Annual Statements Open main menu

Track Group, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2018 December (Form 10-Q)

 

 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-Q
 
(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2018
or
[  ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ___________ to ____________
 
Commission file number: 0-23153
 
Track Group, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
Delaware
 
87-0543981
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
 
200 E. 5th Avenue Suite 100, Naperville, IL 60563
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
 
(877) 260-2010
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes [X]   No [   ]
  
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes [X]   No [   ]
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
 
Large accelerated filer   [   ]
Accelerated filer                     [   ]
Non-accelerated filer     [   ]
Smaller reporting company    [X]
 
Emerging growth company    [   ]
 
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [   ]
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes [   ] No [X]
 
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of February 13, 2019 was 11,401,650. 
 
 

 
 
 
Track Group, Inc.
 
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 2018
 
INDEX
 
 
 
Page
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1

 1
 
 2
 
 3
 
 4
 18
 24
 24
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 25
 27
 27
 27
 27
 27
 
 
 
 28
 
 
 
 
 
 
PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Item 1.  Financial Statements
 
TRACK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
  
Assets
 
December 31,
2018
(unaudited)
 
 
September 30,
2018
 
Current assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash
 $5,865,546 
 $5,446,557 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,218,902 and $3,152,966, respectively
  6,192,940 
  5,978,896 
Note receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $234,733, respectively
  - 
  - 
Prepaid expense and other
  1,337,300 
  1,270,043 
Inventory, net of reserves of $26,934, respectively
  154,408 
  277,119 
Total current assets
  13,550,194 
  12,972,615 
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $2,034,514 and $1,999,222, respectively
  781,704 
  745,475 
Monitoring equipment, net of accumulated amortization of $5,693,930 and $5,325,654, respectively
  2,968,188 
  3,162,542 
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $12,455,608 and $12,016,512, respectively
  22,537,375 
  23,253,054 
Goodwill
  7,892,845 
  8,076,759 
Other assets
  124,237 
  145,839 
Total assets
 $47,854,543 
 $48,356,284 
 
    
    
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
    
    
Current liabilities:
    
    
Accounts payable
 $2,346,015 
 $2,518,030 
Accrued liabilities
  11,664,052 
  10,333,103 
Current portion of long-term debt
  30,437,810 
  30,437,810 
Total current liabilities
  44,447,877 
  43,288,943 
Long-term debt, net of current portion
  3,416,296 
  3,428,975 
Total liabilities
  47,864,173 
  46,717,918 
 
    
    
   Commitments and contingencies (Note 21)
  -
 
  -
 
 
    
    
Stockholders’ equity (deficit):
    
    
Common stock, $0.0001 par value: 30,000,000 shares authorized; 11,401,650 shares outstanding, respectively
  1,140 
  1,140 
Series A Convertible Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value: 1,200,000 shares authorized; 0 shares outstanding
  - 
  - 
Paid in capital
  302,186,084 
  302,102,866 
Accumulated deficit
  (301,323,257)
  (299,495,370)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
  (873,597)
  (970,270)
Total equity (deficit)
  (9,630)
  1,638,366 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)
 $47,854,543 
 $48,356,284 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated statements.
 
 
 
-1-
 
 
TRACK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(Unaudited)
 
 
 
Three Months Ended
December 31, 
 
 
 
2018
 
 
2017
 
Revenue:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Monitoring and other related services
 $8,060,328 
 $7,350,805 
Product sales and other
  151,207 
  139,889 
Total revenue
  8,211,535 
  7,490,694 
 
    
    
Cost of revenue:
    
    
Monitoring, products and other related services
  3,100,193 
  2,542,007 
Depreciation & amortization included in cost of revenue
  478,289 
  477,142 
Total cost of revenue
  3,578,482 
  3,019,149 
 
    
    
Gross profit
  4,633,053 
  4,471,545 
 
    
    
Operating expense: 
    
    
General & administrative
  3,422,272 
  3,657,738 
Selling & marketing
  503,930 
  409,737 
Research & development
  248,865 
  163,946 
Depreciation & amortization
  514,981 
  564,740 
Total operating expense
  4,690,048 
  4,796,161 
 
    
    
Loss from operations
  (56,995)
  (324,616)
 
    
    
Other income (expense):
    
    
Interest expense, net
  (601,239)
  (673,827)
Currency exchange rate loss
  (932,677)
  (55,072)
Other income/expense, net
  - 
  10,924 
Total other expense
  (1,533,916)
  (717,975)
Loss before income taxes
  (1,590,911)
  (1,042,591)
Income tax expense
  144,007 
  - 
Net loss attributable to common shareholders
  (1,734,918)
  (1,042,591)
Foreign currency translation adjustments
  96,673 
  188,725 
Comprehensive loss
 $(1,638,245)
 $(853,866)
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted
 $(0.16)
 $(0.10)
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted
  11,101,650 
  10,476,346 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated statements.
 
 
 
-2-
 
 
TRACK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited) 
 
 
 
Three Months Ended 
December 31,  
 
 
 
2018
 
 
2017
 
Cash flows from operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss
 $(1,734,918)
 $(1,042,591)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
    
    
Depreciation and amortization
  993,270 
  1,041,882 
Bad debt expense
  90,400 
  186,910 
Accretion of debt discount
  - 
  55,744 
Stock based compensation
  83,217 
  787,590 
Loss on monitoring equipment included in cost of revenue
  104,079 
  95,817 
Foreign currency exchange loss
  932,677 
 55,072
Change in assets and liabilities:
    
    
Accounts receivable, net
  (380,133)
  (354,633)
Inventories
  - 
  69,836 
Prepaid expense and other assets
  (106,071)
  (1,009,813)
Accounts payable
  (153,689)
  (238,490)
Accrued liabilities
  1,309,601
 680,886
Net cash provided by operating activities
  1,138,433 
  328,210 
 
    
    
Cash flow from investing activities:
    
    
Purchase of property and equipment
  (141,595)
  (28,685)
Capitalized software
  (275,623)
  (254,899)
Purchase of monitoring equipment and parts
  (133,981)
  (311,142)
Net cash used in investing activities
  (551,199)
  (594,726)
 
    
    
Cash flow from financing activities:
    
    
Principal payments on long-term debt
  (9,357)
  (17,289)
Net cash used in financing activities
  (9,357)
  (17,289)
 
    
    
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
  (158,888)
  11,921 
 
    
    
Net increase (decrease) in cash
  418,989 
  (271,884)
Cash, beginning of period
  5,446,557 
  2,027,321 
Cash, end of period
 $5,865,546 
 $1,755,437 
 
    
    
Cash paid for interest
 $8,858 
 $10,708 
 
    
    
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities:
    
    
Non-cash transfer of inventory to monitoring equipment
 $128,044 
 $81,893 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated statements. 
 
 
 
-3-
 
 
TRACK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
 
(1)  BASIS OF PRESENTATION
 
The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial information of Track Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company” or “Track Group”) has been prepared in accordance with the Instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of management, the accompanying interim consolidated financial information contains all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position as of December 31, 2018, and results of its operations for the three months ended December 31, 2018. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited annual consolidated financial statements and notes thereto that are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2018, filed with the SEC on December 19, 2018. The results of operations for the three months ended December 31, 2018 may not be indicative of the results for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2019.
 
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $301,323,257 and $295,109,920, respectively. The Company incurred a net loss of $1,734,918 and $1,042,591 for the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The Company also has debt maturing in the next 12 months. The Company’s successful development and transition to attaining profitable operations is dependent upon achieving a level of revenue adequate to support its cost structure. Management has evaluated the significance of these conditions and has determined that the Company can meet its operating obligations for a reasonable period of time. The Company expects to fund operations using cash on hand, through operational cash flows and the extension of its existing debt agreement. Management of the Company believes that the availability of financing from these sources is adequate to fund operations through the upcoming twelve months.
 
(2)  PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
 
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Track Group, Inc. and its active subsidiaries, Track Group Analytics Limited, Track Group Americas, Inc., Track Group International LTD., and Track Group - Chile SpA. All significant inter-company transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
 
(3)  RECENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
 
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) or other standard setting bodies, which are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date. During the three months ended December 31, 2018, there were no new accounting pronouncements that had a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
 
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
 
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09 and related amendments “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASC 606”), which superseded all prior revenue recognition methods and industry-specific guidance. The principle of ASC 606 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of control for promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. On October 1, 2018, we adopted ASC 606 using the modified retrospective method, whereby the adoption does not impact any prior periods. See Note 8.
 
 
 
-4-
 
 
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation: Scope of Modification Accounting”, which provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting. An entity will account for the effects of a modification unless the fair value of the modified award is the same as the original award, the vesting conditions of the modified award are the same as the original award and the classification of the modified award as an equity instrument or liability instrument is the same as the original award. The update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The update is to be adopted prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. Early adoption is permitted. The Company’s adoption of ASU 2017-09 did not have an impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
 
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)” requiring the classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments to conform the presentation in the statement of cash flows for certain transactions, including cash distributions from equity method investments, among others. The adoption of ASU 2016-15 did not have an effect on the Company’s consolidated statement of cash flows.
 
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
 
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.” The new guidance simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill by removing the second step of the two-step impairment test. The amendment requires an entity to perform its annual or interim goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity still has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. The new guidance will be effective for annual periods or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. The amendment should be applied on a prospective basis. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. Management does not anticipate that this adoption will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
 
In February 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 841).” For lessees, the amendments in this update require that for all leases not considered to be short term, a company recognize both a lease liability and right-of-use asset on its balance sheet, representing the obligation to make payments and the right to use or control the use of a specified asset for the lease term. The amendments in this update are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those annual periods. Management is currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements and its operating lease obligations discussed in Note 21.
 
 (4)  IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
 
The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the book value of an asset may not be recoverable and in the case of goodwill, at least annually. The Company evaluates whether events and circumstances have occurred which indicate possible impairment as of each balance sheet date. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset. Impairment of long-lived assets is assessed at the lowest levels for which there is an identifiable fair value that is independent of other groups of assets.
 
(5)  BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
 
The Company accounts for its business acquisitions under the acquisition method of accounting as indicated in ASC 805, Business Combinations, which requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize the fair value of all assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree, and establishes the acquisition date as the fair value measurement point. Accordingly, the Company recognizes assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations, including contingent assets and liabilities and non-controlling interest in the acquiree, based on fair value estimates as of the date of acquisition. In accordance with ASC 805, the Company recognizes and measures goodwill as of the acquisition date, as the excess of the fair value of the consideration paid over the fair value of the identified net assets acquired.
 
 
 
 
-5-
 
 
Acquired Assets and Assumed Liabilities
 
Pursuant to ASC No. 805-10-25, if the initial accounting for a business combination is incomplete by the end of the reporting period in which the combination occurs, but during the allowed measurement period not to exceed one year from the acquisition date, the Company retrospectively adjusts the provisional amounts recognized at the acquisition date, by means of adjusting the amount recognized for goodwill.
 
Contingent Consideration
 
In certain acquisitions, the Company has agreed to pay additional amounts to sellers contingent upon achievement by the acquired businesses of certain future goals, which may include revenue milestones, new customer accounts, and earnings targets. The Company records contingent consideration based on its estimated fair value as of the date of the acquisition. The Company evaluates and adjusts the value of contingent consideration, if necessary, at each reporting period based on the progress toward and likely achievement of certain targets on which issuance of the contingent consideration is based. Any differences between the acquisition-date fair value and the changes in fair value of the contingent consideration subsequent to the acquisition date are recognized in current period earnings until the arrangement is settled. If there is uncertainty surrounding the value of contingent consideration, then the Company’s policy is to wait until the end of the measurement period before making an adjustment.
 
(6)  ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
 
Comprehensive income (loss) includes net income (loss) as currently reported under GAAP and other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) considers the effects of additional economic events, such as foreign currency translation adjustments, that are not required to be recorded in determining net income (loss), but rather are reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. The Chilean Peso, New Israeli Shekel and the Canadian Dollar are used as functional currencies of the following operating subsidiaries: (i) Track Group Chile SpA; (ii) Track Group International Ltd.; and (iii) Track Group Analytics Limited, respectively. The balance sheets of all subsidiaries have been converted into United States Dollars (USD) at the prevailing exchange rate at December 31, 2018.
 
(7)  NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
 
Basic net income (loss) per common share (“Basic EPS”) is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
 
Diluted net income (loss) per common share (“Diluted EPS”) is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders by the sum of the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding and the weighted-average dilutive common share equivalents outstanding. The computation of Diluted EPS does not assume exercise or conversion of securities that would have an anti-dilutive effect.
 
Common share equivalents consist of shares issuable upon the exercise of common stock options and warrants. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, there were 681,926 and 570,467 outstanding common share equivalents, respectively, that were not included in the computation of Diluted EPS for the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, as their effect would be anti-dilutive. The common stock equivalents outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 consisted of the following:
 
 
 
December 31,
 
 
December 31,
 
 
 
2018
 
 
2017
 
Exercisable common stock options and warrants
  681,926 
  570,467 
Total common stock equivalents
  681,926 
  570,467 
 
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, all stock option and warrant exercise prices were above the market price of $0.51 and $1.05, respectively, and thus have not been included in the basic earnings per share calculation.
 
 
 
-6-
 
 
(8) REVENUE RECOGNITION
 
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 and related amendments, which superseded all prior revenue recognition methods and industry-specific guidance. The principle of ASC 606 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of control for promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In applying the revenue principles, an entity is required to identify the contract(s) with a customer, identify the performance obligations, determine the transaction price, allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations and recognize revenue when the performance obligation is satisfied (i.e., either over time or at a point in time). ASC 606 further requires that companies disclose sufficient information to enable users of financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. On October 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASC 606 using the modified retrospective method, whereby the adoption does not impact any prior periods.
 
Monitoring and Other Related Services. Monitoring services include two components: (i) lease contracts pursuant to which we provide monitoring services and lease devices to distributors or end users and we retain ownership of the leased device; and (ii) monitoring services purchased by distributors or end users who have previously purchased monitoring devices and opt to use our monitoring services. Sales of devices and leased GPS devices provided by the Company are required to use the Company’s monitoring service and both the GPS leased devices and monitoring services are accounted for as a single performance obligation. The rates for leased devices and monitoring services are considered to be stated at their individual stand-alone selling prices. We recognize revenue on leased devices and monitoring services at the end of each month the services have been provided and payment terms are 30 days from invoice date. In those circumstances in which we receive payment in advance, we record these payments as deferred revenue.
 
Product Sales and Other. The Company sells replacement parts to customers under certain contracts, as well as law enforcement software licenses and maintenance, and analytical software. The Company recognizes product sales: (a) the Company has transferred physical possession of the products, (b) the Company has a present right to payment, (c) the customer has legal title to the products, and (d) the customer bears significant risks and rewards of ownership of the products. We recognize revenue from other services as the customer receives services and the Company has the right to payment.
 
  Multiple Element Arrangements. The majority of our revenue transactions do not have multiple elements. However, on occasion, we may enter into revenue transactions that have multiple elements. These may include different combinations of products or services that are included in a single billable rate. These products or services are delivered over time as the customer utilizes our services. In cases where obligations in a contract are distinct and thus require separation into multiple performance obligations, revenue recognition guidance requires that contract consideration be allocated to each distinct performance obligation based on its relative standalone selling price. The value allocated to each performance obligation is then recognized as revenue when the revenue recognition criteria for each distinct promise or bundle of promises has been met.
 
The standalone selling price for each performance obligation is an amount that depicts the amount of consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring the good or service. When there is only one performance obligation associated with a contract, the entire sale value is attributed to that obligation. When a contract contains multiple performance obligations the transaction value is first allocated using the observable price, which is generally a list price net of applicable discount or the price used to sell in similar circumstances. In circumstances when a selling price is not directly observable, we will estimate the standalone selling price using information available to us.
 
Effect of Adopting ASC 606 The Company adopted ASC 606 using the modified retrospective method. Under the modified retrospective method, the Company recognized the cumulative effect of initially applying this accounting standard as an adjustment to the opening balance in retained earnings of $92,969, relating to one contract for the sale of products and associated use of software. For this contract, the Company now recognizes revenue for the product and software over time, rather recording the sale of products at a point in time and the use of software over time, as this measure more accurately depicts the transfer of control to the customer relative to the goods or services promised under the contract, since the product cannot be used without the Company’s proprietary software.
 
 
 
-7-
 
 
The cumulative effect of the changes made to the Company's Consolidated October 1, 2018 Balance Sheet for the adoption of ASC 606 is as follows:
 
Balance Sheet
 
As Reported at September 30, 2018
 
 
Adjustments
 
 
Balance as of October 1, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LIABILITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accrued liabilities
  10,333,103 
  92,969 
  10,426,072 
Total current liabilities
  43,288,943 
  92,969 
  43,381,912 
Total liabilities
  46,717,918 
  92,969 
  46,810,887 
 
    
    
    
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
    
    
    
Accumulated deficit
  (299,495,370)
  (92,969)
  (299,588,339)
Total equity
  1,638,366 
  (92,969)
  1,545,397 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  48,356,284 
  (92,969)
  48,263,315 
 
The following tables present the Company’s revenue disaggregated by geography, based on management’s assessment of available data:
 
 
 
Three months ended December 31, 2018
 
 
Three months ended December 31, 2017
 
 
 
Total
Revenue
 
 
% of Total
Revenue
 
 
Total
Revenue
 
 
% of Total
Revenue
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States
 $5,061,559 
  62%
 $4,929,390 
  66%
Latin America
  3,107,553 
  38%
  2,506,023 
  33%
Other
  42,423 
  0%
  55,281 
  1%
Total
 $8,211,535 
  100%
 $7,490,694 
  100%
 
The above table includes total revenue for the Company, of which monitoring and other related services is the majority (approximately 98%) of the Company’s revenue. Other revenue, including product sales, license renewals and parts, is considered immaterial to the Company’s overall revenue.
 
(9)  PREPAID EXPENSE AND OTHER
 
As of December 31, 2018, and September 30, 2018, the outstanding balance of prepaid and other expense was $1,337,300 and $1,270,043, respectively. These balances are comprised largely of a performance bond deposit, tax deposits, vendor deposits and other prepaid supplier expense.
 
(10)  INVENTORY
 
 Inventory is valued at the lower of the cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined using the standard costing method. Net realizable value is determined based on the item selling price. Inventory is periodically reviewed in order to identify obsolete or damaged items or impaired values. The Company did not record impairment of inventory during the quarters ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
 
 
 
-8-
 
 
Inventory consists of finished goods that are to be shipped to customers and parts used for minor repairs of ReliAlert™, Shadow, and other tracking devices. Completed and shipped ReliAlert™ and other tracking devices are reflected in Monitoring Equipment. As of December 31, 2018 and September 30, 2018, inventory consisted of the following: 
 
 
 
December 31,
2018
 
 
September 30,
2018
 
Finished goods inventory
 $181,342 
 $304,053 
Reserve for damaged or obsolete inventory
  (26,934)
  (26,934)
Total inventory, net of reserves
 $154,408 
 $277,119 
 
The Company uses a third-party fulfillment service provider. As a result of this service, the Company’s employees do not actively assemble new product or repair damaged inventory or monitoring equipment shipped directly from suppliers. Purchases of monitoring equipment are recognized directly. Management believes this process reduces maintenance and fulfillment costs associated with inventory and monitoring equipment.
 
(11)  PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
 
Property and equipment consisted of the following as of December 31, 2018 and September 30, 2018, respectively:
 
 
 
December 31,
2018
 
 
September 30,
2018
 
Equipment, software and tooling
 $1,128,701 
 $1,074,471 
Automobiles
  5,834 
  6,153 
Leasehold improvements
  1,376,603 
  1,358,984 
Furniture and fixtures
  305,080 
  305,089 
Total property and equipment before accumulated depreciation
  2,816,218 
  2,744,697 
Accumulated depreciation
  (2,034,514)
  (1,999,222)
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
 $781,704 
 $745,475 
 
Property and equipment depreciation expense for the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $79,636 and $114,417, respectively.
 
(12)  MONITORING EQUIPMENT
 
The Company leases monitoring equipment to agencies for offender tracking under contractual service agreements. The monitoring equipment is depreciated using the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of between one and five years. Monitoring equipment as of December 31, 2018 and September 30, 2018 was as follows:
 
 
 
December 31,
2018
 
 
September 30,
2018
 
Monitoring equipment
 $8,662,118 
 $8,488,196 
Less: accumulated amortization
  (5,693,930)
  (5,325,654)
Monitoring equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
 $2,968,188 
 $3,162,542 
 
Depreciation of monitoring equipment for the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $354,626 and $353,027, respectively. Depreciation expense for monitoring devices is recognized in cost of revenue. During the three months ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company recorded charges of $104,079 and $95,817, respectively, for devices that were lost, stolen, damaged or otherwise impaired. Lost, stolen and damaged items are included in Monitoring, products & other related services in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.
 
 
 
-9-
 
 
(13)  INTANGIBLE ASSETS
 
The following table summarizes intangible assets at December 31, 2018 and September 30, 2018, respectively:
 
 
 
December 31,
2018
 
 
September 30,
2018
 
Other intangible assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Patent & royalty agreements
 $21,170,565 
 $21,170,565 
Developed technology
  11,566,373 
  11,835,293 
Customer relationships
  1,860,000 
  1,860,000 
Trade name
  317,844 
  325,507 
Website
  78,201 
  78,201 
Total intangible assets
  34,992,983 
  35,269,566 
Accumulated amortization
  (12,455,608)
  (12,016,512)
Intangible assets, net
 $22,537,375 
 $23,253,054 
 
The intangible assets summarized above were purchased or developed on various dates from January 2010 through December 31, 2018. The assets have useful lives ranging from three to twenty years. Amortization expense for the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $559,008 and $574,438, respectively.
 
(14)  GOODWILL
 
The following table summarizes the activity of goodwill at December 31, 2018 and September 30, 2018, respectively:
 
 
 
December 31,
 
 
September 30,
 
 
 
2018
 
 
2018
 
Balance - beginning of period
 $8,076,759 
 $8,226,714 
Effect of foreign currency translation on goodwill
  (183,914)
  (149,955)
Balance - end of period
 $7,892,845 
 $8,076,759 
 
Goodwill is recognized in connection with acquisition transactions in accordance with ASC 805. The Company performs an impairment test for goodwill annually or more frequently if indicators of potential impairment exist. No impairment of goodwill was recognized through December 31, 2018.
 

 
 
 
-10-
 
 
(15)  ACCRUED LIABILITES
 
Accrued liabilities consisted of the following as of December 31, 2018 and September 30, 2018, respectively:
 
 
 
December 31,
2018
 
 
September 30,
2018
 
Accrued payroll, taxes and employee benefits
 $2,206,196 
 $1,937,021 
Deferred revenue
  234,012 
  150,604 
Deposits payable
  54,504 
  54,504 
Accrued taxes - foreign and domestic
  363,397 
  351,469 
Accrued other expense
 309,962
  298,268 
Accrued legal costs
  607,376 
  473,777 
Accrued costs of revenue
  460,784 
  230,514 
Accrued bond guarantee
  149,059 
  157,199 
Accrued interest
  7,278,762 
  6,679,747 
     Total accrued liabilities
 $11,664,052
 $10,333,103 
 
(16)  DEBT OBLIGATIONS
 
Debt obligations as of December 31, 2018 and September 30, 2018, respectively, are comprised of the following: 
 
 
 
December 31,
2018
 
 
September 30,
2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unsecured facility agreement with Conrent S.A. whereby, as of June 30, 2015, the Company had borrowed $30.4 million, bearing interest at a rate of 8% per annum, payable in arrears semi-annually, with all principal and accrued and unpaid interest due on April 1, 2019. The Company did not pay interest on this loan during the three months ended December 31, 2018.
 $30,400,000 
 $30,400,000 
 
    
    
Loan Agreement whereby the Company can borrow up to $5.0 million at 8% interest per annum on borrowed funds maturing on September 30, 2020.
  3,399,644 
  3,399,644 
 
    
    
Non-interest bearing notes payable to a Canadian governmental agency assumed in conjunction with the G2 acquisition.
  54,462 
  67,141 
 
    
    
Total debt obligations
  33,854,106 
  33,866,785 
Less current portion
  (30,437,810)
  (30,437,810)
Long-term debt, net of current portion
 $3,416,296 
 $3,428,975 
 
The following table summarizes future maturities of debt obligations as of December 31, 2018:
 
Twelve-month period ended December 31,
 
 
Total 
 
 
 
 
 
2019
 $30,437,810 
2020
  3,416,296 
Thereafter
  - 
 Total
 $33,854,106 
 
 
 
-11-
 
 
(17)  RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
 
Related-Party Loan Agreement
 
On September 25, 2015, the Company entered into the Sapinda Loan Agreement with Sapinda, a related party at that time, to provide the Company with a $5.0 million line of credit that accrued interest at a rate of 3% per annum for undrawn funds, and 8% per annum for borrowed funds. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Sapinda Loan Agreement, available funds could be drawn down at the Company’s request at any time prior to the maturity date of September 30, 2017 (the “Maturity Date”), when all borrowed funds, plus all accrued but unpaid interest would have become due and payable. The Company, however, was entitled to elect to satisfy any outstanding obligations under the Sapinda Loan Agreement prior to the Maturity Date without penalties or fees.
 
On March 13, 2017, the Company and Sapinda entered into Amendment Number One to the Sapinda Loan Agreement. Amendment Number One extended the maturity date of all loans made pursuant to the Sapinda Loan Agreement to September 30, 2020. In addition, Amendment Number One eliminated the requirement that the Company pay Sapinda the 3% interest, and forgave the 3% interest due to Sapinda for all undrawn funds under the Sapinda Loan Agreement through the Execution Date. Further, Amendment Number One provided that all Lender Penalties accrued under the Sapinda Loan Agreement through the Execution Date were forgiven. Per Amendment Number One, Lender Penalties began to accrue again because Sapinda failed to fund the amount of $1.5 million on or before March 31, 2017. The Company formally notified Sapinda of the breach by letter dated April 4, 2017. The Company is again accruing Lender Penalties, amounting to $640,000 at December 31, 2018, under Section 6.3 of the Sapinda Loan Agreement, as amended, and the Company intends to offset Lender Penalties against future payments due. We did not draw on this line of credit, nor did we pay any interest during the three months ended December 31, 2018. The undrawn balance of this line of credit at December 31, 2018 was $1,600,356. Further advances under the Sapinda Loan Agreement are not currently expected to be forthcoming, and therefore no assurances can be given that the Company will obtain additional funds to which it is entitled under the Sapinda Loan Agreement, or that the penalties accruing will ever be paid. 
 
Additional Related-Party Transactions and Summary of All Related-Party Obligations
 
 
 
December 31,
2018
 
 
September 30,
2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Related party loan with an interest rate of 8% per annum for borrowed funds. Principal and interest due September 30, 2020.
 $3,399,644 
 $3,399,644 
Total related-party debt obligations
 $3,399,644 
 $3,399,644 
 
Each of the foregoing related-party transactions was reviewed and approved by disinterested and independent members of the Company’s Board of Directors. 
 
(18)  PREFERRED AND COMMON STOCK
 
The Company is authorized to issue up to 30,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.0001 par value per share.
 
The Company is authorized to issue up to 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.0001 par value per share. The Company’s Board of Directors has the authority to amend the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, without further shareholder approval, to designate and determine, in whole or in part, the preferences, limitations and relative rights of the preferred stock before any issuance of the preferred stock, and to create one or more series of preferred stock. As of December 31, 2018, there were no shares of preferred stock outstanding.
 
Series A Preferred Stock
 
On October 12, 2017, the Company filed a Certificate of Designation of the Relative Rights and Preferences (“Certificate of Designation”) with the Delaware Division of Corporations, designating 1,200,000 shares of the Company’s preferred stock as Series A Preferred. Shares of Series A Preferred rank senior to the Company’s common stock, and all other classes and series of equity securities of the Company that by their terms do not rank senior to the Series A Preferred.
 
 
 
-12-
 
 
Except with respect to transactions upon which holders of the Series A Preferred are entitled to vote separately as a class under the terms of the Certificate of Designation, the Series A Preferred has no voting rights. The shares of common stock into which the Series A Preferred is convertible shall, upon issuance, have all of the same voting rights as other issued and outstanding shares of our common stock.
 
The Series A Preferred has no separate dividend rights; however, whenever the Board declares a dividend on the Company’s Common Stock, if ever, each holder of record of a share of Series A Preferred shall be entitled to receive an amount equal to such dividend declared on one share of common stock multiplied by the number of shares of common stock into which such share of Series A Preferred could be converted on the Record Date.
 
Each share of Series A Preferred has a Liquidation Preference of $35.00 per share, and is convertible, at the holder’s option, into ten shares of the Company’s Common Stock, subject to adjustments as set forth in the Certificate of Designation, at any time beginning five hundred and forty days after the date of issuance.
 
As of December 31, 2018, no shares of Series A Preferred were issued and outstanding.
 
 (19)  STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS
 
Stock Incentive Plan
 
At the annual meeting of shareholders on March 21, 2011, our shareholders approved the 2012 Equity Compensation Plan (the “2012 Plan”). The 2012 Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, performance shares, performance stock units, dividend equivalents, stock payments, deferred stock, restricted stock units, other stock-based awards and performance-based awards to employees and certain non-employees who provide services to the Company in lieu of cash. A total of 90,000 shares were initially authorized for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the 2012 Plan. At the 2015 annual meeting of shareholders held on May 19, 2015, our stockholders approved a 713,262 share increase to the total number of shares authorized under the 2012 Plan. Warrants for Board members vest immediately and warrants issued to employees vest annually over either a two or three-year period after the grant date. 
 
As of December 31, 2018, the Board of Directors suspended further awards under the 2012 Plan until further notice. The Company recorded expense of $65,312 and $149,088 for the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, related to the vesting of Common Stock. There were 27,218 shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2012 Plan.
 
All Options and Warrants
 
On November 30, 2017, the Board of Directors unanimously approved the adjustment of the exercise price of 605,678 unexercised warrants issued under the 2012 Plan, with original exercise prices ranging from $1.81 to $19.46, to $1.24, resulting in incremental stock-based compensation of $149,088, which was expensed in the three-month period ending December 31, 2017.
 
The fair value of each stock option and warrant grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. During the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company granted 0 and 30,797 options and warrants to purchase shares of common stock under the 2012 Plan. The warrants for Board members vest immediately and expire five years from grant date and warrants or options issued to employees vest annually over either a two to three-year period and expire five years after the final vesting date of the grant. The Company recorded expense of $17,905 and $638,502 for the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, related to the issuance and vesting of outstanding stock options and warrants.
 
 
 
-13-
 
 
The option and warrant grants for three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were valued using the Black-Scholes model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
 
 
 
Three Months Ended
December 31
 
 
 
 2018
 
 
2017
 
Expected stock price volatility
  N/A 
  120%
Risk-free interest rate
  N/A 
  1.92%
Expected life of options/warrants
 
5 Years
 
 
5 Years
 
 
The expected life of stock options (warrants) represents the period of time that the stock options or warrants are expected to be outstanding based on the simplified method allowed under GAAP. The expected volatility is based on the historical price volatility of the Company’s common stock. The risk-free interest rate represents the U.S. Treasury bill rate for the expected life of the related stock options (warrants). The dividend yield represents the Company’s anticipated cash dividends over the expected life of the stock options (warrants).
 
A summary of stock option (warrant) activity for the three months ended December 31, 2018 is presented below:
 
 
 
Shares Under Option
 
 
Weighted Average
Exercise
Price
 
 
Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
 
 
Aggregate Intrinsic
Value
 
Outstanding as of September 30, 2018
 
 
685,259
 
 
$
1.56
 
 
3.90 years
 
 
$
-
 
Granted
 
 
-
 
 
$
-
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Expired/Cancelled
 
 
-
 
 
$
-
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exercised
 
 
-
 
 
$
-
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Outstanding as of December 31, 2018
 
 
685,259
 
 
1.56
 
 
 
3.65 years
 
 
$
-
 
Exercisable as of December 31, 2018
 
 
681,926
 
 
1.57
 
 
 
3.65 years
 
 
$
-
 
 
The intrinsic value of options and warrants outstanding and exercisable is based on the Company’s share price of $0.51 at December 31, 2018.
 
(20)  INCOME TAXES
 
The Company recognizes deferred income tax assets or liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or income tax returns. Deferred income tax assets or liabilities are determined based upon the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates expected to apply when the differences are expected to be settled or realized. Deferred income tax assets are reviewed periodically for recoverability and valuation allowances are provided as necessary. Interest and penalties related to income tax liabilities, when incurred, are classified in interest expense and income tax provision, respectively.
 
For the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company incurred a net loss for income tax purposes of $1,734,918 and $1,042,591, respectively. The amount and ultimate realization of the benefits from the net operating losses is dependent, in part, upon the tax laws in effect, our future earnings, and other future events, the effects of which cannot be determined. The Company has established a valuation allowance for all deferred income tax assets not offset by deferred income tax liabilities due to the uncertainty of their realization. Accordingly, there is no benefit for income taxes in the accompanying statements of operations.
 
In computing income tax, we recognize an income tax provision in tax jurisdictions in which we have pre-tax income for the period and are expecting to generate pre-tax book income during the fiscal year.
 
 
 
-14-
 
 
(21)  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
 
Legal Matters
 
The Company is, from time to time, involved in various legal proceedings incidental to the conduct of our business. Historically, the outcome of all such legal proceedings has not, in the aggregate, had a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Other than as set forth below, there are no additional pending or threatened legal proceedings at this time.
 
Lazar Leybovich et al. v. SecureAlert, Inc. On March 29, 2012, Lazar Leybovich, Dovie Leybovich and Ben Leybovich filed a complaint in the 11th Circuit Court in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida alleging breach of contract with regard to certain Stock Redemption Agreements. The Plaintiffs are alleging $1,587,604 in combined damages. On May 2, 2016, the Court resolved this case in favor of the Company by granting the Company’s motion for Summary Judgment. The Plaintiffs filed an Appeal on June 1, 2016 challenging the Court’s ruling on the motion for Summary Judgment. The Appellate court ruled in favor of the Plaintiff, finding that factual issue remains, reversing the Summary Judgment and remanding the case back to trial. The Company’s motion for partial Summary Judgment was denied. A five day trial is tentatively scheduled to take place February 19, 2019.
 
Boggs et al. v. Judicial Electronic Monitoring, SecureAlert, Inc. et al. On December 3, 2015, Candace Boggs et al. filed a complaint in the State Court of Dougherty County, Georgia, alleging breach of contract and negligence in monitoring of certain offenders in Dougherty County, Georgia, as well as a request for punitive damages. Plaintiffs withdrew their complaint in February 2016, but refiled the complaint on October 12, 2016. The Company’s motion for Summary Judgment was denied on February 27, 2017 and a Notice of Appeal was filed by the Company’s counsel on April 15, 2017. In May the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court decision and granted the Company’s Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff’s claims. Plaintiff has filed a petition to have the case heard in the Georgia Supreme Court. On June 27, 2018, the Company’s Counsel filed a response to the petition, and on January 7, 2019, the Supreme Court of Georgia denied the petition, thereby concluding the case.
 
Track Group, Inc. v. I.C.S. of the Bahamas Co. Ltd. On May 18, 2016, the Company filed a complaint in the District Court of the Third Judicial District in Salt Lake County, Utah alleging breach of contract, under the terms of a loan agreement and promissory note between the Company and I.C.S. of the Bahamas Co. Ltd (“ICS”). The Company’s damages of unpaid principal and interest on the Promissory Note, as of November 16, 2018, were in the amount of $291,313.81, plus interest as it continues to accrue. The Defendant’s initial Counterclaim was dismissed; however, the Court granted the Defendant leave to amend. The Amended Counterclaim was filed on June 23, 2017 alleging $1,628,667 in damages. Depositions have taken place for both parties. In late 2018, both parties filed motions for summary judgment on all the claims and counterclaims, both of which motions are still pending. If Track Group obtains a judgment for amounts owed under the loan agreement and promissory note, it is unknown whether the Company will be able to collect any sums from ICS in the foreign jurisdiction where ICS resides.
 
Track Group Inc. v. I.C.S. of the Bahamas Co. Ltd. On September 26, 2016, the Company filed a Notice of Arbitration with the International Centre for Dispute Resolution, alleging breach of the Commercial and Monitoring Representative Agreement dated November 30, 2010 (the “C&M Agreement”) by and between the Company and ICS. The Company asserted that ICS has failed to pay the Company fees owed to it under the C&M Agreement. On August 22, 2018, the arbitrator issued a ruling awarding the Company $689,613.50. However, on October 15, 2018, the arbitrator issued a “corrected award” in which he reduced the amount of his award to zero. On January 8, 2019, the Company filed a motion in the United States District Court, District of Puerto Rico to vacate the “corrected award” and confirm the original arbitration award of $689,613.50, which motion is still pending. If the Company is successful in confirming the $689,613.50 award, it is unknown whether it will be able to collect any sums from ICS in the foreign jurisdiction where ICS resides.
 
 
 
-15-
 
 
John Merrill v. Track Group, Inc. and Guy Dubois. On November 30, 2016, the Company was served with a complaint filed by John Merrill, the former Chief Financial Officer of the Company, in District Court of the Third Judicial District in Salt Lake County, Utah alleging breach of contract, among other causes of action, related to Mr. Merrill’s termination of employment. Mr. Merrill is seeking not less than $590,577 plus interest, attorney fees and costs. Mr. Merrill’s employment with the Company was terminated effective September 27, 2016. The Company filed an Answer with Counter Claims on December 21, 2016. The Company filed a motion for Summary Judgment on January 16, 2018. At a hearing on April 25, 2018, the court dismissed the Plaintiff’s claims related to an oral look-back agreement and a separation agreement. The court has not ruled on Plaintiff’s claims related to his employment agreement. A settlement amount could not be reached by the parties. The matter will likely proceed to trial after expert discovery is conducted. We intend to defend the case vigorously and believe the allegations and claims are without merit.
 
SecureAlert, Inc. v. Federal Government of Mexico (Department of the Interior). On March 24, 2017, SecureAlert Inc. filed a complaint before the Federal Administrative Tribunal, asserting the failure by Defendants to pay claimant amounts agreed to, and due under, the Pluri Annual Contract for the Rendering of Monitoring Services of Internees, through Electric Bracelets, in the Islas Marias Penitentiary Complex dated July 15, 2011, entered into by and between the Organo Administrativo Desconcentrado Prevencion y Readaptacion Social of the then Public Security Department, and presently, an agency of the National Security Commission of the Department of the Interior, and SecureAlert, Inc., presently Track Group, Inc. The Company’s claim amount is upwards of $6.0 million. On March 28, 2017, the Federal Administrative Tribunal rejected our claim, based on its determination that this case should be resolved by a Civil Court and not by the Federal Administrative Tribunal. For that reason, on April 25, 2017, the Company filed an appeal before the Collegiate Tribunals against the decision of the Federal Administrative Tribunal. The Tribunal ruled the claims should be resolved in the Civil Court. Following that ruling the Supreme Court took action to resolve the conflicting precedent regarding the jurisdiction of such claims and determined that such claims will be resolved by the Federal Administrative Tribunal.
 
Eli Sabag v. Track Group, Inc., Sapinda Asia Limited and Lars Windhorst. On May 4, 2018, Eli Sabag filed a complaint before the Marion Superior Court in Marion County Indiana for damages and declaratory Judgment against the Company. The complaint seeks to enforce an “earn-out” clause in a Share Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) between the Company and Sabag. Sabag alleges that the Company breached the SPA because it failed to pay him his earn out after it sold and leased a sufficient number of GPS devices to meet the earn-out milestone. In the alternative, Sabag sued the Company for breach of fiduciary duty and tortious interference, alleging that the Company avoided selling sufficient GPS devices so as to not trigger the issuance of Contingent Stock under the SPA. Finally, Sabag alleges that the Company was unjustly enriched because it failed to pay full value for his shares under the SPA. The Company believes the allegations are unfounded and without merit, and it will defend the case vigorously. Furthermore, according to the SPA, any disputes are to be resolved through binding arbitration and enforced in the State of Utah. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the Complaint and Compel Arbitration on September 5, 2018 and we are waiting on a ruling from the court.
 
Erick Cerda v. Track Group, Inc. On July 25, 2018, former employee Erick Cerda, the Plaintiff, filed a complaint against the Company in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Case No. 18-CV-05075, alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief and monetary damages in an unspecific amount. On October 5, 2018, the Company filed its answer and affirmative defenses to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint denying Plaintiff’s allegations in their entirety. The Company believes that Plaintiff’s allegations are unfounded and without merit.
 
 
 
-16-
 
 
Operating Lease Obligations
 
The following table summarizes our contractual lease obligations as of December 31, 2018:
 
Fiscal Year
 
Total
 
 
 
 
 
2019 (nine months)
 $246,857 
2020
  255,646 
2021
  183,131 
2022
  167,345 
2023
  3,612 
Thereafter
  - 
Total
 $856,591 
 
The total operating lease obligations of $856,591 is largely related to facilities operating leases. During the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company paid $111,973 and $107,974, in lease payment obligations, respectively.
 
 (22)  SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
 
On November 14, 2018, the Company requested that Conrent extend the maturity of the Amended Facility Agreement from April 1, 2019 to April 1, 2020. On December 3, 2018, Conrent agreed to convene meetings of the investors who purchased the securities from Conrent to finance the debt (the “Noteholders”) and subsequently issued a notice of a meeting of Noteholders for each series of Notes, which meetings were held on January 16, 2019. On January 17, 2019, Conrent notified the Company (via telephone), that the Noteholders agreed to extend the maturity of the Amended Facility Agreement to April 1, 2020, subject to the signing of a written loan amendment. While the Company believes the Noteholders will sign an amendment to extend the maturity of the Amended Facility Agreement, no assurance can be given.
 
In accordance with the Subsequent Events Topic of the FASB ASC 855, we have evaluated subsequent events, through the filing date and noted that, other than as disclosed above, no additional subsequent events have occurred that are reasonably likely to impact the financial statements.
 
 
 
 
 
-17-
 
 
Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
Forward-Looking Statements
 
This Report contains information that constitutes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Generally, the statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not purely historical can be considered to be “forward-looking statements.” These statements represent our expectations, hopes, beliefs, anticipations, commitments, intentions, and strategies regarding the future. They may be identified by the use of words or phrases such as “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “should,” “plans,” “estimates,” “projects,” “potential,” and “will,” among others. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements contained in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations regarding our financial performance, revenue, and expense levels in the future and the sufficiency of our existing assets to fund future operations and capital spending needs. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In addition, forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our historical experience and our present expectations or projections. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those described in “Risk Factors” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, and those described from time to time in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
 
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto that are contained in this Report, as well as Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018, and Current Reports on Form 8-K that have been filed with the SEC through the date of this Report. Except as otherwise indicated, as used in this Report, the terms “the Company,” “Track Group,” “we,” “our,” “us,” refer to Track Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
 
General
 
Our core business is based on the leasing of patented tracking and monitoring solutions to federal, state and local law enforcement agencies, both in the U.S and abroad, for the electronic monitoring of offenders and offering unique data analytics services on a platform-as-a-service (PaaS) business model. Currently, we deploy offender based management services that combine patented GPS tracking technologies, fulltime 24/7/365 global monitoring capabilities, case management, and proprietary data analytics. We offer customizable tracking solutions that leverage real-time tracking data, best practices monitoring, and analytics capabilities to create complete, end-to-end tracking solutions.
 
Our devices consist principally of the ReliAlertTM product line, which is supplemented by the Shadow product line. These devices are generally leased on a daily rate basis and may be combined with our monitoring center services, proprietary software and data analytics subscription to provide an end-to-end PaaS.
 
ReliAlertTM and Shadow.  Our tracking devices utilize patented technology and are securely attached around an offender’s ankle with a tamper resistant strap that cannot be adjusted or removed without detection, unless by a supervising officer, and which are activated through services provided by our monitoring centers. The ReliAlertTM and Shadow units are intelligent devices with integrated computer circuitry, utilizing both GPS and RF, and constructed from case-hardened plastics designed to promptly notify the intervention centers of any attempt made to breach applicable protocols, or to remove or otherwise tamper with the device or optical strap housing. The ReliAlertTM platform also incorporates voice communication technology that provides officers with 24/7/365 voice communication with the offenders. Both devices are FCC, CE and PTCRB certified and protected by numerous patents and trademarks.
 
 
 
-18-
 
 
Monitoring Center Services.  Our monitoring center facilities provide live 24/7/365 monitoring of all alarms generated from our devices, as well as customer and technical support. Our monitoring center operators play a vital role, and as such, we staff our centers with highly-trained, bi-lingual individuals. These operators act as an extension of agency resources receiving alarms, communicating and intervening with offenders regarding violations, and interacting with supervision staff, all pursuant to agency-established protocols. The facilities have redundant power source, battery back-up and triple redundancy in voice, data, and IP. The Company has established monitoring centers in the U.S. and Chile. In addition, the Company has assisted in the establishment of monitoring centers for customers and local partners in other global locations
 
Data Analytics Services.  Our TrackerPALTM software, TrackerPALTM Mobile, combined with our Data Analytic analysis tools, provide an integrated platform allowing case managers and law enforcement officers quick access views of an offender’s travel behavior, mapping, and inference on patterns. Our advanced data analytics service offers a highly complex predictive reporting mechanism that combines modern statistical methods, developed using computer science and used by intelligence agencies that separate noteworthy events from normal events, rank offender cases according to their need for supervision, and relate decision-relevant metrics to benchmarks in real-time.
 
Business Strategy
 
We are committed to helping our customers improve offender rehabilitation and re-socialization outcomes through our innovative hardware, software, and services. We treat our business as a service business. Although we still manufacture patented tracking technology, we see the physical goods as only a small part of the integrated offender monitoring solutions we provide. Accordingly, rather than receiving a payment just for a piece of manufactured equipment, the Company receives a recurring stream of revenue for ongoing device agnostic subscription contracts. As part of our strategy, we continue to expand our device-agnostic platform to not only collect, but also store, analyze, assess and correlate location data for both accountability and auditing reasons, as well as to use for predictive analytics and assessment of effective and emerging techniques in criminal behavior and rehabilitation. We believe a high-quality customer experience with knowledgeable salespersons who can convey the value of our products and services greatly enhances our ability to attract and retain customers. Therefore, our strategy also includes building and expanding our own direct sales force and our third-party distribution network to effectively reach more customers and provide them with a world-class sales and post-sales support experience. In addition, we are developing related-service offerings to address adjacent market opportunities in both the public and private sectors. We believe continual investment in research and development (“R&D”), including smartphone applications and other monitoring services is critical to the development and sale of innovative technologies and integrated solutions today and in the future.
 
Critical Accounting Policies
 
From time to time, management reviews and evaluates certain accounting policies that are considered to be significant in determining our results of operations and financial position.
 
A description of the Company’s critical accounting policies that affect the preparation of the Company’s financial statements is set forth in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2018, filed with the SEC on December 19, 2018. During the three months ended December 31, 2018 there have been no material changes to the Company’s critical accounting policies other than the adoption of ASU 2014-09 as described in Note 8.
 
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make significant estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expense. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. We assess the reasonableness of our estimates, including those related to bad debts, inventories, estimated useful lives, intangible assets, warranty obligations, product liability, revenue, legal matters and income taxes. We base our estimates on historical experience as well as available current information on a regular basis. Management uses this information to form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
 
 
 
-19-
 
 
Government Regulation
 
Our operations are subject to various federal, state, local and international laws and regulations.
 
In October 2018, through an internal review of our export compliance, it came to our attention that some of our products may not have been properly classified in the past, and that our export of certain products, software and technology may be subject to export licensing requirements of which we were not previously aware. As a result of these findings, we have hired independent counsel to assist in, among other things, an investigation with respect to our past export practices and analyzing our classification of products, software and technology. In addition, on October 16, 2018, we voluntarily self-disclosed the information above to the Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”), and we have taken steps to obtain licenses for the export of certain of our products, software and technology to certain countries. Should the BIS determine that we did violate applicable export regulations, the BIS may, in its discretion, impose certain fines on us for such violations, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. It is currently unknown whether we may face any penalties.
 
On February 7, 2019, the Company received authorization from BIS for its customers, contractors and subsidiaries in Chile, Mexico, Bahamas, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Vietnam and for its Swedish and Mexican foreign national employees to continue using electronic monitoring devices and the associated software and technology.
 
Other than our potential violations of licensing requirements related to our exports, as disclosed above, we are not involved in any pending or, to our knowledge, threatened governmental proceedings, which would require curtailment of our operations because of such laws and regulations.
 
Results of Operations
 
Three Months Ended December 31, 2018 Compared to Three Months Ended December 31, 2017
 
Revenue
 
For the three months ended December 31, 2018, the Company recognized revenue from operations of $8,211,535 compared to $7,490,694 for the three months ended December 31, 2017, an increase of $720,841 or approximately 10%. The increase in revenue was principally the result of an increase in total growth of our North American monitoring operations driven by clients in Puerto Rico, Mexico, Bahamas, and Michigan.
 
Other revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2018 increased to $151,207 from $139,889 in the same period in 2017 largely due to higher sales of consumable items. We will continue to focus on recurring subscription based opportunities as opposed to equipment sales.
 
Cost of Revenue
 
During the three months ended December 31, 2018, cost of revenue totaled $3,578,482 compared to cost of revenue during the three months ended December 31, 2017 of $3,019,149, an increase of $559,333 or approximately 19%. The increase in cost of revenue was largely the result of higher device repair costs of $315,049, incurred to distribute additional devices to meet demand of growing clients, which revenue should be fully recognized in the second fiscal quarter of 2019, and higher monitoring costs of $59,007.
 
Depreciation and amortization included in cost of revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 totaled $478,289 and $477,142, respectively. These costs represent the depreciation of ReliAlert™ and other monitoring devices, as well as the amortization of monitoring software and certain royalty agreements. We believe the equipment lives on which the depreciation is based are appropriate due to rapid changes in electronic monitoring technology and the corresponding potential for obsolescence. Management periodically assesses the useful life of the devices for appropriateness. Amortization of a patent related to GPS and satellite tracking is also included in cost of sales.
 
 
 
-20-
 
 
Gross Profit and Margin
 
During the three months ended December 31, 2018, gross profit totaled $4,633,053, representing an increase of $161,508 or approximately 4% compared to the same period last year, and resulting in a gross margin of approximately 56% compared to $4,471,545 or a gross margin of approximately 60% during the three months ended December 31, 2017. The increase in gross profit is largely due to higher revenue offset by the higher costs of revenue mentioned above.
 
General and Administrative Expense
 
During the three months ended December 31, 2018, general and administrative expense totaled $3,422,272 compared to $3,657,738 for the three months ended December 31, 2017. The decrease of $235,466 or approximately 6% in general and administrative costs resulted largely from a decrease in stock based compensation of $704,372, and lower bad debt expense of $96,510, partially offset by higher legal and professional fees of $325,367, higher business taxes of $70,819, higher insurance costs of $34,971 and higher fees and licenses, and higher consulting costs.
 
Selling and Marketing Expense
 
During the three months ended December 31, 2018, selling and marketing expense increased to $503,930 compared to $409,737 for the three months ended December 31, 2017. The increase in expense of $94,193, or approximately 23% is principally the result of higher travel and entertainment of $50,710 visiting growing or new customers, higher outside service expense of $18,059 and higher wages and benefits of $15,697 for a marketing employee responding to requests for proposals.
 
Research and Development Expense
 
During the three months ended December 31, 2018, research and development expense totaled $248,865 compared to $163,946 for the three months ended December 31, 2017, an increase of $84,919 or approximately 52%. The increase resulted largely from higher wages and benefits of $82,763. In addition, we are significantly enhancing our technology platform to improve the efficiency of our software, firmware, user interface, and automation. As a result of these improvements, $275,623 was capitalized as developed technology during the three months ended December 31, 2018 and $254,899 was capitalized in the three months ended December 31, 2017. A portion of this expense would have been recognized as research and development expense, absent the significant enhancements to the technology.
 
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
 
During the three months ended December 31, 2018, depreciation and amortization expense totaled $514,981 compared to $564,740 for the three months ended December 31, 2017, a decrease of $49,759 or approximately 9%, which was largely the result of certain property and equipment assets becoming fully depreciated.
 
Total Operating Expense
 
During the three months ended December 31, 2018, total operating expense decreased to $4,690,048 compared to $4,796,161 for the three months ended December 31, 2017, a decrease of $106,113 or approximately 2%. The decrease was largely due to lower general and administrative expense of $235,466 and lower depreciation and amortization of $49,759. These costs were partially offset by higher selling and marketing expense of $94,193, and higher research and development expense of $84,919.
 
Loss from Operations
 
During the three months ended December 31, 2018, loss from operations was $56,995 compared to a loss of $324,616 for the three months ended December 31, 2017, a decrease of $267,621 or approximately 82%. This improvement was due to an improvement in gross profit of $161,508 and a reduction in operating expense of $106,113.
 
 
 
-21-
 
 
Other Income and Expense
 
For the three months ended December 31, 2018, other income (expense) totaled ($1,533,916) compared to ($717,975) for the three months ended December 31, 2017, an increase in net expense of $815,941 or approximately 114%. The increase in other income (expense) is due to negative currency exchange rate movements of $877,595 partially offset by lower interest expense, net of $72,588, largely due to higher interest income in the three-month period ended December 31, 2018.
 
Net Loss Attributable to Common Shareholders
 
The Company had net loss attributable to common shareholders of $1,734,918 for the three months ended December 31, 2018, compared to a net loss attributable to common shareholders of $1,042,591 for the three months ended December 31, 2017, an increase of $692,327 or approximately 66%. This increase in net loss is largely due negative currency exchange rate movements, largely offset by higher gross profit. Other costs, including operating expense and interest expense, net and income taxes, are largely offsetting.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
Historically, we have been unable to finance our business solely from cash flows from operating activities. During and prior to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017, we supplemented cash flows to finance the business from borrowings under a credit facility, a revolving line of credit from one of our shareholders, receipt of certain disgorgement funds, and from the sale and issuance of debt securities. As of December 31, 2018, excluding interest, approximately $3.4 million was owed to Sapinda under a loan agreement (the Sapinda Loan Agreement”) and $30.4 million was owed to Conrent under a loan (the Conrent Loan Agreement”). No borrowings or sales of equity securities occurred during the three months ended December 31, 2018 or during the year ended September 30, 2018.
 
On July 19, 2018, the Company and Conrent entered into an amendment to their Facility Agreement (the “Amended Facility Agreement”), which Amended Facility Agreement (i) extends the maturity date of the Facility to the earlier of either April 1, 2019 or the date upon which the outstanding principal amount is repaid by the Company, and (ii) provides that in the event of a change of control of the Company, Conrent shall immediately cancel the Amended Credit Facility and declare the outstanding principal amount, together with unpaid interest, immediately due and payable. On November 14, 2018, the Company requested that Conrent extend the maturity of the Amended Facility Agreement from April 1, 2019 to April 1, 2020. On December 3, 2018, Conrent agreed to convene meetings of the investors who purchased the securities from Conrent to finance the debt, and subsequently issued a notice of a meeting of Noteholders for each series of Notes, which meetings will be held on January 16, 2019. On January 17, 2019, Conrent notified the Company (via telephone), that the Noteholders agreed to extend the maturity of the Amended Facility Agreement to April 1, 2020, subject to the signing of a written loan amendment. While the Company believes the Noteholders will sign an amendment to extend the maturity of the Amended Facility Agreement, no assurance can be given.
 
Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities.
 
During the three months ended December 31, 2018, we had cash flows from operating activities of $1,138,433, compared to cash flows from operating activities of $328,210 for the three months ended December 31, 2017, representing an increase of 247%. The increase of cash from operations compared to the prior year period was largely the result of an increase in accrued liabilities, a decrease in prepaid and other assets, partially offset by a larger in net loss.
 
Net Cash Flows from Investing Activities.
 
The Company used $551,199 of cash for investing activities during the three months ended December 31, 2018, compared to $594,726 of cash used during the three months ended December 31, 2017. Cash used for investing activities was used for significant enhancements of our software platform and purchases of monitoring and other equipment to meet customer demand during the three months ended December 31, 2018.
 
 
 
-22-
 
 
Net Cash Flows from Financing Activities.
 
The Company used $9,357 of cash for financing activities during the three months ended December 31, 2018, compared to $17,289 of cash used in financing activities during the three months ended December 31, 2017.
 
Liquidity, Working Capital and Management’s Plan
 
As of December 31, 2018, we had unrestricted cash of $5,865,546, compared to unrestricted cash of $5,446,557 as of September 30, 2018. As of December 31, 2018, we had a working capital deficit of $30,897,683, compared to a working capital deficit of $30,316,328 as of September 30, 2018. This increase in working capital deficit of $581,355 is principally due to an increase in accrued interest and a decrease in cash due to additional capitalized software of $275,623, purchases of monitoring equipment of $133,981 and purchases of property and equipment of $141,595, partially offset by cash provided by operations.
 
Although no assurances can be given, in the event that management is able to successfully extend the maturity of the Amended Facility Agreement, we currently believe that our cash on hand in addition to cash derived from our operating activities will be sufficient to sustain operations through the next twelve months, although no assurance can be given. In the event that they are not sufficient, we will need to obtain additional funding from outside sources, which may include through the sale of our securities. No assurances can be given that we will be able to obtain additional funding on terms favorable to us, if at all.
 
On March 13, 2017, the Company successfully extended the Sapinda Loan Agreement from September 30, 2017 to September 30, 2020. On July 17, 2018, the Company successfully extended the Conrent Loan Agreement to the earlier of either April 1, 2019 or the date upon which the outstanding principal amount is repaid by the Company. In addition, management is currently working on extending the maturity of debt owed under the Conrent Loan Agreement to April 2020, which was agreed to by Noteholders at a meeting held on January 16, 2019. See Note 22.
 
Inflation
 
We do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our historical operations or profitability.
 
Off-Balance Sheet Financial Arrangements
 
The Company has not entered into any transactions with unconsolidated entities whereby the Company has financial guarantees, derivative instruments, or other contingent arrangements that expose the Company to material continuing risks, contingent liabilities, or any other obligation that provides financing, liquidity, market risk, or credit risk support to the Company, except as described below.
 
 
 
Payments
due in
fiscal year 2019
 
 
Payments
due in fiscal years 2020-2021
 
 
Payments
due in fiscal years 2022-2023
 
 
Total
 
Operating leases
 $246,857 
 $438,777 
 $170,957 
 $856,591 
 
As of December 31, 2018, the Company’s total future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases were $856,591. The Company’s facility leases typically have original terms not exceeding five years and generally contain multi-year renewal options.
 
 
 
-23-
 
 
Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
 
The Company footprint extends to a few countries outside the United States, and we intend to continue to examine international opportunities. As a result, our revenue and results of operations are affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates, interest rates, transfer pricing changes, taxes and other uncertainties inherent in doing business in more than one currency. In addition, our operations are exposed to risks that are associated with changes in social, political, and economic conditions in the foreign countries in which we operate, including changes in the laws and policies that govern foreign investment, as well as, to a lesser extent, changes in United States laws and regulations relating to foreign trade and investment.
 
Foreign Currency Risks
 
We had $3,149,976 and $2,561,305 in revenue from sources outside of the United States for the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. We made and received payments in a foreign currency during the periods indicated, which resulted in a foreign exchange expense of $932,677 and of $55,072 in the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The increase in the exchange loss was due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the Chilean Peso and Canadian dollar. Changes in currency exchange rates affect the relative prices at which we sell our products and purchase goods and services. Given the uncertainty of exchange rate fluctuations, we cannot estimate the effect of these fluctuations on our future business, product pricing, results of operations, or financial condition. We do not use foreign currency exchange contracts or derivative financial instruments for hedging or speculative purposes. To the extent foreign sales become a more significant part of our business in the future, we may seek to implement strategies which make use of these or other instruments in order to minimize the effects of foreign currency exchange on our business.
 
Item 4.  Controls and Procedures
 
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
We have established disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) to ensure that material information relating to the Company is made known to the officers who certify our financial reports and to other members of senior management and the Board of Directors. These disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that are filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. 
 
Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2018 was completed pursuant to Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) under the Exchange Act. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective and designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms as of December 31, 2018.
 
Changes in Internal Controls
 
We maintain a system of internal control over financial reporting that is designed to provide reasonable assurance that our books and records accurately reflect our transactions and that our established policies and procedures are followed. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our quarter ended December 31, 2018 that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 

 
 
-24-
 
 
PART II.   OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item 1.  Legal Proceedings
 
We are, from time to time, involved in various legal proceedings incidental to the conduct of our business. Historically, the outcome of all such legal proceedings has not, in the aggregate, had a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Other than as set forth below, there are no additional pending or threatened legal proceedings at this time.
 
Legal Matters
 
The Company is, from time to time, involved in various legal proceedings incidental to the conduct of our business. Historically, the outcome of all such legal proceedings has not, in the aggregate, had a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Other than as set forth below, there are no additional pending or threatened legal proceedings at this time.
 
Lazar Leybovich et al. v. SecureAlert, Inc. On March 29, 2012, Lazar Leybovich, Dovie Leybovich and Ben Leybovich filed a complaint in the 11th Circuit Court in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida alleging breach of contract with regard to certain Stock Redemption Agreements. The Plaintiffs are alleging $1,587,604 in combined damages. On May 2, 2016, the Court resolved this case in favor of the Company by granting the Company’s motion for Summary Judgment. The Plaintiffs filed an Appeal on June 1, 2016 challenging the Court’s ruling on the motion for Summary Judgment. The Appellate court ruled in favor of the Plaintiff, finding that factual issue remains, reversing the Summary Judgment and remanding the case back to trial. The Company’s motion for partial Summary Judgment was denied. A five day trial is tentatively scheduled to take place February 19, 2019.
 
Boggs et al. v. Judicial Electronic Monitoring, SecureAlert, Inc. et al. On December 3, 2015, Candace Boggs et al. filed a complaint in the State Court of Dougherty County, Georgia, alleging breach of contract and negligence in monitoring of certain offenders in Dougherty County, Georgia, as well as a request for punitive damages. Plaintiffs withdrew their complaint in February 2016, but refiled the complaint on October 12, 2016. The Company’s motion for Summary Judgment was denied on February 27, 2017 and a Notice of Appeal was filed by the Company’s counsel on April 15, 2017. In May the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court decision and granted the Company’s Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff’s claims. Plaintiff has filed a petition to have the case heard in the Georgia Supreme Court. On June 27, 2018, the Company’s counsel filed a response to the petition, and on January 7, 2019, the Supreme Court of Georgia denied the petition, thereby concluding the case.
 
Track Group, Inc. v. I.C.S. of the Bahamas Co. Ltd. On May 18, 2016, the Company filed a complaint in the District Court of the Third Judicial District in Salt Lake County, Utah alleging breach of contract, under the terms of a loan agreement and promissory note between the Company and I.C.S. of the Bahamas Co. Ltd (“ICS”). The Company’s damages of unpaid principal and interest on the Promissory Note, as of November 16, 2018, were in the amount of $291,313.81, plus interest as it continues to accrue. The Defendant’s initial Counterclaim was dismissed; however, the Court granted the Defendant leave to amend. The Amended Counterclaim was filed on June 23, 2017 alleging $1,628,667 in damages. Depositions have taken place for both parties. In late 2018, both parties filed motions for summary judgment on all the claims and counterclaims, both of which motions are still pending. If Track Group obtains a judgment for amounts owed under the loan agreement and promissory note, it is unknown whether the Company will be able to collect any sums from ICS in the foreign jurisdiction where ICS resides.
 
Track Group Inc. v. I.C.S. of the Bahamas Co. Ltd. On September 26, 2016, the Company filed a Notice of Arbitration with the International Centre for Dispute Resolution, alleging breach of the Commercial and Monitoring Representative Agreement dated November 30, 2010 (the “C&M Agreement”) by and between the Company and ICS. The Company asserted that ICS has failed to pay the Company fees owed to it under the C&M Agreement. On August 22, 2018, the arbitrator issued a ruling awarding the Company $689,613.50. However, on October 15, 2018, the arbitrator issued a “corrected award” in which he reduced the amount of his award to zero. On January 8, 2019, the Company filed a motion in the United States District Court, District of Puerto Rico to vacate the “corrected award” and confirm the original arbitration award of $689,613.50, which motion is still pending. If the Company is successful in confirming the $689,613.50 award, it is unknown whether it will be able to collect any sums from ICS in the foreign jurisdiction where ICS resides.
 
 
 
-25-
 
 
 John Merrill v. Track Group, Inc. and Guy Dubois. On November 30, 2016, the Company was served with a complaint filed by John Merrill, the former Chief Financial Officer of the Company, in District Court of the Third Judicial District in Salt Lake County, Utah alleging breach of contract, among other causes of action, related to Mr. Merrill’s termination of employment. Mr. Merrill is seeking not less than $590,577 plus interest, attorney fees and costs. Mr. Merrill’s employment with the Company was terminated effective September 27, 2016. The Company filed an Answer with Counter Claims on December 21, 2016. The Company filed a motion for Summary Judgment on January 16, 2018. At a hearing on April 25, 2018, the court dismissed the Plaintiff’s claims related to an oral look-back agreement and a separation agreement. The court has not ruled on Plaintiff’s claims related to his employment agreement. A settlement amount could not be reached by the parties. The matter will likely proceed to trial after expert discovery is conducted. We intend to defend the case vigorously and believe the allegations and claims are without merit.
 
SecureAlert, Inc. v. Federal Government of Mexico (Department of the Interior). On March 24, 2017, SecureAlert Inc. filed a complaint before the Federal Administrative Tribunal, asserting the failure by Defendants to pay claimant amounts agreed to, and due under, the Pluri Annual Contract for the Rendering of Monitoring Services of Internees, through Electric Bracelets, in the Islas Marias Penitentiary Complex dated July 15, 2011, entered into by and between the Organo Administrativo Desconcentrado Prevencion y Readaptacion Social of the then Public Security Department, and presently, an agency of the National Security Commission of the Department of the Interior, and SecureAlert, Inc., presently Track Group, Inc. The Company’s claim amount is upwards of $6.0 million. On March 28, 2017, the Federal Administrative Tribunal rejected our claim, based on its determination that this case should be resolved by a Civil Court and not by the Federal Administrative Tribunal. For that reason, on April 25, 2017, the Company filed an appeal before the Collegiate Tribunals against the decision of the Federal Administrative Tribunal. The Tribunal ruled the claims should be resolved in the Civil Court. Following that ruling the Supreme Court took action to resolve the conflicting precedent regarding the jurisdiction of such claims and determined that such claims will be resolved by the Federal Administrative Tribunal.
 
Eli Sabag v. Track Group, Inc., Sapinda Asia Limited and Lars Windhorst. On May 4, 2018, Eli Sabag filed a complaint before the Marion Superior Court in Marion County Indiana for damages and declaratory Judgment against the Company. The complaint seeks to enforce an “earn-out” clause in a Share Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) between the Company and Sabag. Sabag alleges that the Company breached the SPA because it failed to pay him his earn out after it sold and leased a sufficient number of GPS devices to meet the earn-out milestone. In the alternative, Sabag sued the Company for breach of fiduciary duty and tortious interference, alleging that the Company avoided selling sufficient GPS devices so as to not trigger the issuance of Contingent Stock under the SPA. Finally, Sabag alleges that the Company was unjustly enriched because it failed to pay full value for his shares under the SPA. The Company believes the allegations are unfounded and without merit, and it will defend the case vigorously. Furthermore, according to the SPA, any disputes are to be resolved through binding arbitration and enforced in the State of Utah. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the Complaint and Compel Arbitration on September 5, 2018 and we are waiting on a ruling from the court.
 
Erick Cerda v. Track Group, Inc. On July 25, 2018, former employee Erick Cerda, the Plaintiff, filed a complaint against the Company in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Case No. 18-CV-05075, alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief and monetary damages in an unspecific amount. On October 5, 2018, the Company filed its answer and affirmative defenses to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint denying Plaintiff’s allegations in their entirety. The Company believes that Plaintiff’s allegations are unfounded and without merit.
 
 
 
-26-
 
 
Item 1A.  Risk Factors
 
Our results of operations and financial condition are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended September 30, 2018, filed on December 19, 2018. You should carefully consider these risk factors in conjunction with the other information contained in this Quarterly Report. Should any of these risks materialize, our business, financial condition and future prospects could be negatively impacted. As of February 13, 2019, there have been no material changes to the disclosures made in the above-referenced Form 10-K.
 
Item 2.   Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
 
None.
 
Item 3.   Defaults Upon Senior Securities
 
None.
 
Item 4.   Mine Safety Disclosures
 
Not applicable.
 
Item 5.   Other Information
 
None.
 
Item 6.   Exhibits
 
(a)
Exhibits Required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K
  
Exhibit
Number
 
Title of Document
 
 
 
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
 
Certifications under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) (filed herewith).
 
 
 
101.INS
 
XBRL INSTANCE DOCUMENT
101.SCH
 
XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION SCHEMA
101.CAL
 
XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION CALCULATION LINKBASE
101.DEF
 
XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION DEFINITION LINKBASE
101.LAB
 
XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION LABEL LINKBASE
101.PRE
 
XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION PRESENTATION LINKBASE
 
 
 
 
-27-
 
 
SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
Track Group, Inc.
 
 
 
Date: February 14, 2019
By:
/s/ Derek Cassell
 
 
 
Derek Cassell, Chief Executive Officer
Principal Executive Officer
 
 
 
Date: February 14, 2019
By:
/s/ Peter K. Poli
 
 
 
Peter K. Poli, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
-28-