|
|
Security
Agreement, dated as of April 3, 2018, by and between Brekford
Traffic Safety, Inc. and Cedarview Opportunities Master Fund,
LP
|
|
8-K
|
|
001-38338
|
|
10.2
|
|
4/9/18
|
|
|
|
|
Letter
of Intent, dated as of September 17, 2018, by and between Novume
Solutions, Inc. and OpenALPR Technology, Inc.
|
|
8-K
|
|
001-38338
|
|
99.2
|
|
9/20/18
|
|
|
|
|
Asset
Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 14, 2018, by and among
Novume Solutions, Inc., OpenALPR Technology, Inc. and Matthew
Hill
|
|
8-K
|
|
001-38338
|
|
10.1
|
|
11/15/18
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment
No. 1 to Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 15, 2019, by and
among Novume Solutions, Inc., OpenALPR Technology, Inc. and Matthew
Hill
|
|
8-K
|
|
001-38338
|
|
10.1
|
|
3/18/19
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment
No. 2 to Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 12, 2019, by and
among Novume Solutions, Inc., OpenALPR Technology, Inc. and Matthew
Hill
|
|
8-K
|
|
001-38338
|
|
10.2
|
|
3/18/19
|
|
|
|
|
Management
Services Agreement, dated as of October 9, 2018, by and between
Novume Solutions, Inc. and OpenALPR Technologies, Inc.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
001-38338
|
|
10.2
|
|
11/13/18
|
|
|
|
Sublease
effective January 1, 2019 by and between BlueWater Federal
Solutions, Inc and AOC Key Solutions, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|||||
|
Form of
Novume Solutions, Inc. Incentive Stock Option Award
Agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Form of
Novume Solutions, Inc. Non-Qualified Stock Option Award
Agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
of Novume Solutions, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Consent
of BD & Company, Inc., Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Section
1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**
|
|
|
Section
1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL
Instance Document
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
*
|
Filed
herewith.
|
**
|
Furnished
herewith.
|
#
|
Indicates
management contract or compensatory plan.
|
^
|
Confidential
treatment has been granted with respect to redacted portions of
this exhibit. Redacted portions of this exhibit have been filed
separately with the SEC.
|
94
Form 10-K Summary.
None.
95
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
Novume
Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Robert A. Berman
|
|
Name:
|
Robert
A. Berman
|
|
Title:
|
Chief
Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer, Director and
Authorized Signatory
|
|
Date:
|
April
11, 2019
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
registration statement has been signed by the following persons in
the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
|
Title
|
Date
|
|
|
|
/s/
Robert A. Berman
Robert A. Berman
|
Chief
Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and
Director
|
April 11,
2019
|
|
|
|
/s/
Riaz Latifullah
Riaz Latifullah
|
EVP,
Corporate Development (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)
|
April 11,
2019
|
|
|
|
/s/
James K. McCarthy
James K. McCarthy
|
Chairman
of the Board and Director
|
April 11,
2019
|
|
|
|
/s/
Richard Nathan
Dr. Richard Nathan
|
Director
|
April 11,
2019
|
|
|
|
/s/
Glenn Goord
Glenn Goord
|
Director
|
April 11,
2019
|
|
|
|
/s/
Paul de Bary
Paul de Bary
|
Director
|
April 11,
2019
|
|
|
|
/s/
Christine J. Harada
Christine J. Harada
|
Director
|
April 11,
2019
|
/s/
David Hanlon
David Hanlon
|
Director
|
April 11,
2019
|
96