Track Group, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2018 December (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2018
or
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For the transition period from ___________ to
____________
Commission file number: 0-23153
Track Group, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
|
87-0543981
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
|
200 E. 5th Avenue Suite 100, Naperville, IL 60563
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip
Code)
(877) 260-2010
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area
code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
[X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer,
smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the
definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting
company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer [ ]
|
Accelerated
filer [
]
|
Non-accelerated filer [
]
|
Smaller reporting company [X]
|
|
Emerging growth company [ ]
|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the
registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period
for complying with any new or revised financial accounting
standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange
Act. [
]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [
] No [X]
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common
stock as of February 13, 2019 was 11,401,650.
Track Group, Inc.
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 2018
INDEX
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
1
|
||
1
|
||
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
18
|
||
24
|
||
24
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
25
|
||
27
|
||
27
|
||
27
|
||
27
|
||
27
|
||
|
|
|
28
|
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
TRACK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Assets
|
December 31,
2018
(unaudited)
|
September 30,
2018
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
Cash
|
$5,865,546
|
$5,446,557
|
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,218,902
and $3,152,966, respectively
|
6,192,940
|
5,978,896
|
Note
receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $234,733,
respectively
|
-
|
-
|
Prepaid
expense and other
|
1,337,300
|
1,270,043
|
Inventory,
net of reserves of $26,934, respectively
|
154,408
|
277,119
|
Total
current assets
|
13,550,194
|
12,972,615
|
Property
and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $2,034,514 and
$1,999,222, respectively
|
781,704
|
745,475
|
Monitoring
equipment, net of accumulated amortization of $5,693,930 and
$5,325,654, respectively
|
2,968,188
|
3,162,542
|
Intangible
assets, net of accumulated amortization of $12,455,608 and
$12,016,512, respectively
|
22,537,375
|
23,253,054
|
Goodwill
|
7,892,845
|
8,076,759
|
Other
assets
|
124,237
|
145,839
|
Total
assets
|
$47,854,543
|
$48,356,284
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
$2,346,015
|
$2,518,030
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
11,664,052
|
10,333,103
|
Current
portion of long-term debt
|
30,437,810
|
30,437,810
|
Total
current liabilities
|
44,447,877
|
43,288,943
|
Long-term
debt, net of current portion
|
3,416,296
|
3,428,975
|
Total
liabilities
|
47,864,173
|
46,717,918
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 21)
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity (deficit):
|
|
|
Common
stock, $0.0001 par value: 30,000,000 shares authorized;
11,401,650 shares outstanding, respectively
|
1,140
|
1,140
|
Series
A Convertible Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value: 1,200,000 shares
authorized; 0 shares outstanding
|
-
|
-
|
Paid
in capital
|
302,186,084
|
302,102,866
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
(301,323,257)
|
(299,495,370)
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(873,597)
|
(970,270)
|
Total
equity (deficit)
|
(9,630)
|
1,638,366
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)
|
$47,854,543
|
$48,356,284
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated statements.
-1-
TRACK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(Unaudited)
|
Three Months Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
Monitoring
and other related services
|
$8,060,328
|
$7,350,805
|
Product
sales and other
|
151,207
|
139,889
|
Total
revenue
|
8,211,535
|
7,490,694
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue:
|
|
|
Monitoring,
products and other related services
|
3,100,193
|
2,542,007
|
Depreciation
& amortization included in cost of revenue
|
478,289
|
477,142
|
Total
cost of revenue
|
3,578,482
|
3,019,149
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
4,633,053
|
4,471,545
|
|
|
|
Operating expense:
|
|
|
General
& administrative
|
3,422,272
|
3,657,738
|
Selling
& marketing
|
503,930
|
409,737
|
Research
& development
|
248,865
|
163,946
|
Depreciation
& amortization
|
514,981
|
564,740
|
Total
operating expense
|
4,690,048
|
4,796,161
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
(56,995)
|
(324,616)
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
Interest
expense, net
|
(601,239)
|
(673,827)
|
Currency
exchange rate loss
|
(932,677)
|
(55,072)
|
Other
income/expense, net
|
-
|
10,924
|
Total other expense
|
(1,533,916)
|
(717,975)
|
Loss before income taxes
|
(1,590,911)
|
(1,042,591)
|
Income tax expense
|
144,007
|
-
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders
|
(1,734,918)
|
(1,042,591)
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustments
|
96,673
|
188,725
|
Comprehensive loss
|
$(1,638,245)
|
$(853,866)
|
Net
loss per common share, basic and diluted
|
$(0.16)
|
$(0.10)
|
Weighted
average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted
|
11,101,650
|
10,476,346
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated statements.
-2-
TRACK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Unaudited)
|
Three Months
Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$(1,734,918)
|
$(1,042,591)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
993,270
|
1,041,882
|
Bad
debt expense
|
90,400
|
186,910
|
Accretion
of debt discount
|
-
|
55,744
|
Stock
based compensation
|
83,217
|
787,590
|
Loss
on monitoring equipment included in cost of revenue
|
104,079
|
95,817
|
Foreign
currency exchange loss
|
932,677
|
55,072
|
Change
in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
(380,133)
|
(354,633)
|
Inventories
|
-
|
69,836
|
Prepaid
expense and other assets
|
(106,071)
|
(1,009,813)
|
Accounts
payable
|
(153,689)
|
(238,490)
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
1,309,601
|
680,886
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
1,138,433
|
328,210
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from investing activities:
|
|
|
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
(141,595)
|
(28,685)
|
Capitalized
software
|
(275,623)
|
(254,899)
|
Purchase
of monitoring equipment and parts
|
(133,981)
|
(311,142)
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(551,199)
|
(594,726)
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from financing activities:
|
|
|
Principal
payments on long-term debt
|
(9,357)
|
(17,289)
|
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(9,357)
|
(17,289)
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
(158,888)
|
11,921
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
418,989
|
(271,884)
|
Cash, beginning of period
|
5,446,557
|
2,027,321
|
Cash, end of period
|
$5,865,546
|
$1,755,437
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid for interest
|
$8,858
|
$10,708
|
|
|
|
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing
activities:
|
|
|
Non-cash
transfer of inventory to monitoring equipment
|
$128,044
|
$81,893
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated statements.
-3-
TRACK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(1) BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The unaudited interim condensed consolidated
financial information of Track Group, Inc. and subsidiaries
(collectively, the “Company” or “Track Group”) has been prepared in accordance with the
Instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X
promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”). Certain information and disclosures
normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant
to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of management,
the accompanying interim consolidated financial information
contains all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments necessary to present fairly the Company’s
financial position as of December 31, 2018, and results of its
operations for the three months ended December 31, 2018. These
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited
annual consolidated financial statements and notes thereto that are
included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended September 30, 2018, filed with the SEC on December 19,
2018. The results of operations for the three months ended
December 31, 2018 may not be indicative of the results for the
fiscal year ending September 30, 2019.
As
of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company had an accumulated
deficit of $301,323,257 and $295,109,920, respectively. The Company
incurred a net loss of $1,734,918 and $1,042,591 for the three
months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The Company
also has debt maturing in the next 12 months. The Company’s
successful development and transition to attaining profitable
operations is dependent upon achieving a level of revenue adequate
to support its cost structure. Management has evaluated the
significance of these conditions and has determined that the
Company can meet its operating obligations for a reasonable period
of time. The Company expects to fund operations using cash on hand,
through operational cash flows and the extension of its existing
debt agreement. Management of the Company believes that the
availability of financing from these sources is adequate to fund
operations through the upcoming twelve months.
(2) PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Track
Group, Inc. and its active subsidiaries, Track Group Analytics
Limited, Track Group Americas, Inc., Track Group International
LTD., and Track Group - Chile SpA. All significant inter-company
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
(3) RECENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements
are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) or other standard setting bodies, which
are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date.
During the three months ended December 31, 2018, there were no new
accounting pronouncements that had a material impact on the
Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In
May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09 and related amendments
“Revenue from Contracts with
Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASC 606”), which superseded all
prior revenue recognition methods and industry-specific guidance.
The principle of ASC 606 is that an entity should recognize revenue
to depict the transfer of control for promised goods or services to
customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the
entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or
services. On October 1, 2018, we adopted ASC 606 using the
modified retrospective method, whereby the adoption does not impact
any prior periods. See Note 8.
-4-
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09,
“Compensation - Stock
Compensation: Scope of Modification
Accounting”, which
provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of
a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification
accounting. An entity will account for the effects of a
modification unless the fair value of the modified award is the
same as the original award, the vesting conditions of the modified
award are the same as the original award and the classification of
the modified award as an equity instrument or liability instrument
is the same as the original award. The update is effective for
annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The update is to
be adopted prospectively to an award modified on or after the
adoption date. Early adoption is permitted. The Company’s
adoption of ASU 2017-09 did not have an impact on its consolidated
financial position, results of operations, or cash
flows.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15,
“Statement of Cash Flows (Topic
230)” requiring the
classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments to
conform the presentation in the statement of cash flows for certain
transactions, including cash distributions from equity method
investments, among others. The adoption of ASU 2016-15 did not have
an effect on the Company’s consolidated statement of cash
flows.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04,
“Intangibles – Goodwill
and Other: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill
Impairment.” The new
guidance simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill by
removing the second step of the two-step impairment test. The
amendment requires an entity to perform its annual or interim
goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting
unit with its carrying amount. An entity still has the option to
perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to
determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. The new
guidance will be effective for annual periods or any interim
goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2019. The amendment should be applied on a prospective basis.
Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill
impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017.
Management does not anticipate that this adoption will have a
significant impact on its consolidated financial position, results
of operations, or cash flows.
In February 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02,
“Leases (Topic
841).” For lessees, the
amendments in this update require that for all leases not
considered to be short term, a company recognize both a lease
liability and right-of-use asset on its balance sheet, representing
the obligation to make payments and the right to use or control the
use of a specified asset for the lease term. The amendments in this
update are effective for annual periods beginning after December
15, 2018 and interim periods within those annual periods.
Management is currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on
its consolidated financial statements and its operating lease
obligations discussed in Note 21.
(4) IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
The
Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment when events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the book value of an asset
may not be recoverable and in the case of goodwill, at least
annually. The Company evaluates whether events and circumstances
have occurred which indicate possible impairment as of each balance
sheet date. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its fair
value, an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which
the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the
asset. Impairment of long-lived assets is assessed at the
lowest levels for which there is an identifiable fair value that is
independent of other groups of assets.
(5) BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
The
Company accounts for its business acquisitions under the
acquisition method of accounting as indicated in ASC 805, Business
Combinations, which requires the acquiring entity in a business
combination to recognize the fair value of all assets acquired,
liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the
acquiree, and establishes the acquisition date as the fair value
measurement point. Accordingly, the Company recognizes assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations,
including contingent assets and liabilities and non-controlling
interest in the acquiree, based on fair value estimates as of the
date of acquisition. In accordance with ASC 805, the Company
recognizes and measures goodwill as of the acquisition date, as the
excess of the fair value of the consideration paid over the fair
value of the identified net assets acquired.
-5-
Acquired Assets and Assumed Liabilities
Pursuant
to ASC No. 805-10-25, if the initial accounting for a business
combination is incomplete by the end of the reporting period in
which the combination occurs, but during the allowed measurement
period not to exceed one year from the acquisition date, the
Company retrospectively adjusts the provisional amounts recognized
at the acquisition date, by means of adjusting the amount
recognized for goodwill.
Contingent Consideration
In
certain acquisitions, the Company has agreed to pay additional
amounts to sellers contingent upon achievement by the acquired
businesses of certain future goals, which may include revenue
milestones, new customer accounts, and earnings targets. The
Company records contingent consideration based on its estimated
fair value as of the date of the acquisition. The Company evaluates
and adjusts the value of contingent consideration, if necessary, at
each reporting period based on the progress toward and likely
achievement of certain targets on which issuance of the contingent
consideration is based. Any differences between the
acquisition-date fair value and the changes in fair value of the
contingent consideration subsequent to the acquisition date are
recognized in current period earnings until the arrangement is
settled. If there is uncertainty surrounding the value of
contingent consideration, then the Company’s policy is to
wait until the end of the measurement period before making an
adjustment.
(6) ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(LOSS)
Comprehensive
income (loss) includes net income (loss) as currently reported
under GAAP and other comprehensive income (loss). Other
comprehensive income (loss) considers the effects of additional
economic events, such as foreign currency translation adjustments,
that are not required to be recorded in determining net income
(loss), but rather are reported as a separate component of
stockholders’ equity. The Chilean Peso, New Israeli Shekel
and the Canadian Dollar are used as functional currencies of the
following operating subsidiaries: (i) Track Group Chile SpA; (ii)
Track Group International Ltd.; and (iii) Track Group Analytics
Limited, respectively. The balance sheets of all subsidiaries have
been converted into United States Dollars (USD) at the prevailing
exchange rate at December 31, 2018.
(7) NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
Basic net income (loss) per common share
(“Basic EPS”) is computed by dividing net income (loss)
available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during the period.
Diluted net income (loss) per common share
(“Diluted EPS”) is computed by dividing net income (loss)
attributable to common shareholders by the sum of the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding and the
weighted-average dilutive common share equivalents
outstanding. The computation of Diluted EPS does not assume
exercise or conversion of securities that would have an
anti-dilutive effect.
Common
share equivalents consist of shares issuable upon the exercise of
common stock options and warrants. As of December 31, 2018 and
2017, there were 681,926 and 570,467 outstanding common share
equivalents, respectively, that were not included in the
computation of Diluted EPS for the three months ended December 31,
2018 and 2017, respectively, as their effect would be
anti-dilutive. The common stock equivalents outstanding as of
December 31, 2018 and 2017 consisted of the following:
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
Exercisable
common stock options and warrants
|
681,926
|
570,467
|
Total
common stock equivalents
|
681,926
|
570,467
|
At
December 31, 2018 and 2017, all stock option and warrant exercise
prices were above the market price of $0.51 and $1.05,
respectively, and thus have not been included in the basic earnings
per share calculation.
-6-
(8) REVENUE RECOGNITION
In
May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 and related amendments,
which superseded all prior revenue recognition methods and
industry-specific guidance. The principle of ASC 606 is that an
entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of control
for promised goods or services to customers in an amount that
reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be
entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In applying the
revenue principles, an entity is required to identify the
contract(s) with a customer, identify the performance
obligations, determine the transaction price, allocate the
transaction price to the performance obligations and recognize
revenue when the performance obligation is satisfied (i.e., either
over time or at a point in time). ASC 606 further requires that
companies disclose sufficient information to enable users of
financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing and
uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with
customers. On October 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASC 606
using the modified retrospective method, whereby the adoption does
not impact any prior periods.
Monitoring and Other Related
Services. Monitoring services
include two components: (i) lease contracts pursuant to which we
provide monitoring services and lease devices to distributors or
end users and we retain ownership of the leased device; and (ii)
monitoring services purchased by distributors or end users who have
previously purchased monitoring devices and opt to use our
monitoring services. Sales of devices and leased GPS devices
provided by the Company are required to use the Company’s
monitoring service and both the GPS leased devices and monitoring
services are accounted for as a single performance
obligation. The rates for leased devices and monitoring
services are considered to be stated at their individual
stand-alone selling prices. We
recognize revenue on leased devices and monitoring services at the
end of each month the services have been provided and payment terms
are 30 days from invoice date. In those circumstances in which we
receive payment in advance, we record these payments as deferred
revenue.
Product Sales and
Other. The Company sells replacement parts to customers
under certain contracts, as well as law enforcement software
licenses and maintenance, and analytical software. The Company recognizes product sales: (a) the
Company has transferred physical possession of the products, (b)
the Company has a present right to payment, (c) the customer has
legal title to the products, and (d) the customer bears significant
risks and rewards of ownership of the products. We recognize
revenue from other services as the customer receives services and
the Company has the right to payment.
Multiple Element
Arrangements. The majority of
our revenue transactions do not have multiple elements. However, on
occasion, we may enter into revenue transactions that have multiple
elements. These may include different combinations of products
or services that are included in a single billable rate. These
products or services are delivered over time as the customer
utilizes our services. In cases where obligations in a
contract are distinct and thus require separation into multiple
performance obligations, revenue recognition guidance requires that
contract consideration be allocated to each distinct performance
obligation based on its relative standalone selling price. The
value allocated to each performance obligation is then recognized
as revenue when the revenue recognition criteria for each distinct
promise or bundle of promises has been met.
The
standalone selling price for each performance obligation is an
amount that depicts the amount of consideration to which the entity
expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring the good or
service. When there is only one performance obligation associated
with a contract, the entire sale value is attributed to that
obligation. When a contract contains multiple performance
obligations the transaction value is first allocated using the
observable price, which is generally a list price net of applicable
discount or the price used to sell in similar circumstances. In
circumstances when a selling price is not directly observable, we
will estimate the standalone selling price using information
available to us.
Effect of Adopting ASC 606. The Company adopted ASC 606
using the modified retrospective method. Under the modified
retrospective method, the Company recognized the cumulative effect
of initially applying this accounting standard as an adjustment to
the opening balance in retained earnings of $92,969, relating to
one contract for the sale of products and associated use of
software. For this contract, the Company now recognizes revenue for
the product and software over time, rather recording the sale of
products at a point in time and the use of software over time, as
this measure more accurately depicts the transfer of control to the
customer relative to the goods or services promised under the
contract, since the product cannot be used without the
Company’s proprietary software.
-7-
The
cumulative effect of the changes made to the Company's Consolidated
October 1, 2018 Balance Sheet for the adoption of ASC 606 is as
follows:
Balance
Sheet
|
As
Reported at September 30, 2018
|
Adjustments
|
Balance
as of October 1, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
10,333,103
|
92,969
|
10,426,072
|
Total current
liabilities
|
43,288,943
|
92,969
|
43,381,912
|
Total
liabilities
|
46,717,918
|
92,969
|
46,810,887
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
(299,495,370)
|
(92,969)
|
(299,588,339)
|
Total
equity
|
1,638,366
|
(92,969)
|
1,545,397
|
Total liabilities
and stockholders’ equity
|
48,356,284
|
(92,969)
|
48,263,315
|
The
following tables present the Company’s revenue disaggregated
by geography, based on management’s assessment of available
data:
|
Three months ended
December 31, 2018
|
Three months ended
December 31, 2017
|
||
|
Total
Revenue
|
% of
Total
Revenue
|
Total
Revenue
|
% of
Total
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States
|
$5,061,559
|
62%
|
$4,929,390
|
66%
|
Latin
America
|
3,107,553
|
38%
|
2,506,023
|
33%
|
Other
|
42,423
|
0%
|
55,281
|
1%
|
Total
|
$8,211,535
|
100%
|
$7,490,694
|
100%
|
The
above table includes total revenue for the Company, of which
monitoring and other related services is the majority
(approximately 98%) of the Company’s revenue. Other revenue,
including product sales, license renewals and parts, is considered
immaterial to the Company’s overall revenue.
(9) PREPAID EXPENSE AND OTHER
As
of December 31, 2018, and September 30, 2018, the outstanding
balance of prepaid and other expense was $1,337,300 and $1,270,043,
respectively. These balances are comprised largely of a
performance bond deposit, tax deposits, vendor deposits and other
prepaid supplier expense.
(10) INVENTORY
Inventory
is valued at the lower of the cost or net realizable
value. Cost is determined using the standard costing method.
Net realizable value is determined based on the item selling
price. Inventory is periodically reviewed in order to identify
obsolete or damaged items or impaired values. The Company did
not record impairment of inventory during the quarters ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
-8-
Inventory
consists of finished goods that are to be shipped to customers
and parts used for minor repairs of ReliAlert™, Shadow, and
other tracking devices. Completed and shipped ReliAlert™ and
other tracking devices are reflected in Monitoring
Equipment. As of December 31, 2018 and September 30, 2018,
inventory consisted of the following:
|
December 31,
2018
|
September 30,
2018
|
Finished
goods inventory
|
$181,342
|
$304,053
|
Reserve
for damaged or obsolete inventory
|
(26,934)
|
(26,934)
|
Total
inventory, net of reserves
|
$154,408
|
$277,119
|
The Company uses a third-party fulfillment service
provider. As a
result of this service, the Company’s employees do not
actively assemble new product or repair damaged inventory or
monitoring equipment shipped directly from suppliers.
Purchases of monitoring equipment are
recognized directly. Management believes this process reduces
maintenance and fulfillment costs associated with inventory and
monitoring equipment.
(11) PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property
and equipment consisted of the following as of December 31, 2018
and September 30, 2018, respectively:
|
December 31,
2018
|
September 30,
2018
|
Equipment,
software and tooling
|
$1,128,701
|
$1,074,471
|
Automobiles
|
5,834
|
6,153
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
1,376,603
|
1,358,984
|
Furniture
and fixtures
|
305,080
|
305,089
|
Total
property and equipment before accumulated depreciation
|
2,816,218
|
2,744,697
|
Accumulated
depreciation
|
(2,034,514)
|
(1,999,222)
|
Property
and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
|
$781,704
|
$745,475
|
Property
and equipment depreciation expense for the three months ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $79,636 and $114,417,
respectively.
(12) MONITORING EQUIPMENT
The
Company leases monitoring equipment to agencies for offender
tracking under contractual service agreements. The monitoring
equipment is depreciated using the straight-line method over an
estimated useful life of between one and five years. Monitoring
equipment as of December 31, 2018 and September 30, 2018 was as
follows:
|
December 31,
2018
|
September 30,
2018
|
Monitoring
equipment
|
$8,662,118
|
$8,488,196
|
Less:
accumulated amortization
|
(5,693,930)
|
(5,325,654)
|
Monitoring
equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
|
$2,968,188
|
$3,162,542
|
Depreciation
of monitoring equipment for the three months ended December 31,
2018 and 2017 was $354,626 and $353,027, respectively. Depreciation
expense for monitoring devices is recognized in cost of revenue.
During the three months ended December 31, 2018 and December 31,
2017, the Company recorded charges of $104,079 and $95,817,
respectively, for devices that were lost, stolen, damaged or
otherwise impaired. Lost, stolen and damaged items are included in
Monitoring, products & other related services in the Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Operations.
-9-
(13) INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The
following table summarizes intangible assets at December 31, 2018
and September 30, 2018, respectively:
|
December 31,
2018
|
September 30,
2018
|
Other
intangible assets:
|
|
|
Patent
& royalty agreements
|
$21,170,565
|
$21,170,565
|
Developed
technology
|
11,566,373
|
11,835,293
|
Customer
relationships
|
1,860,000
|
1,860,000
|
Trade
name
|
317,844
|
325,507
|
Website
|
78,201
|
78,201
|
Total
intangible assets
|
34,992,983
|
35,269,566
|
Accumulated
amortization
|
(12,455,608)
|
(12,016,512)
|
Intangible
assets, net
|
$22,537,375
|
$23,253,054
|
The
intangible assets summarized above were purchased or developed on
various dates from January 2010 through December 31, 2018. The
assets have useful lives ranging from three to twenty years.
Amortization expense for the three months ended December 31, 2018
and 2017 was $559,008 and $574,438, respectively.
(14) GOODWILL
The
following table summarizes the activity of goodwill at December 31,
2018 and September 30, 2018, respectively:
|
December 31,
|
September 30,
|
|
2018
|
2018
|
Balance
- beginning of
period
|
$8,076,759
|
$8,226,714
|
Effect
of foreign currency translation on goodwill
|
(183,914)
|
(149,955)
|
Balance
- end of period
|
$7,892,845
|
$8,076,759
|
Goodwill
is recognized in connection with acquisition transactions in
accordance with ASC 805. The Company performs an impairment test
for goodwill annually or more frequently if indicators of potential
impairment exist. No impairment of goodwill was recognized through
December 31, 2018.
-10-
(15) ACCRUED LIABILITES
Accrued
liabilities consisted of the following as of December 31, 2018 and
September 30, 2018, respectively:
|
December 31,
2018
|
September 30,
2018
|
Accrued
payroll, taxes and employee benefits
|
$2,206,196
|
$1,937,021
|
Deferred
revenue
|
234,012
|
150,604
|
Deposits
payable
|
54,504
|
54,504
|
Accrued
taxes - foreign and domestic
|
363,397
|
351,469
|
Accrued
other expense
|
309,962
|
298,268
|
Accrued
legal costs
|
607,376
|
473,777
|
Accrued
costs of revenue
|
460,784
|
230,514
|
Accrued
bond guarantee
|
149,059
|
157,199
|
Accrued
interest
|
7,278,762
|
6,679,747
|
Total
accrued liabilities
|
$11,664,052
|
$10,333,103
|
(16) DEBT OBLIGATIONS
Debt
obligations as of December 31, 2018 and September 30, 2018,
respectively, are comprised of the following:
|
December 31,
2018
|
September 30,
2018
|
|
|
|
Unsecured
facility agreement with Conrent S.A. whereby, as of June 30, 2015,
the Company had borrowed $30.4 million, bearing interest at a rate
of 8% per annum, payable in arrears semi-annually, with all
principal and accrued and unpaid interest due on April 1, 2019. The
Company did not pay interest on this loan during the three months
ended December 31, 2018.
|
$30,400,000
|
$30,400,000
|
|
|
|
Loan
Agreement whereby the Company can borrow up to $5.0 million at 8%
interest per annum on borrowed funds maturing on September 30,
2020.
|
3,399,644
|
3,399,644
|
|
|
|
Non-interest
bearing notes payable to a Canadian governmental agency assumed in
conjunction with the G2 acquisition.
|
54,462
|
67,141
|
|
|
|
Total
debt obligations
|
33,854,106
|
33,866,785
|
Less
current portion
|
(30,437,810)
|
(30,437,810)
|
Long-term
debt, net of current portion
|
$3,416,296
|
$3,428,975
|
The
following table summarizes future maturities of debt obligations as
of December 31, 2018:
Twelve-month period ended December 31,
|
Total
|
|
|
2019
|
$30,437,810
|
2020
|
3,416,296
|
Thereafter
|
-
|
Total
|
$33,854,106
|
-11-
(17) RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Related-Party Loan Agreement
On September 25, 2015, the Company entered into
the Sapinda Loan Agreement with Sapinda, a related party at that
time, to provide the Company with a $5.0 million line of credit
that accrued interest at a rate of 3% per annum for undrawn funds,
and 8% per annum for borrowed funds. Pursuant to the terms and
conditions of the Sapinda Loan Agreement, available funds could be
drawn down at the Company’s request at any time prior to the
maturity date of September 30, 2017 (the “Maturity
Date”), when all borrowed
funds, plus all accrued but unpaid interest would have become due
and payable. The Company, however, was entitled to elect to satisfy
any outstanding obligations under the Sapinda Loan Agreement prior
to the Maturity Date without penalties or fees.
On March 13, 2017, the
Company and Sapinda entered into Amendment Number One to
the Sapinda Loan Agreement.
Amendment Number One extended the maturity date of all loans made
pursuant to the Sapinda Loan Agreement
to September 30, 2020. In addition, Amendment Number One eliminated
the requirement that the Company pay Sapinda the 3% interest, and forgave
the 3% interest due to Sapinda for all undrawn funds under
the Sapinda Loan Agreement
through the Execution Date. Further, Amendment Number One provided
that all Lender Penalties accrued under the Sapinda Loan Agreement
through the Execution Date were forgiven. Per Amendment Number One,
Lender Penalties began to accrue again because Sapinda failed to
fund the amount of $1.5 million on or before March 31, 2017. The
Company formally notified Sapinda of the breach by letter dated
April 4, 2017. The Company is again accruing Lender Penalties,
amounting to $640,000 at December 31, 2018, under Section 6.3 of
the Sapinda Loan Agreement,
as amended, and the Company intends to offset Lender Penalties
against future payments due. We did not draw on this line of credit, nor
did we pay any interest during the three months ended December 31,
2018. The undrawn balance of this line of credit at December 31,
2018 was $1,600,356. Further advances under
the Sapinda Loan Agreement
are not currently expected to be forthcoming, and therefore no
assurances can be given that the Company will obtain additional
funds to which it is entitled under the Sapinda Loan Agreement,
or that the penalties accruing will ever be
paid.
Additional Related-Party Transactions and Summary of All
Related-Party Obligations
|
December 31,
2018
|
September 30,
2018
|
|
|
|
Related
party loan with an interest rate of 8% per annum for borrowed
funds. Principal and interest due September 30, 2020.
|
$3,399,644
|
$3,399,644
|
Total
related-party debt obligations
|
$3,399,644
|
$3,399,644
|
Each
of the foregoing related-party transactions was reviewed and
approved by disinterested and independent members of the
Company’s Board of Directors.
(18) PREFERRED AND COMMON STOCK
The
Company is authorized to issue up to 30,000,000 shares of common
stock, $0.0001 par value per share.
The
Company is authorized to issue up to 20,000,000 shares of preferred
stock, $0.0001 par value per share. The Company’s Board of
Directors has the authority to amend the Company’s
Certificate of Incorporation, without further shareholder approval,
to designate and determine, in whole or in part, the preferences,
limitations and relative rights of the preferred stock before any
issuance of the preferred stock, and to create one or more series
of preferred stock. As of December 31, 2018, there were no shares
of preferred stock outstanding.
Series A Preferred Stock
On October 12, 2017,
the Company filed a Certificate of Designation of the Relative
Rights and Preferences (“Certificate
of Designation”) with the
Delaware Division of Corporations, designating 1,200,000 shares of
the Company’s preferred stock as Series A Preferred. Shares
of Series A Preferred rank senior to the Company’s common
stock, and all other classes and series of equity securities of the
Company that by their terms do not rank senior to the Series A
Preferred.
-12-
Except with respect to
transactions upon which holders of the Series A Preferred are
entitled to vote separately as a class under the terms of the
Certificate of Designation, the Series A Preferred has no voting
rights. The shares of
common stock into which the Series A Preferred is convertible
shall, upon issuance, have all of the same voting rights as other
issued and outstanding shares of our common
stock.
The
Series A Preferred has no separate dividend rights; however,
whenever the Board declares a dividend on the Company’s
Common Stock, if ever, each holder of record of a share of Series A
Preferred shall be entitled to receive an amount equal to such
dividend declared on one share of common stock multiplied by the
number of shares of common stock into which such share of Series A
Preferred could be converted on the Record Date.
Each share of Series A Preferred has a Liquidation Preference of
$35.00 per share, and is convertible, at the holder’s option,
into ten shares of the Company’s Common Stock, subject to
adjustments as set forth in the Certificate of Designation, at any
time beginning five hundred and forty days after the date of
issuance.
As of December 31, 2018, no shares of Series A Preferred were
issued and outstanding.
(19)
STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS
Stock Incentive Plan
At the annual meeting
of shareholders on March 21, 2011, our shareholders approved the
2012 Equity Compensation Plan (the “2012
Plan”). The 2012
Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options and
nonqualified stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation
rights, performance shares, performance stock units, dividend
equivalents, stock payments, deferred stock, restricted stock
units, other stock-based awards and performance-based awards to
employees and certain non-employees who provide services to the
Company in lieu of cash. A total of 90,000 shares were initially
authorized for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the 2012
Plan. At the 2015 annual meeting of shareholders held on May 19,
2015, our stockholders approved a 713,262 share increase to the
total number of shares authorized under the 2012
Plan. Warrants for Board
members vest immediately and warrants issued to employees vest
annually over either a two or three-year period after the grant
date.
As
of December 31, 2018, the Board of Directors suspended further
awards under the 2012 Plan until further notice. The Company
recorded expense of $65,312 and $149,088 for the three months ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, related to the vesting of
Common Stock. There were 27,218 shares of common stock available
for issuance under the 2012 Plan.
All Options and Warrants
On
November 30, 2017, the Board of Directors unanimously approved the
adjustment of the exercise price of 605,678 unexercised warrants
issued under the 2012 Plan, with original exercise prices ranging
from $1.81 to $19.46, to $1.24, resulting in incremental
stock-based compensation of $149,088, which was expensed in the
three-month period ending December 31, 2017.
The
fair value of each stock option and warrant grant is estimated on
the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
During the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the
Company granted 0 and 30,797 options and warrants to purchase
shares of common stock under the 2012 Plan. The warrants for Board
members vest immediately and expire five years from grant date and
warrants or options issued to employees vest annually over either a
two to three-year period and expire five years after the final
vesting date of the grant. The Company recorded expense of
$17,905 and $638,502 for the three months ended December 31,
2018 and 2017, respectively, related to the issuance and vesting of
outstanding stock options and warrants.
-13-
The
option and warrant grants for three months ended December 31, 2018
and 2017 were valued using the Black-Scholes model with the
following weighted-average assumptions:
|
Three Months Ended
December 31
|
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
Expected
stock price volatility
|
N/A
|
120%
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
N/A
|
1.92%
|
Expected
life of options/warrants
|
5
Years
|
5
Years
|
The
expected life of stock options (warrants) represents the period of
time that the stock options or warrants are expected to be
outstanding based on the simplified method allowed under GAAP. The
expected volatility is based on the historical price volatility of
the Company’s common stock. The risk-free interest rate
represents the U.S. Treasury bill rate for the expected life of the
related stock options (warrants). The dividend yield represents the
Company’s anticipated cash dividends over the expected life
of the stock options (warrants).
A
summary of stock option (warrant) activity for the three months
ended December 31, 2018 is presented below:
|
|
Shares Under Option
|
|
|
Weighted Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
|
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic
Value
|
|
||||
Outstanding as of September 30, 2018
|
|
|
685,259
|
|
|
$
|
1.56
|
|
|
3.90 years
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired/Cancelled
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2018
|
|
|
685,259
|
|
|
$
|
1.56
|
|
|
|
3.65
years
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Exercisable as of December 31, 2018
|
|
|
681,926
|
|
|
$
|
1.57
|
|
|
|
3.65
years
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
The
intrinsic value of options and warrants outstanding and exercisable
is based on the Company’s share price of $0.51 at December
31, 2018.
(20) INCOME TAXES
The
Company recognizes deferred income tax assets or liabilities for
the expected future tax consequences of events that have been
recognized in the financial statements or income tax returns.
Deferred income tax assets or liabilities are determined based upon
the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of
assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates expected to apply
when the differences are expected to be settled or
realized. Deferred income tax assets are reviewed periodically
for recoverability and valuation allowances are provided as
necessary. Interest and penalties related to income tax
liabilities, when incurred, are classified in interest expense and
income tax provision, respectively.
For
the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company
incurred a net loss for income tax purposes of $1,734,918 and
$1,042,591, respectively. The amount and ultimate realization
of the benefits from the net operating losses is dependent, in
part, upon the tax laws in effect, our future earnings, and other
future events, the effects of which cannot be determined. The
Company has established a valuation allowance for all deferred
income tax assets not offset by deferred income tax liabilities due
to the uncertainty of their realization. Accordingly, there is
no benefit for income taxes in the accompanying statements of
operations.
In
computing income tax, we recognize an income tax provision in tax
jurisdictions in which we have pre-tax income for the period and
are expecting to generate pre-tax book income during the fiscal
year.
-14-
(21) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Legal Matters
The Company is, from time to time, involved in various legal
proceedings incidental to the conduct of our business.
Historically, the outcome of all such legal proceedings has not, in
the aggregate, had a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Other than
as set forth below, there are no additional pending or threatened
legal proceedings at this time.
Lazar
Leybovich et al. v. SecureAlert, Inc. On March 29, 2012, Lazar Leybovich, Dovie
Leybovich and Ben Leybovich filed a complaint in the 11th Circuit
Court in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida alleging breach of
contract with regard to certain Stock Redemption Agreements. The
Plaintiffs are alleging $1,587,604 in combined damages. On May 2,
2016, the Court resolved this case in favor of the Company by
granting the Company’s motion for Summary Judgment. The
Plaintiffs filed an Appeal on June 1, 2016 challenging the
Court’s ruling on the motion for Summary Judgment. The
Appellate court ruled in favor of the Plaintiff, finding that
factual issue remains, reversing the Summary Judgment and remanding
the case back to trial. The Company’s motion for partial
Summary Judgment was denied. A five day trial is tentatively
scheduled to take place February 19, 2019.
Boggs
et al. v. Judicial Electronic Monitoring, SecureAlert, Inc. et
al. On December 3, 2015, Candace Boggs et al. filed a
complaint in the State Court of Dougherty County, Georgia, alleging
breach of contract and negligence in monitoring of certain
offenders in Dougherty County, Georgia, as well as a request for
punitive damages. Plaintiffs withdrew their complaint in February
2016, but refiled the complaint on October 12, 2016. The
Company’s motion for Summary Judgment was denied on February
27, 2017 and a Notice of Appeal was filed by the Company’s
counsel on April 15, 2017. In May the Court of Appeals reversed the
trial court decision and granted the Company’s Motion to
Dismiss the Plaintiff’s claims. Plaintiff has filed a
petition to have the case heard in the Georgia Supreme Court. On
June 27, 2018, the Company’s Counsel filed a response to the
petition, and on January 7, 2019, the Supreme Court of Georgia
denied the petition, thereby concluding the
case.
Track Group, Inc.
v. I.C.S. of the Bahamas Co. Ltd. On May 18, 2016, the
Company filed a complaint in the District Court of the Third
Judicial District in Salt Lake County, Utah alleging breach of
contract, under the terms of a loan agreement and promissory note
between the Company and I.C.S. of the Bahamas Co. Ltd
(“ICS”). The
Company’s damages of unpaid principal and interest on the
Promissory Note, as of November 16, 2018, were in the amount of
$291,313.81, plus interest as it continues to accrue. The
Defendant’s initial Counterclaim was dismissed; however, the
Court granted the Defendant leave to amend. The Amended
Counterclaim was filed on June 23, 2017 alleging $1,628,667 in
damages. Depositions have taken place for both parties. In late
2018, both parties filed motions for summary judgment on all the
claims and counterclaims, both of which motions are still pending.
If Track Group obtains a judgment for amounts owed under the loan
agreement and promissory note, it is unknown whether the Company
will be able to collect any sums from ICS in the foreign
jurisdiction where ICS resides.
Track Group Inc.
v. I.C.S. of the Bahamas Co. Ltd. On September 26, 2016,
the Company filed a Notice of Arbitration with the International
Centre for Dispute Resolution, alleging breach of the Commercial
and Monitoring Representative Agreement dated November 30, 2010
(the “C&M
Agreement”) by and between the Company and ICS. The
Company asserted that ICS has failed to pay the Company fees owed
to it under the C&M Agreement. On August 22, 2018, the
arbitrator issued a ruling awarding the Company $689,613.50.
However, on October 15, 2018, the arbitrator issued a
“corrected award” in which he reduced the amount of his
award to zero. On January 8, 2019, the Company filed a motion
in the United States District Court, District of Puerto Rico to
vacate the “corrected award” and confirm the original
arbitration award of $689,613.50, which motion is still
pending. If the Company is successful in confirming the
$689,613.50 award, it is unknown whether it will be able to collect
any sums from ICS in the foreign jurisdiction where ICS
resides.
-15-
John
Merrill v. Track Group, Inc. and Guy Dubois. On November 30, 2016, the Company was served with
a complaint
filed by John Merrill, the former Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, in District Court of the Third Judicial District in Salt
Lake County, Utah alleging breach of contract, among other causes
of action, related to Mr. Merrill’s termination of
employment. Mr. Merrill is seeking not less than $590,577 plus
interest, attorney fees and costs. Mr. Merrill’s employment
with the Company was terminated effective September 27, 2016. The
Company filed an Answer with Counter Claims on December 21, 2016.
The Company filed a motion for Summary Judgment on January 16,
2018. At a hearing on April 25, 2018, the court dismissed the
Plaintiff’s claims related to an oral look-back agreement and
a separation agreement. The court has not ruled on
Plaintiff’s claims related to his employment agreement. A
settlement amount could not be reached by the parties. The matter
will likely proceed to trial after expert discovery is conducted.
We intend to defend the case vigorously and believe the allegations
and claims are without merit.
SecureAlert,
Inc. v. Federal Government of Mexico (Department of the
Interior). On March 24, 2017, SecureAlert Inc. filed a
complaint before the Federal Administrative Tribunal, asserting the
failure by Defendants to pay claimant amounts agreed to, and due
under, the Pluri Annual Contract for the Rendering of Monitoring
Services of Internees, through Electric Bracelets, in the Islas
Marias Penitentiary Complex dated July 15, 2011, entered into by
and between the Organo Administrativo Desconcentrado Prevencion y
Readaptacion Social of the then Public Security Department, and
presently, an agency of the National Security Commission of the
Department of the Interior, and SecureAlert, Inc., presently Track
Group, Inc. The Company’s claim amount is upwards of $6.0
million. On March 28, 2017, the Federal Administrative Tribunal
rejected our claim, based on its determination that this case
should be resolved by a Civil Court and not by the Federal
Administrative Tribunal. For that reason, on April 25, 2017, the
Company filed an appeal before the Collegiate Tribunals against the
decision of the Federal Administrative Tribunal. The Tribunal ruled
the claims should be resolved in the Civil Court. Following that
ruling the Supreme Court took action to resolve the conflicting
precedent regarding the jurisdiction of such claims and determined
that such claims will be resolved by the Federal Administrative
Tribunal.
Eli Sabag v. Track
Group, Inc., Sapinda Asia Limited and Lars
Windhorst. On May 4, 2018, Eli Sabag filed a
complaint before the Marion Superior Court in Marion County Indiana
for damages and declaratory Judgment against the Company. The
complaint seeks to enforce an “earn-out” clause in a
Share Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) between the Company and
Sabag. Sabag alleges that the Company breached the SPA because
it failed to pay him his earn out after it sold and leased a
sufficient number of GPS devices to meet the earn-out
milestone. In the alternative, Sabag sued the Company for
breach of fiduciary duty and tortious interference, alleging that
the Company avoided selling sufficient GPS devices so as to not
trigger the issuance of Contingent Stock under the SPA. Finally,
Sabag alleges that the Company was unjustly enriched because it
failed to pay full value for his shares under the SPA. The
Company believes the allegations are unfounded and without merit,
and it will defend the case vigorously. Furthermore, according
to the SPA, any disputes are to be resolved through binding
arbitration and enforced in the State of Utah. The Company
filed a motion to dismiss the Complaint and Compel Arbitration on
September 5, 2018 and we are waiting on a ruling from the
court.
Erick Cerda v.
Track Group, Inc. On July 25, 2018, former employee Erick
Cerda, the Plaintiff, filed a complaint against the Company in the
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois,
Case No. 18-CV-05075, alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in Employment
Act. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief and monetary damages in
an unspecific amount. On October 5, 2018, the Company filed
its answer and affirmative defenses to Plaintiff’s First
Amended Complaint denying Plaintiff’s allegations in their
entirety. The Company believes that Plaintiff’s
allegations are unfounded and without merit.
-16-
Operating Lease Obligations
The
following table summarizes our contractual lease obligations as of
December 31, 2018:
Fiscal Year
|
Total
|
|
|
2019
(nine months)
|
$246,857
|
2020
|
255,646
|
2021
|
183,131
|
2022
|
167,345
|
2023
|
3,612
|
Thereafter
|
-
|
Total
|
$856,591
|
The total operating lease obligations of $856,591
is largely related to facilities operating leases. During the three
months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company paid $111,973 and $107,974, in lease
payment obligations, respectively.
(22) SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On
November 14, 2018, the Company requested that Conrent extend the
maturity of the Amended Facility Agreement from April 1, 2019 to
April 1, 2020. On December 3, 2018, Conrent agreed to convene
meetings of the investors who purchased the securities from Conrent
to finance the debt (the “Noteholders”) and subsequently
issued a notice of a meeting of Noteholders for each series of
Notes, which meetings were held on January 16, 2019. On January 17,
2019, Conrent notified the Company
(via telephone), that the Noteholders agreed to extend the maturity
of the Amended Facility Agreement to April 1, 2020, subject to the
signing of a written loan amendment. While the Company believes the
Noteholders will sign an amendment to extend the maturity of the
Amended Facility Agreement, no assurance can be
given.
In
accordance with the Subsequent Events Topic of the FASB ASC 855, we
have evaluated subsequent events, through the filing date and noted
that, other than as disclosed above, no additional subsequent
events have occurred that are reasonably likely to impact the
financial statements.
-17-
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
This Report contains information that constitutes
“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Section 21E of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange Act”). Generally, the statements
contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not purely
historical can be considered to be “forward-looking
statements.” These statements represent our
expectations, hopes, beliefs, anticipations, commitments,
intentions, and strategies regarding the future. They may be
identified by the use of words or phrases such as
“believes,” “expects,”
“intends,” “anticipates,”
“should,” “plans,” “estimates,”
“projects,” “potential,” and
“will,” among others. Forward-looking statements
include, but are not limited to, statements contained in
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations regarding our financial performance,
revenue, and expense levels in the future and the sufficiency of
our existing assets to fund future operations and capital spending
needs. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise
any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise. In addition,
forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially
from our historical experience and our present expectations or
projections. These risks and uncertainties include, but are
not limited to, those described in “Risk Factors” in
our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, and those described
from time to time in our reports filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
The following discussion and analysis of our
financial condition and results of operations should be read in
conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto that are contained in this Report, as
well as Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form
10-K, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018, and Current
Reports on Form 8-K that have been filed with the SEC through the
date of this Report. Except as otherwise indicated, as used in this
Report, the terms “the Company,” “Track Group,” “we,” “our,” “us,” refer to Track Group, Inc., a Delaware
corporation.
General
Our core business is based on the leasing of patented tracking and
monitoring solutions to federal, state and local law enforcement
agencies, both in the U.S and abroad, for the electronic monitoring
of offenders and offering unique data analytics services on a
platform-as-a-service (PaaS) business model. Currently, we
deploy offender based management services that combine patented GPS
tracking technologies, fulltime 24/7/365 global monitoring
capabilities, case management, and proprietary data analytics. We
offer customizable tracking solutions that leverage real-time
tracking data, best practices monitoring, and analytics
capabilities to create complete, end-to-end tracking
solutions.
Our devices consist principally of the
ReliAlertTM
product line, which is supplemented by
the Shadow product line. These devices are generally leased on
a daily rate basis and may be combined with our monitoring center
services, proprietary software and data analytics subscription to
provide an end-to-end PaaS.
ReliAlertTM and
Shadow. Our tracking
devices utilize patented technology and are securely attached
around an offender’s ankle with a tamper resistant strap that
cannot be adjusted or removed without detection, unless by a
supervising officer, and which are activated through services
provided by our monitoring centers. The
ReliAlertTM
and Shadow units are intelligent
devices with integrated computer circuitry, utilizing both GPS and
RF, and constructed from case-hardened plastics designed to
promptly notify the intervention centers of any attempt made to
breach applicable protocols, or to remove or otherwise tamper with
the device or optical strap housing. The
ReliAlertTM
platform also incorporates voice
communication technology that provides officers with 24/7/365 voice
communication with the offenders. Both devices are FCC, CE and
PTCRB certified and protected by numerous patents and
trademarks.
-18-
Monitoring Center
Services. Our
monitoring center facilities provide live 24/7/365 monitoring of
all alarms generated from our devices, as well as customer and
technical support. Our monitoring center operators play a vital
role, and as such, we staff our centers with highly-trained,
bi-lingual individuals. These operators act as an extension of
agency resources receiving alarms, communicating and intervening
with offenders regarding violations, and interacting with
supervision staff, all pursuant to agency-established
protocols. The facilities have redundant power source, battery
back-up and triple redundancy in voice, data, and IP. The Company
has established monitoring centers in the U.S. and Chile. In
addition, the Company has assisted in the establishment of
monitoring centers for customers and local partners in other global
locations
Data Analytics
Services. Our
TrackerPALTM
software,
TrackerPALTM
Mobile, combined with our Data
Analytic analysis tools, provide an integrated platform allowing
case managers and law enforcement officers quick access views of an
offender’s travel behavior, mapping, and inference on
patterns. Our advanced data analytics service offers a highly
complex predictive reporting mechanism that combines modern
statistical methods, developed using computer science and used by
intelligence agencies that separate noteworthy events from normal
events, rank offender cases according to their need for
supervision, and relate decision-relevant metrics to benchmarks in
real-time.
Business Strategy
We are committed to helping our customers improve
offender rehabilitation and re-socialization outcomes through our
innovative hardware, software, and services. We treat our
business as a service business. Although we still manufacture
patented tracking technology, we see the physical goods as only a
small part of the integrated offender monitoring solutions we
provide. Accordingly, rather than receiving a payment just for a
piece of manufactured equipment, the Company receives a recurring
stream of revenue for ongoing device agnostic subscription
contracts. As part of our strategy, we continue to expand our
device-agnostic platform to not
only collect, but also store, analyze, assess and correlate
location data for both accountability and auditing reasons, as well
as to use for predictive analytics and assessment of effective and
emerging techniques in criminal behavior and rehabilitation.
We believe a high-quality customer
experience with knowledgeable salespersons who can convey the value
of our products and services greatly enhances our ability to
attract and retain customers. Therefore, our strategy also includes
building and expanding our own direct sales force and our
third-party distribution network to effectively reach more
customers and provide them with a world-class sales and post-sales
support experience. In addition, we are developing related-service
offerings to address adjacent market opportunities in both the
public and private sectors. We believe continual investment in
research and development (“R&D”), including smartphone applications and
other monitoring services is critical to the development and sale
of innovative technologies and integrated solutions today and in
the future.
Critical Accounting Policies
From
time to time, management reviews and evaluates certain accounting
policies that are considered to be significant in determining our
results of operations and financial position.
A description of the
Company’s critical accounting policies that affect the
preparation of the Company’s financial statements is set
forth in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended September 30, 2018,
filed with the SEC on December 19, 2018. During the three months
ended December 31, 2018 there have been no material changes to the
Company’s critical accounting policies other than the
adoption of ASU 2014-09 as described in Note 8.
The
preparation of financial statements requires management to make
significant estimates and judgments that affect the reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expense. By their
nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of
uncertainty. We assess the reasonableness of our estimates,
including those related to bad debts, inventories, estimated useful
lives, intangible assets, warranty obligations, product liability,
revenue, legal matters and income taxes. We base our estimates on
historical experience as well as available current information on a
regular basis. Management uses this information to form the
basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and
liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates
under different assumptions or conditions.
-19-
Government Regulation
Our
operations are subject to various federal, state, local and
international laws and regulations.
In October 2018, through an internal review of our
export compliance, it came to our attention that some of our
products may not have been properly classified in the past, and
that our export of certain products, software and technology may be
subject to export licensing requirements of which we were not
previously aware. As a result of these findings, we have hired
independent counsel to assist in, among other things, an
investigation with respect to our past export practices and
analyzing our classification of products, software and technology.
In addition, on October 16, 2018, we voluntarily self-disclosed the
information above to the Bureau of Industry and Security
(“BIS”), and we have taken steps to obtain
licenses for the export of certain of our products, software and
technology to certain countries. Should the BIS determine that we
did violate applicable export regulations, the BIS may, in its
discretion, impose certain fines on us for such violations, which
may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations. It is currently unknown
whether we may face any penalties.
On
February 7, 2019, the Company received authorization from BIS for
its customers, contractors and subsidiaries in Chile, Mexico,
Bahamas, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Vietnam and for its Swedish and
Mexican foreign national employees to continue using electronic
monitoring devices and the associated software and
technology.
Other
than our potential violations of licensing requirements related to
our exports, as disclosed above, we are not involved in any pending
or, to our knowledge, threatened governmental proceedings, which
would require curtailment of our operations because of such laws
and regulations.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended December 31, 2018 Compared to Three Months Ended
December 31, 2017
Revenue
For
the three months ended December 31, 2018, the Company recognized
revenue from operations of $8,211,535 compared to $7,490,694 for
the three months ended December 31, 2017, an increase of $720,841
or approximately 10%. The increase in revenue was principally
the result of an increase in total growth of our North
American monitoring operations driven by clients in Puerto Rico,
Mexico, Bahamas, and Michigan.
Other
revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2018 increased to
$151,207 from $139,889 in the same period in 2017 largely due to
higher sales of consumable items. We will continue to focus on
recurring subscription based opportunities as opposed to equipment
sales.
Cost of Revenue
During the three months ended December 31, 2018,
cost of revenue totaled $3,578,482 compared to cost of revenue
during the three months ended December 31, 2017 of $3,019,149, an
increase of $559,333 or approximately 19%. The increase in cost of
revenue was largely the result
of higher device repair costs of $315,049, incurred to distribute
additional devices to meet demand of growing clients, which revenue
should be fully recognized in the second fiscal quarter of 2019,
and higher monitoring costs of $59,007.
Depreciation and amortization included in cost of
revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017
totaled $478,289 and $477,142, respectively. These costs represent
the depreciation of ReliAlert™ and other monitoring
devices, as well as the amortization of monitoring software and
certain royalty agreements. We believe the equipment lives on which the
depreciation is based are appropriate due to rapid changes in
electronic monitoring technology and the corresponding potential
for obsolescence. Management periodically assesses the useful
life of the devices for appropriateness. Amortization of a patent
related to GPS and satellite tracking is also included in cost of
sales.
-20-
Gross Profit and Margin
During the three months ended December 31, 2018,
gross profit totaled $4,633,053, representing an increase of
$161,508 or approximately 4% compared to the same period last year,
and resulting in a gross margin of approximately 56% compared to
$4,471,545 or a gross margin of approximately 60% during the three
months ended December 31, 2017. The increase in gross profit
is largely
due to higher revenue offset by the higher costs of revenue
mentioned above.
General and Administrative Expense
During
the three months ended December 31, 2018, general and
administrative expense totaled $3,422,272 compared to $3,657,738
for the three months ended December 31, 2017. The decrease of
$235,466 or approximately 6% in general and administrative costs
resulted largely from a decrease in stock based compensation of
$704,372, and lower bad debt expense of $96,510, partially offset
by higher legal and professional fees of $325,367, higher business
taxes of $70,819, higher insurance costs of $34,971 and higher fees
and licenses, and higher consulting costs.
Selling and Marketing Expense
During
the three months ended December 31, 2018, selling and marketing
expense increased to $503,930 compared to $409,737 for the three
months ended December 31, 2017. The increase in expense of $94,193,
or approximately 23% is principally the result of higher travel and
entertainment of $50,710 visiting growing or new customers, higher
outside service expense of $18,059 and higher wages and benefits of
$15,697 for a marketing employee responding to requests for
proposals.
Research and Development Expense
During the three months ended December 31, 2018,
research and development expense totaled $248,865 compared to
$163,946 for the three months ended December 31, 2017, an increase
of $84,919 or approximately 52%. The increase resulted
largely from higher wages and benefits of $82,763. In addition, we
are significantly enhancing our technology platform to improve the
efficiency of our software, firmware, user interface, and
automation. As a result of these improvements, $275,623 was
capitalized as developed technology during the three months ended
December 31, 2018 and $254,899 was capitalized in the three months
ended December 31, 2017. A portion of this expense would have been
recognized as research and development expense, absent the
significant enhancements to the technology.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
During
the three months ended December 31, 2018, depreciation and
amortization expense totaled $514,981 compared to $564,740 for the
three months ended December 31, 2017, a decrease of $49,759 or
approximately 9%, which was largely the result of certain property
and equipment assets becoming fully depreciated.
Total Operating Expense
During
the three months ended December 31, 2018, total operating expense
decreased to $4,690,048 compared to $4,796,161 for the three months
ended December 31, 2017, a decrease of $106,113 or approximately
2%. The decrease was largely due to lower general and
administrative expense of $235,466 and lower depreciation and
amortization of $49,759. These costs were partially offset by
higher selling and marketing expense of $94,193, and higher
research and development expense of $84,919.
Loss from Operations
During
the three months ended December 31, 2018, loss from operations was
$56,995 compared to a loss of $324,616 for the three months ended
December 31, 2017, a decrease of $267,621 or approximately 82%.
This improvement was due to an improvement in gross profit of
$161,508 and a reduction in operating expense of
$106,113.
-21-
Other Income and Expense
For the three months ended December 31, 2018,
other income (expense) totaled ($1,533,916) compared to ($717,975)
for the three months ended December 31, 2017, an increase in net
expense of $815,941 or approximately 114%. The increase in other
income (expense) is due to negative currency exchange rate
movements of $877,595 partially offset by lower interest expense,
net of $72,588, largely due to higher interest income in the
three-month period ended December 31, 2018.
Net Loss Attributable to Common Shareholders
The Company had net loss attributable to common
shareholders of $1,734,918 for the three months ended December 31,
2018, compared to a net loss attributable to common shareholders of
$1,042,591 for the three months ended December 31, 2017, an
increase of $692,327 or approximately
66%. This increase in net
loss is largely due negative currency exchange rate movements,
largely offset by higher gross profit. Other costs, including
operating expense and interest expense, net and income taxes, are
largely offsetting.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Historically, we have
been unable to finance our business solely from cash flows from
operating activities. During and prior to the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2017, we supplemented cash flows to finance the
business from borrowings under a credit facility, a revolving line
of credit from one of our shareholders, receipt of certain
disgorgement funds, and from the sale and issuance of debt
securities. As of December 31, 2018, excluding interest,
approximately $3.4 million was owed to Sapinda under a loan
agreement (the “Sapinda
Loan Agreement”) and $30.4
million was owed to Conrent under a loan (the
“Conrent
Loan Agreement”). No borrowings
or sales of equity securities occurred during the three months
ended December 31, 2018 or during the year ended September 30,
2018.
On
July 19, 2018, the Company and Conrent entered into an amendment to
their Facility Agreement (the “Amended
Facility Agreement”),
which Amended Facility Agreement (i) extends the maturity date of
the Facility to the earlier of either April 1, 2019 or the date
upon which the outstanding principal amount is repaid by the
Company, and (ii) provides that in the event of a change of control
of the Company, Conrent shall immediately cancel the Amended Credit
Facility and declare the outstanding principal amount, together
with unpaid interest, immediately due and payable.
On November 14, 2018, the Company
requested that Conrent extend the maturity of the Amended Facility
Agreement from April 1, 2019 to April 1, 2020. On December 3, 2018,
Conrent agreed to convene meetings of the investors who purchased
the securities from Conrent to finance the debt, and subsequently
issued a notice of a meeting of Noteholders for each series of
Notes, which meetings will be held on January 16, 2019. On January
17, 2019, Conrent notified the Company (via
telephone), that the Noteholders agreed to extend the maturity of
the Amended Facility Agreement to April 1, 2020, subject to the
signing of a written loan amendment. While the Company believes the
Noteholders will sign an amendment to extend the maturity of the
Amended Facility Agreement, no assurance can be
given.
Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities.
During the three months ended
December 31, 2018, we had cash
flows from operating activities of $1,138,433, compared to cash
flows from operating activities of $328,210 for the
three
months ended December 31, 2017,
representing an increase of 247%. The increase of cash from
operations compared to the prior year period was largely the result
of an increase in accrued liabilities, a decrease in prepaid and
other assets, partially offset by a larger in net
loss.
Net Cash Flows from Investing Activities.
The Company used $551,199 of cash for investing
activities during the three months ended
December 31, 2018, compared to
$594,726 of cash used during the three months ended
December 31, 2017. Cash used for investing
activities was used for significant enhancements of our software
platform and purchases of monitoring and other equipment to meet
customer demand during the three months ended December 31,
2018.
-22-
Net Cash Flows from Financing Activities.
The Company used $9,357 of cash for financing
activities during the three months ended
December 31, 2018, compared to
$17,289 of cash used in financing activities during the
three
months ended December 31, 2017.
Liquidity, Working Capital and Management’s Plan
As of December
31, 2018, we had unrestricted
cash of $5,865,546, compared to unrestricted cash of $5,446,557 as
of September 30,
2018. As of
December
31, 2018, we had a working
capital deficit of $30,897,683, compared to a working capital
deficit of $30,316,328 as of September 30, 2018. This increase
in working capital deficit of $581,355 is principally due to an
increase in accrued interest and a decrease in cash due to
additional capitalized software of $275,623, purchases of
monitoring equipment of $133,981 and purchases of property and
equipment of $141,595, partially offset by cash provided by
operations.
Although
no assurances can be given, in the event that management is able to
successfully extend the maturity of the Amended Facility Agreement,
we currently believe that our cash on hand in addition to cash
derived from our operating activities will be sufficient to sustain
operations through the next twelve months, although no assurance
can be given. In the event that they are not sufficient, we will
need to obtain additional funding from outside sources, which may
include through the sale of our securities. No assurances can be
given that we will be able to obtain additional funding on terms
favorable to us, if at all.
On March 13, 2017, the Company successfully
extended the Sapinda Loan Agreement from September 30, 2017 to
September 30, 2020. On July 17, 2018, the Company successfully
extended the Conrent Loan Agreement to the earlier of either
April 1, 2019 or the date upon which the outstanding principal
amount is repaid by the Company. In addition, management is currently working on
extending the maturity of debt owed under the Conrent Loan
Agreement to April 2020, which was agreed to by Noteholders at a
meeting held on January 16, 2019. See Note 22.
Inflation
We
do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our
historical operations or profitability.
Off-Balance Sheet Financial Arrangements
The
Company has not entered into any transactions with unconsolidated
entities whereby the Company has financial guarantees, derivative
instruments, or other contingent arrangements that expose the
Company to material continuing risks, contingent liabilities, or
any other obligation that provides financing, liquidity, market
risk, or credit risk support to the Company, except as described
below.
|
Payments
due in
fiscal year 2019
|
Payments
due in fiscal years 2020-2021
|
Payments
due in fiscal years 2022-2023
|
Total
|
Operating
leases
|
$246,857
|
$438,777
|
$170,957
|
$856,591
|
As
of December 31, 2018, the Company’s total future minimum
lease payments under noncancelable operating leases were $856,591.
The Company’s facility leases typically have original terms
not exceeding five years and generally contain multi-year renewal
options.
-23-
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk
The
Company footprint extends to a few countries outside the United
States, and we intend to continue to examine international
opportunities. As a result, our revenue and results of
operations are affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates,
interest rates, transfer pricing changes, taxes and other
uncertainties inherent in doing business in more than one
currency. In addition, our operations are exposed to risks
that are associated with changes in social, political, and economic
conditions in the foreign countries in which we operate, including
changes in the laws and policies that govern foreign investment, as
well as, to a lesser extent, changes in United States laws and
regulations relating to foreign trade and investment.
Foreign Currency Risks
We
had $3,149,976 and $2,561,305 in revenue from sources outside of
the United States for the three months ended December 31, 2018 and
2017, respectively. We made and received payments in a foreign
currency during the periods indicated, which resulted in a foreign
exchange expense of $932,677 and of $55,072 in the three months
ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The increase
in the exchange loss was due to the strengthening of the U.S.
dollar against the Chilean Peso and Canadian dollar. Changes in
currency exchange rates affect the relative prices at which we sell
our products and purchase goods and services. Given the uncertainty
of exchange rate fluctuations, we cannot estimate the effect of
these fluctuations on our future business, product pricing, results
of operations, or financial condition. We do not use foreign
currency exchange contracts or derivative financial instruments for
hedging or speculative purposes. To the extent foreign sales become
a more significant part of our business in the future, we may seek
to implement strategies which make use of these or other
instruments in order to minimize the effects of foreign currency
exchange on our business.
Item 4. Controls and
Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We have established disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Exchange Act) to ensure that material information relating to the
Company is made known to the officers who certify our financial
reports and to other members of senior management and the Board of
Directors. These disclosure controls and procedures are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports
that are filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SEC’s rules and
forms.
Under
the supervision and with the participation of management, including
the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, an
evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2018 was
completed pursuant to Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) under the
Exchange Act. Based on this evaluation, our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that
our disclosure controls and procedures were effective and designed
to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be
disclosed is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms as of
December 31, 2018.
Changes in Internal Controls
We
maintain a system of internal control over financial reporting that
is designed to provide reasonable assurance that our books and
records accurately reflect our transactions and that our
established policies and procedures are followed. There was no
change in our internal control over financial reporting during our
quarter ended December 31, 2018 that materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
-24-
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
We are, from time to time, involved in various legal proceedings
incidental to the conduct of our business. Historically, the
outcome of all such legal proceedings has not, in the aggregate,
had a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition,
results of operations or liquidity. Other than as set forth below,
there are no additional pending or threatened legal proceedings at
this time.
Legal Matters
The Company is, from time to time, involved in various legal
proceedings incidental to the conduct of our business.
Historically, the outcome of all such legal proceedings has not, in
the aggregate, had a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Other than
as set forth below, there are no additional pending or threatened
legal proceedings at this time.
Lazar
Leybovich et al. v. SecureAlert, Inc. On March 29, 2012, Lazar Leybovich, Dovie
Leybovich and Ben Leybovich filed a complaint in the 11th Circuit
Court in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida alleging breach of
contract with regard to certain Stock Redemption Agreements. The
Plaintiffs are alleging $1,587,604 in combined damages. On May 2,
2016, the Court resolved this case in favor of the Company by
granting the Company’s motion for Summary Judgment. The
Plaintiffs filed an Appeal on June 1, 2016 challenging the
Court’s ruling on the motion for Summary Judgment. The
Appellate court ruled in favor of the Plaintiff, finding that
factual issue remains, reversing the Summary Judgment and remanding
the case back to trial. The Company’s motion for partial
Summary Judgment was denied. A five day trial is tentatively
scheduled to take place February 19, 2019.
Boggs
et al. v. Judicial Electronic Monitoring, SecureAlert, Inc. et
al. On December 3, 2015, Candace Boggs et al. filed a
complaint in the State Court of Dougherty County, Georgia, alleging
breach of contract and negligence in monitoring of certain
offenders in Dougherty County, Georgia, as well as a request for
punitive damages. Plaintiffs withdrew their complaint in February
2016, but refiled the complaint on October 12, 2016. The
Company’s motion for Summary Judgment was denied on February
27, 2017 and a Notice of Appeal was filed by the Company’s
counsel on April 15, 2017. In May the Court of Appeals reversed the
trial court decision and granted the Company’s Motion to
Dismiss the Plaintiff’s claims. Plaintiff has filed a
petition to have the case heard in the Georgia Supreme Court. On
June 27, 2018, the Company’s counsel filed a
response to the petition, and on January 7, 2019, the Supreme Court
of Georgia denied the petition, thereby concluding the
case.
Track Group, Inc.
v. I.C.S. of the Bahamas Co. Ltd. On May 18, 2016, the
Company filed a complaint in the District Court of the Third
Judicial District in Salt Lake County, Utah alleging breach of
contract, under the terms of a loan agreement and promissory note
between the Company and I.C.S. of the Bahamas Co. Ltd (“ICS”). The Company’s
damages of unpaid principal and interest on the Promissory Note, as
of November 16, 2018, were in the amount of $291,313.81, plus
interest as it continues to accrue. The Defendant’s initial
Counterclaim was dismissed; however, the Court granted the
Defendant leave to amend. The Amended Counterclaim was filed on
June 23, 2017 alleging $1,628,667 in damages. Depositions have
taken place for both parties. In late 2018, both parties filed
motions for summary judgment on all the claims and counterclaims,
both of which motions are still pending. If Track Group obtains a
judgment for amounts owed under the loan agreement and promissory
note, it is unknown whether the Company will be able to collect any
sums from ICS in the foreign jurisdiction where ICS
resides.
Track Group Inc.
v. I.C.S. of the Bahamas Co. Ltd. On September 26, 2016,
the Company filed a Notice of Arbitration with the International
Centre for Dispute Resolution, alleging breach of the Commercial
and Monitoring Representative Agreement dated November 30, 2010
(the “C&M Agreement”) by and between the Company
and ICS. The Company asserted that ICS has failed to pay the
Company fees owed to it under the C&M Agreement. On August 22,
2018, the arbitrator issued a ruling awarding the Company
$689,613.50. However, on October 15, 2018, the arbitrator issued a
“corrected award” in which he reduced the amount of his
award to zero. On January 8, 2019, the Company filed a motion in
the United States District Court, District of Puerto Rico to vacate
the “corrected award” and confirm the original
arbitration award of $689,613.50, which motion is still pending. If
the Company is successful in confirming the $689,613.50 award, it
is unknown whether it will be able to collect any sums from ICS in
the foreign jurisdiction where ICS resides.
-25-
John
Merrill v. Track Group, Inc. and Guy Dubois. On November 30, 2016, the Company was served with
a complaint filed by John Merrill, the former Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, in District Court of the Third Judicial
District in Salt Lake County, Utah alleging breach of contract,
among other causes of action, related to Mr. Merrill’s
termination of employment. Mr. Merrill is seeking not less than
$590,577 plus interest, attorney fees and costs. Mr.
Merrill’s employment with the Company was terminated
effective September 27, 2016. The Company filed an Answer with
Counter Claims on December 21, 2016. The Company filed a motion for
Summary Judgment on January 16, 2018. At a hearing on April 25,
2018, the court dismissed the Plaintiff’s claims related to
an oral look-back agreement and a separation agreement. The court
has not ruled on Plaintiff’s claims related to his employment
agreement. A settlement amount could not be reached by the parties.
The matter will likely proceed to trial after expert discovery is
conducted. We intend to defend the case vigorously and believe the
allegations and claims are without merit.
SecureAlert,
Inc. v. Federal Government of Mexico (Department of the
Interior). On March 24, 2017, SecureAlert Inc. filed a
complaint before the Federal Administrative Tribunal, asserting the
failure by Defendants to pay claimant amounts agreed to, and due
under, the Pluri Annual Contract for the Rendering of Monitoring
Services of Internees, through Electric Bracelets, in the Islas
Marias Penitentiary Complex dated July 15, 2011, entered into by
and between the Organo Administrativo Desconcentrado Prevencion y
Readaptacion Social of the then Public Security Department, and
presently, an agency of the National Security Commission of the
Department of the Interior, and SecureAlert, Inc., presently Track
Group, Inc. The Company’s claim amount is upwards of $6.0
million. On March 28, 2017, the Federal Administrative Tribunal
rejected our claim, based on its determination that this case
should be resolved by a Civil Court and not by the Federal
Administrative Tribunal. For that reason, on April 25, 2017, the
Company filed an appeal before the Collegiate Tribunals against the
decision of the Federal Administrative Tribunal. The Tribunal ruled
the claims should be resolved in the Civil Court. Following that
ruling the Supreme Court took action to resolve the conflicting
precedent regarding the jurisdiction of such claims and determined
that such claims will be resolved by the Federal Administrative
Tribunal.
Eli Sabag v. Track
Group, Inc., Sapinda Asia Limited and Lars
Windhorst. On May 4, 2018, Eli Sabag filed a
complaint before the Marion Superior Court in Marion County Indiana
for damages and declaratory Judgment against the Company. The
complaint seeks to enforce an “earn-out” clause in a
Share Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) between the Company and
Sabag. Sabag alleges that the Company breached the SPA because
it failed to pay him his earn out after it sold and leased a
sufficient number of GPS devices to meet the earn-out
milestone. In the alternative, Sabag sued the Company for
breach of fiduciary duty and tortious interference, alleging that
the Company avoided selling sufficient GPS devices so as to not
trigger the issuance of Contingent Stock under the SPA. Finally,
Sabag alleges that the Company was unjustly enriched because it
failed to pay full value for his shares under the SPA. The
Company believes the allegations are unfounded and without merit,
and it will defend the case vigorously. Furthermore, according
to the SPA, any disputes are to be resolved through binding
arbitration and enforced in the State of Utah. The Company
filed a motion to dismiss the Complaint and Compel Arbitration on
September 5, 2018 and we are waiting on a ruling from the
court.
Erick Cerda v.
Track Group, Inc. On July 25, 2018, former employee Erick
Cerda, the Plaintiff, filed a complaint against the Company in the
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois,
Case No. 18-CV-05075, alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in Employment
Act. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief and monetary damages in
an unspecific amount. On October 5, 2018, the Company filed
its answer and affirmative defenses to Plaintiff’s First
Amended Complaint denying Plaintiff’s allegations in their
entirety. The Company believes that Plaintiff’s
allegations are unfounded and without merit.
-26-
Our results of
operations and financial condition are subject to numerous risks
and uncertainties described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
our fiscal year ended September 30, 2018, filed on December 19,
2018. You should carefully consider these risk factors in
conjunction with the other information contained in this Quarterly
Report. Should any of these risks materialize, our business,
financial condition and future prospects could be negatively
impacted. As of February 13,
2019, there have been no
material changes to the disclosures made in the above-referenced
Form 10-K.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use
of Proceeds
None.
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior
Securities
None.
Not
applicable.
Item 5. Other
Information
None.
(a)
|
Exhibits Required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K
|
Exhibit
Number
|
|
Title of Document
|
|
|
|
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (filed herewith).
|
|
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (filed herewith).
|
|
|
Certifications
under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350) (filed herewith).
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL
INSTANCE DOCUMENT
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL
TAXONOMY EXTENSION SCHEMA
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL
TAXONOMY EXTENSION CALCULATION LINKBASE
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL
TAXONOMY EXTENSION DEFINITION LINKBASE
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL
TAXONOMY EXTENSION LABEL LINKBASE
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL
TAXONOMY EXTENSION PRESENTATION LINKBASE
|
-27-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
Track Group, Inc.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Date: February 14, 2019
|
By:
|
/s/ Derek Cassell
|
|
|
|
Derek Cassell, Chief Executive Officer
Principal Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: February 14, 2019
|
By:
|
/s/
Peter K. Poli
|
|
|
|
Peter K. Poli, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
-28-