MUELLER INDUSTRIES INC - Quarter Report: 2011 October (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended October 1, 2011
|
Commission file number 1–6770
|
MUELLER INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
25-0790410
|
(State or other jurisdiction
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
of incorporation or organization)
|
Identification No.)
|
8285 Tournament Drive, Suite 150
|
|
Memphis, Tennessee
|
38125
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip Code)
|
(901) 753-3200
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x
|
Accelerated filer o
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
Smaller reporting company o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No x
The number of shares of the Registrant’s common stock outstanding as of October 27, 2011, was 38,226,303.
MUELLER INDUSTRIES, INC.
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarterly Period Ended October 1, 2011
__________________________
As used in this report, the terms “Company,” “Mueller,” and “Registrant” mean Mueller Industries, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries taken as a whole, unless the context indicates otherwise.
__________________________
Page Number
|
||
3
|
||
4
|
||
5
|
||
6
|
||
16
|
||
25
|
||
26
|
||
26
|
||
30
|
||
31
|
||
32
|
||
33
|
2
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
For the Quarter Ended
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
October 1, 2011
|
September 25, 2010
|
October 1, 2011
|
September 25, 2010
|
|||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||
Net sales
|
$
|
585,809
|
$
|
507,240
|
$
|
1,926,413
|
$
|
1,532,896
|
||||||||
Cost of goods sold
|
523,984
|
437,597
|
1,687,735
|
1,317,290
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
8,716
|
9,934
|
27,581
|
30,372
|
||||||||||||
Selling, general, and administrative expense
|
34,245
|
28,810
|
102,944
|
99,601
|
||||||||||||
Insurance settlement
|
—
|
12
|
—
|
(21,284
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Litigation settlement
|
—
|
—
|
(10,500
|
)
|
—
|
|||||||||||
Operating income
|
18,864
|
30,887
|
118,653
|
106,917
|
||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
(2,822
|
)
|
(3,072
|
)
|
(9,004
|
)
|
(8,568
|
)
|
||||||||
Other income (expense), net
|
102
|
30
|
1,425
|
(2,348
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Income before income taxes
|
16,144
|
27,845
|
111,074
|
96,001
|
||||||||||||
Income tax expense
|
(5,403
|
)
|
(9,098
|
)
|
(37,060
|
)
|
(26,418
|
)
|
||||||||
Consolidated net income
|
10,741
|
18,747
|
74,014
|
69,583
|
||||||||||||
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
(266
|
)
|
162
|
(621
|
)
|
(1,158
|
)
|
|||||||||
Net income attributable to Mueller Industries, Inc.
|
$
|
10,475
|
$
|
18,909
|
$
|
73,393
|
$
|
68,425
|
||||||||
Weighted average shares for basic earnings per share
|
37,878
|
37,710
|
37,779
|
37,657
|
||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive stock-based awards
|
483
|
92
|
367
|
77
|
||||||||||||
Adjusted weighted average shares for diluted earnings per share
|
38,361
|
37,802
|
38,146
|
37,734
|
||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share
|
$
|
0.28
|
$
|
0.50
|
$
|
1.94
|
$
|
1.82
|
||||||||
Diluted earnings per share
|
$
|
0.27
|
$
|
0.50
|
$
|
1.92
|
$
|
1.81
|
||||||||
Dividends per share
|
$
|
0.10
|
$
|
0.10
|
$
|
0.30
|
$
|
0.30
|
||||||||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
|
3
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
|
October 1, 2011
|
December 25, 2010
|
||||||
(In thousands, except share data) | ||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Current assets:
|
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
448,853
|
$
|
394,139
|
||||
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,807 in 2011 and $5,447 in 2010
|
315,709
|
269,258
|
||||||
Inventories
|
214,868
|
209,892
|
||||||
Current deferred income taxes
|
19,303
|
19,227
|
||||||
Other current assets
|
34,063
|
19,798
|
||||||
Total current assets
|
1,032,796
|
912,314
|
||||||
Property, plant, and equipment, net
|
207,761
|
229,498
|
||||||
Goodwill
|
102,250
|
102,250
|
||||||
Other assets
|
16,103
|
14,934
|
||||||
Total assets
|
$
|
1,358,910
|
$
|
1,258,996
|
||||
Liabilities
|
||||||||
Current liabilities:
|
||||||||
Current portion of debt
|
$
|
52,827
|
$
|
32,020
|
||||
Accounts payable
|
65,743
|
67,849
|
||||||
Accrued wages and other employee costs
|
35,257
|
33,338
|
||||||
Other current liabilities
|
78,566
|
61,920
|
||||||
Total current liabilities
|
232,393
|
195,127
|
||||||
Long-term debt, less current portion
|
156,726
|
158,226
|
||||||
Pension liabilities
|
16,545
|
18,249
|
||||||
Postretirement benefits other than pensions
|
23,104
|
22,690
|
||||||
Environmental reserves
|
23,111
|
23,902
|
||||||
Deferred income taxes
|
19,788
|
24,081
|
||||||
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
2,187
|
824
|
||||||
Total liabilities
|
473,854
|
443,099
|
||||||
Equity
|
||||||||
Mueller Industries, Inc. stockholders' equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred stock - $1.00 par value; shares authorized 5,000,000; none outstanding
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Common stock - $.01 par value; shares authorized 100,000,000; issued 40,091,502; outstanding 38,221,076 in 2011 and 37,854,760 in 2010
|
401
|
401
|
||||||
Additional paid-in capital
|
265,830
|
263,233
|
||||||
Retained earnings
|
673,276
|
611,279
|
||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
(38,714
|
)
|
(37,046
|
)
|
||||
Treasury common stock, at cost
|
(44,604
|
)
|
(49,131
|
)
|
||||
Total Mueller Industries, Inc. stockholders' equity
|
856,189
|
788,736
|
||||||
Noncontrolling interest
|
28,867
|
27,161
|
||||||
Total equity
|
885,056
|
815,897
|
||||||
Commitments and contingencies
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Total liabilities and equity
|
$
|
1,358,910
|
$
|
1,258,996
|
||||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
|
4
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||
October 1,
2011
|
September 25, 2010
|
||||||
(In thousands)
|
|||||||
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|||||||
Consolidated net income
|
$
|
74,014
|
$
|
69,583
|
|||
Reconciliation of consolidated net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
27,844
|
30,550
|
|||||
Stock-based compensation expense
|
2,583
|
2,185
|
|||||
Insurance settlement
|
—
|
(21,284
|
)
|
||||
Insurance proceeds – noncapital related
|
10,000
|
5,561
|
|||||
(Gain) loss on disposal of properties
|
(99
|
)
|
252
|
||||
Deferred income taxes
|
(2,785
|
)
|
(8,386
|
)
|
|||
Income tax benefit from exercise of stock options
|
(867
|
)
|
(89
|
)
|
|||
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of businesses acquired:
|
|||||||
Receivables
|
(38,480
|
)
|
(50,810
|
)
|
|||
Inventories
|
(10,432
|
)
|
2,800
|
||||
Other assets
|
(9,263
|
)
|
6,158
|
||||
Current liabilities
|
13,703
|
21,562
|
|||||
Other liabilities
|
1,907
|
2,839
|
|||||
Other, net
|
759
|
(225
|
)
|
||||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
68,884
|
60,696
|
|||||
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|||||||
Capital expenditures
|
(13,128
|
)
|
(14,210
|
)
|
|||
Acquisition of businesses
|
(6,882
|
)
|
(2,021
|
)
|
|||
Insurance proceeds for property and equipment
|
—
|
17,703
|
|||||
Net (deposits into) withdrawals from restricted cash balances
|
(5,120
|
)
|
1,649
|
||||
Proceeds from sales of properties
|
1,745
|
26
|
|||||
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
(23,385
|
)
|
3,147
|
||||
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|||||||
Dividends paid to stockholders of Mueller Industries, Inc.
|
(11,345
|
)
|
(11,300
|
)
|
|||
Debt issuance cost
|
(1,942
|
)
|
—
|
||||
Issuance (repayment) of debt by joint venture, net
|
19,316
|
(1,097
|
)
|
||||
Acquisition of treasury stock
|
(8,211
|
)
|
(85
|
)
|
|||
Issuance of shares under stock-based incentive plans from treasury
|
11,885
|
2,463
|
|||||
Repayments of long-term debt
|
(1,902
|
)
|
—
|
||||
Income tax benefit from exercise of stock options
|
867
|
89
|
|||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
8,668
|
(9,930
|
)
|
||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
547
|
202
|
|||||
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
54,714
|
54,115
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period
|
394,139
|
346,001
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period
|
$
|
448,853
|
$
|
400,116
|
|||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
|
5
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
General
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S. GAAP) have been condensed or omitted. Results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of results which may be expected for any other interim period or for the year as a whole. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the annual financial statements incorporated therein.
The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements include all normal recurring adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented.
Note 1 – Earnings per Common Share
Basic per share amounts have been computed based on the average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted per share amounts reflect the increase in average common shares outstanding that would result from the assumed exercise of outstanding stock options and vesting of restricted stock awards, computed using the treasury stock method.
Note 2 – Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is involved in certain litigation as a result of claims that arose in the ordinary course of business, which management believes will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. The Company may also realize the benefit of certain legal claims and litigation in the future; these gain contingencies are not recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Environmental Matters
The Company is subject to environmental standards imposed by federal, state, local, and foreign environmental laws and regulations. Environmental costs related to non-operating properties are classified as a component of other income (expense), net and costs related to operating properties are classified as cost of goods sold. Environmental reserves totaled $23.1 million at October 1, 2011 and $23.9 million at December 25, 2010.
The following is an update of recent developments for ongoing environmental matters:
Operating Properties
On April 25, 2011, the Company received approval from the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) notifying it that the actions contained in the Company’s proposed Conceptual Interim Response Plan dated April 4, 2011, in respect of the soil remediation at the Belding site, are acceptable for implementation. Soil sampling of 47 residential properties near that plant has identified 16 properties with lead levels above the Michigan residential clean-up standards. The remediation is expected to be complete in the fourth quarter. The Company does not anticipate any material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows as a result of this remediation.
The Company has negotiated a draft administrative consent order (ACO) with the MDEQ to resolve a violation notice from the MDEQ dated December 28, 2009, alleging that the Company exceeded emission limits for lead, particulate matter and hydrogen chloride at the West Chip Dryer. Additional controls were subsequently installed to ensure consistent compliance with the air permits. Under the draft ACO, which is currently undergoing public review and comment, the Company does not admit violations and does not anticipate any material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
6
Non-operating properties:
There have been no material changes with respect to environmental matters for non-operating properties during the third quarter of 2011.
United States Department of Commerce Antidumping Review
On December 24, 2008, the United States Department of Commerce (DOC) initiated an antidumping administrative review of the antidumping duty order covering circular welded non-alloy steel pipe and tube from Mexico to determine the final antidumping duties owed on U.S. imports during the period November 1, 2007, through October 31, 2008, by certain subsidiaries of the Company. On April 19, 2010, the DOC published the final results of this review and assigned Mueller Comercial de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. (Mueller Comercial) an antidumping duty rate of 48.3 percent. The Company has appealed the final determination to the U.S. Court of International Trade. The Company anticipates that certain of its subsidiaries will incur antidumping duties on subject imports made during the period of review and, as such, established a reserve of approximately $4.2 million for this matter.
On December 23, 2009, the DOC initiated an antidumping administrative review of the antidumping duty order covering circular welded non-alloy steel pipe and tube from Mexico for the November 1, 2008, through October 31, 2009, period of review. The DOC selected Mueller Comercial as a respondent for this period of review. On June 21, 2011, the DOC published the final results of this review and assigned Mueller Comercial an antidumping duty rate of 19.8 percent. On July 8, 2011, the Company filed a notice of intent to seek judicial review of the final results. The Company anticipates that certain of its subsidiaries will incur antidumping duties on subject imports made during the period of review and, as such, established a reserve of approximately $1.0 million for this matter.
On December 28, 2010, the DOC initiated an antidumping administrative review of the antidumping duty order covering circular welded non-alloy steel pipe and tube from Mexico for the November 1, 2009, through October 31, 2010, period of review. The DOC selected Mueller Comercial as a respondent for this period of review. In August 2011, the DOC issued a preliminary determination to rescind the review based on a finding that Mueller Comercial did not ship subject merchandise to the United States during the relevant period of review. By the end of the year, the DOC is expected to issue a final determination which, if the result mirrors the preliminary determination, would result in zero antidumping liability for the Company and its subsidiaries for imports made during the period of review. Until the final determination is issued, however, the Company cannot estimate the impact, if any, that this matter will have on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Other
During the third quarter of 2011, a portion of the Company’s Wynne, Arkansas, manufacturing operation was damaged by fire. There were no reported injuries. Certain inventories, production equipment, and portions of building structures were extensively damaged requiring further assessment which is underway; rehabilitation alternatives are also being evaluated. The total value of the loss, including business interruption, cannot be determined at this time, but is expected to be covered by property and business interruption insurance subject to customary deductibles. As a result of the fire, the Company reclassified $9.4 million representing the book value of inventories prior to potential scrap recoveries and $9.4 million representing the net book value of certain production equipment and building structures that were damaged. The Company also recorded a receivable of $0.2 million for clean-up and other out of pocket costs incurred to date. Any proceeds received for property damage in excess of the net book value of the related property will be recognized upon settlement of the insurance claim. The Company has received an advance of $10.0 million from the insurance company for this claim resulting in a net receivable of $9.0 million, classified as accounts receivable on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at October 1, 2011. The Company has deferred recognition of direct, identifiable costs associated with this matter. These costs will be recognized upon settlement of the insurance claim.
Guarantees, in the form of letters of credit, are issued by the Company generally to assure the payment of insurance deductibles and certain retiree health benefits. The terms of the Company’s guarantees are generally one year but are renewable annually as required. These letters are primarily backed by the Company’s line of credit facility. The maximum payments that the Company could have been required to make under its guarantees at October 1, 2011, was $11.4 million.
Note 3 – Insurance Settlement
In November 2008, the Company’s copper tube facility in Bilston, Great Britain, was damaged by fire. Certain production equipment and portions of building structures were extensively damaged. These losses were covered by property and business interruption insurance. During 2010, the Company settled the claim with its insurer for total proceeds of $35.3 million, net of the deductible of $0.5 million. As a result of the settlement with its insurer, all proceeds received and all costs previously deferred were recognized, resulting in a net pre-tax gain of $21.3 million.
The Company received $23.3 million of proceeds from its insurer in 2010 with the final settlement. Of the $23.3 million proceeds received in 2010, $17.7 million was classified as investing activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows representing the estimated amount of proceeds received for damaged building structures and equipment. All other receipts were classified as operating activities as they reflect the estimated amounts received for business interruption insurance and reimbursement of incremental cleaning and other noncapital costs.
Note 4 – Inventories
October 1, 2011
|
December 25, 2010
|
|||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||
Raw materials and supplies
|
$
|
2,998
|
$
|
47,737
|
||||
Work-in-process
|
56,793
|
34,784
|
||||||
Finished goods
|
166,863
|
131,921
|
||||||
Valuation reserves
|
(11,786
|
)
|
(4,550
|
)
|
||||
Inventories
|
$
|
214,868
|
$
|
209,892
|
||||
The material component of the Company’s U.S. copper tube and copper fittings inventories is valued on a last-in, first-out (LIFO) basis. These inventories were net of LIFO reserves of $118.2 million and $105.6 million at October 1, 2011 and December 25, 2010, respectively. The Company has partially liquidated inventories valued using the LIFO method during the first nine months of 2011. The Company expects to replenish these inventories by the end of 2011 and, as such, has not recognized the effects of liquidating LIFO layers. In the event these inventories are not replenished, due to lack of availability or operational reasons, the Company would recognize a reduction to cost of goods sold of approximately $18.7 million from the liquidation of LIFO layers based on quarter-end quantities.
Additionally, as of October 1, 2011, the Company has recorded a pre-tax provision of approximately $6.8 million, or 12 cents per diluted share after tax, to write-down certain inventories valued using the first-in, first-out and average cost methods to lower-of-cost-or-market.
Note 5 – Industry Segments
The Company’s reportable segments are Plumbing & Refrigeration and Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM). For disclosure purposes, as permitted under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 280, Segment Reporting, certain operating segments are aggregated into reportable segments. The Plumbing & Refrigeration segment is composed of Standard Products (SPD), European Operations, and Mexican Operations. The OEM segment is composed of Industrial Products (IPD), Engineered Products (EPD), and Mueller-Xingrong. These segments are classified primarily by the markets for their products. Performance of segments is generally evaluated by their operating income. Intersegment transactions are generally conducted on an arms-length basis.
8
SPD manufactures copper tube and fittings, plastic fittings, plastic pipe, and line sets. These products are manufactured in the U.S. Outside the U.S., the Company’s European Operations manufacture copper tube, which is sold in Europe and the Middle East. SPD also imports and resells brass and plastic plumbing valves, malleable iron fittings, faucets, and plumbing specialty products. Mexican Operations consist of pipe nipple manufacturing and import distribution businesses including product lines of malleable iron fittings and other plumbing specialties. The European Operations consist of copper tube manufacturing and the import distribution of fittings, valves, and plumbing specialties primarily in the U.K. and Ireland. The Plumbing & Refrigeration segment’s products are sold primarily to plumbing, refrigeration, and air-conditioning wholesalers, hardware wholesalers and co-ops, and building product retailers.
IPD manufactures brass rod, impact extrusions, and forgings which are used in a wide variety of end products including plumbing brass, automotive components, valves, and fittings. EPD manufactures and fabricates valves and assemblies for the refrigeration, air-conditioning, gas appliance, and barbecue grill markets and specialty copper, copper-alloy, and aluminum tubing. Mueller-Xingrong manufactures engineered copper tube primarily for air-conditioning applications. These products are sold primarily to OEM customers.
Summarized segment information is as follows:
For the Quarter Ended October 1, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||
Plumbing & Refrigeration Segment
|
OEM
Segment
|
Corporate and Eliminations
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Net sales
|
$
|
325,776
|
$
|
266,560
|
$
|
(6,527
|
)
|
$
|
585,809
|
|||||||
Cost of goods sold
|
285,242
|
245,223
|
(6,481
|
)
|
523,984
|
|||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
4,859
|
3,519
|
338
|
8,716
|
||||||||||||
Selling, general, and administrative expense
|
21,791
|
5,646
|
6,808
|
34,245
|
||||||||||||
Operating income
|
$
|
13,884
|
$
|
12,172
|
$
|
(7,192
|
)
|
18,864
|
||||||||
Interest expense
|
(2,822
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Other income, net
|
102
|
|||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes
|
$
|
16,144
|
||||||||||||||
9
Segment information (continued):
For the Quarter Ended September 25, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
Plumbing & Refrigeration Segment
|
OEM
Segment
|
Corporate and Eliminations
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Net sales
|
$
|
282,735
|
$
|
228,981
|
$
|
(4,476
|
)
|
$
|
507,240
|
|||||||
Cost of goods sold
|
245,013
|
196,894
|
(4,310
|
)
|
437,597
|
|||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
6,082
|
3,594
|
258
|
9,934
|
||||||||||||
Selling, general, and administrative expense
|
20,117
|
5,499
|
3,194
|
28,810
|
||||||||||||
Insurance settlement
|
12
|
—
|
—
|
12
|
||||||||||||
Operating income
|
$
|
11,511
|
$
|
22,994
|
$
|
(3,618
|
)
|
30,887
|
||||||||
Interest expense
|
(3,072
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Other income, net
|
30
|
|||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes
|
$
|
27,845
|
||||||||||||||
For the Nine Months Ended October 1, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||
Plumbing & Refrigeration Segment
|
OEM
Segment
|
Corporate and Eliminations
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Net sales
|
$
|
1,053,434
|
$
|
899,982
|
$
|
(27,003
|
)
|
$
|
1,926,413
|
|||||||
Cost of goods sold
|
904,470
|
809,959
|
(26,694
|
)
|
1,687,735
|
|||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
16,042
|
10,590
|
949
|
27,581
|
||||||||||||
Selling, general, and administrative expense
|
64,565
|
18,799
|
19,580
|
102,944
|
||||||||||||
Litigation settlement
|
—
|
—
|
(10,500
|
)
|
(10,500
|
)
|
||||||||||
Operating income
|
$
|
68,357
|
$
|
60,634
|
$
|
(10,338
|
)
|
118,653
|
||||||||
Interest expense
|
(9,004
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Other income, net
|
1,425
|
|||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes
|
$
|
111,074
|
||||||||||||||
10
Segment information (continued):
For the Nine Months Ended September 25, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
Plumbing & Refrigeration Segment
|
OEM
Segment
|
Corporate and Eliminations
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Net sales
|
$
|
825,114
|
$
|
718,965
|
$
|
(11,183
|
)
|
$
|
1,532,896
|
|||||||
Cost of goods sold
|
695,987
|
631,988
|
(10,685
|
)
|
1,317,290
|
|||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
18,895
|
10,700
|
777
|
30,372
|
||||||||||||
Selling, general, and administrative expense
|
59,806
|
20,220
|
19,575
|
99,601
|
||||||||||||
Insurance settlement
|
(21,284
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
(21,284
|
)
|
||||||||||
Operating income
|
$
|
71,710
|
$
|
56,057
|
$
|
(20,850
|
)
|
106,917
|
||||||||
Interest expense
|
(8,568
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Other expense, net
|
(2,348
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes
|
$
|
96,001
|
||||||||||||||
Note 6 – Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income is as follows:
For the Quarter Ended
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
October 1, 2011
|
September 25, 2010
|
October 1, 2011
|
September 25, 2010
|
|||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Consolidated net income
|
$
|
10,741
|
$
|
18,747
|
$
|
74,014
|
$
|
69,583
|
||||||||
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:
|
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation
|
(6,389
|
)
|
5,801
|
1,859
|
567
|
|||||||||||
Net change with respect to derivative instruments and hedging activities
|
(3,176
|
)
|
333
|
(3,409
|
)
|
143
|
||||||||||
Other, net
|
535
|
(217
|
)
|
967
|
1,545
|
|||||||||||
Total other comprehensive (loss) income
|
(9,030
|
)
|
5,917
|
(583
|
)
|
2,255
|
||||||||||
Comprehensive income
|
1,711
|
24,664
|
73,431
|
71,838
|
||||||||||||
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
(737
|
)
|
(34
|
)
|
(1,706
|
)
|
(1,309
|
)
|
||||||||
Comprehensive income attributable to Mueller Industries, Inc.
|
$
|
974
|
$
|
24,630
|
$
|
71,725
|
$
|
70,529
|
||||||||
The change in foreign currency translation primarily relates to the Company’s investment in foreign subsidiaries and fluctuations in exchange rates between their local currencies and the U.S. dollar. During the third quarter of 2011, the values of the British pound sterling and Mexican peso decreased approximately 3.1 percent and 12.9 percent, respectively, relative to the U.S. dollar.
11
Note 7 – Debt
On March 7, 2011, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement (Credit Facility) with a syndicate of banks establishing a $350 million revolving credit facility, which matures March 7, 2016. The Credit Facility contains similar provisions and replaces the Company’s prior credit agreement dated December 1, 2006.
On July 29, 2011, Mueller-Xingrong entered into a credit facility with a syndicate of four banks establishing a secured RMB 350 million, or approximately $54.4 million, revolving credit facility with a maturity date of July 28, 2012.
Note 8 – Employee Benefits
The Company sponsors several qualified and nonqualified pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans for certain of its employees. The components of net periodic benefit cost are as follows:
For the Quarter Ended
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
October 1, 2011
|
September 25, 2010
|
October 1, 2011
|
September 25, 2010
|
|||||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Pension benefits:
|
||||||||||||||||
Service cost
|
$
|
230
|
$
|
149
|
$
|
691
|
$
|
447
|
||||||||
Interest cost
|
2,343
|
2,206
|
7,028
|
6,617
|
||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets
|
(2,786
|
)
|
(2,706
|
)
|
(8,357
|
)
|
(8,119
|
)
|
||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost
|
1
|
74
|
2
|
221
|
||||||||||||
Amortization of net loss
|
587
|
452
|
1,760
|
1,357
|
||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost
|
$
|
375
|
$
|
175
|
$
|
1,124
|
$
|
523
|
||||||||
Other benefits:
|
||||||||||||||||
Service cost
|
$
|
75
|
$
|
68
|
$
|
226
|
$
|
202
|
||||||||
Interest cost
|
309
|
318
|
928
|
953
|
||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost
|
(1
|
)
|
1
|
(2
|
)
|
2
|
||||||||||
Amortization of net loss
|
(2
|
)
|
39
|
(8
|
)
|
117
|
||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost
|
$
|
381
|
$
|
426
|
$
|
1,144
|
$
|
1,274
|
||||||||
The Company anticipates contributing to its pension plans approximately $1.5 million for 2011. During the first nine months of 2011, the Company made contributions of approximately $1.2 million to certain pension plans.
12
Note 9 – Income Taxes
The Company’s effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2011 was 33 percent compared with 33 percent for the same period last year. The Company’s effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2011 was 33 percent compared with 28 percent for the same period last year. Factors that explain the difference between the effective tax rate and what would be computed using the U.S. federal statutory tax rate for the first nine months were reductions related to: (i) the effect of foreign tax rates lower than statutory tax rates and other foreign items of $0.6 million; (ii) unrecognized tax benefits of $1.9 million; and (iii) the U.S. production activities deduction of $3.0 million. These items were partially offset by the provision for state income taxes, net of the federal benefit, of $3.7 million.
Due to ongoing federal and state income tax audits and potential lapses of the statutes of limitations in various taxing jurisdictions, it is reasonably possible that unrecognized tax benefits may decrease in the next twelve months by up to $3.8 million. Total unrecognized tax benefits including derecognized deferred tax assets at the end of the third quarter were $7.3 million, without consideration of any applicable federal benefit, including $0.3 million of accrued interest and penalties. Of the $7.3 million, up to $4.5 million could impact the effective tax rate, if recognized.
The Company files a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return and numerous consolidated and separate-company income tax returns in many state, local, and foreign jurisdictions. The statute of limitations is open for the Company’s federal tax return and most state income tax returns for 2008 and all subsequent years. The statutes of limitations for certain state and foreign returns are open for earlier tax years due to ongoing audits and differing statute periods. While the Company believes that it is adequately reserved for possible future audit adjustments, the final resolution of these examinations cannot be determined with certainty and could result in final settlements that differ from current estimates.
Note 10 – Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Cash Flow Hedges
Copper and brass represent the largest component of the Company’s variable costs of production. The cost of these materials is subject to global market fluctuations caused by factors beyond the Company’s control. The Company occasionally enters into forward fixed-price arrangements with certain customers; the risk of these arrangements is generally managed with commodity futures contracts. The Company accounts for these futures contracts in accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (ASC 815). These futures contracts have been designated as cash flow hedges. The fair value of open futures contracts are recognized as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income until the position is closed which corresponds to the period when the related hedged transaction is recognized in earnings. Should these contracts no longer meet hedge criteria in accordance with ASC 815, either through lack of effectiveness or because the hedged transaction is no longer probable of occurring, all deferred gains and losses related to the hedge would be immediately reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into earnings. In the next twelve months, the Company will reclassify into earnings realized gains or losses of cash flow hedges; at October 1, 2011, the net fair value of these contracts was a $4.4 million loss position.
At October 1, 2011, the Company held open futures contracts to purchase approximately $28.4 million of copper over the next twelve months related to fixed price sales orders. The fair value of those futures contracts was a $4.5 million loss position, which was determined by obtaining quoted market prices (Level 1 hierarchy as defined by ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820)).
13
Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges under ASC 815 are reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as follows:
October 1, 2011
|
||||||
Location
|
Fair value
|
|||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||
Commodity contracts
|
Other current liability:
|
Gain positions
|
$ | 20 | ||
Other current liability:
|
Loss positions
|
$ | (4,501 | ) |
December 25, 2010
|
||||||
Location
|
Fair value
|
|||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||
Commodity contracts
|
Other current assets:
|
Gain positions
|
$ | 891 |
The following tables summarize activities related to the Company’s derivative instruments, classified as cash flow hedges in accordance with ASC 815:
(Loss) Gain Recognized in Accumulated OCI (Effective Portion), Net of Tax
|
||||||||||||||||
For the Quarter Ended
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
October 1, 2011
|
|
|
September 25, 2010
|
|
|
October 1, 2011
|
|
|
September 25, 2010
|
|
||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Commodity contracts (1)
|
$
|
(2,386
|
)
|
$
|
402
|
$
|
(1,593
|
)
|
$
|
870
|
||||||
(1) Includes $88 thousand attributable to noncontrolling interest for the nine months ended September 25, 2010.
|
(Gain) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion), Net of Tax
|
||||||||||||||||
For the Quarter Ended
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
October 1, 2011
|
|
|
September 25, 2010
|
|
|
October 1, 2011
|
|
|
September 25, 2010
|
|
||||
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Commodity contracts:
|
||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold
|
$
|
(790
|
)
|
$
|
(69
|
)
|
$
|
(1,816
|
)
|
$
|
(727
|
)
|
Fair Value Hedges
The value of the Company’s copper inventory is subject to global market fluctuations caused by factors beyond the Company’s control. The Company occasionally enters into futures contracts in order to protect the value of inventory against market fluctuations. The Company accounts for these futures contracts in accordance with ASC 815. These futures contracts have been designated as fair value hedges. For fair value hedges, the changes in value of the hedging derivative, as well as the changes in value of the related hedged item due to the risk being hedged, are reflected in current earnings. Hedge ineffectiveness is reflected in current earnings in the period in which it occurs.
14
At October 1, 2011, the Company held open futures contracts to sell approximately $17.8 million of copper over the next three months related to inventory. The fair value of those futures contracts was a $1.8 million gain position and is recorded as an other current asset. The fair value was determined by obtaining quoted market prices (Level 1 hierarchy as defined by ASC 820).
The following tables summarize the gains (losses) on the Company's fair value hedges:
Gains (Losses) on Fair Value Hedges for the
Three Months Ended October 1, 2011
|
|||||
Location
|
Amount
|
||||
(In thousands)
|
|||||
Gain on the derivatives in designated and qualifying fair value hedges:
|
|||||
Commodity Contracts
|
Cost of goods sold
|
$ | 8,424 | ||
(Loss) on the hedged item in designated and qualifying fair value hedges:
|
|||||
Inventory
|
Cost of goods sold
|
$ | (7,915 | ) | |
Gains (Losses) on Fair Value Hedges for the
Nine Months Ended October 1, 2011
|
|||||
Location
|
Amount
|
||||
(In thousands)
|
|||||
Gain on the derivatives in designated and qualifying fair value hedges:
|
|||||
Commodity Contracts
|
Cost of goods sold
|
$ | 5,164 | ||
(Loss) on the hedged item in designated and qualifying fair value hedges:
|
|||||
Inventory
|
Cost of goods sold
|
$ | (4,987 | ) | |
The Company enters into futures contracts that closely match the terms of the underlying transactions. As a result, the ineffective portion of the open cash flow and fair value hedge contracts through October 1, 2011, was not material to the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
The Company does not offset fair value of amounts for derivative instruments and fair value amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral. At October 1, 2011, the Company had recorded restricted cash of $2.7 million related to open futures contracts.
Note 11 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short-term maturity of these instruments. Primarily using market yields, the fair value of the Company’s debt instruments were estimated to be $208.1 million and $189.9 million at October 1, 2011, and December 25, 2010, respectively. Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time based on relevant market information about the financial instrument (Level 2 hierarchy as defined by ASC 820).
15
Note 12 – Acquisitions
On December 28, 2010, the Company purchased certain assets of Tube Forming, L.P. (TFI). TFI primarily serves the heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning market in North America. The acquired assets include inventories, production equipment as well as factory leaseholds. TFI has operations in Carrollton, Texas, and Guadalupe, Mexico, where it produces precision copper return bends and crossovers, and custom-made tube components and brazed assemblies, including manifolds and headers. TFI's estimated net sales for 2010 were approximately $35 million. Mueller paid approximately $6.9 million for the assets, which was funded with existing cash on hand. The acquisition of TFI expands the Company’s product offering within the OEM segment.
On August 6, 2010, the Company purchased certain assets from Linesets, Inc., a manufacturer of assembled line sets with operations in Phoenix, Arizona, and Atlanta, Georgia. This acquisition expands the Company’s current line sets business, a part of the Plumbing & Refrigeration segment. The purchase price of approximately $2.1 million was allocated primarily to inventory and machinery and equipment.
The acquisitions were accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Therefore, the results of operations of the acquired businesses were included in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements since the date of acquisition.
Note 13 – Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Changes to U.S. GAAP are established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in the form of accounting standards updates (ASU’s) to the FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification.
The Company considers the applicability and impact of all ASU’s. ASU’s not listed below were assessed and determined to be either not applicable or are expected to have minimal impact on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
In September 2011, the FASB issued an ASU that amends the accounting guidance on goodwill impairment testing. The amendments provide an option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. Under that option, an entity no longer would be required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines, based on that qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. This ASU is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this ASU will not have an impact on the results of operation or financial position of the Company.
In September 2011, the FASB issued an ASU that requires employers that participate in multiemployer pension plans or other postretirement benefit plans to provide additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures. The amended disclosures provide users with more detailed information about an employer's involvement in multiemployer plans. This ASU is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this ASU will not have an impact on the results of operation or financial position of the Company.
General Overview
The Company is a leading manufacturer of copper, brass, plastic, and aluminum products. The range of these products is broad: copper tube and fittings; brass and copper alloy rod, bar, and shapes; aluminum and brass forgings; aluminum and copper impact extrusions; plastic pipe, fittings and valves; refrigeration valves and fittings; fabricated tubular products; and steel nipples. The Company also resells imported brass and plastic plumbing valves, malleable iron fittings, faucets and plumbing specialty products. Mueller's operations are located throughout the United States and in Canada, Mexico, Great Britain, and China.
16
The Company's businesses are aggregated into two reportable segments: the Plumbing & Refrigeration segment and the Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM) segment. For disclosure purposes, as permitted under Accounting Standards Codification 280, Segment Reporting, certain operating segments are aggregated into reportable segments. The Plumbing & Refrigeration segment is composed of the Standard Products Division (SPD), European Operations, and Mexican Operations. The OEM segment is composed of the Industrial Products Division (IPD), Engineered Products Division (EPD), and Jiangsu Mueller–Xingrong Copper Industries Limited (Mueller-Xingrong), the Company’s Chinese joint venture. Certain administrative expenses and expenses related primarily to retiree benefits at inactive operations are combined into the Corporate and Eliminations classification. These reportable segments are described in more detail below.
SPD manufactures and sells copper tube, copper and plastic fittings, plastic pipe, and valves in North America and sources products for import distribution in North America. European Operations manufacture copper tube in Europe, which is sold in Europe and the Middle East; activities also include import distribution in the U.K. and Ireland. Mexican Operations consist of pipe nipple manufacturing and import distribution businesses including product lines of malleable iron fittings and other plumbing specialties. The Plumbing & Refrigeration segment sells products to wholesalers in the HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning), plumbing, and refrigeration markets, to distributors to the manufactured housing and recreational vehicle industries, and to building material retailers.
The OEM segment manufactures and sells brass and copper alloy rod, bar, and shapes; aluminum and brass forgings; aluminum and copper impact extrusions; refrigeration valves and fittings; fabricated tubular products; and gas valves and assemblies. Mueller-Xingrong manufactures engineered copper tube primarily for air-conditioning applications; these products are sold primarily to original equipment manufacturers located in China. The OEM segment sells its products primarily to original equipment manufacturers, many of which are in the HVAC, plumbing, and refrigeration markets.
New housing starts and commercial construction are important determinants of the Company’s sales to the HVAC, refrigeration, and plumbing markets because the principal end use of a significant portion of the Company’s products is in the construction of single and multi-family housing and commercial buildings. Repairs and remodeling projects are also important drivers of underlying demand for these products.
The majority of the Company’s manufacturing facilities operated below capacity during 2010 and the first nine months of 2011 due to the reduced demand for the Company’s products arising from the general economic conditions in the U.S. and foreign markets that the Company serves. The U.S. housing and residential construction market continues to be adversely affected during the present economic downturn. Per the U.S. Census Bureau, actual housing starts in the U.S. were 460 thousand for the first nine months of 2011 compared to 467 thousand for the same period of 2010. The September 2011 seasonally adjusted annual rate of new housing starts was 658 thousand, which is an increase of 10.2 percent above the September 2010 rate of 597 thousand; however, the 2011 rate remains significantly below historical levels. Mortgage rates have remained at low levels during 2011 and 2010, as the average 30-year fixed mortgage rate was 4.61 percent for the first nine months of 2011 and 5.08 percent for the twelve months ended December 2010. Commercial construction has also remained at historically low levels. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the seasonally adjusted annual value of private nonresidential construction put in place was $273.1 billion in August 2011, significantly less than the activity levels during 2007 and 2008 prior to the economic downturn. Business conditions in the U.S. automotive industry have also been difficult in the economic downturn, which affected the demand for various products in the Company’s OEM segment; however, some improvements have recently occurred. All of these conditions have significantly affected the demand for virtually all of the Company’s core products.
Residential construction activity is still at historical lows and the near-term outlook subdued due to continuing high rates of unemployment, the impact of mounting foreclosures, and the tightening of lending terms. The private non-residential construction sector, which includes offices, industrial and retail projects, continues to experience high vacancy rates.
17
Profitability of certain of the Company’s product lines depends upon the “spreads” between the cost of raw material and the selling prices of its products. The open market prices for copper cathode and scrap, for example, influence the selling price of copper tubing, a principal product manufactured by the Company. The Company attempts to minimize the effects on profitability from fluctuations in material costs by passing through these costs to its customers. The Company’s earnings and cash flow are dependent upon these spreads that fluctuate based upon market conditions.
Earnings and profitability are also impacted by unit volumes that are subject to market trends, such as substitute products and imports, and market share. In core product lines, the Company intensively manages its pricing structure while attempting to maximize its profitability. From time-to-time, this practice results in lost sales opportunities and lower volume. Plastic plumbing systems are the primary substitute product; these products represent an increasing share of consumption. U.S. consumption of copper tubing is predominantly supplied by U.S. manufacturers, although imports have been a significant factor. In recent years, brass rod consumption in the U.S. has declined due to the outsourcing of many manufactured products to offshore regions.
On December 28, 2010, the Company purchased certain assets of Tube Forming, L.P. (TFI). TFI primarily serves the HVAC market in North America. The acquired assets include inventories, production equipment as well as factory leaseholds. TFI has operations in Carrollton, Texas, and Guadalupe, Mexico, where it produces precision copper return bends and crossovers, and custom-made tube components and brazed assemblies, including manifolds and headers.
Results of Operations
Third Quarter 2011 compared with Third Quarter 2010
During the third quarter of 2011, the Company’s net sales were $585.8 million, which compares with net sales of $507.2 million over the same period of 2010. The increase was primarily attributable to increased selling prices, which are a result of the increase in base metal prices, primarily copper, offset by lower unit sales volume. Of the $78.6 million increase in net sales, approximately $93.2 million was due to higher net selling prices, which was offset by approximately $27.6 million attributable to lower unit volume in the Company’s core product lines. Net selling prices generally fluctuate with changes in raw material costs. Changes in raw material costs are generally passed through to customers by adjustments to selling prices. The Comex average copper price in the third quarter of 2011 was approximately $4.07 per pound, or 23 percent higher than the 2010 average of $3.30 per pound. However, as of the end of the third quarter, the Comex close price of copper was $3.15 per pound.
Cost of goods sold was $524.0 million in the third quarter of 2011 compared with $437.6 million in the same period of 2010. This increase was due primarily to the increase in the price of copper, the Company’s principal raw material. During the quarter ended October 1, 2011, the Company recorded provisions of approximately $6.8 million to write-down certain inventories valued using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) and average cost methods to lower-of-cost-or-market.
Depreciation and amortization declined from $9.9 million in 2010 to $8.7 million in 2011. The reduction is due to certain assets becoming fully depreciated. Selling, general, and administrative expenses increased to $34.2 million in the third quarter of 2011; this $5.4 million increase was primarily due to increased employment cost including incentive compensation of $2.7 million and foreign currency transaction losses of $1.2 million.
Interest expense decreased to $2.8 million in the third quarter of 2011 from $3.1 million for the same period in 2010. This decrease was related to Mueller–Xingrong. The Company’s effective tax rate was 33 percent for the third quarter of 2011 and 2010.
18
Plumbing & Refrigeration Segment
Third quarter net sales by the Plumbing & Refrigeration segment increased 15 percent to $325.8 million in 2011 from $282.7 million in 2010. This increase was due to higher selling prices resulting from higher average cost of raw materials, offset by 5.1 percent lower unit sales volume. Of the $43.1 million increase in net sales, approximately $47.8 million was due to higher net selling prices in the segment’s core product lines consisting primarily of copper tube, line sets, and fittings, partially offset by a decrease of $11.6 million related to lower unit volume. Cost of goods sold increased from $245.0 million in the third quarter of 2010 to $285.2 million in the same period of 2011, which was also due to higher raw material prices, primarily copper. During the quarter ended October 1, 2011, the Company recorded provisions of approximately $3.5 million to write-down certain inventories valued using the FIFO and average cost methods to lower-of-cost-or-market. Depreciation and amortization in the third quarter decreased from $6.1 million in 2010 to $4.9 million in 2011 resulting from certain assets being fully depreciated. Selling, general, and administrative expenses increased from $20.1 million in the third quarter of 2010 to $21.8 million in the third quarter of 2011. The $1.7 million increase is primarily due to increased employment costs including incentive compensation of $1.7 million and foreign currency transaction losses of $1.3 million offset by reduced professional fees of $1.7 million. Operating income for the segment increased $2.4 million in the third quarter of 2011 over the third quarter of 2010. This increase was due primarily to increased spreads for 2011 in core products especially copper tube.
OEM Segment
The OEM segment’s third quarter net sales were $266.6 million in 2011 compared with $229.0 million in 2010. The increase was due primarily to higher net selling prices resulting from higher average cost of raw materials, offset by 8.1 percent lower unit sales volume. Of the $37.6 million increase in net sales, approximately $45.4 million was attributable to higher net selling prices in the segment’s core product lines of brass rod, forgings, impacts, and commercial tube, partially offset by a decrease of $16.0 million related to lower unit volume. Cost of goods sold increased to $245.2 million in the third quarter of 2011 from $196.9 million in the same period of 2010, which was primarily due to the increase in cost of raw materials. During the quarter ended October 1, 2011, the Company recorded provisions of approximately $3.3 million to write-down certain inventories valued using the FIFO and average cost methods to lower-of-cost-or-market. Depreciation and amortization remained relatively consistent for both quarters. Selling, general, and administrative expenses were $5.6 million in the third quarter of 2011 and $5.5 million in the third quarter of 2010. Operating income decreased from $23.0 million in the third quarter of 2010 to $12.2 million in the same period of 2011, due primarily to lower spreads for 2011 in core products, primarily brass rod.
Nine Months Ended October 1, 2011, compared with Nine Months Ended September 25, 2010
During the nine months ended October 1, 2011, the Company’s net sales were $1.93 billion, which compares with net sales of $1.53 billion over the same period of 2010. The increase was primarily attributable to increased selling prices, which are a result of the increase in base metal prices, primarily copper and higher unit sales volume in most of the Company’s core product lines. Of the $393.5 million increase in net sales, approximately $284.9 million was due to higher net selling prices in the Company’s core product lines and approximately $48.4 million was attributable to higher unit volume in the Company’s core product lines. The Comex average copper price in the first nine months of 2011 was approximately $4.20 per pound, or 28 percent higher than the 2010 average of $3.26 per pound. However, the as of the end of the current period the Comex close price of copper was $3.15 per pound.
Cost of goods sold was $1.69 billion in the first nine months of 2011 compared with $1.32 billion in the same period of 2010. The year-over-year increase was due primarily to the increase in the cost of copper, the Company’s principal raw material, and increased sales volume in core product lines. During the nine months ended October 1, 2011, the Company recorded provisions of approximately $6.8 million to write-down certain inventories valued using the FIFO and average cost methods to lower-of-cost-or-market.
19
Depreciation and amortization declined from $30.4 million in the first nine months of 2010 to $27.6 million in 2011. This reduction is due to certain assets becoming fully depreciated. Selling, general, and administrative expenses increased to $102.9 million in the first nine months of 2011 from $99.6 million in 2010; this $3.3 million increase was primarily due to increased compensation expense including incentive compensation of approximately $7.7 million offset by a decrease in bad debt expense of $4.4 million.
During the nine months ended October 1, 2011, the Company recorded a gain of $10.5 million upon receipt of payment related to the December 10, 2010, settlement of a lawsuit against Peter D. Berkman, Jeffrey A. Berkman, and Homewerks Worldwide LLC. During the nine months ended September 25, 2010, the Company settled the insurance claim related to a fire at the U.K. copper tube facility, resulting in a cumulative net gain of $21.3 million.
Interest expense increased to $9.0 million for the nine months ended October 1, 2011, from $8.6 million for the same period in 2010. This increase was due to increased borrowings by Mueller–Xingrong to fund operations. Other income (expense), net was income of $1.4 million in the first nine months of 2011 compared with expense of $2.3 million for the same period in 2010. This fluctuation was primarily due to environmental provisions in the first nine months of 2010 that pertained to non-operating properties.
The Company’s effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2011 was 33 percent compared with 28 percent for the same period last year. Factors that explain the difference between the effective tax rate and what would be computed using the U.S. federal statutory tax rate for the first nine months were reductions related to: (i) the effect of foreign tax rates lower than statutory tax rates and other foreign items of $0.6 million; (ii) unrecognized tax benefits of $1.9 million; and (iii) the U.S. production activities deduction of $3.0 million. These items were partially offset by the provision for state income taxes, net of the federal benefit, of $3.7 million.
Plumbing & Refrigeration Segment
Net sales by the Plumbing & Refrigeration segment increased 27 percent to $1.05 billion in the nine months ended October 1, 2011, from $825.1 million in 2010. This increase was due to higher selling prices resulting from higher average prices of raw materials and from higher unit sales volume resulting from increased demand in the majority of the segment’s core product lines. Of the $228.3 million increase in net sales, approximately $165.7 million was due to higher net selling prices in the segment’s core product lines consisting primarily of copper tube, line sets, and fittings and approximately $33.6 million was attributable to higher unit volume. Cost of goods sold increased from $696.0 million in the first nine months of 2010 to $904.5 million in the same period of 2011, which was also due to increasing raw material costs, primarily copper and to higher sales volume. During the nine months ended October 1, 2011, the Company recorded provisions of approximately $3.5 million to write-down certain inventories valued using the FIFO and average cost methods to lower-of-cost-or-market. Depreciation and amortization in the first nine months of 2011 decreased from $18.9 million in 2010 to $16.0 million in 2011 resulting from certain assets being fully depreciated. Selling, general, and administrative expenses increased $4.8 million primarily due to increased compensation including incentive compensation of $3.9 million and foreign currency transaction losses of $875 thousand. Operating income for the segment decreased to $68.4 million in the first nine months of 2011 from $71.7 million in the first nine months of 2010. This decrease was due to the insurance settlement recognized in 2010 partially offset by higher sales volume in the segment’s core product lines, increased spreads in core products especially in copper tube and fittings, and improved per unit conversion costs in a majority of the segment’s product lines resulting primarily from increased production activities.
20
OEM Segment
The OEM segment’s net sales were $900.0 million in the nine months ended October 1, 2011, compared with $719.0 million in 2010. The increase was due primarily to higher net selling prices resulting from higher average cost of raw materials and higher sales volume. Of the $181.0 million increase in net sales, approximately $119.2 million was attributable to higher net selling prices in the segment’s core product lines of brass rod, forgings, impacts, and commercial tube and approximately $14.7 million was due to higher unit volume. Cost of goods sold increased to $810.0 million in the first nine months of 2011 from $632.0 million in the same period of 2010, which was also due to the increase in average cost of raw materials and increases in sales volume. During the nine months ended October 1, 2011, the Company recorded provisions of approximately $3.3 million to write-down certain inventories valued using the FIFO and average cost methods to lower-of-cost-or-market. Depreciation and amortization remained relatively consistent. Selling, general, and administrative expenses were $18.8 million in the first nine months of 2011 compared with $20.2 million in the first nine months of 2010. The $1.4 million decrease was due primarily to decreased bad debt expense of $3.8 million partially offset by increased compensation and related employment costs of $1.7 million. Operating income increased from $56.1 million in the first nine months of 2010 to $60.6 million in the same period of 2011, due primarily to higher sales volume and lower selling, general, and administrative expenses.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash provided by operating activities during the nine months ended October 1, 2011, totaled $68.9 million, which was primarily attributable to net income of $74.0 million plus depreciation and amortization of $27.8 million, insurance proceeds of $10.0 million related to the 2011 fire at the Wynne, Arkansas, facility and a $13.7 million increase in current liabilities. These cash increases were partially offset by increased receivables of $38.5 million, increased other assets of $9.3 million, and increased inventories of $10.4 million. The increases in receivables, inventories, other assets, and current liabilities primarily resulted from the increased cost of raw materials, moderate unit sales increases in certain businesses during the first nine months of 2011, and the recognition of a net receivable related to the September 2011 fire at the Company’s Wynne, Arkansas, manufacturing facility. Fluctuations in the cost of copper and other raw materials affect the Company’s liquidity. Changes in material costs directly impact components of working capital, primarily inventories and accounts receivable. During the first nine months of 2011, the average Comex copper price was approximately $4.20 per pound, which represents a 28 percent increase over the average price during the first nine months of 2010. This increase in the price of cathode has also resulted in sharp increases in the open market price for copper scrap and, to a lesser extent, the price of brass scrap.
During the first nine months of 2011, cash used in investing activities totaled $23.4 million. The major components of net cash used in investing activities included $13.1 million used for capital expenditures, deposits of $5.1 million into restricted cash balances as a result of hedging activities, and $6.9 million used for the acquisition of TFI.
Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $8.7 million, which consists primarily of $19.3 million received from the issuance of debt by Mueller-Xingrong and $11.9 million received from the issuance of shares under stock-based incentive plans from treasury, partially offset by $8.2 million for the acquisition of treasury stock and $11.3 million used for payment of regular quarterly dividends to stockholders of the Company.
The Company has significant environmental remediation obligations. The performance of these obligations is expected to occur over a minimum of 20 years. Cash used for environmental remediation activities was approximately $778 thousand during the first nine months of 2011. In addition, the Company paid the remaining $2.25 million of a $2.5 million settlement during the first nine months of 2011 related to the Eureka Mills Site. The Company expects to spend approximately $0.9 million for the remainder of 2011 for ongoing environmental remediation activities. The timing of a potential payment for a $9.5 million settlement offer has not yet been determined.
21
On March 7, 2011, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement, which provides for an unsecured $350 million revolving line of credit (Credit Facility) maturing on March 7, 2016. The Credit Facility contains similar provisions and replaces the Company’s prior credit agreement dated December 1, 2006. The Credit Facility backed approximately $11.4 million in letters of credit at the end of the quarter. As of October 1, 2011, the Company’s total debt was $209.6 million or 19 percent of its total capitalization.
Covenants contained in the Company’s financing obligations require, among other things, the maintenance of minimum levels of tangible net worth and the satisfaction of certain minimum financial ratios. As of October 1, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all of its debt covenants.
The Company declared and paid a regular quarterly cash dividend of ten cents per common share in the third quarter of 2011. Payment of dividends in the future is dependent upon the Company’s financial condition, cash flows, capital requirements, earnings, and other factors. On November 1, 2011, the Company will pay approximately $4.4 million in interest on the Debentures that remain outstanding.
Management believes that cash provided by operations and currently available cash of $448.9 million will be adequate to meet the Company’s normal future capital expenditures and operational needs. The Company’s current ratio was 4.4 to 1 at October 1, 2011.
The Company’s Board of Directors has extended, until October 2012, its authorization to repurchase up to ten million shares of the Company’s common stock through open market transactions or through privately negotiated transactions. The Company has no obligation to repurchase any shares and may cancel, suspend, or extend the time period for the repurchase of shares at any time. Any repurchases will be funded primarily through existing cash and cash from operations. The Company may hold any shares repurchased in treasury or use a portion of the repurchased shares for employee benefit plans, as well as for other corporate purposes. From its initial authorization in 1999 through October 1, 2011, the Company had repurchased approximately 2.4 million shares under this authorization. In addition, the Company may repurchase portions of its 6% Subordinated Debentures through open market transactions or through privately negotiated transactions.
There have been no significant changes in the Company’s contractual cash obligations reported at December 25, 2010.
22
Non-GAAP Measurements
During the first quarter of 2011, the Company recognized a litigation settlement of $10.5 million (or 18 cents per diluted share after tax); during the third quarter of 2011, the Company recognized a lower-of-cost-or-market (LCM) reserve of $6.8 million (or 12 cents per diluted share after tax). During the nine months ended September 25, 2010, the Company recognized an insurance settlement of $21.3 million (or 59 cents per diluted share after tax). Earnings without the litigation settlement and lower-of-cost-or-market (LCM) reserve in 2011 and without the insurance settlement in 2010 is a measurement not derived in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Excluding the LCM reserve is useful as it assists in comparing our results to competitors. Excluding the litigation settlement and insurance settlement is useful as it measures the operating results that are the outcome of daily operating decisions made in the normal course of business. The LCM reserve resulted from the decrease in copper prices experienced near the end of the quarter, causing the Company to write-down approximately $6.8 million of certain inventories valued using the first-in, first-out and average cost methods to lower-of-cost-or-market. The litigation settlement resulted from the collection of proceeds from the lawsuit against Peter Berkman, Jeffrey Berkman, and Homewerks Worldwide LLC. The insurance settlement resulted from the final settlement for losses claimed as a result of a fire at our U.K. subsidiary in November 2008, the results of which are not impacted by daily operations and are not expected to recur in future periods. Reconciliations of net income as reported to earnings without the litigation settlement, LCM reserve, and insurance settlement are as follows:
For the Three Months Ended
October 1, 2011
|
||||||||||||
As Reported
|
Impact of LCM Reserve
|
Pro forma Without LCM Reserve
|
||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
||||||||||||
Operating income
|
|
$
|
18,864
|
|
|
$
|
6,796
|
|
$
|
25,660
|
||
Interest expense
|
|
|
(2,822
|
)
|
—
|
(2,822
|
)
|
|||||
Other income, net
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
—
|
102
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Income before income taxes
|
16,144
|
6,796
|
22,940
|
|||||||||
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(5,403
|
)
|
|
|
(2,379
|
)
|
|
|
(7,782
|
)
|
Consolidated net income
|
10,741
|
4,417
|
15,158
|
|||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
(266
|
)
|
—
|
(266
|
)
|
|||||||
Net income attributable to Mueller Industries, Inc.
|
$
|
10,475
|
$
|
4,417
|
$
|
14,892
|
||||||
Diluted earnings per share
|
$
|
0.27
|
$
|
0.12
|
$
|
0.39
|
23
Non-GAAP Measurements (continued)
For the Nine Months Ended
October 1, 2011
|
|||||||||||||||
As Reported
|
Impact of Litigation Settlement
|
Impact of LCM Reserve
|
Pro forma Without Litigation Settlement & LCM Reserve
|
||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|||||||||||||||
Operating income
|
$
|
118,653
|
|
$
|
(10,500
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,796
|
|
$
|
114,949
|
|||
Interest expense
|
|
(9,004
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
—
|
(9,004
|
)
|
||||||
Other income, net
|
|
1,425
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
1,425
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income before income taxes
|
111,074
|
(10,500
|
)
|
6,796
|
107,370
|
||||||||||
Income tax expense
|
|
(37,060
|
)
|
|
|
3,675
|
|
|
(2,379
|
)
|
|
|
(35,764
|
)
|
|
Consolidated net income
|
74,014
|
(6,825
|
)
|
4,417
|
71,606
|
||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
(621
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
(621
|
)
|
|||||||||
Net income attributable to Mueller Industries, Inc.
|
$
|
73,393
|
$
|
(6,825
|
)
|
$
|
4,417
|
$
|
70,985
|
||||||
Diluted earnings per share
|
$
|
1.92
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
$
|
0.12
|
$
|
1.86
|
||||||
For the Nine Months Ended
September 25, 2010
|
||||||||||||
As Reported
|
Impact of Insurance Settlement
|
Pro forma Without Insurance Settlement
|
||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
||||||||||||
Operating income
|
|
$
|
106,917
|
|
|
$
|
(21,284
|
)
|
|
$
|
85,633
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(8,568
|
)
|
—
|
(8,568
|
)
|
|||||
Other expense, net
|
|
|
(2,348
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
(2,348
|
)
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Income before income taxes
|
96,001
|
(21,284
|
)
|
74,717
|
||||||||
Income tax expense (A)
|
|
|
(26,418
|
)
|
|
|
(1,090
|
)
|
|
|
(27,508
|
)
|
Consolidated net income
|
69,583
|
(22,374
|
)
|
47,209
|
||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
(1,158
|
)
|
—
|
(1,158
|
)
|
|||||||
Net income attributable to Mueller Industries, Inc.
|
$
|
68,425
|
$
|
(22,374
|
)
|
$
|
46,051
|
|||||
Diluted earnings per share
|
$
|
1.81
|
$
|
(0.59
|
)
|
$
|
1.22
|
|||||
(A) Realization of this insurance settlement resulted in a tax benefit primarily from the utilization of U.K. net operating losses that were previously reserved.
|
24
The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in raw material and energy costs, interest rates, and foreign currency exchange rates. To reduce such risks, the Company may periodically use financial instruments. All hedging transactions are authorized and executed pursuant to policies and procedures. Further, the Company does not buy or sell financial instruments for trading purposes.
Cost and Availability of Raw Materials and Energy
Copper and brass represent the largest component of the Company’s variable costs of production. The cost of these materials is subject to global market fluctuations caused by factors beyond the Company’s control. Significant increases in the cost of metal, to the extent not reflected in prices for the Company’s finished products, or the lack of availability could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, results of operations, and financial condition.
The Company occasionally enters into future fixed-price arrangements with certain customers. The Company may utilize futures contracts to hedge risks associated with these fixed-price arrangements. The Company may also utilize futures contracts to manage price risk associated with inventory. Depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of the futures contracts will either be offset against the change in fair value of the inventory through earnings or recognized as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income and reflected in earnings upon the sale of inventory. Periodic value fluctuations of the contracts generally offset the value fluctuations of the underlying fixed-price transactions or inventory. At October 1, 2011, the Company held open futures contracts to purchase approximately $28.4 million of copper through September 2012 related to fixed-price sales orders and open futures contracts to sell approximately $17.8 million of copper through December 2011.
Futures contracts may also be used to manage price risk associated with natural gas purchases. The effective portion of gains and losses with respect to these positions are deferred in stockholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income and reflected in earnings upon consumption of natural gas. Periodic value fluctuations of the contracts generally offset the value fluctuations of the underlying natural gas prices. At October 1, 2011, the Company held no material open futures contracts to purchase natural gas.
Interest Rates
At October 1, 2011, the Company had variable-rate debt outstanding of $61.4 million, the majority of which related to the debt issued by Mueller-Xingrong. At these borrowing levels, a hypothetical 10 percent increase in interest rates would have had an insignificant unfavorable impact on the Company’s pretax earnings and cash flows. The primary interest rate exposure on floating-rate debt is based on LIBOR and on the base-lending rate published by the People’s Bank of China.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rates
Foreign currency exposures arising from transactions include firm commitments and anticipated transactions denominated in a currency other than an entity’s functional currency. The Company and its subsidiaries generally enter into transactions denominated in their respective functional currencies. Foreign currency exposures arising from transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are generally not material; however, the Company may utilize certain futures or forward contracts to hedge such transactional exposures. Gains and losses with respect to these positions are deferred in stockholders’ equity as a component of comprehensive income and reflected in earnings upon collection of receivables. At October 1, 2011, the Company had open forward contracts with financial institutions to sell approximately 2.2 million Canadian dollars and 1.0 million Euros through December 2011.
The Company’s primary foreign currency exposure arises from foreign-denominated revenues and profits and their translation into U.S. dollars. The primary currencies to which the Company is exposed include the Canadian dollar, the British pound sterling, the Euro, the Mexican peso, and the Chinese renminbi. The Company generally views as long-term its investments in foreign subsidiaries with a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar. As a result, the Company generally does not hedge these net investments.
25
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Information
Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not strictly historical may be "forward-looking" statements, which involve risks and uncertainties. These include economic and currency conditions, continued availability of raw materials and energy, market demand, pricing, competitive and technological factors, and the availability of financing, among others, as set forth in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The words "outlook," "estimate," "project," "intend," "expect," "believe," "target," and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The reader should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. The Company has no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events after the date of this report.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure information required to be disclosed in Company reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in Company reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
The Company's management, with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act as of October 1, 2011. Based on that evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of October 1, 2011, to ensure that information required to be disclosed in Company reports filed under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the Company’s fiscal quarter ending October 1, 2011, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
General
The Company is involved in certain litigation as a result of claims that arose in the ordinary course of business. Additionally, the Company may realize the benefit of certain legal claims and litigation in the future; these gain contingencies are not recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
26
Carrier ACR Tube Action
The Company has been named as a defendant in a pending litigation (the Carrier ACR Tube Action) brought by Carrier Corporation, Carrier S.A., and Carrier Italia S.p.A. (collectively, Carrier), direct purchasers of copper tube. The Carrier ACR Tube Action was filed in March 2006 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee. The Carrier ACR Tube Action alleges anticompetitive activities with respect to the sale of copper tubes used in, among other things, the manufacturing of air-conditioning and refrigeration units. The Company and Mueller Europe, Limited (Mueller Europe) are named in the Carrier ACR Tube Action. The Carrier ACR Tube Action seeks monetary and other relief.
In July 2007 the Carrier ACR Tube Action was dismissed in its entirety for lack of subject matter jurisdiction as to all defendants. In August 2007 plaintiffs filed with the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit a notice of appeal from the judgment and order dismissing the complaint in the Carrier ACR Tube Action. The Company and Mueller Europe filed notices of cross-appeal in August 2007.
In October 2007 Carrier filed with the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit a motion to dismiss the cross-appeals, which the Court denied in December 2007. All appeals in the Carrier ACR Tube Action remain pending. Briefing on the appeals occurred in May 2009 and oral argument took place in October 2009.
The Company believes that the claims for relief in the Carrier ACR Tube Action are without merit and, as a result, does not anticipate a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Canadian Dumping and Countervail Investigation
In June 2006 the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) initiated an investigation into the alleged dumping of certain copper pipe fittings from the United States and from South Korea, and the dumping and subsidizing of these same goods from China. The Company and certain affiliated companies were identified by the CBSA as exporters and importers of these goods.
On January 18, 2007, the CBSA issued a final determination in its investigation. The Company was found to have dumped subject goods during the CBSA’s investigation period. On February 19, 2007, the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (CITT) concluded that the dumping of the subject goods from the United States had caused injury to the Canadian industry.
As a result of these findings, exports of subject goods to Canada by the Company made on or after October 20, 2006, have been subject to antidumping measures. Under Canada’s system of prospective antidumping enforcement, the CBSA has issued normal values to the Company. Antidumping duties will be imposed on the Company only to the extent that the Company’s future exports of copper pipe fittings are made at net export prices which are below these normal values. If net export prices for subject goods exceed normal values, no antidumping duties will be payable. These measures will remain in place for five years, at which time an expiry review will be conducted by Canadian authorities to determine whether these measures should be maintained for another five years or allowed to expire.
On April 8, 2011, CBSA completed a review process pursuant to which revised normal values were issued to exporters of subject goods, including the Company. In any event, given the small percentage of its products that are sold for export to Canada, the Company does not anticipate any material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows as a result of the antidumping case in Canada.
The “sunset review” process, pursuant to which Canadian authorities will examine whether the dumping order should be revoked or maintained for another five years, was initiated on April 12, 2011. It is anticipated that the results of the sunset review process will be issued on or before February 18, 2012.
27
United States Department of Commerce Antidumping Review
On December 24, 2008, the United States Department of Commerce (DOC) initiated an antidumping administrative review of the antidumping duty order covering circular welded non-alloy steel pipe and tube from Mexico to determine the final antidumping duties owed on U.S. imports during the period November 1, 2007, through October 31, 2008, by certain subsidiaries of the Company. On April 19, 2010, the DOC published the final results of this review and assigned Mueller Comercial de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. (Mueller Comercial) an antidumping duty rate of 48.3 percent. The Company has appealed the final determination to the U.S. Court of International Trade. The Company anticipates that certain of its subsidiaries will incur antidumping duties on subject imports made during the period of review and, as such, established a reserve of approximately $4.2 million for this matter.
On December 23, 2009, the DOC initiated an antidumping administrative review of the antidumping duty order covering circular welded non-alloy steel pipe and tube from Mexico for the November 1, 2008, through October 31, 2009, period of review. The DOC selected Mueller Comercial as a respondent for this period of review. On June 21, 2011, the DOC published the final results of this review and assigned Mueller Comercial an antidumping duty rate of 19.8 percent. On July 8, 2011, the Company filed a notice of intent to seek judicial review of the final results. The Company anticipates that certain of its subsidiaries will incur antidumping duties on subject imports made during the period of review and, as such, established a reserve of approximately $1.0 million for this matter.
On December 28, 2010, the DOC initiated an antidumping administrative review of the antidumping duty order covering circular welded non-alloy steel pipe and tube from Mexico for the November 1, 2009, through October 31, 2010, period of review. The DOC selected Mueller Comercial as a respondent for this period of review. In August 2011, the DOC issued a preliminary determination to rescind the review based on a finding that Mueller Comercial did not ship subject merchandise to the United States during the relevant period of review. By the end of the year, the DOC should issue a final determination which, if the result mirrors the preliminary determination, would result in zero antidumping liability for the Company and its subsidiaries for imports made during the period of review. Until the final determination is issued, however, the Company cannot estimate the impact, if any, that this matter will have on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
United States Department of Commerce and United States International Trade Commission Antidumping Investigations
On September 30, 2009, two subsidiaries of the Company, along with Cerro Flow Products, Inc. and KobeWieland Copper Products LLC (collectively, Petitioners), jointly filed antidumping petitions with the DOC and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) alleging that imports of seamless refined copper pipe and tube from China and Mexico (subject imports) were being sold at less than fair value and were causing material injury (and threatening material injury) to the domestic industry. On October 1, 2010, the DOC published its final affirmative determinations, finding antidumping rates from 24.89 percent to 27.16 percent for Mexico (as amended), and from 11.25 percent to 60.85 percent for China.
On November 22, 2010, the ITC issued its final affirmative determination that subject imports from China and Mexico threatened material injury to the domestic industry. Also on November 22, 2010, the DOC published antidumping orders, with the effect that importers are required to post antidumping cash deposits at rates ranging from 24.89 percent to 27.16 percent (for subject imports from Mexico) and from 11.25 percent to 60.85 percent (for subject imports from China).
On December 22, 2010, certain Mexican parties requested panel reviews under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in order to appeal the ITC final determination as to Mexico. The NAFTA panel has not yet been constituted, and at this time, the Company is unable to know the final disposition of that appeal.
On July 7, 2011, the U.S. Department of Commerce initiated a new shipper review of certain entries from a Mexican producer of copper tube, GD Affiliates S.de R.L. de C.V., in order to establish a company-specific dumping assessment for this company. The review is expected to be completed sometime in 2012. At this time, the Company is unable to know the final disposition of the review.
28
Supplier Litigation
On May 6, 2011, the Company and two of its subsidiaries, Mueller Streamline Co. (Mueller Streamline) and B&K Industries, Inc. (B&K), filed a lawsuit in federal district court in Los Angeles, California against a former supplier, Xiamen Lota International Co., Ltd (Xiamen Lota), its U.S. sales representative (Lota USA), and certain other persons. The lawsuit alleges that the defendants gave Peter D. Berkman, a former executive of the Company and B&K, an undisclosed interest in Lota USA, and made payments and promises of payment to him, in return for Peter Berkman maintaining the Company as a customer, increasing purchasing levels, and acquiescing to excessive pricing for Xiamen Lota products. The lawsuit alleges violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962(c) and (d) and state law unfair competition. The lawsuit seeks compensatory, treble and punitive damages, and other appropriate relief. On July 1, 2011, Lota USA filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim, and Xiamen Lota filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficient service. On August 18, 2011, Lota USA filed a motion to disqualify the Company’s counsel. All three motions are currently pending and have not been ruled on by the Court. The Company does not anticipate any material adverse effect on its business or financial condition as a result of this litigation.
On August 2, 2011, a former supplier, Xiamen Lota, and Lota Corp. filed suit in federal district court in Memphis, Tennessee against Mueller Industries, Inc. and Mueller Streamline (collectively Mueller). The lawsuit alleges that Plaintiffs are owed money for plumbing products supplied to or manufactured for Defendants. The lawsuit alleges breach of contract and unjust enrichment. The lawsuit seeks compensatory damages, interest, and other appropriate relief. On September 19, 2011, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss or transfer the complaint for improper venue. The Company does not anticipate any material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows as a result of this litigation.
On September 30, 2011, a lawsuit was filed in federal district court in Chicago, Illinois, against B&K, by a former supplier, Xiamen Lota, and two of its employees, Yongqiang He (He) and Chuanbao Zhu (Zhu). The lawsuit alleges that B&K failed to name He as an inventor on three United States patents, U.S. patent nos. 6,880,573 ('573 Patent), 7,140,390 ('390 Patent), and 7,549,444 ('444 Patent) awarded to employees of B&K, and subsequently assigned to B&K. The '573 Patent, '390 Patent and '573 Patent pertain to frost-free valve assemblies sold by B&K. The lawsuit also alleges that B&K failed to name Zhu as an inventor on the '390 Patent. According to the complaint, He and Zhu have assigned any rights they might have in the three patents to Xiamen Lota. The claims in the lawsuit include correction of inventorship (Counts I - VI), unjust enrichment (Count VII), and tortious interference with prospective economic advantage (Count VIII), and seek unspecified damages from B&K. An initial response to the complaint is due on or before November 21, 2011. The Company does not anticipate any material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows as a result of this litigation.
29
Environmental Matters
Operating properties:
Belding, Michigan Lead Matters
On April 25, 2011, the Company received approval from the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) notifying it that the actions contained in the Company’s proposed Conceptual Interim Response Plan dated April 4, 2011, in respect of the soil remediation at the Belding site, are acceptable for implementation. Soil sampling of 47 residential properties near that plant has identified 16 properties with lead levels above the Michigan residential clean-up standards. The remediation is expected to be complete in the fourth quarter. The Company does not anticipate any material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows as a result of this remediation. The Company has put a prior owner on notice that it will seek indemnification for a portion of the costs.
The Company has negotiated a draft administrative consent order (ACO) with the MDEQ to resolve a violation notice from the MDEQ dated December 28, 2009, alleging that the Company exceeded emission limits for lead, particulate matter and hydrogen chloride at the West Chip Dryer. Additional controls were subsequently installed to insure consistent compliance with the air permits. Under the draft ACO, which is currently undergoing public review and comment, the Company does not admit violations and does not anticipate any material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Non-operating properties:
Southeast Kansas Sites
With respect to the Southeast Kansas Sites, the Company estimates that its share for the costs of the preliminary site assessment at one of the former smelters will be approximately $35 thousand. The Company is currently negotiating the language of the proposed agreement for that site with the Kansas Department of Health and Environment and two other potentially responsible parties.
The Company is exposed to risk as it operates its businesses. To provide a framework to understand the operating environment of the Company, we have provided a brief explanation of the more significant risks associated with our businesses in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. There have been no material changes in risk factors that were previously disclosed in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
30
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The Company’s Board of Directors has extended, until October 2012, its authorization to repurchase up to ten million shares of the Company’s common stock through open market transactions or through privately negotiated transactions. The Company has no obligation to repurchase any shares and may cancel, suspend, or extend the time period for the repurchase of shares at any time. Any repurchases will be funded primarily through existing cash and cash from operations. The Company may hold any shares repurchased in treasury or use a portion of the repurchased shares for employee benefit plans, as well as for other corporate purposes. From its initial authorization in 1999 through October 1, 2011, the Company had repurchased approximately 2.4 million shares under this authorization. Below is a summary of the Company’s stock repurchases for the period ended October 1, 2011.
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
(d)
|
||||||||||
Total Number
of Shares Purchased
|
Average Price Paid per Share
|
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
|
Maximum Number of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
|
||||||||||
7,647,030
|
(1)
|
||||||||||||
July 3 – July 30, 2011
|
57,750
|
(2)
|
$
|
41.86
|
—
|
||||||||
July 31 – August 27, 2011
|
56,615
|
(2)
|
40.15
|
—
|
|||||||||
August 28 – October 1, 2011
|
59,575
|
(2)
|
46.62
|
—
|
|||||||||
(1) Shares available to be purchased under the Company's ten million share repurchase authorization until
October 2012. The extension of the authorization was announced on October 27, 2011.
|
|||||||||||||
(2) Shares tendered to the Company by employee stock option holders in payment of the option purchase
price and/or withholding taxes upon exercise.
|
|||||||||||||
31
10.1
|
Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement among the Company (as borrower), Bank of America, N.A. (as agent), and certain lenders named therein dated August 12, 2011.
|
||
10.2
|
Letter Agreement dated September 2, 2011 by and between Mueller Industries, Inc. and Leucadia National Corporation (incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed by the Company on September 2, 2011).
|
||
19.1
|
Mueller Industries, Inc.’s Quarterly Report to Stockholders for the quarter ended October 1, 2011. Such report is being furnished for the information of the Securities and Exchange Commission only and is not to be deemed filed as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
|
||
31.1 |
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
||
31.2 |
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
||
32.1 |
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
||
32.2 |
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
||
101.CAL
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
|
||
101.DEF
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase | ||
101.INS
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
||
101.LAB
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
|
||
101.PRE
|
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document
|
||
101.SCH
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
|
Items 3, 4, and 5 are not applicable and have been omitted.
32
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
MUELLER INDUSTRIES, INC.
|
|
/S/ Kent A. McKee
|
|
Kent A. McKee
|
|
October 27, 2011
|
Executive Vice President and
|
Date
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
/S/ Richard W. Corman
|
|
October 27, 2011
|
Richard W. Corman
|
Date
|
Vice President – Controller
|
33
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
Exhibits
|
Description
|
10.1
|
Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement among the Company (as borrower), Bank of America, N.A. (as agent), and certain lenders named therein dated August 12, 2011.
|
19.1
|
Mueller Industries, Inc.’s Quarterly Report to Stockholders for the quarter ended October 1, 2011. Such report is being furnished for the information of the Securities and Exchange Commission only and is not to be deemed filed as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
|
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
101.CAL
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
|
101.DEF
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
|
101.INS
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
101.LAB
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
|
101.PRE
|
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document
|
101.SCH
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
|