Western New England Bancorp, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2009 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D. C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
Commission
file number 001-16767
Westfield
Financial, Inc.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Massachusetts
|
73-1627673
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
|
incorporation or organization)
|
Identification No.)
|
141
Elm Street, Westfield, Massachusetts 01086
(Address
of principal executive offices)
(Zip
Code)
(413)
568-1911
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No
£
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files.) Yes £ No
£.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer £
|
Accelerated
filer x
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer £
|
Smaller
reporting company £
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes £ No
x
At
November 2, 2009, the registrant had 30,497,498 shares of common stock, $0.01
par value, issued and outstanding.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Page
|
||
PART I – FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
||
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements of Westfield Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets (Unaudited) – September 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008
|
2
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Income (Unaudited) – nine months ended
|
3
|
|
September
30, 2009 and 2008
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity and
Comprehensive
|
||
Income
(Unaudited) – Nine Months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008
|
4
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) – Nine Months ended
|
||
September
30, 2009 and 2008
|
5
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
6
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
|
|
Results
of Operations
|
23
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
35
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
36
|
PART
II – OTHER INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
37
|
Item 1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
37
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
37
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
upon Senior Securities
|
38
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
38
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
38
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
38
|
Signatures
|
39
|
|
Exhibits
|
FORWARD
– LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
contains “forward-looking statements.” These forward-looking
statements are made in good faith pursuant to the “safe harbor” provisions of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words
“may,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate,”
“expect,” “intend,” “plan” and similar expressions are intended to identify
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements may be
subject to significant known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors,
including, but not limited to, changes in the real estate market or local
economy, changes in interest rates, changes in laws and regulations to which we
are subject, and competition in our primary market area.
Although
we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements
are reasonable, actual results may differ materially from the results discussed
in these forward-looking statements. You are cautioned not to place
undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the
date hereof. Westfield Financial undertakes no obligation to
republish revised forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances
after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated
events.
1
PART
I
ITEM
1: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WESTFIELD
FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS - UNAUDITED
(Dollars
in thousands)
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
$ | 12,313 | $ | 11,525 | ||||
Federal
funds sold
|
11,217 | 42,338 | ||||||
Interest-bearing
deposits and other short-term investments
|
1,075 | 2,670 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
24,605 | 56,533 | ||||||
SECURITIES:
|
||||||||
Available
for sale - at fair value
|
19,759 | 24,396 | ||||||
Held
to Maturity - at amortized cost (fair value of $73,297 at September 30,
2009, and $82,491 at December 31, 2008)
|
69,272 | 79,303 | ||||||
MORTGAGE-BACKED
SECURITIES:
|
||||||||
Available
for sale - at fair value
|
301,597 | 233,747 | ||||||
Held
to maturity - at amortized cost (fair value $243,121 at September
30, 2009, and $168,716 at December 31, 2008)
|
237,580 | 168,332 | ||||||
FEDERAL
HOME LOAN BANK OF BOSTON AND OTHER
|
||||||||
RESTRICTED
STOCK - AT COST
|
10,003 | 8,456 | ||||||
LOANS
- Net of allowance for loan losses of $7,857 at September 30, 2009, and
$8,796 at December 31, 2008
|
466,808 | 472,135 | ||||||
PREMISES
AND EQUIPMENT, Net
|
12,414 | 12,066 | ||||||
ACCRUED
INTEREST RECEIVABLE
|
5,195 | 5,261 | ||||||
BANK-OWNED
LIFE INSURANCE
|
37,184 | 36,100 | ||||||
DEFERRED
TAX ASSET, Net
|
6,859 | 10,521 | ||||||
DUE
FROM BROKER FOR SECURITIES SOLD
|
66,532 | - | ||||||
OTHER
ASSETS
|
3,829 | 2,206 | ||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$ | 1,261,637 | $ | 1,109,056 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
LIABILITIES:
|
||||||||
DEPOSITS:
|
||||||||
Noninterest-bearing
|
$ | 81,070 | $ | 50,860 | ||||
Interest-bearing
|
573,120 | 537,169 | ||||||
Total
deposits
|
654,190 | 588,029 | ||||||
SHORT-TERM
BORROWINGS
|
55,843 | 49,824 | ||||||
LONG-TERM
DEBT
|
218,813 | 173,300 | ||||||
DUE
TO BROKER FOR SECURITIES PURCHASED
|
66,123 | 27,603 | ||||||
OTHER
LIABILITIES
|
9,491 | 10,381 | ||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES
|
1,004,460 | 849,137 | ||||||
STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock – $0.01 par value 5,000,000 shares authorized. None
outstanding at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
|
- | - | ||||||
Common
stock - $0.01 par value, 75,000,000 shares authorized, 30,608,713 shares
issued and outstanding at September 30, 2009; 31,307,881 shares
issued and outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
306 | 313 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
199,709 | 204,866 | ||||||
Unearned
compensation – ESOP
|
(10,453 | ) | (10,913 | ) | ||||
Unearned
compensation - Equity Incentive Plan
|
(3,469 | ) | (4,337 | ) | ||||
Retained
earnings
|
73,220 | 78,898 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(2,136 | ) | (8,908 | ) | ||||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
257,177 | 259,919 | ||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
$ | 1,261,637 | $ | 1,109,056 |
See
accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
2
WESTFIELD
FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME – UNAUDITED
(Dollars
in thousands, except per share data)
Three Months
|
Nine Months
|
|||||||||||||||
Ended September 30,
|
Ended September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
INTEREST
AND DIVIDEND INCOME:
|
||||||||||||||||
Debt
securities, taxable
|
$ | 6,370 | $ | 5,952 | $ | 18,666 | $ | 18,539 | ||||||||
Residential
and commercial real estate loans
|
4,629 | 4,711 | 13,828 | 13,952 | ||||||||||||
Commercial
and industrial loans
|
1,809 | 2,133 | 5,390 | 6,057 | ||||||||||||
Debt
securities, tax-exempt
|
367 | 351 | 1,102 | 1,030 | ||||||||||||
Consumer
loans
|
65 | 78 | 203 | 247 | ||||||||||||
Equity
securities
|
56 | 121 | 176 | 452 | ||||||||||||
Federal
funds sold and other short-term investments
|
2 | 158 | 11 | 544 | ||||||||||||
Total
interest and dividend income
|
13,298 | 13,504 | 39,376 | 40,821 | ||||||||||||
INTEREST
EXPENSE:
|
||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
3,221 | 3,551 | 9,785 | 11,686 | ||||||||||||
Short-term
borrowings
|
78 | 204 | 271 | 768 | ||||||||||||
Long-term
debt
|
1,757 | 1,650 | 5,251 | 4,606 | ||||||||||||
Total
interest expense
|
5,056 | 5,405 | 15,307 | 17,060 | ||||||||||||
Net
interest and dividend income
|
8,242 | 8,099 | 24,069 | 23,761 | ||||||||||||
PROVISION
FOR LOAN LOSSES
|
620 | 275 | 2,360 | 690 | ||||||||||||
Net
interest and dividend income after provision for loan
losses
|
7,622 | 7,824 | 21,709 | 23,071 | ||||||||||||
NONINTEREST
INCOME (LOSS):
|
||||||||||||||||
Total
other-than-temporary impairment losses on securities
|
(1,343 | ) | (651 | ) | (1,343 | ) | (961 | ) | ||||||||
Portion
of other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in accumulated other
comprehensive loss
|
1,157 | - | 1,157 | - | ||||||||||||
Net
other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in
income
|
(186 | ) | (651 | ) | (186 | ) | (961 | ) | ||||||||
Service
charges and fees
|
580 | 605 | 2,023 | 1,768 | ||||||||||||
Income
from bank-owned life insurance
|
371 | 359 | 1,084 | 1,002 | ||||||||||||
(Loss)
gain on sales of securities, net
|
(774 | ) | 486 | (565 | ) | 805 | ||||||||||
Loss
on disposal of premises and equipment, net
|
- | - | (8 | ) | - | |||||||||||
Loss
on prepayment of borrowings
|
- | - | (142 | ) | - | |||||||||||
Loss
on sale of other real estate owned
|
(110 | ) | - | (110 | ) | |||||||||||
Total
noninterest income (loss)
|
(119 | ) | 799 | 2,096 | 2,614 | |||||||||||
NONINTEREST
EXPENSE:
|
||||||||||||||||
Salaries
and employees benefits
|
3,817 | 3,662 | 11,800 | 10,759 | ||||||||||||
Occupancy
|
632 | 593 | 1,948 | 1,819 | ||||||||||||
Professional
fees
|
290 | 356 | 1,210 | 1,203 | ||||||||||||
Computer
operations
|
442 | 422 | 1,299 | 1,276 | ||||||||||||
Stationery,
supplies and postage
|
119 | 111 | 308 | 360 | ||||||||||||
FDIC
insurance assessment
|
102 | 24 | 950 | 65 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
662 | 615 | 1,966 | 1,818 | ||||||||||||
Total
noninterest expense
|
6,064 | 5,783 | 19,481 | 17,300 | ||||||||||||
INCOME
BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
1,439 | 2,840 | 4,324 | 8,385 | ||||||||||||
INCOME
TAXES
|
197 | 793 | 804 | 2,357 | ||||||||||||
NET
INCOME
|
$ | 1,242 | $ | 2,047 | $ | 3,520 | $ | 6,028 | ||||||||
EARNINGS
PER COMMON SHARE:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.20 | ||||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding (1)
|
29,330,638 | 29,719,961 | 29,522,327 | 29,877,284 | ||||||||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.20 | ||||||||
Weighted
average diluted shares outstanding (1)
|
29,591,706 | 30,019,924 | 29,791,421 | 30,246,927 |
(1)
|
Weighted-average
shares outstanding for 2008 have been adjusted retrospectively for
restricted shares that were determined to be “participating” with
Financial Accounting Standards Board ASC 260, “Determining Whether
Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating
Securities.”
|
See
accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3
WESTFIELD
FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME-
UNAUDITED
NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
(Dollars
in thousands, except share data)
Common Stock
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Par
Value
|
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
|
Unearned
Compensation
-
ESOP
|
Unearned
Compensation
-
Equity
Incentive
Plan
|
Retained
Earnings
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE
AT DECEMBER 31, 2008
|
31,307,881 | $ | 313 | $ | 204,866 | $ | (10,913 | ) | $ | (4,337 | ) | $ | 78,898 | $ | (8,908 | ) | $ | 259,919 | ||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
- | - | - | - | - | 3,520 | - | 3,520 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noncredit
portion of other-than-temporary impairment losses on available-for-sale
securities, net of reclassification and tax effects
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | (764 | ) | (764 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
unrealized gains on securities available for sale arising during the
period, net reclassification adjustment and tax effects
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | 7,474 | 7.474 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change
in pension gains or losses and transition assets, net of
tax
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | 62 | 62 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
10.292 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock held by ESOP committed to be released (91,493
shares)
|
- | - | 183 | 460 | - | - | - | 643 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based
compensation - stock options
|
- | - | 703 | - | - | - | - | 703 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based
compensation - equity incentive plan
|
- | - | - | - | 1,002 | - | - | 1.002 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Excess
tax benefits from equity incentive plan
|
- | - | 43 | - | - | - | - | 43 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock repurchased
|
(758,889 | ) | (8 | ) | (6,897 | ) | - | - | - | - | (6.905 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock in connection with stock option exercises
|
59,721 | 1 | 574 | - | - | (313 | ) | - | 262 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock in connection with equity incentive plan
|
- | - | 138 | - | (138 | ) | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Forfeiture
of common stock in connection with equity incentive plan
|
- | - | (4 | ) | - | 4 | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Excess
tax benefits in connection with stock option exercises
|
- | - | 103 | - | - | - | - | 103 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
dividends declared ($0.30 per share)
|
- | - | - | - | - | (8,885 | ) | - | (8.885 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE
AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
|
30,608,713 | $ | 306 | $ | 199,709 | $ | (10,453 | ) | $ | (3,469 | ) | $ | 73,220 | $ | (2,136 | ) | $ | 257,177 | ||||||||||||||
BALANCE
AT DECEMBER 31, 2007
|
31,933,549 | $ | 319 | $ | 209,497 | $ | (11,542 | ) | $ | (5,493 | ) | $ | 92,702 | $ | 1,049 | $ | 286,532 | |||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
- | - | - | - | - | 6,028 | - | 6,028 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
unrealized losses on securities available for sale arising during the
period, net reclassification adjustment and tax effects
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | (4,652 | ) | (4,652 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
1,376 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock held by ESOP committed to be released (93,947
shares)
|
- | - | 216 | 472 | - | - | - | 688 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based
compensation - stock options
|
- | - | 521 | - | - | - | - | 521 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based
compensation - equity incentive plan
|
- | - | - | - | 752 | - | - | 752 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock repurchased
|
(983,471 | ) | (10 | ) | (9,769 | ) | - | - | - | - | (9,779 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock in connection with stock option exercises
|
433,110 | 4 | 4,447 | - | - | (2,550 | ) | - | 1,901 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Excess
tax benefits in connection with stock option exercises
|
- | - | 345 | - | - | - | - | 345 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
dividends declared ($0.30 per share)
|
- | - | - | - | - | (9,025 | ) | - | (9,025 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE
AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
|
31,383,188 | $ | 313 | $ | 205,257 | $ | (11,070 | ) | $ | (4,741 | ) | $ | 87,155 | $ | (3,603 | ) | $ | 273,311 |
See the
accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
4
WESTFIELD
FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - UNAUDITED
(Dollars
in thousands)
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 3,520 | $ | 6,028 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
2,360 | 690 | ||||||
Depreciation
and amortization of premises and equipment
|
929 | 889 | ||||||
Net
amortization of premiums and discounts on securities, mortgage-backed
securities and mortgage loans
|
1,098 | 140 | ||||||
Share-based
compensation expense
|
1,705 | 1,273 | ||||||
Amortization
of ESOP expense
|
643 | 688 | ||||||
Excess
tax benefits from equity incentive plan
|
(43 | ) | - | |||||
Excess
tax benefits in connection with stock option exercises
|
(103 | ) | (345 | ) | ||||
Net
losses (gains) on sales of securities
|
565 | (805 | ) | |||||
Other-than-temporary
impairment losses of securities
|
186 | 961 | ||||||
Write-downs
of other real estate owned
|
17 | - | ||||||
Loss
on sale of other real estate owned
|
110 | - | ||||||
Loss
on disposal of premises and equipment, net
|
8 | - | ||||||
Loss
on prepayment of borrowings
|
142 | - | ||||||
Deferred
income tax benefit
|
(188 | ) | (135 | ) | ||||
Income
from bank-owned life insurance
|
(1.084 | ) | (1,002 | ) | ||||
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accrued
interest receivable
|
(107 | ) | 643 | |||||
Other
assets
|
(1,623 | ) | (1,006 | ) | ||||
Other
liabilities
|
(650 | ) | (1,152 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
7,485 | 6,867 | ||||||
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Securities,
held to maturity:
|
||||||||
Purchases
|
(10,112 | ) | (1,094 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from calls, maturities, and principal collections
|
20,090 | 23,000 | ||||||
Securities,
available for sale:
|
||||||||
Purchases
|
(433 | ) | (17,291 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sales
|
5,107 | 15,242 | ||||||
Proceeds
from calls, maturities, and principal collections
|
154 | 14,992 | ||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities, held to maturity:
|
||||||||
Purchases
|
(113,622 | ) | (23,726 | ) | ||||
Principal
collections
|
43,845 | 28,091 | ||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities, available for sale:
|
||||||||
Purchases
|
(174,202 | ) | (80,114 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sales
|
39,148 | 43,802 | ||||||
Principal
collections
|
48,479 | 35,278 | ||||||
Purchase
of residential mortgages
|
(14,521 | ) | (1,366 | ) | ||||
Net
other decrease (increase) in loans
|
17,169 | (41,233 | ) | |||||
Purchase
of Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock
|
(1,547 | ) | (936 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sale of other real estate owned
|
148 | - | ||||||
Purchases
of premises and equipment
|
(1,285 | ) | (335 | ) | ||||
Purchase
of bank-owned life insurance
|
- | (2,000 | ) | |||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(141,582 | ) | (7,457 | ) | ||||
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in deposits
|
66,161 | (16,638 | ) | |||||
Net
change in short-term borrowings
|
6,019 | 1,425 | ||||||
Repayment
of long-term debt
|
(45,142 | ) | (15,000 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from long-term debt
|
90,513 | 78,500 | ||||||
Cash
dividends paid
|
(8,885 | ) | (9,025 | ) | ||||
Common
stock repurchased
|
(6,905 | ) | (9,779 | ) | ||||
Issuance
of common stock in connection with stock option exercises
|
262 | 1,901 | ||||||
Excess
tax benefits in connection with equity incentive plan
|
43 | - | ||||||
Excess
tax benefits in connection with stock option exercises
|
103 | 345 | ||||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
102,169 | 31,729 | ||||||
NET
CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
|
(31,928 | ) | 31,139 | |||||
Beginning
of period
|
56,533 | 37,623 | ||||||
End
of period
|
$ | 24,605 | $ | 68,762 | ||||
Supplemental
cash flow information:
|
||||||||
Due
to broker
|
$ | 66,123 | $ | - | ||||
Due
from broker
|
66,532 | - | ||||||
Transfer
of loans to other real estate owned
|
275 | - | ||||||
Interest
paid
|
15,287 | 17,077 | ||||||
Taxes
paid
|
1,761 | 2,880 |
See the
accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
5
WESTFIELD
FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
1. SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Operations –
Westfield Financial, Inc. (the “Company” or “Westfield Financial”) is the
bank holding company for Westfield Bank, a federally-chartered stock savings
bank.
Westfield
Bank’s deposits are insured to the limits specified by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). Westfield Bank operates ten branches
in Western Massachusetts. Westfield Bank’s primary source of revenue
is earnings on loans to small and middle-market businesses and to residential
property homeowners.
Elm
Street Securities Corporation and WFD Securities Corporation,
Massachusetts-chartered security corporations, were formed by Westfield
Financial for the primary purpose of holding qualified securities.
Principles of
Consolidation – The consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of Westfield Financial, Westfield Bank, Elm Street Securities
Corporation, and WFD Securities Corporation. All material
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Estimates
– The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the
reported amounts of income and expenses for each. Actual results
could differ from those estimates. Estimates that are particularly
susceptible to significant change in the near-term relate to the determination
of the allowance for loan losses, other-than-temporary impairment of securities,
and the valuation of deferred tax assets.
Basis of
Presentation – In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited
consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting only of
normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of Westfield
Financial’s financial condition as of September 30, 2009, and the results of
operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the interim
periods presented. The results of operations for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results of
operations for the year ending December 31, 2009. Certain information
and disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance
with GAAP have been omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
These
unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
Reclassifications
- Certain amounts in the prior period financial statements have been
reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
6
2. EARNINGS
PER SHARE
Basic
earnings per share represent income available to shareholders divided by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the
period. Diluted earnings per share reflect additional common shares
that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential shares had been issued,
as well as any adjustment to income that would result from the assumed
issuance. Potential common shares that may be issued by Westfield
Financial relate solely to outstanding stock awards and options and are
determined using the treasury stock method.
Earnings
per common share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
have been computed based on the following:
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
income applicable to common stock
|
$ | 1,242 | $ | 2,047 | $ | 3,520 | $ | 6,028 | ||||||||
Average
number of common shares issued
|
30,888 | 31,383 | 31,103 | 31,564 | ||||||||||||
Less:
Average unallocated ESOP Shares
|
(1,506 | ) | (1,598 | ) | (1,528 | ) | (1,622 | ) | ||||||||
Less:
Average ungranted equity incentive plan shares
|
(51 | ) | (65 | ) | (53 | ) | (65 | ) | ||||||||
Average
number of common shares outstanding used to calculate basic earnings per
common share (1)
|
29,331
|
29,720
|
29,522
|
29,877
|
||||||||||||
Effect
of dilutive stock options
|
261 | 300 | 269 | 370 | ||||||||||||
Average
number of common shares outstanding used to calculate diluted earnings per
common share
|
29,592 | 30,020 | 29,791 | 30,247 | ||||||||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.20 | ||||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.20 |
(1)
|
Weighted-average
shares outstanding for 2008 have been adjusted retrospectively for
restricted shares that were determined to be
“participating” in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board
ASC 260, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment
Transactions Are Participating
Securities.”
|
Stock
options that would have an antidilutive effect on diluted earnings per share are
excluded from the calculation. At September 30, 2009 and 2008,
1,538,357 and 1,501,857 shares were antidilutive, respectively.
7
3. COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME/LOSS
Accounting
principles generally require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses
be included in net income. Although certain changes in assets and
liabilities are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the
balance sheet, such items, along with net income are components of comprehensive
income.
The
components of other comprehensive income (loss) and related tax effects are as
follows:
Nine Months Ended September 30
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||
Unrealized
holding (losses) gains on available-for-sale securities
|
$ | 12,277 | $ | (6,798 | ) | |||
Reclassification
adjustment for losses (gains) realized in income
|
565 | (805 | ) | |||||
Noncredit
portion of other-than-temporary impairment losses on available-for-sale
securities
|
(1,157 | ) | - | |||||
Net
realized gains (losses)
|
11,685 | (7,603 | ) | |||||
Tax
effect
|
(4,211 | ) | 2,951 | |||||
Net
of tax amount
|
7,474 | (4,652 | ) | |||||
Gains
and losses arising during the periods pertaining to defined benefit
plan
|
103 | - | ||||||
Reclassification
adjustment for transition asset recognized in net periodic benefit cost
pertaining to defined benefit plan
|
(9 | ) | - | |||||
Net
adjustments pertaining to defined benefit plan
|
94 | - | ||||||
Tax
Effect
|
(32 | ) | - | |||||
Net-of-tax
amount
|
62 | - | ||||||
Net
accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
|
$ | 7,536 | $ | (4,652 | ) |
The
components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) included in
stockholders’ equity are as follows:
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||
Net
unrealized gain (loss) on securities available-for-sale
|
$ | 772 | $ | (10,913 | ) | |||
Tax
effect
|
(179 | ) | 4,032 | |||||
Net-of-tax
amount
|
593 | (6,881 | ) | |||||
Noncredit
portion of other-than-temporary impairment losses on available-for-sale
securities
|
(1,157 | ) | - | |||||
Tax
effect
|
393 | - | ||||||
Net
of tax amount
|
(764 | ) | - | |||||
Unrecognized
deferred loss pertaining to defined benefit plan
|
(3,035 | ) | (3,138 | ) | ||||
Unrecognized
transition asset pertaining to defined benefit plan
|
59 | 68 | ||||||
Net
components pertaining to defined benefit plan
|
(2,976 | ) | (3,070 | ) | ||||
Tax
Effect
|
1,011 | 1,043 | ||||||
Net-of-tax
amount
|
(1,965 | ) | (2,027 | ) | ||||
Net
accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
|
$ | (2,136 | ) | $ | (8,908 | ) |
8
4. SECURITIES
Securities
are summarized as follows:
September 30, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Amortized
Cost
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Held
to maturity:
|
||||||||||||||||
Government-sponsored
enterprises
|
$ | 34,903 | $ | 2,013 | $ | - | $ | 36,916 | ||||||||
Municipal
bonds
|
34,369 | 2,012 | - | 36,381 | ||||||||||||
Total
held to maturity
|
69,272 | 4,025 | - | 73,297 | ||||||||||||
Available
for sale:
|
||||||||||||||||
Government-sponsored
enterprises
|
11,000 | 55 | - | 11,055 | ||||||||||||
Municipal
bonds
|
1,956 | 183 | - | 2,139 | ||||||||||||
Equity
securities
|
6,580 | 30 | (45 | ) | 6,565 | |||||||||||
Total
available for sale
|
19,536 | 268 | (45 | ) | 19,759 | |||||||||||
Total
securities
|
$ | 88,808 | $ | 4,293 | $ | (45 | ) | $ | 93,056 |
December 31, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
Amortized
Cost
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Held
to maturity:
|
||||||||||||||||
Government-sponsored
enterprises
|
$ | 44,906 | $ | 2,900 | $ | - | $ | 47,806 | ||||||||
Municipal
bonds
|
34,397 | 467 | (179 | ) | 34,685 | |||||||||||
Total
held to maturity
|
79,303 | 3,367 | (179 | ) | 82,491 | |||||||||||
Available
for sale:
|
||||||||||||||||
Government-sponsored
enterprises
|
16,018 | 281 | - | 16,299 | ||||||||||||
Municipal
bonds
|
1,957 | 27 | (14 | ) | 1,970 | |||||||||||
Equity
securities
|
6,301 | - | (174 | ) | 6,127 | |||||||||||
Total
available for sale
|
24,276 | 308 | (188 | ) | 24,396 | |||||||||||
Total
securities
|
$ | 103,579 | $ | 3,675 | $ | (367 | ) | $ | 106,887 |
9
Information
pertaining to securities with gross unrealized losses at September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, aggregated by investment category and length of time that
individual securities have been in a continuous loss position,
follows:
September 30, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Less Than Twelve Months
|
Over Twelve Months
|
|||||||||||||||
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Available
for sale:
|
||||||||||||||||
Equity
securities
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | (45 | ) | $ | 1,470 | |||||||
Total
available for sale
|
- | - | (45 | ) | 1,470 | |||||||||||
Total
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | (45 | ) | $ | 1,470 |
December 31, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
Less Than Twelve Months
|
Over Twelve Months
|
|||||||||||||||
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Held
to maturity:
|
||||||||||||||||
Municipal
bonds
|
$ | (155 | ) | $ | 6,677 | $ | (24 | ) | $ | 1,585 | ||||||
Total
held to maturity
|
(155 | ) | 6,667 | (24 | ) | 1,585 | ||||||||||
Available
for sale:
|
||||||||||||||||
Municipal
bonds
|
(14 | ) | 1,093 | - | - | |||||||||||
Equity
securities
|
- | - | (174 | ) | 3,842 | |||||||||||
Total
available for sale
|
(14 | ) | 1,093 | (174 | ) | 3,842 | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | (169 | ) | $ | 7,770 | $ | (198 | ) | $ | 5,427 |
10
At
September 30, 2009, one equity security had a gross unrealized loss with
aggregate depreciation of 3.0% from Westfield Financial’s cost basis existing
for greater than twelve months and was principally related to fluctuations in
interest rates. This loss relates to a mutual fund which invests
primarily in short-term debt instruments and adjustable rate mortgage-backed
securities. Because this loss was the result of fluctuations in
interest rates, and Westfield Financial does not intend to sell the security and
it is more likely than not that it will not be required to sell it prior to the
recovery of its amortized cost basis the loss is deemed temporary. At
September 30, 2009, no securities had gross unrealized losses from Westfield
Financial’s amortized cost basis existing for less than twelve
months.
Westfield
Financial recorded write-downs on preferred stock issued by Freddie Mac of
$651,000 and $961,000 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,
respectively. Freddie Mac was placed into conservatorship by the
United States Treasury in September 2008. Westfield Financial’s book
value remaining on preferred stock issued by Freddie Mac was $39,000 at
September 30, 2009. Westfield Financial recorded no write-downs on
these securities during the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009.
The
amortized cost and fair value of debt securities at September 30, 2009, by
maturity, are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from
contractual maturities because certain issuers have the right to call or repay
obligations.
September
30, 2009
|
||||||||
Amortized
Cost
|
Fair
Value
|
|||||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||||||
Held
to maturity:
|
||||||||
Due
in one year or less
|
$ | 5,068 | $ | 5,083 | ||||
Due
after one year through five years
|
17,934 | 18,820 | ||||||
Due
after five years through ten years
|
33,631 | 35,987 | ||||||
Due
after ten years
|
12,639 | 13,407 | ||||||
Total
held to maturity
|
$ | 69,272 | $ | 73,297 | ||||
Available
for sale:
|
||||||||
Due
after five years through ten years
|
$ | 1,391 | $ | 1,521 | ||||
Due
after ten years
|
11,565 | 11,673 | ||||||
Total
available for sale
|
$ | 12,956 | $ | 13,194 |
Proceeds
from the sale of securities available for sale amounted to $5.1 million and
$15.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Gross
realized gains of $89,000 and $231,000 and gross realized losses of $2,000 and
$12,000 were recorded on the sales of securities during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. No gains or losses were
recorded on the sales of securities during the three months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008. Westfield Financial recorded gross losses of $651,000
and $961,000 due to other-than-temporary impairment in value of securities
during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,
respectively. Westfield Financial recorded no impairment losses on
debt securities during the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009.
At
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, one security with a carrying value of
$4.9 million was pledged as collateral to the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston to
secure public deposits.
11
5.
|
MORTGAGE-BACKED
SECURITIES
|
Mortgage-backed
securities are summarized as follows:
September 30, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Amortized
Cost
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Held
to maturity:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fannie
Mae
|
$ | 114,751 | $ | 3,297 | $ | (35 | ) | $ | 118,013 | |||||||
Freddie
Mac
|
77,545 | 2,800 | (30 | ) | 80,315 | |||||||||||
Ginnie
Mae
|
6,903 | 52 | - | 6,955 | ||||||||||||
Collateralized
mortgage obligations
|
38,381 | 71 | (614 | ) | 37,838 | |||||||||||
Total
held to maturity
|
237,580 | 6,220 | (679 | ) | 243,121 | |||||||||||
Available
for sale:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fannie
Mae
|
155,609 | 1,928 | (407 | ) | 157,130 | |||||||||||
Freddie
Mac
|
89,867 | 1,187 | (544 | ) | 90,510 | |||||||||||
Ginnie
Mae
|
3,594 | 26 | (5 | ) | 3,615 | |||||||||||
Collateralized
mortgage obligations
|
53,135 | 46 | (2,839 | ) | 50,342 | |||||||||||
Total
available for sale
|
302,205 | 3,187 | (3,795 | ) | 301,597 | |||||||||||
Total
mortgage-backed securities
|
$ | 539,785 | $ | 9,407 | $ | (4,474 | ) | $ | 544,718 |
12
December
31, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
Amortized
Cost
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Estimated
Fair
Value
|
|||||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Held
to maturity:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fannie
Mae
|
$ | 89,910 | $ | 1,207 | $ | (341 | ) | $ | 105,304 | |||||||
Freddie
Mac
|
64,067 | 1,264 | (225 | ) | 65,106 | |||||||||||
Ginnie
Mae
|
7,892 | 1 | (340 | ) | 7,553 | |||||||||||
Collateralized
mortgage obligations
|
6,463 | - | (1,182 | ) | 5,281 | |||||||||||
Total
held to maturity
|
168,332 | 2,472 | (2,088 | ) | 168,716 | |||||||||||
Available
for sale:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fannie
Mae
|
105,397 | 476 | (569 | ) | 105,304 | |||||||||||
Freddie
Mac
|
56,529 | 642 | (199 | ) | 56,972 | |||||||||||
Ginnie
Mae
|
40,401 | 181 | (158 | ) | 40,424 | |||||||||||
Collateralized
mortgage obligations
|
42,453 | - | (11,406 | ) | 31,047 | |||||||||||
Total
available for sale
|
244,780 | 1,299 | (12,332 | ) | 233,747 | |||||||||||
Total
mortgage-backed securities
|
$ | 413,112 | $ | 3,771 | $ | (14,420 | ) | $ | 402,463 | |||||||
Proceeds
from the sale of mortgage-backed securities available for sale amounted to $39.1
million and $43.8 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively.
Gross
realized gains of $1.4 million and $486,000 and gross realized losses of $2.2
million and $0 were recorded on sales of mortgage-backed securities during the
three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Gross realized
gains of $1.6 million and $585,000 and gross realized losses of $2.2 million and
$0 were recorded on sales of mortgage-backed securities during the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The loss of $2.2
million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 was primarily due
to a loss of on the sale of a single collateralized mortgage obligation
management opted to sell due to deterioration in its credit
quality. The carrying value of private-label collateralized mortgage
obligations was $28.0 million and $37.5 million at September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively.
Westfield
Financial recorded write-downs of $1.3 million due to other-than-temporary
impairment on mortgage-backed securities during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009. The write-down is related to a single
private-label collateralized mortgage obligation in which $1.2 million of the
other-than-temporary impairment loss was recognized in accumulated other
comprehensive income and a net impairment loss of $186,000 was recognized in
income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009.
13
Information
pertaining to mortgage-backed securities with gross unrealized losses at
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 aggregated by investment category and
length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss
position, follows:
September
30, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Less
Than Twelve Months
|
Over
Twelve Months
|
|||||||||||||||
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
|||||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Held
to maturity:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fannie
Mae
|
$ | (2 | ) | $ | 929 | $ | (33 | ) | $ | 2,817 | ||||||
Freddie
Mac
|
(5 | ) | 1,704 | (25 | ) | 1,377 | ||||||||||
Collateralized
mortgage obligations
|
(236 | ) | 17,900 | (378 | ) | 3,319 | ||||||||||
Total
held to maturity
|
(243 | ) | 20,533 | (436 | ) | 7,513 | ||||||||||
Available
for sale:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fannie
Mae
|
(403 | ) | 60,000 | (4 | ) | 1,231 | ||||||||||
Freddie
Mac
|
(541 | ) | 34,707 | (3 | ) | 166 | ||||||||||
Ginnie
Mae
|
- | - | (5 | ) | 1,440 | |||||||||||
Collateralized
mortgage obligations
|
(306 | ) | 27,648 | (2,533 | ) | 13,944 | ||||||||||
Total
available for sale
|
(1,250 | ) | 122,355 | (2,545 | ) | 16,781 | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | (1,493 | ) | $ | 142,888 | $ | (2,981 | ) | $ | 24,294 |
December 31,
2008
|
||||||||||||||||
Less
Than Twelve Months
|
Over
Twelve Months
|
|||||||||||||||
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
|||||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Held
to maturity:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fannie
Mae
|
$ | (216 | ) | $ | 14,402 | $ | (125 | ) | $ | 8,662 | ||||||
Freddie
Mac
|
(141 | ) | 13,742 | (84 | ) | 2,667 | ||||||||||
Ginnie
Mae
|
(266 | ) | 5,482 | (74 | ) | 1,867 | ||||||||||
Collateralized
mortgage obligations
|
(1,182 | ) | 5,282 | - | - | |||||||||||
Total
held to maturity
|
(1,805 | ) | 38,908 | (283 | ) | 13,196 | ||||||||||
Available
for sale:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fannie
Mae
|
(479 | ) | 42,746 | (90 | ) | 11,416 | ||||||||||
Freddie
Mac
|
(147 | ) | 9,802 | (52 | ) | 10,794 | ||||||||||
Ginnie
Mae
|
(147 | ) | 3,842 | (11 | ) | 251 | ||||||||||
Collateralized
mortgage obligations
|
(6,953 | ) | 28,423 | (4,453 | ) | 2,624 | ||||||||||
Total
available for sale
|
(7,726 | ) | 84,813 | (4,606 | ) | 25,085 | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | (9,531 | ) | $ | 123,721 | $ | (4,889 | ) | $ | 38,281 |
14
At
September 30, 2009, thirty-four mortgage-backed securities had gross unrealized
losses with aggregate depreciation of 1.1% from Westfield Financial’s amortized
cost basis existing for less than twelve months. These losses relate
to mortgage-backed securities, which were primarily issued by
government-sponsored enterprises, and such losses are the result of an illiquid
market. As Westfield Financial does not intend to sell these
securities and it is more likely than not that it will not be required to sell
these securities prior to the recovery of its amortized cost basis less any
credit losses, no declines are deemed to be other than temporary at September
30, 2009.
At
September 30, 2009, twenty-nine mortgage-backed securities issued by
government-sponsored enterprises had gross unrealized losses with aggregate
depreciation of 1.0% from Westfield Financial’s amortized cost basis existing
for greater than twelve months. These losses relate to
mortgage-backed securities and such losses are the result of an illiquid
market. As Westfield Financial does not intend to sell these
securities and it is more likely than not that it will not be required to sell
these securities prior to the recovery of its amortized cost basis less any
credit losses, no declines are deemed to be other than temporary at September
30, 2009.
At
September 30, 2009, seven collateralized mortgage obligations had gross
unrealized losses of 14.4% from Westfield Financial’s amortized cost basis of
temporarily impaired debt securities which existed for greater than twelve
months. The securities are privately issued collateralized mortgage
obligations. Management hired a third party experienced in analyzing
private-label mortgage-backed securities to determine if credit losses existed
for these securities. In preparing the analysis, the third party
determined the performance of the underlying assets in the securities by
measuring the default rates for loans that are currently delinquent or in
foreclosure, severity rates of loss for loans currently delinquent or in
foreclosure and default rates for loans that are current. As a result
of this analysis, one collateralized mortgage obligation was deemed to have
other than temporary impairment loss. Westfield Financial recorded a
write-down of $1.3 million due to other-than-temporary impairment on
mortgage-backed securities during the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009 related to that collateralized mortgage obligation. $1.2 million of the
other-than-temporary impairment loss was recognized in accumulated other
comprehensive income and a net impairment loss of $186,000 due to credit losses
was recognized in income for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009.
6. SHARE-BASED
COMPENSATION
Under the
Westfield Financial, Inc. 2007 Recognition and Retention Plan and 2007 Stock
Option Plan, Westfield Financial may grant up to 624,041 stock awards and
1,631,682 stock options to its directors, officers, and employees,
respectively.
Stock
award allocations are recorded as unearned compensation based on the market
price at the date of grant. Unearned compensation is amortized over
the vesting period.
Westfield
Financial may grant both incentive and non-statutory stock
options. The exercise price of each option equals the market price of
Westfield Financial’s stock on the date of grant with a maximum term of ten
years.
The fair
value of each option grant is estimated on the grant date using the binomial
option pricing model with the following weighted average
assumptions:
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2009
|
||||
Expected
dividend yield
|
6.07 | % | ||
Expected
life
|
10 years | |||
Expected
volatility
|
35.70 | % | ||
Risk-free
interest rate
|
2.59 | % |
All stock
awards and stock options currently vest at 20% per year. At September
30, 2009, 51,441 stock awards and 171,899 stock options were available for
future grants.
15
Westfield
Financial’s stock award and stock option plans activity for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 is summarized below:
Unvested
Stock Awards
Outstanding
|
Stock
Options Outstanding
|
|||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Grant
Date
Fair
Value
|
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
at December 31, 2008
|
465,192 | $ | 10.04 | 2,276,223 | $ | 8.15 | ||||||||||
Granted
|
14,000 | 9.89 | 39,000 | 9.89 | ||||||||||||
Stock
options exercised
|
- | - | (59,721 | ) | 4.39 | |||||||||||
Stock
awards vested
|
(15,206 | ) | 10.06 | - | - | |||||||||||
Forfeited
|
(400 | ) | 10.04 | (2,500 | ) | 10.04 | ||||||||||
Outstanding
at September 30, 2009
|
463,586 | 10.03 | 2,253,002 | 8.28 | ||||||||||||
Outstanding
at December 31, 2007
|
582,966 | $ | 10.04 | 2,709,333 | $ | 8.15 | ||||||||||
Stock
options exercised
|
- | - | (433,110 | ) | 4.39 | |||||||||||
Stock
awards vested
|
(4,005 | ) | 10.11 | - | - | |||||||||||
Outstanding
at September 30, 2008
|
578,961 | 10.04 | 2,276,223 | 8.87 |
Westfield
Financial recorded compensation cost related to the stock awards of $288,000 and
$252,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively,
and $1.0 million and $752,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively.
Westfield
Financial recorded compensation costs relating to stock options of $197,000 and
$703,000, with a related tax benefit of $54,000 and $188,000 for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. Westfield
Financial recorded compensation costs relating to stock options of $175,000 and
$521,000, with a related tax benefit of $45,000 and $135,000 for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively.
7. SHORT-TERM
BORROWINGS AND LONG-TERM DEBT
Westfield
Bank utilizes short-term borrowings and long-term debt as an additional source
of funds to finance its lending and investing activities and to provide
liquidity for daily operations. Short-term borrowings are made up of
Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances with an original maturity of less than
one year as well as customer repurchase agreements, which have an original
maturity of one day. Short-term borrowings issued by the FHLB were
$36.0 million and $28.5 million at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively. Customer repurchase agreements were $19.8 million at
September 30, 2009 and $21.3 million at December 31, 2008. A customer
repurchase agreement is an agreement by Westfield Bank to sell to and repurchase
from the customer an interest in specific securities issued by or guaranteed by
the United States Government. This transaction settles immediately on
a same day basis in immediately available funds. Interest paid is
commensurate with other products of equal interest and credit
risk. All of Westfield Bank’s customer repurchase agreements at
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were held by commercial
customers.
Long-term
debt consists of FHLB advances with an original maturity of one year or more as
well as securities sold under repurchase agreements. At September 30,
2009, Westfield Bank had $132.5 million in long-term debt with the FHLB and
$81.3 million in securities sold under repurchase agreements with an approved
broker-dealer. This compares to $115.0 million in long-term debt with
FHLB advances and $58.3 million in securities sold under repurchase agreements
with an approval broker-dealer at December 31, 2008. Customer
repurchase agreements were $5.0 million at September 30, 2009 and none at
December 31, 2008. The securities sold under agreements to repurchase
are callable at the issuer’s option beginning in the year 2010.
16
8. PENSION
AND POSTRETIREMENT LIFE INSURANCE BENEFITS
The
following table provides information regarding net pension benefit costs for the
periods shown:
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Service
cost
|
$ | 216 | $ | 175 | $ | 647 | $ | 525 | ||||||||
Interest
cost
|
183 | 162 | 548 | 486 | ||||||||||||
Expected
return on assets
|
(169 | ) | (190 | ) | (506 | ) | (570 | ) | ||||||||
Transition
obligation
|
(3 | ) | (3 | ) | (9 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||||||
Actuarial
loss (gain)
|
34 | (10 | ) | 102 | (29 | ) | ||||||||||
Net
periodic pension cost
|
$ | 261 | $ | 134 | $ | 782 | $ | 403 |
Westfield
Bank maintains a pension plan for its eligible employees. Westfield
Financial plans to contribute to the pension plan the amount required to meet
the minimum funding standards under Section 412 of the Internal Revenue
Code. Additional contributions will be made as deemed appropriate by
management in conjunction with the pension plan’s
actuaries. Westfield Financial expects to contribute $466,000 to its
pension plan in 2009.
9. FAIR
VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Determination
of Fair Value
Westfield
Financial uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to
certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value
disclosures. The fair value of a financial instrument is the price
that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair
value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many
instances, there are no quoted market prices for Westfield Financial’s various
financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available,
fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation
techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used,
including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the
fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the
instrument.
Fair
Value Hierarchy
Westfield
Financial groups its financial assets and financial liabilities generally
measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets
and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to
determine fair value.
Level 1 –
Valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities. Level 1 assets and liabilities generally include debt and equity
securities that are traded in an active exchange market. Valuations are obtained
from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving
identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 –
Valuation is based on observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as
quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that
are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by
observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or
liabilities. For example, Level 2 assets and liabilities may include debt
securities with quoted prices that are traded less frequently than
exchange-traded instruments or mortgage loans held for sale, for which the fair
value is based on what the securitization market is currently offering for
mortgage loans with similar characteristics.
17
Level 3 –
Valuation is based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no
market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or
liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose
value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or
similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair
value requires significant management judgment or estimation. This category
generally includes certain asset-backed securities, certain private equity
investments, residential mortgage servicing rights, and long-term derivative
contracts.
Methods
and assumptions for valuing Westfield Financial’s financial instruments are set
forth below for financial instruments that have fair values different than their
carrying values. Estimated fair values are calculated based on the
value without regard to any premium or discount that may result from
concentrations of ownership of a financial instrument, possible tax
ramifications or estimated transaction cost.
Cash and cash
equivalents - The carrying amounts of cash and short-term instruments
approximate fair values based on the short-term nature of the
assets.
Interest-bearing
deposits in banks - The carrying amounts of interest-bearing deposits
maturing within ninety days approximate their fair values. Fair values of other
interest-bearing deposits are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses
based on current market rates for similar types of deposits.
Securities and
mortgage-backed securities - The securities measured at fair value in
Level 1 are based on quoted market prices in an active exchange market. These
securities include marketable equity securities. All other securities
are measured at fair value in Level 2 and are based on pricing models that
consider standard input factors such as observable market data, benchmark
yields, interest rate volatilities, broker/dealer quotes, credit spreads and new
issue data.
Federal Home Loan
Bank and other stock - These investments are carried at cost which is
their estimated redemption value.
Loans
receivable - For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no
significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values.
Fair values for certain mortgage loans (e.g., one-to-four family residential),
credit card loans, and other consumer loans are based on quoted market prices of
similar loans sold in conjunction with securitization transactions, adjusted for
differences in loan characteristics. Fair values for other loans (e.g.,
commercial real estate and investment property mortgage loans, commercial and
industrial loans) are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using
market interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to
borrowers of similar credit quality. Fair values for non-performing loans are
estimated using discounted cash flow analyses or underlying collateral values,
where applicable.
Accrued
interest - The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair
value.
Deposit
liabilities - The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g.,
interest and non-interest checking, passbook savings, and certain types of money
market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at
the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). The carrying amounts of
variable-rate, fixed-term money market accounts and certificates of deposit
approximate their fair values at the reporting date. Fair values for fixed-rate
certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation
that applies market interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a
schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time
deposits.
Short-term
borrowings - For short-term borrowings maturing within ninety days,
carrying values approximate fair values. Fair values of other short-term
borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the
current incremental borrowing rates in the market for similar types of borrowing
arrangements.
Long-term
debt - The fair values of Westfield Financial’s long-term debt are
estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the current incremental
borrowing rates in the market for similar types of borrowing
arrangements.
18
Commitments to
extend credit - The stated value of commitments to extend credit
approximates fair value as the current interest rates for similar commitments do
not differ significantly. For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair value
also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the
committed rates. Such differences are not considered
significant.
Assets
measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:
September 30, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Securities available for sale
|
$ | 6,565 | $ | 13,194 | $ | - | $ | 19,759 | ||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities available for sale
|
- | 301,597 | - | 301,597 | ||||||||||||
$ | 6,565 | $ | 314,791 | $ | - | $ | 321,356 |
September 30, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Securities
available for sale
|
$ | 6,178 | $ | 17,236 | $ | - | $ | 23,414 | ||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities available for sale
|
- | 201,189 | - | 201,189 | ||||||||||||
$ | 6,178 | $ | 218,425 | $ | - | $ | 224,603 |
Also,
Westfield Financial may be required, from time to time, to measure certain other
financial assets and liabilities on a non-recurring basis in accordance with
GAAP. These adjustments to fair value usually result from application
of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual
assets. The following table summarizes the fair value hierarchy used
to determine each adjustment and the carrying value of the related individual
assets at and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008.
At September 30, 2009
|
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2009
|
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2009
|
||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Gains (Losses)
|
Gains (Losses)
|
||||||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Impaired
loans
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 1,271 | $ | (482 | ) | $ | (879 | ) | ||||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 1,271 | $ | (482 | ) | $ | (879 | ) |
At September 30, 2008
|
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2008
|
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2008
|
||||||||||||||||||
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
Gains (Losses)
|
Total
Gains (Losses)
|
||||||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Impaired
loans
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 1,534 | $ | - | $ | (91 | ) | |||||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 1,534 | $ | - | $ | (91 | ) |
19
The
amount of loans represents the carrying value and related write-down and
valuation allowance of impaired loans for which adjustments are based on the
estimated fair value of the underlying collateral. The resulting
losses were recognized in earnings through the provision for loan
losses.
Westfield
Financial does not measure any liabilities at fair value on a recurring or
non-recurring basis on the consolidated balance sheets.
The
estimated fair values of Westfield Financial’s financial instruments are as
follows:
September
30, 2009
|
December
31, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||
Carrying
|
Estimated
|
Carrying
|
Estimated
|
|||||||||||||
Value
|
Fair
Value
|
Value
|
Fair
Value
|
|||||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 24,605 | $ | 24,605 | $ | 56,533 | $ | 56,533 | ||||||||
Securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Available
for sale
|
19,759 | 19,759 | 24,396 | 24,396 | ||||||||||||
Held
to maturity
|
69,272 | 73,297 | 79,303 | 82,491 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Available
for sale
|
301,597 | 301,597 | 233,747 | 233,747 | ||||||||||||
Held
to maturity
|
237,580 | 243,121 | 168,332 | 168,716 | ||||||||||||
Federal
Home Loan Bank of Boston and other restricted stock
|
10,003 | 10,003 | 8,456 | 8,456 | ||||||||||||
Loans-
net
|
466,808 | 475,390 | 472,135 | 492,121 | ||||||||||||
Accrued
interest receivable
|
5,195 | 5,195 | 5,261 | 5,261 | ||||||||||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
654,190 | 655,881 | 588,029 | 591,244 | ||||||||||||
Short-term
borrowings
|
55,843 | 55,843 | 49,824 | 49,824 | ||||||||||||
Long-term
debt
|
218,813 | 222,625 | 173,300 | 177,567 | ||||||||||||
Accrued
interest payable
|
782 | 782 | 762 | 762 |
Limitations
- Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant
market information and information about the financial instrument. These
estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering
for sale at one time Westfield Financial’s entire holdings of a particular
financial instrument. Where quoted market prices are not available, fair
value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss
experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various
financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective
in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment. Changes
in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.
10. SUBSEQUENT
EVENT
Management
evaluated all events or transactions that occurred after September 30, 2009 up
through November 5, 2009, the date Westfield Financial issued these financial
statements. During this period, Westfield Financial did not have any
material recognized or unrecognized subsequent events.
20
11. RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(revised 2007) (“SFAS 141R”),
Business Combinations (ASC Topic 141). The
Statement requires that all business combinations be accounted for under the
"acquisition method." The Statement requires that the assets, liabilities and
noncontrolling interests of a business combination be measured at fair value at
the acquisition date. The acquisition date is defined as the date an acquirer
obtains control of the entity, which is typically the closing date. The
Statement requires that all acquisition and restructuring related costs be
expensed as incurred and that any contingent consideration be measured at fair
value and recorded as either equity or a liability with the liability remeasured
at fair value in subsequent periods. The Statement bcame effective January 1,
2009 and is not applicable to Westfield Financial, and therefore, will not have
an impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In
December 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. 132(R)-1, Employers’ Disclosures about
Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets (“FSP 132(R)-1”) (ASC
Topic 715). This FASB staff position amends FASB Statement No. 132 to
provide guidance on an employer’s disclosures about plan assets of a defined
benefit pension or other postretirement plan. FSP FAS 132(R)-1 requires
disclosure of the fair value of each major category of plan assets for pension
plans and other postretirement benefit plans. This FASB staff position becomes
effective for the Company on January 1, 2010. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of adopting FSP FAS 132(R)-1 on the consolidated financial
statements, but it is not expected to have a material impact.
In
June 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-1 (“FSP 03-6-1”),
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are
Participating Securities (ASC Topic 718), which addresses whether instruments
granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior
to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in
computing earnings per share under the two-class method described in paragraphs
60 and 61 of FASB Statement No. 128, Earnings Per Share. FSP 03-6-1 is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. All prior-period
earnings per share data presented shall be adjusted retrospectively (including
interim financial statements, summaries of earnings and selected financial data)
to conform with the provisions of FSP 03-6-1. Early application is
not permitted. The adoption of FSP 03-6-1 did not have a material impact on
Westfield Financial’s consolidated financial statements.
In April
2009, the FASB issued FSP No. 115-2 (“FSP 115-2”), Recognition and Presentation
of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (ASC Topic 320). FSP 115-2 amends the
other-than-temporary impairment guidance in U.S. GAAP for debt securities to
make the guidance more operational and to improve the presentation and
disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities in
the financial statements. FSP 115-2 does not amend existing recognition and
measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary impairments of equity
securities. FSP 115-2 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods
ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending
after March 15, 2009. Westfield Financial applied the guidance contained in FSP
115-2 effective in January 2009 resulting in a
cumulative effect adjustment of $1.034 million ($1.566 million before
taxes) that increased retained earnings and increased accumulated other
comprehensive loss.
In April
2009, the FASB issued FSP No. 157-4 (“FSP 157-4”), Determining Fair Value When
the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly
Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (ASC Topic 820). FSP
157-4 provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with
FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, when the volume and level of
activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. This FSP also
includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is
not orderly. FSP 157-4 emphasizes that even if there has been a significant
decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability and
regardless of the valuation technique(s) used, the objective of a fair value
measurement remains the same. Fair value is the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction (that
is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at
the measurement date under current market conditions. FSP 157-4 is effective for
interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be
applied prospectively.
21
In April
2009, the FASB issued FSP No. 107-1 (“FSP 107-1”), Interim Disclosures about
Fair Value of Financial Instruments (ASC Topic 270). This
FSP amends FASB Statement No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments, to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments
for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual
financial statements. This FSP also amends APB Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial
Reporting, to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at
interim reporting periods. FSP 107-1 was effective for interim reporting periods
ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending
after March 15, 2009. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material
impact on Westfield Financial’s consolidated financial statements.
In
May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165 Subsequent Events (SFAS
No. 165) (ASC Topic 855). SFAS No. 165 establishes general standards
of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet
date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be
issued. The statement sets forth (1) the period after the balance
sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events
or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the
financial statements; (2) the circumstances under which an entity should
recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its
financial statements and (3) the disclosure that an entity should make
about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date.
SFAS No. 165 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods ending after
June 15, 2009, and shall be applied prospectively. Westfield
Financial adopted this statement as of June 30, 2009 and such adoption did
not have an impact on the results of operations or financial
position.
In June
2009, the FASB issued two related accounting pronouncements changing the
accounting principles and disclosures requirements related to securitizations
and special-purpose entities. Specifically, these pronouncements
eliminate the concept of a “qualifying special-purpose entity”, change the
requirements for derecognizing financial assets and change how a company
determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not
controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be
consolidated. These pronouncements also expand existing disclosure
requirements to include more information about transfers of financial assets,
including securitization transactions, and where companies have continuing
exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. These
pronouncements will be effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s
first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim
periods within that first annual reporting period and for interim and annual
reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is
prohibited. The recognition and measurement provisions regarding
transfers of financial assets shall be applied to transfers that occur on or
after the effective date. The adoption of these pronouncements
is not expected to have a material impact on Westfield Financial’s consolidated
financial statements.
In June
2009, the FASB issued Financial Accounting Standard No. 168, “The FASB
Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles – a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162” (FAS 168). In addition in June 2009,
the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-01, “ASC Topic 205 –
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles - amendments based on Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 168 – The FASB Accounting Standards
Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (ASU
2009-1). Both FAS 168 and ASU 2009-1 recognize the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification as the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles to be utilized by nongovernmental entities. FAS 168 and ASU 2009-1
are effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15,
2009. This statement is not expected to have a material impact on
Westfield Financial’s consolidated financial statements.
In August
2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2009-05 (ASU 2009-5) which
provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an
active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity
is required to measure fair value using one or more of the following
techniques:
|
1.
|
A
valuation technique that uses:
|
|
a.
|
The
quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an
asset
|
|
b.
|
Quoted
prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as
assets.
|
|
2.
|
Another
valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of Topic
820. Two examples would be an income approach, such as a present
value technique, or a market approach, such as a technique that is based
on the amount at the measurement date that the reporting entity would pay
to transfer the identical liability or would receive to enter into the
identical liability.
|
ASU
2009-5 also clarifies that:
22
|
·
|
When
estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not
required to include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs
relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of
the liability; and
|
|
·
|
That
both a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability at the
measurement date and the quoted price for the identical
liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustments
to the quoted price of the asset are required are Level 1 fair value
measurements.
|
This
guidance is effective for the first reporting period (including interim periods)
beginning after issuance, which is October 1, 2009 for Westfield Financial and
is not expected to have a material effect on its consolidated financial
statements.
ITEM
2: MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
Overview
We strive
to remain a leader in meeting the financial service needs of the local community
and to provide quality service to the individuals and businesses in the market
areas that it has served since 1853. Historically, we have been a
community-oriented provider of traditional banking products and services to
business organizations and individuals, including products such as residential
and commercial real estate loans, consumer loans and a variety of deposit
products. We meet the needs of our local community through a
community-based and service-oriented approach to banking.
We have
adopted a growth-oriented strategy that has focused on increased emphasis on
commercial lending. Our strategy also calls for increasing deposit
relationships and broadening its product lines and services. We
believe that this business strategy is best for its long-term success and
viability, and complements its existing commitment to high-quality customer
service. In connection with its overall growth strategy, we seek
to:
|
·
|
grow
our commercial and industrial and commercial real estate loan portfolio by
targeting businesses in our primary market area and in northern
Connecticut as a means to increase the yield on and diversify our loan
portfolio and build transactional deposit account
relationships;
|
|
·
|
focus
on expanding our retail banking franchise and increasing the number of
households served within our market area;
and
|
|
·
|
depending
on market conditions, refer substantially all of the fixed-rate
residential real estate loans to a third-party mortgage company that
underwrites, originates and services these loans in order to diversify our
loan portfolio, increase fee income and reduce interest rate
risk.
|
Please
review our financial results for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 in the
context of this strategy.
|
·
|
Net
income was $1.2 million, or $0.04 per diluted share, for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 compared to $2.0 million, or $0.07 per diluted share
for the same period in 2008. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, net income was $3.5 million, or $0.12 per diluted
share compared to $6.0 million or $0.20 per diluted share for the same
period in 2008.
|
|
·
|
FDIC
insurance expense increased $78,000 to $102,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 from $24,000 for the same period in
2008. The FDIC insurance expense increased $885,000 to $950,000
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $65,000 for the same
period in 2008. The nine months ended September 30, 2009
includes $453,000 for a special assessment that was imposed upon all banks
at June 30, 2009.
|
|
·
|
The
provision for loans losses was $620,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to $275,000 for the same period in
2008. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the
provision for loan losses was $2.4 million compared to $690,000 for the
same period in 2008. The factors that influenced the increase
in the provision for loan losses primarily include an increase in
charge-offs and the continued weakening of the local and national
economy.
|
23
|
·
|
The
three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 includes net losses on the
sale of securities of $774,000 and $565,000, respectively, compared to net
gains of $486,000 and $805,000, respectively for the same periods in
2008. We incurred losses on the sale of securities of $2.2
million for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, due
to a loss on the sale of a single security. The credit quality
of the security had deteriorated and management opted to sell it in the
third quarter of 2009. The losses were partially offset by
gains on the sale of other securities of $1.4 million and $1.6 million,
respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009.
|
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our
critical accounting policies, given our current business strategy and
asset/liability structure, are revenue recognition on loans, the accounting for
allowance for loan losses and provision for loan losses, the classification of
securities as either held to maturity or available for sale, other
than-temporary-impairment of securities and the valuation of deferred
taxes.
Our
general policy is to discontinue the accrual of interest when principal or
interest payments are delinquent 90 days or more, or earlier if the loan is
considered impaired. Any unpaid amounts previously accrued on these loans are
reversed from income. Subsequent cash receipts are applied to the
outstanding principal balance or to interest income if, in the judgment of
management, collection of principal balance is not in question. Loans are
returned to accrual status when they become current as to both principal and
interest and when subsequent performance reduces the concern as to the
collectability of principal and interest. Loan fees and certain
direct loan origination costs are deferred, and the net fee or cost is
recognized as an adjustment to interest income over the estimated average lives
of the related loans.
Our
methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance consists of two
key components: a specific allowance for identified problem or impaired loans,
and a general allowance for the remainder of the
portfolio. Measurement of impairment can be based on the present
value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest
rate, the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral, if
the loan is collateral dependent. This evaluation is inherently
subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to
significant change. The appropriateness of the allowance is also
reviewed by management based upon its evaluation of then-existing economic and
business conditions affecting our key lending areas and other conditions, such
as new loan products, credit quality trends (including trends in nonperforming
loans expected to result from existing conditions), collateral values, loan
volumes and concentrations, specific industry conditions within portfolio
segments that existed as of the balance sheet date and the impact that such
conditions were believed to have had on the collectability of the loan
portfolio. Although management believes it has established and
maintained the allowance for loan losses at adequate levels, if management’s
assumptions and judgments prove to be incorrect due to continued deterioration
in economic, real estate and other conditions, and the allowance for loan losses
is not adequate to absorb inherent losses, our earnings and capital could be
significantly and adversely affected.
Securities,
including mortgage-backed securities, that management has the positive intent
and ability to hold until maturity are classified as held to maturity and are
carried at amortized cost. Securities, including mortgage-backed securities,
that have been identified as assets for which there is not a positive intent to
hold to maturity are classified as available for sale and are carried at fair
value with unrealized gains and losses, net of income taxes, reported as a
separate component of equity. Accordingly, a misclassification would
have a direct effect on stockholders’ equity. Sales or reclassification as
available for sale (except for certain permitted reasons) of held to maturity
securities may result in the reclassification of all such securities to
available for sale. We have never sold held to maturity securities or
reclassified such securities to available for sale other than in specifically
permitted circumstances. We do not acquire securities or
mortgage-backed securities for purposes of engaging in trading
activities.
24
On a
quarterly basis, we review securities with unrealized depreciation on a
judgmental basis to assess whether the decline in fair value is temporary or
other-than-temporary. Declines in the fair value of held to maturity
and available for sale securities below their amortized cost basis that are
deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired are recognized in earnings to the
extent the impairment is related to credit losses. The amount of the
other-than-temporary impairment related to other factors is recognized in other
comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes. In estimating
other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers (1) the length of
time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the
financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the
likelihood that it will be required to sell the securities prior to the recovery
of their amortized cost basis less any credit losses.
We must
make certain estimates in determining income tax expense for financial statement
purposes. These estimates occur in the calculation of the deferred
tax assets and liabilities, which arise from the temporary differences between
the tax basis and financial statement basis of our assets and
liabilities. The carrying value of our net deferred tax asset is
based on our historic taxable income for the two prior years as well as our
belief that it is more likely than not that we will generate sufficient future
taxable income to realize these deferred tax assets. Judgments
regarding future taxable income may change due to changes in market conditions,
changes in tax laws or other factors which could result in a change in the
assessment of the realization of the net deferred tax assets.
COMPARISON
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND DECEMBER 31, 2008
Total
assets increased $152.5 million to $1.3 billion at September 30,
2009. Securities increased $124.0 million to $638.2 million at
September 30, 2009 from $514.2 million at December 31, 2008. The
increase in securities was the result of reinvesting funds from deposits,
short-term borrowings and long-term debt into securities.
The
composition of our loan portfolio at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 is
summarized as follows:
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||||||
Commercial
real estate
|
$ | 226,218 | $ | 223,857 | ||||
Residential
real estate
|
65,045 | 62,810 | ||||||
Home
equity
|
34,302 | 35,562 | ||||||
Commercial
and industrial
|
145,125 | 153,861 | ||||||
Consumer
|
3,636 | 4,248 | ||||||
Total
loans
|
474,326 | 480,338 | ||||||
Unearned
premiums and deferred loan fees and costs, net
|
339 | 593 | ||||||
Allowance
for loan losses
|
(7,857 | ) | (8,796 | ) | ||||
$ | 466,808 | $ | 472,135 |
Net loans
decreased by $5.3 million to $466.8 million at September 30, 2009 from $472.1
million at December 31, 2008. The decrease in net loans was primarily
the result of a decrease in commercial and industrial loans, partially offset by
an increase in commercial real estate loans and residential
loans. Commercial and industrial loans decreased $8.8 million to
$145.1 million at September 30, 2009 from $153.9 million at December 31,
2008. This was primarily the result of customers decreasing their
balances on lines of credit, the charge-off of a single commercial loan
relationship for $3.1 million, the majority of which was recorded in the first
quarter of 2009, and normal loan payments and payoffs. Commercial
real estate loans increased $2.3 million to $226.2 million at September 30, 2009
from $223.9 million at December 31, 2008. Owner occupied commercial
real estate loans totaled $99.1 million at September 30, 2009 and $96.3 million
at December 31, 2008, while non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans
totaled $127.1 million at September 30, 2009 and $127.6 million at December 31,
2008. Residential loans increased $975,000 to $99.3
million.
Nonperforming
loans decreased $2.5 million to $6.3 million at September 30, 2009 compared to
$8.8 million at December 31, 2008. This represented 1.33 % of total
loans at September 30, 2009 and 1.83% of total loans at December 31,
2008. The decrease in nonperforming loans was related to a single
commercial manufacturing relationship of $5.5 million. The business
was sold in 2009 and resulted in a charge-off of $3.1 million, the majority of
which was recorded in the first quarter of 2009.
25
The
following table presents information regarding nonperforming mortgage, consumer
and other loans and foreclosed real estate as of the dates
indicated. All loans where the interest payment is 90 days or more in
arrears as of the closing date of each month are placed on nonaccrual
status. At September 30, 2009, we had $6.3 million of nonaccrual
loans and no foreclosed real estate. At December 31, 2008, we had
$8.8 million of nonaccrual loans and no foreclosed real estate. If
all nonaccrual loans had been performing in accordance with their terms, we
would have earned additional interest income of $174,000 and $200,000 for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 and the year ended December 31, 2008,
respectively.
September 30, 2009
|
December 31, 2008
|
|||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||
Nonaccrual
real estate loans:
|
||||||||
Residential
|
$ | 1,277 | $ | 905 | ||||
Home
equity
|
195 | 239 | ||||||
Commercial
real estate
|
1,366 | 1,460 | ||||||
Total
nonaccrual real estate loans
|
2,838 | 2,604 | ||||||
Other
loans:
|
||||||||
Commercial
and industrial
|
3,473 | 6,195 | ||||||
Consumer
|
3 | 6 | ||||||
Total
nonaccrual consumer and other loans
|
3,476 | 6,201 | ||||||
Total
nonperforming loans
|
6,314 | 8,805 | ||||||
Foreclosed
real estate, net
|
- | - | ||||||
Total
nonperforming assets
|
$ | 6,314 | $ | 8,805 | ||||
Nonperforming
loans to total loans
|
1.33 | % | 1.83 | % | ||||
Nonperforming
assets to total assets
|
0.50 | 0.79 |
Asset
growth was funded primarily through a $66.2 million increase in deposits and a
$45.5 million increase in long-term debt. Total deposits increased
$66.2 million to $654.2 million at September 30, 2009 from $588.0 million at
December 31, 2008. The increase in deposits was due to an increase in
checking accounts and regular savings accounts. Checking accounts
increased $31.1 million to $165.7 million at September 30, 2009 from $134.6
million for December 31, 2008. Regular savings accounts increased
$25.8 million to $93.9 million at September 30, 2009. The increases
in both checking and savings accounts were primarily due to accounts which pay a
higher interest rate than comparable products. Time deposit accounts
increased $15.3 million to $342.9 million at September 30, 2009.
Long-term
debt, which includes FHLB advances and securities sold under repurchase
agreements with an original maturity of one year or more, was $218.8 million at
September 30, 2009 and $173.3 million at December 31, 2008.
Stockholders’
equity at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $257.2 million and $259.9
million, respectively, which represented 20.4% of total assets as of September
30, 2009 and 23.4% of total assets as of December 31, 2008. The
change in stockholders’ equity is comprised of the repurchase of 758,889 shares
for $6.9 million related to the stock repurchase plan and dividends declared
amounting to $8.9 million. This was partially offset by $6.8 million
decrease in other comprehensive loss, net income of $3.5 million and share-based
compensation expense of $2.4 million.
COMPARISON
OF OPERATING RESULTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND SEPTEMBER
30, 2008
General
Net
income was $1.2 million, or $0.04 per diluted share, for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 as compared to $2.0 million, or $0.07 per diluted share, for
the same period in 2008. Net interest and dividend income was
$8.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and $8.1 million
for the same period in 2008.
26
Net
Interest and Dividend Income
The
following tables set forth the information relating to our average balance at,
and net interest income for, the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
and reflect the average yield on interest-earning assets and average cost of
interest-bearing liabilities for the periods indicated. Yields and
costs are derived by dividing interest income by the average balance of
interest-earning assets and interest expense by the average balance of
interest-bearing liabilities for the periods shown. The interest rate
spread is the difference between the total average yield on interest-earning
assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest
margin represents tax-equivalent net interest and dividend income as a
percentage of average interest earning assets. Average balances are
derived from actual daily balances over the periods
indicated. Interest income includes fees earned from making changes
in loan rates and terms and fees earned when the real estate loans are prepaid
or refinanced. For analytical purposes, the interest earned on
tax-exempt assets is adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis to recognize the income
tax savings which facilities comparison between taxable and tax-exempt
assets.
27
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Average
|
Average
Yield /
|
Average
|
Average
Yield /
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
|
Interest
|
Cost
|
Balance
|
Interest
|
Cost
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans(1)(2)
|
$ | 480,950 | $ | 6,530 | 5.43 | % | $ | 456,407 | $ | 6,958 | 6.10 | % | ||||||||||||
Securities(2)
|
618,599 | 6,913 | 4.47 | 508,210 | 6,542 | 5.15 | ||||||||||||||||||
Short-term
investments(3)
|
12,459 | 2 | 0.06 | 33,390 | 158 | 1.89 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
interest-earning assets
|
1,112,008 | 13,445 | 4.84 | 998,007 | 13,658 | 5.47 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
noninterest-earning assets
|
73,550 | 71,483 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 1,185,558 | $ | 1,069,490 | ||||||||||||||||||||
LIABILITIES
AND EQUITY:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
NOW
accounts
|
$ | 80,674 | 392 | 1.94 | $ | 86,203 | 328 | 1.52 | ||||||||||||||||
Savings
accounts
|
89,869 | 254 | 1.13 | 63,906 | 211 | 1.32 | ||||||||||||||||||
Money
market accounts
|
52,194 | 113 | 0.87 | 65,613 | 189 | 1.15 | ||||||||||||||||||
Time
deposits
|
341,443 | 2,462 | 2.88 | 322,038 | 2,823 | 3.51 | ||||||||||||||||||
Short-term
borrowings and long-term debt
|
271,615 | 1,835 | 2.70 | 204,011 | 1,854 | 3.64 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
|
835,795 | 5,056 | 2.42 | 741,771 | 5,405 | 2.91 | ||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing
deposits
|
81,421 | 46,178 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
noninterest-bearing liabilities
|
11,270 | 8,600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
noninterest-bearing liabilities
|
92,691 | 54,778 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities
|
928,486 | 796,549 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
equity
|
257,072 | 272,941 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities and equity
|
$ | 1,185,558 | $ | 1,069,490 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less: Tax-equivalent
adjustment(2)
|
(147 | ) | (154 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest and dividend income
|
$ | 8,242 | $ | 8,099 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest rate spread(4)
|
2.42 | % | 2.56 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest margin(5)
|
2.99 | % | 3.29 | % |
(1)
|
Loans,
including non-accrual loans, are net of deferred loan origination costs,
and unadvanced funds.
|
(2)
|
Securities,
loan income and net interest income are presented on a tax-equivalent
basis using a tax rate of 34%. The tax-equivalent adjustment is
deducted from tax-equivalent net interest and dividend income to agree to
the amount reported in the statements of
income.
|
(3)
|
Short-term
investments include federal funds
sold.
|
(4)
|
Net
interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted
average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of
interest-bearing liabilities.
|
(5)
|
Net
interest margin represents tax-equivalent net interest and dividend income
as a percentage of average interest earning
assets.
|
The
following table shows how changes in interest rates and changes in the volume of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities have affected our
interest income and interest expense during the periods
indicated. Information is provided in each category with respect
to:
·
|
Interest
income changes attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume
multiplied by prior rate);
|
·
|
Interest
income changes attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied
by current volume); and
|
·
|
The
net change.
|
28
The
changes attributable to the combined impact of volume and rate have been
allocated proportionately to the changes due to volume and the changes due to
rate.
Three
Months Ended September 30, 2009 compared
|
||||||||||||
to Three Months Ended September 30,
2008
|
||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) Due to
|
||||||||||||
Volume
|
Rate
|
Net
|
||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets
|
||||||||||||
Short-term
investments
|
$ | (99 | ) | $ | (57 | ) | $ | (156 | ) | |||
Investment
securities (1)
|
1,421 | (1,050 | ) | 371 | ||||||||
Loans
(1)
|
374 | (802 | ) | (428 | ) | |||||||
Total
interest earning assets
|
1,696 | (1,909 | ) | (213 | ) | |||||||
Interest-bearing
liabilities
|
||||||||||||
NOW
accounts
|
(21 | ) | 85 | 64 | ||||||||
Savings
accounts
|
86 | (43 | ) | 43 | ||||||||
Money
market accounts
|
(39 | ) | (37 | ) | (76 | ) | ||||||
Time
deposits
|
170 | (531 | ) | (361 | ) | |||||||
Short-term
borrowing and long-term debt
|
614 | (633 | ) | (19 | ) | |||||||
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
|
810 | (1,159 | ) | (349 | ) | |||||||
Change
in net interest and dividend income
|
$ | 886 | $ | (750 | ) | $ | 136 |
(1)
|
Securities and
loan income and net interest income are presented on a tax-equivalent
basis using a tax rate of 34%. The tax-equivalent adjustment is deducted
from tax-equivalent net interest
income.
|
Net
interest and dividend income increased $143,000 to $8.2 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 from $8.1 million for the same period in
2008. The net interest margin, on a tax-equivalent basis, was 2.99%
for the three months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to 3.29% for the same
period in 2008. Interest and dividend income, on a tax-equivalent
basis, decreased $213,000 to $13.4 million for the three months ended September
30, 2009 from $13.7 million for the same period in 2008. The average
yield on interest-earning assets decreased 63 basis points to 4.84% for the
three months ended September 30, 2009 from 5.47% for the same period in
2008.
The
decrease in interest income was partially offset by a decrease in interest
expense. Interest expense decreased $349,000 to $5.1 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2009 from $5.4 million for the same period in
2008. The average cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased 49
basis points to 2.42% for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from 2.91%
for the same period in 2008, as a result of the declining rate
environment.
Provision
for Loan Losses
The
amount that we provided for loan losses during the three months ended September
30, 2009 was based upon the changes that occurred in the loan portfolio during
that same period. The changes in the loan portfolio, described in detail below,
include an increase in charge-offs, the continued weakening of the local and
national economy. After evaluating these factors, we provided
$620,000 for loan losses for the three months ended September 30, 2009, compared
to $275,000 for the same period in 2008. The allowance was $7.9
million at September 30, 2009 and $6.4 million at September 30,
2008. The allowance for loan losses was 1.66% of total loans at
September 30, 2009 and 1.38% at September 30, 2008.
Net
charge-offs were $99,000 for the three months ended September 30,
2009. This was comprised of charge-offs of $117,000 for the three
months ended September 30, 2009, partially offset by recoveries of $18,000 for
the same period. Net recoveries were $6,000 for the three months
ended September 30, 2008. This was comprised of charge-offs of
$11,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2008, partially offset by
recoveries of $17,000 for the same period.
29
Although
management believes it has established and maintained the allowance for loan
losses at adequate levels, future adjustments may be necessary if economic, real
estate and other conditions differ substantially from the current operating
environment.
Noninterest
Income
Noninterest
income decreased $918,000 to $(119,000) for the three months ended September 30,
2009 from $799,000 for the same period in 2008. The three months
ended September 30, 2009 includes a net loss on the sale of securities of
$774,000 compared to a net gain of $486,000 for the same period in
2008. We incurred losses on the sale of securities of $2.2 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2009, due to a loss on the sale of a
single security. The credit quality of the security had deteriorated
and management opted to sell it in the third quarter of 2009. The
losses were partially offset by gains on the sale of other securities of $1.4
million for the three months ended September 30, 2009.
Noninterest
Expense
Noninterest
expense for the three months ended September 30, 2009 was $6.1 million, compared
to $5.8 million for the same period in 2008.
Salaries
and benefits increased $155,000 to $3.8 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 from $3.7 million for the same period in
2008. Expenses related to the defined benefit pension plan increased
$184,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009. The
increase was due to a decline in the value of assets held by the pension
plan.
Income
Taxes
For the
three months ended September 30, 2009, we had a tax provision of $197,000 as
compared to $793,000 for the same period in 2008. The effective tax
rate was 13.7% for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 27.9% for the
same period in 2008. The decrease in effective tax rate from
September 30, 2009 is due primarily to lower pre-tax income while maintaining
the same level of tax-advantaged income such as BOLI and tax-exempt municipal
obligations.
COMPARISON
OF OPERATING RESULTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND SEPTEMBER
30, 2008
General
Net
income was $3.5 million, or $0.12 per diluted share, for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 as compared to $6.0 million, or $0.20 per diluted share, for
the same period in 2008. Net interest and dividend income was $24.1
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and $23.8 million for the
same period in 2008.
Net
Interest and Dividend Income
The
following tables set forth the information relating to our average balance at,
and net interest income for, the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
and reflect the average yield on interest-earning assets and average cost of
interest-bearing liabilities for the periods indicated. Yields and
costs are derived by dividing interest income by the average balance of
interest-earning assets and interest expense by the average balance of
interest-bearing liabilities for the periods shown. The interest rate
spread is the difference between the total average yield on interest-earning
assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest
margin represents tax-equivalent net interest and dividend income as a
percentage of average interest earning assets. Average balances are
derived from actual daily balances over the periods
indicated. Interest income includes fees earned from making changes
in loan rates and terms and fees earned when the real estate loans are prepaid
or refinanced. For analytical purposes interest earned on tax-exempt
assets is adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis to recognize the income tax savings
which facilities comparison between taxable and tax-exempt
assets.
30
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Average
|
Average
Yield /
|
Average
|
Average
Yield /
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
|
Interest
|
Cost
|
Balance
|
Interest
|
Cost
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans(1)(2)
|
$ | 476,945 | $ | 19,497 | 5.45 | % | $ | 436,537 | $ | 20,362 | 6.22 | % | ||||||||||||
Securities(2)
|
573,971 | 20,302 | 4.72 | 530,296 | 20,343 | 5.11 | ||||||||||||||||||
Short-term
investments(3)
|
17,507 | 11 | 0.08 | 31,779 | 544 | 2.28 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
interest-earning assets
|
1,068,423 | 39,810 | 4.97 | 998,612 | 41,249 | 5.51 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
noninterest-earning assets
|
72,389 | 67,809 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 1,140,812 | $ | 1,066,421 | ||||||||||||||||||||
LIABILITIES
AND EQUITY:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
NOW
accounts
|
$ | 67,451 | 967 | 1.91 | $ | 86,681 | 947 | 1.46 | ||||||||||||||||
Savings
accounts
|
80,913 | 682 | 1.12 | 57,995 | 553 | 1.27 | ||||||||||||||||||
Money
market accounts
|
53,876 | 369 | 0.91 | 69,195 | 608 | 1.17 | ||||||||||||||||||
Time
deposits
|
335,699 | 7,767 | 3.08 | 332,213 | 9,578 | 3.84 | ||||||||||||||||||
Short-term
borrowings and long-term debt
|
252,492 | 5,522 | 2.92 | 190,159 | 5,374 | 3.77 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
|
790,431 | 15,307 | 2.58 | 736,243 | 17,060 | 3.09 | ||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing
deposits
|
79,650 | 42,972 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
noninterest-bearing liabilities
|
11,486 | 8,862 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
noninterest-bearing liabilities
|
91,136 | 51,834 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities
|
881,567 | 788,077 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
equity
|
259,245 | 278,344 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities and equity
|
$ | 1,140,812 | $ | 1,066,421 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less: Tax-equivalent
adjustment(2)
|
(434 | ) | (428 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest and dividend income
|
$ | 24,069 | $ | 23,761 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest rate spread(4)
|
2.39 | % | 2.42 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest margin(5)
|
3.07 | % | 3.24 | % |
(1)
|
Loans,
including non-accrual loans, are net of deferred loan origination costs,
and unadvanced funds.
|
(2)
|
Securities,
loan income and net interest income are presented on a tax-equivalent
basis using a tax rate of 34%. The tax-equivalent adjustment is
deducted from tax-equivalent net interest and dividend income to agree to
the amount reported in the statements of
income.
|
(3)
|
Short-term
investments include federal funds
sold.
|
(4)
|
Net
interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted
average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of
interest-bearing liabilities.
|
(5)
|
Net
interest margin represents tax-equivalent net interest and dividend income
as a percentage of average interest earning
assets.
|
The
following table shows how changes in interest rates and changes in the volume of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities have affected our
interest income and interest expense during the periods
indicated. Information is provided in each category with respect
to:
·
|
Interest
income changes attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume
multiplied by prior rate);
|
·
|
Interest
income changes attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied
by current volume); and
|
·
|
The
net change.
|
The
changes attributable to the combined impact of volume and rate have been
allocated proportionately to the changes due to volume and the changes due to
rate.
31
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 compared
|
||||||||||||
to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) Due to
|
||||||||||||
Volume
|
Rate
|
Net
|
||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Interest-earning
assets
|
|
|||||||||||
Loans
(1)
|
$ | 1,885 | $ | (2,750 | ) | $ | (865 | ) | ||||
Securities
(1)
|
1,675 | (1,716 | ) | (41 | ) | |||||||
Short-term
investments
|
(244 | ) | (289 | ) | (533 | ) | ||||||
Total
interest-earning assets
|
3,316 | (4,755 | ) | (1,439 | ) | |||||||
Interest-bearing
liabilities
|
||||||||||||
NOW
accounts
|
(210 | ) | 230 | 20 | ||||||||
Savings
accounts
|
219 | (90 | ) | 129 | ||||||||
Money
market accounts
|
(135 | ) | (104 | ) | (239 | ) | ||||||
Time
deposits
|
101 | (1,912 | ) | (1,811 | ) | |||||||
Short-term
borrowing and long-time debt
|
1,762 | (1,614 | ) | 148 | ||||||||
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
|
1,737 | (3,490 | ) | (1,753 | ) | |||||||
Change
in net interest and dividend income
|
$ | 1,579 | $ | (1,265 | ) | $ | 314 |
(1)
|
Securities
and loan income and net interest income are presented on a tax-equivalent
basis using a tax rate of 34%. The tax-equivalent adjustment is deducted
from tax-equivalent net interest
income.
|
Net
interest and dividend income increased $308,000 to $24.1 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 from $23.8 million for the same period in
2008. The net interest margin, on a tax-equivalent basis, was 3.07%
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to 3.24% for the same
period in 2008. The primary reason for the increase in net interest
and dividend income was that the cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased
more than the yield on interest-earning assets for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. Interest
expense decreased $1.8 million to $15.3 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to the same period for 2008. The average
cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased 51 basis points to 2.58% for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 from 3.09% for the same period in
2008. The decrease in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities was
primarily due to a decrease in rates on time deposits, repurchase agreements and
borrowings.
Interest
and dividend income, on a tax-equivalent basis, decreased $1.4 million to $39.8
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $41.2 million for the
same period in 2008. The primary reason for the decrease in interest
and dividend income was a decrease in the rate on interest-earning
assets. The yield on average interest-earning assets decreased 54
basis points to 4.97% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from 5.51%
for the same period in 2008. This was partially offset by an increase
of $69.8 million in the balance of average earning assets to $1.1 billion for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $998.6 million for the same period
in 2008.
Provision
for Loan Losses
The
amount that we provided for loan losses during the nine months ended September
30, 2009 was based upon the changes that occurred in the loan portfolio during
that same period. The changes in the loan portfolio, described in detail below,
include an increase in charge-offs and the continued weakening of the local and
national economy. After evaluating these factors, we provided $2.4
million for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared
to $690,000 for the same period in 2008. The allowance was $7.9
million at September 30, 2009 and $8.8 million at December 31,
2008. The allowance for loan losses was 1.66% of total loans at
September 30, 2009 and 1.83% at December 31, 2008.
32
Net
charge-offs were $3.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as
compared to $8,000 for the same period in 2008. This was comprised of
charge-offs of $3.3 million offset by recoveries of $41,000. The
increase in charge-offs was the related to a single commercial manufacturing
relationship. The business was sold in 2009 and resulted in a
charge-off of $3.1 million, the majority of which was recorded in the first
quarter of 2009. Net charge-offs for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 were $8,000. This was comprised of
charge-offs of $62,000 offset by recoveries of $54,000.
Noninterest
Income
Noninterest
income decreased $518,000 to $2.1 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2009 from the same period in 2008. This was primarily the result
of an increase of $412,000 in fees received from the third-party mortgage
program as we experienced an increased in mortgage referrals due to a decrease
in interest rates. This was partially offset by a decrease in net
checking processing fee income of $187,000 for the nine months ended September
30, 2009, primarily due to a decrease in overdraft fee income. In
addition, income from bank-owned life insurance (“BOLI”) increased $83,000 for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
The nine
months ended September 30, 2009 includes a net loss on the sale of securities of
$565,000 compared to a net gain of $805,000 for the same period in
2008. We incurred losses on the sale of securities of $2.2 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, due to a loss on the sale of a
single security. The credit quality of the security had deteriorated
and management opted to sell it in the third quarter of 2009. The
loss was partially offset by gains on the sale of other securities of $1.6
million, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
The nine
months ended September 30, 2009 includes net impairment losses of $186,000,
compared to net impairment losses of $961,000 for the same period in
2008. The 2009 impairment was on a single collateralized mortgage
obligation and was recognized in the third quarter of 2009. The 2008
impairment loss was primarily on preferred stock issued by Freddie Mac, which
was placed into conservatorship by the United States Treasury in September
2008.
Noninterest
Expense
Noninterest
expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $19.5 million, compared
to $17.3 million for the same period in 2008. Salaries and
benefits increased $1.0 to $11.8 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 from $10.8 million for the same period in 2008. Expenses related
to the defined benefit pension plan increased $540,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. The increase was due to a decline in the value of
assets held by the pension plan. Expenses related to share-based
compensation increased $387,000 for the nine months ended September 30,
2009. The increase in share-based compensation was primarily due to
accelerated vesting of share-based compensation in the first quarter of 2009 for
certain employees who were retirement eligible.
FDIC
insurance expense increased $885,000 to $950,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 from $65,000 for the same period in 2008. The six
months ended June 30, 2009 includes the accrual of $453,000 for a special
assessment that was imposed upon all banks at June 30, 2009.
Income
Taxes
For the
nine months ended September 30, 2009, we had a tax provision of $804,000 as
compared to $2.4 million for the same period in 2008. The effective
tax rate was 18.6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 28.1% for
the same period in 2008. The decrease in effective tax rate from
September 30, 2008 is due primarily to additional provision for loan loss
expense recorded in the first quarter of 2009 reducing pre-tax income while
maintaining the same level of tax-advantaged income such as BOLI and tax-exempt
municipal obligations.
33
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The term
“liquidity” refers to our ability to generate adequate amounts of cash to fund
loan originations, loan purchases, withdrawals of deposits and operating
expenses. Our primary sources of liquidity are deposits, scheduled
amortization and prepayments of loan principal and mortgage-backed securities,
maturities and calls of securities and funds provided by
operations. We also can borrow funds from the FHLB based on eligible
collateral of loans and securities. Our maximum additional borrowing
capacity from the FHLB at September 30, 2009 was $96.2 million.
Liquidity
management is both a daily and long-term function of business
management. The measure of a company’s liquidity is its ability to
meet its cash commitments at all times with available cash or by conversion of
other assets to cash at a reasonable price. Loan repayments and
maturing investment securities are a relatively predictable source of
funds. However, deposit flow, calls of securities and repayments of
loans and mortgage-backed securities are strongly influenced by interest rates,
general and local economic conditions and competition in the
marketplace. These factors reduce the predictability of the timing of
these sources of funds. Management believes that we have sufficient
liquidity to meet its current operating needs.
At
September 30, 2009, we exceeded each of its applicable regulatory capital
requirements. As of September 30, 2009, the most recent notification
from the Office of Thrift Supervision (the “OTS”) categorized us as “well
capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective
action. To be categorized as “well capitalized” we must maintain
minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk based and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set
forth in the following table. There are no conditions or events since
that notification that management believes have changed our
category. Our actual capital ratios of September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 are also presented in the following table.
Actual
|
Minimum For Capital
Adequacy Purpose
|
Minimum To Be Well
Capitalized Under Prompt
Corrective Action Provisions
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
Capital (to Risk
Weighted Assets):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
$ | 267,162 | 35.14 | % | $ | 60,829 | 8.00 | % | N/A | - | ||||||||||||||
Bank
|
232,827 | 30.91 | 60,256 | 8.00 | $ | 75,320 | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Tier
1 Capital (to Risk
Weighted Assets):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
259,305 | 34.10 | 30,414 | 4.00 | N/A | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Bank
|
225,926 | 30.00 | 30,128 | 4.00 | 45,192 | 6.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier
1 Capital (to Adjusted
Total Assets):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
259,305 | 20.55 | 50,463 | 4.00 | N/A | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Bank
|
225,926 | 18.35 | 49,250 | 4.00 | 61,562 | 5.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tangible
Equity (to Tangible
Assets):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
N/A | - | N/A | - | N/A | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Bank
|
225,926 | 18.35 | 18,469 | 1.50 | N/A | - | ||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
Capital (to Risk
Weighted Assets):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
$ | 276,857 | 42.56 | % | $ | 52,042 | 8.00 | % | N/A | - | ||||||||||||||
Bank
|
226,314 | 35.55 | 50,930 | 8.00 | $ | 63,662 | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Tier
1 Capital (to Risk
Weighted Assets):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
268,725 | 41.31 | 26,021 | 4.00 | N/A | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Bank
|
219,744 | 34.52 | 25,465 | 4.00 | 38,197 | 6.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier
1 Capital (to Adjusted
Total Assets):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
268,725 | 23.97 | 44,836 | 4.00 | N/A | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Bank
|
219,744 | 20.51 | 42,854 | 4.00 | 53,567 | 5.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tangible
Equity (to Tangible
Assets):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
N/A | - | N/A | - | N/A | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Bank
|
219,744 | 20.51 | 16,070 | 1.50 | N/A | - |
34
We also
have outstanding, at any time, a significant number of commitments to extend
credit and provide financial guarantees to third parties. These
arrangements are subject to strict credit control
assessments. Guarantees specify limits to our
obligations. Because many commitments and almost all guarantees
expire without being funded in whole or in part, the contract amounts are not
estimates of future cash flows. We are obligated under leases for
certain of its branches and equipment. A summary of lease obligations
and credit commitments at September 30, 2009 follows:
After
1 Year
|
After
3 Years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Within
|
But Within
|
But Within
|
After
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
1 Year
|
3 Years
|
5 Years
|
5 Years
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lease
Obligations
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating
lease obligations
|
$ | 515 | $ | 937 | $ | 799 | $ | 10,369 | $ | 12,620 | ||||||||||||||
Borrowings
and Debt
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Home Loan Bank
|
86,000 | 65,800 | 16,650 | - | 168,450 | |||||||||||||||||||
Securities
sold under
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
agreements
to repurchase
|
24,906 | - | 42,800 | 38,500 | 106,206 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total
borrowings and debt
|
110,906 | 65,800 | 59,450 | 38,500 | 274,656 | |||||||||||||||||||
Credit
Commitments
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available
lines of credit
|
64,563 | - | - | 17,427 | 81,990 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other
loan commitments
|
20,014 | - | - | 1,917 | - | 21,931 | ||||||||||||||||||
Letters
of credit
|
3,944 | - | - | 505 | 4,449 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total
credit commitments
|
88,521 | - | 1,917 | 17,932 | 108,370 | |||||||||||||||||||
$ | 199,942 | $ | 66,737 | $ | 62,166 | $ | 66,801 | $ | 395,646 |
OFF-BALANCE
SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We do not
have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to
have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial
condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital
expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.
ITEM
3: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Quantitative
measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require us to
maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table above) of total and
Tier I capital to risk weighted assets and to adjusted total
assets. Management believes, as of September 30, 2009, that we met
all capital adequacy requirements to which it was subject. As of
September 30, 2009, the most recent notification from the OTS categorized us as
“well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective
action.
Management
uses a simulation model to monitor interest rate risk. This model
reports the net interest income at risk primarily under seven different interest
rate environments. Specifically, net interest income is measured in
one scenario that assumes no change in interest rates, and six scenarios where
interest rates increase 100, 200, and 300 basis points, and decrease 100, 200,
and 300 basis points immediately following the current consolidated financial
statements. Income from tax-exempt assets is calculated on a fully
taxable equivalent basis. Management believes that the risk
associated with a 200 or 300 basis point drop in interest rates is mitigated by
the already historically low rate environment.
35
The
changes in interest income and interest expense due to changes in interest rates
reflect the rate sensitivity of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities. For example, in a rising interest rate environment, the
interest income from an adjustable rate loan is likely to increase depending on
its repricing characteristics while the interest income from a fixed rate loan
would not increase until the funds were repaid and loaned out at a higher
interest rate.
The table
below sets forth as of September 30, 2010 the estimated changes in net interest
and dividend income that would result from incremental changes in interest rates
over the applicable twelve-month period.
For the Twelve Months Ending September 30, 2010
|
||||||||
Changes in Interest Rates
(Basis Points)
|
Net Interest and
Dividend Income
|
% Change
|
||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||
300
|
33,910 | 24.7 | % | |||||
200
|
31,905 | 17.3 | % | |||||
100
|
28,827 | 6.0 | % | |||||
0
|
27,203 | 0.0 | % | |||||
-100
|
23,267 | -14.5 | % | |||||
-200
|
18,950 | -30.3 | % | |||||
-300
|
16,875 | -38.0 | % |
Management
believes that there have been no significant changes in market risk since
September 30, 2009.
The
income simulation analysis was based upon a variety of
assumptions. These assumptions include, but are not limited to, asset
mix, prepayment speeds, the timing and level of interest rates, and the shape of
the yield curve. As market conditions vary from the assumptions in
the income simulation analysis, actual results will differ. As a
result, the income simulation analysis does not serve as a forecast of net
interest income, nor do the calculations represent any actions that management
may undertake in response to changes in interest rates.
ITEM
4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated
the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), as of the end of the period covered
by this report. Based upon the evaluation, the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and
procedures were effective, to ensure that information required to be disclosed
in the reports we file and submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded,
processed, summarized and reported as and when required and (ii) accumulated and
communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely discussion regarding required
disclosure.
There
have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified
in connection with the evaluation that occurred during our last fiscal quarter
that have materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
36
PART
II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
None.
ITEM
1A.
|
RISK
FACTORS
|
For a
summary of risk factors relevant to our operations, see Part 1, Item 1A, “Risk
Factors” in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. There are no
material changes in the risk factors relevant to our operations, except as
discussed below.
Stress
on the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) system may cause our results of
operations and financial condition to be adversely affected.
In recent
months, the financial media has disclosed that the nation’s FHLB system may be
under stress due to deterioration in the financial markets, particularly in
relation to valuation of mortgage securities. Several of the
FHLBs have announced impairment charges of these and other assets and, as
such, their capital positions have deteriorated to the point that they have
or may suspend dividend payments to their members. We are a member of the FHLB
of Boston (“FHLBB”). In the first quarter of 2009, the FHLBB notified its
members of its focus on preserving capital in response to the ongoing market
volatility. That notice outlined that actions taken by the FHLBB included
an excess stock repurchase moratorium, an increased retained earnings target,
and suspension of its quarterly dividend payment. If there are any further
developments that cause the value of our stock investment in the FHLBB to
become impaired, we would be required to write down the value of its
investment, which in turn could affect our net income and stockholders’
equity. At September 30, 2009, our investment in FHLBB stock was $9.8
million.
ITEM
2.
|
UNREGISTERED
SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
|
The
following table sets forth information with respect to purchases made by us of
our common stock during the three months ended September 30, 2009.
Period
|
Total number
of shares
purchased
|
Average price
paid per share
($)
|
Total number of
shares purchased
as part of publicly
announced
programs
|
Maximum
number of shares
that may yet be
purchased under
the program (1)
|
||||||||||||
July
1 - 31, 2009
|
- | - | - | 1,698,706 | ||||||||||||
August
1 - 31, 2009
|
1,053 | 8.99 | 1,053 | 1,697,653 | ||||||||||||
September
1 - 30, 2009
|
301,563 | 8.93 | 301,563 | 1,396,090 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
302,616 | 8.93 | 302,616 | 1,396,090 |
(1)
|
In
January 2008, the Board of Directors voted to authorize the commencement
of a repurchase program (“Repurchase Program”) authorizing the Company to
repurchase up to 3,194,000 shares, or ten percent of its outstanding
shares of common stock. The Repurchase Program will continue until it is
completed. The repurchases may be made from time to time at the discretion
of management of the Company.
|
There
were no sales by us of unregistered securities during the three months ended
September 30, 2009.
37
ITEM
3.
|
DEFAULTS
UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
|
None.
ITEM
4.
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY
HOLDERS
|
None
ITEM
5.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
None.
ITEM
6.
|
EXHIBITS
|
The following exhibits are furnished
with this report:
2.1
|
Amended
and Restated Plan of Conversion and Stock Issuance of Westfield Mutual
Holding Company, Westfield Financial, Inc. and Westfield Bank.
(1)
|
|
3.1
|
Articles
of Organization of Westfield Financial, Inc. (2)
|
|
3.2
|
Bylaws
of Westfield Financial, Inc. (2)
|
|
4.1
|
Form
of Stock Certificate of Westfield Financial, Inc. (1)
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002*
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002*
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002*
|
|
32.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002*
|
* Filed
herewith.
(1)
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Registration Statement No. 333-137024 on Form S-1
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 31, 2006, as
amended.
|
(2)
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on January 5, 2007.
|
38
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
Westfield
Financial, Inc.
|
||
(Registrant)
|
||
By:
|
/s/
James C. Hagan
|
|
James
C. Hagan
|
||
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
||
By:
|
/s/
Leo R. Sagan, Jr.
|
|
Leo
R. Sagan, Jr.
|
||
Vice
President/Chief Financial
Officer
|
November
5, 2009
39