ENCORE WIRE CORP - Quarter Report: 2013 June (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013

or

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number: 000-20278

ENCORE WIRE CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (972) 562-9473

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x     No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Number of shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01, outstanding as of August 1, 2013: 20,673,452

Table of Contents

ENCORE WIRE CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

Table of Contents

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

ENCORE WIRE CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

See accompanying notes.

1

Table of Contents

ENCORE WIRE CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (continued)

See accompanying notes.

2

Table of Contents

ENCORE WIRE CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes.

3

Table of Contents

ENCORE WIRE CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes.

4

Table of Contents

ENCORE WIRE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

June 30, 2013

NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The unaudited consolidated financial statements of Encore Wire Corporation (the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete annual financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation, have been included. Results of operations for interim periods presented do not necessarily indicate the results that may be expected for the entire year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

NOTE 2 – INVENTORIES

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost, determined by the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method, or market.

Inventories consist of the following:

LIFO pools are established at the end of each fiscal year. During the first three quarters of every year, LIFO calculations are based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly, interim LIFO balances will fluctuate up and down in tandem with inventory levels and costs.

During the first quarter of 2013, the Company liquidated a portion of the layer established in 2011 and built some of that layer back in the second quarter of 2013. As a result, under the LIFO method, this inventory layer was liquidated at historical costs that were higher than current costs. This activity impacted net income positively in the second quarter of 2013 by $481,000 and negatively by $903,000 for the first six months of 2013. During the first six months of 2012, the Company liquidated a portion of the

5

Table of Contents

layer established in 2011. As a result, under the LIFO method, this inventory layer was liquidated at historical costs that were higher than current costs, which negatively impacted net income for the second quarter and the first six months of 2012 by $383,000.

NOTE 3 – ACCRUED LIABILITIES

Accrued liabilities consist of the following:

NOTE 4 – INCOME TAXES

Income taxes were accrued at an effective rate of 35.3% in the second quarter of 2013 versus 41.8% in the second quarter of 2012, consistent with the Company’s estimated liabilities. The decrease in the effective rate was due to a moderate change in the proportional effects of permanent items on the effective rate. For the six months ended June 30, the Company’s effective tax rate was approximately 33.9% in 2013 and 32.7% in 2012.

6

Table of Contents

NOTE 5 – EARNINGS PER SHARE

Net earnings (loss) per common and common equivalent share are computed using the weighted average number of shares of common stock and common stock equivalents outstanding during each period. If dilutive, the effect of stock options, treated as common stock equivalents, is calculated using the treasury stock method.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net earnings (loss) per share:

The number of weighted average employee stock options excluded from the determination of diluted earnings per share for the second quarter was 191,000 in 2013 and 193,000 in 2012. Such options were anti-dilutive for the respective periods.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net earnings (loss) per share:

7

Table of Contents

The number of weighted average employee stock options excluded from the determination of diluted earnings per share for the six months ended June 30 was 191,000 in 2013 and 166,000 in 2012. Such options were anti-dilutive for the respective periods.

NOTE 6 – DEBT

The Company is party to a Credit Agreement with two banks, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and letter of credit issuer, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as syndication agent (the “Credit Agreement”). The Credit Agreement extends through October 1, 2017, and provides for maximum borrowings of the lesser of $150.0 million or the amount of eligible accounts receivable plus the amount of eligible finished goods and raw materials, less any reserves established by the banks. Additionally, at our request and subject to certain conditions, the commitments under the Credit Agreement may be increased by a maximum of up to $100.0 million as long as existing or new lenders agree to provide such additional commitments. The calculated maximum borrowing amount available at June 30, 2013, as computed under the Credit Agreement, was $149.5 million. Borrowings under the line of credit bear interest, at the Company’s option, at either (1) LIBOR plus a margin that varies from 0.875% to 1.75% depending upon the Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement), or (2) the base rate (which is the highest of the federal funds rate plus 0.5%, the prime rate, or LIBOR plus 1.0%) plus 0% to 0.25% (depending upon the Leverage Ratio). A commitment fee ranging from 0.15% to 0.30% (depending upon the Leverage Ratio) is payable on the unused line of credit. At June 30, 2013, there were no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreement. Obligations under the Credit Agreement are the only contractual borrowing obligations or commercial borrowing commitments of the Company.

Obligations under the Credit Agreement are unsecured and contain customary covenants and events of default. The Company was in compliance with the covenants as of June 30, 2013.

NOTE 7 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

On November 10, 2006, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program authorizing the Company to repurchase up to 1,000,000 shares of its common stock through December 31, 2007 on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions at prices determined by the President of the Company. The Company’s Board of Directors has subsequently authorized increases and annual extensions of this stock repurchase program. As of June 30, 2013, the repurchase authorization had 1,225,750 shares remaining authorized through March 31, 2014. The Company did not repurchase any shares of its stock in the first six months of 2013. On May 14, 2012, the Company repurchased 2,774,250 shares of common stock owned by Capital Southwest Venture Corporation at an aggregate purchase price of $66,637,485, based on a price of $24.02 per share. Appropriate consents to the repurchase were also obtained from lenders under the Company’s Financing Agreement. The repurchase represented approximately 11.8% of the outstanding shares of the Company as of the purchase date and was the only repurchase in the first six months of 2012. Other than net income, there was no material change in stockholders equity during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013.

8

Table of Contents

NOTE 8 – CONTINGENCIES

On July 7, 2009, Southwire Company, a Delaware corporation (“Southwire”), filed a complaint for patent infringement against the Company and Cerro Wire, Inc. (“Cerro”) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. In the complaint, Southwire alleged that the Company infringed one or more claims of United States Patent No. 7,557,301 (the “’301 patent”), entitled “Method of Manufacturing Electrical Cable Having Reduced Required Force for Installation,” by making and selling electrical cables, including the Company’s Super Slick cables. The case has been transferred to the Northern District of Georgia and the parties have agreed to stay it pending reexamination of the ’301 patent by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the “USPTO”). On June 23, 2011, the USPTO issued an office action in the reexamination finally rejecting all the claims of the ’301 patent. Southwire responded to these final rejections on August 8, 2011 by submitting substantially amended claims. The examiner determined that the amended claims captured patentable subject matter and on September 21, 2011 issued a notice that a reexamination certificate would be issued evidencing the patentability of the amended claims. The reexamination certificate was issued on the ‘301 patent on December 27, 2011. Subsequent to the issuance of the ‘301 reexamination certificate, a new inter partes reexamination proceeding was instituted by Cerro Wire against the reexamined ‘301 patent. At this time all of the claims of the reexamined ‘301 patent have been rejected by the USPTO. This decision is not final.

On July 2, 2010, the Company filed a complaint against Southwire in the Northern District of Georgia. The complaint alleged that Southwire was using a deceptively misdescriptive trademark on its SimPull products, and that Southwire had made false statements about the Company’s Slick Wire products. Southwire’s United States Patent No. 7,749,024 (“the ’024 patent”) issued on July 6, 2010. The morning the patent issued, the Company amended its complaint to seek a declaratory judgment that the Company’s Slick Wire products do not infringe the ’024 patent. Later that same day, Southwire filed a separate complaint against the Company and Cerro Wire in the Eastern District of Texas alleging infringement of the ’024 patent. The Company’s complaint against Southwire was stayed by agreement on April 11, 2011. The case will remain stayed until the USPTO issues a certificate of reexamination of the ‘024 patent. The complaint filed by Southwire in the Eastern District of Texas has been voluntarily dismissed and Southwire will have the option to pursue its claims against the Company in the Northern District of Georgia, once the reexamination is completed. On October 8, 2010, the Company filed a request with the USPTO for an inter partes reexamination of the ’024 patent. On November 9, 2010, the USPTO ordered the reexamination of the ’024 patent. In ordering reexamination of Southwire’s ’024 patent, the USPTO determined that the Company’s submission of prior art raised a substantial new question of patentability of the claims of the ’024 patent. On December 3, 2010, the USPTO issued a non-final office action rejecting all of the claims of the ’024 Patent. Southwire filed a response to the non-final office action on February 3, 2011, which included legal arguments and supporting technical declarations. The Company filed its comments to the Southwire response on March 3, 2011, including points and authorities, legal arguments, and supporting technical declarations. On July 9, 2012, the Examiner issued an Action Closing Prosecution (“ACP”) finally rejecting patent claims 4-7 and 9-12 in the reexamination of the ‘024 patent. On August 15, 2012, Southwire filed a response to the ACP, which included extensive proposed claim amendments and arguments supporting the patentability of the proposed amended claims. The Company filed its comments to

9

Table of Contents

the Southwire response to the ACP on September 13, 2012, including points and authorities, legal arguments, and a supporting technical declaration. The Examiner refused entry of Southwire’s proposed amendments and maintained the rejection of all the claims under reexamination in a Right of Appeal Notice mailed September 28, 2012. On October 17, 2012 Southwire filed two petitions requesting that the reexamination be reopened or, in the alternative, that the proposed amendments presented in its September 13, 2012 response to ACP be entered into the record. These petitions were denied by the USPTO in a decision mailed April 5, 2013. Southwire filed a Notice of Appeal on October 29, 2012 and its Appellant’s Brief on December 31, 2012, followed by the Company filing its Respondent’s Brief on January 25, 2013. The Examiner’s Brief was mailed on July 16, 2013. Southwire now has one month to file its Rebuttal Brief, after which the reexamination proceeds to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board for a decision.

The ‘024 patent was also subject to parallel Inter Partes Reexamination Control No. 95/000,594, instituted by Cerro on November 11, 2010 (“the ‘594 reexamination”). The ‘024 patent exam proceeded with the ‘594 reexamination and ultimately all the claims were finally rejected by the Examiner in an Action Closing Prosecution (“ACP”) mailed August 10, 2012. In response to a right of appeal notice mailed by the Examiner on October 25, 2012, Southwire filed a notice of appeal on November 26, 2012 and filed an appeal brief on January 28, 2013. Southwire’s appeal brief exceeded the page limitations allowed for patent owner’s appeal briefs during reexaminations, and therefore the USPTO mailed a notice of defective appeal brief on February 20, 2013. Even though Southwire was given at least one month to file a corrected appeal brief, Southwire failed to do so. Instead, Southwire filed a petition with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) on March 5, 2013, requesting a waiver of the page limit on appeal brief length. On June 24, 2013, the PTAB denied the petition to waive the appeal brief page limit and, since the time limit to file a corrected appeal brief had expired, also dismissed Southwire’s appeal. On July 12, 2013, the Examiner mailed a Notice of Intent to Issue Inter Partes Reexamination Certificate, cancelling all claims of the ‘024 patent.

Southwire’s complaints sought unspecified damages and injunctive relief. At this time, all pending litigation between Encore and Southwire has been dismissed or stayed by agreement of the parties.

The parties convened on March 21, 2012 and August 27, 2012 for settlement conferences regarding the ‘301 patent lawsuit. Such settlement conferences did not result in any negotiation, agreement, decision or other development that the Company believed is material to such lawsuit. Settlement discussions continue between the parties.

The potentially applicable factual and legal issues related to the above claims asserted against the Company have not been resolved. The Company disputes all of Southwire’s claims and alleged damages and intends to vigorously defend the lawsuits and vigorously pursue its own claims against Southwire if and when the litigation resumes.

The Company is from time to time involved in litigation, certain other claims and arbitration matters arising in the ordinary course of its business. The Company accrues for a liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required in both the determination of the probability of a loss and the determination as to whether a loss is

10

Table of Contents

reasonably estimable. Any such accruals are reviewed at least quarterly and adjusted to reflect the effects of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel and technical experts and other information and events pertaining to a particular matter. To the extent there is a reasonable possibility (within the meaning of ASC 450) that probable losses could exceed amounts already accrued, if any, and the additional loss or range of loss is able to be estimated, management discloses the additional loss or range of loss.

For matters where the Company has evaluated that a loss is not probable, but is reasonably possible, the Company will disclose an estimate of the possible loss or range of loss or make a statement that such an estimate cannot be made. In some instances, for reasonably possible losses, the Company cannot estimate the possible loss or range of loss. The nature and progression of litigation can make it difficult to predict the impact a particular lawsuit will have on the Company. There are many reasons that the Company cannot make these assessments, including, among others, one or more of the following: the early stages of a proceeding; damages sought that are unspecified, unsupportable, unexplained or uncertain; discovery is incomplete; the complexity of the facts that are in dispute; the difficulty of assessing novel claims; the parties not having engaged in any meaningful settlement discussions; the possibility that other parties may share in any ultimate liability; and/or the often slow pace of litigation.

At this time, given the status of the proceedings, the complexities of the facts in dispute and the multiple claims involved, the Company has not concluded that a probable loss exists with respect to the Southwire litigation. Accordingly, no accrual has been made. Additionally, given the aforementioned uncertainties, the Company is unable to estimate any possible loss or range of losses for disclosure purposes.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Encore is a low-cost manufacturer of electrical building wire and cable. The Company is a significant supplier of building wire for interior electrical wiring in commercial and industrial buildings, homes, apartments, and manufactured housing.

The Company’s operating results in any given time period are driven by several key factors, including the volume of product produced and shipped, the cost of copper and other raw materials, the competitive pricing environment in the wire industry and the resulting influence on gross margins and the efficiency with which the Company’s plants operate during the period, among others. Price competition for electrical wire and cable is intense, and the Company sells its products in accordance with prevailing market prices. Copper, a commodity product, is the principal raw material used by the Company in manufacturing its products. Copper accounted for approximately 79.0%, 86.1% and 81.1% of the Company’s cost of goods sold during fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The price of copper fluctuates, depending on general economic conditions and in relation to supply and demand and other factors, which causes monthly variations in the cost of copper purchased by the Company. Additionally, the SEC has recently issued an order amending a rule to allow shares of certain physically backed copper exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) to be listed and publicly traded. Such funds and other copper ETFs like it hold copper cathode as collateral against their shares. The acquisition of copper cathode by copper ETFs may materially decrease or

11

Table of Contents

interrupt the availability of copper for immediate delivery in the United States, which could materially increase the Company’s cost of copper. In addition to rising copper prices and potential supply shortages, we believe that ETFs and similar copper-backed derivative products could lead to increased price volatility for copper. The Company cannot predict copper prices in the future or the effect of fluctuations in the cost of copper on the Company’s future operating results. Wire prices can, and frequently do change on a daily basis. This competitive pricing market for wire does not always mirror changes in copper prices, making margins highly volatile. With the Company’s expansion into aluminum conductors in some of its building wire products, the Company expects that aluminum will slowly grow its percentage share of the raw materials cost for the Company. The Company built a plant to expand the production of aluminum building wire as previously announced. The building was completed in mid-2012, while the installation of all the machinery and equipment was completed in the second quarter of 2013. Production ramped up considerably in the first quarter of 2013, and the plant is now fully operational. In 2012, aluminum wire sales constituted less than 4% of total net sales. Historically, the cost of aluminum has been much less than copper and also less volatile. With the volatility of both raw material prices and wire prices in the Company’s end market, hedging raw materials can be risky. Historically, the Company has not engaged in hedging strategies for raw material purchases. The tables below highlight the range of closing prices of copper on the Comex exchange for the periods shown.

COMEX COPPER CLOSING PRICE 2013

COMEX COPPER CLOSING PRICE 2012

The following discussion and analysis relates to factors that have affected the operating results of the Company for the quarters ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. Reference should also be made to the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

12

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Quarter Ended June 30, 2013 Compared to Quarter Ended June 30, 2012

Net sales for the second quarter of 2013 were $289.5 million compared with net sales of $264.7 million for the second quarter of 2012. This dollar increase was primarily the result of an 8.1% increase in the unit volume of copper wire shipped offset slightly by a 2.1% decrease in the average price of copper wire sold. Unit volume is measured in pounds of copper contained in the wire shipped during the period. Fluctuations in sales prices are primarily a result of changing copper raw material prices and product price competition. The average cost per pound of raw copper purchased decreased 8.3% in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the second quarter of 2012, and was the principal driver of the decreased average sales price of wire. In the second quarter of 2013, aluminum wire constituted 6.6% of the Company’s net sales dollars compared to 3.5% in the second quarter of 2012.

Cost of goods sold increased to $249.3 million, or 86.1% of net sales, in the second quarter of 2013, compared to $245.3 million, or 92.7% of net sales, in the second quarter of 2012. Gross profit increased to $40.2 million, or 13.9% of net sales, in the second quarter of 2013 versus $19.4 million, or 7.3% of net sales, in the second quarter of 2012.

The increased gross margins were driven primarily by the increased spread between the average selling price of wire containing a pound of copper and the average cost per pound of copper purchased during the quarter. As noted above, the cost of raw copper purchased per pound declined 8.3% in the second quarter of 2013 versus the second quarter of 2012, but average sales prices declined only 2.1% per copper pound sold, resulting in an 18.1% increase in the spread.

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost, using the last-in, first out (LIFO) method, or market. The Company maintains two inventory pools for LIFO purposes. As permitted by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, the Company maintains its inventory costs and cost of goods sold on a first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis and makes a monthly adjustment to adjust total inventory and cost of goods sold from FIFO to LIFO. The Company applies the lower of cost or market (LCM) test by comparing the LIFO cost of its raw materials, work-in-process and finished goods inventories to estimated market values, which are based primarily upon the most recent quoted market price of copper, aluminum and finished wire prices as of the end of each reporting period. The Company performs a lower of cost or market calculation quarterly. As of June 30, 2013, no LCM adjustment was required. However, decreases in copper and other material prices could necessitate establishing an LCM reserve in future periods. Additionally, future reductions in the quantity of inventory on hand could cause copper or other raw materials that are carried in inventory at costs different from the cost of copper and other raw materials in the period in which the reduction occurs to be included in costs of goods sold for that period at the different price. Due primarily to decreases in copper costs and an increase in copper inventory quantities on hand, lower overhead costs per pound of production and price and volume movements of other materials during the second quarter of 2013, a LIFO adjustment was recorded decreasing cost of sales by $12.0 million during the quarter. A portion of the second quarter LIFO adjustment was due to increased aluminum production activity which enabled enhanced overhead allocations that favorably impacted quarterly results. As discussed in Note 2 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 to this report, during the first quarter

13

Table of Contents

of 2013, the Company liquidated a portion of the layer established in 2011, and then built back some of that layer in the second quarter at historical costs that were higher than current costs, which positively impacted net income for the second quarter of 2013.

Selling expenses, consisting of commissions and freight, for the second quarter of 2013 were $12.1 million, or 4.2% of net sales, compared to $11.2 million, or 4.2% of net sales, in the second quarter of 2012. Commissions paid to independent manufacturers’ representatives are paid as a relatively stable percentage of sales dollars, and therefore, exhibited little change. Freight costs were also flat as a percentage of net sales. General and administrative expenses remained steady at $4.1 million in the second quarters of 2013 and 2012. The provision for bad debts was $0 for the second quarters of 2013 and 2012.

Net interest and other (income) expense was virtually zero in the second quarters of 2013 and 2012. Income taxes were accrued at an effective rate of 35.3% in the second quarter of 2013, versus an effective rate of 41.8% in the second quarter of 2012. The decrease in the effective rate was due to a moderate change in the proportional effects of permanent items on the effective rate.

As a result of the foregoing factors, the Company’s net income increased to $15.5 million in the second quarter of 2013 from $2.4 million in the second quarter of 2012.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2012

Net sales for the first six months of 2013 were $554.8 million compared with net sales of $545.2 million for the first half of 2012. This dollar increase was primarily the result of a 97.3% increase in aluminum building wire sales offset somewhat by a 1.4% decrease in copper building wire sales. Aluminum wire sales constituted 6.1% of net sales in the first six months of 2013 versus 3.2% in the first six months of 2012. Copper unit sales for the first six months of 2013, measured in pounds of copper contained in the wire were up 2.6% compared to the first six months of 2012, but were offset by a 3.9% decrease in the average price of copper wire sold. The average cost per pound of raw copper purchased decreased 6.8% in the first six months of 2013 compared to the first six months of 2012. In comparing the first half of 2013 to the first half of 2012, the average sales price of wire that contained a pound of copper decreased less than the average price of copper purchased during the period. Margins expanded in the first six months of 2013 as the spread between the price of wire sold and the cost of raw copper purchased increased by 5.1%, due primarily to improved industry pricing discipline. Fluctuations in sales prices are primarily a result of changing copper raw material prices and product price competition.

Cost of goods sold decreased to $490.4 million in the first six months of 2013, compared to $501.3 million in the first six months of 2012. Gross profit increased to $64.5 million, or 11.6% of net sales, in the first six months of 2013 versus $43.9 million, or 8.0% of net sales, in the first six months of 2012. The increased gross profit dollars were primarily the result of the increased copper spreads in the first six months of 2013 versus the same period in 2012 as discussed above.

14

Table of Contents

As a result of decreasing copper costs in the second quarter of 2013 and a small decrease in the amount of inventory on hand during the first six months of 2013, a LIFO adjustment was recorded decreasing cost of sales by $9.6 million during the six month period. Based on the current copper prices, there is no LCM adjustment necessary. Future reductions in the price of copper could require the Company to record an LCM adjustment against the related inventory balance, which would result in a negative impact on net income.

Selling expenses for the first six months of 2013 increased to $23.1 million, or 4.2% of net sales, compared to $22.2 million, or 4.1% of net sales, in the same period of 2012. Commissions paid to independent manufacturers’ representatives are calculated as a percentage of sales, and therefore, increased $0.5 million in concert with the increased sales dollars. Freight costs for the first six months of 2013 increased $0.5 million to $10.4 million or 1.9% of net sales versus $9.9 million or 1.8% of net sales for the first six months of 2012. Commissions were 2.3% and 2.2% of net sales in the first six months of 2013 and 2012, respectively. General and administrative expenses remained steady at $8.2 million, or 1.5% of net sales, in the first half of both 2013 and 2012. The provision for bad debts was zero in the first six months of 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Net interest and other expense (income) was $35,000 of income in the first six months of 2013 compared to $28,000 of income in the first half of 2012. Income taxes were accrued at an effective rate of 33.9% in the first six months of 2013 versus 32.7% in the first six months of 2012, consistent with the Company’s estimated liabilities.

As a result of the foregoing factors, the Company’s net income increased to $21.9 million in the first half of 2013 from $9.1 million in the first half of 2012.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company maintains a substantial inventory of finished products to satisfy customers’ prompt delivery requirements. As is customary in the building wire industry, the Company provides payment terms to most of its customers that exceed terms that it receives from its suppliers. Copper suppliers generally give very short payment terms, (less than 15 days) while the Company and the building wire industry give customers much longer terms. In general, the Company’s standard payment terms result in the collection of a significant majority of net sales within approximately 75 days of the date of invoice. As a result of this timing difference, building wire companies must have sufficient cash and access to capital resources to finance their working capital needs, thereby creating a barrier to entry for companies who do not have sufficient liquidity and capital resources. The two largest components of working capital, receivables and inventory, and to some extent, capital expenditures are the primary drivers of the Company’s liquidity needs. Generally, this will cause the Company’s cash balance to rise and fall inversely to the receivables and inventory balances. The Company’s receivables and inventories will rise and fall in concert with several factors, most notably the price of copper and other raw materials and the level of unit sales. Receivables will go up at the end of quarters with strong dollar sales and down as those sales decline. Inventory balances will rise and fall with the raw material price fluctuations and the level of units on hand at the end of any given quarter. Capital expenditures have historically been necessary to expand and update the production capacity of the Company’s manufacturing operations. The Company has historically satisfied its liquidity and capital expenditure needs with cash generated from operations, borrowings under its various debt arrangements and sales of its common stock. The Company historically uses its revolving credit facility to manage day to day operating cash needs as required by daily fluctuations in working capital, and has the facility in place should such a need arise in the future.

15

Table of Contents

For more information on the Company’s revolving credit facility, see Note 6 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 to this report, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Cash used in operating activities was $0.3 million in the first six months of 2013 compared to cash provided of $27.0 million in the first six months of 2012. The following changes in components of cash flow from operations were notable. The Company had net income of $21.9 million in the first six months of 2013 versus net income of $9.1 million in the first six months of 2012. Accounts receivable increased in the first six months of 2013 and 2012, although at much different amounts, resulting in a use of cash of $38.2 million and $6.2 million, respectively, driving a $32.0 million higher use of cash in 2013 versus 2012. Accounts receivable generally increase in proportion to dollar sales and to a lesser extent are affected by the timing of when sales occur during a given quarter. Accounts receivable increased in the first six months of both years, primarily due to the timing of sales in the quarters. With an average of 60 to 75 days of sales outstanding, quarters in which sales are more back-end loaded will have higher accounts receivable balances outstanding at quarter-end. Inventory dollars increased in the first six months of 2013, resulting in a use of cash of $0.8 million, while inventory decreased in the first six months of 2012, generating an $11.0 million source of cash, driving an $11.8 million higher use of cash in the first six months of 2013 versus the first six months of 2012. Trade accounts payable and accrued liabilities resulted in a $7.6 million increase in cash used in the first six months of 2013 versus the first six months of 2012 due primarily to the decrease in accounts payable in 2013, attributable primarily to the timing of inventory receipts at quarter end. In 2013, changes in current and deferred taxes provided cash of $5.3 million versus cash used of $5.1 million in 2012. These changes in cash flow were the primary drivers of the $27.3 million decrease in cash used in operations in the first six months of 2013 versus the first six months of 2012.

Cash used in investing activities increased to $31.7 million in the first six months of 2013 from $24.0 million in the first six months of 2012. The funds invested in 2013 were used primarily to purchase 201 acres of land adjacent to the Company’s existing campus in McKinney, Texas for $25.7 million. In 2012, the funds were used primarily for the construction of the new aluminum wire plant. Cash used in financing activities was $0.6 million in the first six months of 2013 versus $67.5 million in the first six months of 2012. In May of 2012, the Company repurchased 2,774,250 shares of its common stock from Capital Southwest Venture Corporation for $66.6 million. As of June 30, 2013, the Company’s revolving line of credit remained at $0. The Company’s cash balance was $1.2 million at June 30, 2013, versus $47.7 million at June 30, 2012.

During the remainder of 2013, the Company expects its capital expenditures will consist primarily of expenditures related to the purchases of manufacturing equipment throughout its facilities as well as the aforementioned land purchase. The total capital expenditures for all of 2013 associated with these projects are currently estimated to be between $42 million and $45 million. The Company also expects its future working capital requirements may fluctuate as a result of changes in unit sales volumes and the price of copper and other raw materials. The Company believes that the current cash balance, cash flow from operations, and the financing available from its revolving credit facility will satisfy working capital and capital expenditure requirements during 2013.

16

Table of Contents

Information Regarding Forward Looking Statements

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains various “forward-looking statements” (within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) and information that is based on management’s belief as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to management. The words “believes”, “estimates”, “anticipates”, “plans”, “seeks”, “expects”, “intends” and similar expressions identify some of the forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct. Such statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those expected. Among the key factors that may have a direct bearing on the Company’s operating results are fluctuations in the economy and in the level of activity in the building and construction industry, demand for the Company’s products, the impact of price competition and fluctuations in the price of copper. For more information regarding “forward looking statements” see “Information Regarding Forward Looking Statements” in Part II, Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, which is hereby incorporated by reference.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

There have been no material changes from the information provided in Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

The Company maintains controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by it in the reports it files with or submits to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in such reports is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on an evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this report conducted by the Company’s management, with the participation of the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers, the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files with or submits to the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in such reports is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

17

Table of Contents

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

For information on the Company’s legal proceedings, see Note 8 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 to this report and incorporated herein by reference.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

There have been no material changes to the Company’s risk factors as disclosed in Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Note 7 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 to this report is hereby incorporated herein by reference.

Item 6. Exhibits.

The information required by this Item 6 is set forth in the Index to Exhibits accompanying this Form 10-Q and incorporated herein by reference.

18

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

19

Table of Contents

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Table of Contents