SALISBURY BANCORP, INC. - Annual Report: 2022 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

☑ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 0-14854

SALISBURY BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ☐ Yes ☑ No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. ☐ Yes ☑ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☑ Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). ☑ Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company”, and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☐ Accelerated filer ☐ Non-accelerated filer ☑ Smaller reporting company ☑ Emerging growth company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐ Yes ☑ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). ☐ Yes ☑ No

The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 30, 2022 was $126.1 million based on the closing sales price of $23.61 of such stock. The number of shares of the registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of March 1, 2023, was 5,798,816.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.

FORM 10-K

SALISBURY BANCORP, INC.

For the Year Ended December 31, 2022

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K may contain and incorporates by reference statements relating to future results of Salisbury Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) and its Subsidiary, Salisbury Bank and Trust Company (the “Bank”) (collectively, "Salisbury"), that are considered “forward-looking” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “targeted,” “continue,” “remain,” “will,” “should,” “may,” “plans,” “estimates,” and similar references to future periods; however, such words are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements. These statements relate to, among other things, expectations concerning loan demand, growth and performance, simulated changes in interest rates and the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.  Such statements are based upon assumptions and estimates, and actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied as a result of certain risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, changes in political and economic conditions, interest rate fluctuations, competitive product and pricing pressures within Salisbury’s markets, equity and fixed income market fluctuations, personal and corporate customers’ bankruptcies, inflation, acquisitions and integrations of acquired businesses, technological changes and cybersecurity matters, changes in law and regulations, changes in fiscal, monetary, regulatory and tax policies, monetary fluctuations, success in gaining  regulatory approvals when required as well as other risks and uncertainties reported from time to time in Salisbury’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. See also, the “Risk Factors” set forth below.

Forward-looking statements made by Salisbury in this Annual Report on Form 10-K speak only as of the date they are made. Events or other facts that could cause Salisbury’s actual results to differ may arise from time to time, and Salisbury cannot predict all such events and factors. Salisbury undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, except as may be required by law. You are advised to review further disclosures Salisbury makes from time to time in its filings with the SEC.

Development of Business

Salisbury Bancorp, Inc., a Connecticut corporation, formed in 1998, is the bank holding company for Salisbury Bank and Trust Company (the "Bank"), a Connecticut-chartered and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the "FDIC") insured commercial bank headquartered in Lakeville, Connecticut. Salisbury’s common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “SAL.” Salisbury's principal business consists of its operation and control of the business of the Bank.

The Bank, formed in 1848, currently provides commercial banking, consumer financing, retail banking and trust and wealth advisory services through a network of fourteen banking offices and thirteen ATMs located in: Litchfield County, Connecticut; Dutchess, Orange and Ulster Counties, New York; and Berkshire County, Massachusetts and through its internet website (salisburybank.com).

Abbreviations Used Herein

Description of Business

Lending Activities

The Bank originates commercial loans, commercial real estate loans, residential and commercial construction loans, residential real estate loans collateralized by one-to-four family residences, home equity lines of credit and fixed rate loans and other consumer loans predominately in Connecticut’s Litchfield County, New York’s Dutchess, Orange and Ulster Counties and Massachusetts’ Berkshire County in towns proximate to the Bank’s fourteen full service offices.

The majority of the Bank’s loans as of December 31, 2022, including some loans classified as commercial loans, were secured by real estate. Interest rates charged on loans are affected principally by the Bank’s current asset/liability strategy, the demand for such loans, the cost and supply of money available for lending purposes and the rates offered by competitors. These factors are, in turn, affected by general economic and credit conditions, monetary policies of the federal government, including the FRB, federal and state tax policies and budgetary matters.

Residential Real Estate Loans

A principal lending activity of the Bank is to originate loans secured by first mortgages on one-to-four family residences. The Bank typically originates residential real estate loans through employees who are commissioned licensed mortgage originators (in accordance with the mortgage lending compensation guidelines issued by the CFPB). The Bank originates both fixed rate and adjustable rate mortgages.

The Bank currently sells the majority of the fixed rate 30 year residential mortgage loans it originates to the FHLBB under the Mortgage Partnership Finance Program. The Bank typically retains loan servicing. The Bank retains some fixed rate residential mortgage loans and those loans originated under its first-time home owner program.

The retention of adjustable rate residential mortgage loans in the portfolio and the sale of longer term, fixed rate residential mortgage loans helps reduce the Bank’s exposure to interest rate risk. However, adjustable rate mortgages generally pose credit risks different from the credit risks inherent in fixed rate loans primarily because as interest rates rise, the underlying debt service payments of the borrowers rise, thereby increasing the potential for default. Management believes that these risks, which have not had a material adverse effect on the Bank to date, generally are less onerous than the interest rate risks associated with holding long-term fixed rate loans in the loan portfolio.

Commercial Real Estate Loans

The Bank makes commercial real estate loans for the purpose of allowing borrowers to acquire, develop, construct, improve or refinance commercial real estate where the property is the primary collateral securing the loan, and the income generated from the property is the primary repayment source. Office buildings, light industrial, retail facilities or multi-family income properties, normally collateralize commercial real estate loans. Among the reasons for management’s continued emphasis on commercial real estate lending is the desire to invest in assets with yields which are generally higher than yields on one-to-four family residential mortgage loans and are more sensitive to changes in interest rates. These loans typically have terms/amortizations of up to ten and twenty-five years, respectively, and interest rates, which adjust over periods of three to ten years, based on one of various rate indices.

Commercial real estate lending generally poses a greater credit risk than residential mortgage lending to owner-occupants. The repayment of commercial real estate loans depends on the business and financial condition of the borrower. Economic events and changes in government regulations, which the Bank and its borrowers do not control, could have an adverse impact on the cash flows generated by properties securing commercial real estate loans and on the market value of such properties.

Construction Loans

The Bank originates both residential and commercial construction loans. Typically, loans are made to owner-borrowers who will occupy the properties as either their primary or secondary residence and to licensed and experienced developers for the construction of single-family homes or commercial properties.

The proceeds of commercial construction loans are disbursed in stages. Bank officers, appraisers and/or independent engineers inspect each project’s progress before additional funds are disbursed to verify that borrowers have completed project phases.

Residential construction loans to owner-borrowers generally convert to a fully amortizing long-term mortgage loan upon completion of construction. The typical construction phase is generally twelve months.

Construction lending, particularly commercial construction lending, poses greater credit risk than mortgage lending to owner-occupants. The repayment of commercial construction loans depends on the business, the financial condition of the borrower, and on the economic viability of the project financed. Economic events and changes in government regulations, which the Bank and its borrowers do not control, could have an adverse impact on the value of properties securing construction loans and on the borrower’s ability to complete projects financed and sell them for amounts anticipated at the time the projects commenced.

Commercial Loans

Commercial loans are generally made on a secured basis and are primarily collateralized by equipment, inventory, accounts receivable and/or leases. Commercial loans primarily provide working capital, equipment financing, financing for leasehold improvements and financing for expansion. The Bank offers both term and revolving commercial loans. Term loans have either fixed or adjustable rates of interest and, generally, terms of between two and seven years. Term loans generally amortize during their life, although some loans require a balloon payment at maturity if the amortization exceeds seven years. Revolving commercial lines of credit typically are renewable annually and have a floating rate of interest normally indexed to the prime rate as published in the Wall Street Journal.

Commercial lending generally poses a higher degree of credit risk than real estate lending. Repayment of both secured and unsecured commercial loans depends substantially on the success of the borrower’s underlying business, financial condition and cash flows. Unsecured loans generally involve a higher degree of risk of loss than do secured loans because, without collateral, repayment is primarily dependent upon the success of the borrower’s business.

Secured commercial loans are generally collateralized by equipment, inventory, accounts receivable and leases. Compared to real estate, such collateral is more difficult to monitor, its value is more difficult to validate, it may depreciate more rapidly and it may not be as readily saleable if repossessed.

Consumer Loans

The Bank originates various types of consumer loans, including home equity loans and lines of credit, auto and personal installment loans. Home equity loans and lines of credit are generally secured by second mortgages placed on one-to-four family owner-occupied properties. Home equity loans have fixed interest rates, while home equity lines of credit adjust based on the prime rate as published in the Wall Street Journal. Consumer loans are originated through the branch network with the exception of Home Equity Lines of Credit, which are originated by licensed Mortgage Lending Originator staff.

Municipal Loans

The Bank makes commercial loans to municipalities and municipal entities (i.e., fire districts, school districts) located within its geographic market area. The most common loans are one-year interest-only Bond Anticipation Notes. The Bank also makes medium-term amortizing loans (two to seven years) for acquisition of capital equipment. The Bank has also underwritten several long-term amortizing loans to finance municipal buildings and infrastructure. These loans, which are unsecured, are general obligations of each municipality backed by its full faith and credit and taxing authority. Most municipal borrowers maintain a strong deposit relationship with the Bank. Loans to municipalities and municipal entities are bank-qualified tax-exempt loans and are considered to be a lower credit risk relative to most other commercial loans.

Credit Risk Management and Asset Quality

One of the Bank’s key objectives is to maintain a high level of asset quality. The Bank utilizes the following general practices to manage credit risk: ensuring compliance with prudent written policies; limiting the amount of credit that individual lenders may extend; establishing a process for credit approval accountability; careful initial underwriting and analysis of borrower, transaction, market and collateral risks; ongoing servicing of individual loans and lending relationships; continuous monitoring and risk rating of the portfolio, market dynamics and the economy; and periodically reevaluating the Bank’s strategy and overall exposure as economic, market and other relevant conditions change.

Credit Administration is responsible for determining loan loss reserve adequacy and preparing monthly and quarterly reports regarding the credit quality of the loan portfolio, which are submitted to the Loan Committee to ensure compliance with the credit policy, and managing non-performing and classified assets as well as oversight of all collection activity.

In addition to loan reviews performed by Credit Administration, loan review activities are also performed by an independent third-party loan review firm that evaluates the creditworthiness of borrowers and the appropriateness of the Bank’s risk rating classifications. The firm’s findings are reported to Credit Administration, Senior Management, and the Board level Loan and Audit Committees.

Trust and Wealth Advisory Services

The Bank provides a range of fiduciary services including trust and estate administration, wealth advisory, and investment management to individuals, families, businesses and institutions.

Securities

Salisbury’s securities portfolio is structured to diversify the earnings, assets and risk structure of Salisbury, provide liquidity consistent with both projected and potential needs, collateralize certain types of deposits, assist with maintaining a satisfactory net interest margin and comply with regulatory capital and liquidity requirements. Types of securities in the portfolio generally include U.S. Government and Agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations, corporate bonds and tax-exempt municipal bonds, among others.

Sources of Funds

The Bank uses deposits, proceeds from loan and security maturities, repayments and sales, and borrowings to fund lending, investing and general operations. Deposits represent the Bank’s primary source of funds.

Deposits

The Bank offers a variety of deposit accounts with a range of interest rates and other terms, which are designed to meet customer financial needs. Retail and commercial deposits are primarily received through the Bank’s banking offices. Additional depositor related services provided to customers include Landlord/Tenant Lease Security Accounts and Services, Merchant Services, Payroll Services, Cash Management (Remote Deposit Capture, ACH Origination, Wire Transfers and Positive Pay), ATM, Bank-by-Phone, Internet Banking, Internet Bill Pay, Person to Person Payments, Bank to Bank Transfers, Mobile Banking with remote deposit, and Online Financial Management with Account Aggregation Services.

The FDIC provides separate insurance coverage of $250 thousand per depositor for each account ownership category. Deposit flows are significantly influenced by economic conditions, the general level of interest rates and the relative attractiveness of competing deposit and investment alternatives. When determining deposit pricing, the Bank considers strategic objectives, competitive market rates, deposit flows, funding commitments and investment alternatives, FHLBB advance rates and rates on other sources of funds.

National, regional and local economic and credit conditions, changes in competitor money market, savings and time deposit rates, prevailing market interest rates and competing investment alternatives all have a significant impact on the level of the Bank’s deposits. Deposit generation is a key focus for the Bank as a source of liquidity and to fund continuing asset growth. Competition for deposits has been, and is expected to, remain strong.

Borrowings

The Bank is a member of the FHLBB, which provides credit facilities for regulated, federally insured depository institutions and certain other home financing institutions. Members of the FHLBB are required to own capital stock in the FHLBB and are authorized to apply for advances on the security of their FHLBB stock and certain home mortgages and other assets (principally securities, which are obligations of, or guaranteed by, the United States Government or its agencies) provided certain creditworthiness standards have been met. Under its current credit policies, the FHLBB limits advances based on a member’s assets, total borrowings and net worth. Long-term and short-term FHLBB advances may be utilized as a source of funding to meet liquidity and planning needs when the cost of these funds is favorable as compared to deposits or alternate funding sources.

Additional funding sources are available through securities sold under agreements to repurchase and the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.

Subsidiaries

Salisbury has one wholly-owned subsidiary, Salisbury Bank and Trust Company. The Bank has two wholly-owned subsidiaries, SBT Mortgage Service Corporation and S.B.T. Realty, Inc. SBT Mortgage Service Corporation is a passive investment company ("PIC") that holds loans collateralized by real estate originated or purchased by the Bank. Income of the PIC and its dividends to Salisbury are exempt from the Connecticut Corporate Business Tax. S.B.T. Realty, Inc. was formed to hold New York state real estate.

Human Capital Resources

Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (“DEI”)

Salisbury understands that our human capital is the most valuable asset we have and we are committed to fostering, cultivating and preserving a culture of diversity, equity and inclusion. The Bank has a DEI Plan and Policy aimed to cultivate and implement strategies to nurture a culture where talented and committed individuals can thrive. We established a DEI Council comprised of a cross section of employees and senior level management whose responsibilities include, but are not limited to, creating opportunities for employees to meaningfully engage with leadership; providing feedback and insight to executive management in support of current and future workforce needs; review of policies, procedures and processes that may impact DEI efforts; engagement with the communities we serve to promote a greater understanding and respect for diversity; and maintaining a work environment which embraces a variety of employee characteristics. All employees and directors are required to complete annual diversity awareness training. The Board of Directors is committed to diversity at the Board level and currently meets the diversity standards of NASDAQ.

Talent

Salisbury has been successful in attracting, developing and retaining qualified and competent staff. There are many factors that contribute to this success, including internships, tuition reimbursement, career pathing and customized development plans, a variety of training and professional development opportunities, internal job postings, transfer and promotion opportunities, and a comprehensive Leadership Development Program instituted in 2019. Our workforce turnover rates have historically been lower than our compensation peer group average.

Employee Compensation and Benefits

The Bank maintains a comprehensive employee benefit program providing, among other benefits, group medical, dental, and vision insurance, life insurance, disability insurance, a 401k plan, an employee stock ownership plan (“ESOP”), short and long-term incentive programs, paid time off including vacation days, personal days, and paid holidays, and employee recognition programs. The Compensation Committee reviews employee compensation and benefits against our compensation peer group annually.

Workplace Health and Safety

The COVID-19 pandemic has presented ongoing challenges since 2021. The safety of our employees, customers and communities continues to be our top priority. Utilizing our Pandemic Planning Policy and Program, we have implemented proper protocols for safety and business continuity. We have successfully maintained safe operations and approximately 50% of our staff are able to work remotely without disruption to our business. We continued to serve customers through our branch lobbies, drive-ups, ATMs, bank-by-appointment, and through the use of our mobile app and online banking services. Since the start of the pandemic, no employees have been furloughed or laid off, and no employee compensation was reduced. We have a Safety Committee comprised of employee representatives and senior managers who conduct routine safety inspections, provide safety training, and promote safe operations. We are proud of our historically low incident rate.

Culture Initiatives and Community Involvement

Our culture is extremely important to us and we seek to attract qualified individuals whose core values are aligned with that of the organization. We conducted an employee engagement survey in the fall of 2021 with an astounding 93% participation rate and an overall engagement index of 80%. Our staff value the people they work with, the flexible work arrangements, advancement opportunities and benefits. It also identified an opportunity to strengthen multi-directional communication and continue to demonstrate value, recognition and accountability. Salisbury has a longstanding commitment to supporting the communities we serve, and our staff remains actively engaged in volunteer activities through bank-sponsored events as well as a variety of community non-profits focused on education, economic development, the arts, and health and human services. They volunteered more than 7,100 hours at close to 200 local organizations. Additionally, the Bank provided monetary support to nearly 200 non-profits during 2022 and collected nearly 3,500 non-perishable food and household items that were donated directly to local community food pantries. The Bank assisted hundreds of small businesses and their employees through the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) with total PPP loan volume of nearly $150 million.

Succession Planning

The Bank has a robust succession planning process which includes detailed CEO, Board Chair, and Key Employee succession plans. The plans are updated regularly and are reviewed by senior management and the Board of Directors annually.

Pay Equity

Fair and equitable salary administration is predicated on having accurate salary ranges that reflect the relevant labor market. A comprehensive market analysis is conducted and reviewed annually to ensure that our pay is in line with that of our compensation peer group. In an effort to be transparent and educate our employees, they each receive a detailed report of their compensation and benefits annually which outlines their total compensation. The bank complies with Connecticut’s requirements for employers to disclose the wage range for vacant positions to both job applicants and existing employees.

Market Area

Salisbury and the Bank are headquartered in Lakeville, Connecticut, which is located in the northwestern quadrant of Connecticut’s Litchfield County. The Bank has a total of fourteen banking offices, four of which are located in Connecticut's Litchfield County; three of which are located in Massachusetts’ Berkshire County; five of which are located in New York’s Dutchess County, one of which is located in New York’s Ulster County, and one of which is located in New York’s Orange County. The Bank’s primary deposit gathering and lending area consists of the communities and surrounding towns that are served by its branch network in these counties. The Bank also has deposit, lending and trust relationships outside of these areas.

Competition

The Bank faces strong competition in attracting and retaining deposits and in making loans. The primary factors in competing for deposits are interest rates, personalized services, the quality and range of financial services, convenience of office locations, automated services and office hours. Its most direct competition for deposits and loans has come from other commercial banks, savings institutions and credit unions located in its market area. Competition for deposits also comes from mutual funds and other investment alternatives, which offer a range of deposit and deposit-like products. Although the Bank expects this continuing competition to have an effect upon the cost of funds, it does not anticipate any substantial adverse effect on maintaining the current deposit base. The Bank is competitive within its market area in the various deposit products it offers to depositors. Due to this fact, management believes the Bank has the ability to maintain its deposit base.

The Bank's competition for real estate loans comes primarily from mortgage banking companies, savings banks, commercial banks, insurance companies, and other institutional lenders. The primary factors in competing for loans are interest rates, loan origination fees, the quality and range of lending services and personalized service. Factors that affect competition include, among others, the general availability of funds and credit, general and local economic conditions, current interest rate levels and volatility in the mortgage markets.

The banking industry is also experiencing rapid changes in technology. In addition to improving customer services, effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to reduce costs. Technological advances are likely to increase competition by enabling more companies to provide cost effective products and services.

Regulation and Supervision

General

Salisbury is required to file reports and otherwise comply with the rules and regulations of the FRB, the FDIC, the SEC and NASDAQ as well as the state banking supervisory authorities in Connecticut, New York and Massachusetts.

The Bank is subject to extensive regulation by the CTDOB, as its chartering agency, and by the FDIC, as its primary federal supervisory agency. The Bank is required to file reports with, and is periodically examined by, the FDIC and the CTDOB concerning its activities and financial condition. It must obtain regulatory approvals prior to entering into certain transactions, such as mergers.

The following discussion of the laws, regulations and policies material to the operations of Salisbury and the Bank is a summary and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such laws, regulations and policies. Such statutes, regulations and policies are continually under review by Congress and the Connecticut, New York and Massachusetts State Legislatures and federal and state regulatory agencies. Changes in such laws, regulations, or policies could potentially have a material adverse impact on the banking industry, including Salisbury and the Bank.

Bank Holding Company Regulation

SEC and NASDAQ

Salisbury is subject to the rules and regulations of the SEC and is required to comply with the disclosure and regulatory requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as administered by the SEC. Salisbury’s common stock is listed on NASDAQ under the trading symbol “SAL” and, accordingly, Salisbury is also subject to the rules of NASDAQ for listed companies.

Federal Reserve Board Regulation

Salisbury is a registered bank holding company under the BHCA and is subject to comprehensive regulation and regular examinations by the FRB. The FRB also has extensive enforcement authority over bank holding companies, including, among other things, the ability to assess civil money penalties, to issue cease and desist or removal orders and to require that a holding company divest subsidiaries (including its bank subsidiaries). In general, enforcement actions may be initiated for violations of law and regulations and unsafe or unsound practices.

Under FRB policy, a bank holding company must serve as a source of financial and managerial strength for its subsidiary bank. Under this policy, Salisbury is expected to commit resources to support the Bank. The FRB may require a holding company to contribute additional capital to an undercapitalized subsidiary bank.

Bank holding companies must obtain FRB approval before: (i) acquiring, directly or indirectly, ownership or control of another bank or bank holding company; (ii) acquiring all or substantially all of the assets of another bank or bank holding company; or (iii) merging or consolidating with another bank holding company.

The BHCA also prohibits a bank holding company, with certain exceptions, from acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of any company, which is not a bank or bank holding company, or from engaging directly or indirectly in activities other than those of banking, managing or controlling banks, or providing services for its subsidiaries. The principal exceptions to these prohibitions involve certain non-bank activities, which, by statute or by FRB regulation or order, have been identified as activities closely related to the business of banking or managing or controlling banks. The list of activities permitted by the FRB includes, among other things: (i) operating a savings institution, mortgage company, finance company, credit card company or factoring company; (ii) performing certain data processing operations; (iii) providing certain investment and financial advice; (iv) underwriting and acting as an insurance agent for certain types of credit-related insurance; (v) leasing property on a full-payout, non-operating basis; (vi) selling money orders; (vii) real estate and personal property appraising; (viii) providing tax planning and preparation services; (ix) financing and investing in certain community development activities; and (x) subject to certain limitations, providing securities brokerage services for customers.

Connecticut Bank Holding Company Regulation

Salisbury is a Connecticut corporation and is also subject to the Connecticut Business Corporation Act and Connecticut banking law applicable to Connecticut bank holding companies. Under Connecticut banking law, no person may acquire beneficial ownership of more than 10% of any class of voting securities of a Connecticut-chartered bank, or any bank holding company of such a bank, without prior notification to, and lack of disapproval by, the CTDOB. The CTDOB will disapprove the acquisition if the bank or holding company to be acquired has been in existence for less than five years, unless the CTDOB waives this five-year restriction, or if the acquisition would result in the acquirer controlling 30% or more of the total amount of deposits in insured depository institutions in Connecticut. Similar restrictions apply to any person who holds in excess of 10% of any such class and desires to increase its holdings to 25% or more of such class.

Dividends

Salisbury’s dividends to shareholders are substantially dependent upon Salisbury’s receipt of dividends from the Bank. The FRB has issued a policy statement on the payment of cash dividends by bank holding companies, which expresses the FRB’s view that a bank holding company should be a “source of strength” to its bank subsidiary and should pay cash dividends only to the extent that the holding company’s net income for the past year is sufficient to cover both the cash dividends and a rate of earnings retention that is consistent with the holding company’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. The FRB also indicated its view that, generally, it would be inappropriate for a company experiencing serious financial problems to borrow funds to pay dividends. Furthermore, the FRB may prohibit a bank holding company from paying any dividends if the holding company’s bank subsidiary is classified as “undercapitalized” or if the dividend would violate applicable law or would be an unsafe or unsound banking practice.

Financial Modernization

GLBA permits greater affiliation among banks, securities firms, insurance companies, and other companies under a type of financial services company known as a “financial holding company.” A financial holding company essentially is a bank holding company with expanded powers. Financial holding companies are authorized by statute to engage in a number of financial activities previously impermissible for bank holding companies, including securities underwriting, dealing and market making; sponsoring mutual funds and investment companies; insurance underwriting and agency; and merchant banking activities. The act also permits the FRB and the Treasury to authorize additional activities for financial holding companies if they are “financial in nature” or “incidental” to financial activities. A bank holding company may become a financial holding company if each of its subsidiary banks is “well capitalized” and “well managed” as defined in the FRB’s Regulation Y, and has at least a “satisfactory” Community Reinvestment Act rating. A financial holding company must provide notice to the FRB within 30 days after commencing activities previously determined to be permissible by statute or by the FRB and the Treasury. Salisbury is a registered financial holding company.

All financial institutions are required to establish policies and procedures with respect to the ability of the Bank to share nonpublic customer data with nonaffiliated parties and to protect customer data from unauthorized access. The Bank has developed policies and procedures, and believes it is in compliance with all privacy, information sharing, and notification provisions of GLBA and the FACT Act.

State Banking Laws and Supervision

The Bank is a state-chartered commercial bank under Connecticut law and as such is subject to regulation and examination by the CTDOB. In addition, because the Bank operates branch offices in Massachusetts and New York, the Bank is also subject to certain Massachusetts and New York laws and the supervisory authority of the Massachusetts Division of Banks, and New York Department of Financial Services (“NYDFS”) with respect to its branch offices in Massachusetts and New York, respectively. The approval of the state banking regulators is generally required for, among other things, the establishment of branch offices and business combination transactions. The CTDOB conducts periodic examinations of Connecticut-chartered banks. The FDIC also regulates many of the areas regulated by the CTDOB, and federal law may limit some of the authority provided to Connecticut-chartered banks by Connecticut law.

Lending Activities

Connecticut banking laws grant commercial banks broad lending authority. With certain limited exceptions, total secured and unsecured loans made to any one obligor generally may not exceed 15% of the Bank’s equity capital and reserves for loan and lease losses. However, if the loan is fully secured, such limitations generally may be increased by an additional 10%.

Dividends

The Bank may pay cash dividends only out of its net profits. For purposes of this restriction, “net profits” represents the remainder of all earnings from current operations. Further, the total amount of all dividends declared by any Connecticut Bank in any year may not exceed the sum of its net profits for the year in question combined with its retained net profits from the preceding two years, unless the CTDOB approves the larger dividend. Federal law also prevents the Bank from paying dividends or making other capital distributions that would cause it to become “undercapitalized.” The FDIC may also limit a bank’s ability to pay dividends based upon safety and soundness considerations.

Powers

Connecticut law permits Connecticut banks to sell insurance and fixed and variable-rate annuities if licensed to do so by the Connecticut Insurance Department. With the prior approval of the CTDOB, Connecticut banks are also authorized to engage in a broad range of activities related to the business of banking, or that are financial in nature or that are permitted under the BHCA, other federal statutes, or the regulations promulgated pursuant to these statutes. Connecticut banks generally are also authorized to engage in any activity permitted for a federal bank or upon filing prior written notice of its intention to engage in such activity with the CTDOB, unless the CTDOB disapproves the activity.

Assessments

Connecticut banks are required to pay assessments to the CTDOB based upon a bank’s asset size to fund the CTDOB’s operations. The assessments are generally made annually.

Enforcement Authority

Under Connecticut law, the CTDOB has extensive enforcement authority over Connecticut banks and, under certain circumstances, affiliated parties, insiders, and agents. The CTDOB’s enforcement authority includes cease and desist orders, fines, receivership, conservatorship, removal of officers and directors, emergency closures, dissolution and liquidation.

New York and Massachusetts Banking Laws and Supervision

The Bank conducts activities and operates branch offices in New York and Massachusetts as well as Connecticut. Generally, with respect to its business in New York and Massachusetts, the Bank may conduct any activity that is authorized under Connecticut law that is permissible for either New York or Massachusetts state banks or for an out-of-state national bank, at its New York and Massachusetts branch offices, respectively. The New York State Superintendent of Financial Services may exercise regulatory authority with respect to the Bank’s New York branch offices. The Bank is subject to certain rules related to community reinvestment, consumer protection, fair lending, establishment of intra-state branches and the conduct of banking activities with respect to its branches located in New York State. The Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks may exercise similar authority, and the Bank is subject to similar rules under Massachusetts Banking Law with respect to the Bank’s Massachusetts branch offices. Federal and state laws authorize the interstate merger of banks. Among other things, banks may establish new branches on an interstate basis provided that such action is specifically authorized by the law of the host state.

Federal Regulations

Capital Requirements

Under FDIC regulations, federally insured state-chartered banks, such as the Bank, that are not members of the Federal Reserve System (“state non-member banks”) are required to comply with the following minimum leverage capital requirements: common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-based assets ratio of 4.5%, a Tier 1 capital to risk-based assets ratio of 6.0%, a total capital to risk-based assets of 8.0%, and a 4.0% Tier 1 capital to total assets leverage ratio. The existing capital requirements became effective January 1, 2015 and are the result of a final rule implementing regulatory amendments based on recommendations of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and certain requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act. Common equity Tier 1 capital is generally defined as common stockholders’ equity and retained earnings. Tier 1 capital is generally defined as common equity Tier 1 and additional Tier 1 capital. Additional Tier 1 capital includes certain noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus and minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries. Total capital includes Tier 1 capital (common equity Tier 1 capital plus additional Tier 1 capital) and Tier 2 capital. Tier 2 capital is comprised of capital instruments and related surplus, meeting specified requirements, and may include cumulative preferred stock and long-term perpetual preferred stock, mandatory convertible securities, intermediate preferred stock and subordinated debt. Also included in Tier 2 capital is the allowance for loan and lease losses limited to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets and, for institutions that have exercised an opt-out election regarding the treatment of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”), up to 45% of net unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair market values. The Bank chose the opt-out election. Institutions that have not exercised the AOCI opt-out have AOCI incorporated into common equity Tier 1 capital (including unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities). Calculation of all types of regulatory capital is subject to deductions and adjustments specified in the regulations.

The FDIC regulations require state non-member banks to maintain certain levels of regulatory capital in relation to regulatory risk-weighted assets. The ratio of regulatory capital to regulatory risk-weighted assets is referred to as a bank’s “risk-based capital ratio.” Risk-based capital ratios are determined by allocating assets and specified off-balance sheet items (including recourse obligations, direct credit substitutes and residual interests) to risk-weighted categories ranging from 0% to 1,250%, with higher levels of capital being required for the categories perceived as representing greater risk.

In addition to establishing the minimum regulatory capital requirements, the regulations limit capital distributions and certain discretionary bonus payments to management if the institution does not hold a “capital conservation buffer” consisting of 2.5% of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets above the amount necessary to meet its minimum risk-based capital requirements.

In assessing an institution’s capital adequacy, the FDIC takes into consideration not only these numeric factors, but qualitative factors as well, and has the authority to establish higher capital requirements for individual institutions where deemed necessary. As a bank holding company, the Company is also subject to regulatory capital requirements, as described in a subsequent section. As of December 31, 2022, the Bank met its capital requirements and the most recent notification from the FDIC categorized the Bank as “well-capitalized.” There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s category.

Prompt Corrective Regulatory Action

Federal law requires, among other things, that federal bank regulatory authorities take “prompt corrective action” with respect to banks that do not meet minimum capital requirements. For these purposes, the law establishes five capital categories:

Transactions with Affiliates

Under federal law, transactions between depository institutions and their affiliates are governed by Sections 23A and 23B of the FRA. In a holding company structure, at a minimum, the parent holding company of a bank, and any companies that are controlled by such parent holding company, are deemed affiliates of its subsidiary bank. Generally, Sections 23A and 23B are intended to protect insured depository institutions from suffering losses arising from transactions with non-insured affiliates by limiting the extent to which a bank or its subsidiaries may engage in covered transactions with any one affiliate and with all affiliates of the bank in the aggregate, and by requiring that such transactions be on terms that are consistent with safe and sound banking practices.

The FRA and Regulation O impose restrictions on loans to directors, executive officers, and principal shareholders (“insiders”). Loans to insiders and their related interests may not exceed, together with all other outstanding loans to such persons and affiliated entities, the institution’s total capital and surplus. Loans to insiders above specified amounts must receive the prior approval of the board of directors and must be made on terms substantially the same as offered in comparable transactions to other persons. The FRA imposes additional limitations on loans to executive officers.

Enforcement

The FDIC has extensive enforcement authority over insured banks, including the Bank. This enforcement authority includes, among other things, the ability to assess civil money penalties, issue cease and desist orders and remove directors and officers. In general, these enforcement actions may be initiated in response to violations of laws and regulations and unsafe or unsound practices.

Standards for Safety and Soundness

The FDIC, together with the other federal bank regulatory agencies, prescribe standards of safety and soundness by regulations or guidelines, relating generally to operations and management, asset growth, asset quality, earnings, stock valuation and compensation. The federal bank regulatory agencies have adopted a set of guidelines prescribing safety and soundness standards, which establish general standards relating to internal controls and information systems, internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth, and compensation, fees and benefits. In general, the guidelines require, among other things, appropriate systems and practices to identify and manage the risks and exposures specified in the guidelines. The guidelines prohibit excessive compensation as an unsafe and unsound practice and describe compensation as excessive when the amounts paid are unreasonable or disproportionate to the services performed by an executive officer, employee, director or principal shareholder. In addition, the federal bank regulatory agencies adopted regulations that authorize, but do not require, the agencies to order an institution that has been given notice that it is not satisfying the safety and soundness guidelines to submit a compliance plan. The federal bank regulatory agencies have also adopted guidelines for asset quality and earning standards. As a state-chartered bank, the Bank is also subject to state statutes, regulations and guidelines relating to safety and soundness, in addition to the federal requirements.

Insurance of Deposit Accounts

The Bank’s deposit accounts are insured by the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”) of the FDIC up to applicable legal limits (generally, $250 thousand per depositor for each account ownership category and $250 thousand for certain retirement plan accounts) and are subject to deposit insurance assessments. The FDIC insurance coverage limit applies per depositor, per insured depository institution for each account ownership category.

The FDIC utilizes a risk-based assessment system that imposes insurance premiums based upon a risk matrix that considers a bank’s capital level and supervisory rating. The FDIC assigns an institution to one of the following capital categories based on the institution’s financial condition consisting of (1) well capitalized, (2) adequately capitalized or (3) undercapitalized, and one of three supervisory subcategories within each capital group. The supervisory subgroup to which an institution is assigned is based on a supervisory evaluation by the institution’s primary federal regulator and information which the FDIC determines to be relevant to the institution’s financial condition and the risk posed to the deposit insurance funds. An institution’s assessment rate depends on the capital category and supervisory category to which it is assigned.

FDIC insured institutions are required to pay assessments to the FDIC to fund the DIF. The Bank’s current annual assessment rate is approximately 3.61 basis points of average total assets less average tangible equity. The assessment rate is adjusted quarterly to reflect changes in the assessment bases of the DIF based on quarterly Call Report submissions. From time to time, the FDIC may impose a supplemental special assessment in addition to other special assessments and regular premium rates to replenish the DIF during periods of economic difficulty. The amount of an emergency special assessment imposed on a bank will be determined by the FDIC if such amount is necessary to provide sufficient assessment income to repay amounts borrowed from the Treasury; to provide sufficient assessment income to repay obligations issued to and other amounts borrowed from insured depository institutions; or for any other purpose the FDIC may deem necessary.

The FDIC may terminate insurance of deposits, after notice and a hearing, if it finds that the institution is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations, has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC. The management of the Bank does not know of any practice, condition or violation that might lead to termination of deposit insurance.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”)

The Dodd-Frank Act, enacted in July 2010, significantly changed the bank regulatory landscape and has impacted lending, deposit, investment, trading and operating activities of financial institutions and their holding companies. The Dodd-Frank Act revised the statutory authorities governing the FDIC’s management of the DIF. The Dodd-Frank Act granted the FDIC new DIF management tools: maintaining a positive fund balance even during a banking crisis and maintaining moderate, steady assessment rates throughout economic and credit cycles.

Among other things, the Dodd-Frank Act: (1) raised the minimum Designated Reserve Ratio (“DRR”), which the FDIC must set each year, to 1.35% (from the former minimum of 1.15%) and removed the upper limit on the DRR (which was formerly capped at 1.5%) and therefore on the size of the DIF; (2) required that the DIF reserve ratio reach 1.35% by September 30, 2020 (rather than 1.15% by the end of 2016, as formerly required); (3) required that, in setting assessments, the FDIC offset the effect of requiring that the reserve ratio reach 1.35% by September 30, 2020 (rather than 1.15% by the end of 2016) on insured depository institutions with total consolidated assets of less than $10 billion; (4) eliminated the requirement that the FDIC provide dividends from the Fund when the reserve ratio is between 1.35% and 1.50%; and (5) continued the FDIC’s authority to declare dividends when the reserve ratio at the end of a calendar year is at least 1.50%, but granted the FDIC sole discretion in determining whether to suspend or limit the declaration or payment of dividends.

The Dodd-Frank Act also required that the FDIC amend its regulations to redefine the assessment base used for calculating deposit insurance assessments. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the assessment base must, with some possible exceptions, equal average consolidated total assets minus average tangible equity.

The FDIC amended 12 CFR 327 to implement revisions to the Federal Deposit Insurance Act made by the Dodd-Frank Act by modifying the definition of an institution’s deposit insurance assessment base; to change the assessment rate adjustments; to revise the deposit insurance assessment rate schedules in light of the new assessment base and altered adjustments; to implement the Dodd-Frank Act’s dividend provisions; to revise the large insured depository institution assessment system to better differentiate for risk and better take into account losses from large institution failures that the FDIC may incur; and to make technical and other changes to the FDIC's assessment rules. The FDIC Board of Directors adopted the final rule, which redefined the deposit insurance assessment base as required by the Dodd-Frank Act; made changes to assessment rates; implemented the Dodd-Frank Act’s DIF dividend provisions; and revised the risk-based assessment system for all large insured depository institutions, generally, those institutions with at least $10 billion in total assets. Nearly all institutions with assets less than $10 billion, including the Bank, have benefited from a reduction in their assessments as a result of this final rule.

The Dodd-Frank Act requires publicly traded companies to give shareholders a non-binding vote of executive compensation at least every three (3) years. The legislation also authorizes the SEC to prohibit broker discretion on any voting on election of directors, executive compensation matters, and any other significant matter.

The Dodd-Frank Act also adopts various mortgage lending and predatory lending provisions and requires loan originators to retain 5% of any loan sold and securitized, unless it is a “qualified residential mortgage,” which includes standard 30 and 15-year fixed rate loans.

The Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (the “Economic Growth Act”), which was enacted in May 2018, repealed or modified several provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act.  Certain key provisions of the Economic Growth Act and its implementing regulations include:

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

The Dodd-Frank Act created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”). As required by the Dodd-Frank Act, jurisdiction for all existing consumer protection laws and regulations has been transferred to the CFPB. In addition, the CFPB is granted authority to promulgate new consumer protection regulations for banks and nonbank financial firms offering consumer financial services or products to ensure that consumers are protected from “unfair, deceptive, or abusive” acts or practices.

Salisbury is subject to a number of federal and state laws designed to protect borrowers and promote lending to various sectors of the economy and population. These laws include the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Truth in Lending Act, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, various state law counterparts, and the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010, which constitutes part of the Dodd-Frank Act and establishes the CFPB, as described above.

The CFPB issued a final rule implementing the ability-to-repay and qualified mortgage (“QM”) provisions of the Truth in Lending Act, as amended by the Dodd-Frank Act (the “QM Rule”), which became effective on January 10, 2014. The ability-to-repay provision requires creditors to make reasonable, good faith determinations that borrowers are able to repay their mortgages before extending the credit based on a number of factors and consideration of financial information about the borrower from reasonably reliable third-party documents. Under the Dodd-Frank Act and the QM Rule, loans meeting the definition of “qualified mortgage” are entitled to a presumption that the lender satisfied the ability-to-repay requirements. The presumption is a conclusive presumption/safe harbor for prime loans meeting the QM requirements and a rebuttable presumption for higher-priced/subprime loans meeting the QM requirements. The definition of a “qualified mortgage” incorporates the statutory requirements, such as not allowing negative amortization or terms longer than 30 years. The QM Rule also adds an explicit maximum 43% debt-to-income ratio limit for borrowers if the loan is to meet the QM definition, with some exceptions.

The CARES Act and Initiatives Related to COVID-19  

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the CARES Act was signed into law on March 27, 2020 to provide national emergency economic relief measures. Many of the CARES Act’s programs are dependent upon the direct involvement of U.S. financial institutions, such as the Bank, and have been implemented through rules and guidance adopted by federal departments and agencies, including the U.S. Department of Treasury, the Federal Reserve and other federal banking agencies, including those with direct supervisory jurisdiction over Salisbury. It is possible that Congress will enact supplementary COVID-19 response legislation, including amendments to the CARES Act or new bills comparable in scope to the CARES Act.

Paycheck Protection Program. Section 1102 of the CARES Act created the Program Protection Program (PPP), a program administered by the SBA to provide loans to small businesses for payroll and other basic expenses during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Bank participated in the PPP as a lender and has approximately $0.3 million of such loans on its consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2022.

Federal Reserve System

Historically, all depository institutions must hold a percentage of certain types of deposits as reserves. Reserve requirements generally are assessed on the depository institution's net transaction accounts (mostly checking accounts). Depository institutions must also regularly submit deposit reports of their deposits and other reservable liabilities. Effective March 26, 2020, the FRB reduced reserve requirement ratios to 0%, thus eliminating reserve requirements for all depository institutions at least temporarily.

Federal Home Loan Bank System

The Bank is a member of the Boston region of the Federal Home Loan Bank System, which consists of 11 regional Federal Home Loan Banks. The FHLBB provides a central credit facility primarily for member institutions. Member institutions are required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in the FHLBB calculated periodically based primarily on its level of borrowings from the FHLBB. The Bank was in compliance with this requirement. At December 31, 2022, the Bank had FHLBB stock of $1.3 million, outstanding FHLBB advances and letters of credit of $10.0 million and $20.0 million, respectively.

No market exists for shares of the FHLBB and, therefore, they are carried at par value. FHLBB stock may be redeemed at par value five years following termination of FHLBB membership, subject to limitations which may be imposed by the FHLBB or its regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Board, to maintain capital adequacy of the FHLBB. While the Bank currently has no intentions to terminate its FHLBB membership, the ability to redeem its investment in FHLBB stock would be subject to the conditions imposed by the FHLBB.

Other Regulations

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The stated goals of SOX are to increase corporate responsibility, to provide for enhanced penalties for accounting and auditing improprieties at publicly traded companies and to protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures pursuant to the securities laws.

SOX includes very specific disclosure requirements and corporate governance rules, requires the SEC and securities exchanges to adopt extensive additional disclosure, corporate governance and other related rules, and mandates further studies of certain issues by the SEC and the Comptroller General. SOX represents significant federal involvement in matters traditionally left to state regulatory systems, such as the regulation of the accounting profession, and to state corporate law, such as the relationship between a board of directors and management and between a board of directors and its committees.

SOX addresses, among other matters, audit committees; certification of financial statements and internal controls by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer; the forfeiture of bonuses or other incentive-based compensation and profits from the sale of an issuer’s securities by directors and senior officers in the twelve-month period following initial publication of any financial statements that later require restatement; a prohibition on insider trading during pension plan black-out periods; disclosure of off-balance sheet transactions; a prohibition on certain loans to directors and officers; expedited filing requirements for Forms 4; disclosure of a code of ethics and filing a Form 8-K for significant changes or waivers of such code; “real time” filing of periodic reports; the formation of a Public Company Accounting Oversight Board; auditor independence; and various increased criminal penalties for violations of securities laws. The SEC has enacted rules to implement various provisions of SOX.

On March 12, 2020 the Securities and Exchange Commission finalized amendments to the definitions of “accelerated” and “large accelerated filer”. The categorization of “accelerated” or “large accelerated filer” determines the requirement for a public company to obtain auditor attestation of its internal control over financial reporting. Salisbury meets the new definition of a “non-accelerated filer” and as such, as of December 31, 2020, the Bank was no longer subject to section 404(b) of SOX, which requires public companies' annual reports to include the company's own assessment of internal control over financial reporting, and an auditor's attestation.

USA PATRIOT Act

Under the USA PATRIOT Act, all financial institutions are required to take certain measures to identify their customers, prevent money laundering, monitor customer transactions and report suspicious activity to U.S. law enforcement agencies. Financial institutions also are required to respond to requests for information from federal banking regulatory authorities and law enforcement agencies. Information sharing among financial institutions for the above purposes is encouraged by an exemption granted to complying financial institutions from the privacy provisions of GLBA and other privacy laws. Financial institutions that hold correspondent accounts for foreign banks or provide private banking services to foreign individuals are required to take measures to avoid dealing with certain foreign individuals or entities, including foreign banks with profiles that raise money laundering concerns, and are prohibited from dealing with foreign “shell banks” and persons from jurisdictions of particular concern. The primary federal banking regulators and the Secretary of the Treasury have adopted regulations to implement several of these provisions. All financial institutions are also required to establish internal anti-money laundering programs. The effectiveness of a financial institution in combating money laundering activities is a factor to be considered in any application submitted by the financial institution under the Bank Merger Act or the BHCA. Salisbury has in place a Bank Secrecy Act and USA PATRIOT Act compliance program, and has implemented internal practices, procedures, and controls to comply with anti-money laundering requirements.

Community Reinvestment Act and Fair Lending Laws

The Bank has a responsibility under the CRA to help meet the credit needs of our communities, including low and moderate-income neighborhoods. The CRA does not establish specific lending requirements or programs for financial institutions nor does it limit an institution’s discretion to develop the types of products and services that it believes are best suited to its particular community, consistent with the CRA. In connection with its examination, the FDIC assesses the Bank’s record of compliance with the CRA. In addition, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Fair Housing Act prohibit discrimination in lending practices on the basis of characteristics specified in those statutes. The Bank’s failure to comply with the provisions of the CRA could, at a minimum, result in regulatory restrictions on our activities. The Bank’s failure to comply with the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Fair Housing Act could result in enforcement actions against the Bank by the FDIC as well as other federal regulatory agencies and the Department of Justice. The Bank’s most recent FDIC CRA rating was “satisfactory.”

The Electronic Funds Transfer Act, Regulation E and Related Laws

The Electronic Funds Transfer Act (the “EFTA”) provides a basic framework for establishing the rights, liabilities, and responsibilities of consumers who use electronic funds transfer (“EFT”) systems. The EFTA is implemented by the Federal Reserve's Regulation E, which governs transfers initiated through ATMs, point-of-sale terminals, payroll cards, automated clearing house (“ACH”) transactions, telephone bill-payment plans, or remote banking services. Regulation E requires consumers to opt in (affirmatively consent) to participation in a bank's overdraft service program for ATM and one-time debit card transactions before overdraft fees may be assessed on the consumer’s account. Notice of the opt-in right must be provided to all new customers who are consumers, and the customer's affirmative consent must be obtained, before charges may be assessed on the consumer's account for paying such overdrafts.

Regulation E also provides bank customers with an ongoing right to revoke consent to participation in an overdraft service program for ATM and one-time debit card transactions and prohibits banks from conditioning the payment of overdrafts for checks, ACH transactions, or other types of transactions that overdraw the consumer's account on the consumer's opting into an overdraft service for ATM and one-time debit card transactions. For customers who do not affirmatively consent to overdraft service for ATM and one-time debit card transactions, a bank must provide those customers with the same account terms, conditions, and features that it provides to consumers who do affirmatively consent, except for the overdraft service for ATM and one-time debit card transactions. Salisbury does not provide an overdraft service with respect to one time point-of-sale or ATM transactions.

Future Legislative Initiatives

In light of the recent changes in the composition of Congress and many state legislatures, it is anticipated that state legislatures and financial regulatory agencies will introduce various legislative and regulatory initiatives that may impact the financial services industry, generally. Such initiatives may include proposals to expand or contract the powers of bank holding companies and/or depository institutions or proposals to substantially change the financial institution regulatory system. Such legislation could change banking statutes and the operating environment of Salisbury in significant and unpredictable ways. For example, if enacted, such legislation could increase or decrease the cost of doing business, limit or expand permissible activities, or affect the competitive balance among banks, savings associations, credit unions, and other financial institutions. Salisbury cannot predict whether any such legislation will be enacted, and, if enacted, what effects that such legislation would have on the financial condition or results of operations of Salisbury. A change in statutes, regulations, or regulatory policies applicable to Salisbury or any of its subsidiaries could have a material effect on the business of Salisbury.

Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices

The Consolidated Financial Statements and their Notes presented within this document have been prepared in accordance with GAAP, which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollar amounts without considering changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The impact of inflation is reflected in the increased cost of Salisbury’s operations. Unlike the assets and liabilities of industrial companies, nearly all of the assets and liabilities of Salisbury are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a greater impact on Salisbury’s performance than do the effects of general levels of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or to the same extent as the prices of goods and services.

Availability of Securities and Exchange Commission Filings

Salisbury makes available free of charge on its website (salisburybank.com) under shareholder relations a link to its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as practicable after such reports are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. Such reports filed with the SEC are also available on its website (www.sec.gov). Information about accessing company filings can be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. Information on Salisbury’s website is not incorporated by reference into this report. Investors are encouraged to access these reports and the other information about Salisbury’s business and operations on its website. Copies of these filings may also be obtained from Salisbury free of charge upon request.

Guide 3 Statistical Disclosure by Bank Holding Companies

The following information required by Subpart 229.1400 of Regulation S-K is located on the pages noted below.

Salisbury is the registered bank holding company for the Bank, its wholly-owned subsidiary. Salisbury's business and activity are currently limited to the holding of the Bank's outstanding capital stock, and the Bank is Salisbury's primary investment.

An investment in Salisbury common stock entails certain risks, some of which are inherent in the financial services industry and others of which are more specific to the Bank’s business. Salisbury considers the most significant factors of which we are aware affecting risk in Salisbury common stock as those that are set forth below. These are not the only risks to which an investment in Salisbury common stock is subject, and none of the factors set forth below relates to the personal circumstances of individual investors. Investors should read this entire Form 10-K, as well as other documents and exhibits that are incorporated by reference in the 10-K and that have been filed with the SEC, in order to better understand these risks and to evaluate investment in Salisbury common stock.

Changes in interest rates and spreads could have a negative impact on earnings and financial condition.

Salisbury’s earnings and financial condition are dependent to a large degree upon net interest income, which is the difference between interest earned from loans and investments and interest paid on deposits and borrowings. The narrowing of interest rate spreads, meaning the difference between interest rates earned on loans and investments, and the interest rates paid on deposits and borrowings, could adversely affect Salisbury’s earnings and financial condition. Salisbury cannot predict with certainty or control changes in interest rates. Global, national, regional, and local economic conditions and the policies of regulatory authorities, including monetary policies of the FRB, affect interest income and interest expense. Salisbury has ongoing policies and procedures designed to manage the risks associated with changes in market interest rates.

However, changes in interest rates still may have an adverse effect on Salisbury’s profitability. For example, high interest rates could also affect the volume of loans that Salisbury originates, because higher rates could cause customers to apply for fewer mortgages, or cause depositors to shift funds from accounts that have a comparatively lower rate, to accounts with a higher rate, or experience customer attrition due to competitor pricing or disintermediation. If the cost of interest-bearing deposits increases at a rate greater than the yields on interest-earning assets increase, net interest income will be negatively affected. Changes in the asset and liability mix may also affect net interest income. Similarly, lower interest rates cause higher yielding assets to prepay and floating or adjustable rate assets to reset to lower rates. If Salisbury is not able to reduce its funding costs sufficiently, due to either competitive factors or the maturity schedule of existing liabilities, then Salisbury’s net interest margin would likely decline.

Financial stress on borrowers could reduce Salisbury’s net income and profitability.

Financial stress on borrowers as a result of job losses, or other factors, could have further adverse effects on borrowers that result in higher delinquencies and greater charge-offs in future periods beyond that which is provided for in Salisbury’s allowance for loan losses, which would adversely affect Salisbury’s financial condition or results of operations.

Fluctuations in economic conditions and collateral values could impact the adequacy of Salisbury’s allowance for loan losses.

Salisbury’s business is subject to periodic fluctuations based on national and local economic conditions. These fluctuations are not predictable, cannot be controlled and may have a material adverse impact on Salisbury’s operations and financial condition. For example, declines in housing activity including declines in building permits, housing sales and home prices may make it more difficult for Salisbury’s borrowers to sell their homes or refinance their debt. Slow sales could strain the resources of real estate developers and builders. The ongoing economic uncertainty has affected employment levels and could impact the ability of Salisbury’s borrowers to service their debt. Bank regulatory agencies also periodically review Salisbury’s allowance for loan losses and may require an increase in the provision for credit losses or the recognition of further loan charge-offs, based on judgments different than those of management. In addition, if charge-offs in future periods exceed the allowance for loan losses Salisbury will need additional provisions to increase the allowance for loan losses. Any increases in the allowance for loan losses will result in a decrease in net income and, possibly, capital, and may have a material adverse effect on Salisbury’s financial condition and results of operations. Salisbury may suffer higher loan losses as a result of these factors and the resulting impact on its borrowers.

Credit market conditions may impact Salisbury’s investments.

Significant credit market anomalies may impact the valuation and liquidity of Salisbury’s investment securities. Illiquidity could reduce the market value of Salisbury’s investments, even those with no apparent credit exposure. The valuation of Salisbury’s investments requires judgment, and as market conditions change investment values may also change.

Salisbury’s securities portfolio performance in difficult market conditions could have adverse effects on Salisbury’s results of operations.

Under GAAP, Salisbury is required to review Salisbury’s investment portfolio periodically for the presence of other-than-temporary impairment of its securities, taking into consideration current market conditions, the extent and nature of changes in fair value, issuer rating changes and trends, volatility of earnings, current analysts’ evaluations, Salisbury’s ability and intent to hold investments until a recovery of amortized cost, as well as other factors. Adverse developments with respect to one or more of the foregoing factors may require Salisbury to deem particular securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired, with the credit related portion of the reduction in the value recognized as a charge to Salisbury’s earnings. Market volatility may make it extremely difficult to value certain securities of Salisbury. Subsequent valuations, in light of factors prevailing at that time, may result in significant changes in the values of these securities in future periods. Any of these factors could require Salisbury to recognize further impairments in the value of Salisbury’s securities portfolio, which may have an adverse effect on Salisbury’s results of operations in future periods.

If the goodwill that Salisbury has recorded in connection with its acquisitions becomes impaired, it could have a negative impact on Salisbury’s profitability.

Applicable accounting standards require that the acquisition method of accounting be used for all business combinations. Under acquisition accounting, if the purchase price of an acquired company exceeds the fair value of the acquired company’s net assets, the excess is carried on the acquirer’s balance sheet as goodwill. At December 31, 2022, Salisbury had $13.8 million of goodwill on its balance sheet. Salisbury must evaluate goodwill for impairment at least annually. Write-downs of the amount of any impairment, if necessary, are to be charged to the results of operations in the period in which the impairment occurs. There can be no assurance that future evaluations of goodwill will not result in findings of impairment and related write-downs, which may have a material adverse effect on Salisbury’s financial condition and results of operations.

Salisbury’s ability to pay dividends substantially depends upon its receipt of dividends from the Bank.

Cash dividends from the Bank and Salisbury’s liquid assets are the principal sources of funds for paying cash dividends on Salisbury’s common stock. Unless Salisbury receives dividends from the Bank or chooses to use its liquid assets, it may not be able to pay dividends. The Bank’s ability to pay dividends to Salisbury is subject to its condition and profitability as well as its regulatory requirements.

Strong competition within Salisbury’s market areas may limit growth and profitability.

Competition in the banking and financial services industry is intense. Salisbury competes with commercial banks, savings institutions, mortgage brokerage firms, credit unions, finance companies, mutual funds, insurance companies, and brokerage and investment banking firms operating locally and elsewhere. As Salisbury grows, it may expand into contiguous market areas where it may not be as well-known as other institutions that have been operating in those areas for some time. In addition, larger banking institutions may become increasingly active in Salisbury’s market areas, may have substantially greater resources and lending limits and may offer certain services that Salisbury does not, or cannot efficiently, provide. Salisbury’s profitability depends upon its continued ability to successfully compete in its market areas. The greater resources and deposit and loan products offered by some competitors may limit its ability to grow profitably.

Salisbury and the Bank are subject to extensive federal and state regulation and supervision.

Salisbury and the Bank are subject to extensive federal and state regulation and supervision. Banking regulations are primarily intended to protect depositors’ funds, federal deposit insurance funds and the banking system as a whole, not shareholders. These regulations affect Salisbury’s lending practices, capital structure, investment practices, and dividend policy and growth, among other things. State and federal legislatures and regulatory agencies continually review banking laws, regulations and policies for possible changes. Changes to statutes, regulations or regulatory policies, including changes in interpretation or implementation of statutes, regulations or policies, could affect Salisbury in substantial and unpredictable ways. Such changes could subject Salisbury to additional costs, limit the types of financial services and products it may offer and/or increase the ability of non-banks to offer competing financial services and products, among other things. Failure to comply with laws, regulations or policies could result in sanctions by regulatory agencies, civil money penalties and/or reputation damage, which could have a material adverse effect on Salisbury’s business, financial condition and results of operations. While Salisbury has policies and procedures designed to prevent any such violations, there can be no assurance that such violations will not occur. See the section captioned “Regulation and Supervision” in Item 1 of this report for further information.

Salisbury’s stock price may be volatile.

Salisbury’s stock is inactively traded and its stock price may fluctuate widely in response to a variety of factors including:

General market fluctuations, industry factors and general economic and political conditions and events, such as economic slowdowns or recessions, interest rate changes, credit loss trends or currency fluctuations could also cause Salisbury’s stock price to decrease regardless of Salisbury’s operating results. As a result, such change could adversely affect the liquidity of the market for Salisbury’s shares and reduce trading.

Salisbury’s ability to attract and retain skilled personnel may impact its success.

Salisbury’s success depends, in large part, on its ability to attract and retain key people. Competition for people with specialized knowledge and skills can be intense, and Salisbury may not be able to hire people or to retain them. The unexpected loss of services of one or more of Salisbury’s key personnel could have a material adverse impact on the business because of their skills, knowledge of the market, years of industry experience and the difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel.

Salisbury continually encounters technological change.

The financial services industry is continually undergoing rapid technological change with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services as well as the emergence of online bank competitors. The effective use of technology can increase efficiency and enable financial institutions to better serve customers and to reduce costs. However, some new technologies needed to compete effectively result in incremental operating costs. Salisbury’s future success depends, in part, upon its ability to address the needs of its customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands, as well as to create additional efficiencies in operations. Many of Salisbury’s competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements. Salisbury may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing these products and services to its customers. Failure to successfully keep pace with technological change affecting the financial services industry could have a material adverse impact on Salisbury’s business and, in turn, its financial condition and results of operations.

A failure involving controls and procedures may have an adverse effect on Salisbury.

Management regularly reviews and updates Salisbury’s internal controls, disclosure controls and procedures, and corporate governance policies and procedures. Any system of controls, however well designed and operated, is based in part on certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurances that the objectives of the system are met. Any failure or circumvention of the controls and procedures or failure to comply with regulations related to controls and procedures could have a material adverse effect on Salisbury’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

If customer information was to be misappropriated and used fraudulently, due to a breach of our systems, or those of third-party vendors or service providers, including as a result of cyberattacks, Salisbury could be exposed to potential liability and reputation risk as well as increased costs.

Risk of theft of customer information resulting from security breaches by third parties exposes banks to reputation risk and potential monetary loss. Like other financial institutions, Salisbury has exposure to fraudulent misuse of its customers’ personal information resulting from its general business operations through loss or theft of the information and through misappropriation of information by third parties in connection with customer use of financial instruments, such as debit cards.

In addition, Salisbury relies upon a variety of computing platforms and networks over the internet for the purposes of data processing, communications and information exchange. Despite the safeguards instituted by Salisbury, any system is susceptible to a breach of security. In addition, Salisbury relies on the services of a variety of third-party vendors to meet Salisbury’s data processing and communication needs. The occurrence of any failures, interruptions or security breaches of Salisbury’s information systems or that of its vendors could damage Salisbury’s reputation, result in a loss of customer business or expose Salisbury to civil litigation and possible financial loss. Such costs and/or losses could materially impact Salisbury’s earnings.

Changes in accounting standards can materially impact Salisbury’s financial statements.

Salisbury’s accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how Salisbury records and reports its financial condition and results of operations. From time to time, the Financial Accounting Standards Board or regulatory authorities change the financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of Salisbury’s financial statements. These changes can be hard to predict and can materially impact how Salisbury records and reports its financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, Salisbury could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in Salisbury restating prior period financial statements.

Changes and interpretations of tax laws and regulations may adversely impact Salisbury’s financial statements.

Local, state or federal tax authorities may interpret tax laws and regulations differently than Salisbury and challenge tax positions that Salisbury has taken on its tax returns. This may result in the disallowance of deductions or differences in the timing of deductions and result in the payment of additional taxes, interest or penalties that could materially affect Salisbury’s performance.

In addition, changes in tax law may adversely affect Salisbury’s lending business and performance, especially those provisions regarding the deductibility of residential mortgage interest and state property taxes.

Salisbury may be adversely impacted by the discontinuance of LIBOR as a short-term interest rate utilized for certain financing agreements.

In July 2017, the Financial Conduct Authority (the authority that regulates LIBOR) announced it intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. The Alternative Reference Rates Committee ("ARRC") has proposed that the Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR") is the rate that represents best practice as the alternative to USD-LIBOR for use in derivatives and other financial contracts that are currently indexed to USD-LIBOR. ARRC has proposed a paced market transition plan to SOFR from USD-LIBOR and organizations are currently working on industry wide and company-specific transition plans as it relates to derivatives and cash markets exposed to USD-LIBOR. The uncertainty as to the nature of alternative reference rates and the replacement of LIBOR may adversely affect the value of certain loans and investment securities.

The economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic may continue to have an adverse impact on our business and results of operations.

The COVID-19 pandemic (hereafter referred to as “COVID-19”, “pandemic” or “virus”) has had a substantial adverse impact in the United States, including threats to public health, increased volatility in markets, and significant effects on national and local economies. The ultimate effect of the virus on Salisbury’s and the Bank’s business will depend on numerous factors and future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with certainty.  Salisbury’s business is dependent upon the willingness and ability of our customers to conduct banking and other financial transactions. COVID-19, or another highly contagious or infectious disease, could negatively impact the ability of our employees and customers to conduct such transactions and disrupt the business activities and operations of the Bank’s customers in the communities in which the Bank operates. Any sustained disruption to the Bank’s operations is likely to negatively impact Salisbury’s financial condition and results of operations. Notwithstanding Salisbury’s contingency plans and other safeguards against pandemics or other contagious diseases, the spread of COVID-19 could also negatively impact the availability of the Bank’s personnel who are necessary to conduct business operations, as well as potentially impact the business and operations of Salisbury’s third-party service providers who perform critical services for Salisbury. If the response to contain COVID-19, or another highly infectious or contagious disease, is unsuccessful, Salisbury could experience a material adverse effect on its business operations, asset valuations, financial condition, and results of operations. Material adverse impacts may include all or a combination of valuation impairments on Salisbury’s intangible assets, investments, loans, loan servicing rights, or deferred tax assets.

In addition, Salisbury may experience changes in the value of collateral securing outstanding loans, reductions in the credit quality of borrowers and the inability of borrowers to repay loans in accordance with their terms. These and similar factors and events may have substantial negative effects on the business, financial condition, ability to pay dividends and results of operations of Salisbury, the Bank and its customers.

Salisbury may be adversely affected by new federal legislation.

Legislation enacted by the Biden administration may have an adverse impact on the conduct and profitability of businesses, including companies like Salisbury and the Bank through increased regulation and taxes.

Geopolitical events may trigger fluctuations in economic conditions which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Salisbury’s business is subject to periodic fluctuations based on national and local economic conditions. Geopolitical events may trigger fluctuations that are not predictable, cannot be controlled and may have a material adverse impact on Salisbury’s operations and financial condition.

Merger-Related Risks

On December 5, 2022, Salisbury and NBT Bancorp Inc. (“NBT”) announced that they entered into a definitive merger agreement pursuant to which Salisbury will merge with and into NBT, and Salisbury Bank will merge with and into NBT Bank, N.A., in an all-stock transaction.

There is no assurance when or even if the merger will be completed.

Completion of the merger is subject to satisfaction or waiver of a number of conditions. There can be no assurance that the closing conditions, especially those closing conditions not within the parties’ control, will be satisfied or waived.

Failure to complete the merger with NBT could negatively affect Salisbury’s stock price and financial results.

If the pending merger with NBT is not completed for any reason, Salisbury’s ongoing business may be adversely affected and, without realizing any of the benefits of having completed the merger, Salisbury would be subject to a number of risks, including the following: (a) negative reactions from the financial markets, including negative effects on Salisbury’s stock price; (b) negative reactions from our customers and vendors; (c) Salisbury will have incurred substantial expenses and will be required to pay certain costs relating to the merger, including legal, accounting, and other fees, whether or not the merger is completed; and (d) Salisbury’s management team will have devoted substantial time and resources to matters relating to the merger, and would otherwise have devoted their time and resources to other opportunities that may have been beneficial to Salisbury. See Note 2 “Acquisitions and Dispositions” in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Salisbury may be subject to uncertainties while the merger with NBT is pending, which would adversely affect Salisbury’s business.

Uncertainty about the effect of the merger on our employees and customers may have an adverse effect Salisbury’s business. These uncertainties may impair our ability to attract, retain and motivate key personnel until the merger is consummated and for a period of time thereafter, and could cause customers and vendors to seek to change their existing business relationships with Salisbury. Employee retention may be particularly challenging during the pendency of the merger, as employees may experience uncertainty about their roles with the surviving corporation following the merger.

The merger agreement may be terminated and the merger with NBT may not be completed.

The merger agreement is subject to a number of customary closing conditions, including the receipt of regulatory approvals and the requisite approvals of Salisbury’s shareholders. Conditions to the closing of the merger may not be fulfilled in a timely manner or at all, and, accordingly, the merger may be delayed or may not be completed. In addition, Salisbury and/or NBT may elect to terminate the merger agreement under certain circumstances.

Shareholder litigation could prevent or delay the closing of the pending merger with NBT or otherwise negatively affect Salisbury’s business and operations.

Salisbury may incur additional costs in connection with the defense or settlement of any shareholder lawsuits filed in connection with the pending merger with NBT. Such litigation could have an adverse effect on Salisbury’s financial condition and results of operations and could prevent or delay the consummation of the merger.

Because the market price of NBT’s common stock may fluctuate, Salisbury shareholders cannot be certain of the precise value of the merger consideration they may receive in the proposed merger with NBT.

At the time the pending merger with NBT is completed, each issued and outstanding share of Salisbury common stock will be converted into the right to receive 0.745 shares of NBT’s common stock. The actual value of the shares of NBT’s common stock received by Salisbury shareholders will depend on the market value of shares of NBT’s common stock at the time the merger is completed. This market value may be less or more than the value used to determine the exchange ratio stated in the merger agreement. The market value of NBT’s common stock may fluctuate between the date that the merger was announced and the closing date due to a variety of factors, including general market and economic conditions, changes in NBT’s businesses, and other factors. Many of these factors are outside of Salisbury’s and NBT’s control. Consequently, at the time that Salisbury shareholders must decide whether to approve the merger, they will not know the actual market value of the shares of NBT’s common stock they will receive when the merger is completed.

None.

Salisbury does not directly own or lease any properties. The properties described below are owned or leased by the Bank.

The Bank conducts its business at its main office, located at 5 Bissell Street, Lakeville, Connecticut, and through an additional thirteen full service branch offices located in Canaan, Salisbury and Sharon, Connecticut; Great Barrington, South Egremont and Sheffield, Massachusetts; and Dover Plains, Fishkill, Millerton, Newburgh, New Paltz, Poughkeepsie, and Red Oaks Mill, New York. The Bank owns its main office and seven of its branch offices and its Operations office, and currently leases six branch offices. In November of 2022, the Board of Directors authorized and directed management to proceed with the closure of the Bank’s Red Oaks Mill office in Poughkeepsie, NY. In January 2023, Salisbury notified regulators of its intent to close the Red Oaks Mill office . The Bank anticipates that this closure will be completed in second quarter 2023. For additional information, see Note 8, “Bank Premises and Equipment,” and Note 5 “Leases” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The following table includes all property owned or leased by the Bank, but does not include Other Real Estate Owned.

The Bank is involved in various claims and legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, which management currently believes are not material, individually or in the aggregate, to the business, financial condition or operating results of Salisbury or any of its subsidiaries.

There are no material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to Salisbury’s business, to which Salisbury is a party or any of its subsidiaries is a party or of which any of their property is subject.

Not applicable.

PART II

Market Information

Salisbury’s common stock trades on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “SAL.” All share and per share amounts have been adjusted to reflect the two-for-one forward stock split effective June 30, 2022.

Holders

There were approximately 2,421 holders of record of the common stock of Salisbury as of March 1, 2023. This number includes brokerage firms and other financial institutions that hold stock in their name, but which is actually beneficially owned by third parties.

Dividends

For a discussion of Salisbury's dividend policy and restrictions on dividends see "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" under the caption “Dividends.” See also, Note 14 – “Shareholders’ Equity” of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

For the information required by this item see Note 16 – “Long Term Incentive Plans” of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

None. On March 23, 2022 Salisbury announced that its Board of Directors renewed its share repurchase program that was established in March 2021. The share repurchase program provides for the potential repurchase of Salisbury’s common stock in amounts up to an aggregate of five percent (5%) of the outstanding shares of Salisbury’s common stock from time to time over a period of the next twelve (12) months through privately negotiated transactions and/or market purchases at appropriate prices, subject to price and market conditions on terms determined to be in the best interests of Salisbury. However, there is no assurance that Salisbury will complete repurchases of 5% of its outstanding shares over the next twelve (12) months. Salisbury did not repurchase any shares during 2022.

BUSINESS

Salisbury Bancorp, Inc., a Connecticut corporation, formed in 1998, is the bank holding company for Salisbury Bank and Trust Company (the "Bank"), a Connecticut-chartered and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") insured commercial bank headquartered in Lakeville, Connecticut. Salisbury’s common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “SAL”. Salisbury's principal business consists of its operation and control of the business of the Bank.

The Bank, formed in 1848, currently provides commercial banking, consumer financing, retail banking and trust and wealth advisory services through a network of fourteen banking offices and thirteen ATMs located in: Litchfield County, Connecticut; Dutchess, Orange and Ulster Counties, New York; and Berkshire County, Massachusetts and through its internet website (salisburybank.com).

In December 2022, Salisbury announced that it signed a definitive agreement to merge with and into NBT. The transaction is expected to close in second quarter 2023 subject to regulatory and Salisbury shareholder approval. Under the terms of the merger agreement, each outstanding share of Salisbury common stock will be converted into the right to receive 0.7450 shares of NBT common stock upon completion of the merger, which equated to a value of $35.00 per Salisbury share based on NBT’s volume-weighted average closing stock price of $46.98 for the 10-day trading period ending on November 29, 2022. The initial value reflected in the exchange ratio was approximately 187% of Salisbury’s tangible book value at September 30, 2022. The transaction is intended to qualify as a reorganization for federal income tax purposes, and as a result, the receipt of NBT common stock by shareholders of Salisbury is expected to be tax-free.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Salisbury’s consolidated financial statements follow GAAP as applied to the banking industry in which it operates. Application of these principles requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements. These estimates, assumptions and judgments are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements; accordingly, as this information changes, the financial statements could reflect different estimates, assumptions and judgments and as such have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported. Estimates, assumptions and judgments are necessary when assets and liabilities are required to be recorded at fair value, when a decline in the value of an asset not carried at fair value warrants an impairment write-down or valuation reserve to be established, or when an asset or liability needs to be recorded contingent upon a future event.

Salisbury’s significant accounting policies are presented in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, which, along with this Management’s Discussion and Analysis, provide information on how significant assets are valued in the financial statements and how those values are determined. Management believes that the following accounting estimates are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating Salisbury’s reported financial results, and they require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, resulting from the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.

Management considers the policies related to the allowance for loan losses as the most critical to the financial statement presentation because it requires significant judgment and the use of estimates related to the amount and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience, and consideration of current economic trends and conditions, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. The allowance for loan losses, which is established through a provision for loan losses charged to current earnings, is a valuation account that is deducted from the loans' amortized cost basis to present the net amount expected to be collected on the loans. For purposes of determining the allowance for loan losses, the loan portfolio is segregated into pools of homogeneous loans in order to recognize differing risk characteristics among categories, and then further segregated by internal credit risk ratings. Loans that do not share similar risk characteristics are evaluated on an individual basis and are not included in the collective evaluation. Management estimates the allowance balance using relevant available information from internal and external sources relating to past events and current conditions. Adjustments to historical loss information are made to incorporate necessary qualitative adjustments to address factors that are not present in historical loss rates and are otherwise unaccounted for in the quantitative process. A reserve is recorded upon origination or purchase of a loan. The allowance represents management’s best estimate, but significant downturns in circumstances relating to loan quality and economic conditions could result in a requirement for additional allowance. Likewise, an upturn in loan quality and improved economic conditions may allow a reduction in the required allowance. In either instance, unanticipated changes could have a significant impact on results of operations. Note 1 describes the methodology used to determine the allowance for loan losses. A discussion of the factors driving changes in the amount of the allowance for loan losses is included in the “Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

Climate Change

There have been significant developments in federal and state legislation and regulation and international accords regarding climate change in recent years. Given our size and the nature of our business, the direct impact and expected future direct impact of climate-related regulation is not material to us, and is not expected to be material, to our business, financial condition, or results of operations. Salisbury has not experienced any physical effects of climate change on our operations and results. We recognize that, while not material to our operations, indirect consequences of climate-related regulation may exist as a result of the impact such legislation may have on certain types of customers who engage in activity that could be deemed potentially harmful to the environment. Salisbury notes that the climate change landscape is constantly evolving and at this time, it is not possible for us to know or predict the full universe or extent that these indirect effects will have on the Company's future operations. At this time, Salisbury does not plan to have material future capital expenditures for climate-related projects. Additionally, we have not incurred material compliance costs related to climate change.

The following discussion and analysis of Salisbury's consolidated results of operations should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and footnotes.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2022 and 2021

Net Interest and Dividend Income

Net interest and dividend income (presented on a tax-equivalent basis) increased $4.5 million, or 10.8%, in 2022 over 2021. The net interest margin increased 15 basis point to 3.16% in 2022 from 3.01% in 2021, mostly due to a 25 basis point increase in the average yield on interest-earning assets, partly offset by a 15 basis point increase in the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. The net interest margin was affected by changes in the mix of interest-earning assets and funding liabilities, asset and liability growth, and the effects of changes in market interest rates on the pricing and re-pricing of assets and liabilities. Excluding PPP loans, the tax-equivalent net interest margin for 2022 was 3.12% compared with 2.87% for 2021. The following table sets forth the components of Salisbury's net interest income and yields on average interest-earning assets and interest-bearing funds. Income and yields on tax-exempt securities are presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis.

The following table sets forth the changes in net interest income (presented on a tax-equivalent basis) due to volume and rate.

Net interest and dividend income represents the difference between interest and dividends earned on loans and securities and interest expense incurred on deposits and borrowings. The level of net interest income is a function of volume, rates and mix of both earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income can be affected by changes in interest rate levels, changes in the volume of assets and liabilities that are subject to re-pricing within different future time periods, and in the level of non-performing assets.

Interest and Dividend Income

Tax equivalent interest and dividend income of $50.8 million in 2022 increased $6.0 million, or 13.4% in 2022. Loan income increased $3.8 million, or 9.2%, to $45.3 million in 2022. The increase was primarily due to a $83.0 million, or 7.8%, increase in average loans and a 4 basis point increase in average yield.

Tax equivalent interest and dividend income from securities increased $1.6 million, or 52.1%, to $4.5 million in 2022, as a result of a $73.5 million, or 50.7%, increase in average security balances and a 2 basis point increase in average yield. Interest from short term funds increased $620 thousand, or 295.2%, to $830 thousand in 2022, as a result of a 102 basis point increase in average yield, partly offset by a $86.6 million, or 54.5%, decrease in average short-term balances.

Interest Expense

Interest expense increased $1.5 million, or 44.2%, to $5.0 million in 2022. Interest expense on interest bearing deposit accounts increased $1.6 million, or 72.4%, to $3.7 million in 2022, as a result of a 16 basis point increase in the average rate to 0.40% and a $36.7 million, or 4.1%, increase in average interest bearing deposit balances. Interest expense on money market accounts increased $1.0 million, or 184.1%, due to a 32 basis point increase in the average rate, and a $2.8 million, or 0.9% increase in average balances. Interest expense on savings and other accounts increased $391 thousand, or 163.6%, due to a 15 basis point increase in the average rate and a $25.4 million, or 11.8%, increase in average balances. Interest expense on certificates of deposits increased $172 thousand, or 18.3%, due to a 12 basis point increase in the average rate and a $1.3 million, or 1.0% increase in average balance.

Interest expense on FHLBB advances decreased $11 thousand, or 8.8%, to $114 thousand in 2022, due to a $7.5 million, or 75.4%, decrease in average advances, partly offset by a 335 basis point increase in the average borrowing rate to 4.59%.

Interest expense on subordinated debt decreased $68 thousand, or 6.8% to $932 thousand in 2022, due to a decrease in the average borrowing rate to 3.80%, partly offset by a $2.0 million, or 8.8%, increase in the average balance. In March 2021, Salisbury issued $25.0 million of fixed to floating rate subordinated debentures at an initial coupon rate of 3.50%. The proceeds from the issuance were used in part to fully redeem the $10 million of its outstanding subordinated debt issued in 2015 at a rate of 6.00%.

Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses was $2.7 million in 2022 compared with a net release of credit reserves of $0.7 million in 2021. The provision for full year 2022 was primarily driven by robust loan growth in the commercial and residential portfolios during the year. Net loan charge-offs were $0.8 million for 2022 compared with $72 thousand in 2021. The increase in charge-offs in 2022 was attributed to the sale of $3.8 million of non-performing and under performing loans in first quarter 2022 as well as the charge off of a discrete commercial loan in second quarter 2022. Net loan charge-offs for the last six months of 2022 were $78 thousand. Management will continue to monitor the impact of macro-economic factors on its borrowers and adjust the allowance as appropriate. An economic slowdown due to rising interest rates, inflation or labor shortages may result in an increase in Salisbury’s provision and allowance for loan losses.

The following table sets forth changes in the allowance for loan losses and other statistical data:

The reserve coverage at December 31, 2022, as measured by the ratio of allowance for loan losses to gross loans, was 1.21%, as compared with 1.20% at December 31, 2021. Excluding loans advanced under the SBA’s Paycheck Protection Program, the ratio of the allowance to gross loans was 1.21% at December 31, 2022 compared with 1.23% at December 31, 2021. Non-performing loans (non-accrual loans and accruing loans past-due 90 days or more) decreased $1.5 million to $2.7 million, or 0.22% of gross loans receivable, at December 31, 2022, down from $4.2 million or 0.39% of gross loans receivable at December 31, 2021. Accruing loans past due 30-89 days decreased slightly from $1.3 million, or 0.12%, of gross loans receivable at December 31, 2021 to $1.3 million, or 0.11%, of gross loans receivable at December 31, 2022. See “Overview – Loan Credit Quality” below for further discussion and analysis. 

Non-Interest Income

The following table details the principal categories of non-interest income.

Non-interest income increased $202 thousand, or 1.8%, in 2022 versus 2021. Trust and Wealth Advisory revenues decreased $83 thousand mainly due to lower asset-based fees. Service charges and fees increased $477 thousand from 2021 primarily due to higher deposit fees and higher loan prepayment fees. Mortgage banking activities, net decreased $444 thousand on lower sales volume. Mortgage loan sales to FHLBB totaled $7.2 million in 2022 versus $34.6 million in 2021. Loans serviced under the FHLBB Mortgage Partnership Finance Program totaled $133.1 million and $140.6 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021 respectively. The twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 included mortgage servicing amortization of $140 thousand and $235 thousand, respectively. Non-interest income for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2021 also included a pre-tax gain of $73 thousand primarily from the sale of Salisbury’s operations center in Canaan, Connecticut. Other income primarily includes rental property income.

Non-Interest Expense

The following table details the principal categories of non-interest expense.

Non-interest expenses increased $2.5 million, or 7.9%, in 2022 versus 2021. Salaries increased $1.5 million primarily reflecting annual merit increases and incentive accruals. Benefits increased $102 thousand compared to the same period in 2021 primarily due to higher 401K accruals, deferred compensation and payroll taxes. Premises and equipment increased $167 thousand mainly due to higher lease depreciation, facilities related expenses and utilities. The twelve-month period ended December 31, 2021 also included a pre-tax loss of $144 thousand on the sale of the building housing the Bank’s branch in Poughkeepsie, New York, which closed during the first quarter 2022. Data processing increased $354 thousand mainly due to higher ATM fees, core system costs, website expense, and Trust and Wealth data related expenses. The increase in professional fees of $439 thousand versus the twelve-month period 2021 primarily reflected legal and consulting expenses related to the pending merger with NBT, partially offset by lower audit and exam and investment management expenses. Collections, OREO and loan related expense decreased $79 thousand primarily due to lower appraisal, litigation related expenses and mortgage recording costs. FDIC related expense decreased $15 thousand compared to the same period in 2021. Marketing and community support costs decreased $59 thousand compared to the same period in 2021 primarily due to the cost of web site redesign and branding initiatives in 2021. Amortization of intangible assets decreased $65 thousand due to the aging off of expenses related to previous acquisitions. Other expenses increased $323 thousand primarily due to higher charge-offs for fraud losses as well as higher director fees.

Income Taxes

The effective income tax rates for 2022 and 2021 were 18.2% and 20.6%, respectively. Salisbury’s effective tax rate was less than the 21% federal statutory rate due to tax-exempt income, primarily from municipal bonds, tax advantaged loans and bank-owned life insurance. Fluctuations in the effective tax rate generally result from changes in the mix of taxable and tax-exempt income. For further information on income taxes, see Note 13 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Salisbury did not incur Connecticut income tax in 2022, 2021 or 2019, other than minimum state income tax, as a result of a Connecticut law that permits banks to shelter certain mortgage income from the Connecticut corporation business tax through the use of a special purpose entity called a Passive Investment Company or PIC. Salisbury avails itself of this benefit through its PIC, SBT Mortgage Service Corporation. Salisbury's income tax provision reflects the full impact of the Connecticut legislation. Salisbury does not expect to pay other than minimum Connecticut state income tax in the foreseeable future unless there is a change in Connecticut tax law.

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2021 and 2020

Net interest and dividend income represents the difference between interest and dividends earned on loans and securities and interest expense incurred on deposits and borrowings. The level of net interest income is a function of volume, rates and mix of both earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income can be affected by changes in interest rate levels, changes in the volume of assets and liabilities that are subject to re-pricing within different future time periods, and in the level of non-performing assets.

Interest and Dividend Income

Tax equivalent interest and dividend income of $44.8 million in 2021 increased $0.7 million, or 1.5% in 2021. Loan income increased $282 thousand, or 0.7%, to $41.5 million in 2021. The increase was primarily due to a $39.7 million, or 3.9%, increase in average loans, which was partly offset by a 13 basis point decrease in average yield.

Tax equivalent interest and dividend income from securities increased $428 thousand, or 16.7%, to $3.0 million in 2021, as a result of a $55.2 million, or 61.9%, increase in average security balances, partly offset by an 80 basis point decrease in average yield. Interest from short term funds increased $56 thousand, or 36.4%, to $210 thousand in 2021, as a result of a $93.0 million, or 141.0%, increase in average short-term balances, partly offset by a 10 basis point decrease in average yield.

Interest Expense

Interest expense decreased $1.8 million, or 34.8%, to $3.4 million in 2021. Interest expense on interest bearing deposit accounts decreased $1.7 million, or 44.4%, to $2.2 million in 2021, as a result of a 27 basis point decrease in the average rate to 0.24%, partly offset by a $126.4 million, or 16.6%, increase in average interest bearing deposit balances. Interest expense on money market accounts decreased $598 thousand, or 52.2%, due to a 28 basis point decline in the average rate, partly offset by a $59.1 million, or 23.0% increase in average balances. Interest expense on savings and other accounts decreased $225 thousand, or 48.5%, due to a 15 basis point decline in the average rate, partially offset by a $40.1 million, or 22.9%, increase in average balances. Interest expense on certificates of deposits decreased $901 thousand, or 49.0%, due to 55 basis point decline in the average rate and a $13.6 million, or 9.4% decrease in average balance.

Interest expense on FHLBB advances decreased $480 thousand, or 79.3%, to $125 thousand in 2021, due to a $30.2 million, or 75.2%, decrease in average advances and a 25 basis point decrease in the average borrowing rate to 1.24%.

Interest expense on subordinated debt increased $382 thousand, or 61.8% to $1.0 million in 2021, due to a $12.6 million, or 128.1% increase in average balances, partly offset by a decrease in the average borrowing rate to 4.44%. In March 2021, Salisbury issued $25.0 million of fixed to floating rate subordinated debentures at an initial coupon rate of 3.50%. The proceeds from the issuance were used in part to fully redeem the $10 million of its outstanding subordinated debt issued in 2015 at a rate of 6.00%.

Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses

Net credit reserves of $0.7 million were released in 2021 compared with a provision for loan losses of $5.0 million for 2020. Net loan charge-offs were $72 thousand and $179 thousand, for the respective years. The net release of credit reserves in 2021 primarily reflected the transfer of loans in the discrete COVID-19 pool, which carries a higher level of reserves, back to their pre-pandemic loan pool because the borrowers were paying as agreed and the underlying businesses were substantially operating at pre-pandemic levels. The pay-off of certain commercial loans and internal risk rating changes also contributed to the release of credit reserves, which was substantially offset by loan growth and changes to qualitative factors due to continued uncertainty over the economic impact of COVID-19 and other macro-economic factors. Management will continue to monitor the impact of the virus and other macro-economic factors on its borrowers and adjust the allowance as appropriate. A resurgence of the virus that results in another economic lockdown or an economic slowdown due to rising interest rates, inflation or labor shortages may result in an increase in Salisbury’s provision and allowance for loan losses.

The reserve coverage at December 31, 2021, as measured by the ratio of allowance for loan losses to gross loans, was 1.20%, as compared with 1.32% at December 31, 2020. Excluding loans advanced under the SBA’s Paycheck Protection Program, the ratio of the allowance to gross loans was 1.23% at December 31, 2021 compared with 1.44% at December 31, 2020. Non-performing loans (non-accrual loans and accruing loans past-due 90 days or more) decreased $1.4 million to $4.2 million, or 0.39% of gross loans receivable, at December 31, 2021, down from $5.6 million or 0.54% of gross loans receivable at December 31, 2020. Accruing loans past due 30-89 days decreased from $6.8 million, or 0.66%, of gross loans receivable at December 31, 2020 to $1.3 million, or 0.12%, of gross loans receivable at December 31, 2021. See “Overview – Loan Credit Quality” below for further discussion and analysis.

Non-Interest Income

Non-interest income increased $1.2 million, or 11.4%, in 2021 versus 2020. Trust and Wealth Advisory revenues increased $776 thousand mainly due to growth in asset-based fees. Service charges and fees increased $1.8 million from 2020. The increase primarily reflected higher deposit, interchange and loan prepayment fees. In addition, during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2020, Salisbury waived approximately $754 thousand in various deposit fees, including overdraft and ATM fees, to support customers affected by COVID-19. Mortgage banking activities, net decreased $621 thousand on lower sales volume. Mortgage loan sales to FHLBB totaled $34.6 million in 2021 versus $59.8 million in 2020. Loans serviced under the FHLBB Mortgage Partnership Finance Program totaled $140.7 million and $134.4 million at December 31, 2021 and 2020 respectively. The twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 included mortgage servicing amortization of $235 thousand and $151 thousand, respectively. In 2020, the Bank recorded a non-taxable gain of $601 thousand related to proceeds received from a BOLI policy due to the death of a covered former employee. Non-interest income for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2021 also included a pre-tax gain of $73 thousand primarily from the sale of Salisbury’s operations center in Canaan, Connecticut. Other income primarily includes rental property income.

Non-Interest Expense

Non-interest expenses increased $3.1 million, or 10.6%, in 2021 versus 2020. Salaries increased $1.6 million primarily reflecting annual merit increases and higher production and incentive accruals. Benefits increased $490 thousand compared to the same period in 2020 primarily due higher medical insurance costs, 401K accruals and payroll taxes. Premises and equipment increased $95 thousand mainly due to higher building depreciation and facilities related expenses. The twelve-month period ended December 31, 2021 also included a pre-tax loss of $144 thousand on the sale of the building housing the Bank’s branch in Poughkeepsie, New York, which closed during the first quarter 2022. Data processing increased $230 thousand mainly due to higher ATM fees, core system costs and Trust and Wealth data related expenses. The increase in professional fees of $38 thousand versus the twelve-month period 2020 primarily reflected higher legal, audit and exam and investment management expenses partially offset by lower consulting expense. Collections, OREO and loan related expense increased $132 thousand primarily due to higher appraisal and mortgage recording costs. FDIC related expense increased $75 thousand compared to the same period in 2020 reflecting higher deposit balances. Marketing and community support costs increased $308 thousand compared to the same period in 2020 primarily due to Salisbury’s website redesign and branding initiatives as well as costs associated with various marketing events. Amortization of intangible assets decreased $65 thousand due to the aging off of expenses related to previous acquisitions. Other expenses increased $30 thousand and primarily reflected higher employee related expenses, postage and telephone expense.

Income Taxes

The effective income tax rates for 2021 and 2020 were 20.6% and 17.0%, respectively. Salisbury’s effective tax rate was less than the 21% federal statutory rate due to tax-exempt income, primarily from municipal bonds, tax advantaged loans and bank-owned life insurance. Fluctuations in the effective tax rate generally result from changes in the mix of taxable and tax-exempt income. For further information on income taxes, see Note 13 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Salisbury did not incur Connecticut income tax in 2021, 2020 or 2019, other than minimum state income tax, as a result of a Connecticut law that permits banks to shelter certain mortgage income from the Connecticut corporation business tax through the use of a special purpose entity called a Passive Investment Company or PIC. Salisbury avails itself of this benefit through its PIC, SBT Mortgage Service Corporation. Salisbury's income tax provision reflects the full impact of the Connecticut legislation. Salisbury does not expect to pay other than minimum Connecticut state income tax in the foreseeable future unless there is a change in Connecticut tax law.

Overview

Assets

During 2022, Salisbury’s assets increased by $12.4 million, or 0.8%, to $1.54 billion at December 31, 2022. This increase was driven by robust net loan growth of $146.9 million, or 13.8%, which was mostly offset by a decline in cash and cash equivalent balances of $124.8 million, or 71.1%, as Salisbury deployed excess liquidity into loans. In addition, the balance of Salisbury’s available-for-sale (“AFS”) investment portfolio decreased $15.0 million, or 7.4%, during 2022. At December 31, 2022, Salisbury’s tangible book value and book value per common share were $19.71 and $22.13, respectively. At December 31, 2022, the Bank’s Tier 1 leverage and total risk-based capital ratios were 9.99% and 13.43%, respectively, and the Bank was categorized as "well capitalized" according to regulatory guidelines.

Securities and Short-Term Funds

During 2022, securities decreased $14.1 million, or 6.8%, to $190.6 million primarily due to unrealized losses of $27.3 million, which reflected the significant increases in market interest rates during 2022. Short-term funds (cash and due from banks and interest-bearing deposits with other banks) decreased $124.8, or 71.2%, million to $50.5 million in 2022 reflecting the funding of loans as well as a normalization of deposit balances back to pre-pandemic levels. The carrying values of securities are as follows:

Salisbury evaluates securities for OTTI where the fair value of a security is less than its amortized cost basis at the balance sheet date. As part of this process, Salisbury considers whether it has the intent to sell each debt security and whether it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery. If either of these conditions is met, Salisbury recognizes an OTTI charge to earnings equal to the entire difference between the security’s amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance sheet date. For securities that meet neither of these conditions, an analysis is performed to determine if any of these securities are at risk for OTTI.

Salisbury evaluates securities for strategic fit and may reduce its position in securities, although it is not more likely than not that Salisbury will be required to sell these securities before recovery of their cost basis, which may be maturity, and does not intend to sell these securities. Management does not consider any of its securities to be OTTI at December 31, 2022. It is possible that future loss assumptions could change, necessitating Salisbury to recognize future OTTI.

Accumulated other comprehensive income at December 31, 2022 reflected net unrealized losses, net of tax, of $20.7 million in Salisbury’s AFS securities portfolio compared to an unrealized gain of $0.9 million at year end 2021. The unrealized losses, which reflected the significant increase in market interest rates experienced in 2022, do not affect Salisbury’s regulatory capital ratios.

Loans

During 2022, net loans receivable increased $146.9 million, or 13.8%, to $1.214 billion at December 31, 2022. Excluding PPP loans, net loans increased by $172.2 million, or 16.5%, in 2022. Salisbury’s retail lending department originates residential mortgage, home equity loans and lines of credit, and consumer loans for the portfolio. During 2022, Salisbury originated $118.1 million of residential mortgage loans and $15.9 million of home equity loans for the portfolio, compared with $165.9 million and $11.8 million, respectively, in 2021. During 2022, total residential mortgage and home equity loans receivable increased $88.7 million, or 18.9%, to $557.1 million at December 31, 2022, and represented 45.4% of gross loans receivable. During 2022, Salisbury’s residential mortgage lending department also originated and sold $7.2 million of residential mortgage loans, compared with $34.6 million during 2021. All such sold loans were sold through the FHLBB Mortgage Partnership Finance Program with servicing retained by Salisbury. Consumer loans, amounted to $20.5 million at December 31, 2022, representing 1.7% of gross loans receivable.

Salisbury’s commercial lending department specializes in lending to small and mid-size companies, businesses and municipalities. More specifically, we meet our clients’ credit needs by providing short-term and long-term financing, construction loans, commercial mortgages, equipment, working capital, property improvement loans and municipal financing. The department also works with both the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) and United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) Government Guaranteed Lending Programs; however, such loans represent a very small percent of the commercial loan portfolio. Excluding PPP loans, total commercial loans, which include commercial real estate, commercial and industrial and municipal loans, increased $75.2 million, or 13.5%, to $631.0 million at December 31, 2022, and represent 51.4% of gross loans receivable. At December 31, 2022 approximately $0.3 million of PPP loans remained on Salisbury’s balance sheet. These loans are reported as a separate component of “commercial and industrial” loans in the table below.

The principal categories of loans receivable and loans held-for-sale are as follows:

The composition of loans receivable by forecasted maturity distribution is as follows:

The composition of loans receivable with either fixed, variable or adjustable interest rates is as follows:

Loan Credit Quality

Salisbury has cooperative relationships with the vast majority of its non-performing loan customers. Substantially all non-performing loans are collateralized with real estate and the repayment of such loans is largely dependent on the return of such loans to performing status or the liquidation of the underlying real estate collateral. Salisbury pursues the resolution of all non-performing loans through collections, restructures, voluntary liquidation of collateral by the borrower and, where necessary, legal action. When attempts to work with a customer to return a loan to performing status, including restructuring the loan, are unsuccessful, Salisbury will initiate appropriate legal action seeking to acquire property by deed in lieu of foreclosure or through foreclosure, or to liquidate business assets.

Past Due Loans

Loans past due 30 days or more decreased $1.2 million during 2022 to $1.5 million, or 0.12% of gross loans receivable at December 31, 2022, compared with $2.6 million, or 0.24% of gross loans receivable at December 31, 2021. The decline in past due loans from year end 2021 primarily reflected the sale and charge-off of certain loans during the twelve-month period ending December 31, 2022.

The components of loans past due 30 days or greater are as follows:

Credit Quality Segments

Salisbury categorizes loans receivable into the following credit quality segments.

Non-Performing Assets

Non-performing assets decreased $1.5 million to $2.7 million at December 31, 2022, or 0.17% of assets, from $4.2 million or 0.27% of assets at December 31, 2021. The decrease in non-performing assets resulted primarily from the sale and charge-off of $2.0 million of non-performing loans and $0.4 million of loan payments, which were partially offset by the downgrade of $0.9 million of loans during 2022.

The components of non-performing assets are as follows:

Reductions in interest income associated with non-accrual loans are as follows:

The past due status of non-performing loans is as follows:

At December 31, 2022, 93.50% of non-performing loans were current with respect to loan payments, compared with 69.02% at December 31, 2021. Loans past due 180 days and over are substantially all mortgage loans in the process of foreclosure or litigation.

Salisbury endeavors to work constructively to resolve its non-performing loan issues with customers. Substantially all non-performing loans are collateralized with real estate and the repayment of such loans is largely dependent on the return of such loans to performing status or the liquidation of the underlying real estate collateral.

Troubled Debt Restructured Loans

Troubled debt restructured loans decreased $2.2 million in 2022 to $2.7 million, or 0.22% of gross loans receivable, from $5.0 million, or 0.46% of gross loans receivable at December 31, 2021. The reduction in loan balance from year end 2021 primarily reflected the sale and charge-off of certain loans and loan payments during the twelve month period ended December 31, 2022. The components of troubled debt restructured loans are as follows:

The past due status of troubled debt restructured loans is as follows:

At December 31, 2022, 97.55% of troubled debt restructured loans were current with respect to loan payments, as compared with 79.73% at December 31, 2021. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, there were specific reserves on troubled debt restructured loans amounting to $22 thousand and $31 thousand, respectively. 

Potential Problem Loans

Potential problem loans consist of performing loans that have been assigned a substandard credit risk rating and are not classified as impaired. Potential problem loans decreased $18.9 million during 2022 to $6.1 million, or 0.49% of gross loans receivable at December 31, 2022, compared with $25.0 million, or 2.32% of gross loans receivable at December 31, 2021. The decrease primarily reflected internal credit risk rating upgrades on loans to businesses primarily in the hospitality, health care and entertainment and recreation industries which were previously downgraded due to concerns over the impact of COVID-19. These businesses have demonstrated a return to pre-pandemic levels of activity and liquidity, warranting the improvement in risk rating. The decrease in potential problem loans also reflected the sale of certain loans during 2022. The components of potential problem loans were as follows:

The past due status of potential problem loans was as follows:

At December 31, 2022, 99.67% of potential problem loans were current with respect to loan payments, as compared with 99.84% at December 31, 2021. Management cannot predict the extent to which economic or other factors may impact such borrowers’ future payment capacity, and there can be no assurance that such loans will not be placed on nonaccrual status, restructured, or require increased provisions for loan losses.

Deposits and Borrowings

Deposits increased $22.2 million, or 1.7%, during 2022, to $1.36 billion at December 31, 2022, compared with $1.34 billion at December 31, 2021. Deposit balances at year end 2022 included $40.0 million from an independent third party and are held in a business money market account. These funds, similar to other deposits, were utilized by Salisbury to fund loan growth. Retail repurchase agreements decreased $4.2 million, or 36.8%, to $7.2 million at December 31, 2022, compared with $11.4 million at December 31, 2021.

The distribution of average total deposits by account type was as follows:

The total deposit accounts greater than the federally insured limit of $250,000 amounted to $567million and $531 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

The classification of certificates of deposit by interest rates was as follows:

The distribution of certificates of deposit by interest rate and maturity was as follows:

Scheduled maturities of time certificates of deposit in denominations of $100 thousand or more were as follows:

FHLBB advances increased $2.3 million during 2022 to $10.0 million at December 31, 2022, compared with $7.7 million at December 31, 2021. The increase primarily reflected a purchase of an advance offset by the maturities and principal payments on amortizing advances. Salisbury also has an Irrevocable Letter of Credit Reimbursement Agreement with the FHLBB, whereby upon the Bank’s request an irrevocable letter of credit is issued to secure municipal and certain other transactional deposit accounts. These letters of credit are secured primarily by residential mortgage loans. The amount of funds available from the FHLBB to the Bank is reduced by any letters of credit outstanding. At year end 2022 and 2021, Salisbury had $20.0 million of outstanding letters of credit with FHLBB. At December 31, 2022, Salisbury’s excess borrowing capacity at the FHLBB was $241.3 million compared with $250.9 million at December 31, 2021.

The following table sets forth certain information concerning short-term FHLBB advances:

Subordinated Debentures

Subordinated debentures totaled $24.5 million at December 31, 2022, which includes $469 thousand of remaining unamortized debt issuance costs. The debt issuance costs are being amortized to maturity. The effective interest rate of the subordinated debentures is 3.80%.

MATERIAL CASH REQUIREMENTS FROM CONTRACTUAL CASH OBLIGATIONS

In the normal course of business, Salisbury enters into various contractual obligations that may require future cash payments. Contractual obligations at December 31, 2022 include operating leases, capital leases, contractual purchases and certain other benefit plans. For further discussion regarding leases see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The accompanying table summarizes Salisbury’s off-balance sheet lending-related financial instruments and significant cash obligations, by remaining maturity, at December 31, 2022. Salisbury’s lending-related financial instruments include commitments that have maturities over one year. Contractual purchases include commitments for future cash expenditures, primarily for services and contracts that reflect the minimum contractual obligation under legally enforceable contracts with contract terms that are both fixed and determinable. Excluded from the following table are a number of obligations to be settled in cash, primarily in under one year. These obligations are reflected in Salisbury’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and include deposits, FHLBB advances and repurchase agreements that settle within standard market timeframes.

LIQUIDITY

Salisbury manages its liquidity position to ensure it has sufficient funding availability at all times to meet both anticipated and unanticipated deposit withdrawals, loan originations and advances, securities purchases and other operating cash outflows. Salisbury’s primary source of liquidity is deposits and though its preferred funding strategy is to attract and retain low cost deposits, its ability to do so is affected by competitive interest rates and terms in its marketplace, and other financial market conditions. Other sources of funding include cash flows from loan and securities principal payments and maturities, funds provided by operations, and discretionary use of national market certificates of deposit and FHLBB advances. Liquidity can also be provided through sales of securities and loans. Salisbury manages its liquidity in accordance with a liquidity funding policy, and also maintains a contingency funding plan that provides for the prompt and comprehensive response to unexpected demands for liquidity. Management believes Salisbury’s funding sources will meet anticipated funding needs.

Operating activities for 2022 provided net cash of $27.4 million. Investing activities utilized net cash of $168.7 million, principally from purchases of securities of $54.2 million, net loan originations and principal collections of $152.2 million, an investment of $2.5 million in BOLI, capital expenditures of $0.8 million and the investment and reinvestment in mutual funds of $1.2 million, offset by sales, calls, and maturities of securities of $41.3 million, proceeds from the redemption of FHLBB stock of $0.1 million, and proceeds from insurance policies of $0.7 million. Financing activities provided net cash of $16.5 million, principally from a net increase in deposits of $22.2 million, short term FHLB advances of $10.0 million and proceeds from the exercising of stock options of $0.2 million, partly off-set by a decrease of $4.2 million in securities sold under agreements to repurchase, payments of $1.7 million on FHLBB amortizing long-term advances, repayment of long-term FHLBB advances of $6.0 million, common stock dividends of $3.7 million and other activity of $0.2 million.

Operating activities for 2021 provided net cash of $18.1 million. Investing activities utilized net cash of $153.2 million, principally from purchases of securities of $145.3 million, net loan originations and principal collections of $37.8 million, an investment of $6.0 million in BOLI and capital expenditures of $2.3 million, offset by sales, calls, and maturities of securities of $37.5 million, proceeds from sale of assets of $0.2, proceeds from the redemption of FHLBB stock of $0.3 million and other activity of $0.2 million. Financing activities provided net cash of $217.3 million, principally from a net increase in deposits of $207.1 million, net proceeds of $24.4 million from the issuance of subordinated debt, an increase of $4.3 million in securities sold under agreements to repurchase, partly offset by the redemption of $10.0 million of subordinated debt issued by Salisbury in 2015, payments of $5.0 million on FHLBB advances, common stock dividends of $3.5 million and other activity of $0.1 million.

Operating activities for 2020 provided net cash of $13.8 million. Investing activities utilized net cash of $114.0 million, principally from purchases of securities of $37.4 million, net loan originations and principal collections of $107.4 million, a $3.5 million investment in BOLI and capital expenditures of $4.4 million, offset by sales, calls, and maturities of securities of $32.5 million, BOLI proceeds of $4.0 million and proceeds from the redemption of FHLBB stock of $1.5 million. Financing activities provided net cash of $166.5 million, principally from a net deposit increase of $209.5 million and advances from FHLBB for $16.0 million, partly offset by FHLBB advances payments of $54.3 million, and common stock dividends of $3.3 million, and a decrease of $1.4 million in securities sold under agreements to repurchase.

CAPITAL RESOURCES

Shareholders’ Equity

Shareholders’ equity decreased $8.2 million, or 6.0%, in 2022 to $128.4 million at December 31, 2022. The decline was driven by unrealized losses in Salisbury’s AFS portfolio of $21.6 million, due to the significant increase in market interest rates during 2022, and common stock dividends declared of $3.7 million, partially offset by net income of $15.9 million and other activity of $1.2 million. The unrealized losses in the AFS portfolio do not affect the Bank’s regulatory capital ratios. 

Capital Requirements

The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Under current regulatory definitions, the Bank meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject and the Bank is considered to be well-capitalized. As a result, the Bank pays lower federal deposit insurance premiums than those banks that are not “well capitalized.” Requirements for classification as a well-capitalized institution and for minimum capital adequacy along with the Bank's regulatory capital ratios are as follows at December 31, 2022 and 2021 under the regulatory capital rules then in effect:

A well-capitalized institution, which is the highest capital category for an institution as defined by the Prompt Corrective Action regulations issued by the FDIC and the FRB, is one which maintains a Total Risk-Based ratio of 10% or above, a Tier 1 Risk-Based ratio of 8% or above, a Common Equity Tier 1 ratio of 6.5% or above, and a Leverage ratio of 5% or above, and is not subject to any written order, written agreement, capital directive, or prompt corrective action directive to meet and maintain a specific capital level. Maintaining strong capital is essential to Salisbury and the Bank’s safety and soundness. However, the effective management of capital resources requires generating attractive returns on equity to build value for shareholders while maintaining appropriate levels of capital to fund growth, meet regulatory requirements and be consistent with prudent industry practices.

The FRB’s final rules implementing the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s capital guidelines for bank holding companies and their bank subsidiaries include a common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets minimum ratio of 4.5%, a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of 6.0%, require a minimum ratio of Total capital to risk-weighted assets of 8.0%, and require a minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4.0%. Strict eligibility criteria for regulatory capital instruments were also implemented under the final rules.

As of December 31, 2022, the Company and the Bank met each of their capital requirements and the most recent notification from the FDIC categorized the Bank as “well-capitalized.” There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s category.

On September 17, 2019, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the FRB and the FDIC published its final rule establishing a “Community Bank Leverage Ratio” (“CBLR”) that simplifies capital requirements for certain community banking organizations with less than $10 billion in total consolidated assets (such as the Bank). Under the final rule, depository institutions and their holding companies that meet certain criteria (generally, those with limited amounts of off-balance sheet exposures, trading assets and liabilities, mortgage servicing assets, and temporary difference deferred tax assets) (“qualifying community banking organizations”) may elect to report the components of its Tier 1 leverage ratio as a measure of capital adequacy. A qualifying community banking organization with a CBLR of greater than 9% that “elects to use the CBLR framework” will not be subject to other risk-based and leverage capital requirements and will be considered to have met the “well-capitalized” ratio requirements for purposes of the agencies’ Prompt Corrective Action (“PCA”) framework. Under the final rule, if a bank that has opted to use the CBLR framework subsequently fails to satisfy one or more of the qualifying criteria but continues to report a leverage ratio of greater than 8%, the bank may continue to use the framework and will be deemed “well capitalized” for a grace period of up to two quarters. A qualifying community banking organization will be required to comply with the generally applicable capital rule and file the relevant regulatory reports if the banking organization: (1) is unable to restore compliance with all qualifying criteria during the two-quarter grace period (including achieving compliance with the greater than 9% leverage ratio requirement); (2) reports a leverage ratio of 8% or less; or (3) ceases to satisfy the qualifying criteria due to consummation of a merger transaction. The final rule became effective on January 1, 2020. The Bank would qualify for the CBLR methodology and would also be considered to be well capitalized if it elected to utilize such methodology. The Bank continues to evaluate the benefits of transitioning to this simplified methodology for assessing capital adequacy.

Stock Repurchase Plan

On March 23, 2022 Salisbury announced that its Board of Directors renewed its share repurchase program that was established in March 2021. The share repurchase program provides for the potential repurchase of Salisbury’s common stock in amounts up to an aggregate of five percent (5%) of the outstanding shares of Salisbury’s common stock from time to time over a period of the next twelve (12) months through privately negotiated transactions and/or market purchases at appropriate prices, subject to price and market conditions on terms determined to be in the best interests of Salisbury. However, there is no assurance that Salisbury will complete repurchases of 5% of its outstanding shares over the next twelve (12) months. Salisbury did not repurchase any shares during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2022.

Stock Split

At Salisbury’s annual shareholder meeting on May 18, 2022, shareholders approved a recommendation by Salisbury’s Board of Directors to amend Salisbury’s Certificate of Incorporation to increase Salisbury’s authorized shares of Common Stock from 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 shares. On June 30, 2022, Salisbury’s Board implemented a two for one forward split of the shares of the Company’s Common Stock as a means of enhancing the liquidity and marketability of the Company’s securities in the best interests of shareholders.

Dividends

During 2022 Salisbury declared and paid four quarterly common stock dividends of $0.16 per common share each quarter totaling $3.7 million. In 2021, Salisbury declared and paid quarterly common stock dividends of $0.14 in first quarter, $0.15 in second quarter, and $0.16 in third and fourth quarter, respectively, totaling $3.5 million. On January 25, 2023, the Board of Directors of Salisbury declared a common stock dividend of $0.16 per common share payable on February 24, 2023 to shareholders of record on February 10, 2023. Common stock dividends, when declared, will generally be paid the last business day of February, May, August and November, although Salisbury is not obligated to pay dividends on those dates or at any other time.

Salisbury's ability to pay cash dividends is dependent on the Bank's ability to pay cash dividends to Salisbury. There are certain restrictions on the payment of cash dividends and other payments by the Bank to Salisbury. Under Connecticut law, the Bank cannot declare a cash dividend except from net profits, defined as the remainder of all earnings from current operations. The total of all cash dividends declared by the Bank in any calendar year shall not, unless specifically approved by the Banking Commissioner, exceed the total of its net profits of that year combined with its retained net profits of the preceding two years.

FRB Supervisory Letter SR 09-4, February 24, 2009, revised March 30, 2009, states that, as a general matter, the Board of Directors of a Bank Holding Company (“BHC”) should inform the Federal Reserve and should eliminate, defer, or significantly reduce dividends if (1) net income available to shareholders for the past four quarters, net of dividends previously paid during that period, is not sufficient to fully fund the dividends; (2) the prospective rate of earnings retention is not consistent with capital needs and overall current and prospective financial condition; or (3) the BHC will not meet, or is in danger of not meeting, its minimum regulatory capital adequacy ratios. Moreover, a BHC should inform the Federal Reserve reasonably in advance of declaring or paying a dividend that exceeds earnings for the period (e.g., quarter) for which the dividend is being paid or that could result in a material adverse change to the BHC capital position.

Salisbury believes that the payment of common stock cash dividends is appropriate, provided that such payment considers Salisbury's capital needs, asset quality, and overall financial condition and does not adversely affect the financial stability of Salisbury or the Bank. The continued payment of common stock cash dividends by Salisbury will be dependent on Salisbury's future core earnings, financial condition and capital needs, regulatory restrictions, and other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors of Salisbury.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for details of recently issued accounting pronouncements and their expected impact on Salisbury’s consolidated financial statements.

IMPACT OF INFLATION AND CHANGING PRICES

Salisbury’s consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto presented elsewhere in this Form 10-K are prepared in conformity with GAAP, which require the measurement of financial condition and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering changes in the relative purchasing power of money, over time, due to inflation. Unlike some other types of companies, the financial nature of Salisbury’s consolidated financial statements is more clearly affected by changes in interest rates than by inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily fluctuate in the same direction or in the same magnitude as the prices of goods and services. However, inflation does affect Salisbury to some extent because, as prices increase, the money supply grows and interest rates are affected by inflationary expectations. There is no precise method, however, to measure the effects of inflation on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, any examination or analysis of the financial statements should take into consideration the possible effects of inflation. Although not a material factor in recent years, inflation could impact earnings in future periods.

Salisbury manages its exposure to interest rate risk through its internal Asset/Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”) using risk limits and policy guidelines to manage assets and funding liabilities to produce financial results that are consistent with Salisbury’s liquidity, capital adequacy, growth, risk and profitability targets. Interest rate risk is the risk of a negative impact to future earnings due to changes in interest rates.

The ALCO manages interest rate risk using income simulation to measure interest rate risk inherent in Salisbury’s financial instruments at a given point in time by showing the effect of interest rate shifts on net interest income over a 24-month horizon. In management’s December 31, 2022 analysis, the simulations incorporate static growth assumptions over the simulation horizons for regulatory compliance and interest rate risk measurement purposes. In the dynamic growth scenarios, allowances are made for loan, deposit and security product mix shifts in selected interest rate scenarios, such as movements between lower rate savings and money market deposit accounts and higher rate time deposits, and changes in the reinvestment of loan and securities cash flows. Additionally, the simulations take into consideration the specific re-pricing, maturity and prepayment characteristics of differing financial instruments that may vary under different interest rate scenarios.

The ALCO reviews the simulation results to determine whether Salisbury’s exposure to change in net interest income remains within established tolerance levels over the simulation horizons and to develop appropriate strategies to manage this exposure. Salisbury’s tolerance levels for changes in net interest income in its income simulations varies depending on the magnitude of interest rate changes and level of risk-based capital. All changes are measured in comparison to the projected net interest income that would result from an “unchanged” rate scenario where interest rates remain stable over the forecast horizon. The ALCO also evaluates the directional trends of net interest income, net interest margin and other financial measures over the forecast horizon for consistency with its liquidity, capital adequacy, growth, risk and profitability targets.

ALCO uses four interest rate scenarios to evaluate interest risk exposure and may vary these interest rate scenarios to show the effect of steepening or flattening changes in yield curves as well as parallel changes in interest rates. At December 31, 2022, ALCO used the following interest rate scenarios: (1) unchanged interest rates; (2) immediately rising interest rates – immediate parallel upward shift in market interest rates of 400 basis points across the yield curve; (3) immediately falling interest rates – immediate parallel downward shift in market interest rates of 300 basis points across the yield curve; and (4) gradual and non-parallel changes in interest rates – the yield curve is assumed to rise in the early part of 2023 before flattening out declining toward the latter part of 2023 and into 2024. The Federal Funds rate increases to 5.50% by March 2023 and remains flat until a projected 0.25% rate cut in December 2023 and another 0.75% in rate cuts throughout 2024. In the first quarter of 2023, the two year, five year, and 10 year treasury are projected to increase by 0.80%, 0.70%, and 0.70%, respectively. In the final nine months of 2023, the two year, five year, and 10 year treasury increase by 0.20%, 0.80%, and 0.80%, respectively. In 2024, the two year, five year, and 10 year treasury decline by 0.65%, 0.45%, and 0.25%, respectively. Simulations do not reflect adjustments in strategy that the ALCO could implement in response to rate shifts.

As of December 31, 2022, net interest income simulations indicated that Salisbury’s exposure to changing interest rates over the simulation horizons remained within its tolerance levels.

The following table sets forth the estimated change in net interest income from an unchanged interest rate scenario over the periods indicated for changes in market interest rates using Salisbury’s financial instruments as of December 31, 2022.

The negative exposure of net interest income to immediately and gradually rising rates as compared to the unchanged rate scenario results from a faster projected rise in the cost of funds versus income from earning assets, as relatively rate-sensitive money market and time deposits re-price faster than longer duration earning assets. The positive exposure to net interest income to immediately and gradually rising rates as compared to the unchanged rate scenario results from a faster projected rise in the income from earning assets versus the projected increase in the Bank’s cost of funds. The negative exposure to net interest income to immediately falling rates as compared to an unchanged rate scenario results from a greater decline in earning asset yields compared to rates paid on funding liabilities, as a result of faster prepayments on existing assets and lower reinvestment rates on future loans originated and securities purchased.

While the ALCO reviews simulation assumptions and back-tests simulation results to ensure that they are reasonable and current, income simulation may not always prove to be an accurate indicator of interest rate risk or future net interest margin. Over time, the re-pricing, maturity and prepayment characteristics of financial instruments and the composition of Salisbury’s balance sheet may change to a different degree than estimated. Simulation modeling assumes Salisbury’s expectation for future balance sheet growth, which is a function of the business environment and customer behavior. Another significant simulation assumption is the sensitivity of core savings deposits to fluctuations in interest rates. Income simulation results assume that changes in both core savings deposit rates and balances are related to changes in short-term interest rates. The relationship between short-term interest rate changes and core deposit rate and balance changes may differ from those used in ALCO’s estimates for income simulation. Lastly, mortgage-backed securities and mortgage loans involve a level of risk that unforeseen changes in prepayment speeds may cause related cash flows to vary significantly in differing rate environments. Such changes could affect the level of reinvestment risk associated with cash flow from these instruments, as well as their market value. Changes in prepayment speeds could also increase or decrease the amortization of premium or accretion of discounts related to such instruments, thereby affecting interest income.

Salisbury also monitors the potential change in market value of its available-for-sale debt securities in changing interest rate environments. The purpose is to determine market value exposure that may not be captured by income simulation, but which might result in changes to Salisbury’s capital and liquidity position. Results are calculated using industry-standard analytical techniques and securities data. Equity securities are excluded from this analysis because the market value of such securities cannot be directly correlated with changes in interest rates. The following table summarizes the potential change in market value of available-for-sale debt securities resulting from immediate parallel rate shifts:

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors

of Salisbury Bancorp, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Salisbury Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary (the Company) as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive (loss) income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements (collectively, the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Allowance for Loan Losses – General Reserve Qualitative Adjustments

As described in Notes 1 and 4 to the financial statements, the Company has recorded an allowance for loan losses (ALL) in the amount of $14.8 million as of December 31, 2022, representing management’s estimate of the probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of that date. The ALL at December 31, 2022, consists of two components: the ALL individually evaluated for impairment (specific reserves), representing $22 thousand, and the ALL collectively evaluated for impairment (general reserves), representing $14.8 million. The ALL is increased by provisions charged to earnings and by recoveries of amounts previously charged off, and is reduced by loan charge-offs. The general reserve component is based on a quantitative and qualitative analysis, whereby qualitative adjustments are applied to historical loss rates by loan segment. The development of the qualitative adjustments involves significant and subjective assumptions which require a high degree of judgment relating to general economic conditions and other qualitative risk factors – both internal and external to the Company.

General reserve factors are based on specific quantitative and qualitative criteria representing key sources of risk within the loan portfolio. Such sources of risk include those relating to: changes in lending policies and procedures; changes in national and local economic and business conditions and developments; changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio; changes in lending management and staff; trends in past due, classified, nonaccrual, and other loan categories; changes in the Company’s loan review system and oversight; changes in collateral values; credit concentration risk; and the competitive environment.

The qualitative adjustments contribute significantly to the general reserve component of the ALL and the ALL as a whole. Management’s identification and analysis of these considerations and related adjustments requires significant judgment. We identified the estimate of the qualitative adjustments in developing the general reserve component of the ALL as a critical audit matter as it required especially subjective auditor judgment.