SMITH MICRO SOFTWARE, INC. - Quarter Report: 2010 June (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number 0-26536
SMITH MICRO SOFTWARE, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE | 33-0029027 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) |
51 COLUMBIA
ALISO VIEJO, CA92656
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
ALISO VIEJO, CA92656
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(949) 362-5800
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange
Act Rule 12b-2).
Yes o No þ
As of July 30, 2010 there were 34,266,588 shares of common stock outstanding.
SMITH MICRO SOFTWARE, INC.
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
June 30, 2010
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
June 30, 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I. | ||||||||
Item 1. | ||||||||
2 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
Item 2. | 17 | |||||||
Item 3. | 25 | |||||||
Item 4. | 25 | |||||||
PART II. | ||||||||
Item 1. | 27 | |||||||
Item 1A. | 27 | |||||||
Item 6. | 27 | |||||||
28 | ||||||||
EX-31.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.2 | ||||||||
EX-32.1 |
1
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements |
SMITH MICRO SOFTWARE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands except share, and par value data)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands except share, and par value data)
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(unaudited) | (audited) | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 13,248 | $ | 14,577 | ||||
Short-term investments |
41,599 | 31,284 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowances for doubtful accounts
and other adjustments of $1,062 (2010) and $1,045 (2009) |
25,321 | 24,147 | ||||||
Income tax receivable |
980 | 980 | ||||||
Inventories, net of reserves for excess and obsolete inventory
of $1,275 (2010) and $1,221 (2009) |
400 | 406 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
1,332 | 1,506 | ||||||
Deferred tax asset |
2,694 | 2,696 | ||||||
Total current assets |
85,574 | 75,596 | ||||||
Equipment and improvements, net |
10,221 | 8,193 | ||||||
Goodwill |
94,231 | 94,320 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
23,794 | 27,662 | ||||||
Other assets |
191 | 163 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 214,011 | $ | 205,934 | ||||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 3,651 | $ | 4,215 | ||||
Accrued liabilities |
9,690 | 11,359 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
2,736 | 1,317 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
16,077 | 16,891 | ||||||
Non-current liabilities: |
||||||||
Deferred
rent and other long-term liabilities |
129 | 70 | ||||||
Deferred tax liability |
997 | 994 | ||||||
Total non-current liabilities |
1,126 | 1,064 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share; 5,000,000 shares
authorized; none issued or outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share; 50,000,000 shares authorized;
34,266,588 and 33,380,496 shares issued and outstanding at June 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively |
34 | 33 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
189,119 | 183,756 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(14 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||
Accumulated earnings |
7,669 | 4,192 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
196,808 | 187,979 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 214,011 | $ | 205,934 | ||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
SMITH MICRO SOFTWARE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | (unaudited) | (unaudited) | |||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 31,357 | $ | 25,986 | $ | 61,219 | $ | 49,774 | ||||||||
Cost of revenues |
3,965 | 3,922 | 7,697 | 8,445 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
27,392 | 22,064 | 53,522 | 41,329 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Selling and marketing |
7,398 | 6,148 | 14,688 | 12,425 | ||||||||||||
Research and development |
10,095 | 8,725 | 20,223 | 16,837 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
6,217 | 4,508 | 12,023 | 8,995 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
23,710 | 19,381 | 46,934 | 38,257 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
3,682 | 2,683 | 6,588 | 3,072 | ||||||||||||
Interest and other income (expense) |
(7 | ) | 119 | 33 | 374 | |||||||||||
Profit before taxes |
3,675 | 2,802 | 6,621 | 3,446 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
1,790 | 1,525 | 3,144 | 1,891 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,885 | $ | 1,277 | $ | 3,477 | $ | 1,555 | ||||||||
Net income per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.06 | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.05 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.05 | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.05 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
34,264 | 32,338 | 33,999 | 32,008 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
34,781 | 32,955 | 34,480 | 32,464 | ||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
SMITH MICRO SOFTWARE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(in thousands)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(in thousands)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | other | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock | paid-in | comprehensive | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | capital | loss | earnings | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE, December 31, 2009 |
33,380 | $ | 33 | $ | 183,756 | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 4,192 | $ | 187,979 | ||||||||||||
Exercise of common stock options |
51 | | 260 | | | 260 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non cash compensation recognized on stock
options |
| | 2,288 | | | 2,288 | ||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock grants |
852 | 1 | 2,379 | | | 2,380 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cancellation of shares for payment of
withholding tax |
(16 | ) | | (136 | ) | | | (136 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Excess tax benefit related to stock compensation |
| | 574 | | | 574 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax deficiencies related to stock compensation |
| | (2 | ) | | | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on short-term investments |
| | | (12 | ) | | (12 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | 3,477 | 3,477 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
3,465 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE, June 30, 2010 (unaudited) |
34,267 | $ | 34 | $ | 189,119 | $ | (14 | ) | $ | 7,669 | $ | 196,808 | ||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
SMITH MICRO SOFTWARE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | |||||||
Operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 3,477 | $ | 1,555 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities, net of the effect of acquisitions: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
5,867 | 5,030 | ||||||
Loss on disposal of assets |
| 20 | ||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts and other adjustments to
accounts receivable |
705 | 623 | ||||||
Provision for excess and obsolete inventory |
93 | 511 | ||||||
Tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
(574 | ) | (121 | ) | ||||
Non cash compensation related to stock options & restricted stock |
4,668 | 4,615 | ||||||
Change in operating accounts, net of effect from acquisitions: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(1,879 | ) | (4,325 | ) | ||||
Deferred income taxes |
3 | | ||||||
Inventories |
(87 | ) | (23 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
146 | (101 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
(418 | ) | 2,045 | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
12,001 | 9,829 | ||||||
Investing activities: |
||||||||
Adjustments made to the acquisition of Core Mobility |
143 | | ||||||
Acquisition of Avot Media, net of cash received |
(675 | ) | | |||||
Capital expenditures |
(3,305 | ) | (3,289 | ) | ||||
Purchase of short-term investments |
(10,327 | ) | (7,172 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(14,164 | ) | (10,461 | ) | ||||
Financing activities: |
||||||||
Tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
574 | 121 | ||||||
Cash received from exercise of stock options |
260 | 593 | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
834 | 714 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(1,329 | ) | 82 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
14,577 | 13,966 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 13,248 | $ | 14,048 | ||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
||||||||
Cash paid for income taxes |
$ | 2,591 | $ | 2,177 | ||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
SMITH MICRO SOFTWARE, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
1. The Company
Smith Micro Software, Inc. (we, us, our, Smith Micro, or the Company) designs,
develops and markets software products and services primarily for the mobile computing and
communications industries. The Company is focused on developing connectivity, communications and
content management solutions for a converging world of wireless and wired networks. The Companys
portfolio of wireless software products and services includes a wide range of software solutions
including our QuickLink® family of products. We provide mobile voice and data connectivity across
3G, 4G and Wi-Fi networks. Our mobile communications portfolio includes solutions for
Push-To-Talk, Visual Voicemail and mobile device management. We also offer user-friendly solutions
for the management of mobile content, contacts and calendar data. We sell our products and services
to many of the worlds leading mobile network operators, original equipment manufacturers (OEM),
device manufacturers and enterprise businesses, as well as directly to consumers.
2. Basis of Presentation
The
accompanying interim consolidated balance sheet and statement of
stockholders equity as of June 30,
2010, the related statements of operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 and the related statements of cash flows for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009 are unaudited. The unaudited consolidated financial statements have been
prepared according to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
and, therefore, certain information and disclosures normally included in financial statements
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been
omitted.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for
the periods presented reflect all adjustments, which are normal and recurring, necessary to fairly
state the financial position, results of operations and cash flows. These unaudited consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements included
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on
March 2, 2010.
Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2010.
3. Net Income Per Share
The Company calculates earnings per share (EPS) as required by the Earning Per Share Topic
No. 260 of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC). Basic EPS is calculated by dividing the net income available to common stockholders by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period, excluding common stock
equivalents. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing the net income available to common stockholders by
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period plus the weighted average
number of dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding for the period determined using the
treasury-stock method. For purposes of this calculation, common stock subject to repurchase by the
Company and options are considered to be common stock equivalents and are only included in the
calculation of diluted earnings per share when their effect is dilutive.
6
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
(unaudited, in thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 1,885 | $ | 1,277 | $ | 3,477 | $ | 1,555 | ||||||||||||
Denominator: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding basic |
34,264 | 32,338 | 33,999 | 32,008 | ||||||||||||||||
Potential common shares options (treasury
stock method) |
517 | 617 | 481 | 456 | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted |
34,781 | 32,955 | 34,480 | 32,464 | ||||||||||||||||
Shares excluded due to an exercise price
greater than
weighted average stock price for the period |
2,440 | 2,475 | 2,440 | 2,624 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income per common share: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.06 | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.05 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.05 | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.05 | ||||||||||||
4. Acquisitions
Core Mobility, Inc.
On October 26, 2009, the Company acquired Core Mobility, Inc. (Core Mobility), a developer
of mobility software and solutions, for $10.0 million in cash and 700,000 shares of Smith Micro
common stock. Core Mobility became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Smith Micro. In addition, the
former shareholders of Core Mobility had the ability to earn additional cash consideration of up to
$1.8 million contingent on Core Mobility achieving certain milestone deliverables for product
development and deployment. In March 2010, a milestone payment of $0.6 million was made. Of the
$10.0 million of cash consideration, $3.0 million was held back (Holdback) as security against
possible indemnification obligations. In June 2010, $1.5 million of the Holdback was paid.
Assuming there are no claims, the remaining 50% of the Holdback will be paid on the one year
anniversary. Acquisition-related costs of $0.2 million were recorded as expense in the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2009 in the general and administrative section of the consolidated statement of
operations.
The total purchase price is summarized as follows (in thousands):
Cash paid at closing |
$ | 6,970 | ||
Holdback (including interest) |
3,041 | |||
Common stock issued |
6,881 | |||
Milestone payments |
1,839 | |||
Total purchase price |
$ | 18,731 | ||
7
Table of Contents
The Companys allocation of the purchase price is summarized as follows (in thousands):
Assets: |
||||
Cash |
$ | 63 | ||
Accounts receivable |
997 | |||
Unbilled receivable |
324 | |||
Prepaid and other assets |
279 | |||
Fixed assets |
856 | |||
Deferred tax assets |
1,735 | |||
Intangible assets |
8,858 | |||
Goodwill |
10,694 | |||
Total assets |
23,806 | |||
Liabilities: |
||||
Accounts payable |
26 | |||
Accrued expenses |
258 | |||
Deferred revenue |
1,280 | |||
Deferred tax liability |
3,511 | |||
Total liabilities |
5,075 | |||
Total purchase price |
$ | 18,731 | ||
The results of operations of Core Mobility have been included in the Companys consolidated
financial statements from the date of acquisition. The pro-forma effect of the acquisition on
historical periods is not material and therefore not included.
5. Stock-Based Compensation
Stock Plans
On July 28, 2005, our Shareholders approved the 2005 Stock Option / Stock Issuance Plan (2005
Plan). The 2005 Plan, which became effective the same date, replaced the 1995 Stock Option /
Stock Issuance Plan (1995 Plan), which expired on May 24, 2005. All outstanding options under
the 1995 Plan remained outstanding, but no further grants will be made under that Plan.
The 2005 Plan provides for the issuance of non-qualified or incentive stock options and
restricted stock to employees, non-employee members of the board and consultants. The exercise
price per share is not to be less than the fair market value per share of the Companys common
stock on the date of grant. The Board of Directors has the discretion to determine the vesting
schedule. Options may be exercisable immediately or in installments, but generally vest over a
four-year period from the date of grant. In the event the holder ceases to be employed by the
Company, all unvested options terminate and all vested options may be exercised within a period
following termination. In general, options expire ten years from the date of grant. Restricted
stock is valued using the closing stock price on the date of the grant. The total value is
expensed over the vesting period of 12 to 48 months. The maximum number of shares of the Companys
common stock that were available for issuance over the term of the original 2005 Plan could not
exceed 5,000,000 shares, plus that number of additional shares equal to 2.5% of the number of
shares of common stock outstanding on the last trading day of the calendar year commencing with
calendar year 2006 (but not in excess of 750,000 shares). On
October 11, 2007, our shareholders
voted to approve an amendment to the 2005 Plan to increase the maximum number of shares of common
stock that may be issued under the 2005 Plan from 5,000,000 shares (plus an annual increase) to
7,000,000 shares (plus an annual increase).
Stock Compensation Expense
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company started to measure and recognize compensation expense
for all stock-based payment awards made to employees and directors, including stock options based
on their fair values as required by FASB ASC Topic No. 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation. The
Company used the modified prospective transition method as of January 1, 2006. In accordance with
the modified prospective transition method, the Companys financial statements for prior periods
have not been restated to reflect, and do not include, the impact of stock compensation expense.
Stock-based compensation expense recognized is based on the value of the portion of
stock-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest. Stock-based compensation expense
recognized in the Companys consolidated statements of operations during the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 includes compensation expense for stock-based payment awards
8
Table of Contents
granted
prior to, but not yet vested as of, December 31, 2005 based on the grant date fair value estimated
in accordance with the pro forma provisions.
As required by FASB ASC Topic No. 718, the Company elected to attribute the value of
stock-based compensation to expense using the straight-line method over the requisite service
period for each award, which was previously used for its pro forma information. Stock-based
non-cash compensation expenses related to stock options and restricted stock grants were recorded
in the financial statements as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Cost of revenues |
$ | 25 | $ | 56 | $ | 53 | $ | 129 | ||||||||
Selling and marketing |
631 | 627 | 1,263 | 1,306 | ||||||||||||
Research and development |
616 | 649 | 1,202 | 1,256 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
1,139 | 909 | 2,150 | 1,924 | ||||||||||||
Total non-cash stock compensation expense |
$ | 2,411 | $ | 2,241 | $ | 4,668 | $ | 4,615 | ||||||||
Total share-based compensation for each quarter includes cash payment of income taxes related
to grants of restricted stock in the amount of $0.5 million and $0.2 million in the three months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The cash payment of income taxes related to grants of
restricted stock totaled $1.0 million and $0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively.
Stock Options
There were 20,000 stock options granted during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.
There were no stock options granted during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. The
weighted average grant-date fair value of stock options granted during the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010 was $2.97. The assumptions used to compute the stock-based compensation costs
for the stock options granted during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model, were as follows:
Three and Six Months Ended | ||||
June 30, 2010 | ||||
(unaudited) | ||||
Employee Stock Options |
||||
Risk-free interest rate |
0.32 | % | ||
Expected dividend yield |
| |||
Weighted average expected life (years) |
1 | |||
Volatility |
72.0 | % | ||
Forfeiture rate |
0.0 | % |
The risk-free interest rate assumption was based on the United States Treasurys rates for
U.S. Treasury zero-coupon bonds with maturities similar to those of the expected term of the award
being valued. The Company assumed no dividend yield because it does not expect to pay dividends for
the foreseeable future.
A summary of the Companys stock options outstanding under the 2005 Plan as of June 30, 2010,
and the activity during the six months then ended, are as follows:
9
Table of Contents
Weighted Ave. | Aggregate | |||||||||||
Shares | Exercise Price | Intrinsic Value | ||||||||||
(in thousands except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||
Outstanding as of December 31, 2009 |
3,536 | $ | 11.29 | |||||||||
Granted (unaudited) |
20 | $ | 10.51 | |||||||||
Exercised (unaudited) |
(51 | ) | $ | 5.07 | ||||||||
Cancelled (unaudited) |
(50 | ) | $ | 12.96 | ||||||||
Outstanding as of June 30, 2010
(unaudited) |
3,455 | $ | 11.35 | $ | | |||||||
Exercisable as of June 30, 2010
(unaudited) |
2,996 | $ | 10.95 | $ | | |||||||
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, options to acquire 51,300 shares were exercised
with an intrinsic value of $0.2 million, resulting in cash proceeds to the Company of $0.3 million.
As of June 30, 2010, there is $3.0 million total unrecognized compensation costs related to
unvested stock options granted under the Plan, which will be recognized over a period not to exceed
four years. At June 30, 2010, there were 1.4 million shares available for future grants under the
2005 Plan.
Additional information regarding options outstanding as of June 30, 2010 is as follows:
Options outstanding | Options exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||
Range of | Number | remaining | average | Number | average | |||||||||||||||
exercise | outstanding | contractual | exercise | exercisable | exercise | |||||||||||||||
prices | (in thousands) | life (years) | price | (in thousands) | price | |||||||||||||||
$0.24 - $4.00 |
182 | 3.7 | $ | 1.56 | 182 | $ | 1.56 | |||||||||||||
$4.01 - $6.00 |
651 | 5.1 | $ | 4.95 | 651 | $ | 4.95 | |||||||||||||
$6.01 - $12.00 |
309 | 6.8 | $ | 9.18 | 277 | $ | 9.32 | |||||||||||||
$12.01 - $14.00 |
1,276 | 6.6 | $ | 12.67 | 1,064 | $ | 12.67 | |||||||||||||
$14.01 - $16.00 |
657 | 6.7 | $ | 15.18 | 534 | $ | 15.18 | |||||||||||||
$16.01 - $19.00 |
380 | 6.9 | $ | 17.73 | 288 | $ | 17.79 | |||||||||||||
3,455 | 6.3 | $ | 11.35 | 2,996 | $ | 10.95 | ||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock Awards
There were 0.8 million shares of restricted stock with a total value of $6.9 million granted
to key officers and employees of the Company during the six months ended June 30, 2010. This cost
will be amortized over a period of 48 months. In addition, 50,000 shares of restricted stock with
a total value of $0.4 million were granted to members of the Board of Directors during the six
months ended June 30, 2010. This cost will be amortized over a period of 12 months. Grants of
restricted stock are valued using the closing stock price on the date of grant.
A summary of the Companys restricted stock awards outstanding under the 2005 Plan as of June
30, 2009, and the activity during the six months then ended, are as follows (in thousands):
Shares | ||||
Unvested at December 31, 2009 |
1,415 | |||
Granted (unaudited) |
899 | |||
Cancelled (unaudited) |
(47 | ) | ||
Vested (unaudited) |
(360 | ) | ||
Unvested at June 30, 2010 (unaudited) |
1,907 | |||
10
Table of Contents
6. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company measures and discloses fair value measurements as required by FASB ASC Topic No.
820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.
The carrying value of accounts receivable, foreign cash accounts, prepaid expenses, other
current assets, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities are considered to be representative of
their respective fair values because of the short-term nature of those instruments.
Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset
or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such,
fair value is a market-based measurement that is determined based on assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability. As a basis for considering such
assumptions, the FASB establishes a three-tier value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used
in the valuation methodologies in measuring fair value:
| Level 1 Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. |
| Level 2 Include other inputs that are directly or indirectly observable in the marketplace. |
| Level 3 Unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity. |
The fair value hierarchy also requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and
minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
As required by FASB ASC Topic No. 820, we measure our cash equivalents and short-term
investments at fair value. Our cash equivalents and short-term investments are classified within
Level 1 by using quoted market prices utilizing market observable inputs.
As required by FASB ASC Topic No. 825, Financial Instruments, an entity can choose to measure
at fair value many financial instruments and certain other items that are not currently required to
be measured at fair value. Subsequent changes in fair value for designated items are required to be
reported in earnings in the current period. This Topic also establishes presentation and disclosure
requirements for similar types of assets and liabilities measured at fair value. As permitted, the
Company has elected not to use the fair value option to measure our available-for-sale securities
under this Topic and will continue to report as required by FASB ASC Topic No. 320,
Investments-Debt and Equity Securities. We have made this election because the nature of our
financial assets and liabilities are not of such complexity that they would benefit from a change
in valuation to fair value.
7. Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents generally consist of cash, government securities, mutual funds, and
money market funds. These securities are primarily held in two financial institutions and are
uninsured except for the minimum Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) coverage, and have
original maturity dates of three months or less. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, bank
balances totaling approximately $13.8 million and $4.6 million, respectively, were uninsured. On
January 1, 2010, our primary United States bank exited the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.s
Transaction Account Guarantee Program. Our uninsured bank balances would have been $14.3 million
for the year ended December 31, 2009 if our primary United States bank exited Federal Deposit
Insurance Corp.s Transaction Account Guarantee Program prior to January 1, 2010.
8. Short-Term Investments
Short-term investments consist of U.S. government agency and government sponsored enterprise
obligations. The Company accounts for these short-term investments as required by FASB ASC Topic
No. 320, Investments-Debt and Equity Securities. These debt and equity securities are not
classified as either held-to-maturity securities or trading securities. As such, they are
classified as available-for-sale securities. Available-for-sale securities are recorded at fair
value, with unrealized gains or losses recorded as a separate component of accumulated other
comprehensive income in stockholders equity until realized. Available-for-sale securities with
contractual maturities of less than 12 months were as follows (in thousands):
11
Table of Contents
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | (audited) | |||||||||||||||
Fair value | Unrealized gain (loss) | Fair value | Unrealized (loss) | |||||||||||||
Corporate bonds and notes |
$ | 10,257 | $ | (18 | ) | $ | 3,499 | $ | | |||||||
Government-backed securities |
31,342 | 4 | 27,785 | (2 | ) | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 41,599 | $ | (14 | ) | $ | 31,284 | $ | (2 | ) | ||||||
9. Accounts Receivable
The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and generally does not
require collateral. The Company maintains reserves for estimated credit losses, and those losses
have been within managements estimates. Allowances for product returns are included in other
adjustments to accounts receivable on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Product
returns are estimated based on historical experience and have also been within managements
estimates.
10. Inventories
Inventories consist principally of cables, compact disks (CDs), boxes and manuals and are
stated at the lower of cost (determined by the first-in, first-out method) or market. The Company
regularly reviews its inventory quantities on hand and records a provision for excess and obsolete
inventory based primarily on managements forecast of product demand and production requirements.
At June 30, 2010, our net inventory balance of $0.4 million consisted of approximately $0.1 million
of assembled products and $0.3 million of components.
11. Equipment and Improvements
Equipment and improvements are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed using the
straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally ranging from
three to seven years. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the
shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the lease term.
12. Goodwill
In accordance with FASB ASC Topic No. 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other, we review the
recoverability of the carrying value of goodwill at least annually or whenever events or
circumstances indicate a potential impairment. The Companys annual impairment testing date is
December 31. Recoverability of goodwill is determined by comparing the fair value of the Companys
reporting units to the carrying value of the underlying net assets in the reporting units. If the
fair value of a reporting unit is determined to be less than the carrying value of its net assets,
goodwill is deemed impaired and an impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying
value of goodwill exceeds the difference between the fair value of the reporting unit and the fair
value of its other assets and liabilities. We determined that we did not have any impairment of
goodwill at December 31, 2009.
The carrying amount of the Companys goodwill was $94.2 million as of June 30, 2010 and was
$94.3 million as of December 31, 2009.
13. Intangible Assets
The following table sets forth our acquired intangible assets by major asset class as of June
30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (in thousands except useful life data):
12
Table of Contents
Useful | June 30, 2010 (unaudited) | December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
life | Accumulated | Net book | Accumulated | Net book | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(years) | Gross | amortization | value | Gross | amortization | value | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortizing: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchased technology |
1-3 | $ | 7,347 | $ | (4,316 | ) | $ | 3,031 | $ | 6,667 | $ | (3,349 | ) | $ | 3,318 | |||||||||||||
In process R&D |
2 | 990 | | 990 | 990 | | 990 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Capitalized software |
1-7 | 23,846 | (13,524 | ) | 10,322 | 23,846 | (11,485 | ) | 12,361 | |||||||||||||||||||
Distribution rights |
5 | 482 | (482 | ) | | 482 | (447 | ) | 35 | |||||||||||||||||||
Customer lists |
3-5 | 1,484 | (1,225 | ) | 259 | 1,484 | (1,048 | ) | 436 | |||||||||||||||||||
Database |
10 | 182 | (47 | ) | 135 | 182 | (38 | ) | 144 | |||||||||||||||||||
Trademarks |
5-10 | 926 | (491 | ) | 435 | 926 | (445 | ) | 481 | |||||||||||||||||||
Trade names |
1-7 | 2,121 | (1,008 | ) | 1,113 | 2,121 | (807 | ) | 1,314 | |||||||||||||||||||
Non-compete |
2 | 21 | (7 | ) | 14 | 21 | (2 | ) | 19 | |||||||||||||||||||
Customer agreements |
1-2 | 1,135 | (1,135 | ) | | 1,135 | (1,135 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||
Customer
relationships |
4-7 | 11,130 | (3,635 | ) | 7,495 | 11,130 | (2,566 | ) | 8,564 | |||||||||||||||||||
Totals |
$ | 49,664 | $ | (25,870 | ) | $ | 23,794 | $ | 48,984 | $ | (21,322 | ) | $ | 27,662 | ||||||||||||||
Aggregate amortization expense on intangible assets was $2.3 million and $4.5 million for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2010. Expected future amortization expense is as follows:
$4.4 million for the remainder of 2010, $8.8 million for 2011, $6.6 million for 2012, $3.4 million
for 2013, and $0.6 million thereafter.
14. Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income includes unrealized gains and losses on short-term investments of U.S.
government agency and government sponsored enterprise debt and equity securities. The following
table sets forth the calculation of comprehensive income (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,885 | $ | 1,277 | $ | 3,477 | $ | 1,555 | ||||||||
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on investments, net |
7 | 8 | (12 | ) | (37 | ) | ||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
$ | 1,892 | $ | 1,285 | $ | 3,465 | $ | 1,518 | ||||||||
15. Segment and Geographical Information
Segment Information
Public companies are required to report financial and descriptive information about their
reportable operating segments as required by FASB ASC Topic No. 280, Segment Reporting. The
Company identifies its operating segments based on how management internally evaluates separate
financial information, business activities and management responsibility. The Company has two
primary business units. Wireless includes our connectivity and security, backup and
messaging, multimedia and mobile device solutions product lines. Productivity & Graphics
includes retail and direct sales of our compression and broad consumer-based software.
Corporate/Other revenue includes the consulting portion of our services sector which has been
de-emphasized and is no longer considered a strategic element of our future plans.
The Company does not separately allocate operating expenses to these business units, nor does
it allocate specific assets. Therefore, business unit information reported includes only revenues.
13
Table of Contents
The following table shows the revenues generated by each business unit (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Wireless |
$ | 28,329 | $ | 21,373 | $ | 55,291 | $ | 40,630 | ||||||||
Productivity & Graphics |
2,907 | 4,332 | 5,681 | 8,583 | ||||||||||||
Corporate/Other |
121 | 281 | 247 | 561 | ||||||||||||
Total Revenues |
$ | 31,357 | $ | 25,986 | $ | 61,219 | $ | 49,774 | ||||||||
Revenues to three customers and their respective affiliates in the Wireless business segment
accounted for 38.8%, 16.0% and 10.6% of the Companys total revenues for the three months ended
June 30, 2010. Revenues to two customers and their respective affiliates in the Wireless business
segment accounted for 35.6% and 13.0% of the Companys total revenues for the three months ended
June 30, 2009. Revenues to three customers and their respective affiliates in the Wireless business
segment accounted for 33.7%, 16.3% and 14.4% of the Companys total revenues for the six months
ended June 30, 2010. Revenues to two customers and their respective affiliates in the Wireless
business segment accounted for 32.1% and 13.6% of the Companys total revenues for the six months
ended June 30, 2009.
Geographical Information
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company operated in three
geographic locations: the Americas, Asia Pacific, and Europe, the Middle East, and Africa (EMEA).
Revenues, attributed to the geographic location of the customers bill-to address, were as follows
(in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30 | |||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Americas |
$ | 27,770 | $ | 24,434 | $ | 55,785 | $ | 45,385 | ||||||||
Asia Pacific |
469 | 666 | 833 | 1,985 | ||||||||||||
EMEA |
3,118 | 886 | 4,601 | 2,404 | ||||||||||||
Total Revenues |
$ | 31,357 | $ | 25,986 | $ | 61,219 | $ | 49,774 | ||||||||
The Company does not separately allocate specific assets to these geographic locations.
16. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2010-06, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.
This guidance amends the disclosure requirements related to recurring and nonrecurring fair value
measurements and requires new disclosures on the transfers of assets and liabilities between Level
1 (quoted prices in active market for identical assets or liabilities) and Level 2 (significant
other observable inputs) of the fair value measurement hierarchy, including the reasons and the
timing of the transfers. Additionally, the guidance requires a roll forward of activities on
purchases, sales, issuance and settlements of the assets and liabilities measured using significant
unobservable inputs (Level 3 fair value measurements). The guidance has become effective for the
reporting period beginning January 1, 2010, except for the disclosure on the roll forward
activities for Level 3 fair value measurements, which will become effective for the
reporting period beginning January 1, 2011. The Company adopted this guidance on its effective
date and since it currently only has Level 1 assets and liabilities, it did not have an impact on
its consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
In
December 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-17, Consolidations
(Topic 810): Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises
Involved with Variable Interest Entities. This new guidance
addresses (1) the effects on certain provisions of Financial
Accounting Standards Board Interpretation (FIN) No. 46
(revised December 2003),
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, as a result of
the elimination of the qualifying special-purpose entity concept in
SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets,
and (2) constituent concerns about the application of certain key
provisions of FIN No. 46(R), including those in which the accounting
and disclosures under the Interpretation do not always provide timely
and useful information about an enterprises involvement in a
variable interest entity.
This Statement shall be effective as of the beginning of each reporting entitys first annual reporting
period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period,
and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier
application is prohibited. The Company adopted ASU No. 2009-17 this
year and its adoption did not have an impact on its consolidated
results of operations and financial condition.
In December 2009,
the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-16, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860): Accounting for Transfers of
Financial Assets. This guidance was issued to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness,
and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a
transfer of financial assets; the effects of a
transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash
flows; and a transferors continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets.
This Statement must be applied as of the beginning of each reporting
entitys first annual reporting period that begins after
November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual
reporting period and for interim and annual reporting periods
thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited.
This Statement must be applied to transfers occurring on or after the
effective date.
The Company adopted
ASU No. 2009-16 this year and its adoption did not have an impact on
its consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
14
Table of Contents
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-14, Software (Topic 985): Certain
Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task
Force). This new guidance amends the scope of existing software revenue recognition accounting.
Tangible products containing software components and non-software components that function together
to deliver the products essential functionality would be scoped out of the accounting guidance on
software and accounted for based on other appropriate revenue recognition guidance. For the
Company, this guidance is effective for all new or materially modified arrangements entered into on
or after January 1, 2011 with earlier application permitted as of the beginning of a fiscal year.
Full retrospective application of the new guidance is optional. This guidance must be adopted in
the same period that the company adopts the amended accounting for arrangements with multiple
deliverables described in the preceding paragraph. The Company is currently assessing its
implementation of this new guidance, but does not expect a material impact on the consolidated
financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic
605):Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements. ASU No. 2009-13 amends revenue recognition
guidance for arrangements with multiple deliverables. The new guidance eliminates the residual
method of revenue recognition and allows the use of managements best estimate of selling price
for individual elements of an arrangement when vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE), vendor
objective evidence (VOE) or third-party evidence (TPE) is unavailable. For the Company, this
guidance is effective for all new or materially modified arrangements entered into on or after
January 1, 2011 with earlier application permitted as of the
beginning of a fiscal year. Full retrospective application of the new guidance is optional. The Company is currently assessing its
implementation of this new guidance, but does not expect a material impact on the consolidated
financial statements.
17. Commitments and Contingencies
Leases
The Company leases its buildings under operating leases that expire on various dates through
2022. Future minimum annual lease payments under such leases as of June 30, 2010 are as follows (in
thousands):
Year Ending December 31, | Operating | |||
2010-6 months |
$ | 1,139 | ||
2011 |
2,163 | |||
2012 |
1,919 | |||
2013 |
1,636 | |||
2014 |
1,294 | |||
2015 |
1,251 | |||
Beyond |
3,396 | |||
Total |
$ | 12,798 | ||
Rent
expense under operating leases for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $0.6
million and $0.4 million, respectively. Rent expense under operating leases for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $1.2 million and $0.9 million, respectively.
15
Table of Contents
18. Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes as required by FASB ASC Topic No. 740, Income Taxes.
This Topic clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises
financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for financial
statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax
return. The Topic also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties,
accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. In the event the future consequences of
differences between financial reporting bases and the tax bases of the Companys assets and
liabilities result in a deferred tax asset, we are required to evaluate the probability of being
able to realize the future benefits indicated by such asset. A valuation allowance related to a
deferred tax asset is recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion or the entire
deferred tax asset will not be realized. In 2006, the Company reversed all of its valuation
allowance on its deferred tax assets as a result of the Companys improving financial performance
and projected income in future years.
In July 2006, the FASB clarified the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in
the financial statements. A tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized when it
is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions
of any related appeals or litigation process, based on the technical merits. Based on our
evaluation, we have concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring
recognition on our financial statements. Our evaluation was performed for the tax years ended
December 31, 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009, the tax years which remain subject to examination by major
tax jurisdictions as of June 30, 2010.
We may from time to time be assessed interest or penalties by major tax jurisdictions,
although any such assessments historically have been minimal and immaterial to our financial
results. In the event we have received an assessment for interest and/or penalties, it has been
classified in the financial statements as general and administrative expense.
19. Subsequent Events
In
May 2009, the FASB issued new accounting guidance found under ASC
Topic No. 855, Subsequent Events. The Topic establishes general
standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after
the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued
or are available to be issued. The Company has adopted this Topic.
Subsequent events have been evaluated as of the date of this filing
and other than the following item, there are no further disclosures required.
On June
24, 2010, the Company held its 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
and the stockholders approved the Company's proposed Employee Stock
Purchase Plan. The initial purchase period will commence in October 2010.
16
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
In this document, the terms Smith Micro, Company, we, us, and our refer to Smith
Micro Software, Inc. and, where appropriate, its subsidiaries.
This report contains forward-looking statements regarding Smith Micro which include, but are
not limited to, statements concerning projected revenues, expenses, gross profit and income, the
competitive factors affecting our business, market acceptance of products, customer concentration,
the success and timing of new product introductions and the protection of our intellectual
property. These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations, estimates and
projections about our industry, managements beliefs, and certain assumptions made by us. Words
such as anticipates, expects, intends, plans, predicts, potential, believes, seeks,
estimates, should, may, will and variations of these words or similar expressions are
intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements also include the
assumptions underlying or relating to any of the foregoing statements. These statements are not
guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are
difficult to predict. Therefore, our actual results could differ materially and adversely from
those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. Such
factors include, but are not limited to, the following:
| the duration and depth of the current economic slowdown and its effects on capital expenditures by our customers and their end users; | ||
| our ability to predict consumer needs, introduce new products, gain broad market acceptance for such products and ramp up manufacturing in a timely manner; | ||
| changes in demand for our products from our customers and their end-users; | ||
| the intensity of the competition and our ability to successfully compete; | ||
| the pace at which the market for new products develop; | ||
| the response of competitors, many of whom are bigger and better financed than us; | ||
| our ability to successfully execute our business plan and control costs and expenses; | ||
| our ability to protect our intellectual property and our ability to not infringe on the rights of others; and | ||
| those additional factors which are listed under the section Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. |
The forward-looking statements contained in this report are made on the basis of the views and
assumptions of management regarding future events and business performance as of the date this
report is filed with the SEC. We do not undertake any obligation to update these statements to
reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date this report is filed.
Overview
Smith Micro Software, Inc. designs, develops and markets software products and services
primarily for the mobile computing and communications industries. The Company is focused on
developing connectivity, communications, and content management solutions for a converging world of
wireless and wired networks. The Companys portfolio of wireless software products and services
includes a wide range of software solutions including our QuickLink® family of products. We
provide mobile voice and data connectivity across 3G, 4G and Wi-Fi networks. Our mobile
communications portfolio includes solutions for Push-To-Talk, Visual Voicemail and mobile device
management. We also offer user-friendly solutions for the management of mobile content, contacts
and calendar data.
Our patented compression technologies are utilized within various Smith Micro products
including our line of Personal Computer (PC) and Smartphones compression products and our new
file-transfer solution.
We sell our products and services to many of the worlds leading mobile network operators,
original equipment manufacturers (OEM), device manufacturers and enterprise businesses, as well
as directly to consumers. The proliferation of broadband mobile wireless technologies is providing
new opportunities for our products and services on a global basis. When these
broadband wireless technologiesEVDO, UMTS/HSPA, Wi-Fi, LTE and WiMAXare combined with new
devices such as mobile
17
Table of Contents
phones, PCs, Smartphones, Netbooks, and tablets and emerging
Machine-to-Machine (M2M) devices, opportunities emerge for new communications software products.
Our core technologies are designed to address these emerging mobile convergence opportunities.
Our innovative line of productivity and graphics products are distributed through a variety of
consumer channels worldwide, our online stores, and third-party wholesalers, retailers and
value-added resellers. We offer products that operate on Windows, Mac, UNIX, Linux, Apple
iPhone/iPad, Android, Windows Mobile, Symbian and Java platforms.
Revenues to three customers and their respective affiliates in the Wireless business segment
accounted for 38.8%, 16.0% and 10.6% of the Companys total revenues for the three months ended
June 30, 2010. Revenues to two customers and their respective affiliates in the Wireless business
segment accounted for 35.6% and 13.0% of the Companys total revenues for the three months ended
June 30, 2009. Revenues to three customers and their respective affiliates in the Wireless
business segment accounted for 33.7%, 16.3% and 14.4% of the Companys total revenues for the six
months ended June 30, 2010. Revenues to two customers and their respective affiliates in the
Wireless business segment accounted for 32.1% and 13.6% of the Companys total revenues for the six
months ended June 30, 2009.
On October 26, 2009, the Company acquired Core Mobility, Inc. (Core Mobility), a developer
of mobility software and solutions, for $10.0 million in cash and 700,000 shares of Smith Micro
common stock. Core Mobility became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Smith Micro. Of the $10.0 million
of cash consideration, $3.0 million was held back (Holdback) as security against possible
indemnification obligations.
Results of Operations
The table below sets forth certain statements of operations data expressed as a percentage of
revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. Our historical results are not
necessarily indicative of the operating results that may be expected in the future.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Revenues |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost of revenues |
12.6 | 15.1 | 12.6 | 17.0 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
87.4 | 84.9 | 87.4 | 83.0 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Selling and marketing |
23.6 | 23.7 | 24.0 | 24.9 | ||||||||||||
Research and development |
32.2 | 33.6 | 33.0 | 33.8 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
19.9 | 17.3 | 19.6 | 18.1 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
75.7 | 74.6 | 76.6 | 76.8 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
11.7 | 10.3 | 10.8 | 6.2 | ||||||||||||
Interest and other income |
0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.7 | ||||||||||||
Profit before taxes |
11.7 | 10.8 | 10.8 | 6.9 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
5.7 | 5.9 | 5.1 | 3.8 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
6.0 | % | 4.9 | % | 5.7 | % | 3.1 | % | ||||||||
Revenues and Expense Components
The following is a description of the primary components of our revenues and expenses:
Revenues. Revenues are net of sales returns and allowances. Our operations are organized
into two business segments:
| Wireless, which includes our connectivity and security management solutions, mobile VPN, music and multimedia management, device management, Push-To-Talk, Visual Voicemail and contact and calendar syncing solutions; and | ||
| Productivity & Graphics, which includes retail and direct sales of our compression and broad consumer-based software. |
18
Table of Contents
The following table shows the revenues generated by each business unit (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Wireless |
$ | 28,329 | $ | 21,373 | $ | 55,291 | $ | 40,630 | ||||||||
Productivity &
Graphics |
2,907 | 4,332 | 5,681 | 8,583 | ||||||||||||
Corporate/Other |
121 | 281 | 247 | 561 | ||||||||||||
Total Revenues |
31,357 | 25,986 | 61,219 | 49,774 | ||||||||||||
Cost of revenues |
3,965 | 3,922 | 7,697 | 8,445 | ||||||||||||
Gross Profit |
$ | 27,392 | $ | 22,064 | $ | 53,522 | $ | 41,329 | ||||||||
Corporate/Other refers to the consulting portion of our services sector which has been
de-emphasized and is no longer considered a strategic element of our future plans.
Cost of revenues. Cost of revenues consists of direct product costs, royalties, and the
amortization of purchased intangibles and capitalized software.
Selling and marketing. Selling and marketing expenses consist primarily of personnel costs,
advertising costs, sales commissions, trade show expenses, and the amortization of certain
purchased intangibles. These expenses vary significantly from quarter to quarter based on the
timing of trade shows and product introductions.
Research and development. Research and development expenses consist primarily of personnel and
equipment costs required to conduct our software development efforts and the amortization of
certain acquired intangibles.
General
and administrative. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel
costs, professional services and fees paid for external service providers, space and occupancy
costs, and legal and other public company costs.
Interest
and other income (expense). Interest and other income (expense) are directly related to
our average cash and short term investment balances during the period and vary among periods. Our
other excess cash is invested in short term marketable equity and debt securities classified as
cash equivalents.
Income tax expense. The Company accounts for income taxes as required by FASB ASC Topic No.
740, Income Taxes. This statement requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities
for the future consequences of events that have been recognized in the Companys financial
statements or tax returns. Measurement of the deferred items is based on enacted tax laws. In the
event the future consequences of differences between financial reporting bases and tax bases of the
Companys assets and liabilities result in a deferred tax asset, we are required to evaluate the
probability of being able to realize the future benefits indicated by such asset. A valuation
allowance related to a deferred tax asset is recorded when it is more likely than not that some
portion or the entire deferred tax asset will not be realized. Based on our evaluation, we believe
all of the deferred tax assets at June 30, 2010 are likely to be realized.
In July 2006, the FASB clarified the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in
the financial statements. A tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized when it
is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions
of any related appeals or litigation process, based on the technical merits.
Income tax positions must meet a more likely-than-not recognition threshold at the effective
date to be recognized upon the adoption of new FASB guidance, and in subsequent periods. The
interpretation also provides guidance on measurement, derecognition, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. We adopted this FASB
guidance effective January 1, 2007. Based on our evaluation, we have concluded that there are
no significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition on our financial statements.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
Revenues. Revenues were $31.4 million and $26.0 million for the three months ended June 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively, representing an increase of $5.4 million, or 20.7%. Wireless revenues
increased $7.0 million, or 32.5%, primarily due to $3.7 million of visual voicemail and
push-to-talk sales as a result of our acquisition of Core Mobility in the fourth quarter of 2009,
$2.2 million of new device solutions sales, and new connectivity and security product OEM licenses
of $1.1 million. Productivity & Graphics revenues decreased $1.4 million, or 32.9%, due to continued
unfavorable consumer spending trends. Corporate/Other revenues decreased $0.2 million as we have
de-emphasized this business.
19
Table of Contents
Cost of revenues. Cost of revenues were $4.0 million and $3.9 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, representing an increase of $0.1 million, or 1.1%.
Direct product costs decreased $0.2 million primarily due to a shift in product mix. Amortization
of intangibles increased from $1.2 million to $1.5 million, or $0.3 million primarily due to the
Core Mobility acquisition which closed in the fourth quarter of 2009. Stock-based compensation
expense was essentially zero for both of the three months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009.
Gross profit. Gross profit was $27.4 million, or 87.4% of revenues for the three months ended
June 30, 2010, an increase of $5.3 million, or 24.1%, from $22.1 million, or 84.9% of revenues for
the three months ended June 30, 2009. The 2.5 percentage point increase was primarily due to
improved product margins of 2.6 points due to the change in product
mix. This was partially offset
by higher amortization of intangibles due to the Core Mobility
acquisition of 0.1 point.
Selling and marketing. Selling and marketing expenses were $7.4 million and $6.1 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively,
representing an increase of $1.3
million, or 20.3%. This increase was primarily due to personnel costs associated with increased
headcount and higher commissions of $1.0 million. Stock-based
compensation expense was $0.8
million and $0.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively,
representing an increase of $0.1 million. Amortization of
intangible assets was $0.8 million and $0.6
million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, an increase of $0.2
million due to the Core Mobility acquisition.
Research and development. Research and development expenses were $10.1 million and $8.7
million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, representing an increase
of $1.4 million, or 15.7%. This increase was primarily due to personnel costs associated with
newly hired and acquired headcount of $1.7 million. Stock-based compensation expense was $0.7
million for both periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
Amortization of purchased technologies was zero
for the period ended June 30, 2010 versus $0.3 million for period ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of
$0.3 million.
General and administrative. General and administrative expenses were $6.2 million and $4.5
million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, representing an increase of
$1.7 million, or 37.9%. This increase was primarily due to an increase in space and occupancy
costs as a result of our acquisition of Core Mobility and the expansion of our corporate
headquarters campus of $0.6 million, acquired headcount of $0.4 million, increased depreciation and
amortization of fixed assets of $0.2 million, and other cost increases of $0.1 million.
Stock-based compensation expense was $1.4 million and $1.0 million for the three months ended June
30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, representing an increase of $0.4 million.
Interest and other income (expense). Interest and other income (expense) was essentially
zero for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Interest expense
due to discounting an earnout
payout offset interest and other income on our short-term investments. Interest and other income
was $0.1 million for three months ended June 30, 2009.
Income tax expense. Income tax expense was $1.8 million and $1.5 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The high effective tax rate is due to stock-based
compensation book expense which is a permanent difference to the taxable income.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
Revenues. Revenues were $61.2 million and $49.8 million for the six months ended June 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively, representing an increase of $11.4 million, or 23.0%. Wireless
revenues increased $14.6 million, or 36.1%, primarily due to $6.2 million of visual voicemail and
push-to-talk sales as a result of our acquisition of Core Mobility in the fourth quarter of 2009,
new connectivity and security product OEM licenses of $4.6 million, new device solutions sales of
$3.2 million, and new multimedia sales of $0.6 million.
Productivity & Graphics revenues decreased
$2.9 million, or 33.8%, due to continued unfavorable consumer spending trends. Corporate/Other
revenues decreased $0.3 million as we have de-emphasized this business.
Cost of revenues. Cost of revenues were $7.7 million and $8.5 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, representing a decrease of $0.8 million, or 8.9%.
Direct product costs decreased $1.3 million primarily due to a change in product mix. Amortization
of intangibles increased from $2.4 million to $3.0 million, or $0.6 million, due to the Core
Mobility acquisition. Stock-based compensation expense decreased from $0.1 million to nearly zero.
Gross profit. Gross profit was $53.5 million, or 87.4% of revenues for the six months ended
June 30, 2010, an increase of $12.2 million, or 29.5%, from $41.3 million, or 83.0% of revenues for
the six months ended June 30, 2009. The 4.4 percentage point increase was due to improved product
margins as a result of the change in product mix to more downloads and licenses. Lower stock-based
compensation expense as a percentage of revenue was 0.2 points which was offset by higher
amortization of intangibles due to the Core Mobility acquisition of 0.2 points.
20
Table of Contents
Selling and marketing. Selling and marketing expenses were $14.7 million and $12.4 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively,
representing an increase of $2.3
million, or 18.2%. This increase was primarily due to personnel costs associated with increased
headcount and higher commissions of $2.0 million partially offset by other cost reductions of $0.1
million. Stock-based compensation expense was $1.6 million and $1.4 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, representing an increase of $0.2 million. Amortization of
intangible assets was $1.5 million and $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, an increase of $0.2 million due to the Core Mobility acquisition.
Research and development. Research and development expenses were $20.2 million and $16.8
million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, representing an increase of
$3.4 million, or 20.1%. This increase was primarily due to the addition of engineers through new
hiring or by acquisition of $4.0 million to support our new product initiatives and new contracts.
Stock-based compensation expense of $1.3 million was essentially the same for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009. Amortization of intangible assets was
zero and $0.6 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, a decrease of $0.6 million.
General and administrative. General and administrative expenses were $12.0 million and $9.0
million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, representing an increase of
$3.0 million, or 33.7%. This increase was primarily due to an increase in space and occupancy
costs due to our acquisition of Core Mobility and the expansion of our corporate headquarters
campus of $1.1 million, acquired headcount of $0.8 million, increased depreciation and amortization
of fixed assets of $0.3 million, and other cost increases of $0.2 million. Stock-based
compensation expense was $2.8 million and $2.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively, representing an increase of $0.6 million.
Interest and other income (expense). Interest and other income (expense) was essentially
zero for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Interest expense due to discounting an earnout payout
offset interest and other income on our short-term investments. Interest and other income was $0.4
million for six months ended June 30, 2009.
Income tax expense. Income tax expense was $3.1 million and $1.9 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The high effective tax rate is due to stock-based
compensation book expense which is a permanent difference to the taxable income.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At June 30, 2010, we had $54.8 million in cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments
and $69.5 million of working capital. On October 26, 2009,
we acquired Core Mobility for $10.0
million in cash ($6.9 million upon closing and $3.1 million
held back as security against possible
indemnification obligations) and 700,000 shares of Smith Micro common stock. We currently have no
significant capital commitments, and currently anticipate that capital expenditures will not vary
significantly from recent periods. We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents, and
short-term investment balances and cash flow from operations will be sufficient to finance our
working capital and capital expenditure requirements through at least the next twelve months. We
may require additional funds to support our working capital requirements or for other purposes and
may seek to raise additional funds through public or private equity or debt financing or from other
sources. If additional financing is needed, we cannot assure that such financing will be available
to us at commercially reasonable terms or at all.
Operating activities
Net
cash provided by operating activities was $12.0 million for the
six months ended June 30,
2010. The primary sources of operating cash were adjustments for non-cash expenses including
depreciation and amortization of $5.9 million, stock-based compensation of $4.7 million, net income
of $3.5 million, and other non-cash expenses of $0.2 million. The primary use of cash affecting
operating cash flow was an increase in accounts receivable of $1.9 million and the reduction of
other liabilities of $0.4 million. Net cash provided by operating activities was $9.8 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2009. The primary sources of operating cash were
adjustments for non-cash expenses including depreciation and amortization of $5.0 million,
stock-based compensation of $4.6 million, net income and other non-cash expenses of $2.6 million,
and increases of current liabilities of $2.0 million. The primary use of cash affecting operating
cash flow was an increase in accounts receivable of $4.3 million and the reduction of other assets
of $0.1 million.
Investing activities
During
the six months ended June 30, 2010, we used $14.2 million in
investing activities due to
investing in short-term investments of $10.3 million, capital expenditures for leasehold
improvements and computer hardware and software of $3.3 million, and acquisitions of $0.6 million.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we used $10.5 million in investing activities due to
investing in short-term investments of $7.2 million and capital expenditures for leasehold
improvements, a new phone system, a new ERP system, and other computer equipment of $3.3 million.
21
Table of Contents
Financing activities
We received $0.8 million in cash during the six months ended June 30, 2010; $0.2 million from
the exercise of stock options and $0.6 million for tax benefits from stock-based compensation. We
received $0.7 million in cash during the six months ended June 30, 2009; $0.6 million from the
exercise of stock options and $0.1 million for tax benefits from stock-based compensation.
Contractual obligations and commercial commitments
As of June 30, 2010 we had no debt. The following table summarizes our contractual
obligations as of June 30, 2010 (in thousands):
Payments due by period | ||||||||||||||||||||
1 year | More than | |||||||||||||||||||
Contractual obligations: | Total | or less | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | 5 years | |||||||||||||||
Operating Lease
Obligations |
$ | 12,798 | $ | 2,278 | $ | 3,755 | $ | 2,738 | $ | 4,027 | ||||||||||
Purchase Obligations |
1,229 | 1,229 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 14,027 | $ | 3,507 | $ | 3,755 | $ | 2,738 | $ | 4,027 | ||||||||||
During our normal course of business, we have made certain indemnities, commitments and
guarantees under which we may be required to make payments in relation to certain transactions.
These include: intellectual property indemnities to our customers and licensees in connection with
the use, sale and/or license of our products; indemnities to various lessors in connection with
facility leases for certain claims arising from such facility or lease; indemnities to vendors and
service providers pertaining to claims based on the negligence or willful misconduct; indemnities
involving the accuracy of representations and warranties in certain contracts; and indemnities to
directors and officers of the Company to the maximum extent permitted under the laws of the State
of Delaware. We may also issue a guarantee in the form of a standby letter of credit as security
for contingent liabilities under certain customer contracts. The duration of these indemnities,
commitments and guarantees varies, and in certain cases, may be indefinite. The majority of these
indemnities, commitments and guarantees may not provide for any limitation of the maximum potential
for future payments we could be obligated to make. We have not recorded any liability for these
indemnities, commitments and guarantees in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Real Property Leases
Our corporate headquarters, including our principal administrative, sales and marketing,
customer support and research and development facility, is located in Aliso Viejo, California,
where we currently lease and occupy approximately 52,700 square feet of space pursuant to leases
that expire on May 31, 2016 and January 31, 2022. We lease approximately 21,000 square feet in
Mountain View, California under a lease that expires February 28, 2014. We lease approximately
14,400 square feet in Chicago, Illinois under a lease that expires August 31, 2012. We lease
approximately 15,300 square feet in Watsonville, California under a lease that expires September
30, 2018. We lease approximately 7,700 square feet in Herndon, Virginia under a lease that expires
May 31, 2011. We lease approximately 4,200 square feet in Austin, Texas under a lease that expires
June 30, 2011. Internationally, we lease space in Stockholm, Sweden; Belgrade, Serbia; Oslo, Norway;
and Vancouver, Canada. These leases are for one to three-year terms.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of results of operations, financial condition and liquidity are
based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these
financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed
to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may materially differ from these estimates
under different assumptions or conditions. On an on-going basis, we review our estimates to ensure
that the estimates appropriately reflect changes in our business or new information as it becomes
available.
We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant estimates
and assumptions used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:
22
Table of Contents
Revenue Recognition
We currently report our net revenues under two operating groups: Wireless and Productivity &
Graphics. Within each of these groups software revenue is recognized based on the customer and
contract type. We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has
occurred, the price is fixed and determinable, and collectibility is probable as required by FASB
ASC Topic No. 985-605, Software-Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenues from sales of our
software to OEM customers or end users as completed products are shipped and titles passes; or from
royalties generated as authorized customers duplicate our software,
if the other requirements are
met. If the requirements are not met at the date of shipment, revenue is not recognized until these
elements are known or resolved. Returns from OEM customers are limited to defective goods or goods
shipped in error. Historically, OEM customer returns have not exceeded the very nominal estimates
and reserves. Management reviews available retail channel information and makes a determination of
a return provision for sales made to distributors and retailers based on current channel inventory
levels and historical return patterns. Certain sales to distributors or retailers are made on a
consignment basis. Revenue for consignment sales are not recognized until sell through to the final
customer is established. Within the Productivity & Graphics group certain revenues are booked net
of revenue sharing payments. We have a few multiple element agreements for which we have contracted
to provide a perpetual license for use of proprietary software, to provide non-recurring
engineering, and in some cases to provide software maintenance (post contract support). For
multiple element agreements, vendor specific objective evidence of fair value for all contract
elements is reviewed and the timing of the individual element revenue streams is determined and
recognized as required. Sales directly to end-users are recognized upon shipment. End users have a
thirty day right of return, but such returns are reasonably estimable and have historically been
immaterial. We also provide technical support to our customers. Such costs have historically been
insignificant.
Sales Incentives
The cost of sales incentives the Company offers without charge to customers that can be used
in, or that are exercisable by a customer as a result of, a single exchange transaction is
accounted for as a reduction of revenue as required by FASB ASC Topic No. 985-605, Software-Revenue
Recognition. We use historical redemption rates to estimate the cost of customer incentives.
Total sales incentives were $0.3 million and $0.6 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We sell our products worldwide. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and
adjust credit limits based upon payment history, the customers current credit worthiness and
various other factors, as determined by our review of their current credit information. We
continuously monitor collections and payments from our customers. We estimate credit losses and
maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts reserve based upon these estimates. While such credit
losses have historically been within our estimated reserves, we cannot guarantee that we will
continue to experience the same credit loss rates that we have in the past. If not, this could
have an adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Internal Software Development Costs
Development costs incurred in the research and development of new software products and
enhancements to existing software products are expensed as incurred until technological feasibility
has been established. The Company considers technological feasibility to be established when all
planning, designing, coding and testing has been completed according to design specifications.
After technological feasibility is established, any additional costs are capitalized. Through June
30, 2010, software has been substantially completed concurrently with the establishment of
technological feasibility; accordingly, no costs have been capitalized to date.
In-Process Research and Development
In 2009, we capitalized $1.0 million of IPR&D costs related to our acquisition of Core
Mobility in accordance with accounting standards that became effective in 2009. Upon completion,
the related IPR&D asset will be amortized over its estimated useful life. If the project is
abandoned, we will be required to impair the related IPR&D asset.
The fair value of the IPR&D was determined using the discounted cash flow approach. The
expected future cash flows were estimated and discounted to their net present values at an
appropriate risk-adjusted rate of return. Significant factors considered in the calculation of the
rate of return were the weighted average cost of capital and return on assets, as well as the risks
inherent in the development process, including the likelihood of achieving technological success
and market acceptance. Future cash flows were estimated based on forecasted revenue and costs,
taking into account the expected product life cycle, market penetration and growth rates.
23
Table of Contents
Capitalized Software and Amortization
We capitalize internally developed software and software purchased from third parties if the
related software product under development has reached technological feasibility or if there are
alternative future uses for the purchased software as required by FASB ASC Topic No. 985-20,
Software-Costs of Software to be Sold, Leased, or Marketed. These costs are amortized on a
product-by-product basis, typically over an estimated life of five to seven years, using the larger
of the amount calculated using the straight-line method or the amount calculated using the ratio
between current period gross revenues and the total of current period gross revenues and estimated
future gross revenues. At each balance sheet date, we evaluate on a product-by-product basis the
unamortized capitalized cost of computer software compared to the net realizable value of that
product. The amount by which the unamortized capitalized costs of a computer software product
exceed its net realizable value is written off.
Intangible Assets and Amortization
Amortization expense related to other intangibles acquired in previous acquisitions is
calculated on a straight line basis over various useful lives.
Impairment or Disposal of Long Lived Assets
Long-lived assets to be held are reviewed for events or changes in circumstances which
indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable. They are tested for recoverability
using undiscounted cash flows to determine whether or not impairment to such value has occurred as
required by FASB ASC Topic No. 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment. The Company has determined
that there was no impairment at June 30, 2010.
Valuation of Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The Company accounts for goodwill and intangible assets as required by FASB ASC Topic No. 350,
Intangibles-Goodwill and Other. This statement requires us to periodically assess the impairment
of our goodwill and intangible assets, which requires us to make assumptions and judgments
regarding the carrying value of these assets. These assets are considered to be impaired if we
determine that their carrying value may not be recoverable based upon our assessment of the
following events or changes in circumstances:
| a determination that the carrying value of such assets cannot be recovered through undiscounted cash flows; | ||
| loss of legal ownership or title to the assets; | ||
| significant changes in our strategic business objectives and utilization of the assets; or | ||
| the impact of significant negative industry or economic trends. |
If the intangible assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment we recognize is the
amount by which the carrying value of the intangible assets exceeds the fair value of the
intangible assets. In addition, we base the useful lives and the related amortization expense on
our estimate of the useful life of the intangible assets. Due to the numerous variables associated
with our judgments and assumptions relating to the carrying value of our intangible assets and the
effects of changes in circumstances affecting these valuations, both the precision and reliability
of the resulting estimates are subject to uncertainty, and as additional information
becomes known, we may change our estimate, in which case, the likelihood of a material change
in our reported results would increase.
Deferred
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes as required by FASB ASC Topic No. 740, Income Taxes. This
statement requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future
consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns. The
measurement of the deferred items is based on enacted tax laws. In the event the future
consequences of differences between financial reporting bases and the tax bases of our assets and
liabilities result in a deferred tax asset, we are required to evaluate the probability of being
able to realize the future benefits indicated by such asset. A valuation allowance related to a
deferred tax asset is recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion or the entire
deferred tax asset will not be realized. The Companys net deferred tax assets were not reduced by
a tax valuation allowance at June 30, 2010. Management evaluated the positive and negative
evidence in determining the realizability of the net deferred tax assets at June 30, 2010 and
concluded it is more likely than not that the Company should realize its net deferred tax assets
through future operating results and the reversal of taxable temporary differences.
24
Table of Contents
Stock-Based Compensation
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company started to measure and recognize compensation expense
for all stock-based payment awards made to employees and directors, including stock options based
on their fair values as required by FASB ASC Topic No. 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation. The
Company used the modified prospective transition method as of January 1, 2006. In accordance with
the modified prospective transition method, the Companys financial statements for prior periods
have not been restated to reflect, and do not include, the impact of stock compensation expense.
Stock-based compensation expense recognized is based on the value of the portion of
stock-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest. Stock-based compensation expense
recognized in the Companys consolidated statement of operations includes compensation expense for
stock-based payment awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of, December 31, 2005 based on
the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the pro forma provisions.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Interest Rate Risk
Our financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, and short-term investments. At
June 30, 2010, the carrying values of our financial instruments approximated fair values based on
current market prices and rates.
Foreign Currency Risk
While a majority of our business is denominated in U.S. dollars, we do occasionally invoice in
foreign currencies. For the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, our revenues denominated in
foreign currencies were $0.4 million and $0.3 million, respectively. For the six months ended June
30, 2010 and 2009, our revenues denominated in foreign currencies were $0.8 million and $0.7
million, respectively. Fluctuations in the rate of exchange between the U.S. dollar and certain
other currencies may affect our results of operations and period-to-period comparisons of our
operating results. We do not currently engage in hedging or similar transactions to reduce these
risks. The operational expenses of our foreign entities reduce the currency exposure we have
because our foreign currency revenues are offset in part by expenses payable in foreign currencies.
As such, we do not believe we have a material exposure to foreign currency rate fluctuations at
this time.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
We conducted an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act)) as of June 30, 2010. Based upon that
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have determined that as of June
30, 2010, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that the information
required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and
Exchange Commissions rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to
our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate,
to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the
disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no
matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the
desired control objectives, and our management necessarily is required to apply its judgment in
evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
Managements responsibility for financial statements
Our management is responsible for the integrity and objectivity of all information presented
in this report. The consolidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America and include amounts based on
managements best estimates and judgments. Management believes the consolidated financial
statements fairly reflect the form and substance of transactions and that the financial statements
fairly represent the Companys financial position and results of operations for the periods and as
of the dates stated therein.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, which is composed solely of independent
directors, meets regularly with our independent registered public accounting firm, SingerLewak LLP,
and representatives of management to review accounting, financial
25
Table of Contents
reporting, internal control and
audit matters, as well as the nature and extent of the audit effort. The Audit Committee is
responsible for the engagement of the independent auditors. The independent auditors have free
access to the Audit Committee.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter
ended June 30, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
26
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
From time to time we may be party to litigation incidental to our business, none of which is
expected to have a material adverse effect on us.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider
the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our
fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. The risks discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K could
materially affect our business, financial condition and future results. The risks described in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not
currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially and adversely
affect our business, financial condition or operating results.
Item 6. Exhibits.
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
27
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
SMITH MICRO SOFTWARE, INC. |
||||
August 5, 2010 | By: | /s/ William W. Smith, Jr. | ||
William W. Smith, Jr. | ||||
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
||||
August 5, 2010 | By: | /s/ Andrew C. Schmidt | ||
Andrew C. Schmidt | ||||
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
28
Table of Contents
Exhibit Index
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
29